Miscellaneous Federal Home Loan Bank Operations and Authorities-Financing Corporation Assessments, 63054-63059 [2018-26449]
Download as PDF
63054
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 235 / Friday, December 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE
AGENCY
12 CFR Part 1271
RIN 2590–AA99
Miscellaneous Federal Home Loan
Bank Operations and Authorities—
Financing Corporation Assessments
Federal Housing Finance
Agency.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Federal Housing Finance
Agency (FHFA) is adopting a final rule
pertaining to the operation of the
Financing Corporation (FICO), a vehicle
established by one of FHFA’s
predecessors to issue bonds, the
proceeds of which were used to help
fund the resolution of failed savings and
loan associations during the 1980s. The
last of those FICO bonds will mature in
September 2019. By statute, FICO
obtains the monies to pay the interest on
those bonds by assessing depository
institutions (FICO assessments) that are
insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The final
rule addresses the manner in which
FICO will conduct the 2019 FICO
assessments, which will be the last of
those assessments. Specifically, the final
rule provides that all payments made by
FDIC-insured depository institutions
during 2019 are final, and that no
adjustments to prior FICO assessments
will be permitted after March 26, 2019,
the projected date as of which the FDIC
will finalize the amounts of the final
collection for the 2019 FICO
assessments.
SUMMARY:
The rule is effective on January
7, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Louis M. Scalza, Associate Director,
Examinations, Office of Safety &
Soundness Examinations, Louis.Scalza@
fhfa.gov, (202) 649–3710; Winston Sale,
Assistant General Counsel,
Winston.Sale@fhfa.gov, (202) 649–3081;
or Neil R. Crowley, Deputy General
Counsel, Neil.Crowley@fhfa.gov, (202)
649–3055 (these are not toll-free
numbers), Federal Housing Finance
Agency, 400 Seventh Street SW,
Washington, DC 20219. The telephone
number for the Telecommunications
Device for the Hearing Impaired is (800)
877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
DATES:
I. Background
FHFA is an independent agency of the
federal government established to
regulate and oversee the Federal
National Mortgage Association, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Dec 06, 2018
Jkt 247001
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation, the Federal Home Loan
Banks (Banks), and the Bank System’s
Office of Finance.1 FHFA also is
responsible for overseeing FICO. The
Competitive Equality Banking Act of
1987 2 amended the Federal Home Loan
Bank Act (Bank Act) and authorized
FHFA’s predecessor to establish FICO,
and authorizes the FHFA Director to
select the two Bank presidents that
serve on its directorate, to prescribe
such regulations as are necessary to
carry out the statutory provisions
relating to FICO, and to oversee the
dissolution of FICO.3
FICO is a mixed-ownership, taxexempt government corporation,
chartered in 1987 by the former Federal
Home Loan Bank Board, one of FHFA’s
predecessor agencies, pursuant to the
Federal Savings and Loan Insurance
Corporation (FSLIC) Recapitalization
Act of 1987, as amended
(Recapitalization Act).4 The
Recapitalization Act’s purpose was to
recapitalize the FSLIC insurance fund,
which had been significantly depleted
by a wave of savings and loan (S&L)
failures during the S&L crisis of the
1980s. FICO’s mission was to provide
funding for FSLIC (and later for the
FSLIC Resolution Fund after FSLIC’s
insolvency and later abolishment by the
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery,
and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA))
by selling bonds to the public. FICO’s
operations are managed by a directorate
composed of the Director of the Office
of Finance and two Bank presidents
who rotate after serving one year terms.5
FICO has no permanent staff and
utilizes Office of Finance staff to
execute its day-to-day functions.
FICO was initially capitalized by
issuing stock to the Banks in an
aggregate amount of $680 million,
apportioned pro rata among the Banks
in accordance with a statutory formula.6
FICO used the proceeds from the stock
issuances to purchase U.S. Treasury
zero-coupon securities (Zeros), which
were to be the sole source of repayment
of the principal of the bonds to be
issued by FICO. Between 1987 and 1989
FICO issued 14 separate series of 30year bonds (Obligations) in an aggregate
1 12
U.S.C. 4511.
Law 100–86, 101 Stat. 552.
3 See 12 U.S.C. 1441(a) (establishment of FICO),
(b)(1)(B) (selection of directors), (i) (dissolution, and
authority for FHFA to exercise any FICO powers,
needed to conclude its affairs), and (j) (authority to
prescribe regulations).
4 See 12 U.S.C. 1441(a).
5 See 12 U.S.C. 1441(b).
6 See 12 U.S.C. 1441(d)(4). FICO issued the stock
in a series of transactions between 1987 and 1989,
each in anticipation of an issuance of a particular
series of the FICO bonds.
2 Public
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
principal amount of approximately $8.2
billion. FICO conveyed the proceeds of
the Obligations to FSLIC, to finance its
resolution of failed S&Ls.7 FICO is
required by statute to hold the Zeros in
a segregated account until they are used
to pay the principal due on the
Obligations at their maturity.8 The
Obligations began to mature in 2017,
and the last Obligation will mature in
September 2019.
The Recapitalization Act established a
different source for providing the funds
needed to service the semiannual
interest payments on the FICO
Obligations.9 The statute initially
authorized FICO to assess FSLICinsured depository institutions for the
funds needed to pay the interest due on
the FICO Obligations.10 The Deposit
Insurance Funds Act of 1996 authorized
FICO to assess against institutions with
deposits insured by both the Bank
Insurance Fund (BIF) and the Savings
Association Insurance Fund (SAIF).11
Pursuant to the Federal Deposit
Insurance Reform Act of 2005, effective
March 31, 2006, the BIF and SAIF were
merged into the newly created Deposit
Insurance Fund (DIF), and thus FICO
may assess institutions insured by the
DIF.12 FICO is authorized to assess
insured depository institutions only for
three purposes: For making interest
payments on the FICO Obligations;
paying issuance costs for the FICO
Obligations; and paying custodial fees
associated with the FICO Obligations.
The Bank Act, as amended by FIRREA,
further provides that FICO is to conduct
its assessments in the same manner that
the FDIC uses when assessing its
insured depository institutions for
deposit insurance purposes.13 FICO and
the FDIC entered into a memorandum of
understanding in 1997 (Memorandum of
Understanding), as amended in 1999,
pursuant to which the FDIC collects
FICO’s assessments from its insured
7 FICO used the net proceeds from the first 13
series of its Obligations to purchase nonredeemable
capital certificates and nonredeemable nonvoting
capital stock issued by the FSLIC. After the FSLIC
was abolished in 1989, FICO used the proceeds
from its final series of Obligations to purchase
nonredeemable capital certificates issued by the
FSLIC Resolution Fund, the statutory successor to
the FSLIC. See 12 U.S.C. 1821a (establishment of
FSLIC Resolution Fund). Those instruments have
no value and have been charged to FICO’s capital.
8 See 12 U.S.C 1441(g)(2).
9 Interest on each FICO Obligation is paid on the
anniversary of its issuance date, and six months
after that date each year.
10 Public Law 100–86, sec, 302, 101 Stat. 552,
591–592.
11 Public Law 104–208, sec. 2703, 110 Stat. 3009–
479, 3009–485.
12 Public Law 109–171, sec. 2102, 120 Stat. 9.
13 12 U.S.C. 1441(f)(2).
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 235 / Friday, December 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
depository institutions quarterly, as
agent for FICO.
The FDIC conducts its own Deposit
Insurance Fund assessments quarterly
(FDIC assessment), with the amount of
the FDIC assessment for each insured
depository institution being determined
based, in part, on data that the
institution has submitted to the Federal
Financial Institutions Examination
Council (FFIEC) in its Consolidated
Reports of Condition and Income (call
report). If an insured depository
institution amends a call report on
which a previous FDIC assessment had
been calculated and the amendment to
the call report would cause the
calculation of the prior FDIC assessment
to change, the institution may receive an
adjustment, which generally appears on
an upcoming invoice.14
Pursuant to the Memorandum of
Understanding, the FDIC collects the
FICO assessments from the insured
depository institutions quarterly, as
agent for FICO, at the same time as the
collection of FDIC assessments. FICO
assessments are made based on an
assessment rate formula adopted by
FICO, and approved by the FDIC Board
of Directors. One factor in FICO’s
formula is the deposit insurance
assessment base, which (as described
above) is calculated using an insured
depository institution’s call report data.
Under the terms of the Memorandum of
Understanding, twice per year, FICO
notifies the FDIC of the total amounts
that would be needed for FICO to make
its upcoming Obligation interest
payments and annually informs the
FDIC of the interest it has earned. Using
that information and FICO’s assessment
rate formula, the FDIC calculates a
‘‘quarterly multiplier’’ and applies it to
information derived from each
institution’s call report to determine the
FICO assessment for each institution for
that calendar quarter. The FDIC then
issues an invoice to each insured
depository institution detailing both its
quarterly FDIC and FICO assessments.15
Insured depository institutions submit
payment for their FDIC and FICO
assessments to the FDIC via Automated
Clearing House (ACH). The FDIC then
transfers the aggregate FICO collections
to an account that FICO maintains at the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, from
which FICO pays the interest that is due
on the FICO Obligations.
14 See 12 U.S.C. 1817(e)(1) (addressing refunds of
overpayments of FDIC assessments).
15 The FDIC provides to each institution a
Quarterly Certified Statement Invoice that specifies
the total amount of that quarter’s assessment,
including the FDIC assessment and the FICO
assessment for that calendar quarter.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Dec 06, 2018
Jkt 247001
In the case of an insured depository
institution that amends its call report for
a prior period, FICO assessments are
adjusted in the same manner as FDIC
assessments. Thus, if an amended call
report results in an institution having
overpaid or underpaid a prior quarter’s
FICO assessment an adjustment amount
will appear on an upcoming invoice,
provided that the amendment has been
made within three years after the date
that the associated FICO payment was
due.16 Pursuant to the Memorandum of
Understanding, overpayments arising
from amended call reports are generally
credited against the next quarter’s FICO
assessment and underpayments are
added to the next quarter’s FICO
assessment.
With respect to all such refunds for
overpayments of prior period FICO
assessments, however, FICO has no
legal obligation to use its own assets to
provide monies to any insured
depository institutions to make those
refunds and does not do so. Indeed,
FICO has no legal authority to assess
insured depository institutions for the
sole purpose of obtaining monies to
provide refunds to other insured
depository institutions or to spend its
own non-assessment assets for that
purpose. As a practical matter, because
these refunds are processed as credits
against the next FICO assessment, they
do not require any cash outlay from
FICO and all refunds are effectively paid
from the assessments on the other
insured depository institutions
collectively. The principal effect of such
refunds is that they modestly reduce the
amount of monies actually collected by
the FDIC, as agent for FICO, as part of
a particular quarter’s FICO assessment.
Those refund credits, however, may be
offset by the additional amounts that the
FDIC collects, as an agent for FICO, from
other institutions that had previously
underpaid a prior FICO assessment.17
To the extent overpayment credits
exceed underpayment collections, such
shortfall is made up the following
quarter by increasing the total collection
amount accordingly. Moreover, because
the determination of the quarterly
16 See 12 U.S.C. 1817(g)(2) (establishing a threeyear statute of limitations on actions by insured
depository institutions to recover overpayments
from FDIC, and on actions by FDIC to recover
underpayments from the insured institutions).
17 The number of call report amendments
submitted during a particular calendar quarter that
will affect a FICO assessment will vary, but is small
in comparison to the number of insured depository
institutions filing call reports with FDIC. Generally
speaking, the dollar amounts of the gross FICO
refunds and FICO additional collections for any
calendar quarter are also small, and the net amounts
of such adjustments during a particular quarter
often are less than $100,000.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
63055
multiplier for setting the FICO
assessment involves rounding, any
quarterly collection of the FICO
assessment may yield slightly more
money than the initially projected
assessment amount. Pursuant to the
Memorandum of Understanding with
the FDIC, FICO also maintains a cash
reserve that is available to make up
modest shortfalls that might arise during
a quarterly collection. FICO has never
needed to use the cash reserve, because
it has always collected sufficient funds
to make all required interest payments
when due. FHFA anticipates that FICO
will draw down the monies in its cash
reserve to fund a portion of the
remaining interest payments on its
Obligations as they come due, which
also would reduce the amount needed
to be assessed and collected from
insured depository institutions during
2019.
As is evident from the above
description, the current practice for
adjusting individual FICO
assessments—to account for either
refunds or additional collections—
depends on the existence of a
subsequent FICO collection that could
serve as the source of funds and the
means by which any such adjustments
may be processed. The last of the FICO
bonds will mature during 2019 and
FICO is scheduled to make five different
interest payments during 2019.18 FHFA
anticipates that the FDIC, as agent for
FICO, will collect one FICO assessment
during 2019 and that the amounts
received by FICO from the March 2019
collection will be sufficient (when
combined with any other available
funds that FICO will have on hand) to
make all remaining interest payments
due during 2019. Accordingly, once the
final FICO assessment has been
collected, there will be no subsequent
billing cycle through which an insured
depository institution could have a prior
FICO assessment adjusted, i.e., the
FDIC, which will cease to be collection
agent for FICO, will no longer invoice
institutions for FICO assessments that
could be adjusted to reflect increases or
decreases attributable to amendments to
their prior period call reports. Because
FICO assessments are collected in the
same manner as FDIC assessments, the
FDIC’s billing practices, as agent for
FICO, have long included the above18 Two interest payments, in the approximate
amount of $28 million each, are due during March
2019, and FICO will collect monies needed to make
those payments during the December 2018
collection. The remaining three interest payments,
in the approximate amounts of $26 million each,
are due during April, June, and September 2019,
and FICO will collect monies needed to make those
payments during the March 2019 collection.
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
63056
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 235 / Friday, December 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
described adjustment provision for the
FICO assessments. Thus, FHFA has
determined that it is appropriate, as
FICO’s regulator, to adopt a rule to make
clear that such adjustments must cease
after FICO has collected its final
assessment from the insured depository
institutions, and that FICO has no
obligation to make any adjustments to
prior FICO assessments.
This rulemaking pertains only to the
FICO assessments, which the FDIC
collects on behalf of FICO. It does not
affect the deposit insurance assessments
that the FDIC collects from insured
depository institutions, which will
continue in their normal manner. The
sections below describe the history and
content of the final rule.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
II. The Proposed Rule
On September 26, 2018, FHFA
published in the Federal Register a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(proposed rule) to amend 12 CFR
1271.37 of the FHFA regulations, which
governs the assessment and collection of
monies from FDIC-insured institutions
to pay interest on the FICO Obligations.
The 30-day comment period for the
proposed rule ended on October 26,
2018. FHFA received no comments on
the substance of the proposed rule or on
its discussion relating to the
applicability of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. FHFA’s interpretation of
the facts and legal authorities governing
FICO’s assessments in view of its
impending dissolution remain
unchanged. Thus, this final rule adopts
without change all of the regulatory
additions set forth in the proposed rule.
III. The Final Rule
Content of the Final Rule. The final
rule does four things. First, it provides
that all FICO assessments collected
during 2019 will be final, meaning that
there will be no possibility of any
subsequent adjustments to those
assessment amounts. Second, it
provides that after the collection of the
final FICO assessment (which is
expected to occur on March 29, 2019)
no insured depository institution will be
entitled to any adjustment of any prior
FICO assessment that arises as a result
of an amendment to the call report on
which the prior assessment had been
based. This recognizes the fact that
adjustments to prior FICO assessments
can only be made as part of the process
of collecting a subsequent FICO
assessment. Third, it preserves the
existing adjustment practice through the
final FICO assessment collection, i.e., it
would allow the FDIC, as agent for
FICO, to adjust the March 2019 FICO
assessment for any institution to reflect
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Dec 06, 2018
Jkt 247001
amendments that the institution has
made to its call reports for any calendar
quarters prior to and including the
fourth quarter of 2018. This provision is
phrased in terms of setting March 26,
2019—the projected date as of which
the FDIC will finalize the amounts due
for the March 2019 FICO assessment—
as the last date for any such call report
amendments to affect the institution’s
FICO assessments.19 Fourth, this final
rule includes a provision that is
intended to address the possibility,
which FHFA believes to be small, that
FICO may need to conduct another
assessment in June 2019, which would
occur only if the March collection did
not yield sufficient monies to make the
remaining interest payments on the
FICO bonds. This provision has been
drafted to preserve the current practice
of allowing an insured depository
institution to amend the call report on
which its June FICO assessments will be
based up until the date on which the
FDIC finalizes the amounts due from
each institution for that quarter. This
paragraph provides that any
amendments to the call reports for the
calendar quarter ending on March 31,
2019 that are submitted after June 25,
2019, the anticipated date on which the
FDIC would finalize payments for the
collection, will not affect the
institution’s FICO assessment. Any
amended call reports for the first quarter
of 2019 submitted prior to that date will
be used to calculate the June
assessments. This is consistent with
current practice for FICO assessments,
under which payment amounts for FICO
assessments are finalized three days
prior to the date of collection.
Analysis. In the absence of an ongoing
FICO assessment process continuing
after March 2019, there will be no
funding mechanism for FICO to provide
an insured depository institution a
credit for any overpayment of a prior
FICO assessment or to bill it for any
underpayment of a prior assessment.
FHFA has therefore determined to
provide clarity and finality by
affirmatively declaring the FICO
assessment adjustment practices
terminated, effective with the collection
of the final FICO assessment. FHFA is
mindful of the statutory requirement
that FICO should assess the depository
institutions for its interest costs in the
19 For example, an insured depository institution
that amends a prior period call report on or before
March 26, 2019 will receive an appropriate
adjustment to the assessment amount anticipated to
be collected on March 29, 2019. An institution that
amends a prior period call report after that date will
not receive any adjustment to its prior FICO
assessment because there is not expected to be
another FICO assessment after that date.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
same manner as the FDIC assesses those
institutions for deposit insurance
purposes. FHFA also understands,
however, that the FDIC has an
established practice of allowing insured
depository institutions to have
adjustments made to their prior FDIC
assessments if they later amend the call
report data on which those assessments
were based, provided it occurs within
the three-year statutory period, a
practice that will not be available when
the FICO assessments cease.
A key difference between the FICO
assessments and the FDIC assessments
is that the FDIC assessments are
continual, with no predetermined
termination date. The FICO assessment
authority, however, is required by
statute to cease after FICO has collected
sufficient monies to pay the interest and
related costs on its Obligations. In light
of that difference, FHFA believes that
the statutory language requiring FICO to
conduct its assessments in the same
manner as the FDIC assessments is best
read as requiring FICO to follow the
FDIC practice for prior period
adjustments only for so long as FICO
actually is collecting assessments from
the insured depository institutions.
FHFA has drafted the final regulation in
that manner, i.e., the final rule would
preserve the existing FDIC adjustment
process through and including what is
expected to be the final collection of the
FICO assessment in March 2019. Until
that final collection has been completed,
all insured depository institutions that
are eligible to be credited a refund for
any prior overpayment of their FICO
assessment or to be billed for any prior
underpayment of their FICO assessment
will be able to continue to have the
appropriate adjustment included in the
calculation of the amount they are
required to pay.
For the foregoing reasons, FHFA does
not believe that the ‘‘in the same
manner’’ language of the Bank Act can
reasonably be construed to require FICO
to provide refunds to, or to collect
monies from, insured depository
institutions that amend a prior period
call report after FICO has ceased its
assessments. As noted above, there will
be no practical way to process such
adjustments because there will be no
invoiced amount against which a credit
could be applied or to which a
surcharge could be added. Moreover,
there is no source of funds from which
FICO could pay cash refunds because
FICO will have used all monies received
from its prior assessments to pay the
interest and other costs due on its
Obligations. FICO also could not assess
insured depository institutions to obtain
additional monies to provide refunds to
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 235 / Friday, December 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
other institutions because its authority
is limited to assessing the institutions
only for monies needed for interest
payments, issuance costs, and custodial
fees. Finally, Congress has mandated
that FHFA dissolve FICO as soon as
practicable after it has repaid the last of
its Obligations, which evidences an
intent that FICO may not undertake any
new activities, such as facilitating
collections from and payments to
insured institutions, after FICO has
repaid its Obligations.
FHFA believes that the most
appropriate reading of the Bank Act in
these circumstances is that it allows
insured depository institutions to
continue to receive refunds for prior
overpayments (and to continue to be
billed for prior underpayments) in the
same manner as FDIC assessments
through and including the final FICO
assessment. That approach gives
appropriate effect to the ‘‘in the same
manner’’ language of the statute without
creating any conflict with the provision
requiring the prompt dissolution of
FICO, and without imposing on FICO
any obligations that are not expressly
mandated by the Bank Act.
FHFA also does not believe that this
final rule will have a significant effect
on FDIC-insured institutions. As an
initial matter, the number of insured
depository institutions amending call
reports in any calendar quarter that
affect their prior FICO assessments
typically is small. For example, the
number of such amended call reports for
the fourth quarter of 2017 was 91, out
of approximately 5,600 FDIC-insured
depository institutions filing call
reports. Moreover, the dollar amount of
FICO assessment adjustments also is
generally small. For that same period,
the gross amount of refunds of prior
FICO assessments related to those
amended call reports was approximately
$24,000, while the gross amount of
collections of prior FICO
underpayments was approximately
$170,000, resulting in a net surplus of
collections over refunds of
approximately $146,000, i.e., the
insured depository institutions
generally owe more for underpayments
than they are entitled to receive in
refunds. From mid-2011 through the last
2017 assessment period, the average net
quarterly adjustment of prior FICO
assessments resulting from all
institutions’ amendments to their prior
call reports was approximately $95,000
of additional collections of prior FICO
underpayments. As noted previously,
and notwithstanding the typically
modest numbers involved, this final
rule has been drafted so as to preserve,
through the date of the final FICO
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Dec 06, 2018
Jkt 247001
collection, the current practice of
allowing all insured depository
institutions to have their FICO
assessments adjusted to reflect
amendments to their prior call reports
up until the date that FDIC finalizes the
amount of each institution’s final FICO
assessment in March 2019.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) requires that
regulations involving the collection of
information receive clearance from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). This rule contains no such
collection of information requiring OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act. Consequently, no
information has been submitted to OMB
for review.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
generally requires that, in connection
with a notice of final rulemaking, an
agency prepare a Final Regulatory
Flexibility Act analysis describing the
impact of the rule on small entities.20 A
Final Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis
is not required, however, if the agency
certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities,
and publishes its certification and a
short explanatory statement in the
Federal Register together with the final
rule. The SBA has defined ‘‘small
entities’’ to include banking
organizations with total assets less than
or equal to $550 million.21 As discussed
further below, FHFA certifies that this
final rule will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of FDICinsured small entities.
Description of Need and Policy
Objectives
By statute, FHFA must dissolve FICO
as soon as practicable after it has made
the final payments of principal and
interest due on its Obligations, the last
of which matures in September 2019. To
facilitate FICO’s prompt and orderly
dissolution, and for the other reasons
described in Section III above, this final
rule will make all 2019 FICO
assessments final and will terminate
FICO assessment adjustments as of
March 26, 2019.
Description of the Final Rule
A description of this final rule is
presented in Section III: Final Rule.
Please refer to it for further information.
20 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.
CFR 121.201 (as amended, effective
December 2, 2014).
Other Federal Rules
FHFA has exclusive regulatory
authority over FICO and has sole
responsibility for interpreting and
applying the provisions of the Bank Act
that govern FICO’s operations and
dissolution. For the reasons described in
Section III, FHFA has determined that
the most appropriate way to interpret
the provisions of the Bank Act that refer
to the manner in which the FDIC
conducts its own assessments is to read
them as applying only while FICO is
conducting its own assessments. FHFA
has not identified any likely
duplication, overlap, and/or potential
conflict between the final rule and any
other federal rule.
Economic Impacts on Small Entities
This final rule applies to FICO and
the manner in which it conducts its
assessments, and may indirectly affect
any FDIC-insured depository
institutions that have been assessed to
pay interest on the FICO’s obligations.
As of March 2018, the FDIC insured
5,606 depository institutions, of which
4,492 are defined as small banking
entities for purposes of the RFA.22 Each
insured depository institution’s share of
the FICO assessment is based on the
insured depository institution’s selfreported call report data, which the
depository institution may amend after
their initial filing with the FFIEC.
Because decisions to amend previously
filed call reports are solely within the
control of the insured depository
institution, it is not possible to predict
how many depository institutions may
amend a prior period call report during
any calendar quarter, how many of
those institutions amending a prior call
report would be small entities for RFA
purposes, whether the call report
amendments would affect the
calculation of an individual institution’s
prior FICO assessment, the dollar
amount by which a prior FICO
assessment had changed as a result of an
amended call report, or the net amount
of all such changes for all insured
depository institutions, i.e., whether the
dollar amount of all refunds for prior
overpayments was greater or less than
the dollar amount of all billings for prior
underpayments. Based on historical
FFIEC data relating to call report
amendments that affected individual
institution FICO assessments, however,
it appears that this final rule will not
affect a substantial number of small
entities, and that the economic effect on
those small entities that may be affected
by this final rule will not be significant.
21 13
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
63057
22 Call
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
Report data as of March 31, 2018.
07DER1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
63058
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 235 / Friday, December 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Indeed, the potential net economic
effect on those small entities will most
likely be positive, meaning that more of
them would receive a financial benefit—
being relieved of the obligation to pay
for any prior underpayment of a FICO
assessment—than would experience the
negative effect of losing refunds for
prior overpayment of FICO assessments.
Between March 2012 and December
2017, there has been an average of
approximately 205 FICO assessments
amended per calendar quarter, split
evenly between refunds and additional
collections. Based on the proportion of
small entities to the total number of
FDIC-insured depository institutions,
FHFA has deemed approximately 80
percent of those amendments to have
been attributable to small entities. The
actual number of small entities
amending call reports that affect their
FICO assessments is apt to be lower,
however, because each institution may
amend multiple quarters’ call reports at
one time. For example, an institution
amending a call report from a particular
calendar quarter two years ago may also
amend some or all of the subsequent
call reports. Of the 164 FICO assessment
amendments attributable to small
banking entities per quarter, if each
entity submits an average of two
amendments per quarter, approximately
82, or slightly less than two percent, of
FDIC-insured small banking entities
would be affected per quarter by this
final rule.
During the same period, the average
gross FICO refunds to institutions due to
their overpayments of prior FICO
assessments was approximately
$139,000 per quarter, or an average of
about $1,350 per amendment. The
average gross additional FICO collection
for underpayment of prior FICO
assessments was $243,000 per quarter,
or $2,370 per amendment. Based on
those numbers, and assuming the largest
possible estimated refunds, i.e., where
an institution amended call reports for
each of the twelve calendar quarters in
the three year period and was entitled
to an overpayment credit for each
quarter of $1,350 each, the potential cost
to that institution would be $16,200. In
a similar fashion, assuming the largest
possible estimated billings, i.e., where
the institution amended its twelve most
recent call reports and had underpaid
each of the FICO assessments for those
periods, the potential savings to that
institution would be $28,440. These
figures indicate that this final rule will
likely not have a significant economic
effect on even the smallest banking
entities. When viewed in the aggregate,
it appears that the most likely net effect
on all FDIC insured institutions,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Dec 06, 2018
Jkt 247001
including small entities, will be positive
because the available data indicates that
most adjustments to prior FICO
assessments result in the depository
institution paying additional amounts to
make up for prior underpayments of its
prior period FICO assessments, and that
the amounts of such billings are greater
than the amounts of any refunds.
This final rule poses no regulatory
costs for FDIC insured small entities, as
their FDIC assessment process will
remain in place as currently
implemented. Overall assessment costs
will be permanently reduced to the
extent each entity’s FICO assessment is
no longer collected. Further, FDIC
assessment adjustments will be
unaffected by this final rule, which
typically represent 90 percent of an
insured institution’s total potential
adjustment value. For these reasons and
based on the figures cited above, FHFA
finds that this final rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Alternatives Considered
As discussed previously, FHFA is
promulgating this final rule to provide
clarity and finality to an issue—the
status of future adjustments to prior
FICO assessments—that is not otherwise
addressed by the statute. FHFA has
considered three other approaches to
addressing this issue. First, FHFA
considered taking no action. That
approach likely would have resulted in
insured depository institutions being in
the same situation as will be the case
under the final rule—without any
mechanism to process adjustments to
their prior FICO assessments—but
neither they nor FICO would have had
any guidance as to the status of their
prior FICO assessments. By providing
that all FICO assessments become final
and nonrefundable when FICO
completes its 2019 assessments, the
final rule provides certainty to those
institutions that they would not have
otherwise, and without placing them in
any different situation than would be
the case if FHFA took no action.
Second, FHFA considered whether,
after all FICO obligations are paid, FICO
could assess all FDIC-insured
institutions or use its own assets to
obtain the monies needed to pay
refunds to any insured depository
institutions whose FICO assessments
had changed due to amendments to
their prior period call reports. FHFA
concluded that further assessments are
not legally permissible because
Congress has authorized FICO to assess
FDIC-insured institutions only for three
specific purposes—to pay interest on
the FICO Obligations, issuance costs,
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and custodian fees—which means that
FICO’s assessment authority does not
extend to obtaining monies for paying
refunds of prior FICO assessments. FICO
also could not use its own assets to
provide such monies because, as
described previously, FICO has no legal
obligation under any statute to
reimburse insured institutions for their
prior overpayments of FICO
assessments, and has no authority to
spend its assets for any purposes
beyond those authorized by statute.
Third, FHFA considered whether
FICO could direct the FDIC, as
collection agent, to continue to process
adjustments to prior FICO assessments
on its own, but deemed that approach
not to be legally permissible. The FDIC
acts solely as FICO’s agent when
collecting the FICO assessments, and as
such FDIC’s authority derives from, and
can be no greater than, FICO’s own
assessment authority.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 1271
Accounting, Community
development, Credit, Federal home loan
banks, Government securities, Housing,
Miscellaneous federal home loan bank
operations and authorities, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority and Issuance
Accordingly, for reasons stated in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION and under
the authority of 12 U.S.C. 1431(a),
1432(a), 4511(b), 4513, 4526(a), FHFA
amends subchapter D of chapter XII of
title 12 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 1271—MISCELLANEOUS
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
OPERATIONS AND AUTHORITIES
1. The authority citation for part 1271
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1430, 1431, 1432,
1441(b)(8), (c), (j), 1442, 4511(b), 4513(a),
4526.
2. Amend § 1271.37 by adding
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 1271.37 Non-administrative expenses;
assessments.
*
*
*
*
*
(d)(1) Final assessments. All
Financing Corporation assessments
collected during 2019 shall be final.
Subsequent to March 29, 2019, no
insured depository institution shall
have any right to receive refunds for any
overpayment of any prior Financing
Corporation assessments nor shall it be
billed for any underpayment of any
prior Financing Corporation
assessments that arise as a result of an
amendment to any Consolidated Reports
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 235 / Friday, December 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
of Condition and Income on which the
prior Financing Corporation assessment
had been based.
(2) Amendments to call reports.
Amendments to an institution’s
Consolidated Reports of Condition and
Income for quarters prior to and
including the fourth quarter of 2018
shall not affect an institution’s
Financing Corporation assessments after
March 26, 2019.
(3) June 2019 assessment. In the event
Financing Corporation assessments are
collected in June 2019, amendments to
an institution’s first quarter 2019
Consolidated Reports of Condition and
Income that are submitted after June 25,
2019 shall not affect the institution’s
Financing Corporation assessment.
Dated: November 26, 2018.
Melvin L. Watt,
Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency.
BILLING CODE 8070–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2018–0843]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Barters Island Bridge,
Back River, Barters Island, ME
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
the navigable waters within a 50 yard
radius from the center point of the
Barters Island Bridge, on the Back River,
ME, approximately 4.6 miles north of
the mouth of the waterway. The safety
zone is necessary to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment
from potential hazards which could
pose as imminent hazard to persons and
vessels operating in the area created by
the demolition, subsequent removal,
and replacement of the Barters Island
Bridge and a temporary bridge. When
enforced, persons and vessels are
prohibited from being in the safety zone
during bridge replacement operations
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Northern New England or a
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from December 7, 2018
through January 31, 2021. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from December 1, 2018
through December 7, 2018.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Dec 06, 2018
Jkt 247001
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
MEDOT Maine Department of
Transportation
[FR Doc. 2018–26449 Filed 12–6–18; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2018–
0843 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this
rulemaking, call or email LT Matthew
Odom, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Northern New England, telephone 207–
347–5015, email Matthew.T.Odom@
uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On April 27, 2018, the Maine
Department of Transportation (MEDOT)
applied for a bridge construction permit
for Barter’s Island Bridge with the Coast
Guard. On June 22, 2018, the Coast
Guard issued Public Notice 1–164,
published it on the USCG Navigation
Center website, and solicited comments
through July 23, 2018. Three comments
were received in response to the public
notice: One commenter requested the
project be stopped if any human
remains, archaeological properties or
other items of historical importance are
unearthed and we report the findings. A
second commenter notified us this
project will not affect any Penobscot
cultural/historic properties or interests
and had no objection. A third
commenter stated that Tennessee Gas
Pipeline currently does not have
facilities within the area. There were no
statements of objection.
On August 22, 2018, MEDOT
requested by letter that the Coast Guard
impose waterway restrictions on the
Back River around the Barters Island
Bridge between Hodgdon Island and
Barters Island in Boothbay Harbor in
support of the bridge improvements.
The project includes the replacement of
the swing span of the bridge and the
existing center pier. A temporary fixed
bridge will be used to maintain vehicle
traffic during construction of the new
bridge. The temporary fixed bridge will
reduce the vertical clearance of the
channel to 6.8 feet mean high water
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
63059
(MHW) from approximately November
1, 2019 through May 31, 2020. On or
about June 1, 2020, the new swing
bridge is expected to be operating with
unlimited clearance in the open
position. The anticipated date for
removal of the temporary bridge is
August 2020. A bridge protection
system and bridge lighting will be
installed as part of the new bridge.
Captain of the Port (COTP) Northern
New England has determined that
hazards associated with the bridge
replacement project will be a safety
concern for anyone within a 50-yard
radius from the center point of the
Barters Island bridge. It is anticipated
that the Back River will be closed
because of this safety zone for a total of
85 non-continuous days.
On October 9, 2018, the Coast Guard
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) titled ‘‘Safety
Zones; Barters Island Bridge, Back
River, Barters Island, ME’’ (83 FR
50545). There we stated why we issued
the NPRM, and invited comments on
our proposed regulatory action related
to this safety zone. During the comment
period that ended November 8, 2018, we
received one comment.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable
because immediate action is needed to
respond to the potential safety hazards
associated with demolition, subsequent
removal, and replacement of the Barters
Island Bridge and a temporary bridge.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The
COTP Northern New England has
determined that potential hazards
associated with the demolition,
subsequent removal, and replacement of
the Barters Island Bridge and a
temporary bridge will be a safety
concern for anyone transiting within a
50 yard radius of the center point of the
Barters Island Bridge. The purpose of
this rule is to ensure safety of vessels
and the navigable waters in the safety
zone before, during, and after the bridge
demolition, removal, and replacement.
During times of enforcement, no vessel
or person would be permitted to enter
the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP Northern
New England or a designated
representative.
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 235 (Friday, December 7, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63054-63059]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26449]
[[Page 63054]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY
12 CFR Part 1271
RIN 2590-AA99
Miscellaneous Federal Home Loan Bank Operations and Authorities--
Financing Corporation Assessments
AGENCY: Federal Housing Finance Agency.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) is adopting a final
rule pertaining to the operation of the Financing Corporation (FICO), a
vehicle established by one of FHFA's predecessors to issue bonds, the
proceeds of which were used to help fund the resolution of failed
savings and loan associations during the 1980s. The last of those FICO
bonds will mature in September 2019. By statute, FICO obtains the
monies to pay the interest on those bonds by assessing depository
institutions (FICO assessments) that are insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The final rule addresses the manner in
which FICO will conduct the 2019 FICO assessments, which will be the
last of those assessments. Specifically, the final rule provides that
all payments made by FDIC-insured depository institutions during 2019
are final, and that no adjustments to prior FICO assessments will be
permitted after March 26, 2019, the projected date as of which the FDIC
will finalize the amounts of the final collection for the 2019 FICO
assessments.
DATES: The rule is effective on January 7, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Louis M. Scalza, Associate Director,
Examinations, Office of Safety & Soundness Examinations,
[email protected], (202) 649-3710; Winston Sale, Assistant General
Counsel, [email protected], (202) 649-3081; or Neil R. Crowley,
Deputy General Counsel, [email protected], (202) 649-3055 (these
are not toll-free numbers), Federal Housing Finance Agency, 400 Seventh
Street SW, Washington, DC 20219. The telephone number for the
Telecommunications Device for the Hearing Impaired is (800) 877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FHFA is an independent agency of the federal government established
to regulate and oversee the Federal National Mortgage Association, the
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, the Federal Home Loan Banks
(Banks), and the Bank System's Office of Finance.\1\ FHFA also is
responsible for overseeing FICO. The Competitive Equality Banking Act
of 1987 \2\ amended the Federal Home Loan Bank Act (Bank Act) and
authorized FHFA's predecessor to establish FICO, and authorizes the
FHFA Director to select the two Bank presidents that serve on its
directorate, to prescribe such regulations as are necessary to carry
out the statutory provisions relating to FICO, and to oversee the
dissolution of FICO.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 12 U.S.C. 4511.
\2\ Public Law 100-86, 101 Stat. 552.
\3\ See 12 U.S.C. 1441(a) (establishment of FICO), (b)(1)(B)
(selection of directors), (i) (dissolution, and authority for FHFA
to exercise any FICO powers, needed to conclude its affairs), and
(j) (authority to prescribe regulations).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FICO is a mixed-ownership, tax-exempt government corporation,
chartered in 1987 by the former Federal Home Loan Bank Board, one of
FHFA's predecessor agencies, pursuant to the Federal Savings and Loan
Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) Recapitalization Act of 1987, as amended
(Recapitalization Act).\4\ The Recapitalization Act's purpose was to
recapitalize the FSLIC insurance fund, which had been significantly
depleted by a wave of savings and loan (S&L) failures during the S&L
crisis of the 1980s. FICO's mission was to provide funding for FSLIC
(and later for the FSLIC Resolution Fund after FSLIC's insolvency and
later abolishment by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and
Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA)) by selling bonds to the public.
FICO's operations are managed by a directorate composed of the Director
of the Office of Finance and two Bank presidents who rotate after
serving one year terms.\5\ FICO has no permanent staff and utilizes
Office of Finance staff to execute its day-to-day functions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 12 U.S.C. 1441(a).
\5\ See 12 U.S.C. 1441(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FICO was initially capitalized by issuing stock to the Banks in an
aggregate amount of $680 million, apportioned pro rata among the Banks
in accordance with a statutory formula.\6\ FICO used the proceeds from
the stock issuances to purchase U.S. Treasury zero-coupon securities
(Zeros), which were to be the sole source of repayment of the principal
of the bonds to be issued by FICO. Between 1987 and 1989 FICO issued 14
separate series of 30-year bonds (Obligations) in an aggregate
principal amount of approximately $8.2 billion. FICO conveyed the
proceeds of the Obligations to FSLIC, to finance its resolution of
failed S&Ls.\7\ FICO is required by statute to hold the Zeros in a
segregated account until they are used to pay the principal due on the
Obligations at their maturity.\8\ The Obligations began to mature in
2017, and the last Obligation will mature in September 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See 12 U.S.C. 1441(d)(4). FICO issued the stock in a series
of transactions between 1987 and 1989, each in anticipation of an
issuance of a particular series of the FICO bonds.
\7\ FICO used the net proceeds from the first 13 series of its
Obligations to purchase nonredeemable capital certificates and
nonredeemable nonvoting capital stock issued by the FSLIC. After the
FSLIC was abolished in 1989, FICO used the proceeds from its final
series of Obligations to purchase nonredeemable capital certificates
issued by the FSLIC Resolution Fund, the statutory successor to the
FSLIC. See 12 U.S.C. 1821a (establishment of FSLIC Resolution Fund).
Those instruments have no value and have been charged to FICO's
capital.
\8\ See 12 U.S.C 1441(g)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Recapitalization Act established a different source for
providing the funds needed to service the semiannual interest payments
on the FICO Obligations.\9\ The statute initially authorized FICO to
assess FSLIC-insured depository institutions for the funds needed to
pay the interest due on the FICO Obligations.\10\ The Deposit Insurance
Funds Act of 1996 authorized FICO to assess against institutions with
deposits insured by both the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) and the Savings
Association Insurance Fund (SAIF).\11\ Pursuant to the Federal Deposit
Insurance Reform Act of 2005, effective March 31, 2006, the BIF and
SAIF were merged into the newly created Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF),
and thus FICO may assess institutions insured by the DIF.\12\ FICO is
authorized to assess insured depository institutions only for three
purposes: For making interest payments on the FICO Obligations; paying
issuance costs for the FICO Obligations; and paying custodial fees
associated with the FICO Obligations. The Bank Act, as amended by
FIRREA, further provides that FICO is to conduct its assessments in the
same manner that the FDIC uses when assessing its insured depository
institutions for deposit insurance purposes.\13\ FICO and the FDIC
entered into a memorandum of understanding in 1997 (Memorandum of
Understanding), as amended in 1999, pursuant to which the FDIC collects
FICO's assessments from its insured
[[Page 63055]]
depository institutions quarterly, as agent for FICO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Interest on each FICO Obligation is paid on the anniversary
of its issuance date, and six months after that date each year.
\10\ Public Law 100-86, sec, 302, 101 Stat. 552, 591-592.
\11\ Public Law 104-208, sec. 2703, 110 Stat. 3009-479, 3009-
485.
\12\ Public Law 109-171, sec. 2102, 120 Stat. 9.
\13\ 12 U.S.C. 1441(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FDIC conducts its own Deposit Insurance Fund assessments
quarterly (FDIC assessment), with the amount of the FDIC assessment for
each insured depository institution being determined based, in part, on
data that the institution has submitted to the Federal Financial
Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) in its Consolidated Reports of
Condition and Income (call report). If an insured depository
institution amends a call report on which a previous FDIC assessment
had been calculated and the amendment to the call report would cause
the calculation of the prior FDIC assessment to change, the institution
may receive an adjustment, which generally appears on an upcoming
invoice.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See 12 U.S.C. 1817(e)(1) (addressing refunds of
overpayments of FDIC assessments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding, the FDIC collects the
FICO assessments from the insured depository institutions quarterly, as
agent for FICO, at the same time as the collection of FDIC assessments.
FICO assessments are made based on an assessment rate formula adopted
by FICO, and approved by the FDIC Board of Directors. One factor in
FICO's formula is the deposit insurance assessment base, which (as
described above) is calculated using an insured depository
institution's call report data. Under the terms of the Memorandum of
Understanding, twice per year, FICO notifies the FDIC of the total
amounts that would be needed for FICO to make its upcoming Obligation
interest payments and annually informs the FDIC of the interest it has
earned. Using that information and FICO's assessment rate formula, the
FDIC calculates a ``quarterly multiplier'' and applies it to
information derived from each institution's call report to determine
the FICO assessment for each institution for that calendar quarter. The
FDIC then issues an invoice to each insured depository institution
detailing both its quarterly FDIC and FICO assessments.\15\ Insured
depository institutions submit payment for their FDIC and FICO
assessments to the FDIC via Automated Clearing House (ACH). The FDIC
then transfers the aggregate FICO collections to an account that FICO
maintains at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, from which FICO pays
the interest that is due on the FICO Obligations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ The FDIC provides to each institution a Quarterly Certified
Statement Invoice that specifies the total amount of that quarter's
assessment, including the FDIC assessment and the FICO assessment
for that calendar quarter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case of an insured depository institution that amends its
call report for a prior period, FICO assessments are adjusted in the
same manner as FDIC assessments. Thus, if an amended call report
results in an institution having overpaid or underpaid a prior
quarter's FICO assessment an adjustment amount will appear on an
upcoming invoice, provided that the amendment has been made within
three years after the date that the associated FICO payment was
due.\16\ Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding, overpayments
arising from amended call reports are generally credited against the
next quarter's FICO assessment and underpayments are added to the next
quarter's FICO assessment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See 12 U.S.C. 1817(g)(2) (establishing a three-year statute
of limitations on actions by insured depository institutions to
recover overpayments from FDIC, and on actions by FDIC to recover
underpayments from the insured institutions).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to all such refunds for overpayments of prior period
FICO assessments, however, FICO has no legal obligation to use its own
assets to provide monies to any insured depository institutions to make
those refunds and does not do so. Indeed, FICO has no legal authority
to assess insured depository institutions for the sole purpose of
obtaining monies to provide refunds to other insured depository
institutions or to spend its own non-assessment assets for that
purpose. As a practical matter, because these refunds are processed as
credits against the next FICO assessment, they do not require any cash
outlay from FICO and all refunds are effectively paid from the
assessments on the other insured depository institutions collectively.
The principal effect of such refunds is that they modestly reduce the
amount of monies actually collected by the FDIC, as agent for FICO, as
part of a particular quarter's FICO assessment. Those refund credits,
however, may be offset by the additional amounts that the FDIC
collects, as an agent for FICO, from other institutions that had
previously underpaid a prior FICO assessment.\17\ To the extent
overpayment credits exceed underpayment collections, such shortfall is
made up the following quarter by increasing the total collection amount
accordingly. Moreover, because the determination of the quarterly
multiplier for setting the FICO assessment involves rounding, any
quarterly collection of the FICO assessment may yield slightly more
money than the initially projected assessment amount. Pursuant to the
Memorandum of Understanding with the FDIC, FICO also maintains a cash
reserve that is available to make up modest shortfalls that might arise
during a quarterly collection. FICO has never needed to use the cash
reserve, because it has always collected sufficient funds to make all
required interest payments when due. FHFA anticipates that FICO will
draw down the monies in its cash reserve to fund a portion of the
remaining interest payments on its Obligations as they come due, which
also would reduce the amount needed to be assessed and collected from
insured depository institutions during 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ The number of call report amendments submitted during a
particular calendar quarter that will affect a FICO assessment will
vary, but is small in comparison to the number of insured depository
institutions filing call reports with FDIC. Generally speaking, the
dollar amounts of the gross FICO refunds and FICO additional
collections for any calendar quarter are also small, and the net
amounts of such adjustments during a particular quarter often are
less than $100,000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As is evident from the above description, the current practice for
adjusting individual FICO assessments--to account for either refunds or
additional collections--depends on the existence of a subsequent FICO
collection that could serve as the source of funds and the means by
which any such adjustments may be processed. The last of the FICO bonds
will mature during 2019 and FICO is scheduled to make five different
interest payments during 2019.\18\ FHFA anticipates that the FDIC, as
agent for FICO, will collect one FICO assessment during 2019 and that
the amounts received by FICO from the March 2019 collection will be
sufficient (when combined with any other available funds that FICO will
have on hand) to make all remaining interest payments due during 2019.
Accordingly, once the final FICO assessment has been collected, there
will be no subsequent billing cycle through which an insured depository
institution could have a prior FICO assessment adjusted, i.e., the
FDIC, which will cease to be collection agent for FICO, will no longer
invoice institutions for FICO assessments that could be adjusted to
reflect increases or decreases attributable to amendments to their
prior period call reports. Because FICO assessments are collected in
the same manner as FDIC assessments, the FDIC's billing practices, as
agent for FICO, have long included the above-
[[Page 63056]]
described adjustment provision for the FICO assessments. Thus, FHFA has
determined that it is appropriate, as FICO's regulator, to adopt a rule
to make clear that such adjustments must cease after FICO has collected
its final assessment from the insured depository institutions, and that
FICO has no obligation to make any adjustments to prior FICO
assessments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ Two interest payments, in the approximate amount of $28
million each, are due during March 2019, and FICO will collect
monies needed to make those payments during the December 2018
collection. The remaining three interest payments, in the
approximate amounts of $26 million each, are due during April, June,
and September 2019, and FICO will collect monies needed to make
those payments during the March 2019 collection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This rulemaking pertains only to the FICO assessments, which the
FDIC collects on behalf of FICO. It does not affect the deposit
insurance assessments that the FDIC collects from insured depository
institutions, which will continue in their normal manner. The sections
below describe the history and content of the final rule.
II. The Proposed Rule
On September 26, 2018, FHFA published in the Federal Register a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (proposed rule) to amend 12 CFR 1271.37
of the FHFA regulations, which governs the assessment and collection of
monies from FDIC-insured institutions to pay interest on the FICO
Obligations. The 30-day comment period for the proposed rule ended on
October 26, 2018. FHFA received no comments on the substance of the
proposed rule or on its discussion relating to the applicability of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. FHFA's interpretation of the facts and
legal authorities governing FICO's assessments in view of its impending
dissolution remain unchanged. Thus, this final rule adopts without
change all of the regulatory additions set forth in the proposed rule.
III. The Final Rule
Content of the Final Rule. The final rule does four things. First,
it provides that all FICO assessments collected during 2019 will be
final, meaning that there will be no possibility of any subsequent
adjustments to those assessment amounts. Second, it provides that after
the collection of the final FICO assessment (which is expected to occur
on March 29, 2019) no insured depository institution will be entitled
to any adjustment of any prior FICO assessment that arises as a result
of an amendment to the call report on which the prior assessment had
been based. This recognizes the fact that adjustments to prior FICO
assessments can only be made as part of the process of collecting a
subsequent FICO assessment. Third, it preserves the existing adjustment
practice through the final FICO assessment collection, i.e., it would
allow the FDIC, as agent for FICO, to adjust the March 2019 FICO
assessment for any institution to reflect amendments that the
institution has made to its call reports for any calendar quarters
prior to and including the fourth quarter of 2018. This provision is
phrased in terms of setting March 26, 2019--the projected date as of
which the FDIC will finalize the amounts due for the March 2019 FICO
assessment--as the last date for any such call report amendments to
affect the institution's FICO assessments.\19\ Fourth, this final rule
includes a provision that is intended to address the possibility, which
FHFA believes to be small, that FICO may need to conduct another
assessment in June 2019, which would occur only if the March collection
did not yield sufficient monies to make the remaining interest payments
on the FICO bonds. This provision has been drafted to preserve the
current practice of allowing an insured depository institution to amend
the call report on which its June FICO assessments will be based up
until the date on which the FDIC finalizes the amounts due from each
institution for that quarter. This paragraph provides that any
amendments to the call reports for the calendar quarter ending on March
31, 2019 that are submitted after June 25, 2019, the anticipated date
on which the FDIC would finalize payments for the collection, will not
affect the institution's FICO assessment. Any amended call reports for
the first quarter of 2019 submitted prior to that date will be used to
calculate the June assessments. This is consistent with current
practice for FICO assessments, under which payment amounts for FICO
assessments are finalized three days prior to the date of collection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ For example, an insured depository institution that amends
a prior period call report on or before March 26, 2019 will receive
an appropriate adjustment to the assessment amount anticipated to be
collected on March 29, 2019. An institution that amends a prior
period call report after that date will not receive any adjustment
to its prior FICO assessment because there is not expected to be
another FICO assessment after that date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis. In the absence of an ongoing FICO assessment process
continuing after March 2019, there will be no funding mechanism for
FICO to provide an insured depository institution a credit for any
overpayment of a prior FICO assessment or to bill it for any
underpayment of a prior assessment. FHFA has therefore determined to
provide clarity and finality by affirmatively declaring the FICO
assessment adjustment practices terminated, effective with the
collection of the final FICO assessment. FHFA is mindful of the
statutory requirement that FICO should assess the depository
institutions for its interest costs in the same manner as the FDIC
assesses those institutions for deposit insurance purposes. FHFA also
understands, however, that the FDIC has an established practice of
allowing insured depository institutions to have adjustments made to
their prior FDIC assessments if they later amend the call report data
on which those assessments were based, provided it occurs within the
three-year statutory period, a practice that will not be available when
the FICO assessments cease.
A key difference between the FICO assessments and the FDIC
assessments is that the FDIC assessments are continual, with no
predetermined termination date. The FICO assessment authority, however,
is required by statute to cease after FICO has collected sufficient
monies to pay the interest and related costs on its Obligations. In
light of that difference, FHFA believes that the statutory language
requiring FICO to conduct its assessments in the same manner as the
FDIC assessments is best read as requiring FICO to follow the FDIC
practice for prior period adjustments only for so long as FICO actually
is collecting assessments from the insured depository institutions.
FHFA has drafted the final regulation in that manner, i.e., the final
rule would preserve the existing FDIC adjustment process through and
including what is expected to be the final collection of the FICO
assessment in March 2019. Until that final collection has been
completed, all insured depository institutions that are eligible to be
credited a refund for any prior overpayment of their FICO assessment or
to be billed for any prior underpayment of their FICO assessment will
be able to continue to have the appropriate adjustment included in the
calculation of the amount they are required to pay.
For the foregoing reasons, FHFA does not believe that the ``in the
same manner'' language of the Bank Act can reasonably be construed to
require FICO to provide refunds to, or to collect monies from, insured
depository institutions that amend a prior period call report after
FICO has ceased its assessments. As noted above, there will be no
practical way to process such adjustments because there will be no
invoiced amount against which a credit could be applied or to which a
surcharge could be added. Moreover, there is no source of funds from
which FICO could pay cash refunds because FICO will have used all
monies received from its prior assessments to pay the interest and
other costs due on its Obligations. FICO also could not assess insured
depository institutions to obtain additional monies to provide refunds
to
[[Page 63057]]
other institutions because its authority is limited to assessing the
institutions only for monies needed for interest payments, issuance
costs, and custodial fees. Finally, Congress has mandated that FHFA
dissolve FICO as soon as practicable after it has repaid the last of
its Obligations, which evidences an intent that FICO may not undertake
any new activities, such as facilitating collections from and payments
to insured institutions, after FICO has repaid its Obligations.
FHFA believes that the most appropriate reading of the Bank Act in
these circumstances is that it allows insured depository institutions
to continue to receive refunds for prior overpayments (and to continue
to be billed for prior underpayments) in the same manner as FDIC
assessments through and including the final FICO assessment. That
approach gives appropriate effect to the ``in the same manner''
language of the statute without creating any conflict with the
provision requiring the prompt dissolution of FICO, and without
imposing on FICO any obligations that are not expressly mandated by the
Bank Act.
FHFA also does not believe that this final rule will have a
significant effect on FDIC-insured institutions. As an initial matter,
the number of insured depository institutions amending call reports in
any calendar quarter that affect their prior FICO assessments typically
is small. For example, the number of such amended call reports for the
fourth quarter of 2017 was 91, out of approximately 5,600 FDIC-insured
depository institutions filing call reports. Moreover, the dollar
amount of FICO assessment adjustments also is generally small. For that
same period, the gross amount of refunds of prior FICO assessments
related to those amended call reports was approximately $24,000, while
the gross amount of collections of prior FICO underpayments was
approximately $170,000, resulting in a net surplus of collections over
refunds of approximately $146,000, i.e., the insured depository
institutions generally owe more for underpayments than they are
entitled to receive in refunds. From mid-2011 through the last 2017
assessment period, the average net quarterly adjustment of prior FICO
assessments resulting from all institutions' amendments to their prior
call reports was approximately $95,000 of additional collections of
prior FICO underpayments. As noted previously, and notwithstanding the
typically modest numbers involved, this final rule has been drafted so
as to preserve, through the date of the final FICO collection, the
current practice of allowing all insured depository institutions to
have their FICO assessments adjusted to reflect amendments to their
prior call reports up until the date that FDIC finalizes the amount of
each institution's final FICO assessment in March 2019.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) requires that
regulations involving the collection of information receive clearance
from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This rule contains no
such collection of information requiring OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act. Consequently, no information has been
submitted to OMB for review.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires that, in
connection with a notice of final rulemaking, an agency prepare a Final
Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis describing the impact of the rule
on small entities.\20\ A Final Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis is
not required, however, if the agency certifies that the rule will not
have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities, and publishes its certification and a short explanatory
statement in the Federal Register together with the final rule. The SBA
has defined ``small entities'' to include banking organizations with
total assets less than or equal to $550 million.\21\ As discussed
further below, FHFA certifies that this final rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of FDIC-insured small
entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
\21\ 13 CFR 121.201 (as amended, effective December 2, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description of Need and Policy Objectives
By statute, FHFA must dissolve FICO as soon as practicable after it
has made the final payments of principal and interest due on its
Obligations, the last of which matures in September 2019. To facilitate
FICO's prompt and orderly dissolution, and for the other reasons
described in Section III above, this final rule will make all 2019 FICO
assessments final and will terminate FICO assessment adjustments as of
March 26, 2019.
Description of the Final Rule
A description of this final rule is presented in Section III: Final
Rule. Please refer to it for further information.
Other Federal Rules
FHFA has exclusive regulatory authority over FICO and has sole
responsibility for interpreting and applying the provisions of the Bank
Act that govern FICO's operations and dissolution. For the reasons
described in Section III, FHFA has determined that the most appropriate
way to interpret the provisions of the Bank Act that refer to the
manner in which the FDIC conducts its own assessments is to read them
as applying only while FICO is conducting its own assessments. FHFA has
not identified any likely duplication, overlap, and/or potential
conflict between the final rule and any other federal rule.
Economic Impacts on Small Entities
This final rule applies to FICO and the manner in which it conducts
its assessments, and may indirectly affect any FDIC-insured depository
institutions that have been assessed to pay interest on the FICO's
obligations. As of March 2018, the FDIC insured 5,606 depository
institutions, of which 4,492 are defined as small banking entities for
purposes of the RFA.\22\ Each insured depository institution's share of
the FICO assessment is based on the insured depository institution's
self-reported call report data, which the depository institution may
amend after their initial filing with the FFIEC. Because decisions to
amend previously filed call reports are solely within the control of
the insured depository institution, it is not possible to predict how
many depository institutions may amend a prior period call report
during any calendar quarter, how many of those institutions amending a
prior call report would be small entities for RFA purposes, whether the
call report amendments would affect the calculation of an individual
institution's prior FICO assessment, the dollar amount by which a prior
FICO assessment had changed as a result of an amended call report, or
the net amount of all such changes for all insured depository
institutions, i.e., whether the dollar amount of all refunds for prior
overpayments was greater or less than the dollar amount of all billings
for prior underpayments. Based on historical FFIEC data relating to
call report amendments that affected individual institution FICO
assessments, however, it appears that this final rule will not affect a
substantial number of small entities, and that the economic effect on
those small entities that may be affected by this final rule will not
be significant.
[[Page 63058]]
Indeed, the potential net economic effect on those small entities will
most likely be positive, meaning that more of them would receive a
financial benefit--being relieved of the obligation to pay for any
prior underpayment of a FICO assessment--than would experience the
negative effect of losing refunds for prior overpayment of FICO
assessments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ Call Report data as of March 31, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Between March 2012 and December 2017, there has been an average of
approximately 205 FICO assessments amended per calendar quarter, split
evenly between refunds and additional collections. Based on the
proportion of small entities to the total number of FDIC-insured
depository institutions, FHFA has deemed approximately 80 percent of
those amendments to have been attributable to small entities. The
actual number of small entities amending call reports that affect their
FICO assessments is apt to be lower, however, because each institution
may amend multiple quarters' call reports at one time. For example, an
institution amending a call report from a particular calendar quarter
two years ago may also amend some or all of the subsequent call
reports. Of the 164 FICO assessment amendments attributable to small
banking entities per quarter, if each entity submits an average of two
amendments per quarter, approximately 82, or slightly less than two
percent, of FDIC-insured small banking entities would be affected per
quarter by this final rule.
During the same period, the average gross FICO refunds to
institutions due to their overpayments of prior FICO assessments was
approximately $139,000 per quarter, or an average of about $1,350 per
amendment. The average gross additional FICO collection for
underpayment of prior FICO assessments was $243,000 per quarter, or
$2,370 per amendment. Based on those numbers, and assuming the largest
possible estimated refunds, i.e., where an institution amended call
reports for each of the twelve calendar quarters in the three year
period and was entitled to an overpayment credit for each quarter of
$1,350 each, the potential cost to that institution would be $16,200.
In a similar fashion, assuming the largest possible estimated billings,
i.e., where the institution amended its twelve most recent call reports
and had underpaid each of the FICO assessments for those periods, the
potential savings to that institution would be $28,440. These figures
indicate that this final rule will likely not have a significant
economic effect on even the smallest banking entities. When viewed in
the aggregate, it appears that the most likely net effect on all FDIC
insured institutions, including small entities, will be positive
because the available data indicates that most adjustments to prior
FICO assessments result in the depository institution paying additional
amounts to make up for prior underpayments of its prior period FICO
assessments, and that the amounts of such billings are greater than the
amounts of any refunds.
This final rule poses no regulatory costs for FDIC insured small
entities, as their FDIC assessment process will remain in place as
currently implemented. Overall assessment costs will be permanently
reduced to the extent each entity's FICO assessment is no longer
collected. Further, FDIC assessment adjustments will be unaffected by
this final rule, which typically represent 90 percent of an insured
institution's total potential adjustment value. For these reasons and
based on the figures cited above, FHFA finds that this final rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Alternatives Considered
As discussed previously, FHFA is promulgating this final rule to
provide clarity and finality to an issue--the status of future
adjustments to prior FICO assessments--that is not otherwise addressed
by the statute. FHFA has considered three other approaches to
addressing this issue. First, FHFA considered taking no action. That
approach likely would have resulted in insured depository institutions
being in the same situation as will be the case under the final rule--
without any mechanism to process adjustments to their prior FICO
assessments--but neither they nor FICO would have had any guidance as
to the status of their prior FICO assessments. By providing that all
FICO assessments become final and nonrefundable when FICO completes its
2019 assessments, the final rule provides certainty to those
institutions that they would not have otherwise, and without placing
them in any different situation than would be the case if FHFA took no
action.
Second, FHFA considered whether, after all FICO obligations are
paid, FICO could assess all FDIC-insured institutions or use its own
assets to obtain the monies needed to pay refunds to any insured
depository institutions whose FICO assessments had changed due to
amendments to their prior period call reports. FHFA concluded that
further assessments are not legally permissible because Congress has
authorized FICO to assess FDIC-insured institutions only for three
specific purposes--to pay interest on the FICO Obligations, issuance
costs, and custodian fees--which means that FICO's assessment authority
does not extend to obtaining monies for paying refunds of prior FICO
assessments. FICO also could not use its own assets to provide such
monies because, as described previously, FICO has no legal obligation
under any statute to reimburse insured institutions for their prior
overpayments of FICO assessments, and has no authority to spend its
assets for any purposes beyond those authorized by statute.
Third, FHFA considered whether FICO could direct the FDIC, as
collection agent, to continue to process adjustments to prior FICO
assessments on its own, but deemed that approach not to be legally
permissible. The FDIC acts solely as FICO's agent when collecting the
FICO assessments, and as such FDIC's authority derives from, and can be
no greater than, FICO's own assessment authority.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 1271
Accounting, Community development, Credit, Federal home loan banks,
Government securities, Housing, Miscellaneous federal home loan bank
operations and authorities, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority and Issuance
Accordingly, for reasons stated in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
and under the authority of 12 U.S.C. 1431(a), 1432(a), 4511(b), 4513,
4526(a), FHFA amends subchapter D of chapter XII of title 12 of the
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 1271--MISCELLANEOUS FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OPERATIONS AND
AUTHORITIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 1271 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1430, 1431, 1432, 1441(b)(8), (c), (j),
1442, 4511(b), 4513(a), 4526.
0
2. Amend Sec. 1271.37 by adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 1271.37 Non-administrative expenses; assessments.
* * * * *
(d)(1) Final assessments. All Financing Corporation assessments
collected during 2019 shall be final. Subsequent to March 29, 2019, no
insured depository institution shall have any right to receive refunds
for any overpayment of any prior Financing Corporation assessments nor
shall it be billed for any underpayment of any prior Financing
Corporation assessments that arise as a result of an amendment to any
Consolidated Reports
[[Page 63059]]
of Condition and Income on which the prior Financing Corporation
assessment had been based.
(2) Amendments to call reports. Amendments to an institution's
Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income for quarters prior to and
including the fourth quarter of 2018 shall not affect an institution's
Financing Corporation assessments after March 26, 2019.
(3) June 2019 assessment. In the event Financing Corporation
assessments are collected in June 2019, amendments to an institution's
first quarter 2019 Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income that
are submitted after June 25, 2019 shall not affect the institution's
Financing Corporation assessment.
Dated: November 26, 2018.
Melvin L. Watt,
Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency.
[FR Doc. 2018-26449 Filed 12-6-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8070-01-P