Fall 2018 Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions, 58079-58084 [2018-23914]
Download as PDF
Vol. 83
Friday,
No. 222
November 16, 2018
Part XV
Environmental Protection Agency
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS 15
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:34 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4717
Sfmt 4717
E:\FR\FM\16NOP15.SGM
16NOP15
58080
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Ch. I
[FRL–9981–53–OP]
Fall 2018 Unified Agenda of Regulatory
and Deregulatory Actions
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) publishes the Semiannual
Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory
Actions online at https://
www.reginfo.gov and at https://
www.regulations.gov to update the
public. This document contains
information about regulations in the
Semiannual Agenda that are under
development, completed, or canceled
since the last agenda.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions or comments about
a particular action, please get in touch
with the Agency contact listed in each
agenda entry. If you have general
questions about the Semiannual
Agenda, please contact: Caryn
Muellerleile (muellerleile.caryn@
epa.gov; 202–564–2855).
SUMMARY:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS 15
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
A. EPA’s Regulatory Information
B. What key statutes and Executive Orders
guide EPA’s rule and policymaking
process?
C. How can you be involved in EPA’s rule
and policymaking process?
II. Semiannual Agenda of Regulatory and
Deregulatory Actions
A. What actions are included in the EAgenda and the Regulatory Flexibility
Agenda?
B. How is the E-Agenda organized?
C. What information is in the Regulatory
Flexibility Agenda and the E-Agenda?
D. What tools are available for mining
Regulatory Agenda data and for finding
more about EPA rules and policies?
III. Review of Regulations Under 610 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act
A. Reviews of Rules With Significant
Impacts on a Substantial Number of
Small Entities
B. What other special attention does EPA
give to the impacts of rules on small
businesses, small governments, and
small nonprofit organizations?
IV. Thank You for Collaborating With Us
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
EPA is committed to a regulatory
strategy that effectively achieves the
Agency’s mission of protecting the
environment and the health, welfare,
and safety of Americans while also
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:34 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
supporting economic growth, job
creation, competitiveness, and
innovation. EPA publishes the
Semiannual Agenda of Regulatory and
Deregulatory Actions to update the
public about regulatory activity
undertaken in support of this mission.
In the Semiannual Agenda, EPA
provides notice of our plans to review,
propose, and issue regulations.
Additionally, EPA’s Semiannual
Agenda includes information about
rules that may have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, and review of
those regulations under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, as amended.
In this document, EPA explains in
greater detail the types of actions and
information available in the Semiannual
Agenda and actions that are currently
undergoing review specifically for
impacts on small entities.
A. EPA’s Regulatory Information
‘‘E-Agenda,’’ ‘‘online regulatory
agenda,’’ and ‘‘semiannual regulatory
agenda’’ all refer to the same
comprehensive collection of
information that, until 2007, was
published in the Federal Register.
Currently, this information is only
available through an online database, at
both https://www.reginfo.gov/ and
https://www.regulations.gov.
‘‘Regulatory Flexibility Agenda’’
refers to a document that contains
information about regulations that may
have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities. We
continue to publish this document in
the Federal Register pursuant to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980. This
document is available at https://
www.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action.
‘‘Unified Regulatory Agenda’’ refers to
the collection of all agencies’ agendas
with an introduction prepared by the
Regulatory Information Service Center
facilitated by the General Service
Administration.
‘‘Regulatory Agenda Preamble’’ refers
to the document you are reading now.
It appears as part of the Regulatory
Flexibility Agenda and introduces both
EPA’s Regulatory Flexibility Agenda
and the e-Agenda.
‘‘610 Review’’ as required by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act means a
periodic review within ten years of
promulgating a final rule that has or
may have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. EPA maintains a list of these
actions at https://www.epa.gov/reg-flex/
section-610-reviews.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
B. What key statutes and Executive
Orders guide EPA’s rule and
policymaking process?
A number of environmental laws
authorize EPA’s actions, including but
not limited to:
• Clean Air Act (CAA),
• Clean Water Act (CWA),
• Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA, or Superfund),
• Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Act
(EPCRA),
• Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA),
• Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA),
• Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA),
and
• Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA).
Not only must EPA comply with
environmental laws, but also
administrative legal requirements that
apply to the issuance of regulations,
such as: The Administrative Procedure
Act (APA), the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) as amended by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA), the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA), the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA), and the
Congressional Review Act (CRA).
EPA also meets a number of
requirements contained in numerous
Executive Orders: 13771, ‘‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’’ (82 FR 9339, Feb. 3, 2017);
12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review’’ (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993), as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review’’ (76 FR 3821, Jan.
21, 2011); 12898, ‘‘Environmental
Justice’’ (59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994);
13045, ‘‘Children’s Health Protection’’
(62 FR 19885, Apr. 23, 1997); 13132,
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, Aug. 10,
1999); 13175, ‘‘Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, Nov. 9,
2000); and 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001).
C. How can you be involved in EPA’s
rule and policymaking process?
You can make your voice heard by
getting in touch with the contact person
provided in each agenda entry. EPA
encourages you to participate as early in
the process as possible. You may also
participate by commenting on proposed
rules published in the Federal Register
(FR).
E:\FR\FM\16NOP15.SGM
16NOP15
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
Instructions on how to submit your
comments through https://
www.regulations.gov are provided in
each Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM). To be most effective,
comments should contain information
and data that support your position and
you also should explain why EPA
should incorporate your suggestion in
the rule or other type of action. You can
be particularly helpful and persuasive if
you provide examples to illustrate your
concerns and offer specific alternative(s)
to that proposed by EPA.
EPA believes its actions will be more
cost effective and protective if the
development process includes
stakeholders working with us to help
identify the most practical and effective
solutions to environmental problems.
EPA encourages you to become involved
in its rule and policymaking process.
For more information about EPA’s
efforts to increase transparency,
participation and collaboration in EPA
activities, please visit https://
www.epa.gov/open.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS 15
II. Semiannual Agenda of Regulatory
and Deregulatory Actions
A. What actions are included in the EAgenda and the Regulatory Flexibility
Agenda?
EPA includes regulations in the eAgenda. However, there is no legal
significance to the omission of an item
from the agenda, and EPA generally
does not include the following
categories of actions:
• Administrative actions such as
delegations of authority, changes of
address, or phone numbers;
• Under the CAA: Revisions to state
implementation plans, equivalent
methods for ambient air quality
monitoring, deletions from the new
source performance standards source
categories list, delegations of authority
to states, and area designations for air
quality planning purposes;
• Under FIFRA: Registration-related
decisions, actions affecting the status of
currently registered pesticides, and data
call-ins;
• Under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act: Actions regarding
pesticide tolerances and food additive
regulations;
• Under RCRA: Authorization of State
solid waste management plans, and
hazardous waste delisting petitions;
• Under the CWA: State Water
Quality Standards, deletions from the
section 307(a) list of toxic pollutants,
suspensions of toxic testing
requirements under the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES), and delegations of NPDES
authority to States;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:34 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
• Under SDWA: Actions on State
underground injection control
programs.
Meanwhile, the Regulatory Flexibility
Agenda includes:
• Actions likely to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
• Rules the Agency has identified for
periodic review under section 610 of the
RFA.
EPA has no 610 reviews in this
Agenda.
B. How is the E-Agenda organized?
Online, you can choose how to sort
the agenda entries by specifying the
characteristics of the entries of interest
in the desired individual data fields for
both the https://www.reginfo.gov and
https://www.regulations.gov versions of
the e-Agenda. You can sort based on the
following characteristics: EPA
subagency (such as Office of Water);
stage of rulemaking as described in the
following paragraphs; alphabetically by
title; or the Regulation Identifier
Number (RIN), which is assigned
sequentially when an action is added to
the agenda.
Each entry in the Agenda is associated
with one of five rulemaking stages. The
rulemaking stages are:
1. Prerule Stage—EPA’s prerule
actions generally are intended to
determine whether the Agency should
initiate rulemaking. Prerulemakings
may include anything that influences or
leads to rulemaking; this would include
Advance Notices of Proposed
Rulemaking (ANPRMs), studies or
analyses of the possible need for
regulatory action.
2. Proposed Rule Stage—Proposed
rulemaking actions include EPA’s
Notice of Proposed Rulemakings
(NPRMs); these proposals are scheduled
to publish in the Federal Register
within the next year.
3. Final Rule Stage—Final rulemaking
actions are those actions that EPA is
scheduled to finalize and publish in the
Federal Register within the next year.
4. Long-Term Actions—This section
includes rulemakings for which the next
scheduled regulatory action (such as
publication of a NPRM or final rule) is
twelve or more months into the future.
We urge you to explore becoming
involved even if an action is listed in
the Long-Term category.
5. Completed Actions—EPA’s
completed actions are those that have
been promulgated and published in the
Federal Register since publication of
the spring 2018 Agenda. The term
completed actions also includes actions
that EPA is no longer considering and
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
58081
has elected to withdraw and also the
results of any RFA section 610 reviews.
C. What information is in the Regulatory
Flexibility Agenda and the E-Agenda?
The Regulatory Flexibility Agenda
entries include only the nine categories
of information that are required by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 and
by Federal Register Agenda printing
requirements: Sequence Number, RIN,
Title, Description, Statutory Authority,
Section 610 Review, if applicable,
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required, Schedule and Contact Person.
Note that the electronic version of the
Agenda (E-Agenda) replicates each of
these actions with more extensive
information, described below.
E-Agenda entries include:
Title: a brief description of the subject
of the regulation. The notation ’’Section
610 Review’’ follows the title if we are
reviewing the rule as part of our
periodic review of existing rules under
section 610 of the RFA (5 U.S.C. 610).
Priority: Each entry is placed into one
of the five following categories:
a. Economically Significant: Under
Executive Order 12866, a rulemaking
that may have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities.
b. Other Significant: A rulemaking
that is not economically significant but
is considered significant for other
reasons. This category includes rules
that may:
1. Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
2. Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients; or
3. Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
in Executive Order 12866.
c. Substantive, Nonsignificant: A
rulemaking that has substantive impacts
but is not Significant, Routine and
Frequent, or Informational/
Administrative/Other.
d. Routine and Frequent: A
rulemaking that is a specific case of a
recurring application of a regulatory
program in the Code of Federal
Regulations (e.g., certain State
Implementation Plans, National Priority
List updates, Significant New Use Rules,
State Hazardous Waste Management
Program actions, and Pesticide
Tolerances and Tolerance Exemptions).
E:\FR\FM\16NOP15.SGM
16NOP15
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS 15
58082
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
If an action that would normally be
classified Routine and Frequent is
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under E.O. 12866,
then we would classify the action as
either ‘‘Economically Significant’’ or
‘‘Other Significant.’’
e. Informational/Administrative/
Other: An action that is primarily
informational or pertains to an action
outside the scope of Executive Order
12866.
Executive Order 13771 Designation:
Each entry is placed into one of the
following categories:
a. Deregulatory: When finalized, an
action is expected to have total costs
less than zero.
b. Regulatory: The action is either:
(i) A significant regulatory action as
defined in section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866, or
(ii) a significant guidance document
(e.g., significant interpretive guidance)
reviewed by OMB’s Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(OIRA) under the procedures of
Executive Order 12866 that, when
finalized, is expected to impose total
costs greater than zero.
c. Fully or Partially Exempt: the
action has been granted, or is expected
to be granted, a full or partial waiver
under one or more of the following
circumstances:
(i) It is expressly exempt by Executive
Order 13771 (issued with respect to a
‘‘military, national security, or foreign
affairs function of the United States’’; or
related to ‘‘agency organization,
management, or personnel’’),
(ii) it addresses an emergency such as
critical health, safety, financial, or nonexempt national security matters (offset
requirements may be exempted or
delayed),
(iii) it is required to meet a statutory
or judicial deadline (offset requirements
may be exempted or delayed), or
(iv) it is expected to generate de
minimis costs.
d. Not subject to, not significant: Is a
NPRM or final rule AND is neither an
Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
nor an Executive Order 13771
deregulatory action.
e. Other: At the time of designation,
either the available information is too
preliminary to determine Executive
Order 13771 status or other reasonable
circumstances preclude a preliminary
Executive Order 13771 designation.
f. Independent agency: Is an action an
independent agency anticipates issuing
and thus is not subject to Executive
Order 13771.
Major: a rule is ‘‘major’’ under 5
U.S.C. 801 (Pub. L. 104–121) if it has
resulted or is likely to result in an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:34 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or meets other criteria
specified in that Act.
Unfunded Mandates: Whether the
rule is covered by section 202 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4). The Act requires that,
before issuing an NPRM likely to result
in a mandate that may result in
expenditures by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector of more than $100 million
in 1 year, the Agency prepare a written
statement on federal mandates
addressing costs, benefits, and
intergovernmental consultation.
Legal Authority: The sections of the
United States Code (U.S.C.), Public Law
(Pub. L.), Executive Order (E.O.), or
common name of the law that
authorizes the regulatory action.
CFR Citation: The sections of the
Code of Federal Regulations that would
be affected by the action.
Legal Deadline: An indication of
whether the rule is subject to a statutory
or judicial deadline, the date of that
deadline, and whether the deadline
pertains to a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, a Final Action, or some
other action.
Abstract: A brief description of the
problem the action will address.
Timetable: The dates and citations (if
available) for all past steps and a
projected date for at least the next step
for the regulatory action. A date
displayed in the form 10/00/19 means
the agency is predicting the month and
year the action will take place but not
the day it will occur. For some entries,
the timetable indicates that the date of
the next action is ‘‘to be determined.’’
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Indicates whether EPA has
prepared or anticipates preparing a
regulatory flexibility analysis under
section 603 or 604 of the RFA.
Generally, such an analysis is required
for proposed or final rules subject to the
RFA that EPA believes may have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Small Entities Affected: Indicates
whether the rule is anticipated to have
any effect on small businesses, small
governments or small nonprofit
organizations.
Government Levels Affected: Indicates
whether the rule may have any effect on
levels of government and, if so, whether
the affected governments are State,
local, Tribal, or Federal.
Federalism Implications: Indicates
whether the action is expected to have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Energy Impacts: Indicates whether the
action is a significant energy action
under E.O. 13211.
Sectors Affected: Indicates the main
economic sectors regulated by the
action. The regulated parties are
identified by their North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS)
codes. These codes were created by the
Census Bureau for collecting, analyzing,
and publishing statistical data on the
U.S. economy. There are more than
1,000 NAICS codes for sectors in
agriculture, mining, manufacturing,
services, and public administration.
International Trade Impacts: Indicates
whether the action is likely to have
international trade or investment effects,
or otherwise be of international interest.
Agency Contact: The name, address,
phone number, and email address, if
available, of a person who is
knowledgeable about the regulation.
Additional Information: Other
information about the action including
docket information.
URLs: For some actions, the internet
addresses are included for reading
copies of rulemaking documents,
submitting comments on proposals, and
getting more information about the
rulemaking and the program of which it
is a part. (Note: To submit comments on
proposals, you can go to the associated
electronic docket, which is housed at
https://www.regulations.gov. Once
there, follow the online instructions to
access the docket in question and
submit comments. A docket
identification [ID] number will assist in
the search for materials.)
RIN: The Regulation Identifier
Number is used by OMB to identify and
track rulemakings. The first four digits
of the RIN identify the EPA office with
lead responsibility for developing the
action.
D. What tools are available for mining
Regulatory Agenda data and for finding
more about EPA rules and policies?
1. Federal Regulatory Dashboard
The https://www.reginfo.gov/
searchable database, maintained by the
Regulatory Information Service Center
and OIRA, allows users to view the
Regulatory Agenda database (https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
eAgendaMain), which includes search,
display, and data transmission options.
2. Subject Matter EPA Websites
Some actions listed in the Agenda
include a URL for an EPA-maintained
website that provides additional
information about the action.
E:\FR\FM\16NOP15.SGM
16NOP15
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
3. Deregulatory Actions and Regulatory
Reform
EPA maintains a list of its
deregulatory actions under
development, as well as those that are
completed, at https://www.epa.gov/
laws-regulations/epa-deregulatoryactions. Additional information about
EPA’s regulatory reform activity is
available to the public at https://
www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/
regulatory-reform.
4. Public Dockets
When EPA publishes either an
Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (ANPRM) or a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in the
Federal Register, the Agency typically
establishes a docket to accumulate
materials developed throughout the
development process for that
rulemaking. The docket serves as the
repository for the collection of
documents or information related to that
particular Agency action or activity.
EPA most commonly uses dockets for
rulemaking actions, but dockets may
also be used for RFA section 610
reviews of rules with significant
economic impacts on a substantial
number of small entities and for various
non-rulemaking activities, such as
Federal Register documents seeking
public comments on draft guidance,
policy statements, information
collection requests under the PRA, and
other non-rule activities. Docket
information should be in that action’s
agenda entry. All of EPA’s public
dockets can be located at https://
www.regulations.gov.
III. Review of Regulations Under 610 of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act
A. Reviews of Rules With Significant
Impacts on a Substantial Number of
Small Entities
Section 610 of the RFA requires that
an agency review, within 10 years of
promulgation, each rule that has or will
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
At this time, EPA has no 610 reviews.
B. What other special attention does
EPA give to the impacts of rules on
small businesses, small governments,
and small nonprofit organizations?
For each of EPA’s rulemakings,
consideration is given to whether there
will be any adverse impact on any small
entity. EPA attempts to fit the regulatory
requirements, to the extent feasible, to
the scale of the businesses,
organizations, and governmental
jurisdictions subject to the regulation.
58083
Under the RFA as amended by
SBREFA, the Agency must prepare a
formal analysis of the potential negative
impacts on small entities, convene a
Small Business Advocacy Review Panel
(proposed rule stage), and prepare a
Small Entity Compliance Guide (final
rule stage) unless the Agency certifies a
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. For more
detailed information about the Agency’s
policy and practice with respect to
implementing the RFA/SBREFA, please
visit EPA’s RFA/SBREFA website at
https://www.epa.gov/reg-flex.
IV. Thank You for Collaborating With
Us
Finally, we would like to thank those
of you who choose to join with us in
making progress on the complex issues
involved in protecting human health
and the environment. Collaborative
efforts such as EPA’s open rulemaking
process are a valuable tool for
addressing the problems we face, and
the regulatory agenda is an important
part of that process.
Dated: July 25, 2018.
Brittany Bolen,
Associate Administrator, Office of Policy.
35—FINAL RULE STAGE
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
356 ....................
Methylene Chloride; Rulemaking Under TSCA Section 6(a) ..........................................................................
2070–AK07
35—LONG-TERM ACTIONS
Title
357 ....................
358 ....................
Trichloroethylene (TCE); Rulemaking Under TSCA Section 6(a); Vapor Degreasing ....................................
N-Methylpyrrolidone; Regulation of Certain Uses Under TSCA Section 6(a) .................................................
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY (EPA)
35
Final Rule Stage
356. Methylene Chloride; Rulemaking
Under TSCA Section 6(A)
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS 15
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2605, Toxic
Substances Control Act; 15 U.S.C. 2625
TSCA 26
Abstract: Section 6(a) of the Toxic
Substances Control Act provides
authority for EPA to ban or restrict the
manufacture (including import),
processing, distribution in commerce,
and use of chemical substances, as well
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:34 Nov 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
as any manner or method of disposal.
Section 26(l)(4) of TSCA authorizes EPA
to issue rules under TSCA section 6 for
chemicals listed in the 2014 update to
the TSCA Work Plan for Chemical
Assessments for which EPA published
completed risk assessments prior to
June 22, 2016, consistent with the scope
of the completed risk assessment.
Methylene chloride is used in paint and
coating removal in commercial
processes and consumer products. In
the August 2014 TSCA Work Plan
Chemical Risk Assessment for
methylene chloride, EPA characterized
risks from use of these chemicals in
paint and coating removal. On January
19, 2017, EPA preliminarily determined
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
2070–AK11
2070–AK46
that the use of methylene chloride in
paint and coating removal poses an
unreasonable risk of injury to health.
EPA also proposed prohibitions and
restrictions on the manufacture,
processing, and distribution in
commerce of methylene chloride for all
consumer and most types of commercial
paint and coating removal and on the
use of methylene chloride in
commercial paint and coating removal
in specified sectors. While EPA
proposed to identify the use of
methylene chloride in commercial
furniture refinishing as presenting an
unreasonable risk, EPA intends to
further evaluate the commercial
furniture refinishing use and develop an
E:\FR\FM\16NOP15.SGM
16NOP15
58084
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Unified Agenda
appropriate regulatory risk management
approach under the process for risk
evaluations for existing chemicals under
TSCA. Although N-methylpyrrolidone
(NMP) was included in the January 2017
proposed rule, EPA intends to address
NMP use in paint and coating removal
in the risk evaluation for NMP and to
consider any resulting risk reduction
requirements in a separate regulatory
action (RIN 2070–AK46).
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period Extended.
Notice ..................
Final Rule ............
FR Cite
01/19/17
05/01/17
82 FR 7464
82 FR 20310
08/30/17
12/00/18
82 FR 41256
Action
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Ana Corado,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Mail Code 7408M, Washington, DC
20460, Phone: 202 564–0140, Email:
corado.ana@epa.gov.
Joel Wolf, Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Chemical Safety and
Pollution Prevention, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code
7404T, Washington, DC 20460, Phone:
202 564–2228, Fax: 202 566–0471,
Email: wolf.joel@epa.gov.
RIN: 2070–AK07
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY (EPA)
35
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS 15
Long-Term Actions
357. Trichloroethylene (TCE);
Rulemaking Under TSCA Section 6(A);
Vapor Degreasing
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory
Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2605, Toxic
Substances Control Act
Abstract: Section 6(a) of the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) provides
authority for EPA to ban or restrict the
manufacture (including import),
processing, distribution in commerce,
and use of chemical substances, as well
as any manner or method of disposal.
Section 26(l)(4) of TSCA authorizes EPA
to issue rules under TSCA section 6 for
chemicals listed in the 2014 update to
the TSCA Work Plan for Chemical
Assessments for which EPA published
completed risk assessments prior to
June 22, 2016, consistent with the scope
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:34 Nov 15, 2018
of the completed risk assessment. In the
June 2014 TSCA Work Plan Chemical
Risk Assessment for TCE, EPA
characterized risks from the use of TCE
in commercial degreasing and in some
consumer uses. EPA has preliminarily
determined that these risks are
unreasonable risks. On January 19,
2017, EPA proposed to prohibit the
manufacture, processing, distribution in
commerce, or commercial use of TCE in
vapor degreasing. A separate action (RIN
2070–AK03), published on December
16, 2016, proposed to address the
unreasonable risks from TCE when used
as a spotting agent in dry cleaning and
in commercial and consumer aerosol
spray degreasers.
Timetable:
Jkt 247001
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period Extended.
NPRM Comment
Period Extended.
FR Cite
01/19/17
02/15/17
82 FR 7432
82 FR 10732
05/01/17
82 FR 20310
Final Rule ............
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Toni Krasnic,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Mail Code 7405M, Washington, DC
20460, Phone: 202 564–0984, Email:
krasnic.toni@epa.gov.
Joel Wolf, Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Chemical Safety and
Pollution Prevention, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code
7404T, Washington, DC 20460, Phone:
202–564–2228, Fax: 202–566–0471,
Email: wolf.joel@epa.gov.
RIN: 2070–AK11
358. • N-Methylpyrrolidone; Regulation
of Certain Uses Under TSCA Section
6(A)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2605, Toxic
Substances Control Act
Abstract: Section 6(a) of the Toxic
Substances Control Act provides
authority for EPA to ban or restrict the
manufacture (including import),
processing, distribution in commerce,
and use of chemical substances, as well
as any manner or method of disposal.
Section 26(l)(4) of TSCA authorizes EPA
to issue rules under TSCA section 6 for
chemicals listed in the 2014 update to
the TSCA Work Plan for Chemical
Assessments for which EPA published
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
completed risk assessments prior to
June 22, 2016, consistent with the scope
of the completed risk assessment. Nmethylpyrrolidone (NMP) is used in
paint and coating removal in
commercial processes and consumer
products. In the March 2015 TSCA
Work Plan Chemical Risk Assessment
for NMP, EPA characterized risks from
use of this chemical in paint and coating
removal. On January 19, 2017, EPA
preliminarily determined that the use of
NMP in paint and coating removal poses
an unreasonable risk of injury to health.
EPA also co-proposed two options for
NMP in paint and coating removal. The
first co-proposal would prohibit the
manufacture, processing, and
distribution in commerce of NMP for all
consumer and most commercial paint
and coating removal and the use of NMP
for most commercial paint and coating
removal. The second co-proposal would
require commercial users of NMP for
paint and coating removal to establish a
worker protection program and not use
paint and coating removal products that
contain greater than 35% NMP by
weight, with certain exceptions; and
require processors of products
containing NMP for paint and coating
removal to reformulate products such
that they do not exceed 35% NMP by
weight, to identify gloves that provide
effective protection for the formulation,
and to provide warnings and
instructions on any paint and coating
removal products containing NMP.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
Final Rule ............
Date
01/17/17
FR Cite
82 FR 7464
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Ana Corado,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Mail Code 7408M, Washington, DC
20460, Phone: 202–564–0140, Email:
corado.ana@epa.gov.
Joel Wolf, Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Chemical Safety and
Pollution Prevention, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code
7404T, Washington, DC 20460, Phone:
202–564–2228, Fax: 202–566–0471,
Email: wolf.joel@epa.gov.
RIN: 2070–AK46
[FR Doc. 2018–23914 Filed 11–15–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\16NOP15.SGM
16NOP15
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 222 (Friday, November 16, 2018)]
[Unknown Section]
[Pages 58079-58084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-23914]
[[Page 58079]]
Vol. 83
Friday,
No. 222
November 16, 2018
Part XV
Environmental Protection Agency
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda
Federal Register / Vol. 83 , No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 /
Unified Agenda
[[Page 58080]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Ch. I
[FRL-9981-53-OP]
Fall 2018 Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) publishes the
Semiannual Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions online at
https://www.reginfo.gov and at https://www.regulations.gov to update
the public. This document contains information about regulations in the
Semiannual Agenda that are under development, completed, or canceled
since the last agenda.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions or comments
about a particular action, please get in touch with the Agency contact
listed in each agenda entry. If you have general questions about the
Semiannual Agenda, please contact: Caryn Muellerleile
([email protected]; 202-564-2855).
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
A. EPA's Regulatory Information
B. What key statutes and Executive Orders guide EPA's rule and
policymaking process?
C. How can you be involved in EPA's rule and policymaking
process?
II. Semiannual Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
A. What actions are included in the E-Agenda and the Regulatory
Flexibility Agenda?
B. How is the E-Agenda organized?
C. What information is in the Regulatory Flexibility Agenda and
the E-Agenda?
D. What tools are available for mining Regulatory Agenda data
and for finding more about EPA rules and policies?
III. Review of Regulations Under 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act
A. Reviews of Rules With Significant Impacts on a Substantial
Number of Small Entities
B. What other special attention does EPA give to the impacts of
rules on small businesses, small governments, and small nonprofit
organizations?
IV. Thank You for Collaborating With Us
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
EPA is committed to a regulatory strategy that effectively achieves
the Agency's mission of protecting the environment and the health,
welfare, and safety of Americans while also supporting economic growth,
job creation, competitiveness, and innovation. EPA publishes the
Semiannual Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions to update the
public about regulatory activity undertaken in support of this mission.
In the Semiannual Agenda, EPA provides notice of our plans to review,
propose, and issue regulations.
Additionally, EPA's Semiannual Agenda includes information about
rules that may have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, and review of those regulations under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended.
In this document, EPA explains in greater detail the types of
actions and information available in the Semiannual Agenda and actions
that are currently undergoing review specifically for impacts on small
entities.
A. EPA's Regulatory Information
``E-Agenda,'' ``online regulatory agenda,'' and ``semiannual
regulatory agenda'' all refer to the same comprehensive collection of
information that, until 2007, was published in the Federal Register.
Currently, this information is only available through an online
database, at both https://www.reginfo.gov/ and https://www.regulations.gov.
``Regulatory Flexibility Agenda'' refers to a document that
contains information about regulations that may have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small entities. We continue to
publish this document in the Federal Register pursuant to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980. This document is available at
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action.
``Unified Regulatory Agenda'' refers to the collection of all
agencies' agendas with an introduction prepared by the Regulatory
Information Service Center facilitated by the General Service
Administration.
``Regulatory Agenda Preamble'' refers to the document you are
reading now. It appears as part of the Regulatory Flexibility Agenda
and introduces both EPA's Regulatory Flexibility Agenda and the e-
Agenda.
``610 Review'' as required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act means
a periodic review within ten years of promulgating a final rule that
has or may have a significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities. EPA maintains a list of these actions at https://www.epa.gov/reg-flex/section-610-reviews.
B. What key statutes and Executive Orders guide EPA's rule and
policymaking process?
A number of environmental laws authorize EPA's actions, including
but not limited to:
Clean Air Act (CAA),
Clean Water Act (CWA),
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA, or Superfund),
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act
(EPCRA),
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA),
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA),
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), and
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).
Not only must EPA comply with environmental laws, but also
administrative legal requirements that apply to the issuance of
regulations, such as: The Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) as amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA), the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA), the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA), and the Congressional
Review Act (CRA).
EPA also meets a number of requirements contained in numerous
Executive Orders: 13771, ``Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs'' (82 FR 9339, Feb. 3, 2017); 12866, ``Regulatory
Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993), as supplemented by
Executive Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
(76 FR 3821, Jan. 21, 2011); 12898, ``Environmental Justice'' (59 FR
7629, Feb. 16, 1994); 13045, ``Children's Health Protection'' (62 FR
19885, Apr. 23, 1997); 13132, ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, Aug. 10,
1999); 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments'' (65 FR 67249, Nov. 9, 2000); and 13211, ``Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001).
C. How can you be involved in EPA's rule and policymaking process?
You can make your voice heard by getting in touch with the contact
person provided in each agenda entry. EPA encourages you to participate
as early in the process as possible. You may also participate by
commenting on proposed rules published in the Federal Register (FR).
[[Page 58081]]
Instructions on how to submit your comments through https://www.regulations.gov are provided in each Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM). To be most effective, comments should contain information and
data that support your position and you also should explain why EPA
should incorporate your suggestion in the rule or other type of action.
You can be particularly helpful and persuasive if you provide examples
to illustrate your concerns and offer specific alternative(s) to that
proposed by EPA.
EPA believes its actions will be more cost effective and protective
if the development process includes stakeholders working with us to
help identify the most practical and effective solutions to
environmental problems. EPA encourages you to become involved in its
rule and policymaking process. For more information about EPA's efforts
to increase transparency, participation and collaboration in EPA
activities, please visit https://www.epa.gov/open.
II. Semiannual Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
A. What actions are included in the E-Agenda and the Regulatory
Flexibility Agenda?
EPA includes regulations in the e-Agenda. However, there is no
legal significance to the omission of an item from the agenda, and EPA
generally does not include the following categories of actions:
Administrative actions such as delegations of authority,
changes of address, or phone numbers;
Under the CAA: Revisions to state implementation plans,
equivalent methods for ambient air quality monitoring, deletions from
the new source performance standards source categories list,
delegations of authority to states, and area designations for air
quality planning purposes;
Under FIFRA: Registration-related decisions, actions
affecting the status of currently registered pesticides, and data call-
ins;
Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: Actions
regarding pesticide tolerances and food additive regulations;
Under RCRA: Authorization of State solid waste management
plans, and hazardous waste delisting petitions;
Under the CWA: State Water Quality Standards, deletions
from the section 307(a) list of toxic pollutants, suspensions of toxic
testing requirements under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES), and delegations of NPDES authority to States;
Under SDWA: Actions on State underground injection control
programs.
Meanwhile, the Regulatory Flexibility Agenda includes:
Actions likely to have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Rules the Agency has identified for periodic review under
section 610 of the RFA.
EPA has no 610 reviews in this Agenda.
B. How is the E-Agenda organized?
Online, you can choose how to sort the agenda entries by specifying
the characteristics of the entries of interest in the desired
individual data fields for both the https://www.reginfo.gov and https://www.regulations.gov versions of the e-Agenda. You can sort based on
the following characteristics: EPA subagency (such as Office of Water);
stage of rulemaking as described in the following paragraphs;
alphabetically by title; or the Regulation Identifier Number (RIN),
which is assigned sequentially when an action is added to the agenda.
Each entry in the Agenda is associated with one of five rulemaking
stages. The rulemaking stages are:
1. Prerule Stage--EPA's prerule actions generally are intended to
determine whether the Agency should initiate rulemaking. Prerulemakings
may include anything that influences or leads to rulemaking; this would
include Advance Notices of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRMs), studies or
analyses of the possible need for regulatory action.
2. Proposed Rule Stage--Proposed rulemaking actions include EPA's
Notice of Proposed Rulemakings (NPRMs); these proposals are scheduled
to publish in the Federal Register within the next year.
3. Final Rule Stage--Final rulemaking actions are those actions
that EPA is scheduled to finalize and publish in the Federal Register
within the next year.
4. Long-Term Actions--This section includes rulemakings for which
the next scheduled regulatory action (such as publication of a NPRM or
final rule) is twelve or more months into the future. We urge you to
explore becoming involved even if an action is listed in the Long-Term
category.
5. Completed Actions--EPA's completed actions are those that have
been promulgated and published in the Federal Register since
publication of the spring 2018 Agenda. The term completed actions also
includes actions that EPA is no longer considering and has elected to
withdraw and also the results of any RFA section 610 reviews.
C. What information is in the Regulatory Flexibility Agenda and the E-
Agenda?
The Regulatory Flexibility Agenda entries include only the nine
categories of information that are required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 and by Federal Register Agenda printing
requirements: Sequence Number, RIN, Title, Description, Statutory
Authority, Section 610 Review, if applicable, Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis Required, Schedule and Contact Person. Note that the
electronic version of the Agenda (E-Agenda) replicates each of these
actions with more extensive information, described below.
E-Agenda entries include:
Title: a brief description of the subject of the regulation. The
notation ''Section 610 Review'' follows the title if we are reviewing
the rule as part of our periodic review of existing rules under section
610 of the RFA (5 U.S.C. 610).
Priority: Each entry is placed into one of the five following
categories:
a. Economically Significant: Under Executive Order 12866, a
rulemaking that may have an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more, or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities.
b. Other Significant: A rulemaking that is not economically
significant but is considered significant for other reasons. This
category includes rules that may:
1. Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
2. Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of
recipients; or
3. Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles in Executive
Order 12866.
c. Substantive, Nonsignificant: A rulemaking that has substantive
impacts but is not Significant, Routine and Frequent, or Informational/
Administrative/Other.
d. Routine and Frequent: A rulemaking that is a specific case of a
recurring application of a regulatory program in the Code of Federal
Regulations (e.g., certain State Implementation Plans, National
Priority List updates, Significant New Use Rules, State Hazardous Waste
Management Program actions, and Pesticide Tolerances and Tolerance
Exemptions).
[[Page 58082]]
If an action that would normally be classified Routine and Frequent is
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under E.O. 12866,
then we would classify the action as either ``Economically
Significant'' or ``Other Significant.''
e. Informational/Administrative/Other: An action that is primarily
informational or pertains to an action outside the scope of Executive
Order 12866.
Executive Order 13771 Designation: Each entry is placed into one of
the following categories:
a. Deregulatory: When finalized, an action is expected to have
total costs less than zero.
b. Regulatory: The action is either:
(i) A significant regulatory action as defined in section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, or
(ii) a significant guidance document (e.g., significant
interpretive guidance) reviewed by OMB's Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) under the procedures of Executive Order 12866
that, when finalized, is expected to impose total costs greater than
zero.
c. Fully or Partially Exempt: the action has been granted, or is
expected to be granted, a full or partial waiver under one or more of
the following circumstances:
(i) It is expressly exempt by Executive Order 13771 (issued with
respect to a ``military, national security, or foreign affairs function
of the United States''; or related to ``agency organization,
management, or personnel''),
(ii) it addresses an emergency such as critical health, safety,
financial, or non-exempt national security matters (offset requirements
may be exempted or delayed),
(iii) it is required to meet a statutory or judicial deadline
(offset requirements may be exempted or delayed), or
(iv) it is expected to generate de minimis costs.
d. Not subject to, not significant: Is a NPRM or final rule AND is
neither an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action nor an Executive
Order 13771 deregulatory action.
e. Other: At the time of designation, either the available
information is too preliminary to determine Executive Order 13771
status or other reasonable circumstances preclude a preliminary
Executive Order 13771 designation.
f. Independent agency: Is an action an independent agency
anticipates issuing and thus is not subject to Executive Order 13771.
Major: a rule is ``major'' under 5 U.S.C. 801 (Pub. L. 104-121) if
it has resulted or is likely to result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or meets other criteria specified in
that Act.
Unfunded Mandates: Whether the rule is covered by section 202 of
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). The Act
requires that, before issuing an NPRM likely to result in a mandate
that may result in expenditures by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of more than
$100 million in 1 year, the Agency prepare a written statement on
federal mandates addressing costs, benefits, and intergovernmental
consultation.
Legal Authority: The sections of the United States Code (U.S.C.),
Public Law (Pub. L.), Executive Order (E.O.), or common name of the law
that authorizes the regulatory action.
CFR Citation: The sections of the Code of Federal Regulations that
would be affected by the action.
Legal Deadline: An indication of whether the rule is subject to a
statutory or judicial deadline, the date of that deadline, and whether
the deadline pertains to a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, a Final
Action, or some other action.
Abstract: A brief description of the problem the action will
address.
Timetable: The dates and citations (if available) for all past
steps and a projected date for at least the next step for the
regulatory action. A date displayed in the form 10/00/19 means the
agency is predicting the month and year the action will take place but
not the day it will occur. For some entries, the timetable indicates
that the date of the next action is ``to be determined.''
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Indicates whether EPA has
prepared or anticipates preparing a regulatory flexibility analysis
under section 603 or 604 of the RFA. Generally, such an analysis is
required for proposed or final rules subject to the RFA that EPA
believes may have a significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities.
Small Entities Affected: Indicates whether the rule is anticipated
to have any effect on small businesses, small governments or small
nonprofit organizations.
Government Levels Affected: Indicates whether the rule may have any
effect on levels of government and, if so, whether the affected
governments are State, local, Tribal, or Federal.
Federalism Implications: Indicates whether the action is expected
to have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Energy Impacts: Indicates whether the action is a significant
energy action under E.O. 13211.
Sectors Affected: Indicates the main economic sectors regulated by
the action. The regulated parties are identified by their North
American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes. These codes were
created by the Census Bureau for collecting, analyzing, and publishing
statistical data on the U.S. economy. There are more than 1,000 NAICS
codes for sectors in agriculture, mining, manufacturing, services, and
public administration.
International Trade Impacts: Indicates whether the action is likely
to have international trade or investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.
Agency Contact: The name, address, phone number, and email address,
if available, of a person who is knowledgeable about the regulation.
Additional Information: Other information about the action
including docket information.
URLs: For some actions, the internet addresses are included for
reading copies of rulemaking documents, submitting comments on
proposals, and getting more information about the rulemaking and the
program of which it is a part. (Note: To submit comments on proposals,
you can go to the associated electronic docket, which is housed at
https://www.regulations.gov. Once there, follow the online instructions
to access the docket in question and submit comments. A docket
identification [ID] number will assist in the search for materials.)
RIN: The Regulation Identifier Number is used by OMB to identify
and track rulemakings. The first four digits of the RIN identify the
EPA office with lead responsibility for developing the action.
D. What tools are available for mining Regulatory Agenda data and for
finding more about EPA rules and policies?
1. Federal Regulatory Dashboard
The https://www.reginfo.gov/ searchable database, maintained by the
Regulatory Information Service Center and OIRA, allows users to view
the Regulatory Agenda database (https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaMain), which includes search, display, and data transmission
options.
2. Subject Matter EPA Websites
Some actions listed in the Agenda include a URL for an EPA-
maintained website that provides additional information about the
action.
[[Page 58083]]
3. Deregulatory Actions and Regulatory Reform
EPA maintains a list of its deregulatory actions under development,
as well as those that are completed, at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/epa-deregulatory-actions. Additional information about
EPA's regulatory reform activity is available to the public at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/regulatory-reform.
4. Public Dockets
When EPA publishes either an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(ANPRM) or a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal
Register, the Agency typically establishes a docket to accumulate
materials developed throughout the development process for that
rulemaking. The docket serves as the repository for the collection of
documents or information related to that particular Agency action or
activity. EPA most commonly uses dockets for rulemaking actions, but
dockets may also be used for RFA section 610 reviews of rules with
significant economic impacts on a substantial number of small entities
and for various non-rulemaking activities, such as Federal Register
documents seeking public comments on draft guidance, policy statements,
information collection requests under the PRA, and other non-rule
activities. Docket information should be in that action's agenda entry.
All of EPA's public dockets can be located at https://www.regulations.gov.
III. Review of Regulations Under 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
A. Reviews of Rules With Significant Impacts on a Substantial Number of
Small Entities
Section 610 of the RFA requires that an agency review, within 10
years of promulgation, each rule that has or will have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. At this
time, EPA has no 610 reviews.
B. What other special attention does EPA give to the impacts of rules
on small businesses, small governments, and small nonprofit
organizations?
For each of EPA's rulemakings, consideration is given to whether
there will be any adverse impact on any small entity. EPA attempts to
fit the regulatory requirements, to the extent feasible, to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions
subject to the regulation.
Under the RFA as amended by SBREFA, the Agency must prepare a
formal analysis of the potential negative impacts on small entities,
convene a Small Business Advocacy Review Panel (proposed rule stage),
and prepare a Small Entity Compliance Guide (final rule stage) unless
the Agency certifies a rule will not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. For more detailed
information about the Agency's policy and practice with respect to
implementing the RFA/SBREFA, please visit EPA's RFA/SBREFA website at
https://www.epa.gov/reg-flex.
IV. Thank You for Collaborating With Us
Finally, we would like to thank those of you who choose to join
with us in making progress on the complex issues involved in protecting
human health and the environment. Collaborative efforts such as EPA's
open rulemaking process are a valuable tool for addressing the problems
we face, and the regulatory agenda is an important part of that
process.
Dated: July 25, 2018.
Brittany Bolen,
Associate Administrator, Office of Policy.
35--Final Rule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
356....................... Methylene Chloride; 2070-AK07
Rulemaking Under TSCA
Section 6(a).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
35--Long-Term Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
357....................... Trichloroethylene (TCE); 2070-AK11
Rulemaking Under TSCA
Section 6(a); Vapor
Degreasing.
358....................... N-Methylpyrrolidone; 2070-AK46
Regulation of Certain
Uses Under TSCA Section
6(a).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA)
35
Final Rule Stage
356. Methylene Chloride; Rulemaking Under TSCA Section 6(A)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2605, Toxic Substances Control Act; 15
U.S.C. 2625 TSCA 26
Abstract: Section 6(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act provides
authority for EPA to ban or restrict the manufacture (including
import), processing, distribution in commerce, and use of chemical
substances, as well as any manner or method of disposal. Section
26(l)(4) of TSCA authorizes EPA to issue rules under TSCA section 6 for
chemicals listed in the 2014 update to the TSCA Work Plan for Chemical
Assessments for which EPA published completed risk assessments prior to
June 22, 2016, consistent with the scope of the completed risk
assessment. Methylene chloride is used in paint and coating removal in
commercial processes and consumer products. In the August 2014 TSCA
Work Plan Chemical Risk Assessment for methylene chloride, EPA
characterized risks from use of these chemicals in paint and coating
removal. On January 19, 2017, EPA preliminarily determined that the use
of methylene chloride in paint and coating removal poses an
unreasonable risk of injury to health. EPA also proposed prohibitions
and restrictions on the manufacture, processing, and distribution in
commerce of methylene chloride for all consumer and most types of
commercial paint and coating removal and on the use of methylene
chloride in commercial paint and coating removal in specified sectors.
While EPA proposed to identify the use of methylene chloride in
commercial furniture refinishing as presenting an unreasonable risk,
EPA intends to further evaluate the commercial furniture refinishing
use and develop an
[[Page 58084]]
appropriate regulatory risk management approach under the process for
risk evaluations for existing chemicals under TSCA. Although N-
methylpyrrolidone (NMP) was included in the January 2017 proposed rule,
EPA intends to address NMP use in paint and coating removal in the risk
evaluation for NMP and to consider any resulting risk reduction
requirements in a separate regulatory action (RIN 2070-AK46).
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/19/17 82 FR 7464
NPRM Comment Period Extended........ 05/01/17 82 FR 20310
Notice.............................. 08/30/17 82 FR 41256
Final Rule.......................... 12/00/18 .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Ana Corado, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Mail Code 7408M, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-0140, Email:
[email protected].
Joel Wolf, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Chemical
Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code
7404T, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-2228, Fax: 202 566-0471,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 2070-AK07
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA)
35
Long-Term Actions
357. Trichloroethylene (TCE); Rulemaking Under TSCA Section 6(A); Vapor
Degreasing
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory
Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2605, Toxic Substances Control Act
Abstract: Section 6(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
provides authority for EPA to ban or restrict the manufacture
(including import), processing, distribution in commerce, and use of
chemical substances, as well as any manner or method of disposal.
Section 26(l)(4) of TSCA authorizes EPA to issue rules under TSCA
section 6 for chemicals listed in the 2014 update to the TSCA Work Plan
for Chemical Assessments for which EPA published completed risk
assessments prior to June 22, 2016, consistent with the scope of the
completed risk assessment. In the June 2014 TSCA Work Plan Chemical
Risk Assessment for TCE, EPA characterized risks from the use of TCE in
commercial degreasing and in some consumer uses. EPA has preliminarily
determined that these risks are unreasonable risks. On January 19,
2017, EPA proposed to prohibit the manufacture, processing,
distribution in commerce, or commercial use of TCE in vapor degreasing.
A separate action (RIN 2070-AK03), published on December 16, 2016,
proposed to address the unreasonable risks from TCE when used as a
spotting agent in dry cleaning and in commercial and consumer aerosol
spray degreasers.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/19/17 82 FR 7432
NPRM Comment Period Extended........ 02/15/17 82 FR 10732
NPRM Comment Period Extended........ 05/01/17 82 FR 20310
-----------------------------------
Final Rule.......................... To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Toni Krasnic, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Mail Code 7405M, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564-0984,
Email: [email protected].
Joel Wolf, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Chemical
Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code
7404T, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202-564-2228, Fax: 202-566-0471,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 2070-AK11
358. N-Methylpyrrolidone; Regulation of Certain Uses Under
TSCA Section 6(A)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2605, Toxic Substances Control Act
Abstract: Section 6(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act provides
authority for EPA to ban or restrict the manufacture (including
import), processing, distribution in commerce, and use of chemical
substances, as well as any manner or method of disposal. Section
26(l)(4) of TSCA authorizes EPA to issue rules under TSCA section 6 for
chemicals listed in the 2014 update to the TSCA Work Plan for Chemical
Assessments for which EPA published completed risk assessments prior to
June 22, 2016, consistent with the scope of the completed risk
assessment. N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) is used in paint and coating
removal in commercial processes and consumer products. In the March
2015 TSCA Work Plan Chemical Risk Assessment for NMP, EPA characterized
risks from use of this chemical in paint and coating removal. On
January 19, 2017, EPA preliminarily determined that the use of NMP in
paint and coating removal poses an unreasonable risk of injury to
health. EPA also co-proposed two options for NMP in paint and coating
removal. The first co-proposal would prohibit the manufacture,
processing, and distribution in commerce of NMP for all consumer and
most commercial paint and coating removal and the use of NMP for most
commercial paint and coating removal. The second co-proposal would
require commercial users of NMP for paint and coating removal to
establish a worker protection program and not use paint and coating
removal products that contain greater than 35% NMP by weight, with
certain exceptions; and require processors of products containing NMP
for paint and coating removal to reformulate products such that they do
not exceed 35% NMP by weight, to identify gloves that provide effective
protection for the formulation, and to provide warnings and
instructions on any paint and coating removal products containing NMP.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/17/17 82 FR 7464
-----------------------------------
Final Rule.......................... To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Ana Corado, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Mail Code 7408M, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202-564-0140, Email:
[email protected].
Joel Wolf, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Chemical
Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code
7404T, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202-564-2228, Fax: 202-566-0471,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 2070-AK46
[FR Doc. 2018-23914 Filed 11-15-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P