Proposed Finding Against Federal Acknowledgment of the Southern Sierra Miwuk Nation, 59409-59410 [2018-25487]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 226 / Friday, November 23, 2018 / Notices
issues: (1) Is the collection necessary to
the proper functions of the BIE; (2) will
this information be processed and used
in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate
of burden accurate; (4) how might the
BIE enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (5) how might the BIE
minimize the burden of this collection
on the respondents, including through
the use of information technology.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this ICR. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Abstract: The purpose of the Human
Capital Management Strengths and
Needs Assessment process is to gain an
understanding of processes and
practices within BIE schools in five
areas including: Hiring, retention, staff
support and development, learning
environment, school culture and
community engagement. Information
will be collected from school staff
members, residential staff members,
school board members, and parents
through online surveys. The goal of
collecting this information is to capture
the perspective of stakeholders when
considering a school’s strengths and
areas of improvement in relation to
human capital functions. The BIE will
use the information collected from this
process to provide targeted
individualized support to schools and to
inform institutional change and
improvement in areas including but not
limited to hiring, professional
development, and retention.
Title of Collection: Human Capital
Management Strengths and Needs
Assessment.
OMB Control Number: 1076–NEW.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: New.
Respondents/Affected Public: School
staff, residential staff, parents, and
school board members affiliated with
Bureau-funded schools.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Respondents: 380.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 380.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:33 Nov 21, 2018
Jkt 247001
Estimated Completion Time per
Response: Varies from 10 to 40 minutes
depending on role of respondent.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 148 hours.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
Obtain a Benefit.
Frequency of Collection: Annually.
Total Estimated Annual Nonhour
Burden Cost: None.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
The authority for this action is the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Elizabeth K. Appel,
Director, Office of Regulatory Affairs and
Collaborative Action, Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2018–25482 Filed 11–21–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[190A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900 253G]
Proposed Finding Against Federal
Acknowledgment of the Southern
Sierra Miwuk Nation
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Interior (Department) gives notice that
the Assistant Secretary–Indian Affairs
(AS–IA) proposes to determine that the
petitioner, Southern Sierra Miwuk
Nation (SSM), is not an Indian Tribe
within the meaning of Federal law. This
notice is based on a determination that
SSM does not meet one of the seven
mandatory criteria for a government-togovernment relationship with the
United States. This proposed finding is
based on only one criterion.
DATES: Comments on this proposed
finding (PF) are due on or before May
22, 2019. We must receive any request
for a technical assistance meeting by
January 22, 2019. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this notice for more information about
these dates.
ADDRESSES: Please address comments
on the PF or requests for a copy of the
report to the Department of the Interior,
Office of the Assistant Secretary–Indian
Affairs, Attn: Office of Federal
Acknowledgment, 1849 C Street NW,
MS–4071 MIB, Washington, DC 20240.
Parties who make comments on the PF
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59409
must also provide a copy of their
comments to the petitioner.
R.
Lee Fleming, Director, Office of Federal
Acknowledgment (OFA), (202) 513–
7650.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to 25 CFR 83.10(h), the Department
gives notice that the AS–IA proposes to
determine that the Southern Sierra
Miwuk Nation (SSM, Petitioner #82),
c/o William H. Leonard, 4630 Ben Hur
Road, Mariposa, California 95338, is not
an Indian Tribe within the meaning of
the Federal law. This notice is based on
a preliminary finding that the petitioner
fails to satisfy one of the seven
mandatory criteria for acknowledgement
set forth in 25 CFR 83.7(a) through (g),
and thus, does not meet the
requirements for a government-togovernment relationship with the
United States.
The Department received a letter of
intent from the petitioner under the
name ‘‘American Indian Council of
Mariposa County’’ (AICMC) on April 24,
1982, and designated it Petitioner #82.
The petitioner submitted a narrative and
partial documentation on April 19,
1984. The Department replied with an
‘‘obvious deficiency’’ (OD) review letter
on May 1, 1985. The petitioner
responded with documentation on
December 12, 1986. At the request of the
petitioner, the Department sent a second
OD review letter on April 11, 1988. The
Department received the petitioner’s
response on January 16, 1998. The
Department then placed Petitioner #82
on the ‘‘Ready, Waiting for Active
Consideration’’ list.
Active consideration began on
November 1, 2010, after which the
Department asked for an updated
membership list and any other materials
within 60 days (70 FR 16514). The
petitioner requested an ‘‘extension of
time to submit documentation,’’ and the
Department received the petitioner’s
submission on February 8, 2011,
containing documentation, meeting
minutes, membership list, articles,
newspapers, and governing documents.
During review of Petitioner #82’s
documented petition, OFA identified
technical issues with the petitioner’s
membership files that needed to be
resolved in order to complete the review
for the PF. For this reason, the AS–IA
extended the original due date for
issuance of the PF, from November 1,
2011 to April 30, 2012. During further
review, additional technical issues with
the petitioner’s membership vital
records arose, and the AS–IA found
good cause to suspend the issuance of
the PF under 83.10(g).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM
23NON1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
59410
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 226 / Friday, November 23, 2018 / Notices
On July 31, 2015, the Department
issued a final rule that revised the
acknowledgment regulations and
provided the petitioner the opportunity
to choose to complete the evaluation
either under the revised 2015
regulations or under the 1994
regulations (80 FR 37862–37895).
Petitioner #82 decided to continue with
the review of its petition under the 1994
regulations. Active consideration
resumed, with the AS–IA ultimately
extending the deadline for this PF to
November 16, 2018.
Criterion 83.7(b) requires that ‘‘a
predominant portion of the petitioning
group comprises a distinct community
and has existed as a community from
historical times until the present.’’
Section 83.1 defines ‘‘Community’’ as:
Any group of people which can
demonstrate that consistent interactions
and significant social relationships exist
within its membership and that its
members are differentiated from and
identified as distinct from
nonmembers.. Community must be
understood in the context of the history,
geography, culture and social
organization of the group.’’ The
definition of ‘‘the present’’ is tailored to
each petitioner’s unique history. For
this petitioner, ‘‘the present’’ is defined
as 1982 (the year when the petitioner
submitted its Letter of Intent) to 2011
(the year when the petitioner submitted
supplemental membership information).
Evidence in the record shows
involvement by some members of the
petitioner in group activities, but not by
a predominant portion of the
membership. Events sponsored by the
formal organization are attended by
some of the petitioner’s members, but
also by non-Indians and non-Miwok
Indians (some of whom may be closely
related to the petitioner but who are
enrolled in federally recognized Tribes).
Participation in these activities appears
to include some members from various
families, but it is unclear to what extent
this participation represents a crosssection of the entire membership. The
record contains very little information
regarding how often members interact
with each other outside of the functions
organized by the group’s leadership.
The materials and interviews contained
few descriptions of members from
multiple families socializing at birthday
parties, baby showers, graduations,
anniversaries, or other events not
sponsored by the group’s governing
body. There is also little to no
discussion in the interviews or in any of
the documents in the record of members
informally looking after each other’s
children, taking in other members if
they were rendered homeless, helping
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:33 Nov 21, 2018
Jkt 247001
other members to secure employment,
or aiding other members in times of
sickness or financial hardship.
The evidence in the record is
insufficient to demonstrate that
Petitioner #82 meets the criterion
83.7(b), one of the seven mandatory
criteria of the regulations for a
determination that the petitioning group
is an Indian Tribe. In accordance with
the regulations, the failure to meet all
seven criteria requires a determination
that the petitioning group is not an
Indian Tribe within the meaning of
Federal law. See 25 CFR 83.6(d) and 25
CFR 83.10(m). Therefore, the
Department proposes to decline to
acknowledge Petitioner #82 as an Indian
Tribe.
According to the AS–IA OFA;
Guidance and Direction Regarding
Internal Procedures of May 23, 2008:
If during the evaluation of a petition on
active consideration it becomes apparent that
the petitioner fails on one criterion, or more,
under the reasonable likelihood of the
validity of the facts standard, OFA may
prepare a proposed finding or final
determination not to acknowledge the group
on the failed criterion or criteria alone,
setting forth the evidence, reasoning, and
analyses that form the basis for the proposed
decision. (73 FR 30146–30148)
The burden of providing sufficient
evidence under the criteria in the
regulations rests with the petitioner (25
CFR 83.5(c)). Because Petitioner #82 has
not met criterion § 83.(b) as a distinct
community, it is not necessary, at this
time, for the Department to make
conclusions regarding the other six
mandatory criteria.
Additionally, due to the fact that the
petitioner fails to meet the requirements
of 83.7(b) (‘‘the present’’), the
Department considers it unnecessary to
conduct an analysis whether a
predominant portion of the group
comprised a distinct community and
existed as a community from historical
times. If additional evidence is provided
after the PF is published, the
Department may find it necessary to
conduct an analysis of community from
historical times to the present.
The PF is based on the evidence
currently in the record. Additional
evidence may be submitted during the
comment period that follows
publication of this finding. If new
evidence provided during the comment
period results in a reversal of this
conclusion, the AS–IA will issue an
amended PF evaluating all seven
criteria. (73 FR 30146–30148)
Publication of this notice of the PF in
the Federal Register initiates a 180-day
comment period during which the
petitioner and interested and informed
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
parties may submit arguments and
evidence to support or rebut the
evidence relied upon in the PF.
Comments on the PF should be
addressed to both the petitioner and the
Federal Government as required by 25
CFR 83.10(i) and as instructed in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice by the
date listed in the DATES section of this
notice. The regulations, 25 CFR
83.10(k), provide the petitioner a
minimum of 60 days to respond to any
submissions on the PF received from
interested and informed parties during
the comment period. After expiration of
the comment and response periods
described above, the Department will
consult with the petitioner and
interested parties to determine an
equitable timeframe for consideration of
written arguments and evidence. The
Department will notify the petitioner
and interested parties of the date such
consideration begins. After
consideration of the written arguments
and evidence rebutting or supporting
the PF and the petitioner’s response to
the comments of interested parties, the
AS–IA will either issue an amended
proposed finding or make a final
determination regarding the petitioner’s
status. The Department will publish a
summary of this determination in the
Federal Register.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal information
from public review, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Dated: November 16, 2018.
Tara Sweeney,
Assistant Secretary, Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2018–25487 Filed 11–21–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM
23NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 226 (Friday, November 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59409-59410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-25487]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[190A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900 253G]
Proposed Finding Against Federal Acknowledgment of the Southern
Sierra Miwuk Nation
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Interior (Department) gives notice that
the Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs (AS-IA) proposes to determine
that the petitioner, Southern Sierra Miwuk Nation (SSM), is not an
Indian Tribe within the meaning of Federal law. This notice is based on
a determination that SSM does not meet one of the seven mandatory
criteria for a government-to-government relationship with the United
States. This proposed finding is based on only one criterion.
DATES: Comments on this proposed finding (PF) are due on or before May
22, 2019. We must receive any request for a technical assistance
meeting by January 22, 2019. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this notice for more information about these dates.
ADDRESSES: Please address comments on the PF or requests for a copy of
the report to the Department of the Interior, Office of the Assistant
Secretary-Indian Affairs, Attn: Office of Federal Acknowledgment, 1849
C Street NW, MS-4071 MIB, Washington, DC 20240. Parties who make
comments on the PF must also provide a copy of their comments to the
petitioner.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R. Lee Fleming, Director, Office of
Federal Acknowledgment (OFA), (202) 513-7650.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 25 CFR 83.10(h), the Department
gives notice that the AS-IA proposes to determine that the Southern
Sierra Miwuk Nation (SSM, Petitioner #82), c/o William H. Leonard, 4630
Ben Hur Road, Mariposa, California 95338, is not an Indian Tribe within
the meaning of the Federal law. This notice is based on a preliminary
finding that the petitioner fails to satisfy one of the seven mandatory
criteria for acknowledgement set forth in 25 CFR 83.7(a) through (g),
and thus, does not meet the requirements for a government-to-government
relationship with the United States.
The Department received a letter of intent from the petitioner
under the name ``American Indian Council of Mariposa County'' (AICMC)
on April 24, 1982, and designated it Petitioner #82. The petitioner
submitted a narrative and partial documentation on April 19, 1984. The
Department replied with an ``obvious deficiency'' (OD) review letter on
May 1, 1985. The petitioner responded with documentation on December
12, 1986. At the request of the petitioner, the Department sent a
second OD review letter on April 11, 1988. The Department received the
petitioner's response on January 16, 1998. The Department then placed
Petitioner #82 on the ``Ready, Waiting for Active Consideration'' list.
Active consideration began on November 1, 2010, after which the
Department asked for an updated membership list and any other materials
within 60 days (70 FR 16514). The petitioner requested an ``extension
of time to submit documentation,'' and the Department received the
petitioner's submission on February 8, 2011, containing documentation,
meeting minutes, membership list, articles, newspapers, and governing
documents.
During review of Petitioner #82's documented petition, OFA
identified technical issues with the petitioner's membership files that
needed to be resolved in order to complete the review for the PF. For
this reason, the AS-IA extended the original due date for issuance of
the PF, from November 1, 2011 to April 30, 2012. During further review,
additional technical issues with the petitioner's membership vital
records arose, and the AS-IA found good cause to suspend the issuance
of the PF under 83.10(g).
[[Page 59410]]
On July 31, 2015, the Department issued a final rule that revised
the acknowledgment regulations and provided the petitioner the
opportunity to choose to complete the evaluation either under the
revised 2015 regulations or under the 1994 regulations (80 FR 37862-
37895). Petitioner #82 decided to continue with the review of its
petition under the 1994 regulations. Active consideration resumed, with
the AS-IA ultimately extending the deadline for this PF to November 16,
2018.
Criterion 83.7(b) requires that ``a predominant portion of the
petitioning group comprises a distinct community and has existed as a
community from historical times until the present.'' Section 83.1
defines ``Community'' as: Any group of people which can demonstrate
that consistent interactions and significant social relationships exist
within its membership and that its members are differentiated from and
identified as distinct from nonmembers.. Community must be understood
in the context of the history, geography, culture and social
organization of the group.'' The definition of ``the present'' is
tailored to each petitioner's unique history. For this petitioner,
``the present'' is defined as 1982 (the year when the petitioner
submitted its Letter of Intent) to 2011 (the year when the petitioner
submitted supplemental membership information).
Evidence in the record shows involvement by some members of the
petitioner in group activities, but not by a predominant portion of the
membership. Events sponsored by the formal organization are attended by
some of the petitioner's members, but also by non-Indians and non-Miwok
Indians (some of whom may be closely related to the petitioner but who
are enrolled in federally recognized Tribes). Participation in these
activities appears to include some members from various families, but
it is unclear to what extent this participation represents a cross-
section of the entire membership. The record contains very little
information regarding how often members interact with each other
outside of the functions organized by the group's leadership. The
materials and interviews contained few descriptions of members from
multiple families socializing at birthday parties, baby showers,
graduations, anniversaries, or other events not sponsored by the
group's governing body. There is also little to no discussion in the
interviews or in any of the documents in the record of members
informally looking after each other's children, taking in other members
if they were rendered homeless, helping other members to secure
employment, or aiding other members in times of sickness or financial
hardship.
The evidence in the record is insufficient to demonstrate that
Petitioner #82 meets the criterion 83.7(b), one of the seven mandatory
criteria of the regulations for a determination that the petitioning
group is an Indian Tribe. In accordance with the regulations, the
failure to meet all seven criteria requires a determination that the
petitioning group is not an Indian Tribe within the meaning of Federal
law. See 25 CFR 83.6(d) and 25 CFR 83.10(m). Therefore, the Department
proposes to decline to acknowledge Petitioner #82 as an Indian Tribe.
According to the AS-IA OFA; Guidance and Direction Regarding
Internal Procedures of May 23, 2008:
If during the evaluation of a petition on active consideration
it becomes apparent that the petitioner fails on one criterion, or
more, under the reasonable likelihood of the validity of the facts
standard, OFA may prepare a proposed finding or final determination
not to acknowledge the group on the failed criterion or criteria
alone, setting forth the evidence, reasoning, and analyses that form
the basis for the proposed decision. (73 FR 30146-30148)
The burden of providing sufficient evidence under the criteria in
the regulations rests with the petitioner (25 CFR 83.5(c)). Because
Petitioner #82 has not met criterion Sec. 83.(b) as a distinct
community, it is not necessary, at this time, for the Department to
make conclusions regarding the other six mandatory criteria.
Additionally, due to the fact that the petitioner fails to meet the
requirements of 83.7(b) (``the present''), the Department considers it
unnecessary to conduct an analysis whether a predominant portion of the
group comprised a distinct community and existed as a community from
historical times. If additional evidence is provided after the PF is
published, the Department may find it necessary to conduct an analysis
of community from historical times to the present.
The PF is based on the evidence currently in the record. Additional
evidence may be submitted during the comment period that follows
publication of this finding. If new evidence provided during the
comment period results in a reversal of this conclusion, the AS-IA will
issue an amended PF evaluating all seven criteria. (73 FR 30146-30148)
Publication of this notice of the PF in the Federal Register
initiates a 180-day comment period during which the petitioner and
interested and informed parties may submit arguments and evidence to
support or rebut the evidence relied upon in the PF. Comments on the PF
should be addressed to both the petitioner and the Federal Government
as required by 25 CFR 83.10(i) and as instructed in the ADDRESSES
section of this notice by the date listed in the DATES section of this
notice. The regulations, 25 CFR 83.10(k), provide the petitioner a
minimum of 60 days to respond to any submissions on the PF received
from interested and informed parties during the comment period. After
expiration of the comment and response periods described above, the
Department will consult with the petitioner and interested parties to
determine an equitable timeframe for consideration of written arguments
and evidence. The Department will notify the petitioner and interested
parties of the date such consideration begins. After consideration of
the written arguments and evidence rebutting or supporting the PF and
the petitioner's response to the comments of interested parties, the
AS-IA will either issue an amended proposed finding or make a final
determination regarding the petitioner's status. The Department will
publish a summary of this determination in the Federal Register.
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal information from
public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Dated: November 16, 2018.
Tara Sweeney,
Assistant Secretary, Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2018-25487 Filed 11-21-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
