Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Removal of Obsolete Gasoline Volatility Regulations, 66196-66197 [2018-27905]
Download as PDF
66196
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• This action is not expected to be an
Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
because this action is not significant
under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:37 Dec 21, 2018
Jkt 247001
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: December 17, 2018.
Alexandra Dunn,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.
[FR Doc. 2018–27773 Filed 12–21–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2018–0103; FRL–9988–24–
Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Removal of
Obsolete Gasoline Volatility
Regulations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
request submitted by the Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio
EPA) on February 5, 2018, to revise the
Ohio State Implementation Plan (SIP)
under the Clean Air Act (CAA). Ohio
EPA is requesting to remove from the
SIP the remaining provisions of the
Ohio Administrative Code concerning
the State’s former 7.8 pounds per square
inch (psi) Reid vapor pressure (RVP)
fuel requirements for the Cincinnati and
Dayton areas. In a previous action, EPA
approved the removal of the 7.8 psi RVP
fuel applicability requirements in the
Cincinnati and Dayton areas as a
component of the Ohio SIP, including
the approval of a demonstration under
section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) that addressed emissions impacts
associated with the removal of the
program.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before January 25, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2018–0103 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Francisco J. Acevedo, Mobile Source
Program Manager, Control Strategies
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6061,
acevedo.francisco@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background for this action?
II. What is EPA proposing to approve?
III. What is EPA’s analysis of the state’s
submittal?
IV. What action is EPA proposing to take?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the background for this
action?
On April 15, 2004, EPA designated
Hamilton, Butler, Clinton, Warren and
Clermont counties (Cincinnati area) and
Clark, Greene, Miami, and Montgomery
counties (Dayton area) as nonattainment
for the 8-hour ozone standard. As part
of Ohio’s efforts to bring these areas into
attainment of the ozone standard, the
State adopted and implemented a broad
range of ozone control measures for the
areas including the implementation of a
7.8 psi RVP fuel program that was more
stringent than the Federal 9.0 psi RVP
requirement. The Ohio EPA originally
submitted a SIP revision to EPA (on
E:\FR\FM\26DEP1.SGM
26DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
February 14, 2006 and October 6, 2006)
establishing a gasoline RVP limit of 7.8
psi for gasoline sold in the Cincinnati
and Dayton areas. The revision
specifically applied to the Cincinnati
and Dayton areas in Ohio. EPA
approved Ohio’s 7.8 psi RVP program
on May 25, 2007 (72 FR 29269),
including the program’s legal authority
and administrative requirements found
in the Ohio Administrative Code (OAC)
rules 3745–72–1 to 8.
On December 19, 2016, Ohio EPA
submitted a SIP revision requesting that
EPA approve the removal of the 7.8 psi
RVP fuel applicability requirements
from the Ohio SIP before the beginning
of the 2017 ozone control period. The
revision also included a section 110(l)
demonstration addressing the emissions
impacts associated with the removal of
the program. On April 7, 2017 (82 FR
16932) EPA approved the removal of the
7.8 psi RVP fuel applicability
requirements in the Cincinnati and
Dayton areas from the Ohio SIP. In that
action EPA determined that that
removal of the 7.8 psi RVP fuel
requirements would not interfere with
attainment or maintenance of any of the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
in the Cincinnati and Dayton areas and
would not interfere with any other
applicable requirement of the CAA, and
thus, were approvable under CAA
section 110(l).
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
II. What is EPA proposing to approve?
On February 5, 2018, Ohio EPA
submitted to EPA a revision to the Ohio
SIP for approval. In this action EPA is
proposing to approve the removal of all
OAC Chapter 3745–72 provisions from
the Ohio SIP, as requested. Ohio EPA
conducted a public hearing on this
matter in Columbus, Ohio on December
7, 2017.
III. What is EPA’s analysis of the state’s
submittal?
On January 20, 2018, Ohio EPA
rescinded rules in OAC 3745–72 that
formerly established low RVP fuel
requirements for the Cincinnati and
Dayton areas. These rules were
rescinded by Ohio EPA as they are no
longer necessary since on April 7, 2017
(82 FR 16932) EPA approved the
removal of the 7.8 psi RVP fuel
applicability requirements in the
Cincinnati and Dayton areas from the
Ohio ozone SIP. In that action EPA
determined that that removal of the 7.8
psi RVP fuel requirements would not
interfere with attainment or
maintenance of any of the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards in the
Cincinnati and Dayton areas and would
not interfere with any other applicable
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:37 Dec 21, 2018
Jkt 247001
requirement of the CAA, and thus, were
approvable under CAA section 110(l).
The removal of the remaining
provisions in OAC Chapter 3745–72
from the SIP is only administrative in
nature and does not have any negative
impact on air quality in the Cincinnati
and Dayton areas. No emissions
increases will result from the removal of
the OAC Chapter 3745–72 provisions
from the Ohio SIP.
IV. What action is EPA proposing to
take?
EPA is proposing to approve the
revision to the Ohio SIP submitted by
the Ohio EPA on February 5, 2018,
because the removal of remaining low
RVP requirements in OAC Chapter
3745–72 from the SIP meets all
applicable requirements and it would
not interfere with reasonable further
progress or attainment of any of the
national ambient air quality standards.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66197
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: December 6, 2018.
Cathy Stepp,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2018–27905 Filed 12–21–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2018–0393; FRL–9988–23–
Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Open Burning
Rules
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the open burning standards
in the Ohio State Implementation Plan
(SIP) under the Clean Air Act (CAA). On
June 4, 2018, Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency (Ohio) requested the
approval of its revised open burning
rules, which include adding
requirements for air curtain burners,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26DEP1.SGM
26DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 246 (Wednesday, December 26, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66196-66197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27905]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2018-0103; FRL-9988-24-Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Removal of Obsolete Gasoline Volatility
Regulations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a request submitted by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency
(Ohio EPA) on February 5, 2018, to revise the Ohio State Implementation
Plan (SIP) under the Clean Air Act (CAA). Ohio EPA is requesting to
remove from the SIP the remaining provisions of the Ohio Administrative
Code concerning the State's former 7.8 pounds per square inch (psi)
Reid vapor pressure (RVP) fuel requirements for the Cincinnati and
Dayton areas. In a previous action, EPA approved the removal of the 7.8
psi RVP fuel applicability requirements in the Cincinnati and Dayton
areas as a component of the Ohio SIP, including the approval of a
demonstration under section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) that
addressed emissions impacts associated with the removal of the program.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 25, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2018-0103 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the For Further Information Contact section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Francisco J. Acevedo, Mobile Source
Program Manager, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6061,
acevedo.francisco@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background for this action?
II. What is EPA proposing to approve?
III. What is EPA's analysis of the state's submittal?
IV. What action is EPA proposing to take?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the background for this action?
On April 15, 2004, EPA designated Hamilton, Butler, Clinton, Warren
and Clermont counties (Cincinnati area) and Clark, Greene, Miami, and
Montgomery counties (Dayton area) as nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone
standard. As part of Ohio's efforts to bring these areas into
attainment of the ozone standard, the State adopted and implemented a
broad range of ozone control measures for the areas including the
implementation of a 7.8 psi RVP fuel program that was more stringent
than the Federal 9.0 psi RVP requirement. The Ohio EPA originally
submitted a SIP revision to EPA (on
[[Page 66197]]
February 14, 2006 and October 6, 2006) establishing a gasoline RVP
limit of 7.8 psi for gasoline sold in the Cincinnati and Dayton areas.
The revision specifically applied to the Cincinnati and Dayton areas in
Ohio. EPA approved Ohio's 7.8 psi RVP program on May 25, 2007 (72 FR
29269), including the program's legal authority and administrative
requirements found in the Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) rules 3745-72-
1 to 8.
On December 19, 2016, Ohio EPA submitted a SIP revision requesting
that EPA approve the removal of the 7.8 psi RVP fuel applicability
requirements from the Ohio SIP before the beginning of the 2017 ozone
control period. The revision also included a section 110(l)
demonstration addressing the emissions impacts associated with the
removal of the program. On April 7, 2017 (82 FR 16932) EPA approved the
removal of the 7.8 psi RVP fuel applicability requirements in the
Cincinnati and Dayton areas from the Ohio SIP. In that action EPA
determined that that removal of the 7.8 psi RVP fuel requirements would
not interfere with attainment or maintenance of any of the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards in the Cincinnati and Dayton areas and
would not interfere with any other applicable requirement of the CAA,
and thus, were approvable under CAA section 110(l).
II. What is EPA proposing to approve?
On February 5, 2018, Ohio EPA submitted to EPA a revision to the
Ohio SIP for approval. In this action EPA is proposing to approve the
removal of all OAC Chapter 3745-72 provisions from the Ohio SIP, as
requested. Ohio EPA conducted a public hearing on this matter in
Columbus, Ohio on December 7, 2017.
III. What is EPA's analysis of the state's submittal?
On January 20, 2018, Ohio EPA rescinded rules in OAC 3745-72 that
formerly established low RVP fuel requirements for the Cincinnati and
Dayton areas. These rules were rescinded by Ohio EPA as they are no
longer necessary since on April 7, 2017 (82 FR 16932) EPA approved the
removal of the 7.8 psi RVP fuel applicability requirements in the
Cincinnati and Dayton areas from the Ohio ozone SIP. In that action EPA
determined that that removal of the 7.8 psi RVP fuel requirements would
not interfere with attainment or maintenance of any of the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards in the Cincinnati and Dayton areas and
would not interfere with any other applicable requirement of the CAA,
and thus, were approvable under CAA section 110(l). The removal of the
remaining provisions in OAC Chapter 3745-72 from the SIP is only
administrative in nature and does not have any negative impact on air
quality in the Cincinnati and Dayton areas. No emissions increases will
result from the removal of the OAC Chapter 3745-72 provisions from the
Ohio SIP.
IV. What action is EPA proposing to take?
EPA is proposing to approve the revision to the Ohio SIP submitted
by the Ohio EPA on February 5, 2018, because the removal of remaining
low RVP requirements in OAC Chapter 3745-72 from the SIP meets all
applicable requirements and it would not interfere with reasonable
further progress or attainment of any of the national ambient air
quality standards.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone,
Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: December 6, 2018.
Cathy Stepp,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2018-27905 Filed 12-21-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P