Energy Conservation Program: Petition for Waiver of Beghelli North America From the Department of Energy Illuminated Exit Signs Test Procedure, 2194-2206 [2019-01241]
Download as PDF
2194
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2019 / Notices
accommodate persons with physical
disabilities or special needs. If you
require special accommodations due to
a disability, please contact Melyssa P.
Noe at least seven days in advance of
the meeting at the phone number listed
above. Written statements may be filed
with the Board either before or after the
meeting. Individuals who wish to make
oral statements pertaining to the agenda
item should contact Melyssa P. Noe at
the address or telephone number listed
above. Requests must be received five
days prior to the meeting and reasonable
provision will be made to include the
presentation in the agenda. The Deputy
Designated Federal Officer is
empowered to conduct the meeting in a
fashion that will facilitate the orderly
conduct of business. Individuals
wishing to make public comments will
be provided a maximum of five minutes
to present their comments.
Minutes: Minutes will be available by
writing or calling Melyssa P. Noe at the
address and phone number listed above.
Minutes will also be available at the
following website: https://energy.gov/
orem/listings/oak-ridge-site-specificadvisory-board-meetings.
Signed in Washington, DC, on January 31,
2019.
LaTanya Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–01235 Filed 2–5–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Case Number 2018–007; EERE–2018–BT–
WAV–0011]
Energy Conservation Program:
Petition for Waiver of Beghelli North
America From the Department of
Energy Illuminated Exit Signs Test
Procedure
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of petition for waiver,
and request for comments.
AGENCY:
This document announces
receipt of and publishes a petition for
waiver from Beghelli North America
(‘‘Beghelli’’), which seeks a waiver from
the U.S. Department of Energy (‘‘DOE’’)
test procedure used for determining the
energy consumption of specified
illuminated exit sign basic models.
Beghelli seeks to use an alternate test
procedure to address issues involved in
testing the basic models identified in its
petition. Beghelli contends that the
design characteristics of its combination
illuminated exit signs prevent them
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:09 Feb 05, 2019
Jkt 247001
from being accurately tested using the
currently applicable DOE test
procedure. Beghelli has suggested an
alternate test procedure to test and rate
the Beghelli basic models specified in
its petition. For the reasons discussed in
this document DOE is proposing a
different alternate test procedure. DOE
solicits comments, data, and
information concerning Beghelli’s
petition, its suggested alternate test
procedure, and DOE’s proposed
alternate test procedure to inform its
decision on Beghelli’s waiver request.
DATES: Written comments and
information are requested and will be
accepted on or before March 8, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
encouraged to submit comments using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Alternatively, interested persons may
submit comments, identified by case
number ‘‘2018–007,’’ and Docket
number ‘‘EERE–2018–BT–WAV–0011,’’
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: Beghelli2018WAV0011@
ee.doe.gov. Include the case number
[Case No. 2018–007] in the subject line
of the message.
• Postal Mail: Appliance and
Equipment Standards Program, U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy,
Building Technologies Office, Mailstop
EE–5B, Petition for Waiver Case No.
2018–007, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW, Washington, DC 20585–0121. If
possible, please submit all items on a
compact disc (‘‘CD’’), in which case it is
not necessary to include printed copies.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Appliance
and Equipment Standards Program, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Office, 950 L’Enfant Plaza
SW, 6th floor, Washington, DC 20024. If
possible, please submit all items on a
‘‘CD’’, in which case it is not necessary
to include printed copies.
No telefacsimilies (faxes) will be
accepted. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on this process, see section
V of this document.
Docket: The docket, which includes
Federal Register notices, comments,
and other supporting documents/
materials, is available for review at
https://www.regulations.gov. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov index.
However, some documents listed in the
index, such as those containing
information that is exempt from public
disclosure, may not be publicly
available.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The docket web page can be found at
https://www.regulations.gov/docket
?D=EERE-2018-BT-WAV-0011. The
docket web page contains simple
instruction on how to access all
documents, including public comments,
in the docket. See section V for
information on how to submit
comments through https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Lucy deButts, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Office, Mailstop EE–5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20585–0121. Email:
AS_Waiver_Request@ee.doe.gov.
Mr. Michael Kido, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
Mail Stop GC–33, Forrestal Building,
1000 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20585–0103.
Telephone: (202) 586–8145. Email:
Michael.Kido@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background and Authority
The Energy Policy and Conservation
Act of 1975, as amended (‘‘EPCA’’),1
authorizes the U.S. Department of
Energy (‘‘DOE’’) to regulate the energy
efficiency of a number of consumer
products and industrial equipment. (42
U.S.C. 6291–6317) Title III, Part B of
EPCA established the Energy
Conservation Program for Consumer
Products Other Than Automobiles,
which sets forth a variety of provisions
designed to improve energy efficiency
for certain types of consumer products.
These products include illuminated exit
signs, the focus of this document. (42
U.S.C. 6291(37); 42 U.S.C. 6295(w))
Under EPCA, DOE’s energy
conservation program consists
essentially of four parts: (1) Testing, (2)
labeling, (3) Federal energy conservation
standards, and (4) certification and
enforcement procedures. Relevant
provisions of EPCA include definitions
(42 U.S.C. 6291), energy conservation
standards (42 U.S.C. 6295), test
procedures (42 U.S.C. 6293), labeling
provisions (42 U.S.C. 6294), and the
authority to require information and
reports from manufacturers (42 U.S.C.
6296).
The Federal testing requirements
consist of test procedures that
manufacturers of covered products must
use as the basis for: (1) Certifying to
DOE that their products comply with
the applicable energy conservation
1 All references to EPCA in this document refer
to the statute as amended through the EPS
Improvement Act of 2017, Public Law 11–115
(January 12, 2018).
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2019 / Notices
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
standards adopted pursuant to EPCA (42
U.S.C. 6295(s)), and (2) making
representations about the efficiency of
that product (42 U.S.C. 6293(c)).
Similarly, DOE must use these test
procedures to determine whether the
product complies with relevant
standards promulgated under EPCA. (42
U.S.C. 6295(s))
Under 42 U.S.C. 6293, EPCA sets forth
the criteria and procedures DOE is
required to follow when prescribing or
amending test procedures for covered
products. EPCA requires that any test
procedures prescribed or amended
under this section must be reasonably
designed to produce test results which
reflect the energy efficiency, energy use
or estimated annual operating cost of a
covered product during a representative
average use cycle or period of use and
requires that test procedures not be
unduly burdensome to conduct. (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)) The test procedure for
illuminated exit signs is contained in
the Code of Federal Regulations (‘‘CFR’’)
at 10 CFR 431.204, ‘‘Uniform test
method for the measurement of energy
consumption of illuminated exit
signs.’’ 2
Under 10 CFR 431.401, any interested
person may submit a petition for waiver
from DOE’s test procedure
requirements. DOE will grant a waiver
from the test procedure requirements if
DOE determines either that the basic
model for which the waiver was
requested contains a design
characteristic that prevents testing of the
basic model according to the prescribed
test procedures, or that the prescribed
test procedures evaluate the basic model
in a manner so unrepresentative of its
true energy consumption characteristics
as to provide materially inaccurate
comparative data. 10 CFR 431.401(f)(2).
A petitioner must include in its petition
any alternate test procedures known to
the petitioner to evaluate the basic
model in a manner representative of its
energy consumption characteristics. 10
CFR 431.401(b)(1)(iii).
DOE may grant the waiver subject to
conditions, including adherence to
alternate test procedures. 10 CFR
431.401(f)(2). As soon as practicable
after the granting of any waiver, DOE
will publish in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to amend
2 Although illuminated exit signs are covered
products pursuant to EPCA, as a matter of
administrative convenience and to minimize
confusion among interested parties, DOE codified
illuminated exit sign provisions into subpart L of
10 CFR part 431 (the portion of DOE’s regulations
dealing with commercial and industrial equipment)
because typically businesses, rather than
individuals, purchase them. 70 FR 60407, 60409
(Oct. 18, 2005). DOE refers to illuminated exit signs
as either ‘‘products’’ or ‘‘equipment.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:09 Feb 05, 2019
Jkt 247001
its regulations so as to eliminate any
need for the continuation of such
waiver. 10 CFR 431.401(l) As soon
thereafter as practicable, DOE will
publish in the Federal Register a final
rule. Id.
When DOE amends the test procedure
to address the issues presented in a
waiver, the waiver will automatically
terminate on the date on which use of
that test procedure is required to
demonstrate compliance. 10 CFR
431.401(h)(2).
II. Beghelli’s Petition for Waiver
On June 26, 2018, Beghelli filed a
petition for waiver from the test
procedure applicable to illuminated exit
signs set forth in 10 CFR 431.204.
(Beghelli, No. 1 at pp. 1–6 3) Beghelli
has requested a waiver for basic
models 4 that provide the dual function
of exit signage and lighting for
emergency egress (combination
illuminated exit signs 5), stating that the
battery used in combination illuminated
exit signs requires a substantially larger
capacity to provide a minimum of 90
minutes of egress lighting, as required
by safety codes. Beghelli has further
stated that it is not feasible to separate
the power measurement associated with
the exit signage and the egress lighting
because a single battery and charging
circuit supplies power for both
functions.
III. Requested Alternate Test Procedure
EPCA requires that manufacturers use
DOE test procedures when making
representations about the energy
consumption and energy consumption
costs of products covered by the statute.
(42 U.S.C. 6293(c)) Consistent
representations are important for
manufacturers to use in making
representations about the energy
efficiency of their products and to
demonstrate compliance with
applicable DOE energy conservation
3 A notation in this form provides a reference for
information that is in the docket for this test
procedure waiver (Docket No. EERE–2018–BT–
WAV–0011) (available at https://
www.regulations.gov/document?D=EERE-2018-BTWAV-0011-0001) This notation indicates that the
statement preceding the reference is document
number 1 in the docket and appears at pages 2–4
of that document.
4 Due to the lengthy list of affected illuminated
exit sign basic models covered by Beghelli’s June
26, 2018 petition, DOE is making the complete list
publicly available in the relevant regulatory docket.
The specific basic models identified on pages 2–4
of the petition can be found in the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EERE-2018-BTWAV-0011.
5 DOE uses the term ‘‘combination illuminated
exit sign’’ in this notice to mean an illuminated exit
sign that includes or is packaged with (1) at least
one auxiliary feature and (2) a battery electrically
connected to the illumination source for the face.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2195
standards. Pursuant to its regulations
applicable to waivers from applicable
test procedures at 10 CFR 431.401, and
after consideration of public comments
on the petition, DOE will consider
setting an alternate test procedure for
the products identified by Beghelli’s
petition in a subsequent Decision and
Order.
Beghelli seeks to use an alternate test
procedure to test and rate specific
combination illuminated exit sign basic
models. As an alternate to the test
procedure currently in place at 10 CFR
part 431, subpart L, Beghelli has
requested that it determine the power
for its combination illuminated exit
signs using the following procedure:
1. Measure AC input power of the
complete unit of combination
illuminated exit sign with a fully
charged battery.
2. Measure the DC output voltage and
current to the light source of the unit.
3. Calculate the AC power
consumption of the light source of the
unit by applying a power factor
correction of 30 percent as worst-case
scenario. (Beghelli asserted that based
on the circuitry design the loss would
not exceed 30 percent.)
4. If needed, calculate the stand-by
power for the unit when the battery is
fully charged. Stand-by power = input
power (from item 1)¥power of basic exit
sign light source (from item 3).
The alternate test procedure suggested
by Beghelli in its petition would
measure the output power of the exit
sign and apply conversion losses to
back-calculate the input power to the
exit sign. This approach requires
assumptions that will likely result in an
uncertainty of measured values.
Beghelli contends that the input to
output power conversion losses of all
basic models under consideration are at
maximum 30 percent. However,
Beghelli’s petition does not provide a
sufficient basis for the 30-percent value.
With the differences in battery types
and sizes in the various basic models for
which the waiver is being requested, it
is not evident from the petition that the
30-percent value would apply across all
the basic models of illuminated exit sign
models identified in Beghelli’s petition.
Additionally, it is unclear whether the
DC output voltage and current
measurement in step 2 of Beghelli’s
suggested alternative testing method
would result in a power measurement
that could only be attributable to the
light sources of the exit sign, without
resorting to additional steps such as
cutting wires or otherwise modifying
the equipment’s circuitry. Based on the
limited information contained in
Beghelli’s petition, in DOE’s view, the
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
2196
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2019 / Notices
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
alternative test procedure suggested by
Beghelli to use the estimated conversion
losses in conjunction with a
measurement that does not clearly
isolate the power consumption to the
light source(s) of the exit sign would be
unlikely to accurately calculate the
combination illuminated exit sign input
power demand of the affected basic
models.
As an alternative to Beghelli’s
suggested approach, this interim waiver
will require the company to apply an
alternate testing method that does not
require application of conversion losses
and, instead, relies on a more direct
measurement of the input power
consumption attributable to the light
source(s) of the exit sign. This
alternative approach, as noted in
Section IV of this document, is
consistent with one that DOE has
permitted to be used in similar test
procedure waiver circumstances.
Although Beghelli would be required to
use this approach for the purposes of
this interim waiver, as discussed in
Section V of this document, DOE seeks
comment on both the applicability of
Beghelli’s suggested method as well as
the one required as part of this grant of
interim waiver.
IV. DOE’s Proposed Alternate Test
Procedure
DOE investigated various approaches
to isolate the input power used to
illuminate only the exit sign portion of
a combination exit sign including:
Scaling or prorating the portion of the
input power demand associated with
the battery; and measuring alternative
power quantities as a proxy for input
power demand. DOE tentatively
concluded that these methods would
require isolating the battery power used
to illuminate the faces of the exit sign
from the battery power used to operate
auxiliary features. Based on DOE’s
understanding of combination exit sign
circuitry, DOE has tentatively
determined that it is either not possible
to measure the required quantities or
that doing so would require cutting
wires and modifying the circuitry of the
combination exit sign. However, DOE
has determined that the basic models
identified by Beghelli in its petition for
waiver have equivalent noncombination illuminated exit sign
models. For the specified basic models,
DOE proposes the following alternate
test method be used in the context of
this interim waiver grant to Beghelli:
(1) Identify an equivalent noncombination illuminated exit sign for
the combination illuminated exit sign
under test. A unit is an equivalent noncombination illuminated exit sign only
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:09 Feb 05, 2019
Jkt 247001
if it consists entirely of electricityconsuming components identical to all
of those of the unit whose input power
demand is being determined, but does
not include any auxiliary features, and
contains an electrically connected
battery. The equivalent noncombination illuminated exit sign must
also have the same manufacturer and
number of faces as the unit whose input
power demand is being determined.
(2) Test the equivalent noncombination illuminated exit sign using
the DOE test procedure at 10 CFR, part
431, subpart L. Assign the input power
demand of the combination illuminated
exit sign under test as the input power
demand of the equivalent noncombination illuminated exit sign.
This alternate test procedure permits
Beghelli to use the same approach that
DOE permitted Acuity Brands to use as
part of a prior Decision and Order
granting that company a waiver from the
DOE test procedure for evaluating
similar equipment. 83 FR 11740 (March
16, 2018). Because the alternate
procedure granted to Acuity Brands
offers a more direct measurement of the
actual energy use of the lighting sources
in the exit sign—rather than an
estimated power factor correction
value—DOE is applying an approach
that it believes offers a more accurate
method in evaluating the energy usage
of the lighting equipment at issue.
V. Request for Comments
DOE is publishing Beghelli’s petition
for waiver in its entirety, pursuant to 10
CFR 431.401(b)(1)(iv). The petition
includes the basic models for which
Beghelli is requesting the waiver and
Beghelli’s suggested alternate test
procedure to determine the efficiency of
Beghelli’s those specified illuminated
exit signs. DOE is particularly interested
in the merits of Beghelli’s suggested
alternative testing method, including
data supporting the suggested or another
power factor, as well as comments
comparing the accuracy of that
approach against the one that DOE is
requiring as part of this interim
waiver—i.e., the Acuity Brands-based
alternative test method.
DOE invites all interested parties to
submit in writing by March 8, 2019,
comments and information on all
aspects of the petition, including the
alternate test procedure. Pursuant to 10
CFR 431.401(d), any person submitting
written comments to DOE must also
send a copy of such comments to the
petitioner. The contact information for
the petitioner is Wenceslao Garro,
wenceslao.garro@
beghellinorthamerica.com, 3250
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Corporate Way, Miramar, FL 33025
USA.
Submitting comments via https://
www.regulations.gov. The https://
www.regulations.gov web page will
require you to provide your name and
contact information. Your contact
information will be viewable to DOE
Building Technologies staff only. Your
contact information will not be publicly
viewable except for your first and last
names, organization name (if any), and
submitter representative name (if any).
If your comment is not processed
properly because of technical
difficulties, DOE will use this
information to contact you. If DOE
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, DOE may not be
able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information
will be publicly viewable if you include
it in the comment or in any documents
attached to your comment. Any
information that you do not want to be
publicly viewable should not be
included in your comment, nor in any
document attached to your comment.
Persons viewing comments will see only
first and last names, organization
names, correspondence containing
comments, and any documents
submitted with the comments.
Do not submit to https://
www.regulations.gov information for
which disclosure is restricted by statute,
such as trade secrets and commercial or
financial information (hereinafter
referred to as Confidential Business
Information (‘‘CBI’’)). Comments
submitted through https://
www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed
as CBI. Comments received through the
website will waive any CBI claims for
the information submitted. For
information on submitting CBI, see the
Confidential Business Information
section.
DOE processes submissions made
through https://www.regulations.gov
before posting. Normally, comments
will be posted within a few days of
being submitted. However, if large
volumes of comments are being
processed simultaneously, your
comment may not be viewable for up to
several weeks. Please keep the comment
tracking number that https://
www.regulations.gov provides after you
have successfully uploaded your
comment.
Submitting comments via email, hand
delivery, or mail. Comments and
documents submitted via email, hand
delivery, or mail also will be posted to
https://www.regulations.gov. If you do
not want your personal contact
information to be publicly viewable, do
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
2197
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2019 / Notices
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
not include it in your comment or any
accompanying documents. Instead,
provide your contact information on a
cover letter. Include your first and last
names, email address, telephone
number, and optional mailing address.
The cover letter will not be publicly
viewable as long as it does not include
any comments.
Include contact information each time
you submit comments, data, documents,
and other information to DOE. If you
submit via mail or hand delivery, please
provide all items on a CD, if feasible. It
is not necessary to submit printed
copies. No facsimiles (faxes) will be
accepted.
Comments, data, and other
information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in
PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file
format. Provide documents that are not
secured, written in English and free of
any defects or viruses. Documents
should not contain special characters or
any form of encryption and, if possible,
they should carry the electronic
signature of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit
campaign form letters by the originating
organization in batches of between 50 to
500 form letters per PDF or as one form
letter with a list of supporters’ names
compiled into one or more PDFs. This
reduces comment processing and
posting time.
Confidential Business Information.
According to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he
or she believes to be confidential and
exempt by law from public disclosure
should submit via email, postal mail, or
hand delivery two well-marked copies:
One copy of the document marked
confidential including all the
information believed to be confidential,
and one copy of the document marked
‘‘non-confidential’’ with the information
believed to be confidential deleted.
Submit these documents via email or on
a CD, if feasible. DOE will make its own
determination about the confidential
status of the information and treat it
according to its determination.
Factors of interest to DOE when
evaluating requests to treat submitted
information as confidential include (1) a
description of the items, (2) whether
and why such items are customarily
treated as confidential within the
industry, (3) whether the information is
generally known by or available from
other sources, (4) whether the
information has previously been made
available to others without obligation
concerning its confidentiality, (5) an
explanation of the competitive injury to
the submitting person which would
result from public disclosure, (6) when
such information might lose its
confidential character due to the
passage of time, and (7) why disclosure
of the information would be contrary to
the public interest.
It is DOE’s policy that all comments
may be included in the public docket,
without change and as received,
including any personal information
provided in the comments (except
information deemed to be exempt from
public disclosure).
Signed in Washington, DC, on January 31,
2019.
Steve Chalk,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy.
Date: 6/26/2018
To Whom It May Concern
Subject: Beghelli Petition for Test
Procedure Waiver for Specified
Combination Illuminated Exit Signs
Following the waiver granted to
Acuity Brands in reference to
illuminated exit signs combo units (Case
Number IES–001) for Test Procedure
Waiver for Illuminated Exit Signs,
Pursuant to 10 CFR § 430.27; Beghelli is
petitioning under the provision 10
C.F.R. § 431.401 a waiver for specified
combination illuminated exit signs basic
models on the grounds that contain
design characteristics which prevent
testing the basic models as per the
prescribed test procedures.
1) Test procedure sought to be waived
The test procedure to be waived is in
10 CFR part 431, subpart L, 431.203 &
431.204 that requires the measurement
of power including the internal battery.
Since the power limits were not
established using a baseline for units
that provide the dual function
associated with a combo unit, it is not
possible to separate the power
measurement for the exit sign and the
egress lighting at the same time since a
single battery and charging circuit
supplies power for both functions.
2) Manufacturers of all other basic
models distributed in commerce in the
United States and known to the
petitioner to incorporate design
characteristic(s) similar to those found
in the basic model that is the subject of
the petition.
Vernon J. Nagel, Acuity Brands, 1170
Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2300,
Atlanta, GA 30309–7676, Waiver
83FR11740.
Mr. David Woodward, Standards and
Regulations Manager Americas,
Philips Lighting, 938 South Green
Street, Tupelo, MS 38802–1687,
david.r.woodward@philips.com.
Mr. Bob Howard-Anderson, Fulham Co.,
Inc., 12705 S. Van Ness Ave.,
Hawthorne, CA 90250.
Jessica Stanek, Con-Tech Lighting, 2783
Shermer Road, Northbrook, IL 60062,
jstanek@con-techlighting.com.
3) Alternative test procedure known to
the petitioner to evaluate the
performance of the equipment type in a
manner representative of the energy
and/or water consumption
characteristics of the basic model.
For combination exit and egress
lighting units (combo units), the power
shall be determined by the following
procedure:
1. Measure AC input power of the
complete combo unit for a fully charged
battery
2. Measure the DC output voltage and
current to the light source of the exit
sign
3. Calculate the AC power
consumption of the light source of the
exit sign by applying a power factor
correction of 30% as worst case
scenario. Based on our circuitry design
the loss couldn’t be more than 30%
4. If needed calculate the stand-by
power for the combo unit when the
battery is fully charged
Stand-by power = input power (from item
1)¥power of basic exit sign light source
(from item 3)
4) Individual model name for which a
waiver is requested.
Model code breakdown sample:
SAMPLE MODEL: RBO–C–6–36–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
SERIES
OPERATION (6V,
12V)
CAPACITY
6V, 12V ................
Pb–A: 36, 60, 72,
100, 120, 140.
NI–CD: 42, 54, 90,
130.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:09 Feb 05, 2019
Jkt 247001
LED
RED,
GREEN.
PO 00000
FACE
1 (SINGLE).
Frm 00059
CHEVRONS
MOUNTING
HEADS
U (UNIVERSAL) ...
W (WALL) .............
2LRWP (ONLY) ....
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
COMPOSITE
TUNGSTEN: 9W,
18W
COMPOSITE
TUNGSTEN:
9W, 18W.
HALOGEN: 8W.
2198
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2019 / Notices
SAMPLE MODEL: RBO–C–6–36–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–9W—Continued
SERIES
OPERATION (6V,
12V)
CAPACITY
LED
RBO–C
6V .........................
36 .........................
LR (RED) ...
FACE
1 (SINGLE).
CHEVRONS
MOUNTING
HEADS
U (UNIVERSAL) ...
W (WALL) .............
2LRWP .................
COMPOSITE
TUNGSTEN: 9W,
18W
9W.
LRWP: LEFT, RIGHT, WATERPROOF.
NOTE: THESE MODELS ARE ALL 2 HEADS, THE 1, 3, 4 HEAD OPTIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED IN THE FUTURE.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
RBO–C BASIC MODELS
RBO–C–6–36–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–9W ................................................................................................................
RBO–C–6–42–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–6–54–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–6–60–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–6–72–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–6–90–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–6–100–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–6–120–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–6–36–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–9W ................................................................................................................
RBO–C–6–42–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–6–54–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–6–60–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–6–72–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–6–90–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–6–100–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–6–120–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–12–36–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–9W ..............................................................................................................
RBO–C–12–42–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–12–60–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–12–90–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–12–120–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–12–130–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–12–140–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–12–36–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–9W ..............................................................................................................
RBO–C–12–42–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–12–60–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–12–90–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–12–120–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–12–130–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–12–140–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–9W
RBO–C–6–36–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–18W ..............................................................................................................
RBO–C–6–42–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–6–54–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–6–60–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–6–72–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–6–90–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–6–100–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–6–120–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–6–36–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–18W ..............................................................................................................
RBO–C–6–42–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–6–54–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–6–60–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–6–72–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–6–90–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–6–100–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–6–120–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–12–36–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–18W ............................................................................................................
RBO–C–12–42–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–12–60–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–12–90–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–12–120–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–12–130–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–12–140–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–12–36–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–18W ............................................................................................................
RBO–C–12–42–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–12–60–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–12–90–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–12–120–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–12–130–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–12–140–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–18W
RBO–C–6–36–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–8W ................................................................................................................
RBO–C–6–42–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–6–54–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–6–60–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–6–72–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–6–90–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–6–100–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–6–120–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–6–36–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–8W ................................................................................................................
RBO–C–6–42–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–6–54–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:09 Feb 05, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6V, 9W (RED) (COMPOSITE TUNGSTEN).
6V, 9W (GREEN) (COMPOSITE TUNGSTEN).
12V, 9W (RED) (COMPOSITE TUNGSTEN).
12V, 9W (GREEN) (COMPOSITE TUNGSTEN).
6V, 18W (RED) (COMPOSITE TUNGSTEN).
6V, 18W (GREEN) (COMPOSITE TUNGSTEN).
12V, 18W (RED) (COMPOSITE TUNGSTEN).
12V, 18W (GREEN) (COMPOSITE TUNGSTEN).
6V, 8W (RED) (HALOGEN).
6V, 8W (GREEN) (HALOGEN).
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2019 / Notices
2199
RBO–C BASIC MODELS—Continued
Our basic combo models are a
combination of egress and emergency
lighting in which the sign portion is
identical to our DOE listed illuminated
exit signs.
The supporting information is
provided in the following appendixes:
• Appendix A: Basic models table
• Appendix B: Test report RBO–C12 on
illuminated exit signs for combo
• Appendix C: Test report RBO–C6 on
illuminated exit signs for combo units
• Appendix D: for the test report on
illuminated exit signs.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
TEST PROCEDURE ISSUES:
A combo unit utilizes a higher
capacity battery to power both the exit
sign face(s) as well as emergency egress
lighting during a power outage. While
§ 431.202 indicates that the input power
demand shall be measured with
batteries at full charge, the higher
capacity dual function battery for a
combo unit results in a higher power
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:09 Feb 05, 2019
Jkt 247001
than a smaller battery utilized in a unit
that provides only the exit signage
functionality.
The performance specification for the
input power described in the Energy
Star 2.0 specifications limits the power
to illuminate the face of the exit sign
with no reference to power associated
with the emergency egress lighting. The
test procedure for Energy Star 2.0
requires the measurement of power
including the internal battery, but the
power limits were not established using
a baseline for units that provide the dual
function associated with a combo unit.
For a combo unit, it is not feasible to
separate the power measurement
associated with the exit signage and the
egress lighting since a single battery and
charging circuit supplies power for both
functions.
CONCLUSION:
Beghelli is submitting this request for
a test procedure waiver for combo units
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12V, 8W (RED) (HALOGEN).
12V, 8W (GREEN) (COMPOSITE TUNGSTEN).
that provide the dual function of exit
signs and emergency egress lighting.
This requests under the provision 10
C.F.R. § 431.401 is for illuminated exit
signs combo that contain design
characteristics which prevent testing the
basic models as per the prescribed test
procedures.
Thank you in advance for your
prompt consideration of this waiver
request.
Best regards,
Wenceslao Garro,
Engineering Manager | Beghelli North
America,wenceslao.garro@
beghellinorthamerica.com, Beghelli North
America, 3250 Corporate Way, Miramar,
FL 33025 USA, Ph +1 954 442 6600 | Fax
+1 954 442 6677.
References: 2013–07–17 Acuity
Brands original petition for test
procedure waiver, https://
www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EERE2017-BT-WAV-0033.
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
EN06FE19.006
RBO–C–6–60–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–6–72–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–6–90–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–6–100–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–6–120–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–12–36–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–8W ..............................................................................................................
RBO–C–12–42–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–12–60–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–12–90–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–12–120–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–12–130–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–12–140–LR1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–12–36–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–8W ..............................................................................................................
RBO–C–12–42–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–12–60–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–12–90–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–12–120–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–12–130–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
RBO–C–12–140–LG1–U–W–2LRWP–8W
2200
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2019 / Notices
Appendix A: Basic models table.
All model combinations will be considered for the waiver request except for the model
that includes O(no heads) that does not qualify for this waiver because it does not have
egress lighting
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Brand Name
Beghelli
Beghelli
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Basic Model Number
RBO-C6***-***
RBO-C12***-***
18:09 Feb 05, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
EN06FE19.007
1)
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2019 / Notices
to determine conformance with the
requirement.
As mentioned in Part1 5.2, in
situations where the above ‘‘accuracy
method’’ does not apply, uncertainty of
measurement values are needed to be
Charger and transformer model ..................................................................
Battery model ..............................................................................................
Rating of battery ..........................................................................................
Input Voltage ...............................................................................................
Nominal Voltage of battery ..........................................................................
Min. end of discharge voltage .....................................................................
Recharge time .............................................................................................
Time rating ..................................................................................................
Charge current ............................................................................................
Lamp type/load ............................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:09 Feb 05, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
calculated and reported along with the
variables results obtained during testing.
Follow the procedures in IECEE–CTL
Guide001 Part2 to calculate uncertainty
of measurement.
1. Condition for Test: Clause 6.2
12V High Power Charger #451002100, Transformer #400000101.
Sigmas Lead-acid #SP6–12–T2, Beghelli #500000008.
6V12Ah × 4.
120\277\347VAC.
12V.
10.0V at circuit board.
1.5A.
48 hours.
90 mins.
140W, Electronic load.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
EN06FE19.008
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
According to IECEE–CTL Guide001
Part1 5.1, if all accuracy of instruments
is within the range limit stated in IEC/
ISO17025, the measurement result can
be directly compared with the test limit
2201
2202
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2019 / Notices
21. Tests for Energy Performance—
Actual Input Power: TIL B–75, Clause
2—Type 3 exit signs containing an
integral battery-charging system shall be
tested with the charging system
connected and the battery fully charged.
Sample #1: RBO–C–12–140–LR–1U–W–
2LRWP
Measured
current (Arms)
Measured voltage (Vrms)
120 ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Max actual
input power
Type of sign
Single-sided EXIT ........................................................................................................................
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit ...........................................................................................
5W
10 W
Actual power
(W)
0.075
Measured
input power
N/A
7
7
Compliance
Yes.
Sample #2: RBO–C–12–140–LG–1U–W–
2LRWP
Measured
current (Arms)
Measured Voltage (Vrms)
119 ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Max actual
input power
Type of sign
Single-sided EXIT ........................................................................................................................
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit ...........................................................................................
5W
10 W
Actual Power
(W)
0.074
Measured
input power
N/A
7
7
Compliance
Yes.
Sample #3: RBO–C–12–140–LR–1U–W–
4LRWP
Measured
current (Arms)
Measured voltage (Vrms)
120 ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Max actual
input power
Type of sign
Single-sided EXIT ........................................................................................................................
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit ...........................................................................................
5W
10 W
Actual Power
(W)
0.074
Measured
input power
N/A
7
7
Compliance
Yes.
Sample #4: RBO–C–12–140–LG–1U–W–
4LRWP
Measured
current (Arms)
Measured voltage (Vrms)
120 ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Max actual
input power
Type of sign
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Single-sided EXIT ........................................................................................................................
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit ...........................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:09 Feb 05, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
5W
10 W
06FEN1
Actual power
(W)
0.075
Measured
input power
N/A
7
7
Compliance
Yes.
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2019 / Notices
to determine conformance with the
requirement.
As mentioned in Part1 5.2, in
situations where the above ‘‘accuracy
method’’ does not apply, uncertainty of
measurement values are needed to be
Charger and transformer model ..................................................................
Battery model ..............................................................................................
Rating of battery ..........................................................................................
Input Voltage ...............................................................................................
Nominal Voltage of battery ..........................................................................
Min. end of discharge voltage .....................................................................
Recharge time .............................................................................................
Time rating ..................................................................................................
Charge current ............................................................................................
Lamp type/load ............................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:09 Feb 05, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
calculated and reported along with the
variables results obtained during testing.
Follow the procedures in IECEE–CTL
Guide001 Part2 to calculate uncertainty
of measurement.
1. Condition for Test: Clause 6.2
6V High Power Charger #451002000, Transformer #400000100.
Sigmas Lead-acid #SP6–12–T2, Beghelli #500000008.
6V12Ah x 4.
120\277\347VAC.
6V.
5.0V at circuit board.
1.5A.
48 hours.
90 mins.
120W, Electronic load.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
EN06FE19.009
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
According to IECEE–CTL Guide001
Part1 5.1, if all accuracy of instruments
is within the range limit stated in IEC/
ISO17025, the measurement result can
be directly compared with the test limit
2203
2204
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2019 / Notices
21. Tests for Energy Performance—
Actual Input Power: TIL B–75, Clause
2—Type 3 exit signs containing an
integral battery-charging system shall be
tested with the charging system
connected and the battery fully charged.
Sample #1: RBO–C–6–120–LR–1U–W–
2LRWP
Measured current (Arms)
Measured voltage (Vrms)
120 ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Max actual
input power
Type of sign
Single-sided EXIT ........................................................................................................................
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit ...........................................................................................
5W
10 W
Actual power
(W)
0.083
Measured
input
power
N/A
8
8
Compliance
........................
Yes
Sample #2: RBO–C–6–120–LG–1U–
W–2LRWP
Measured current (Arms)
Measured voltage (Vrms)
119 ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Max actual
input power
Type of sign
Single-sided EXIT ........................................................................................................................
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit ...........................................................................................
5W
10 W
Actual power
(W)
0.083
Measured
input power
N/A
8
8
Compliance
........................
Yes
Sample #3: RBO–C–6–120–LR–1U–
W–4LRWP
Measured current (Arms)
Measured voltage (Vrms)
120 ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Max actual
input power
Type of sign
Single-sided EXIT ........................................................................................................................
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit ...........................................................................................
5W
10 W
Actual power
(W)
0.083
Measured
input power
N/A
8
8
Compliance
........................
Yes
Sample #4: RBO–C–6–120–LG–1U–
W–4LRWP
Measured current (Arms)
Measured voltage (Vrms)
120 ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Max actual
input power
Type of sign
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Single-sided EXIT ........................................................................................................................
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit ...........................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:09 Feb 05, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
5W
10 W
06FEN1
Actual power
(W)
0.082
Measured
input power
N/A
8
8
Compliance
........................
Yes
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2019 / Notices
According to IECEE–CTL Guide001
Part1 5.1, if all accuracy of instruments
is within the range limit stated in IEC/
ISO17025, the measurement result can
be directly compared with the test limit
to determine conformance with the
requirement.
As mentioned in Part1 5.2, in
situations where the above ‘‘accuracy
method’’ does not apply, uncertainty of
measurement values are needed to be
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Charger and transformer model ..................................................................
Battery model ..............................................................................................
Rating of battery ..........................................................................................
Input Voltage ...............................................................................................
Nominal Voltage of battery ..........................................................................
Min. end of discharge voltage .....................................................................
Recharge time .............................................................................................
Time rating ..................................................................................................
Charge current ............................................................................................
Lamp type/load ............................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:09 Feb 05, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
calculated and reported along with the
variables results obtained during testing.
Follow the procedures in IECEE–CTL
Guide001 Part2 to calculate uncertainty
of measurement.
1. Condition for Test: Clause 6.2
LED board models tested: RBO–E–SALG1, RBO–E–HTLG1, RBO–E
HTLG1UDC.
120\277\347VAC.
4.8V Ni-Cd.
4.0V at circuit board.
48 hours.
90 mins.
65mA.
W, Electronic load.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
EN06FE19.010
BILLING CODE 6450–01–C
2205
2206
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2019 / Notices
21. Tests for Energy Performance—
Actual Input Power: TIL B–75, Clause
2—Type 3 exit signs containing an
integral battery-charging system shall be
tested with the charging system
connected and the battery fully charged.
Single or double faces use the same
power consumptions
Sample #1: RBO–E–SALG1
Measured
current (Arms)
Measured voltage (Vrms)
120 ...............................................................................................................................................
0.12
Max actual
input power
Type of sign
Single-sided EXIT ........................................................................................................................
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit ...........................................................................................
5W
10 W
Actual
power (W)
1.4
Measured
input power
1.4
N/A
Batterypowered sign
........................
Compliance
Yes
........................
Sample #2: RBO–E–HTLG1
Measured current (Arms)
Measured voltage (Vrms)
119 ...............................................................................................................................................
0.029
Max actual
input power
Type of sign
Single-sided EXIT ........................................................................................................................
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit ...........................................................................................
5W
10 W
Actual power
(W)
0.67
Measured
input power
0.67
N/A
AC only sign
........................
Compliance
Yes
........................
Sample #3: RBO–E HTLG1UDC
Measured
current (Arms)
Measured voltage (Vrms)
120 ...............................................................................................................................................
0.028
Max actual
input power
Type of sign
Single-sided EXIT ........................................................................................................................
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit ...........................................................................................
The opportunities for public comment
are at 10:15 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. This
time is subject to change; please contact
the Federal Coordinator (below) for
confirmation of times prior to the
meeting.
[FR Doc. 2019–01241 Filed 2–5–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Environmental Management SiteSpecific Advisory Board, Idaho
Cleanup Project
ADDRESSES:
Office of Environmental
Management, Department of Energy.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hilton Garden Inn Twin
Falls, 1741 Harrison Street North, Twin
Falls, ID 83301.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice of Open Meeting.
This notice announces a
meeting of the Environmental
Management Site-Specific Advisory
Board (EM SSAB), Idaho Cleanup
Project. The Federal Advisory
Committee Act requires that public
notice of this meeting be announced in
the Federal Register.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
Thursday, April 25, 2019; 8:00
a.m.–5:00 p.m.
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:09 Feb 05, 2019
Jkt 247001
Brad
Bugger, Federal Coordinator,
Department of Energy, Idaho Operations
Office, 1955 Fremont Avenue, MS–
1203, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415. Phone
(208) 526–0833; or email: buggerbp@
id.doe.gov or visit the Board’s internet
home page at: https://energy.gov/em/
icpcab/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of the Board: The purpose of
the Board is to make recommendations
to DOE–EM and site management in the
areas of environmental restoration,
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5W
10 W
Actual
power (W)
0.55
Measured
input power
0.55
N/A
Universal DC
sign
........................
Compliance
Yes
........................
waste management, and related
activities.
Tentative Topics (agenda topics may
change up to the day of the meeting;
please contact Brad Bugger for the most
current agenda):
• Recent Public Outreach
• Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) Overview
• Update on Integrated Waste
Treatment Unit (IWTU)
• Update on Fiscal Year 2020 Budget
Proposal
• Subsurface Disposal Area (SDA) Cap
90 Percent Design
• Update on Groundwater and Snake
River Plain Aquifer
• Report from Subcommittee on Calcine
• Reports from Other Subcommittees
and Board Organizational Topics
Public Participation: The meeting is
open to the public. The EM SSAB, Idaho
Cleanup Project, welcomes the
attendance of the public at its advisory
committee meetings and will make
every effort to accommodate persons
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 6, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2194-2206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-01241]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Case Number 2018-007; EERE-2018-BT-WAV-0011]
Energy Conservation Program: Petition for Waiver of Beghelli
North America From the Department of Energy Illuminated Exit Signs Test
Procedure
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of petition for waiver, and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces receipt of and publishes a petition
for waiver from Beghelli North America (``Beghelli''), which seeks a
waiver from the U.S. Department of Energy (``DOE'') test procedure used
for determining the energy consumption of specified illuminated exit
sign basic models. Beghelli seeks to use an alternate test procedure to
address issues involved in testing the basic models identified in its
petition. Beghelli contends that the design characteristics of its
combination illuminated exit signs prevent them from being accurately
tested using the currently applicable DOE test procedure. Beghelli has
suggested an alternate test procedure to test and rate the Beghelli
basic models specified in its petition. For the reasons discussed in
this document DOE is proposing a different alternate test procedure.
DOE solicits comments, data, and information concerning Beghelli's
petition, its suggested alternate test procedure, and DOE's proposed
alternate test procedure to inform its decision on Beghelli's waiver
request.
DATES: Written comments and information are requested and will be
accepted on or before March 8, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are encouraged to submit comments using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
Alternatively, interested persons may submit comments, identified by
case number ``2018-007,'' and Docket number ``EERE-2018-BT-WAV-0011,''
by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Email: Beghelli2018WAV0011@ee.doe.gov. Include the case
number [Case No. 2018-007] in the subject line of the message.
Postal Mail: Appliance and Equipment Standards Program,
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy, Building Technologies Office, Mailstop EE-5B, Petition for
Waiver Case No. 2018-007, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC
20585-0121. If possible, please submit all items on a compact disc
(``CD''), in which case it is not necessary to include printed copies.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Appliance and Equipment Standards
Program, U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Office, 950
L'Enfant Plaza SW, 6th floor, Washington, DC 20024. If possible, please
submit all items on a ``CD'', in which case it is not necessary to
include printed copies.
No telefacsimilies (faxes) will be accepted. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments and additional information on this
process, see section V of this document.
Docket: The docket, which includes Federal Register notices,
comments, and other supporting documents/materials, is available for
review at https://www.regulations.gov. All documents in the docket are
listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. However, some documents
listed in the index, such as those containing information that is
exempt from public disclosure, may not be publicly available.
The docket web page can be found at https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EERE-2018-BT-WAV-0011. The docket web page contains simple
instruction on how to access all documents, including public comments,
in the docket. See section V for information on how to submit comments
through https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lucy deButts, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Office, Mailstop EE-5B, 1000 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20585-0121. Email: AS_Waiver_Request@ee.doe.gov.
Mr. Michael Kido, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General
Counsel, Mail Stop GC-33, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW, Washington, DC 20585-0103. Telephone: (202) 586-8145. Email:
Michael.Kido@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background and Authority
The Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, as amended
(``EPCA''),\1\ authorizes the U.S. Department of Energy (``DOE'') to
regulate the energy efficiency of a number of consumer products and
industrial equipment. (42 U.S.C. 6291-6317) Title III, Part B of EPCA
established the Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products Other
Than Automobiles, which sets forth a variety of provisions designed to
improve energy efficiency for certain types of consumer products. These
products include illuminated exit signs, the focus of this document.
(42 U.S.C. 6291(37); 42 U.S.C. 6295(w))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ All references to EPCA in this document refer to the statute
as amended through the EPS Improvement Act of 2017, Public Law 11-
115 (January 12, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under EPCA, DOE's energy conservation program consists essentially
of four parts: (1) Testing, (2) labeling, (3) Federal energy
conservation standards, and (4) certification and enforcement
procedures. Relevant provisions of EPCA include definitions (42 U.S.C.
6291), energy conservation standards (42 U.S.C. 6295), test procedures
(42 U.S.C. 6293), labeling provisions (42 U.S.C. 6294), and the
authority to require information and reports from manufacturers (42
U.S.C. 6296).
The Federal testing requirements consist of test procedures that
manufacturers of covered products must use as the basis for: (1)
Certifying to DOE that their products comply with the applicable energy
conservation
[[Page 2195]]
standards adopted pursuant to EPCA (42 U.S.C. 6295(s)), and (2) making
representations about the efficiency of that product (42 U.S.C.
6293(c)). Similarly, DOE must use these test procedures to determine
whether the product complies with relevant standards promulgated under
EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6295(s))
Under 42 U.S.C. 6293, EPCA sets forth the criteria and procedures
DOE is required to follow when prescribing or amending test procedures
for covered products. EPCA requires that any test procedures prescribed
or amended under this section must be reasonably designed to produce
test results which reflect the energy efficiency, energy use or
estimated annual operating cost of a covered product during a
representative average use cycle or period of use and requires that
test procedures not be unduly burdensome to conduct. (42 U.S.C.
6293(b)(3)) The test procedure for illuminated exit signs is contained
in the Code of Federal Regulations (``CFR'') at 10 CFR 431.204,
``Uniform test method for the measurement of energy consumption of
illuminated exit signs.'' \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Although illuminated exit signs are covered products
pursuant to EPCA, as a matter of administrative convenience and to
minimize confusion among interested parties, DOE codified
illuminated exit sign provisions into subpart L of 10 CFR part 431
(the portion of DOE's regulations dealing with commercial and
industrial equipment) because typically businesses, rather than
individuals, purchase them. 70 FR 60407, 60409 (Oct. 18, 2005). DOE
refers to illuminated exit signs as either ``products'' or
``equipment.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under 10 CFR 431.401, any interested person may submit a petition
for waiver from DOE's test procedure requirements. DOE will grant a
waiver from the test procedure requirements if DOE determines either
that the basic model for which the waiver was requested contains a
design characteristic that prevents testing of the basic model
according to the prescribed test procedures, or that the prescribed
test procedures evaluate the basic model in a manner so
unrepresentative of its true energy consumption characteristics as to
provide materially inaccurate comparative data. 10 CFR 431.401(f)(2). A
petitioner must include in its petition any alternate test procedures
known to the petitioner to evaluate the basic model in a manner
representative of its energy consumption characteristics. 10 CFR
431.401(b)(1)(iii).
DOE may grant the waiver subject to conditions, including adherence
to alternate test procedures. 10 CFR 431.401(f)(2). As soon as
practicable after the granting of any waiver, DOE will publish in the
Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking to amend its
regulations so as to eliminate any need for the continuation of such
waiver. 10 CFR 431.401(l) As soon thereafter as practicable, DOE will
publish in the Federal Register a final rule. Id.
When DOE amends the test procedure to address the issues presented
in a waiver, the waiver will automatically terminate on the date on
which use of that test procedure is required to demonstrate compliance.
10 CFR 431.401(h)(2).
II. Beghelli's Petition for Waiver
On June 26, 2018, Beghelli filed a petition for waiver from the
test procedure applicable to illuminated exit signs set forth in 10 CFR
431.204. (Beghelli, No. 1 at pp. 1-6 \3\) Beghelli has requested a
waiver for basic models \4\ that provide the dual function of exit
signage and lighting for emergency egress (combination illuminated exit
signs \5\), stating that the battery used in combination illuminated
exit signs requires a substantially larger capacity to provide a
minimum of 90 minutes of egress lighting, as required by safety codes.
Beghelli has further stated that it is not feasible to separate the
power measurement associated with the exit signage and the egress
lighting because a single battery and charging circuit supplies power
for both functions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A notation in this form provides a reference for information
that is in the docket for this test procedure waiver (Docket No.
EERE-2018-BT-WAV-0011) (available at https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EERE-2018-BT-WAV-0011-0001) This notation indicates that
the statement preceding the reference is document number 1 in the
docket and appears at pages 2-4 of that document.
\4\ Due to the lengthy list of affected illuminated exit sign
basic models covered by Beghelli's June 26, 2018 petition, DOE is
making the complete list publicly available in the relevant
regulatory docket. The specific basic models identified on pages 2-4
of the petition can be found in the docket at https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EERE-2018-BT-WAV-0011.
\5\ DOE uses the term ``combination illuminated exit sign'' in
this notice to mean an illuminated exit sign that includes or is
packaged with (1) at least one auxiliary feature and (2) a battery
electrically connected to the illumination source for the face.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Requested Alternate Test Procedure
EPCA requires that manufacturers use DOE test procedures when
making representations about the energy consumption and energy
consumption costs of products covered by the statute. (42 U.S.C.
6293(c)) Consistent representations are important for manufacturers to
use in making representations about the energy efficiency of their
products and to demonstrate compliance with applicable DOE energy
conservation standards. Pursuant to its regulations applicable to
waivers from applicable test procedures at 10 CFR 431.401, and after
consideration of public comments on the petition, DOE will consider
setting an alternate test procedure for the products identified by
Beghelli's petition in a subsequent Decision and Order.
Beghelli seeks to use an alternate test procedure to test and rate
specific combination illuminated exit sign basic models. As an
alternate to the test procedure currently in place at 10 CFR part 431,
subpart L, Beghelli has requested that it determine the power for its
combination illuminated exit signs using the following procedure:
1. Measure AC input power of the complete unit of combination
illuminated exit sign with a fully charged battery.
2. Measure the DC output voltage and current to the light source of
the unit.
3. Calculate the AC power consumption of the light source of the
unit by applying a power factor correction of 30 percent as worst-case
scenario. (Beghelli asserted that based on the circuitry design the
loss would not exceed 30 percent.)
4. If needed, calculate the stand-by power for the unit when the
battery is fully charged. Stand-by power = input power (from item 1)-
power of basic exit sign light source (from item 3).
The alternate test procedure suggested by Beghelli in its petition
would measure the output power of the exit sign and apply conversion
losses to back-calculate the input power to the exit sign. This
approach requires assumptions that will likely result in an uncertainty
of measured values. Beghelli contends that the input to output power
conversion losses of all basic models under consideration are at
maximum 30 percent. However, Beghelli's petition does not provide a
sufficient basis for the 30-percent value. With the differences in
battery types and sizes in the various basic models for which the
waiver is being requested, it is not evident from the petition that the
30-percent value would apply across all the basic models of illuminated
exit sign models identified in Beghelli's petition. Additionally, it is
unclear whether the DC output voltage and current measurement in step 2
of Beghelli's suggested alternative testing method would result in a
power measurement that could only be attributable to the light sources
of the exit sign, without resorting to additional steps such as cutting
wires or otherwise modifying the equipment's circuitry. Based on the
limited information contained in Beghelli's petition, in DOE's view,
the
[[Page 2196]]
alternative test procedure suggested by Beghelli to use the estimated
conversion losses in conjunction with a measurement that does not
clearly isolate the power consumption to the light source(s) of the
exit sign would be unlikely to accurately calculate the combination
illuminated exit sign input power demand of the affected basic models.
As an alternative to Beghelli's suggested approach, this interim
waiver will require the company to apply an alternate testing method
that does not require application of conversion losses and, instead,
relies on a more direct measurement of the input power consumption
attributable to the light source(s) of the exit sign. This alternative
approach, as noted in Section IV of this document, is consistent with
one that DOE has permitted to be used in similar test procedure waiver
circumstances. Although Beghelli would be required to use this approach
for the purposes of this interim waiver, as discussed in Section V of
this document, DOE seeks comment on both the applicability of
Beghelli's suggested method as well as the one required as part of this
grant of interim waiver.
IV. DOE's Proposed Alternate Test Procedure
DOE investigated various approaches to isolate the input power used
to illuminate only the exit sign portion of a combination exit sign
including: Scaling or prorating the portion of the input power demand
associated with the battery; and measuring alternative power quantities
as a proxy for input power demand. DOE tentatively concluded that these
methods would require isolating the battery power used to illuminate
the faces of the exit sign from the battery power used to operate
auxiliary features. Based on DOE's understanding of combination exit
sign circuitry, DOE has tentatively determined that it is either not
possible to measure the required quantities or that doing so would
require cutting wires and modifying the circuitry of the combination
exit sign. However, DOE has determined that the basic models identified
by Beghelli in its petition for waiver have equivalent non-combination
illuminated exit sign models. For the specified basic models, DOE
proposes the following alternate test method be used in the context of
this interim waiver grant to Beghelli:
(1) Identify an equivalent non-combination illuminated exit sign
for the combination illuminated exit sign under test. A unit is an
equivalent non-combination illuminated exit sign only if it consists
entirely of electricity-consuming components identical to all of those
of the unit whose input power demand is being determined, but does not
include any auxiliary features, and contains an electrically connected
battery. The equivalent non-combination illuminated exit sign must also
have the same manufacturer and number of faces as the unit whose input
power demand is being determined.
(2) Test the equivalent non-combination illuminated exit sign using
the DOE test procedure at 10 CFR, part 431, subpart L. Assign the input
power demand of the combination illuminated exit sign under test as the
input power demand of the equivalent non-combination illuminated exit
sign.
This alternate test procedure permits Beghelli to use the same
approach that DOE permitted Acuity Brands to use as part of a prior
Decision and Order granting that company a waiver from the DOE test
procedure for evaluating similar equipment. 83 FR 11740 (March 16,
2018). Because the alternate procedure granted to Acuity Brands offers
a more direct measurement of the actual energy use of the lighting
sources in the exit sign--rather than an estimated power factor
correction value--DOE is applying an approach that it believes offers a
more accurate method in evaluating the energy usage of the lighting
equipment at issue.
V. Request for Comments
DOE is publishing Beghelli's petition for waiver in its entirety,
pursuant to 10 CFR 431.401(b)(1)(iv). The petition includes the basic
models for which Beghelli is requesting the waiver and Beghelli's
suggested alternate test procedure to determine the efficiency of
Beghelli's those specified illuminated exit signs. DOE is particularly
interested in the merits of Beghelli's suggested alternative testing
method, including data supporting the suggested or another power
factor, as well as comments comparing the accuracy of that approach
against the one that DOE is requiring as part of this interim waiver--
i.e., the Acuity Brands-based alternative test method.
DOE invites all interested parties to submit in writing by March 8,
2019, comments and information on all aspects of the petition,
including the alternate test procedure. Pursuant to 10 CFR 431.401(d),
any person submitting written comments to DOE must also send a copy of
such comments to the petitioner. The contact information for the
petitioner is Wenceslao Garro,
wenceslao.garro@beghellinorthamerica.com, 3250 Corporate Way, Miramar,
FL 33025 USA.
Submitting comments via https://www.regulations.gov. The https://www.regulations.gov web page will require you to provide your name and
contact information. Your contact information will be viewable to DOE
Building Technologies staff only. Your contact information will not be
publicly viewable except for your first and last names, organization
name (if any), and submitter representative name (if any). If your
comment is not processed properly because of technical difficulties,
DOE will use this information to contact you. If DOE cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, DOE may not be able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information will be publicly viewable if you
include it in the comment or in any documents attached to your comment.
Any information that you do not want to be publicly viewable should not
be included in your comment, nor in any document attached to your
comment. Persons viewing comments will see only first and last names,
organization names, correspondence containing comments, and any
documents submitted with the comments.
Do not submit to https://www.regulations.gov information for which
disclosure is restricted by statute, such as trade secrets and
commercial or financial information (hereinafter referred to as
Confidential Business Information (``CBI'')). Comments submitted
through https://www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed as CBI. Comments
received through the website will waive any CBI claims for the
information submitted. For information on submitting CBI, see the
Confidential Business Information section.
DOE processes submissions made through https://www.regulations.gov
before posting. Normally, comments will be posted within a few days of
being submitted. However, if large volumes of comments are being
processed simultaneously, your comment may not be viewable for up to
several weeks. Please keep the comment tracking number that https://www.regulations.gov provides after you have successfully uploaded your
comment.
Submitting comments via email, hand delivery, or mail. Comments and
documents submitted via email, hand delivery, or mail also will be
posted to https://www.regulations.gov. If you do not want your personal
contact information to be publicly viewable, do
[[Page 2197]]
not include it in your comment or any accompanying documents. Instead,
provide your contact information on a cover letter. Include your first
and last names, email address, telephone number, and optional mailing
address. The cover letter will not be publicly viewable as long as it
does not include any comments.
Include contact information each time you submit comments, data,
documents, and other information to DOE. If you submit via mail or hand
delivery, please provide all items on a CD, if feasible. It is not
necessary to submit printed copies. No facsimiles (faxes) will be
accepted.
Comments, data, and other information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file format. Provide documents that
are not secured, written in English and free of any defects or viruses.
Documents should not contain special characters or any form of
encryption and, if possible, they should carry the electronic signature
of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit campaign form letters by the
originating organization in batches of between 50 to 500 form letters
per PDF or as one form letter with a list of supporters' names compiled
into one or more PDFs. This reduces comment processing and posting
time.
Confidential Business Information. According to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he or she believes to be
confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure should submit via
email, postal mail, or hand delivery two well-marked copies: One copy
of the document marked confidential including all the information
believed to be confidential, and one copy of the document marked ``non-
confidential'' with the information believed to be confidential
deleted. Submit these documents via email or on a CD, if feasible. DOE
will make its own determination about the confidential status of the
information and treat it according to its determination.
Factors of interest to DOE when evaluating requests to treat
submitted information as confidential include (1) a description of the
items, (2) whether and why such items are customarily treated as
confidential within the industry, (3) whether the information is
generally known by or available from other sources, (4) whether the
information has previously been made available to others without
obligation concerning its confidentiality, (5) an explanation of the
competitive injury to the submitting person which would result from
public disclosure, (6) when such information might lose its
confidential character due to the passage of time, and (7) why
disclosure of the information would be contrary to the public interest.
It is DOE's policy that all comments may be included in the public
docket, without change and as received, including any personal
information provided in the comments (except information deemed to be
exempt from public disclosure).
Signed in Washington, DC, on January 31, 2019.
Steve Chalk,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency, Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
Date: 6/26/2018
To Whom It May Concern
Subject: Beghelli Petition for Test Procedure Waiver for Specified
Combination Illuminated Exit Signs
Following the waiver granted to Acuity Brands in reference to
illuminated exit signs combo units (Case Number IES-001) for Test
Procedure Waiver for Illuminated Exit Signs, Pursuant to 10 CFR Sec.
430.27; Beghelli is petitioning under the provision 10 C.F.R. Sec.
431.401 a waiver for specified combination illuminated exit signs basic
models on the grounds that contain design characteristics which prevent
testing the basic models as per the prescribed test procedures.
1) Test procedure sought to be waived
The test procedure to be waived is in 10 CFR part 431, subpart L,
431.203 & 431.204 that requires the measurement of power including the
internal battery. Since the power limits were not established using a
baseline for units that provide the dual function associated with a
combo unit, it is not possible to separate the power measurement for
the exit sign and the egress lighting at the same time since a single
battery and charging circuit supplies power for both functions.
2) Manufacturers of all other basic models distributed in commerce in
the United States and known to the petitioner to incorporate design
characteristic(s) similar to those found in the basic model that is the
subject of the petition.
Vernon J. Nagel, Acuity Brands, 1170 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2300,
Atlanta, GA 30309-7676, Waiver 83FR11740.
Mr. David Woodward, Standards and Regulations Manager Americas, Philips
Lighting, 938 South Green Street, Tupelo, MS 38802-1687,
david.r.woodward@philips.com.
Mr. Bob Howard-Anderson, Fulham Co., Inc., 12705 S. Van Ness Ave.,
Hawthorne, CA 90250.
Jessica Stanek, Con-Tech Lighting, 2783 Shermer Road, Northbrook, IL
60062, techlighting.com">jstanek@con-techlighting.com.
3) Alternative test procedure known to the petitioner to evaluate the
performance of the equipment type in a manner representative of the
energy and/or water consumption characteristics of the basic model.
For combination exit and egress lighting units (combo units), the
power shall be determined by the following procedure:
1. Measure AC input power of the complete combo unit for a fully
charged battery
2. Measure the DC output voltage and current to the light source of
the exit sign
3. Calculate the AC power consumption of the light source of the
exit sign by applying a power factor correction of 30% as worst case
scenario. Based on our circuitry design the loss couldn't be more than
30%
4. If needed calculate the stand-by power for the combo unit when
the battery is fully charged
Stand-by power = input power (from item 1)-power of basic exit
sign light source (from item 3)
4) Individual model name for which a waiver is requested.
Model code breakdown sample:
SAMPLE MODEL: RBO-C-6-36-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPOSITE
SERIES OPERATION (6V, CAPACITY LED FACE CHEVRONS MOUNTING HEADS TUNGSTEN: 9W,
12V) 18W
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6V, 12V......... Pb-A: 36, 60, RED, GREEN.... 1 (SINGLE)...... U (UNIVERSAL)... W (WALL)........ 2LRWP (ONLY).... COMPOSITE
72, 100, 120, TUNGSTEN: 9W,
140. 18W.
NI-CD: 42, 54, HALOGEN: 8W.
90, 130.
[[Page 2198]]
RBO-C..... 6V.............. 36.............. LR (RED)...... 1 (SINGLE)...... U (UNIVERSAL)... W (WALL)........ 2LRWP........... 9W.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LRWP: LEFT, RIGHT, WATERPROOF.
NOTE: THESE MODELS ARE ALL 2 HEADS, THE 1, 3, 4 HEAD OPTIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED IN THE FUTURE.
RBO-C BASIC MODELS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RBO-C-6-36-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-9W.............. 6V, 9W (RED) (COMPOSITE TUNGSTEN).
RBO-C-6-42-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-6-54-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-6-60-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-6-72-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-6-90-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-6-100-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-6-120-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-6-36-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-9W.............. 6V, 9W (GREEN) (COMPOSITE TUNGSTEN).
RBO-C-6-42-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-6-54-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-6-60-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-6-72-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-6-90-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-6-100-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-6-120-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-12-36-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-9W............. 12V, 9W (RED) (COMPOSITE TUNGSTEN).
RBO-C-12-42-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-12-60-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-12-90-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-12-120-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-12-130-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-12-140-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-12-36-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-9W............. 12V, 9W (GREEN) (COMPOSITE TUNGSTEN).
RBO-C-12-42-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-12-60-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-12-90-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-12-120-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-12-130-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-12-140-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-9W
RBO-C-6-36-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-18W............. 6V, 18W (RED) (COMPOSITE TUNGSTEN).
RBO-C-6-42-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-6-54-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-6-60-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-6-72-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-6-90-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-6-100-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-6-120-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-6-36-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-18W............. 6V, 18W (GREEN) (COMPOSITE TUNGSTEN).
RBO-C-6-42-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-6-54-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-6-60-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-6-72-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-6-90-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-6-100-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-6-120-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-12-36-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-18W............ 12V, 18W (RED) (COMPOSITE TUNGSTEN).
RBO-C-12-42-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-12-60-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-12-90-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-12-120-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-12-130-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-12-140-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-12-36-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-18W............ 12V, 18W (GREEN) (COMPOSITE TUNGSTEN).
RBO-C-12-42-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-12-60-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-12-90-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-12-120-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-12-130-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-12-140-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-18W
RBO-C-6-36-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-8W.............. 6V, 8W (RED) (HALOGEN).
RBO-C-6-42-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-6-54-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-6-60-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-6-72-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-6-90-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-6-100-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-6-120-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-6-36-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-8W.............. 6V, 8W (GREEN) (HALOGEN).
RBO-C-6-42-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-6-54-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
[[Page 2199]]
RBO-C-6-60-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-6-72-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-6-90-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-6-100-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-6-120-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-12-36-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-8W............. 12V, 8W (RED) (HALOGEN).
RBO-C-12-42-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-12-60-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-12-90-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-12-120-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-12-130-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-12-140-LR1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-12-36-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-8W............. 12V, 8W (GREEN) (COMPOSITE TUNGSTEN).
RBO-C-12-42-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-12-60-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-12-90-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-12-120-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-12-130-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
RBO-C-12-140-LG1-U-W-2LRWP-8W
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06FE19.006
Our basic combo models are a combination of egress and emergency
lighting in which the sign portion is identical to our DOE listed
illuminated exit signs.
The supporting information is provided in the following appendixes:
Appendix A: Basic models table
Appendix B: Test report RBO-C12 on illuminated exit signs for
combo
Appendix C: Test report RBO-C6 on illuminated exit signs for
combo units
Appendix D: for the test report on illuminated exit signs.
TEST PROCEDURE ISSUES:
A combo unit utilizes a higher capacity battery to power both the
exit sign face(s) as well as emergency egress lighting during a power
outage. While Sec. 431.202 indicates that the input power demand shall
be measured with batteries at full charge, the higher capacity dual
function battery for a combo unit results in a higher power than a
smaller battery utilized in a unit that provides only the exit signage
functionality.
The performance specification for the input power described in the
Energy Star 2.0 specifications limits the power to illuminate the face
of the exit sign with no reference to power associated with the
emergency egress lighting. The test procedure for Energy Star 2.0
requires the measurement of power including the internal battery, but
the power limits were not established using a baseline for units that
provide the dual function associated with a combo unit. For a combo
unit, it is not feasible to separate the power measurement associated
with the exit signage and the egress lighting since a single battery
and charging circuit supplies power for both functions.
CONCLUSION:
Beghelli is submitting this request for a test procedure waiver for
combo units that provide the dual function of exit signs and emergency
egress lighting. This requests under the provision 10 C.F.R. Sec.
431.401 is for illuminated exit signs combo that contain design
characteristics which prevent testing the basic models as per the
prescribed test procedures.
Thank you in advance for your prompt consideration of this waiver
request.
Best regards,
Wenceslao Garro,
Engineering Manager [bond] Beghelli North
America,wenceslao.garro@beghellinorthamerica.com, Beghelli North
America, 3250 Corporate Way, Miramar, FL 33025 USA, Ph +1 954 442
6600 [bond] Fax +1 954 442 6677.
References: 2013-07-17 Acuity Brands original petition for test
procedure waiver, https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EERE-2017-BT-WAV-0033.
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
[[Page 2200]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06FE19.007
[[Page 2201]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06FE19.008
According to IECEE-CTL Guide001 Part1 5.1, if all accuracy of
instruments is within the range limit stated in IEC/ISO17025, the
measurement result can be directly compared with the test limit to
determine conformance with the requirement.
As mentioned in Part1 5.2, in situations where the above ``accuracy
method'' does not apply, uncertainty of measurement values are needed
to be calculated and reported along with the variables results obtained
during testing.
Follow the procedures in IECEE-CTL Guide001 Part2 to calculate
uncertainty of measurement.
1. Condition for Test: Clause 6.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charger and transformer model................... 12V High Power Charger #451002100, Transformer #400000101.
Battery model................................... Sigmas Lead-acid #SP6-12-T2, Beghelli #500000008.
Rating of battery............................... 6V12Ah x 4.
Input Voltage................................... 120\277\347VAC.
Nominal Voltage of battery...................... 12V.
Min. end of discharge voltage................... 10.0V at circuit board.
Recharge time................................... 1.5A.
Time rating..................................... 48 hours.
Charge current.................................. 90 mins.
Lamp type/load.................................. 140W, Electronic load.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 2202]]
21. Tests for Energy Performance--Actual Input Power: TIL B-75,
Clause 2--Type 3 exit signs containing an integral battery-charging
system shall be tested with the charging system connected and the
battery fully charged.
Sample #1: RBO-C-12-140-LR-1U-W-2LRWP
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured Actual power
Measured voltage (Vrms) current (Arms) (W)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
120..................................... 0.075 7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Max actual Measured
Type of sign input power input power Compliance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Single-sided EXIT........................... 5 W N/A ..................................
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit........ 10 W 7 Yes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sample #2: RBO-C-12-140-LG-1U-W-2LRWP
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured Actual Power
Measured Voltage (Vrms) current (Arms) (W)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
119..................................... 0.074 7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Max actual Measured
Type of sign input power input power Compliance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Single-sided EXIT........................... 5 W N/A ..................................
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit........ 10 W 7 Yes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sample #3: RBO-C-12-140-LR-1U-W-4LRWP
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured Actual Power
Measured voltage (Vrms) current (Arms) (W)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
120..................................... 0.074 7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Max actual Measured
Type of sign input power input power Compliance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Single-sided EXIT........................... 5 W N/A ..................................
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit........ 10 W 7 Yes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sample #4: RBO-C-12-140-LG-1U-W-4LRWP
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured Actual power
Measured voltage (Vrms) current (Arms) (W)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
120..................................... 0.075 7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Max actual Measured
Type of sign input power input power Compliance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Single-sided EXIT........................... 5 W N/A ..................................
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit........ 10 W 7 Yes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 2203]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06FE19.009
According to IECEE-CTL Guide001 Part1 5.1, if all accuracy of
instruments is within the range limit stated in IEC/ISO17025, the
measurement result can be directly compared with the test limit to
determine conformance with the requirement.
As mentioned in Part1 5.2, in situations where the above ``accuracy
method'' does not apply, uncertainty of measurement values are needed
to be calculated and reported along with the variables results obtained
during testing.
Follow the procedures in IECEE-CTL Guide001 Part2 to calculate
uncertainty of measurement.
1. Condition for Test: Clause 6.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charger and transformer model................... 6V High Power Charger #451002000, Transformer #400000100.
Battery model................................... Sigmas Lead-acid #SP6-12-T2, Beghelli #500000008.
Rating of battery............................... 6V12Ah x 4.
Input Voltage................................... 120\277\347VAC.
Nominal Voltage of battery...................... 6V.
Min. end of discharge voltage................... 5.0V at circuit board.
Recharge time................................... 1.5A.
Time rating..................................... 48 hours.
Charge current.................................. 90 mins.
Lamp type/load.................................. 120W, Electronic load.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 2204]]
21. Tests for Energy Performance--Actual Input Power: TIL B-75,
Clause 2--Type 3 exit signs containing an integral battery-charging
system shall be tested with the charging system connected and the
battery fully charged.
Sample #1: RBO-C-6-120-LR-1U-W-2LRWP
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured Actual power
Measured voltage (Vrms) current (Arms) (W)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
120..................................... 0.083 8
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Max actual Measured
Type of sign input power input power Compliance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Single-sided EXIT............................................... 5 W N/A ..............
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit............................ 10 W 8 Yes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sample #2: RBO-C-6-120-LG-1U-W-2LRWP
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured Actual power
Measured voltage (Vrms) current (Arms) (W)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
119..................................... 0.083 8
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Max actual Measured
Type of sign input power input power Compliance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Single-sided EXIT............................................... 5 W N/A ..............
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit............................ 10 W 8 Yes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sample #3: RBO-C-6-120-LR-1U-W-4LRWP
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured Actual power
Measured voltage (Vrms) current (Arms) (W)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
120..................................... 0.083 8
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Max actual Measured
Type of sign input power input power Compliance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Single-sided EXIT............................................... 5 W N/A ..............
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit............................ 10 W 8 Yes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sample #4: RBO-C-6-120-LG-1U-W-4LRWP
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured Actual power
Measured voltage (Vrms) current (Arms) (W)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
120..................................... 0.082 8
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Max actual Measured
Type of sign input power input power Compliance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Single-sided EXIT............................................... 5 W N/A ..............
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit............................ 10 W 8 Yes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 2205]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06FE19.010
BILLING CODE 6450-01-C
According to IECEE-CTL Guide001 Part1 5.1, if all accuracy of
instruments is within the range limit stated in IEC/ISO17025, the
measurement result can be directly compared with the test limit to
determine conformance with the requirement.
As mentioned in Part1 5.2, in situations where the above ``accuracy
method'' does not apply, uncertainty of measurement values are needed
to be calculated and reported along with the variables results obtained
during testing.
Follow the procedures in IECEE-CTL Guide001 Part2 to calculate
uncertainty of measurement.
1. Condition for Test: Clause 6.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charger and transformer model................... LED board models tested: RBO-E-SALG1, RBO-E-HTLG1, RBO-E HTLG1UDC.
Battery model...................................
Rating of battery...............................
Input Voltage................................... 120\277\347VAC.
Nominal Voltage of battery...................... 4.8V Ni-Cd.
Min. end of discharge voltage................... 4.0V at circuit board.
Recharge time................................... 48 hours.
Time rating..................................... 90 mins.
Charge current.................................. 65mA.
Lamp type/load.................................. W, Electronic load.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 2206]]
21. Tests for Energy Performance--Actual Input Power: TIL B-75,
Clause 2--Type 3 exit signs containing an integral battery-charging
system shall be tested with the charging system connected and the
battery fully charged.
Single or double faces use the same power consumptions
Sample #1: RBO-E-SALG1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured Actual power Battery-
Measured voltage (Vrms) current (Arms) (W) powered sign
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
120............................................................. 0.12 1.4 ..............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Max actual Measured
Type of sign input power input power Compliance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Single-sided EXIT............................................... 5 W 1.4 Yes
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit............................ 10 W N/A ..............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sample #2: RBO-E-HTLG1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured Actual power
Measured voltage (Vrms) current (Arms) (W) AC only sign
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
119............................................................. 0.029 0.67 ..............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Max actual Measured
Type of sign input power input power Compliance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Single-sided EXIT............................................... 5 W 0.67 Yes
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit............................ 10 W N/A ..............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sample #3: RBO-E HTLG1UDC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured Actual power Universal DC
Measured voltage (Vrms) current (Arms) (W) sign
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
120............................................................. 0.028 0.55 ..............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Max actual Measured
Type of sign input power input power Compliance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Single-sided EXIT............................................... 5 W 0.55 Yes
Single-sided EXIT w/charging circuit............................ 10 W N/A ..............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2019-01241 Filed 2-5-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P