Revisions to California State Implementation Plan; South Coast Air Quality Management District; Stationary Source Permits, 61551-61552 [2018-25900]
Download as PDF
61551
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 231 / Friday, November 30, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Appendix B to Part 202—‘‘Best Edition’’
of Published Copyrighted Works for the
Collections of the Library of Congress
a. * * * (For works first published only in
a country other than the United States, the
law requires the deposit of the work as first
published.)
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: November 5, 2018.
Karyn A. Temple,
Acting Register of Copyrights.
Approved by:
Carla D. Hayden,
Librarian of Congress.
[FR Doc. 2018–26091 Filed 11–29–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2018–0413; FRL–9985–75–
Region 9]
Revisions to California State
Implementation Plan; South Coast Air
Quality Management District;
Stationary Source Permits
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is finalizing action on a
revision to the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD or
District) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). We are
finalizing a conditional approval of one
rule governing issuance of permits for
stationary sources, including review and
permitting of major sources and major
modifications under part D of title I of
the Clean Air Act (CAA). Specifically,
the revision pertains to SCAQMD Rule
1325—Federal PM2.5 New Source
Review Program.
DATES: This rule will be effective on
December 31, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket No.
EPA–R09–OAR–2018–0413. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
SUMMARY:
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Yannayon, EPA Region 9, (415)
972–3534, yannayon.laura@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, the terms
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On August 8, 2018 (83 FR 39012), the
EPA proposed to conditionally approve
the following rule that was submitted
for incorporation into the SCAQMD
portion of the California SIP.
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULE
Rule
No.
Rule title
1325
Federal PM2.5 New Source Review Program ............................................................................................
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
We proposed a conditional approval
of this rule because we determined that,
separate from the deficiencies listed in
Section II.B of our proposed rulemaking
action, the rule met the statutory
requirements for SIP revisions as
specified in section 110(l) of the CAA,
as well as the substantive statutory and
regulatory requirements for a
nonattainment New Source Review
(NSR) permit program as contained in
CAA sections 110(a)(2)(C) and 173(a)
through (c), and 40 CFR 51.165 that
pertain to a PM2.5 nonattainment area
classified as Serious. Moreover, we
concluded that if the State submits the
changes it committed to submit in its
July 16, 2018 commitment letter, the
identified deficiencies will be cured.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received two comments
on the proposed rule. These comments
raised issues that are outside the scope
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Nov 29, 2018
Jkt 247001
Amended
of our proposed approval of Rule 1325,
including air pollution monitoring in
China and India, climate change, and
wind and solar power costs and
regulations. None of those comments are
germane to our evaluation of Rule 1325.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment that submitted
Rule 1325 satisfies the applicable CAA
requirements. Therefore, under CAA
sections 110(k)(4) and 301(a), and for
the reasons set forth in our August 8,
2018 proposed rule, we are finalizing
the conditional approval of Rule 1325.
This action incorporates Rule 1325 into
the federally enforceable SIP and will be
codified through revisions to 40 CFR
52.220 (Identification of plan) and 40
CFR 52.248 (Identification of plan—
conditional approval).
If the State meets its commitment to
submit the required changes, the
revisions to Rule 1325 will remain a
part of the SIP until EPA takes final
action approving or disapproving the
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Submitted
11/4/16
5/8/17
new SIP revisions. However, if the State
fails to submit these revisions within
the required timeframe, the conditional
approval will automatically become a
disapproval, and EPA will issue a
finding of disapproval. EPA is not
required to propose the finding of
disapproval.
In addition, because we are finalizing
our proposed action, we are removing
the existing Rule 1325 from the
SCAQMD portion of the California SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
SCAQMD rule listed in Table 1 of this
preamble. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
61552
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 231 / Friday, November 30, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
section of
this preamble for more information).
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Nov 29, 2018
Jkt 247001
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
New Source Review, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: October 11, 2018.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(458)(i)(A)(2) and
(c)(509) to read as follows:
■
Identification of plan—in part.
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(458) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(2) Previously approved on May 1,
2015 in paragraph (c)(458)(i)(A)(1) of
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
*
(f) The EPA is conditionally
approving a California State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted on May 8, 2017, updating
Rule 1325—Federal PM2.5 New Source
Review Program, for the South Coast Air
Quality Management District. The
conditional approval is based on a
commitment from the State to submit a
SIP revision that will correct the
identified deficiencies. If the State fails
to meet its commitment by December
30, 2019, the conditional approval is
treated as a disapproval.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–25900 Filed 11–29–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 260, 261, and 262
Safe Management of Recalled Airbags
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
*
§ 52.248 Identification of plan—conditional
approval.
[EPA–HQ–OLEM–2018–0646; FRL9986–91–
OLEM]
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
§ 52.220
this section and now deleted with
replacement in paragraph
(c)(509)(i)(A)(1), Rule 1325.
*
*
*
*
*
(509) New and amended regulations
for the following APCDs were submitted
on May 8, 2017 by the Governor’s
designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A)
South Coast Air Quality Management
District.
(1) Rule 1325, ‘‘Federal PM2.5 New
Source Review Program’’ amended on
November 4, 2016.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 52.248 is amended by
adding paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Interim final rule with request
for comments.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is issuing this interim
final rule in response to the urgent
public health issue posed by recalled
Takata airbag inflators still installed in
vehicles. With this rule, EPA is
facilitating a more expedited removal of
defective Takata airbag inflators from
vehicles by dealerships, salvage yards
and other locations for safe and
environmentally sound disposal by
exempting the collection of airbag waste
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 231 (Friday, November 30, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61551-61552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-25900]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2018-0413; FRL-9985-75-Region 9]
Revisions to California State Implementation Plan; South Coast
Air Quality Management District; Stationary Source Permits
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing action
on a revision to the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD or District) portion of the California State Implementation
Plan (SIP). We are finalizing a conditional approval of one rule
governing issuance of permits for stationary sources, including review
and permitting of major sources and major modifications under part D of
title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA). Specifically, the revision pertains
to SCAQMD Rule 1325--Federal PM2.5 New Source Review
Program.
DATES: This rule will be effective on December 31, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2018-0413. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Yannayon, EPA Region 9, (415)
972-3534, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the terms ``we,''
``us,'' and ``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On August 8, 2018 (83 FR 39012), the EPA proposed to conditionally
approve the following rule that was submitted for incorporation into
the SCAQMD portion of the California SIP.
Table 1--Submitted Rule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule No. Rule title Amended Submitted
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1325........... Federal PM2.5 New 11/4/16 5/8/17
Source Review Program.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed a conditional approval of this rule because we
determined that, separate from the deficiencies listed in Section II.B
of our proposed rulemaking action, the rule met the statutory
requirements for SIP revisions as specified in section 110(l) of the
CAA, as well as the substantive statutory and regulatory requirements
for a nonattainment New Source Review (NSR) permit program as contained
in CAA sections 110(a)(2)(C) and 173(a) through (c), and 40 CFR 51.165
that pertain to a PM2.5 nonattainment area classified as
Serious. Moreover, we concluded that if the State submits the changes
it committed to submit in its July 16, 2018 commitment letter, the
identified deficiencies will be cured.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received two comments on the proposed rule.
These comments raised issues that are outside the scope of our proposed
approval of Rule 1325, including air pollution monitoring in China and
India, climate change, and wind and solar power costs and regulations.
None of those comments are germane to our evaluation of Rule 1325.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment that
submitted Rule 1325 satisfies the applicable CAA requirements.
Therefore, under CAA sections 110(k)(4) and 301(a), and for the reasons
set forth in our August 8, 2018 proposed rule, we are finalizing the
conditional approval of Rule 1325. This action incorporates Rule 1325
into the federally enforceable SIP and will be codified through
revisions to 40 CFR 52.220 (Identification of plan) and 40 CFR 52.248
(Identification of plan--conditional approval).
If the State meets its commitment to submit the required changes,
the revisions to Rule 1325 will remain a part of the SIP until EPA
takes final action approving or disapproving the new SIP revisions.
However, if the State fails to submit these revisions within the
required timeframe, the conditional approval will automatically become
a disapproval, and EPA will issue a finding of disapproval. EPA is not
required to propose the finding of disapproval.
In addition, because we are finalizing our proposed action, we are
removing the existing Rule 1325 from the SCAQMD portion of the
California SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
SCAQMD rule listed in Table 1 of this preamble. The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these materials available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the EPA Region IX Office
(please contact the person identified in the FOR
[[Page 61552]]
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, New Source Review, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: October 11, 2018.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(458)(i)(A)(2) and
(c)(509) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan--in part.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(458) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(2) Previously approved on May 1, 2015 in paragraph
(c)(458)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
paragraph (c)(509)(i)(A)(1), Rule 1325.
* * * * *
(509) New and amended regulations for the following APCDs were
submitted on May 8, 2017 by the Governor's designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) South Coast Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Rule 1325, ``Federal PM2.5 New Source Review
Program'' amended on November 4, 2016.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
* * * * *
0
3. Section 52.248 is amended by adding paragraph (f) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.248 Identification of plan--conditional approval.
* * * * *
(f) The EPA is conditionally approving a California State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted on May 8, 2017, updating
Rule 1325--Federal PM2.5 New Source Review Program, for the
South Coast Air Quality Management District. The conditional approval
is based on a commitment from the State to submit a SIP revision that
will correct the identified deficiencies. If the State fails to meet
its commitment by December 30, 2019, the conditional approval is
treated as a disapproval.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-25900 Filed 11-29-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P