Expansion of the Monticello Viticultural Area, 64272-64274 [2018-27125]
Download as PDF
64272
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
requirements, unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. As noted
above in this preamble, this rule is a
deregulatory action taken by HUD that
will alleviate the economic costs borne
by participants in the FHA single family
mortgage insurance programs. As
discussed in this preamble, removal of
the requirement for a 10-year protection
plan would ease burdens on lenders and
homebuilders and does not preclude
borrowers from purchasing such plans.
HUD is removing this requirement
because it has deemed they are no
longer necessary. Therefore, the
undersigned certifies that this rule will
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Environmental Impact
This rule does not direct, provide for
assistance or loan and mortgage
insurance for, or otherwise govern or
regulate, real property acquisition,
disposition, leasing, rehabilitation,
alteration, demolition, or new
construction, or establish, revise, or
provide for standards for construction or
construction materials, manufactured
housing, or occupancy. In addition, part
of this rule changes a statutorily
required and/or discretionary
establishment and review of loan limits.
Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(1)
and (c)(6), this rule is categorically
excluded from environmental review
under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321).
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism
implications if the rule either imposes
substantial direct compliance costs on
State and local governments or is not
required by statute, or the rule preempts
State law, unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive Order. This
rule will not have federalism
implications and would not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
State and local governments or preempt
State law within the meaning of the
Executive Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538) (UMRA) establishes requirements
for federal agencies to assess the effects
of their regulatory actions on State,
local, and tribal governments, and on
the private sector. This rule does not
impose any federal mandates on any
State, local, or tribal governments, or on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Dec 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
the private sector, within the meaning of
UMRA.
Catalogue of Federal Domestic
Assistance
Dated: December 3, 2018.
Brian D. Montgomery,
Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal
Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2018–27116 Filed 12–13–18; 8:45 am]
The Catalogue of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number for the principal
FHA single-family mortgage insurance
program is 14.117.
List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 203
Hawaiian Natives, Home
improvement, Indians–lands, Loan
programs—housing and community
development, Mortgage insurance,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Solar energy.
Accordingly, for the reasons
discussed in the preamble, HUD amends
24 CFR part 203 to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2018–0004; T.D. TTB–154;
Ref: Notice No. 173]
RIN 1513–AC37
Expansion of the Monticello
Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
PART 203—SINGLE FAMILY
MORTGAGE INSURANCE
1. The authority citation for part 203
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1709, 1710, 1715b,
1715z–16, and 1715u; 42 U.S.C. 3535(d).
§ 203.18
[Amended]
2. In § 203.18, remove paragraph (a)(3)
and redesignate paragraph (a)(4) as
paragraph (a)(3).
■
3. In § 203.50, revise paragraph (f)(1)
to read as follows:
■
§ 203.50
Eligibility of rehabilitation loans.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(1)(i) The limits prescribed in
§ 203.18(a)(1) (in the case of a dwelling
to be occupied as a principal residence,
as defined in § 203.18(f)(1));
(ii) The limits prescribed in
§ 203.18(a)(1) and (3) (in the case of a
dwelling to be occupied as a secondary
residence, as defined in § 203.18(f)(2));
(iii) 85 percent of the limits
prescribed in § 203.18(c), or such higher
limit, not to exceed the limits set forth
in § 203.18(a)(1), as Commissioner may
prescribe (in the case of an eligible nonoccupant mortgagor as defined in
§ 203.18(f)(3));
(iv) The limits prescribed in
§ 203.18a, based upon the sum of the
estimated cost of rehabilitation and the
Commissioner’s estimate of the value of
the property before rehabilitation; or
*
*
*
*
*
§§ 203.200 through 203.209
[Removed]
4. Remove the undesignated center
heading ‘‘Insured Ten-Year Protection
Plans (Plan)’’ and §§ 203.200 through
203.209.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) is expanding
the approximately 1,320-square mile
‘‘Monticello’’ viticultural area in
Albemarle, Greene, Nelson, and Orange
Counties, in Virginia, by approximately
166 square miles, into Fluvanna County,
Virginia. The established viticultural
area and the expansion area are not
located within any other established
viticultural area. TTB designates
viticultural areas to allow vintners to
better describe the origin of their wines
and to allow consumers to better
identify wines they may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective
January 14, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Trevar D. Kolodny, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street
NW, Box 12, Washington, DC 20005;
phone 202–559–6222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
provides that these regulations should,
among other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the FAA Act
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury
Department Order 120–01, dated
December 10, 2013 (superseding
Treasury Order 120–01, dated January
24, 2003), to the TTB Administrator to
perform the functions and duties in the
administration and enforcement of this
law.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) authorizes TTB to establish
definitive viticultural areas and regulate
the use of their names as appellations of
origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets forth
standards for the preparation and
submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of
American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
a viticultural area for American wine as
a delimited grape-growing region having
distinguishing features, as described in
part 9 of the regulations, and a name
and a delineated boundary, as
established in part 9 of the regulations.
These designations allow vintners and
consumers to attribute a given quality,
reputation, or other characteristic of a
wine made from grapes grown in an area
to the wine’s geographic origin. The
establishment of AVAs allows vintners
to describe more accurately the origin of
their wines to consumers and helps
consumers to identify wines they may
purchase. Establishment of an AVA is
neither an approval nor an endorsement
by TTB of the wine produced in that
area.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) outlines
the procedure for proposing an AVA
and provides that any interested party
may petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as an AVA. Petitioners
may use the same process to request
changes involving established AVAs.
Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27
CFR 9.12) prescribes standards for
petitions for modifying established
AVAs. Petitions to expand an
established AVA must include the
following:
• Evidence that the area within the
proposed expansion area boundary is
nationally or locally known by the name
of the established AVA;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Dec 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
• An explanation of the basis for
defining the boundary of the proposed
expansion area;
• A narrative description of the
features of the proposed expansion area
that affect viticulture, such as climate,
geology, soils, physical features, and
elevation, that make the proposed
expansion area similar to the
established AVA and distinguish it from
adjacent areas outside the established
AVA boundary;
• The appropriate United States
Geological Survey (USGS) map(s)
showing the location of the proposed
expansion area, with the boundary of
the proposed expansion area clearly
drawn thereon; and
• A detailed narrative description of
the proposed expansion area boundary
based on USGS map markings.
Petition To Expand the Monticello AVA
TTB received a petition from George
Cushnie, co-owner of Thistle Gate
Vineyard, submitted on behalf of
himself and a second vineyard owner,
proposing to expand the established
Monticello AVA. The Monticello AVA
(27 CFR 9.48) was established by T.D.
ATF–164, which was published in the
Federal Register on January 23, 1984
(49 FR 2758). The Monticello AVA
covers approximately 1,320 square
miles in Albemarle, Greene, Nelson, and
Orange Counties in Virginia. The
Monticello AVA and the proposed
expansion area do not overlap any other
established or proposed AVAs.
The proposed expansion area extends
beyond the Albemarle County line,
which currently serves as the
southeastern border of the established
AVA, to encompass approximately 166
square miles of Fluvanna County,
between the James and Rivanna Rivers.
The petition included a letter from the
President of the Jeffersonian Wine Grape
Growers Society, an association of over
30 wineries within the existing
Monticello AVA, supporting the
proposed expansion.
When the petition was filed, there
were two commercially-producing
vineyards covering a total of
approximately 15 acres within the
proposed expansion area. Since the
petition was filed, an additional
vineyard has been established in the
proposed expansion area, covering
approximately 6.5 acres.
According to the petition, the soils
and climate of the proposed expansion
area are similar to those of the
established Monticello AVA. The soils
in Fluvanna County consist of the
Nason, Manteo, Tatum, and Louisburg
types, which are also the main soil types
found in Albemarle County, which
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64273
forms the heart of the existing AVA, and
Orange County, which forms the
northeast portion of the existing AVA.
The petition further notes that the
Nelson and Manteo soils are Virginia
soils particularly well-suited to
viticulture, given that they are silty
loams, characterized by moderate levels
of nutritious organic content and good
drainage conditions.
The climate of the proposed
expansion is similar to the climate of
the existing AVA. Gaps in the Blue
Ridge Mountains to the east cause
‘‘rivers of cold air’’ to flow through
corridors that converge east of the
Monticello AVA and the new expansion
area. As a result, temperatures in the
Monticello AVA and the proposed
expansion area are 4–5 °F warmer than
the climate in the surrounding areas
outside the Monticello AVA. This
warmer weather allows for a longer
growing season and protection from
frosts, which can be fatal to ripening
grapes. This warmer weather was an
important factor in establishing the
Monticello AVA in 1982, and is a point
of similarity that the proposed
expansion area shares with the existing
AVA, in contrast to surrounding areas.
The growing season of the proposed
expansion area is typically a minimum
of 190 or even 200 days, which is
similar to the 190–200 day average of
the Orange County portion of the
Monticello AVA. By contrast, the lands
further east and south of the proposed
expansion area average 150 days and
less.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and
Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 173 in the
Federal Register on April 6, 2018 (83 FR
14787), proposing to expand the
Monticello AVA. In the notice, TTB
summarized the evidence from the
petition regarding the name, boundary,
and distinguishing features for the
proposed expansion area. For a detailed
description of the evidence relating to
the name, boundary, and distinguishing
features of the proposed expansion area,
and for a comparison of the
distinguishing features of the proposed
expansion area to the surrounding areas
and to the established Monticello AVA,
see Notice No. 173.
Comments Received
In Notice No. 173, TTB solicited
comments on the accuracy of the name,
boundary, climatic, and other required
information submitted in support of the
petition. The comment period closed on
June 5, 2018.
In response to Notice No. 173, TTB
received one comment from Will and
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
64274
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Leah Wentz, who have established a
vineyard in the proposed expansion
area, and who supported the proposed
expansion of the Monticello AVA. They
claim that they selected their vineyard
site in Fluvanna County based on the
various viticultural attributes of the
area, especially including its climate
and soils, which they said were
accurately described in the initial
petition. TTB did not receive any
comments objecting to the proposed
AVA expansion.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition,
TTB finds that the evidence provided by
the petitioner sufficiently demonstrates
that the proposed expansion area shares
the characteristics of the established
Monticello AVA and should also be
recognized as part of that AVA.
Accordingly, under the authority of the
FAA Act, section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002, and
parts 4 and 9 of the TTB regulations,
TTB expands the 1,320 square mile
‘‘Monticello’’ AVA to include the
approximately 166 square mile
expansion area as described in Notice
No. 173, effective 30 days from the
publication date of this document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the
boundary of the AVA expansion in the
regulatory text published at the end of
this final rule.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
Maps
The petitioner provided the required
maps, and they are codified in the
regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits
any label reference on a wine that
indicates or implies an origin other than
the wine’s true place of origin. For a
wine to be labeled with an AVA name
or with a brand name that includes an
AVA name, at least 85 percent of the
wine must be derived from grapes
grown within the area represented by
that name, and the wine must meet the
other conditions listed in § 4.25(e)(3) of
the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)).
If the wine is not eligible for labeling
with an AVA name and that name
appears in the brand name, then the
label is not in compliance, and the
bottler must change the brand name and
obtain approval of a new label.
Similarly, if the AVA name appears in
another reference on the label in a
misleading manner, the bottler would
have to obtain approval of a new label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a
brand name containing an AVA name
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Dec 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
that was used as a brand name on a
label approved before July 7, 1986. See
§ 4.39(i)(2) of the TTB regulations (27
CFR 4.39(i)(2)) for details.
The expansion of the Monticello AVA
will not affect any other existing AVA,
and bottlers using ‘‘Monticello’’ as an
appellation of origin or in a brand name
for wines made from grapes within the
‘‘Monticello’’ AVA will not be affected
by this expansion of the Monticello
AVA. The expansion of the Monticello
AVA will allow vintners to use
‘‘Monticello’’ as an appellation of origin
for wines made primarily from grapes
grown within the expansion area if the
wines meet the eligibility requirements
for the appellation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The regulation imposes no new
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit
derived from the use of an AVA name
would be the result of a proprietor’s
efforts and consumer acceptance of
wines from that area. Therefore, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is
required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this rule
is not a significant regulatory action as
defined by Executive Order 12866 of
September 30, 1993. Therefore, no
regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter
I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL
AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C—Approved American
Viticultural Areas
2. Section 9.48 is amended by revising
paragraph (c)(16), redesignating
paragraph (c)(17) as (c)(19), and adding
new paragraph (c)(17) and paragraph
(c)(18) to read as follows:
■
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Monticello.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(16) Then continuing southwest along
the county line to its intersection with
the Rivanna River;
(17) Then southeast along the Rivanna
River to its confluence with the James
River, near the Fluvanna-Goochland
County line;
(18) Then southwest, then northwest
along the James River to its intersection
with the Albemarle County line;
*
*
*
*
*
Signed: September 5, 2018.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: December 4, 2018.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2018–27125 Filed 12–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2018–0003; T.D. TTB–153;
Ref: Notice No. 172]
RIN 1513–AC36
Expansion of the Arroyo Seco
Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
Trevar D. Kolodny of the Regulations
and Rulings Division drafted this final
rule.
PO 00000
§ 9.48
Sfmt 4700
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) is expanding
the approximately 18,240-acre ‘‘Arroyo
Seco’’ viticultural area in Monterey
County, California, by approximately 90
acres. The established Arroyo Seco
viticultural area and the expansion area
both lie within the established Monterey
viticultural area and the larger, multicounty Central Coast viticultural area.
TTB designates viticultural areas to
allow vintners to better describe the
origin of their wines and to allow
consumers to better identify wines they
may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective
January 14, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Forster-Smith, Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau,
Regulations and Rulings Division, 1310
G Street NW, Box 12, Washington, DC
20005; phone 202–453–1039, ext. 150.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 240 (Friday, December 14, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64272-64274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27125]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB-2018-0004; T.D. TTB-154; Ref: Notice No. 173]
RIN 1513-AC37
Expansion of the Monticello Viticultural Area
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) is
expanding the approximately 1,320-square mile ``Monticello''
viticultural area in Albemarle, Greene, Nelson, and Orange Counties, in
Virginia, by approximately 166 square miles, into Fluvanna County,
Virginia. The established viticultural area and the expansion area are
not located within any other established viticultural area. TTB
designates viticultural areas to allow vintners to better describe the
origin of their wines and to allow consumers to better identify wines
they may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective January 14, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trevar D. Kolodny, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G
Street NW, Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202-559-6222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act),
27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe
regulations for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt
beverages. The FAA Act provides that these regulations should, among
other things, prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity and quality of the product. The
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the FAA Act
[[Page 64273]]
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury Department Order 120-01, dated December
10, 2013 (superseding Treasury Order 120-01, dated January 24, 2003),
to the TTB Administrator to perform the functions and duties in the
administration and enforcement of this law.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) authorizes TTB to
establish definitive viticultural areas and regulate the use of their
names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets
forth standards for the preparation and submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i))
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region having distinguishing features, as described in part 9
of the regulations, and a name and a delineated boundary, as
established in part 9 of the regulations. These designations allow
vintners and consumers to attribute a given quality, reputation, or
other characteristic of a wine made from grapes grown in an area to the
wine's geographic origin. The establishment of AVAs allows vintners to
describe more accurately the origin of their wines to consumers and
helps consumers to identify wines they may purchase. Establishment of
an AVA is neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine
produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2))
outlines the procedure for proposing an AVA and provides that any
interested party may petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region
as an AVA. Petitioners may use the same process to request changes
involving established AVAs. Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
9.12) prescribes standards for petitions for modifying established
AVAs. Petitions to expand an established AVA must include the
following:
Evidence that the area within the proposed expansion area
boundary is nationally or locally known by the name of the established
AVA;
An explanation of the basis for defining the boundary of
the proposed expansion area;
A narrative description of the features of the proposed
expansion area that affect viticulture, such as climate, geology,
soils, physical features, and elevation, that make the proposed
expansion area similar to the established AVA and distinguish it from
adjacent areas outside the established AVA boundary;
The appropriate United States Geological Survey (USGS)
map(s) showing the location of the proposed expansion area, with the
boundary of the proposed expansion area clearly drawn thereon; and
A detailed narrative description of the proposed expansion
area boundary based on USGS map markings.
Petition To Expand the Monticello AVA
TTB received a petition from George Cushnie, co-owner of Thistle
Gate Vineyard, submitted on behalf of himself and a second vineyard
owner, proposing to expand the established Monticello AVA. The
Monticello AVA (27 CFR 9.48) was established by T.D. ATF-164, which was
published in the Federal Register on January 23, 1984 (49 FR 2758). The
Monticello AVA covers approximately 1,320 square miles in Albemarle,
Greene, Nelson, and Orange Counties in Virginia. The Monticello AVA and
the proposed expansion area do not overlap any other established or
proposed AVAs.
The proposed expansion area extends beyond the Albemarle County
line, which currently serves as the southeastern border of the
established AVA, to encompass approximately 166 square miles of
Fluvanna County, between the James and Rivanna Rivers. The petition
included a letter from the President of the Jeffersonian Wine Grape
Growers Society, an association of over 30 wineries within the existing
Monticello AVA, supporting the proposed expansion.
When the petition was filed, there were two commercially-producing
vineyards covering a total of approximately 15 acres within the
proposed expansion area. Since the petition was filed, an additional
vineyard has been established in the proposed expansion area, covering
approximately 6.5 acres.
According to the petition, the soils and climate of the proposed
expansion area are similar to those of the established Monticello AVA.
The soils in Fluvanna County consist of the Nason, Manteo, Tatum, and
Louisburg types, which are also the main soil types found in Albemarle
County, which forms the heart of the existing AVA, and Orange County,
which forms the northeast portion of the existing AVA. The petition
further notes that the Nelson and Manteo soils are Virginia soils
particularly well-suited to viticulture, given that they are silty
loams, characterized by moderate levels of nutritious organic content
and good drainage conditions.
The climate of the proposed expansion is similar to the climate of
the existing AVA. Gaps in the Blue Ridge Mountains to the east cause
``rivers of cold air'' to flow through corridors that converge east of
the Monticello AVA and the new expansion area. As a result,
temperatures in the Monticello AVA and the proposed expansion area are
4-5 [deg]F warmer than the climate in the surrounding areas outside the
Monticello AVA. This warmer weather allows for a longer growing season
and protection from frosts, which can be fatal to ripening grapes. This
warmer weather was an important factor in establishing the Monticello
AVA in 1982, and is a point of similarity that the proposed expansion
area shares with the existing AVA, in contrast to surrounding areas.
The growing season of the proposed expansion area is typically a
minimum of 190 or even 200 days, which is similar to the 190-200 day
average of the Orange County portion of the Monticello AVA. By
contrast, the lands further east and south of the proposed expansion
area average 150 days and less.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 173 in the Federal Register on April 6,
2018 (83 FR 14787), proposing to expand the Monticello AVA. In the
notice, TTB summarized the evidence from the petition regarding the
name, boundary, and distinguishing features for the proposed expansion
area. For a detailed description of the evidence relating to the name,
boundary, and distinguishing features of the proposed expansion area,
and for a comparison of the distinguishing features of the proposed
expansion area to the surrounding areas and to the established
Monticello AVA, see Notice No. 173.
Comments Received
In Notice No. 173, TTB solicited comments on the accuracy of the
name, boundary, climatic, and other required information submitted in
support of the petition. The comment period closed on June 5, 2018.
In response to Notice No. 173, TTB received one comment from Will
and
[[Page 64274]]
Leah Wentz, who have established a vineyard in the proposed expansion
area, and who supported the proposed expansion of the Monticello AVA.
They claim that they selected their vineyard site in Fluvanna County
based on the various viticultural attributes of the area, especially
including its climate and soils, which they said were accurately
described in the initial petition. TTB did not receive any comments
objecting to the proposed AVA expansion.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition, TTB finds that the evidence
provided by the petitioner sufficiently demonstrates that the proposed
expansion area shares the characteristics of the established Monticello
AVA and should also be recognized as part of that AVA. Accordingly,
under the authority of the FAA Act, section 1111(d) of the Homeland
Security Act of 2002, and parts 4 and 9 of the TTB regulations, TTB
expands the 1,320 square mile ``Monticello'' AVA to include the
approximately 166 square mile expansion area as described in Notice No.
173, effective 30 days from the publication date of this document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the boundary of the AVA expansion
in the regulatory text published at the end of this final rule.
Maps
The petitioner provided the required maps, and they are codified in
the regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true
place of origin. For a wine to be labeled with an AVA name or with a
brand name that includes an AVA name, at least 85 percent of the wine
must be derived from grapes grown within the area represented by that
name, and the wine must meet the other conditions listed in Sec.
4.25(e)(3) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)). If the wine is
not eligible for labeling with an AVA name and that name appears in the
brand name, then the label is not in compliance, and the bottler must
change the brand name and obtain approval of a new label. Similarly, if
the AVA name appears in another reference on the label in a misleading
manner, the bottler would have to obtain approval of a new label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a brand name containing an AVA name
that was used as a brand name on a label approved before July 7, 1986.
See Sec. 4.39(i)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.39(i)(2)) for
details.
The expansion of the Monticello AVA will not affect any other
existing AVA, and bottlers using ``Monticello'' as an appellation of
origin or in a brand name for wines made from grapes within the
``Monticello'' AVA will not be affected by this expansion of the
Monticello AVA. The expansion of the Monticello AVA will allow vintners
to use ``Monticello'' as an appellation of origin for wines made
primarily from grapes grown within the expansion area if the wines meet
the eligibility requirements for the appellation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
regulation imposes no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit derived from the use of an AVA
name would be the result of a proprietor's efforts and consumer
acceptance of wines from that area. Therefore, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993. Therefore, no regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Trevar D. Kolodny of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted
this final rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB amends title 27,
chapter I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas
0
2. Section 9.48 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(16), redesignating
paragraph (c)(17) as (c)(19), and adding new paragraph (c)(17) and
paragraph (c)(18) to read as follows:
Sec. 9.48 Monticello.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(16) Then continuing southwest along the county line to its
intersection with the Rivanna River;
(17) Then southeast along the Rivanna River to its confluence with
the James River, near the Fluvanna-Goochland County line;
(18) Then southwest, then northwest along the James River to its
intersection with the Albemarle County line;
* * * * *
Signed: September 5, 2018.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: December 4, 2018.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2018-27125 Filed 12-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P