Amendments to the Regulations Governing Meats, Prepared Meats, and Meat Products (Grading, Certification, and Standards), 1641-1652 [2019-00869]
Download as PDF
1641
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 84, No. 24
Tuesday, February 5, 2019
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dana K. Stahl, Chief, Grading Services
Branch, QAD, Livestock and Poultry
Program, AMS, USDA; 1400
Independence Avenue SW; Room 3932–
S, STOP 0258; Washington, DC 20250–
0258; (202) 690–3169; or email to
dana.stahl@ams.usda.gov.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Executive Orders 12866 and 13771, and
Regulatory Flexibility Act
7 CFR Part 54
This rulemaking does not meet the
definition of a significant regulatory
action contained in section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 and is not
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
Additionally, because this rule does not
meet the definition of a significant
regulatory action it does not trigger the
requirements contained in Executive
Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum
titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing
Section 2 of the Executive Order of
January 30, 2017, titled ‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’’’ (February 2, 2017).
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
[5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.], the Administrator
of AMS has considered the economic
effect of this action on small entities and
has determined that this proposed rule
does not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
business entities. The purpose of RFA is
to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly burdened.
AMS has determined that this
proposed rule will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities, as defined by RFA, because the
user-fee services are not subject to
scalability based on the business size.
Currently, approximately 235
applicants subscribe to AMS’s
voluntary, fee-for-services that are
subject to the requirements of this
regulation. The U.S. Small Business
Administration’s Table of Small
Business Size Standards matched to the
North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) Codes identifies small
business size by average annual receipts
or by the average number of employees
at a firm. This information can be found
at 13 CFR parts 121.104, 121.106, and
121.201.
[No. AMS–LP–16–0080]
Amendments to the Regulations
Governing Meats, Prepared Meats, and
Meat Products (Grading, Certification,
and Standards)
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Agriculture’s (USDA) Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) proposes to
amend its regulations to update a
number of outdated administrative and
organizational references, clarify agency
action as it relates to the withdrawal or
denial of service, update the official
shields and grademarks associated with
the grading service, and make reference
to the use of instrument grading
equipment as a means of determining
official grades on beef and lamb
carcasses.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received by
April 8, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
submitted electronically at
www.regulations.gov. Comments may
also be submitted to: Dana K. Stahl,
Chief, Grading Services Branch, Quality
Assessment Division (QAD); Livestock
and Poultry Program, AMS, USDA; 1400
Independence Avenue SW; Room
3932–S, STOP 0258; Washington, DC
20250–0258. Comments will be made
available for public inspection at Room
3932–S of the above address during
regular business hours or electronically
at www.regulations.gov. Comments
received will be posted without change,
including any personal information
provided. All comments should
reference the docket number AMS–LP–
16–0080, the date of submission, and
the page number of this issue of the
Federal Register.
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Feb 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
AMS requires that all applicants for
service provide information about their
company for the purpose of processing
bills. Information collected from an
applicant includes company name,
address, billing address, and similar
information. AMS does not collect
information about the size of the
business. However, based on working
knowledge of these operations, AMS
estimates that roughly 72 percent of
current applicants may be classified as
small entities. It is not anticipated that
this action would impose additional
costs to applicants, regardless of size.
Current applicants will not be required
to provide any additional information to
receive service. The effects of this
proposed rule are not expected to be
disproportionately greater or lesser for
small applicants than for large
applicants.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act of 2002 to
promote the use of the internet and
other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to government
information and services, and for other
purposes. Accordingly, AMS developed
options for companies requesting
service to do so electronically.
The USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this proposed
rule.
Executive Order 13175
This action has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that
this regulation would not have
substantial and direct effects on Tribal
governments and would not have
significant Tribal implications.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This proposed rule is
not intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act prohibits states or political
subdivisions of a state to impose any
requirement that is in addition to, or
inconsistent with, any requirement of
the Act. There are no civil justice
implications associated with this
proposed rule.
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
1642
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 [44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35], this proposed rule would
not change the information collection
and recordkeeping requirements
previously approved and would not
impose additional reporting or
recordkeeping burden on users of these
voluntary services.
The information collection and
recordkeeping requirements of this part
have been approved by OMB under 44
U.S.C. Chapter 35 and have been
assigned OMB Control Number 0581–
0128.
In September 2014, three separate
OMB collections—OMB 0581–0127,
OMB 0581–0124, and OMB 0581–
0128—were merged, such that the
current OMB 0581–0128 pertains to
Regulations for Voluntary Grading,
Certification, and Standards and
includes 7 CFR parts 54, 56, 62, and 70.
Background and Proposed Revisions
The Agricultural Marketing Act of
1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.), herein after
referred to as the ‘‘Act,’’ directs and
authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture
to facilitate the competitive and efficient
marketing of agricultural products. AMS
programs support a strategic marketing
perspective that adapts product and
marketing decisions to consumer
demands, changes domestic and
international marketing practices, and
incorporates emerging technology. AMS
provides impartial grading and
certification services that ensure
agricultural products meet specified
requirements. These services are
voluntary, with users paying for the cost
of the requested service. AMS grading
services verify that product meets USDA
grade standards (e.g., USDA Choice) and
certify that products meet requirements
defined by the company or another
third-party. Product characteristics such
as manner of cut, color, and other
quality attributes can be directly
examined by an AMS employee or an
authorized agent to determine if product
requirements have been met. The
product can be identified as ‘‘USDA
Prime,’’ ‘‘USDA Choice,’’ ‘‘USDA
Select,’’ ‘‘USDA Certified,’’ ‘‘USDA
Accepted as Specified,’’ or ‘‘USDA
Further Processing Certification
Program.’’
Administrative and Organizational
Revisions
In 2012, an organizational merger
within AMS combined the Livestock
and Seed Program and Poultry Programs
into the Livestock, Poultry, and Seed
(LPS) Program. Subsequently, the LPS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Feb 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
Program created the Quality Assessment
Division (QAD) to oversee services
carried out by the Audit Services
Branch, Grading Services Branch,
Standardization Branch, and the
Business Operations Branch. The
Grading Services Branch administers
grading and certification services that
were performed by the former Meat
Grading and Certification Branch of the
former Livestock and Seed Program and
the former Grading Branch of Poultry
Programs. In 2018, another
organizational change caused the LPS
Program to be renamed the Livestock
and Poultry (LP) Program.
Meat grading and certification
activities are carried out under 7 CFR
54, while poultry and shell egg grading
and certification activities are carried
out under 7 CFR 70 and 7 CFR 56,
respectively.
AMS proposes to update a number of
administrative and organizational
references to reflect the current
terminology and structure of AMS.
These amendments would include
amending § 54.1 to change the LPS
Program to the Livestock and Poultry
Program. Certain terms and definitions
would be added to, updated in, or
deleted from § 54.1 to reflect the current
organizational structure within the
Agency. The term and definition for
Livestock would be removed from the
regulation because the use of this
definition was fundamentally the same
as the definition of Animals. The term
and definitions for Contract Verification
Service would be removed from § 54.1
because this service is no longer
provided, a conforming change would
be made to § 54.4 Kind of Service. The
definition for Animals would be revised
to add ‘‘bison,’’ as the Agency certifies
bison; Chief would be revised to
identify the Grading Services Branch
Chief; Division would be revised to
identify QAD and appropriately reflect
its level within the organization; Meat
by-products would be revised to exclude
brain derived from ruminant animals,
which is no longer allowed per food
safety regulations; and the term
Standards would be replaced with
Official Standards and its definition
would be revised for consistency within
the regulation. The terms Yield Grade
and Appeal Service and their respective
definitions would be added to identify
the different types of grading service
offered under the regulations. The terms
Program and Deputy Administrator and
their respective definitions would be
added to appropriately recognize the
office and leadership within the current
organizational structure of the Agency.
Since this regulation has not received
significant revisions for some time,
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
AMS proposes to bring it into
compliance with The Plain Writing Act
of 2010, which requires all Federal
agencies to write clear Government
communication that the public can
understand and use. To accomplish this,
AMS is focusing on appropriate
pronoun use, omitting unnecessary
words, and writing short sentences.
To reflect organizational changes and
for consistency with other changes to
this regulation, AMS proposes to amend
§ 54.4 Kind of Service, § 54.6 How to
Obtain Service, § 54.7 Order of
Furnishing Service, § 54.8 When Request
for Service Deemed Made, § 54.9
Withdrawal of Application or Request
for Service, and § 54.10 Authority of
Agent.
AMS also proposes to amend § 54.5
Availability of Service by removing
language that states service will be
provided without discrimination, as this
is a duplicative statement of a
requirement that is mandated through
Departmental regulations, not by AMS.
AMS proposes to amend § 54.6 How to
obtain service by increasing the length
of time between cancellation of
commitment service and reapplication
for commitment service from 1 to 2
years, and the applicant is responsible
for reimbursing relocation costs
incurred by the Agency to transfer the
grader.
AMS proposes to remove the
reference to the Medium grade for lamb,
yearling lamb, mutton, and pork
carcasses in § 54.11 (a)(1)(vii). The
official standards for grades of lamb and
mutton carcasses were amended in
October 1940 (Amendment No. 1 to
S.R.A. 123) to change the grade
designations Medium and Common to
Commercial and Utility, respectively. In
April 1968, the official standards for
pork carcasses were revised and the
former Medium and Cull grades were
combined and renamed U.S. Utility.
Removing the reference to Medium in
§ 54.11 (a)(1)(vii) aligns the regulatory
language with the language contained
within the official standards.
Clarify Agency Action on Denial or
Withdrawal of Service
AMS proposes to create a stairstepped approach regarding denial or
withdrawal of Grading Branch services.
As written, § 54.11 requires AMS to go
before an administrative law judge to
hear a case for an applicant accused of
misconduct before any action can be
taken; the process and actions currently
identified in this part limit AMS’s
ability to effectively manage its services,
including denying, withdrawing, or
suspending services in a timely manner
when warranted for reasons of
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2019 / Proposed Rules
misconduct. Therefore, AMS is
clarifying that it relies first on the
Supplemental Rules of Practice in 7 CFR
50 and then, if necessary, uses the Rules
of Practice Governing Formal
Adjudicatory Proceedings Instituted by
the Secretary Under Various Statues set
forth in 7 CFR 1.130 through 1.151
when denying, withdrawing, or
suspending services to applicants. An
applicant would still have an
opportunity for a hearing before an
administrative law judge before any
permanent action occurs.
The regulations outlined in this part
are intended to describe to the public
how AMS provides grading and
certification services and the related
processes, not provide instruction to
employees or repeat requirements
covered by another Federal regulation.
In this vein, AMS proposes to remove
and reserve for future use § 54.12
Financial interest of official grader.
USDA graders and other employees are
required to meet and maintain
Departmental ethics requirements;
therefore, AMS has determined that it is
unnecessary to maintain this
administrative item in this regulation.
AMS also proposes to remove and
reserve § 54.14 Official certificates,
which removes the Agricultural
Products Certificate Form LS–5–3 and
the Applicant Charges Certificate Form
LS–5–5 that were discontinued in 2009;
instead, the information contained on
these forms is entered into a database.
If applicants require an official
certificate from USDA, an official
memorandum is issued containing the
pertinent information.
In 2001, vision-based instrument
technology was approved for use in the
official determination of the size of the
ribeye area. In 2007, it was approved for
yield grade determination, and in 2009,
it was approved for marbling
assessment. Although this technology
has been used as an aid in the
application of official USDA beef grades
in since 2001, the current regulations
make no mention of it. AMS considers
the use of instrument technology to be
an important option for determining
degrees of marbling in meat carcasses
and yield and, therefore, is adding a
reference to it in § 54.15.
AMS proposes to appropriately
identify and reference figures within
§ 54.17. Currently, multiple figures in
that section contain the same reference,
Figure 1, which makes it difficult to
appropriately reference a particular
figure. AMS proposes to remove the
Carcass Data Service orange ear tag from
§ 54.17, because the Agency no longer
prints or maintains them and instead
allows cattle enrolled in the Carcass
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Feb 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
Data Service to be identified through
other approved methods. AMS proposes
to appropriately identify and reference
in § 54.17 the USDA Further Processing
Certification Program shield used to
identify product produced under the
USDA Further Processing Certification
Program. Additionally, AMS proposes
to amend language within this section to
accurately identify the USDA Hold tag
that is now used in place of the USDA
Product Control tag; the tag is now
‘‘red’’ in color as opposed to ‘‘orange.’’
With § 54.19, AMS proposes to
remove the heading APPEAL SERVICE,
rename § 54.19 as Appeal of a grading
service decision, reassign amended
language from §§ 54.20 through 54.26
under § 54.19 (a) through (h), and
subsequently reserve §§ 54.21 through
54.26.
AMS proposes to rename § 54.20,
Exemptions. The proposed amendments
would identify the requirements within
the regulation where exemptions are
most commonly provided and identify
an option for exemptions as seen fit by
the Director. It also would require the
Director to approve all exemptions to
this regulation. In doing so, AMS
proposes to amend language pertaining
to grading exemptions from §§ 54.4,
Kind of service, 54.5 Availability of
service, and 54.13, Accessibility and
refrigeration of products; access to
establishments.
AMS proposes to remove and reserve
§ 54.30 Errors in service. AMS proposes
that § 54.30 is most appropriately
covered under a policy or procedure
rather than a regulation; therefore, AMS
proposes that it is unnecessary to
maintain this administrative item in this
regulation.
Lastly, AMS proposes to replace the
title and language of § 54.31 Uniforms
with the title OMB Control Number.
AMS believes the subject of uniforms is
more appropriate under a policy rather
than a regulation. AMS proposes to add
language under this section that clearly
identifies the OMB control number,
OMB 0581–0128, assigned to this
regulation in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR 54
Food grades and standards, Food
labeling, Meat and meat products,
Poultry and poultry products.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, AMS proposes to amend 7
CFR 54 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1643
PART 7 CFR 54–MEATS, PREPARED
MEATS, AND MEAT PRODUCTS
(GRADING, CERTIFICATION, AND
STANDARDS)
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR 54
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.
2. Amend § 54.1 by:
a. Revising the definitions of
Administrator and Animals;
■ b. Adding in alphabetical order the
term Appeal service;
■ c. Revising the definitions of Branch
and Chief;
■ d. Removing the term and definition
for Contract verification service;
■ e. Adding in alphabetical order the
term Deputy Administrator;
■ f. Revising the definitions of Director,
Division, and Institutional Meat
Purchase Specifications;
■ g. Removing the term and definition
for Livestock;
■ h. Revising the definition of Meat byproducts;
■ i. Adding in alphabetical order the
terms Official standards and Program;
■ j. Revising the definition of Service;
■ k. Removing the term and definition
for Standards.
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
■
■
§ 54.1 Meaning of words and terms
defined.
*
*
*
*
*
Administrator. The Administrator of
the Agricultural Marketing Service
(AMS), or any officer or employee of the
AMS to whom authority has been or
may be delegated to act in the
Administrator’s stead.
*
*
*
*
*
Animals. Bison, cattle, goats, sheep,
swine, or other species identified by the
Administrator.
*
*
*
*
*
Appeal service. Appeal service is a
redetermination of the class, grade,
other quality, or compliance of product
when the applicant for the appeal
service formally challenges the
correctness of the original
determination.
*
*
*
*
*
Branch. The Grading Services Branch
of the Division.
*
*
*
*
*
Chief. The Chief of the Grading
Services Branch, or any officer or
employee of the Branch to whom
authority has been or may be delegated
to act in the Chief’s stead.
*
*
*
*
*
Deputy Administrator. The Deputy
Administrator of the Program, or any
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
1644
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2019 / Proposed Rules
other officer or employee of the Program
to whom authority has been or may be
delegated to act in the Deputy
Administrator’s stead.
Director. The Director of the Division,
or any officer or employee of the
Division to whom authority has been or
may be delegated to act in the Director’s
stead.
*
*
*
*
*
Division. The Quality Assessment
Division of the Livestock and Poultry
Program.
*
*
*
*
*
Institutional Meat Purchase
Specifications. Specifications describing
various meat cuts, meat products, and
meat food products derived from
species covered in the definition of
Animals above, commonly abbreviated
‘‘IMPS,’’ and intended for use by any
meat procuring activity. For labeling
purposes, only product certified by the
Grading Services Branch may contain
the letters IMPS on the product label.
*
*
*
*
*
Meat by-products. All edible parts,
other than meat and prepared meats,
and except as otherwise limited by 9
CFR 310.22, intended for human food,
derived from one or more animals, and
including but not limited to such organs
and parts as livers, kidneys,
sweetbreads, lungs, spleens, stomachs,
tripe, lips, snouts, and ears.
*
*
*
*
*
Official standards. Official standards
refer to the United States Standards for
Grades of Carcass Beef; the United
States Standards for Grades of Veal and
Calf Carcasses; the United States
Standards for Grades of Lamb, Yearling
Mutton, and Mutton Carcasses; and/or
the United States Standards for Grades
of Pork Carcasses.
*
*
*
*
*
Program. The Livestock and Poultry
Program of the Agricultural Marketing
Service.
Service. Services offered by the
Grading Services Branch such as
Grading Service, Certification Service,
and Carcass Data Service.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Revise § 54.4 to read as follows:
§ 54.4
Kind of service.
(a) Grading Service consists of the
determination, certification, and
identification of the class, grade, or
other quality attributes of products
under applicable official standards.
(b) Certification Service consists of
the determination, certification, and
identification of products to an
approved specification. Determination
of product compliance with
specifications for ingredient content or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Feb 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
method of preparation may be based
upon information received from the
inspection system having jurisdiction
over the products involved.
(c) Carcass Data Service consists of
the evaluation of carcass characteristics
of animals identified with an approved
ear tag to applicable official standards or
specifications, and the recording and
transmitting of the associated data to the
applicant or a party designated by the
applicant.
■ 4. Revise § 54.5 to read as follows:
§ 54.5
Availability of service.
Service under these regulations may
be made available to products shipped
or received in interstate commerce. It
also may be made available to the
products not shipped or received if the
Director or Chief determines that the
furnishing of service for such products
would facilitate the marketing,
distribution, processing, or utilization of
agricultural products through
commercial channels. Service will be
furnished for products only if they were
derived from animals slaughtered in
federally inspected establishments or
operated under state meat inspection in
a state other than one designated in 9
CFR 331.2. Service may be furnished for
imported meat only if an exemption to
do so is granted by the Director as
described in § 54.20.
■ 5. Revise § 54.6 to read as follows:
§ 54.6
How to obtain service.
(a) Application. Any person may
apply for service with respect to
products in which he or she has a
financial interest by completing the
required application for service. In any
case in which the service is intended to
be furnished at an establishment not
operated by the applicant, the
application shall be approved by the
operator of such establishment and such
approval shall constitute an
authorization for any employee of the
Department to enter the establishment
for the purpose of performing his or her
functions under the regulations. The
application shall include:
(1) Name and address of the
establishment at which service is
desired;
(2) Name and post office address of
the applicant;
(3) Financial interest of the applicant
in the products, except where
application is made by representative of
a Government agency in the
representative’s official capacity;
(4) Signature of the applicant (or the
signature and title of the applicant’s
representative);
(5) Indication of the legal status of the
applicant as an individual, partnership,
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
corporation, or other form of legal
entity; and
(6) The legal designation of the
applicant’s business as a small or large
business, as defined by the U.S. Small
Business Administration’s North
American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) Codes.
(b) Notice of eligibility for service. The
applicant will be notified whether the
application is approved or denied.
(c) Request by applicant for service:
(1) Noncommitment. Upon notification
of the approval of an application for
service, the applicant may, from time-totime as desired, make oral or written
requests for service to be furnished with
respect to specific products. Such
requests shall be made at an office for
grading either directly or through an
AMS employee.
(2) Commitment. If desired, the
applicant may request to enter into an
agreement with AMS to furnish service
on a weekly commitment basis, where
the applicant agrees to pay for 8 hours
of service per day, 5 days per week,
Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal legal holidays occurring
Monday through Friday on which no
grading and certification services are
performed, and AMS agrees to make an
official grader available to provide
service for the applicant. However, AMS
reserves the right to use any official
grader assigned to a commitment
applicant to perform service for other
applicants when, in the opinion of the
Chief, the official grader is not needed
to perform service for the commitment
applicant. In those instances, the
applicant will not be charged for the
work of the grader assigned to his or her
facility.
(3) If an applicant who terminates
commitment grading service requests
service again within a 2-year period
from the date of the initial termination,
the applicant will be responsible for all
relocation costs associated with the
grader assigned to fulfill the new service
agreement. If more than one applicant is
involved, expenses will be prorated
according to each applicant’s committed
portion of the official grader’s services.
■ 6. Revise § 54.7 to read as follows:
§ 54.7
Order of furnishing service.
Service shall be furnished to
applicants in the order in which
requests are received. Preference will be
given, when necessary, to requests made
by any government agency or any
regular user of the service, and to
requests for appeal service under
§ 54.19.
■ 7. Revise § 54.8 to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2019 / Proposed Rules
§ 54.8 When request for service deemed
made.
A request for service is considered
made when received by the designated
office as identified on the Application
for Service form. Records showing the
date and time of the request shall be
made and maintained in the designated
office.
■ 8. Revise § 54.9 to read as follows:
§ 54.9 Withdrawal of application or request
for service.
An application or a request for service
may be withdrawn by the applicant at
any time before the application is
approved or prior to performance of
service. In accordance with §§ 54.27 and
54.28, any expenses already incurred by
AMS in connection with the review of
an application or fulfilling a request for
service is the responsibility of the
applicant.
■ 9. Revise § 54.10 to read as follows:
§ 54.10
Authority of agent.
Proof that any person making an
application or a request for service on
behalf of any other person has the
authority to do so may be required at the
discretion of the Director or Chief.
■ 10. Amend § 54.11 by revising
paragraph (a)(1) introductory text, and
paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (iii), (vii),
(x), and (a)(2) to read as follows:
§ 54.11 Denial, conditional withdrawal, or
suspension of service.
(a) * * * (1) Basis for denial or
withdrawal. An application or a request
for service may be rejected, or the
benefits of the service may be otherwise
denied to, or withdrawn from, any
person who, or whose employee or
agent in the scope of the individual’s
employment or agency:
(i) Has willfully made any
misrepresentation or has committed any
other fraudulent or deceptive practice in
connection with any application or
request for service;
(ii) Has given or attempted to give, as
a loan or for any other purpose, any
money, favor, or other thing of value, to
any employee of the Department
authorized to perform any function;
(iii) Has interfered with or obstructed,
or attempted to interfere with or to
obstruct, any employee of the
Department in the performance of his or
her duties under the regulations by
intimidation, threats, assaults, abuse, or
any other improper means;
*
*
*
*
*
(vii) Has applied the designation
‘‘US’’ or ‘‘USDA’’ and ‘‘Prime,’’
‘‘Choice,’’ ‘‘Select,’’ ‘‘Good,’’
‘‘Standard,’’ ‘‘Commercial,’’ ‘‘Utility,’’
‘‘Cutter,’’ ‘‘Canner,’’ ‘‘Cull,’’ ‘‘No. 1,’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Feb 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
‘‘No. 2,’’ ‘‘No. 3,’’ ‘‘No. 4,’’ ‘‘Yield Grade
1,’’ ‘‘Yield Grade 2,’’ ‘‘Yield Grade 3,’’
‘‘Yield Grade 4,’’ ‘‘Yield Grade 5,’’
‘‘USDA Accepted as Specified,’’ by
stamp or text enclosed within a shield,
or brand directly on any carcass,
wholesale cut, or retail cut of any
carcass, or has applied the afore
mentioned designations including
‘‘USDA Certified,’’ and ‘‘USDA Further
Processing Certification Program’’ on
the marketing material associated with
any such product as part of a grade
designation or product specification;
*
*
*
*
*
(x) Has in any manner not specified
in this paragraph violated subsection
203(h) of the Act: Provided, that
paragraph (a)(1)(vi) of this section shall
not be deemed to be violated if the
person in possession of any item
mentioned therein notifies the Director
or Chief without delay that the person
has possession of such item and, in the
case of an official device, surrenders it
to the Chief, and, in the case of any
other item, surrenders it to the Director
or Chief or destroys it or brings it into
compliance with the regulations by
obliterating or removing the violative
features under supervision of the
Director or Chief: And provided further,
that paragraphs (a)(1) (ii) through (ix) of
this section shall not be deemed to be
violated by any act committed by any
person prior to the making of an
application of service under the
regulations by the principal person. An
application or a request for service may
be rejected or the benefits of the service
may be otherwise denied to, or
withdrawn from, any person who
operates an establishment for which that
person has made application for service
if, with the knowledge of such operator,
any other person conducting any
operations in such establishment has
committed any of the offenses specified
in paragraphs (a)(1) (i) through (x) of
this section after such application was
made. Moreover, an application or a
request for service made in the name of
a person otherwise eligible for service
under the regulations may be rejected,
or the benefits of the service may be
otherwise denied to, or withdrawn from,
such a person:
(A) In case the service is or would be
performed at an establishment operated:
(1) By a corporation, partnership, or
other person from whom the benefits of
the service are currently being withheld
under this paragraph; or
(2) By a corporation, partnership, or
other person having an officer, director,
partner, or substantial investor from
whom the benefits of the service are
currently being withheld and who has
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1645
any authority with respect to the
establishment where service is or would
be performed; or
(B) In case the service is or would be
performed with respect to any product
with which any corporation,
partnership, or other person within
paragraph (a)(1)(x)(A)(1) of this section
has a contract or other financial interest.
(2) Procedure. All cases arising under
this paragraph shall be initially
conducted in accordance with the
Supplemental Rules of Practice in part
50 of this chapter. Any issue unable to
be resolved under part 50 shall be
resolved or handled in accordance with
the Rules of Practice Governing Formal
Adjudicatory Proceedings Instituted by
the Secretary Under Various Statutes set
forth in §§ 1.130 through 1.151 of this
title.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 54.12
■
■
[Removed and Reserved]
11. Remove and reserve § 54.12.
12. Revise § 54.13 to read as follows:
§ 54.13 Accessibility and refrigeration of
products; access to establishments;
suitable work environment; and access to
records.
(a) The applicant shall make products
easily accessible for examination, with
appropriate and adequate illuminating
facilities, in order to disclose their class,
grade, other quality characteristics, and
compliance with official standards or
other contractual requirements for
which service is being provided.
Supervisors of grading and other
employees of the Department
responsible for maintaining uniformity
and accuracy of service shall have
access to all parts of establishments
covered by approved applications for
service under the regulations, for the
purpose of examining all products in
the establishments that have been or are
to be graded or examined for
compliance with specifications or
which bear any marks of grade or
compliance.
(b) Grading service will be furnished
only for meat that an official grader
determines is chilled so that grade
factors are developed to the extent that
a proper grade determination can be
made in accordance with the official
standards. Meat that is presented in a
frozen condition is not eligible for a
grade determination.
(c) Applicants are responsible for
providing a work environment where
official graders are not subjected to
physical and/or verbal abuse, or other
elements that could have a negative
effect on providing an unbiased, thirdparty evaluation. Applicants shall
designate primary company
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2019 / Proposed Rules
§ 54.14
representatives to discuss grade
placements and certification
determinations with official graders.
■
■
(d) Applicants will make products
and related records (approved labeling,
technical proposals, quality plans,
specifications, end product data
schedules, grade volume information,
etc.) easily accessible and provide
assistance and any equipment necessary
to accomplish the requested services.
Equipment may include storage lockers/
cabinets, branding ink, certified scales,
food blenders, processors, grinders,
sampling containers, sanitation
equipment, thermometers, adequate
lighting, weight tags, display monitors,
video equipment for monitoring live
animal schedules, etc. When offering
product for grading or certification,
applicants must ensure a minimum of
90 percent acceptable product.
[Removed and reserved]
13. Remove and reserve § 54.14.
14. Revise § 54.15 to read as follows:
§ 54.15
Instrument grading.
(e) Applicants will provide a metal
cabinet(s) or locker(s) for the secure
storage of official meat grading
equipment and identification devices
for each official meat grader assigned to
their establishment. Such cabinet(s) or
locker(s) must be capable of being
locked with a Government-owned lock
and be located in an easily-accessible
and secure location within the
applicant’s establishment.
(a) Applicants may use USDAapproved technologies to augment the
official USDA grading process for
approved species presented for official
grading. This voluntary program may be
utilized by a plant at its discretion but
must comply with QAD procedures to
be recognized and relied upon by the
official grader in conducting official
duties.
(b) Applicants have the option to
augment quality and yield grading
services through the use of vision-based
instrument technology. Instrument
grading may be used as an option for
determining degrees of marbling and
yield factors for meat carcasses. AMS
approves the grading instrument itself
and its use within individual applicant
facilities. Applicants may contact
grading supervision to initiate the
process for in-plant approval. The
process for instrument grading approval
at an applicant’s facility is dictated
through internal procedures. Final
determination of quality and yield
grades is made by the official grader.
■ 15. Revise § 54.16 to read as follows:
(b) A shield enclosing the letters
‘‘USDA’’ as shown in Figure 2 to
paragraph (b) with the appropriate
quality grade designation ‘‘Prime,’’
‘‘Choice,’’ ‘‘Select,’’ ‘‘Good,’’
‘‘Standard,’’ ‘‘Commercial,’’ ‘‘Utility,’’
‘‘Cutter,’’ ‘‘Canner,’’ or ‘‘Cull,’’ as
provided in the United States Standards
for Grades of Carcass Beef, the United
States Standards for Grades of Veal and
Calf Carcasses, and the United States
Standards for Grades of Lamb, Yearling
Mutton, and Mutton Carcasses; and
accompanied by the class designation
‘‘Bullock,’’ ‘‘Veal,’’ ‘‘Calf,’’ ‘‘Lamb,’’
‘‘Yearling Mutton,’’ or ‘‘Mutton,’’
constitutes a form of official
identification under the regulations to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Feb 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 54.16
Marking of products.
All products examined for class and
grade under the official standards, or the
immediate containers and the shipping
containers, shall be stamped, branded,
or otherwise marked with an
appropriate official identification.
Except as otherwise directed by the
Director, such markings will not be
required when an applicant desires only
an official memorandum. The marking
of products, or their containers, as
required by this section shall be done by
official graders or under their immediate
supervision.
■ 16. Revise § 54.17 to read as follows:
§ 54.17
Official identifications.
(a) A shield enclosing the letters
‘‘USDA’’ and identification letters
assigned to the grader performing the
service, as shown in Figure 1 to
paragraph (a), constitutes a form of
official identification under the
regulations for preliminary grade of
carcasses. This form of official
identification may also be used to
determine the final quality grade of
carcasses; one stamp equates to ‘‘USDA
Select’’ or ‘‘USDA Good’’; two stamps
placed together vertically equates to
‘‘USDA Choice’’; and three stamps
placed together vertically equates to
‘‘USDA Prime.’’
show the quality grade, and where
necessary, the class, under said
standards, of steer, heifer, and cow beef,
veal, calf, lamb, yearling mutton, and
mutton. The identification letters
assigned to the grader performing the
service will appear underneath and
outside of the shield.
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
EP05FE19.000
1646
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2019 / Proposed Rules
1647
Standards for Grades of Lamb, Yearling
Mutton, and Mutton Carcasses,
constitutes a form of official
identification under the regulations to
show the yield grade under said
standards. When yield graded, bull and
bullock carcasses will be identified with
the class designation ‘‘Bull’’ and
‘‘Bullock,’’ respectively. The
identification letters assigned to the
grader performing the service will
appear underneath and outside of the
shield.
(d) For combined quality and yield
grade identification purposes only, a
shield enclosing the letters ‘‘US’’ on one
side and ‘‘DA’’ on the other, with the
appropriate yield grade designation
number ‘‘1,’’ ‘‘2,’’ ‘‘3,’’ ‘‘4,’’ or ‘‘5,’’ and
with the appropriate quality grade
designation of ‘‘Prime,’’ ‘‘Choice,’’
‘‘Select,’’ ‘‘Good,’’ ‘‘Standard,’’
‘‘Commercial,’’ ‘‘Utility,’’ ‘‘Cutter,’’
‘‘Canner,’’ or ‘‘Cull’’ shown in Figure 4
to paragraph (d) constitutes a form of
official identification under the
regulations to show the quality and
yield grade under said standards. The
identification letters assigned to the
grader performing the service will
appear underneath and outside of the
shield.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Feb 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
EP05FE19.001
EP05FE19.002
(c) A shield enclosing the letters
‘‘USDA’’ and the words ‘‘Yield Grade,’’
as in Figure 3 to paragraph (c), with the
appropriate yield grade designation ‘‘1,’’
‘‘2,’’ ‘‘3,’’ ‘‘4,’’ or ‘‘5’’ as provided in the
United States Standards for Grades of
Carcass Beef and the United States
1648
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2019 / Proposed Rules
number ‘‘1,’’ ‘‘2,’’ ‘‘3,’’ ‘‘4,’’ or ‘‘5’’ as
shown in Figure 5 to paragraph (e)
constitutes a form of official
identification under the regulations to
show the yield grade under said
standards. The identification letters
assigned to the grader performing the
service will appear underneath and
outside of the shield.
(f) For quality grade identification
only, a shield enclosing the letters ‘‘US’’
on one side and ‘‘DA’’ on the other with
the appropriate quality grade
designation of ‘‘Prime,’’ ‘‘Choice,’’
‘‘Select,’’ ‘‘Good,’’ ‘‘Standard,’’
‘‘Commercial,’’ ‘‘Utility,’’ ‘‘Cutter,’’
‘‘Canner,’’ or ‘‘Cull’’ as shown in Figure
6 to paragraph (f) constitutes a form of
official identification under the
regulations to show the yield grade
under said standards. The identification
letters assigned to the grader performing
the service will appear underneath and
outside of the shield.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Feb 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
EP05FE19.003
EP05FE19.004
(e) Under the regulations, for yield
grade identification purposes only, a
shield enclosing the letters ‘‘US’’ on one
side and ‘‘DA’’ on the other, and with
the appropriate yield grade designation
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2019 / Proposed Rules
as provided in the Official United States
Standards for Grades of Pork Carcasses,
constitutes a form of official
identification under the regulations to
(h) The following constitute forms of
official identification under the
regulations to show compliance of
products:
show the grade under said standards of
barrow, gilt, and sow pork carcasses.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Feb 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
EP05FE19.005
EP05FE19.006
(g) The letters ‘‘USDA’’ with the
appropriate grade designation ‘‘1,’’ ‘‘2,’’
‘‘3,’’ ‘‘4,’’ ‘‘Utility,’’ enclosed in a shield
as shown in Figure 7 to paragraph (g),
1649
1650
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2019 / Proposed Rules
identification to show quality system
certification.
(j) The following, as shown in Figure
11 to paragraph (j), constitutes official
identification to show that products
produced under USDA AMS
supervision that meet specified
requirements may carry the ‘‘USDA
Certified’’ statement and/or ‘‘USDA
Certified’’ shield, so long as each is used
in direct association with a clear
description of the standard or other
requirement(s) to which the product
claims to be certified.
(1) The ‘‘USDA Certified’’ shield must
replicate the form and design of the
example in Figure 11 and must be
printed legibly and conspicuously:
(i) On a white background, with the
term ‘‘USDA’’ in white overlaying a blue
upper third of the shield and the term
‘‘Certified’’ in black overlaying a white
middle third of the shield, with no
terms in the red lower third of the
shield; or
(ii) On a white or transparent
background with a black trimmed
shield, with the term ‘‘USDA’’ in white
overlaying a black upper third of the
shield and the term ‘‘Certified’’ in black
overlaying the white or transparent
remaining two-thirds of the shield.
(2) Use of the ‘‘USDA Certified’’
statement and the ‘‘USDA Certified’’
shield shall be approved in writing by
the Director prior to use by an applicant.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Feb 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
EP05FE19.007
EP05FE19.008
(i) The following, as shown in Figure
10 to paragraph (i), constitutes official
(k) The following, as shown in Figure
12 to paragraph (k), constitutes official
identification to show product or
services produced under an approved
USDA Further Processing Certification
Program (FPCP):
(1) Products produced under an
approved USDA FPCP may use the
‘‘USDA Further Processing Certification
Program’’ statement and the ‘‘USDA
Further Processing Certification
Program’’ shield, and
(2) The USDA Further Processing
Certification Program shield must
replicate the form and design of the
example in Figure 12 and must be
printed legibly and conspicuously:
(i) On a white background, with the
term ‘‘USDA’’ in white overlaying a blue
upper third of the shield and the terms
‘‘USDA Further Processing Certification
Program’’ in black overlaying a white
middle third of the shield, with no
terms in the red lower third of the
shield; or
(ii) On a white or transparent
background with a black trimmed
shield, with the term ‘‘USDA’’ in white
overlaying a black upper third of the
shield and the terms ‘‘USDA Further
Processing Certification Program’’ in
black overlaying the white or
transparent remaining two-thirds of the
shield.
(3) Use of the ‘‘USDA Further
Processing Certification Program’’
statement and the ‘‘USDA Further
Processing Certification Program’’ shield
shall be approved in writing by the
Director prior to use by an applicant.
(l)(1) One device used by official
graders is the LP–36 Form, a
rectangular, serially numbered, red tag
on which a shield encloses the words
‘‘USDA Hold,’’ constitutes a form of
official identification under the
regulations for meat and meat products.
(2) Official graders and supervisors of
grading may use ‘‘USDA Hold’’ tags or
other methods and devices as approved
by the Administrator for the
identification and control of meat and
meat products that are not in
compliance with the regulations or are
held pending the results of an
examination. Any such meat or meat
product identified shall not be used,
moved, or altered in any manner; nor
shall official control identification be
removed, without the expressed
permission of an authorized
representative of the USDA.
■ 17. Revise § 54.18 to read as follows:
§ 54.19 Appeal of a grading service
decision.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Feb 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
§ 54.18
Custody of identification devices.
All identification devices used in
marking products or their containers,
including those indicating compliance
with approved specifications, shall be
kept in the custody of the Branch, and
accurate records shall be kept by the
Branch of all such devices. Such devices
shall be distributed only to persons
authorized by the Department, who will
keep the devices in their possession or
control at all times.
■ 18. Remove undesignated center
heading APPEAL SERVICE.
■ 19. Revise § 54.19 to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Appeal service is a redetermination of
the class, grade, other quality, or
compliance of product when the
applicant for the appeal service formally
challenges the correctness of the
original determination.
(a) Authority to request appeal
service. A request for appeal service
with respect to any product may be
made by any person who is financially
interested in the product when that
person disagrees with the original
determination as to class, grade, other
quality, or compliance of the product as
shown by the markings on the product
or its containers, or as stated in the
applicable official memorandum.
(b)Requesting appeal service. A
request for appeal service shall be filed
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
EP05FE19.010
1651
EP05FE19.009
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2019 / Proposed Rules
1652
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2019 / Proposed Rules
with the Chief. The request shall state
the reasons for appeal and may be
accompanied by a copy of any previous
official report, or any other information
that the applicant may have received
regarding the product at the time of the
original service. Such request may be
made orally (including by telephone) or
in writing (including by email). If made
orally, the person receiving the request
may require that it be confirmed in
writing.
(c) Determining original service from
appeal service. Examination requested
to determine the class, grade, other
quality, or compliance of a product that
has been altered or has undergone a
material change since the original
service, or examination of product
requested for the purpose of obtaining
an official memorandum and not
involving any question as to the
correctness of the original service for the
product involved shall be considered
equivalent to original service and not
appeal service.
(d) Not eligible for appeal service.
Grade determinations cannot be
appealed for any lot or product
consisting of less than 10 similar units
or carcasses. Moreover, appeal service
will not be furnished with respect to
product that has been altered or has
undergone any material change since
the original service.
(e) Withdrawal of appeal service. A
request for appeal service may be
withdrawn by the applicant at any time
before the appeal service has been
performed; however, the applicant is
responsible for payment of any expenses
incurred by the Branch towards
providing the appeal service prior to
withdrawal.
(f) Denial or withdrawal of appeal
service. A request for appeal service
may be rejected or such service may be
otherwise denied to or withdrawn from
any person, without a hearing, in
accordance with the procedure set forth
in § 54.11(b), if it appears that the
person or product involved is not
eligible for appeal service under
§ 54.19(a) and (b), or that the identity of
the product has been lost; or for any of
the causes set forth in § 54.11(b). Appeal
service may also be denied to, or
withdrawn from, any person in any case
under § 54.11(a).
(g) Who performs appeal service.
Appeal service shall be performed by
the National Meat Supervisor or his or
her designee.
(h) Appeal service report.
Immediately after appeal service has
been performed for any products, a
report shall be prepared and issued
referring specifically to the original
findings and stating the class, grade,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Feb 04, 2019
Jkt 247001
other quality, or compliance of the
products as shown by the appeal
service.
■ 20. Revise § 54.20 to read as follows:
§ 54.20
Exemptions.
Any exemption to the regulations
must be approved by the Director.
Exemptions may include but are not
limited to:
(a) Grading the meat of animals in
other than carcass form if the class,
grade, and other quality attributes may
be determined under the applicable
standards.
(b) Grading in an establishment other
than where the animal was slaughtered
or initially chilled if the class, grade,
and other quality attributes can be
determined under the applicable
standards, and if the identity of the
carcasses can be maintained.
(c) If the Branch is unable to provide
grading service in a timely manner and
the meat can be identified in
conformance with the standards.
(d) Grading in the establishment other
than where the hide is removed,
provided the meat can be identified in
conformance with the standards.
(e) Grading meat of imported animals,
provided:
(1) The imported meat is marked so
that the name of the country of origin
is conspicuous to the USDA grader. The
mark of foreign origin shall be
imprinted by roller brand, handstamp,
tag, or other approved method.
(2) The imprints of the mark of foreign
origin have been submitted to the Chief
for the determination of compliance
with these regulations prior to use on
meats offered for Federal grading.
(3) The applicant notifies the official
grader performing the service whenever
imported meat is offered for grading.
(f) For good cause and provided that
the meat can be identified in
conformance with the standards.
§§ 54.21–54.26
[Removed and reserved]
21. Remove and reserve §§ 54.21
through 54.26.
■
§ 54.30
■
■
[Removed and reserved]
22. Remove and reserve § 54.30.
23. Revise § 54.31 to read as follows:
§ 54.31
OMB control number.
The information collection and
recordkeeping requirements of this part
have been approved by OMB under 44
U.S.C. Chapter 35 and have been
assigned OMB Control Number 0581–
0128.
Dated: January 29, 2019.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2019–00869 Filed 2–4–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 431
[EERE–2018–BT–STD–0003]
Appliance Standards and Rulemaking
Federal Advisory Committee:
Notification of Public Meetings for the
Variable Refrigerant Flow Multi-Split
Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps
Working Group To Negotiate a Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking for Test
Procedures and Energy Conservation
Standards
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notification of public meetings
and webinar.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE or the Department)
announces public meetings for the
variable refrigerant flow multi-split air
conditioners and heat pumps (VRF
multi-split systems) working group. The
Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA) requires that agencies publish
notice of an advisory committee meeting
in the Federal Register.
DATES: DOE will hold a public meeting
on Thursday, February 21, 2019 from
9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and on Friday,
February 22, 2019 from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00
p.m. in Washington, DC. The meetings
will also be broadcast as a webinar.
ADDRESSES: The public meetings will be
held at Federal Mediation &
Conciliation Services, Room 7008, 250 E
Street, SW, Washington, DC 20427.
Please see the PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
section of this notification for additional
information on attending the public
meeting, including webinar registration
information, participant instructions,
and information about the capabilities
available to webinar participants.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Cymbalsky, U.S. Department of Energy,
Office of Building Technologies (EE–
5B), 950 L’Enfant Plaza, SW,
Washington, DC 20024. Telephone:
(202) 287–1692. Email: ASRAC@
ee.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 10, 2018, the Appliance
Standards and Rulemaking Federal
Advisory Committee (ASRAC) met and
passed the recommendation to form a
VRF multi-split systems working group
to meet and discuss and, if possible,
reach a consensus on proposed Federal
test procedures and standards for VRF
multi-split systems. On April 11, 2018,
DOE published a notification of intent
to establish a working group for VRF
multi-split systems to negotiate a notice
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 24 (Tuesday, February 5, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 1641-1652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00869]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2019 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 1641]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 54
[No. AMS-LP-16-0080]
Amendments to the Regulations Governing Meats, Prepared Meats,
and Meat Products (Grading, Certification, and Standards)
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) proposes to amend its regulations to update a
number of outdated administrative and organizational references,
clarify agency action as it relates to the withdrawal or denial of
service, update the official shields and grademarks associated with the
grading service, and make reference to the use of instrument grading
equipment as a means of determining official grades on beef and lamb
carcasses.
DATES: Comments must be received by April 8, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be submitted electronically at
www.regulations.gov. Comments may also be submitted to: Dana K. Stahl,
Chief, Grading Services Branch, Quality Assessment Division (QAD);
Livestock and Poultry Program, AMS, USDA; 1400 Independence Avenue SW;
Room 3932-S, STOP 0258; Washington, DC 20250-0258. Comments will be
made available for public inspection at Room 3932-S of the above
address during regular business hours or electronically at
www.regulations.gov. Comments received will be posted without change,
including any personal information provided. All comments should
reference the docket number AMS-LP-16-0080, the date of submission, and
the page number of this issue of the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dana K. Stahl, Chief, Grading Services
Branch, QAD, Livestock and Poultry Program, AMS, USDA; 1400
Independence Avenue SW; Room 3932-S, STOP 0258; Washington, DC 20250-
0258; (202) 690-3169; or email to dana.stahl@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Orders 12866 and 13771, and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rulemaking does not meet the definition of a significant
regulatory action contained in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
and is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Additionally, because this rule does not meet the definition of
a significant regulatory action it does not trigger the requirements
contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum titled
``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order of
January 30, 2017, titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs''' (February 2, 2017).
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) [5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.], the Administrator of AMS
has considered the economic effect of this action on small entities and
has determined that this proposed rule does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small business entities. The
purpose of RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses
subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be
unduly burdened.
AMS has determined that this proposed rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities, as
defined by RFA, because the user-fee services are not subject to
scalability based on the business size.
Currently, approximately 235 applicants subscribe to AMS's
voluntary, fee-for-services that are subject to the requirements of
this regulation. The U.S. Small Business Administration's Table of
Small Business Size Standards matched to the North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) Codes identifies small business size by
average annual receipts or by the average number of employees at a
firm. This information can be found at 13 CFR parts 121.104, 121.106,
and 121.201.
AMS requires that all applicants for service provide information
about their company for the purpose of processing bills. Information
collected from an applicant includes company name, address, billing
address, and similar information. AMS does not collect information
about the size of the business. However, based on working knowledge of
these operations, AMS estimates that roughly 72 percent of current
applicants may be classified as small entities. It is not anticipated
that this action would impose additional costs to applicants,
regardless of size. Current applicants will not be required to provide
any additional information to receive service. The effects of this
proposed rule are not expected to be disproportionately greater or
lesser for small applicants than for large applicants.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act of 2002 to
promote the use of the internet and other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for citizen access to government
information and services, and for other purposes. Accordingly, AMS
developed options for companies requesting service to do so
electronically.
The USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule.
Executive Order 13175
This action has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements
of Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments. The review reveals that this regulation would not
have substantial and direct effects on Tribal governments and would not
have significant Tribal implications.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This proposed rule is not intended to have
retroactive effect. The Act prohibits states or political subdivisions
of a state to impose any requirement that is in addition to, or
inconsistent with, any requirement of the Act. There are no civil
justice implications associated with this proposed rule.
[[Page 1642]]
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 [44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35], this proposed rule would not change the information
collection and recordkeeping requirements previously approved and would
not impose additional reporting or recordkeeping burden on users of
these voluntary services.
The information collection and recordkeeping requirements of this
part have been approved by OMB under 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35 and have been
assigned OMB Control Number 0581-0128.
In September 2014, three separate OMB collections--OMB 0581-0127,
OMB 0581-0124, and OMB 0581-0128--were merged, such that the current
OMB 0581-0128 pertains to Regulations for Voluntary Grading,
Certification, and Standards and includes 7 CFR parts 54, 56, 62, and
70.
Background and Proposed Revisions
The Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.),
herein after referred to as the ``Act,'' directs and authorizes the
Secretary of Agriculture to facilitate the competitive and efficient
marketing of agricultural products. AMS programs support a strategic
marketing perspective that adapts product and marketing decisions to
consumer demands, changes domestic and international marketing
practices, and incorporates emerging technology. AMS provides impartial
grading and certification services that ensure agricultural products
meet specified requirements. These services are voluntary, with users
paying for the cost of the requested service. AMS grading services
verify that product meets USDA grade standards (e.g., USDA Choice) and
certify that products meet requirements defined by the company or
another third-party. Product characteristics such as manner of cut,
color, and other quality attributes can be directly examined by an AMS
employee or an authorized agent to determine if product requirements
have been met. The product can be identified as ``USDA Prime,'' ``USDA
Choice,'' ``USDA Select,'' ``USDA Certified,'' ``USDA Accepted as
Specified,'' or ``USDA Further Processing Certification Program.''
Administrative and Organizational Revisions
In 2012, an organizational merger within AMS combined the Livestock
and Seed Program and Poultry Programs into the Livestock, Poultry, and
Seed (LPS) Program. Subsequently, the LPS Program created the Quality
Assessment Division (QAD) to oversee services carried out by the Audit
Services Branch, Grading Services Branch, Standardization Branch, and
the Business Operations Branch. The Grading Services Branch administers
grading and certification services that were performed by the former
Meat Grading and Certification Branch of the former Livestock and Seed
Program and the former Grading Branch of Poultry Programs. In 2018,
another organizational change caused the LPS Program to be renamed the
Livestock and Poultry (LP) Program.
Meat grading and certification activities are carried out under 7
CFR 54, while poultry and shell egg grading and certification
activities are carried out under 7 CFR 70 and 7 CFR 56, respectively.
AMS proposes to update a number of administrative and
organizational references to reflect the current terminology and
structure of AMS. These amendments would include amending Sec. 54.1 to
change the LPS Program to the Livestock and Poultry Program. Certain
terms and definitions would be added to, updated in, or deleted from
Sec. 54.1 to reflect the current organizational structure within the
Agency. The term and definition for Livestock would be removed from the
regulation because the use of this definition was fundamentally the
same as the definition of Animals. The term and definitions for
Contract Verification Service would be removed from Sec. 54.1 because
this service is no longer provided, a conforming change would be made
to Sec. 54.4 Kind of Service. The definition for Animals would be
revised to add ``bison,'' as the Agency certifies bison; Chief would be
revised to identify the Grading Services Branch Chief; Division would
be revised to identify QAD and appropriately reflect its level within
the organization; Meat by-products would be revised to exclude brain
derived from ruminant animals, which is no longer allowed per food
safety regulations; and the term Standards would be replaced with
Official Standards and its definition would be revised for consistency
within the regulation. The terms Yield Grade and Appeal Service and
their respective definitions would be added to identify the different
types of grading service offered under the regulations. The terms
Program and Deputy Administrator and their respective definitions would
be added to appropriately recognize the office and leadership within
the current organizational structure of the Agency.
Since this regulation has not received significant revisions for
some time, AMS proposes to bring it into compliance with The Plain
Writing Act of 2010, which requires all Federal agencies to write clear
Government communication that the public can understand and use. To
accomplish this, AMS is focusing on appropriate pronoun use, omitting
unnecessary words, and writing short sentences.
To reflect organizational changes and for consistency with other
changes to this regulation, AMS proposes to amend Sec. 54.4 Kind of
Service, Sec. 54.6 How to Obtain Service, Sec. 54.7 Order of
Furnishing Service, Sec. 54.8 When Request for Service Deemed Made,
Sec. 54.9 Withdrawal of Application or Request for Service, and Sec.
54.10 Authority of Agent.
AMS also proposes to amend Sec. 54.5 Availability of Service by
removing language that states service will be provided without
discrimination, as this is a duplicative statement of a requirement
that is mandated through Departmental regulations, not by AMS. AMS
proposes to amend Sec. 54.6 How to obtain service by increasing the
length of time between cancellation of commitment service and
reapplication for commitment service from 1 to 2 years, and the
applicant is responsible for reimbursing relocation costs incurred by
the Agency to transfer the grader.
AMS proposes to remove the reference to the Medium grade for lamb,
yearling lamb, mutton, and pork carcasses in Sec. 54.11 (a)(1)(vii).
The official standards for grades of lamb and mutton carcasses were
amended in October 1940 (Amendment No. 1 to S.R.A. 123) to change the
grade designations Medium and Common to Commercial and Utility,
respectively. In April 1968, the official standards for pork carcasses
were revised and the former Medium and Cull grades were combined and
renamed U.S. Utility. Removing the reference to Medium in Sec. 54.11
(a)(1)(vii) aligns the regulatory language with the language contained
within the official standards.
Clarify Agency Action on Denial or Withdrawal of Service
AMS proposes to create a stair-stepped approach regarding denial or
withdrawal of Grading Branch services. As written, Sec. 54.11 requires
AMS to go before an administrative law judge to hear a case for an
applicant accused of misconduct before any action can be taken; the
process and actions currently identified in this part limit AMS's
ability to effectively manage its services, including denying,
withdrawing, or suspending services in a timely manner when warranted
for reasons of
[[Page 1643]]
misconduct. Therefore, AMS is clarifying that it relies first on the
Supplemental Rules of Practice in 7 CFR 50 and then, if necessary, uses
the Rules of Practice Governing Formal Adjudicatory Proceedings
Instituted by the Secretary Under Various Statues set forth in 7 CFR
1.130 through 1.151 when denying, withdrawing, or suspending services
to applicants. An applicant would still have an opportunity for a
hearing before an administrative law judge before any permanent action
occurs.
The regulations outlined in this part are intended to describe to
the public how AMS provides grading and certification services and the
related processes, not provide instruction to employees or repeat
requirements covered by another Federal regulation. In this vein, AMS
proposes to remove and reserve for future use Sec. 54.12 Financial
interest of official grader. USDA graders and other employees are
required to meet and maintain Departmental ethics requirements;
therefore, AMS has determined that it is unnecessary to maintain this
administrative item in this regulation. AMS also proposes to remove and
reserve Sec. 54.14 Official certificates, which removes the
Agricultural Products Certificate Form LS-5-3 and the Applicant Charges
Certificate Form LS-5-5 that were discontinued in 2009; instead, the
information contained on these forms is entered into a database. If
applicants require an official certificate from USDA, an official
memorandum is issued containing the pertinent information.
In 2001, vision-based instrument technology was approved for use in
the official determination of the size of the ribeye area. In 2007, it
was approved for yield grade determination, and in 2009, it was
approved for marbling assessment. Although this technology has been
used as an aid in the application of official USDA beef grades in since
2001, the current regulations make no mention of it. AMS considers the
use of instrument technology to be an important option for determining
degrees of marbling in meat carcasses and yield and, therefore, is
adding a reference to it in Sec. 54.15.
AMS proposes to appropriately identify and reference figures within
Sec. 54.17. Currently, multiple figures in that section contain the
same reference, Figure 1, which makes it difficult to appropriately
reference a particular figure. AMS proposes to remove the Carcass Data
Service orange ear tag from Sec. 54.17, because the Agency no longer
prints or maintains them and instead allows cattle enrolled in the
Carcass Data Service to be identified through other approved methods.
AMS proposes to appropriately identify and reference in Sec. 54.17 the
USDA Further Processing Certification Program shield used to identify
product produced under the USDA Further Processing Certification
Program. Additionally, AMS proposes to amend language within this
section to accurately identify the USDA Hold tag that is now used in
place of the USDA Product Control tag; the tag is now ``red'' in color
as opposed to ``orange.''
With Sec. 54.19, AMS proposes to remove the heading APPEAL
SERVICE, rename Sec. 54.19 as Appeal of a grading service decision,
reassign amended language from Sec. Sec. 54.20 through 54.26 under
Sec. 54.19 (a) through (h), and subsequently reserve Sec. Sec. 54.21
through 54.26.
AMS proposes to rename Sec. 54.20, Exemptions. The proposed
amendments would identify the requirements within the regulation where
exemptions are most commonly provided and identify an option for
exemptions as seen fit by the Director. It also would require the
Director to approve all exemptions to this regulation. In doing so, AMS
proposes to amend language pertaining to grading exemptions from
Sec. Sec. 54.4, Kind of service, 54.5 Availability of service, and
54.13, Accessibility and refrigeration of products; access to
establishments.
AMS proposes to remove and reserve Sec. 54.30 Errors in service.
AMS proposes that Sec. 54.30 is most appropriately covered under a
policy or procedure rather than a regulation; therefore, AMS proposes
that it is unnecessary to maintain this administrative item in this
regulation.
Lastly, AMS proposes to replace the title and language of Sec.
54.31 Uniforms with the title OMB Control Number. AMS believes the
subject of uniforms is more appropriate under a policy rather than a
regulation. AMS proposes to add language under this section that
clearly identifies the OMB control number, OMB 0581-0128, assigned to
this regulation in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR 54
Food grades and standards, Food labeling, Meat and meat products,
Poultry and poultry products.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, AMS proposes to amend 7
CFR 54 as follows:
PART 7 CFR 54-MEATS, PREPARED MEATS, AND MEAT PRODUCTS (GRADING,
CERTIFICATION, AND STANDARDS)
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR 54 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627.
0
2. Amend Sec. 54.1 by:
0
a. Revising the definitions of Administrator and Animals;
0
b. Adding in alphabetical order the term Appeal service;
0
c. Revising the definitions of Branch and Chief;
0
d. Removing the term and definition for Contract verification service;
0
e. Adding in alphabetical order the term Deputy Administrator;
0
f. Revising the definitions of Director, Division, and Institutional
Meat Purchase Specifications;
0
g. Removing the term and definition for Livestock;
0
h. Revising the definition of Meat by-products;
0
i. Adding in alphabetical order the terms Official standards and
Program;
0
j. Revising the definition of Service;
0
k. Removing the term and definition for Standards.
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 54.1 Meaning of words and terms defined.
* * * * *
Administrator. The Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS), or any officer or employee of the AMS to whom authority
has been or may be delegated to act in the Administrator's stead.
* * * * *
Animals. Bison, cattle, goats, sheep, swine, or other species
identified by the Administrator.
* * * * *
Appeal service. Appeal service is a redetermination of the class,
grade, other quality, or compliance of product when the applicant for
the appeal service formally challenges the correctness of the original
determination.
* * * * *
Branch. The Grading Services Branch of the Division.
* * * * *
Chief. The Chief of the Grading Services Branch, or any officer or
employee of the Branch to whom authority has been or may be delegated
to act in the Chief's stead.
* * * * *
Deputy Administrator. The Deputy Administrator of the Program, or
any
[[Page 1644]]
other officer or employee of the Program to whom authority has been or
may be delegated to act in the Deputy Administrator's stead.
Director. The Director of the Division, or any officer or employee
of the Division to whom authority has been or may be delegated to act
in the Director's stead.
* * * * *
Division. The Quality Assessment Division of the Livestock and
Poultry Program.
* * * * *
Institutional Meat Purchase Specifications. Specifications
describing various meat cuts, meat products, and meat food products
derived from species covered in the definition of Animals above,
commonly abbreviated ``IMPS,'' and intended for use by any meat
procuring activity. For labeling purposes, only product certified by
the Grading Services Branch may contain the letters IMPS on the product
label.
* * * * *
Meat by-products. All edible parts, other than meat and prepared
meats, and except as otherwise limited by 9 CFR 310.22, intended for
human food, derived from one or more animals, and including but not
limited to such organs and parts as livers, kidneys, sweetbreads,
lungs, spleens, stomachs, tripe, lips, snouts, and ears.
* * * * *
Official standards. Official standards refer to the United States
Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef; the United States Standards for
Grades of Veal and Calf Carcasses; the United States Standards for
Grades of Lamb, Yearling Mutton, and Mutton Carcasses; and/or the
United States Standards for Grades of Pork Carcasses.
* * * * *
Program. The Livestock and Poultry Program of the Agricultural
Marketing Service.
Service. Services offered by the Grading Services Branch such as
Grading Service, Certification Service, and Carcass Data Service.
* * * * *
0
3. Revise Sec. 54.4 to read as follows:
Sec. 54.4 Kind of service.
(a) Grading Service consists of the determination, certification,
and identification of the class, grade, or other quality attributes of
products under applicable official standards.
(b) Certification Service consists of the determination,
certification, and identification of products to an approved
specification. Determination of product compliance with specifications
for ingredient content or method of preparation may be based upon
information received from the inspection system having jurisdiction
over the products involved.
(c) Carcass Data Service consists of the evaluation of carcass
characteristics of animals identified with an approved ear tag to
applicable official standards or specifications, and the recording and
transmitting of the associated data to the applicant or a party
designated by the applicant.
0
4. Revise Sec. 54.5 to read as follows:
Sec. 54.5 Availability of service.
Service under these regulations may be made available to products
shipped or received in interstate commerce. It also may be made
available to the products not shipped or received if the Director or
Chief determines that the furnishing of service for such products would
facilitate the marketing, distribution, processing, or utilization of
agricultural products through commercial channels. Service will be
furnished for products only if they were derived from animals
slaughtered in federally inspected establishments or operated under
state meat inspection in a state other than one designated in 9 CFR
331.2. Service may be furnished for imported meat only if an exemption
to do so is granted by the Director as described in Sec. 54.20.
0
5. Revise Sec. 54.6 to read as follows:
Sec. 54.6 How to obtain service.
(a) Application. Any person may apply for service with respect to
products in which he or she has a financial interest by completing the
required application for service. In any case in which the service is
intended to be furnished at an establishment not operated by the
applicant, the application shall be approved by the operator of such
establishment and such approval shall constitute an authorization for
any employee of the Department to enter the establishment for the
purpose of performing his or her functions under the regulations. The
application shall include:
(1) Name and address of the establishment at which service is
desired;
(2) Name and post office address of the applicant;
(3) Financial interest of the applicant in the products, except
where application is made by representative of a Government agency in
the representative's official capacity;
(4) Signature of the applicant (or the signature and title of the
applicant's representative);
(5) Indication of the legal status of the applicant as an
individual, partnership, corporation, or other form of legal entity;
and
(6) The legal designation of the applicant's business as a small or
large business, as defined by the U.S. Small Business Administration's
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Codes.
(b) Notice of eligibility for service. The applicant will be
notified whether the application is approved or denied.
(c) Request by applicant for service: (1) Noncommitment. Upon
notification of the approval of an application for service, the
applicant may, from time-to-time as desired, make oral or written
requests for service to be furnished with respect to specific products.
Such requests shall be made at an office for grading either directly or
through an AMS employee.
(2) Commitment. If desired, the applicant may request to enter into
an agreement with AMS to furnish service on a weekly commitment basis,
where the applicant agrees to pay for 8 hours of service per day, 5
days per week, Monday through Friday, excluding Federal legal holidays
occurring Monday through Friday on which no grading and certification
services are performed, and AMS agrees to make an official grader
available to provide service for the applicant. However, AMS reserves
the right to use any official grader assigned to a commitment applicant
to perform service for other applicants when, in the opinion of the
Chief, the official grader is not needed to perform service for the
commitment applicant. In those instances, the applicant will not be
charged for the work of the grader assigned to his or her facility.
(3) If an applicant who terminates commitment grading service
requests service again within a 2-year period from the date of the
initial termination, the applicant will be responsible for all
relocation costs associated with the grader assigned to fulfill the new
service agreement. If more than one applicant is involved, expenses
will be prorated according to each applicant's committed portion of the
official grader's services.
0
6. Revise Sec. 54.7 to read as follows:
Sec. 54.7 Order of furnishing service.
Service shall be furnished to applicants in the order in which
requests are received. Preference will be given, when necessary, to
requests made by any government agency or any regular user of the
service, and to requests for appeal service under Sec. 54.19.
0
7. Revise Sec. 54.8 to read as follows:
[[Page 1645]]
Sec. 54.8 When request for service deemed made.
A request for service is considered made when received by the
designated office as identified on the Application for Service form.
Records showing the date and time of the request shall be made and
maintained in the designated office.
0
8. Revise Sec. 54.9 to read as follows:
Sec. 54.9 Withdrawal of application or request for service.
An application or a request for service may be withdrawn by the
applicant at any time before the application is approved or prior to
performance of service. In accordance with Sec. Sec. 54.27 and 54.28,
any expenses already incurred by AMS in connection with the review of
an application or fulfilling a request for service is the
responsibility of the applicant.
0
9. Revise Sec. 54.10 to read as follows:
Sec. 54.10 Authority of agent.
Proof that any person making an application or a request for
service on behalf of any other person has the authority to do so may be
required at the discretion of the Director or Chief.
0
10. Amend Sec. 54.11 by revising paragraph (a)(1) introductory text,
and paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (iii), (vii), (x), and (a)(2) to read
as follows:
Sec. 54.11 Denial, conditional withdrawal, or suspension of service.
(a) * * * (1) Basis for denial or withdrawal. An application or a
request for service may be rejected, or the benefits of the service may
be otherwise denied to, or withdrawn from, any person who, or whose
employee or agent in the scope of the individual's employment or
agency:
(i) Has willfully made any misrepresentation or has committed any
other fraudulent or deceptive practice in connection with any
application or request for service;
(ii) Has given or attempted to give, as a loan or for any other
purpose, any money, favor, or other thing of value, to any employee of
the Department authorized to perform any function;
(iii) Has interfered with or obstructed, or attempted to interfere
with or to obstruct, any employee of the Department in the performance
of his or her duties under the regulations by intimidation, threats,
assaults, abuse, or any other improper means;
* * * * *
(vii) Has applied the designation ``US'' or ``USDA'' and ``Prime,''
``Choice,'' ``Select,'' ``Good,'' ``Standard,'' ``Commercial,''
``Utility,'' ``Cutter,'' ``Canner,'' ``Cull,'' ``No. 1,'' ``No. 2,''
``No. 3,'' ``No. 4,'' ``Yield Grade 1,'' ``Yield Grade 2,'' ``Yield
Grade 3,'' ``Yield Grade 4,'' ``Yield Grade 5,'' ``USDA Accepted as
Specified,'' by stamp or text enclosed within a shield, or brand
directly on any carcass, wholesale cut, or retail cut of any carcass,
or has applied the afore mentioned designations including ``USDA
Certified,'' and ``USDA Further Processing Certification Program'' on
the marketing material associated with any such product as part of a
grade designation or product specification;
* * * * *
(x) Has in any manner not specified in this paragraph violated
subsection 203(h) of the Act: Provided, that paragraph (a)(1)(vi) of
this section shall not be deemed to be violated if the person in
possession of any item mentioned therein notifies the Director or Chief
without delay that the person has possession of such item and, in the
case of an official device, surrenders it to the Chief, and, in the
case of any other item, surrenders it to the Director or Chief or
destroys it or brings it into compliance with the regulations by
obliterating or removing the violative features under supervision of
the Director or Chief: And provided further, that paragraphs (a)(1)
(ii) through (ix) of this section shall not be deemed to be violated by
any act committed by any person prior to the making of an application
of service under the regulations by the principal person. An
application or a request for service may be rejected or the benefits of
the service may be otherwise denied to, or withdrawn from, any person
who operates an establishment for which that person has made
application for service if, with the knowledge of such operator, any
other person conducting any operations in such establishment has
committed any of the offenses specified in paragraphs (a)(1) (i)
through (x) of this section after such application was made. Moreover,
an application or a request for service made in the name of a person
otherwise eligible for service under the regulations may be rejected,
or the benefits of the service may be otherwise denied to, or withdrawn
from, such a person:
(A) In case the service is or would be performed at an
establishment operated:
(1) By a corporation, partnership, or other person from whom the
benefits of the service are currently being withheld under this
paragraph; or
(2) By a corporation, partnership, or other person having an
officer, director, partner, or substantial investor from whom the
benefits of the service are currently being withheld and who has any
authority with respect to the establishment where service is or would
be performed; or
(B) In case the service is or would be performed with respect to
any product with which any corporation, partnership, or other person
within paragraph (a)(1)(x)(A)(1) of this section has a contract or
other financial interest.
(2) Procedure. All cases arising under this paragraph shall be
initially conducted in accordance with the Supplemental Rules of
Practice in part 50 of this chapter. Any issue unable to be resolved
under part 50 shall be resolved or handled in accordance with the Rules
of Practice Governing Formal Adjudicatory Proceedings Instituted by the
Secretary Under Various Statutes set forth in Sec. Sec. 1.130 through
1.151 of this title.
* * * * *
Sec. 54.12 [Removed and Reserved]
0
11. Remove and reserve Sec. 54.12.
0
12. Revise Sec. 54.13 to read as follows:
Sec. 54.13 Accessibility and refrigeration of products; access to
establishments; suitable work environment; and access to records.
(a) The applicant shall make products easily accessible for
examination, with appropriate and adequate illuminating facilities, in
order to disclose their class, grade, other quality characteristics,
and compliance with official standards or other contractual
requirements for which service is being provided. Supervisors of
grading and other employees of the Department responsible for
maintaining uniformity and accuracy of service shall have access to all
parts of establishments covered by approved applications for service
under the regulations, for the purpose of examining all products in the
establishments that have been or are to be graded or examined for
compliance with specifications or which bear any marks of grade or
compliance.
(b) Grading service will be furnished only for meat that an
official grader determines is chilled so that grade factors are
developed to the extent that a proper grade determination can be made
in accordance with the official standards. Meat that is presented in a
frozen condition is not eligible for a grade determination.
(c) Applicants are responsible for providing a work environment
where official graders are not subjected to physical and/or verbal
abuse, or other elements that could have a negative effect on providing
an unbiased, third-party evaluation. Applicants shall designate primary
company
[[Page 1646]]
representatives to discuss grade placements and certification
determinations with official graders.
(d) Applicants will make products and related records (approved
labeling, technical proposals, quality plans, specifications, end
product data schedules, grade volume information, etc.) easily
accessible and provide assistance and any equipment necessary to
accomplish the requested services. Equipment may include storage
lockers/cabinets, branding ink, certified scales, food blenders,
processors, grinders, sampling containers, sanitation equipment,
thermometers, adequate lighting, weight tags, display monitors, video
equipment for monitoring live animal schedules, etc. When offering
product for grading or certification, applicants must ensure a minimum
of 90 percent acceptable product.
(e) Applicants will provide a metal cabinet(s) or locker(s) for the
secure storage of official meat grading equipment and identification
devices for each official meat grader assigned to their establishment.
Such cabinet(s) or locker(s) must be capable of being locked with a
Government-owned lock and be located in an easily-accessible and secure
location within the applicant's establishment.
Sec. 54.14 [Removed and reserved]
0
13. Remove and reserve Sec. 54.14.
0
14. Revise Sec. 54.15 to read as follows:
Sec. 54.15 Instrument grading.
(a) Applicants may use USDA-approved technologies to augment the
official USDA grading process for approved species presented for
official grading. This voluntary program may be utilized by a plant at
its discretion but must comply with QAD procedures to be recognized and
relied upon by the official grader in conducting official duties.
(b) Applicants have the option to augment quality and yield grading
services through the use of vision-based instrument technology.
Instrument grading may be used as an option for determining degrees of
marbling and yield factors for meat carcasses. AMS approves the grading
instrument itself and its use within individual applicant facilities.
Applicants may contact grading supervision to initiate the process for
in-plant approval. The process for instrument grading approval at an
applicant's facility is dictated through internal procedures. Final
determination of quality and yield grades is made by the official
grader.
0
15. Revise Sec. 54.16 to read as follows:
Sec. 54.16 Marking of products.
All products examined for class and grade under the official
standards, or the immediate containers and the shipping containers,
shall be stamped, branded, or otherwise marked with an appropriate
official identification. Except as otherwise directed by the Director,
such markings will not be required when an applicant desires only an
official memorandum. The marking of products, or their containers, as
required by this section shall be done by official graders or under
their immediate supervision.
0
16. Revise Sec. 54.17 to read as follows:
Sec. 54.17 Official identifications.
(a) A shield enclosing the letters ``USDA'' and identification
letters assigned to the grader performing the service, as shown in
Figure 1 to paragraph (a), constitutes a form of official
identification under the regulations for preliminary grade of
carcasses. This form of official identification may also be used to
determine the final quality grade of carcasses; one stamp equates to
``USDA Select'' or ``USDA Good''; two stamps placed together vertically
equates to ``USDA Choice''; and three stamps placed together vertically
equates to ``USDA Prime.''
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05FE19.000
(b) A shield enclosing the letters ``USDA'' as shown in Figure 2 to
paragraph (b) with the appropriate quality grade designation ``Prime,''
``Choice,'' ``Select,'' ``Good,'' ``Standard,'' ``Commercial,''
``Utility,'' ``Cutter,'' ``Canner,'' or ``Cull,'' as provided in the
United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef, the United States
Standards for Grades of Veal and Calf Carcasses, and the United States
Standards for Grades of Lamb, Yearling Mutton, and Mutton Carcasses;
and accompanied by the class designation ``Bullock,'' ``Veal,''
``Calf,'' ``Lamb,'' ``Yearling Mutton,'' or ``Mutton,'' constitutes a
form of official identification under the regulations to show the
quality grade, and where necessary, the class, under said standards, of
steer, heifer, and cow beef, veal, calf, lamb, yearling mutton, and
mutton. The identification letters assigned to the grader performing
the service will appear underneath and outside of the shield.
[[Page 1647]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05FE19.001
(c) A shield enclosing the letters ``USDA'' and the words ``Yield
Grade,'' as in Figure 3 to paragraph (c), with the appropriate yield
grade designation ``1,'' ``2,'' ``3,'' ``4,'' or ``5'' as provided in
the United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef and the United
States Standards for Grades of Lamb, Yearling Mutton, and Mutton
Carcasses, constitutes a form of official identification under the
regulations to show the yield grade under said standards. When yield
graded, bull and bullock carcasses will be identified with the class
designation ``Bull'' and ``Bullock,'' respectively. The identification
letters assigned to the grader performing the service will appear
underneath and outside of the shield.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05FE19.002
(d) For combined quality and yield grade identification purposes
only, a shield enclosing the letters ``US'' on one side and ``DA'' on
the other, with the appropriate yield grade designation number ``1,''
``2,'' ``3,'' ``4,'' or ``5,'' and with the appropriate quality grade
designation of ``Prime,'' ``Choice,'' ``Select,'' ``Good,''
``Standard,'' ``Commercial,'' ``Utility,'' ``Cutter,'' ``Canner,'' or
``Cull'' shown in Figure 4 to paragraph (d) constitutes a form of
official identification under the regulations to show the quality and
yield grade under said standards. The identification letters assigned
to the grader performing the service will appear underneath and outside
of the shield.
[[Page 1648]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05FE19.003
(e) Under the regulations, for yield grade identification purposes
only, a shield enclosing the letters ``US'' on one side and ``DA'' on
the other, and with the appropriate yield grade designation number
``1,'' ``2,'' ``3,'' ``4,'' or ``5'' as shown in Figure 5 to paragraph
(e) constitutes a form of official identification under the regulations
to show the yield grade under said standards. The identification
letters assigned to the grader performing the service will appear
underneath and outside of the shield.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05FE19.004
(f) For quality grade identification only, a shield enclosing the
letters ``US'' on one side and ``DA'' on the other with the appropriate
quality grade designation of ``Prime,'' ``Choice,'' ``Select,''
``Good,'' ``Standard,'' ``Commercial,'' ``Utility,'' ``Cutter,''
``Canner,'' or ``Cull'' as shown in Figure 6 to paragraph (f)
constitutes a form of official identification under the regulations to
show the yield grade under said standards. The identification letters
assigned to the grader performing the service will appear underneath
and outside of the shield.
[[Page 1649]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05FE19.005
(g) The letters ``USDA'' with the appropriate grade designation
``1,'' ``2,'' ``3,'' ``4,'' ``Utility,'' enclosed in a shield as shown
in Figure 7 to paragraph (g), as provided in the Official United States
Standards for Grades of Pork Carcasses, constitutes a form of official
identification under the regulations to show the grade under said
standards of barrow, gilt, and sow pork carcasses.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05FE19.006
(h) The following constitute forms of official identification under
the regulations to show compliance of products:
[[Page 1650]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05FE19.007
(i) The following, as shown in Figure 10 to paragraph (i),
constitutes official identification to show quality system
certification.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05FE19.008
(j) The following, as shown in Figure 11 to paragraph (j),
constitutes official identification to show that products produced
under USDA AMS supervision that meet specified requirements may carry
the ``USDA Certified'' statement and/or ``USDA Certified'' shield, so
long as each is used in direct association with a clear description of
the standard or other requirement(s) to which the product claims to be
certified.
(1) The ``USDA Certified'' shield must replicate the form and
design of the example in Figure 11 and must be printed legibly and
conspicuously:
(i) On a white background, with the term ``USDA'' in white
overlaying a blue upper third of the shield and the term ``Certified''
in black overlaying a white middle third of the shield, with no terms
in the red lower third of the shield; or
(ii) On a white or transparent background with a black trimmed
shield, with the term ``USDA'' in white overlaying a black upper third
of the shield and the term ``Certified'' in black overlaying the white
or transparent remaining two-thirds of the shield.
(2) Use of the ``USDA Certified'' statement and the ``USDA
Certified'' shield shall be approved in writing by the Director prior
to use by an applicant.
[[Page 1651]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05FE19.009
(k) The following, as shown in Figure 12 to paragraph (k),
constitutes official identification to show product or services
produced under an approved USDA Further Processing Certification
Program (FPCP):
(1) Products produced under an approved USDA FPCP may use the
``USDA Further Processing Certification Program'' statement and the
``USDA Further Processing Certification Program'' shield, and
(2) The USDA Further Processing Certification Program shield must
replicate the form and design of the example in Figure 12 and must be
printed legibly and conspicuously:
(i) On a white background, with the term ``USDA'' in white
overlaying a blue upper third of the shield and the terms ``USDA
Further Processing Certification Program'' in black overlaying a white
middle third of the shield, with no terms in the red lower third of the
shield; or
(ii) On a white or transparent background with a black trimmed
shield, with the term ``USDA'' in white overlaying a black upper third
of the shield and the terms ``USDA Further Processing Certification
Program'' in black overlaying the white or transparent remaining two-
thirds of the shield.
(3) Use of the ``USDA Further Processing Certification Program''
statement and the ``USDA Further Processing Certification Program''
shield shall be approved in writing by the Director prior to use by an
applicant.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05FE19.010
(l)(1) One device used by official graders is the LP-36 Form, a
rectangular, serially numbered, red tag on which a shield encloses the
words ``USDA Hold,'' constitutes a form of official identification
under the regulations for meat and meat products.
(2) Official graders and supervisors of grading may use ``USDA
Hold'' tags or other methods and devices as approved by the
Administrator for the identification and control of meat and meat
products that are not in compliance with the regulations or are held
pending the results of an examination. Any such meat or meat product
identified shall not be used, moved, or altered in any manner; nor
shall official control identification be removed, without the expressed
permission of an authorized representative of the USDA.
0
17. Revise Sec. 54.18 to read as follows:
Sec. 54.18 Custody of identification devices.
All identification devices used in marking products or their
containers, including those indicating compliance with approved
specifications, shall be kept in the custody of the Branch, and
accurate records shall be kept by the Branch of all such devices. Such
devices shall be distributed only to persons authorized by the
Department, who will keep the devices in their possession or control at
all times.
0
18. Remove undesignated center heading APPEAL SERVICE.
0
19. Revise Sec. 54.19 to read as follows:
Sec. 54.19 Appeal of a grading service decision.
Appeal service is a redetermination of the class, grade, other
quality, or compliance of product when the applicant for the appeal
service formally challenges the correctness of the original
determination.
(a) Authority to request appeal service. A request for appeal
service with respect to any product may be made by any person who is
financially interested in the product when that person disagrees with
the original determination as to class, grade, other quality, or
compliance of the product as shown by the markings on the product or
its containers, or as stated in the applicable official memorandum.
(b)Requesting appeal service. A request for appeal service shall be
filed
[[Page 1652]]
with the Chief. The request shall state the reasons for appeal and may
be accompanied by a copy of any previous official report, or any other
information that the applicant may have received regarding the product
at the time of the original service. Such request may be made orally
(including by telephone) or in writing (including by email). If made
orally, the person receiving the request may require that it be
confirmed in writing.
(c) Determining original service from appeal service. Examination
requested to determine the class, grade, other quality, or compliance
of a product that has been altered or has undergone a material change
since the original service, or examination of product requested for the
purpose of obtaining an official memorandum and not involving any
question as to the correctness of the original service for the product
involved shall be considered equivalent to original service and not
appeal service.
(d) Not eligible for appeal service. Grade determinations cannot be
appealed for any lot or product consisting of less than 10 similar
units or carcasses. Moreover, appeal service will not be furnished with
respect to product that has been altered or has undergone any material
change since the original service.
(e) Withdrawal of appeal service. A request for appeal service may
be withdrawn by the applicant at any time before the appeal service has
been performed; however, the applicant is responsible for payment of
any expenses incurred by the Branch towards providing the appeal
service prior to withdrawal.
(f) Denial or withdrawal of appeal service. A request for appeal
service may be rejected or such service may be otherwise denied to or
withdrawn from any person, without a hearing, in accordance with the
procedure set forth in Sec. 54.11(b), if it appears that the person or
product involved is not eligible for appeal service under Sec.
54.19(a) and (b), or that the identity of the product has been lost; or
for any of the causes set forth in Sec. 54.11(b). Appeal service may
also be denied to, or withdrawn from, any person in any case under
Sec. 54.11(a).
(g) Who performs appeal service. Appeal service shall be performed
by the National Meat Supervisor or his or her designee.
(h) Appeal service report. Immediately after appeal service has
been performed for any products, a report shall be prepared and issued
referring specifically to the original findings and stating the class,
grade, other quality, or compliance of the products as shown by the
appeal service.
0
20. Revise Sec. 54.20 to read as follows:
Sec. 54.20 Exemptions.
Any exemption to the regulations must be approved by the Director.
Exemptions may include but are not limited to:
(a) Grading the meat of animals in other than carcass form if the
class, grade, and other quality attributes may be determined under the
applicable standards.
(b) Grading in an establishment other than where the animal was
slaughtered or initially chilled if the class, grade, and other quality
attributes can be determined under the applicable standards, and if the
identity of the carcasses can be maintained.
(c) If the Branch is unable to provide grading service in a timely
manner and the meat can be identified in conformance with the
standards.
(d) Grading in the establishment other than where the hide is
removed, provided the meat can be identified in conformance with the
standards.
(e) Grading meat of imported animals, provided:
(1) The imported meat is marked so that the name of the country of
origin is conspicuous to the USDA grader. The mark of foreign origin
shall be imprinted by roller brand, handstamp, tag, or other approved
method.
(2) The imprints of the mark of foreign origin have been submitted
to the Chief for the determination of compliance with these regulations
prior to use on meats offered for Federal grading.
(3) The applicant notifies the official grader performing the
service whenever imported meat is offered for grading.
(f) For good cause and provided that the meat can be identified in
conformance with the standards.
Sec. Sec. 54.21-54.26 [Removed and reserved]
0
21. Remove and reserve Sec. Sec. 54.21 through 54.26.
Sec. 54.30 [Removed and reserved]
0
22. Remove and reserve Sec. 54.30.
0
23. Revise Sec. 54.31 to read as follows:
Sec. 54.31 OMB control number.
The information collection and recordkeeping requirements of this
part have been approved by OMB under 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35 and have been
assigned OMB Control Number 0581-0128.
Dated: January 29, 2019.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2019-00869 Filed 2-4-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P