North Dakota: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revisions, 65101-65104 [2018-27422]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by February 19,
2019. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Ammonia,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide, Volatile
organic compounds.
Identification of plan—in part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(512) The following plan was
submitted on January 19, 2016, by the
Governor’s Designee.
(i) [Reserved].
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) California Air Resources Board
(CARB).
(1) ‘‘California Infrastructure State
Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision,
Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2)(D),’’
adopted December 17, 2015,
(‘‘California Transport Plan’’).
■ 3. Section 52.283 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(3), (d)(3), and
(g)(3) to read as follows:
§ 52.283
Interstate Transport.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) The requirements of CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) regarding significant
contribution to nonattainment of the
2006 PM2.5 NAAQS and 2012 PM2.5
NAAQS in any other state and
interference with maintenance of the
2006 PM2.5 NAAQS and 2012 PM2.5
NAAQS by any other state.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) The requirements of CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) regarding significant
contribution to nonattainment of the
2008 ozone NAAQS in any other State
and interference with maintenance of
the 2010 ozone NAAQS by any other
State.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(3) The requirements of CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) regarding significant
contribution to nonattainment of the
2010 SO2 NAAQS in any other State and
interference with maintenance of the
2010 SO2 NAAQS by any other State.
[FR Doc. 2018–27477 Filed 12–18–18; 8:45 am]
Dated: November 30, 2018.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
[EPA–R08–RCRA–2018–0554; FRL–9986–
24–Region 8]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
North Dakota: Final Authorization of
State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions
■
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
§ 52.220
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(512) to read as
follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Dec 18, 2018
Jkt 247001
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
North Dakota has applied for
final authorization of a revision to its
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65101
hazardous waste program under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA). The revision has two parts,
both of which relate directly to the
creation of the North Dakota Department
of Environmental Quality (NDDEQ) by
the North Dakota Legislature, and the
impending transfer of authority, power,
and duties relating to environmental
quality from the North Dakota
Department of Health (NDDH) to the
NDDEQ. The first part of the program
revision is the complete transfer of all
hazardous waste program rules from
Title 33 Article 24 of the North Dakota
Administrative Code (NDAC) to NDAC
Title 33.1 Article 24. The second part is
replacing all references to NDDH with
NDDEQ. No other changes are being
made to the hazardous waste program
rules in this revision. The EPA has
reviewed the application and
determined that North Dakota’s
hazardous waste program revision
satisfies all of the requirements
necessary to qualify for final
authorization. The EPA is authorizing
the state program revision through this
direct final rule. The EPA is publishing
this rule without prior proposal because
the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial action and does not
anticipate adverse comments. However,
in the proposed rules section of this
Federal Register, the EPA is publishing
a separate document that will serve as
a proposal to authorize the revision
should the Agency receive adverse
comment. Unless the EPA receives
adverse written comments during the
review and comment period, the
decision to authorize North Dakota’s
hazardous waste program revision will
take effect as provided below.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
March 15, 2019, unless the EPA receives
adverse written comment by January 18,
2019. Should the EPA receive such
comments, it will publish a timely
document either: Withdrawing the
direct final publication or affirming the
publication and responding to
comments.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R08–RCRA–2018–0554. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information, the
disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
65102
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at: EPA Region 8, from 8:00 a.m.
to 4:00 p.m., 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202–1129; contact:
Moye Lin, phone number (303) 312–
6667, or the North Dakota Department of
Health (NDDH) from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00
p.m., 918 East Divide Avenue, 3rd
Floor, Bismarck, North Dakota 58501–
1947, phone number (701) 328–5166.
The public is advised to call in advance
to verify business hours.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Moye Lin, Resource Conservation and
Recovery Program, EPA Region 8, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129; phone number (303) 312–
6667; Email address: lin.moye@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Authorization of Revisions to North
Dakota’s Hazardous Waste Program
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
A. Why are revisions to state programs
necessary?
States which have received final
authorization from the EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must
maintain a hazardous waste program
that is equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the federal
program. As the federal program
changes, states must change their
programs and ask the EPA to authorize
the changes. Changes to state programs
may be necessary when federal or state
statutory or regulatory authority is
modified or when certain other changes
occur. Most commonly, states must
change their programs because of
changes to the EPA’s regulations in 40
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts
124, 260 through 268, 270, 273 and 279.
When states make other changes to their
regulations, it is often appropriate for
the states to seek authorization for the
changes.
B. What decisions have we made in this
rule?
We conclude that North Dakota’s
application to revise its authorized
program meets all of the statutory and
regulatory requirements established by
RCRA. Therefore, we grant North Dakota
final authorization to operate its
hazardous waste program with the
changes described in the authorization
application.
The State of North Dakota adopted
state Senate Bill No. 2327 (S.L. 2017, ch.
199, § 75), which separated the
Environmental Health Section from the
North Dakota Department of Health
(NDDH) to create a standalone North
Dakota Department of Environmental
Quality (NDDEQ). Per S.L. 2017, ch.
199, Section 75, the transfer of
authority, power, and duties related to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Dec 18, 2018
Jkt 247001
environmental quality from NDDH to
NDDEQ will become effective upon the
North Dakota Legislative Council’s
receipt of the certification by the Chief
of the Environmental Health Section of
the State Department of Health attesting
that all necessary federal approvals have
been obtained and all necessary federal
and other agreements have been
amended to ensure the state will
continue to meet the authorization
requirements it currently satisfies after
the transfer of authority, powers and
duties from the NDDH to the NDDEQ.
This direct final rule constitutes EPA
approval of the transfer of all duties and
responsibilities of the state relating to
the existing federal hazardous waste
program in North Dakota from the
NDDH to the NDDEQ.
North Dakota will continue to have
responsibility for permitting Treatment,
Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs)
within its borders (except in Indian
country), and for carrying out the
aspects of the RCRA program described
in its revised program application,
subject to the limitations of the
Hazardous and Solid Waste
Amendments of 1984 (HSWA). New
federal requirements and prohibitions
imposed by federal regulations that the
EPA promulgates under the authority of
HSWA after this action, if any, will be
effective in North Dakota on the
effective date of the federal rule. Thus,
the EPA will implement those
requirements and prohibitions in North
Dakota, including issuing permits, until
North Dakota applies for authorization
of equivalent state rules and those rules
are authorized.
C. What is the effect of this
authorization decision?
While there will be no substantive
changes to the federal hazardous waste
program requirements if North Dakota is
authorized for these changes, NDDEQ
will become the state department
responsible for implementation of the
federal hazardous waste program
instead of NDDH. This change should
have little to no practical effect on the
regulated community in North Dakota.
Additionally, pursuant to section 3006
of RCRA, the regulated community must
comply with HSWA regulations issued
by the EPA for which the state has not
received authorization. North Dakota
will continue to have enforcement
responsibilities under its state
hazardous waste program for violations
of such program, and the EPA continues
to retain its authority under RCRA
sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003,
which include, among others, authority
to:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• Conduct inspections and require
monitoring, tests, analyses, or reports;
• Enforce RCRA requirements; suspend or
revoke permits; and,
• Take enforcement actions regardless of
whether North Dakota has taken its own
actions.
This action to approve these provisions
would not impose additional
requirements on the regulated
community because the regulations for
which North Dakota is requesting
authorization are already effective under
both state and federal law and are not
changed by our authorization of these
revisions.
D. For what has North Dakota
previously been authorized?
North Dakota initially received final
authorization on October 5, 1984,
effective October 19, 1984 (49 FR
39328), to implement the RCRA
hazardous waste management program.
We granted authorization for changes to
their program on: June 25, 1990,
effective August 24, 1990 (55 FR 25836);
May 4, 1992, effective July 6, 1992 (57
FR 19087); April 7, 1994, effective June
6, 1994 (59 FR 16566); January 19, 2000,
effective March 20, 2000 (65 FR 02897);
September 26, 2005, effective November
25, 2000 (70 FR 56132); February 14,
2008, effective April 14, 2008 (73 FR
8610); and October 30, 2018, effective
October 30, 2018 (83 FR 54521).
The EPA understands that the state
intends to take the necessary additional
steps, as specified in S.L. 2017, ch. 199,
Section 75, to ensure that NDDEQ
comes into existence and that the
NDDEQ rules are effective as a matter of
state law so that the rules also and the
NDDEQ will become federally
enforceable prior to the effective date of
EPA’s approval of these revisions.
Further background on the new
department is documented in the state
Program Description dated September
2018. Therefore, once this rule is
effective and for the purposes of
administration of the state’s authorized
hazardous waste program, references to
the NDDH Division of Waste
Management of the Environmental
Health Section will be to the NDDEQ.
For further legislative history on the
new department, see North Dakota
Session Laws of 2017 [S.L. 2017, ch.
199, § 75].
The NDDEQ has primary
responsibility for administration of laws
and regulations concerning hazardous
waste under the North Dakota
Hazardous Waste Management Act
(codified in Chapter 23.1–04 of the
North Dakota Century Code [N.D.C.C.]).
The NDDEQ is also authorized to
administer the federal hazardous waste
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
program, including jurisdiction over the
generation, discharge, storage,
treatment, handling, transportation,
reclamation, or disposal of hazardous
waste.
The NDDEQ has the rules necessary to
implement the federal Hazardous Waste
Program from the Base program through
RCRA Cluster XXIV revisions
promulgated through June 30, 2015, as
found in NDAC Title 33.1 Article 24
Hazardous Waste Management. The
NDDEQ authority to incorporate federal
rules by reference can be found at
N.D.C.C. § 23.1–01–04(1) and adoption
of the hazardous waste rules in general
are pursuant to the statutory provisions
enacted in 2018 at N.D.C.C. Title 23.1.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
E. What changes are we authorizing
with this action?
The State of North Dakota submitted
a final complete program revision
application on July 31, 2018 and is
seeking re-authorization of their
complete program in accordance with
40 CFR 271.21 due to the transfer of the
approved hazardous waste program
from the NDDH to the NDDEQ as
described in section I.D. above. North
Dakota’s program consists of regulations
which specifically govern the federal
hazardous waste program from base
program authorization in 1984 through
June 30, 2015 (RCRA Cluster XXIV).
All revisions to the applicable
hazardous waste program are federally
approved as of the effective date of this
action. The EPA’s understanding is that,
per S.L. 2017, ch. 199, Section 75 (S.B.
2327), the state plans to rely on the date
the EPA signs this notice for purposes
of notifying the state legislature that the
EPA has approved these revisions,
which will provide for the transfer
authority from NDDH to NDDEQ to be
effective under state law. The EPA also
understands that there are some
programs that will not be required to be
a part of this State Legislature approval.
Unless and until the NDDEQ rules and
agency become fully effective under
state and federal law, for purposes of
federal law, the EPA recognizes the
state’s program as currently approved
under the North Dakota Department of
Health.
We now make a final decision, subject
to receipt of written comments that raise
concerns with this action, that North
Dakota’s hazardous waste program
satisfies all of the requirements
necessary to qualify for final
authorization. Therefore, we grant North
Dakota DEQ final authorization for the
state’s hazardous waste program.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Dec 18, 2018
Jkt 247001
F. Who handles permits after the final
authorization takes effect?
North Dakota will continue to issue
permits for all the provisions for which
it is authorized and will administer the
permits it issues. The EPA will continue
to administer any RCRA hazardous
waste permits or portions of permits
which were issued by the EPA prior to
the effective date of this authorization.
G. How does this action affect Indian
country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in North
Dakota?
The EPA’s approval of the North
Dakota Hazardous Waste Program (state
program) does not extend to Indian
country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151.
Indian country in North Dakota
generally includes:
1. Lands within the exterior
boundaries of the following Indian
reservations located within North
Dakota:
a. Fort Berthold Indian Reservation
b. Spirit Lake Reservation
c. Standing Rock Sioux Reservation
d. Turtle Mountain Indian
Reservation
2. Any land held in trust by the
United States for an Indian tribe, and
3. Any other areas that are ‘‘Indian
country’’ within the meaning of 18
U.S.C. 1151.
Therefore, this program revision does
not extend to Indian country; the EPA
will retain responsibilities under the
Resource Conservation Recovery Act of
1976 (RCRA) in Indian country.
II. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted this action from
the requirements of Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993)
and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011). This action authorizes state
requirements for the purpose of RCRA
section 3006 and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Therefore, this action is not
subject to review by OMB. This action
is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR
9339, February 3, 2017) regulatory
action because actions such as today’s
authorization of North Dakota’s revised
hazardous waste program under RCRA
are exempted under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, I certify that this
action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). Because this action authorizes
pre-existing requirements under state
law and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required
by state law, it does not contain any
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65103
unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538). For the same reason, this action
also does not significantly or uniquely
affect the communities of tribal
governments, as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). This action will not have
substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), because it merely
authorizes state requirements as part of
the state RCRA hazardous waste
program without altering the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
RCRA.
This action also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant, and it does not
make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001), because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Under RCRA 3006(b), the EPA grants
a state’s application for authorization as
long as the state meets the criteria
required by RCRA. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for the
EPA, when it reviews a state
authorization application, to require the
use of any particular voluntary
consensus standard in place of another
standard that otherwise satisfies the
requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this action, the EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct. The
EPA has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by
examining the takings implications of
the action in accordance with the
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings’’ issued under the executive
order. This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
65104
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
‘‘Burden’’ is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) establishes federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
Because this rule authorizes pre-existing
state rules which are at least equivalent
to, and no less stringent than existing
federal requirements, and imposes no
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law, and there are no
anticipated significant adverse human
health or environmental effects, the rule
is not subject to Executive Order 12898.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801–808, generally provides that
before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a
report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication in the Federal Register. A
major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
action will be effective on March 15,
2019.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: December 13, 2018.
Douglas Benevento,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2018–27422 Filed 12–18–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Dec 18, 2018
Jkt 247001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 281
[EPA–R08–UST–2018–0728; FRL–9986–98–
Region 8]
North Dakota: Final Approval of State
Underground Storage Tank Program
Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA
or Act), the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the State
of North Dakota’s Underground Storage
Tank (UST) program submitted by the
State. The EPA has determined that
these revisions satisfy all requirements
needed for program approval. The
State’s federally-authorized and codified
UST program, as revised pursuant to
this action, will remain subject to the
EPA’s inspection and enforcement
authorities under sections 9005 and
9006 of RCRA subtitle I and other
applicable statutory and regulatory
provisions.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective March 15,
2019, unless the EPA receives adverse
comment by January 18, 2019. If the
EPA receives substantive adverse
comment, it will publish a timely
document either: Withdrawing the
direct final publication or affirming the
publication and responding to
comments.
DATES:
Submit your comments by
one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: Bents.Benjamin@epa.gov.
3. Mail: Benjamin Bents, Resource
Conservation and Recovery Program,
Office of Partnerships and Regulatory
Assistance (8P–R), EPA Region 8, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
your comments to Benjamin Bents,
Region 8, Resource Conservation and
Recovery Program, Office of
Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance
(8P–R), EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R08–UST–2018–
0728. The EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov, or email. The
federal https://www.regulations.gov
website is an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system, which means the EPA will not
know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an
email comment directly to the EPA
without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, the EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If the EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties, and cannot
contact you for clarification, the EPA
may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
You can view and copy the
documents that form the basis for this
action and associated publicly available
materials from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.,
Monday through Friday at the following
location: EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129,
phone number (303) 312–6284.
Interested persons wanting to examine
these documents should make an
appointment with the office at least 2
days in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Benjamin Bents, (303) 312–6435,
Bents.Benjamin@epa.gov. To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment with Benjamin Bents at
(303) 312–6435.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Approval of Revisions to North
Dakota’s Underground Storage Tank
Program
A. Why are revisions to state programs
necessary?
States which have received final
approval from the EPA under RCRA
section 9004(b) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991c(b), must maintain an
underground storage tank program that
is equivalent to, consistent with, and no
less stringent than the federal
underground storage tank program.
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 19, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65101-65104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27422]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA-R08-RCRA-2018-0554; FRL-9986-24-Region 8]
North Dakota: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste
Management Program Revisions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: North Dakota has applied for final authorization of a revision
to its hazardous waste program under the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA). The revision has two parts, both of which relate
directly to the creation of the North Dakota Department of
Environmental Quality (NDDEQ) by the North Dakota Legislature, and the
impending transfer of authority, power, and duties relating to
environmental quality from the North Dakota Department of Health (NDDH)
to the NDDEQ. The first part of the program revision is the complete
transfer of all hazardous waste program rules from Title 33 Article 24
of the North Dakota Administrative Code (NDAC) to NDAC Title 33.1
Article 24. The second part is replacing all references to NDDH with
NDDEQ. No other changes are being made to the hazardous waste program
rules in this revision. The EPA has reviewed the application and
determined that North Dakota's hazardous waste program revision
satisfies all of the requirements necessary to qualify for final
authorization. The EPA is authorizing the state program revision
through this direct final rule. The EPA is publishing this rule without
prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial
action and does not anticipate adverse comments. However, in the
proposed rules section of this Federal Register, the EPA is publishing
a separate document that will serve as a proposal to authorize the
revision should the Agency receive adverse comment. Unless the EPA
receives adverse written comments during the review and comment period,
the decision to authorize North Dakota's hazardous waste program
revision will take effect as provided below.
DATES: This final rule is effective on March 15, 2019, unless the EPA
receives adverse written comment by January 18, 2019. Should the EPA
receive such comments, it will publish a timely document either:
Withdrawing the direct final publication or affirming the publication
and responding to comments.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R08-RCRA-2018-0554. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or
other information, the disclosure of which is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
through
[[Page 65102]]
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at: EPA Region 8, from 8:00
a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129;
contact: Moye Lin, phone number (303) 312-6667, or the North Dakota
Department of Health (NDDH) from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 918 East
Divide Avenue, 3rd Floor, Bismarck, North Dakota 58501-1947, phone
number (701) 328-5166. The public is advised to call in advance to
verify business hours.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Moye Lin, Resource Conservation and
Recovery Program, EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202-1129; phone number (303) 312-6667; Email address:
lin.moye@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Authorization of Revisions to North Dakota's Hazardous Waste Program
A. Why are revisions to state programs necessary?
States which have received final authorization from the EPA under
RCRA section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous
waste program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less
stringent than the federal program. As the federal program changes,
states must change their programs and ask the EPA to authorize the
changes. Changes to state programs may be necessary when federal or
state statutory or regulatory authority is modified or when certain
other changes occur. Most commonly, states must change their programs
because of changes to the EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) parts 124, 260 through 268, 270, 273 and 279. When
states make other changes to their regulations, it is often appropriate
for the states to seek authorization for the changes.
B. What decisions have we made in this rule?
We conclude that North Dakota's application to revise its
authorized program meets all of the statutory and regulatory
requirements established by RCRA. Therefore, we grant North Dakota
final authorization to operate its hazardous waste program with the
changes described in the authorization application.
The State of North Dakota adopted state Senate Bill No. 2327 (S.L.
2017, ch. 199, Sec. 75), which separated the Environmental Health
Section from the North Dakota Department of Health (NDDH) to create a
standalone North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality (NDDEQ).
Per S.L. 2017, ch. 199, Section 75, the transfer of authority, power,
and duties related to environmental quality from NDDH to NDDEQ will
become effective upon the North Dakota Legislative Council's receipt of
the certification by the Chief of the Environmental Health Section of
the State Department of Health attesting that all necessary federal
approvals have been obtained and all necessary federal and other
agreements have been amended to ensure the state will continue to meet
the authorization requirements it currently satisfies after the
transfer of authority, powers and duties from the NDDH to the NDDEQ.
This direct final rule constitutes EPA approval of the transfer of all
duties and responsibilities of the state relating to the existing
federal hazardous waste program in North Dakota from the NDDH to the
NDDEQ.
North Dakota will continue to have responsibility for permitting
Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) within its borders
(except in Indian country), and for carrying out the aspects of the
RCRA program described in its revised program application, subject to
the limitations of the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984
(HSWA). New federal requirements and prohibitions imposed by federal
regulations that the EPA promulgates under the authority of HSWA after
this action, if any, will be effective in North Dakota on the effective
date of the federal rule. Thus, the EPA will implement those
requirements and prohibitions in North Dakota, including issuing
permits, until North Dakota applies for authorization of equivalent
state rules and those rules are authorized.
C. What is the effect of this authorization decision?
While there will be no substantive changes to the federal hazardous
waste program requirements if North Dakota is authorized for these
changes, NDDEQ will become the state department responsible for
implementation of the federal hazardous waste program instead of NDDH.
This change should have little to no practical effect on the regulated
community in North Dakota. Additionally, pursuant to section 3006 of
RCRA, the regulated community must comply with HSWA regulations issued
by the EPA for which the state has not received authorization. North
Dakota will continue to have enforcement responsibilities under its
state hazardous waste program for violations of such program, and the
EPA continues to retain its authority under RCRA sections 3007, 3008,
3013, and 7003, which include, among others, authority to:
Conduct inspections and require monitoring, tests,
analyses, or reports;
Enforce RCRA requirements; suspend or revoke permits;
and,
Take enforcement actions regardless of whether North
Dakota has taken its own actions.
This action to approve these provisions would not impose additional
requirements on the regulated community because the regulations for
which North Dakota is requesting authorization are already effective
under both state and federal law and are not changed by our
authorization of these revisions.
D. For what has North Dakota previously been authorized?
North Dakota initially received final authorization on October 5,
1984, effective October 19, 1984 (49 FR 39328), to implement the RCRA
hazardous waste management program. We granted authorization for
changes to their program on: June 25, 1990, effective August 24, 1990
(55 FR 25836); May 4, 1992, effective July 6, 1992 (57 FR 19087); April
7, 1994, effective June 6, 1994 (59 FR 16566); January 19, 2000,
effective March 20, 2000 (65 FR 02897); September 26, 2005, effective
November 25, 2000 (70 FR 56132); February 14, 2008, effective April 14,
2008 (73 FR 8610); and October 30, 2018, effective October 30, 2018 (83
FR 54521).
The EPA understands that the state intends to take the necessary
additional steps, as specified in S.L. 2017, ch. 199, Section 75, to
ensure that NDDEQ comes into existence and that the NDDEQ rules are
effective as a matter of state law so that the rules also and the NDDEQ
will become federally enforceable prior to the effective date of EPA's
approval of these revisions. Further background on the new department
is documented in the state Program Description dated September 2018.
Therefore, once this rule is effective and for the purposes of
administration of the state's authorized hazardous waste program,
references to the NDDH Division of Waste Management of the
Environmental Health Section will be to the NDDEQ. For further
legislative history on the new department, see North Dakota Session
Laws of 2017 [S.L. 2017, ch. 199, Sec. 75].
The NDDEQ has primary responsibility for administration of laws and
regulations concerning hazardous waste under the North Dakota Hazardous
Waste Management Act (codified in Chapter 23.1-04 of the North Dakota
Century Code [N.D.C.C.]). The NDDEQ is also authorized to administer
the federal hazardous waste
[[Page 65103]]
program, including jurisdiction over the generation, discharge,
storage, treatment, handling, transportation, reclamation, or disposal
of hazardous waste.
The NDDEQ has the rules necessary to implement the federal
Hazardous Waste Program from the Base program through RCRA Cluster XXIV
revisions promulgated through June 30, 2015, as found in NDAC Title
33.1 Article 24 Hazardous Waste Management. The NDDEQ authority to
incorporate federal rules by reference can be found at N.D.C.C. Sec.
23.1-01-04(1) and adoption of the hazardous waste rules in general are
pursuant to the statutory provisions enacted in 2018 at N.D.C.C. Title
23.1.
E. What changes are we authorizing with this action?
The State of North Dakota submitted a final complete program
revision application on July 31, 2018 and is seeking re-authorization
of their complete program in accordance with 40 CFR 271.21 due to the
transfer of the approved hazardous waste program from the NDDH to the
NDDEQ as described in section I.D. above. North Dakota's program
consists of regulations which specifically govern the federal hazardous
waste program from base program authorization in 1984 through June 30,
2015 (RCRA Cluster XXIV).
All revisions to the applicable hazardous waste program are
federally approved as of the effective date of this action. The EPA's
understanding is that, per S.L. 2017, ch. 199, Section 75 (S.B. 2327),
the state plans to rely on the date the EPA signs this notice for
purposes of notifying the state legislature that the EPA has approved
these revisions, which will provide for the transfer authority from
NDDH to NDDEQ to be effective under state law. The EPA also understands
that there are some programs that will not be required to be a part of
this State Legislature approval. Unless and until the NDDEQ rules and
agency become fully effective under state and federal law, for purposes
of federal law, the EPA recognizes the state's program as currently
approved under the North Dakota Department of Health.
We now make a final decision, subject to receipt of written
comments that raise concerns with this action, that North Dakota's
hazardous waste program satisfies all of the requirements necessary to
qualify for final authorization. Therefore, we grant North Dakota DEQ
final authorization for the state's hazardous waste program.
F. Who handles permits after the final authorization takes effect?
North Dakota will continue to issue permits for all the provisions
for which it is authorized and will administer the permits it issues.
The EPA will continue to administer any RCRA hazardous waste permits or
portions of permits which were issued by the EPA prior to the effective
date of this authorization.
G. How does this action affect Indian country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in North
Dakota?
The EPA's approval of the North Dakota Hazardous Waste Program
(state program) does not extend to Indian country, as defined in 18
U.S.C. 1151. Indian country in North Dakota generally includes:
1. Lands within the exterior boundaries of the following Indian
reservations located within North Dakota:
a. Fort Berthold Indian Reservation
b. Spirit Lake Reservation
c. Standing Rock Sioux Reservation
d. Turtle Mountain Indian Reservation
2. Any land held in trust by the United States for an Indian tribe,
and
3. Any other areas that are ``Indian country'' within the meaning
of 18 U.S.C. 1151.
Therefore, this program revision does not extend to Indian country;
the EPA will retain responsibilities under the Resource Conservation
Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) in Indian country.
II. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this action
from the requirements of Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October
4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011). This action
authorizes state requirements for the purpose of RCRA section 3006 and
imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Therefore, this action is not subject to review by OMB. This action is
not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017) regulatory
action because actions such as today's authorization of North Dakota's
revised hazardous waste program under RCRA are exempted under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, I certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this action authorizes pre-existing requirements under state law and
does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538). For the same reason,
this action also does not significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of tribal governments, as specified by Executive Order
13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999),
because it merely authorizes state requirements as part of the state
RCRA hazardous waste program without altering the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established by RCRA.
This action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant, and
it does not make decisions based on environmental health or safety
risks. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because it is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
Under RCRA 3006(b), the EPA grants a state's application for
authorization as long as the state meets the criteria required by RCRA.
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for the EPA, when it
reviews a state authorization application, to require the use of any
particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard
that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996),
in issuing this action, the EPA has taken the necessary steps to
eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,
and provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. The EPA has
complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by
examining the takings implications of the action in accordance with the
``Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the executive
order. This action does not impose an information collection burden
under the
[[Page 65104]]
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.). ``Burden'' is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes
federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States. Because this rule authorizes pre-
existing state rules which are at least equivalent to, and no less
stringent than existing federal requirements, and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law, and there are no
anticipated significant adverse human health or environmental effects,
the rule is not subject to Executive Order 12898.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801-808, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule
must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each
House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United
States. The EPA will submit a report containing this document and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This
action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
action will be effective on March 15, 2019.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 13, 2018.
Douglas Benevento,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2018-27422 Filed 12-18-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P