Safety Zone; The Gut, South Bristol, ME, 57322-57324 [2018-24899]
Download as PDF
57322
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 221 / Thursday, November 15, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
specifies the location of the regulated
area for the Santa Spectacular
Fireworks. Entry into the regulated area
is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Marine Safety Unit
Pittsburgh (COTP) or a designated
representative. Persons or vessels
desiring to enter into or pass through
the regulated area must request
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. They can be
reached on VHF FM channel 16. If
permission is granted, all persons and
vessels shall comply with the
instructions of the COTP or designated
representative.
In addition to this notice of
enforcement in the Federal Register, the
COTP or a designated representative
will inform the public through
Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNMs),
Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs),
Marine Safety Information Bulletins
(MSIBs), and/or through other means of
public notice as appropriate at least 24
hours in advance of enforcement.
A.W. Demo,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh.
[FR Doc. 2018–24900 Filed 11–14–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2018–0849]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; The Gut, South Bristol,
ME
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
the navigable waters within a 50 yard
radius from the center point of The Gut
Bridge in South Bristol, ME between
Rutherford Island and Bristol Neck. The
safety zone is necessary to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from potential hazards
created during bedrock removal
operations. When enforced, this
regulation prohibits entry of vessels or
persons into the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Northern New England or a designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from November 15, 2018
through March 31, 2019. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:25 Nov 14, 2018
Jkt 247001
will be used from November 8, 2018
through November 15, 2018.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2018–
0849 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LT Matthew Odom, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Northern New England,
telephone 207–347–5015, email
Matthew.T.Odom@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
MEDOT Maine Department of
Transportation
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On August 21, 2018, the Maine
Department of Transportation (MEDOT)
notified the Coast Guard that it will be
removing bedrock in the areas between
Rutherford Island and Bristol Neck
underneath The Gut Bridge. The
removal operations include removing
bedrock from between the bridge
abutments and areas near the navigation
channel both upstream and downstream
of The Gut Bridge. To remove the
bedrock workers will need to utilize the
waterway underneath the bridge span
and prohibit people and vessels from
entering the safety zone at various
times. Removal operations are expected
to take place between 8 November 2018
and 31 March 2019. However, we only
anticipate a continuous 35 day full
closure of the waterway. The COTP
Northern New England has determined
that the potential hazards associated
with the removal operations will be a
safety concern for anyone transiting
within a 50-yard radius of the center
point of The Gut Bridge.
In response, on September 27, 2018,
the Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled
‘‘Safety Zone; The Gut, South Bristol,
ME’’ (83 FR 48748). There we stated
why we issued the NPRM, and invited
comments on our proposed regulatory
action related to this safety zone. During
the comment period that ended on
October 29, 2018, we received no
comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable
because immediate action is needed to
respond to the potential safety hazards
associated with bedrock removal
operations near The Gut Bridge which
are scheduled to commence on
November 8, 2018.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The
COTP Northern New England has
determined that potential hazards
associated with the bedrock removal
operations will be a safety concern for
anyone transiting within a 50-yard
radius of the center point of the bridge.
The purpose of this rule is to ensure the
safety of vessels and personnel within a
50-yard radius of the center point of The
Gut Bridge before, during, and after the
bedrock removal operations.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
As noted above, we received no
comments on our NPRM published
September 27, 2018. There are no
changes in the regulatory text of this
rule from the proposed rule in the
NPRM.
This rule establishes a safety zone
from 12:01 a.m. on November 8, 2018 to
11:59 on March 31, 2019. While the
safety zone would be effective
throughout this period, it would only be
enforced during periods of active
bedrock removal operations. The safety
zone would include all navigable waters
from surface to bottom within a 50 yard
radius from the center point of The Gut
Bridge between Rutherford Island and
Bristol Neck in South Bristol, ME.
During times of enforcement, no vessel
or person would be permitted to enter
the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP Northern
New England or a designated
representative. The Coast Guard will
notify the public and local mariners of
this safety zone through appropriate
means, which may include, but are not
limited to, publication in the Federal
Register, the Local Notice to Mariners,
and Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
marine Channel 16 (VHF–FM) in
advance of any enforcement.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
E:\FR\FM\15NOR1.SGM
15NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 221 / Thursday, November 15, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and selective enforcement of the safety
zone. The safety zone impacts only a
small designated portion on The Gut
waterway for 143 days. This waterway
is typically transited by small
recreational craft on an infrequent basis
after Labor Day Weekend and prior to
Memorial Day Weekend. Vessel traffic is
able to safely transit around this safety
zone with a slight delay (approximately
20–60 minutes) by transiting around
Rutherford Island to reach any
destination on the other side of The Gut.
Additionally, the safety zone will only
be enforced during active bedrock
removal operations necessitating closure
of the waterway or during an
emergency. Moreover, the rule allows
vessels to seek permission to enter the
zone. The Coast Guard will notify the
public of enforcement of this rule via
appropriate means, such as via Local
Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice
to Mariners via marine Channel 16
(VHF–FM).
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
from the Small Business Administration
on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:25 Nov 14, 2018
Jkt 247001
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above,
this rule would not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule would not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57323
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01 and Commandant
Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone that would prohibit entry within a
50-yard radius of the center point of a
bridge. It is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60 (a)
of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard to amend 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
E:\FR\FM\15NOR1.SGM
15NOR1
57324
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 221 / Thursday, November 15, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–0849 to read as
follows:
■
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
§ 165.T01–0849 Safety Zone; The Gut,
South Bristol, ME.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of The Gut, a
waterway between Rutherford Island
and Bristol Neck in South Bristol, ME,
from surface to bottom, encompassed by
a 50-yard radius from the center point
of The Gut Bridge at position 43°51.720′
N, 069°33.480′ W (NAD 83).
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section:
Designated representative means any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant,
petty officer, or designated Patrol
Commander of the U.S. Coast Guard
who has been designated by the Captain
of the Port, Sector Northern New
England (COTP), to act on his or her
behalf. The designated representative
may be on an official patrol vessel or
may be on shore and will communicate
with vessels via VHF–FM radio or
loudhailer. In addition, members of the
Coast Guard Auxiliary may be present to
inform vessel operators of this
regulation.
Official patrol vessels means any
Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
state, or local law enforcement vessels
assigned or approved by the COTP to
enforce this section.
(c) Enforcement period. This rule is
effective without actual notice from
November 15, 2018 through 11:59 p.m.
on March 31, 2019. For the purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used
from 12:01 a.m. on November 8, 2018
through November 15, 2018. The rule
will only be enforced during active
bedrock removal operations or other
instances which may cause a hazard to
navigation, or when deemed necessary
by the Captain of the Port (COTP),
Northern New England.
(d) Regulations. When this safety zone
is enforced, the following regulations,
along with those contained in § 165.23
apply:
(1) No person or vessel may enter or
remain in the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless
authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(2) To obtain permission required by
this regulation, individuals may reach
the COTP or the COTP’s designated
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:25 Nov 14, 2018
Jkt 247001
representative via Channel 16 (VHF–
FM) or (207) 767–0303 (Sector Northern
New England Command Center).
(3) During periods of enforcement,
any person or vessel permitted to enter
the safety zone must comply with all
lawful orders or directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(e) Penalties. Those who violate this
section are subject to the penalties set
forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232.
(f) Notification. Coast Guard Sector
Northern New England will give notice
through the Local Notice to Mariners
and Broadcast Notice to Mariners for the
purpose of enforcement of temporary
safety zone. Coast Guard Sector
Northern New England will also notify
the public to the greatest extent possible
of any period in which the Coast Guard
will suspend enforcement of this safety
zone.
Dated: November 8, 2018.
B.J. LeFebvre,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector Northern New England.
[FR Doc. 2018–24899 Filed 11–14–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 51 and 52
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0064; FRL–9986–47–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AP80
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) and Nonattainment New Source
Review (NNSR): Aggregation;
Reconsideration
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final action; lifting of
administrative stay and announcement
of effective date.
AGENCY:
In this action, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
is concluding the reconsideration of an
earlier action that the EPA published on
January 15, 2009, titled ‘‘Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) and
Nonattainment New Source Review
(NSR): Aggregation and Project
Netting.’’ The 2009 action—hereafter
referred to as ‘‘2009 NSR Aggregation
Action’’—clarified implementation of
the New Source Review (NSR)
permitting program under the Clean Air
Act (CAA or Act) with respect to
treating related physical or operational
changes as a single ‘‘modification’’ for
the purpose of determining NSR
applicability at a stationary source. On
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
April 15, 2010, the EPA proposed to
revoke the 2009 NSR Aggregation
Action. After a review of the public
comments received on that proposal, the
EPA has now decided to not revoke the
2009 NSR Aggregation Action. The EPA
is, therefore, retaining the interpretation
set forth in the 2009 NSR Aggregation
Action, while not adopting any changes
to the relevant rule text. At the same
time, the EPA is using this present
action to clarify the implications of the
2009 NSR Aggregation Action for EPAapproved permitting programs. This
action also lifts the administrative stay
and announces the effective date of the
2009 NSR Aggregation Action.
This action is effective on
November 15, 2018.
DATES:
The EPA has established a
docket for this action, identified by
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–
0064. All documents in the docket are
listed in the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information may not be publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov.
ADDRESSES:
For
further general information on this
action, contact Mr. Dave Svendsgaard,
Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards (OAQPS), Air Quality Policy
Division, U.S. EPA, Mail Code 504–03,
109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research
Triangle Park, NC 27711; by telephone
at (919) 541–2380; or by email at
svendsgaard.dave@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
Entities potentially affected directly
by this action include sources in all
industry categories. Entities potentially
affected by this action also include state,
local and tribal air pollution control
agencies (air agencies) responsible for
permitting sources pursuant to the NSR
program.
B. Where can I get a copy of this
document and other related
information?
In addition to being available in the
docket, an electronic copy of this
Federal Register document will be
posted at https://www.epa.gov/nsr.
E:\FR\FM\15NOR1.SGM
15NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 221 (Thursday, November 15, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57322-57324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-24899]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2018-0849]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; The Gut, South Bristol, ME
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
the navigable waters within a 50 yard radius from the center point of
The Gut Bridge in South Bristol, ME between Rutherford Island and
Bristol Neck. The safety zone is necessary to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards created
during bedrock removal operations. When enforced, this regulation
prohibits entry of vessels or persons into the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Northern New England or a
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from November 15,
2018 through March 31, 2019. For the purposes of enforcement, actual
notice will be used from November 8, 2018 through November 15, 2018.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2018-0849 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LT Matthew Odom, Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Northern New England, telephone 207-347-5015, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
MEDOT Maine Department of Transportation
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On August 21, 2018, the Maine Department of Transportation (MEDOT)
notified the Coast Guard that it will be removing bedrock in the areas
between Rutherford Island and Bristol Neck underneath The Gut Bridge.
The removal operations include removing bedrock from between the bridge
abutments and areas near the navigation channel both upstream and
downstream of The Gut Bridge. To remove the bedrock workers will need
to utilize the waterway underneath the bridge span and prohibit people
and vessels from entering the safety zone at various times. Removal
operations are expected to take place between 8 November 2018 and 31
March 2019. However, we only anticipate a continuous 35 day full
closure of the waterway. The COTP Northern New England has determined
that the potential hazards associated with the removal operations will
be a safety concern for anyone transiting within a 50-yard radius of
the center point of The Gut Bridge.
In response, on September 27, 2018, the Coast Guard published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled ``Safety Zone; The Gut,
South Bristol, ME'' (83 FR 48748). There we stated why we issued the
NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action related to
this safety zone. During the comment period that ended on October 29,
2018, we received no comments.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable because immediate action is needed to
respond to the potential safety hazards associated with bedrock removal
operations near The Gut Bridge which are scheduled to commence on
November 8, 2018.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231. The COTP Northern New England has determined that potential
hazards associated with the bedrock removal operations will be a safety
concern for anyone transiting within a 50-yard radius of the center
point of the bridge. The purpose of this rule is to ensure the safety
of vessels and personnel within a 50-yard radius of the center point of
The Gut Bridge before, during, and after the bedrock removal
operations.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule
As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM published
September 27, 2018. There are no changes in the regulatory text of this
rule from the proposed rule in the NPRM.
This rule establishes a safety zone from 12:01 a.m. on November 8,
2018 to 11:59 on March 31, 2019. While the safety zone would be
effective throughout this period, it would only be enforced during
periods of active bedrock removal operations. The safety zone would
include all navigable waters from surface to bottom within a 50 yard
radius from the center point of The Gut Bridge between Rutherford
Island and Bristol Neck in South Bristol, ME. During times of
enforcement, no vessel or person would be permitted to enter the safety
zone without obtaining permission from the COTP Northern New England or
a designated representative. The Coast Guard will notify the public and
local mariners of this safety zone through appropriate means, which may
include, but are not limited to, publication in the Federal Register,
the Local Notice to Mariners, and Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
marine Channel 16 (VHF-FM) in advance of any enforcement.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
[[Page 57323]]
Executive orders and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and selective enforcement of the safety zone. The
safety zone impacts only a small designated portion on The Gut waterway
for 143 days. This waterway is typically transited by small
recreational craft on an infrequent basis after Labor Day Weekend and
prior to Memorial Day Weekend. Vessel traffic is able to safely transit
around this safety zone with a slight delay (approximately 20-60
minutes) by transiting around Rutherford Island to reach any
destination on the other side of The Gut. Additionally, the safety zone
will only be enforced during active bedrock removal operations
necessitating closure of the waterway or during an emergency. Moreover,
the rule allows vessels to seek permission to enter the zone. The Coast
Guard will notify the public of enforcement of this rule via
appropriate means, such as via Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast
Notice to Mariners via marine Channel 16 (VHF-FM).
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this rule would not have a significant economic impact on
any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule would not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule would not result
in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves
a safety zone that would prohibit entry within a 50-yard radius of the
center point of a bridge. It is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60 (a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard to amend
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
[[Page 57324]]
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T01-0849 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-0849 Safety Zone; The Gut, South Bristol, ME.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
The Gut, a waterway between Rutherford Island and Bristol Neck in South
Bristol, ME, from surface to bottom, encompassed by a 50-yard radius
from the center point of The Gut Bridge at position 43[deg]51.720' N,
069[deg]33.480' W (NAD 83).
(b) Definitions. As used in this section:
Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, petty officer, or designated Patrol Commander of the U.S.
Coast Guard who has been designated by the Captain of the Port, Sector
Northern New England (COTP), to act on his or her behalf. The
designated representative may be on an official patrol vessel or may be
on shore and will communicate with vessels via VHF-FM radio or
loudhailer. In addition, members of the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be
present to inform vessel operators of this regulation.
Official patrol vessels means any Coast Guard, Coast Guard
Auxiliary, state, or local law enforcement vessels assigned or approved
by the COTP to enforce this section.
(c) Enforcement period. This rule is effective without actual
notice from November 15, 2018 through 11:59 p.m. on March 31, 2019. For
the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from 12:01 a.m.
on November 8, 2018 through November 15, 2018. The rule will only be
enforced during active bedrock removal operations or other instances
which may cause a hazard to navigation, or when deemed necessary by the
Captain of the Port (COTP), Northern New England.
(d) Regulations. When this safety zone is enforced, the following
regulations, along with those contained in Sec. 165.23 apply:
(1) No person or vessel may enter or remain in the safety zone
described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the
COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(2) To obtain permission required by this regulation, individuals
may reach the COTP or the COTP's designated representative via Channel
16 (VHF-FM) or (207) 767-0303 (Sector Northern New England Command
Center).
(3) During periods of enforcement, any person or vessel permitted
to enter the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative.
(e) Penalties. Those who violate this section are subject to the
penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232.
(f) Notification. Coast Guard Sector Northern New England will give
notice through the Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to
Mariners for the purpose of enforcement of temporary safety zone. Coast
Guard Sector Northern New England will also notify the public to the
greatest extent possible of any period in which the Coast Guard will
suspend enforcement of this safety zone.
Dated: November 8, 2018.
B.J. LeFebvre,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Northern New
England.
[FR Doc. 2018-24899 Filed 11-14-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P