Information Collections Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission, 2502-2504 [2019-01498]
Download as PDF
2502
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 26 / Thursday, February 7, 2019 / Notices
urbanized areas where the frequencies
designated for alarm use in urban areas
are not in use. The Commission
tentatively concluded that it would be
in the public interest to make these
frequencies available for other PLMR
operations in those areas and sought
comment on this proposal, including its
costs and benefits. The Commission also
sought comment on other ways to
expand PLMR users’ access to
frequencies that are designated, but no
longer needed, for central station
commercial protection services,
including by making available channels
in urbanized areas where some of the
urban frequencies are in use, including:
Related costs and benefits associated
with such proposals; current and
expected future need for central station
commercial protection service channels
in the 460–470 MHz band; and how to
protect incumbent central station
commercial protection service
operations from harmful interference if
eliminating the use restriction on any
frequency in any area where it currently
is in use.
On October 22, 2018, the Commission
issued a Report and Order and Order,
FCC 18–143, in WP Docket No. 15–32,
RM–11572, WP Docket No. 16–261,
RM–11719 and RM–11722 (800/PLMR
Access Order), in which it revised
certain rules to require applicants for
channels currently designated for
central station alarm use to obtain the
concurrence of the central station alarm
frequency coordinator in order to use
the channels for uses other than central
station alarm operations. This
requirement is similar to existing
requirements pertaining to certain other
channels. The Report and Order and
Order did not revise any of the
information collection requirements that
are contained in this collection but
rather added additional frequencies to
the list. Therefore, this essentially is
adding an additional 200 respondents to
this collection.
OMB Control No.: 3060–1042.
Title: Request for Technical Support—
Help Request Form.
Form No.: N/A—Electronic only.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Individuals or
household; business or other for-profit;
not-for-profit institutions; and state,
local or tribal government.
Number of Respondents: 36,300.
Estimated Time per Response: 8
minutes (0.13 hours).
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement and
recordkeeping requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Feb 06, 2019
Jkt 247001
Total Annual Burden: 5,082 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $609,840.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment:
Possible Impacts.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
In general there is no need for
confidentiality. On a case by case basis,
the Commission may be required to
withhold from disclosure certain
information about the location,
character, or ownership of a historic
property, including traditional religious
sites.
Needs and Uses: The Commission
will submit this collection as revision to
the currently approved collection. The
Commission is slightly revising the
electronic form to include five
additional data elements, FCC
Registration Number, Call Sign,
Antenna Registration Number, Facility
ID and File Number. Today customers
are asked to include this information as
part of their narrative description and
often neglect to include all the
necessary information to process their
request. This results in customer
services representatives needing to
contact the customers to obtain the
additional details, which slows down
case resolution. We do not anticipate
these changes will impact the customer
burden, since they will only need to
include the information applicable to
their request, and it was previous
requested as part of the description
field. There will be no change to the
estimated average burden (hours and
costs) or the number of respondents.
The FCC’s maintains internet software
used by the public to apply for licenses,
participate in auctions for spectrum,
and maintain license information. In
this mission, FCC has a ‘help desk’ that
answers questions related to these
systems as well as resetting and/or
issuing user passwords for access to
these systems.
The form currently is available on the
website https://esupport.fcc.gov/
request.htm under OMB Control
Number 3060–1042. This form will
continue to substantially decrease
public and staff burden since all the
information needed to facilitate a
support request will be submitted in a
standard format but be available to a
wider audience. This eliminates or at
least minimizes the need to follow-up
with the customers to obtain all the
information necessary to respond to
their request. This form also helps
presort requests into previously defined
categories to all staff to respond more
quickly.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Federal Communications Commission.
Katura Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Office of the
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–01499 Filed 2–6–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[OMB 3060–1084 and OMB 3060–1088]
Information Collections Being
Reviewed by the Federal
Communications Commission
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
As part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork burdens, and as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC or
Commission) invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collections.
Comments are requested concerning:
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and ways to
further reduce the information
collection burden on small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
PRA that does not display a valid OMB
control number.
DATES: Written PRA comments should
be submitted on or before April 8, 2019.
If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contact listed below as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Cathy Williams, FCC, via email PRA@
fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 26 / Thursday, February 7, 2019 / Notices
For
additional information about the
information collection, contact Cathy
Williams at (202) 418–2918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–1084.
Title: Rules and Regulations
Implementing Minimum Customer
Account Record Exchange Obligations
on All Local and Interexchange Carriers
(CARE).
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities.
Number of Respondents and
Responses: 2,989 respondents; 665,248
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 1
minute (.017 hours) to 20 minutes (.33
hours).
Frequency of Response:
Recordkeeping and annual reporting
requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. The statutory
authority for these information
requirements are found in sections 1–4,
201, 202, 222, 258, and 303(r) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended; 47 U.S.C. 151–154, 201, 202,
222, 258, and 303(r).
Total Annual Burden: 54,900 hours.
Total Annual Cost: None.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
Confidentiality is not an issue as
individuals and/or households are not
required to provide personally
identifiable information.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No
impact(s).
Needs and Uses: In the 2005 Report
and Order and Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, In the Matter of
Rules and Regulations Implementing
Minimum Customer Account Record
Exchange Obligations on All Local and
Interexchange Carriers (2005 Report and
Order), CG Docket No. 02–386, FCC 05–
29, which was released on February 25,
2005, the Commission adopted rules
governing the exchange of customer
account information between local
exchange carriers (LECs) and
interexchange carriers (IXCs). The
Commission concluded that mandatory,
minimum standards are needed in light
of record evidence demonstrating that
information needed by carriers to
execute customer requests and properly
bill customers is not being consistently
provided by all LECs and IXCs.
Specifically, the 2005 Report and Order
requires LECs to supply customer
account information to IXCs when: (1)
The LEC places an end user on, or
removes an end user from, an IXC’s
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Feb 06, 2019
Jkt 247001
network; (2) an end user presubscribed
to an IXC makes certain changes to her
account information via her LEC; (3) an
IXC requests billing name and address
information for an end user who has
usage on an IXC’s network but for whom
the IXC does not have an existing
account; and (4) a LEC rejects an IXCinitiated PIC order. The 2005 Report
and Order required IXCs to notify LECs
when an IXC customer informs an IXC
directly of the customer’s desire to
change IXCs. In the accompanying
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
the Commission sought comment on
whether to require the exchange of
customer account information between
LECs. In December 2007, the
Commission declined to adopt
mandatory LEC-to-LEC data exchange
requirements.
OMB Control Number: 3060–1088.
Title: Rules and Regulations
Implementing the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act (TCPA) of 1991, Report
and Order and Third Order on
Reconsideration, CG Docket No. 05–338,
FCC 06–42.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; Not-for-profit
institutions; and Individuals or
households.
Number of Respondents and
Responses: 5,340,000 respondents;
6,051,545 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 3
minutes (.05 hours) to 30 minutes (.50
hours).
Frequency of Response: Annual,
monthly, and on occasion reporting
requirements; Recordkeeping; and Third
party disclosure.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. The
authorizing statutes for this information
collection are: Telephone Consumer
Protection Act of 1991, Public Law 102–
243. 105 Stat. 2394 (1991); Junk Fax
Prevention Act, Public Law 109–21, 119
Stat. 359 (2005).
Total Annual Burden: 3,670,945
hours.
Total Annual Cost: $1,051,042.00.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
Confidentiality is an issue to the extent
that individuals and households
provide personally identifiable
information, which is covered under the
FCC’s updated system of records notice
(SORN), FCC/CGB–1, ‘‘Informal
Complaints, Inquiries and Requests for
Dispute Assistance’’, which became
effective on September 24, 2014.
Privacy Impact Assessment: The
Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for
Informal Complaints and Inquiries was
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2503
completed on June 28, 2007. It may be
reviewed at https://www.fcc.gov/omd/
privacyact/Privacy_Impact_
Assessment.html. The Commission is in
the process of updating the PIA to
incorporate various revisions to it as a
result of revisions to the SORN.
Needs and Uses: On April 5, 2006, the
Commission adopted a Report and
Order and Third Order on
Reconsideration, In the Matter of Rules
and Regulations Implementing the
Telephone Consumer Protection Act of
1991; Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005,
CG Docket Nos. 02–278 and 05–338,
FCC 06–42, which modified the
Commission’s facsimile advertising
rules to implement the Junk Fax
Prevention Act. The Report and Order
and Third Order on Reconsideration
contained information collection
requirements pertaining to: (1) Opt-out
Notice and Do-Not-Fax Requests
Recordkeeping in which the rules
require senders of unsolicited facsimile
advertisements to include a notice on
the first page of the facsimile that
informs the recipient of the ability and
means to request that they not receive
future unsolicited facsimile
advertisements from the sender; (2)
Established Business Relationship
Recordkeeping whereas the Junk Fax
Prevention Act provides that the sender,
e.g., a person, business, or a nonprofit/
institution, is prohibited from faxing an
unsolicited advertisement to a facsimile
machine unless the sender has an
‘‘established business relationship’’
(EBR) with the recipient; (3) Facsimile
Number Recordkeeping in which the
Junk Fax Prevention Act provides that
an EBR alone does not entitle a sender
to fax an advertisement to an individual
or business. The fax number must also
be provided voluntarily by the recipient;
and (4) Express Invitation or Permission
Recordkeeping where in the absence of
an EBR, the sender must obtain the prior
express invitation or permission from
the consumer before sending the
facsimile advertisement.
On October 14, 2008, the Commission
released an Order on Reconsideration,
FCC 08–239, addressing certain issues
raised in petitions for reconsideration
and/or clarification filed in response to
the Commission’s Report and Order and
Third Order on Reconsideration (Junk
Fax Order), FCC 06–42. In document
FCC 08–239, the Commission clarified
that: (1) Facsimile numbers compiled by
third parties on behalf of the facsimile
sender will be presumed to have been
made voluntarily available for public
distribution so long as they are obtained
from the intended recipient’s own
directory, advertisement, or internet
site; (2) Reasonable steps to verify that
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
2504
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 26 / Thursday, February 7, 2019 / Notices
a recipient has agreed to make available
a facsimile number for public
distribution may include methods other
than direct contact with the recipient;
and (3) a description of the facsimile
sender’s opt-out mechanism on the first
web page to which recipients are
directed in the opt-out notice satisfies
the requirement that such a description
appear on the first page of the website.
The Commission believes these
clarifications will assist senders of
facsimile advertisements in complying
with the Commission’s rules in a
manner that minimizes regulatory
compliance costs while maintaining the
protections afforded consumers under
the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
(TCPA).
Federal Communications Commission.
Katura Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer Office of the
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–01498 Filed 2–6–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
[Notice 2019–03]
Price Index Adjustments for
Contribution and Expenditure
Limitations and Lobbyist Bundling
Disclosure Threshold
Federal Election Commission.
Notice of adjustments to
contribution and expenditure
limitations and lobbyist bundling
disclosure threshold.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
As mandated by provisions of
the Federal Election Campaign Act (‘‘the
Act’’), the Federal Election Commission
(‘‘the Commission’’) is adjusting certain
contribution and expenditure
limitations and the lobbyist bundling
disclosure threshold set forth in the Act,
to index the amounts for inflation.
Additional details appear in the
supplemental information that follows.
DATES: The effective date for the
limitation at 52 U.S.C. 30116(a)(1)(A) is
November 7, 2018. The effective date for
the limitations at 52 U.S.C.
30104(i)(3)(A), 30116(a)(1)(B), 30116(d)
and 30116(h) is January 1, 2019.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Feb 06, 2019
Jkt 247001
Ms.
Elizabeth S. Kurland, Information
Division, 1050 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20463; (202) 694–1100
or (800) 424–9530.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Under the
Federal Election Campaign Act, 52
U.S.C. 30101–46, coordinated party
expenditure limits (52 U.S.C.
30116(d)(3)), certain contribution limits
(52 U.S.C. 30116(a)(1)(A) and (B), and
(h)), and the disclosure threshold for
contributions bundled by lobbyists (52
U.S.C. 30104(i)(3)(A)) are adjusted
periodically to reflect changes in the
consumer price index. See 52 U.S.C.
30104(i)(3), 30116(c); 11 CFR 109.32,
110.17(a), (f). The Commission is
publishing this notice to announce the
adjusted limits and disclosure
threshold.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Coordinated Party Expenditure Limits
for 2019
Under 52 U.S.C. 30116(c), the
Commission must adjust the
expenditure limitations established by
52 U.S.C. 30116(d) (the limits on
expenditures by national party
committees, state party committees, or
their subordinate committees in
connection with the general election
campaign of candidates for Federal
office) annually to account for inflation.
This expenditure limitation is increased
by the percent difference between the
price index, as certified to the
Commission by the Secretary of Labor,
for the 12 months preceding the
beginning of the calendar year and the
price index for the base period (calendar
year 1974). 52 U.S.C. 30116(c).
1. Expenditure Limitation for House of
Representatives in States With More
Than One Congressional District
Both the national and state party
committees have an expenditure
limitation for each general election held
to fill a seat in the House of
Representatives in states with more than
one congressional district. See 52 U.S.C.
30116(d)(3)(B). This limitation also
applies to the District of Columbia and
territories that elect individuals to the
office of Delegate or Resident
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commissioner.1 Id. The formula used to
calculate the expenditure limitation in
such states and territories multiplies the
base figure of $10,000 by the difference
in the price index (5.09279), rounding to
the nearest $100. See 52 U.S.C.
30116(c)(1)(B), (d)(3)(B); 11 CFR
109.32(b), 110.17. Based upon this
formula, the expenditure limitation for
2019 general elections for House
candidates in these states, districts, and
territories is $50,900.
2. Expenditure Limitation for Senate
and for House of Representatives in
States With Only One Congressional
District
Both the national and state party
committees have an expenditure
limitation for a general election held to
fill a seat in the Senate or in the House
of Representatives in states with only
one congressional district. See 52 U.S.C.
30116(d)(3)(A). The formula used to
calculate this expenditure limitation
considers not only the price index but
also the voting age population (‘‘VAP’’)
of the state. Id. The VAP figures used to
calculate the expenditure limitations
were certified by the U.S. Census
Bureau. The VAP of each state is also
published annually in the Federal
Register by the U.S. Department of
Commerce. 11 CFR 110.18. The general
election expenditure limitation is the
greater of: The base figure ($20,000)
multiplied by the difference in the price
index, 5.09279 (which totals $101,900);
or $0.02 multiplied by the VAP of the
state, multiplied by 5.09279. Amounts
are rounded to the nearest $100. See 52
U.S.C. 30116(c)(1)(B), (d)(3)(A); 11 CFR
109.32(b), 110.17. The chart below
provides the state-by-state breakdown of
the 2019 general election expenditure
limitations for Senate elections. The
expenditure limitation for 2019 House
elections in states with only one
congressional district 2 is $101,900.
1 .Currently, these are the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, and the territories of American Samoa,
Guam, the United States Virgin Islands and the
Northern Mariana Islands. See https://
www.house.gov/representatives.
2 Currently, these states are: Alaska, Delaware,
Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and
Wyoming. See https://www.house.gov/
representatives/.
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 26 (Thursday, February 7, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2502-2504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-01498]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
[OMB 3060-1084 and OMB 3060-1088]
Information Collections Being Reviewed by the Federal
Communications Commission
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens,
and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) invites the
general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on the following information collections. Comments are
requested concerning: whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected;
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the
information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. No person
shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection
of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid OMB
control number.
DATES: Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before April 8,
2019. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find
it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice,
you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Cathy Williams, FCC, via email
PRA@fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.
[[Page 2503]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information about the
information collection, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418-2918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060-1084.
Title: Rules and Regulations Implementing Minimum Customer Account
Record Exchange Obligations on All Local and Interexchange Carriers
(CARE).
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities.
Number of Respondents and Responses: 2,989 respondents; 665,248
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 1 minute (.017 hours) to 20 minutes
(.33 hours).
Frequency of Response: Recordkeeping and annual reporting
requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. The
statutory authority for these information requirements are found in
sections 1-4, 201, 202, 222, 258, and 303(r) of the Communications Act
of 1934, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 151-154, 201, 202, 222, 258, and 303(r).
Total Annual Burden: 54,900 hours.
Total Annual Cost: None.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: Confidentiality is not an
issue as individuals and/or households are not required to provide
personally identifiable information.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
Needs and Uses: In the 2005 Report and Order and Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, In the Matter of Rules and Regulations
Implementing Minimum Customer Account Record Exchange Obligations on
All Local and Interexchange Carriers (2005 Report and Order), CG Docket
No. 02-386, FCC 05-29, which was released on February 25, 2005, the
Commission adopted rules governing the exchange of customer account
information between local exchange carriers (LECs) and interexchange
carriers (IXCs). The Commission concluded that mandatory, minimum
standards are needed in light of record evidence demonstrating that
information needed by carriers to execute customer requests and
properly bill customers is not being consistently provided by all LECs
and IXCs. Specifically, the 2005 Report and Order requires LECs to
supply customer account information to IXCs when: (1) The LEC places an
end user on, or removes an end user from, an IXC's network; (2) an end
user presubscribed to an IXC makes certain changes to her account
information via her LEC; (3) an IXC requests billing name and address
information for an end user who has usage on an IXC's network but for
whom the IXC does not have an existing account; and (4) a LEC rejects
an IXC-initiated PIC order. The 2005 Report and Order required IXCs to
notify LECs when an IXC customer informs an IXC directly of the
customer's desire to change IXCs. In the accompanying Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission sought comment on whether to
require the exchange of customer account information between LECs. In
December 2007, the Commission declined to adopt mandatory LEC-to-LEC
data exchange requirements.
OMB Control Number: 3060-1088.
Title: Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act (TCPA) of 1991, Report and Order and Third Order on
Reconsideration, CG Docket No. 05-338, FCC 06-42.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities; Not-for-profit
institutions; and Individuals or households.
Number of Respondents and Responses: 5,340,000 respondents;
6,051,545 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 3 minutes (.05 hours) to 30 minutes
(.50 hours).
Frequency of Response: Annual, monthly, and on occasion reporting
requirements; Recordkeeping; and Third party disclosure.
Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. The
authorizing statutes for this information collection are: Telephone
Consumer Protection Act of 1991, Public Law 102-243. 105 Stat. 2394
(1991); Junk Fax Prevention Act, Public Law 109-21, 119 Stat. 359
(2005).
Total Annual Burden: 3,670,945 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $1,051,042.00.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: Confidentiality is an issue
to the extent that individuals and households provide personally
identifiable information, which is covered under the FCC's updated
system of records notice (SORN), FCC/CGB-1, ``Informal Complaints,
Inquiries and Requests for Dispute Assistance'', which became effective
on September 24, 2014.
Privacy Impact Assessment: The Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for
Informal Complaints and Inquiries was completed on June 28, 2007. It
may be reviewed at https://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/Privacy_Impact_Assessment.html. The Commission is in the process of
updating the PIA to incorporate various revisions to it as a result of
revisions to the SORN.
Needs and Uses: On April 5, 2006, the Commission adopted a Report
and Order and Third Order on Reconsideration, In the Matter of Rules
and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of
1991; Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005, CG Docket Nos. 02-278 and 05-
338, FCC 06-42, which modified the Commission's facsimile advertising
rules to implement the Junk Fax Prevention Act. The Report and Order
and Third Order on Reconsideration contained information collection
requirements pertaining to: (1) Opt-out Notice and Do-Not-Fax Requests
Recordkeeping in which the rules require senders of unsolicited
facsimile advertisements to include a notice on the first page of the
facsimile that informs the recipient of the ability and means to
request that they not receive future unsolicited facsimile
advertisements from the sender; (2) Established Business Relationship
Recordkeeping whereas the Junk Fax Prevention Act provides that the
sender, e.g., a person, business, or a nonprofit/institution, is
prohibited from faxing an unsolicited advertisement to a facsimile
machine unless the sender has an ``established business relationship''
(EBR) with the recipient; (3) Facsimile Number Recordkeeping in which
the Junk Fax Prevention Act provides that an EBR alone does not entitle
a sender to fax an advertisement to an individual or business. The fax
number must also be provided voluntarily by the recipient; and (4)
Express Invitation or Permission Recordkeeping where in the absence of
an EBR, the sender must obtain the prior express invitation or
permission from the consumer before sending the facsimile
advertisement.
On October 14, 2008, the Commission released an Order on
Reconsideration, FCC 08-239, addressing certain issues raised in
petitions for reconsideration and/or clarification filed in response to
the Commission's Report and Order and Third Order on Reconsideration
(Junk Fax Order), FCC 06-42. In document FCC 08-239, the Commission
clarified that: (1) Facsimile numbers compiled by third parties on
behalf of the facsimile sender will be presumed to have been made
voluntarily available for public distribution so long as they are
obtained from the intended recipient's own directory, advertisement, or
internet site; (2) Reasonable steps to verify that
[[Page 2504]]
a recipient has agreed to make available a facsimile number for public
distribution may include methods other than direct contact with the
recipient; and (3) a description of the facsimile sender's opt-out
mechanism on the first web page to which recipients are directed in the
opt-out notice satisfies the requirement that such a description appear
on the first page of the website.
The Commission believes these clarifications will assist senders of
facsimile advertisements in complying with the Commission's rules in a
manner that minimizes regulatory compliance costs while maintaining the
protections afforded consumers under the Telephone Consumer Protection
Act (TCPA).
Federal Communications Commission.
Katura Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-01498 Filed 2-6-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P