North Dakota: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revisions, 65101-65104 [2018-27422]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 19, 2019. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Ammonia, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur dioxide, Volatile organic compounds. Identification of plan—in part. * * * * * (c) * * * (512) The following plan was submitted on January 19, 2016, by the Governor’s Designee. (i) [Reserved]. (ii) Additional materials. (A) California Air Resources Board (CARB). (1) ‘‘California Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision, Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2)(D),’’ adopted December 17, 2015, (‘‘California Transport Plan’’). ■ 3. Section 52.283 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(3), (d)(3), and (g)(3) to read as follows: § 52.283 Interstate Transport. * * * * * (c) * * * (3) The requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) regarding significant contribution to nonattainment of the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS in any other state and interference with maintenance of the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS by any other state. * * * * * (d) * * * (3) The requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) regarding significant contribution to nonattainment of the 2008 ozone NAAQS in any other State and interference with maintenance of the 2010 ozone NAAQS by any other State. * * * * * (g) * * * (3) The requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) regarding significant contribution to nonattainment of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS in any other State and interference with maintenance of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS by any other State. [FR Doc. 2018–27477 Filed 12–18–18; 8:45 am] Dated: November 30, 2018. Deborah Jordan, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 271 PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS [EPA–R08–RCRA–2018–0554; FRL–9986– 24–Region 8] 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: North Dakota: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revisions ■ amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES § 52.220 Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F—California 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(512) to read as follows: ■ VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Dec 18, 2018 Jkt 247001 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. AGENCY: North Dakota has applied for final authorization of a revision to its SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 65101 hazardous waste program under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The revision has two parts, both of which relate directly to the creation of the North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality (NDDEQ) by the North Dakota Legislature, and the impending transfer of authority, power, and duties relating to environmental quality from the North Dakota Department of Health (NDDH) to the NDDEQ. The first part of the program revision is the complete transfer of all hazardous waste program rules from Title 33 Article 24 of the North Dakota Administrative Code (NDAC) to NDAC Title 33.1 Article 24. The second part is replacing all references to NDDH with NDDEQ. No other changes are being made to the hazardous waste program rules in this revision. The EPA has reviewed the application and determined that North Dakota’s hazardous waste program revision satisfies all of the requirements necessary to qualify for final authorization. The EPA is authorizing the state program revision through this direct final rule. The EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial action and does not anticipate adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register, the EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as a proposal to authorize the revision should the Agency receive adverse comment. Unless the EPA receives adverse written comments during the review and comment period, the decision to authorize North Dakota’s hazardous waste program revision will take effect as provided below. DATES: This final rule is effective on March 15, 2019, unless the EPA receives adverse written comment by January 18, 2019. Should the EPA receive such comments, it will publish a timely document either: Withdrawing the direct final publication or affirming the publication and responding to comments. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–R08–RCRA–2018–0554. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information, the disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM 19DER1 65102 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at: EPA Region 8, from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129; contact: Moye Lin, phone number (303) 312– 6667, or the North Dakota Department of Health (NDDH) from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 918 East Divide Avenue, 3rd Floor, Bismarck, North Dakota 58501– 1947, phone number (701) 328–5166. The public is advised to call in advance to verify business hours. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Moye Lin, Resource Conservation and Recovery Program, EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129; phone number (303) 312– 6667; Email address: lin.moye@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Authorization of Revisions to North Dakota’s Hazardous Waste Program amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES A. Why are revisions to state programs necessary? States which have received final authorization from the EPA under RCRA section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous waste program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent than the federal program. As the federal program changes, states must change their programs and ask the EPA to authorize the changes. Changes to state programs may be necessary when federal or state statutory or regulatory authority is modified or when certain other changes occur. Most commonly, states must change their programs because of changes to the EPA’s regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124, 260 through 268, 270, 273 and 279. When states make other changes to their regulations, it is often appropriate for the states to seek authorization for the changes. B. What decisions have we made in this rule? We conclude that North Dakota’s application to revise its authorized program meets all of the statutory and regulatory requirements established by RCRA. Therefore, we grant North Dakota final authorization to operate its hazardous waste program with the changes described in the authorization application. The State of North Dakota adopted state Senate Bill No. 2327 (S.L. 2017, ch. 199, § 75), which separated the Environmental Health Section from the North Dakota Department of Health (NDDH) to create a standalone North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality (NDDEQ). Per S.L. 2017, ch. 199, Section 75, the transfer of authority, power, and duties related to VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Dec 18, 2018 Jkt 247001 environmental quality from NDDH to NDDEQ will become effective upon the North Dakota Legislative Council’s receipt of the certification by the Chief of the Environmental Health Section of the State Department of Health attesting that all necessary federal approvals have been obtained and all necessary federal and other agreements have been amended to ensure the state will continue to meet the authorization requirements it currently satisfies after the transfer of authority, powers and duties from the NDDH to the NDDEQ. This direct final rule constitutes EPA approval of the transfer of all duties and responsibilities of the state relating to the existing federal hazardous waste program in North Dakota from the NDDH to the NDDEQ. North Dakota will continue to have responsibility for permitting Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) within its borders (except in Indian country), and for carrying out the aspects of the RCRA program described in its revised program application, subject to the limitations of the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA). New federal requirements and prohibitions imposed by federal regulations that the EPA promulgates under the authority of HSWA after this action, if any, will be effective in North Dakota on the effective date of the federal rule. Thus, the EPA will implement those requirements and prohibitions in North Dakota, including issuing permits, until North Dakota applies for authorization of equivalent state rules and those rules are authorized. C. What is the effect of this authorization decision? While there will be no substantive changes to the federal hazardous waste program requirements if North Dakota is authorized for these changes, NDDEQ will become the state department responsible for implementation of the federal hazardous waste program instead of NDDH. This change should have little to no practical effect on the regulated community in North Dakota. Additionally, pursuant to section 3006 of RCRA, the regulated community must comply with HSWA regulations issued by the EPA for which the state has not received authorization. North Dakota will continue to have enforcement responsibilities under its state hazardous waste program for violations of such program, and the EPA continues to retain its authority under RCRA sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003, which include, among others, authority to: PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 • Conduct inspections and require monitoring, tests, analyses, or reports; • Enforce RCRA requirements; suspend or revoke permits; and, • Take enforcement actions regardless of whether North Dakota has taken its own actions. This action to approve these provisions would not impose additional requirements on the regulated community because the regulations for which North Dakota is requesting authorization are already effective under both state and federal law and are not changed by our authorization of these revisions. D. For what has North Dakota previously been authorized? North Dakota initially received final authorization on October 5, 1984, effective October 19, 1984 (49 FR 39328), to implement the RCRA hazardous waste management program. We granted authorization for changes to their program on: June 25, 1990, effective August 24, 1990 (55 FR 25836); May 4, 1992, effective July 6, 1992 (57 FR 19087); April 7, 1994, effective June 6, 1994 (59 FR 16566); January 19, 2000, effective March 20, 2000 (65 FR 02897); September 26, 2005, effective November 25, 2000 (70 FR 56132); February 14, 2008, effective April 14, 2008 (73 FR 8610); and October 30, 2018, effective October 30, 2018 (83 FR 54521). The EPA understands that the state intends to take the necessary additional steps, as specified in S.L. 2017, ch. 199, Section 75, to ensure that NDDEQ comes into existence and that the NDDEQ rules are effective as a matter of state law so that the rules also and the NDDEQ will become federally enforceable prior to the effective date of EPA’s approval of these revisions. Further background on the new department is documented in the state Program Description dated September 2018. Therefore, once this rule is effective and for the purposes of administration of the state’s authorized hazardous waste program, references to the NDDH Division of Waste Management of the Environmental Health Section will be to the NDDEQ. For further legislative history on the new department, see North Dakota Session Laws of 2017 [S.L. 2017, ch. 199, § 75]. The NDDEQ has primary responsibility for administration of laws and regulations concerning hazardous waste under the North Dakota Hazardous Waste Management Act (codified in Chapter 23.1–04 of the North Dakota Century Code [N.D.C.C.]). The NDDEQ is also authorized to administer the federal hazardous waste E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM 19DER1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations program, including jurisdiction over the generation, discharge, storage, treatment, handling, transportation, reclamation, or disposal of hazardous waste. The NDDEQ has the rules necessary to implement the federal Hazardous Waste Program from the Base program through RCRA Cluster XXIV revisions promulgated through June 30, 2015, as found in NDAC Title 33.1 Article 24 Hazardous Waste Management. The NDDEQ authority to incorporate federal rules by reference can be found at N.D.C.C. § 23.1–01–04(1) and adoption of the hazardous waste rules in general are pursuant to the statutory provisions enacted in 2018 at N.D.C.C. Title 23.1. amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES E. What changes are we authorizing with this action? The State of North Dakota submitted a final complete program revision application on July 31, 2018 and is seeking re-authorization of their complete program in accordance with 40 CFR 271.21 due to the transfer of the approved hazardous waste program from the NDDH to the NDDEQ as described in section I.D. above. North Dakota’s program consists of regulations which specifically govern the federal hazardous waste program from base program authorization in 1984 through June 30, 2015 (RCRA Cluster XXIV). All revisions to the applicable hazardous waste program are federally approved as of the effective date of this action. The EPA’s understanding is that, per S.L. 2017, ch. 199, Section 75 (S.B. 2327), the state plans to rely on the date the EPA signs this notice for purposes of notifying the state legislature that the EPA has approved these revisions, which will provide for the transfer authority from NDDH to NDDEQ to be effective under state law. The EPA also understands that there are some programs that will not be required to be a part of this State Legislature approval. Unless and until the NDDEQ rules and agency become fully effective under state and federal law, for purposes of federal law, the EPA recognizes the state’s program as currently approved under the North Dakota Department of Health. We now make a final decision, subject to receipt of written comments that raise concerns with this action, that North Dakota’s hazardous waste program satisfies all of the requirements necessary to qualify for final authorization. Therefore, we grant North Dakota DEQ final authorization for the state’s hazardous waste program. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Dec 18, 2018 Jkt 247001 F. Who handles permits after the final authorization takes effect? North Dakota will continue to issue permits for all the provisions for which it is authorized and will administer the permits it issues. The EPA will continue to administer any RCRA hazardous waste permits or portions of permits which were issued by the EPA prior to the effective date of this authorization. G. How does this action affect Indian country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in North Dakota? The EPA’s approval of the North Dakota Hazardous Waste Program (state program) does not extend to Indian country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. Indian country in North Dakota generally includes: 1. Lands within the exterior boundaries of the following Indian reservations located within North Dakota: a. Fort Berthold Indian Reservation b. Spirit Lake Reservation c. Standing Rock Sioux Reservation d. Turtle Mountain Indian Reservation 2. Any land held in trust by the United States for an Indian tribe, and 3. Any other areas that are ‘‘Indian country’’ within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. 1151. Therefore, this program revision does not extend to Indian country; the EPA will retain responsibilities under the Resource Conservation Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) in Indian country. II. Administrative Requirements The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this action from the requirements of Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011). This action authorizes state requirements for the purpose of RCRA section 3006 and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Therefore, this action is not subject to review by OMB. This action is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017) regulatory action because actions such as today’s authorization of North Dakota’s revised hazardous waste program under RCRA are exempted under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this action authorizes pre-existing requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 65103 unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531– 1538). For the same reason, this action also does not significantly or uniquely affect the communities of tribal governments, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely authorizes state requirements as part of the state RCRA hazardous waste program without altering the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established by RCRA. This action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant, and it does not make decisions based on environmental health or safety risks. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. Under RCRA 3006(b), the EPA grants a state’s application for authorization as long as the state meets the criteria required by RCRA. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for the EPA, when it reviews a state authorization application, to require the use of any particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing this action, the EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. The EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the takings implications of the action in accordance with the ‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings’’ issued under the executive order. This action does not impose an information collection burden under the E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM 19DER1 65104 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). ‘‘Burden’’ is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations in the United States. Because this rule authorizes pre-existing state rules which are at least equivalent to, and no less stringent than existing federal requirements, and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law, and there are no anticipated significant adverse human health or environmental effects, the rule is not subject to Executive Order 12898. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801–808, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this document and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This action will be effective on March 15, 2019. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste transportation, Indian lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: December 13, 2018. Douglas Benevento, Regional Administrator, Region 8. [FR Doc. 2018–27422 Filed 12–18–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Dec 18, 2018 Jkt 247001 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 281 [EPA–R08–UST–2018–0728; FRL–9986–98– Region 8] North Dakota: Final Approval of State Underground Storage Tank Program Revisions Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. AGENCY: Pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA or Act), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the State of North Dakota’s Underground Storage Tank (UST) program submitted by the State. The EPA has determined that these revisions satisfy all requirements needed for program approval. The State’s federally-authorized and codified UST program, as revised pursuant to this action, will remain subject to the EPA’s inspection and enforcement authorities under sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA subtitle I and other applicable statutory and regulatory provisions. SUMMARY: This rule is effective March 15, 2019, unless the EPA receives adverse comment by January 18, 2019. If the EPA receives substantive adverse comment, it will publish a timely document either: Withdrawing the direct final publication or affirming the publication and responding to comments. DATES: Submit your comments by one of the following methods: 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. 2. Email: Bents.Benjamin@epa.gov. 3. Mail: Benjamin Bents, Resource Conservation and Recovery Program, Office of Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance (8P–R), EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129. 4. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to Benjamin Bents, Region 8, Resource Conservation and Recovery Program, Office of Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance (8P–R), EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA–R08–UST–2018– 0728. The EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be available online at https:// www.regulations.gov, including any ADDRESSES: PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https:// www.regulations.gov, or email. The federal https://www.regulations.gov website is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means the EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to the EPA without going through https:// www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the internet. If you submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If the EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties, and cannot contact you for clarification, the EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. You can view and copy the documents that form the basis for this action and associated publicly available materials from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday at the following location: EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129, phone number (303) 312–6284. Interested persons wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment with the office at least 2 days in advance. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin Bents, (303) 312–6435, Bents.Benjamin@epa.gov. To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment with Benjamin Bents at (303) 312–6435. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Approval of Revisions to North Dakota’s Underground Storage Tank Program A. Why are revisions to state programs necessary? States which have received final approval from the EPA under RCRA section 9004(b) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c(b), must maintain an underground storage tank program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent than the federal underground storage tank program. E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM 19DER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 19, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65101-65104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27422]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[EPA-R08-RCRA-2018-0554; FRL-9986-24-Region 8]


North Dakota: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste 
Management Program Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: North Dakota has applied for final authorization of a revision 
to its hazardous waste program under the Resource Conservation and 
Recovery Act (RCRA). The revision has two parts, both of which relate 
directly to the creation of the North Dakota Department of 
Environmental Quality (NDDEQ) by the North Dakota Legislature, and the 
impending transfer of authority, power, and duties relating to 
environmental quality from the North Dakota Department of Health (NDDH) 
to the NDDEQ. The first part of the program revision is the complete 
transfer of all hazardous waste program rules from Title 33 Article 24 
of the North Dakota Administrative Code (NDAC) to NDAC Title 33.1 
Article 24. The second part is replacing all references to NDDH with 
NDDEQ. No other changes are being made to the hazardous waste program 
rules in this revision. The EPA has reviewed the application and 
determined that North Dakota's hazardous waste program revision 
satisfies all of the requirements necessary to qualify for final 
authorization. The EPA is authorizing the state program revision 
through this direct final rule. The EPA is publishing this rule without 
prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial 
action and does not anticipate adverse comments. However, in the 
proposed rules section of this Federal Register, the EPA is publishing 
a separate document that will serve as a proposal to authorize the 
revision should the Agency receive adverse comment. Unless the EPA 
receives adverse written comments during the review and comment period, 
the decision to authorize North Dakota's hazardous waste program 
revision will take effect as provided below.

DATES: This final rule is effective on March 15, 2019, unless the EPA 
receives adverse written comment by January 18, 2019. Should the EPA 
receive such comments, it will publish a timely document either: 
Withdrawing the direct final publication or affirming the publication 
and responding to comments.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket ID No. EPA-R08-RCRA-2018-0554. All documents in the docket are 
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in 
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or 
other information, the disclosure of which is restricted by statute. 
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on 
the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. 
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically 
through

[[Page 65102]]

https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at: EPA Region 8, from 8:00 
a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129; 
contact: Moye Lin, phone number (303) 312-6667, or the North Dakota 
Department of Health (NDDH) from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 918 East 
Divide Avenue, 3rd Floor, Bismarck, North Dakota 58501-1947, phone 
number (701) 328-5166. The public is advised to call in advance to 
verify business hours.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Moye Lin, Resource Conservation and 
Recovery Program, EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 
80202-1129; phone number (303) 312-6667; Email address: 
lin.moye@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Authorization of Revisions to North Dakota's Hazardous Waste Program

A. Why are revisions to state programs necessary?

    States which have received final authorization from the EPA under 
RCRA section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous 
waste program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less 
stringent than the federal program. As the federal program changes, 
states must change their programs and ask the EPA to authorize the 
changes. Changes to state programs may be necessary when federal or 
state statutory or regulatory authority is modified or when certain 
other changes occur. Most commonly, states must change their programs 
because of changes to the EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR) parts 124, 260 through 268, 270, 273 and 279. When 
states make other changes to their regulations, it is often appropriate 
for the states to seek authorization for the changes.

B. What decisions have we made in this rule?

    We conclude that North Dakota's application to revise its 
authorized program meets all of the statutory and regulatory 
requirements established by RCRA. Therefore, we grant North Dakota 
final authorization to operate its hazardous waste program with the 
changes described in the authorization application.
    The State of North Dakota adopted state Senate Bill No. 2327 (S.L. 
2017, ch. 199, Sec.  75), which separated the Environmental Health 
Section from the North Dakota Department of Health (NDDH) to create a 
standalone North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality (NDDEQ). 
Per S.L. 2017, ch. 199, Section 75, the transfer of authority, power, 
and duties related to environmental quality from NDDH to NDDEQ will 
become effective upon the North Dakota Legislative Council's receipt of 
the certification by the Chief of the Environmental Health Section of 
the State Department of Health attesting that all necessary federal 
approvals have been obtained and all necessary federal and other 
agreements have been amended to ensure the state will continue to meet 
the authorization requirements it currently satisfies after the 
transfer of authority, powers and duties from the NDDH to the NDDEQ. 
This direct final rule constitutes EPA approval of the transfer of all 
duties and responsibilities of the state relating to the existing 
federal hazardous waste program in North Dakota from the NDDH to the 
NDDEQ.
    North Dakota will continue to have responsibility for permitting 
Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) within its borders 
(except in Indian country), and for carrying out the aspects of the 
RCRA program described in its revised program application, subject to 
the limitations of the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 
(HSWA). New federal requirements and prohibitions imposed by federal 
regulations that the EPA promulgates under the authority of HSWA after 
this action, if any, will be effective in North Dakota on the effective 
date of the federal rule. Thus, the EPA will implement those 
requirements and prohibitions in North Dakota, including issuing 
permits, until North Dakota applies for authorization of equivalent 
state rules and those rules are authorized.

C. What is the effect of this authorization decision?

    While there will be no substantive changes to the federal hazardous 
waste program requirements if North Dakota is authorized for these 
changes, NDDEQ will become the state department responsible for 
implementation of the federal hazardous waste program instead of NDDH. 
This change should have little to no practical effect on the regulated 
community in North Dakota. Additionally, pursuant to section 3006 of 
RCRA, the regulated community must comply with HSWA regulations issued 
by the EPA for which the state has not received authorization. North 
Dakota will continue to have enforcement responsibilities under its 
state hazardous waste program for violations of such program, and the 
EPA continues to retain its authority under RCRA sections 3007, 3008, 
3013, and 7003, which include, among others, authority to:

     Conduct inspections and require monitoring, tests, 
analyses, or reports;
     Enforce RCRA requirements; suspend or revoke permits; 
and,
     Take enforcement actions regardless of whether North 
Dakota has taken its own actions.

This action to approve these provisions would not impose additional 
requirements on the regulated community because the regulations for 
which North Dakota is requesting authorization are already effective 
under both state and federal law and are not changed by our 
authorization of these revisions.

D. For what has North Dakota previously been authorized?

    North Dakota initially received final authorization on October 5, 
1984, effective October 19, 1984 (49 FR 39328), to implement the RCRA 
hazardous waste management program. We granted authorization for 
changes to their program on: June 25, 1990, effective August 24, 1990 
(55 FR 25836); May 4, 1992, effective July 6, 1992 (57 FR 19087); April 
7, 1994, effective June 6, 1994 (59 FR 16566); January 19, 2000, 
effective March 20, 2000 (65 FR 02897); September 26, 2005, effective 
November 25, 2000 (70 FR 56132); February 14, 2008, effective April 14, 
2008 (73 FR 8610); and October 30, 2018, effective October 30, 2018 (83 
FR 54521).
    The EPA understands that the state intends to take the necessary 
additional steps, as specified in S.L. 2017, ch. 199, Section 75, to 
ensure that NDDEQ comes into existence and that the NDDEQ rules are 
effective as a matter of state law so that the rules also and the NDDEQ 
will become federally enforceable prior to the effective date of EPA's 
approval of these revisions. Further background on the new department 
is documented in the state Program Description dated September 2018. 
Therefore, once this rule is effective and for the purposes of 
administration of the state's authorized hazardous waste program, 
references to the NDDH Division of Waste Management of the 
Environmental Health Section will be to the NDDEQ. For further 
legislative history on the new department, see North Dakota Session 
Laws of 2017 [S.L. 2017, ch. 199, Sec.  75].
    The NDDEQ has primary responsibility for administration of laws and 
regulations concerning hazardous waste under the North Dakota Hazardous 
Waste Management Act (codified in Chapter 23.1-04 of the North Dakota 
Century Code [N.D.C.C.]). The NDDEQ is also authorized to administer 
the federal hazardous waste

[[Page 65103]]

program, including jurisdiction over the generation, discharge, 
storage, treatment, handling, transportation, reclamation, or disposal 
of hazardous waste.
    The NDDEQ has the rules necessary to implement the federal 
Hazardous Waste Program from the Base program through RCRA Cluster XXIV 
revisions promulgated through June 30, 2015, as found in NDAC Title 
33.1 Article 24 Hazardous Waste Management. The NDDEQ authority to 
incorporate federal rules by reference can be found at N.D.C.C. Sec.  
23.1-01-04(1) and adoption of the hazardous waste rules in general are 
pursuant to the statutory provisions enacted in 2018 at N.D.C.C. Title 
23.1.

E. What changes are we authorizing with this action?

    The State of North Dakota submitted a final complete program 
revision application on July 31, 2018 and is seeking re-authorization 
of their complete program in accordance with 40 CFR 271.21 due to the 
transfer of the approved hazardous waste program from the NDDH to the 
NDDEQ as described in section I.D. above. North Dakota's program 
consists of regulations which specifically govern the federal hazardous 
waste program from base program authorization in 1984 through June 30, 
2015 (RCRA Cluster XXIV).
    All revisions to the applicable hazardous waste program are 
federally approved as of the effective date of this action. The EPA's 
understanding is that, per S.L. 2017, ch. 199, Section 75 (S.B. 2327), 
the state plans to rely on the date the EPA signs this notice for 
purposes of notifying the state legislature that the EPA has approved 
these revisions, which will provide for the transfer authority from 
NDDH to NDDEQ to be effective under state law. The EPA also understands 
that there are some programs that will not be required to be a part of 
this State Legislature approval. Unless and until the NDDEQ rules and 
agency become fully effective under state and federal law, for purposes 
of federal law, the EPA recognizes the state's program as currently 
approved under the North Dakota Department of Health.
    We now make a final decision, subject to receipt of written 
comments that raise concerns with this action, that North Dakota's 
hazardous waste program satisfies all of the requirements necessary to 
qualify for final authorization. Therefore, we grant North Dakota DEQ 
final authorization for the state's hazardous waste program.

F. Who handles permits after the final authorization takes effect?

    North Dakota will continue to issue permits for all the provisions 
for which it is authorized and will administer the permits it issues. 
The EPA will continue to administer any RCRA hazardous waste permits or 
portions of permits which were issued by the EPA prior to the effective 
date of this authorization.

G. How does this action affect Indian country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in North 
Dakota?

    The EPA's approval of the North Dakota Hazardous Waste Program 
(state program) does not extend to Indian country, as defined in 18 
U.S.C. 1151. Indian country in North Dakota generally includes:
    1. Lands within the exterior boundaries of the following Indian 
reservations located within North Dakota:
    a. Fort Berthold Indian Reservation
    b. Spirit Lake Reservation
    c. Standing Rock Sioux Reservation
    d. Turtle Mountain Indian Reservation
    2. Any land held in trust by the United States for an Indian tribe, 
and
    3. Any other areas that are ``Indian country'' within the meaning 
of 18 U.S.C. 1151.
    Therefore, this program revision does not extend to Indian country; 
the EPA will retain responsibilities under the Resource Conservation 
Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) in Indian country.

II. Administrative Requirements

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this action 
from the requirements of Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 
4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011). This action 
authorizes state requirements for the purpose of RCRA section 3006 and 
imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. 
Therefore, this action is not subject to review by OMB. This action is 
not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017) regulatory 
action because actions such as today's authorization of North Dakota's 
revised hazardous waste program under RCRA are exempted under Executive 
Order 12866. Accordingly, I certify that this action will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because 
this action authorizes pre-existing requirements under state law and 
does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by 
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538). For the same reason, 
this action also does not significantly or uniquely affect the 
communities of tribal governments, as specified by Executive Order 
13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action will not have 
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between 
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as 
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), 
because it merely authorizes state requirements as part of the state 
RCRA hazardous waste program without altering the relationship or the 
distribution of power and responsibilities established by RCRA.
    This action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant, and 
it does not make decisions based on environmental health or safety 
risks. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because it is not a 
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
    Under RCRA 3006(b), the EPA grants a state's application for 
authorization as long as the state meets the criteria required by RCRA. 
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for the EPA, when it 
reviews a state authorization application, to require the use of any 
particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard 
that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the 
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and 
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required 
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996), 
in issuing this action, the EPA has taken the necessary steps to 
eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, 
and provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. The EPA has 
complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by 
examining the takings implications of the action in accordance with the 
``Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk 
and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the executive 
order. This action does not impose an information collection burden 
under the

[[Page 65104]]

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
seq.). ``Burden'' is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes 
federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision 
directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and 
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission 
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high 
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs, 
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income 
populations in the United States. Because this rule authorizes pre-
existing state rules which are at least equivalent to, and no less 
stringent than existing federal requirements, and imposes no additional 
requirements beyond those imposed by state law, and there are no 
anticipated significant adverse human health or environmental effects, 
the rule is not subject to Executive Order 12898.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801-808, generally provides 
that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule 
must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each 
House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United 
States. The EPA will submit a report containing this document and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect 
until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This 
action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This 
action will be effective on March 15, 2019.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste 
transportation, Indian lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: December 13, 2018.
Douglas Benevento,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2018-27422 Filed 12-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.