Department Regulatory and Deregulatory Agenda; Semiannual Summary, 58051-58070 [2018-24091]
Download as PDF
Vol. 83
Friday,
No. 222
November 16, 2018
Part XI
Department of Transportation
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4717
Sfmt 4717
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
58052
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
14 CFR Chs. I–III
23 CFR Chs. I–III
Purpose
Appendix A—Instructions for Obtaining
Copies of Regulatory Documents
Appendix B—General Rulemaking Contact
Persons
Appendix C—Public Rulemaking Dockets
Appendix D—Review Plans for Section 610
and Other Requirements
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
33 CFR Chs. I and IV
Background
46 CFR Chs. I–III
48 CFR Ch. 12
49 CFR Subtitle A, Chs. I–VI, and Chs.
X–XII
[DOT–OST–1999–5129]
Department Regulatory and
Deregulatory Agenda; Semiannual
Summary
Office of the Secretary, DOT.
Unified Agenda of Federal
Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
(Regulatory Agenda).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Regulatory and
Deregulatory Agenda is a semiannual
summary of all current and projected
rulemakings, reviews of existing
regulations, and completed actions of
the Department. The intent of the
Agenda is to provide the public with
information about the Department of
Transportation’s regulatory activity
planned for the next 12 months. It is
expected that this information will
enable the public to more effectively
participate in the Department’s
regulatory process. The public is also
invited to submit comments on any
aspect of this Agenda.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUMMARY:
General
You should direct all comments and
inquiries on the Agenda in general to
Jonathan Moss, Assistant General
Counsel for Regulation, Office of
General Counsel, Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590;
(202) 366–4723.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
Specific
You should direct all comments and
inquiries on particular items in the
Agenda to the individual listed for the
regulation or the general rulemaking
contact person for the operating
administration in appendix B.
Table of Contents
Supplementary Information
Background
Significant/Priority Rulemakings
Explanation of Information on the Agenda
Request for Comments
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
A primary goal of the Department of
Transportation (Department or DOT) is
to allow the public to understand how
we make decisions, which necessarily
includes being transparent in the way
we measure the risks, costs, and benefits
of engaging in—or deciding not to
engage in—a particular regulatory
action. As such, it is our policy to
provide an opportunity for public
comment on such actions to all
interested stakeholders. Above all,
transparency and meaningful
engagement mandate that regulations
should be straightforward, clear, and
accessible to any interested stakeholder.
The Department also embraces the
notion that there should be no more
regulations than necessary. We
emphasize consideration of nonregulatory solutions and have rigorous
processes in place for continual
reassessment of existing regulations.
These processes provide that regulations
and other agency actions are
periodically reviewed and, if
appropriate, are revised to ensure that
they continue to meet the needs for
which they were originally designed,
and that they remain cost-effective and
cost-justified.
To help the Department achieve its
goals and in accordance with Executive
Order (E.O.) 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review,’’ (58 FR 51735;
Oct. 4, 1993) and the Department’s
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; Feb. 26, 1979), the
Department prepares a semiannual
regulatory and deregulatory agenda. It
summarizes all current and projected
rulemakings, reviews of existing
regulations, and completed actions of
the Department. These are matters on
which action has begun or is projected
during the next 12 months or for which
action has been completed since the last
Agenda.
In addition, this Agenda was prepared
in accordance with three Executive
Orders issued by President Trump,
which directed agencies to further
scrutinize their regulations and other
agency actions. On January 30, 2017,
President Trump signed Executive
Order 13771, Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs. Under
section 2(a) of the Executive order,
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
unless prohibited by law, whenever an
executive department or agency
publicly proposes for notice and
comment or otherwise promulgates a
new regulation, it must identify at least
two existing regulations to be repealed.
On February 24, 2017, President Trump
signed Executive Order 13777,
Enforcing the Regulatory Reform
Agenda. Under this Executive order,
each agency must establish a Regulatory
Reform Task Force (RRTF) to evaluate
existing regulations, and make
recommendations for their repeal,
replacement, or modification. On March
28, 2017, President Trump signed
Executive Order 13783, Promoting
Energy Independence and Economic
Growth, requiring agencies to review all
existing regulations, orders, guidance
documents, policies, and other similar
agency actions that potentially burden
the development or use of domestically
produced energy resources, with
particular attention to oil, natural gas,
coal, and nuclear energy resources.
In response to the mandate in
Executive Order 13777, the Department
formed an RRTF consisting of senior
career and non-career leaders, which
has already conducted extensive
reviews of existing regulations, and
identified a number of rules to be
repealed, replaced, or modified. As a
result of the RRTF’s work, since January
2017, the Department has issued
deregulatory actions that reduce
regulatory costs on the public by at least
$882 million (in net present value cost
savings). Even when the costs of
significant regulatory actions are
factored in, the Department’s
deregulatory actions in FY 2018 will
still result in over $500 million in net
cost savings (in net present value). With
the RRTF’s assistance, the Department
has achieved these cost savings in a
manner that is fully consistent with
enhancing safety. For example, in
March 2018, the FAA promulgated a
rule titled Rotorcraft Pilot Compartment
View, which will reduce the number of
tests for nighttime operations, after the
Agency carefully considered the safety
data and determined the tests were
unnecessary.
The Department has also significantly
increased the number of deregulatory
actions it is pursuing. Today, DOT is
pursuing over 120 deregulatory
rulemakings, up from just 16 in the fall
of 2016.
While each regulatory and
deregulatory action is evaluated on its
own merits, the RRTF augments the
Department’s consideration of
prospective rulemakings by conducting
monthly reviews across all OAs to
identify appropriate deregulatory
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
actions. The RRTF also works to ensure
that any new regulatory action is
rigorously vetted and non-regulatory
alternatives are considered. Further
information on the RRTF can be found
online at: https://
www.transportation.gov/regulations/
regulatory-reform-task-force-report.
The Department’s ongoing regulatory
effort is guided by four fundamental
principles—safety, innovation, enabling
investment in infrastructure, and
reducing unnecessary regulatory
burdens. These priorities are grounded
in our national interest in maintaining
U.S. global leadership in safety,
innovation, and economic growth. To
accomplish our regulatory goals, we
must create a regulatory environment
that fosters growth in new and
innovative industries without burdening
them with unnecessary restrictions. At
the same time, safety remains our
highest priority; we must remain
focused on managing safety risks and
being sure that we do not regress from
the successes already achieved. Our
planned regulatory actions reflect a
careful balance that emphasizes the
Department’s priority in fostering
innovation while at the same time
meeting the challenges of maintaining a
safe, reliable, and sustainable
transportation system.
For example, the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
is working on reducing regulatory
barriers to technology innovation,
including the integration of automated
vehicles. Automated vehicles are
expected to increase safety significantly
by reducing the likelihood of human
error when driving, which today
accounts for the overwhelming majority
of accidents on our nation’s roadways.
NHTSA plans to issue regulatory actions
that: (1) Design a pilot program for
vehicles that may not meet FMVSS; (2)
allow for permanent updates to current
FMVSS reflecting new technology; and
(3) allow for updates to NHTSA’s
regulations outlining the administrative
processes for petitioning the agency for
exemptions, rulemakings, and
reconsiderations. Similarly, the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) is
working to enable, safely and efficiently,
the integration of unmanned aircraft
systems (UAS) into the National
Airspace System. UAS are expected to
continue to drive innovation and
increase safety as operators and
manufacturers find new and inventive
uses for UAS. For instance, UAS are
poised to assist human operators with a
number of different mission sets such as
inspection of critical infrastructure and
search and rescue, enabling beneficial
and lifesaving activities that would
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
otherwise be difficult or even
impossible for a human to accomplish
unassisted. The Department has
regulatory efforts underway to further
integrate UAS safely and efficiently.
The Department is working on several
rulemakings to facilitate a major
transformation of our national space
program from one in which the federal
government has a primary role to one in
which private industry drives growth in
innovation and launches. The
Department is also currently working on
a rulemaking to facilitate a major
transformation of our national space
program that will enable private
industry to drive growth in innovation
and launches. The FAA is proposing a
rule that will fundamentally change
how FAA licenses launches and
reentries of commercial space vehicles
moving from prescriptive requirements
to a performance based approach.
Explanation of Information in the
Agenda
An Office of Management and Budget
memorandum, dated June 18, 2018,
establishes the format for this Agenda.
First, the Agenda is divided by
initiating offices. Then the Agenda is
divided into five categories: (1) Prerule
stage; (2) proposed rule stage; (3) final
rule stage; (4) long-term actions; and (5)
completed actions. For each entry, the
Agenda provides the following
information: (1) Its ‘‘significance’’; (2) a
short, descriptive title; (3) its legal basis;
(4) the related regulatory citation in the
Code of Federal Regulations; (5) any
legal deadline and, if so, for what action
(e.g., NPRM, final rule); (6) an abstract;
(7) a timetable, including the earliest
expected date for when a rulemaking
document may publish; (8) whether the
rulemaking will affect small entities
and/or levels of Government and, if so,
which categories; (9) whether a
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
analysis is required (for rules that would
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities);
(10) a listing of any analyses an office
will prepare or has prepared for the
action (with minor exceptions, DOT
requires an economic analysis for all its
rulemakings); (11) an agency contact
office or official who can provide
further information; (12) a Regulation
Identifier Number (RIN) assigned to
identify an individual rulemaking in the
Agenda and facilitate tracing further
action on the issue; (13) whether the
action is subject to the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act; (14) whether the
action is subject to the Energy Act; (15)
the action’s designation under Executive
Order 13771 explaining whether the
action will have a regulatory or
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
58053
deregulatory effect; and (16) whether the
action is major under the congressional
review provisions of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
For nonsignificant regulations issued
routinely and frequently as a part of an
established body of technical
requirements (such as the Federal
Aviation Administration’s Airspace
Rules), to keep those requirements
operationally current, we only include
the general category of the regulations,
the identity of a contact office or
official, and an indication of the
expected number of regulations; we do
not list individual regulations.
In the ‘‘Timetable’’ column, we use
abbreviations to indicate the particular
documents being considered. ANPRM
stands for Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, SNPRM for Supplemental
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, and
NPRM for Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking. Listing a future date in this
column does not mean we have made a
decision to issue a document; it is the
earliest date on which a rulemaking
document may publish. In addition,
these dates are based on current
schedules. Information received after
the issuance of this Agenda could result
in a decision not to take regulatory
action or in changes to proposed
publication dates. For example, the
need for further evaluation could result
in a later publication date; evidence of
a greater need for the regulation could
result in an earlier publication date.
Finally, a dot (•) preceding an entry
indicates that the entry appears in the
Agenda for the first time.
The internet is the basic means for
disseminating the Unified Agenda. The
complete Unified Agenda is available
online at www.reginfo.gov in a format
that offers users a greatly enhanced
ability to obtain information from the
Agenda database. A portion of the
Agenda is published in the Federal
Register, however, because the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 602)
mandates publication for the regulatory
flexibility agenda. Accordingly, DOT’s
printed Agenda entries include only:
1. The agency’s Agenda preamble;
2. Rules that are in the agency’s
regulatory flexibility agenda, in
accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, because they are likely
to have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities; and
3. Any rules that the agency has
identified for periodic review under
section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act.
Printing of these entries is limited to
fields that contain information required
by the Regulatory Flexibility Act’s
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
58054
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
Agenda requirements. These elements
are: Sequence Number; Title; Section
610 Review, if applicable; Legal
Authority; Abstract; Timetable;
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required; Agency Contact; and
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN).
Additional information (for detailed list,
see section heading ‘‘Explanation of
Information on the Agenda’’) on these
entries is available in the Unified
Agenda published on the internet.
Request for Comments
General
Our Agenda is intended primarily for
the use of the public. Since its
inception, we have made modifications
and refinements that we believe provide
the public with more helpful
information, as well as making the
Agenda easier to use. We would like
you, the public, to make suggestions or
comments on how the Agenda could be
further improved.
Reviews
We also seek your suggestions on
which of our existing regulations you
believe need to be reviewed to
determine whether they should be
revised or revoked. We particularly
draw your attention to the Department’s
review plan in appendix D.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department is especially
interested in obtaining information on
requirements that have a ‘‘significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities’’ and, therefore,
must be reviewed under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. If you have any
suggested regulations, please submit
them to us, along with your explanation
of why they should be reviewed.
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, comments are
specifically invited on regulations that
we have targeted for review under
section 610 of the Act. The phrase (sec.
610 Review) appears at the end of the
title for these reviews. Please see
appendix D for the Department’s section
610 review plans.
Consultation With State, Local, and
Tribal Governments
Executive Orders 13132 and 13175
require us to develop an account
process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and
timely input’’ by State, local, and tribal
officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism
or tribal implications. These policies are
defined in the Executive orders to
include regulations that have
‘‘substantial direct effects’’ on States or
Indian tribes, on the relationship
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
between the Federal Government and
them, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and various levels of
Government or Indian tribes. Therefore,
we encourage State and local
Governments or Indian tribes to provide
us with information about how the
Department’s rulemakings impact them.
Purpose
The Department is publishing this
regulatory Agenda in the Federal
Register to share with interested
members of the public the Department’s
preliminary expectations regarding its
future regulatory actions. This should
enable the public to be more aware of
the Department’s regulatory activity and
should result in more effective public
participation. This publication in the
Federal Register does not impose any
binding obligation on the Department or
any of the offices within the Department
with regard to any specific item on the
Agenda. Regulatory action, in addition
to the items listed, is not precluded.
Dated: July 27, 2018.
Elaine L. Chao,
Secretary of Transportation.
Appendix A—Instructions for
Obtaining Copies of Regulatory
Documents
To obtain a copy of a specific
regulatory document in the Agenda, you
should communicate directly with the
contact person listed with the regulation
at the address below. We note that most,
if not all, such documents, including the
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda, are
available through the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov. See appendix C
for more information.
Appendix B—General Rulemaking
Contact Persons
The following is a list of persons who
can be contacted within the Department
for general information concerning the
rulemaking process within the various
operating administrations.
FAA—Lirio Liu, Director, Office of
Rulemaking, 800 Independence Avenue
SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone
(202) 267–7833.
FHWA—Jennifer Outhouse, Office of
Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone
(202) 366–0761.
FMCSA—Steven J. LaFreniere,
Regulatory Ombudsman, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590; telephone (202) 366–0596.
NHTSA—Steve Wood, Office of Chief
Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202)
366–2992.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
FRA—Kathryn Gresham, Office of
Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone
(202) 493–6063.
FTA—Chaya Koffman, Office of Chief
Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202)
366–3101.
SLSDC—Carrie Mann Lavigne, Chief
Counsel, 180 Andrews Street, Massena,
NY 13662; telephone (315) 764–3200.
PHMSA—Stephen Gordon, Office of
Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone
(202) 366–1101.
MARAD—Gabriel Chavez, Office of
Chief Counsel, Maritime
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590;
telephone (202) 366–2621.
OST—Jonathan Moss, Assistant
General Counsel for Regulation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590; telephone (202) 366–4723.
Appendix C—Public Rulemaking
Dockets
All comments via the internet are
submitted through the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) at the
following address: https://
www.regulations.gov. The FDMS allows
the public to search, view, download,
and comment on all Federal agency
rulemaking documents in one central
online system. The above referenced
internet address also allows the public
to sign up to receive notification when
certain documents are placed in the
dockets.
The public also may review regulatory
dockets at or deliver comments on
proposed rulemakings to the Dockets
Office at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590,
1–800–647–5527. Working Hours: 9:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Appendix D—Review Plans for Section
610 and Other Requirements
Part I—The Plan
General
The Department of Transportation has
long recognized the importance of
regularly reviewing its existing
regulations to determine whether they
need to be revised or revoked. Our
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
require such reviews. We also have
responsibilities under Executive Order
12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review,’’ Executive Order 13563,
‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review,’’ 76 FR 3821 (January 18, 2011),
Executive Order 13771 ‘‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs,’’ Executive Order 13777,
‘‘Enforcing the Regulatory Agenda,’’ and
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
58055
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act to conduct such reviews. This
includes the designation of a Regulatory
Reform Officer, the establishment of a
Regulatory Reform Task Force, and the
use of plain language techniques in new
rules and considering its use in existing
rules when we have the opportunity and
resources to revise them. We are
committed to continuing our reviews of
existing rules and, if it is needed, will
initiate rulemaking actions based on
these reviews. The Department will
begin a new 10-year review cycle with
the Fall 2018 Agenda.
Section 610 Review Plan
Section 610 requires that we conduct
reviews of rules that: (1) Have been
published within the last 10 years; and
(2) have a ‘‘significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities’’ (SEISNOSE). It also requires
that we publish in the Federal Register
each year a list of any such rules that
we will review during the next year.
The Office of the Secretary and each of
the Department’s Operating
Administrations have a 10-year review
plan. These reviews comply with
section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act.
Changes to the Review Plan
Some reviews may be conducted
earlier than scheduled. For example, to
the extent resources permit, the plain
language reviews will be conducted
more quickly. Other events, such as
accidents, may result in the need to
conduct earlier reviews of some rules.
Other factors may also result in the need
to make changes; for example, we may
make changes in response to public
comment on this plan or in response to
a presidentially mandated review. If
there is any change to the review plan,
we will note the change in the following
Agenda. For any section 610 review, we
will provide the required notice prior to
the review.
Part II—The Review Process
The Analysis
Generally, the agencies have divided
their rules into 10 different groups and
Year
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Section 610 Review
The agency will analyze each of the
rules in a given year’s group to
determine whether any rule has a
SEISNOSE and, thus, requires review in
accordance with section 610 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The level of
analysis will, of course, depend on the
nature of the rule and its applicability.
Publication of agencies’ section 610
analyses listed each fall in this Agenda
provides the public with notice and an
opportunity to comment consistent with
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. We request that public
comments be submitted to us early in
the analysis year concerning the small
entity impact of the rules to help us in
making our determinations.
In each fall Agenda, the agency will
publish the results of the analyses it has
completed during the previous year. For
rules that had a negative finding on
SEISNOSE, we will give a short
explanation (e.g., ‘‘these rules only
establish petition processes that have no
cost impact’’ or ‘‘these rules do not
apply to any small entities’’). For parts,
subparts, or other discrete sections of
rules that do have a SEISNOSE, we will
announce that we will be conducting a
formal section 610 review during the
following 12 months. At this stage, we
will add an entry to the Agenda in the
pre-rulemaking section describing the
review in more detail. We also will seek
public comment on how best to lessen
the impact of these rules and provide a
name or docket to which public
comments can be submitted. In some
cases, the section 610 review may be
part of another unrelated review of the
rule. In such a case, we plan to clearly
indicate which parts of the review are
being conducted under section 610.
Other Reviews
The agency will also examine the
specified rules to determine whether
any other reasons exist for revising or
revoking the rule or for rewriting the
rule in plain language. In each fall
Agenda, the agency will also publish
information on the results of the
examinations completed during the
previous year.
Part III—List of Pending Section 610
Reviews
The Agenda identifies the pending
DOT section 610 Reviews by inserting
‘‘(Section 610 Review)’’ after the title for
the specific entry. For further
information on the pending reviews, see
the Agenda entries at www.reginfo.gov.
For example, to obtain a list of all
entries that are in section 610 Reviews
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, a
user would select the desired responses
on the search screen (by selecting
‘‘advanced search’’) and, in effect,
generate the desired ‘‘index’’ of reviews.
Office of the Secretary
Section 610 and Other Reviews
Regulations to be reviewed
1 ........................
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
plan to analyze one group each year. For
purposes of these reviews, a year will
coincide with the fall-to-fall schedule
for publication of the Agenda. Most
agencies provide historical information
about the reviews that have occurred
over the past 10 years. Thus, Year 1
(2018) begins in the fall of 2018 and
ends in the fall of 2019; Year 2 (2019)
begins in the fall of 2019 and ends in
the fall of 2020, and so on. The
exception to this general rule is the
FAA, which provides information about
the reviews it completed for this year
and prospective information about the
reviews it intends to complete in the
next 10 years. Thus, for FAA Year 1
(2017) begins in the fall of 2017 and
ends in the fall of 2018; Year 2 (2018)
begins in the fall of 2018 and ends in
the fall of 2019, and so on. We request
public comment on the timing of the
reviews. For example, is there a reason
for scheduling an analysis and review
for a particular rule earlier than we
have? Any comments concerning the
plan or analyses should be submitted to
the regulatory contacts listed in
appendix B, General Rulemaking
Contact Persons.
49
14
48
48
14
14
14
14
14
14
49
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
Analysis year
parts 91 through 99 ....................................................................................................
parts 200 through 212
parts 1201 through 1224
parts 1227 through 1253 and new parts and subparts ..............................................
parts 213 through 232 ................................................................................................
parts 234 through 254 ................................................................................................
parts 255 through 298 and 49 CFR part 40 ...............................................................
parts 300 through 373 ................................................................................................
parts 374 through 398 ................................................................................................
part 399 and 49 CFR parts 1 through 15 ...................................................................
parts 17 through 28 ....................................................................................................
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
Review year
2018
2019
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
58056
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
Year
Regulations to be reviewed
10 ......................
49 CFR parts 29 through 39 and parts 41 through 89 ............................................................
Year 10 (2017) List of Rules Analyzed
and a Summary of Results
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
49 CFR part 30—Denial of Public Works
Contracts to Suppliers of Goods and
Services of Countries That Deny
Procurement Market Access to U.S.
Contractors
• Section 610: OST conducted a
Section 610 review of this part and
found no SEISNOSE.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden. OST’s plain
language review of these rules indicates
no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 31—Program Fraud Civil
Remedies
• Section 610: OST conducted a
review of this part and found no
SEISNOSE.
• General: Changes are needed to this
part to remove obsolete references;
update the Civil Penalties in accordance
with the Federal Civil Penalties
Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements
Act of 2015 (Pub. L. 114–74, section
701), including adding reference to the
Act in the footnotes to append to the
amounts of those penalties; correct and/
or remove certain phrases and terms
throughout the part; and to clarify the
meaning of ‘‘designated by the party’s
representative’’ found in 31.33(f)(2)(ii).
OST’s plain language review of this part
indicates no need for substantial
revision.
49 CFR part 32—Governmentwide
Requirements for Drug-Free
Workplace (Financial Assistance)
• Section 610: OST conducted review
of this part and found no SEISNOSE.
• General: No changes are needed to
this part of the regulation. OST’s plain
language review of this part indicates no
need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 33—Transportation
Priorities and Allocation System
• Section 610: OST conducted review
of this part and found no SEISNOSE.
• General: Review of this part
indicates that Schedule 1 of the
appendix needs to be updated to
include current approved programs.
Additionally, Form OST F 1254—
Appendix I needs to be updated with an
OMB Control Number. OST’s plain
language review of this part indicates no
need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 37—Transportation
Services for Individuals With
Disabilities (ADA)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
Analysis year
• Section 610: OST conducted a
Section 610 review of this part and
found no SEISNOSE.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden. OST’s plain
language review of these rules indicates
no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 38—Americans With
Disabilities Act (ADA) Accessibility
Specifications for Transportation
Vehicles
• Section 610: OST conducted a
Section 610 review of this part and
found no SEISNOSE.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden. OST’s plain
language review of these rules indicates
no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 39—Transportation for
Individuals With Disabilities:
Passenger Vessels
• Section 610: OST conducted a
Section 610 review of this part and
found no SEISNOSE.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden. OST’s plain
language review of these rules indicates
no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 41—Seismic Safety
• Section 610: OST conducted review
of this part and found no SEISNOSE.
• General: Review of this part
indicates that this part needs to be
updated for consistency with Executive
Order 13717, February 2, 2016, which
repealed the underlying Executive
Order 12699. OST’s plain language
review of this part indicates no need for
substantial revision.
49 CFR part 71—Standard Time Zone
Boundaries
• Section 610: No SEISNOSE. No
small entities are affected.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden. OST’s plain
language review of these rules indicates
no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 79—Medals of Honor
• Section 610: OST conducted a
Section 610 review of this part and
found no SEISNOSE.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden. OST’s plain
language review of these rules indicates
no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 80—Credit Assistance for
Surface Transportation Projects
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
2027
Review year
2028
• Section 610: OST conducted a
section 610 review of this part and
found no SEISNOSE.
• General: No changes are needed.
This regulation is cost effective and
imposes the least burden. OST’s plain
language review of this rule indicates no
need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 89—Implementation of
Federal Claims Collection Act
• Section 610: OST conducted review
of this part and found no SEISNOSE.
• General: Review of this part
outlined that numerous cross-references
to statutes and regulations should be
updated to ensure the references are
current and that the DOT’s regulations
are consistent with those references; this
includes removing any obsolete
references to regulations or statutes that
have been rescinded. OST’s plain
language review of this part indicates no
need for substantial revision.
Year 1 (Fall 2018) List of Rules That
Will Be Analyzed During the Next Year
49 CFR part 91—International Air
Transportation Fair Competitive
Practices
49 CFR part 92—Recovering Debts to the
United States by Salary Offset
49 CFR part 93—Aircraft Allocation
49 CFR part 98—Enforcement of
Restrictions on Post-Employment
Activities
49 CFR part 99—Employee
Responsibilities and Conduct
14 CFR part 200—Definitions and
Instructions
14 CFR part 201—Air Carrier Authority
under Subtitle VII of Title 49 of the
United States Code [Amended]
14 CFR part 203—Waiver of Warsaw
Convention Liability Limits and
Defenses
14 CFR part 204—Data to Support
Fitness Determinations
14 CFR part 205—Aircraft Accident
Liability Insurance
14 CFR part 206—Certificates of Public
Convenience and Necessity: Special
Authorizations and Exemptions
14 CFR part 207—Charter Trips by U.S.
Scheduled Air Carriers
14 CFR part 208—Charter Trips by U.S.
Charter Air Carriers
14 CFR part 211—Applications for
Permits to Foreign Air Carriers
14 CFR part 212—Charter Rules for U.S.
and Foreign Direct Air Carriers
48 CFR part 1201—Federal Acquisition
Regulations System
48 CFR part 1202—Definitions of Words
and Terms
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
58057
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
48 CFR part 1203—Improper Business
Practices and Personal Conflicts of
Interest
48 CFR part 1204—Administrative
Matters
48 CFR part 1205—Publicizing Contract
Actions
48 CFR part 1206—Competition
Requirements
48 CFR part 1207—Acquisition
Planning
48 CFR part 1208–1210—[Reserved]
48 CFR part 1211—Describing Agency
Needs
48 CFR part 1212—[Reserved]
48 CFR part 1213—Simplified
Acquisition Procedures
48 CFR part 1214—Sealed Bidding
48 CFR part 1215—Contracting by
Negotiation
48 CFR part 1216—Types of Contracts
Year
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
parts
parts
parts
parts
parts
parts
parts
parts
parts
parts
Section 610 and Other Reviews
The Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) has elected to use the two-step,
two-year process used by most
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
as amended (RFA), (sections 601
through 612 of title 5, United States
Code (5 U.S.C.)) requires Federal
regulatory agencies to analyze all
proposed and final rules to determine
their economic impact on small entities,
which includes small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions. The primary purpose of
the RFA is to establish as a principle of
regulatory issuance that Federal
agencies endeavor, consistent with the
objectives of the rule and applicable
statutes, to fit regulatory and
informational requirements to the scale
of entities subject to the regulation. The
FAA performed the required RFA
analyses of each final rulemaking action
and amendment it has initiated since
enactment of the RFA in 1980.
Section 610 of 5 U.S.C. requires
government agencies to periodically
review all regulations that will have a
SEISNOSE. The FAA must analyze each
rule within 10 years of its publication
date.
Defining SEISNOSE
The RFA does not define ‘‘significant
economic impact.’’ Therefore, there is
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Analysis year
119 through 129 and parts 150 through 156 ....................................................
133 through 139 and parts 157 through 169 ....................................................
141 through 147 and parts 170 through 187 ....................................................
189 through 198 and parts 1 through 16 ..........................................................
17 through 33 ....................................................................................................
34 through 39 and parts 400 through 405 ........................................................
43 through 49 and parts 406 through 415 ........................................................
60 through 77 ....................................................................................................
91 through 105 ..................................................................................................
417 through 460 ................................................................................................
Background on the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
Federal Aviation Administration
Department of Transportation (DOT)
modes in past plans. As such, the FAA
has divided its rules into 10 groups as
displayed in the table below. During the
first year (the ‘‘analysis year’’), all rules
published during the previous 10 years
within a 10% block of the regulations
will be analyzed to identify those with
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
(SEISNOSE). During the second year
(the ‘‘review year’’), each rule identified
in the analysis year as having a
SEISNOSE will be reviewed in
accordance with Section 610(b) to
determine if it should be continued
without change or changed to minimize
impact on small entities. Results of
those reviews will be published in the
DOT Semiannual Regulatory Agenda.
Regulations to be reviewed
1 ........................
2 ........................
3 ........................
4 ........................
5 ........................
6 ........................
7 ........................
8 ........................
9 ........................
10 ......................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
48 CFR part 1217—Special Contracting
Methods
48 CFR part 1218—[Reserved]
48 CFR part 1219—Small Business
Programs
48 CFR part 1220–1221—[Reserved]
48 CFR part 1222—Application of Labor
Laws to Government Acquisitions
48 CFR part 1223—Environment, Energy
and Water Efficiency, Renewable
Energy Technologies, Occupational
Safety, and Drug-Free Workplace
48 CFR part 1224—Protection of Privacy
and Freedom of Information
Jkt 247001
no clear rule or number to determine
when a significant economic impact
occurs. However, the Small Business
Administration (SBA) states that
significance should be determined by
considering the size of the business, the
size of the competitor’s business, and
the impact the same regulation has on
larger competitors.
Likewise, the RFA does not define
‘‘substantial number.’’ However, the
legislative history of the RFA suggests
that a substantial number must be at
least one but does not need to be an
overwhelming percentage such as more
than half. The SBA states that the
substantiality of the number of small
businesses affected should be
determined on an industry-specific
basis.
This analysis consisted of the
following three steps:
1. Review of the number of small
entities affected by the amendments to
parts 119 through 129 and parts 150
through 156.
2. Identification and analysis of all
amendments to parts 119 through 129
and parts 150 through 156 since 2008 to
determine whether any still have or now
have a SEISNOSE.
3. Review of the FAA’s regulatory
flexibility assessment of each
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Review year
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
amendment performed as required by
the RFA.
Year 2 (2019) List of Rules To Be
Analyzed the Next Year
14 CFR part 133—Rotorcraft ExternalLoad Operations
14 CFR part 135—Operating
Requirements: Commuter and On
Demand Operations and Rules
Governing Persons on Board Such
Aircraft
14 CFR part 136—Commercial Air Tours
and National Parks Air Tour
Management
14 CFR part 137—Agricultural Aircraft
Operations
14 CFR part 139—Certification of
Airports
14 CFR part 157—Notice of
Construction, Alteration,
Activation, and Deactivation of
Airports
14 CFR part 158—Passenger Facility
Charges
14 CFR part 161—Notice and Approval
of Airport Noise and Access
Restrictions
14 CFR part 169—Expenditure of
Federal Funds for Nonmilitary
Airports or Air Navigation Facilities
Thereon
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
58058
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
Year 1 (2018) List of Rules Analyzed
and Summary of Results
14 CFR part 119—Certification: Air
Carriers and Commercial Operators
• Section 610: The agency conducted
a Section 610 review of this part and
found no SEISNOSE.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden.
14 CFR part 120—Drug and Alcohol
Testing Programs
• Section 610: The agency conducted
a Section 610 review of this part and
found Docket No. FAA–2008–0937, 74
FR 22653, May 14, 2009, as amended by
Amendment 120–2, 79 FR 9973, Feb. 21,
2014 of section 120.105, Employees
Who Must Be Tested, and Docket No.
FAA–2008–0937, 74 FR 22653, May 14,
2009, as amended by Amendment 120–
2, 79 FR 9973, Feb. 21, 2014 of section
120.215, Covered Employees in CFR
120, trigger SEISNOSE within the
meaning of the RFA.
• General: No revisions are needed.
The FAA has considered a number of
alternatives and has taken steps to
minimize the impact on small entities in
attempts to lower compliance costs for
small entities, but could not go forward
without compromising the safety for the
industry.
14 CFR part 121—Operating
Requirements: Domestic, Flag, and
Supplemental Operations
• Section 610: The agency conducted
a Section 610 review of this part and
found Docket No. FAA–2008–0677, 78
FR 67836, Nov. 12, 2013; Docket No.
9509, 35 FR 90, Jan. 3, 1970, as
amended by Amendment 121–366, 78
FR 67836, Nov. 12, 2013; Docket No.
FAA–2008–0677, 78 FR 67837, Nov. 12,
2013; Amendment 121–366, 78 FR
67837, Nov. 12, 2013; 62 FR 3739, Jan.
24, 1997, as amended by Amendment
121–366, 78 FR 67838, Nov. 12, 2013;
Docket No. FAA–2010–0100, 78 FR
42377, July 15, 2013, as amended by
Amendment 121–366, 78 FR 67839,
Nov. 12, 2013; Amendment 121–357, 77
FR 402, Jan. 4, 2012; Docket No. FAA–
2009–1093, 77 FR 402, Jan. 4, 2012;
Docket No. FAA–2002–12461, 71 FR
63640, Oct. 30, 2006, as amended by
Amendment 121–365, 78 FR 42379, July
15, 2013 in CFR 121 trigger SEISNOSE
within the meaning of the RFA.
• General: No revisions are needed.
The FAA has considered a number of
alternatives and has taken steps to
minimize the impact on small entities in
attempts to lower compliance costs for
small entities, but could not go forward
without compromising the safety for the
industry.
14 CFR part 125—Certification and
Operations: Airplanes Having a
Seating Capacity of 20 or More
Passengers or a Maximum Payload
Capacity of 6,000 Pounds or More,
and Rules Governing Persons on
Board Such Aircraft
• Section 610:
• General:
14 CFR part 129—Operations: Foreign
Air Carriers and Foreign Operators
of U.S.-Registered Aircraft Engaged
in Common Carriage
• Section 610:
• General:
14 CFR part 150—Airport Noise
Compatibility Planning
• Section 610: The agency conducted
a Section 610 review of this part and
found no SEISNOSE.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden.
14 CFR part 151—Federal Aid to
Airports
• Section 610: The agency conducted
a Section 610 review of this part and
found no SEISNOSE.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden.
14 FR part 152—Airport Aid Program
• Section 610: The agency conducted
a Section 610 review of this part and
found no SEISNOSE.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden.
14 CFR part 153—Airport Operations
• Section 610: The agency conducted
a Section 610 review of this part and
found no SEISNOSE.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden.
14 CFR part 155—Release of Airport
Property from Surplus Property
Disposal Restrictions
• Section 610: The agency conducted
a Section 610 review of this part and
found no SEISNOSE.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden.
14 CFR part 156—State Block Grant
Pilot Program
• Section 610: The agency conducted
a Section 610 review of this part and
found no SEISNOSE.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden.
Federal Highway Administration
Section 610 and Other Reviews
Year
Regulations to be reviewed
1 ........................
2 ........................
3 ........................
4 ........................
5 ........................
6 ........................
7 ........................
8 ........................
9 ........................
10 ......................
None .........................................................................................................................................
23 CFR parts 1 to 260 ..............................................................................................................
23 CFR parts 420 to 470 ..........................................................................................................
23 CFR part 500 .......................................................................................................................
23 CFR parts 620 to 637 ..........................................................................................................
23 CFR parts 645 to 669 ..........................................................................................................
23 CFR parts 710 to 924 ..........................................................................................................
23 CFR parts 940 to 973 ..........................................................................................................
23 CFR parts 1200 to 1252 ......................................................................................................
New parts and subparts ...........................................................................................................
Federal-Aid Highway Program
The Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) has adopted regulations in title
23 of the CFR, chapter I, related to the
Federal-Aid Highway Program. These
regulations implement and carry out the
provisions of Federal law relating to the
administration of Federal aid for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
Analysis year
highways. The primary law authorizing
Federal aid for highways is chapter I of
title 23 of the U.S.C. 145, which
expressly provides for a federally
assisted State program. For this reason,
the regulations adopted by the FHWA in
title 23 of the CFR primarily relate to the
requirements that States must meet to
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Review year
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
receive Federal funds for construction
and other work related to highways.
Because the regulations in title 23
primarily relate to States, which are not
defined as small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, the FHWA
believes that its regulations in title 23
do not have a significant economic
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
58059
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The FHWA solicits public
comment on this preliminary
conclusion.
Year 10 (Fall 2017) List of Rules
Analyzed and a Summary of Results
23 CFR part 490—National Performance
Management Measures
• Section 610: No SEISNOSE. No
small entities are affected.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden. FHWA’s plain
language review of these rules indicates
no need for substantial revision. The
FHWA recently repealed one of the
original performance measures on May
31, 2018, at 83 FR 24920.
23 CFR part 505—Projects of National
and Regional Significance
Evaluation and Rating
• Section 610: No SEISNOSE. No
small entities are affected.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden. FHWA’s plain
language review of these rules indicates
no need for substantial revision.
23 FR part 511—Real-Time System
Management Information Program
Year
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
impose the least burden. FHWA’s plain
language review of these rules indicates
no need for substantial revision.
23 CFR part 667—Periodic Evaluation of
Facilities Repeatedly Requiring
Repair and Reconstruction Due to
Emergency Events
• Section 610: No SEISNOSE. No
small entities are affected.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden. FHWA’s plain
language review of these rules indicates
no need for substantial revision.
23 CFR part 950—Electronic Toll
Collection
• Section 610: No SEISNOSE. No
small entities are affected.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden. FHWA’s plain
language review of these rules indicates
no need for substantial revision.
Year 1 (Fall 2018) List of Rules That
Will Be Analyzed During the Next Year
None.
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
Section 610 and Other Reviews
Regulations to be reviewed
1 ........................
2 ........................
3 ........................
4 ........................
5 ........................
6 ........................
7 ........................
8 ........................
9 ........................
10 ......................
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
Analysis year
parts 386 and 395 .......................................................................................................
part 385 .......................................................................................................................
part 382 .......................................................................................................................
parts 380 and 383 .......................................................................................................
part 387 .......................................................................................................................
part 398 .......................................................................................................................
part 392 .......................................................................................................................
part 375 .......................................................................................................................
part 367 .......................................................................................................................
part 395 .......................................................................................................................
Year 1 (Fall 2018) List of Rules That
Will Be Analyzed During the Next Year
49 CFR part 395—Hours of Service
(HOS) of Drivers
(Note: The analysis of this regulation
is continued from year 10 (fall 2017) to
year 1 (fall 2018) of the new review
schedule.
• Section 610: There is a
SEIOSNOSE. The Federal HOS
regulations promote safe driving of
commercial motor vehicles by limiting
on-duty driving time, thereby improving
the likelihood that drivers have
adequate time for restorative rest.
Year
Although this rule drives a SEISNOSE,
it also drives significant benefits to
small business. Tangible benefits
include streamlined operations, reduced
operational cost, maximized
productivity, lower insurance, improved
vehicle diagnostics, reduced
administrative burden, and increased
profits.
• General: The regulatory value of
restricting fatigue-related operations
will save lives and reduce injuries.
These regulations are written consistent
with plain language guidelines, and
uses clear and unambiguous language.
2 ........................
49
49
23
49
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Section 610 and Other Reviews
Analysis year
CFR parts 571.214 through 571.219, except 571.217 .......................................................
FR parts 591 through 595 and new parts and subparts
CFR parts 1200 and 1300 ...................................................................................................
CFR parts 571.223 through 571.500, 575 and 579.23
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Review year
The Agency is currently considering
changes to the hours of service
regulations that would improve
operational flexibilities for motor
carriers without a deleterious effect on
safety.
49 CFR part 386—Rules of practice for
motor carrier, intermodal
equipment provider, broker, freight
forwarder, and hazardous materials
proceedings
Regulations to be reviewed
1 ........................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
• Section 610: No SEISNOSE. No
small entities are affected.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden. FHWA’s plain
language review of these rules indicates
no need for substantial revision.
23 CFR part 515—Asset Management
Plans
• Section 610: No SEISNOSE. No
small entities are affected.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden. FHWA’s plain
language review of these rules indicates
no need for substantial revision.
23 CFR part 635—Subpart E—
Construction Manager/General
Contractor (CM/GC) Contracting
• Section 610: No SEISNOSE. No
small entities are affected.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
impose the least burden. FHWA’s plain
language review of these rules indicates
no need for substantial revision.
23 CFR part 650—Subpart E—National
Tunnel Inspection Standards
• Section 610: No SEISNOSE. No
small entities are affected.
• General: No changes are needed.
These regulations are cost effective and
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
Review year
2018
2019
2019
2020
58060
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
Year
Regulations to be reviewed
3 ........................
4 ........................
5 ........................
6 ........................
7 ........................
8 ........................
9 ........................
10 ......................
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
CFR parts
CFR parts
CFR parts
CFR parts
CFR parts
parts CFR
parts CFR
CFR parts
501 through 526 and 571.213 ...........................................................................
571.131, 571.217, 571.220, 571.221, and 571.222 ..........................................
571.101 through 571.110, and 571.135, 571.136, 571.138 and 571.139 ........
571.141, 529 through 578, except parts 571 and 575 ......................................
571.111 through 571.129 and 580 through 588 ...............................................
571.201 through 571.212 ..................................................................................
571.214 through 571.219, except 571.217 .......................................................
591 through 595 and new parts and subparts ..................................................
Year 1 (Fall 2018) List of Rules That
Will Be Analyzed During the Next Year
49 CFR part 571.214—Side Impact
Protection
49 CFR part 571.215—[Reserved]
49 CFR part 571.216—Roof Crush
Resistance; Applicable Unless a
Vehicle Is Certified to 571.216a
49 CFR part 571.216a—Roof Crush
Resistance; Upgraded Standard
49 CFR part 571.218—Motorcycle
Helmets
Year
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
49 CFR part 571.219—Windshield Zone
Intrusion
49 CFR part 591—Importation of
Vehicles and Equipment Subject to
Federal Safety, Bumper and Theft
Prevention Standards
49 CFR part 592—Registered Importers
of Vehicles Not Originally
Manufactured to Conform to the
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
parts
parts
parts
parts
parts
parts
parts
parts
parts
parts
200,
211,
216,
221,
227,
232,
237,
242,
261,
269,
207,
212,
217,
222,
228,
233,
238,
243,
262,
270,
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Section 610 and Other Reviews
Analysis year
However, the actual burden on most of
these railroads varies because of their
different operating characteristics.
Entities that are not subject to this rule
include railroads that do not operate on
the general railroad system of
transportation. The communication
requirements of this rule have been
designed to minimize the impact on
small railroads. For instance, while
large railroads are required to have a
working radio and wireless
communication redundancy in every
train, small railroads are only required
to comply with this standard for trains
used to transport passengers. However,
the FRA will conduct a formal review to
identify whether opportunities may
exist to reduce the burden on small
railroads without compromising safety
standards.
• General: The rule prescribes
minimum requirements governing the
use of wireless communications in
connection with railroad operations.
Uniform standard communications
procedures and requirements
throughout the railroad industry are
necessary to ensure the protection and
safety of railroad employees and the
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
Federal Railroad Administration
209, and 210 .....................................................................................
213, 214, and 215 .............................................................................
218, 219, and 220 .............................................................................
223, 224, and 225 .............................................................................
229, 230, and 231 .............................................................................
234, 235, and 236 .............................................................................
249, 240, and 241 .............................................................................
244, 250, and 256 .............................................................................
264, 266, and 268 .............................................................................
and 272 .............................................................................................
Year 10 (Fall 2017) List of Rules
Analyzed and a Summary of Results
49 FR part 213—Track Safety Standards
• Section 610: This rule appears to
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
(SEISNOSE). These small entities are
approximately 735 short line railroads.
However, the FRA will conduct a formal
review to identify whether
opportunities may exist to reduce the
burden on small railroads without
compromising safety standards.
• General: The rule prescribes
minimum safety requirements for
railroad track that is part of the general
railroad system of transportation. The
objective of the rule is to enhance the
safety of rail transportation, protecting
both those traveling and working on the
system and those off the system who
might be adversely affected by a rail
incident. FRA’s plain language review
of this rule indicates no need for
substantial revision.
49 CFR part 220—Railroad
Communications
• Section 610: This rule has
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Review year
49 CFR part 593—Determinations That
a Vehicle Not Originally
Manufactured to Conform to the
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards is Eligible for Importation
49 CFR part 594—Schedule of Fees
Authorized by 49 U.S.C. 30141
49 CFR part 595—Make Inoperative
Exemptions
Regulations to be reviewed
1 ........................
2 ........................
3 ........................
4 ........................
5 ........................
6 ........................
7 ........................
8 ........................
9 ........................
10 ......................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Analysis year
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Review year
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
general public, and to minimize the
number of casualties. FRA’s plain
language review of this rule indicates no
need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 230—Steam Locomotive
Inspection and Maintenance
Records
• Section 610: There is no SEISNOSE.
• General: The rule prescribes
minimum Federal safety standards of
inspection and maintenance for all
steam locomotive operated on railroads.
These requirements are necessary to
ensure the protection and safety of
railroad employees and the general
public and to minimize the number of
casualties. FRA’s plain language review
of this rule indicates no need for
substantial revision.
49 CFR part 232—Brake System Safety
Standards for Freight and Other
Non-Passenger Trains and
Equipment; End of Train Devices
• Section 610: This rule has
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
About 700 small railroads are subject to
this rule. However, the actual burden on
most of these small entities varies
depending on their operating
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
58061
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
characteristics. FRA is currently
evaluating this rule to determine if
changes need to be made because of
technological developments in the
systems affected by this rule.
• General: The rule prescribes
minimum Federal safety standards for
freight and other non-passenger train
brake systems, as well as requirements
for all trains that use end-of-train
devices. This rule governs critical safety
systems of the train and therefore
continues to be needed. To FRA’s
knowledge, it does not overlap or
conflict with other rules. Furthermore,
FRA’s plain language review of this rule
indicates no need for substantial
revision.
49 CFR part 239—Passenger Train
Emergency Preparedness
• Section 610: There is no SEISNOSE.
• General: The rule prescribes
minimum Federal safety standards for
the preparation, adoption and
implementation of emergency
preparedness plans by railroads. These
requirements are necessary to ensure the
protection and safety of railroad
passengers and employees, as well as
the general public, and to minimize the
Year
Year 1 (Fall 2018) List of Rule(s) That
Will Be Analyzed During Next Year
49 CFR part 200—Informal Rules of
Practice for Passenger Service
49 CFR part 207—Railroad Police
Officers
49 CFR part 209—Railroad Safety
Enforcement Procedures
49 CFR part 210—Railroad Noise
Emission Compliance
Federal Transit Administration
Section 610 and Other Reviews
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), as amended (sections 601
through 612 of title 5, United States
Code), requires Federal regulatory
agencies to analyze all proposed and
final rules to determine their economic
impact on small entities, which include
small businesses, organizations, and
governmental jurisdictions. Section 610
requires government agencies to
periodically review all regulations that
will have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
(SEISNOSE).
In complying with this section, the
Federal Transit Administration (FTA)
has elected to use the two-step, two-year
process used by most Department of
Transportation (DOT) modes. As such,
FTA has divided its rules into 10 groups
as displayed in the table below. During
the analysis year, the listed rules will be
analyzed to identify those with a
SEISNOSE. During the review year, each
rule identified in the analysis year as
having a SEISNOSE will be reviewed in
accordance with Section 610(b) to
determine if it should be continued
without change or changed to minimize
the impact on small entities.
Regulations to be reviewed
1 ........................
2 ........................
3 ........................
4 ........................
5 ........................
6 ........................
7 ........................
8 ........................
9 ........................
10 ......................
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
Analysis year
parts 604, 605, and 624 .............................................................................................
parts 609 and 640 .......................................................................................................
part 633 .......................................................................................................................
part 611 .......................................................................................................................
part 655 .......................................................................................................................
parts 602 and 614 .......................................................................................................
parts 661 and 663 .......................................................................................................
parts 625, 630, and 665 .............................................................................................
parts 613, 622, 670 and 674 ......................................................................................
parts 650, 672 and 673 ..............................................................................................
Year 10 (2018) List of Rules Analyzed
and Summary of Results
49 CFR part 665—Bus Testing
• Section 610: Pursuant to Section
20014 of the Moving Ahead for Progress
in the 21st Century Act (MAP–21), FTA
issued a new pass/fail standard and new
aggregated scoring system for buses and
modified vans that are subject to FTA’s
bus testing program. FTA conducted a
Section 610 review of part 665, as
amended (81 FR 50637, August 1, 2016),
and determined that it would not result
in a SEISNOSE within the meaning of
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
number of casualties. FRA’s plain
language review of this rule indicates no
need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 240—Qualification and
Certification of Locomotive
Engineers
• Section 610: There is no SEISNOSE.
• General: The purpose of this rule is
to prescribes minimum Federal safety
standards for the eligibility, training,
testing, certification and monitoring of
locomotive engineers. FRA’s plain
language review of this rule indicates no
need of substantial revision.
the RFA. In evaluating the likely effects
of the rule, FTA acknowledged the
compliance costs to bus manufacturers,
some of whom may meet the definition
of ‘‘small entity,’’ but noted that
Congress authorized FTA to pay 80% of
a bus manufacturer’s testing fee,
defraying the direct financial impact on
these small entities.
• General: No changes are needed.
The regulation implements the
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5318. FTA
estimated the costs and projected
benefits of the rule and believes it is
cost-effective and imposes the least
49 CFR part 604—Charter Service
49 CFR part 605—School Bus
Operations
49 CFR part 624—Clean Fuels Grant
Program
Maritime Administration
Section 610 and Other Reviews
1 ........................
46 CFR parts 201 through 205, 46 CFR parts 315 through 340, 46 CFR part 345 through
347, and 46 CFR parts 381 and 382.
46 CFR parts 221 through 232 ................................................................................................
46 CFR parts 249 through 296 ................................................................................................
46 CFR parts 221, 298, 308, and 309 .....................................................................................
46 CFR parts 307 through 309 ................................................................................................
46 CFR part 310 .......................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
Year 1 (2019) List of Rules To Be
Analyzed the Next Year
Regulations to be reviewed
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
burden for statutory compliance. FTA’s
plain language review of this rule
indicates no need for substantial
revision.
Year
2
3
4
5
6
Review year
Analysis year
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
Review year
2018
2019
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
58062
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
Year
Regulations to be reviewed
7 ........................
8 ........................
9 ........................
10 ......................
46
46
46
46
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
parts
parts
parts
parts
315
345
382
390
through
through
through
through
Year 10 (2017) List of Rules Analyzed
and a Summary of Results
46 CFR part 390—Capital Construction
Fund Implementing Regulations
• Section 610: There is no
SEIOSNOSE.
• General: The purpose of this rule is
to govern the capital construction fund
program authorized by 46 U.S.C. 53501.
The Agency has determined that the
rule is cost-effective and imposes the
least possible burden on small entities.
MARAD’s plain language review of this
rule indicates no need of substantial
revision.
46 CFR part 391—Federal Income Tax
Aspects of the Capital Construction
Fund.
• Section 610: There is no
SEIOSNOSE.
• General: The purpose of this rule is
to govern tax aspects of the capital
construction fund program. The Agency
has determined that the rule is costeffective and imposes the least possible
burden on small entities. MARAD’s
plain language review of this rule
indicates no need of substantial
revision.
46 CFR part 392—Reserved
46 CFR part 393—America’s Marine
Highway Program
• Section 610 review: There is no
SEIOSNOSE.
• General: The Agency published a
final rule to implement statutory
updates and clarify applicant
procedures. MARAD’s plain language
review of this rule indicated that a
substantial revision to the part was
needed.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
Year
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
Year 1 (2018) List of Rules That Will Be
Analyzed During the Next Year
46 CFR part 201—Rules of Practice And
Procedure
46 CFR part 202—Procedures relating to
review by Secretary of
Transportation of actions by
Maritime Subsidy Board
46 CFR part 203—Procedures relating to
conduct of certain hearings under
the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as
amended
46 CFR part 204—Claims against the
Maritime Administration under the
Federal Tort Claims Act
46 CFR part 205—Audit Appeals; Policy
and Procedure
46 CFR part 315—Agency Agreements
and Appointment of Agents
46 CFR part 317—Bonding of Ship’s
Personnel
46 CFR part 324—Procedural Rules for
Financial Transactions Under
Agency Agreements
46 CFR part 325—Procedure to Be
Followed by General Agents in
Preparation of Invoices and
Payment of Compensation Pursuant
To Provisions of NSA Order No. 47
46 CFR part 326—Marine Protection and
Indemnity Insurance Under
Agreements with Agents
46 CFR part 327—Seamen’s Claims;
Administrative Action and
Litigation
46 CFR part 328— Slop Chests
46 CFR part 329—Voyage Data
46 CFR part 330—Launch Services
46 CFR part 332—Repatriation of
Seamen
46 CFR part 335—Authority and
Responsibility of General Agents to
Undertake Emergency Repairs in
Foreign Ports
46 CFR part 336—Authority and
Responsibility of General Agents to
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
2024
2025
2026
2027
2025
2026
2027
2028
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration (PHMSA)
Section 610 and Other Reviews
Analysis
year
part 178 .......................................................................................................................
parts 178 through 180 ................................................................................................
parts 172 and 175 .......................................................................................................
part 171, sections 171.15 and 171.16 ........................................................................
parts 106, 107, 171, 190, and 195 .............................................................................
parts 174, 177, and 199 .............................................................................................
parts 176, 191 and 192 ..............................................................................................
parts 172 and 178 .......................................................................................................
parts 172, 173, 174, 176, 177, and 193 .....................................................................
parts 173 and 194 .......................................................................................................
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Review year
Undertake in Continental United
States Ports Voyage Repairs and
Service Equipment of Vessels
Operated for the Account of The
National Shipping Authority Under
General Agency Agreement
46 CFR part 337—General Agent’s
Responsibility in Connection with
Foreign Repair Custom’s Entries
46 CFR part 338—Procedure for
Accomplishment of Vessel Repairs
Under National Shipping Authority
Master Lump Sum Repair
Contract—NSA-Lumpsumrep
46 CFR part 339—Procedure for
Accomplishment of Ship Repairs
Under National Shipping Authority
Individual Contract for Minor
Repairs—NSA-Worksmalrep
46 CFR part 340—Priority Use and
Allocation of Shipping Services,
Containers and Chassis, and Port
Facilities and Services for National
Security and National Defense
Related Operations
46 CFR part 345—Restrictions Upon the
Transfer or Change in Use or in
Terms Governing Utilization of Port
Facilities
46 CFR part 346—Federal Port
Controllers
46 CFR part 347—Operating Contract
46 CFR part 381—Cargo Preference—
U.S.-Flag Vessels
46 CFR part 382—Determination of Fair
and Reasonable Rates for the
Carriage of Bulk and Packaged
Preference Cargoes on U.S.-Flag
Commercial Vessels
Regulations to be reviewed
1 ........................
2 ........................
3 ........................
4 ........................
5 ........................
6 ........................
7 ........................
8 ........................
9 ........................
10 ......................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
340
381
389
393
Analysis year
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Review year
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
58063
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
Year 10 (Fall 2018) List of Rules
Analyzed and a Summary of Results
49 CFR part 173—Shippers—General
Requirements for Shipments and
Packaging
• Section 610: PHMSA conducted a
review of this part and found no
SEISNOSE.
• General: PHMSA has reviewed this
part and found that while the part does
not have a SEISNOSE, it could be
streamlined to reflect new technologies
and harmonize with certain
international references. Therefore, even
though the review indicated that the
economic impact on small entities is not
significant, PHMSA has initiated
multiple new deregulatory rulemakings
to reduce the compliance burdens of
part 173. Further, PHMSA’s plain
language review of this part indicates no
need for substantial revision. Where
confusing or wordy language has been
identified, PHMSA plans to propose
revisions in the upcoming biennial
international harmonization rulemaking
or other deregulatory rulemakings.
For example, the 2137–AF32
rulemaking action is part of PHMSA’s
ongoing biennial process to harmonize
the HMR with international regulations
and standards. Federal law and policy
strongly favor the harmonization of
domestic and international standards for
hazardous materials transportation. The
Federal hazardous materials
transportation law (Federal hazmat law;
49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.) directs PHMSA
to participate in relevant international
standard-setting bodies and promotes
consistency of the HMR with
international transport standards to the
extent practicable. Federal hazmat law
permits PHMSA to depart from
international standards where
appropriate, including to promote safety
or other overriding public interests.
However, Federal hazmat law otherwise
encourages domestic and international
harmonization (see 49 U.S.C. 5120).
Harmonization facilitates
international trade by minimizing the
costs and other burdens of complying
with multiple or inconsistent safety
requirements for transportation of
hazardous materials. Safety is enhanced
by creating a uniform framework for
compliance, and as the volume of
hazardous materials transported in
international commerce continues to
grow, harmonization becomes
increasingly important.
The impact that the 2137–AF32
rulemaking will have on small entities
is not expected to be significant. The
rulemaking will clarify provisions based
on PHMSA’s initiatives and
correspondence with the regulated
community and domestic and
international stakeholders. The changes
are generally intended to provide relief
and, as a result, positive economic
benefits to shippers, carriers, and
packaging manufacturers and testers,
including small entities.
49 CFR part 194—Response Plans for
Onshore Oil Pipelines
• Section 610: PHMSA conducted a
Section 610 review of this part and has
initiated a regulatory reform rulemaking
that includes provisions that are
expected to reduce the compliance
burden of part 194. The rulemaking is
considered a deregulatory action that is
expected to have the net effect of
streamlining the program requirements,
established in response to the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990, by targeting the
highest risk locations. The revisions are
expected to clarify that part 194 is
focused on hazardous liquid pipelines
that could affect navigable waters and to
create a new harm category for lowerrisk areas.
• General: This part contains
requirements for oil spill response
plans to reduce the environmental
impact of oil discharged from onshore
oil pipelines. The regulation under
this part is cost effective and imposes
the least burden.
Year 1 (Fall 2018) List of Rules That
Will Be Analyzed During the Next Year
49 CFR part 178—Specifications for
Packaging
Saint Lawrence Seaway Development
Corporation
Section 610 and Other Reviews
Year
Regulations to be reviewed
Analysis year
1 ........................
* 33 CFR parts 401 through 403 .............................................................................................
2018
Review year
2019
* The review for these regulations is recurring each year of the 10-year review cycle (currently 2018 through 2027).
Year 1 (Fall 2018) List of Rules That
Will Be Analyzed During the Next Year
33 CFR part 401—Seaway Regulations
and Rules
33 CFR part 402—Tariff of Tolls
33 CFR part 403—Rules of Procedure of
the Joint Tolls Review Board
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY—PROPOSED RULE STAGE
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
327 ....................
328 ....................
+ Defining Unfair or Deceptive Practices ........................................................................................................
+ Processing Buy America Waivers Based on Non availability (Section 610 Review) (Reg Plan Seq No.
104).
2105–AE72
2105–AE79
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
References in boldface appear in The Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register.
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION—PRERULE STAGE
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
329 ....................
+ Applying the Flight, Duty, and Rest Rules of 14 CFR Part 135 to Tail-End Ferry Operations (FAA Reauthorization).
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
2120–AK26
58064
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION—PROPOSED RULE STAGE
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
330 ....................
Drug and Alcohol Testing of Certain Maintenance Provider Employees Located Outside of the United
States.
+ Applying the Flight, Duty, and Rest Requirements to Ferry Flights That Follow Domestic, Flag, or Supplemental All-Cargo Operations (Reauthorization).
+ Pilot Records Database (HR 5900) .............................................................................................................
+ Aircraft Registration and Airmen Certification Fees ....................................................................................
+ Requirements to File Notice of Construction of Meteorological Evaluation Towers and Other Renewable
Energy Projects (Section 610 Review).
+ Operations of Small Unmanned Aircraft Over People .................................................................................
331 ....................
332 ....................
333 ....................
334 ....................
335 ....................
2120–AK09
2120–AK22
2120–AK31
2120–AK37
2120–AK77
2120–AK85
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION—FINAL RULE STAGE
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
336 ....................
337 ....................
+ Airport Safety Management System ............................................................................................................
+ Registration and Marking Requirements for Small Unmanned Aircraft (Reg Plan Seq No. 105) .............
2120–AJ38
2120–AK82
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
References in boldface appear in The Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register.
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION—LONG-TERM ACTIONS
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
338 ....................
339 ....................
+ Regulation of Flight Operations Conducted by Alaska Guide Pilots ...........................................................
+ Helicopter Air Ambulance Pilot Training and Operational Requirements (HAA II) (FAA Reauthorization)
2120–AJ78
2120–AK57
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION—PROPOSED RULE STAGE
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
340 ....................
Incorporation by Reference; North American Standard Out-of-Service Criteria; Hazardous Materials Safety
Permits (Section 610 Review).
Controlled Substances and Alcohol Testing: State Driver’s Licensing Agency Downgrade of Commercial
Driver’s License (Section 610 Review).
341 ....................
2126–AC01
2126–AC11
FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION—FINAL RULE STAGE
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
342 ....................
Commercial Learner’s Permit Validity (Section 610 Review) ........................................................................
2126–AB98
FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION—LONG-TERM ACTIONS
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
343 ....................
+ Safety Monitoring System and Compliance Initiative for Mexico-Domiciled Motor Carriers Operating in
the United States.
2126–AA35
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION—FINAL RULE STAGE
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
344 ....................
+ Passenger Equipment Safety Standards Amendments (Reg Plan Seq No. 108) .....................................
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
References in boldface appear in The Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
2130–AC46
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
58065
FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION—LONG-TERM ACTIONS
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
345 ....................
+ Train Crew Staffing and Location ................................................................................................................
2130–AC48
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
SAINT LAWRENCE SEAWAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION—LONG-TERM ACTIONS
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
346 ....................
Seaway Regulations and Rules: Periodic Update, Various Categories (Rulemaking Resulting From a
Section 610 Review).
Tariff of Tolls (Rulemaking Resulting From a Section 610 Review) ..........................................................
347 ....................
2135–AA45
2135–AA46
PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION—PROPOSED RULE STAGE
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
348 ....................
+ Pipeline Safety: Amendments to Parts 192 and 195 to Require Valve Installation and Minimum Rupture
Detection Standards.
2137–AF06
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION—FINAL RULE STAGE
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
349 ....................
350 ....................
351 ....................
+ Pipeline Safety: Safety of Hazardous Liquid Pipelines (Reg Plan Seq No. 111) ......................................
+ Pipeline Safety: Issues Related to the Use of Plastic Pipe in Gas Pipeline Industry .................................
+ Hazardous Materials: Oil Spill Response Plans and Information Sharing for High-Hazard Flammable
Trains (FAST Act) (Reg Plan Seq No. 113).
2137–AE66
2137–AE93
2137–AF08
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
References in boldface appear in The Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(DOT)
Office of the Secretary (OST)
Proposed Rule Stage
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
327. +Defining Unfair or Deceptive
Practices
E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 41712
Abstract: This rulemaking would
define the phrase ‘‘unfair or deceptive
practice’’ found in the Department’s
aviation consumer protection statute.
The Department’s statute is modeled
after a similar statute granting the
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) the
authority to regulate unfair or deceptive
practices. Using the FTC’s policy
statements as a guide, the Department
has found a practice to be unfair if it
causes or is likely to cause substantial
harm, the harm cannot reasonably be
avoided, and the harm is not
outweighed by any countervailing
benefits to consumers or to competition.
Likewise, the Department has found a
practice to be deceptive if it misleads or
is likely to mislead a consumer acting
reasonably under the circumstances
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
with respect to a material issue (one that
is likely to affect the consumer’s
decision with regard to a product or
service). This rulemaking would codify
the Department’s existing interpretation
of ‘‘unfair or deceptive practice’’ and
seek comment on whether any changes
are needed. The rulemaking is not
expected to impose monetary costs, and
will benefit regulated entities by
providing a clearer understanding of the
Department’s interpretation of the
statute.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
FR Cite
03/00/19
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Blane A. Workie,
Assistant General Counsel, Department
of Transportation, Office of the
Secretary, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202–
366–9342, Fax: 202–366–7153, Email:
blane.workie@ost.dot.gov.
RIN: 2105–AE72
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
328. • +Processing Buy America
Waivers Based on Non Availability
(Section 610 Review)
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq.
No. 104 in part II of this issue of the
Federal Register.
RIN: 2105–AE79
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(DOT)
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Prerule Stage
329. +Applying the Flight, Duty, and
Rest Rules of 14 CFR Part 135 to TailEnd Ferry Operations (FAA
Reauthorization)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49
U.S.C. 1153; 49 U.S.C. 40101; 49 U.S.C.
40102; 49 U.S.C. 40103; 49 U.S.C.
40113; 49 U.S.C. 41706; 49 U.S.C.
44105; 49 U.S.C. 44106; 49 U.S.C.
44111; 49 U.S.C. 44701 to 44717; 49
U.S.C. 44722; 49 U.S.C. 44901; 49 U.S.C.
44903; 49 U.S.C. 44904; 49 U.S.C.
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
58066
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
44906; 49 U.S.C. 44912; 49 U.S.C.
44914; 49 U.S.C. 44936; 49 U.S.C.
44938; 49 U.S.C. 45101 to 45105; 49
U.S.C. 46103
Abstract: This rulemaking would
require a flightcrew member who is
employed by an air carrier conducting
operations under part 135, and who
accepts an additional assignment for
flying under part 91 from the air carrier
or from any other air carrier conducting
operations under part 121 or 135, to
apply the period of the additional
assignment toward any limitation
applicable to the flightcrew member
relating to duty periods or flight times
under part 135.
Timetable:
Action
Date
ANPRM ...............
FR Cite
01/00/19
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Dale Roberts,
Department of Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Ave. SW, Washington,
DC 20591, Phone: 202–267–5749, Email:
dale.roberts@faa.gov.
RIN: 2120–AK26
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(DOT)
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Proposed Rule Stage
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
330. Drug and Alcohol Testing of
Certain Maintenance Provider
Employees Located Outside of the
United States
E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or
Partially Exempt.
Legal Authority: 14 CFR; 49 U.S.C.
106(g); 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C.
44701; 49 U.S.C. 44702; 49 U.S.C.
44707; 49 U.S.C. 44709; 49 U.S.C. 44717
Abstract: This rulemaking would
require controlled substance testing of
some employees working in repair
stations located outside the United
States. The intended effect is to increase
participation by companies outside of
the United States in testing of
employees who perform safety critical
functions and testing standards similar
to those used in the repair stations
located in the United States. This action
is necessary to increase the level of
safety of the flying public. This
rulemaking is a statutory mandate under
section 308(d) of the FAA
Modernization and Reform Act of 2012
(Pub. L. 112–95).
Timetable:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
Action
Date
ANPRM ...............
Comment Period
Extended.
ANPRM Comment
Period End.
Comment Period
End.
NPRM ..................
03/17/14
05/01/14
FR Cite
79 FR 14621
79 FR 24631
05/16/14
07/17/14
12/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Vicky Dunne,
Department of Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Ave. SW, Washington,
DC 20591, Phone: 202–267–8522, Email:
vicky.dunne@faa.gov.
RIN: 2120–AK09
331. +Applying the Flight, Duty, and
Rest Requirements to Ferry Flights That
Follow Domestic, Flag, or Supplemental
All-Cargo Operations (Reauthorization)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49
U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C. 40119; 49 U.S.C.
41706; 49 U.S.C. 44101; 49 U.S.C.
44701; 49 U.S.C. 44702; 49 U.S.C.
44705; 49 U.S.C. 44709 to 44711; 49
U.S.C. 44713; 49 U.S.C. 44716; 49 U.S.C.
44717
Abstract: This rulemaking would
apply the flight, duty, and rest
requirements for domestic, flag and
supplemental operations to ferry flights
that follow domestic, flag or
supplemental all-cargo operations. A
ferry flight that follows a domestic, flag
or supplemental all-cargo operation
would be subject to the same flight,
duty, and rest rules as the all-cargo
operation it follows. This rule is
necessary as it would make part 121
flight, duty, and rest limits applicable to
tail-end ferry flights that follow an allcargo flight.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
FR Cite
05/00/19
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Dale Roberts,
Department of Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Ave. SW, Washington,
DC 20591, Phone: 202–267–5749, Email:
dale.roberts@faa.gov.
RIN: 2120–AK22
332. +Pilot Records Database (HR 5900)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49
U.S.C. 1155; 49 U.S.C. 40103; 49 U.S.C.
40113; 49 U.S.C. 40119; 49 U.S.C.
40120; 49 U.S.C. 41706; 49 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
44101; 49 U.S.C. 44111; 49 U.S.C. 44701
to 44705; 49 U.S.C. 44709 to 44713; 49
U.S.C. 44715 to 44717; 49 U.S.C. 44722;
49 U.S.C. 45101 to 45105; 49 U.S.C.
46105; 49 U.S.C. 46306; 49 U.S.C.
46315; 49 U.S.C. 46316; 49 U.S.C.
46504; 49 U.S.C. 46507; 49 U.S.C.
47122; 49 U.S.C. 47508; 49 U.S.C. 47528
to 47531
Abstract: This rulemaking would
implement a Pilot Records Database as
required by Public Law 111–216 (Aug.
1, 2010). Section 203 amends the Pilot
Records Improvement Act by requiring
the FAA to create a pilot records
database that contains various types of
pilot records. These records would be
provided by the FAA, air carriers, and
other persons who employ pilots. The
FAA must maintain these records until
it receives notice that a pilot is
deceased. Air carriers would use this
database to perform a record check on
a pilot prior to making a hiring decision.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
Date
FR Cite
05/00/19
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Christopher Morris,
Department of Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration, 6500 S
MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK
73169, Phone: 405–954–4646, Email:
christopher.morris@faa.gov.
RIN: 2120–AK31
333. +Aircraft Registration and Airmen
Certification Fees
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701; 4
U.S.T. 1830; 49 U.S.C. 106(f); 49 U.S.C.
106(g); 49 U.S.C. 106(l)(6); 49 U.S.C.
40104; 49 U.S.C. 40105; 49 U.S.C.
40109; 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C.
40114; 49 U.S.C. 44101 to 44108; 49
U.S.C. 44110 to 44113; 49 U.S.C. 44701
to 44704; 49 U.S.C. 44707; 49 U.S.C.
44709 to 44711; 49 U.S.C. 44713; 49
U.S.C. 45102; 49 U.S.C. 45103; 49 U.S.C.
45301; 49 U.S.C. 45302; 49 U.S.C.
45305; 49 U.S.C. 46104; 49 U.S.C.
46301; Pub. L. 108–297, 118 Stat. 1095
Abstract: This rulemaking would
establish fees for airman certificates,
medical certificates, and provision of
legal opinions pertaining to aircraft
registration or recordation. This
rulemaking also would revise existing
fees for aircraft registration, recording of
security interests in aircraft or aircraft
parts, and replacement of an airman
certificate. This rulemaking addresses
provisions of the FAA Modernization
and Reform Act of 2012. This
rulemaking is intended to recover the
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
estimated costs of the various services
and activities for which fees would be
established or revised.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
FR Cite
01/00/19
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Isra Raza,
Department of Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Ave. SW, Washington,
DC 20591, Phone: 202–267–8994, Email:
isra.raza@faa.gov.
RIN: 2120–AK37
334. +Requirements To File Notice of
Construction of Meteorological
Evaluation Towers and Other
Renewable Energy Projects (Section 610
Review)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103
Abstract: This rulemaking would add
specific requirements for proponents
who wish to construct meteorological
evaluation towers at a height of 50 feet
above ground level (AGL) up to 200 feet
AGL to file notice of construction with
the FAA. This rule also requires
sponsors of wind turbines to provide
certain specific data when filing notice
of construction with the FAA. This
rulemaking is a statutory mandate under
section 2110 of the FAA Extension,
Safety, and Security Act of 2016 (Pub.
L. 114–190).
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
FR Cite
06/00/19
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: No.
Agency Contact: Sheri Edgett-Baron,
Air Traffic Service, Department of
Transportation, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591,
Phone: 202 267–9354.
RIN: 2120–AK77
335. +Operations of Small Unmanned
Aircraft Over People
E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f); 49
U.S.C. 40101; 49 U.S.C. 40103(b); 49
U.S.C. 44701(a)(5); Pub. L. 112–95, sec.
333
Abstract: This rulemaking would
address the performance-based
standards and means-of-compliance for
operation of small unmanned aircraft
systems (sUAS) over people not directly
participating in the operation or not
under a covered structure or inside a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
stationary vehicle that can provide
reasonable protection from a falling
small unmanned aircraft. This rule
would provide relief from certain
operational restrictions implemented in
the Operation and Certification of Small
Unmanned Aircraft Systems final rule
(RIN 2120–AJ60).
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
FR Cite
10/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Guido Hassig,
Department of Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration, 1 Airport
Way, Rochester, NY 14624, Phone: 585–
436–3880, Email: guido.hassig@faa.gov.
RIN: 2120–AK85
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(DOT)
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Final Rule Stage
336. +Airport Safety Management
System
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 44706; 49
U.S.C. 106(g); 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49
U.S.C. 44701 to 44706; 49 U.S.C. 44709;
49 U.S.C. 44719
Abstract: This rulemaking would
require certain airport certificate holders
to develop, implement, maintain, and
adhere to a safety management system
(SMS) for its aviation related activities.
An SMS is a formalized approach to
managing safety by developing an
organization-wide safety policy,
developing formal methods of
identifying hazards, analyzing and
mitigating risk, developing methods for
ensuring continuous safety
improvement, and creating
organization-wide safety promotion
strategies.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period Extended.
NPRM Comment
Period End.
End of Extended
Comment Period.
Second Extension
of Comment
Period.
End of Second
Extended Comment Period.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
10/07/10
12/10/10
FR Cite
75 FR 62008
75 FR 76928
01/05/11
03/07/11
03/07/11
76 FR 12300
07/05/11
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Action
Second NPRM ....
Second NPRM
Comment Period End.
Final Rule ............
Date
07/14/16
09/12/16
58067
FR Cite
81 FR 45871
12/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Keri Lyons,
Department of Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Ave. SW, Washington,
DC 20591, Phone: 202–267–8972, Email:
keri.lyons@faa.gov.
RIN: 2120–AJ38
337. +Registration and Marking
Requirements for Small Unmanned
Aircraft
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq.
No. 105 in part II of this issue of the
Federal Register.
RIN: 2120–AK82
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(DOT)
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Long-Term Actions
338. +Regulation of Flight Operations
Conducted by Alaska Guide Pilots
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g) ; 49
U.S.C. 1153; 49 U.S.C. 1155; 49 U.S.C.
40101 to 40103; 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49
U.S.C. 40120; 49 U.S.C. 44101; 49 U.S.C.
44105 to 44016; 49 U.S.C. 44111; 49
U.S.C. 44701 to 44717; 49 U.S.C. 44722;
49 U.S.C. 44901; 49 U.S.C. 44903 to
44904; 49 U.S.C. 44906; 49 U.S.C.
44912; 49 U.S.C. 44914; 49 U.S.C.
44936; 49 U.S.C. 44938; 49 U.S.C.
46103; 49 U.S.C. 46105; 49 U.S.C.
46306; 49 U.S.C. 46315 to 46316; 49
U.S.C. 46504; 49 U.S.C. 46506 to 46507;
49 U.S.C. 47122; 49 U.S.C. 47508; 49
U.S.C. 47528 to 47531; Articles 12 and
29 of 61 Statue 1180; P.L. 106–181, Sec.
732
Abstract: The rulemaking would
establish regulations concerning Alaska
guide pilot operations. The rulemaking
would implement Congressional
legislation and establish additional
safety requirements for the conduct of
these operations. The intended effect of
this rulemaking is to enhance the level
of safety for persons and property
transported in Alaska guide pilot
operations. In addition, the rulemaking
would add a general provision
applicable to pilots operating under the
general operating and flight rules
concerning falsification, reproduction,
and alteration of applications, logbooks,
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
58068
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
reports, or records. This rulemaking is a
statutory mandate under section 732 of
the Wendell H. Ford Aviation
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st
Century, (Pub. L. 106–181).
Timetable: Next Action
Undetermined.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jeff Smith,
Department of Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20785, Phone: 202 385–9615, Email:
jeffrey.smith@faa.gov.
RIN: 2120–AJ78
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
339. +Helicopter Air Ambulance Pilot
Training and Operational
Requirements (HAA II) (FAA
Reauthorization)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f); 49
U.S.C. 106(g); 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49
U.S.C. 41706; 49 U.S.C. 44701; 49 U.S.C.
44702; 49 U.S.C. 44705; 49 U.S.C.
44709; 49 U.S.C. 44711 to 44713; 49
U.S.C. 44715 to 44717; 49 U.S.C. 44722;
49 U.S.C. 44730; 49 U.S.C. 45101 to
45105
Abstract: This rulemaking would
develop training requirements for crew
resource management, flight risk
evaluation, and operational control of
the pilot in command, as well as
standards for the use of flight simulation
training devices and line-oriented flight
training. Additionally, it would
establish requirements for the use of
safety equipment for flight
crewmembers and flight nurses. These
changes will aide in the increase in
aviation safety and increase
survivability in the event of an accident.
Without these changes, the Helicopter
Air Ambulance industry may continue
to see the unacceptable high rate of
aircraft accidents. This rulemaking is a
statutory mandate under section 306(e)
of the FAA Modernization and Reform
Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112–95).
Timetable: Next Action
Undetermined.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Chris Holliday,
Department of Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration, 801
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20024, Phone: 202–267–4552, Email:
chris.holliday@faa.gov.
RIN: 2120–AK57
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(DOT)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA)
Proposed Rule Stage
340. Incorporation by Reference; North
American Standard Out-of-Service
Criteria; Hazardous Materials Safety
Permits (Section 610 Review)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or
Partially Exempt.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5105; 49
U.S.C. 5109
Abstract: This action will update an
existing Incorporation by Reference (by
the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance)
of the North American Standard Out-ofService Criteria and Level VI Inspection
Procedures and Out-of-Service for
Commercial Highway Vehicles
Transporting Transuranics and Highway
Route Controlled Quantities of
Radioactive Materials as defined in 49
CFR part 173.403.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
FR Cite
10/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: No.
Agency Contact: Stephanie Dunlap,
Department of Transportation, Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366–
3536, Email: stephanie.dunlap@dot.gov.
RIN: 2126–AC01
341. Controlled Substances and Alcohol
Testing: State Driver’s Licensing
Agency Downgrade of Commercial
Driver’s License (Section 610 Review)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or
Partially Exempt.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31136(a);
49 U.S.C. 31305(a)
Abstract: The Commercial Driver’s
License Drug and Alcohol
Clearinghouse (Clearinghouse) final rule
(81 FR 87686 (December 5, 2016)
requires State Driver’s Licensing
Agencies (SDLAs) to check the
Clearinghouse before issuing, renewing,
transferring, or upgrading a commercial
driver’s license (CDL) to determine
whether the driver is qualified to
operate a commercial motor vehicle.
FMCSA proposes to require State
Driver’s Licensing Agencies (SDLAs) to
remove the commercial learner’s permit
(CLP) or commercial driver’s license
(CDL) privilege from the driver license
of individuals who, under current
regulations, are prohibited from
operating a commercial motor vehicle
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(CMV) due to controlled substance
(drug) and alcohol program violations.
At a minimum, States would be
required to downgrade the driver’s
license by changing the commercial
status from ‘‘licensed’’ to ‘‘eligible’’ on
the CDLIS driver record. Under the
proposed rule, States could not restore
the CLP or CDL privilege to the license
until the driver completes the return-toduty (RTD) requirements that would
allow the resumption of safety-sensitive
functions, such as operating a CMV.
SDLAs would rely on applicable State
law and procedures to accomplish the
downgrade and any subsequent
reinstatement of the CLP or CDL
privilege. In addition, under this
proposal, SDLAs could not issue, renew,
upgrade, or transfer the CDL, or issue,
renew, or upgrade the CLP, of any driver
who is prohibited from operating a CMV
due to drug and alcohol program
violations. This Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) will improve
roadway safety by helping to ensure that
CLP and CDL holders who engage in
prohibited drug or alcohol-related
conduct complete the necessary RTD
requirements before resuming operation
of a CMV on public roads. This NPRM
does not propose any other changes to
the Clearinghouse final rule, nor does it
propose any changes to the drug and
alcohol testing requirements in part 382
and part 40.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
Date
FR Cite
12/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: No.
Agency Contact: Juan Moya,
Department of Transportation, Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington,
DC 20590, Phone: 202–366–4844, Email:
Juan.Moya@dot.gov.
RIN: 2126–AC11
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(DOT)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA)
Final Rule Stage
342. Commercial Learner’s Permit
Validity (Section 610 Review)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31305; 49
U.S.C. 31308
Abstract: This rulemaking would
amend Commercial Driver’s License
(CDL) regulations to allow a commercial
learner’s permit to be issued for 1 year,
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
without renewal. This rule would not
require a State to revise its current CLP
issuance practices, unless it chooses to
do so. This change would reduce costs
to CDL applicants who are unable to
complete the required training and
testing within the current validity
period, with no expected negative safety
benefits.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Final Rule ............
06/12/17
08/11/17
FR Cite
10/00/18
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(DOT)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA)
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
Long-Term Actions
343. +Safety Monitoring System and
Compliance Initiative for MexicoDomiciled Motor Carriers Operating in
the United States
E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or
Partially Exempt.
Legal Authority: Pub. L. 107–87, sec
350; 49 U.S.C. 113; 49 U.S.C. 31136; 49
U.S.C. 31144; 49 U.S.C. 31502; 49 U.S.C.
504; 49 U.S.C. 5113; 49 U.S.C.
521(b)(5)(A)
Abstract: This rule would implement
a safety monitoring system and
compliance initiative designed to
evaluate the continuing safety fitness of
all Mexico-domiciled carriers within 18
months after receiving a provisional
Certificate of Registration or provisional
authority to operate in the United
States. It also would establish
suspension and revocation procedures
for provisional Certificates of
Registration and operating authority,
and incorporate criteria to be used by
FMCSA in evaluating whether Mexicodomiciled carriers exercise basic safety
management controls. The interim rule
included requirements that were not
proposed in the NPRM but which are
necessary to comply with the FY 2002
DOT Appropriations Act. On January
16, 2003, the Ninth Circuit Court of
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
20107; 49 U.S.C. 21301 and 21302; 49
U.S.C. 21304
Abstract: This rule would establish
requirements to appropriately address
known safety risks posed by train
operations that use fewer than two
crewmembers. FRA is considering
options based on public comments on
the proposed rule and other
information.
Timetable:
Action
82 FR 26888
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: No.
Agency Contact: Thomas Yager,
Driver and Carrier Operations Division,
Department of Transportation, Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366–
4325, Email: tom.yager@dot.gov.
RIN: 2126–AB98
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Appeals remanded this rule, along with
two other NAFTA-related rules, to the
Agency, requiring a full environmental
impact statement and an analysis
required by the Clean Air Act. On June
7, 2004, the Supreme Court reversed the
Ninth Circuit and remanded the case,
holding that FMCSA is not required to
prepare the environmental documents.
FMCSA originally planned to publish a
final rule by November 28, 2003.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Interim Final Rule
Interim Final Rule
Comment Period End.
Interim Final Rule
Effective.
Notice of Intent
To Prepare an
EIS.
EIS Public
Scoping Meetings.
Next Action Undetermined.
58069
Date
FR Cite
FR Cite
05/03/01
07/02/01
66 FR 22415
03/19/02
04/18/02
67 FR 12758
05/03/02
08/26/03
68 FR 51322
10/08/03
68 FR 58162
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Next Action Undetermined.
03/15/16
05/16/16
81 FR 13918
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Kathryn Gresham,
Trial Attorney, Department of
Transportation, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590,
Phone: 202 493–6063, Email:
kathryn.gresham@dot.gov.
RIN: 2130–AC48
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Dolores Macias,
Acting Division Chief, Department of
Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590, Phone:
202 366–2995, Email: dolores.macias@
dot.gov.
RIN: 2126–AA35
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(DOT)
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
Final Rule Stage
344. +Passenger Equipment Safety
Standards Amendments
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq.
No. 108 in part II of this issue of the
Federal Register.
RIN: 2130–AC46
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(DOT)
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
Long-Term Actions
345. +Train Crew Staffing and Location
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2461, note;
49 CFR 1.89; 49 U.S.C. 20103; 49 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(DOT)
Saint Lawrence Seaway Development
Corporation (SLSDC)
Long-Term Actions
346. • Seaway Regulations and Rules:
Periodic Update, Various Categories
(Rulemaking Resulting From a Section
610 Review)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Not subject
to, not significant.
Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 981 et seq.
Abstract: The Saint Lawrence Seaway
Development Corporation (SLSDC) and
the St. Lawrence Seaway Management
Corporation (SLSMC) of Canada, under
international agreement, jointly publish
and presently administer the St.
Lawrence Seaway Regulations and
Rules (Practices and Procedures in
Canada) in their respective jurisdictions.
Under agreement with the SLSMC, the
SLSDC is amending the joint regulations
by updating the Seaway Regulations and
Rules in various categories.
Timetable: Next Action
Undetermined.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: No.
Agency Contact: Carrie Lavigne,
Department of Transportation, Saint
Lawrence Seaway Development
Corporation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE,
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
58070
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 315–
764–3231, Email: Carrie.Mann@dot.gov.
RIN: 2135–AA45
347. • Tariff of Tolls (Rulemaking
Resulting From a Section 610 Review)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Not subject
to, not significant.
Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 981 et seq.
Abstract: The Saint Lawrence Seaway
Development Corporation (SLSDC) and
the St. Lawrence Seaway Management
Corporation (SLSMC) of Canada, under
international agreement, jointly publish
and presently administer the St.
Lawrence Seaway Tariff of Tolls in their
respective jurisdictions. The Tariff sets
forth the level of tolls assessed on all
commodities and vessels transiting the
facilities operated by the SLSDC and the
SLSMC.
Timetable: Next Action
Undetermined.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: No.
Agency Contact: Carrie Lavigne,
Department of Transportation, Saint
Lawrence Seaway Development
Corporation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE,
Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 315–
764–3231, Email: Carrie.Mann@dot.gov.
RIN: 2135–AA46
BILLING CODE 4910–61–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(DOT)
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
FR Cite
Action
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Robert Jagger,
Technical Writer, Department of
Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, Washington, DC
20590, Phone: 202–366–4595, Email:
robert.jagger@dot.gov.
RIN: 2137–AF06
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(DOT)
Proposed Rule Stage
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration (PHMSA)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60101 et
seq.
Abstract: PHMSA is amending the
Federal Pipeline Safety Regulations that
govern the use of plastic piping systems
in the transportation of natural and
other gas. These amendments are
necessary to enhance pipeline safety,
adopt innovative technologies and best
practices, and respond to petitions from
stakeholders. The amendments include
an increased design factor for
polyethylene (PE) pipe, stronger
mechanical fitting requirements, new
and updated riser standards, new
accepted uses of Polyamide-11 (PA–11)
thermoplastic pipe, authorization to use
Polyamide-12 (PA–12) thermoplastic
pipe, and new or updated consensus
standards for pipe, fittings, and other
components.
Timetable:
01/00/19
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration (PHMSA)
348. +Pipeline Safety: Amendments to
Parts 192 and 195 To Require Valve
Installation and Minimum Rupture
Detection Standards
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60101 et
seq.
Abstract: PHMSA is proposing to
revise the Pipeline Safety Regulations
applicable to newly constructed or
entirely replaced natural gas
transmission and hazardous liquid
pipelines to improve rupture mitigation
and shorten pipeline segment isolation
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS11
times in high consequence and select
non-high consequence areas. The
proposed rule defines certain pipeline
events as ‘‘ruptures’’ and outlines
certain performance standards related to
rupture identification and pipeline
segment isolation. PHMSA also
proposes specific valve maintenance
and inspection requirements, and
9–1–1 notification requirements to help
operators achieve better rupture
response and mitigation. These
proposals address Congressional
mandates, incorporate
recommendations from the National
Transportation Safety Board, and are
necessary to reduce the serious
consequences of large-volume,
uncontrolled releases of natural gas and
hazardous liquids.
Timetable:
Final Rule Stage
349. +Pipeline Safety: Safety of
Hazardous Liquid Pipelines
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq.
No. 111 in part II of this issue of the
Federal Register.
RIN: 2137–AE66
350. +Pipeline Safety: Issues Related to
the Use of Plastic Pipe in Gas Pipeline
Industry
E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Final Rule ............
Date
05/21/15
07/31/15
FR Cite
80 FR 29263
10/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Cameron H.
Satterthwaite, Transportation
Regulations Specialist, Department of
Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590, Phone: 202–366–8553, Email:
cameron.satterthwaite@dot.gov.
RIN: 2137–AE93
351. +Hazardous Materials: Oil Spill
Response Plans and Information
Sharing for High-Hazard Flammable
Trains (Fast Act)
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq.
No. 113 in part II of this issue of the
Federal Register.
RIN: 2137–AF08
[FR Doc. 2018–24091 Filed 11–15–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
E:\FR\FM\16NOP11.SGM
16NOP11
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 222 (Friday, November 16, 2018)]
[Unknown Section]
[Pages 58051-58070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-24091]
[[Page 58051]]
Vol. 83
Friday,
No. 222
November 16, 2018
Part XI
Department of Transportation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda
Federal Register / Vol. 83 , No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 /
Unified Agenda
[[Page 58052]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
14 CFR Chs. I-III
23 CFR Chs. I-III
33 CFR Chs. I and IV
46 CFR Chs. I-III
48 CFR Ch. 12
49 CFR Subtitle A, Chs. I-VI, and Chs. X-XII
[DOT-OST-1999-5129]
Department Regulatory and Deregulatory Agenda; Semiannual Summary
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.
ACTION: Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
(Regulatory Agenda).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Regulatory and Deregulatory Agenda is a semiannual summary
of all current and projected rulemakings, reviews of existing
regulations, and completed actions of the Department. The intent of the
Agenda is to provide the public with information about the Department
of Transportation's regulatory activity planned for the next 12 months.
It is expected that this information will enable the public to more
effectively participate in the Department's regulatory process. The
public is also invited to submit comments on any aspect of this Agenda.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
General
You should direct all comments and inquiries on the Agenda in
general to Jonathan Moss, Assistant General Counsel for Regulation,
Office of General Counsel, Department of Transportation, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; (202) 366-4723.
Specific
You should direct all comments and inquiries on particular items in
the Agenda to the individual listed for the regulation or the general
rulemaking contact person for the operating administration in appendix
B.
Table of Contents
Supplementary Information
Background
Significant/Priority Rulemakings
Explanation of Information on the Agenda
Request for Comments
Purpose
Appendix A--Instructions for Obtaining Copies of Regulatory
Documents
Appendix B--General Rulemaking Contact Persons
Appendix C--Public Rulemaking Dockets
Appendix D--Review Plans for Section 610 and Other Requirements
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
A primary goal of the Department of Transportation (Department or
DOT) is to allow the public to understand how we make decisions, which
necessarily includes being transparent in the way we measure the risks,
costs, and benefits of engaging in--or deciding not to engage in--a
particular regulatory action. As such, it is our policy to provide an
opportunity for public comment on such actions to all interested
stakeholders. Above all, transparency and meaningful engagement mandate
that regulations should be straightforward, clear, and accessible to
any interested stakeholder. The Department also embraces the notion
that there should be no more regulations than necessary. We emphasize
consideration of non-regulatory solutions and have rigorous processes
in place for continual reassessment of existing regulations. These
processes provide that regulations and other agency actions are
periodically reviewed and, if appropriate, are revised to ensure that
they continue to meet the needs for which they were originally
designed, and that they remain cost-effective and cost-justified.
To help the Department achieve its goals and in accordance with
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' (58
FR 51735; Oct. 4, 1993) and the Department's Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034; Feb. 26, 1979), the Department prepares a
semiannual regulatory and deregulatory agenda. It summarizes all
current and projected rulemakings, reviews of existing regulations, and
completed actions of the Department. These are matters on which action
has begun or is projected during the next 12 months or for which action
has been completed since the last Agenda.
In addition, this Agenda was prepared in accordance with three
Executive Orders issued by President Trump, which directed agencies to
further scrutinize their regulations and other agency actions. On
January 30, 2017, President Trump signed Executive Order 13771,
Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs. Under section
2(a) of the Executive order, unless prohibited by law, whenever an
executive department or agency publicly proposes for notice and comment
or otherwise promulgates a new regulation, it must identify at least
two existing regulations to be repealed. On February 24, 2017,
President Trump signed Executive Order 13777, Enforcing the Regulatory
Reform Agenda. Under this Executive order, each agency must establish a
Regulatory Reform Task Force (RRTF) to evaluate existing regulations,
and make recommendations for their repeal, replacement, or
modification. On March 28, 2017, President Trump signed Executive Order
13783, Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth, requiring
agencies to review all existing regulations, orders, guidance
documents, policies, and other similar agency actions that potentially
burden the development or use of domestically produced energy
resources, with particular attention to oil, natural gas, coal, and
nuclear energy resources.
In response to the mandate in Executive Order 13777, the Department
formed an RRTF consisting of senior career and non-career leaders,
which has already conducted extensive reviews of existing regulations,
and identified a number of rules to be repealed, replaced, or modified.
As a result of the RRTF's work, since January 2017, the Department has
issued deregulatory actions that reduce regulatory costs on the public
by at least $882 million (in net present value cost savings). Even when
the costs of significant regulatory actions are factored in, the
Department's deregulatory actions in FY 2018 will still result in over
$500 million in net cost savings (in net present value). With the
RRTF's assistance, the Department has achieved these cost savings in a
manner that is fully consistent with enhancing safety. For example, in
March 2018, the FAA promulgated a rule titled Rotorcraft Pilot
Compartment View, which will reduce the number of tests for nighttime
operations, after the Agency carefully considered the safety data and
determined the tests were unnecessary.
The Department has also significantly increased the number of
deregulatory actions it is pursuing. Today, DOT is pursuing over 120
deregulatory rulemakings, up from just 16 in the fall of 2016.
While each regulatory and deregulatory action is evaluated on its
own merits, the RRTF augments the Department's consideration of
prospective rulemakings by conducting monthly reviews across all OAs to
identify appropriate deregulatory
[[Page 58053]]
actions. The RRTF also works to ensure that any new regulatory action
is rigorously vetted and non-regulatory alternatives are considered.
Further information on the RRTF can be found online at: https://www.transportation.gov/regulations/regulatory-reform-task-force-report.
The Department's ongoing regulatory effort is guided by four
fundamental principles--safety, innovation, enabling investment in
infrastructure, and reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens. These
priorities are grounded in our national interest in maintaining U.S.
global leadership in safety, innovation, and economic growth. To
accomplish our regulatory goals, we must create a regulatory
environment that fosters growth in new and innovative industries
without burdening them with unnecessary restrictions. At the same time,
safety remains our highest priority; we must remain focused on managing
safety risks and being sure that we do not regress from the successes
already achieved. Our planned regulatory actions reflect a careful
balance that emphasizes the Department's priority in fostering
innovation while at the same time meeting the challenges of maintaining
a safe, reliable, and sustainable transportation system.
For example, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA) is working on reducing regulatory barriers to technology
innovation, including the integration of automated vehicles. Automated
vehicles are expected to increase safety significantly by reducing the
likelihood of human error when driving, which today accounts for the
overwhelming majority of accidents on our nation's roadways. NHTSA
plans to issue regulatory actions that: (1) Design a pilot program for
vehicles that may not meet FMVSS; (2) allow for permanent updates to
current FMVSS reflecting new technology; and (3) allow for updates to
NHTSA's regulations outlining the administrative processes for
petitioning the agency for exemptions, rulemakings, and
reconsiderations. Similarly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
is working to enable, safely and efficiently, the integration of
unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) into the National Airspace System. UAS
are expected to continue to drive innovation and increase safety as
operators and manufacturers find new and inventive uses for UAS. For
instance, UAS are poised to assist human operators with a number of
different mission sets such as inspection of critical infrastructure
and search and rescue, enabling beneficial and lifesaving activities
that would otherwise be difficult or even impossible for a human to
accomplish unassisted. The Department has regulatory efforts underway
to further integrate UAS safely and efficiently.
The Department is working on several rulemakings to facilitate a
major transformation of our national space program from one in which
the federal government has a primary role to one in which private
industry drives growth in innovation and launches. The Department is
also currently working on a rulemaking to facilitate a major
transformation of our national space program that will enable private
industry to drive growth in innovation and launches. The FAA is
proposing a rule that will fundamentally change how FAA licenses
launches and reentries of commercial space vehicles moving from
prescriptive requirements to a performance based approach.
Explanation of Information in the Agenda
An Office of Management and Budget memorandum, dated June 18, 2018,
establishes the format for this Agenda.
First, the Agenda is divided by initiating offices. Then the Agenda
is divided into five categories: (1) Prerule stage; (2) proposed rule
stage; (3) final rule stage; (4) long-term actions; and (5) completed
actions. For each entry, the Agenda provides the following information:
(1) Its ``significance''; (2) a short, descriptive title; (3) its legal
basis; (4) the related regulatory citation in the Code of Federal
Regulations; (5) any legal deadline and, if so, for what action (e.g.,
NPRM, final rule); (6) an abstract; (7) a timetable, including the
earliest expected date for when a rulemaking document may publish; (8)
whether the rulemaking will affect small entities and/or levels of
Government and, if so, which categories; (9) whether a Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) analysis is required (for rules that would have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities);
(10) a listing of any analyses an office will prepare or has prepared
for the action (with minor exceptions, DOT requires an economic
analysis for all its rulemakings); (11) an agency contact office or
official who can provide further information; (12) a Regulation
Identifier Number (RIN) assigned to identify an individual rulemaking
in the Agenda and facilitate tracing further action on the issue; (13)
whether the action is subject to the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act; (14)
whether the action is subject to the Energy Act; (15) the action's
designation under Executive Order 13771 explaining whether the action
will have a regulatory or deregulatory effect; and (16) whether the
action is major under the congressional review provisions of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
For nonsignificant regulations issued routinely and frequently as a
part of an established body of technical requirements (such as the
Federal Aviation Administration's Airspace Rules), to keep those
requirements operationally current, we only include the general
category of the regulations, the identity of a contact office or
official, and an indication of the expected number of regulations; we
do not list individual regulations.
In the ``Timetable'' column, we use abbreviations to indicate the
particular documents being considered. ANPRM stands for Advance Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking, SNPRM for Supplemental Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, and NPRM for Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Listing a
future date in this column does not mean we have made a decision to
issue a document; it is the earliest date on which a rulemaking
document may publish. In addition, these dates are based on current
schedules. Information received after the issuance of this Agenda could
result in a decision not to take regulatory action or in changes to
proposed publication dates. For example, the need for further
evaluation could result in a later publication date; evidence of a
greater need for the regulation could result in an earlier publication
date.
Finally, a dot () preceding an entry indicates that the
entry appears in the Agenda for the first time.
The internet is the basic means for disseminating the Unified
Agenda. The complete Unified Agenda is available online at
www.reginfo.gov in a format that offers users a greatly enhanced
ability to obtain information from the Agenda database. A portion of
the Agenda is published in the Federal Register, however, because the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 602) mandates publication for the
regulatory flexibility agenda. Accordingly, DOT's printed Agenda
entries include only:
1. The agency's Agenda preamble;
2. Rules that are in the agency's regulatory flexibility agenda, in
accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, because they are likely
to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities; and
3. Any rules that the agency has identified for periodic review
under section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Printing of these entries is limited to fields that contain
information required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act's
[[Page 58054]]
Agenda requirements. These elements are: Sequence Number; Title;
Section 610 Review, if applicable; Legal Authority; Abstract;
Timetable; Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required; Agency Contact;
and Regulation Identifier Number (RIN). Additional information (for
detailed list, see section heading ``Explanation of Information on the
Agenda'') on these entries is available in the Unified Agenda published
on the internet.
Request for Comments
General
Our Agenda is intended primarily for the use of the public. Since
its inception, we have made modifications and refinements that we
believe provide the public with more helpful information, as well as
making the Agenda easier to use. We would like you, the public, to make
suggestions or comments on how the Agenda could be further improved.
Reviews
We also seek your suggestions on which of our existing regulations
you believe need to be reviewed to determine whether they should be
revised or revoked. We particularly draw your attention to the
Department's review plan in appendix D.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department is especially interested in obtaining information on
requirements that have a ``significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities'' and, therefore, must be reviewed under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. If you have any suggested regulations,
please submit them to us, along with your explanation of why they
should be reviewed.
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, comments are
specifically invited on regulations that we have targeted for review
under section 610 of the Act. The phrase (sec. 610 Review) appears at
the end of the title for these reviews. Please see appendix D for the
Department's section 610 review plans.
Consultation With State, Local, and Tribal Governments
Executive Orders 13132 and 13175 require us to develop an account
process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input'' by State, local, and
tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have
federalism or tribal implications. These policies are defined in the
Executive orders to include regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects'' on States or Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and them, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and various levels of
Government or Indian tribes. Therefore, we encourage State and local
Governments or Indian tribes to provide us with information about how
the Department's rulemakings impact them.
Purpose
The Department is publishing this regulatory Agenda in the Federal
Register to share with interested members of the public the
Department's preliminary expectations regarding its future regulatory
actions. This should enable the public to be more aware of the
Department's regulatory activity and should result in more effective
public participation. This publication in the Federal Register does not
impose any binding obligation on the Department or any of the offices
within the Department with regard to any specific item on the Agenda.
Regulatory action, in addition to the items listed, is not precluded.
Dated: July 27, 2018.
Elaine L. Chao,
Secretary of Transportation.
Appendix A--Instructions for Obtaining Copies of Regulatory Documents
To obtain a copy of a specific regulatory document in the Agenda,
you should communicate directly with the contact person listed with the
regulation at the address below. We note that most, if not all, such
documents, including the Semiannual Regulatory Agenda, are available
through the internet at https://www.regulations.gov. See appendix C for
more information.
Appendix B--General Rulemaking Contact Persons
The following is a list of persons who can be contacted within the
Department for general information concerning the rulemaking process
within the various operating administrations.
FAA--Lirio Liu, Director, Office of Rulemaking, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-7833.
FHWA--Jennifer Outhouse, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-0761.
FMCSA--Steven J. LaFreniere, Regulatory Ombudsman, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-0596.
NHTSA--Steve Wood, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-2992.
FRA--Kathryn Gresham, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 493-6063.
FTA--Chaya Koffman, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-3101.
SLSDC--Carrie Mann Lavigne, Chief Counsel, 180 Andrews Street,
Massena, NY 13662; telephone (315) 764-3200.
PHMSA--Stephen Gordon, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-1101.
MARAD--Gabriel Chavez, Office of Chief Counsel, Maritime
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590;
telephone (202) 366-2621.
OST--Jonathan Moss, Assistant General Counsel for Regulation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-4723.
Appendix C--Public Rulemaking Dockets
All comments via the internet are submitted through the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) at the following address: https://www.regulations.gov. The FDMS allows the public to search, view,
download, and comment on all Federal agency rulemaking documents in one
central online system. The above referenced internet address also
allows the public to sign up to receive notification when certain
documents are placed in the dockets.
The public also may review regulatory dockets at or deliver
comments on proposed rulemakings to the Dockets Office at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590, 1-800-647-5527.
Working Hours: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Appendix D--Review Plans for Section 610 and Other Requirements
Part I--The Plan
General
The Department of Transportation has long recognized the importance
of regularly reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether
they need to be revised or revoked. Our Regulatory Policies and
Procedures require such reviews. We also have responsibilities under
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' 76 FR 3821
(January 18, 2011), Executive Order 13771 ``Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs,'' Executive Order 13777, ``Enforcing the
Regulatory Agenda,'' and
[[Page 58055]]
section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act to conduct such reviews.
This includes the designation of a Regulatory Reform Officer, the
establishment of a Regulatory Reform Task Force, and the use of plain
language techniques in new rules and considering its use in existing
rules when we have the opportunity and resources to revise them. We are
committed to continuing our reviews of existing rules and, if it is
needed, will initiate rulemaking actions based on these reviews. The
Department will begin a new 10-year review cycle with the Fall 2018
Agenda.
Section 610 Review Plan
Section 610 requires that we conduct reviews of rules that: (1)
Have been published within the last 10 years; and (2) have a
``significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities'' (SEISNOSE). It also requires that we publish in the Federal
Register each year a list of any such rules that we will review during
the next year. The Office of the Secretary and each of the Department's
Operating Administrations have a 10-year review plan. These reviews
comply with section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Changes to the Review Plan
Some reviews may be conducted earlier than scheduled. For example,
to the extent resources permit, the plain language reviews will be
conducted more quickly. Other events, such as accidents, may result in
the need to conduct earlier reviews of some rules. Other factors may
also result in the need to make changes; for example, we may make
changes in response to public comment on this plan or in response to a
presidentially mandated review. If there is any change to the review
plan, we will note the change in the following Agenda. For any section
610 review, we will provide the required notice prior to the review.
Part II--The Review Process
The Analysis
Generally, the agencies have divided their rules into 10 different
groups and plan to analyze one group each year. For purposes of these
reviews, a year will coincide with the fall-to-fall schedule for
publication of the Agenda. Most agencies provide historical information
about the reviews that have occurred over the past 10 years. Thus, Year
1 (2018) begins in the fall of 2018 and ends in the fall of 2019; Year
2 (2019) begins in the fall of 2019 and ends in the fall of 2020, and
so on. The exception to this general rule is the FAA, which provides
information about the reviews it completed for this year and
prospective information about the reviews it intends to complete in the
next 10 years. Thus, for FAA Year 1 (2017) begins in the fall of 2017
and ends in the fall of 2018; Year 2 (2018) begins in the fall of 2018
and ends in the fall of 2019, and so on. We request public comment on
the timing of the reviews. For example, is there a reason for
scheduling an analysis and review for a particular rule earlier than we
have? Any comments concerning the plan or analyses should be submitted
to the regulatory contacts listed in appendix B, General Rulemaking
Contact Persons.
Section 610 Review
The agency will analyze each of the rules in a given year's group
to determine whether any rule has a SEISNOSE and, thus, requires review
in accordance with section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The
level of analysis will, of course, depend on the nature of the rule and
its applicability. Publication of agencies' section 610 analyses listed
each fall in this Agenda provides the public with notice and an
opportunity to comment consistent with the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. We request that public comments be
submitted to us early in the analysis year concerning the small entity
impact of the rules to help us in making our determinations.
In each fall Agenda, the agency will publish the results of the
analyses it has completed during the previous year. For rules that had
a negative finding on SEISNOSE, we will give a short explanation (e.g.,
``these rules only establish petition processes that have no cost
impact'' or ``these rules do not apply to any small entities''). For
parts, subparts, or other discrete sections of rules that do have a
SEISNOSE, we will announce that we will be conducting a formal section
610 review during the following 12 months. At this stage, we will add
an entry to the Agenda in the pre-rulemaking section describing the
review in more detail. We also will seek public comment on how best to
lessen the impact of these rules and provide a name or docket to which
public comments can be submitted. In some cases, the section 610 review
may be part of another unrelated review of the rule. In such a case, we
plan to clearly indicate which parts of the review are being conducted
under section 610.
Other Reviews
The agency will also examine the specified rules to determine
whether any other reasons exist for revising or revoking the rule or
for rewriting the rule in plain language. In each fall Agenda, the
agency will also publish information on the results of the examinations
completed during the previous year.
Part III--List of Pending Section 610 Reviews
The Agenda identifies the pending DOT section 610 Reviews by
inserting ``(Section 610 Review)'' after the title for the specific
entry. For further information on the pending reviews, see the Agenda
entries at www.reginfo.gov. For example, to obtain a list of all
entries that are in section 610 Reviews under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, a user would select the desired responses on the
search screen (by selecting ``advanced search'') and, in effect,
generate the desired ``index'' of reviews.
Office of the Secretary
Section 610 and Other Reviews
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulations to
Year be reviewed Analysis year Review year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1..................... 49 CFR parts 91 2018 2019
through 99.
14 CFR parts 200
through 212.
48 CFR parts
1201 through
1224.
2..................... 48 CFR parts 2019 2020
1227 through
1253 and new
parts and
subparts.
3..................... 14 CFR parts 213 2020 2021
through 232.
4..................... 14 CFR parts 234 2021 2022
through 254.
5..................... 14 CFR parts 255 2022 2023
through 298 and
49 CFR part 40.
6..................... 14 CFR parts 300 2023 2024
through 373.
7..................... 14 CFR parts 374 2024 2025
through 398.
8..................... 14 CFR part 399 2025 2026
and 49 CFR
parts 1 through
15.
9..................... 49 CFR parts 17 2026 2027
through 28.
[[Page 58056]]
10.................... 49 CFR parts 29 2027 2028
through 39 and
parts 41
through 89.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year 10 (2017) List of Rules Analyzed and a Summary of Results
49 CFR part 30--Denial of Public Works Contracts to Suppliers of Goods
and Services of Countries That Deny Procurement Market Access to U.S.
Contractors
Section 610: OST conducted a Section 610 review of this
part and found no SEISNOSE.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden. OST's plain language review of
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 31--Program Fraud Civil Remedies
Section 610: OST conducted a review of this part and found
no SEISNOSE.
General: Changes are needed to this part to remove
obsolete references; update the Civil Penalties in accordance with the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of
2015 (Pub. L. 114-74, section 701), including adding reference to the
Act in the footnotes to append to the amounts of those penalties;
correct and/or remove certain phrases and terms throughout the part;
and to clarify the meaning of ``designated by the party's
representative'' found in 31.33(f)(2)(ii). OST's plain language review
of this part indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 32--Governmentwide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace
(Financial Assistance)
Section 610: OST conducted review of this part and found
no SEISNOSE.
General: No changes are needed to this part of the
regulation. OST's plain language review of this part indicates no need
for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 33--Transportation Priorities and Allocation System
Section 610: OST conducted review of this part and found
no SEISNOSE.
General: Review of this part indicates that Schedule 1 of
the appendix needs to be updated to include current approved programs.
Additionally, Form OST F 1254--Appendix I needs to be updated with an
OMB Control Number. OST's plain language review of this part indicates
no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 37--Transportation Services for Individuals With
Disabilities (ADA)
Section 610: OST conducted a Section 610 review of this
part and found no SEISNOSE.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden. OST's plain language review of
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 38--Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Accessibility
Specifications for Transportation Vehicles
Section 610: OST conducted a Section 610 review of this
part and found no SEISNOSE.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden. OST's plain language review of
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 39--Transportation for Individuals With Disabilities:
Passenger Vessels
Section 610: OST conducted a Section 610 review of this
part and found no SEISNOSE.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden. OST's plain language review of
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 41--Seismic Safety
Section 610: OST conducted review of this part and found
no SEISNOSE.
General: Review of this part indicates that this part
needs to be updated for consistency with Executive Order 13717,
February 2, 2016, which repealed the underlying Executive Order 12699.
OST's plain language review of this part indicates no need for
substantial revision.
49 CFR part 71--Standard Time Zone Boundaries
Section 610: No SEISNOSE. No small entities are affected.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden. OST's plain language review of
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 79--Medals of Honor
Section 610: OST conducted a Section 610 review of this
part and found no SEISNOSE.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden. OST's plain language review of
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 80--Credit Assistance for Surface Transportation Projects
Section 610: OST conducted a section 610 review of this
part and found no SEISNOSE.
General: No changes are needed. This regulation is cost
effective and imposes the least burden. OST's plain language review of
this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 89--Implementation of Federal Claims Collection Act
Section 610: OST conducted review of this part and found
no SEISNOSE.
General: Review of this part outlined that numerous cross-
references to statutes and regulations should be updated to ensure the
references are current and that the DOT's regulations are consistent
with those references; this includes removing any obsolete references
to regulations or statutes that have been rescinded. OST's plain
language review of this part indicates no need for substantial
revision.
Year 1 (Fall 2018) List of Rules That Will Be Analyzed During the Next
Year
49 CFR part 91--International Air Transportation Fair Competitive
Practices
49 CFR part 92--Recovering Debts to the United States by Salary Offset
49 CFR part 93--Aircraft Allocation
49 CFR part 98--Enforcement of Restrictions on Post-Employment
Activities
49 CFR part 99--Employee Responsibilities and Conduct
14 CFR part 200--Definitions and Instructions
14 CFR part 201--Air Carrier Authority under Subtitle VII of Title 49
of the United States Code [Amended]
14 CFR part 203--Waiver of Warsaw Convention Liability Limits and
Defenses
14 CFR part 204--Data to Support Fitness Determinations
14 CFR part 205--Aircraft Accident Liability Insurance
14 CFR part 206--Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity:
Special Authorizations and Exemptions
14 CFR part 207--Charter Trips by U.S. Scheduled Air Carriers
14 CFR part 208--Charter Trips by U.S. Charter Air Carriers
14 CFR part 211--Applications for Permits to Foreign Air Carriers
14 CFR part 212--Charter Rules for U.S. and Foreign Direct Air Carriers
48 CFR part 1201--Federal Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR part 1202--Definitions of Words and Terms
[[Page 58057]]
48 CFR part 1203--Improper Business Practices and Personal Conflicts of
Interest
48 CFR part 1204--Administrative Matters
48 CFR part 1205--Publicizing Contract Actions
48 CFR part 1206--Competition Requirements
48 CFR part 1207--Acquisition Planning
48 CFR part 1208-1210--[Reserved]
48 CFR part 1211--Describing Agency Needs
48 CFR part 1212--[Reserved]
48 CFR part 1213--Simplified Acquisition Procedures
48 CFR part 1214--Sealed Bidding
48 CFR part 1215--Contracting by Negotiation
48 CFR part 1216--Types of Contracts
48 CFR part 1217--Special Contracting Methods
48 CFR part 1218--[Reserved]
48 CFR part 1219--Small Business Programs
48 CFR part 1220-1221--[Reserved]
48 CFR part 1222--Application of Labor Laws to Government Acquisitions
48 CFR part 1223--Environment, Energy and Water Efficiency, Renewable
Energy Technologies, Occupational Safety, and Drug-Free Workplace
48 CFR part 1224--Protection of Privacy and Freedom of Information
Federal Aviation Administration
Section 610 and Other Reviews
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has elected to use the
two-step, two-year process used by most Department of Transportation
(DOT) modes in past plans. As such, the FAA has divided its rules into
10 groups as displayed in the table below. During the first year (the
``analysis year''), all rules published during the previous 10 years
within a 10% block of the regulations will be analyzed to identify
those with a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities (SEISNOSE). During the second year (the ``review
year''), each rule identified in the analysis year as having a SEISNOSE
will be reviewed in accordance with Section 610(b) to determine if it
should be continued without change or changed to minimize impact on
small entities. Results of those reviews will be published in the DOT
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulations to
Year be reviewed Analysis year Review year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1..................... 14 CFR parts 119 2018 2019
through 129 and
parts 150
through 156.
2..................... 14 CFR parts 133 2019 2020
through 139 and
parts 157
through 169.
3..................... 14 CFR parts 141 2020 2021
through 147 and
parts 170
through 187.
4..................... 14 CFR parts 189 2021 2022
through 198 and
parts 1 through
16.
5..................... 14 CFR parts 17 2022 2023
through 33.
6..................... 14 CFR parts 34 2023 2024
through 39 and
parts 400
through 405.
7..................... 14 CFR parts 43 2024 2025
through 49 and
parts 406
through 415.
8..................... 14 CFR parts 60 2025 2026
through 77.
9..................... 14 CFR parts 91 2026 2027
through 105.
10.................... 14 CFR parts 417 2027 2028
through 460.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background on the Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 as amended (RFA), (sections
601 through 612 of title 5, United States Code (5 U.S.C.)) requires
Federal regulatory agencies to analyze all proposed and final rules to
determine their economic impact on small entities, which includes small
businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions.
The primary purpose of the RFA is to establish as a principle of
regulatory issuance that Federal agencies endeavor, consistent with the
objectives of the rule and applicable statutes, to fit regulatory and
informational requirements to the scale of entities subject to the
regulation. The FAA performed the required RFA analyses of each final
rulemaking action and amendment it has initiated since enactment of the
RFA in 1980.
Section 610 of 5 U.S.C. requires government agencies to
periodically review all regulations that will have a SEISNOSE. The FAA
must analyze each rule within 10 years of its publication date.
Defining SEISNOSE
The RFA does not define ``significant economic impact.'' Therefore,
there is no clear rule or number to determine when a significant
economic impact occurs. However, the Small Business Administration
(SBA) states that significance should be determined by considering the
size of the business, the size of the competitor's business, and the
impact the same regulation has on larger competitors.
Likewise, the RFA does not define ``substantial number.'' However,
the legislative history of the RFA suggests that a substantial number
must be at least one but does not need to be an overwhelming percentage
such as more than half. The SBA states that the substantiality of the
number of small businesses affected should be determined on an
industry-specific basis.
This analysis consisted of the following three steps:
1. Review of the number of small entities affected by the
amendments to parts 119 through 129 and parts 150 through 156.
2. Identification and analysis of all amendments to parts 119
through 129 and parts 150 through 156 since 2008 to determine whether
any still have or now have a SEISNOSE.
3. Review of the FAA's regulatory flexibility assessment of each
amendment performed as required by the RFA.
Year 2 (2019) List of Rules To Be Analyzed the Next Year
14 CFR part 133--Rotorcraft External-Load Operations
14 CFR part 135--Operating Requirements: Commuter and On Demand
Operations and Rules Governing Persons on Board Such Aircraft
14 CFR part 136--Commercial Air Tours and National Parks Air Tour
Management
14 CFR part 137--Agricultural Aircraft Operations
14 CFR part 139--Certification of Airports
14 CFR part 157--Notice of Construction, Alteration, Activation, and
Deactivation of Airports
14 CFR part 158--Passenger Facility Charges
14 CFR part 161--Notice and Approval of Airport Noise and Access
Restrictions
14 CFR part 169--Expenditure of Federal Funds for Nonmilitary Airports
or Air Navigation Facilities Thereon
[[Page 58058]]
Year 1 (2018) List of Rules Analyzed and Summary of Results
14 CFR part 119--Certification: Air Carriers and Commercial Operators
Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of
this part and found no SEISNOSE.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden.
14 CFR part 120--Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs
Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of
this part and found Docket No. FAA-2008-0937, 74 FR 22653, May 14,
2009, as amended by Amendment 120-2, 79 FR 9973, Feb. 21, 2014 of
section 120.105, Employees Who Must Be Tested, and Docket No. FAA-2008-
0937, 74 FR 22653, May 14, 2009, as amended by Amendment 120-2, 79 FR
9973, Feb. 21, 2014 of section 120.215, Covered Employees in CFR 120,
trigger SEISNOSE within the meaning of the RFA.
General: No revisions are needed. The FAA has considered a
number of alternatives and has taken steps to minimize the impact on
small entities in attempts to lower compliance costs for small
entities, but could not go forward without compromising the safety for
the industry.
14 CFR part 121--Operating Requirements: Domestic, Flag, and
Supplemental Operations
Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of
this part and found Docket No. FAA-2008-0677, 78 FR 67836, Nov. 12,
2013; Docket No. 9509, 35 FR 90, Jan. 3, 1970, as amended by Amendment
121-366, 78 FR 67836, Nov. 12, 2013; Docket No. FAA-2008-0677, 78 FR
67837, Nov. 12, 2013; Amendment 121-366, 78 FR 67837, Nov. 12, 2013; 62
FR 3739, Jan. 24, 1997, as amended by Amendment 121-366, 78 FR 67838,
Nov. 12, 2013; Docket No. FAA-2010-0100, 78 FR 42377, July 15, 2013, as
amended by Amendment 121-366, 78 FR 67839, Nov. 12, 2013; Amendment
121-357, 77 FR 402, Jan. 4, 2012; Docket No. FAA-2009-1093, 77 FR 402,
Jan. 4, 2012; Docket No. FAA-2002-12461, 71 FR 63640, Oct. 30, 2006, as
amended by Amendment 121-365, 78 FR 42379, July 15, 2013 in CFR 121
trigger SEISNOSE within the meaning of the RFA.
General: No revisions are needed. The FAA has considered a
number of alternatives and has taken steps to minimize the impact on
small entities in attempts to lower compliance costs for small
entities, but could not go forward without compromising the safety for
the industry.
14 CFR part 125--Certification and Operations: Airplanes Having a
Seating Capacity of 20 or More Passengers or a Maximum Payload Capacity
of 6,000 Pounds or More, and Rules Governing Persons on Board Such
Aircraft
Section 610:
General:
14 CFR part 129--Operations: Foreign Air Carriers and Foreign Operators
of U.S.-Registered Aircraft Engaged in Common Carriage
Section 610:
General:
14 CFR part 150--Airport Noise Compatibility Planning
Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of
this part and found no SEISNOSE.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden.
14 CFR part 151--Federal Aid to Airports
Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of
this part and found no SEISNOSE.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden.
14 FR part 152--Airport Aid Program
Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of
this part and found no SEISNOSE.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden.
14 CFR part 153--Airport Operations
Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of
this part and found no SEISNOSE.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden.
14 CFR part 155--Release of Airport Property from Surplus Property
Disposal Restrictions
Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of
this part and found no SEISNOSE.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden.
14 CFR part 156--State Block Grant Pilot Program
Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of
this part and found no SEISNOSE.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden.
Federal Highway Administration
Section 610 and Other Reviews
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulations to
Year be reviewed Analysis year Review year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1..................... None............ 2018 2019
2..................... 23 CFR parts 1 2019 2020
to 260.
3..................... 23 CFR parts 420 2020 2021
to 470.
4..................... 23 CFR part 500. 2021 2022
5..................... 23 CFR parts 620 2022 2023
to 637.
6..................... 23 CFR parts 645 2023 2024
to 669.
7..................... 23 CFR parts 710 2024 2025
to 924.
8..................... 23 CFR parts 940 2025 2026
to 973.
9..................... 23 CFR parts 2026 2027
1200 to 1252.
10.................... New parts and 2027 2028
subparts.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal-Aid Highway Program
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has adopted regulations
in title 23 of the CFR, chapter I, related to the Federal-Aid Highway
Program. These regulations implement and carry out the provisions of
Federal law relating to the administration of Federal aid for highways.
The primary law authorizing Federal aid for highways is chapter I of
title 23 of the U.S.C. 145, which expressly provides for a federally
assisted State program. For this reason, the regulations adopted by the
FHWA in title 23 of the CFR primarily relate to the requirements that
States must meet to receive Federal funds for construction and other
work related to highways. Because the regulations in title 23 primarily
relate to States, which are not defined as small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, the FHWA believes that its regulations in
title 23 do not have a significant economic
[[Page 58059]]
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The FHWA solicits
public comment on this preliminary conclusion.
Year 10 (Fall 2017) List of Rules Analyzed and a Summary of Results
23 CFR part 490--National Performance Management Measures
Section 610: No SEISNOSE. No small entities are affected.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. The FHWA
recently repealed one of the original performance measures on May 31,
2018, at 83 FR 24920.
23 CFR part 505--Projects of National and Regional Significance
Evaluation and Rating
Section 610: No SEISNOSE. No small entities are affected.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
23 FR part 511--Real-Time System Management Information Program
Section 610: No SEISNOSE. No small entities are affected.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
23 CFR part 515--Asset Management Plans
Section 610: No SEISNOSE. No small entities are affected.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
23 CFR part 635--Subpart E--Construction Manager/General Contractor
(CM/GC) Contracting
Section 610: No SEISNOSE. No small entities are affected.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
23 CFR part 650--Subpart E--National Tunnel Inspection Standards
Section 610: No SEISNOSE. No small entities are affected.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
23 CFR part 667--Periodic Evaluation of Facilities Repeatedly Requiring
Repair and Reconstruction Due to Emergency Events
Section 610: No SEISNOSE. No small entities are affected.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
23 CFR part 950--Electronic Toll Collection
Section 610: No SEISNOSE. No small entities are affected.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost
effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
Year 1 (Fall 2018) List of Rules That Will Be Analyzed During the Next
Year
None.
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Section 610 and Other Reviews
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulations to
Year be reviewed Analysis year Review year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1..................... 49 CFR parts 386 2018 2019
and 395.
2..................... 49 CFR part 385. 2019 2020
3..................... 49 CFR part 382. 2020 2021
4..................... 49 CFR parts 380 2021 2022
and 383.
5..................... 49 CFR part 387. 2022 2023
6..................... 49 CFR part 398. 2023 2024
7..................... 49 CFR part 392. 2024 2025
8..................... 49 CFR part 375. 2025 2026
9..................... 49 CFR part 367. 2026 2027
10.................... 49 CFR part 395. 2027 2028
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year 1 (Fall 2018) List of Rules That Will Be Analyzed During the Next
Year
49 CFR part 395--Hours of Service (HOS) of Drivers
(Note: The analysis of this regulation is continued from year 10
(fall 2017) to year 1 (fall 2018) of the new review schedule.
Section 610: There is a SEIOSNOSE. The Federal HOS
regulations promote safe driving of commercial motor vehicles by
limiting on-duty driving time, thereby improving the likelihood that
drivers have adequate time for restorative rest. Although this rule
drives a SEISNOSE, it also drives significant benefits to small
business. Tangible benefits include streamlined operations, reduced
operational cost, maximized productivity, lower insurance, improved
vehicle diagnostics, reduced administrative burden, and increased
profits.
General: The regulatory value of restricting fatigue-
related operations will save lives and reduce injuries. These
regulations are written consistent with plain language guidelines, and
uses clear and unambiguous language. The Agency is currently
considering changes to the hours of service regulations that would
improve operational flexibilities for motor carriers without a
deleterious effect on safety.
49 CFR part 386--Rules of practice for motor carrier, intermodal
equipment provider, broker, freight forwarder, and hazardous materials
proceedings
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Section 610 and Other Reviews
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulations to
Year be reviewed Analysis year Review year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1..................... 49 CFR parts 2018 2019
571.214 through
571.219, except
571.217.
49 FR parts 591
through 595 and
new parts and
subparts.
2..................... 23 CFR parts 2019 2020
1200 and 1300.
49 CFR parts
571.223 through
571.500, 575
and 579.23.
[[Page 58060]]
3..................... 49 CFR parts 501 2020 2021
through 526 and
571.213.
4..................... 49 CFR parts 2021 2022
571.131,
571.217,
571.220,
571.221, and
571.222.
5..................... 49 CFR parts 2022 2023
571.101 through
571.110, and
571.135,
571.136,
571.138 and
571.139.
6..................... 49 CFR parts 2023 2024
571.141, 529
through 578,
except parts
571 and 575.
7..................... 49 CFR parts 2024 2025
571.111 through
571.129 and 580
through 588.
8..................... 49 parts CFR 2025 2026
571.201 through
571.212.
9..................... 49 parts CFR 2026 2027
571.214 through
571.219, except
571.217.
10.................... 49 CFR parts 591 2027 2028
through 595 and
new parts and
subparts.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year 1 (Fall 2018) List of Rules That Will Be Analyzed During the Next
Year
49 CFR part 571.214--Side Impact Protection
49 CFR part 571.215--[Reserved]
49 CFR part 571.216--Roof Crush Resistance; Applicable Unless a Vehicle
Is Certified to 571.216a
49 CFR part 571.216a--Roof Crush Resistance; Upgraded Standard
49 CFR part 571.218--Motorcycle Helmets
49 CFR part 571.219--Windshield Zone Intrusion
49 CFR part 591--Importation of Vehicles and Equipment Subject to
Federal Safety, Bumper and Theft Prevention Standards
49 CFR part 592--Registered Importers of Vehicles Not Originally
Manufactured to Conform to the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
49 CFR part 593--Determinations That a Vehicle Not Originally
Manufactured to Conform to the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
is Eligible for Importation
49 CFR part 594--Schedule of Fees Authorized by 49 U.S.C. 30141
49 CFR part 595--Make Inoperative Exemptions
Federal Railroad Administration
Section 610 and Other Reviews
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulations to
Year be reviewed Analysis year Review year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1..................... 49 CFR parts 2018 2019
200, 207, 209,
and 210.
2..................... 49 CFR parts 2019 2020
211, 212, 213,
214, and 215.
3..................... 49 CFR parts 2020 2021
216, 217, 218,
219, and 220.
4..................... 49 CFR parts 2021 2022
221, 222, 223,
224, and 225.
5..................... 49 CFR parts 2022 2023
227, 228, 229,
230, and 231.
6..................... 49 CFR parts 2023 2024
232, 233, 234,
235, and 236.
7..................... 49 CFR parts 2024 2025
237, 238, 249,
240, and 241.
8..................... 49 CFR parts 2025 2026
242, 243, 244,
250, and 256.
9..................... 49 CFR parts 2026 2027
261, 262, 264,
266, and 268.
10.................... 49 CFR parts 2027 2028
269, 270, and
272.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year 10 (Fall 2017) List of Rules Analyzed and a Summary of Results
49 FR part 213--Track Safety Standards
Section 610: This rule appears to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities (SEISNOSE).
These small entities are approximately 735 short line railroads.
However, the FRA will conduct a formal review to identify whether
opportunities may exist to reduce the burden on small railroads without
compromising safety standards.
General: The rule prescribes minimum safety requirements
for railroad track that is part of the general railroad system of
transportation. The objective of the rule is to enhance the safety of
rail transportation, protecting both those traveling and working on the
system and those off the system who might be adversely affected by a
rail incident. FRA's plain language review of this rule indicates no
need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 220--Railroad Communications
Section 610: This rule has significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. However, the actual burden on
most of these railroads varies because of their different operating
characteristics. Entities that are not subject to this rule include
railroads that do not operate on the general railroad system of
transportation. The communication requirements of this rule have been
designed to minimize the impact on small railroads. For instance, while
large railroads are required to have a working radio and wireless
communication redundancy in every train, small railroads are only
required to comply with this standard for trains used to transport
passengers. However, the FRA will conduct a formal review to identify
whether opportunities may exist to reduce the burden on small railroads
without compromising safety standards.
General: The rule prescribes minimum requirements
governing the use of wireless communications in connection with
railroad operations. Uniform standard communications procedures and
requirements throughout the railroad industry are necessary to ensure
the protection and safety of railroad employees and the general public,
and to minimize the number of casualties. FRA's plain language review
of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 230--Steam Locomotive Inspection and Maintenance Records
Section 610: There is no SEISNOSE.
General: The rule prescribes minimum Federal safety
standards of inspection and maintenance for all steam locomotive
operated on railroads. These requirements are necessary to ensure the
protection and safety of railroad employees and the general public and
to minimize the number of casualties. FRA's plain language review of
this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 232--Brake System Safety Standards for Freight and Other
Non-Passenger Trains and Equipment; End of Train Devices
Section 610: This rule has significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. About 700 small railroads are
subject to this rule. However, the actual burden on most of these small
entities varies depending on their operating
[[Page 58061]]
characteristics. FRA is currently evaluating this rule to determine if
changes need to be made because of technological developments in the
systems affected by this rule.
General: The rule prescribes minimum Federal safety
standards for freight and other non-passenger train brake systems, as
well as requirements for all trains that use end-of-train devices. This
rule governs critical safety systems of the train and therefore
continues to be needed. To FRA's knowledge, it does not overlap or
conflict with other rules. Furthermore, FRA's plain language review of
this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 239--Passenger Train Emergency Preparedness
Section 610: There is no SEISNOSE.
General: The rule prescribes minimum Federal safety
standards for the preparation, adoption and implementation of emergency
preparedness plans by railroads. These requirements are necessary to
ensure the protection and safety of railroad passengers and employees,
as well as the general public, and to minimize the number of
casualties. FRA's plain language review of this rule indicates no need
for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 240--Qualification and Certification of Locomotive
Engineers
Section 610: There is no SEISNOSE.
General: The purpose of this rule is to prescribes minimum
Federal safety standards for the eligibility, training, testing,
certification and monitoring of locomotive engineers. FRA's plain
language review of this rule indicates no need of substantial revision.
Year 1 (Fall 2018) List of Rule(s) That Will Be Analyzed During Next
Year
49 CFR part 200--Informal Rules of Practice for Passenger Service
49 CFR part 207--Railroad Police Officers
49 CFR part 209--Railroad Safety Enforcement Procedures
49 CFR part 210--Railroad Noise Emission Compliance
Federal Transit Administration
Section 610 and Other Reviews
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), as amended (sections
601 through 612 of title 5, United States Code), requires Federal
regulatory agencies to analyze all proposed and final rules to
determine their economic impact on small entities, which include small
businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions. Section 610
requires government agencies to periodically review all regulations
that will have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities (SEISNOSE).
In complying with this section, the Federal Transit Administration
(FTA) has elected to use the two-step, two-year process used by most
Department of Transportation (DOT) modes. As such, FTA has divided its
rules into 10 groups as displayed in the table below. During the
analysis year, the listed rules will be analyzed to identify those with
a SEISNOSE. During the review year, each rule identified in the
analysis year as having a SEISNOSE will be reviewed in accordance with
Section 610(b) to determine if it should be continued without change or
changed to minimize the impact on small entities.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulations to
Year be reviewed Analysis year Review year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1..................... 49 CFR parts 2018 2019
604, 605, and
624.
2..................... 49 CFR parts 609 2019 2020
and 640.
3..................... 49 CFR part 633. 2020 2021
4..................... 49 CFR part 611. 2021 2022
5..................... 49 CFR part 655. 2022 2023
6..................... 49 CFR parts 602 2023 2024
and 614.
7..................... 49 CFR parts 661 2024 2025
and 663.
8..................... 49 CFR parts 2025 2026
625, 630, and
665.
9..................... 49 CFR parts 2026 2027
613, 622, 670
and 674.
10.................... 49 CFR parts 2027 2028
650, 672 and
673.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year 10 (2018) List of Rules Analyzed and Summary of Results
49 CFR part 665--Bus Testing
Section 610: Pursuant to Section 20014 of the Moving Ahead
for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), FTA issued a new pass/
fail standard and new aggregated scoring system for buses and modified
vans that are subject to FTA's bus testing program. FTA conducted a
Section 610 review of part 665, as amended (81 FR 50637, August 1,
2016), and determined that it would not result in a SEISNOSE within the
meaning of the RFA. In evaluating the likely effects of the rule, FTA
acknowledged the compliance costs to bus manufacturers, some of whom
may meet the definition of ``small entity,'' but noted that Congress
authorized FTA to pay 80% of a bus manufacturer's testing fee,
defraying the direct financial impact on these small entities.
General: No changes are needed. The regulation implements
the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5318. FTA estimated the costs and
projected benefits of the rule and believes it is cost-effective and
imposes the least burden for statutory compliance. FTA's plain language
review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.
Year 1 (2019) List of Rules To Be Analyzed the Next Year
49 CFR part 604--Charter Service
49 CFR part 605--School Bus Operations
49 CFR part 624--Clean Fuels Grant Program
Maritime Administration
Section 610 and Other Reviews
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulations to
Year be reviewed Analysis year Review year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1..................... 46 CFR parts 201 2018 2019
through 205, 46
CFR parts 315
through 340, 46
CFR part 345
through 347,
and 46 CFR
parts 381 and
382.
2..................... 46 CFR parts 221 2019 2020
through 232.
3..................... 46 CFR parts 249 2020 2021
through 296.
4..................... 46 CFR parts 2021 2022
221, 298, 308,
and 309.
5..................... 46 CFR parts 307 2022 2023
through 309.
6..................... 46 CFR part 310. 2023 2024
[[Page 58062]]
7..................... 46 CFR parts 315 2024 2025
through 340.
8..................... 46 CFR parts 345 2025 2026
through 381.
9..................... 46 CFR parts 382 2026 2027
through 389.
10.................... 46 CFR parts 390 2027 2028
through 393.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year 10 (2017) List of Rules Analyzed and a Summary of Results
46 CFR part 390--Capital Construction Fund Implementing Regulations
Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
General: The purpose of this rule is to govern the capital
construction fund program authorized by 46 U.S.C. 53501. The Agency has
determined that the rule is cost-effective and imposes the least
possible burden on small entities. MARAD's plain language review of
this rule indicates no need of substantial revision.
46 CFR part 391--Federal Income Tax Aspects of the Capital Construction
Fund.
Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
General: The purpose of this rule is to govern tax aspects
of the capital construction fund program. The Agency has determined
that the rule is cost-effective and imposes the least possible burden
on small entities. MARAD's plain language review of this rule indicates
no need of substantial revision.
46 CFR part 392--Reserved
46 CFR part 393--America's Marine Highway Program
Section 610 review: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
General: The Agency published a final rule to implement
statutory updates and clarify applicant procedures. MARAD's plain
language review of this rule indicated that a substantial revision to
the part was needed.
Year 1 (2018) List of Rules That Will Be Analyzed During the Next Year
46 CFR part 201--Rules of Practice And Procedure
46 CFR part 202--Procedures relating to review by Secretary of
Transportation of actions by Maritime Subsidy Board
46 CFR part 203--Procedures relating to conduct of certain hearings
under the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended
46 CFR part 204--Claims against the Maritime Administration under the
Federal Tort Claims Act
46 CFR part 205--Audit Appeals; Policy and Procedure
46 CFR part 315--Agency Agreements and Appointment of Agents
46 CFR part 317--Bonding of Ship's Personnel
46 CFR part 324--Procedural Rules for Financial Transactions Under
Agency Agreements
46 CFR part 325--Procedure to Be Followed by General Agents in
Preparation of Invoices and Payment of Compensation Pursuant To
Provisions of NSA Order No. 47
46 CFR part 326--Marine Protection and Indemnity Insurance Under
Agreements with Agents
46 CFR part 327--Seamen's Claims; Administrative Action and Litigation
46 CFR part 328-- Slop Chests
46 CFR part 329--Voyage Data
46 CFR part 330--Launch Services
46 CFR part 332--Repatriation of Seamen
46 CFR part 335--Authority and Responsibility of General Agents to
Undertake Emergency Repairs in Foreign Ports
46 CFR part 336--Authority and Responsibility of General Agents to
Undertake in Continental United States Ports Voyage Repairs and Service
Equipment of Vessels Operated for the Account of The National Shipping
Authority Under General Agency Agreement
46 CFR part 337--General Agent's Responsibility in Connection with
Foreign Repair Custom's Entries
46 CFR part 338--Procedure for Accomplishment of Vessel Repairs Under
National Shipping Authority Master Lump Sum Repair Contract--NSA-
Lumpsumrep
46 CFR part 339--Procedure for Accomplishment of Ship Repairs Under
National Shipping Authority Individual Contract for Minor Repairs--NSA-
Worksmalrep
46 CFR part 340--Priority Use and Allocation of Shipping Services,
Containers and Chassis, and Port Facilities and Services for National
Security and National Defense Related Operations
46 CFR part 345--Restrictions Upon the Transfer or Change in Use or in
Terms Governing Utilization of Port Facilities
46 CFR part 346--Federal Port Controllers
46 CFR part 347--Operating Contract
46 CFR part 381--Cargo Preference--U.S.-Flag Vessels
46 CFR part 382--Determination of Fair and Reasonable Rates for the
Carriage of Bulk and Packaged Preference Cargoes on U.S.-Flag
Commercial Vessels
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)
Section 610 and Other Reviews
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulations to
Year be reviewed Analysis year Review year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1..................... 49 CFR part 178. 2018 2019
2..................... 49 CFR parts 178 2019 2020
through 180.
3..................... 49 CFR parts 172 2020 2021
and 175.
4..................... 49 CFR part 171, 2021 2022
sections 171.15
and 171.16.
5..................... 49 CFR parts 2022 2023
106, 107, 171,
190, and 195.
6..................... 49 CFR parts 2023 2024
174, 177, and
199.
7..................... 49 CFR parts 2024 2025
176, 191 and
192.
8..................... 49 CFR parts 172 2025 2026
and 178.
9..................... 49 CFR parts 2026 2027
172, 173, 174,
176, 177, and
193.
10.................... 49 CFR parts 173 2027 2028
and 194.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 58063]]
Year 10 (Fall 2018) List of Rules Analyzed and a Summary of Results
49 CFR part 173--Shippers--General Requirements for Shipments and
Packaging
Section 610: PHMSA conducted a review of this part and
found no SEISNOSE.
General: PHMSA has reviewed this part and found that while
the part does not have a SEISNOSE, it could be streamlined to reflect
new technologies and harmonize with certain international references.
Therefore, even though the review indicated that the economic impact on
small entities is not significant, PHMSA has initiated multiple new
deregulatory rulemakings to reduce the compliance burdens of part 173.
Further, PHMSA's plain language review of this part indicates no need
for substantial revision. Where confusing or wordy language has been
identified, PHMSA plans to propose revisions in the upcoming biennial
international harmonization rulemaking or other deregulatory
rulemakings.
For example, the 2137-AF32 rulemaking action is part of PHMSA's
ongoing biennial process to harmonize the HMR with international
regulations and standards. Federal law and policy strongly favor the
harmonization of domestic and international standards for hazardous
materials transportation. The Federal hazardous materials
transportation law (Federal hazmat law; 49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.) directs
PHMSA to participate in relevant international standard-setting bodies
and promotes consistency of the HMR with international transport
standards to the extent practicable. Federal hazmat law permits PHMSA
to depart from international standards where appropriate, including to
promote safety or other overriding public interests. However, Federal
hazmat law otherwise encourages domestic and international
harmonization (see 49 U.S.C. 5120).
Harmonization facilitates international trade by minimizing the
costs and other burdens of complying with multiple or inconsistent
safety requirements for transportation of hazardous materials. Safety
is enhanced by creating a uniform framework for compliance, and as the
volume of hazardous materials transported in international commerce
continues to grow, harmonization becomes increasingly important.
The impact that the 2137-AF32 rulemaking will have on small
entities is not expected to be significant. The rulemaking will clarify
provisions based on PHMSA's initiatives and correspondence with the
regulated community and domestic and international stakeholders. The
changes are generally intended to provide relief and, as a result,
positive economic benefits to shippers, carriers, and packaging
manufacturers and testers, including small entities.
49 CFR part 194--Response Plans for Onshore Oil Pipelines
Section 610: PHMSA conducted a Section 610 review of this
part and has initiated a regulatory reform rulemaking that includes
provisions that are expected to reduce the compliance burden of part
194. The rulemaking is considered a deregulatory action that is
expected to have the net effect of streamlining the program
requirements, established in response to the Oil Pollution Act of 1990,
by targeting the highest risk locations. The revisions are expected to
clarify that part 194 is focused on hazardous liquid pipelines that
could affect navigable waters and to create a new harm category for
lower-risk areas.
General: This part contains requirements for oil spill
response plans to reduce the environmental impact of oil discharged
from onshore oil pipelines. The regulation under this part is cost
effective and imposes the least burden.
Year 1 (Fall 2018) List of Rules That Will Be Analyzed During the Next
Year
49 CFR part 178--Specifications for Packaging
Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation
Section 610 and Other Reviews
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulations to
Year be reviewed Analysis year Review year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1..................... * 33 CFR parts 2018 2019
401 through 403.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The review for these regulations is recurring each year of the 10-year
review cycle (currently 2018 through 2027).
Year 1 (Fall 2018) List of Rules That Will Be Analyzed During the Next
Year
33 CFR part 401--Seaway Regulations and Rules
33 CFR part 402--Tariff of Tolls
33 CFR part 403--Rules of Procedure of the Joint Tolls Review Board
Office of the Secretary--Proposed Rule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
327....................... + Defining Unfair or 2105-AE72
Deceptive Practices.
328....................... + Processing Buy America 2105-AE79
Waivers Based on Non
availability (Section 610
Review) (Reg Plan Seq No.
104).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
References in boldface appear in The Regulatory Plan in part II of this
issue of the Federal Register.
Federal Aviation Administration--Prerule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
329....................... + Applying the Flight, 2120-AK26
Duty, and Rest Rules of
14 CFR Part 135 to Tail-
End Ferry Operations (FAA
Reauthorization).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
[[Page 58064]]
Federal Aviation Administration--Proposed Rule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
330....................... Drug and Alcohol Testing 2120-AK09
of Certain Maintenance
Provider Employees
Located Outside of the
United States.
331....................... + Applying the Flight, 2120-AK22
Duty, and Rest
Requirements to Ferry
Flights That Follow
Domestic, Flag, or
Supplemental All-Cargo
Operations
(Reauthorization).
332....................... + Pilot Records Database 2120-AK31
(HR 5900).
333....................... + Aircraft Registration 2120-AK37
and Airmen Certification
Fees.
334....................... + Requirements to File 2120-AK77
Notice of Construction of
Meteorological Evaluation
Towers and Other
Renewable Energy Projects
(Section 610 Review).
335....................... + Operations of Small 2120-AK85
Unmanned Aircraft Over
People.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
Federal Aviation Administration--Final Rule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
336....................... + Airport Safety 2120-AJ38
Management System.
337....................... + Registration and Marking 2120-AK82
Requirements for Small
Unmanned Aircraft (Reg
Plan Seq No. 105).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
References in boldface appear in The Regulatory Plan in part II of this
issue of the Federal Register.
Federal Aviation Administration--Long-Term Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
338....................... + Regulation of Flight 2120-AJ78
Operations Conducted by
Alaska Guide Pilots.
339....................... + Helicopter Air Ambulance 2120-AK57
Pilot Training and
Operational Requirements
(HAA II) (FAA
Reauthorization).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration--Proposed Rule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
340....................... Incorporation by 2126-AC01
Reference; North American
Standard Out-of-Service
Criteria; Hazardous
Materials Safety Permits
(Section 610 Review).
341....................... Controlled Substances and 2126-AC11
Alcohol Testing: State
Driver's Licensing Agency
Downgrade of Commercial
Driver's License (Section
610 Review).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration--Final Rule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
342....................... Commercial Learner's 2126-AB98
Permit Validity (Section
610 Review).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration--Long-Term Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
343....................... + Safety Monitoring System 2126-AA35
and Compliance Initiative
for Mexico-Domiciled
Motor Carriers Operating
in the United States.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
Federal Railroad Administration--Final Rule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
344....................... + Passenger Equipment 2130-AC46
Safety Standards
Amendments (Reg Plan Seq
No. 108).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
References in boldface appear in The Regulatory Plan in part II of this
issue of the Federal Register.
[[Page 58065]]
Federal Railroad Administration--Long-Term Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
345....................... + Train Crew Staffing and 2130-AC48
Location.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation--Long-Term Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
346....................... Seaway Regulations and 2135-AA45
Rules: Periodic Update,
Various Categories
(Rulemaking Resulting
From a Section 610
Review).
347....................... Tariff of Tolls 2135-AA46
(Rulemaking Resulting
From a Section 610
Review).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration--Proposed Rule
Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
348....................... + Pipeline Safety: 2137-AF06
Amendments to Parts 192
and 195 to Require Valve
Installation and Minimum
Rupture Detection
Standards.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration--Final Rule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
349....................... + Pipeline Safety: Safety 2137-AE66
of Hazardous Liquid
Pipelines (Reg Plan Seq
No. 111).
350....................... + Pipeline Safety: Issues 2137-AE93
Related to the Use of
Plastic Pipe in Gas
Pipeline Industry.
351....................... + Hazardous Materials: Oil 2137-AF08
Spill Response Plans and
Information Sharing for
High-Hazard Flammable
Trains (FAST Act) (Reg
Plan Seq No. 113).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.
References in boldface appear in The Regulatory Plan in part II of this
issue of the Federal Register.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
Office of the Secretary (OST)
Proposed Rule Stage
327. +Defining Unfair or Deceptive Practices
E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 41712
Abstract: This rulemaking would define the phrase ``unfair or
deceptive practice'' found in the Department's aviation consumer
protection statute. The Department's statute is modeled after a similar
statute granting the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) the authority to
regulate unfair or deceptive practices. Using the FTC's policy
statements as a guide, the Department has found a practice to be unfair
if it causes or is likely to cause substantial harm, the harm cannot
reasonably be avoided, and the harm is not outweighed by any
countervailing benefits to consumers or to competition. Likewise, the
Department has found a practice to be deceptive if it misleads or is
likely to mislead a consumer acting reasonably under the circumstances
with respect to a material issue (one that is likely to affect the
consumer's decision with regard to a product or service). This
rulemaking would codify the Department's existing interpretation of
``unfair or deceptive practice'' and seek comment on whether any
changes are needed. The rulemaking is not expected to impose monetary
costs, and will benefit regulated entities by providing a clearer
understanding of the Department's interpretation of the statute.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 03/00/19
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Blane A. Workie, Assistant General Counsel,
Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202-366-9342, Fax: 202-366-
7153, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 2105-AE72
328. +Processing Buy America Waivers Based on Non Availability
(Section 610 Review)
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 104 in part II of this
issue of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2105-AE79
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Prerule Stage
329. +Applying the Flight, Duty, and Rest Rules of 14 CFR Part 135 to
Tail-End Ferry Operations (FAA Reauthorization)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49 U.S.C. 1153; 49 U.S.C. 40101;
49 U.S.C. 40102; 49 U.S.C. 40103; 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C. 41706; 49
U.S.C. 44105; 49 U.S.C. 44106; 49 U.S.C. 44111; 49 U.S.C. 44701 to
44717; 49 U.S.C. 44722; 49 U.S.C. 44901; 49 U.S.C. 44903; 49 U.S.C.
44904; 49 U.S.C.
[[Page 58066]]
44906; 49 U.S.C. 44912; 49 U.S.C. 44914; 49 U.S.C. 44936; 49 U.S.C.
44938; 49 U.S.C. 45101 to 45105; 49 U.S.C. 46103
Abstract: This rulemaking would require a flightcrew member who is
employed by an air carrier conducting operations under part 135, and
who accepts an additional assignment for flying under part 91 from the
air carrier or from any other air carrier conducting operations under
part 121 or 135, to apply the period of the additional assignment
toward any limitation applicable to the flightcrew member relating to
duty periods or flight times under part 135.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM............................... 01/00/19
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Dale Roberts, Department of Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC
20591, Phone: 202-267-5749, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 2120-AK26
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Proposed Rule Stage
330. Drug and Alcohol Testing of Certain Maintenance Provider Employees
Located Outside of the United States
E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or Partially Exempt.
Legal Authority: 14 CFR; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49
U.S.C. 44701; 49 U.S.C. 44702; 49 U.S.C. 44707; 49 U.S.C. 44709; 49
U.S.C. 44717
Abstract: This rulemaking would require controlled substance
testing of some employees working in repair stations located outside
the United States. The intended effect is to increase participation by
companies outside of the United States in testing of employees who
perform safety critical functions and testing standards similar to
those used in the repair stations located in the United States. This
action is necessary to increase the level of safety of the flying
public. This rulemaking is a statutory mandate under section 308(d) of
the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-95).
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM............................... 03/17/14 79 FR 14621
Comment Period Extended............. 05/01/14 79 FR 24631
ANPRM Comment Period End............ 05/16/14 .......................
Comment Period End.................. 07/17/14 .......................
NPRM................................ 12/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Vicky Dunne, Department of Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC
20591, Phone: 202-267-8522, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 2120-AK09
331. +Applying the Flight, Duty, and Rest Requirements to Ferry Flights
That Follow Domestic, Flag, or Supplemental All-Cargo Operations
(Reauthorization)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C.
40119; 49 U.S.C. 41706; 49 U.S.C. 44101; 49 U.S.C. 44701; 49 U.S.C.
44702; 49 U.S.C. 44705; 49 U.S.C. 44709 to 44711; 49 U.S.C. 44713; 49
U.S.C. 44716; 49 U.S.C. 44717
Abstract: This rulemaking would apply the flight, duty, and rest
requirements for domestic, flag and supplemental operations to ferry
flights that follow domestic, flag or supplemental all-cargo
operations. A ferry flight that follows a domestic, flag or
supplemental all-cargo operation would be subject to the same flight,
duty, and rest rules as the all-cargo operation it follows. This rule
is necessary as it would make part 121 flight, duty, and rest limits
applicable to tail-end ferry flights that follow an all-cargo flight.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 05/00/19
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Dale Roberts, Department of Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC
20591, Phone: 202-267-5749, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 2120-AK22
332. +Pilot Records Database (HR 5900)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49 U.S.C. 1155; 49 U.S.C. 40103;
49 U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C. 40119; 49 U.S.C. 40120; 49 U.S.C. 41706; 49
U.S.C. 44101; 49 U.S.C. 44111; 49 U.S.C. 44701 to 44705; 49 U.S.C.
44709 to 44713; 49 U.S.C. 44715 to 44717; 49 U.S.C. 44722; 49 U.S.C.
45101 to 45105; 49 U.S.C. 46105; 49 U.S.C. 46306; 49 U.S.C. 46315; 49
U.S.C. 46316; 49 U.S.C. 46504; 49 U.S.C. 46507; 49 U.S.C. 47122; 49
U.S.C. 47508; 49 U.S.C. 47528 to 47531
Abstract: This rulemaking would implement a Pilot Records Database
as required by Public Law 111-216 (Aug. 1, 2010). Section 203 amends
the Pilot Records Improvement Act by requiring the FAA to create a
pilot records database that contains various types of pilot records.
These records would be provided by the FAA, air carriers, and other
persons who employ pilots. The FAA must maintain these records until it
receives notice that a pilot is deceased. Air carriers would use this
database to perform a record check on a pilot prior to making a hiring
decision.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 05/00/19
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Christopher Morris, Department of Transportation,
Federal Aviation Administration, 6500 S MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City,
OK 73169, Phone: 405-954-4646, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 2120-AK31
333. +Aircraft Registration and Airmen Certification Fees
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701; 4 U.S.T. 1830; 49 U.S.C. 106(f);
49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49 U.S.C. 106(l)(6); 49 U.S.C. 40104; 49 U.S.C.
40105; 49 U.S.C. 40109; 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C. 40114; 49 U.S.C.
44101 to 44108; 49 U.S.C. 44110 to 44113; 49 U.S.C. 44701 to 44704; 49
U.S.C. 44707; 49 U.S.C. 44709 to 44711; 49 U.S.C. 44713; 49 U.S.C.
45102; 49 U.S.C. 45103; 49 U.S.C. 45301; 49 U.S.C. 45302; 49 U.S.C.
45305; 49 U.S.C. 46104; 49 U.S.C. 46301; Pub. L. 108-297, 118 Stat.
1095
Abstract: This rulemaking would establish fees for airman
certificates, medical certificates, and provision of legal opinions
pertaining to aircraft registration or recordation. This rulemaking
also would revise existing fees for aircraft registration, recording of
security interests in aircraft or aircraft parts, and replacement of an
airman certificate. This rulemaking addresses provisions of the FAA
Modernization and Reform Act of 2012. This rulemaking is intended to
recover the
[[Page 58067]]
estimated costs of the various services and activities for which fees
would be established or revised.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/00/19
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Isra Raza, Department of Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC
20591, Phone: 202-267-8994, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 2120-AK37
334. +Requirements To File Notice of Construction of Meteorological
Evaluation Towers and Other Renewable Energy Projects (Section 610
Review)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103
Abstract: This rulemaking would add specific requirements for
proponents who wish to construct meteorological evaluation towers at a
height of 50 feet above ground level (AGL) up to 200 feet AGL to file
notice of construction with the FAA. This rule also requires sponsors
of wind turbines to provide certain specific data when filing notice of
construction with the FAA. This rulemaking is a statutory mandate under
section 2110 of the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016
(Pub. L. 114-190).
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 06/00/19
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
Agency Contact: Sheri Edgett-Baron, Air Traffic Service, Department
of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591, Phone: 202 267-9354.
RIN: 2120-AK77
335. +Operations of Small Unmanned Aircraft Over People
E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f); 49 U.S.C. 40101; 49 U.S.C.
40103(b); 49 U.S.C. 44701(a)(5); Pub. L. 112-95, sec. 333
Abstract: This rulemaking would address the performance-based
standards and means-of-compliance for operation of small unmanned
aircraft systems (sUAS) over people not directly participating in the
operation or not under a covered structure or inside a stationary
vehicle that can provide reasonable protection from a falling small
unmanned aircraft. This rule would provide relief from certain
operational restrictions implemented in the Operation and Certification
of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems final rule (RIN 2120-AJ60).
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 10/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Guido Hassig, Department of Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration, 1 Airport Way, Rochester, NY 14624, Phone:
585-436-3880, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 2120-AK85
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Final Rule Stage
336. +Airport Safety Management System
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 44706; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49 U.S.C.
40113; 49 U.S.C. 44701 to 44706; 49 U.S.C. 44709; 49 U.S.C. 44719
Abstract: This rulemaking would require certain airport certificate
holders to develop, implement, maintain, and adhere to a safety
management system (SMS) for its aviation related activities. An SMS is
a formalized approach to managing safety by developing an organization-
wide safety policy, developing formal methods of identifying hazards,
analyzing and mitigating risk, developing methods for ensuring
continuous safety improvement, and creating organization-wide safety
promotion strategies.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 10/07/10 75 FR 62008
NPRM Comment Period Extended........ 12/10/10 75 FR 76928
NPRM Comment Period End............. 01/05/11
End of Extended Comment Period...... 03/07/11
Second Extension of Comment Period.. 03/07/11 76 FR 12300
End of Second Extended Comment 07/05/11
Period.
Second NPRM......................... 07/14/16 81 FR 45871
Second NPRM Comment Period End...... 09/12/16
Final Rule.......................... 12/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Keri Lyons, Department of Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC
20591, Phone: 202-267-8972, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 2120-AJ38
337. +Registration and Marking Requirements for Small Unmanned Aircraft
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 105 in part II of this
issue of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2120-AK82
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Long-Term Actions
338. +Regulation of Flight Operations Conducted by Alaska Guide Pilots
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g) ; 49 U.S.C. 1153; 49 U.S.C. 1155;
49 U.S.C. 40101 to 40103; 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C. 40120; 49 U.S.C.
44101; 49 U.S.C. 44105 to 44016; 49 U.S.C. 44111; 49 U.S.C. 44701 to
44717; 49 U.S.C. 44722; 49 U.S.C. 44901; 49 U.S.C. 44903 to 44904; 49
U.S.C. 44906; 49 U.S.C. 44912; 49 U.S.C. 44914; 49 U.S.C. 44936; 49
U.S.C. 44938; 49 U.S.C. 46103; 49 U.S.C. 46105; 49 U.S.C. 46306; 49
U.S.C. 46315 to 46316; 49 U.S.C. 46504; 49 U.S.C. 46506 to 46507; 49
U.S.C. 47122; 49 U.S.C. 47508; 49 U.S.C. 47528 to 47531; Articles 12
and 29 of 61 Statue 1180; P.L. 106-181, Sec. 732
Abstract: The rulemaking would establish regulations concerning
Alaska guide pilot operations. The rulemaking would implement
Congressional legislation and establish additional safety requirements
for the conduct of these operations. The intended effect of this
rulemaking is to enhance the level of safety for persons and property
transported in Alaska guide pilot operations. In addition, the
rulemaking would add a general provision applicable to pilots operating
under the general operating and flight rules concerning falsification,
reproduction, and alteration of applications, logbooks,
[[Page 58068]]
reports, or records. This rulemaking is a statutory mandate under
section 732 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act
for the 21st Century, (Pub. L. 106-181).
Timetable: Next Action Undetermined.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jeff Smith, Department of Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC
20785, Phone: 202 385-9615, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 2120-AJ78
339. +Helicopter Air Ambulance Pilot Training and Operational
Requirements (HAA II) (FAA Reauthorization)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f); 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49 U.S.C.
40113; 49 U.S.C. 41706; 49 U.S.C. 44701; 49 U.S.C. 44702; 49 U.S.C.
44705; 49 U.S.C. 44709; 49 U.S.C. 44711 to 44713; 49 U.S.C. 44715 to
44717; 49 U.S.C. 44722; 49 U.S.C. 44730; 49 U.S.C. 45101 to 45105
Abstract: This rulemaking would develop training requirements for
crew resource management, flight risk evaluation, and operational
control of the pilot in command, as well as standards for the use of
flight simulation training devices and line-oriented flight training.
Additionally, it would establish requirements for the use of safety
equipment for flight crewmembers and flight nurses. These changes will
aide in the increase in aviation safety and increase survivability in
the event of an accident. Without these changes, the Helicopter Air
Ambulance industry may continue to see the unacceptable high rate of
aircraft accidents. This rulemaking is a statutory mandate under
section 306(e) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Pub. L.
112-95).
Timetable: Next Action Undetermined.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Chris Holliday, Department of Transportation,
Federal Aviation Administration, 801 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20024, Phone: 202-267-4552, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 2120-AK57
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA)
Proposed Rule Stage
340. Incorporation by Reference; North American Standard Out-of-Service
Criteria; Hazardous Materials Safety Permits (Section 610 Review)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or Partially Exempt.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5105; 49 U.S.C. 5109
Abstract: This action will update an existing Incorporation by
Reference (by the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance) of the North
American Standard Out-of-Service Criteria and Level VI Inspection
Procedures and Out-of-Service for Commercial Highway Vehicles
Transporting Transuranics and Highway Route Controlled Quantities of
Radioactive Materials as defined in 49 CFR part 173.403.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 10/00/18 .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
Agency Contact: Stephanie Dunlap, Department of Transportation,
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366-3536, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 2126-AC01
341. Controlled Substances and Alcohol Testing: State Driver's
Licensing Agency Downgrade of Commercial Driver's License (Section 610
Review)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or Partially Exempt.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31136(a); 49 U.S.C. 31305(a)
Abstract: The Commercial Driver's License Drug and Alcohol
Clearinghouse (Clearinghouse) final rule (81 FR 87686 (December 5,
2016) requires State Driver's Licensing Agencies (SDLAs) to check the
Clearinghouse before issuing, renewing, transferring, or upgrading a
commercial driver's license (CDL) to determine whether the driver is
qualified to operate a commercial motor vehicle. FMCSA proposes to
require State Driver's Licensing Agencies (SDLAs) to remove the
commercial learner's permit (CLP) or commercial driver's license (CDL)
privilege from the driver license of individuals who, under current
regulations, are prohibited from operating a commercial motor vehicle
(CMV) due to controlled substance (drug) and alcohol program
violations. At a minimum, States would be required to downgrade the
driver's license by changing the commercial status from ``licensed'' to
``eligible'' on the CDLIS driver record. Under the proposed rule,
States could not restore the CLP or CDL privilege to the license until
the driver completes the return-to-duty (RTD) requirements that would
allow the resumption of safety-sensitive functions, such as operating a
CMV. SDLAs would rely on applicable State law and procedures to
accomplish the downgrade and any subsequent reinstatement of the CLP or
CDL privilege. In addition, under this proposal, SDLAs could not issue,
renew, upgrade, or transfer the CDL, or issue, renew, or upgrade the
CLP, of any driver who is prohibited from operating a CMV due to drug
and alcohol program violations. This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) will improve roadway safety by helping to ensure that CLP and
CDL holders who engage in prohibited drug or alcohol-related conduct
complete the necessary RTD requirements before resuming operation of a
CMV on public roads. This NPRM does not propose any other changes to
the Clearinghouse final rule, nor does it propose any changes to the
drug and alcohol testing requirements in part 382 and part 40.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 12/00/18 .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
Agency Contact: Juan Moya, Department of Transportation, Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE,
Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202-366-4844, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 2126-AC11
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA)
Final Rule Stage
342. Commercial Learner's Permit Validity (Section 610 Review)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31305; 49 U.S.C. 31308
Abstract: This rulemaking would amend Commercial Driver's License
(CDL) regulations to allow a commercial learner's permit to be issued
for 1 year,
[[Page 58069]]
without renewal. This rule would not require a State to revise its
current CLP issuance practices, unless it chooses to do so. This change
would reduce costs to CDL applicants who are unable to complete the
required training and testing within the current validity period, with
no expected negative safety benefits.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 06/12/17 82 FR 26888
NPRM Comment Period End............. 08/11/17 .......................
Final Rule.......................... 10/00/18 .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
Agency Contact: Thomas Yager, Driver and Carrier Operations
Division, Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, Phone:
202 366-4325, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 2126-AB98
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA)
Long-Term Actions
343. +Safety Monitoring System and Compliance Initiative for Mexico-
Domiciled Motor Carriers Operating in the United States
E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or Partially Exempt.
Legal Authority: Pub. L. 107-87, sec 350; 49 U.S.C. 113; 49 U.S.C.
31136; 49 U.S.C. 31144; 49 U.S.C. 31502; 49 U.S.C. 504; 49 U.S.C. 5113;
49 U.S.C. 521(b)(5)(A)
Abstract: This rule would implement a safety monitoring system and
compliance initiative designed to evaluate the continuing safety
fitness of all Mexico-domiciled carriers within 18 months after
receiving a provisional Certificate of Registration or provisional
authority to operate in the United States. It also would establish
suspension and revocation procedures for provisional Certificates of
Registration and operating authority, and incorporate criteria to be
used by FMCSA in evaluating whether Mexico-domiciled carriers exercise
basic safety management controls. The interim rule included
requirements that were not proposed in the NPRM but which are necessary
to comply with the FY 2002 DOT Appropriations Act. On January 16, 2003,
the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals remanded this rule, along with two
other NAFTA-related rules, to the Agency, requiring a full
environmental impact statement and an analysis required by the Clean
Air Act. On June 7, 2004, the Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit
and remanded the case, holding that FMCSA is not required to prepare
the environmental documents. FMCSA originally planned to publish a
final rule by November 28, 2003.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 05/03/01 66 FR 22415
NPRM Comment Period End............. 07/02/01 .......................
Interim Final Rule.................. 03/19/02 67 FR 12758
Interim Final Rule Comment Period 04/18/02 .......................
End.
Interim Final Rule Effective........ 05/03/02 .......................
Notice of Intent To Prepare an EIS.. 08/26/03 68 FR 51322
EIS Public Scoping Meetings......... 10/08/03 68 FR 58162
Next Action Undetermined............ .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Dolores Macias, Acting Division Chief, Department
of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366-2995, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 2126-AA35
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
Final Rule Stage
344. +Passenger Equipment Safety Standards Amendments
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 108 in part II of this
issue of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2130-AC46
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
Long-Term Actions
345. +Train Crew Staffing and Location
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2461, note; 49 CFR 1.89; 49 U.S.C.
20103; 49 U.S.C. 20107; 49 U.S.C. 21301 and 21302; 49 U.S.C. 21304
Abstract: This rule would establish requirements to appropriately
address known safety risks posed by train operations that use fewer
than two crewmembers. FRA is considering options based on public
comments on the proposed rule and other information.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 03/15/16 81 FR 13918
NPRM Comment Period End............. 05/16/16 .......................
Next Action Undetermined............ .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Kathryn Gresham, Trial Attorney, Department of
Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 493-6063, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 2130-AC48
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (SLSDC)
Long-Term Actions
346. Seaway Regulations and Rules: Periodic Update, Various
Categories (Rulemaking Resulting From a Section 610 Review)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Not subject to, not significant.
Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 981 et seq.
Abstract: The Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (SLSDC)
and the St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation (SLSMC) of Canada,
under international agreement, jointly publish and presently administer
the St. Lawrence Seaway Regulations and Rules (Practices and Procedures
in Canada) in their respective jurisdictions. Under agreement with the
SLSMC, the SLSDC is amending the joint regulations by updating the
Seaway Regulations and Rules in various categories.
Timetable: Next Action Undetermined.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
Agency Contact: Carrie Lavigne, Department of Transportation, Saint
Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE,
[[Page 58070]]
Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 315-764-3231, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 2135-AA45
347. Tariff of Tolls (Rulemaking Resulting From a Section 610
Review)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Not subject to, not significant.
Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 981 et seq.
Abstract: The Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (SLSDC)
and the St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation (SLSMC) of Canada,
under international agreement, jointly publish and presently administer
the St. Lawrence Seaway Tariff of Tolls in their respective
jurisdictions. The Tariff sets forth the level of tolls assessed on all
commodities and vessels transiting the facilities operated by the SLSDC
and the SLSMC.
Timetable: Next Action Undetermined.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
Agency Contact: Carrie Lavigne, Department of Transportation, Saint
Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE,
Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 315-764-3231, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 2135-AA46
BILLING CODE 4910-61-P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)
Proposed Rule Stage
348. +Pipeline Safety: Amendments to Parts 192 and 195 To Require Valve
Installation and Minimum Rupture Detection Standards
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq.
Abstract: PHMSA is proposing to revise the Pipeline Safety
Regulations applicable to newly constructed or entirely replaced
natural gas transmission and hazardous liquid pipelines to improve
rupture mitigation and shorten pipeline segment isolation times in high
consequence and select non-high consequence areas. The proposed rule
defines certain pipeline events as ``ruptures'' and outlines certain
performance standards related to rupture identification and pipeline
segment isolation. PHMSA also proposes specific valve maintenance and
inspection requirements, and 9-1-1 notification requirements to help
operators achieve better rupture response and mitigation. These
proposals address Congressional mandates, incorporate recommendations
from the National Transportation Safety Board, and are necessary to
reduce the serious consequences of large-volume, uncontrolled releases
of natural gas and hazardous liquids.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/00/19 .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Robert Jagger, Technical Writer, Department of
Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202-366-4595,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 2137-AF06
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)
Final Rule Stage
349. +Pipeline Safety: Safety of Hazardous Liquid Pipelines
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 111 in part II of this
issue of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2137-AE66
350. +Pipeline Safety: Issues Related to the Use of Plastic Pipe in Gas
Pipeline Industry
E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory.
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq.
Abstract: PHMSA is amending the Federal Pipeline Safety Regulations
that govern the use of plastic piping systems in the transportation of
natural and other gas. These amendments are necessary to enhance
pipeline safety, adopt innovative technologies and best practices, and
respond to petitions from stakeholders. The amendments include an
increased design factor for polyethylene (PE) pipe, stronger mechanical
fitting requirements, new and updated riser standards, new accepted
uses of Polyamide-11 (PA-11) thermoplastic pipe, authorization to use
Polyamide-12 (PA-12) thermoplastic pipe, and new or updated consensus
standards for pipe, fittings, and other components.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 05/21/15 80 FR 29263
NPRM Comment Period End............. 07/31/15 .......................
Final Rule.......................... 10/00/18 .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Cameron H. Satterthwaite, Transportation
Regulations Specialist, Department of Transportation, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202-366-8553, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 2137-AE93
351. +Hazardous Materials: Oil Spill Response Plans and Information
Sharing for High-Hazard Flammable Trains (Fast Act)
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 113 in part II of this
issue of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2137-AF08
[FR Doc. 2018-24091 Filed 11-15-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P