Federal Acquisition Regulation: Whistleblower Protection for Contractor Employees, 66223-66228 [2018-27493]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
XI. Statutory and Executive Order
Review
what actions, if any, to take to revise the
MSWLF criteria.
Under Executive Order 12866,
entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
this is a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
because it relates to a novel approach to
nationwide landfill management.
Accordingly, EPA submitted this
Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review under Executive Order 12866
and any changes made in response to
OMB recommendations have been
documented in the docket for this
action.
Because this document does not
impose or propose any requirements,
and instead seeks comments and
suggestions for the Agency to consider
in possibly developing a subsequent
proposed rule, the various other review
requirements that apply when an agency
imposes requirements do not apply to
this action. Nevertheless, as part of your
comments on this ANPRM, you may
include any comments or information
that could help the Agency: To assess
the potential impact of a subsequent
regulatory action on small entities
pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); to consider
voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (15 U.S.C. 272 note); to consider
environmental health or safety effects
on children pursuant to Executive Order
13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997); to consider human health or
environmental effects on minority or
low-income populations pursuant to
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994); or to consider potential impacts
to state and local governments or tribal
governments.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 258
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
XII. Conclusion
The information available to EPA to
date suggests that liquids addition in
well-managed bioreactor landfill units
and/or wet landfill units may provide
reductions in long-term risk and
operational costs in comparison to drytomb landfills as a result of accelerated
waste biodegradation. The EPA
continues to gather information on this
issue, including the information
received in response to this ANPRM.
This information will assist EPA in
making a determination concerning
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:37 Dec 21, 2018
Jkt 247001
Environmental protection, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Waste
treatment and disposal, Water pollution
control.
Dated: December 14, 2018.
Andrew R. Wheeler,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018–27748 Filed 12–21–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 3, 31, and 52
[FAR Case 2017–005; Docket No. 2017–
0005, Sequence No. 1]
RIN 9000–AN32
Federal Acquisition Regulation:
Whistleblower Protection for
Contractor Employees
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement an act to enhance
whistleblower protection for contractor
employees. The rule would make
permanent the protection for disclosure
of certain information. It also would
clarify that the prohibition on
reimbursement for certain legal costs
applies to subcontractors, as well as
contractors.
SUMMARY:
Interested parties should submit
comments to the Regulatory Secretariat
Division at one of the addresses shown
below on or before February 25, 2019 to
be considered in the formulation of a
final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in
response to FAR Case 2017–005 by any
of the following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
entering ‘‘FAR Case 2017–005’’ under
the heading ‘‘Enter Keyword or ID’’ and
selecting ‘‘Search.’’ Select the link
‘‘Comment Now’’ that corresponds with
‘‘FAR Case 2017–005.’’ Follow the
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66223
instructions provided on the screen.
Please include your name, company
name (if any), and ‘‘FAR Case 2017–
005’’ on your attached document.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory-Secretariat
Division (MVCB), ATTN: Lois Mandell,
1800 F Street NW, 2nd Floor,
Washington, DC 20405.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite ‘‘FAR case 2017–005’’ in
all correspondence related to this case.
All comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided. To confirm
receipt of your comment(s), please
check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting (except
allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
clarification of content, contact Ms.
Cecelia L. Davis, Procurement Analyst,
at 202–219–0202. For information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat Division at 202–501–4755.
Please cite ‘‘FAR Case 2017–005.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing
to amend the FAR to implement an act
to enhance whistleblower protection for
contractor and grantee employees (Pub.
L. 114–261), enacted December 14,
2016. Although the statute addresses
both contractor and grantee employees,
the FAR only covers contracts and
contractors. Grants are covered in title 2
of the Code of Federal Regulations.
This statute amends 41 U.S.C. 4712 to
make permanent the pilot program for
enhancement of contractor protection
from reprisal for sharing certain
information. The four-year pilot
program was enacted on January 2,
2013, by section 828 of the National
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for
Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 (Pub. L. 112–239),
with an effective period of four years
from the date of enactment (i.e., January
2, 2013, through January 1, 2017).
Section 1091(e) of the NDAA for FY
2014 (Pub. L. 113–66) modified the
effective period of the pilot program to
be four years from the date that is 180
days after the date of enactment (i.e.,
July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2017).
However, the program did not expire as
it became permanent on December 14,
2016, before either of those expiration
dates. This program does not apply to
DoD, NASA, or the Coast Guard.
This statute also clarifies that the cost
principles at 10 U.S.C. 2324(k) and 41
E:\FR\FM\26DEP1.SGM
26DEP1
66224
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
U.S.C. 4304 and 4310 that prohibit
reimbursement for certain legal costs
apply to costs incurred by a contractor,
subcontractor, or personal services
contractor. Personal services contractors
are contractors. Cost principles
generally already apply in the same way
to costs incurred by subcontractors as to
costs incurred by contractors.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
II. Discussion and Analysis
A. Pilot program becomes permanent.
This rule proposes to amend the FAR to
make permanent the civilian agency
contractor pilot program that
implements 41 U.S.C. 4712, currently
located at FAR 3.908.
• FAR 3.900 is amended to delete: (1)
The discussion of 41 U.S.C. 4705, the
prior whistleblower statute (which had
been implemented at FAR 3.901 through
3.906, but which had been suspended
for the duration of the 41 U.S.C. 4712
pilot program), since the successor
statute, 41 U.S.C. 4712, has been made
permanent; and (2) the sunset date for
41 U.S.C. 4712.
• The FAR 3.908 heading is amended
to remove the designation as a pilot
program, and the entire section is
relocated to 3.900 through 3.906 as
follows:
Æ 3.908–1 = 3.900(a)
Æ 3.908–2 = 3.901 (retains the definition
of ‘‘authorized official of the
Department of Justice’’)
Æ 3.908–3 = 3.903
Æ 3.908–4 = 3.904–1
Æ 3.908–5 = 3.904–2
Æ 3.908–6 = 3.905–1
Æ 3.908–7 = 3.905–2
Æ 3.908–8 = 3.902
Æ 3.908–9 = 3.906
• There are a few minor edits in FAR
3.900(a).
• FAR 3.903(a) and 3.905–1 are
reformatted with vertical lists for
improved clarity.
• FAR 3.904–2 is amended to state
that the complainant, contractor, and/or
subcontractor shall submit their
responses to the written report to both
the head of the agency and the Office of
Inspector General.
• FAR clause 52.203–17, Contractor
Employee Whistleblower Rights, is
amended to remove the reference to
section 828 of the NDAA for FY 2013,
which is no longer necessary since 41
U.S.C. 4712 has been made permanent.
The title of the clause is also simplified.
• Agencies will use FAR clause
52.203–17 in contracts for both
commercial and noncommercial items
that exceed the simplified acquisition
threshold. Previously, the requirement
to comply with the civilian agency
contractor Whistleblower statute was
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:37 Dec 21, 2018
Jkt 247001
implemented through paragraph (r) of
FAR clause 52.212–4, Contract Terms
and Conditions—Commercial items.
• The civilian agency contractor
whistleblower protections of 41 U.S.C.
4712 listed in paragraph (r) of FAR
clause 52.212–4 are removed, because
the clause 52.203–17 is now included in
FAR clause 52.212–5, Contract Terms
and Conditions Required To Implement
Statutes or Executive Orders—
Commercial Items.
• Coverage of 10 U.S.C. 2409 will
remain in FAR clause 52.212–4(r) to
cover DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard.
Only 41 U.S.C. 4712 coverage is being
moved to FAR clause 52.212–5.
• FAR clause 52.212–5 is amended to
list FAR clause 52.203–17.
• Conforming changes are made to
FAR 52.244–6, Subcontracts for
Commercial Items.
B. Prohibition on reimbursement for
legal costs.
• In order to clarify that the
prohibition on reimbursement for
certain legal costs applies to
subcontractors, as well as contractors,
this rule proposes to amend FAR
31.205–47 and 31.603 to add ‘‘or
subcontract’’ or ‘‘or subcontractor’’ as
appropriate. The term ‘‘personal
services contract’’ and ‘‘personal
services contractor’’ are not added to the
FAR, because they are covered by the
terms ‘‘contract’’ and ‘‘contractor.’’ Also,
the term ‘‘or subcontract’’ is not added
at FAR 31.205–47(b)(3)(ii) and (iii),
because the Government does not have
the authority to rescind, void, or
terminate a subcontract.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or
Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold (SAT) and for Commercial
Items, Including Commercially
Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items
This proposed rule does not add any
new provisions or clauses, nor does it
change the applicability of existing
provisions or clauses to contracts at or
below the SAT and contracts for the
acquisition of commercial items,
including COTS items. The clause at
52.203–17, Contractor Employee
Whistleblower Rights and Requirement
to Inform Employees of Whistleblower
Rights, is not prescribed for use in
contracts valued at or below the SAT.
IV. Expected Cost Impact on the Public
FAR subpart 3.9, Whistleblower
Protections for Contractor Employees,
was added to the FAR on September 19,
1995, to implement sections 6005 and
6006 of the Federal Acquisition
Streamlining Act of 1994 (Pub. L. 103–
355) codified at 41 U.S.C. 265,
recodified as 41 U.S.C. 4705. DoD, GSA,
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and NASA published an interim rule in
the Federal Register at 78 FR 60169 on
September 30, 2013 (finalized on
December 4, 2015, at 80 FR 75911) to
implement a four-year pilot program to
enhance the existing whistleblower
protections, as required by section 828
of the NDAA for FY 2013, effective
through January 1, 2017. This pilot
program is inapplicable to DoD, NASA,
and the Coast Guard, because these
agencies are covered by 10 U.S.C. 2409,
as amended by section 827 of the NDAA
for FY 2013. Using FPDS data for FY
2016, there were about 20,800 new
awards over the simplified acquisition
threshold in FY 2016 by agencies other
than DoD, NASA and the Coast Guard,
to approximately 9,100 unique
awardees.
This proposed rule would implement
Public Law 114–261, which makes the
pilot program permanent. If Public Law
114–261 had not been enacted, the pilot
program would have expired and 41
U.S.C. 4705, as implemented in 1995 at
FAR 3.900–3.906, would automatically
become effective again. Therefore, any
impact of this rule is due to the
differences between the pilot program
authorized by the NDAA for FY 2013, as
made permanent, and the prior
whistleblower regulations implemented
in 1995.
The enhancements to the
whistleblower regulations created by the
pilot that would be made permanent by
this rulemaking do not impose any
substantive burden on the public. The
rule provides more details about the
nature of what constitutes
whistleblower information and to whom
it may be disclosed, as well as more
detailed procedures for filing and
investigating complaints and enforcing
orders. A clause, applicable above the
simplified acquisition threshold,
informs the contractor that employees
working under the contract are subject
to whistleblower protection and
requires the contractor to inform its
employees in writing, in the
predominant language of the workforce,
of the employee whistleblower rights
and protections. This requirement can
be easily satisfied by issuing an email to
all employees working on the contract.
For this reason, DoD, GSA, and NASA
consider the burden to be de minimis.
The rule would also add the words
‘‘or subcontractor’’ at multiple locations
throughout FAR 31.205–47, which also
has no or de minimis impact, because
the cost principles generally already
apply in the same way to costs incurred
by subcontractors as to costs incurred by
contractors. FAR 31.000 states that the
part contains cost principles and
procedures for the pricing of contracts,
E:\FR\FM\26DEP1.SGM
26DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
subcontracts, and modifications to
contracts and subcontracts whenever
cost analysis is performed (see 15.404–
1), and the determination, negotiation,
or allowance of costs when required by
a contract clause. FAR 31.103 further
states that the contracting officer shall
incorporate the cost principles and
procedures in subpart 31.2 and agency
supplements by reference in contracts
with commercial organizations as the
basis for determining reimbursable costs
under cost-reimbursement contracts and
cost-reimbursement subcontracts under
these contracts performed by
commercial organizations. Other
sections expand this to contracts and
subcontracts thereunder with
educational institutions and
construction and architect-engineer
contracts. FAR 31.204 further addresses
the applicability of the cost principles
and procedures to subcontracts.
There were a small number of
whistleblower cases filed during the
pilot period as shown in a U.S.
Government Accountability Office
(GAO) report. GAO report 17–227,
Contractor Whistleblower Protections
Pilot Program—Improvements Needed
to Ensure Effective Implementation
showed that GAO surveyed 14
departments for reprisal complaints
received from July 1, 2013, to December
31, 2015. This report was published and
publicly released on March 2, 2017.
The report stated ‘‘Of the 127 reprisal
complaints submitted by employees of
contractors, subcontractors, and
grantees under the pilot program, 44
were investigated by the OIG [Office of
Inspector General] and none of the
investigations completed thus far
resulted in findings that substantiated
reprisal.’’
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was
subject to review under Section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:37 Dec 21, 2018
Jkt 247001
66225
VI. Executive Order 13771
This proposed rule is not expected to
be subject to E.O. 13771, because this
rule has a de minimis impact on the
public (see section IV of this preamble).
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties
must submit such comments separately
and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (FAR Case
2017–005) in correspondence.
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA do not expect
this rule to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq. However, an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) has been
performed and is summarized as
follows:
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
This proposed rule would implement
Public Law 114–261, which was enacted
December 14, 2016. The objective of this rule
is to enhance whistleblower protection for
contractor employees, by making permanent
the protection for disclosure of certain
information, and ensuring that the
prohibition on reimbursement for certain
legal costs applies to subcontractors, as well
as contractors, as required by Public Law
114–261.
This proposed rule does not make any
substantive changes to the pilot program
applicable to civilian agencies authorized by
the NDAA for FY 2013, other than to make
it permanent. The clause is prescribed above
the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT). It
also does not apply to DoD, NASA, and the
Coast Guard, nor to certain elements of the
intelligence community. Based on Federal
Procurement Data System (FPDS) data for
fiscal year (FY) 2016, there were
approximately 10,000 new contract awards to
small businesses by civilian agencies that
exceeded the SAT (about 5,000 unique
vendors).
Regarding the amendment to the cost
principles, addition of the words ‘‘or
subcontractor’’ at multiple locations
throughout FAR 31.205–47 has no or de
minimis impact, because the cost principles
generally already apply in the same way to
costs incurred by subcontractors as to costs
incurred by contractors.
There are no reporting, recordkeeping, or
other compliance requirements in this rule.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with any other Federal rules. DoD,
GSA, and NASA were unable to identify any
alternatives to the rule that would reduce the
impact on small entities and still meet the
requirements of the statute.
Dated: December 14, 2018.
William F. Clark,
Director, Office of Government-wide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.
The Regulatory Secretariat Division
has submitted a copy of the IRFA to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration. A copy of the
IRFA may be obtained from the
Regulatory Secretariat Division. DoD,
GSA and NASA invite comments from
small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected
impact of this rule on small entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also
consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in
subparts affected by this rule consistent
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 3, 31,
and 52
Government procurement.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend 48 CFR parts 3, 31,
and 52 as set forth below:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 3, 31, and 52 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 51 U.S.C. 20113.
PART 3—IMPROPER BUSINESS
PRACTICES AND PERSONAL
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
2. Revise section 3.900 to read as
follows:
■
3.900
Scope of subpart.
This subpart implements various
statutory whistleblower programs. This
subpart does not implement 10 U.S.C.
2409, which is applicable only to DoD,
NASA, and the Coast Guard.
(a) 41 U.S.C. 4712 is implemented in
3.900 through 3.906. These sections do
not apply to—
(1) DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard;
or
(2) Any element of the intelligence
community, as defined in section 3(4) of
the National Security Act of 1947 (50
U.S.C. 3003(4)). Sections 3.900 through
3.906 do not apply to any disclosure
made by an employee of a contractor or
subcontractor of an element of the
intelligence community if such
disclosure—
(i) Relates to an activity of an element
of the intelligence community; or
(ii) Was discovered during contract or
subcontract services provided to an
element of the intelligence community.
(b) Section 743 of Division E, Title VII
of the Consolidated and Further
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015
(Pub. L. 113–235) and its successor
provisions in subsequent appropriations
acts (and as extended in continuing
E:\FR\FM\26DEP1.SGM
26DEP1
66226
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
resolutions), is implemented in 3.909,
which is applicable to all agencies.
(c) Contracts funded by the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Section
3.907 of this subpart implements section
1553 of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111–
5) and applies to all contracts funded in
whole or in part by that Act.
■ 3. Amend section 3.901 by—
■ a. Adding in alphabetical order, the
definition, ‘‘Abuse of authority’’;
■ b. Removing the definition
‘‘Authorized official of an agency’’; and
■ c. Revising the definition ‘‘Inspector
General’’.
The added and revised text reads as
follows:
3.901
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Abuse of authority means an arbitrary
and capricious exercise of authority that
is inconsistent with the mission of the
executive agency concerned or the
successful performance of a contract of
such agency.
*
*
*
*
*
Inspector General means an Inspector
General appointed under the Inspector
General Act of 1978 and any Inspector
General that receives funding from, or
has oversight over contracts awarded
for, or on behalf of, the executive agency
concerned. This definition does not
apply to 3.907.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Revise section 3.902 to read as
follows:
3.902
Classified information.
41 U.S.C. 4712 does not provide any
right to disclose classified information
not otherwise provided by law.
■ 5. Revise section 3.903 to read as
follows:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
3.903
Policy.
(a)(1) Contractors and subcontractors
are prohibited from discharging,
demoting, or otherwise discriminating
against an employee as a reprisal for
disclosing, to any of the entities listed
at paragraph (b) of this section,
information that the employee
reasonably believes is—
(i) Evidence of gross mismanagement
of a Federal contract;
(ii) A gross waste of Federal funds;
(iii) An abuse of authority relating to
a Federal contract;
(iv) A substantial and specific danger
to public health or safety; or
(v) A violation of law, rule, or
regulation related to a Federal contract
(including the competition for or
negotiation of a contract).
(2) A reprisal is prohibited even if it
is undertaken at the request of an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:37 Dec 21, 2018
Jkt 247001
executive branch official, unless the
request takes the form of a nondiscretionary directive and is within the
authority of the executive branch
official making the request.
(b) Entities to whom disclosure may
be made.
(1) A Member of Congress or a
representative of a committee of
Congress.
(2) An Inspector General.
(3) The Government Accountability
Office.
(4) A Federal employee responsible
for contract oversight or management at
the relevant agency.
(5) An authorized official of the
Department of Justice or other law
enforcement agency.
(6) A court or grand jury.
(7) A management official or other
employee of the contractor or
subcontractor who has the
responsibility to investigate, discover, or
address misconduct.
(c) An employee who initiates or
provides evidence of contractor or
subcontractor misconduct in any
judicial or administrative proceeding
relating to waste, fraud, or abuse on a
Federal contract shall be deemed to
have made a disclosure.
■ 6. Amend section 3.904 by revising
the section to read as follows:
3.904
Complaints.
7. Add section 3.904–1 to read as
follows:
■
3.904–1
Procedures for filing complaints.
A contractor or subcontractor
employee who believes that he or she
has been discharged, demoted, or
otherwise discriminated against
contrary to the policy in 3.903 may
submit a complaint with the Inspector
General of the agency concerned.
Procedures for submitting fraud, waste,
abuse, and whistleblower complaints
are generally accessible on agency
Office of Inspector General Hotline or
Whistleblower internet sites or the
complainant may directly contact the
cognizant Office of the Inspector
General for submission instructions. A
complaint by the employee may not be
brought under 41 U.S.C. 4712 more than
three years after the date on which the
alleged reprisal took place.
■ 8. Add section 3.904–2 to read as
follows:
3.904–2 Procedures for investigating
complaints.
(a) Investigation of complaints will be
in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 4712(b).
(b) Upon completion of the
investigation, the head of the agency
shall ensure that the Inspector General
provides the report of findings to—
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(1) The complainant and any person
acting on the complainant’s behalf;
(2) The contractor and/or
subcontractor alleged to have committed
the violation; and
(3) The head of the agency.
(c) Unless otherwise provided in
agency procedures, the complainant,
contractor, and/or subcontractor shall be
afforded the opportunity to submit a
written response to the report of
findings to the head of the agency and
the Office of Inspector General.
■ 9. Revise section 3.905 to read as
follows:
3.905 Remedies and enforcement of
orders.
10. Add section 3.905–1 to read as
follows:
■
3.905–1
Remedies.
(a) Agency response to Inspector
General report. Not later than 30 days
after receiving a report pursuant to
3.904–2, the head of the agency shall—
(1) Determine whether sufficient basis
exists to conclude that the contractor or
subcontractor has subjected the
employee who submitted the complaint
to a reprisal as prohibited by 3.903; and
(2) Either issue an order denying relief
or take one or more of the following
actions:
(i) Order the contractor or
subcontractor to take affirmative action
to abate the reprisal.
(ii) Order the contractor or
subcontractor to reinstate the
complainant-employee to the position
that the person held before the reprisal,
together with compensatory damages
(including back pay), employment
benefits, and other terms and conditions
of employment that would apply to the
person in that position if the reprisal
had not been taken.
(iii) Order the contractor or
subcontractor to pay the complainantemployee an amount equal to the
aggregate amount of all costs and
expenses (including attorneys’ fees and
expert witnesses’ fees) that were
reasonably incurred by the complainant
for, or in connection with, bringing the
complaint regarding the reprisal, as
determined by the head of the agency.
(b) Complainant’s right to go to court.
(1) Paragraph (b)(2) of this section
applies if—
(i) The head of the agency issues an
order denying relief; or
(ii)(A) The head of the agency has not
issued an order—
(1) Within 210 days after the
submission of the complaint; or
(2) Within 30 days after the expiration
of an extension of time granted in
accordance with 41 U.S.C. 4712(b)(2)(B)
E:\FR\FM\26DEP1.SGM
26DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
for the submission of the report to those
stated in 3.904–2(b); and
(B) There is no showing that such
delay is due to the bad faith of the
complainant.
(2) If the conditions in either
paragraph (b)(1)(i) or (ii) of this section
are met—
(i) The complainant shall be deemed
to have exhausted all administrative
remedies with respect to the complaint;
and
(ii) The complainant may bring a de
novo action at law or equity against the
contractor or subcontractor to seek
compensatory damages and other relief
available under 41 U.S.C. 4712 in the
appropriate district court of the United
States, which shall have jurisdiction
over such an action without regard to
the amount in controversy.
(A) Such an action shall, at the
request of either party to the action, be
tried by the court with a jury.
(B) An action under this authority
may not be brought more than two years
after the date on which remedies are
deemed to have been exhausted.
(c) Admissibility in evidence. An
Inspector General determination and an
agency head order denying relief under
this section shall be admissible in
evidence in any de novo action at law
or equity brought pursuant to 41 U.S.C.
4712.
(d) No waiver. The rights and
remedies provided for in 41 U.S.C. 4712
may not be waived by any agreement,
policy, form, or condition of
employment.
■ 11. Add section 3.905–2 to read as
follows:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
3.905–2
Enforcement of orders.
(a) Whenever a contractor or
subcontractor fails to comply with an
order issued under 3.905–1(a)(2), the
head of the agency concerned shall file
an action for enforcement of the order
in the U.S. district court for a district in
which the reprisal was found to have
occurred. In any action brought
pursuant to this authority, the court may
grant appropriate relief, including
injunctive relief, compensatory and
exemplary damages, and attorney fees
and costs. The complainant-employee
upon whose behalf an order was issued
may also file such an action or join in
an action filed by the head of the
agency.
(b) Any person adversely affected or
aggrieved by an order issued under
3.905–1(a)(2) may obtain review of the
order’s conformance with 41 U.S.C.
4712 and its implementing regulations,
in the U.S. court of appeals for a circuit
in which the reprisal is alleged in the
order to have occurred. No petition
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:37 Dec 21, 2018
Jkt 247001
seeking such review may be filed more
than 60 days after issuance of the order
by the head of the agency. Filing such
an appeal shall not act to stay the
enforcement of the order of the head of
an agency, unless a stay is specifically
entered by the court.
■ 12. Revise section 3.906 to read as
follows:
3.906
Contract clause.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, the contracting officer
shall insert the clause at 52.203–17,
Contractor Employee Whistleblower
Rights, in all solicitations and contracts
that exceed the simplified acquisition
threshold.
(b) The clause prescription in
paragraph (a) of this section does not
apply to solicitations and contracts of
DoD, NASA, the Coast Guard, or
applicable elements of the intelligence
community (see 3.900(a)).
3.907–7
[Amended]
13. Amend section 3.907–7 by
removing ‘‘Reinvestment Act of 2009
in’’ and adding ‘‘Reinvestment Act of
2009, in’’ in its place.
■
3.908
■
[Removed and reserved]
14. Remove and reserve section 3.908.
3.908–1 through 3.908–9
[Removed]
15. Remove sections 3.908–1 through
3.908–9.
■
PART 31—CONTRACT COST
PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES
31.205–47
[Amended]
16. Amend section 31.205–47 by—
a. In paragraph (a), in the definition of
‘‘Costs’’ by removing ‘‘or others retained
by the contractor to assist it;’’ and
adding ‘‘or others retained by the
contractor or subcontractor to assist it;’’
in its place;
■ b. In the introductory text of
paragraph (b), by removing ‘‘law or
regulation by the contractor’’ and
adding ‘‘law or regulation by the
contractor or subcontractor’’ in its place;
■ c. In paragraph (b)(2) by removing
‘‘either a finding of contractor liability’’
and adding ‘‘either a finding of
contractor or subcontractor liability’’ in
its place;
■ d. In paragraph (b)(3)(i), by removing
‘‘the contractor;’’ and adding ‘‘the
contractor or subcontractor;’’ in its
place;
■ e. In paragraph (c)(1), by removing
‘‘between the contractor’’ and adding
‘‘between the contractor or
subcontractor’’ in its place;
■ f. In paragraph (c)(2)(i), by removing
‘‘incurred by the contractor’’ and adding
‘‘incurred by the contractor or
subcontractor’’ in its place;
■
■
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66227
g. In paragraph (d)(1) by removing
‘‘Federal contract; or’’ and adding
‘‘Federal contract or subcontract; or’’ in
its place;
■ h. In the introductory paragraph of
paragraph (f) by removing ‘‘connection
with’’ and adding ‘‘connection with the
following’’ in its place;
■ i. In paragraph (f)(4) by removing ‘‘the
contractor under’’ and adding ‘‘the
contractor or subcontractor under’’ in its
place; and removing ‘‘the contractor
was’’ and adding ‘‘the contractor or
subcontractor was’’ in its place;
■ j. In the introductory paragraph of
paragraph (f)(5) by removing
‘‘contractors arising from either’’ and
adding ‘‘contractors or subcontractors
arising from either—’’ in its place;
■ k. In paragraph (f)(5)(i) by removing
‘‘an agreement’’ and adding ‘‘An
agreement’’ in its place;
■ l. In paragraph (f)(5)(ii) by removing
‘‘dual sourcing’’ and adding ‘‘Dual
sourcing’’ and removing ‘‘except when’’
and adding ‘‘except when—’’ in its
place;
■ m. In paragraph (f)(5)(ii)(A) by
removing ‘‘incurred as’’ and adding
‘‘Incurred as’’, removing ‘‘contract or’’
and adding ‘‘contract or subcontract, or’’
in its place, and removing ‘‘contracting
officer, or’’ and adding ‘‘contracting
officer; or’’ in its place;
■ n. In paragraph (f)(5)(ii)(B) by
removing ‘‘when agreed’’ and adding
‘‘When agreed’’ in its place;
■ o. In paragraph (f)(6) by removing
‘‘contract.’’ and adding ‘‘contract or
subcontract.’’ in its place;
■ p. In paragraph (f)(7) by removing
‘‘the contractor is’’ and adding ‘‘the
contractor or subcontractor is’’ in its
place;
■ q. In paragraph (g) by removing
‘‘contractor separately.’’ and adding
‘‘contractor or subcontractor
separately.’’ in its place, and removing
‘‘contractor to repay all’’ and adding
‘‘contractor or subcontractor to repay
all’’ in its place.
■ 17. Amend section 31.603 by revising
paragraph (b)(15) to read as follows:
■
31.603
Requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(15) Unless any of the exceptions at
31.205–47(c) or (d) apply, costs incurred
by a contractor or subcontractor in
connection with any criminal, civil, or
administrative proceedings that result in
dispositions described at 31.205–
47(b)(1) through (5) commenced by: A
Federal, State, local, or foreign
government, for a violation of, or failure
to comply with, law or regulation by the
contractor or subcontractor (including
its agents or employees); a contractor or
E:\FR\FM\26DEP1.SGM
26DEP1
66228
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
subcontractor employee submitting a
whistleblower complaint of reprisal in
accordance with 41 U.S.C. 4712 or 10
U.S.C. 2409; or a third party in the name
of the United States under the False
Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3730. For any
such proceeding that does not result in
a disposition described at 31.205–
47(b)(1) through (5), or to which 31.205–
47(c) exceptions apply, the cost of that
proceeding shall be subject to the
limitations in 31.205–47(e).
PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
18. Amend section 52.203–17 by—
a. Revising the section heading;
b. Removing from the introductory
text ‘‘3.908–9’’ and adding ‘‘3.906’’ in its
place;
■ c. Revising the date of the clause; and
■ d. Revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to
read as follows:
■
■
■
52.203–17 Contractor Employee
Whistleblower Rights.
*
*
*
*
*
Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights
(Date)
(a) This contract and employees working
on this contract will be subject to the
whistleblower rights and remedies
established at 41 U.S.C. 4712 and FAR 3.901
through 3.905.
(b) The Contractor shall inform its
employees in writing, in the predominant
language of the workforce, of employee
whistleblower rights and protections under
41 U.S.C. 4712, as described in FAR 3.901
through 3.905.
*
*
*
*
*
19. Amend section 52.212–4 by
revising the date of the clause; and
removing from paragraph (r) ‘‘41 U.S.C.
4712 and’’. The revised text reads as
follows:
■
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
20. Amend section 52.212–5 by:
a. Revising the date of the clause;
b. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(4)
through (60) as paragraphs (b)(5)
through (61), respectively;
■ c. Adding a new paragraph (b)(4);
■ d. Redesignating paragraphs (e)(1)(ii)
through (xxii) as paragraphs (e)(1)(iii)
through (xxiii), respectively;
■ e. Adding a new paragraph (e)(1)(ii);
■ f. Revising the date of Alternate II;
■ g. Redesignating paragraphs of
Alternate II; (e)(1)(ii)(C) through (T) as
paragraphs (e)(1)(ii)(D) through (U),
respectively; and
■ h. Adding a new paragraph
(e)(1)(ii)(C).
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
■
■
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:37 Dec 21, 2018
Jkt 247001
*
*
*
*
Contract Terms and Conditions Required to
Implement Statutes or Executive Orders—
Commercial Items (Date)
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
ll(4) 52.203–17, Contractor
Employee Whistleblower Rights (Date)
(41 U.S.C. 4712)
*
*
*
*
*
(e)(1) * * *
(ii) 52.203–17, Contractor Employee
Whistleblower Rights (Date) (41 U.S.C.
4712)
*
*
*
*
*
Alternate II (Date). * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(e)(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(C) 52.203–17, Contractor Employee
Whistleblower Rights (Date) (41 U.S.C.
4712)
*
*
*
*
*
■ 21. Amend section 52.213–4 by
revising the date of the clause and
paragraph (a)(2)(viii) to read as follows:
52.213–4 Terms and Conditions—
Simplified Acquisitions (Other Than
Commercial Items).
*
*
*
*
*
Terms and Conditions—Simplified
Acquisitions (Other Than Commercial Items)
(Date)
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(viii) 52.244–6, Subcontracts for
Commercial Items (Date).
*
*
*
*
22. Amend section 52.244–6 by—
a. Revising the date of the clause;
b. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)
through (c)(1)(xix) as paragraphs
(c)(1)(iv) through (c)(1)(xx), respectively;
■ c. Adding a new paragraph (c)(1)(iii).
The revised and added text reads as
follows:
52.244–6
Items.
*
*
Subcontracts for Commercial
*
*
*
Subcontracts for Commercial Items (Date)
*
*
*
*
*
(c)(1) * * *
(iii) 52.203–17, Contractor Employee
Whistleblower Rights (Date) (41 U.S.C.
4712) relating to whistleblower
protections, if the subcontract is over
the simplified acquisition threshold;
this clause does not apply to contracts
of DoD, NASA, the Coast Guard, or
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4702
applicable elements of the intelligence
community–see FAR 3.900(a).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–27493 Filed 12–21–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
*
■
■
■
Contract Terms and Conditions—
Commercial Items (Date)
*
52.212–5 Contract Terms and Conditions
Required To Implement Statutes or
Executive Orders—Commercial Items.
*
52.212–4 Contract Terms and
Conditions—Commercial Items.
*
The revised and added text reads as
follows:
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[Docket No. NHTSA–2010–0012]
RIN 2127–AK58
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards; Motor Vehicle Brake Fluids
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
NHTSA withdraws its notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM),
published on February 3, 2010,
proposing amendments to the Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS)
No. 116, Motor Vehicle Brake Fluids.
Since publication of the NPRM and after
review of the comments, the agency has
determined that updates and corrections
outside the scope of the notice are
necessary in order to publish a final
rule. Based on this, the agency has
decided to withdraw the proposal to
amend FMVSS No. 116.
DATES: The NPRM ‘‘Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standards; Motor
Vehicles Brake Fluids,’’ RIN 2027–
AK58, published February 3, 2010 (75
FR 5553), is withdrawn as of December
26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Electronic Access: You can
view and download related documents
and public comments by going to the
website https://www.regulations.gov.
Enter the docket number NHTSA–2010–
0012 in the search field.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua Fikentscher, Office of Crash
Avoidance Standards (Phone: 202–366–
1810; Fax: 202–493–0073) or Sara R.
Bennett, Office of the Chief Counsel
(Phone: 202–366–2992; Fax: 202–366–
3820). You may send mail to both of
these officials at the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) No. 116, ‘‘Motor
Vehicle Brake Fluids,’’ specifies
E:\FR\FM\26DEP1.SGM
26DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 246 (Wednesday, December 26, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66223-66228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27493]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 3, 31, and 52
[FAR Case 2017-005; Docket No. 2017-0005, Sequence No. 1]
RIN 9000-AN32
Federal Acquisition Regulation: Whistleblower Protection for
Contractor Employees
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement an act to enhance
whistleblower protection for contractor employees. The rule would make
permanent the protection for disclosure of certain information. It also
would clarify that the prohibition on reimbursement for certain legal
costs applies to subcontractors, as well as contractors.
DATES: Interested parties should submit comments to the Regulatory
Secretariat Division at one of the addresses shown below on or before
February 25, 2019 to be considered in the formulation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in response to FAR Case 2017-005 by any of
the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by entering ``FAR Case
2017-005'' under the heading ``Enter Keyword or ID'' and selecting
``Search.'' Select the link ``Comment Now'' that corresponds with ``FAR
Case 2017-005.'' Follow the instructions provided on the screen. Please
include your name, company name (if any), and ``FAR Case 2017-005'' on
your attached document.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory-
Secretariat Division (MVCB), ATTN: Lois Mandell, 1800 F Street NW, 2nd
Floor, Washington, DC 20405.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite ``FAR case 2017-
005'' in all correspondence related to this case. All comments received
will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal and/or business confidential information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting
(except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For clarification of content, contact
Ms. Cecelia L. Davis, Procurement Analyst, at 202-219-0202. For
information pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the
Regulatory Secretariat Division at 202-501-4755. Please cite ``FAR Case
2017-005.''
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the FAR to implement an
act to enhance whistleblower protection for contractor and grantee
employees (Pub. L. 114-261), enacted December 14, 2016. Although the
statute addresses both contractor and grantee employees, the FAR only
covers contracts and contractors. Grants are covered in title 2 of the
Code of Federal Regulations.
This statute amends 41 U.S.C. 4712 to make permanent the pilot
program for enhancement of contractor protection from reprisal for
sharing certain information. The four-year pilot program was enacted on
January 2, 2013, by section 828 of the National Defense Authorization
Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 (Pub. L. 112-239), with an
effective period of four years from the date of enactment (i.e.,
January 2, 2013, through January 1, 2017). Section 1091(e) of the NDAA
for FY 2014 (Pub. L. 113-66) modified the effective period of the pilot
program to be four years from the date that is 180 days after the date
of enactment (i.e., July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2017). However, the
program did not expire as it became permanent on December 14, 2016,
before either of those expiration dates. This program does not apply to
DoD, NASA, or the Coast Guard.
This statute also clarifies that the cost principles at 10 U.S.C.
2324(k) and 41
[[Page 66224]]
U.S.C. 4304 and 4310 that prohibit reimbursement for certain legal
costs apply to costs incurred by a contractor, subcontractor, or
personal services contractor. Personal services contractors are
contractors. Cost principles generally already apply in the same way to
costs incurred by subcontractors as to costs incurred by contractors.
II. Discussion and Analysis
A. Pilot program becomes permanent. This rule proposes to amend the
FAR to make permanent the civilian agency contractor pilot program that
implements 41 U.S.C. 4712, currently located at FAR 3.908.
FAR 3.900 is amended to delete: (1) The discussion of 41
U.S.C. 4705, the prior whistleblower statute (which had been
implemented at FAR 3.901 through 3.906, but which had been suspended
for the duration of the 41 U.S.C. 4712 pilot program), since the
successor statute, 41 U.S.C. 4712, has been made permanent; and (2) the
sunset date for 41 U.S.C. 4712.
The FAR 3.908 heading is amended to remove the designation
as a pilot program, and the entire section is relocated to 3.900
through 3.906 as follows:
[cir] 3.908-1 = 3.900(a)
[cir] 3.908-2 = 3.901 (retains the definition of ``authorized official
of the Department of Justice'')
[cir] 3.908-3 = 3.903
[cir] 3.908-4 = 3.904-1
[cir] 3.908-5 = 3.904-2
[cir] 3.908-6 = 3.905-1
[cir] 3.908-7 = 3.905-2
[cir] 3.908-8 = 3.902
[cir] 3.908-9 = 3.906
There are a few minor edits in FAR 3.900(a).
FAR 3.903(a) and 3.905-1 are reformatted with vertical
lists for improved clarity.
FAR 3.904-2 is amended to state that the complainant,
contractor, and/or subcontractor shall submit their responses to the
written report to both the head of the agency and the Office of
Inspector General.
FAR clause 52.203-17, Contractor Employee Whistleblower
Rights, is amended to remove the reference to section 828 of the NDAA
for FY 2013, which is no longer necessary since 41 U.S.C. 4712 has been
made permanent. The title of the clause is also simplified.
Agencies will use FAR clause 52.203-17 in contracts for
both commercial and noncommercial items that exceed the simplified
acquisition threshold. Previously, the requirement to comply with the
civilian agency contractor Whistleblower statute was implemented
through paragraph (r) of FAR clause 52.212-4, Contract Terms and
Conditions--Commercial items.
The civilian agency contractor whistleblower protections
of 41 U.S.C. 4712 listed in paragraph (r) of FAR clause 52.212-4 are
removed, because the clause 52.203-17 is now included in FAR clause
52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes
or Executive Orders--Commercial Items.
Coverage of 10 U.S.C. 2409 will remain in FAR clause
52.212-4(r) to cover DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard. Only 41 U.S.C.
4712 coverage is being moved to FAR clause 52.212-5.
FAR clause 52.212-5 is amended to list FAR clause 52.203-
17.
Conforming changes are made to FAR 52.244-6, Subcontracts
for Commercial Items.
B. Prohibition on reimbursement for legal costs.
In order to clarify that the prohibition on reimbursement
for certain legal costs applies to subcontractors, as well as
contractors, this rule proposes to amend FAR 31.205-47 and 31.603 to
add ``or subcontract'' or ``or subcontractor'' as appropriate. The term
``personal services contract'' and ``personal services contractor'' are
not added to the FAR, because they are covered by the terms
``contract'' and ``contractor.'' Also, the term ``or subcontract'' is
not added at FAR 31.205-47(b)(3)(ii) and (iii), because the Government
does not have the authority to rescind, void, or terminate a
subcontract.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold (SAT) and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially
Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items
This proposed rule does not add any new provisions or clauses, nor
does it change the applicability of existing provisions or clauses to
contracts at or below the SAT and contracts for the acquisition of
commercial items, including COTS items. The clause at 52.203-17,
Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement to Inform
Employees of Whistleblower Rights, is not prescribed for use in
contracts valued at or below the SAT.
IV. Expected Cost Impact on the Public
FAR subpart 3.9, Whistleblower Protections for Contractor
Employees, was added to the FAR on September 19, 1995, to implement
sections 6005 and 6006 of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of
1994 (Pub. L. 103-355) codified at 41 U.S.C. 265, recodified as 41
U.S.C. 4705. DoD, GSA, and NASA published an interim rule in the
Federal Register at 78 FR 60169 on September 30, 2013 (finalized on
December 4, 2015, at 80 FR 75911) to implement a four-year pilot
program to enhance the existing whistleblower protections, as required
by section 828 of the NDAA for FY 2013, effective through January 1,
2017. This pilot program is inapplicable to DoD, NASA, and the Coast
Guard, because these agencies are covered by 10 U.S.C. 2409, as amended
by section 827 of the NDAA for FY 2013. Using FPDS data for FY 2016,
there were about 20,800 new awards over the simplified acquisition
threshold in FY 2016 by agencies other than DoD, NASA and the Coast
Guard, to approximately 9,100 unique awardees.
This proposed rule would implement Public Law 114-261, which makes
the pilot program permanent. If Public Law 114-261 had not been
enacted, the pilot program would have expired and 41 U.S.C. 4705, as
implemented in 1995 at FAR 3.900-3.906, would automatically become
effective again. Therefore, any impact of this rule is due to the
differences between the pilot program authorized by the NDAA for FY
2013, as made permanent, and the prior whistleblower regulations
implemented in 1995.
The enhancements to the whistleblower regulations created by the
pilot that would be made permanent by this rulemaking do not impose any
substantive burden on the public. The rule provides more details about
the nature of what constitutes whistleblower information and to whom it
may be disclosed, as well as more detailed procedures for filing and
investigating complaints and enforcing orders. A clause, applicable
above the simplified acquisition threshold, informs the contractor that
employees working under the contract are subject to whistleblower
protection and requires the contractor to inform its employees in
writing, in the predominant language of the workforce, of the employee
whistleblower rights and protections. This requirement can be easily
satisfied by issuing an email to all employees working on the contract.
For this reason, DoD, GSA, and NASA consider the burden to be de
minimis.
The rule would also add the words ``or subcontractor'' at multiple
locations throughout FAR 31.205-47, which also has no or de minimis
impact, because the cost principles generally already apply in the same
way to costs incurred by subcontractors as to costs incurred by
contractors. FAR 31.000 states that the part contains cost principles
and procedures for the pricing of contracts,
[[Page 66225]]
subcontracts, and modifications to contracts and subcontracts whenever
cost analysis is performed (see 15.404-1), and the determination,
negotiation, or allowance of costs when required by a contract clause.
FAR 31.103 further states that the contracting officer shall
incorporate the cost principles and procedures in subpart 31.2 and
agency supplements by reference in contracts with commercial
organizations as the basis for determining reimbursable costs under
cost-reimbursement contracts and cost-reimbursement subcontracts under
these contracts performed by commercial organizations. Other sections
expand this to contracts and subcontracts thereunder with educational
institutions and construction and architect-engineer contracts. FAR
31.204 further addresses the applicability of the cost principles and
procedures to subcontracts.
There were a small number of whistleblower cases filed during the
pilot period as shown in a U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)
report. GAO report 17-227, Contractor Whistleblower Protections Pilot
Program--Improvements Needed to Ensure Effective Implementation showed
that GAO surveyed 14 departments for reprisal complaints received from
July 1, 2013, to December 31, 2015. This report was published and
publicly released on March 2, 2017.
The report stated ``Of the 127 reprisal complaints submitted by
employees of contractors, subcontractors, and grantees under the pilot
program, 44 were investigated by the OIG [Office of Inspector General]
and none of the investigations completed thus far resulted in findings
that substantiated reprisal.''
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was subject to
review under Section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804.
VI. Executive Order 13771
This proposed rule is not expected to be subject to E.O. 13771,
because this rule has a de minimis impact on the public (see section IV
of this preamble).
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA do not expect this rule to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. However,
an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) has been performed
and is summarized as follows:
This proposed rule would implement Public Law 114-261, which was
enacted December 14, 2016. The objective of this rule is to enhance
whistleblower protection for contractor employees, by making
permanent the protection for disclosure of certain information, and
ensuring that the prohibition on reimbursement for certain legal
costs applies to subcontractors, as well as contractors, as required
by Public Law 114-261.
This proposed rule does not make any substantive changes to the
pilot program applicable to civilian agencies authorized by the NDAA
for FY 2013, other than to make it permanent. The clause is
prescribed above the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT). It also
does not apply to DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, nor to certain
elements of the intelligence community. Based on Federal Procurement
Data System (FPDS) data for fiscal year (FY) 2016, there were
approximately 10,000 new contract awards to small businesses by
civilian agencies that exceeded the SAT (about 5,000 unique
vendors).
Regarding the amendment to the cost principles, addition of the
words ``or subcontractor'' at multiple locations throughout FAR
31.205-47 has no or de minimis impact, because the cost principles
generally already apply in the same way to costs incurred by
subcontractors as to costs incurred by contractors.
There are no reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements in this rule.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal rules. DoD, GSA, and NASA were unable to identify any
alternatives to the rule that would reduce the impact on small
entities and still meet the requirements of the statute.
The Regulatory Secretariat Division has submitted a copy of the
IRFA to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration. A copy of the IRFA may be obtained from the Regulatory
Secretariat Division. DoD, GSA and NASA invite comments from small
business concerns and other interested parties on the expected impact
of this rule on small entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule
consistent with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (FAR Case 2017-005) in
correspondence.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 3, 31, and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: December 14, 2018.
William F. Clark,
Director, Office of Government-wide Acquisition Policy, Office of
Acquisition Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend 48 CFR parts
3, 31, and 52 as set forth below:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 3, 31, and 52 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 51
U.S.C. 20113.
PART 3--IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF
INTEREST
0
2. Revise section 3.900 to read as follows:
3.900 Scope of subpart.
This subpart implements various statutory whistleblower programs.
This subpart does not implement 10 U.S.C. 2409, which is applicable
only to DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard.
(a) 41 U.S.C. 4712 is implemented in 3.900 through 3.906. These
sections do not apply to--
(1) DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard; or
(2) Any element of the intelligence community, as defined in
section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)).
Sections 3.900 through 3.906 do not apply to any disclosure made by an
employee of a contractor or subcontractor of an element of the
intelligence community if such disclosure--
(i) Relates to an activity of an element of the intelligence
community; or
(ii) Was discovered during contract or subcontract services
provided to an element of the intelligence community.
(b) Section 743 of Division E, Title VII of the Consolidated and
Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. L. 113-235) and its
successor provisions in subsequent appropriations acts (and as extended
in continuing
[[Page 66226]]
resolutions), is implemented in 3.909, which is applicable to all
agencies.
(c) Contracts funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
Section 3.907 of this subpart implements section 1553 of the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-5) and applies to
all contracts funded in whole or in part by that Act.
0
3. Amend section 3.901 by--
0
a. Adding in alphabetical order, the definition, ``Abuse of
authority'';
0
b. Removing the definition ``Authorized official of an agency''; and
0
c. Revising the definition ``Inspector General''.
The added and revised text reads as follows:
3.901 Definitions.
* * * * *
Abuse of authority means an arbitrary and capricious exercise of
authority that is inconsistent with the mission of the executive agency
concerned or the successful performance of a contract of such agency.
* * * * *
Inspector General means an Inspector General appointed under the
Inspector General Act of 1978 and any Inspector General that receives
funding from, or has oversight over contracts awarded for, or on behalf
of, the executive agency concerned. This definition does not apply to
3.907.
* * * * *
0
4. Revise section 3.902 to read as follows:
3.902 Classified information.
41 U.S.C. 4712 does not provide any right to disclose classified
information not otherwise provided by law.
0
5. Revise section 3.903 to read as follows:
3.903 Policy.
(a)(1) Contractors and subcontractors are prohibited from
discharging, demoting, or otherwise discriminating against an employee
as a reprisal for disclosing, to any of the entities listed at
paragraph (b) of this section, information that the employee reasonably
believes is--
(i) Evidence of gross mismanagement of a Federal contract;
(ii) A gross waste of Federal funds;
(iii) An abuse of authority relating to a Federal contract;
(iv) A substantial and specific danger to public health or safety;
or
(v) A violation of law, rule, or regulation related to a Federal
contract (including the competition for or negotiation of a contract).
(2) A reprisal is prohibited even if it is undertaken at the
request of an executive branch official, unless the request takes the
form of a non-discretionary directive and is within the authority of
the executive branch official making the request.
(b) Entities to whom disclosure may be made.
(1) A Member of Congress or a representative of a committee of
Congress.
(2) An Inspector General.
(3) The Government Accountability Office.
(4) A Federal employee responsible for contract oversight or
management at the relevant agency.
(5) An authorized official of the Department of Justice or other
law enforcement agency.
(6) A court or grand jury.
(7) A management official or other employee of the contractor or
subcontractor who has the responsibility to investigate, discover, or
address misconduct.
(c) An employee who initiates or provides evidence of contractor or
subcontractor misconduct in any judicial or administrative proceeding
relating to waste, fraud, or abuse on a Federal contract shall be
deemed to have made a disclosure.
0
6. Amend section 3.904 by revising the section to read as follows:
3.904 Complaints.
0
7. Add section 3.904-1 to read as follows:
3.904-1 Procedures for filing complaints.
A contractor or subcontractor employee who believes that he or she
has been discharged, demoted, or otherwise discriminated against
contrary to the policy in 3.903 may submit a complaint with the
Inspector General of the agency concerned. Procedures for submitting
fraud, waste, abuse, and whistleblower complaints are generally
accessible on agency Office of Inspector General Hotline or
Whistleblower internet sites or the complainant may directly contact
the cognizant Office of the Inspector General for submission
instructions. A complaint by the employee may not be brought under 41
U.S.C. 4712 more than three years after the date on which the alleged
reprisal took place.
0
8. Add section 3.904-2 to read as follows:
3.904-2 Procedures for investigating complaints.
(a) Investigation of complaints will be in accordance with 41
U.S.C. 4712(b).
(b) Upon completion of the investigation, the head of the agency
shall ensure that the Inspector General provides the report of findings
to--
(1) The complainant and any person acting on the complainant's
behalf;
(2) The contractor and/or subcontractor alleged to have committed
the violation; and
(3) The head of the agency.
(c) Unless otherwise provided in agency procedures, the
complainant, contractor, and/or subcontractor shall be afforded the
opportunity to submit a written response to the report of findings to
the head of the agency and the Office of Inspector General.
0
9. Revise section 3.905 to read as follows:
3.905 Remedies and enforcement of orders.
0
10. Add section 3.905-1 to read as follows:
3.905-1 Remedies.
(a) Agency response to Inspector General report. Not later than 30
days after receiving a report pursuant to 3.904-2, the head of the
agency shall--
(1) Determine whether sufficient basis exists to conclude that the
contractor or subcontractor has subjected the employee who submitted
the complaint to a reprisal as prohibited by 3.903; and
(2) Either issue an order denying relief or take one or more of the
following actions:
(i) Order the contractor or subcontractor to take affirmative
action to abate the reprisal.
(ii) Order the contractor or subcontractor to reinstate the
complainant-employee to the position that the person held before the
reprisal, together with compensatory damages (including back pay),
employment benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment that
would apply to the person in that position if the reprisal had not been
taken.
(iii) Order the contractor or subcontractor to pay the complainant-
employee an amount equal to the aggregate amount of all costs and
expenses (including attorneys' fees and expert witnesses' fees) that
were reasonably incurred by the complainant for, or in connection with,
bringing the complaint regarding the reprisal, as determined by the
head of the agency.
(b) Complainant's right to go to court.
(1) Paragraph (b)(2) of this section applies if--
(i) The head of the agency issues an order denying relief; or
(ii)(A) The head of the agency has not issued an order--
(1) Within 210 days after the submission of the complaint; or
(2) Within 30 days after the expiration of an extension of time
granted in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 4712(b)(2)(B)
[[Page 66227]]
for the submission of the report to those stated in 3.904-2(b); and
(B) There is no showing that such delay is due to the bad faith of
the complainant.
(2) If the conditions in either paragraph (b)(1)(i) or (ii) of this
section are met--
(i) The complainant shall be deemed to have exhausted all
administrative remedies with respect to the complaint; and
(ii) The complainant may bring a de novo action at law or equity
against the contractor or subcontractor to seek compensatory damages
and other relief available under 41 U.S.C. 4712 in the appropriate
district court of the United States, which shall have jurisdiction over
such an action without regard to the amount in controversy.
(A) Such an action shall, at the request of either party to the
action, be tried by the court with a jury.
(B) An action under this authority may not be brought more than two
years after the date on which remedies are deemed to have been
exhausted.
(c) Admissibility in evidence. An Inspector General determination
and an agency head order denying relief under this section shall be
admissible in evidence in any de novo action at law or equity brought
pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 4712.
(d) No waiver. The rights and remedies provided for in 41 U.S.C.
4712 may not be waived by any agreement, policy, form, or condition of
employment.
0
11. Add section 3.905-2 to read as follows:
3.905-2 Enforcement of orders.
(a) Whenever a contractor or subcontractor fails to comply with an
order issued under 3.905-1(a)(2), the head of the agency concerned
shall file an action for enforcement of the order in the U.S. district
court for a district in which the reprisal was found to have occurred.
In any action brought pursuant to this authority, the court may grant
appropriate relief, including injunctive relief, compensatory and
exemplary damages, and attorney fees and costs. The complainant-
employee upon whose behalf an order was issued may also file such an
action or join in an action filed by the head of the agency.
(b) Any person adversely affected or aggrieved by an order issued
under 3.905-1(a)(2) may obtain review of the order's conformance with
41 U.S.C. 4712 and its implementing regulations, in the U.S. court of
appeals for a circuit in which the reprisal is alleged in the order to
have occurred. No petition seeking such review may be filed more than
60 days after issuance of the order by the head of the agency. Filing
such an appeal shall not act to stay the enforcement of the order of
the head of an agency, unless a stay is specifically entered by the
court.
0
12. Revise section 3.906 to read as follows:
3.906 Contract clause.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the
contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.203-17, Contractor
Employee Whistleblower Rights, in all solicitations and contracts that
exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.
(b) The clause prescription in paragraph (a) of this section does
not apply to solicitations and contracts of DoD, NASA, the Coast Guard,
or applicable elements of the intelligence community (see 3.900(a)).
3.907-7 [Amended]
0
13. Amend section 3.907-7 by removing ``Reinvestment Act of 2009 in''
and adding ``Reinvestment Act of 2009, in'' in its place.
3.908 [Removed and reserved]
0
14. Remove and reserve section 3.908.
3.908-1 through 3.908-9 [Removed]
0
15. Remove sections 3.908-1 through 3.908-9.
PART 31--CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES
31.205-47 [Amended]
0
16. Amend section 31.205-47 by--
0
a. In paragraph (a), in the definition of ``Costs'' by removing ``or
others retained by the contractor to assist it;'' and adding ``or
others retained by the contractor or subcontractor to assist it;'' in
its place;
0
b. In the introductory text of paragraph (b), by removing ``law or
regulation by the contractor'' and adding ``law or regulation by the
contractor or subcontractor'' in its place;
0
c. In paragraph (b)(2) by removing ``either a finding of contractor
liability'' and adding ``either a finding of contractor or
subcontractor liability'' in its place;
0
d. In paragraph (b)(3)(i), by removing ``the contractor;'' and adding
``the contractor or subcontractor;'' in its place;
0
e. In paragraph (c)(1), by removing ``between the contractor'' and
adding ``between the contractor or subcontractor'' in its place;
0
f. In paragraph (c)(2)(i), by removing ``incurred by the contractor''
and adding ``incurred by the contractor or subcontractor'' in its
place;
0
g. In paragraph (d)(1) by removing ``Federal contract; or'' and adding
``Federal contract or subcontract; or'' in its place;
0
h. In the introductory paragraph of paragraph (f) by removing
``connection with'' and adding ``connection with the following'' in its
place;
0
i. In paragraph (f)(4) by removing ``the contractor under'' and adding
``the contractor or subcontractor under'' in its place; and removing
``the contractor was'' and adding ``the contractor or subcontractor
was'' in its place;
0
j. In the introductory paragraph of paragraph (f)(5) by removing
``contractors arising from either'' and adding ``contractors or
subcontractors arising from either--'' in its place;
0
k. In paragraph (f)(5)(i) by removing ``an agreement'' and adding ``An
agreement'' in its place;
0
l. In paragraph (f)(5)(ii) by removing ``dual sourcing'' and adding
``Dual sourcing'' and removing ``except when'' and adding ``except
when--'' in its place;
0
m. In paragraph (f)(5)(ii)(A) by removing ``incurred as'' and adding
``Incurred as'', removing ``contract or'' and adding ``contract or
subcontract, or'' in its place, and removing ``contracting officer,
or'' and adding ``contracting officer; or'' in its place;
0
n. In paragraph (f)(5)(ii)(B) by removing ``when agreed'' and adding
``When agreed'' in its place;
0
o. In paragraph (f)(6) by removing ``contract.'' and adding ``contract
or subcontract.'' in its place;
0
p. In paragraph (f)(7) by removing ``the contractor is'' and adding
``the contractor or subcontractor is'' in its place;
0
q. In paragraph (g) by removing ``contractor separately.'' and adding
``contractor or subcontractor separately.'' in its place, and removing
``contractor to repay all'' and adding ``contractor or subcontractor to
repay all'' in its place.
0
17. Amend section 31.603 by revising paragraph (b)(15) to read as
follows:
31.603 Requirements.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(15) Unless any of the exceptions at 31.205-47(c) or (d) apply,
costs incurred by a contractor or subcontractor in connection with any
criminal, civil, or administrative proceedings that result in
dispositions described at 31.205-47(b)(1) through (5) commenced by: A
Federal, State, local, or foreign government, for a violation of, or
failure to comply with, law or regulation by the contractor or
subcontractor (including its agents or employees); a contractor or
[[Page 66228]]
subcontractor employee submitting a whistleblower complaint of reprisal
in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 4712 or 10 U.S.C. 2409; or a third party
in the name of the United States under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C.
3730. For any such proceeding that does not result in a disposition
described at 31.205-47(b)(1) through (5), or to which 31.205-47(c)
exceptions apply, the cost of that proceeding shall be subject to the
limitations in 31.205-47(e).
PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
18. Amend section 52.203-17 by--
0
a. Revising the section heading;
0
b. Removing from the introductory text ``3.908-9'' and adding ``3.906''
in its place;
0
c. Revising the date of the clause; and
0
d. Revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows:
52.203-17 Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights.
* * * * *
Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights (Date)
(a) This contract and employees working on this contract will be
subject to the whistleblower rights and remedies established at 41
U.S.C. 4712 and FAR 3.901 through 3.905.
(b) The Contractor shall inform its employees in writing, in the
predominant language of the workforce, of employee whistleblower
rights and protections under 41 U.S.C. 4712, as described in FAR
3.901 through 3.905.
* * * * *
0
19. Amend section 52.212-4 by revising the date of the clause; and
removing from paragraph (r) ``41 U.S.C. 4712 and''. The revised text
reads as follows:
52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions--Commercial Items.
* * * * *
Contract Terms and Conditions--Commercial Items (Date)
* * * * *
0
20. Amend section 52.212-5 by:
0
a. Revising the date of the clause;
0
b. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(4) through (60) as paragraphs (b)(5)
through (61), respectively;
0
c. Adding a new paragraph (b)(4);
0
d. Redesignating paragraphs (e)(1)(ii) through (xxii) as paragraphs
(e)(1)(iii) through (xxiii), respectively;
0
e. Adding a new paragraph (e)(1)(ii);
0
f. Revising the date of Alternate II;
0
g. Redesignating paragraphs of Alternate II; (e)(1)(ii)(C) through (T)
as paragraphs (e)(1)(ii)(D) through (U), respectively; and
0
h. Adding a new paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(C).
The revised and added text reads as follows:
52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes
or Executive Orders--Commercial Items.
* * * * *
Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or
Executive Orders--Commercial Items (Date)
* * * * *
(b) * * *
__(4) 52.203-17, Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights (Date)
(41 U.S.C. 4712)
* * * * *
(e)(1) * * *
(ii) 52.203-17, Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights (Date) (41
U.S.C. 4712)
* * * * *
Alternate II (Date). * * *
* * * * *
(e)(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(C) 52.203-17, Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights (Date) (41
U.S.C. 4712)
* * * * *
0
21. Amend section 52.213-4 by revising the date of the clause and
paragraph (a)(2)(viii) to read as follows:
52.213-4 Terms and Conditions--Simplified Acquisitions (Other Than
Commercial Items).
* * * * *
Terms and Conditions--Simplified Acquisitions (Other Than Commercial
Items) (Date)
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(viii) 52.244-6, Subcontracts for Commercial Items (Date).
* * * * *
0
22. Amend section 52.244-6 by--
0
a. Revising the date of the clause;
0
b. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(1)(iii) through (c)(1)(xix) as
paragraphs (c)(1)(iv) through (c)(1)(xx), respectively;
0
c. Adding a new paragraph (c)(1)(iii).
The revised and added text reads as follows:
52.244-6 Subcontracts for Commercial Items.
* * * * *
Subcontracts for Commercial Items (Date)
* * * * *
(c)(1) * * *
(iii) 52.203-17, Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights (Date)
(41 U.S.C. 4712) relating to whistleblower protections, if the
subcontract is over the simplified acquisition threshold; this clause
does not apply to contracts of DoD, NASA, the Coast Guard, or
applicable elements of the intelligence community-see FAR 3.900(a).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-27493 Filed 12-21-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P