Security Zone; Puget Sound, Tacoma, WA, 65525-65527 [2018-27579]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01 and Commandant
Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Dec 20, 2018
Jkt 247001
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone
surrounding the Winneconne Bridge
(STH 116) on the Wolf River, in
Winneconne, WI. It is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph L[60(a)] of Appendix A, Table
1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–
001–01, Rev. 01. A Record of
Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–1097 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T09–1097 Safety Zone; Wolf River,
Winneconne Bridge Blasting, Winneconne,
WI.
(a) Location. All navigable waters of
Wolf River within 700 feet of the
Winneconne Bridge (STH 116) located
at 44°6.646 N, 088°42.697 W (NAD 83).
(b) Enforcement period. This rule will
be enforced from 6 a.m. through 5 p.m.
each day from December 17, 2018
through January 21, 2019.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or a
designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan or a designated on-scene
representative.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65525
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
is any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan to act on his or her
behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or an on-scene representative
to obtain permission to do so. The
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an
on-scene representative may be
contacted via VHF Channel 16. Vessel
operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply
with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an
on-scene representative.
Dated: December 17, 2018.
Thomas J. Stuhlreyer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port.
[FR Doc. 2018–27599 Filed 12–20–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2018–1082]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Puget Sound, Tacoma,
WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary security zone
for the navigable waters within 500
yards of the M/V CAPE HUDSON,
Official Number 901127, during its
departure from Terminal 7 in Tacoma,
WA. This security zone is necessary to
protect the vessel and associated
personnel from terrorist acts, accidents,
sabotage, or other subversive acts
associated with the vessel’s movement
of military cargo. Entry of vessels or
persons into this zone is prohibited
while the M/V CAPE HUDSON is in
transit unless specifically authorized by
the Captain of the Port Puget Sound.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from 8:45 a.m. on
December 21, 2018, through 9 p.m. on
January 2, 2019. For the purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used
from 8:00 a.m. on December 20, 2018,
through 8:44 a.m. December 21, 2018.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
65526
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2018–
1082 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Petty Officer Zachary Spence,
Sector Puget Sound Waterways
Management Branch, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 206–217–6051, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the
Coast Guard did not receive notification
of the movement of military cargo until
December 3, 2018, and immediate
action is needed to protect the security
of M/V CAPE HUDSON and its
personnel from terrorist acts, accidents,
sabotage, or other subversive acts. It is
impracticable to publish a NPRM
because we must establish this security
zone by December 20, 2018.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable
because immediate action is needed to
respond to the potential security risks
associated with the shipment of military
cargo onboard the M/V CAPE HUDSON.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The
Captain of the Port Puget Sound (COTP)
has determined that there are potential
security concerns associated with the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Dec 20, 2018
Jkt 247001
shipment of military cargo aboard the
M/V CAPE HUDSON. This rule is
needed to protect the M/V CAPE
HUDSON and its personnel from
terrorist acts, accidents, sabotage, or
other subversive acts while underway
from Terminal 7 in Tacoma, WA to the
Puget Sound Traffic Separation Lane
Lighted Buoy SE.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a security zone
from 8 a.m. on December 20, 2018
through 8 p.m. on January 2, 2019. The
security zone will cover all navigable
waters within 500 yards of the M/V
CAPE HUDSON while underway from
Terminal 7 in Tacoma, WA until the
vessel arrives near the Puget Sound
Traffic Separation Lane Lighted Buoy
SE. The duration of the zone is intended
to protect the M/V CAPE HUDSON and
its personnel during its departure
transit. Because weather conditions may
affect the vessel’s loading timeframes,
the actual planned departure of the
vessel will occur between 8 a.m. on
December 20, 2018 and 8 p.m. on
January 2, 2019. Enforcement of the
security zone will only occur while the
vessel is in transit, and no vessel or
person will be permitted to enter the
security zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the security zone.
Vessel traffic will be able safely transit
around this security zone which would
impact a small designated area around
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the M/V CAPE HUDSON during the
vessel’s departure transit through Puget
Sound for less than 6 hours.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01 and Commandant
Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
security zone limited in duration to
M/V CAPE HUDSON’s departure from
Terminal 7 in Tacoma, WA until the
vessel reaches the Puget Sound Traffic
Separation Lane Lighted Buoy SE that
will prohibit entry within 500 yards of
the vessel. It is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph L
60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Dec 20, 2018
Jkt 247001
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T13–1082 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–1082 Security Zone; Puget
Sound, Tacoma, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is a
security zone: All navigable waters,
from surface to bottom, within 500
yards of the M/V CAPE HUDSON while
underway from Terminal 7 in Tacoma,
WA until the vessel reaches the Puget
Sound Traffic Separation Lane Lighted
Buoy SE.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port Puget Sound (COTP) in the
enforcement of the security zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
security zone regulations in subpart D of
this part, you may not enter the security
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative by VHF CH 16 or at 206–
217–6051. Those in the security zone
must comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or
the COTP’s designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This rule is
effective without actual notice from 8:45
a.m. on December 21, 2018, through 9
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65527
p.m. on January 2, 2019. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from 8:00 a.m. on
December 20, 2018, through 8:44 a.m.
December 21, 2018. This rule will be
enforced with actual notice by COTP’s
designated representatives on scene
during M/V CAPE HUDSON departure
transit.
Dated: December 17, 2018.
L.A. Sturgis,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2018–27579 Filed 12–20–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 9
RIN 2900–AQ12
Veterans’ Group Life Insurance
Increased Coverage
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Current statutory provisions
provide Veterans’ Group Life Insurance
(VGLI) insureds under the age of 60
with the opportunity to increase their
VGLI coverage by $25,000 not more than
once in each five-year period beginning
on the one-year anniversary of the date
a person becomes insured under VGLI.
The Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA) is finalizing the amendment of its
VGLI regulations to establish a
permanent regulatory framework for
such elections of increased coverage.
The final rule clarifies that coverage
increases in an amount less than
$25,000 are available only when
existing VGLI coverage is within
$25,000 of the Servicemembers’ Group
Life Insurance maximum of $400,000,
and any increases of less than $25,000
must be only in an amount that would
bring the insurance coverage up to the
statutory maximum.
DATES: Effective date: This rule is
effective on January 22, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen Naccarelli, Department of
Veterans Affairs Insurance Center (310/
290B), P.O. Box 13399, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19101, (215) 381–3029.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April
27, 2018, VA published in the Federal
Register (83 FR 18491) a proposed rule
seeking comments regarding
amendment of 38 CFR 9.2 to reflect
Section 404 of the Veterans’ Benefits
Act of 2010, Public Law 111–275, 124
Stat. 2879–2880 (2010). The amendment
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 245 (Friday, December 21, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65525-65527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27579]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2018-1082]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone; Puget Sound, Tacoma, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone for
the navigable waters within 500 yards of the M/V CAPE HUDSON, Official
Number 901127, during its departure from Terminal 7 in Tacoma, WA. This
security zone is necessary to protect the vessel and associated
personnel from terrorist acts, accidents, sabotage, or other subversive
acts associated with the vessel's movement of military cargo. Entry of
vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited while the M/V CAPE
HUDSON is in transit unless specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port Puget Sound.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from 8:45 a.m. on
December 21, 2018, through 9 p.m. on January 2, 2019. For the purposes
of enforcement, actual notice will be used from 8:00 a.m. on December
20, 2018, through 8:44 a.m. December 21, 2018.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
[[Page 65526]]
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2018-1082 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Petty Officer Zachary Spence, Sector Puget Sound
Waterways Management Branch, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 206-217-6051,
email SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the Coast Guard did not receive
notification of the movement of military cargo until December 3, 2018,
and immediate action is needed to protect the security of M/V CAPE
HUDSON and its personnel from terrorist acts, accidents, sabotage, or
other subversive acts. It is impracticable to publish a NPRM because we
must establish this security zone by December 20, 2018.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable because immediate action is needed to
respond to the potential security risks associated with the shipment of
military cargo onboard the M/V CAPE HUDSON.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231. The Captain of the Port Puget Sound (COTP) has determined that
there are potential security concerns associated with the shipment of
military cargo aboard the M/V CAPE HUDSON. This rule is needed to
protect the M/V CAPE HUDSON and its personnel from terrorist acts,
accidents, sabotage, or other subversive acts while underway from
Terminal 7 in Tacoma, WA to the Puget Sound Traffic Separation Lane
Lighted Buoy SE.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a security zone from 8 a.m. on December 20,
2018 through 8 p.m. on January 2, 2019. The security zone will cover
all navigable waters within 500 yards of the M/V CAPE HUDSON while
underway from Terminal 7 in Tacoma, WA until the vessel arrives near
the Puget Sound Traffic Separation Lane Lighted Buoy SE. The duration
of the zone is intended to protect the M/V CAPE HUDSON and its
personnel during its departure transit. Because weather conditions may
affect the vessel's loading timeframes, the actual planned departure of
the vessel will occur between 8 a.m. on December 20, 2018 and 8 p.m. on
January 2, 2019. Enforcement of the security zone will only occur while
the vessel is in transit, and no vessel or person will be permitted to
enter the security zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a
designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the security zone. Vessel
traffic will be able safely transit around this security zone which
would impact a small designated area around the M/V CAPE HUDSON during
the vessel's departure transit through Puget Sound for less than 6
hours.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
[[Page 65527]]
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves
a security zone limited in duration to M/V CAPE HUDSON's departure from
Terminal 7 in Tacoma, WA until the vessel reaches the Puget Sound
Traffic Separation Lane Lighted Buoy SE that will prohibit entry within
500 yards of the vessel. It is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L 60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-1082 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-1082 Security Zone; Puget Sound, Tacoma, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All navigable
waters, from surface to bottom, within 500 yards of the M/V CAPE HUDSON
while underway from Terminal 7 in Tacoma, WA until the vessel reaches
the Puget Sound Traffic Separation Lane Lighted Buoy SE.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Puget Sound (COTP) in the enforcement of the
security zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general security zone regulations in
subpart D of this part, you may not enter the security zone described
in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative by VHF CH 16 or at 206-217-6051. Those in the security
zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by
the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This rule is effective without actual
notice from 8:45 a.m. on December 21, 2018, through 9 p.m. on January
2, 2019. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used
from 8:00 a.m. on December 20, 2018, through 8:44 a.m. December 21,
2018. This rule will be enforced with actual notice by COTP's
designated representatives on scene during M/V CAPE HUDSON departure
transit.
Dated: December 17, 2018.
L.A. Sturgis,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2018-27579 Filed 12-20-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P