Semiannual Regulatory Agenda, 58117-58121 [2018-24167]
Download as PDF
Vol. 83
Friday,
No. 222
November 16, 2018
Part XXII
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS 22
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:13 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4717
Sfmt 4717
E:\FR\FM\16NOP22.SGM
16NOP22
58118
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL
PROTECTION
12 CFR CH. X
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda
Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection (Bureau) is
publishing this agenda as part of the
Fall 2018 Unified Agenda of Federal
Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions.
The Bureau reasonably anticipates
having the regulatory matters identified
below under consideration during the
period from October 1, 2018 to
September 30, 2019. The next agenda
will be published in spring 2019 and
will update this agenda through spring
2020. Publication of this agenda is in
accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
DATES: This information is current as of
August 30, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection, 1700 G Street NW,
Washington, DC 20552.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A
staff contact is included for each
regulatory item listed herein. If you
require this document in an alternative
electronic format, please contact CFPB_
Accessibility@cfpb.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Bureau is publishing its Fall 2018
Agenda as part of the Fall 2018 Unified
Agenda of Federal Regulatory and
Deregulatory Actions, which is
coordinated by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866. The agenda lists
the regulatory matters that the Bureau
reasonably anticipates having under
consideration during the period from
October 1, 2018 to September 30, 2019,
as described further below.1 The
Bureau’s participation in the Unified
Agenda is voluntary. The complete
Unified Agenda is available to the
public at the following website: https://
www.reginfo.gov.
Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act, Public Law 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376
(Dodd-Frank Act), the Bureau has
rulemaking, supervisory, enforcement,
and other authorities relating to
consumer financial products and
services. These authorities include the
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS 22
SUMMARY:
1 The listing does not include certain routine,
frequent, or administrative matters. Further, certain
of the information fields for the listing are not
applicable to independent regulatory agencies,
including the Bureau, and, accordingly, the Bureau
has indicated responses of ‘‘no’’ for such fields.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:13 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
authority to issue regulations under
more than a dozen Federal consumer
financial laws, which transferred to the
Bureau from seven Federal agencies on
July 21, 2011. The Bureau’s general
purpose, as specified in section 1021 of
the Dodd-Frank Act, is to implement
and enforce Federal consumer financial
law consistently for the purpose of
ensuring that all consumers have access
to markets for consumer financial
products and services and that markets
for consumer financial products and
services are fair, transparent, and
competitive.
The Bureau is working on various
initiatives to address issues in markets
for consumer financial products and
services that are not reflected in this
notice because the Unified Agenda is
limited to rulemaking activities. Section
1021 of the Dodd-Frank Act specifies
the objectives of the Bureau, including
ensuring that, with respect to consumer
financial products and services,
consumers are provided with timely and
understandable information to make
responsible decisions about financial
transactions; consumers are protected
from unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts
and practices and from discrimination;
outdated, unnecessary, or unduly
burdensome regulations are regularly
identified and addressed in order to
reduce unwarranted regulatory burdens;
that Federal consumer financial law is
enforced consistently, without regard to
the status of a person as a depository
institution, in order to promote fair
competition; and markets for consumer
financial products and services operate
transparently and efficiently to facilitate
access and innovation.
The Bureau is under interim
leadership pending the confirmation of
a permanent director. The Bureau is also
in the process of implementing various
provisions in the Economic Growth,
Regulatory Relief, and Consumer
Protection Act (EGRRCPA), Public Law
115–174, 132 Stat. 1297, which was
signed into law in May 2018, and of
conducting its first assessments of the
effectiveness of prior ‘‘significant’’
Bureau rulemakings as required by
section 1022(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act.
In addition, the Bureau is analyzing
more than 86,000 comments received in
response to its ‘‘Call for Evidence’’
initiative seeking feedback on Bureau
operations and regulations. The
comment period for the last of that
initiative’s twelve Requests for
Information closed in July 2018.
This Agenda largely focuses on the
continuation of projects from the Spring
2018 Agenda and the addition of
rulemakings to implement EGRRCPA
requirements. The Bureau is carefully
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
considering the feedback received
through the Call for Evidence, prior
Requests for Information released in
conjunction with the section 1022(d)
assessments, and other sources in
setting its future priorities. Following
this consideration, the Bureau expects
to refine its priorities no later than the
Spring 2019 Agenda and will publish a
statement of priorities at that time.
Implementing Statutory Directives
Much of the Bureau’s rulemaking
work is focusing on implementing
directives mandated in the EGRRCPA,
the Dodd-Frank Act, and other statutes.
As part of these rulemakings, the Bureau
is working to achieve the consumer
protection objectives of the statutes
while minimizing regulatory burden on
financial services providers, including
facilitating industry compliance with
rules.
For example, the Bureau issued two
rules to facilitate the implementation of
the EGRRCPA. The first was an interim
final rule that adjusts certain model
forms under the Fair Credit Reporting
Act in light of EGRRCPA amendments
to strengthen consumers’ ability to
protect themselves from identity theft.
To reduce compliance costs and
disruption in light of the September 21,
2018 effective date of this amendment,
the rule provides various options for
amending the affected disclosures to
inform consumers that the EGRRCPA
created a right to obtain a free ‘‘security
freeze’’ from nationwide consumer
reporting agencies and extended the
length of ‘‘fraud alerts’’ that consumers
may place on their files with nationwide
consumer reporting agencies from 90
days to one year. The interim final rule
takes effect on September 21, 2018, but
the Bureau is seeking comment on the
changes and underlying disclosures.
The second issuance in August 2018
was an interpretive and procedural rule
that provides clarification regarding
EGRRCPA amendments to the Home
Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA),
which requires financial institutions to
report certain mortgage information to
federal financial regulators and the
public. The scope of HMDA reporting
was expanded by the Dodd-Frank Act
and by the Bureau via rule in 2015. The
EGRRCPA creates a partial exemption to
allow certain insured depository
institutions and insured credit unions
not to report certain data points for
certain transactions. The August 2018
interpretive and procedural rule
provides clarification as to which loans
and lines of credit count toward the
EGRRCPA exemption thresholds and
which data points are covered by the
partial exemptions. As indicated in the
E:\FR\FM\16NOP22.SGM
16NOP22
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS 22
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
rule and discussed further below, the
Bureau anticipates commencing an
additional notice-and-comment
rulemaking in spring 2019 to
incorporate the August interpretations
and procedures into Regulation C,
further implement the EGRRCPA
amendments to HMDA, and conduct the
Bureau’s own reconsideration of the
2015 HMDA rule.
The Bureau has also added three
additional EGRRCPA projects to the
agenda, in addition to engaging in a
range of other non-rulemaking activities
to reflect the statute’s passage and to
provide guidance to industry on
implementation issues. The first two
projects reflect directives in sections
108 and 307 of EGRRCPA that require
the Bureau to engage in rulemakings to
(1) exempt certain creditors with assets
of $10 billion or less from certain
mortgage escrow requirements under
the Dodd-Frank Act; and (2) develop
standards for assessing consumers’
ability to repay ‘‘Property Assessed
Clean Energy’’ financing (PACE), which
results in a tax assessment on a
consumer’s home and covers the costs
of home improvements, often to
increase energy efficiency. The third
project contemplates that notice-andcomment rulemaking may be helpful to
implement or clarify other provisions of
EGRRCPA that do not require Bureau
rulemaking to take effect,2 particularly
with regard to various provisions that
address mortgage requirements under
the Dodd-Frank Act and its
implementing regulations.
The Bureau has also added a new
rulemaking to its agenda to facilitate
further implementation of a statutory
directive in the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act
amendments to HMDA that the Bureau
modify or require modification of the
public HMDA data for the purpose of
protecting consumer privacy interests.
In the 2015 final rule to implement the
Dodd-Frank Act amendments, the
Bureau adopted a balancing test to
determine whether and how HMDA
data should be modified prior to its
disclosure to the public in order to
protect applicant and borrower privacy
while also fulfilling HMDA’s public
disclosure purpose. The Bureau sought
comment in 2017 on its proposed
application of the balancing test to the
2018 data to be collected and reported
by lenders, and expects to issue final
guidance in the next few months to
govern the disclosure of the 2018 data.
After consideration of stakeholder
2 See, e.g., Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief,
and Consumer Protection Act, Public Law 115–174,
132 Stat. 1296, §§ 101, 104, 106, 107, 109(a), 301,
601 (2018).’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:13 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
comments urging that determinations
concerning the disclosure of loan-level
HMDA data be effectuated through more
formal processes, the Bureau has
decided to add the new notice-andcomment rulemaking to govern the
disclosure of HMDA data in future
years.
In light of the need to focus additional
resources on various HMDA initiatives
discussed elsewhere in this agenda, the
Bureau has adjusted its timeline for
implementing an additional statutory
directive contained in section 1071 of
the Dodd-Frank Act. Section 1071
amended the Equal Credit Opportunity
Act (ECOA) to require financial
institutions to collect, report, and make
public certain information concerning
credit applications made by womenowned, minority-owned, and small
businesses. The Bureau delayed
implementation of this provision
pending implementation of the DoddFrank Act amendments to HMDA,
which creates a similar regime for
mortgages, and then accelerated work
on the project after the HMDA rules
were issued in 2015. In light of current
resource constraints and priority
accorded to HMDA implementation, the
Bureau has now reclassified the section
1071 project from pre-rule status to
longer-term action status. The Bureau
intends to continue certain market
monitoring and research activities to
facilitate resumption of the rulemaking.
Continuation of Other Rulemakings
The Bureau is continuing certain
other rulemakings described in its
Spring 2018 Agenda to ensure that
markets for consumer financial products
and services operate transparently and
efficiently and to address potential
unwarranted regulatory burdens.
For example, the Bureau announced
in January 2018 that it intends to engage
in a rulemaking to reconsider a 2017
rule titled Payday, Vehicle Title, and
Certain High-Cost Installment Loans.
The rule has a compliance date in
August 2019. The Bureau expects to
issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
by no later than early 2019 that will
address reconsideration of the rule on
the merits as well as address changes to
its compliance date.
In addition, prior to the enactment of
the EGRRCPA, the Bureau had already
taken action in August 2017 to
temporarily increase the threshold for
collecting and reporting HMDA data
with respect to open-end lines of credit
so that the Bureau could assess whether
to make a permanent adjustment to that
threshold. In December 2017, the
Bureau announced that it intended to
open a rulemaking to reconsider its
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
58119
2015 HMDA rule more generally, for
instance by potentially revisiting such
issues as the institutional and
transactional coverage tests and the
rule’s discretionary data points. In
addition, as noted above, the Bureau
anticipates engaging in notice-andcomment rulemaking to incorporate the
EGRRCPA interpretative and procedural
rule issued in August 2018 into
Regulation C and to further implement
the Act. The Bureau is considering these
various HMDA projects in conjunction
with each other and expects to issue a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in
spring 2019 to address some or all of the
issues related to them.
Finally, the Bureau has continued to
engage in research and pre-rulemaking
activities regarding the debt collection
market, which remains a top source of
complaints to the Bureau. The Bureau
has also received encouragement from
industry and consumer groups to engage
in rulemaking to address how to apply
the 40-year old Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act (FDCPA) to modern
collection practices. The Bureau
released an outline of proposals under
consideration in July 2016 concerning
practices by companies that are debt
collectors under the FDCPA. This
outline was released in advance of
convening a panel in August 2016 under
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act in
conjunction with the Office of
Management and Budget and the Small
Business Administration’s Chief
Counsel for Advocacy to consult with
representatives of small businesses that
might be affected by the rulemaking.
The Bureau expects to issue a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking addressing such
issues as communication practices and
consumer disclosures by spring 2019.
Further Planning
As noted above, the Bureau has a
number of workstreams underway that
could affect planning and prioritization
of rulemaking activity, as well as the
way in which it conducts rulemakings
and related processes. First, by January
2019, the Bureau will have completed
three assessments prior ‘‘significant’’
Bureau rulemakings. These are the first
assessments the Bureau has conducted
to comply with section 1022(d) of the
Dodd-Frank Act. These assessments
focus on rules that the Bureau issued to
implement Dodd-Frank Act
requirements concerning international
remittance transfers, the assessment of
consumers’ ability to repay mortgage
loans, and mortgage servicing. The
Bureau will consider the results of these
assessments and stakeholder feedback
on the rules in determining whether
E:\FR\FM\16NOP22.SGM
16NOP22
58120
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
additional rulemaking or other policy
initiatives are warranted. The Bureau
also expects to begin work in 2019 on
an assessment of its rules implementing
a Dodd-Frank Act mandate to
consolidate various mortgage
origination disclosures under the Truth
in Lending Act and Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act.
In addition, as noted above, the
Bureau issued twelve Requests for
Information in 2018 seeking feedback on
a wide variety of Bureau practices and
procedures, as well as regulations that it
had inherited from other agencies and
issued under its own authority. The
Bureau is assessing the suggestions for
substantive rulemakings received in
response to the RFIs along with
suggestions from other sources, such as
ideas gathered by an internal task force
on burden reduction and projects that
have previously been listed on the
Bureau’s agenda for potential
rulemaking.3
The Bureau is also considering future
activity with regard to specific areas of
consumer financial law of significant
public interest. For example, the Bureau
announced in May 2018 that it is
reexamining the requirements of the
Equal Credit Opportunity Act
concerning the disparate impact
doctrine in light of recent Supreme
Court case law and the Congressional
disapproval of a prior Bureau bulletin
concerning indirect auto lender
compliance with ECOA and its
implementing regulations.4 The Bureau
is also considering whether rulemaking
or other activities may be helpful to
further clarify the meaning of
‘‘abusiveness’’ under the section 1031 of
the Dodd-Frank Act. Section 1031 and
other provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act
authorize the Bureau to take
enforcement, supervision, and
rulemaking action concerning unfair,
deceptive, or abusive acts and practices.
While statutory language, regulations,
policy statements, and case law have
provided important clarifications as to
the meaning of unfairness and
deception under federal consumer
protection law over several decades, the
Dodd-Frank Act was the first federal law
to define and prohibit ‘‘abusive’’ acts
and practices with respect to consumer
financial products and services
generally.
The Bureau is also considering
refinements to the ways in which it
conducts processes related to
rulemakings, both in response to
comments received in response to the
Call for Evidence and other
considerations. For example, the Bureau
has decided to create an Office of Cost
Benefit Analysis as part of an ongoing
initiative to improve its analysis of the
impacts of potential and adopted rules
on consumers, financial services
providers, and broader markets.5 The
Bureau is also refining and expanding
its processes for conducting
retrospective reviews of regulations to
identify and address potential
unwarranted regulatory burdens on an
ongoing basis.6
Finally, as required by the DoddFrank Act, the Bureau is continuing to
monitor markets for consumer financial
products and services to identify risks to
consumers and the proper functioning
of such markets. The Bureau expects by
no later than the Spring 2019 Agenda to
issue a more comprehensive statement
of priorities to reflect this market
monitoring and the Bureau’s other
activities discussed above.
Kelly Thompson Cochran,
Assistant Director for Regulations, Bureau of
Consumer Financial Protection.
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU—LONG-TERM ACTIONS
Title
434 ....................
Business Lending Data (Regulation B) ............................................................................................................
3170–AA09
E.O. 13771 Designation: Independent
agency.
Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1691c–2
Abstract: Section 1071 of the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act)
amends the Equal Credit Opportunity
Act (ECOA) to require financial
institutions to report information
concerning credit applications made by
women-owned, minority-owned, and
small businesses. The amendments to
ECOA made by the Dodd-Frank Act
require that certain data be collected,
maintained, and reported, including the
number of the application and date the
application was received; the type and
purpose of the loan or credit applied for;
the amount of credit applied for and
approved; the type of action taken with
regard to each application and the date
of such action; the census tract of the
principal place of business; the gross
annual revenue of the business; and the
race, sex, and ethnicity of the principal
owners of the business. The Dodd-Frank
Act also provides authority for the
Bureau to require any additional data
that the Bureau determines would aid in
fulfilling the purposes of this section.
The Bureau issued a Request for
Information in 2017 seeking public
comment on, among other things, the
types of credit products offered and the
types of data currently collected by
lenders in this market, and the potential
complexity, cost of, and privacy issues
related to, small business data
collection. The information received
will help the Bureau determine how to
implement the rule efficiently while
minimizing burdens on lenders. In light
of other responsibilities, the Bureau has
moved this rulemaking from pre-rule to
long-term action status. The Bureau
intends to continue certain market
monitoring and research activities to
facilitate resumption of the rulemaking.
Timetable:
3 In spring 2018, the Bureau reclassified certain
projects that had previously been listed on the
Bureau’s active and longer-term agenda as
‘‘inactive’’ pending a decision by the Bureau’s next
permanent director as to whether and when to
proceed with the projects. The Bureau noted that
the reclassification was not intended as a decision
on the merits. The Bureau has made no further
adjustments to the projects that were retained on
the longer-term agenda for the Spring 2018 edition
except to note where some projects have been
reclassified as active rulemakings.
4 https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/
newsroom/statement-bureau-consumer-financialprotection-enactment-sj-res-57/.
5 https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/thebureau/bureau-structure/.
6 See, e.g., the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
610 (requiring agencies to review certain
regulations within ten years after publication for
purposes of minimizing their impacts on small
businesses).
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION
BUREAU (CFPB)
Long-Term Actions
434. Business Lending Data (Regulation
B)
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS 22
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:13 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Action
Request for Information.
E:\FR\FM\16NOP22.SGM
16NOP22
Date
05/15/17
FR Cite
82 FR 22318
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
Action
Date
Request for Information Comment Period
End.
Next action undetermined.
FR Cite
09/14/17
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Elena Grigera
Babinecz, Office of Regulations,
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Phone: 202 435–7700.
RIN: 3170–AA09
[FR Doc. 2018–24167 Filed 11–15–18; 8:45 am]
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS 22
BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:13 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\16NOP22.SGM
16NOP22
58121
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 222 (Friday, November 16, 2018)]
[Unknown Section]
[Pages 58117-58121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-24167]
[[Page 58117]]
Vol. 83
Friday,
No. 222
November 16, 2018
Part XXII
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda
Federal Register / Vol. 83 , No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 /
Unified Agenda
[[Page 58118]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION
12 CFR CH. X
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda
AGENCY: Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau) is
publishing this agenda as part of the Fall 2018 Unified Agenda of
Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions. The Bureau reasonably
anticipates having the regulatory matters identified below under
consideration during the period from October 1, 2018 to September 30,
2019. The next agenda will be published in spring 2019 and will update
this agenda through spring 2020. Publication of this agenda is in
accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
DATES: This information is current as of August 30, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, 1700 G Street NW,
Washington, DC 20552.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A staff contact is included for each
regulatory item listed herein. If you require this document in an
alternative electronic format, please contact
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Bureau is publishing its Fall 2018
Agenda as part of the Fall 2018 Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory
and Deregulatory Actions, which is coordinated by the Office of
Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866. The agenda lists the
regulatory matters that the Bureau reasonably anticipates having under
consideration during the period from October 1, 2018 to September 30,
2019, as described further below.\1\ The Bureau's participation in the
Unified Agenda is voluntary. The complete Unified Agenda is available
to the public at the following website: https://www.reginfo.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The listing does not include certain routine, frequent, or
administrative matters. Further, certain of the information fields
for the listing are not applicable to independent regulatory
agencies, including the Bureau, and, accordingly, the Bureau has
indicated responses of ``no'' for such fields.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (Dodd-Frank Act),
the Bureau has rulemaking, supervisory, enforcement, and other
authorities relating to consumer financial products and services. These
authorities include the authority to issue regulations under more than
a dozen Federal consumer financial laws, which transferred to the
Bureau from seven Federal agencies on July 21, 2011. The Bureau's
general purpose, as specified in section 1021 of the Dodd-Frank Act, is
to implement and enforce Federal consumer financial law consistently
for the purpose of ensuring that all consumers have access to markets
for consumer financial products and services and that markets for
consumer financial products and services are fair, transparent, and
competitive.
The Bureau is working on various initiatives to address issues in
markets for consumer financial products and services that are not
reflected in this notice because the Unified Agenda is limited to
rulemaking activities. Section 1021 of the Dodd-Frank Act specifies the
objectives of the Bureau, including ensuring that, with respect to
consumer financial products and services, consumers are provided with
timely and understandable information to make responsible decisions
about financial transactions; consumers are protected from unfair,
deceptive, or abusive acts and practices and from discrimination;
outdated, unnecessary, or unduly burdensome regulations are regularly
identified and addressed in order to reduce unwarranted regulatory
burdens; that Federal consumer financial law is enforced consistently,
without regard to the status of a person as a depository institution,
in order to promote fair competition; and markets for consumer
financial products and services operate transparently and efficiently
to facilitate access and innovation.
The Bureau is under interim leadership pending the confirmation of
a permanent director. The Bureau is also in the process of implementing
various provisions in the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and
Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA), Public Law 115-174, 132 Stat. 1297,
which was signed into law in May 2018, and of conducting its first
assessments of the effectiveness of prior ``significant'' Bureau
rulemakings as required by section 1022(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act. In
addition, the Bureau is analyzing more than 86,000 comments received in
response to its ``Call for Evidence'' initiative seeking feedback on
Bureau operations and regulations. The comment period for the last of
that initiative's twelve Requests for Information closed in July 2018.
This Agenda largely focuses on the continuation of projects from
the Spring 2018 Agenda and the addition of rulemakings to implement
EGRRCPA requirements. The Bureau is carefully considering the feedback
received through the Call for Evidence, prior Requests for Information
released in conjunction with the section 1022(d) assessments, and other
sources in setting its future priorities. Following this consideration,
the Bureau expects to refine its priorities no later than the Spring
2019 Agenda and will publish a statement of priorities at that time.
Implementing Statutory Directives
Much of the Bureau's rulemaking work is focusing on implementing
directives mandated in the EGRRCPA, the Dodd-Frank Act, and other
statutes. As part of these rulemakings, the Bureau is working to
achieve the consumer protection objectives of the statutes while
minimizing regulatory burden on financial services providers, including
facilitating industry compliance with rules.
For example, the Bureau issued two rules to facilitate the
implementation of the EGRRCPA. The first was an interim final rule that
adjusts certain model forms under the Fair Credit Reporting Act in
light of EGRRCPA amendments to strengthen consumers' ability to protect
themselves from identity theft. To reduce compliance costs and
disruption in light of the September 21, 2018 effective date of this
amendment, the rule provides various options for amending the affected
disclosures to inform consumers that the EGRRCPA created a right to
obtain a free ``security freeze'' from nationwide consumer reporting
agencies and extended the length of ``fraud alerts'' that consumers may
place on their files with nationwide consumer reporting agencies from
90 days to one year. The interim final rule takes effect on September
21, 2018, but the Bureau is seeking comment on the changes and
underlying disclosures.
The second issuance in August 2018 was an interpretive and
procedural rule that provides clarification regarding EGRRCPA
amendments to the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), which requires
financial institutions to report certain mortgage information to
federal financial regulators and the public. The scope of HMDA
reporting was expanded by the Dodd-Frank Act and by the Bureau via rule
in 2015. The EGRRCPA creates a partial exemption to allow certain
insured depository institutions and insured credit unions not to report
certain data points for certain transactions. The August 2018
interpretive and procedural rule provides clarification as to which
loans and lines of credit count toward the EGRRCPA exemption thresholds
and which data points are covered by the partial exemptions. As
indicated in the
[[Page 58119]]
rule and discussed further below, the Bureau anticipates commencing an
additional notice-and-comment rulemaking in spring 2019 to incorporate
the August interpretations and procedures into Regulation C, further
implement the EGRRCPA amendments to HMDA, and conduct the Bureau's own
reconsideration of the 2015 HMDA rule.
The Bureau has also added three additional EGRRCPA projects to the
agenda, in addition to engaging in a range of other non-rulemaking
activities to reflect the statute's passage and to provide guidance to
industry on implementation issues. The first two projects reflect
directives in sections 108 and 307 of EGRRCPA that require the Bureau
to engage in rulemakings to (1) exempt certain creditors with assets of
$10 billion or less from certain mortgage escrow requirements under the
Dodd-Frank Act; and (2) develop standards for assessing consumers'
ability to repay ``Property Assessed Clean Energy'' financing (PACE),
which results in a tax assessment on a consumer's home and covers the
costs of home improvements, often to increase energy efficiency. The
third project contemplates that notice-and-comment rulemaking may be
helpful to implement or clarify other provisions of EGRRCPA that do not
require Bureau rulemaking to take effect,\2\ particularly with regard
to various provisions that address mortgage requirements under the
Dodd-Frank Act and its implementing regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See, e.g., Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer
Protection Act, Public Law 115-174, 132 Stat. 1296, Sec. Sec. 101,
104, 106, 107, 109(a), 301, 601 (2018).''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bureau has also added a new rulemaking to its agenda to
facilitate further implementation of a statutory directive in the 2010
Dodd-Frank Act amendments to HMDA that the Bureau modify or require
modification of the public HMDA data for the purpose of protecting
consumer privacy interests. In the 2015 final rule to implement the
Dodd-Frank Act amendments, the Bureau adopted a balancing test to
determine whether and how HMDA data should be modified prior to its
disclosure to the public in order to protect applicant and borrower
privacy while also fulfilling HMDA's public disclosure purpose. The
Bureau sought comment in 2017 on its proposed application of the
balancing test to the 2018 data to be collected and reported by
lenders, and expects to issue final guidance in the next few months to
govern the disclosure of the 2018 data. After consideration of
stakeholder comments urging that determinations concerning the
disclosure of loan-level HMDA data be effectuated through more formal
processes, the Bureau has decided to add the new notice-and-comment
rulemaking to govern the disclosure of HMDA data in future years.
In light of the need to focus additional resources on various HMDA
initiatives discussed elsewhere in this agenda, the Bureau has adjusted
its timeline for implementing an additional statutory directive
contained in section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act. Section 1071 amended
the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) to require financial
institutions to collect, report, and make public certain information
concerning credit applications made by women-owned, minority-owned, and
small businesses. The Bureau delayed implementation of this provision
pending implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act amendments to HMDA, which
creates a similar regime for mortgages, and then accelerated work on
the project after the HMDA rules were issued in 2015. In light of
current resource constraints and priority accorded to HMDA
implementation, the Bureau has now reclassified the section 1071
project from pre-rule status to longer-term action status. The Bureau
intends to continue certain market monitoring and research activities
to facilitate resumption of the rulemaking.
Continuation of Other Rulemakings
The Bureau is continuing certain other rulemakings described in its
Spring 2018 Agenda to ensure that markets for consumer financial
products and services operate transparently and efficiently and to
address potential unwarranted regulatory burdens.
For example, the Bureau announced in January 2018 that it intends
to engage in a rulemaking to reconsider a 2017 rule titled Payday,
Vehicle Title, and Certain High-Cost Installment Loans. The rule has a
compliance date in August 2019. The Bureau expects to issue a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking by no later than early 2019 that will address
reconsideration of the rule on the merits as well as address changes to
its compliance date.
In addition, prior to the enactment of the EGRRCPA, the Bureau had
already taken action in August 2017 to temporarily increase the
threshold for collecting and reporting HMDA data with respect to open-
end lines of credit so that the Bureau could assess whether to make a
permanent adjustment to that threshold. In December 2017, the Bureau
announced that it intended to open a rulemaking to reconsider its 2015
HMDA rule more generally, for instance by potentially revisiting such
issues as the institutional and transactional coverage tests and the
rule's discretionary data points. In addition, as noted above, the
Bureau anticipates engaging in notice-and-comment rulemaking to
incorporate the EGRRCPA interpretative and procedural rule issued in
August 2018 into Regulation C and to further implement the Act. The
Bureau is considering these various HMDA projects in conjunction with
each other and expects to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in
spring 2019 to address some or all of the issues related to them.
Finally, the Bureau has continued to engage in research and pre-
rulemaking activities regarding the debt collection market, which
remains a top source of complaints to the Bureau. The Bureau has also
received encouragement from industry and consumer groups to engage in
rulemaking to address how to apply the 40-year old Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act (FDCPA) to modern collection practices. The Bureau
released an outline of proposals under consideration in July 2016
concerning practices by companies that are debt collectors under the
FDCPA. This outline was released in advance of convening a panel in
August 2016 under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act in conjunction with the Office of Management and Budget and the
Small Business Administration's Chief Counsel for Advocacy to consult
with representatives of small businesses that might be affected by the
rulemaking. The Bureau expects to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
addressing such issues as communication practices and consumer
disclosures by spring 2019.
Further Planning
As noted above, the Bureau has a number of workstreams underway
that could affect planning and prioritization of rulemaking activity,
as well as the way in which it conducts rulemakings and related
processes. First, by January 2019, the Bureau will have completed three
assessments prior ``significant'' Bureau rulemakings. These are the
first assessments the Bureau has conducted to comply with section
1022(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act. These assessments focus on rules that
the Bureau issued to implement Dodd-Frank Act requirements concerning
international remittance transfers, the assessment of consumers'
ability to repay mortgage loans, and mortgage servicing. The Bureau
will consider the results of these assessments and stakeholder feedback
on the rules in determining whether
[[Page 58120]]
additional rulemaking or other policy initiatives are warranted. The
Bureau also expects to begin work in 2019 on an assessment of its rules
implementing a Dodd-Frank Act mandate to consolidate various mortgage
origination disclosures under the Truth in Lending Act and Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act.
In addition, as noted above, the Bureau issued twelve Requests for
Information in 2018 seeking feedback on a wide variety of Bureau
practices and procedures, as well as regulations that it had inherited
from other agencies and issued under its own authority. The Bureau is
assessing the suggestions for substantive rulemakings received in
response to the RFIs along with suggestions from other sources, such as
ideas gathered by an internal task force on burden reduction and
projects that have previously been listed on the Bureau's agenda for
potential rulemaking.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In spring 2018, the Bureau reclassified certain projects
that had previously been listed on the Bureau's active and longer-
term agenda as ``inactive'' pending a decision by the Bureau's next
permanent director as to whether and when to proceed with the
projects. The Bureau noted that the reclassification was not
intended as a decision on the merits. The Bureau has made no further
adjustments to the projects that were retained on the longer-term
agenda for the Spring 2018 edition except to note where some
projects have been reclassified as active rulemakings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bureau is also considering future activity with regard to
specific areas of consumer financial law of significant public
interest. For example, the Bureau announced in May 2018 that it is
reexamining the requirements of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act
concerning the disparate impact doctrine in light of recent Supreme
Court case law and the Congressional disapproval of a prior Bureau
bulletin concerning indirect auto lender compliance with ECOA and its
implementing regulations.\4\ The Bureau is also considering whether
rulemaking or other activities may be helpful to further clarify the
meaning of ``abusiveness'' under the section 1031 of the Dodd-Frank
Act. Section 1031 and other provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act authorize
the Bureau to take enforcement, supervision, and rulemaking action
concerning unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts and practices. While
statutory language, regulations, policy statements, and case law have
provided important clarifications as to the meaning of unfairness and
deception under federal consumer protection law over several decades,
the Dodd-Frank Act was the first federal law to define and prohibit
``abusive'' acts and practices with respect to consumer financial
products and services generally.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/newsroom/statement-bureau-consumer-financial-protection-enactment-sj-res-57/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bureau is also considering refinements to the ways in which it
conducts processes related to rulemakings, both in response to comments
received in response to the Call for Evidence and other considerations.
For example, the Bureau has decided to create an Office of Cost Benefit
Analysis as part of an ongoing initiative to improve its analysis of
the impacts of potential and adopted rules on consumers, financial
services providers, and broader markets.\5\ The Bureau is also refining
and expanding its processes for conducting retrospective reviews of
regulations to identify and address potential unwarranted regulatory
burdens on an ongoing basis.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/the-bureau/bureau-structure/.
\6\ See, e.g., the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 610
(requiring agencies to review certain regulations within ten years
after publication for purposes of minimizing their impacts on small
businesses).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, as required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the Bureau is
continuing to monitor markets for consumer financial products and
services to identify risks to consumers and the proper functioning of
such markets. The Bureau expects by no later than the Spring 2019
Agenda to issue a more comprehensive statement of priorities to reflect
this market monitoring and the Bureau's other activities discussed
above.
Kelly Thompson Cochran,
Assistant Director for Regulations, Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau--Long-Term Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
434....................... Business Lending Data 3170-AA09
(Regulation B).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU (CFPB)
Long-Term Actions
434. Business Lending Data (Regulation B)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Independent agency.
Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1691c-2
Abstract: Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) amends the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act (ECOA) to require financial institutions to report
information concerning credit applications made by women-owned,
minority-owned, and small businesses. The amendments to ECOA made by
the Dodd-Frank Act require that certain data be collected, maintained,
and reported, including the number of the application and date the
application was received; the type and purpose of the loan or credit
applied for; the amount of credit applied for and approved; the type of
action taken with regard to each application and the date of such
action; the census tract of the principal place of business; the gross
annual revenue of the business; and the race, sex, and ethnicity of the
principal owners of the business. The Dodd-Frank Act also provides
authority for the Bureau to require any additional data that the Bureau
determines would aid in fulfilling the purposes of this section. The
Bureau issued a Request for Information in 2017 seeking public comment
on, among other things, the types of credit products offered and the
types of data currently collected by lenders in this market, and the
potential complexity, cost of, and privacy issues related to, small
business data collection. The information received will help the Bureau
determine how to implement the rule efficiently while minimizing
burdens on lenders. In light of other responsibilities, the Bureau has
moved this rulemaking from pre-rule to long-term action status. The
Bureau intends to continue certain market monitoring and research
activities to facilitate resumption of the rulemaking.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Request for Information............. 05/15/17 82 FR 22318
[[Page 58121]]
Request for Information Comment 09/14/17 .......................
Period End.
-----------------------------------
Next action undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Elena Grigera Babinecz, Office of Regulations,
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Phone: 202 435-7700.
RIN: 3170-AA09
[FR Doc. 2018-24167 Filed 11-15-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AM-P