Production Authority Not Approved; Gildan Yarns, LLC; Foreign-Trade Zone 57; (Cotton and Cotton/Polyester Yarns); Salisbury, North Carolina, 57410-57411 [2018-24934]
Download as PDF
57410
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 221 / Thursday, November 15, 2018 / Notices
The amended application to
reorganize FTZ 81 under the ASF is
approved, subject to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations, including
Section 400.13, to the Board’s standard
2,000-acre activation limit for the zone,
to an ASF sunset provision for magnet
sites that would terminate authority for
Sites 1, 2, 4 and 5 if not activated within
five years from the month of approval,
and to an ASF sunset provision for
usage-driven sites that would terminate
authority for Site 6 if no foreign-status
merchandise is admitted for a bona fide
customs purpose within three years
from the month of approval.
Dated: November 8, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 2018–24936 Filed 11–14–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 2072]
Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone
9 Under Alternative Site Framework;
Honolulu, Hawaii
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the
following Order:
Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones
(FTZ) Act provides for ‘‘. . . the
establishment . . . of foreign-trade
zones in ports of entry of the United
States, to expedite and encourage
foreign commerce, and for other
purposes,’’ and authorizes the ForeignTrade Zones Board to grant to qualified
corporations the privilege of
establishing foreign-trade zones in or
adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection ports of entry;
Whereas, the Board adopted the
alternative site framework (ASF) (15
CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the
establishment or reorganization of
zones;
Whereas, the State of Hawaii, grantee
of Foreign-Trade Zone 9, submitted an
application to the Board (FTZ Docket B–
40–2018, docketed June 18, 2018) for
authority to reorganize under the ASF
with a service area of the City and
County of Honolulu, County of Hawaii,
County of Kauai, and County of Maui,
Hawaii, in and adjacent to the Hilo and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Nov 14, 2018
Jkt 247001
Kona (Hawaii), Kahului and Kihei
(Maui), Honolulu (Oahu) and
Nawiliwili-Port Allen (Kauai) U.S.
Customs and Border Protection ports of
entry, FTZ 9’s existing Sites 2, 3, 4, 5
and 9 would be categorized as magnet
sites and existing Sites 1, 6, 7 and 8
would be categorized as usage-driven
sites;
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment was given in the Federal
Register (83 FR 29541–29542, June 25,
2018) and the application has been
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendations of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and the
Board’s regulations are satisfied;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
orders:
The application to reorganize FTZ 9
under the ASF is approved, subject to
the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations,
including Section 400.13, to the Board’s
standard 2,000-acre activation limit for
the zone, to an ASF sunset provision for
magnet sites that would terminate
authority for Sites 2, 3, 4 and 9 if not
activated within five years from the
month of approval and to an ASF sunset
provision for usage-driven sites that
would terminate authority for Sites 1, 6,
7 and 8 if no foreign-status merchandise
is admitted to the sites for a bona fide
customs purpose within three years
from the month of approval.
Dated: November 8, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 2018–24935 Filed 11–14–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[B–46–2018)
Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 41—
Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Authorization
of Production Activity; CNH Industrial
America LLC; (Tractors, Component
Parts, and Axle Subassemblies);
Sturtevant, Wisconsin
On July 11, 2018, CNH Industrial
America LLC submitted a notification of
proposed production activity to the FTZ
Board for its facility within Subzone
41I, in Sturtevant, Wisconsin.
The notification was processed in
accordance with the regulations of the
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including
notice in the Federal Register inviting
public comment (83 FR 33918, July 18,
2018). On November 8, 2018, the
applicant was notified of the FTZ
Board’s decision that no further review
of the activity is warranted at this time.
The production activity described in the
notification was authorized, subject to
the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board’s
regulations, including Section 400.14.
Dated: November 8, 2018.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–24932 Filed 11–14–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 2074]
Production Authority Not Approved;
Gildan Yarns, LLC; Foreign-Trade Zone
57; (Cotton and Cotton/Polyester
Yarns); Salisbury, North Carolina
Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the
following Order:
Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones
(FTZ) Act provides for ‘‘. . . the
establishment . . . of foreign-trade
zones in ports of entry of the United
States, to expedite and encourage
foreign commerce, and for other
purposes,’’ and authorizes the ForeignTrade Zones Board to grant to qualified
corporations the privilege of
establishing foreign-trade zones in or
adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection ports of entry;
Whereas, the Charlotte Regional
Partnership, Inc., grantee of FTZ 57, has
requested production authority on
behalf of Gildan Yarns, LLC, for its
facility located in Salisbury, North
Carolina (B–43–2017, docketed June 16,
2017);
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment has been given in the Federal
Register (82 FR 28628–28629, June 23,
2017) and the application has been
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendations of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and the
Board’s regulations have not been
satisfied;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby does
not approve the application requesting
production authority under zone
procedures within FTZ 57 at the facility
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 221 / Thursday, November 15, 2018 / Notices
of Gildan Yarns, LLC, located in
Salisbury, North Carolina, as described
in the application and Federal Register
notice.
Dated: November 8, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 2018–24934 Filed 11–14–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) has received requests to
conduct administrative reviews of
various antidumping and countervailing
duty orders and findings with
September anniversary dates. In
accordance with Commerce’s
regulations, we are initiating those
administrative reviews.
DATES: Applicable November 15, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD
Operations, Customs Liaison Unit,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4735.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Background
Commerce has received timely
requests, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b), for administrative reviews of
various antidumping and countervailing
duty orders and findings with
September anniversary dates.
All deadlines for the submission of
various types of information,
certifications, or comments or actions by
Commerce discussed below refer to the
number of calendar days from the
applicable starting time.
Notice of No Sales
If a producer or exporter named in
this notice of initiation had no exports,
sales, or entries during the period of
review (POR), it must notify Commerce
within 30 days of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. All
submissions must be filed electronically
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Nov 14, 2018
Jkt 247001
at https://access.trade.gov in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.303.1 Such
submissions are subject to verification
in accordance with section 782(i) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Further, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.303(f)(1)(i), a copy must be served
on every party on Commerce’s service
list.
Respondent Selection
In the event Commerce limits the
number of respondents for individual
examination for administrative reviews
initiated pursuant to requests made for
the orders identified below, Commerce
intends to select respondents based on
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) data for U.S. imports during the
period of review. We intend to place the
CBP data on the record within five days
of publication of the initiation notice
and to make our decision regarding
respondent selection within 30 days of
publication of the initiation Federal
Register notice. Comments regarding the
CBP data and respondent selection
should be submitted seven days after
the placement of the CBP data on the
record of this review. Parties wishing to
submit rebuttal comments should
submit those comments five days after
the deadline for the initial comments.
In the event Commerce decides it is
necessary to limit individual
examination of respondents and
conduct respondent selection under
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
In general, Commerce has found that
determinations concerning whether
particular companies should be
‘‘collapsed’’ (e.g., treated as a single
entity for purposes of calculating
antidumping duty rates) require a
substantial amount of detailed
information and analysis, which often
require follow-up questions and
analysis. Accordingly, Commerce will
not conduct collapsing analyses at the
respondent selection phase of this
review and will not collapse companies
at the respondent selection phase unless
there has been a determination to
collapse certain companies in a
previous segment of this antidumping
proceeding (e.g., investigation,
administrative review, new shipper
review or changed circumstances
review). For any company subject to this
review, if Commerce determined, or
continued to treat, that company as
collapsed with others, Commerce will
assume that such companies continue to
operate in the same manner and will
1 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR
39263 (July 6, 2011).
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57411
collapse them for respondent selection
purposes. Otherwise, Commerce will
not collapse companies for purposes of
respondent selection. Parties are
requested to (a) identify which
companies subject to review previously
were collapsed, and (b) provide a
citation to the proceeding in which they
were collapsed. Further, if companies
are requested to complete the Quantity
and Value (Q&V) Questionnaire for
purposes of respondent selection, in
general each company must report
volume and value data separately for
itself. Parties should not include data
for any other party, even if they believe
they should be treated as a single entity
with that other party. If a company was
collapsed with another company or
companies in the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding
where Commerce considered collapsing
that entity, complete Q&V data for that
collapsed entity must be submitted.
Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a
party that has requested a review may
withdraw that request within 90 days of
the date of publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review. The
regulation provides that Commerce may
extend this time if it is reasonable to do
so. Determinations by Commerce to
extend the 90-day deadline will be
made on a case-by-case basis.
Deadline for Particular Market
Situation Allegation
Section 504 of the Trade Preferences
Extension Act of 2015 amended the Act
by adding the concept of particular
market situation (PMS) for purposes of
constructed value under section 773(e)
of the Act.2 Section 773(e) of the Act
states that ‘‘if a particular market
situation exists such that the cost of
materials and fabrication or other
processing of any kind does not
accurately reflect the cost of production
in the ordinary course of trade, the
administering authority may use
another calculation methodology under
this subtitle or any other calculation
methodology.’’ When an interested
party submits a PMS allegation pursuant
to section 773(e) of the Act, Commerce
will respond to such a submission
consistent with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(v). If
Commerce finds that a PMS exists under
section 773(e) of the Act, then it will
modify its dumping calculations
appropriately.
Neither section 773(e) of the Act nor
19 CFR 351.301(c)(v) set a deadline for
2 See Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015,
Public Law 114–27, 129 Stat. 362 (2015).
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 221 (Thursday, November 15, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57410-57411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-24934]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 2074]
Production Authority Not Approved; Gildan Yarns, LLC; Foreign-
Trade Zone 57; (Cotton and Cotton/Polyester Yarns); Salisbury, North
Carolina
Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones
Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Act provides for ``. . . the
establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of
entry;
Whereas, the Charlotte Regional Partnership, Inc., grantee of FTZ
57, has requested production authority on behalf of Gildan Yarns, LLC,
for its facility located in Salisbury, North Carolina (B-43-2017,
docketed June 16, 2017);
Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the
Federal Register (82 FR 28628-28629, June 23, 2017) and the application
has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations;
and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and
the Board's regulations have not been satisfied;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby does not approve the application
requesting production authority under zone procedures within FTZ 57 at
the facility
[[Page 57411]]
of Gildan Yarns, LLC, located in Salisbury, North Carolina, as
described in the application and Federal Register notice.
Dated: November 8, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate Chairman,
Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-24934 Filed 11-14-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P