North Carolina & Virginia Railroad Company, L.L.C., Chesapeake & Albemarle Railroad Division-Lease Amendment and Operation Exemption Including Interchange Commitment-Norfolk Southern Railway Company, 63192 [2018-26575]
Download as PDF
63192
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 235 / Friday, December 7, 2018 / Notices
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36252]
North Carolina & Virginia Railroad
Company, L.L.C., Chesapeake &
Albemarle Railroad Division—Lease
Amendment and Operation Exemption
Including Interchange Commitment—
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
Chesapeake & Albemarle Railroad
(CA), a Class III railroad and division of
North Carolina & Virginia Railroad
Company, L.L.C. (NCVA), has filed a
verified notice of exemption under 49
U.S.C. 10902 to enter into a superseding
and replacement lease with Norfolk
Southern Railway Company (NSR) and
operate lines of railroad between (1)
milepost NS 4.00 at Providence
Junction, Va., and milepost NS 8.00 at
Butts, Va., (2) milepost NS 8.00 at Butts,
Va., and milepost NS 73.59 at Edenton,
N.C., and (3) milepost WK 0.00 at
Elizabeth City, N.C., and milepost WK
7.48 at Weeksville, N.C. (collectively,
the Line). The Line totals approximately
77.07 miles.
CA and NSR entered into a lease in
1990, which covered lines between (1)
milepost NS 8.00, and milepost NS
74.00, and (2) milepost WK 0.00, and
milepost WK 7.48 (Original Lease).1 A
2003 amendment added a line between
milepost NS 4.00, and milepost NS
8.00.2 In 2004 and 2007, the Board
issued abandonment and
discontinuance of service exemptions
for line included in the Original Lease
between (1) milepost NS 73.67 and
milepost NS 74.00 at Edenton, N.C.,3
and (2) milepost NS 73.59 and milepost
NS 73.67 at Edenton, N.C.4 In 2011, CA
and NSR added an amendment to
extend the term of the Original Lease
and strike all provisions relating to the
option to purchase.5 Now, CA explains
that the Original Lease has expired, and
1 Chesapeake & Albemarle R.R.—Lease, Acquis. &
Operation Exemption—S. Ry., FD 31617 (ICC
served Apr. 17, 1990).
2 N.C. & Va. R.R.—Lease & Operation
Exemption—Norfolk S. Ry., FD 34272 (STB served
Jan. 22, 2003).
3 Norfolk S. Ry.—Aban. Exemption—in Chowan
Cty., N.C., AB 290 (Sub-No. 251X) et al. (STB served
July 16, 2004). NSR consummated the abandonment
between milepost NS 73.67 and milepost NS 74.00.
4 The verified notices filed by NSR and CA
describe the line to be abandoned and discontinued
as between milepost NS 73.59 and milepost NS
73.67. Likewise, NSR consummated the
abandonment between milepost NS 73.59 and
milepost NS 73.67. Therefore, it appears this
milepost was erroneously stated as 73.50 in the
published notice. See Norfolk S. Ry.—Aban.
Exemption—in Chowan Cty., N.C., AB 290 (Sub-No.
295X) et al. (STB served Aug. 9, 2007).
5 N.C. & Va. R.R., Chesapeake & Albemarle R.R.
Div.—Lease Amendment Exemption—Norfolk S.
Ry., FD 35564 (Sub-No. 1) (STB served Dec. 16,
2011).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Dec 06, 2018
Jkt 247001
CA and NSR have reached a new Lease
Agreement (New Lease). CA and NSR
intend the New Lease to supersede and
replace the Original Lease and extend
the term for an additional 10 years. CA
declares that it currently operates the
Line pursuant to the Original Lease and
will continue to operate the Line under
the New Lease.6
According to CA, the New Lease
includes an interchange commitment
that is similar in structure to the
interchange commitment included in
the Original Lease. As required under 49
CFR 1150.43(h)(1), CA provided
additional information regarding the
interchange commitment.
CA does not project that this
transaction will result in annual
revenues significant enough to establish
a Class I or Class II rail carrier.
Additionally, CA confirms that its total
revenues will not exceed $5 million
after the transaction; however, CA states
that NCVA, of which CA is a division,
will have revenues over $5 million
following the transaction. Accordingly,
CA is required by Board regulations to
send notice of the transaction to the
national offices of the labor unions with
employees on the affected lines at least
60 days before this exemption is to
become effective, to post a copy of the
notice at the workplace of the
employees on the affected lines, and to
certify to the Board that it has done so.
49 CFR 1150.42(e).
CA requests a waiver of the 60-day
advance labor notice requirement under
49 CFR 1150.42(e). In that request, CA
argues that: (1) No employees of the
transferring carrier, NSR, will be
affected by the lease and no employees
of NSR have worked on any part of the
Line since 2003 and therefore, posting
notices would be futile because no NSR
employees work on the Line and (2)
there will be no operational changes and
no CA employees will be affected by the
lease. CA’s waiver request will be
addressed in a separate decision.
CA states that it expects to
consummate the transaction on the
effective date of this exemption. The
Board will establish the effective date in
its separate decision on the waiver
request.
If the notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
6 The Original Lease, as amended in 2011,
appears to have included line from mileposts NS
73.59 to NS 74.00, which had been abandoned prior
to the 2011 lease amendment. CA does not state
whether it continued to operate over that
abandoned line after the 2011 renewal.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
automatically stay the effectiveness of
the exemption. Petitions for stay must
be filed at least seven days before the
exemption becomes effective.
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to Docket No. FD
36252, must be filed with the Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20423–0001. In
addition, a copy of each pleading must
be served on Eric M. Hocky, Clark Hill
PLC, One Commerce Square, 2005
Market Street, Suite 1000, Philadelphia,
PA 19103.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our website at www.stb.gov.
Decided: December 3, 2018.
By the Board, Scott M. Zimmerman, Acting
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2018–26575 Filed 12–6–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Environmental Impact Statement for
Gallatin Fossil Plant Surface
Impoundment Closure and Restoration
Project
Tennessee Valley Authority.
Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Tennessee Valley
Authority (TVA) intends to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
to address the potential environmental
effects associated with management of
coal combustion residual (CCR) material
at the Gallatin Fossil Plant (GAF)
located near Gallatin in Sumner County,
Tennessee. The purpose of the EIS is to
address the final disposition of CCR
onsite at GAF, support TVA’s goal to
eliminate wet CCR storage at its plants,
and assist TVA in complying with the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s
(EPA’s) CCR Rule. The proposed actions
would also provide long-term on-site
landfill space for operations and/or
storage of CCR. TVA will develop and
evaluate various alternatives for these
actions, including the No Action
Alternative. Public comments are
invited concerning both the scope of the
review and environmental issues that
should be addressed.
DATES: Comments on the scope of the
EIS must be received on or before
January 11, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted in writing to Ashley Farless,
NEPA Specialist, 1101 Market Street,
BR4A–C, Chattanooga, TN, 37402.
Comments may also be submitted online
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 235 (Friday, December 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 63192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26575]
[[Page 63192]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36252]
North Carolina & Virginia Railroad Company, L.L.C., Chesapeake &
Albemarle Railroad Division--Lease Amendment and Operation Exemption
Including Interchange Commitment--Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Chesapeake & Albemarle Railroad (CA), a Class III railroad and
division of North Carolina & Virginia Railroad Company, L.L.C. (NCVA),
has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10902 to enter
into a superseding and replacement lease with Norfolk Southern Railway
Company (NSR) and operate lines of railroad between (1) milepost NS
4.00 at Providence Junction, Va., and milepost NS 8.00 at Butts, Va.,
(2) milepost NS 8.00 at Butts, Va., and milepost NS 73.59 at Edenton,
N.C., and (3) milepost WK 0.00 at Elizabeth City, N.C., and milepost WK
7.48 at Weeksville, N.C. (collectively, the Line). The Line totals
approximately 77.07 miles.
CA and NSR entered into a lease in 1990, which covered lines
between (1) milepost NS 8.00, and milepost NS 74.00, and (2) milepost
WK 0.00, and milepost WK 7.48 (Original Lease).\1\ A 2003 amendment
added a line between milepost NS 4.00, and milepost NS 8.00.\2\ In 2004
and 2007, the Board issued abandonment and discontinuance of service
exemptions for line included in the Original Lease between (1) milepost
NS 73.67 and milepost NS 74.00 at Edenton, N.C.,\3\ and (2) milepost NS
73.59 and milepost NS 73.67 at Edenton, N.C.\4\ In 2011, CA and NSR
added an amendment to extend the term of the Original Lease and strike
all provisions relating to the option to purchase.\5\ Now, CA explains
that the Original Lease has expired, and CA and NSR have reached a new
Lease Agreement (New Lease). CA and NSR intend the New Lease to
supersede and replace the Original Lease and extend the term for an
additional 10 years. CA declares that it currently operates the Line
pursuant to the Original Lease and will continue to operate the Line
under the New Lease.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Chesapeake & Albemarle R.R.--Lease, Acquis. & Operation
Exemption--S. Ry., FD 31617 (ICC served Apr. 17, 1990).
\2\ N.C. & Va. R.R.--Lease & Operation Exemption--Norfolk S.
Ry., FD 34272 (STB served Jan. 22, 2003).
\3\ Norfolk S. Ry.--Aban. Exemption--in Chowan Cty., N.C., AB
290 (Sub-No. 251X) et al. (STB served July 16, 2004). NSR
consummated the abandonment between milepost NS 73.67 and milepost
NS 74.00.
\4\ The verified notices filed by NSR and CA describe the line
to be abandoned and discontinued as between milepost NS 73.59 and
milepost NS 73.67. Likewise, NSR consummated the abandonment between
milepost NS 73.59 and milepost NS 73.67. Therefore, it appears this
milepost was erroneously stated as 73.50 in the published notice.
See Norfolk S. Ry.--Aban. Exemption--in Chowan Cty., N.C., AB 290
(Sub-No. 295X) et al. (STB served Aug. 9, 2007).
\5\ N.C. & Va. R.R., Chesapeake & Albemarle R.R. Div.--Lease
Amendment Exemption--Norfolk S. Ry., FD 35564 (Sub-No. 1) (STB
served Dec. 16, 2011).
\6\ The Original Lease, as amended in 2011, appears to have
included line from mileposts NS 73.59 to NS 74.00, which had been
abandoned prior to the 2011 lease amendment. CA does not state
whether it continued to operate over that abandoned line after the
2011 renewal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to CA, the New Lease includes an interchange commitment
that is similar in structure to the interchange commitment included in
the Original Lease. As required under 49 CFR 1150.43(h)(1), CA provided
additional information regarding the interchange commitment.
CA does not project that this transaction will result in annual
revenues significant enough to establish a Class I or Class II rail
carrier. Additionally, CA confirms that its total revenues will not
exceed $5 million after the transaction; however, CA states that NCVA,
of which CA is a division, will have revenues over $5 million following
the transaction. Accordingly, CA is required by Board regulations to
send notice of the transaction to the national offices of the labor
unions with employees on the affected lines at least 60 days before
this exemption is to become effective, to post a copy of the notice at
the workplace of the employees on the affected lines, and to certify to
the Board that it has done so. 49 CFR 1150.42(e).
CA requests a waiver of the 60-day advance labor notice requirement
under 49 CFR 1150.42(e). In that request, CA argues that: (1) No
employees of the transferring carrier, NSR, will be affected by the
lease and no employees of NSR have worked on any part of the Line since
2003 and therefore, posting notices would be futile because no NSR
employees work on the Line and (2) there will be no operational changes
and no CA employees will be affected by the lease. CA's waiver request
will be addressed in a separate decision.
CA states that it expects to consummate the transaction on the
effective date of this exemption. The Board will establish the
effective date in its separate decision on the waiver request.
If the notice contains false or misleading information, the
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to
revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the exemption.
Petitions for stay must be filed at least seven days before the
exemption becomes effective.
An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to Docket No.
FD 36252, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each
pleading must be served on Eric M. Hocky, Clark Hill PLC, One Commerce
Square, 2005 Market Street, Suite 1000, Philadelphia, PA 19103.
Board decisions and notices are available on our website at
www.stb.gov.
Decided: December 3, 2018.
By the Board, Scott M. Zimmerman, Acting Director, Office of
Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2018-26575 Filed 12-6-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P