Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 65757-65759 [2018-27622]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2018 / Notices
OMB Number: 3137–TBD.
Frequency: One-time collection
anticipated.
Affected Public: Community
stakeholders at the county level,
museum and library staff, local
government officials.
Number of Respondents: 520.
Estimated Average Burden per
Response: 52.5 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 484
hours.
Total Annualized Capital/Startup
Costs: n/a.
Total Annual Costs: $13,421.
Dated: December 18, 2018.
Kim Miller,
Grants Management Specialist, Office of
Grants Policy and Management.
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
National Science Foundation.
Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
ACTION:
RIN 3145–AA58
Notice on Penalty Inflation
Adjustments for Civil Monetary
Penalties
National Science Foundation.
Notice announcing updated
penalty inflation adjustments for civil
monetary penalties for 2019.
ACTION:
The National Science
Foundation (NSF or Foundation) is
providing notice of its adjusted
maximum civil monetary penalties,
effective January 15, 2019. These
adjustments are required by the Federal
Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
Improvements Act of 2015 (the 2015
Act).
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bijan Gilanshah, Assistant General
Counsel, Office of the General Counsel,
National Science Foundation, 2415
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA
22314. Telephone: 703.292.5055.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June
27, 2016, NSF published an interim
final rule amending its regulations to
adjust, for inflation, the maximum civil
monetary penalties that may be imposed
for violations of the Antarctic
Conservation Act of 1978 (ACA), as
amended, 16 U.S.C. 2401 et seq., and
the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act
of 1986 (PFCRA), 31 U.S.C. 3801, et seq.
These adjustments are required by the
2015 Act (Sec. 701 of Pub. L. 114–74).
The 2015 Act also requires agencies to
make subsequent annual adjustments
for inflation. Pursuant to OMB guidance
dated December 14, 2018, the cost-ofliving adjustment multiplier for 2019 is
Jkt 247001
In accordance with the
requirement of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the National
Science Foundation (NSF) is providing
opportunity for public comment on the
NSF Major Facilities Guide (MFG) and
the accompanying NSF Financial Data
Collection Tool for Major Facilities. The
Major Facilities Guide was previously
cleared under the title Large Facilities
Manual. The primary purpose of this
revision is to update the roles and
responsibilities for NSF staff for
oversight of Major Facilities, provide
requirements for mid-scale projects, and
provide content in previously reserved
Sections as well as clarify existing
content. The draft versions of the NSF
MFG and the accompanying NSF
Financial Data Collection Tool for Major
Facilities are available on the NSF
website at: https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/lfo/
lfo_documents.jsp.
To facilitate review, a Change Log
with brief comment explanations of the
changes is provided in the guide. NSF
is particularly interested in public
comment on the new content provided
in Section 5 Guidance for Mid-Scale
Research Infrastructure Projects and the
previously reserved sections.
DATES: Written comments should be
received by February 19, 2019 to be
assured of consideration. Comments
received after that date will be
considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding the information collection and
requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request should be
addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports
SUMMARY:
AGENCY:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
[FR Doc. 2018–27659 Filed 12–20–18; 8:45 am]
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
BILLING CODE 7036–01–P
00:00 Dec 21, 2018
Dated: December 18, 2018.
Suzanne Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
[FR Doc. 2018–27625 Filed 12–20–18; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
1.02522. Accordingly, the 2019 annual
inflation adjustments for the maximum
penalties under the ACA are $17,278
($16,853 × 1.02522) for violations and
$29,239 ($28,520 × 1.02522) for
knowing violations of the ACA. Finally,
the 2019 annual inflation adjustment for
the maximum penalty for violations
under PFCRA is $11,463 ($11,181 ×
1.02522).
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65757
Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm.
1265, Arlington, VA 22230, or by email
to splimpto@nsf.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne Plimpton on (703) 292–7556 or
send email to splimpto@nsf.gov.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339, which is accessible 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year
(including federal holidays).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments: In addition to the type of
comments identified above, comments
are also invited on: (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
Agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
After obtaining and considering public
comment, NSF will prepare the
submission requesting OMB clearance
of this collection for no longer than 3
years.
Title of Collection: Major Facilities
Guide.
OMB Approval Number: 3145–0239.
Expiration Date of Approval: 6/30/
2020.
Type of Request: Intent to seek
approval to extend with revision an
information collection for three years.
Proposed Project: The National
Science Foundation Act of 1950 (Pub. L.
81–507) set forth NSF’s mission and
purpose:
‘‘To promote the progress of science;
to advance the national health,
prosperity, and welfare; to secure the
national defense. * * *
The Act authorized and directed NSF
to initiate and support:
b Basic scientific research and
research fundamental to the engineering
process;
b Programs to strengthen scientific
and engineering research potential;
b Science and engineering education
programs at all levels and in all the
various fields of science and
engineering;
b Programs that provide a source of
information for policy formulation; and
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
65758
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2018 / Notices
b Other activities to promote these
ends.
Among Federal agencies, NSF is a
leader in providing the academic
community with advanced
instrumentation needed to conduct
state-of-the-art research and to educate
the next generation of scientists,
engineers and technical workers. The
knowledge generated by these tools
sustains U.S. leadership in science and
engineering (S&E) to drive the U.S.
economy and secure the future. NSF’s
responsibility is to ensure that the
research and education communities
have access to these resources, and to
provide the support needed to utilize
them optimally, and implement timely
upgrades.
The scale of advanced
instrumentation ranges from small
research instruments to shared
resources or facilities that can be used
by entire communities. The demand for
such instrumentation is very high, and
is growing rapidly, along with the pace
of discovery. For major facilities and
shared infrastructure, the need is
particularly high. This trend is expected
to accelerate in the future as increasing
numbers of researchers and educators
rely on such large facilities,
instruments, and databases to provide
the reach to make the next intellectual
leaps.
NSF currently provides support for
facility construction from two accounts:
The Major Research Equipment and
Facility Construction (MREFC) account,
and the Research and Related Activities
(R&RA) account. The MREFC account,
established in FY 1995, is a separate
budget line item that provides an
agency-wide mechanism, permitting
directorates to undertake large facility
projects that exceed 10% of the
Directorate’s annual budget; or roughly
$70M or greater. Smaller projects
continue to be supported from the
R&RA Account.
Facilities are defined as shared-use
infrastructure, instrumentation and
equipment that are accessible to a broad
community of researchers and/or
educators. Facilities may be centralized
or may consist of distributed
installations. They may incorporate
large-scale networking or computational
infrastructure, multi-user instruments or
networks of such instruments, or other
infrastructure, instrumentation and
equipment having a major impact on a
broad segment of a scientific or
engineering discipline. Historically,
awards have been made for such diverse
projects as accelerators, telescopes,
research vessels and aircraft, and
geographically distributed but
networked sensors and instrumentation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
00:00 Dec 21, 2018
Jkt 247001
The growth and diversification of
large facility projects require that NSF
remain attentive to the ever-changing
issues and challenges inherent in their
planning, construction, operation,
management and oversight. Most
importantly, dedicated, competent NSF
and awardee staff are needed to manage
and oversee these projects; giving the
attention and oversight that good
practice dictates and that proper
accountability to taxpayers and
Congress demands. To this end, there is
also a need for consistent, documented
requirements and procedures to be
understood and used by NSF program
managers and awardees for all such
major projects.
Use of the Information: Facilities are
an essential part of the science and
engineering enterprise, and supporting
them is one major responsibility of the
National Science Foundation (NSF).
NSF makes awards to external
entities—primarily universities,
consortia of universities or non-profit
organizations—to undertake
construction, management and
operation of facilities. Such awards
frequently take the form of cooperative
agreements. NSF does not directly
construct or operate the facilities it
supports. However, NSF retains
responsibility for overseeing their
development, management and
successful performance. The Major
Facilities Guide is intended to:
• Provide guidance for NSF staff and
awardees to carry out effective project
planning, management and oversight of
major facilities while considering the
varying requirements of a diverse
portfolio;
• Clearly state the policies, processes
and procedures pertinent at each stage
of a facility’s life cycle from
development through design,
construction, operations, and
divestment; and
• Document and disseminate ‘‘best
practices’’ identified over time so that
NSF and awardees can carry out their
responsibilities more effectively.
This version of the Major Facilities
Guide adds a section for guidance on
mid-scale research infrastructure
projects; updates sections related to NSF
policy on research infrastructure, roles
and responsibilities for NSF staff,
divestment stage, earned value
management, cybersecurity, and
property management; and clarifies cost
estimating requirements, the
construction stage total project costs
including NSF policy on contingency
and reporting requirements. As part of
the implementation of incurred cost
reporting, a NSF Financial Data
Collection Tool for Major Facilities is
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
referenced in the Guide and included in
the request for comment. This version
also reflects revisions to improve
readability and facilitate period
revision. The Guide does not replace
existing formal procedures required for
all NSF awards, which are described in
the Grant Proposal Guide and The
Award and Administration Guide.
Instead, it draws upon and supplements
them for the purpose of providing
detailed guidance regarding NSF
management and oversight of facilities
projects. All facilities projects require
merit and technical review, as well as
approval of certain deliverables. The
level of review and approval varies
substantially from standard grants, as
does the level of oversight needed to
ensure appropriate and proper
accountability for federal funds. The
requirements, recommended procedures
and best practices presented in the
Guide apply to any facility significant
enough to require close and substantial
interaction with the Foundation and the
National Science Board.
This Guide will be updated
periodically to reflect changes in
requirements, policies and/or
procedures. Award Recipients are
expected to monitor and adopt the
requirements and best practices
included in the Guide which are aimed
at improving management and oversight
of major facilities projects and at
enabling the most efficient and costeffective delivery of tools to the research
and education communities.
The submission of proposals and
subsequent project documentation to
the Foundation related to the design,
construction and operations of Major
Facilities is part of the collection of
information. This information is used to
help NSF fulfill this responsibility in
supporting merit-based research and
education projects in all the scientific
and engineering disciplines. The
Foundation also has a continuing
commitment to provide oversight on
facilities design and construction which
must be balanced against monitoring its
information collection so as to identify
and address any excessive reporting
burdens.
NSF has approximately twenty-four
(24) Major Facilities in various stages of
design, construction, operations and
divestment. Facilities undergoing a
major upgrade may be classified in both
design or construction and operations at
the same time. Two to four (2 to 4) new
construction awards are made
approximately every five (5) years based
on science community infrastructure
needs and availability of funding.
Among the twenty-four major facilities,
there are approximately seven (7)
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2018 / Notices
facilities that are either in design or
construction. These stages require the
highest level of reporting and
management documentation per the
Major Facilities Guide. NSF estimates
there will be four (4) mid-scale projects
in progress at a given time.
Burden to the Public: The Foundation
estimates that approximately five (5)
Full Time Equivalents (FTE’s) are
necessary for each major facility project
in design or construction to respond to
NSF performance and financial
reporting and project management
documentation requirements on an
annual basis; or 10,400 hours per year.
The Foundation estimates
approximately one and half (1.5) FTE
for a major facility in operations to
respond to NSF performance and
financial reporting on an annual basis;
or 3,120 hours per year. For mid-scale
projects, the Foundation estimates
approximately one (1) Full Time
Equivalent (FTE’s) is necessary for each
mid-scale project to respond to NSF
project management documentation
requirements on an annual basis; or
2,080 hours per year. With seven (7)
major facilities in design or construction
and twenty-one (21) in operations and
four (4) mid-scale projects, this equates
to roughly 150,000 public burden hours
annually.
Dated: December 17, 2018.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2018–27622 Filed 12–20–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
[NRC–2018–0155]
Instructions for Completing NRC’s
Uniform Low-Level Radioactive Waste
Manifest
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Draft NUREG; extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
On October 30, 2018, the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
solicited comments on its draft guidance
document, NUREG/BR–0204, Rev. 3,
‘‘Instructions for Completing NRC’s
Uniform Low-Level Radioactive Waste
Manifest,’’ in the Federal Register. The
public comment period was originally
scheduled to close on December 31,
2018. The NRC has decided to extend
the public comment period until
January 31, 2019, to allow more time for
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
00:00 Dec 21, 2018
stakeholders to develop and submit
their comments.
DATES: The due date for comments
requested in the document published on
October 30, 2018 (83 FR 54620), is
extended. Comments should be filed no
later than January 31, 2019. Comments
received after this date will be
considered, if it is practical to do so, but
the Commission is able to ensure
consideration only for comments
received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2018–0155. Address
questions about Docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Krupskaya Castellon;
telephone: 301–287–9221; email:
Krupskaya.Castellon@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• Mail comments to: May Ma, Office
of Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN–7–
A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
For additional direction on obtaining
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lloyd Desotell, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–415–5969, email: Lloyd.Desotell@
nrc.gov.
Jkt 247001
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2018–
0155 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2018–0155.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
PO 00000
Frm 00138
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65759
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov. The draft NUREG is available in
ADAMS under Accession No.
ML18261A002.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC–2018–
0155 in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission.
The NRC will post all comment
submissions at https://
www.regulations.gov as well as enter the
comment submissions into ADAMS.
The NRC does not routinely edit
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information
before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Discussion
On October 30, 2018, the NRC
solicited comments on its draft guidance
document, NUREG/BR–0204, Rev. 3,
‘‘Instructions for Completing NRC’s
Uniform Low-Level Radioactive Waste
Manifest.’’ This document provides
instructions to prepare NRC Form 540
(Uniform Low-Level Radioactive Waste
Manifest (Shipping Paper)), NRC Form
541 (Uniform Low-Level Radioactive
Waste Manifest (Container and Waste
Description)), and NRC Form 542
(Uniform Low-Level Radioactive Waste
Manifest (Manifest Index and Regional
Compact Tabulation)). Pursuant to the
requirements of part 20 of title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR
part 20), ‘‘Standards for Protection
Against Radiation,’’ Appendix G,
‘‘Requirements for Transfers of LowLevel Radioactive Waste Intended for
Disposal At Licensed Land Disposal
Facilities and Manifests,’’ NRC Forms
540 and 541 must be prepared for lowlevel radioactive waste intended for
ultimate disposal at a licensed low-level
radioactive waste land disposal facility.
NRC Form 542 is required only if
processors and collectors of low-level
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 245 (Friday, December 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65757-65759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27622]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirement of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, the National Science Foundation (NSF) is providing
opportunity for public comment on the NSF Major Facilities Guide (MFG)
and the accompanying NSF Financial Data Collection Tool for Major
Facilities. The Major Facilities Guide was previously cleared under the
title Large Facilities Manual. The primary purpose of this revision is
to update the roles and responsibilities for NSF staff for oversight of
Major Facilities, provide requirements for mid-scale projects, and
provide content in previously reserved Sections as well as clarify
existing content. The draft versions of the NSF MFG and the
accompanying NSF Financial Data Collection Tool for Major Facilities
are available on the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/lfo/lfo_documents.jsp.
To facilitate review, a Change Log with brief comment explanations
of the changes is provided in the guide. NSF is particularly interested
in public comment on the new content provided in Section 5 Guidance for
Mid-Scale Research Infrastructure Projects and the previously reserved
sections.
DATES: Written comments should be received by February 19, 2019 to be
assured of consideration. Comments received after that date will be
considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Written comments regarding the information collection and
requests for copies of the proposed information collection request
should be addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer,
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm. 1265, Arlington, VA
22230, or by email to splimpto@nsf.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne Plimpton on (703) 292-7556 or
send email to splimpto@nsf.gov. Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339, which is accessible
24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year (including federal
holidays).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments: In addition to the type of comments identified above,
comments are also invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology. After obtaining and considering public comment, NSF will
prepare the submission requesting OMB clearance of this collection for
no longer than 3 years.
Title of Collection: Major Facilities Guide.
OMB Approval Number: 3145-0239.
Expiration Date of Approval: 6/30/2020.
Type of Request: Intent to seek approval to extend with revision an
information collection for three years.
Proposed Project: The National Science Foundation Act of 1950 (Pub.
L. 81-507) set forth NSF's mission and purpose:
``To promote the progress of science; to advance the national
health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense. * * *
The Act authorized and directed NSF to initiate and support:
[square] Basic scientific research and research fundamental to the
engineering process;
[square] Programs to strengthen scientific and engineering research
potential;
[square] Science and engineering education programs at all levels
and in all the various fields of science and engineering;
[square] Programs that provide a source of information for policy
formulation; and
[[Page 65758]]
[square] Other activities to promote these ends.
Among Federal agencies, NSF is a leader in providing the academic
community with advanced instrumentation needed to conduct state-of-the-
art research and to educate the next generation of scientists,
engineers and technical workers. The knowledge generated by these tools
sustains U.S. leadership in science and engineering (S&E) to drive the
U.S. economy and secure the future. NSF's responsibility is to ensure
that the research and education communities have access to these
resources, and to provide the support needed to utilize them optimally,
and implement timely upgrades.
The scale of advanced instrumentation ranges from small research
instruments to shared resources or facilities that can be used by
entire communities. The demand for such instrumentation is very high,
and is growing rapidly, along with the pace of discovery. For major
facilities and shared infrastructure, the need is particularly high.
This trend is expected to accelerate in the future as increasing
numbers of researchers and educators rely on such large facilities,
instruments, and databases to provide the reach to make the next
intellectual leaps.
NSF currently provides support for facility construction from two
accounts: The Major Research Equipment and Facility Construction
(MREFC) account, and the Research and Related Activities (R&RA)
account. The MREFC account, established in FY 1995, is a separate
budget line item that provides an agency-wide mechanism, permitting
directorates to undertake large facility projects that exceed 10% of
the Directorate's annual budget; or roughly $70M or greater. Smaller
projects continue to be supported from the R&RA Account.
Facilities are defined as shared-use infrastructure,
instrumentation and equipment that are accessible to a broad community
of researchers and/or educators. Facilities may be centralized or may
consist of distributed installations. They may incorporate large-scale
networking or computational infrastructure, multi-user instruments or
networks of such instruments, or other infrastructure, instrumentation
and equipment having a major impact on a broad segment of a scientific
or engineering discipline. Historically, awards have been made for such
diverse projects as accelerators, telescopes, research vessels and
aircraft, and geographically distributed but networked sensors and
instrumentation.
The growth and diversification of large facility projects require
that NSF remain attentive to the ever-changing issues and challenges
inherent in their planning, construction, operation, management and
oversight. Most importantly, dedicated, competent NSF and awardee staff
are needed to manage and oversee these projects; giving the attention
and oversight that good practice dictates and that proper
accountability to taxpayers and Congress demands. To this end, there is
also a need for consistent, documented requirements and procedures to
be understood and used by NSF program managers and awardees for all
such major projects.
Use of the Information: Facilities are an essential part of the
science and engineering enterprise, and supporting them is one major
responsibility of the National Science Foundation (NSF).
NSF makes awards to external entities--primarily universities,
consortia of universities or non-profit organizations--to undertake
construction, management and operation of facilities. Such awards
frequently take the form of cooperative agreements. NSF does not
directly construct or operate the facilities it supports. However, NSF
retains responsibility for overseeing their development, management and
successful performance. The Major Facilities Guide is intended to:
Provide guidance for NSF staff and awardees to carry out
effective project planning, management and oversight of major
facilities while considering the varying requirements of a diverse
portfolio;
Clearly state the policies, processes and procedures
pertinent at each stage of a facility's life cycle from development
through design, construction, operations, and divestment; and
Document and disseminate ``best practices'' identified
over time so that NSF and awardees can carry out their responsibilities
more effectively.
This version of the Major Facilities Guide adds a section for
guidance on mid-scale research infrastructure projects; updates
sections related to NSF policy on research infrastructure, roles and
responsibilities for NSF staff, divestment stage, earned value
management, cybersecurity, and property management; and clarifies cost
estimating requirements, the construction stage total project costs
including NSF policy on contingency and reporting requirements. As part
of the implementation of incurred cost reporting, a NSF Financial Data
Collection Tool for Major Facilities is referenced in the Guide and
included in the request for comment. This version also reflects
revisions to improve readability and facilitate period revision. The
Guide does not replace existing formal procedures required for all NSF
awards, which are described in the Grant Proposal Guide and The Award
and Administration Guide. Instead, it draws upon and supplements them
for the purpose of providing detailed guidance regarding NSF management
and oversight of facilities projects. All facilities projects require
merit and technical review, as well as approval of certain
deliverables. The level of review and approval varies substantially
from standard grants, as does the level of oversight needed to ensure
appropriate and proper accountability for federal funds. The
requirements, recommended procedures and best practices presented in
the Guide apply to any facility significant enough to require close and
substantial interaction with the Foundation and the National Science
Board.
This Guide will be updated periodically to reflect changes in
requirements, policies and/or procedures. Award Recipients are expected
to monitor and adopt the requirements and best practices included in
the Guide which are aimed at improving management and oversight of
major facilities projects and at enabling the most efficient and cost-
effective delivery of tools to the research and education communities.
The submission of proposals and subsequent project documentation to
the Foundation related to the design, construction and operations of
Major Facilities is part of the collection of information. This
information is used to help NSF fulfill this responsibility in
supporting merit-based research and education projects in all the
scientific and engineering disciplines. The Foundation also has a
continuing commitment to provide oversight on facilities design and
construction which must be balanced against monitoring its information
collection so as to identify and address any excessive reporting
burdens.
NSF has approximately twenty-four (24) Major Facilities in various
stages of design, construction, operations and divestment. Facilities
undergoing a major upgrade may be classified in both design or
construction and operations at the same time. Two to four (2 to 4) new
construction awards are made approximately every five (5) years based
on science community infrastructure needs and availability of funding.
Among the twenty-four major facilities, there are approximately seven
(7)
[[Page 65759]]
facilities that are either in design or construction. These stages
require the highest level of reporting and management documentation per
the Major Facilities Guide. NSF estimates there will be four (4) mid-
scale projects in progress at a given time.
Burden to the Public: The Foundation estimates that approximately
five (5) Full Time Equivalents (FTE's) are necessary for each major
facility project in design or construction to respond to NSF
performance and financial reporting and project management
documentation requirements on an annual basis; or 10,400 hours per
year. The Foundation estimates approximately one and half (1.5) FTE for
a major facility in operations to respond to NSF performance and
financial reporting on an annual basis; or 3,120 hours per year. For
mid-scale projects, the Foundation estimates approximately one (1) Full
Time Equivalent (FTE's) is necessary for each mid-scale project to
respond to NSF project management documentation requirements on an
annual basis; or 2,080 hours per year. With seven (7) major facilities
in design or construction and twenty-one (21) in operations and four
(4) mid-scale projects, this equates to roughly 150,000 public burden
hours annually.
Dated: December 17, 2018.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2018-27622 Filed 12-20-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P