Expansion of the Arroyo Seco Viticultural Area, 64274-64276 [2018-27014]
Download as PDF
64274
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Leah Wentz, who have established a
vineyard in the proposed expansion
area, and who supported the proposed
expansion of the Monticello AVA. They
claim that they selected their vineyard
site in Fluvanna County based on the
various viticultural attributes of the
area, especially including its climate
and soils, which they said were
accurately described in the initial
petition. TTB did not receive any
comments objecting to the proposed
AVA expansion.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition,
TTB finds that the evidence provided by
the petitioner sufficiently demonstrates
that the proposed expansion area shares
the characteristics of the established
Monticello AVA and should also be
recognized as part of that AVA.
Accordingly, under the authority of the
FAA Act, section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002, and
parts 4 and 9 of the TTB regulations,
TTB expands the 1,320 square mile
‘‘Monticello’’ AVA to include the
approximately 166 square mile
expansion area as described in Notice
No. 173, effective 30 days from the
publication date of this document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the
boundary of the AVA expansion in the
regulatory text published at the end of
this final rule.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
Maps
The petitioner provided the required
maps, and they are codified in the
regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits
any label reference on a wine that
indicates or implies an origin other than
the wine’s true place of origin. For a
wine to be labeled with an AVA name
or with a brand name that includes an
AVA name, at least 85 percent of the
wine must be derived from grapes
grown within the area represented by
that name, and the wine must meet the
other conditions listed in § 4.25(e)(3) of
the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)).
If the wine is not eligible for labeling
with an AVA name and that name
appears in the brand name, then the
label is not in compliance, and the
bottler must change the brand name and
obtain approval of a new label.
Similarly, if the AVA name appears in
another reference on the label in a
misleading manner, the bottler would
have to obtain approval of a new label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a
brand name containing an AVA name
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Dec 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
that was used as a brand name on a
label approved before July 7, 1986. See
§ 4.39(i)(2) of the TTB regulations (27
CFR 4.39(i)(2)) for details.
The expansion of the Monticello AVA
will not affect any other existing AVA,
and bottlers using ‘‘Monticello’’ as an
appellation of origin or in a brand name
for wines made from grapes within the
‘‘Monticello’’ AVA will not be affected
by this expansion of the Monticello
AVA. The expansion of the Monticello
AVA will allow vintners to use
‘‘Monticello’’ as an appellation of origin
for wines made primarily from grapes
grown within the expansion area if the
wines meet the eligibility requirements
for the appellation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The regulation imposes no new
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit
derived from the use of an AVA name
would be the result of a proprietor’s
efforts and consumer acceptance of
wines from that area. Therefore, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is
required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this rule
is not a significant regulatory action as
defined by Executive Order 12866 of
September 30, 1993. Therefore, no
regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter
I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL
AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C—Approved American
Viticultural Areas
2. Section 9.48 is amended by revising
paragraph (c)(16), redesignating
paragraph (c)(17) as (c)(19), and adding
new paragraph (c)(17) and paragraph
(c)(18) to read as follows:
■
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Monticello.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(16) Then continuing southwest along
the county line to its intersection with
the Rivanna River;
(17) Then southeast along the Rivanna
River to its confluence with the James
River, near the Fluvanna-Goochland
County line;
(18) Then southwest, then northwest
along the James River to its intersection
with the Albemarle County line;
*
*
*
*
*
Signed: September 5, 2018.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: December 4, 2018.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2018–27125 Filed 12–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2018–0003; T.D. TTB–153;
Ref: Notice No. 172]
RIN 1513–AC36
Expansion of the Arroyo Seco
Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
Trevar D. Kolodny of the Regulations
and Rulings Division drafted this final
rule.
PO 00000
§ 9.48
Sfmt 4700
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) is expanding
the approximately 18,240-acre ‘‘Arroyo
Seco’’ viticultural area in Monterey
County, California, by approximately 90
acres. The established Arroyo Seco
viticultural area and the expansion area
both lie within the established Monterey
viticultural area and the larger, multicounty Central Coast viticultural area.
TTB designates viticultural areas to
allow vintners to better describe the
origin of their wines and to allow
consumers to better identify wines they
may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective
January 14, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Forster-Smith, Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau,
Regulations and Rulings Division, 1310
G Street NW, Box 12, Washington, DC
20005; phone 202–453–1039, ext. 150.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Background on Viticultural Areas
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
provides that these regulations should,
among other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury
Department Order 120–01, dated
December 10, 2013 (superseding
Treasury Order 120–01, dated January
24, 2003), to the TTB Administrator to
perform the functions and duties in the
administration and enforcement of this
law.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) authorizes TTB to establish
definitive viticultural areas and regulate
the use of their names as appellations of
origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets forth
standards for the preparation and
submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of
American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
a viticultural area for American wine as
a delimited grape-growing region having
distinguishing features, as described in
part 9 of the regulations, and a name
and a delineated boundary, as
established in part 9 of the regulations.
These designations allow vintners and
consumers to attribute a given quality,
reputation, or other characteristic of a
wine made from grapes grown in an area
to the wine’s geographic origin. The
establishment of AVAs allows vintners
to describe more accurately the origin of
their wines to consumers and helps
consumers to identify wines they may
purchase. Establishment of an AVA is
neither an approval nor an endorsement
by TTB of the wine produced in that
area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) outlines
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Dec 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
the procedure for proposing an AVA
and provides that any interested party
may petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as an AVA. Petitioners
may use the same process to request
changes involving established AVAs.
Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27
CFR 9.12) prescribes standards for
petitions for modifying established
AVAs. Petitions to expand an
established AVA must include the
following:
• Evidence that the area within the
proposed expansion area boundary is
nationally or locally known by the name
of the established AVA;
• An explanation of the basis for
defining the boundary of the proposed
expansion area;
• A narrative description of the
features of the proposed expansion area
that affect viticulture, such as climate,
geology, soils, physical features, and
elevation, that make the proposed
expansion area similar to the
established AVA and distinguish it from
adjacent areas outside the established
AVA boundary;
• The appropriate United States
Geological Survey (USGS) map(s)
showing the location of the proposed
expansion area, with the boundary of
the proposed expansion area clearly
drawn thereon; and
• A detailed narrative description of
the proposed expansion area boundary
based on USGS map markings.
Petition To Expand the Arroyo Seco
AVA
TTB received a petition from Ann
Hougham, owner of the Mesa del Sol
Vineyards, proposing to expand the
established ‘‘Arroyo Seco’’ AVA. The
Arroyo Seco AVA (27 CFR 9.59) was
established by T.D. ATF–131, which
was published in the Federal Register
on April 15, 1983 (48 FR 16245). The
Arroyo Seco AVA covers approximately
18,240 acres in Monterey County,
California. The proposed expansion area
and the established AVA are both
located within the Monterey AVA (27
CFR 9.98) and the larger, multi-county
Central Coast AVA (27 CFR 9.75).
The proposed expansion area contains
approximately 90 acres and is adjacent
to the far southwestern corner of the
established Arroyo Seco AVA. The
proposed expansion area is located on
an upland terrace on the northern bank
of a creek known as the Arroyo Seco,
which is Spanish for ‘‘dry creek.’’ There
is one vineyard covering approximately
14 acres within the proposed expansion
area. The petition included a copy of an
email from the Arroyo Seco
Winegrowers, stating that the proposed
expansion was shared with its members
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64275
and received no objections. Unless
otherwise noted, all information and
data pertaining to the proposed
expansion area contained in this
document come from the petition and
its supporting exhibits.
According to the petition, the soils
and topography of the proposed
expansion area are similar to those of
the established Arroyo Seco AVA. The
soils of the proposed expansion area
and the established AVA are gravelly
and fine sandy loams with low lime and
salt content and pH levels between 5.1
and 8.4. The proposed expansion area
contains soils primarily from the
Lockwood, Elder, and Mocho series,
which are all principal soil series within
the established Arroyo Seco AVA.
Finally, the proposed expansion area
and the established AVA are both
regions of terraces and alluvial fans with
elevations from approximately 600 to
700 feet, and slope angles between 0
and 9 percent.
Although the proposed expansion
area is more similar to the Arroyo Seco
AVA than the surrounding regions, the
proposed expansion area still shares
some of the features of the surrounding
Monterey and Central Coast AVAs. For
example, the proposed Arroyo Seco
AVA expansion area has moderate
elevations and soils with lime, salt, and
pH levels similar to the Monterey AVA
and shares the marine climate influence
of the larger Central Coast AVA due to
its proximity to the Pacific Ocean.
However, the soils of the proposed
expansion area have medium-to-high
levels of organic matter, compared to
the very low levels of organic matter
that characterize the Monterey AVA.
Additionally, due to its location east of
the Santa Lucas Mountains, the
proposed expansion area is not as
exposed to the marine air and fog as the
more western regions of the Central
Coast AVA that are closer to the ocean.
Finally, because of its much smaller
size, the topographical features of the
proposed expansion area are more
uniform than the diverse features of the
large multicounty Central Coast AVA,
and are more similar to the
topographical features of the Arroyo
Seco AVA, which is located on the same
sloping bench lands and terraces along
the Arroyo Seco as the proposed
expansion area.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and
Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 172 in the
Federal Register on Friday, April 6,
2018 (83 FR 14791), proposing to
expand the Arroyo Seco AVA. In the
notice, TTB summarized the evidence
from the petition regarding the name,
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
64276
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
boundary, and distinguishing features
for the proposed expansion area. For a
detailed description of the evidence
relating to the name, boundary, and
distinguishing features of the proposed
expansion area, and for a comparison of
the distinguishing features of the
proposed expansion area to the
surrounding areas and to the established
Arroyo Seco AVA, see Notice No. 172.
In Notice No. 172, TTB solicited
comments on the accuracy of the name,
boundary, climatic, and other required
information submitted in support of the
petition. The comment period closed on
June 5, 2018.
TTB received no comments in
response to Notice No. 172.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition,
TTB finds that the evidence provided by
the petitioner sufficiently demonstrates
that although the proposed expansion
area shares some of the broader
characteristics of the larger Monterey
and Central Coast AVAs, it is also
similar to the established Arroyo Seco
AVA and should also be recognized as
part of that AVA. Accordingly, under
the authority of the FAA Act, section
1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of
2002, and part 4 of the TTB regulations,
TTB expands the 18,240 acre ‘‘Arroyo
Seco’’ AVA to include the
approximately 90-acre expansion area as
described in Notice No. 172, effective 30
days from the publication date of this
document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the
boundary of the AVA expansion in the
regulatory text published at the end of
this final rule.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
Maps
The petitioner provided the required
maps, and they are listed in the
regulatory text of 27 CFR 9.59.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits
any label reference on a wine that
indicates or implies an origin other than
the wine’s true place of origin. For a
wine to be labeled with an AVA name
or with a brand name that includes an
AVA name, at least 85 percent of the
wine must be derived from grapes
grown within the area represented by
that name, and the wine must meet the
other conditions listed in § 4.25(e)(3) of
the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)).
If the wine is not eligible for labeling
with an AVA name and that name
appears in the brand name, then the
label is not in compliance, and the
bottler must change the brand name and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Dec 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
obtain approval of a new label.
Similarly, if the AVA name appears in
another reference on the label in a
misleading manner, the bottler would
have to obtain approval of a new label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a
brand name containing an AVA name
that was used as a brand name on a
label approved before July 7, 1986. See
§ 4.39(i)(2) of the TTB regulations (27
CFR 4.39(i)(2)) for details.
The expansion of the Arroyo Seco
AVA will not affect any other existing
AVA, and bottlers using ‘‘Arroyo Seco,’’
‘‘Monterey,’’ or ‘‘Central Coast’’ as an
appellation of origin or in a brand name
for wines made from grapes within the
‘‘Arroyo Seco,’’ ‘‘Monterey,’’ or ‘‘Central
Coast’’ AVAs will not be affected by this
expansion of the Arroyo Seco AVA. The
expansion of the Arroyo Seco AVA will
allow vintners to use ‘‘Arroyo Seco,’’
‘‘Monterey,’’ or ‘‘Central Coast’’ as an
appellation of origin for wines made
primarily from grapes grown within the
expansion area if the wines meet the
eligibility requirements for the
appellation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The regulation imposes no new
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit
derived from the use of an AVA name
would be the result of a proprietor’s
efforts and consumer acceptance of
wines from that area. Therefore, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is
required.
Executive Order 12866
Drafting Information
Christopher Forster-Smith of the
Regulations and Rulings Division
drafted this final rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter
I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL
AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Subpart C—Approved American
Viticultural Areas
2. Section 9.59 is amended by revising
paragraphs (c) introductory text and
(c)(1), redesignating paragraphs (c)(2)
through (c)(21) as paragraphs (c)(3)
through (c)(22), and adding new
paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 9.59
Arroyo Seco.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Boundaries. The Arroyo Seco
viticultural area is located in Monterey
County, California. The beginning point
is found on the ‘‘Sycamore Flat’’
U.S.G.S. map at the intersection of
Jamesburg Road (known locally as
Carmel Valley Road) and Arroyo Seco
Road, near the intersection of sections
21, 22, 28, and 27, T.19 S., R. 5 E. From
the beginning point, proceed
southwesterly along Arroyo Seco Road
to its intersection with Piney Creek.
(1) Then southeasterly along Piney
Creek to its confluence with the Arroyo
Seco in section 27, T. 19 S., R. 5 E.
(2) Then northerly along the Arroyo
Seco to its intersection with the
southern boundary of section 22, T. 19
S., R 5 E.
*
*
*
*
*
Signed: September 19, 2018.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: December 4, 2018.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2018–27014 Filed 12–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
It has been determined that this rule
is not a significant regulatory action as
defined by Executive Order 12866 of
September 30, 1993. Therefore, no
regulatory assessment is required.
■
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2018–0006; T.D. TTB–155;
Ref: Notice No. 175]
RIN 1513–AC39
Establishment of the Van Duzer
Corridor Viticultural Area and
Clarification of the Eola-Amity Hills
Viticultural Area Boundary Description
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes the
approximately 59,871-acre ‘‘Van Duzer
Corridor’’ viticultural area in Polk and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 240 (Friday, December 14, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64274-64276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27014]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB-2018-0003; T.D. TTB-153; Ref: Notice No. 172]
RIN 1513-AC36
Expansion of the Arroyo Seco Viticultural Area
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) is
expanding the approximately 18,240-acre ``Arroyo Seco'' viticultural
area in Monterey County, California, by approximately 90 acres. The
established Arroyo Seco viticultural area and the expansion area both
lie within the established Monterey viticultural area and the larger,
multi-county Central Coast viticultural area. TTB designates
viticultural areas to allow vintners to better describe the origin of
their wines and to allow consumers to better identify wines they may
purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective January 14, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Forster-Smith, Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Regulations and Rulings Division, 1310 G
Street NW, Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202-453-1039, ext. 150.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 64275]]
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act),
27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe
regulations for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt
beverages. The FAA Act provides that these regulations should, among
other things, prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity and quality of the product. The
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury Department Order 120-01, dated December
10, 2013 (superseding Treasury Order 120-01, dated January 24, 2003),
to the TTB Administrator to perform the functions and duties in the
administration and enforcement of this law.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) authorizes TTB to
establish definitive viticultural areas and regulate the use of their
names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets
forth standards for the preparation and submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i))
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region having distinguishing features, as described in part 9
of the regulations, and a name and a delineated boundary, as
established in part 9 of the regulations. These designations allow
vintners and consumers to attribute a given quality, reputation, or
other characteristic of a wine made from grapes grown in an area to the
wine's geographic origin. The establishment of AVAs allows vintners to
describe more accurately the origin of their wines to consumers and
helps consumers to identify wines they may purchase. Establishment of
an AVA is neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine
produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2))
outlines the procedure for proposing an AVA and provides that any
interested party may petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region
as an AVA. Petitioners may use the same process to request changes
involving established AVAs. Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
9.12) prescribes standards for petitions for modifying established
AVAs. Petitions to expand an established AVA must include the
following:
Evidence that the area within the proposed expansion area
boundary is nationally or locally known by the name of the established
AVA;
An explanation of the basis for defining the boundary of
the proposed expansion area;
A narrative description of the features of the proposed
expansion area that affect viticulture, such as climate, geology,
soils, physical features, and elevation, that make the proposed
expansion area similar to the established AVA and distinguish it from
adjacent areas outside the established AVA boundary;
The appropriate United States Geological Survey (USGS)
map(s) showing the location of the proposed expansion area, with the
boundary of the proposed expansion area clearly drawn thereon; and
A detailed narrative description of the proposed expansion
area boundary based on USGS map markings.
Petition To Expand the Arroyo Seco AVA
TTB received a petition from Ann Hougham, owner of the Mesa del Sol
Vineyards, proposing to expand the established ``Arroyo Seco'' AVA. The
Arroyo Seco AVA (27 CFR 9.59) was established by T.D. ATF-131, which
was published in the Federal Register on April 15, 1983 (48 FR 16245).
The Arroyo Seco AVA covers approximately 18,240 acres in Monterey
County, California. The proposed expansion area and the established AVA
are both located within the Monterey AVA (27 CFR 9.98) and the larger,
multi-county Central Coast AVA (27 CFR 9.75).
The proposed expansion area contains approximately 90 acres and is
adjacent to the far southwestern corner of the established Arroyo Seco
AVA. The proposed expansion area is located on an upland terrace on the
northern bank of a creek known as the Arroyo Seco, which is Spanish for
``dry creek.'' There is one vineyard covering approximately 14 acres
within the proposed expansion area. The petition included a copy of an
email from the Arroyo Seco Winegrowers, stating that the proposed
expansion was shared with its members and received no objections.
Unless otherwise noted, all information and data pertaining to the
proposed expansion area contained in this document come from the
petition and its supporting exhibits.
According to the petition, the soils and topography of the proposed
expansion area are similar to those of the established Arroyo Seco AVA.
The soils of the proposed expansion area and the established AVA are
gravelly and fine sandy loams with low lime and salt content and pH
levels between 5.1 and 8.4. The proposed expansion area contains soils
primarily from the Lockwood, Elder, and Mocho series, which are all
principal soil series within the established Arroyo Seco AVA. Finally,
the proposed expansion area and the established AVA are both regions of
terraces and alluvial fans with elevations from approximately 600 to
700 feet, and slope angles between 0 and 9 percent.
Although the proposed expansion area is more similar to the Arroyo
Seco AVA than the surrounding regions, the proposed expansion area
still shares some of the features of the surrounding Monterey and
Central Coast AVAs. For example, the proposed Arroyo Seco AVA expansion
area has moderate elevations and soils with lime, salt, and pH levels
similar to the Monterey AVA and shares the marine climate influence of
the larger Central Coast AVA due to its proximity to the Pacific Ocean.
However, the soils of the proposed expansion area have medium-to-high
levels of organic matter, compared to the very low levels of organic
matter that characterize the Monterey AVA. Additionally, due to its
location east of the Santa Lucas Mountains, the proposed expansion area
is not as exposed to the marine air and fog as the more western regions
of the Central Coast AVA that are closer to the ocean. Finally, because
of its much smaller size, the topographical features of the proposed
expansion area are more uniform than the diverse features of the large
multicounty Central Coast AVA, and are more similar to the
topographical features of the Arroyo Seco AVA, which is located on the
same sloping bench lands and terraces along the Arroyo Seco as the
proposed expansion area.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 172 in the Federal Register on Friday,
April 6, 2018 (83 FR 14791), proposing to expand the Arroyo Seco AVA.
In the notice, TTB summarized the evidence from the petition regarding
the name,
[[Page 64276]]
boundary, and distinguishing features for the proposed expansion area.
For a detailed description of the evidence relating to the name,
boundary, and distinguishing features of the proposed expansion area,
and for a comparison of the distinguishing features of the proposed
expansion area to the surrounding areas and to the established Arroyo
Seco AVA, see Notice No. 172.
In Notice No. 172, TTB solicited comments on the accuracy of the
name, boundary, climatic, and other required information submitted in
support of the petition. The comment period closed on June 5, 2018.
TTB received no comments in response to Notice No. 172.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition, TTB finds that the evidence
provided by the petitioner sufficiently demonstrates that although the
proposed expansion area shares some of the broader characteristics of
the larger Monterey and Central Coast AVAs, it is also similar to the
established Arroyo Seco AVA and should also be recognized as part of
that AVA. Accordingly, under the authority of the FAA Act, section
1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, and part 4 of the TTB
regulations, TTB expands the 18,240 acre ``Arroyo Seco'' AVA to include
the approximately 90-acre expansion area as described in Notice No.
172, effective 30 days from the publication date of this document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the boundary of the AVA expansion
in the regulatory text published at the end of this final rule.
Maps
The petitioner provided the required maps, and they are listed in
the regulatory text of 27 CFR 9.59.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true
place of origin. For a wine to be labeled with an AVA name or with a
brand name that includes an AVA name, at least 85 percent of the wine
must be derived from grapes grown within the area represented by that
name, and the wine must meet the other conditions listed in Sec.
4.25(e)(3) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)). If the wine is
not eligible for labeling with an AVA name and that name appears in the
brand name, then the label is not in compliance, and the bottler must
change the brand name and obtain approval of a new label. Similarly, if
the AVA name appears in another reference on the label in a misleading
manner, the bottler would have to obtain approval of a new label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a brand name containing an AVA name
that was used as a brand name on a label approved before July 7, 1986.
See Sec. 4.39(i)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.39(i)(2)) for
details.
The expansion of the Arroyo Seco AVA will not affect any other
existing AVA, and bottlers using ``Arroyo Seco,'' ``Monterey,'' or
``Central Coast'' as an appellation of origin or in a brand name for
wines made from grapes within the ``Arroyo Seco,'' ``Monterey,'' or
``Central Coast'' AVAs will not be affected by this expansion of the
Arroyo Seco AVA. The expansion of the Arroyo Seco AVA will allow
vintners to use ``Arroyo Seco,'' ``Monterey,'' or ``Central Coast'' as
an appellation of origin for wines made primarily from grapes grown
within the expansion area if the wines meet the eligibility
requirements for the appellation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
regulation imposes no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit derived from the use of an AVA
name would be the result of a proprietor's efforts and consumer
acceptance of wines from that area. Therefore, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993. Therefore, no regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Christopher Forster-Smith of the Regulations and Rulings Division
drafted this final rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB amends title 27,
chapter I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas
0
2. Section 9.59 is amended by revising paragraphs (c) introductory text
and (c)(1), redesignating paragraphs (c)(2) through (c)(21) as
paragraphs (c)(3) through (c)(22), and adding new paragraph (c)(2) to
read as follows:
Sec. 9.59 Arroyo Seco.
* * * * *
(c) Boundaries. The Arroyo Seco viticultural area is located in
Monterey County, California. The beginning point is found on the
``Sycamore Flat'' U.S.G.S. map at the intersection of Jamesburg Road
(known locally as Carmel Valley Road) and Arroyo Seco Road, near the
intersection of sections 21, 22, 28, and 27, T.19 S., R. 5 E. From the
beginning point, proceed southwesterly along Arroyo Seco Road to its
intersection with Piney Creek.
(1) Then southeasterly along Piney Creek to its confluence with the
Arroyo Seco in section 27, T. 19 S., R. 5 E.
(2) Then northerly along the Arroyo Seco to its intersection with
the southern boundary of section 22, T. 19 S., R 5 E.
* * * * *
Signed: September 19, 2018.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: December 4, 2018.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2018-27014 Filed 12-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P