Privacy Act of 1974: System of Records, 67172-67174 [2018-26048]
Download as PDF
67172
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2018 / Proposed Rules
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF
NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
32 CFR Part 1701
Privacy Act of 1974: System of
Records
Office of the Director of
National Intelligence.
ACTION: Proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Office of the Director of
National Intelligence (ODNI) proposes
to: Exempt a new system of records
(Continuous Evaluation System) as well
as systems of records of the Intelligence
Community Office of Inspector General
(ICIG) from the requirements of the
Privacy Act to the extent that
information in each system is subject to
the Privacy Act’s exemption provisions.
The ODNI also proposes to add a new
section which restores a list of all ODNI
systems of records that are subject to
Privacy Act exemption.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
January 28, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Mail: Director, Information
Management Division, Office of the
Director of National Intelligence,
Washington, DC 20511.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Patricia Gaviria, Director, Information
Management Division, (301–243–1054).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with the Privacy Act, 5
U.S.C. 552a(e)(4), ODNI has already
described in the notice section of the
Federal Register (83 FR 61395,
document 18–25970), published on
November 29, 2018, the following new
system of records: Continuous
Evaluation Records (ODNI/NCSC–003).
This new system of records facilitates
implementation of the National
Counterintelligence and Security Center
(NCSC) Continuous Evaluation System,
which conducts ongoing automated
checks of security-relevant databases to
ensure that individuals who have been
determined to be eligible for access to
classified information or to hold a
sensitive position remain eligible, as
required by Executive Orders 12968 as
amended (Access to Classified
Information), and 13467 as amended
(Reforming Processes Related to
Suitability for Government
Employment, Fitness for Contractor
Employees, and Eligibility for Access to
Classified National Security
Information). The system of records will
contain biographic and personnel
security-relevant records pertaining to
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 27, 2018
Jkt 247001
current Executive Branch employees,
detailees, contractors, and other
sponsored individuals (enrollees).
In its proposed rule, the ODNI intends
to exempt the above new system of
records, Continuous Evaluation Records
(ODNI/NCSC–003), from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act to prevent
the compromise of classified
information and to ensure the integrity
of any law enforcement,
counterintelligence, or administrative
investigation that may be undertaken
with respect to the subject of the record.
In addition, this ODNI proposed rule
intends to restore the list of ODNI
exempt systems of records to Part 32 of
the CFR at § 1701.22, as redesignated.
This list had been deleted by final
action published at 80 FR 63427
(October 20, 2015). The restored list
reflects the break-down of exempt
systems of records by ODNI component.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule affects the manner
in which ODNI collects and maintains
information about individuals. ODNI
certifies that this rulemaking will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Accordingly, pursuant to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is required
for this rule.
Small Entity Inquiries
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of
1996 requires ODNI to comply with
small entity requests for information
and advice about compliance with
statutes and regulations within ODNI
jurisdiction. Any small entity that has a
question regarding this document may
address it to the information contact
listed above. Further information
regarding SBREFA is available on the
Small Business Administration’s web
page at https://www.sga.gov/advo/law/
law_lib.html.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires that ODNI
consider the impact of paperwork and
other burdens imposed on the public
associated with the collection of
information. There are no information
collection requirements associated with
this proposed rule and therefore no
analysis of burden is required.
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ within
the meaning of Executive Order 12866.
This rule will not have an annual effect
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
on the economy of $100 million or more
or otherwise adversely affect the
economy or sector of the economy in a
material way; will not create
inconsistency with, or interfere with,
other agency action; will not materially
alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, fees, or loans or the
rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; and will not raise legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order.
Accordingly, further regulatory
evaluation is not required.
Unfunded Mandates
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, 109 Stat. 48 (Mar. 22, 1995),
requires Federal agencies to assess the
effects of certain regulatory actions on
State, local, and tribal governments, and
the private sector. This proposed rule
imposes no Federal mandate on any
State, local, or tribal government or on
the private sector. Accordingly, no
UMRA analysis of economic and
regulatory alternatives is required.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 requires ODNI
to examine the implications for the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government resulting from this
proposed rule. ODNI concludes that the
proposed rule does not affect the rights,
roles and responsibilities of the States,
involves no preemption of State law,
and does not limit State policymaking
discretion. This rule has no federalism
implications as defined by the Executive
Order.
Environmental Impact
ODNI has reviewed this action for
purposes of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C.
4321–4347, and has determined that
this action will not have a significant
effect on the human environment.
Energy Impact
The energy impact of this action has
been assessed in accordance with the
Energy Policy and Conservation Act
(EPCA), Public Law 94–163, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6362. This
rulemaking is not a major regulatory
action under the provisions of the
EPCA.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 1701
Records and Privacy Act.
For the reasons set forth above, ODNI
proposes to amend 32 CFR part 1701 as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2018 / Proposed Rules
PART 1701—ADMINISTRATION OF
RECORDS UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT
OF 1974
1. The authority citation for part 1701
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. 3002–3231; 5 U.S.C.
552a.
Subpart B—[Amended]
2. Revise subpart B by:
(a) Removing §§ 1701.21 through
1701.23
■ (b) Redesignating § 1701.24 as
§ 1701.21 and revising it to read as
follows:
■
■
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 1701.21 Exemption of the Office of the
Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)
Systems of Records
(a) ODNI exempts the systems of
records listed in § 1701.22 from the
requirements of paragraphs (c)(3); (d)(1),
(2), (3) and (4); (e)(1), and (e)(4)(G), (H)
and (I); and (f) of the Privacy Act to the
extent that information in the system is
subject to exemption pursuant to
paragraphs (k)(1), (k)(2) or (k)(5) of the
Act as noted in the individual systems
notices. ODNI also may derivatively
preserve the exempt status of records it
receives from source agencies when the
reason for the exemption remains valid,
as set forth in 32 CFR 1701.20.
(b) Systems of records utilized by the
Office of the Intelligence Community
Inspector General (ICIG) are additionally
exempted from the requirements of
paragraphs (c)(4); (e)(2); (e)(3); (e)(5);
(e)(8); (e)(12) and (g) of the Privacy Act
to the extent that information in the
system is subject to exemption pursuant
to paragraphs (j)(2) of the Privacy Act.
(c) Exemption of records in these
systems from any or all of the
enumerated requirements may be
necessary for the following reasons:
(1) From paragraphs (c)(3) (accounting
of disclosures) because an accounting of
disclosures from records concerning the
record subject would specifically reveal
an intelligence or investigative interest
on the part of ODNI or the recipient
agency and could result in release of
properly classified national security or
foreign policy information.
(2) From paragraphs (c)(4) (notice of
amendment to record recipients)
because the system is exempted from
the access and amendment provisions of
paragraphs (d).
(3) From paragraphs (d)(1), (2), (3) and
(4) (record subject’s right to access and
amend records) because affording access
and amendment rights could alert the
record subject to the investigative
interest of intelligence or law
enforcement agencies or compromise
sensitive information classified in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 27, 2018
Jkt 247001
interest of national security. In the
absence of a national security basis for
exemption, records in this system may
be exempted from access and
amendment to the extent necessary to
honor promises of confidentiality to
persons providing information
concerning a candidate for position.
Inability to maintain such
confidentiality would restrict the free
flow of information vital to a
determination of a candidate’s
qualifications and suitability.
(4) From paragraphs (e)(1) (maintain
only relevant and necessary records)
because it is not always possible to
establish relevance and necessity before
all information is considered and
evaluated in relation to an intelligence
concern. In the absence of a national
security basis for exemption under
paragraphs (k)(1), records in this system
may be exempted from the relevance
requirement pursuant to paragraphs
(k)(2) and (k)(5) because it is not
possible to determine in advance what
exact information may assist in
determining the qualifications and
suitability of a candidate for position.
Seemingly irrelevant details, when
combined with other data, can provide
a useful composite for determining
whether a candidate should be
appointed.
(5) From paragraphs (e)(2) (collection
directly from the individual) because
application of this provision would alert
the subject of a counterterrorism
investigation, study, or analysis to that
fact, permitting the subject to frustrate
or impede the activity. Counterterrorism
investigations necessarily rely on
information obtained from third parties
rather than information furnished by
subjects themselves.
(6) From paragraphs (e)(3) (provide
Privacy Act Statement to subjects
furnishing information) because the
system if exempted from paragraphs
(e)(2) requirement to collect information
directly from the subject.
(7) From paragraphs (e)(4)(G) and (H)
(publication of procedures for notifying
subjects of the existence of records
about them and how they may access
records and contest contents) because
the system is exempted from paragraphs
(d) provisions regarding access and
amendment, and from the paragraphs (f)
requirement to promulgate agency rules
for notification, access, and amendment.
Nevertheless, ODNI has published
notice concerning notification, access,
and contest procedures because it may
in certain circumstances determine it
appropriate to provide subjects access to
all or a portion of the records about
them in a system of records.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
67173
(8) From paragraphs (e)(4)(I)
(identifying sources of records in the
system of records) because identifying
sources could result in disclosure of
properly classified national defense or
foreign policy information, intelligence
sources and methods, and investigatory
techniques and procedures.
Notwithstanding its proposed
exemption from this requirement, ODNI
identifies record sources in broad
categories sufficient to provide general
notice of the origins of the information
it maintains in its systems of records.
(9) From paragraphs (e)(5) (maintain
timely, accurate, complete and up-todate records) because many of the
records in the system are derived from
other domestic and foreign agency
record systems over which ODNI
exercises no control. In addition, in
collecting information for
counterterrorism, intelligence, and law
enforcement purposes, it is not possible
to determine in advance what
information is accurate, relevant, timely,
and complete. With the passage of time
and the development of additional facts
and circumstances, seemingly irrelevant
or dated information may acquire
significance. The restrictions imposed
by paragraphs (e)(5) would limit the
ability of intelligence analysts to
exercise judgment in conducting
investigations and impede development
of intelligence necessary for effective
counterterrorism and law enforcement
efforts.
(10) From paragraphs (e)(8) (notice of
compelled disclosures) because
requiring individual notice of legally
compelled disclosure poses an
impossible administrative burden and
could alert subjects of counterterrorism,
law enforcement, or intelligence
investigations to the previously
unknown fact of those investigations.
(11) From paragraphs (e)(12) (public
notice of matching activity) because, to
the extent such activities are not
otherwise excluded from the matching
requirements of the Privacy Act,
publishing advance notice in the
Federal Register would frustrate the
ability of intelligence analysts to act
quickly in furtherance of analytical
efforts.
(12) From paragraphs (f) (agency rules
for notifying subjects to the existence of
records about them, for accessing and
amending records, and for assessing
fees) because the system is exempt from
paragraphs (d) provisions regarding
access and amendment of records by
record subjects. Nevertheless, ODNI has
published agency rules concerning
notification of a subject in response to
his request if any system of records
named by the subject contains a record
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
67174
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2018 / Proposed Rules
pertaining to him and procedures by
which the subject may access or amend
the records. Notwithstanding
exemption, ODNI may determine it
appropriate to satisfy a record subject’s
access request.
(13) From paragraphs (g) (civil
remedies) to the extent that the civil
remedies relate to provisions of 5 U.S.C.
552a from which this rule exempts the
system.
(c) inserting a new § 1701.22 entitled
‘‘List of ODNI Systems of Records That
Are Subject to Exemption’’
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
ODNI Systems of Records Subject to
Exemption
Manuscript, Presentation, and Resume
Review Records (ODNI–01) (k)(1)
Executive Secretary Action Management
System Records (ODNI–02) (k)(1)
Public Affairs Office Records (ODNI–03)
(k)(1)
Office of Legislative Affairs Records
(ODNI–04) (k)(1)
ODNI Guest Speaker Records (ODNI–05)
(k)(1)
Office of General Counsel Records
(ODNI–06) (k)(1), (2), (5)
Intelligence Community Customer
Registry (ODNI–09) (k)(1)
Office of Intelligence Community Equal
Employment Opportunity and
Diversity Records (ODNI–10) (k)(1),
(2), (5)
Office of Protocol Records (ODNI–11)
(k)(1)
Intelligence Community Security
Clearance and Access Approval
Repository (ODNI–12) (k)(1), (2), (5)
Security Clearance Reform Research and
Oversight Records (ODNI–13) (k)(1),
(2), (5)
Civil Liberties and Privacy Office
Complaint Records (ODNI–14) (k)(1),
(2), (5)
Mission Outreach and Collaboration
Records (ODNI–15) (k)(1)
ODNI Human Resource Records (ODNI–
16) (k)(1)
ODNI Personnel Security Records
(ODNI–17) (k)(1), (2), (5)
ODNI Freedom of Information Act,
Privacy Act, and Mandatory
Declassification Review Request
Records (ODNI–18) (k)(1), (2), (5)
ODNI Information Technology Systems
Activity and Access Records (ODNI–
19) (k)(1), (2), (5)
ODNI Security Clearance Reciprocity
Hotline Records (ODNI–20) (k)(1), (5)
ODNI Information Technology Network
Support, Administration and Analysis
Records (ODNI–21) (k)(1)
Insider Threat Program Records (ODNI–
22) (k)(1), (2), (5)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 27, 2018
Jkt 247001
ODNI/National Counterintelligence and
Security Center (NCSC) Systems of
Records
Damage Assessment Records (ODNI/
NCIX–001) (k)(1), (2)
Counterintelligence Trends Analyses
Records (ODNI/NCSC–002) (k)(1), (2)
Continuous Evaluation Records (ODNI/
NCSC–003) (k)(1), (2), (5)
ODNI/National Counterterrorism Center
(NCTC) Systems of Records
NCTC Access Authorization Records
(ODNI/NCTC–002) (k)(1)
NCTC Telephone Directory (ODNI/
NCTC–003) (k)(1)
NCTC Knowledge Repository (ODNI/
NCTC–004) (k)(1), (2)
NCTC Current (ODNI/NCTC–005) (k)(1),
(2)
NCTC Partnership Management Records
(ODNI/NCTC–006) (k)(1)
NCTC Tacit Knowledge Management
Records (ODNI/NCTC–007)
NCTC Terrorism Analysis Records
(ODNI/NCTC–008) (k)(1), (2)
Terrorist Identities Records (ODNI/
NCTC–009) (k)(1), (2)
ODNI/Office of the Intelligence
Community Inspector General (ICIG)
Systems of Records
OIG Human Resources Records (ODNI/
OIG–001) (k)(1), (5)
OIG Experts Contact Records (ODNI/
OIG–002) (k)(1), (5)
OIG Investigation and Interview Records
(ODNI/OIG–003) (j)(2); (k)(1), (2), (5)
Deirdre M. Walsh,
Chief Operating Officer, Office of the Director
of National Intelligence.
[FR Doc. 2018–26048 Filed 12–27–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910–79–P–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
33 CFR Part 328
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 110, 112, 116, 117, 122,
232, 300, 302, and 401
[EPA–HQ–OW–2018–0149; FRL–9988–72–
OW]
RIN 2040–AF75
Revised Definition of ‘‘Waters of the
United States’’
Department of the Army; and
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA).
AGENCIES:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ACTION:
Notice of public hearing.
On December 11, 2018, the
Environmental Protection Agency and
the U.S. Department of the Army (the
agencies) signed a proposed rule
revising the definition of ‘‘waters of the
United States’’ to clarify the scope of
waters federally regulated under the
Clean Water Act. The agencies are
announcing that a public hearing will be
held in Kansas City, Kansas on January
23, 2019, to provide interested parties
the opportunity to present data, views,
or information concerning the proposed
rule. The pre-publication version of this
proposal can be found at https://
www.epa.gov/wotus-rule/step-tworevise.
SUMMARY:
The agencies will hold a public
hearing on Wednesday, January 23,
2019, in Kansas City, Kansas. Please
refer to the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for additional information on
the public hearing.
ADDRESSES: The hearing will be held in
the Wyandotte Ballroom of the Reardon
Convention Center, 520 Minnesota
Avenue, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. The
hearing will convene at 1:00 p.m. (local
time) and will conclude no later than
8:00 p.m. There will be a break from
5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
A complete set of documents related
to the proposal will be available for
public inspection through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov, Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OW–2018–0149 once the
notice of proposed rulemaking
publishes in the Federal Register.
Documents can also be viewed at the
Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center, located at 1301
Constitution Avenue NW, Room 3334,
Washington, DC between 8:30 a.m. and
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. In addition,
the pre-publication version of the notice
of proposed rule, the economic analysis
for the proposed rule, and the resource
and programmatic assessment for the
proposed rule are available at https://
www.epa.gov/wotus-rule/step-tworevise.
If you are unable to attend the public
hearing you will be able to submit your
comments, identified by Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OW–2018–0149, to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method). Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments. All
submissions received must include the
Docket ID No. for this rulemaking.
Comments received may be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 67172-67174]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26048]
[[Page 67172]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
32 CFR Part 1701
Privacy Act of 1974: System of Records
AGENCY: Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
ACTION: Proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)
proposes to: Exempt a new system of records (Continuous Evaluation
System) as well as systems of records of the Intelligence Community
Office of Inspector General (ICIG) from the requirements of the Privacy
Act to the extent that information in each system is subject to the
Privacy Act's exemption provisions. The ODNI also proposes to add a new
section which restores a list of all ODNI systems of records that are
subject to Privacy Act exemption.
DATES: Submit comments on or before January 28, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Mail: Director, Information Management Division, Office of the
Director of National Intelligence, Washington, DC 20511.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Patricia Gaviria, Director,
Information Management Division, (301-243-1054).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C.
552a(e)(4), ODNI has already described in the notice section of the
Federal Register (83 FR 61395, document 18-25970), published on
November 29, 2018, the following new system of records: Continuous
Evaluation Records (ODNI/NCSC-003). This new system of records
facilitates implementation of the National Counterintelligence and
Security Center (NCSC) Continuous Evaluation System, which conducts
ongoing automated checks of security-relevant databases to ensure that
individuals who have been determined to be eligible for access to
classified information or to hold a sensitive position remain eligible,
as required by Executive Orders 12968 as amended (Access to Classified
Information), and 13467 as amended (Reforming Processes Related to
Suitability for Government Employment, Fitness for Contractor
Employees, and Eligibility for Access to Classified National Security
Information). The system of records will contain biographic and
personnel security-relevant records pertaining to current Executive
Branch employees, detailees, contractors, and other sponsored
individuals (enrollees).
In its proposed rule, the ODNI intends to exempt the above new
system of records, Continuous Evaluation Records (ODNI/NCSC-003), from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act to prevent the compromise of
classified information and to ensure the integrity of any law
enforcement, counterintelligence, or administrative investigation that
may be undertaken with respect to the subject of the record.
In addition, this ODNI proposed rule intends to restore the list of
ODNI exempt systems of records to Part 32 of the CFR at Sec. 1701.22,
as redesignated. This list had been deleted by final action published
at 80 FR 63427 (October 20, 2015). The restored list reflects the
break-down of exempt systems of records by ODNI component.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule affects the manner in which ODNI collects and
maintains information about individuals. ODNI certifies that this
rulemaking will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Accordingly, pursuant to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, no regulatory flexibility analysis
is required for this rule.
Small Entity Inquiries
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of
1996 requires ODNI to comply with small entity requests for information
and advice about compliance with statutes and regulations within ODNI
jurisdiction. Any small entity that has a question regarding this
document may address it to the information contact listed above.
Further information regarding SBREFA is available on the Small Business
Administration's web page at https://www.sga.gov/advo/law/law_lib.html.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires
that ODNI consider the impact of paperwork and other burdens imposed on
the public associated with the collection of information. There are no
information collection requirements associated with this proposed rule
and therefore no analysis of burden is required.
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action''
within the meaning of Executive Order 12866. This rule will not have an
annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or otherwise
adversely affect the economy or sector of the economy in a material
way; will not create inconsistency with, or interfere with, other
agency action; will not materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, fees, or loans or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; and will not raise legal or policy issues arising
out of legal mandates, the President's priorities or the principles set
forth in the Executive Order. Accordingly, further regulatory
evaluation is not required.
Unfunded Mandates
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104-4, 109 Stat. 48 (Mar. 22, 1995), requires Federal agencies to
assess the effects of certain regulatory actions on State, local, and
tribal governments, and the private sector. This proposed rule imposes
no Federal mandate on any State, local, or tribal government or on the
private sector. Accordingly, no UMRA analysis of economic and
regulatory alternatives is required.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 requires ODNI to examine the implications for
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government resulting from this proposed rule. ODNI concludes that
the proposed rule does not affect the rights, roles and
responsibilities of the States, involves no preemption of State law,
and does not limit State policymaking discretion. This rule has no
federalism implications as defined by the Executive Order.
Environmental Impact
ODNI has reviewed this action for purposes of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, and has
determined that this action will not have a significant effect on the
human environment.
Energy Impact
The energy impact of this action has been assessed in accordance
with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), Public Law 94-163,
as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6362. This rulemaking is not a major regulatory
action under the provisions of the EPCA.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 1701
Records and Privacy Act.
For the reasons set forth above, ODNI proposes to amend 32 CFR part
1701 as follows:
[[Page 67173]]
PART 1701--ADMINISTRATION OF RECORDS UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
0
1. The authority citation for part 1701 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. 3002-3231; 5 U.S.C. 552a.
Subpart B--[Amended]
0
2. Revise subpart B by:
0
(a) Removing Sec. Sec. 1701.21 through 1701.23
0
(b) Redesignating Sec. 1701.24 as Sec. 1701.21 and revising it to
read as follows:
Sec. 1701.21 Exemption of the Office of the Director of National
Intelligence (ODNI) Systems of Records
(a) ODNI exempts the systems of records listed in Sec. 1701.22
from the requirements of paragraphs (c)(3); (d)(1), (2), (3) and (4);
(e)(1), and (e)(4)(G), (H) and (I); and (f) of the Privacy Act to the
extent that information in the system is subject to exemption pursuant
to paragraphs (k)(1), (k)(2) or (k)(5) of the Act as noted in the
individual systems notices. ODNI also may derivatively preserve the
exempt status of records it receives from source agencies when the
reason for the exemption remains valid, as set forth in 32 CFR 1701.20.
(b) Systems of records utilized by the Office of the Intelligence
Community Inspector General (ICIG) are additionally exempted from the
requirements of paragraphs (c)(4); (e)(2); (e)(3); (e)(5); (e)(8);
(e)(12) and (g) of the Privacy Act to the extent that information in
the system is subject to exemption pursuant to paragraphs (j)(2) of the
Privacy Act.
(c) Exemption of records in these systems from any or all of the
enumerated requirements may be necessary for the following reasons:
(1) From paragraphs (c)(3) (accounting of disclosures) because an
accounting of disclosures from records concerning the record subject
would specifically reveal an intelligence or investigative interest on
the part of ODNI or the recipient agency and could result in release of
properly classified national security or foreign policy information.
(2) From paragraphs (c)(4) (notice of amendment to record
recipients) because the system is exempted from the access and
amendment provisions of paragraphs (d).
(3) From paragraphs (d)(1), (2), (3) and (4) (record subject's
right to access and amend records) because affording access and
amendment rights could alert the record subject to the investigative
interest of intelligence or law enforcement agencies or compromise
sensitive information classified in the interest of national security.
In the absence of a national security basis for exemption, records in
this system may be exempted from access and amendment to the extent
necessary to honor promises of confidentiality to persons providing
information concerning a candidate for position. Inability to maintain
such confidentiality would restrict the free flow of information vital
to a determination of a candidate's qualifications and suitability.
(4) From paragraphs (e)(1) (maintain only relevant and necessary
records) because it is not always possible to establish relevance and
necessity before all information is considered and evaluated in
relation to an intelligence concern. In the absence of a national
security basis for exemption under paragraphs (k)(1), records in this
system may be exempted from the relevance requirement pursuant to
paragraphs (k)(2) and (k)(5) because it is not possible to determine in
advance what exact information may assist in determining the
qualifications and suitability of a candidate for position. Seemingly
irrelevant details, when combined with other data, can provide a useful
composite for determining whether a candidate should be appointed.
(5) From paragraphs (e)(2) (collection directly from the
individual) because application of this provision would alert the
subject of a counterterrorism investigation, study, or analysis to that
fact, permitting the subject to frustrate or impede the activity.
Counterterrorism investigations necessarily rely on information
obtained from third parties rather than information furnished by
subjects themselves.
(6) From paragraphs (e)(3) (provide Privacy Act Statement to
subjects furnishing information) because the system if exempted from
paragraphs (e)(2) requirement to collect information directly from the
subject.
(7) From paragraphs (e)(4)(G) and (H) (publication of procedures
for notifying subjects of the existence of records about them and how
they may access records and contest contents) because the system is
exempted from paragraphs (d) provisions regarding access and amendment,
and from the paragraphs (f) requirement to promulgate agency rules for
notification, access, and amendment. Nevertheless, ODNI has published
notice concerning notification, access, and contest procedures because
it may in certain circumstances determine it appropriate to provide
subjects access to all or a portion of the records about them in a
system of records.
(8) From paragraphs (e)(4)(I) (identifying sources of records in
the system of records) because identifying sources could result in
disclosure of properly classified national defense or foreign policy
information, intelligence sources and methods, and investigatory
techniques and procedures. Notwithstanding its proposed exemption from
this requirement, ODNI identifies record sources in broad categories
sufficient to provide general notice of the origins of the information
it maintains in its systems of records.
(9) From paragraphs (e)(5) (maintain timely, accurate, complete and
up-to-date records) because many of the records in the system are
derived from other domestic and foreign agency record systems over
which ODNI exercises no control. In addition, in collecting information
for counterterrorism, intelligence, and law enforcement purposes, it is
not possible to determine in advance what information is accurate,
relevant, timely, and complete. With the passage of time and the
development of additional facts and circumstances, seemingly irrelevant
or dated information may acquire significance. The restrictions imposed
by paragraphs (e)(5) would limit the ability of intelligence analysts
to exercise judgment in conducting investigations and impede
development of intelligence necessary for effective counterterrorism
and law enforcement efforts.
(10) From paragraphs (e)(8) (notice of compelled disclosures)
because requiring individual notice of legally compelled disclosure
poses an impossible administrative burden and could alert subjects of
counterterrorism, law enforcement, or intelligence investigations to
the previously unknown fact of those investigations.
(11) From paragraphs (e)(12) (public notice of matching activity)
because, to the extent such activities are not otherwise excluded from
the matching requirements of the Privacy Act, publishing advance notice
in the Federal Register would frustrate the ability of intelligence
analysts to act quickly in furtherance of analytical efforts.
(12) From paragraphs (f) (agency rules for notifying subjects to
the existence of records about them, for accessing and amending
records, and for assessing fees) because the system is exempt from
paragraphs (d) provisions regarding access and amendment of records by
record subjects. Nevertheless, ODNI has published agency rules
concerning notification of a subject in response to his request if any
system of records named by the subject contains a record
[[Page 67174]]
pertaining to him and procedures by which the subject may access or
amend the records. Notwithstanding exemption, ODNI may determine it
appropriate to satisfy a record subject's access request.
(13) From paragraphs (g) (civil remedies) to the extent that the
civil remedies relate to provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a from which this
rule exempts the system.
(c) inserting a new Sec. 1701.22 entitled ``List of ODNI Systems
of Records That Are Subject to Exemption''
ODNI Systems of Records Subject to Exemption
Manuscript, Presentation, and Resume Review Records (ODNI-01) (k)(1)
Executive Secretary Action Management System Records (ODNI-02) (k)(1)
Public Affairs Office Records (ODNI-03) (k)(1)
Office of Legislative Affairs Records (ODNI-04) (k)(1)
ODNI Guest Speaker Records (ODNI-05) (k)(1)
Office of General Counsel Records (ODNI-06) (k)(1), (2), (5)
Intelligence Community Customer Registry (ODNI-09) (k)(1)
Office of Intelligence Community Equal Employment Opportunity and
Diversity Records (ODNI-10) (k)(1), (2), (5)
Office of Protocol Records (ODNI-11) (k)(1)
Intelligence Community Security Clearance and Access Approval
Repository (ODNI-12) (k)(1), (2), (5)
Security Clearance Reform Research and Oversight Records (ODNI-13)
(k)(1), (2), (5)
Civil Liberties and Privacy Office Complaint Records (ODNI-14) (k)(1),
(2), (5)
Mission Outreach and Collaboration Records (ODNI-15) (k)(1)
ODNI Human Resource Records (ODNI-16) (k)(1)
ODNI Personnel Security Records (ODNI-17) (k)(1), (2), (5)
ODNI Freedom of Information Act, Privacy Act, and Mandatory
Declassification Review Request Records (ODNI-18) (k)(1), (2), (5)
ODNI Information Technology Systems Activity and Access Records (ODNI-
19) (k)(1), (2), (5)
ODNI Security Clearance Reciprocity Hotline Records (ODNI-20) (k)(1),
(5)
ODNI Information Technology Network Support, Administration and
Analysis Records (ODNI-21) (k)(1)
Insider Threat Program Records (ODNI-22) (k)(1), (2), (5)
ODNI/National Counterintelligence and Security Center (NCSC) Systems of
Records
Damage Assessment Records (ODNI/NCIX-001) (k)(1), (2)
Counterintelligence Trends Analyses Records (ODNI/NCSC-002) (k)(1), (2)
Continuous Evaluation Records (ODNI/NCSC-003) (k)(1), (2), (5)
ODNI/National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) Systems of Records
NCTC Access Authorization Records (ODNI/NCTC-002) (k)(1)
NCTC Telephone Directory (ODNI/NCTC-003) (k)(1)
NCTC Knowledge Repository (ODNI/NCTC-004) (k)(1), (2)
NCTC Current (ODNI/NCTC-005) (k)(1), (2)
NCTC Partnership Management Records (ODNI/NCTC-006) (k)(1)
NCTC Tacit Knowledge Management Records (ODNI/NCTC-007)
NCTC Terrorism Analysis Records (ODNI/NCTC-008) (k)(1), (2)
Terrorist Identities Records (ODNI/NCTC-009) (k)(1), (2)
ODNI/Office of the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG)
Systems of Records
OIG Human Resources Records (ODNI/OIG-001) (k)(1), (5)
OIG Experts Contact Records (ODNI/OIG-002) (k)(1), (5)
OIG Investigation and Interview Records (ODNI/OIG-003) (j)(2); (k)(1),
(2), (5)
Deirdre M. Walsh,
Chief Operating Officer, Office of the Director of National
Intelligence.
[FR Doc. 2018-26048 Filed 12-27-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-79-P-P