Pacific Ocean at Naval Base Guam Telecommunication Site, Finegayan Small Arms Range, on the Northwestern Coast of Guam; Danger Zone, 64053-64055 [2018-27028]

Download as PDF amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2018 / Proposed Rules State line and an unnamed road, known locally as Bonnette Avenue, in Thompson; then (2) Proceed southeast along Bonnette Avenue approximately 0.38 mile to its intersection with an unnamed road known locally as Sand Dam Road; then (3) Proceed southeast along Sand Dam Road approximately 1.5 miles to its intersection with an unnamed road known locally as Thompson Road; then (4) Proceed south along Thompson Road approximately 1,000 feet to its intersection with an unnamed road known locally as Quaddick Town Farm Road; then (5) Proceed east then south along Quaddick Town Farm Road approximately 5.5 miles into the town of Putnam, where the road becomes known as East Putnam Road, and continuing south along East Putnam Road approximately 1 mile to its intersection with U.S. Highway 44; then (6) Proceed west along U.S. Highway 44 approximately 1 mile to its intersection with an unnamed road known locally as Tucker Hill Road; then (7) Proceed south along Tucker Hill Road approximately 0.38 mile to its intersection with an unnamed road known locally as Five Mile River Road; then (8) Proceed southwest then west along Five Mile River Road 1.75 miles to its intersection with State Highway 21; then (9) Proceed south along State Highway 21 approximately 2 miles to its intersection with State Highway 12; then (10) Proceed south along State Highway 12 approximately 1 mile to its intersection with Five Mile River; then (11) Proceed west along Five Mile River approximately 0.13 mile to its intersection with the highway marked on the map State Highway 52 (also known as Interstate 395); then (12) Proceed south along State Highway 52/Interstate 395 approximately 14.5 miles to its intersection with State Highway 201; then (13) Proceed southeast along State Highway 201 approximately 5.25 miles to its intersection with State Highway 165; then (14) Proceed southwest along State Highway 165 approximately 10 miles to its intersection with State Highway 2; then (15) Proceed west along State Highway 2 approximately 1 mile to its intersection with State Highway 82; then (16) Proceed southwest, then northwest, then southwest along State Highway 82 approximately 27.72 miles VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:36 Dec 12, 2018 Jkt 247001 to its intersection with State Highway 9; then (17) Proceed southeast along State Highway 9 approximately 3.7 miles to its intersection with State Highway 80; then (18) Proceed west along State Highway 80 approximately 15.7 miles to its intersection with State Highway 77; then (19) Proceed north along State Highway 77 approximately 8.3 miles to its intersection with State Highway 17; then (20) Proceed northeast along State Highway 17 approximately 6.8 miles to the point where it becomes concurrent with State Highway 9; then (21) Proceed north along concurrent State Highway 17–State Highway 9 approximately 0.75 mile the point where State Highway 17 departs from State Highway 9; then (22) Proceed east along State Highway 17 approximately 0.25 mile, crossing over the Connecticut River, to the highway’s intersection with State Highway 17A; then (23) Proceed north along State Highway 17A approximately 3 miles to its intersection with State Highway 17; then (24) Proceed north along State Highway 17 approximately 8 miles to its intersection with State Highway 94; then (25) Proceed east along State Highway 94 approximately 4 miles to its intersection with State Highway 83; then (26) Proceed north along State Highway 83 approximately 25 miles, returning to the beginning point. SUMMARY: Signed: June 25, 2018. John J. Manfreda, Administrator. Approved: December 4, 2018. Timothy E. Skud, Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy). AGENCY: [FR Doc. 2018–27016 Filed 12–12–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4810–31–P NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 29 CFR Chapter I RIN 3142–AA13 The Standard for Determining JointEmployer Status; Extension of Comment Period AGENCY: National Labor Relations Board. Proposed rule; second extension of comment period. ACTION: PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 64053 The National Labor Relations Board (the Board) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register of September 14, 2018, seeking comments from the public concerning the standard for determining jointemployer status under the National Labor Relations Act. The date to submit responses to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is again extended for 30 days. DATES: The comment period for the notice of proposed rulemaking published at 83 FR 46681, and first extended at 83 FR 55329, is extended. Comments must be received by the Board on or before January 14, 2019. Comments replying to the comments submitted during the initial comment period must be received by the Board on or before January 21, 2019. Dated: December 10, 2018. Farah Z. Qureshi, Associate Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2018–27024 Filed 12–12–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers 33 CFR Part 334 [COE–2018–0005] Pacific Ocean at Naval Base Guam Telecommunication Site, Finegayan Small Arms Range, on the Northwestern Coast of Guam; Danger Zone U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD. Notice of proposed rulemaking and request for comments. ACTION: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is proposing to revise the existing regulations to establish a danger zone at the U.S. Naval Base Guam Telecommunication Site in the Pacific Ocean, Guam. The Navy requested establishment of a danger zone extending over the Pacific Ocean adjacent to the Finegayan Small Arms Range. Establishment of a danger zone would intermittently restrict commercial, public, and private vessels from entering or lingering in the restricted safety zone to ensure public safety during small arms training activities. This danger zone is necessary to minimize potential conflicts between local populace activities and ongoing military training in the subject area. DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before January 14, 2019. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM 13DEP1 64054 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2018 / Proposed Rules You may submit comments, identified by docket number COE– 2018–0005, by any of the following methods: Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Email: david.b.olson@usace.army.mil. Include the docket number, COE–2018– 0005, in the subject line of the message. Mail: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Attn: CECW–CO–R (David B. Olson), 441 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20314–1000. Hand Delivery/Courier: Due to security requirements, we cannot receive comments by hand delivery or courier. Instructions: Direct your comments to docket number COE–2018–0005. All comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available on-line at http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the commenter indicates that the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI, or otherwise protected, through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov website is an anonymous access system, which means we will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email directly to the Corps without going through regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the internet. If you submit an electronic comment, we recommend that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any compact disc you may submit. If we cannot read your comment because of technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, we may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic comments should avoid the use of any special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to www.regulations.gov . All documents in the docket are listed. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, such as CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1 ADDRESSES: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:36 Dec 12, 2018 Jkt 247001 publicly available only in hard copy form. Mr. David Olson, Headquarters, Operations and Regulatory Community of Practice, Washington, DC at 202–761–4922 or Ms. Karen Urelius, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Honolulu District, Regulatory Branch at 671–339–2108. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Background Pursuant to its authorities in Section 7 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1917 (40 Stat 266; 33 U.S.C. 1) and Chapter XIX of the Army Appropriations Act of 1919 (40 Stat 892; 33 U.S.C. 3) the Corps is proposing to revise the regulations at 33 CFR part 334 by establishing a danger zone in the Pacific Ocean. The amendment to this regulation will allow the Commanding Officer of the U.S. Naval Base Guam to restrict passage of persons, watercraft, and vessels in the waters within the danger zone during use of the Finegayan Small Arms Range. The establishment of a danger zone would intermittently restrict commercial, public, and private vessels from entering or lingering in the restricted safety zone to ensure public safety during small arms training activities at the Finegayan Small Arms Range. This danger zone will be in place as a precautionary measure to protect the public from any potential impacts in firing small arms to the west. The proposed establishment of this danger zone was considered in the Final Mariana Islands Training and Testing/ Overseas Environmental Impact Statement prepared by the Navy. This location is an existing range and meets all of the landside requirements of a small arms range. With limited land on the island, it is not feasible to have the firing range and safety zone completely on land. Military and Government of Guam law enforcement agencies are required to qualify with their assigned weapon prior to executing their duties. Additionally, other military forces (ships, submarines, expeditionary forces and other combat forces) are required to qualify and maintain their qualifications on the weapons needed to further the execution of their assigned mission. These ranges are not only used by forces assigned to the island, but also deployable military forces (Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines). The Department of Defense requires frequent firing of assigned weapons to ensure proficiency in the use and operations of assigned weapons. Currently there are two other ranges on Naval Base Guam that are being used PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 to support weapons qualifications. However, due to the number of units required to maintain weapon qualifications, the two ranges are insufficient. Both ranges are fully booked with commands having to be placed on a waiting list for range availability. Procedural Requirements a. Review Under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This proposed rule has not been designated a ‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this proposed rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. The Corps determined this proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action. This regulatory action determination is based on the proposed rule governing the danger zone, which allow any vessel that needs to transit the danger zone to expeditiously transit through the danger zone when the small arms range is in use. When the range is not in use, the danger zone will be open to normal maritime traffic and to all activities, include anchoring and loitering. The proposed rule is issued with respect to a military function of the Department of Defense and the provisions of Executive Order 12866 do not apply. b. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act. This proposed rule has been reviewed under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–354). The Regulatory Flexibility Act generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice-and-comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities (i.e., small businesses and small governments). The danger zone is necessary to protect public safety during use of the small arms range. Unless information is obtained to the contrary during the comment period, the Corps certifies that the proposed rule would have no significant economic impact on the public. After considering the economic impacts of this proposed danger zone E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM 13DEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2018 / Proposed Rules regulation on small entities, I certify that this action will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. c. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act. Due to the administrative nature of this action and because there is no intended change in the use of the area, the Corps expects that this regulation, if adopted, will not have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment and, therefore, preparation of an environmental impact statement will not be required. An environmental assessment will be prepared after the public notice period is closed and all comments have been received and considered. d. Unfunded Mandates Act. This proposed rule does not contain a Federal mandate that may result in expenditures of $100 million or more for State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or the private sector in any one year. Therefore, this proposed rule is not subject to the requirements of Sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA). The proposed rule contains no regulatory requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, the proposed rule is not subject to the requirements of Section 203 of UMRA. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 334 Danger zones, Navigation (water), Restricted areas, Waterways. For the reasons set forth in the summary above, the Corps proposes to amend 33 CFR part 334 as follows: PART 334—DANGER ZONE AND RESTRICTED AREA REGULATIONS 1. The authority citation for part 334 continues to read as follows: amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R05–OAR–2007–1092; FRL–9987–74– Region 5] The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve the rescission of Michigan rule 221 from the Michigan state implementation plan (SIP). Rule 221 exempted sources that had significant net emission increases of sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, and carbon monoxide from offset requirements. Michigan rescinded this rule effective November 14, 1990. DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 14, 2019. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– OAR–2007–1092 at https:// www.regulations.gov, or via email to Damico.genvieve@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, SUMMARY: § 334.1415 Pacific Ocean, adjacent to the Finegayan Small Arms Range at Naval Base Guam Telecommunication Site, on the northwestern coast of Guam; danger zone. (a) The area. Coordinates are bounded by the following four points: Point A (13°34′57″ N; 144°49′53″ E) following the high tide line to Point B (13°35′49″ N; 144°47′59″ E), Point C (13°34′57″ N; 144°47′45″ E), and Point D (13°34′48″ N; 144°49′50″ E). The datum for these coordinates is NAD–83. (b) The regulation. (1) Vessels or persons shall expeditiously transit through the danger zone when the small arms range is in use. Vessels shall not be permitted to anchor or loiter within Jkt 247001 BILLING CODE 3720–58–P Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. 2. Add § 334.1415 to read as follows: 16:36 Dec 12, 2018 [FR Doc. 2018–27028 Filed 12–12–18; 8:45 am] AGENCY: Authority: 40 Stat. 266 (33 U.S.C. 1) and 40 Stat. 892 (33 U.S.C. 3). VerDate Sep<11>2014 Dated: December 6, 2018. Thomas P. Smith, Chief, Operations and Regulatory Division, Directorate of Civil Works. Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Michigan Minor New Source Review ■ ■ the danger zone while the range is in use. Range activities shall be halted until all vessels are cleared from the danger zone. When the range is not in use, the danger zone shall be open to normal maritime traffic and all activities to include anchoring and loitering. (2) When the range is in use, the person(s) or officer(s) in charge shall display a red flag from a conspicuous and easily-seen location along the nearby shore to signify that the range is in use and will post lookouts to ensure the safety of all vessels transiting through the area. If the range is in use at night, a strobe light shall be displayed from the same conspicuous and easilyseen location in lieu of flags. The range shall not be used when visibility is equal to or less than the maximum range of the weapons being used at the facility. (c) Enforcement. The restrictions on public access in this section shall be enforced by the Commander, Joint Region Marianas, and such agencies as the Commander may designate in writing. PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 64055 follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Constantine Blathras, Environmental Engineer, Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–0671, Blathras.constantine@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information section is arranged as follows: I. Background Section 110(a)(2)(C) of the Clean Air Act requires that the SIP include a program to provide for the ‘‘regulation of the modification and construction of any stationary source within the areas covered by the plan as necessary to assure that national ambient air quality standards are achieved.’’ This includes a program for permitting construction and modification of both major and minor sources that the State deems necessary to protect air quality. The State of Michigan’s minor source permit to install rules are contained in Part 2 (Air Use Approval) of the Michigan Administrative Code. Changes to the Part 2 rules were submitted on November 12, 1993; May 16, 1996; April 3, 1998; September 2, 2003; March 24, 2009; and February 28, 2017. EPA approved changes to the Part 2 rules most recently in a final approval dated August 31, 2018 (83 FR 44485). E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM 13DEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 239 (Thursday, December 13, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64053-64055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27028]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers

33 CFR Part 334

[COE-2018-0005]


Pacific Ocean at Naval Base Guam Telecommunication Site, 
Finegayan Small Arms Range, on the Northwestern Coast of Guam; Danger 
Zone

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is proposing to 
revise the existing regulations to establish a danger zone at the U.S. 
Naval Base Guam Telecommunication Site in the Pacific Ocean, Guam. The 
Navy requested establishment of a danger zone extending over the 
Pacific Ocean adjacent to the Finegayan Small Arms Range. Establishment 
of a danger zone would intermittently restrict commercial, public, and 
private vessels from entering or lingering in the restricted safety 
zone to ensure public safety during small arms training activities. 
This danger zone is necessary to minimize potential conflicts between 
local populace activities and ongoing military training in the subject 
area.

DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before January 14, 
2019.

[[Page 64054]]


ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number COE-
2018-0005, by any of the following methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    Email: [email protected]. Include the docket number, 
COE-2018-0005, in the subject line of the message.
    Mail: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Attn: CECW-CO-R (David B. 
Olson), 441 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20314-1000.
    Hand Delivery/Courier: Due to security requirements, we cannot 
receive comments by hand delivery or courier.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket number COE-2018-0005. 
All comments received will be included in the public docket without 
change and may be made available on-line at http://www.regulations.gov, 
including any personal information provided, unless the commenter 
indicates that the comment includes information claimed to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you 
consider to be CBI, or otherwise protected, through regulations.gov or 
email. The regulations.gov website is an anonymous access system, which 
means we will not know your identity or contact information unless you 
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email directly 
to the Corps without going through regulations.gov, your email address 
will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that 
is placed in the public docket and made available on the internet. If 
you submit an electronic comment, we recommend that you include your 
name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with 
any compact disc you may submit. If we cannot read your comment because 
of technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, we 
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic comments should 
avoid the use of any special characters, any form of encryption, and be 
free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments received, go to www.regulations.gov . All documents in the 
docket are listed. Although listed in the index, some information is 
not publicly available, such as CBI or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as 
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be 
publicly available only in hard copy form.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Olson, Headquarters, 
Operations and Regulatory Community of Practice, Washington, DC at 202-
761-4922 or Ms. Karen Urelius, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Honolulu 
District, Regulatory Branch at 671-339-2108.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    Pursuant to its authorities in Section 7 of the Rivers and Harbors 
Act of 1917 (40 Stat 266; 33 U.S.C. 1) and Chapter XIX of the Army 
Appropriations Act of 1919 (40 Stat 892; 33 U.S.C. 3) the Corps is 
proposing to revise the regulations at 33 CFR part 334 by establishing 
a danger zone in the Pacific Ocean. The amendment to this regulation 
will allow the Commanding Officer of the U.S. Naval Base Guam to 
restrict passage of persons, watercraft, and vessels in the waters 
within the danger zone during use of the Finegayan Small Arms Range. 
The establishment of a danger zone would intermittently restrict 
commercial, public, and private vessels from entering or lingering in 
the restricted safety zone to ensure public safety during small arms 
training activities at the Finegayan Small Arms Range. This danger zone 
will be in place as a precautionary measure to protect the public from 
any potential impacts in firing small arms to the west.
    The proposed establishment of this danger zone was considered in 
the Final Mariana Islands Training and Testing/Overseas Environmental 
Impact Statement prepared by the Navy. This location is an existing 
range and meets all of the landside requirements of a small arms range. 
With limited land on the island, it is not feasible to have the firing 
range and safety zone completely on land.
    Military and Government of Guam law enforcement agencies are 
required to qualify with their assigned weapon prior to executing their 
duties. Additionally, other military forces (ships, submarines, 
expeditionary forces and other combat forces) are required to qualify 
and maintain their qualifications on the weapons needed to further the 
execution of their assigned mission. These ranges are not only used by 
forces assigned to the island, but also deployable military forces 
(Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines). The Department of Defense 
requires frequent firing of assigned weapons to ensure proficiency in 
the use and operations of assigned weapons.
    Currently there are two other ranges on Naval Base Guam that are 
being used to support weapons qualifications. However, due to the 
number of units required to maintain weapon qualifications, the two 
ranges are insufficient. Both ranges are fully booked with commands 
having to be placed on a waiting list for range availability.

Procedural Requirements

    a. Review Under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563. Executive Orders 
12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of 
available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to 
select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive 
Order 13771 directs agencies to control regulatory costs through a 
budgeting process. This proposed rule has not been designated a 
``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, this proposed rule has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    The Corps determined this proposed rule is not a significant 
regulatory action. This regulatory action determination is based on the 
proposed rule governing the danger zone, which allow any vessel that 
needs to transit the danger zone to expeditiously transit through the 
danger zone when the small arms range is in use. When the range is not 
in use, the danger zone will be open to normal maritime traffic and to 
all activities, include anchoring and loitering. The proposed rule is 
issued with respect to a military function of the Department of Defense 
and the provisions of Executive Order 12866 do not apply.
    b. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act. This proposed rule 
has been reviewed under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-
354). The Regulatory Flexibility Act generally requires an agency to 
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to 
notice-and-comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative 
Procedure Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the 
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities (i.e., small businesses and small 
governments). The danger zone is necessary to protect public safety 
during use of the small arms range. Unless information is obtained to 
the contrary during the comment period, the Corps certifies that the 
proposed rule would have no significant economic impact on the public. 
After considering the economic impacts of this proposed danger zone

[[Page 64055]]

regulation on small entities, I certify that this action will not have 
a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    c. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act. Due to the 
administrative nature of this action and because there is no intended 
change in the use of the area, the Corps expects that this regulation, 
if adopted, will not have a significant impact on the quality of the 
human environment and, therefore, preparation of an environmental 
impact statement will not be required. An environmental assessment will 
be prepared after the public notice period is closed and all comments 
have been received and considered.
    d. Unfunded Mandates Act. This proposed rule does not contain a 
Federal mandate that may result in expenditures of $100 million or more 
for State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or the 
private sector in any one year. Therefore, this proposed rule is not 
subject to the requirements of Sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA). The proposed rule contains no regulatory 
requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small 
governments. Therefore, the proposed rule is not subject to the 
requirements of Section 203 of UMRA.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 334

    Danger zones, Navigation (water), Restricted areas, Waterways.

    For the reasons set forth in the summary above, the Corps proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 334 as follows:

PART 334--DANGER ZONE AND RESTRICTED AREA REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 334 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 40 Stat. 266 (33 U.S.C. 1) and 40 Stat. 892 (33 
U.S.C. 3).

0
2. Add Sec.  334.1415 to read as follows:


Sec.  334.1415   Pacific Ocean, adjacent to the Finegayan Small Arms 
Range at Naval Base Guam Telecommunication Site, on the northwestern 
coast of Guam; danger zone.

    (a) The area. Coordinates are bounded by the following four points: 
Point A (13[deg]34'57'' N; 144[deg]49'53'' E) following the high tide 
line to Point B (13[deg]35'49'' N; 144[deg]47'59'' E), Point C 
(13[deg]34'57'' N; 144[deg]47'45'' E), and Point D (13[deg]34'48'' N; 
144[deg]49'50'' E). The datum for these coordinates is NAD-83.
    (b) The regulation. (1) Vessels or persons shall expeditiously 
transit through the danger zone when the small arms range is in use. 
Vessels shall not be permitted to anchor or loiter within the danger 
zone while the range is in use. Range activities shall be halted until 
all vessels are cleared from the danger zone. When the range is not in 
use, the danger zone shall be open to normal maritime traffic and all 
activities to include anchoring and loitering.
    (2) When the range is in use, the person(s) or officer(s) in charge 
shall display a red flag from a conspicuous and easily-seen location 
along the nearby shore to signify that the range is in use and will 
post lookouts to ensure the safety of all vessels transiting through 
the area. If the range is in use at night, a strobe light shall be 
displayed from the same conspicuous and easily-seen location in lieu of 
flags. The range shall not be used when visibility is equal to or less 
than the maximum range of the weapons being used at the facility.
    (c) Enforcement. The restrictions on public access in this section 
shall be enforced by the Commander, Joint Region Marianas, and such 
agencies as the Commander may designate in writing.

    Dated: December 6, 2018.
Thomas P. Smith,
Chief, Operations and Regulatory Division, Directorate of Civil Works.
[FR Doc. 2018-27028 Filed 12-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3720-58-P