Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations, 63509-63510 [2018-26636]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 236 / Monday, December 10, 2018 / Notices
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, December 4, 2018.
Yao-Chin Chao,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, December 4, 2018.
Yao-Chin Chao,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018–26649 Filed 12–7–18; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2018–26648 Filed 12–7–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
BILLING CODE P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Savings and Loan Holding
Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Home Owners’ Loan Act
(12 U.S.C. 1461 et seq.) (HOLA),
Regulation LL (12 CFR part 238), and
Regulation MM (12 CFR part 239), and
all other applicable statutes and
regulations to become a savings and
loan holding company and/or to acquire
the assets or the ownership of, control
of, or the power to vote shares of a
savings association and nonbanking
companies owned by the savings and
loan holding company, including the
companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The application also will be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(e)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 10(c)(4)(B) of the
HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(c)(4)(B)). Unless
otherwise noted, nonbanking activities
will be conducted throughout the
United States.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than January 4,
2019.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of
Philadelphia (William Spaniel, Senior
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105–
1521. Comments can also be sent
electronically to
Comments.applications@phil.frb.org:
1. RBI Holdings, Inc., Roseville,
Michigan; to become a savings and loan
by acquiring 57 percent of the voting
shares of PrinCap Holdings One, LLC,
Ewing, New Jersey, and thereby
indirectly acquire shares of Resolute
Bank, Maumee, Ohio.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Dec 07, 2018
Jkt 247001
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60Day–19–19BX; Docket No. CDC–2018–
0107]
Proposed Data Collection Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice with comment period.
AGENCY:
The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of
its continuing effort to reduce public
burden and maximize the utility of
government information, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies the opportunity to comment on
a proposed and/or continuing
information collection, as required by
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
This notice invites comment on a
proposed information collection project
titled Understanding How Discounting
Affects Decision Making and Adoption
of Prevention Through Design
Solutions. The goal of this information
collection is to understand the social
and organizational factors that may
increase or decrease the adoption of
practices that keep workers safe.
DATES: CDC must receive written
comments on or before February 8,
2019.
SUMMARY:
You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CDC–2018–
0107 by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
Regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Mail: Jeffrey M. Zirger, Information
Collection Review Office, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 1600
Clifton Road NE, MS–D74, Atlanta,
Georgia 30329.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
Docket Number. CDC will post, without
change, all relevant comments to
Regulations.gov.
Please note: Submit all Federal
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking portal (regulations.gov) or
by U.S. mail to the address listed above.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63509
To
request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of
the information collection plan and
instruments, contact Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Information Collection Review Office,
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS–
D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329; phone:
404–639–7570; Email: omb@cdc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal agencies
must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each
collection of information they conduct
or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also
requires Federal agencies to provide a
60-day notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each new
proposed collection, each proposed
extension of existing collection of
information, and each reinstatement of
previously approved information
collection before submitting the
collection to the OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, we are
publishing this notice of a proposed
data collection as described below.
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments that will help:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
5. Assess information collection costs.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Proposed Project
Understanding How Discounting
Affects Decision Making and Adoption
of Prevention Through Design
Solutions—New—National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC).
Background and Brief Description
As mandated in the Occupational
Safety and Health Act of 1970 (Pub. L.
E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM
10DEN1
63510
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 236 / Monday, December 10, 2018 / Notices
91–596), the mission of NIOSH is to
conduct research and investigations on
occupational safety and health. This
project will focus on understanding the
decision-making processes of small
wholesale and small retail businesses in
regards to the adoption of fallprevention solutions. Slips, trips, and
falls are major sources of workplace
injury across all industry sectors and
represent a significant burden. In the
wholesale and retail trade sectors, slips,
trips, and falls account for 25% of all
reported injuries. By definition, small
businesses employ fewer numbers of
people, therefore a slip, trip, or fall
resulting in an injury is less likely to
occur in any given establishment. Small
business employers may underestimate
the risks associated with occupational
slips, trips, and falls because they have
not experienced them and therefore do
not take the necessary steps to prevent
them.
One of the best ways to prevent and
control occupational injuries, illnesses,
and fatalities is to ‘‘design out’’ or
minimize hazards and risks. NIOSH’s
Prevention Through Design Initiative
focuses on this concept through the
inclusion of prevention considerations
in all designs that impact workers.
Although employers’ decisions can lead
to the successful implementation of
Prevention Through Design, fallprevention solutions are not well
understood. More information is needed
to better understand the motivational,
injured?’’), and behavioral economic
discounting assessments. For the
behavioral economic questions in the
survey, participants will be asked to
make choices about hypothetical, but
realistic, scenarios that assess the
influence of several factors on the
patterns of decision-making. To date, no
study has quantitatively assessed the
safety-related decision-making
processes of small business employers
from a behavioral economic perspective.
Previous studies in this area consist of
qualitative studies of some factors that
affect occupational safety and health of
small businesses. This study will
address a knowledge gap in the
professional and scientific literature by
contributing quantitative data to a
problem that has been overlooked. The
results for this study are meant for
theory development and are not
intended to be nationally representative.
The sample size for this survey will
be 100 small business employers in the
wholesale or retail trade sectors. This
sample size is based on a power analysis
which indicated that 100 respondents
would be sufficient to detect any
correlations between the organizational
or demographic variables and the
behavioral economic measures of
decision making. Each web-based
survey will take approximately 30
minutes to complete, resulting in an
annualized burden estimate of 50 hours.
There is no cost to respondents other
than their time.
social, and organizational factors that
affect employers’ decisions to adopt fallprevention solutions. This project will
combine traditional surveys with
behavioral economic methodologies to
understand the decision-making
processes related to the adoption of fallprevention solutions. By using
behavioral economic principles and
methods, this study will pose
hypothetical, but realistic, scenarios to
small business employers to assess the
influence of several factors on the
patterns of decisions. One of the goals
of the study is to assess the subjective
value of fall-prevention solutions based
on their costs and effort required to use
them. To quantify the subjective value
of fall-prevention solutions, this project
will use the behavioral economic
principles to assess the trade-offs small
business owners make among the cost of
fall prevention solutions, the amount of
effort require to assemble them, and the
amount of time they take to assemble.
One of the behavioral economic
principles is discounting, in which the
value of a product or outcome decreases
as the cost, effort, or delay associated
with it increases. For example, smallbusiness owners may ‘‘discount’’ the
value of a fall-prevention solution if it
requires great effort to assemble,
The survey will include instruments
to obtain demographic information (age,
gender, income, etc.), organizational
safety information (e.g., ‘‘Has someone
at your place of work ever been
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Type of
respondents
Form name
Number of
respondents
Small business employers ................
Survey ..............................................
Number of
responses per
respondent
100
1
Total ...........................................
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
[FR Doc. 2018–26636 Filed 12–7–18; 8:45 am]
[60Day–19–17BBV; Docket No. CDC–2018–
0106]
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Proposed Data Collection Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice with comment period.
AGENCY:
The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Dec 07, 2018
Jkt 247001
30/60
Total
burden
(in hours)
50
50
Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Acting Lead, Information Collection Review
Office, Office of Scientific Integrity, Office
of Science, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
its continuing effort to reduce public
burden and maximize the utility of
government information, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies the opportunity to comment on
a proposed and/or continuing
information collection, as required by
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
This notice invites comments on a
proposed information collection project
titled ‘‘Online training for law
enforcement to reduce risks associated
with shift work and long work hours’’.
This study will develop and pilot test a
new, online, interactive training
program tailored for the law
enforcement community that relays the
health and safety risks associated with
E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM
10DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 236 (Monday, December 10, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63509-63510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26636]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[60Day-19-19BX; Docket No. CDC-2018-0107]
Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and
Recommendations
AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice with comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as part
of its continuing effort to reduce public burden and maximize the
utility of government information, invites the general public and other
Federal agencies the opportunity to comment on a proposed and/or
continuing information collection, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. This notice invites comment on a proposed
information collection project titled Understanding How Discounting
Affects Decision Making and Adoption of Prevention Through Design
Solutions. The goal of this information collection is to understand the
social and organizational factors that may increase or decrease the
adoption of practices that keep workers safe.
DATES: CDC must receive written comments on or before February 8, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CDC-2018-
0107 by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Jeffrey M. Zirger, Information Collection Review
Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road
NE, MS-D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and Docket Number. CDC will post, without change, all relevant comments
to Regulations.gov.
Please note: Submit all Federal comments through the Federal
eRulemaking portal (regulations.gov) or by U.S. mail to the address
listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of the information collection plan
and instruments, contact Jeffrey M. Zirger, Information Collection
Review Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton
Road NE, MS-D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329; phone: 404-639-7570; Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal agencies must obtain approval from
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also requires
Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of information, including each new
proposed collection, each proposed extension of existing collection of
information, and each reinstatement of previously approved information
collection before submitting the collection to the OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, we are publishing this notice of a
proposed data collection as described below.
The OMB is particularly interested in comments that will help:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submissions of responses.
5. Assess information collection costs.
Proposed Project
Understanding How Discounting Affects Decision Making and Adoption
of Prevention Through Design Solutions--New--National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
As mandated in the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (Pub.
L.
[[Page 63510]]
91-596), the mission of NIOSH is to conduct research and investigations
on occupational safety and health. This project will focus on
understanding the decision-making processes of small wholesale and
small retail businesses in regards to the adoption of fall-prevention
solutions. Slips, trips, and falls are major sources of workplace
injury across all industry sectors and represent a significant burden.
In the wholesale and retail trade sectors, slips, trips, and falls
account for 25% of all reported injuries. By definition, small
businesses employ fewer numbers of people, therefore a slip, trip, or
fall resulting in an injury is less likely to occur in any given
establishment. Small business employers may underestimate the risks
associated with occupational slips, trips, and falls because they have
not experienced them and therefore do not take the necessary steps to
prevent them.
One of the best ways to prevent and control occupational injuries,
illnesses, and fatalities is to ``design out'' or minimize hazards and
risks. NIOSH's Prevention Through Design Initiative focuses on this
concept through the inclusion of prevention considerations in all
designs that impact workers. Although employers' decisions can lead to
the successful implementation of Prevention Through Design, fall-
prevention solutions are not well understood. More information is
needed to better understand the motivational, social, and
organizational factors that affect employers' decisions to adopt fall-
prevention solutions. This project will combine traditional surveys
with behavioral economic methodologies to understand the decision-
making processes related to the adoption of fall-prevention solutions.
By using behavioral economic principles and methods, this study will
pose hypothetical, but realistic, scenarios to small business employers
to assess the influence of several factors on the patterns of
decisions. One of the goals of the study is to assess the subjective
value of fall-prevention solutions based on their costs and effort
required to use them. To quantify the subjective value of fall-
prevention solutions, this project will use the behavioral economic
principles to assess the trade-offs small business owners make among
the cost of fall prevention solutions, the amount of effort require to
assemble them, and the amount of time they take to assemble. One of the
behavioral economic principles is discounting, in which the value of a
product or outcome decreases as the cost, effort, or delay associated
with it increases. For example, small-business owners may ``discount''
the value of a fall-prevention solution if it requires great effort to
assemble,
The survey will include instruments to obtain demographic
information (age, gender, income, etc.), organizational safety
information (e.g., ``Has someone at your place of work ever been
injured?''), and behavioral economic discounting assessments. For the
behavioral economic questions in the survey, participants will be asked
to make choices about hypothetical, but realistic, scenarios that
assess the influence of several factors on the patterns of decision-
making. To date, no study has quantitatively assessed the safety-
related decision-making processes of small business employers from a
behavioral economic perspective. Previous studies in this area consist
of qualitative studies of some factors that affect occupational safety
and health of small businesses. This study will address a knowledge gap
in the professional and scientific literature by contributing
quantitative data to a problem that has been overlooked. The results
for this study are meant for theory development and are not intended to
be nationally representative.
The sample size for this survey will be 100 small business
employers in the wholesale or retail trade sectors. This sample size is
based on a power analysis which indicated that 100 respondents would be
sufficient to detect any correlations between the organizational or
demographic variables and the behavioral economic measures of decision
making. Each web-based survey will take approximately 30 minutes to
complete, resulting in an annualized burden estimate of 50 hours. There
is no cost to respondents other than their time.
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
Type of respondents Form name Number of responses per per response Total burden
respondents respondent (in hours) (in hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Small business employers...... Survey.......... 100 1 30/60 50
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total..................... 50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Acting Lead, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific
Integrity, Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2018-26636 Filed 12-7-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
