Urgent Care, 627-633 [2019-00277]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 21 / Thursday, January 31, 2019 / Proposed Rules
values cited above, the Departments
certify that this rulemaking will not
have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
Under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 801
et seq.), this proposed rule is not a major
rule. It will not have an effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, will
not cause a major increase in costs or
prices for consumers, and will not have
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises.
Executive Order 12630
Title VIII of ANILCA requires the
Secretaries to administer a subsistence
priority for rural Alaskan residents on
public lands. The scope of this program
is limited by definition to certain public
lands. Likewise, these proposed
regulations have no potential takings of
private property implications as defined
by Executive Order 12630.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Secretaries have determined and
certify pursuant to the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et
seq., that this rulemaking will not
impose a cost of $100 million or more
in any given year on local or State
governments or private entities. The
implementation of this rule is by
Federal agencies and there is no cost
imposed on any State or local entities or
tribal governments.
Executive Order 12988
The Secretaries have determined that
these regulations meet the applicable
standards provided in §§ 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, regarding
civil justice reform.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 13132
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, the proposed rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a Federalism
Assessment. Title VIII of ANILCA
precludes the State from exercising
subsistence management authority over
fish and wildlife resources on Federal
lands unless it meets certain
requirements.
Executive Order 13175
Title VIII of ANILCA does not provide
specific rights to tribes for the
subsistence taking of wildlife, fish, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Jan 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
shellfish. However, as described above
under Tribal Consultation and
Comment, the Secretaries, through the
Board, will provide federally recognized
Tribes and Alaska Native corporations
an opportunity to consult on this
proposed rule.
Executive Order 13211
Drafting Information
List of Subjects
36 CFR Part 242
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
50 CFR Part 100
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Federal Subsistence
Board proposes to amend 36 CFR part
242 and 50 CFR part 100 for the 2020–
21 and 2021–22 regulatory years.
The text of the proposed amendments
to 36 CFR 242.24, 242.25, and 242.26
and 50 CFR 100.24, 100.25, and 100.26
is the final rule for the 2018–2020
regulatory periods for wildlife (83 FR
50759; October 9, 2018).
■
Fmt 4702
BILLING CODE 3411–15–4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AQ47
Urgent Care
Theo Matuskowitz drafted this
proposed rule under the guidance of
Thomas C.J. Doolittle, Jr. of the Office of
Subsistence Management, Alaska
Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Anchorage, Alaska. Additional
assistance was provided by:
• Daniel Sharp, Alaska State Office,
Bureau of Land Management;
• Clarence Summers, Alaska Regional
Office, National Park Service;
• Dr. Glenn Chen, Alaska Regional
Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs;
• Carol Damberg, Alaska Regional
Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service;
and
• Thomas Whitford, Alaska Regional
Office, USDA–Forest Service.
Frm 00056
Dated: December 21, 2018.
Thomas C.J. Doolittle,
Acting Assistant Regional Director, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service.
Dated: December 21, 2018.
Thomas Whitford,
Subsistence Program Leader, USDA—Forest
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–00424 Filed 1–30–19; 8:45 am]
Executive Order 13211 requires
agencies to prepare Statements of
Energy Effects when undertaking certain
actions. However, this proposed rule is
not a significant regulatory action under
E.O. 13211, affecting energy supply,
distribution, or use, and no Statement of
Energy Effects is required.
PO 00000
627
Sfmt 4702
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) is proposing to amend its
regulations that govern VA health care.
This rule would grant eligible veterans
access to urgent care from qualifying
non-VA entities or providers without
prior approval from VA. This
rulemaking would implement the
mandates of the VA MISSION Act of
2018 and increase veterans’ access to
health care in the community.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 4, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through https://
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to: Director, Regulation Policy
and Management (00REG), Department
of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont
Avenue, North West, Room 1063B,
Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to
(202) 273–9026. (This is not a toll-free
telephone number.) Comments should
indicate that they are submitted in
response to ‘‘RIN 2900–AQ47 Urgent
Care.’’ Copies of comments received
will be available for public inspection in
the Office of Regulation Policy and
Management, Room 1063B, between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday (except holidays). Please
call (202) 461–4902 for an appointment.
(This is not a toll-free telephone
number.) In addition, during the
comment period, comments may be
viewed online through the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) at
https://www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Duran, Director of Policy and
Planning. 3773 Cherry Creek North
Drive, Denver, CO 80209.
Joseph.Duran2@va.gov. (303) 370–1637.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\31JAP1.SGM
31JAP1
628
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 21 / Thursday, January 31, 2019 / Proposed Rules
On June 6,
2018, section 105 of Public Law 115–
182, the John S. McCain III, Daniel K.
Akaka, and Samuel R. Johnson VA
Maintaining Internal Systems and
Strengthening Integrated Outside
Networks Act of 2018, or the VA
MISSION Act of 2018, amended title 38
of the United States Code (U.S.C.) by
adding a new section 1725A, Access to
walk-in care. The new section 1725A
was further amended through the
Department of Veterans Affairs Expiring
Authorities Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115–
251). This benefit is intended to offer
eligible veterans convenient care for
certain, limited, non-emergent health
care needs. Section 1725A(a) and (g)
direct the Secretary to establish
procedures and regulations to ensure
eligible veterans are able to access such
care from qualifying non-VA entities or
providers to ensure their access to care
when minor injury or illness arises. VA
is required to develop procedures to
ensure eligible veterans are able to
access this care from qualifying non-VA
entities or providers. Eligible veterans
would include any enrolled veteran
who has received care under chapter 17
of title 38 United States Code (U.S.C.)
within the 24-month period preceding
the furnishing of care under this section.
Care under chapter 17 of title 38, U.S.C.,
would include any of the following:
Care provided in a VA facility, care
authorized by VA performed by a
community provider, care furnished by
a State Veterans home, or urgent care
under this proposed section. Qualifying
non-VA entities or providers would
include any non-VA entity or provider
that has entered into a contract,
agreement, or other arrangement with
VA to provide services under this
section.
VA proposes to refer to this benefit as
urgent care, instead of walk-in care. As
explained in further detail below, this
benefit will include care provided at
both urgent care facilities and walk-in
retail health clinics. We believe
referring to this type of care as ‘‘urgent
care’’ would be consistent with industry
practice.
This proposed rule would implement
the mandates of section 1725A, as
added by the VA MISSION Act of 2018
as amended, by establishing a new
§ 17.4600.
Proposed paragraph (a) would
establish the purpose for this section.
We would state that this section
establishes procedures for accessing
urgent care, which would be available to
eligible veterans from qualifying nonVA entities or providers under the
requirements established by this
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Jan 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
rulemaking. This would be consistent
with sections 1725A(a) and (g).
Proposed paragraph (b) would define
the terms for this section. We would
define the term ‘‘eligible veteran’’ in
proposed paragraph (b)(1) as a veteran
described in 38 U.S.C. 1725A(b).
Section 1725A(b) defines eligible
veterans as those who are enrolled
under section 1705(a) of title 38, U.S.C.
and who have received medical care
under chapter 17 of title 38, U.S.C.,
within the 24-month period preceding
the furnishing of urgent care under this
new program. We would not restate the
definition in section 1725A in the event
that this section is amended in the
future. As stated earlier, veterans have
received care under chapter 17 of title
38, U.S.C., when they have received
care provided in a VA facility, care
authorized by VA and performed by a
community provider, care furnished by
a State Veterans home, or urgent care
under this proposed section.
The term ‘‘episodic care’’ appears, but
is not defined, in section 1725A(h). We
propose to define the term ‘‘episodic
care’’ in proposed paragraph (b)(2) as
care or services provided to an eligible
veteran for a particular health condition,
or a limited set of particular health
conditions, without an ongoing
relationship being established between
the eligible veteran and qualifying nonVA entities or providers. Episodic care
would be only for a particular health
condition (or a flu shot) or a limited set
of particular health conditions, to be
addressed in a single visit. For example,
an eligible veteran could seek episodic
care for a sore throat, an ankle sprain,
or both in a single visit. There would be
no further relationship between the
qualifying non-VA entity or provider
and the eligible veteran for the
treatment of those health conditions. VA
believes that flu shots, as well as
therapeutic vaccines that are furnished
in the course of treatment of another
condition, would be clinically
appropriate because the risk of an
adverse reaction would be minimal for
a flu shot, and therapeutic vaccines
would be necessary for the treatment of
certain conditions. For example, a
veteran seeking treatment for a wound
caused by rusted metal requires
treatment for the wound and may
require a tetanus vaccine as part of the
course of treatment. VA acknowledges
that there may be other preventive
treatments with minimal risk of adverse
action, however, VA considers these
preventive care treatments to be part of
the veteran’s longitudinal care, as such,
these other treatments should be
provided by the veteran’s primary care
provider and not as part of urgent care.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
As stated in section 1725A(h), urgent
care should not be used for the
longitudinal management of health care.
These requirements are consistent with
the general model of urgent care where
patients seek health care for the
treatment of minor injuries and illnesses
through a single visit.
We propose to define the term
‘‘longitudinal management of
conditions’’ in proposed paragraph
(b)(3) as outpatient care that addresses
important disease prevention and
treatment goals and is dependent upon
bidirectional communications that are
ongoing over an extended period of
time. Section 1725A(h) excludes from
the definition of walk-in care the
longitudinal management of conditions;
while we would define the term
‘‘longitudinal management of
conditions,’’ we would also state that,
for purposes of this section, the term
‘‘longitudinal care’’ is synonymous with
longitudinal management of conditions
because we believe ‘‘longitudinal care’’
is better understood and would be
clearer in the context of the regulation.
We would only refer to outpatient care
because urgent/walk-in care providers
do not provide inpatient care or
extended care services. The reference to
bidirectional communications that are
ongoing over an extended period of time
is intended to reflect that longitudinal
care occurs within the context of an
ongoing relationship between the
provider and patient.
Proposed paragraph (b)(4) would
define the term ‘‘qualifying non-VA
entities or providers’’ consistent with
the definition in section 1725A(c), but
we have specifically included Federallyqualified health centers based on
section 1725A(d). We would define
‘‘qualifying non-VA entity or provider’’
as a non-VA entity or provider,
including Federally-qualified health
centers as defined in 42 U.S.C.
1396d(l)(2)(B), that has entered into a
contract, agreement, or other
arrangement with the Secretary to
furnish urgent care under the section.
VA currently furnishes care in the
community through networks of
providers that are maintained by thirdparty administrators. The third-party
administrator meets the definition of the
qualifying non-VA entity or provider—
they are non-VA entities or providers
that have entered into a contract or
agreement with the Secretary to furnish
care and services under this section—
and it is through these administrators
that the urgent care benefit primarily
will be provided.
We propose to define the term ‘‘urgent
care’’ in proposed paragraph (b)(5). This
definition would include several key
E:\FR\FM\31JAP1.SGM
31JAP1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 21 / Thursday, January 31, 2019 / Proposed Rules
conditions as follows. This definition
would only apply to this section; other
uses of the term ‘‘urgent care’’ or
‘‘urgent services’’ in other VA
regulations, specifically §§ 17.101,
17.106, and 70.71, would not refer to
this benefit. Section 1725A(h) defines
the term ‘‘walk-in care’’ as nonemergent care provided by a qualifying
non-Department entity or provider that
furnishes episodic care and not
longitudinal management of conditions
and is otherwise defined through
regulations the Secretary shall
promulgate. However, VA proposes to
use the term ‘‘urgent care’’ instead of
‘‘walk-in care.’’ Urgent care is an
industry standard description of the
services described below available at
specific provider locations, including
Federally Qualified Health Centers
(FQHCs) as required under section
1725A(h). VA prefers to use an industry
standard name for the benefit.
First, VA proposes to provide in
proposed paragraph (b)(5) that urgent
care is those services being provided by
walk-in retail health clinics or urgent
care facilities, as designated by the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services, furnished by a qualifying nonVA entity or provider, and as further
defined in the paragraph. We believe
that defining urgent care to include
those services that are furnished by
walk-in retail health clinics or urgent
care facilities, as designated by the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services, would be in alignment with
public expectations of the types of
urgent care services that are otherwise
available under other health care plans.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services currently describes the services
that walk-in retail health clinics and
urgent care facilities furnish at the
following website: https://
www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coding/placeof-service-codes/Place_of_Service_
Code_Set.html. VA’s proposed
definition would also allow the benefit
available under this section to evolve
based upon advances in the industry
regarding the types of services offered
by these clinics and facilities. A
qualifying non-VA entity or provider
would have to enter into a contract,
agreement, or other arrangement with
VA to furnish services under this
section. This is a requirement of section
1725A(c), and is also a critical part of
the definition of a ‘‘qualifying non-VA
entity or provider’’ under paragraph
(b)(4). We note that, while we propose
to define the scope of services available
as urgent care in paragraph (b)(5),
because of our reliance on contracts,
agreements, or other arrangements, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Jan 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
actual services available at a particular
qualifying non-VA entity or provider
may vary. We further note that any care
that is provided to an eligible veteran
that does not meet this definition,
whether it be that the care was provided
by a non-qualifying entity or provider or
that the care provided was beyond the
scope of urgent care as defined in this
section, will not be covered by VA. In
these situations, the eligible veteran
would be liable for the cost of such care.
In proposed paragraph (b)(5)(i)(A),
however, VA would not, except as
provided for in paragraph (b)(5)(i)(B) or
(b)(5)(iii), include preventive health
services, as defined in 38 U.S.C.
1701(9). We would exclude generally
preventive services because, consistent
with the statutory requirement in
section 1725A(e), the best way to ensure
continuity of care is to have preventive
health services coordinated and
managed by a primary care provider
furnishing longitudinal care. Section
1725A(e) requires that the Secretary
ensure continuity of care for eligible
veterans receiving this benefit.
Preventive health services are a critical
component to VA’s health care
management system. VA believes that
urgent care is fundamentally distinct
from providing longitudinal health care
within VA or the community. The best
way to address a veteran’s health care
needs would be to manage a veteran’s
preventive health services as part of
their overall health care rather than
attempting to furnish such services on
an episodic and uncoordinated basis. As
such, we believe that to ensure
continuity of care, as required by
section 1725A(e), VA should exclude
generally preventive health services
from the definition of urgent care.
We would further define urgent care
in proposed paragraph (b)(5)(i)(B) to
include immunizations against
influenza (flu shots), as well as
therapeutic vaccines that are necessary
in the course of treatment of an
otherwise included service.
Vaccinations are included within the
definition of preventive health services
in 38 U.S.C. 1701(9)(G) (which refers to
immunizations) and as such would have
been excluded under paragraph
(b)(5)(i)(A).
We would also add in paragraph
(b)(5)(ii) another requirement of urgent
care: It must be furnished as ‘‘episodic
care for eligible veterans needing
immediate non-emergent medical
attention, but does not include
longitudinal care.’’ This is based on the
definition of walk-in care in section
1725A(h).
Finally, we propose to state in
paragraph (b)(5)(iii) that VA may
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
629
provide additional services it
determines to be appropriate if it is in
the interest of eligible veterans’, based
on identified health needs. VA would
inform the public via Federal Register
document, published as soon as
practicable, and other communication
as VA determines appropriate. VA’s
determination that additional services
are in the interest of eligible veterans
could be made to expand services
regionally or nationally and for
specified periods of time. This authority
would only allow for the provision of
services that qualifying non-VA entities
or providers would otherwise furnish,
but that would be excluded by our
definition of the benefit of urgent care.
Principally, these services would
include preventive health services,
including immunizations that are not
for influenza or therapeutic vaccines.
For example, if there is a localized
outbreak of an infectious disease, VA
could provide eligible veterans
immunizations to prevent this disease
as part of urgent care until the outbreak
is contained.
Proposed paragraph (c) would
establish procedures for urgent care.
Procedures are required pursuant to
section 1725A(a). We would state in
proposed paragraph (c)(1) that eligible
veterans may ‘‘receive urgent care from
a qualifying non-VA entity or provider
without prior approval from VA.’’ We
believe this would be consistent with
the general understanding of urgent and
walk-in care, as well as the structure of
the statute, which authorizes this
benefit outside of the general Veterans
Community Care Program under the
amendments to section 1703, as made
by section 101 of the VA MISSION Act
of 2018. The general Veterans
Community Care Program requires
authorization for services, see
amendments to section 1703(a)(3), while
there is no similar requirement in
section 1725A. This arrangement,
combined with the Senate Committee’s
report on this language, suggest that the
purpose of this provision is to ensure
that eligible veterans have access to
convenient care. See S. Rpt. 115–212, p.
18.
We would provide in proposed
paragraph (c)(2) that VA will publish a
website containing information on
urgent care, including the names,
locations, and contact information for
qualifying non-VA entities or providers
within an eligible veteran’s community.
The website would also include a list of
services and other general information
on the urgent care program established
under this section.
Proposed paragraph (c)(3) would
provide, in general, eligibility under the
E:\FR\FM\31JAP1.SGM
31JAP1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
630
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 21 / Thursday, January 31, 2019 / Proposed Rules
section does not affect eligibility for
hospital care or medical services under
the medical benefits package, as defined
in § 17.38, or other benefits addressed in
title 38. Nothing in the section waives
the eligibility requirements established
in other statutes or regulations. This
proposed paragraph would address the
effect of urgent care on other provisions
and programs administered by VA.
Proposed paragraph (c)(3) would
provide that, generally, eligibility for
urgent care does not affect eligibility for
hospital care or medical services under
the medical benefits package or other
benefits addressed in title 38. If
particular services have unique
eligibility standards, only veterans who
are eligible under this section and who
meet the eligibility standards for those
services can elect to receive urgent care
for them. Additionally, nothing in this
section waives the eligibility
requirements established in other
statutes or regulations. However,
eligibility for urgent care could affect
eligibility for other benefits indirectly.
For example, section 1725(b)(2)(B)
provides that to be eligible for
reimbursement for emergency treatment,
a veteran must have received care under
chapter 17 of title 38, U.S.C., within the
24-month period preceding the
furnishing of such emergency treatment.
If a veteran’s only care within the 24month period preceding the furnishing
of such emergency treatment was for
urgent care pursuant to these
regulations, the veteran would satisfy
this eligibility requirement and could be
eligible for reimbursement for
emergency treatment under section
1725.
Proposed paragraph (d) would
establish the copayment obligations for
eligible veterans. Section 1725A(f)(1)(A)
authorizes the Secretary to require an
eligible veteran to pay the United States
a copayment for each episode of
hospital care or medical services
provided under the section if the
eligible veteran would be required to
pay a copayment under this title.
Section 1725A(f)(1)(B) states that an
eligible veteran not required to pay a
copayment under the title may access
walk-in care without a copayment for
the first two visits in a calendar year.
For any additional visits, a copayment
at an amount determined by the
Secretary may be required. Section
1725A(f)(1)(C) further states that an
eligible veteran required to pay a
copayment under the title may be
required to pay a regular copayment for
the first two walk-in care visits in a
calendar year. For any additional visits,
a higher copayment at an amount
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Jan 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
determined by the Secretary may be
required. Similarly, section 1725A(f)(2)
states that after the first two episodes of
care furnished to an eligible veteran
under the section, the Secretary may
adjust the copayment required of the
veteran under the subsection based
upon the priority group of enrollment of
the eligible veteran, the number of
episodes of care furnished to the eligible
veteran during a year, and other factors
the Secretary considers appropriate
under the section.
In this rulemaking, we propose to
establish a regular copayment for urgent
care of $30. An eligible veteran’s
liability for the $30 regular copayment
would depend on the veteran’s
enrollment category and the number of
visits in a calendar year, as further
explained below. We note that section
1725A(f)(3), which allows the Secretary
to prescribe by rule the amount or
amounts of copayments required under
this section, allows the Secretary to
establish unique regular copayments
applicable to urgent care when provided
under this section. We further note that
section 1725A(f)(4) states that sections
8153(c) and 1703A(j) do not apply to
section 1725A(f). Sections 8153(c) and
1703A(j) stipulate that care furnished
pursuant to an agreement authorized by
one of these sections is subject to the
same terms as though provided in a
facility of the Department, and that
provisions of chapter 17 applicable to
veterans receiving such care and
services in a VA medical facility shall
apply to veterans treated under this
section. We interpret these exemptions,
along with section 1725A(f)(3), to
permit the Secretary to establish unique
copayment amounts applicable to
urgent care.
Copayments are a common feature of
health care, including VA health care.
They are an important mechanism for
guiding behavior to ensure that patients
receive care at an appropriate location.
As previously stated in this rulemaking,
urgent care does not include
longitudinal care. Urgent care is
considered to be a convenient option for
care, but is not intended to be used as
a substitute for traditional primary care.
Also, collecting copayments allows VA
to utilize its health care resources more
efficiently.
VA believes that $30 amount is
consistent with the copayments charged
by other Federal programs for similar
benefits under the TRICARE and
Medicare programs. Also, the $30
amount is a reasonable charge because
it is considerably less than what is
commercially available, which on
average is approximately $67, based on
an analysis VA conducted of private
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
sector benefits under commercial health
plans. This amount is consistent with
legislative history suggesting that the
copayment amount not exceed $50 per
visit. S. Rpt. 115–212, p. 19. We believe
that the convenience associated with
accessing urgent care merits a
copayment amount that could be higher
than the amount that would apply if VA
furnished that care in a VA facility or
through authorized community care.
Eligible veterans would not owe
copayments at the time of service,
consistent with current practice for VA
and VA-authorized community care.
Consistent with section
1725A(f)(1)(B), we propose to require all
eligible veterans who are enrolled in
priority groups 1–6, except those
veterans described in § 17.36(d)(3)(iii),
to only pay the $30 copayment after
three urgent care visits. For further
information on priority groups see
§ 17.36. Although these veterans are not
required to pay copayments for other
health care services furnished or paid
for by VA, section 1725A(f)(1)(B)
authorizes VA to start requiring a
copayment after two visits, we believe
that is appropriate to require a
copayment after three visits instead of
two. For those veterans who are
enrolled in priority groups 7–8,
including those veterans described in
§ 17.36(d)(3)(iii), we propose to charge
the $30 for all visits and will not
exercise the authority under section
1725A(f)(1)(C) and (f)(2) to increase
their copayment rate after two visits.
Therefore, we would state in
proposed paragraph (d)(1) that, except
as provided in paragraph (d)(2) or (d)(3),
an eligible veteran, as a condition for
receiving urgent care provided by VA
under this section, must agree to pay VA
(and is obligated to pay VA) a
copayment of $30 if the veteran is
enrolled in priority groups 1–6, except
those veterans described in
§ 17.36(d)(3)(iii) and has more than
three urgent care visits under this
section in a year, or if the veteran is
enrolled in priority groups 7–8,
including those veterans described in
§ 17.36(d)(3)(iii). These conditions
would be stated in proposed paragraph
(d)(1)(i), dealing with veterans enrolled
in priority groups 1–6 generally, and in
proposed paragraph (d)(1)(ii), dealing
with veterans enrolled in priority
groups 7–8.
Proposed paragraph (d)(2) would
provide that an eligible veteran who
receives urgent care under
§ 17.4600(b)(5)(iii) or urgent care
consisting solely of an immunization
against influenza (flu shot) is not subject
to a copayment under paragraph (d)(1).
VA would not charge a copayment for
E:\FR\FM\31JAP1.SGM
31JAP1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 21 / Thursday, January 31, 2019 / Proposed Rules
flu shots to be consistent with private
care best practice standards and be in
alignment with other Federal programs.
The Affordable Care Act requires health
insurers to cover the flu shot without
charging a copayment or coinsurance.
While the insurer can require an
individual to go to a specific facility to
receive a flu shot, most insurers allow
individuals to go to walk-in clinics for
this benefit. Additionally, neither
Medicare nor TRICARE charges a
copayment for the flu shot. If VA were
to charge a copayment for flu shots, we
would not be aligned with the private
sector or other government agencies.
Furthermore, VA does not currently
require a copayment for a flu shot if
veterans receive one at a VA clinic on
a walk-in basis, and we believe it is in
the veterans’ best interest to continue
this practice.
Proposed paragraph (d)(3) would
provide that if an eligible veteran
receives more than one type of care on
the same day that would subject the
veteran to a copayment under § 17.108,
which establishes copayments for
inpatient and outpatient care, or
§ 17.111, which establishes copayments
for extended care services, VA would
only charge the higher copayment for
that day. We would only charge one
copayment to reduce the burden on the
part of the eligible veteran. This is
consistent with how VA charges
copayments for multiple VA visits in
the same day. See § 17.108(c)(2) and (f).
VA would also only charge a single
copayment if an eligible veteran
receives more than one episode of care
under § 17.4600 on the same day.
VA also proposes to amend § 17.105
to reflect the copayments as established
in this rulemaking. First, VA would
propose to include proposed § 17.4600
among the list of regulatory authorities
under which copayments would be
subject to a waiver under § 17.105(c).
This would ensure that urgent care
copayments would be treated the same
as other copayments for eligible
veterans seeking a waiver of their
liability. Second, VA would delete the
list of authorities for § 17.105 to comply
with the guidelines of the Office of the
Federal Register, but would add the
complete list of authorities for this
regulation, including 38 U.S.C. 1725A,
among the authority citations listed for
part 17.
VA similarly proposes to amend
§ 17.108(e) to make clear that the
copayment exemptions for outpatient
medical care specified in that section
also apply to urgent care under this
section. This would ensure consistent
application of copayment rules for
eligible veterans. We would make
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Jan 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
similar conforming changes regarding
the list of authorities for § 17.108.
Effect of Rulemaking
The Code of Federal Regulations, as
proposed to be revised by this proposed
rulemaking, would represent the
exclusive legal authority on this subject.
No contrary rules or procedures would
be authorized. All VA guidance would
be read to conform with this proposed
rulemaking if possible or, if not
possible, such guidance would be
superseded by this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking does not contain any
provisions constituting collections of
information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on
qualifying non-VA entities or providers.
To the extent there is any such impact,
it would result in increased business
and revenue for them. We also do not
believe there will be a significant
economic impact on insurance
companies, as claims would only be
submitted for care that would otherwise
have been received whether such care
was authorized under this Program or
not. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
605(b), this rulemaking is exempt from
the initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603
and 604.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ which requires
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), as any regulatory action
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
631
that is likely to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order.
VA has examined the economic,
interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action
and determined that the action is an
economically significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866.
VA’s regulatory impact analysis can be
found as a supporting document at
https://www.regulations.gov, usually
within 48 hours after the rulemaking
document is published. Additionally, a
copy of the rulemaking and its
regulatory impact analysis are available
on VA’s website at https://www.va.gov/
orpm by following the link for VA
Regulations Published from FY 2004
through FYTD.
Executive Order 12866 also directs
agencies to ‘‘in most cases . . . include
a comment period of not less than 60
days.’’ This regulation will increase
access to care for eligible veterans in
local communities across the country.
Providing a 30-day comment period will
allow the Secretary to expedite the
commencement of this new benefit
thereby increasing access to health care
for eligible veterans. Moreover, we
believe that urgent care is a common
benefit among other health care plans
and thus should not be an unfamiliar
benefit to the public. Given general
public familiarity with this benefit, we
believe that 30 days would be a
sufficient period of time for the public
to comment on this rulemaking. In sum,
providing a 60-day public comment
period instead of a 30-day public
comment period would be against
public interest and the health and safety
of eligible veterans. For the above
reasons, the Secretary issues this rule
with a 30-day public comment period.
VA will consider and address comments
that are received within 30 days of the
date this proposed rule is published in
the Federal Register.
E:\FR\FM\31JAP1.SGM
31JAP1
632
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 21 / Thursday, January 31, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This proposed rule would
have no such effect on State, local, and
tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance numbers and titles for the
programs affected by this document are
as follows: 64.009, Veterans Medical
Care Benefits; 64.012, Veterans
Prescription Service; 64.013, Veterans
Prosthetic Appliances; and 64.018,
Sharing Specialized Medical Resources.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Day care, Dental
health, Government contracts, Health
care, Health facilities, Health
professions, Health records, Mental
health programs, Nursing homes,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Travel and transportation
expenses, Veterans.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs
approved this document and authorized
the undersigned to sign and submit the
document to the Office of the Federal
Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department
of Veterans Affairs. Robert L. Wilkie,
Secretary, Department of Veterans
Affairs, approved this document on
November 9, 2018, for publication.
Dated: January 25, 2019.
Consuela Benjamin,
Regulations Development Coordinator, Office
of Regulation Policy & Management, Office
of the Secretary, Department of Veterans
Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, we propose to amend 38 CFR
part 17 as follows:
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
PART 17—MEDICAL
1. The authority citation for part 17 is
amended by adding entries for
§§ 17.105, 17.108, and 17.4600 to read
in part as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as noted in
specific sections.
*
*
*
*
*
Section 17.105 is also issued under 38
U.S.C. 501, 1721, 1722A, 1724, and 1725A.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Jan 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
Section 17.108 is also issued under 38
U.S.C. 501, 1710, 1725A, 1730A, Sec. 101,
Pub. L. 113–146, 128 Stat. 1754.
*
*
*
*
*
Section 17.4600 is also issued under 38
U.S.C. 1725A.
§ 17.105
[Amended]
2. Amend § 17.105 by:
a. In paragraph (c), removing ‘‘or
17.111’’ and adding in its place ‘‘17.111,
or 17.4600’’.
■ b. Removing the authority citation at
the end of the section.
■ 3. Amend § 17.108 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (e) introductory
text.
■ b. Removing the authority citation at
the end of the section.
The revision reads as follows:
■
■
§ 17.108 Copayments for inpatient hospital
care and outpatient medical care.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Services not subject to copayment
requirements for inpatient hospital care,
outpatient medical care, or urgent care.
The following are not subject to the
copayment requirements under this
section or § 17.4600.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Add § 17.4600 to read as follows:
§ 17.4600
Urgent care.
(a) Purpose. The purpose of this
section is to establish procedures for
accessing urgent care. Eligible veterans
may obtain urgent care from qualifying
non-VA entities or providers under
these requirements.
(b) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section.
(1) Eligible veteran means a veteran
described in 38 U.S.C. 1725A(b).
(2) Episodic care means care or
services provided to an eligible veteran
for a particular health condition, or a
limited set of particular health
conditions, without an ongoing
relationship being established between
the eligible veteran and qualifying nonVA entities or providers.
(3) Longitudinal management of
conditions means outpatient care that
addresses important disease prevention
and treatment goals and is dependent
upon bidirectional communications that
are ongoing over an extended period of
time. For purposes of this section, the
term ‘‘longitudinal management of
conditions’’ and ‘‘longitudinal care’’ are
synonymous.
(4) Qualifying non-VA entity or
provider means a non-VA entity or
provider, including Federally-qualified
health centers as defined in 42 U.S.C.
1396d(l)(2)(B), that has entered into a
contract, agreement, or other
arrangement with the Secretary to
furnish urgent care under this section.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(5) Urgent care means those services
being provided by walk-in retail health
clinics or urgent care facilities, as
designated by the Centers for Medicare
and Medicaid Services, furnished by a
qualifying non-VA entity or provider,
and as further defined in paragraphs
(b)(5)(i) through (iii) of this section.
(i)(A) Except as provided in paragraph
(b)(5)(i)(B) or (b)(5)(iii) of this section,
urgent care does not include preventive
health services, as defined in section
1701(9) of title 38, United States Code.
(B) Urgent care includes
immunization against influenza (flu
shots), as well as therapeutic vaccines
that are necessary in the course of
treatment of an otherwise included
service.
(ii) Urgent care may only be furnished
as episodic care for eligible veterans
needing immediate non-emergent
medical attention, but does not include
longitudinal care.
(iii) If VA determines that the
provision of additional services is in the
interest of eligible veterans, based upon
identified health needs, VA may offer
such additional services under this
section as VA determines appropriate.
Such services may be limited in
duration and location. VA will inform
the public through a Federal Register
document, published as soon as
practicable, and other communications,
as appropriate.
(c) Procedures. (1) Eligible veterans
may receive urgent care from a
qualifying non-VA entity or provider
without prior approval from VA.
(2) VA will publish a website
containing information on urgent care,
including the names, locations, and
contact information for qualifying nonVA entities or providers.
(3) In general, eligibility under this
section does not affect eligibility for
hospital care or medical services under
the medical benefits package, as defined
in § 17.38, or other benefits addressed in
this title. Nothing in this section waives
the eligibility requirements established
in other statutes or regulations.
(d) Copayment. (1) Except as provided
in paragraphs (d)(2) and (3) of this
section, an eligible veteran, as a
condition for receiving urgent care
provided by VA under this section,
must agree to pay VA (and is obligated
to pay VA) a copayment of $30:
(i) After three visits in a calendar year
if such eligible veteran is enrolled under
§ 17.36(b)(1) through (6), except those
veterans described in § 17.36(d)(3)(iii)
for all matters not covered by priority
category 6.
(ii) If such eligible veteran is enrolled
under § 17.36(b)(7) or (8), including
veterans described in § 17.36(d)(3)(iii).
E:\FR\FM\31JAP1.SGM
31JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 21 / Thursday, January 31, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(2) An eligible veteran who receives
urgent care under paragraph (b)(5)(iii) of
this section or urgent care consisting
solely of an immunization against
influenza (flu shot) is not subject to a
copayment under paragraph (d)(1) of
this section.
(3) If an eligible veteran would be
required to pay more than one
copayment under this section, or a
copayment under this section and a
copayment under § 17.108 or § 17.111,
on the same day, the eligible veteran
will only be charged the higher
copayment.
[FR Doc. 2019–00277 Filed 1–30–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
45 CFR Part 162
[CMS–0055–P]
RIN 0938–AT52
Administrative Simplification:
Modification of the Requirements for
the Use of Health Insurance Portability
and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)
National Council for Prescription Drug
Programs (NCPDP) D.0 Standard
Office of the Secretary, HHS.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This proposed rule would
adopt a modification to the
requirements for the use of the
Telecommunication Standard
Implementation Guide, Version D,
Release 0 (Version D.0), August 2007,
National Council for Prescription Drug
Programs by requiring covered entities
to use the Quantity Prescribed (460–ET)
field for retail pharmacy transactions for
Schedule II drugs. The modification
would enable covered entities to clearly
distinguish whether a prescription is a
‘‘partial fill,’’ where less than the full
amount prescribed is dispensed, or a
refill, in the HIPAA retail pharmacy
transactions. We believe this
modification is important to ensure
information is available to help prevent
impermissible refills of Schedule II
drugs, which would help to address the
public health concerns associated with
prescription drug abuse in the United
States.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
Comment Date: To be assured
consideration, comments must be
received at one of the addresses
provided below, no later than 5 p.m.
April 1, 2019.
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Jan 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
In commenting, please refer
to file code CMS–0055–P. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
Comments, including mass comment
submissions, must be submitted in one
of the following three ways (please
choose only one of the ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on this regulation
to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the ‘‘Submit a comment’’ instructions.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address ONLY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS–0055–P, P.O. Box 8013, Baltimore,
MD 21244–8013.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments to the
following address ONLY: Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human
Services, Attention: CMS–0055–P, Mail
Stop C4–26–05, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
For information on viewing public
comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Geanelle G. Herring, (410) 786–4466.
Daniel Kalwa, (410) 786–1352. Angelo
Pardo, (410) 786–1836.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Inspection
of Public Comments: All comments
received before the close of the
comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the
comment period on the following
website as soon as possible after they
have been received: https://
regulations.gov. Follow the search
instructions on that website to view
public comments.
ADDRESSES:
I. Background
The Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)
required the Secretary of the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) to adopt standards for
electronic health care administrative
transactions conducted between health
care providers, health plans, and health
care clearinghouses. In January 2009 (74
FR 3295), the Secretary adopted the
National Council of Prescription Drug
Programs (NCPDP) Telecommunication
Standard Implementation Guide,
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
633
Version D, Release 0, August 2007
(hereinafter referred to as Version D.0)
for the following retail pharmacy
transactions: Health care claims or
equivalent encounter information;
referral certification and authorization;
and coordination of benefits. As
discussed later, a technical issue with
Version D.0 necessitates a modification
of the requirements for the use of this
standard.
A. Inappropriate Medicare Part D
Payments for Schedule II Drugs Billed
as Refills
The HHS Office of the Inspector
General (OIG) conducted a study of
Medicare Part D payments for Schedule
II drugs that were billed as refills in
2009. Schedule II drugs are of particular
interest to regulators because of the
public health issues associated with
their use and the potential for misuse
and abuse. Schedule II drugs are
defined, in part, by the Controlled
Substances Act (CSA) as those with a
high potential for abuse, with use
potentially leading to severe
psychological or physical dependence
(21 U.S.C. 812(b)(2)). The CSA prohibits
the refilling of Schedule II drugs;
however, in some cases partial fills are
permissible. Partial fills of Schedule II
drugs were previously allowed only in
limited circumstances, including where
a pharmacist had less quantity on hand
than the prescribed amount of
medication, the prescription was for a
patient in a LTC facility, or a patient
had a terminal illness.1
Based on the data from the study, the
HHS OIG issued a report in September
2012 titled ‘‘Inappropriate Medicare
Part D Payments for Schedule II Drugs
Billed as Refills,’’ which analyzed all of
the 2009 program year prescription drug
event (PDE) records for refills of
Schedule II drugs.2 The OIG analyzed
20.1 million records for Schedule II
drugs and identified refills according to
the numeric values in a particular data
field—the Fill Number (403–D3) 3 field.
The OIG concluded that the Medicare
Part D program had inappropriately
paid $25 million for 397,203 Schedule
II drug refills and that long-term care
1 The Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) indicated
in a July 2017 letter to the NCPDP that it was
currently promulgating proposed rulemaking to
address the changes to 21 CFR 1306.13 (which
concerns partial fills of prescriptions for Schedule
II controlled substances) made by CARA.
2 Inappropriate Medicare Part D Payments for
Schedule II Drugs Billed as Refills, https://
oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-02-09-00605.asp
3 National Council of Prescription Drug Programs
(NCPDP) Telecommunication Standard
Implementation Guide, Version D, Release 0,
August 2007, defines the Fill Number Field as
‘‘403–D3’’.
E:\FR\FM\31JAP1.SGM
31JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 627-633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00277]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900-AQ47
Urgent Care
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is proposing to amend
its regulations that govern VA health care. This rule would grant
eligible veterans access to urgent care from qualifying non-VA entities
or providers without prior approval from VA. This rulemaking would
implement the mandates of the VA MISSION Act of 2018 and increase
veterans' access to health care in the community.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 4, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through https://www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to: Director, Regulation
Policy and Management (00REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue, North West, Room 1063B, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax
to (202) 273-9026. (This is not a toll-free telephone number.) Comments
should indicate that they are submitted in response to ``RIN 2900-AQ47
Urgent Care.'' Copies of comments received will be available for public
inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and Management, Room
1063B, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday
(except holidays). Please call (202) 461-4902 for an appointment. (This
is not a toll-free telephone number.) In addition, during the comment
period, comments may be viewed online through the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) at https://www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Duran, Director of Policy and
Planning. 3773 Cherry Creek North Drive, Denver, CO 80209.
Joseph.Duran2@va.gov. (303) 370-1637. (This is not a toll-free number.)
[[Page 628]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 6, 2018, section 105 of Public Law
115-182, the John S. McCain III, Daniel K. Akaka, and Samuel R. Johnson
VA Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside
Networks Act of 2018, or the VA MISSION Act of 2018, amended title 38
of the United States Code (U.S.C.) by adding a new section 1725A,
Access to walk-in care. The new section 1725A was further amended
through the Department of Veterans Affairs Expiring Authorities Act of
2018 (Pub. L. 115-251). This benefit is intended to offer eligible
veterans convenient care for certain, limited, non-emergent health care
needs. Section 1725A(a) and (g) direct the Secretary to establish
procedures and regulations to ensure eligible veterans are able to
access such care from qualifying non-VA entities or providers to ensure
their access to care when minor injury or illness arises. VA is
required to develop procedures to ensure eligible veterans are able to
access this care from qualifying non-VA entities or providers. Eligible
veterans would include any enrolled veteran who has received care under
chapter 17 of title 38 United States Code (U.S.C.) within the 24-month
period preceding the furnishing of care under this section. Care under
chapter 17 of title 38, U.S.C., would include any of the following:
Care provided in a VA facility, care authorized by VA performed by a
community provider, care furnished by a State Veterans home, or urgent
care under this proposed section. Qualifying non-VA entities or
providers would include any non-VA entity or provider that has entered
into a contract, agreement, or other arrangement with VA to provide
services under this section.
VA proposes to refer to this benefit as urgent care, instead of
walk-in care. As explained in further detail below, this benefit will
include care provided at both urgent care facilities and walk-in retail
health clinics. We believe referring to this type of care as ``urgent
care'' would be consistent with industry practice.
This proposed rule would implement the mandates of section 1725A,
as added by the VA MISSION Act of 2018 as amended, by establishing a
new Sec. 17.4600.
Proposed paragraph (a) would establish the purpose for this
section. We would state that this section establishes procedures for
accessing urgent care, which would be available to eligible veterans
from qualifying non-VA entities or providers under the requirements
established by this rulemaking. This would be consistent with sections
1725A(a) and (g).
Proposed paragraph (b) would define the terms for this section. We
would define the term ``eligible veteran'' in proposed paragraph (b)(1)
as a veteran described in 38 U.S.C. 1725A(b). Section 1725A(b) defines
eligible veterans as those who are enrolled under section 1705(a) of
title 38, U.S.C. and who have received medical care under chapter 17 of
title 38, U.S.C., within the 24-month period preceding the furnishing
of urgent care under this new program. We would not restate the
definition in section 1725A in the event that this section is amended
in the future. As stated earlier, veterans have received care under
chapter 17 of title 38, U.S.C., when they have received care provided
in a VA facility, care authorized by VA and performed by a community
provider, care furnished by a State Veterans home, or urgent care under
this proposed section.
The term ``episodic care'' appears, but is not defined, in section
1725A(h). We propose to define the term ``episodic care'' in proposed
paragraph (b)(2) as care or services provided to an eligible veteran
for a particular health condition, or a limited set of particular
health conditions, without an ongoing relationship being established
between the eligible veteran and qualifying non-VA entities or
providers. Episodic care would be only for a particular health
condition (or a flu shot) or a limited set of particular health
conditions, to be addressed in a single visit. For example, an eligible
veteran could seek episodic care for a sore throat, an ankle sprain, or
both in a single visit. There would be no further relationship between
the qualifying non-VA entity or provider and the eligible veteran for
the treatment of those health conditions. VA believes that flu shots,
as well as therapeutic vaccines that are furnished in the course of
treatment of another condition, would be clinically appropriate because
the risk of an adverse reaction would be minimal for a flu shot, and
therapeutic vaccines would be necessary for the treatment of certain
conditions. For example, a veteran seeking treatment for a wound caused
by rusted metal requires treatment for the wound and may require a
tetanus vaccine as part of the course of treatment. VA acknowledges
that there may be other preventive treatments with minimal risk of
adverse action, however, VA considers these preventive care treatments
to be part of the veteran's longitudinal care, as such, these other
treatments should be provided by the veteran's primary care provider
and not as part of urgent care. As stated in section 1725A(h), urgent
care should not be used for the longitudinal management of health care.
These requirements are consistent with the general model of urgent care
where patients seek health care for the treatment of minor injuries and
illnesses through a single visit.
We propose to define the term ``longitudinal management of
conditions'' in proposed paragraph (b)(3) as outpatient care that
addresses important disease prevention and treatment goals and is
dependent upon bidirectional communications that are ongoing over an
extended period of time. Section 1725A(h) excludes from the definition
of walk-in care the longitudinal management of conditions; while we
would define the term ``longitudinal management of conditions,'' we
would also state that, for purposes of this section, the term
``longitudinal care'' is synonymous with longitudinal management of
conditions because we believe ``longitudinal care'' is better
understood and would be clearer in the context of the regulation. We
would only refer to outpatient care because urgent/walk-in care
providers do not provide inpatient care or extended care services. The
reference to bidirectional communications that are ongoing over an
extended period of time is intended to reflect that longitudinal care
occurs within the context of an ongoing relationship between the
provider and patient.
Proposed paragraph (b)(4) would define the term ``qualifying non-VA
entities or providers'' consistent with the definition in section
1725A(c), but we have specifically included Federally-qualified health
centers based on section 1725A(d). We would define ``qualifying non-VA
entity or provider'' as a non-VA entity or provider, including
Federally-qualified health centers as defined in 42 U.S.C.
1396d(l)(2)(B), that has entered into a contract, agreement, or other
arrangement with the Secretary to furnish urgent care under the
section. VA currently furnishes care in the community through networks
of providers that are maintained by third-party administrators. The
third-party administrator meets the definition of the qualifying non-VA
entity or provider--they are non-VA entities or providers that have
entered into a contract or agreement with the Secretary to furnish care
and services under this section--and it is through these administrators
that the urgent care benefit primarily will be provided.
We propose to define the term ``urgent care'' in proposed paragraph
(b)(5). This definition would include several key
[[Page 629]]
conditions as follows. This definition would only apply to this
section; other uses of the term ``urgent care'' or ``urgent services''
in other VA regulations, specifically Sec. Sec. 17.101, 17.106, and
70.71, would not refer to this benefit. Section 1725A(h) defines the
term ``walk-in care'' as non-emergent care provided by a qualifying
non-Department entity or provider that furnishes episodic care and not
longitudinal management of conditions and is otherwise defined through
regulations the Secretary shall promulgate. However, VA proposes to use
the term ``urgent care'' instead of ``walk-in care.'' Urgent care is an
industry standard description of the services described below available
at specific provider locations, including Federally Qualified Health
Centers (FQHCs) as required under section 1725A(h). VA prefers to use
an industry standard name for the benefit.
First, VA proposes to provide in proposed paragraph (b)(5) that
urgent care is those services being provided by walk-in retail health
clinics or urgent care facilities, as designated by the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services, furnished by a qualifying non-VA entity
or provider, and as further defined in the paragraph. We believe that
defining urgent care to include those services that are furnished by
walk-in retail health clinics or urgent care facilities, as designated
by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, would be in
alignment with public expectations of the types of urgent care services
that are otherwise available under other health care plans. The Centers
for Medicare and Medicaid Services currently describes the services
that walk-in retail health clinics and urgent care facilities furnish
at the following website: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coding/place-of-service-codes/Place_of_Service_Code_Set.html. VA's proposed definition
would also allow the benefit available under this section to evolve
based upon advances in the industry regarding the types of services
offered by these clinics and facilities. A qualifying non-VA entity or
provider would have to enter into a contract, agreement, or other
arrangement with VA to furnish services under this section. This is a
requirement of section 1725A(c), and is also a critical part of the
definition of a ``qualifying non-VA entity or provider'' under
paragraph (b)(4). We note that, while we propose to define the scope of
services available as urgent care in paragraph (b)(5), because of our
reliance on contracts, agreements, or other arrangements, the actual
services available at a particular qualifying non-VA entity or provider
may vary. We further note that any care that is provided to an eligible
veteran that does not meet this definition, whether it be that the care
was provided by a non-qualifying entity or provider or that the care
provided was beyond the scope of urgent care as defined in this
section, will not be covered by VA. In these situations, the eligible
veteran would be liable for the cost of such care.
In proposed paragraph (b)(5)(i)(A), however, VA would not, except
as provided for in paragraph (b)(5)(i)(B) or (b)(5)(iii), include
preventive health services, as defined in 38 U.S.C. 1701(9). We would
exclude generally preventive services because, consistent with the
statutory requirement in section 1725A(e), the best way to ensure
continuity of care is to have preventive health services coordinated
and managed by a primary care provider furnishing longitudinal care.
Section 1725A(e) requires that the Secretary ensure continuity of care
for eligible veterans receiving this benefit. Preventive health
services are a critical component to VA's health care management
system. VA believes that urgent care is fundamentally distinct from
providing longitudinal health care within VA or the community. The best
way to address a veteran's health care needs would be to manage a
veteran's preventive health services as part of their overall health
care rather than attempting to furnish such services on an episodic and
uncoordinated basis. As such, we believe that to ensure continuity of
care, as required by section 1725A(e), VA should exclude generally
preventive health services from the definition of urgent care.
We would further define urgent care in proposed paragraph
(b)(5)(i)(B) to include immunizations against influenza (flu shots), as
well as therapeutic vaccines that are necessary in the course of
treatment of an otherwise included service. Vaccinations are included
within the definition of preventive health services in 38 U.S.C.
1701(9)(G) (which refers to immunizations) and as such would have been
excluded under paragraph (b)(5)(i)(A).
We would also add in paragraph (b)(5)(ii) another requirement of
urgent care: It must be furnished as ``episodic care for eligible
veterans needing immediate non-emergent medical attention, but does not
include longitudinal care.'' This is based on the definition of walk-in
care in section 1725A(h).
Finally, we propose to state in paragraph (b)(5)(iii) that VA may
provide additional services it determines to be appropriate if it is in
the interest of eligible veterans', based on identified health needs.
VA would inform the public via Federal Register document, published as
soon as practicable, and other communication as VA determines
appropriate. VA's determination that additional services are in the
interest of eligible veterans could be made to expand services
regionally or nationally and for specified periods of time. This
authority would only allow for the provision of services that
qualifying non-VA entities or providers would otherwise furnish, but
that would be excluded by our definition of the benefit of urgent care.
Principally, these services would include preventive health services,
including immunizations that are not for influenza or therapeutic
vaccines. For example, if there is a localized outbreak of an
infectious disease, VA could provide eligible veterans immunizations to
prevent this disease as part of urgent care until the outbreak is
contained.
Proposed paragraph (c) would establish procedures for urgent care.
Procedures are required pursuant to section 1725A(a). We would state in
proposed paragraph (c)(1) that eligible veterans may ``receive urgent
care from a qualifying non-VA entity or provider without prior approval
from VA.'' We believe this would be consistent with the general
understanding of urgent and walk-in care, as well as the structure of
the statute, which authorizes this benefit outside of the general
Veterans Community Care Program under the amendments to section 1703,
as made by section 101 of the VA MISSION Act of 2018. The general
Veterans Community Care Program requires authorization for services,
see amendments to section 1703(a)(3), while there is no similar
requirement in section 1725A. This arrangement, combined with the
Senate Committee's report on this language, suggest that the purpose of
this provision is to ensure that eligible veterans have access to
convenient care. See S. Rpt. 115-212, p. 18.
We would provide in proposed paragraph (c)(2) that VA will publish
a website containing information on urgent care, including the names,
locations, and contact information for qualifying non-VA entities or
providers within an eligible veteran's community. The website would
also include a list of services and other general information on the
urgent care program established under this section.
Proposed paragraph (c)(3) would provide, in general, eligibility
under the
[[Page 630]]
section does not affect eligibility for hospital care or medical
services under the medical benefits package, as defined in Sec. 17.38,
or other benefits addressed in title 38. Nothing in the section waives
the eligibility requirements established in other statutes or
regulations. This proposed paragraph would address the effect of urgent
care on other provisions and programs administered by VA. Proposed
paragraph (c)(3) would provide that, generally, eligibility for urgent
care does not affect eligibility for hospital care or medical services
under the medical benefits package or other benefits addressed in title
38. If particular services have unique eligibility standards, only
veterans who are eligible under this section and who meet the
eligibility standards for those services can elect to receive urgent
care for them. Additionally, nothing in this section waives the
eligibility requirements established in other statutes or regulations.
However, eligibility for urgent care could affect eligibility for other
benefits indirectly. For example, section 1725(b)(2)(B) provides that
to be eligible for reimbursement for emergency treatment, a veteran
must have received care under chapter 17 of title 38, U.S.C., within
the 24-month period preceding the furnishing of such emergency
treatment. If a veteran's only care within the 24-month period
preceding the furnishing of such emergency treatment was for urgent
care pursuant to these regulations, the veteran would satisfy this
eligibility requirement and could be eligible for reimbursement for
emergency treatment under section 1725.
Proposed paragraph (d) would establish the copayment obligations
for eligible veterans. Section 1725A(f)(1)(A) authorizes the Secretary
to require an eligible veteran to pay the United States a copayment for
each episode of hospital care or medical services provided under the
section if the eligible veteran would be required to pay a copayment
under this title. Section 1725A(f)(1)(B) states that an eligible
veteran not required to pay a copayment under the title may access
walk-in care without a copayment for the first two visits in a calendar
year. For any additional visits, a copayment at an amount determined by
the Secretary may be required. Section 1725A(f)(1)(C) further states
that an eligible veteran required to pay a copayment under the title
may be required to pay a regular copayment for the first two walk-in
care visits in a calendar year. For any additional visits, a higher
copayment at an amount determined by the Secretary may be required.
Similarly, section 1725A(f)(2) states that after the first two episodes
of care furnished to an eligible veteran under the section, the
Secretary may adjust the copayment required of the veteran under the
subsection based upon the priority group of enrollment of the eligible
veteran, the number of episodes of care furnished to the eligible
veteran during a year, and other factors the Secretary considers
appropriate under the section.
In this rulemaking, we propose to establish a regular copayment for
urgent care of $30. An eligible veteran's liability for the $30 regular
copayment would depend on the veteran's enrollment category and the
number of visits in a calendar year, as further explained below. We
note that section 1725A(f)(3), which allows the Secretary to prescribe
by rule the amount or amounts of copayments required under this
section, allows the Secretary to establish unique regular copayments
applicable to urgent care when provided under this section. We further
note that section 1725A(f)(4) states that sections 8153(c) and 1703A(j)
do not apply to section 1725A(f). Sections 8153(c) and 1703A(j)
stipulate that care furnished pursuant to an agreement authorized by
one of these sections is subject to the same terms as though provided
in a facility of the Department, and that provisions of chapter 17
applicable to veterans receiving such care and services in a VA medical
facility shall apply to veterans treated under this section. We
interpret these exemptions, along with section 1725A(f)(3), to permit
the Secretary to establish unique copayment amounts applicable to
urgent care.
Copayments are a common feature of health care, including VA health
care. They are an important mechanism for guiding behavior to ensure
that patients receive care at an appropriate location. As previously
stated in this rulemaking, urgent care does not include longitudinal
care. Urgent care is considered to be a convenient option for care, but
is not intended to be used as a substitute for traditional primary
care. Also, collecting copayments allows VA to utilize its health care
resources more efficiently.
VA believes that $30 amount is consistent with the copayments
charged by other Federal programs for similar benefits under the
TRICARE and Medicare programs. Also, the $30 amount is a reasonable
charge because it is considerably less than what is commercially
available, which on average is approximately $67, based on an analysis
VA conducted of private sector benefits under commercial health plans.
This amount is consistent with legislative history suggesting that the
copayment amount not exceed $50 per visit. S. Rpt. 115-212, p. 19. We
believe that the convenience associated with accessing urgent care
merits a copayment amount that could be higher than the amount that
would apply if VA furnished that care in a VA facility or through
authorized community care. Eligible veterans would not owe copayments
at the time of service, consistent with current practice for VA and VA-
authorized community care.
Consistent with section 1725A(f)(1)(B), we propose to require all
eligible veterans who are enrolled in priority groups 1-6, except those
veterans described in Sec. 17.36(d)(3)(iii), to only pay the $30
copayment after three urgent care visits. For further information on
priority groups see Sec. 17.36. Although these veterans are not
required to pay copayments for other health care services furnished or
paid for by VA, section 1725A(f)(1)(B) authorizes VA to start requiring
a copayment after two visits, we believe that is appropriate to require
a copayment after three visits instead of two. For those veterans who
are enrolled in priority groups 7-8, including those veterans described
in Sec. 17.36(d)(3)(iii), we propose to charge the $30 for all visits
and will not exercise the authority under section 1725A(f)(1)(C) and
(f)(2) to increase their copayment rate after two visits.
Therefore, we would state in proposed paragraph (d)(1) that, except
as provided in paragraph (d)(2) or (d)(3), an eligible veteran, as a
condition for receiving urgent care provided by VA under this section,
must agree to pay VA (and is obligated to pay VA) a copayment of $30 if
the veteran is enrolled in priority groups 1-6, except those veterans
described in Sec. 17.36(d)(3)(iii) and has more than three urgent care
visits under this section in a year, or if the veteran is enrolled in
priority groups 7-8, including those veterans described in Sec.
17.36(d)(3)(iii). These conditions would be stated in proposed
paragraph (d)(1)(i), dealing with veterans enrolled in priority groups
1-6 generally, and in proposed paragraph (d)(1)(ii), dealing with
veterans enrolled in priority groups 7-8.
Proposed paragraph (d)(2) would provide that an eligible veteran
who receives urgent care under Sec. 17.4600(b)(5)(iii) or urgent care
consisting solely of an immunization against influenza (flu shot) is
not subject to a copayment under paragraph (d)(1). VA would not charge
a copayment for
[[Page 631]]
flu shots to be consistent with private care best practice standards
and be in alignment with other Federal programs. The Affordable Care
Act requires health insurers to cover the flu shot without charging a
copayment or coinsurance. While the insurer can require an individual
to go to a specific facility to receive a flu shot, most insurers allow
individuals to go to walk-in clinics for this benefit. Additionally,
neither Medicare nor TRICARE charges a copayment for the flu shot. If
VA were to charge a copayment for flu shots, we would not be aligned
with the private sector or other government agencies. Furthermore, VA
does not currently require a copayment for a flu shot if veterans
receive one at a VA clinic on a walk-in basis, and we believe it is in
the veterans' best interest to continue this practice.
Proposed paragraph (d)(3) would provide that if an eligible veteran
receives more than one type of care on the same day that would subject
the veteran to a copayment under Sec. 17.108, which establishes
copayments for inpatient and outpatient care, or Sec. 17.111, which
establishes copayments for extended care services, VA would only charge
the higher copayment for that day. We would only charge one copayment
to reduce the burden on the part of the eligible veteran. This is
consistent with how VA charges copayments for multiple VA visits in the
same day. See Sec. 17.108(c)(2) and (f). VA would also only charge a
single copayment if an eligible veteran receives more than one episode
of care under Sec. 17.4600 on the same day.
VA also proposes to amend Sec. 17.105 to reflect the copayments as
established in this rulemaking. First, VA would propose to include
proposed Sec. 17.4600 among the list of regulatory authorities under
which copayments would be subject to a waiver under Sec. 17.105(c).
This would ensure that urgent care copayments would be treated the same
as other copayments for eligible veterans seeking a waiver of their
liability. Second, VA would delete the list of authorities for Sec.
17.105 to comply with the guidelines of the Office of the Federal
Register, but would add the complete list of authorities for this
regulation, including 38 U.S.C. 1725A, among the authority citations
listed for part 17.
VA similarly proposes to amend Sec. 17.108(e) to make clear that
the copayment exemptions for outpatient medical care specified in that
section also apply to urgent care under this section. This would ensure
consistent application of copayment rules for eligible veterans. We
would make similar conforming changes regarding the list of authorities
for Sec. 17.108.
Effect of Rulemaking
The Code of Federal Regulations, as proposed to be revised by this
proposed rulemaking, would represent the exclusive legal authority on
this subject. No contrary rules or procedures would be authorized. All
VA guidance would be read to conform with this proposed rulemaking if
possible or, if not possible, such guidance would be superseded by this
rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking does not contain any provisions constituting
collections of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501-3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612. This proposed rule would not have a significant
economic impact on qualifying non-VA entities or providers. To the
extent there is any such impact, it would result in increased business
and revenue for them. We also do not believe there will be a
significant economic impact on insurance companies, as claims would
only be submitted for care that would otherwise have been received
whether such care was authorized under this Program or not. Therefore,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this rulemaking is exempt from the initial
and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603
and 604.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a
``significant regulatory action,'' which requires review by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB), as any regulatory action that is likely
to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
the Executive Order.
VA has examined the economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and
policy implications of this regulatory action and determined that the
action is an economically significant regulatory action under Executive
Order 12866. VA's regulatory impact analysis can be found as a
supporting document at https://www.regulations.gov, usually within 48
hours after the rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy
of the rulemaking and its regulatory impact analysis are available on
VA's website at https://www.va.gov/orpm by following the link for VA
Regulations Published from FY 2004 through FYTD.
Executive Order 12866 also directs agencies to ``in most cases . .
. include a comment period of not less than 60 days.'' This regulation
will increase access to care for eligible veterans in local communities
across the country. Providing a 30-day comment period will allow the
Secretary to expedite the commencement of this new benefit thereby
increasing access to health care for eligible veterans. Moreover, we
believe that urgent care is a common benefit among other health care
plans and thus should not be an unfamiliar benefit to the public. Given
general public familiarity with this benefit, we believe that 30 days
would be a sufficient period of time for the public to comment on this
rulemaking. In sum, providing a 60-day public comment period instead of
a 30-day public comment period would be against public interest and the
health and safety of eligible veterans. For the above reasons, the
Secretary issues this rule with a 30-day public comment period. VA will
consider and address comments that are received within 30 days of the
date this proposed rule is published in the Federal Register.
[[Page 632]]
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This proposed rule would have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance numbers and titles for
the programs affected by this document are as follows: 64.009, Veterans
Medical Care Benefits; 64.012, Veterans Prescription Service; 64.013,
Veterans Prosthetic Appliances; and 64.018, Sharing Specialized Medical
Resources.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Day care, Dental
health, Government contracts, Health care, Health facilities, Health
professions, Health records, Mental health programs, Nursing homes,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Travel and transportation
expenses, Veterans.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document to the
Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as an
official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Robert L.
Wilkie, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on November 9, 2018, for publication.
Dated: January 25, 2019.
Consuela Benjamin,
Regulations Development Coordinator, Office of Regulation Policy &
Management, Office of the Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, we propose to amend 38
CFR part 17 as follows:
PART 17--MEDICAL
0
1. The authority citation for part 17 is amended by adding entries for
Sec. Sec. 17.105, 17.108, and 17.4600 to read in part as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as noted in specific sections.
* * * * *
Section 17.105 is also issued under 38 U.S.C. 501, 1721, 1722A,
1724, and 1725A.
Section 17.108 is also issued under 38 U.S.C. 501, 1710, 1725A,
1730A, Sec. 101, Pub. L. 113-146, 128 Stat. 1754.
* * * * *
Section 17.4600 is also issued under 38 U.S.C. 1725A.
Sec. 17.105 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 17.105 by:
0
a. In paragraph (c), removing ``or 17.111'' and adding in its place
``17.111, or 17.4600''.
0
b. Removing the authority citation at the end of the section.
0
3. Amend Sec. 17.108 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (e) introductory text.
0
b. Removing the authority citation at the end of the section.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 17.108 Copayments for inpatient hospital care and outpatient
medical care.
* * * * *
(e) Services not subject to copayment requirements for inpatient
hospital care, outpatient medical care, or urgent care. The following
are not subject to the copayment requirements under this section or
Sec. 17.4600.
* * * * *
0
4. Add Sec. 17.4600 to read as follows:
Sec. 17.4600 Urgent care.
(a) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish procedures
for accessing urgent care. Eligible veterans may obtain urgent care
from qualifying non-VA entities or providers under these requirements.
(b) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section.
(1) Eligible veteran means a veteran described in 38 U.S.C.
1725A(b).
(2) Episodic care means care or services provided to an eligible
veteran for a particular health condition, or a limited set of
particular health conditions, without an ongoing relationship being
established between the eligible veteran and qualifying non-VA entities
or providers.
(3) Longitudinal management of conditions means outpatient care
that addresses important disease prevention and treatment goals and is
dependent upon bidirectional communications that are ongoing over an
extended period of time. For purposes of this section, the term
``longitudinal management of conditions'' and ``longitudinal care'' are
synonymous.
(4) Qualifying non-VA entity or provider means a non-VA entity or
provider, including Federally-qualified health centers as defined in 42
U.S.C. 1396d(l)(2)(B), that has entered into a contract, agreement, or
other arrangement with the Secretary to furnish urgent care under this
section.
(5) Urgent care means those services being provided by walk-in
retail health clinics or urgent care facilities, as designated by the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, furnished by a qualifying
non-VA entity or provider, and as further defined in paragraphs
(b)(5)(i) through (iii) of this section.
(i)(A) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(5)(i)(B) or (b)(5)(iii)
of this section, urgent care does not include preventive health
services, as defined in section 1701(9) of title 38, United States
Code.
(B) Urgent care includes immunization against influenza (flu
shots), as well as therapeutic vaccines that are necessary in the
course of treatment of an otherwise included service.
(ii) Urgent care may only be furnished as episodic care for
eligible veterans needing immediate non-emergent medical attention, but
does not include longitudinal care.
(iii) If VA determines that the provision of additional services is
in the interest of eligible veterans, based upon identified health
needs, VA may offer such additional services under this section as VA
determines appropriate. Such services may be limited in duration and
location. VA will inform the public through a Federal Register
document, published as soon as practicable, and other communications,
as appropriate.
(c) Procedures. (1) Eligible veterans may receive urgent care from
a qualifying non-VA entity or provider without prior approval from VA.
(2) VA will publish a website containing information on urgent
care, including the names, locations, and contact information for
qualifying non-VA entities or providers.
(3) In general, eligibility under this section does not affect
eligibility for hospital care or medical services under the medical
benefits package, as defined in Sec. 17.38, or other benefits
addressed in this title. Nothing in this section waives the eligibility
requirements established in other statutes or regulations.
(d) Copayment. (1) Except as provided in paragraphs (d)(2) and (3)
of this section, an eligible veteran, as a condition for receiving
urgent care provided by VA under this section, must agree to pay VA
(and is obligated to pay VA) a copayment of $30:
(i) After three visits in a calendar year if such eligible veteran
is enrolled under Sec. 17.36(b)(1) through (6), except those veterans
described in Sec. 17.36(d)(3)(iii) for all matters not covered by
priority category 6.
(ii) If such eligible veteran is enrolled under Sec. 17.36(b)(7)
or (8), including veterans described in Sec. 17.36(d)(3)(iii).
[[Page 633]]
(2) An eligible veteran who receives urgent care under paragraph
(b)(5)(iii) of this section or urgent care consisting solely of an
immunization against influenza (flu shot) is not subject to a copayment
under paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(3) If an eligible veteran would be required to pay more than one
copayment under this section, or a copayment under this section and a
copayment under Sec. 17.108 or Sec. 17.111, on the same day, the
eligible veteran will only be charged the higher copayment.
[FR Doc. 2019-00277 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P