Air Plan Approval; OR: Lane County Outdoor Burning and Enforcement Procedure Rules, 60386-60389 [2018-25679]
Download as PDF
60386
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 227 / Monday, November 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
through the annual compliance review
proceedings, but also proposes an
alternative before-the-fact review of rate
adjustments. Id. at 10. The Postal
Service submits these proposed rules
and alternative proposed rules in
Appendix I of the Petition.
IV. Invitation to Comment
The Commission establishes Docket
No. RM2019–2 for consideration of
matters raised in the Petition. More
information on the Petition may be
accessed via the Commission’s website
at https://www.prc.gov. Interested
persons may submit comments on the
Petition no later than December 10,
2018.
Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Kenneth E.
Richardson is appointed to serve as an
officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in the
above-captioned docket.
V. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. RM2019–2 for consideration of the
matters raised by the Petition of the
United States Postal Service to Initiate
a Rulemaking Concerning Ratemaking
Procedures for Inbound Letter Post and
Related Services, filed November 16,
2018.
2. Comments are due no later than
December 10, 2018.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the
Commission appoints Kenneth E.
Richardson to serve as an officer of the
Commission (Public Representative) to
represent the interests of the general
public in this docket.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this Notice in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Stacy L. Ruble,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–25665 Filed 11–23–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2018–0596; FRL–9986–94–
Region 10]
Air Plan Approval; OR: Lane County
Outdoor Burning and Enforcement
Procedure Rules
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:28 Nov 23, 2018
Jkt 247001
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) proposes to approve and
incorporate by reference (IBR) into the
Oregon State Implementation Plan (SIP)
the Lane Regional Air Protection
Agency’s (LRAPA) revised outdoor
burning rule submitted by the Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality
(ODEQ) on July 19, 2018. The revised
rule, as it applies in Lane County,
Oregon, clarifies terminology and
provides additional controls of outdoor
burning activities, reducing particulate
emissions and strengthening the Oregon
SIP. In addition, the EPA proposes to
approve but not IBR the enforcement
procedures and civil penalties rule for
LRAPA submitted by the ODEQ on
September 25, 2018. The revised rule
contains revisions that bring
enforcement procedures and civil
penalties rule into alignment with
recent changes in Oregon State
regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10–
OAR–2018–0596, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information the disclosure of which is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christi Duboiski at (360) 753–9081, or
duboiski.christi@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is
intended to refer to the EPA.
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Evaluation of Revisions
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
A. Title 47: Outdoor Burning
B. Title 15: Enforcement Procedures and
Civil Penalties
III. Proposed Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Oregon Notice Provision
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Each State has a Clean Air Act (CAA)
State Implementation Plan (SIP),
containing the control measures and
strategies used to attain and maintain
the national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS) established for the
criteria pollutants (carbon monoxide,
lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone,
particulate matter, sulfur dioxide). The
SIP contains such elements as air
pollution control regulations, emission
inventories, attainment demonstrations,
and enforcement mechanisms. The SIP
is a compilation of these elements and
is revised and updated by a State over
time—to keep pace with Federal
requirements and to address changing
air quality issues in that State.
The Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality (ODEQ)
implements and enforces the Oregon
SIP through rules set out in Chapter 340
of the Oregon Administrative Rules
(OAR), Divisions 200 to 268, apply in all
areas of the State, except where the
Oregon Environmental Quality
Commission (EQC) has designated Lane
Regional Air Protection Agency
(LRAPA) to administer rules within its
area of jurisdiction.
LRAPA has been designated by the
EQC to implement and enforce State
rules in Lane County, and to adopt local
rules that apply within Lane County.
LRAPA may promulgate a local rule in
lieu of a State rule provided: (1) it is as
strict as the corresponding State rule;
and (2) it has been submitted to and
approved by the EQC. This delegation of
authority to LRAPA in the Oregon SIP
is consistent with CAA section
110(a)(2)(E) requirements for State and
local air agencies.
On July 19, 2018 and September 25,
2018, the ODEQ and LRAPA submitted
revisions to the Oregon SIP as it applies
in Lane County. These changes update
the LRAPA Title 47 outdoor burning
rule providing clarification and
additional controls of outdoor burning
activities in Lane County and align the
Title 15 enforcement procedure and
civil penalties rule with recently
approved State rules in OAR Chapter
340, Division12 (80 FR 64346, October
23, 2015).
E:\FR\FM\26NOP1.SGM
26NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 227 / Monday, November 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
II. Evaluation of Revisions
A. Title 47: Outdoor Burning
LRAPA regulates outdoor burning
throughout Lane County, Oregon, except
for agricultural burning, forest slash
burning permitted by the Oregon
Department of Forestry or U.S. Forest
Service, and fire department training
burns. The LRAPA Title 47 outdoor
burning rule, most recently approved by
the EPA on October 23, 2015, is an
element of the SIP strategy outlining
how Oregon will meet Federal air
quality standards to protect public
health and the environment (80 FR
64346). In general, the revised LRAPA
outdoor burning rule provides for
additional controls of outdoor burning
activities in Lane County, Oregon. In
addition, the submitted revisions make
clarifications, incorporate housekeeping
changes that eliminate duplicative text,
change the ‘‘open burning’’ reference to
‘‘outdoor burning’’, separate the
reference of Eugene-Springfield Urban
Growth Boundary (ESUGB) to the
Eugene Urban Growth Boundary (UGB)
and the Springfield UGB (noting each as
a separate and distinct UGB), clean up
typographical errors, and format and
renumber sections and paragraphs. The
key substantive changes are discussed
below.
General
LRAPA revised the general policy
section of Title 47, Section 47–001 to
clarify the outdoor burning rule applies
in Lane County in accordance with OAR
340–264–0160(1). This State rule
establishes the outdoor burning
requirements in Lane County are not to
be less stringent than Oregon’s rule and
prohibits LRAPA from regulating
agricultural outdoor burning. In
addition, LRAPA added ‘‘bonfires’’ and
‘‘ecological conversion’’ to the list of
outdoor burning categories to provide
clarification and a more complete list of
what types of permits LRAPA issues for
outdoor burning,
Exemptions
LRAPA revised the agricultural
outdoor burning exemption language in
Section 47–005 to align with OAR 340–
264–0040 and ORS 468A.020 and made
clear that this type of burning is still
subject to the requirements and
prohibitions of local jurisdictions and
the State Fire Marshal. The exemption
for recreational fires on private property
or in designated recreational areas was
tightened in two ways: the prohibition
on recreational fires on yellow and red
home wood heating advisory days now
extends from at least October through
May (as opposed to November through
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:28 Nov 23, 2018
Jkt 247001
February in the current SIP) and now
applies in the Oakridge Urban Growth
Boundary (in addition to within the
Eugene and Springfield Urban Growth
Boundaries and the city limits of
Oakridge). Although outdoor barbequing
remains exempt, woody yard trimmings,
leaves and grass clippings may no
longer be burned as fuel. Religious
ceremonial fires remain exempt;
however, LRAPA clarified the allowable
size, location, and fuel source. Larger
fires are to be permitted under the
‘‘Bonfire’’ requirement under Section
47–020 Outdoor Burning Letter Permit.
LRAPA expects religious ceremonial
fires to occur infrequently and the
definition requires that such fires be
controlled, be ‘‘integral to a religious
ceremony or ritual,’’ and that prohibited
materials not be burned.
Definitions
In general, the revisions to LRAPA’s
definitions in Section 47–010 clarify the
types of burn categories, and further
define restrictions and burn boundaries.
For example, the ‘‘bonfire’’ definition
establishes the size of a controlled
outdoor fire to be larger than 3 feet in
diameter and 2 feet in height. This helps
to distinguish between what is allowed
as a bonfire, or what is considered
‘‘recreational’’ or ‘‘religious
ceremonial’’. LRAPA also clarified that
a bonfire cannot serve as a disposal for
prohibited materials listed in Section
47–015(1)(e). LRAPA bounded the
definition of ‘‘religious ceremonial fire’’,
setting limits on pile size, defining
materials that can and cannot be burned
and defining where the burn can take
place. Finally, LRAPA defined ‘‘outdoor
burning letter permit’’, issued pursuant
to Section 47–020, to authorize burning
of select materials at a defined site and
under certain conditions. These updates
provide clarification designed to
enhance the enforceability of the rule.
We propose to approve the submitted
revisions to Title 47 definitions because
the changes strengthen the SIP and are
consistent with the CAA.
Outdoor Burning Requirements
LRAPA Section 47–015 contains most
of the general requirements for all
outdoor burning and specific
requirements for the following burn
types: residential, construction and
demolition, commercial, industrial, and
forest slash. The general outdoor
burning requirements have been made
more stringent in many respects. First,
subsection 47–015(1)(e) regarding
prohibited materials has been expanded
to broadly prohibit the burning of items
which, when burned, normally emit
dense smoke noxious odors, or
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60387
hazardous air contaminants, and
specifically adds cardboard, clothing
and grass clippings to the list of such
items. The prohibition on the outdoor
burning of cardboard and clothing was
included to be at least as stringent with
OAR 340–264–0160. In addition, a new
provision was added, Section 47–
015(1)(i), which prohibits the outdoor
burning in barrels throughout Lane
County.
Residential outdoor burning is
allowed only on approved burning days
with the start and end times for burning
set as part of the daily burning advisory
issued by LRAPA. The previous start
and end times, beginning at sunrise and
extending until sunset, were eliminated
to avoid misinterpretation of the hours
set by the LRAPA outdoor burning
advisory, which generally allows the
burn to commence a minimum of
several hours after sunrise and requires
the burn to be extinguished at least
several hours prior to sunset.
LRAPA also added and expanded
several provisions defining outdoor
burning limits for the cities of Eugene,
Springfield, Oakridge and Lowell and
their associated urban growth
boundaries; and the cities of Coburg,
Cottage Grove, Creswell, Dunes City,
Junction City, Veneta and Westfir. For
example, LRAPA expanded outdoor
burning limits from the Eugene city
limits to the Eugene UGB, except that
outdoor burning of wood yard
trimmings is allowed on lots of two
acres or more. The outdoor burning
prohibition for Springfield was
expanded to include the UGB, except
that outdoor burning of woody yard
trimmings is allowed on lots of one half
acre or more. The Oakridge outdoor
burning boundary was also expanded to
include the UGB. In addition, LRAPA
added that outdoor burning within
Florence city limits is prohibited per
Florence city ordinance. These changes
strengthen the previous rule, which
only restricted the burning of woody
yard trimmings within the Eugene and
Springfield city limits and as otherwise
prohibited by some city fire codes.
LRAPA’s approved burn days are still
from March 1 through June 15 and
October 1 through October 31. LRAPA
also formalized the prohibition of the
outdoor burning of grass clippings
throughout Lane County; however, the
outdoor burning of fallen leaves and
woody yard trimmings is still allowed,
subject to restrictions based on time and
location.
In general, these revisions impose
more stringent requirements on
additional geographic areas, increasing
the overall stringency of the restrictions
on outdoor burning, and the EPA
E:\FR\FM\26NOP1.SGM
26NOP1
60388
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 227 / Monday, November 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
proposes to approve them as consistent
with CAA requirements.
Letter Permits
Section 47–020 authorizes certain
types of outdoor burning under letter
permits issued by LRAPA. Section 47–
020(2) has been amended, increasing the
fees for letter permits issued for outdoor
burning of standing vegetation from
$100 to $1,000. A new provision in
Section 47–020(2) authorizes the
Director to compromise on the permit
fee, on a case by case basis, based on set
factors. In addition, Subsection 47–
020(4) was amended to increase the
permit fee for outdoor burning from $4
per cubic year to $10 per cubic yard,
with a minimum fee of $100. The fee
applies to all outdoor burning except for
prescribed burning of standing
vegetation, which is addressed in
Section 47–010(2).
The EPA proposes to find the revised
LRAPA Title 47 outdoor burning rule
provides for additional controls on
outdoor burning which are designed to
reduce particulate emissions in Lane
County and strengthen Oregon’s SIP.
Based on the EPA’s review and analysis
of the revised rule, the EPA is proposing
to approve the submitted Title 47
revisions to the Oregon SIP for Lane
County as meeting the requirements of
section 110 of the Clean Air Act.
Rules not Appropriate for SIP Approval
Title 47 contains several provisions
that are not appropriate for SIP
approval, including but not limited to
nuisance, fire safety, and Title V. The
EPA’s authority to approve SIPs extends
to provisions related to attainment and
maintenance of the NAAQS and
carrying out other specific requirements
of section 110 of the CAA. In this action,
the EPA is not approving into the SIP
the following provisions of Title 47
because they are inappropriate for SIP
approval: LRAPA 47–010—definition of
‘‘nuisance’’; LRAPA 47–015(1)(d);
LRAPA 47–015(1)(h); LRAPA 47–020(3);
LRAPA 47–020(9)(i); and LRAPA 47–
020(10) (80 FR 64346, October 23,
2015).
B. Title 15: Enforcement Procedure and
Civil Penalties
Title 15 outlines enforcement
procedures and civil penalty provisions
that apply to air quality regulations
implemented by LRAPA and approved
by the EPA into the SIP. Title 15
provides the authority and procedures
under which LRAPA notifies regulated
entities of violations, determines the
appropriate penalties for violations, and
assesses penalties for such violations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:28 Nov 23, 2018
Jkt 247001
LRAPA updated Title 15 to
correspond to the State enforcement
rule in OAR Chapter 340, Division 12,
approved by the EPA on October 23,
2015 (80 FR 64346). LRAPA revisions
implement legislative increases in
statutory maximum penalties, align
violation classifications and magnitudes
with program priorities, and provide
greater mitigating credit for correcting
violations. In addition, the rules
incorporate housekeeping changes that
include eliminating duplicative text,
changing references from ‘‘the Agency’’
to ‘‘LRAPA’’ and ‘‘open burning’’ to
‘‘outdoor burning’’, formatting and
renumbering the sections and
paragraphs, and cleaning up
typographical errors. The key
substantive changes are discussed
below.
Overall, LRAPA aligned its
definitions with those in the
corresponding State rule recently
reviewed and approved by the EPA on
October 23, 2015 (80 FR 64346). Key
definition changes include adding
definitions for ‘‘alleged violation’’,
‘‘conduct’’, ‘‘notice of civil penalty
assessment’’, ‘‘residential owneroccupant’’ and ‘‘willful’’ and removing
the term ‘‘risk of harm’’. To mirror the
State’s definition, LRAPA revised the
term ‘‘magnitude of the violation’’ by
removing language that is procedural in
nature. Detailed procedures are
centralized in Section 15–030 Civil
Penalty Determination Procedure
(Mitigating and Aggravating Factors).
LRAPA also simplified the definition of
‘‘violation’’ to remove redundant
language defining the three classes of
violation (class I, II and III).
The submitted revisions also include
several rule sections revised to be
consistent with OAR Chapter 340,
Division 12. LRAPA revised Section
15.018 Notice of Permit Violations and
Exceptions to align with OAR 340–012–
0038 by including language requiring no
advance notice prior to assessment of a
civil penalty if the permittee has an Air
Contaminant Discharge Permit (ACDP)
condition that implements the SIP
under the CAA and the permit violation
would disqualify a State program from
Federal approval or delegation.
Section 15.025 Civil Penalty Matrices
was revised to align with State civil
penalties in OAR 340–012–0140. The
LRAPA penalty matrices and
applications were updated to directly
reflect Oregon’s SIP-approved penalty
amounts. LRAPA also amended Section
15.030 Civil Penalty Determination to
provide the director the discretion to
increase the penalty amount to $25,000
per violation per day of violation to
correspond with OAR 340–012–0160(4).
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
In addition, the civil penalty
formulation factors were updated to
mirror language in OAR 340–012–0045
and OAR 340–012–0145. The submitted
revisions increase the additional civil
penalties for violations that pose an
extreme hazard to public health or cause
extensive environmental damage to
mirror those in OAR 340–200–012–
0155. As stated in Section 15–045,
nothing in Title 15 is intended to
preclude LRAPA from assessing a
penalty of up to the maximum allowed
for the violation by Oregon Revised
Statutes 468 (ORS 468).
LRAPA also aligned Section 15.060
Selected Magnitude Categories with the
State SIP-approved language in OAR
340–012–0135 by removing a
duplicative table defining significant
emission rate amounts for selected air
pollutant magnitude determinations.
This information can now be found in
LRAPA’s Title 12, Tables 2 and 3.
The EPA has reviewed the revisions
to the LRAPA Title 15 enforcement
procedures and civil penalties rule and
finds the rule continues to provide
LRAPA with adequate authority to
enforce the SIP as required by section
110 of the Clean Air Act. The EPA
therefore proposes to approve into the
SIP the revisions to Title 15 to the
extent the provisions relate to section
110 of the CAA and determining
compliance with and for purposes of
implementation of SIP-approved
requirements. We note that we are not
incorporating Title 15 by reference into
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
These types of rules are generally not
incorporated by reference into the CFR
because they may conflict with the
EPA’s independent administrative and
enforcement procedures under the CAA.
III. Proposed Action
We propose to approve and
incorporate by reference into the Oregon
SIP the submitted revisions to the
LRAPA Title 47 outdoor burning rule,
Sections 001, 005, 010 (except the
definition of ‘‘nuisance’’), 015 (except
(1)(d) and (1)(h)), and 020 (except (3),
(9)(i), and (10)). These rules were State
effective July 13, 2018 and submitted to
the EPA by the ODEQ and LRAPA on
July 19, 2018.
We also propose to approve, but not
incorporate by reference, the submitted
revisions to the LRAPA Title 15
enforcement procedures and civil
penalty rule, Sections 001, 005, 015,
018, 020, 025, 030, 035, 040, 045, 055,
057, 060, and 065. These rules were
State effective on September 14, 2018,
and submitted by the ODEQ and LRAPA
on September 25, 2018. They align
LRAPA’s Title 15 rule with the ODEQ’s
E:\FR\FM\26NOP1.SGM
26NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 227 / Monday, November 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Division 12 and provide LRAPA with
authority needed for SIP approval.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, we are proposing to
include in a final rule regulatory text
that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, we are
proposing to incorporate by reference
the provisions described above in
Section III. Proposed Action. The EPA
has made, and will continue to make,
these documents generally available
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at the appropriate EPA office (see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble for
more information).
V. Oregon Notice Provision
Oregon Revised Statute 468.126
prohibits the ODEQ from imposing a
penalty for violation of an air, water or
solid waste permit unless the source has
been provided five days’ advanced
written notice of the violation and has
not come into compliance or submitted
a compliance schedule within that fiveday period. By its terms, the statute does
not apply to Oregon’s title V program or
to any program if application of the
notice provision would disqualify the
program from Federal delegation.
Oregon has previously confirmed that,
because application of the notice
provision would preclude EPA approval
of the Oregon SIP, no advance notice is
required for violation of SIP
requirements.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed
action merely approves State law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by State law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:28 Nov 23, 2018
Jkt 247001
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
this action does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The proposed SIP would not be
approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area
where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the proposed rule does not
have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 9, 2018.
Chris Hladick,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2018–25679 Filed 11–23–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60389
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 158
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2018–0668; FRL–9984–47]
RIN 2070–AK41
Notification of Submission to the
Secretaries of Agriculture and Health
and Human Services; Pesticides;
Technical Amendment to Data
Requirements for Antimicrobial
Pesticides
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notification of submission to
the Secretaries of Agriculture and
Health and Human Services.
AGENCY:
This document notifies the
public as required by the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA) that the EPA Administrator
has forwarded to the Secretary of the
United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA) and the Secretary of the United
States Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) a draft regulatory
document concerning Pesticides;
Technical Amendment to Data
Requirements for Antimicrobial
Pesticides. The draft regulatory
document is not available to the public
until after it has been signed and made
available by EPA.
DATES: On October 29, 2018, the EPA
Administrator forwarded to the
Secretary of the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA) and
the Secretary of the United States
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) a draft regulatory
document concerning Pesticides;
Technical Amendment to Data
Requirements for Antimicrobial
Pesticides.
SUMMARY:
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2018–0668, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg. Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\26NOP1.SGM
26NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 227 (Monday, November 26, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60386-60389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-25679]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2018-0596; FRL-9986-94-Region 10]
Air Plan Approval; OR: Lane County Outdoor Burning and
Enforcement Procedure Rules
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to approve
and incorporate by reference (IBR) into the Oregon State Implementation
Plan (SIP) the Lane Regional Air Protection Agency's (LRAPA) revised
outdoor burning rule submitted by the Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality (ODEQ) on July 19, 2018. The revised rule, as it
applies in Lane County, Oregon, clarifies terminology and provides
additional controls of outdoor burning activities, reducing particulate
emissions and strengthening the Oregon SIP. In addition, the EPA
proposes to approve but not IBR the enforcement procedures and civil
penalties rule for LRAPA submitted by the ODEQ on September 25, 2018.
The revised rule contains revisions that bring enforcement procedures
and civil penalties rule into alignment with recent changes in Oregon
State regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R10-
OAR-2018-0596, at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christi Duboiski at (360) 753-9081, or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, it is intended to refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Evaluation of Revisions
A. Title 47: Outdoor Burning
B. Title 15: Enforcement Procedures and Civil Penalties
III. Proposed Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Oregon Notice Provision
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Each State has a Clean Air Act (CAA) State Implementation Plan
(SIP), containing the control measures and strategies used to attain
and maintain the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)
established for the criteria pollutants (carbon monoxide, lead,
nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, sulfur dioxide). The SIP
contains such elements as air pollution control regulations, emission
inventories, attainment demonstrations, and enforcement mechanisms. The
SIP is a compilation of these elements and is revised and updated by a
State over time--to keep pace with Federal requirements and to address
changing air quality issues in that State.
The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) implements
and enforces the Oregon SIP through rules set out in Chapter 340 of the
Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR), Divisions 200 to 268, apply in all
areas of the State, except where the Oregon Environmental Quality
Commission (EQC) has designated Lane Regional Air Protection Agency
(LRAPA) to administer rules within its area of jurisdiction.
LRAPA has been designated by the EQC to implement and enforce State
rules in Lane County, and to adopt local rules that apply within Lane
County. LRAPA may promulgate a local rule in lieu of a State rule
provided: (1) it is as strict as the corresponding State rule; and (2)
it has been submitted to and approved by the EQC. This delegation of
authority to LRAPA in the Oregon SIP is consistent with CAA section
110(a)(2)(E) requirements for State and local air agencies.
On July 19, 2018 and September 25, 2018, the ODEQ and LRAPA
submitted revisions to the Oregon SIP as it applies in Lane County.
These changes update the LRAPA Title 47 outdoor burning rule providing
clarification and additional controls of outdoor burning activities in
Lane County and align the Title 15 enforcement procedure and civil
penalties rule with recently approved State rules in OAR Chapter 340,
Division12 (80 FR 64346, October 23, 2015).
[[Page 60387]]
II. Evaluation of Revisions
A. Title 47: Outdoor Burning
LRAPA regulates outdoor burning throughout Lane County, Oregon,
except for agricultural burning, forest slash burning permitted by the
Oregon Department of Forestry or U.S. Forest Service, and fire
department training burns. The LRAPA Title 47 outdoor burning rule,
most recently approved by the EPA on October 23, 2015, is an element of
the SIP strategy outlining how Oregon will meet Federal air quality
standards to protect public health and the environment (80 FR 64346).
In general, the revised LRAPA outdoor burning rule provides for
additional controls of outdoor burning activities in Lane County,
Oregon. In addition, the submitted revisions make clarifications,
incorporate housekeeping changes that eliminate duplicative text,
change the ``open burning'' reference to ``outdoor burning'', separate
the reference of Eugene-Springfield Urban Growth Boundary (ESUGB) to
the Eugene Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and the Springfield UGB (noting
each as a separate and distinct UGB), clean up typographical errors,
and format and renumber sections and paragraphs. The key substantive
changes are discussed below.
General
LRAPA revised the general policy section of Title 47, Section 47-
001 to clarify the outdoor burning rule applies in Lane County in
accordance with OAR 340-264-0160(1). This State rule establishes the
outdoor burning requirements in Lane County are not to be less
stringent than Oregon's rule and prohibits LRAPA from regulating
agricultural outdoor burning. In addition, LRAPA added ``bonfires'' and
``ecological conversion'' to the list of outdoor burning categories to
provide clarification and a more complete list of what types of permits
LRAPA issues for outdoor burning,
Exemptions
LRAPA revised the agricultural outdoor burning exemption language
in Section 47-005 to align with OAR 340-264-0040 and ORS 468A.020 and
made clear that this type of burning is still subject to the
requirements and prohibitions of local jurisdictions and the State Fire
Marshal. The exemption for recreational fires on private property or in
designated recreational areas was tightened in two ways: the
prohibition on recreational fires on yellow and red home wood heating
advisory days now extends from at least October through May (as opposed
to November through February in the current SIP) and now applies in the
Oakridge Urban Growth Boundary (in addition to within the Eugene and
Springfield Urban Growth Boundaries and the city limits of Oakridge).
Although outdoor barbequing remains exempt, woody yard trimmings,
leaves and grass clippings may no longer be burned as fuel. Religious
ceremonial fires remain exempt; however, LRAPA clarified the allowable
size, location, and fuel source. Larger fires are to be permitted under
the ``Bonfire'' requirement under Section 47-020 Outdoor Burning Letter
Permit. LRAPA expects religious ceremonial fires to occur infrequently
and the definition requires that such fires be controlled, be
``integral to a religious ceremony or ritual,'' and that prohibited
materials not be burned.
Definitions
In general, the revisions to LRAPA's definitions in Section 47-010
clarify the types of burn categories, and further define restrictions
and burn boundaries. For example, the ``bonfire'' definition
establishes the size of a controlled outdoor fire to be larger than 3
feet in diameter and 2 feet in height. This helps to distinguish
between what is allowed as a bonfire, or what is considered
``recreational'' or ``religious ceremonial''. LRAPA also clarified that
a bonfire cannot serve as a disposal for prohibited materials listed in
Section 47-015(1)(e). LRAPA bounded the definition of ``religious
ceremonial fire'', setting limits on pile size, defining materials that
can and cannot be burned and defining where the burn can take place.
Finally, LRAPA defined ``outdoor burning letter permit'', issued
pursuant to Section 47-020, to authorize burning of select materials at
a defined site and under certain conditions. These updates provide
clarification designed to enhance the enforceability of the rule. We
propose to approve the submitted revisions to Title 47 definitions
because the changes strengthen the SIP and are consistent with the CAA.
Outdoor Burning Requirements
LRAPA Section 47-015 contains most of the general requirements for
all outdoor burning and specific requirements for the following burn
types: residential, construction and demolition, commercial,
industrial, and forest slash. The general outdoor burning requirements
have been made more stringent in many respects. First, subsection 47-
015(1)(e) regarding prohibited materials has been expanded to broadly
prohibit the burning of items which, when burned, normally emit dense
smoke noxious odors, or hazardous air contaminants, and specifically
adds cardboard, clothing and grass clippings to the list of such items.
The prohibition on the outdoor burning of cardboard and clothing was
included to be at least as stringent with OAR 340-264-0160. In
addition, a new provision was added, Section 47-015(1)(i), which
prohibits the outdoor burning in barrels throughout Lane County.
Residential outdoor burning is allowed only on approved burning
days with the start and end times for burning set as part of the daily
burning advisory issued by LRAPA. The previous start and end times,
beginning at sunrise and extending until sunset, were eliminated to
avoid misinterpretation of the hours set by the LRAPA outdoor burning
advisory, which generally allows the burn to commence a minimum of
several hours after sunrise and requires the burn to be extinguished at
least several hours prior to sunset.
LRAPA also added and expanded several provisions defining outdoor
burning limits for the cities of Eugene, Springfield, Oakridge and
Lowell and their associated urban growth boundaries; and the cities of
Coburg, Cottage Grove, Creswell, Dunes City, Junction City, Veneta and
Westfir. For example, LRAPA expanded outdoor burning limits from the
Eugene city limits to the Eugene UGB, except that outdoor burning of
wood yard trimmings is allowed on lots of two acres or more. The
outdoor burning prohibition for Springfield was expanded to include the
UGB, except that outdoor burning of woody yard trimmings is allowed on
lots of one half acre or more. The Oakridge outdoor burning boundary
was also expanded to include the UGB. In addition, LRAPA added that
outdoor burning within Florence city limits is prohibited per Florence
city ordinance. These changes strengthen the previous rule, which only
restricted the burning of woody yard trimmings within the Eugene and
Springfield city limits and as otherwise prohibited by some city fire
codes. LRAPA's approved burn days are still from March 1 through June
15 and October 1 through October 31. LRAPA also formalized the
prohibition of the outdoor burning of grass clippings throughout Lane
County; however, the outdoor burning of fallen leaves and woody yard
trimmings is still allowed, subject to restrictions based on time and
location.
In general, these revisions impose more stringent requirements on
additional geographic areas, increasing the overall stringency of the
restrictions on outdoor burning, and the EPA
[[Page 60388]]
proposes to approve them as consistent with CAA requirements.
Letter Permits
Section 47-020 authorizes certain types of outdoor burning under
letter permits issued by LRAPA. Section 47-020(2) has been amended,
increasing the fees for letter permits issued for outdoor burning of
standing vegetation from $100 to $1,000. A new provision in Section 47-
020(2) authorizes the Director to compromise on the permit fee, on a
case by case basis, based on set factors. In addition, Subsection 47-
020(4) was amended to increase the permit fee for outdoor burning from
$4 per cubic year to $10 per cubic yard, with a minimum fee of $100.
The fee applies to all outdoor burning except for prescribed burning of
standing vegetation, which is addressed in Section 47-010(2).
The EPA proposes to find the revised LRAPA Title 47 outdoor burning
rule provides for additional controls on outdoor burning which are
designed to reduce particulate emissions in Lane County and strengthen
Oregon's SIP. Based on the EPA's review and analysis of the revised
rule, the EPA is proposing to approve the submitted Title 47 revisions
to the Oregon SIP for Lane County as meeting the requirements of
section 110 of the Clean Air Act.
Rules not Appropriate for SIP Approval
Title 47 contains several provisions that are not appropriate for
SIP approval, including but not limited to nuisance, fire safety, and
Title V. The EPA's authority to approve SIPs extends to provisions
related to attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS and carrying out
other specific requirements of section 110 of the CAA. In this action,
the EPA is not approving into the SIP the following provisions of Title
47 because they are inappropriate for SIP approval: LRAPA 47-010--
definition of ``nuisance''; LRAPA 47-015(1)(d); LRAPA 47-015(1)(h);
LRAPA 47-020(3); LRAPA 47-020(9)(i); and LRAPA 47-020(10) (80 FR 64346,
October 23, 2015).
B. Title 15: Enforcement Procedure and Civil Penalties
Title 15 outlines enforcement procedures and civil penalty
provisions that apply to air quality regulations implemented by LRAPA
and approved by the EPA into the SIP. Title 15 provides the authority
and procedures under which LRAPA notifies regulated entities of
violations, determines the appropriate penalties for violations, and
assesses penalties for such violations.
LRAPA updated Title 15 to correspond to the State enforcement rule
in OAR Chapter 340, Division 12, approved by the EPA on October 23,
2015 (80 FR 64346). LRAPA revisions implement legislative increases in
statutory maximum penalties, align violation classifications and
magnitudes with program priorities, and provide greater mitigating
credit for correcting violations. In addition, the rules incorporate
housekeeping changes that include eliminating duplicative text,
changing references from ``the Agency'' to ``LRAPA'' and ``open
burning'' to ``outdoor burning'', formatting and renumbering the
sections and paragraphs, and cleaning up typographical errors. The key
substantive changes are discussed below.
Overall, LRAPA aligned its definitions with those in the
corresponding State rule recently reviewed and approved by the EPA on
October 23, 2015 (80 FR 64346). Key definition changes include adding
definitions for ``alleged violation'', ``conduct'', ``notice of civil
penalty assessment'', ``residential owner-occupant'' and ``willful''
and removing the term ``risk of harm''. To mirror the State's
definition, LRAPA revised the term ``magnitude of the violation'' by
removing language that is procedural in nature. Detailed procedures are
centralized in Section 15-030 Civil Penalty Determination Procedure
(Mitigating and Aggravating Factors). LRAPA also simplified the
definition of ``violation'' to remove redundant language defining the
three classes of violation (class I, II and III).
The submitted revisions also include several rule sections revised
to be consistent with OAR Chapter 340, Division 12. LRAPA revised
Section 15.018 Notice of Permit Violations and Exceptions to align with
OAR 340-012-0038 by including language requiring no advance notice
prior to assessment of a civil penalty if the permittee has an Air
Contaminant Discharge Permit (ACDP) condition that implements the SIP
under the CAA and the permit violation would disqualify a State program
from Federal approval or delegation.
Section 15.025 Civil Penalty Matrices was revised to align with
State civil penalties in OAR 340-012-0140. The LRAPA penalty matrices
and applications were updated to directly reflect Oregon's SIP-approved
penalty amounts. LRAPA also amended Section 15.030 Civil Penalty
Determination to provide the director the discretion to increase the
penalty amount to $25,000 per violation per day of violation to
correspond with OAR 340-012-0160(4). In addition, the civil penalty
formulation factors were updated to mirror language in OAR 340-012-0045
and OAR 340-012-0145. The submitted revisions increase the additional
civil penalties for violations that pose an extreme hazard to public
health or cause extensive environmental damage to mirror those in OAR
340-200-012-0155. As stated in Section 15-045, nothing in Title 15 is
intended to preclude LRAPA from assessing a penalty of up to the
maximum allowed for the violation by Oregon Revised Statutes 468 (ORS
468).
LRAPA also aligned Section 15.060 Selected Magnitude Categories
with the State SIP-approved language in OAR 340-012-0135 by removing a
duplicative table defining significant emission rate amounts for
selected air pollutant magnitude determinations. This information can
now be found in LRAPA's Title 12, Tables 2 and 3.
The EPA has reviewed the revisions to the LRAPA Title 15
enforcement procedures and civil penalties rule and finds the rule
continues to provide LRAPA with adequate authority to enforce the SIP
as required by section 110 of the Clean Air Act. The EPA therefore
proposes to approve into the SIP the revisions to Title 15 to the
extent the provisions relate to section 110 of the CAA and determining
compliance with and for purposes of implementation of SIP-approved
requirements. We note that we are not incorporating Title 15 by
reference into the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). These types of
rules are generally not incorporated by reference into the CFR because
they may conflict with the EPA's independent administrative and
enforcement procedures under the CAA.
III. Proposed Action
We propose to approve and incorporate by reference into the Oregon
SIP the submitted revisions to the LRAPA Title 47 outdoor burning rule,
Sections 001, 005, 010 (except the definition of ``nuisance''), 015
(except (1)(d) and (1)(h)), and 020 (except (3), (9)(i), and (10)).
These rules were State effective July 13, 2018 and submitted to the EPA
by the ODEQ and LRAPA on July 19, 2018.
We also propose to approve, but not incorporate by reference, the
submitted revisions to the LRAPA Title 15 enforcement procedures and
civil penalty rule, Sections 001, 005, 015, 018, 020, 025, 030, 035,
040, 045, 055, 057, 060, and 065. These rules were State effective on
September 14, 2018, and submitted by the ODEQ and LRAPA on September
25, 2018. They align LRAPA's Title 15 rule with the ODEQ's
[[Page 60389]]
Division 12 and provide LRAPA with authority needed for SIP approval.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, we are proposing to include in a final rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, we are proposing to incorporate by
reference the provisions described above in Section III. Proposed
Action. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
generally available electronically through https://www.regulations.gov
and in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES
section of this preamble for more information).
V. Oregon Notice Provision
Oregon Revised Statute 468.126 prohibits the ODEQ from imposing a
penalty for violation of an air, water or solid waste permit unless the
source has been provided five days' advanced written notice of the
violation and has not come into compliance or submitted a compliance
schedule within that five-day period. By its terms, the statute does
not apply to Oregon's title V program or to any program if application
of the notice provision would disqualify the program from Federal
delegation. Oregon has previously confirmed that, because application
of the notice provision would preclude EPA approval of the Oregon SIP,
no advance notice is required for violation of SIP requirements.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
proposed action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because this action does not involve technical standards; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The proposed SIP would not be approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and
will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 9, 2018.
Chris Hladick,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2018-25679 Filed 11-23-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P