Air Plan Approval; California; El Dorado County Air Quality Management District; Reasonably Available Control Technology Demonstration, 67696-67698 [2018-28294]
Download as PDF
67696
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 249 / Monday, December 31, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Consideration (REC) are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
2. Add § 165.T11–903 to read as
follows:
■
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
[EPA–R09–OAR–2018–0602; FRL–9988–52–
Region 9]
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters from
the surface to the sea floor within a 500foot radius around the fireworks launch
site at the south jetty in approximate
position: 33°57.760N 118°27.328W.
These coordinates are based on North
American Datum of 1983.
(b) Definitions. For the purposes of
this section:
Designated representative means a
Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty
officer, or other officer operating a Coast
Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and
local officer designated by or assisting
the COTP in the enforcement of the
safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, you may not enter the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or her designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter, hail
Coast Guard Sector Los Angeles—Long
Beach on VHF–FM Channel 16 or call
Jkt 247001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
§ 165.T11–903 Safety Zone; Marina Del
Rey Fireworks Event; Marina Del Rey,
California.
15:57 Dec 28, 2018
Dated: December 19, 2018.
M.L. Rochester,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Los Angeles—Long Beach.
[FR Doc. 2018–28355 Filed 12–28–18; 8:45 am]
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
at (310) 521–3801. Those in the safety
zone must comply with all lawful orders
or directions given to them by the COTP
or her designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This duration
of this rule is from 12:01 a.m. on
December 31, 2018 through 1:01 a.m. on
January 1, 2019 in Marina Del Rey
harbor and will be enforced for the
duration of two fireworks displays,
respectively expected to commence at
9:00 p.m. on December 31, 2018 and
12:00 a.m. on January 1, 2019, with each
display lasting for approximately 15
minutes. No vessel or person would be
permitted to operate in the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the
COTP or her designated representative.
The safety zone will only be enforced
during the specific dates scheduled for
fireworks displays during this period.
General boating public will be notified
prior to the enforcement of the
temporary safety zone via Broadcast
Notice to Mariners.
Air Plan Approval; California; El
Dorado County Air Quality
Management District; Reasonably
Available Control Technology
Demonstration
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a revision to the El Dorado
County Air Quality Management District
(EDCAQMD or ‘‘District’’) portion of the
California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). This revision concerns the
District’s demonstration regarding
reasonably available control technology
(RACT) requirements for the 2008
8-hour ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS) and negative
declarations for several source
categories. We are approving local SIP
revisions to demonstrate that RACT is
implemented as required under the
Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘the Act’’).
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This rule is effective on January
30, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2018–0602. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stanley Tong, EPA Region IX, (415)
947–4122, tong.stanley@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
DATES:
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On October 9, 2018 (83 FR 50548), the
EPA proposed to approve EDCAQMD’s
‘‘Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) State
Implementation Plan (SIP) Update
Analysis Staff Report’’ (‘‘2017 RACT
SIP’’), submitted to the EPA by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB)
on January 4, 2017,1 for approval as a
revision to the California SIP.
EDCAQMD’s January 3, 2017 2017
RACT SIP also included negative
declarations for several control
techniques guidelines (CTG) source
categories where the District certified
that it had no sources subject to the CTG
documents. The submittal also included
EDCAQMD’s Resolution 002–2017,
which approved the 2017 RACT SIP and
certified the District has no major
stationary sources of volatile organic
compounds (VOC) or oxides of nitrogen
(NOX).
We proposed to approve the 2017
RACT SIP and negative declarations
because we determined that they
complied with the relevant CAA
requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the
documents and our evaluation.
1 The EDCAQMD adopted its 2017 RACT SIP on
January 3, 2017.
E:\FR\FM\31DER1.SGM
31DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 249 / Monday, December 31, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received one comment
that supported our proposed approval of
EDCAQMD’s 2017 RACT SIP. The
commenter also raised comments that
were not germane to our proposed
rulemaking action (natural asbestos
formations and factors contributing to
the reduced clarity of Lake Tahoe).
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment of EDCAQMD’s
2017 RACT SIP and negative
declarations as described in our
proposed action. Therefore, as
authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the
Act, the EPA is fully approving the 2017
RACT SIP and negative declarations
into the California SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Dec 28, 2018
Jkt 247001
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by March 1, 2019.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67697
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: November 30, 2018.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(513) to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan—in part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(513) The following plan was
submitted on January 4, 2017 by the
Governor’s designee.
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) Additional materials. (A) El
Dorado County Air Quality Management
District.
(1) Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) State
Implementation Plan (SIP) Update
Analysis Staff Report, adopted on
January 3, 2017.
(2) Board of Directors of the El Dorado
County Air Quality Management
District, Resolution No. 002–2017,
‘‘Resolution Approving 2008
Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) State
Implementation Plan (SIP) Update
Analysis.’’
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 52.222 is amended by
adding paragraph (a)(7)(iv) to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.222
Negative declarations.
(a) * * *
(7) * * *
(iv) The following negative
declarations for the 2008 NAAQS were
adopted by the El Dorado County Air
Quality Management District on January
3, 2017, and submitted to the EPA on
January 4, 2017.
E:\FR\FM\31DER1.SGM
31DER1
67698
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 249 / Monday, December 31, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS FOR THE 2008 OZONE NAAQS
CTG document No.
Title
EPA–450/2–77–008 .........................
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume II: Surface Coating of
Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Solvent Metal Cleaning.
Control of Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems, Wastewater Separators, and Process Unit Turnarounds.
Control of Hydrocarbons from Tank Truck Gasoline Loading Terminals.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume III: Surface Coating of
Metal Furniture.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume IV: Surface Coating of
Insulation of Magnet Wire.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume V: Surface Coating of
Large Appliances.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Storage of Petroleum Liquids in Fixed-Roof Tanks.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume VI: Surface Coating of
Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume VII: Factory Surface
Coating of Flat Wood Paneling.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume VIII: Graphic Arts-Rotogravure and Flexography.
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Petroleum Liquid Storage in External Floating Roof Tanks.
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners.
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Synthetic Organic Chemical Polymer and Resin Manufacturing Equipment.
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Equipment Leaks from Natural Gas/Gasoline Processing Plants.
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Manufacture of High-Density Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and Polystyrene Resins.
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes in Synthetic Organic
Chemical Manufacturing Industry.
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations in
Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry.
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations.
Alternative Control Technology Document—Surface Coating Operations at Shipbuilding and Ship Repair
Facilities Control Techniques Guidelines for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Operations (Surface Coating).
Aerospace MACT and Aerospace (CTG & MACT).
EPA–450/2–77–022
EPA–450/2–77–025
EPA–450/2–77–026
EPA–450/2–77–032
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
EPA–450/2–77–033 .........................
EPA–450/2–77–034 .........................
EPA–450/2–77–036 .........................
EPA–450/2–78–015 .........................
EPA–450/2–78–029 .........................
EPA–450/2–78–030 .........................
EPA–450/2–78–032 .........................
EPA–450/2–78–033 .........................
EPA–450/2–78–036
EPA–450/2–78–047
EPA–450/3–82–009
EPA–450/3–83–006
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
EPA–450/3–83–007 .........................
EPA–450/3–83–008 .........................
EPA–450/3–84–015 .........................
EPA–450/4–91–031 .........................
EPA–453/R–96–007 ........................
EPA–453/R–94–032 61 FR 44050;
8/27/96
EPA–453/R–97–004 59 FR 29216;
6/6/94.
EPA–453/R–06–001 ........................
EPA–453/R–06–002 ........................
EPA–453/R–06–003 ........................
EPA–453/R–06–004 ........................
EPA 453/R–07–003 .........................
EPA 453/R–07–004 .........................
EPA 453/R–07–005 .........................
EPA 453/R–08–003 .........................
EPA 453/R–08–004 .........................
EPA 453/R–08–005 .........................
EPA 453/R–08–006 .........................
EPA 453/B16–001 ...........................
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Techniques
Techniques
Techniques
Techniques
Techniques
Techniques
Techniques
Techniques
Techniques
Techniques
Techniques
Techniques
Guidelines
Guidelines
Guidelines
Guidelines
Guidelines
Guidelines
Guidelines
Guidelines
Guidelines
Guidelines
Guidelines
Guidelines
for
for
for
for
for
for
for
for
for
for
for
for
Industrial Cleaning Solvents.
Offset Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing.
Flexible Package Printing.
Flat Wood Paneling Coatings
Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings.
Large Appliance Coatings.
Metal Furniture Coatings.
Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings.
Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials.
Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives.
Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings.
the Oil and Natural Gas Industry.
Major non-CTG VOC sources.
Major non-CTG NOX sources.
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
49 CFR 1022
This final rule is effective on
December 31, 2018.
DATES:
[Docket No. EP 716 (Sub-No. 4)]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Civil Monetary Penalties—2019
Adjustment
Surface Transportation Board.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
The Surface Transportation
Board (Board) is issuing a final rule to
implement the annual inflationary
adjustment to its civil monetary
penalties, pursuant to the Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
Improvements Act of 2015.
SUMMARY:
[FR Doc. 2018–28294 Filed 12–28–18; 8:45 am]
15:57 Dec 28, 2018
Jkt 247001
Jonathon Binet: (202) 245–0368. Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the
hearing impaired: (800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
I. Background
The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act Improvements Act of
2015 (2015 Act), enacted as part of the
Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, Public
Law 114–74, 701, 129 Stat. 584, 599–
601, requires agencies to adjust their
civil penalties for inflation annually,
beginning on July 1, 2016, and no later
than January 15 of every year thereafter.
In accordance with the 2015 Act, annual
inflation adjustments are to be based on
the percent change between the
Consumer Price Index for all Urban
Consumers (CPI–U) for October of the
E:\FR\FM\31DER1.SGM
31DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 249 (Monday, December 31, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67696-67698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-28294]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2018-0602; FRL-9988-52-Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; California; El Dorado County Air Quality
Management District; Reasonably Available Control Technology
Demonstration
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a revision to the El Dorado County Air Quality
Management District (EDCAQMD or ``District'') portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns the District's
demonstration regarding reasonably available control technology (RACT)
requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS) and negative declarations for several source
categories. We are approving local SIP revisions to demonstrate that
RACT is implemented as required under the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``the
Act'').
DATES: This rule is effective on January 30, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2018-0602. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley Tong, EPA Region IX, (415)
947-4122, tong.stanley@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On October 9, 2018 (83 FR 50548), the EPA proposed to approve
EDCAQMD's ``Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) State
Implementation Plan (SIP) Update Analysis Staff Report'' (``2017 RACT
SIP''), submitted to the EPA by the California Air Resources Board
(CARB) on January 4, 2017,\1\ for approval as a revision to the
California SIP. EDCAQMD's January 3, 2017 2017 RACT SIP also included
negative declarations for several control techniques guidelines (CTG)
source categories where the District certified that it had no sources
subject to the CTG documents. The submittal also included EDCAQMD's
Resolution 002-2017, which approved the 2017 RACT SIP and certified the
District has no major stationary sources of volatile organic compounds
(VOC) or oxides of nitrogen (NOX).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The EDCAQMD adopted its 2017 RACT SIP on January 3, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve the 2017 RACT SIP and negative declarations
because we determined that they complied with the relevant CAA
requirements. Our proposed action contains more information on the
documents and our evaluation.
[[Page 67697]]
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received one comment that supported our proposed
approval of EDCAQMD's 2017 RACT SIP. The commenter also raised comments
that were not germane to our proposed rulemaking action (natural
asbestos formations and factors contributing to the reduced clarity of
Lake Tahoe).
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment of EDCAQMD's
2017 RACT SIP and negative declarations as described in our proposed
action. Therefore, as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the
EPA is fully approving the 2017 RACT SIP and negative declarations into
the California SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 1, 2019. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: November 30, 2018.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(513) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan--in part.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(513) The following plan was submitted on January 4, 2017 by the
Governor's designee.
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) Additional materials. (A) El Dorado County Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) State
Implementation Plan (SIP) Update Analysis Staff Report, adopted on
January 3, 2017.
(2) Board of Directors of the El Dorado County Air Quality
Management District, Resolution No. 002-2017, ``Resolution Approving
2008 Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) State
Implementation Plan (SIP) Update Analysis.''
* * * * *
0
3. Section 52.222 is amended by adding paragraph (a)(7)(iv) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.222 Negative declarations.
(a) * * *
(7) * * *
(iv) The following negative declarations for the 2008 NAAQS were
adopted by the El Dorado County Air Quality Management District on
January 3, 2017, and submitted to the EPA on January 4, 2017.
[[Page 67698]]
Negative Declarations for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CTG document No. Title
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA-450/2-77-008............................... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary
Sources--Volume II: Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper,
Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks.
EPA-450/2-77-022............................... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Solvent Metal
Cleaning.
EPA-450/2-77-025............................... Control of Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems, Wastewater
Separators, and Process Unit Turnarounds.
EPA-450/2-77-026............................... Control of Hydrocarbons from Tank Truck Gasoline Loading
Terminals.
EPA-450/2-77-032............................... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary
Sources--Volume III: Surface Coating of Metal Furniture.
EPA-450/2-77-033............................... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary
Sources--Volume IV: Surface Coating of Insulation of Magnet
Wire.
EPA-450/2-77-034............................... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary
Sources--Volume V: Surface Coating of Large Appliances.
EPA-450/2-77-036............................... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Storage of Petroleum
Liquids in Fixed-Roof Tanks.
EPA-450/2-78-015............................... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary
Sources--Volume VI: Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal
Parts and Products.
EPA-450/2-78-029............................... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of
Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products.
EPA-450/2-78-030............................... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of
Pneumatic Rubber Tires.
EPA-450/2-78-032............................... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary
Sources--Volume VII: Factory Surface Coating of Flat Wood
Paneling.
EPA-450/2-78-033............................... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary
Sources--Volume VIII: Graphic Arts-Rotogravure and
Flexography.
EPA-450/2-78-036............................... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum
Refinery Equipment.
EPA-450/2-78-047............................... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Petroleum Liquid
Storage in External Floating Roof Tanks.
EPA-450/3-82-009............................... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Large
Petroleum Dry Cleaners.
EPA-450/3-83-006............................... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Synthetic
Organic Chemical Polymer and Resin Manufacturing Equipment.
EPA-450/3-83-007............................... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Equipment Leaks from
Natural Gas/Gasoline Processing Plants.
EPA-450/3-83-008............................... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Manufacture
of High-Density Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and Polystyrene
Resins.
EPA-450/3-84-015............................... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Air
Oxidation Processes in Synthetic Organic Chemical
Manufacturing Industry.
EPA-450/4-91-031............................... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Reactor
Processes and Distillation Operations in Synthetic Organic
Chemical Manufacturing Industry.
EPA-453/R-96-007............................... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Wood
Furniture Manufacturing Operations.
EPA-453/R-94-032 61 FR 44050; 8/27/96 Alternative Control Technology Document--Surface Coating
Operations at Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Facilities Control
Techniques Guidelines for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair
Operations (Surface Coating).
EPA-453/R-97-004 59 FR 29216; 6/6/94........... Aerospace MACT and Aerospace (CTG & MACT).
EPA-453/R-06-001............................... Control Techniques Guidelines for Industrial Cleaning Solvents.
EPA-453/R-06-002............................... Control Techniques Guidelines for Offset Lithographic Printing
and Letterpress Printing.
EPA-453/R-06-003............................... Control Techniques Guidelines for Flexible Package Printing.
EPA-453/R-06-004............................... Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood Paneling Coatings
EPA 453/R-07-003............................... Control Techniques Guidelines for Paper, Film, and Foil
Coatings.
EPA 453/R-07-004............................... Control Techniques Guidelines for Large Appliance Coatings.
EPA 453/R-07-005............................... Control Techniques Guidelines for Metal Furniture Coatings.
EPA 453/R-08-003............................... Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and
Plastic Parts Coatings.
EPA 453/R-08-004............................... Control Techniques Guidelines for Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing
Materials.
EPA 453/R-08-005............................... Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Industrial
Adhesives.
EPA 453/R-08-006............................... Control Techniques Guidelines for Automobile and Light-Duty
Truck Assembly Coatings.
EPA 453/B16-001................................ Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas
Industry.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Major non-CTG VOC sources.
Major non-CTG NOX sources.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-28294 Filed 12-28-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P