Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Dam Safety Modification Study for the Cherry Creek Project, Arapahoe County, Colorado, 64335-64337 [2018-27115]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / Notices
January 8, 2019; Independent
Assessment of the Army’s Science and
Technology Portfolio Realignment. This
study is classified and will be discussed
from 3:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. on January
9, 2019.
Meeting Accessibility: Pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552b, as amended, and 41 CFR
102–3.155, the Department of the Army
has determined that the meeting shall be
closed to the public. Specifically,
consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), the
Administrative Assistant to the
Secretary of the Army, in consultation
with the Office of the Army General
Counsel, has determined in writing that
the public interest requires that all
sessions of the committee’s meeting will
be closed to the public because the
meetings are likely to disclose matters
that are (A) specifically authorized
under criteria established by an
Executive order to be kept secret in the
interest of national defense or foreign
policy and (B) in fact properly classified
pursuant to such Executive order.
Written Statements: Pursuant to 41
CFR 102–3.105(j) and 102–3.140, and
§ 10(a)(3) of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act of 1972, the public or
interested organizations may submit
written statements to the ASB about its
mission and functions. Written
statements may be submitted at any
time or in response to the stated agenda
of a planned meeting of the ASB. All
written statements must be submitted to
the Designated Federal Officer (DFO) at
the address listed above, and this
individual will ensure that the written
statements are provided to the
membership for their consideration.
Written statements not received at least
10 calendar days prior to the meeting
may not be considered by the ASB prior
to its scheduled meeting. After
reviewing written comments, the DFO
may choose to invite the submitter of
the comments to orally present their
issue during a future open meeting.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018–27108 Filed 12–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–03–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DOD–2018–HA–0099]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Health Affairs, DoD.
ACTION: Information collection notice.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Dec 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Defense Health Agency announces a
proposed public information collection
and seeks public comment on the
provisions thereof. Comments are
invited on: Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways
to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the information collection on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
comments received by February 12,
2019.
SUMMARY:
You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Department of Defense, Office of
the Chief Management Officer,
Directorate for Oversight and
Compliance, 4800 Mark Center Drive,
Mailbox #24, Suite 08D09, Alexandria,
VA 22350–1700.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, docket
number and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
ADDRESSES:
To
request more information on this
proposed information collection or to
obtain a copy of the proposal and
associated collection instruments,
please write to Defense Health Agency,
Office of General Counsel, 61401 E
Centretech Parkway, Attn: Bridget
Ewings, Aurora, CO 80011, or call
Defense Health Agency, Office of
General Counsel, at (303) 676–3705.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title; Associated Form; and OMB
Number: Statement of Personal Injury:
Possible Third Party Liability; DD–2527;
OMB Control Number 0720–0003.
Needs and Uses: When a claim for
TRICARE benefits is identified as
involving possible third party liability
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64335
and the information is not submitted
with the claim the TRICARE contractors
request that the injured party (or a
designee) complete DD Form 2527. To
protect the interests of the Government
the contractor suspends claims
processing until the requested third
party liability information is received.
The contractor conducts a preliminary
evaluation based upon the collection of
information and refers the case to a
designated appropriate legal officer of
the Uniformed Services. The
responsible Uniformed Services legal
officer uses the information as a basis
for asserting and settling the
Government’s claim. When appropriate
the information is forwarded to the
Department of Justice as the basis for
litigation.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Annual Burden Hours: 47,022.50.
Number of Respondents: 188,090.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 188,090.
Average Burden per Response: 15
minutes.
Frequency: On occasion.
Dated: December 11, 2018.
Morgan E. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2018–27102 Filed 12–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Army Corps
of Engineers
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Dam Safety Modification Study for
the Cherry Creek Project, Arapahoe
County, Colorado
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) has made available for
public review and comment the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (Draft
EIS) for the Federal action to remediate
dam safety concerns at Cherry Creek
Dam. The dam safety concerns are
primarily related to a hydrologic
deficiency resulting from an extreme
precipitation event and the large
population that could be affected by
such an event. Cherry Creek Dam and
Lake is located on Cherry Creek, 11.4
miles upstream of its confluence with
the South Platte River, in Aurora,
Colorado (southeast Denver
metropolitan area). The remediation
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
64336
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / Notices
actions will be identified through a Dam
Safety Modification Study being
conducted in accordance with Corps
policy as described in Engineering
Regulation 1110–2–1156 ‘‘Safety of
Dams—Policy and Procedures.’’
DATES: The public comment period on
the Draft EIS begins on December 12,
2018 and will last 45 days. Submit
written comments on the Draft EIS on or
before January 28, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments,
requests to be added to the mailing list,
or requests for sign language
interpretation for the hearing impaired
or other special assistance needs to U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers Omaha
District, ATTN: CENWO–PMA–C,
ATTN: Cherry Creek DSMS, 1616
Capitol Avenue, Omaha, NE 68102–
4901; or email to cenwo-planning@
usace.army.mil.
Mr.
John Palensky, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, 1616 Capitol Ave., Omaha,
NE 68102, or john.a.palensky@
usace.army.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The Corps
is issuing this notice pursuant to section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended,
42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.; the Council on
Environmental Quality’s (CEQ)
regulations for implementing the
procedural provisions of NEPA, 43 CFR
parts 1500 through 1508; the
Department of the Interior’s NEPA
regulations, 43 CFR part 46.
The Corps published a Notice of
Intent (NOI) to prepare the Draft EIS in
the Federal Register on December 17,
2013. Public scoping meetings to share
information and to allow the public to
provide oral or written comments were
held near Cherry Creek Dam on January
22, 2015 at the Cherry Creek High
School and on January 24, 2015 at the
Campus Middle School. Three public
scoping meetings were held (September
20, 21 and 22, 2016) in the vicinities of
the 3 potential impact areas of the
Cherry Creek project, the Cherry Creek
Presbyterian Church, Virginia Village
Library, and the Aurora Municipal
Center. The Corps is planning an
additional public on December 12, 2018
at the Lake House at Cherry Creek,
Greenwood Village, Colorado to present
the Draft EA and seek additional input
from the agencies, utility companies and
other stakeholders.
Background Information. The Cherry
Creek Dam and Reservoir Project is
located in western Arapahoe County,
Colorado southeast of the city of Denver.
The project consists of a main dam
embankment, outlet works, and an
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Dec 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
emergency side-channel spillway. The
14,300-foot-long embankment holds
approximately 270,000 acre-feet of
water at the top of the dam. Cherry
Creek Dam and Reservoir is operated as
a system with the Chatfield and Bear
Creek projects. Chatfield Dam is located
on the South Platte River approximately
15 miles upstream of the South Platte’s
confluence with Cherry Creek in
downtown Denver. Bear Creek Dam is
located on Bear Creek, which flows into
the South Platte River approximately
seven miles upstream of the South
Platte’s confluence with Cherry Creek.
The tri-lakes system is operated to
minimize flows at the Denver gauge on
the South Platte River in downtown
Denver, CO.
The dam was screened in 2005 using
the Screening Portfolio Risk Assessment
(SPRA). As a result of that analysis, an
Issue Evaluation Study (IES) was
completed in 2011. The most significant
failure mode identified during the IES
was overtopping and failure of the
embankment during extreme floods.
Combined with the extremely high
consequences, primarily due to the
project location upstream of the Denver
metropolitan area, the dam was found to
pose an unacceptable risk to the public.
A Dam Safety Modification Study
(DSMS) was started in 2013. The
purpose of the DSMS is to identify and
recommend a risk management plan
that reduces risks posed by Cherry
Creek Dam. The recommended plan is
the No Action Alternative. Federal costs
of implementation for this alternative
are zero. In some instances, the
justification can be made that tolerating
structures with high consequences from
a failure is in the interest of society. In
the case of Cherry Creek Dam, the
probability of failure is very low,
individual risk is more than two orders
of magnitude below the USACE
threshold, the risk posed by the project
meets the principle of equity as
described in ER 1110–2–1156, and the
benefits provided by the dam to society
justify continued federal investment in
this project by the federal government.
Risks at the dam are being properly
monitored by USACE and state of the
practice actions are being taken,
including improvements to the USACE
warning issuance time and
improvements to emergency planning
and preparedness by downstream local
emergency management agencies.
During the DSMS, the Omaha District
initiated a Water Control Plan (WCP)
Modification Study in accordance with
ER 1110–2–240, Water Control
Management and ER 1110–2–1156,
Safety of Dams, Policy and Procedures.
The purpose of the study was to reduce
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the potential risk of failure of Cherry
Creek Dam during extreme floods by
releasing more water from the outlet
works at the dam while limiting
exposure to potential downstream
damages. The study proposed using a
pool elevation trigger. The modification
to the WCP was approved in April 2017.
Another factor that reduced
overtopping risk in the Future without
Action Condition (FWAC) is the
restoration of the spillway capacity. The
spillway is located on the right side of
the embankment and is configured to
spill water into the adjacent Sand Creek
basin, which flows into the South Platte
River in Commerce City north of
downtown Denver. Over time soil has
accumulated on the bed of the spillway
channel resulting in an increase in the
spillway crest elevation of
approximately 12.5 feet. The spillway
crest will be returned back to its design
elevation through the maintenance
program. A draft Environmental
Assessment to evaluate the potential
environmental and social effects of the
Cherry Creek Spillway Project is
currently being prepared under the
Operation and Maintenance (O&M)
program. Conducting the spillway
project under the O&M program will
allow the issue to be addressed as a
matter of required maintenance as
opposed to a dam modification via the
Dam Safety program. A contract for the
spillway excavation work is planned for
2019 and anticipated to take 12 to 18
months. The costs for returning the
spillway to the design configuration are
about $11 million.
The Draft EIS document was
produced to look at environmental
impacts from implementing potential
risk reduction alternatives. While the
focus of the DSMS concerns tolerable
risk, risk of life loss, etc., the focus of
this Draft EIS is not to evaluate impacts
of dam failure, but to compare direct,
indirect, and cumulative effects of
implementing any of the alternatives
that address risk.
This notice announces the availability
of the Draft EIS and begins a 45-day
public comment period on the range of
alternatives and effects analysis.
Analysis in the Draft EIS will support a
decision on the selection of an
alternative. The Draft EIS can be
accessed at: https://www.nwo.
usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/
Planning/Project-Reports/. The Corps is
serving as the lead Federal agency for
the NEPA analysis process and
preparation of the Draft EIS. No
Cooperating Agencies were established
for this study.
Project Alternatives. The purpose of
the Cherry Creek DSMS is to identify
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / Notices
and recommend a risk management plan
that addresses risk of life loss and
significant economic, social, and
environmental damages associated with
a potential failure of Cherry Creek Dam.
In addition to the No Action
Alternative, Alternatives 2F (raise dam
7.1 feet and spillway to elevation 5610.5
from original design of 5599.8 feet
NAVD88 to prevent overtopping) and
3B (dam raise of 6.2 feet and no
spillway raise) were evaluated in the
final array of alternatives.
Dam Raise Alternative 3B consists of
the FWAC spillway and a dam raise to
contain the PMF. A dam raise height for
this alternative is 6.2 feet and the crest
width was assumed to be approximately
38 feet to allow reconstruction of the
crest road using current road design
standards. Various methods for raising
the dam were considered, including an
earth raise, reinforced concrete wall,
and mechanically stabilized earth. The
most efficient method of raise depends
on several factors including the height
of raise, crest width, availability of onsite materials, and steepness of
embankment side slopes. Earth/rock fill
raises compete well for raises below 4
to 5 feet if the crest width can be
minimized. Reinforced Concrete (RC)
wall raises are clearly more cost
effective for larger raises and when a
wide crest is required to allow
construction of a crest road that meets
modern standards of construction,
therefore, the dam would be raised
using an RC wall if Alternative 3B is
implemented.
Dam Raise Alternative 2F consists of
a RC wall dam raise of 7.1 feet and a
spillway raise to crest elevation 5610.5
feet NAVD88 to prevent overtopping
during the PMF. This spillway crest
elevation of 5610.5 feet was chosen to
minimize non-breach flows in the
spillway impact area. As with
Alternative 3B the dam would be raised
using an RC wall and the crest width
would be approximately 38 feet to allow
reconstruction of the crest road using
current road design standards.
The Draft EIS evaluates the potential
effects on the human environment
associated with each of the alternatives.
Issues addressed include: Land use and
vegetation, social and economic
conditions, recreation, water resources,
air quality, noise, and environmental
justice.
Schedule. The public comment period
will begin December 12, 2018.
Comments on the Draft EIS must be
received by January 28, 2019. The Corps
will consider and respond to all
comments received on the Draft EIS
when preparing the Final EIS. The
Corps expects to issue the Final EIS in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Dec 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
the summer of 2019, at which time a
Notice of Availability will be published
in the Federal Register.
The public meeting date or location
may change based on inclement weather
or exceptional circumstances. If the
meeting date or location is changed, the
Corps will issue a press release and post
it on the web at https://
www.nwo.usace.army.mil/Media/NewsReleases/ to announce the updated
meeting details.
Public Disclosure Statement. If you
wish to comment, you may mail or
email your comments as indicated
under the ADDRESSES section of this
notice. Before including your address,
phone number, email address, or any
other personal identifying information
in your comment, you should be aware
that your entire comment—including
your personal identifying information—
may be made available to the public at
any time. While you can request in your
comment for us to withhold your
personal identifying information from
public review, we cannot guarantee that
we will be able to do so.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018–27115 Filed 12–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
Availability of a Draft Environmental
Impact Statement, Whittier Narrow
Dam Safety Modification Study, Los
Angeles County, California
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) announces the
availability of a Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) for the Whittier
Narrows Dam Safety Modification
Study, Los Angeles County, California
for review and comment. Pursuant to
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). The Corps has prepared a Draft
EIS for the Whittier Narrows Dam Safety
Modification Study (DSMS). The Draft
EIS evaluates risk management plans
(alternatives) to remediate safety
concerns such as overtopping and
seepage. The Draft EIS describes and
analyses the impacts of risk
management plans (RMPs) that are
formulated, evaluated and compared
through the DSMS process in order to
identify a recommended RMP that
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64337
reduces risks to downstream life-safety
and property associated with dam
failure. Implementation of the
recommended risk management plan
would mitigate the intolerable Dam
safety risk and allow the Dam to safely
function as originally intended and
authorized. Without this action, the
Dam could fail resulting in lifethreatening floods to downstream
communities. The Proposed Action is
needed to provide life-safety to the
communities downstream of the
Whittier Narrows Dam.
DATES: Written comments pursuant to
the NEPA will be accepted until the
close of business on January 28, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The document is available
for review at:
(1) https://www.spl.usace.army.mil/
Missions/Civil-Works/Projects-Studies/
Whittier-Narrows-Dam-SafetyModification-Study/.
(2) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los
Angeles District, 915 Wilshire Blvd., Los
Angeles, CA 90017–3401.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Deborah Lamb, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Los Angeles District, phone
number (213) 452–3798. Questions or
comments regarding the Whittier
Narrows Dam DSMS Draft EIS, contact
Ms. Deborah Lamb by phone or by email
to Deborah.L.Lamb@usace.army.mil. or
Whittier Narrows DSMS EIS Whittier_
Narrows_DSMS@usace.army.mil.
For further information regarding the
Whittier Narrows DSMS, contact Mr.
Doug Chitwood, (213) 452 3587, or by
email to Douglas.E.Chitwood@
usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Background Information.
Construction of Whittier Narrows Dam
was completed in 1957 as an integral
component of the Los Angeles County
Drainage Area (LACDA) system of dams
and channelized rivers authorized by
Congress in the Flood Control Act of
1936. The Whittier Narrows Dam
primary purpose is flood risk
management with recreation added in
the Flood Control Act of 1944 (Pub. L.
78–534). Whittier Narrows Dam is
located approximately 11 miles east of
downtown Los Angeles, Los Angeles
County, CA. The dam protects over one
million people and reduces economic
damages to the communities
downstream during flood events. The
Corps has classified Whittier Narrows
Dam as very high risk due to the
potential for seepage and hydrologic
issues during rare storms that could lead
to failure. The DSMS and Draft EIS
identify and evaluate alternatives to
address these deficiencies and reduce
the annual probability of failure and the
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 240 (Friday, December 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64335-64337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27115]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Army Corps of Engineers
Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact
Statement for the Dam Safety Modification Study for the Cherry Creek
Project, Arapahoe County, Colorado
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has made available
for public review and comment the Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(Draft EIS) for the Federal action to remediate dam safety concerns at
Cherry Creek Dam. The dam safety concerns are primarily related to a
hydrologic deficiency resulting from an extreme precipitation event and
the large population that could be affected by such an event. Cherry
Creek Dam and Lake is located on Cherry Creek, 11.4 miles upstream of
its confluence with the South Platte River, in Aurora, Colorado
(southeast Denver metropolitan area). The remediation
[[Page 64336]]
actions will be identified through a Dam Safety Modification Study
being conducted in accordance with Corps policy as described in
Engineering Regulation 1110-2-1156 ``Safety of Dams--Policy and
Procedures.''
DATES: The public comment period on the Draft EIS begins on December
12, 2018 and will last 45 days. Submit written comments on the Draft
EIS on or before January 28, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments, requests to be added to the mailing
list, or requests for sign language interpretation for the hearing
impaired or other special assistance needs to U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Omaha District, ATTN: CENWO-PMA-C, ATTN: Cherry Creek DSMS,
1616 Capitol Avenue, Omaha, NE 68102-4901; or email to [email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John Palensky, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, 1616 Capitol Ave., Omaha, NE 68102, or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Corps is issuing this notice pursuant to
section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.; the Council on
Environmental Quality's (CEQ) regulations for implementing the
procedural provisions of NEPA, 43 CFR parts 1500 through 1508; the
Department of the Interior's NEPA regulations, 43 CFR part 46.
The Corps published a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare the Draft
EIS in the Federal Register on December 17, 2013. Public scoping
meetings to share information and to allow the public to provide oral
or written comments were held near Cherry Creek Dam on January 22, 2015
at the Cherry Creek High School and on January 24, 2015 at the Campus
Middle School. Three public scoping meetings were held (September 20,
21 and 22, 2016) in the vicinities of the 3 potential impact areas of
the Cherry Creek project, the Cherry Creek Presbyterian Church,
Virginia Village Library, and the Aurora Municipal Center. The Corps is
planning an additional public on December 12, 2018 at the Lake House at
Cherry Creek, Greenwood Village, Colorado to present the Draft EA and
seek additional input from the agencies, utility companies and other
stakeholders.
Background Information. The Cherry Creek Dam and Reservoir Project
is located in western Arapahoe County, Colorado southeast of the city
of Denver. The project consists of a main dam embankment, outlet works,
and an emergency side-channel spillway. The 14,300-foot-long embankment
holds approximately 270,000 acre-feet of water at the top of the dam.
Cherry Creek Dam and Reservoir is operated as a system with the
Chatfield and Bear Creek projects. Chatfield Dam is located on the
South Platte River approximately 15 miles upstream of the South
Platte's confluence with Cherry Creek in downtown Denver. Bear Creek
Dam is located on Bear Creek, which flows into the South Platte River
approximately seven miles upstream of the South Platte's confluence
with Cherry Creek. The tri-lakes system is operated to minimize flows
at the Denver gauge on the South Platte River in downtown Denver, CO.
The dam was screened in 2005 using the Screening Portfolio Risk
Assessment (SPRA). As a result of that analysis, an Issue Evaluation
Study (IES) was completed in 2011. The most significant failure mode
identified during the IES was overtopping and failure of the embankment
during extreme floods. Combined with the extremely high consequences,
primarily due to the project location upstream of the Denver
metropolitan area, the dam was found to pose an unacceptable risk to
the public.
A Dam Safety Modification Study (DSMS) was started in 2013. The
purpose of the DSMS is to identify and recommend a risk management plan
that reduces risks posed by Cherry Creek Dam. The recommended plan is
the No Action Alternative. Federal costs of implementation for this
alternative are zero. In some instances, the justification can be made
that tolerating structures with high consequences from a failure is in
the interest of society. In the case of Cherry Creek Dam, the
probability of failure is very low, individual risk is more than two
orders of magnitude below the USACE threshold, the risk posed by the
project meets the principle of equity as described in ER 1110-2-1156,
and the benefits provided by the dam to society justify continued
federal investment in this project by the federal government. Risks at
the dam are being properly monitored by USACE and state of the practice
actions are being taken, including improvements to the USACE warning
issuance time and improvements to emergency planning and preparedness
by downstream local emergency management agencies.
During the DSMS, the Omaha District initiated a Water Control Plan
(WCP) Modification Study in accordance with ER 1110-2-240, Water
Control Management and ER 1110-2-1156, Safety of Dams, Policy and
Procedures. The purpose of the study was to reduce the potential risk
of failure of Cherry Creek Dam during extreme floods by releasing more
water from the outlet works at the dam while limiting exposure to
potential downstream damages. The study proposed using a pool elevation
trigger. The modification to the WCP was approved in April 2017.
Another factor that reduced overtopping risk in the Future without
Action Condition (FWAC) is the restoration of the spillway capacity.
The spillway is located on the right side of the embankment and is
configured to spill water into the adjacent Sand Creek basin, which
flows into the South Platte River in Commerce City north of downtown
Denver. Over time soil has accumulated on the bed of the spillway
channel resulting in an increase in the spillway crest elevation of
approximately 12.5 feet. The spillway crest will be returned back to
its design elevation through the maintenance program. A draft
Environmental Assessment to evaluate the potential environmental and
social effects of the Cherry Creek Spillway Project is currently being
prepared under the Operation and Maintenance (O&M) program. Conducting
the spillway project under the O&M program will allow the issue to be
addressed as a matter of required maintenance as opposed to a dam
modification via the Dam Safety program. A contract for the spillway
excavation work is planned for 2019 and anticipated to take 12 to 18
months. The costs for returning the spillway to the design
configuration are about $11 million.
The Draft EIS document was produced to look at environmental
impacts from implementing potential risk reduction alternatives. While
the focus of the DSMS concerns tolerable risk, risk of life loss, etc.,
the focus of this Draft EIS is not to evaluate impacts of dam failure,
but to compare direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of implementing
any of the alternatives that address risk.
This notice announces the availability of the Draft EIS and begins
a 45-day public comment period on the range of alternatives and effects
analysis. Analysis in the Draft EIS will support a decision on the
selection of an alternative. The Draft EIS can be accessed at: https://www.nwo.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Planning/Project-Reports/.
The Corps is serving as the lead Federal agency for the NEPA analysis
process and preparation of the Draft EIS. No Cooperating Agencies were
established for this study.
Project Alternatives. The purpose of the Cherry Creek DSMS is to
identify
[[Page 64337]]
and recommend a risk management plan that addresses risk of life loss
and significant economic, social, and environmental damages associated
with a potential failure of Cherry Creek Dam. In addition to the No
Action Alternative, Alternatives 2F (raise dam 7.1 feet and spillway to
elevation 5610.5 from original design of 5599.8 feet NAVD88 to prevent
overtopping) and 3B (dam raise of 6.2 feet and no spillway raise) were
evaluated in the final array of alternatives.
Dam Raise Alternative 3B consists of the FWAC spillway and a dam
raise to contain the PMF. A dam raise height for this alternative is
6.2 feet and the crest width was assumed to be approximately 38 feet to
allow reconstruction of the crest road using current road design
standards. Various methods for raising the dam were considered,
including an earth raise, reinforced concrete wall, and mechanically
stabilized earth. The most efficient method of raise depends on several
factors including the height of raise, crest width, availability of on-
site materials, and steepness of embankment side slopes. Earth/rock
fill raises compete well for raises below 4 to 5 feet if the crest
width can be minimized. Reinforced Concrete (RC) wall raises are
clearly more cost effective for larger raises and when a wide crest is
required to allow construction of a crest road that meets modern
standards of construction, therefore, the dam would be raised using an
RC wall if Alternative 3B is implemented.
Dam Raise Alternative 2F consists of a RC wall dam raise of 7.1
feet and a spillway raise to crest elevation 5610.5 feet NAVD88 to
prevent overtopping during the PMF. This spillway crest elevation of
5610.5 feet was chosen to minimize non-breach flows in the spillway
impact area. As with Alternative 3B the dam would be raised using an RC
wall and the crest width would be approximately 38 feet to allow
reconstruction of the crest road using current road design standards.
The Draft EIS evaluates the potential effects on the human
environment associated with each of the alternatives. Issues addressed
include: Land use and vegetation, social and economic conditions,
recreation, water resources, air quality, noise, and environmental
justice.
Schedule. The public comment period will begin December 12, 2018.
Comments on the Draft EIS must be received by January 28, 2019. The
Corps will consider and respond to all comments received on the Draft
EIS when preparing the Final EIS. The Corps expects to issue the Final
EIS in the summer of 2019, at which time a Notice of Availability will
be published in the Federal Register.
The public meeting date or location may change based on inclement
weather or exceptional circumstances. If the meeting date or location
is changed, the Corps will issue a press release and post it on the web
at https://www.nwo.usace.army.mil/Media/News-Releases/ to announce the
updated meeting details.
Public Disclosure Statement. If you wish to comment, you may mail
or email your comments as indicated under the ADDRESSES section of this
notice. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
any other personal identifying information in your comment, you should
be aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made available to the public at any time. While you
can request in your comment for us to withhold your personal
identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-27115 Filed 12-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P