Testing Regulations for Air Emission Sources, 56713-56734 [2018-24747]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
southeast (from west to east). The area
is defined as that airspace upward from
700 feet above the surface within the
area bounded by a line beginning at lat.
58°27′33″ N, long. 134°37′40″ W, to lat.
58°13′13″ N, long. 134°11′51″ W, to lat.
58°05′59″ N, long. 134°21′04″ W, to lat.
58°10′51″ N, long. 134°59′18″ W, to lat.
58°23′41″ N, long. 135°31′13″ W, to lat.
58°32′22″ N, long. 135°18′32″ W, to lat.
58°27′17″ N, long. 135°01′27″ W, thence
to the point of beginning. This
modification reduces the airspace area
to only that area necessary to contain
IFR operations as they transition
between the airport and en route
environments. Also, Class E airspace
extending upward from 1,200 feet above
the surface designated for Juneau
International Airport is removed since
this airspace is wholly contained within
the Southeast Alaska Class E en route
airspace, and duplication is not
necessary.
This action also makes an editorial
change to the Class D airspace legal
description replacing Airport/Facility
Directory with Chart Supplement.
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current, is non-controversial and
unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that only affects air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
PART 71 —DESIGNATION OF CLASS
A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS;
AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
airport 3-mile radius to 5 miles southeast of
the airport, excluding that airspace below
2,000 feet MSL within the area bounded by
a line beginning at lat. 58°19′35″ N, long.
134°24′31″ W, to lat. 58°19′02″ N, long.
134°25′33″ W, to lat. 58°20′16″ N, long.
134°27′28″ W, to lat. 58°20′34″ N, long.
134°26′22″ W, thence to the point of
beginning. This Class E airspace area is
effective during the specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective date and time will
thereafter be continuously published in the
Chart Supplement.
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace
Designated as an Extension to a Class D or
Class E Surface Area.
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11C,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 13, 2018, and
effective September 15, 2018, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 5000
Class D Airspace.
*
*
*
*
*
AAL AK D Juneau, AK [Amended]
Juneau International Airport, AK
(Lat. 58°21′17″ N, long. 134°34′42″ W)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface to and including 2,500 feet MSL
within a 3-mile radius of Juneau
International Airport, and within 2.5 miles
each side of the 271° bearing from the airport
extending from the 3-mile radius to 5.2 miles
west of the airport, and within 1 mile
southwest and 2.6 miles northeast of the
airport 135° bearing extending from the
airport 3-mile radius to 5 miles southeast of
the airport, excluding that airspace below
2,000 feet MSL within the area bounded by
a line beginning at lat. 58°19′35″ N, long.
134°24′31″ W, to lat. 58°19′02″ N, long.
134°25′33″ W, to lat. 58°20′16″ N, long.
134°27′28″ W, to lat. 58°20′34″ N, long.
134°26′22″ W, thence to the point of
beginning. This Class D airspace area is
effective during the specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective date and time will
thereafter be continuously published in the
Chart Supplement.
Environmental Review
Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas
Designated as Surface Areas.
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1F, ‘‘Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’
paragraph 5–6.5a. This airspace action
is not expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts, and
no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
56713
*
*
*
*
AAL AK E2 Juneau, AK [Amended]
Juneau International Airport, AK
(Lat. 58°21′17″ N, long. 134°34′42″ W)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface within a 3-mile radius of Juneau
International Airport, and within 2.5 miles
each side of the 271° bearing from the airport
extending from the 3-mile radius to 5.2 miles
west of the airport, and within 1 mile
southwest and 2.6 miles northeast of the
airport 135° bearing extending from the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
AAL AK E4
*
*
Juneau, AK [Removed]
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
*
AAL AK E5 Juneau, AK [Amended]
Juneau International Airport, AK
(Lat. 58°21′17″ N, long. 134°34′42″ W)
That airspace upward from 700 feet above
the surface within the area bounded by a line
beginning at lat. 58°27′33″ N, long.
134°37′40″ W, to lat. 58°13′13″ N, long.
134°11′51″ W, to lat. 58°05′59″ N, long.
134°21′04″ W, to lat. 58°10′51″ N, long.
134°59′18″ W, to lat. 58°23′41″ N, long.
135°31′13″ W, to lat. 58°32′22″ N, long.
135°18′32″ W, to lat. 58°27′17″ N, long.
135°01′27″ W, thence to the point of
beginning.
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on
November 1, 2018.
Shawn M. Kozica,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western
Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2018–24721 Filed 11–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 51, 60, and 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2016–0510; FRL–9986–42–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AS95
Testing Regulations for Air Emission
Sources
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action amends certain
existing testing regulations to reflect
corrections, updates, and the addition of
alternative equipment and methods for
source testing of emissions. These
revisions will improve the quality of
data and provide flexibility in the use of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
56714
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
approved alternative procedures. The
revisions do not impose any new
substantive requirements on source
owners or operators.
DATES: The final rule is effective on
January 14, 2019. The incorporation by
reference materials listed in the rule are
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of January 14, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2016–0510. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., confidential business information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are
available electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Lula H. Melton, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Air Quality
Assessment Division (E143–02),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711;
telephone number: (919) 541–2910; fax
number: (919) 541–0516; email address:
melton.lula@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
supplementary information in this
preamble is organized as follows:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. What action is the agency taking?
C. Judicial Review
II. Background
III. Summary of Amendments
A. Method 201A of Appendix M of Part 51
B. Method 204 of Appendix M of Part 51
C. Method 205 of Appendix M of Part 51
D. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part
60
E. Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators
(Subpart D) Part 60
F. Electric Utility Steam Generating Units
(Subpart Da) Part 60
G. Industrial-Commercial-Institutional
Steam Generating Units (Subpart Db)
Part 60
H. Small Industrial-CommercialInstitutional Steam Generating Units
(Subpart Dc) Part 60
I. Municipal Waste Combustors for Which
Construction is Commenced After
December 20, 1989 and on or Before
September 20, 1994 (Subpart Ea) Part 60
J. Glass Manufacturing Plants (Subpart CC)
Part 60
K. New Residential Wood Heaters, New
Residential Hydronic Heaters and
Forced-Air Furnaces (Subpart QQQQ)
Part 60
L. Method 2B of Appendix A–1 of Part 60
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
M. Method 5 of Appendix A–3 of Part 60
N. Method 5B of Appendix A–3 of Part 60
O. Method 5I of Appendix A–3 of Part 60
P. Method 7 of Appendix A–4 of Part 60
Q. Method 8 of Appendix A–4 of Part 60
R. Method 18 of Appendix A–6 of Part 60
S. Method 22 of Appendix A–7 of Part 60
T. Method 26 of Appendix A–8 of Part 60
U. Method 26A of Appendix A–8 of Part
60
V. Test Method 28WHH of Appendix A–8
of Part 60
W. Performance Specification 1 of
Appendix B of Part 60
X. Performance Specification 2 of
Appendix B of Part 60
Y. Performance Specification 3 of
Appendix B of Part 60
Z. Performance Specification 11 of
Appendix B of Part 60
AA. Performance Specification 15 of
Appendix B of Part 60
BB. Performance Specification 18 of
Appendix B of Part 60
CC. Procedure 1 of Appendix F of Part 60
DD. General Provisions (Subpart A) Part 63
EE. Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing
(Subpart NNN) Part 63
FF. Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial,
and Institutional Boilers and Process
Heaters (Subpart DDDDD) Part 63
GG. Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility
Steam Generating Units (Subpart
UUUUU) Part 63
HH. Method 303 of Appendix A of Part 63
II. Method 308 of Appendix A of Part 63
JJ. Method 320 of Appendix A of Part 63
KK. Method 323 of Appendix A of Part 63
LL. Method 325A of Appendix A of Part 63
MM. Method 325B of Appendix A of Part
63
IV. Public Comments on the Proposed Rule
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use
J. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA) and 1 CFR
part 51
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
to Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
The revisions promulgated in this
final rule apply to industries that are
subject to the current provisions of 40
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts
51, 60, and 63. We did not list all of the
specific affected industries or their
North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) codes herein since
there are many affected sources in
numerous NAICS categories. If you have
any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult either the air
permitting authority for the entity or
your EPA Regional representative as
listed in 40 CFR 63.13.
B. What action is the agency taking?
We are promulgating corrections and
updates to regulations for source testing
of emissions. More specifically, we are
correcting typographical and technical
errors, updating obsolete testing
procedures, adding approved testing
alternatives, and clarifying testing
requirements.
C. Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act (CAA), judicial review of this
final rule is available by filing a petition
for review in the United States Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit by January 14, 2019. Under
section 307(d)(7)(B) of the CAA, only an
objection to this final rule that was
raised with reasonable specificity
during the period for public comment
can be raised during judicial review.
Moreover, under section 307(b)(2) of the
CAA, the requirements that are the
subject of this final rule may not be
challenged later in civil or criminal
proceedings brought by the EPA to
enforce these requirements.
II. Background
The revisions to testing regulations for
air emission sources were proposed in
the Federal Register on January 26,
2018 (83 FR 3636). The public comment
period ended March 27, 2018, and 83
comment letters were received from the
public; 23 of the comment letters were
relevant, and the other 60 comment
letters were considered beyond the
scope of the proposed rule. This final
rule was developed based on public
comments that the agency received on
the proposed rule.
III. Summary of Amendments
A. Method 201A of Appendix M of Part
51
In Method 201A, in section 12.5, the
denominator of equation 24 is corrected
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
as proposed; the proposed c′p in the
denominator is changed to Cp′ to be
consistent with the nomenclature in
section 12.1. The cp in the numerator is
changed to Cp also to be consistent with
the nomenclature in section 12.1.
B. Method 204 of Appendix M of Part
51
In Method 204, in section 8.2, the
statement regarding equation 204–2 is
corrected to ‘‘The NEAR must be ≤0.05,’’
as proposed.
C. Method 205 of Appendix M of Part
51
In Method 205, section 2.1.1 is
revised to allow the use of National
Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST)-traceable transfer standards to
calibrate the gas dilution system as
proposed. The agency continues to
believe that these standards are widely
available and provide the accuracy
necessary to perform the calibration.
Section 2.1.1 is also revised as proposed
to require testers to report the results of
the calibration of the dilution system to
enable the regulatory authority to
review this information.
D. General Provisions (Subpart A) of
Part 60
In the General Provisions of part 60,
§ 60.17(h) is revised as proposed to add
ASTM D6216–12 to the list of
incorporations by reference and to renumber the remaining consensus
standards that are incorporated by
reference in alpha-numeric order.
E. Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators
(Subpart D) Part 60
In a change from proposal, the
allowed filter temperature in
§ 60.46(b)(2)(i) is not revised. Based on
comments we received on the proposed
revisions, we are deferring finalizing the
proposed revisions of the temperature
tolerances of probe and filter holder
heating systems as part of this
rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we
received on the proposed rule and may
propose either revisions or similar
requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
F. Electric Utility Steam Generating
Units (Subpart Da) Part 60
In a change from proposal, the
allowed filter temperature in § 60.50Da
(b)(1)(ii)(A) is not revised. Based on
comments we received on the proposed
revisions, we are deferring finalizing the
proposed revisions of the temperature
tolerances of probe and filter holder
heating systems as part of this
rulemaking. We will continue to review
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
supporting information and data we
received on the proposed rule and may
propose either revisions or similar
requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
G. Industrial-Commercial-Institutional
Steam Generating Units (Subpart Db)
Part 60
In a change from proposal, the
allowed filter temperature in
§ 60.46b(d)(4) is not revised. Based on
comments we received on the proposed
revisions, we are deferring finalizing the
proposed revisions of the temperature
tolerances of probe and filter holder
heating systems as part of this
rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we
received on the proposed rule and may
propose either revisions or similar
requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
H. Small Industrial-CommercialInstitutional Steam Generating Units
(Subpart Dc) Part 60
In a change from proposal, the
allowed filter temperature in
§ 60.45c(a)(5) is not revised. Based on
comments we received on the proposed
revisions, we are deferring finalizing the
proposed revisions of the temperature
tolerances of probe and filter holder
heating systems as part of this
rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we
received on the proposed rule and may
propose either revisions or similar
requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
I. Municipal Waste Combustors for
Which Construction is Commenced
After December 20, 1989 and on or
Before September 20, 1994 (Subpart Ea)
Part 60
In a change from proposal, the
allowed filter temperature in
§ 60.58a(b)(3) is not revised. Based on
comments we received on the proposed
revisions, we are deferring finalizing the
proposed revisions of the temperature
tolerances of probe and filter holder
heating systems as part of this
rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we
received on the proposed rule and may
propose either revisions or similar
requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
J. Glass Manufacturing Plants (Subpart
CC) Part 60
In a change from proposal, the
allowed filter temperatures in
§§ 60.293(f) and 60.296(d)(2) are not
revised. Based on comments we
received on the proposed revisions, we
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56715
are deferring finalizing the proposed
revisions of the temperature tolerances
of probe and filter holder heating
systems as part of this rulemaking. We
will continue to review supporting
information and data we received on the
proposed rule and may propose either
revisions or similar requirements as part
of future rulemakings.
K. New Residential Wood Heaters, New
Residential Hydronic Heaters and
Forced-Air Furnaces (Subpart QQQQ)
Part 60
In subpart QQQQ, in Method 28WHH,
in section 13.5.1, equation 8 is corrected
as proposed.
L. Method 2B of Appendix A–1 of Part
60
In Method 2B, in section 12.1, the
definition of ambient carbon dioxide
concentration is revised as proposed.
The agency continues to believe that the
global monthly mean (CO2)a
concentration varies over time. Also, a
website link is added to the definition
as specified at proposal.
M. Method 5 of Appendix A–3 of Part
60
In a change from proposal, allowed
filter temperatures in Method 5, sections
2.0, 6.1.1.2, 6.1.1.6, 6.1.1.7, and 8.5 are
not revised. Based on comments we
received on the proposed revisions, we
are deferring finalizing the proposed
revisions of the temperature tolerances
of probe and filter holder heating
systems as part of this rulemaking. We
will continue to review supporting
information and data we received on the
proposed rule and may propose either
revisions or similar requirements as part
of future rulemakings.
Section 6.1.1.9 is revised as proposed
to allow the use of a single temperature
sensor in lieu of two temperature
sensors on the dry gas meter as allowed
by Technical Information Document 19
(TID–19) and the approved broadly
applicable alternative, ALT–117 (see
https://www.epa.gov/emc). Consistent
with our response to the comment
regarding allowing flexibility for the
weighing container in section 11.2.1,
Method 5B, the first sentence in section
11.2.1, Method 5 is revised similarly.
N. Method 5B of Appendix A–3 of Part
60
In a change from proposal, the
allowed filter temperatures in Method
5B, sections 2.0, 6.1, and 8.2 are not
revised. Based on comments we
received on the proposed revisions, we
are deferring finalizing the proposed
revisions of the temperature tolerances
of probe and filter holder heating
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
56716
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
systems as part of this rulemaking. We
will continue to review supporting
information and data we received on the
proposed rule and may propose either
revisions or similar requirements as part
of future rulemakings.
Section 11.0 is revised as proposed to
replace the reference to Method 5,
section 11.0 with specific analytical
procedures and to report the results
using Figure 5B–1 for complete data
review. Section 17.0 is revised as
proposed to delete the word ‘‘Reserved’’
from the title, and Figure 5B–1
(Analytical Data Sheet) is added.
O. Method 5I of Appendix A–3 of Part
60
In a change from proposal, Method 5I,
sections 2.1 and 8.5.2.2 are not revised
to tighten the allowed filter
temperatures. Based on comments we
received on the proposed revisions, we
are deferring finalizing the proposed
revisions of the temperature tolerances
of probe and filter holder heating
systems as part of this rulemaking. We
will continue to review supporting
information and data we received on the
proposed rule and may propose either
revisions or similar requirements as part
of future rulemakings.
P. Method 7 of Appendix A–4 of Part 60
In Method 7, sections 10.1.2 and 11.3
reference erroneous sections; the correct
section is inserted, as proposed. The
proposed referenced section 10.1.1.2 is
changed to 10.1.1 to include procedures
in both sections 10.1.1.1 and 10.1.1.2.
Q. Method 8 of Appendix A–4 of Part 60
As proposed, Method 8, sections
6.1.1.1 through 6.1.1.4 are renumbered
to 6.1.1.2 through 6.1.1.5; a new section
6.1.1.1 is added to clarify the
requirements that apply to the probe
nozzle; and, in response to comments,
Figure 8–1 (Sulfuric Acid Sampling
Train) is corrected by: (1) Modifying the
impinger graphics to make it consistent
with the text in section 6.1.1.4 and (2)
revising the proposed label S-Type Pitot
Tube to Type S Pitot Tube for
consistency. The proposed first sentence
in section 6.1.1.1 is revised to
‘‘Borosilicate or quartz glass with a
sharp, tapered leading edge and coupled
to the probe liner using a
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or glasslined union (e.g., fused silica, Silico, or
equivalent).’’ Based on a public
comment that recommended adding
Silco coated stainless steel unions as an
option for Teflon unions, and for
consistency with other test methods, we
have replaced Teflon with the generic
option polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
R. Method 18 of Appendix A–6 of Part
60
In Method 18, in section 13.1, the
erroneous paragraph (c) designation is
re-designated as (b), as proposed.
S. Method 22 of Appendix A–7 of Part
60
In Method 22, sections 11.2.1 and
11.2.2 are revised as proposed to allow
digital photography to be used for a
subset of the recordkeeping
requirements. As proposed, section
11.2.3 is added to specify the
requirements for digital photographic
records. In response to comments on the
proposal, the next to the last sentence in
section 11.2.3 regarding photographs
that must be taken within 15 minutes of
the observation period is revised from
the proposal, and another sentence is
added to provide clarity. The revised
and new sentences read: ‘‘The
photograph(s) representing the
environmental conditions including the
sky conditions and the position of the
sun relative to the observer and the
emission point must be taken within a
reasonable time of the observation (i.e.,
15 minutes). When observations are
taken from exactly the same observation
point on a routine basis (e.g., daily) and
as long as there are no modifications to
the units depicted, only a single
photograph each day is necessary to
document the observer’s location
relative to the emissions source, the
process unit being observed, and the
location of potential and actual
emission points.’’ The agency notes that
ALT–109 (see https://www.epa.gov/
emc) is the associated broadly
applicable alternative that allows the
use of digital photographs for specific
recordkeeping requirements.
T. Method 26 of Appendix A–8 of Part
60
As proposed, Method 26, section 6.2.2
is revised to allow the use of glass
sample storage containers as an option
to allow flexibility and to be consistent
with Method 26A. The proposed title of
section 6.2.2, ‘‘Storage Bottles,’’ is
changed to ‘‘Storage Containers’’ to be
consistent with the language in section
6.2.2.
U. Method 26A of Appendix A–8 of Part
60
As proposed, in Method 26A, section
6.2.1 is revised to remove the language
regarding sample storage containers. In
response to comments on our proposal,
we have determined that high-density
polyethylene is an acceptable material
for sample storage containers in
addition to the currently allowed glass.
Therefore, in a new section 6.2.4., we
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
have specified that both high-density
polyethylene and glass are acceptable
sample storage containers.
V. Test Method 28WHH of Appendix A–
8 of Part 60
In Test Method 28WHH, equation 8 in
section 13.5.1 is corrected, as proposed.
W. Performance Specification 1 of
Appendix B of Part 60
As proposed, in Performance
Specification 1, references to ASTM
D6216–98 (in sections 2.1, 3.1, 6.1,
8.1(1), 8.1(3)(ii), 8.2(1), 8.2(2), 8.2(3),
9.0, 12.1, 13.0, 13.1, 13.2, and 16.0
paragraph 8) are replaced with ASTM
D6216–12. As noted at proposal, if the
initial certification of the continuous
opacity monitoring system (COMS) has
already occurred using D6216–98,
D6216–03, or D6216–07, it will not be
necessary to recertify using D6216–12.
In response to comments on our
decision to add ASTM D6216 to the list
of consensus standards, the April 1998
publication date for ASTM D6216 in
paragraph 8 in section 16.0 is replaced
with October 2012, the ASTM D6216–12
publication date. In response to
comments, for consistency with section
2.1, and for purposes of clarification, the
note at the end of section 2.1 is added
to section 13.0.
X. Performance Specification 2 of
Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 2,
section 13.2 is replaced with a table that
indicates the relative accuracy
performance specifications, as
proposed. Given that the equals to (=)
signs were erroneously omitted from
several of the < and > values during
publication of the table in the proposed
rule, these values have been corrected.
Y. Performance Specification 3 of
Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 3, the
two sentences in section 12.0 that read,
‘‘Calculate the arithmetic difference
between the RM and the CEMS output
for each run. The average difference of
the nine (or more) data sets constitute
the RA.’’ are deleted, as proposed; these
two sentences are no longer necessary
since equations 3–1 and 3–2 would be
moved from section 13.2 to section 12.0.
The sentence, ‘‘Calculate the RA using
equations 3–1 and 3–2.’’ is added to the
beginning of section 12.0.
Z. Performance Specification 11 of
Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 11,
section 13.1, the word ‘‘average’’
erroneously exists in the second
sentence and is deleted, as proposed.
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
AA. Performance Specification 15 of
Appendix B of Part 60
As proposed, in Performance
Specification 15, section 13.0 is added
as ‘‘Method Performance [Reserved].’’
BB. Performance Specification 18 of
Appendix B of Part 60
As proposed, in Performance
Specification 18, in section 11.8.7, the
last sentence is revised to clarify the
duration of the drift check. In Table 1,
the erroneous acronym ‘‘NO2’’ is
replaced with ‘‘NO,’’ as proposed. In the
appendix of Performance Specification
18, the inadvertently omitted reserved
section 12.0 is added, as proposed.
CC. Procedure 1 of Appendix F of Part
60
As proposed, in Procedure 1, in
section 5.1.2 (1), the sentence
immediately following the table that
reads, ‘‘Challenge the CEMS three times
at each audit point, and use the average
of the three responses in determining
accuracy.’’ is replaced with, ‘‘Introduce
each of the audit gases, three times each
for a total of six challenges. Introduce
the gases in such a manner that the
entire CEMS is challenged. Do not
introduce the same gas concentration
twice in succession.’’ In order to obtain
six distinct readings during the cylinder
gas audit (CGA), the same gas must not
be introduced twice in succession, and
this revised language accurately reflects
this standard scientific practice. As also
proposed, in section 5.1.2 (3), the
reference to EPA’s traceability protocol
for gaseous calibration standards is
updated, and the language regarding the
use of EPA Method 205 for dilution of
audit gases is clarified.
DD. General Provisions (Subpart A) of
Part 63
Sections 63.7(g)(2), 63.7(g)(2)(v), and
63.8(e)(5)(i) of the General Provisions
(subpart A) of part 63 are revised, as
proposed, to require the reporting of
specific test data for continuous
monitoring system performance
evaluation tests and ongoing quality
assurance (QA) tests. These data
elements are required regardless of the
format of the report, i.e., electronic or
paper. These modifications will ensure
that performance evaluation and QA test
reporting include all data necessary for
the compliance authority to assess and
assure the quality of the reported data
and that the reported information
describes and identifies the specific unit
covered by the evaluation test report. In
response to comment, we specified the
level of reporting needed for continuous
parameter monitoring systems (CPMS)
versus other continuous monitoring
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
systems including continuous emission
monitoring systems (CEMS), COMS, and
predictive emissions monitoring
systems (PEMS).
EE. Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing
(Subpart NNN) Part 63
In a change from proposal, the
allowed filter temperature in
§ 63.1385(a)(5) is not revised. Based on
comments we received on the proposed
revisions, we are deferring finalizing
proposed revisions of the temperature
tolerances of probe and filter holder
heating systems as part of this
rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we
received on the proposed rule and may
propose either revisions or similar
requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
FF. Major Sources: Industrial,
Commercial, and Institutional Boilers
and Process Heaters (Subpart DDDDD)
Part 63
As proposed, in Table 6 of subpart
DDDDD, row 1.f. is revised to allow the
use of EPA SW–846–7471B (for liquid
samples) in addition to EPA SW–846–
7470A for measuring mercury to allow
for compliance flexibility.
GG. Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility
Steam Generating Units (Subpart
UUUUU) Part 63
In a change from proposal, the
allowed filter temperature in
§ 63.10010(h)(7)(i)(1) is not revised.
Based on comments we received on the
proposed revisions, we are deferring
finalizing proposed revisions of the
temperature tolerances of probe and
filter holder heating systems as part of
this rulemaking. We will continue to
review supporting information and data
we received on the proposed rule and
may propose either revisions or similar
requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
As proposed, in Table 5, Method 5I is
specified as a test method option
because, as explained at proposal,
Method 5I is designed for low
particulate matter (PM) application.
HH. Method 303 of Appendix A of Part
63
In Method 303, section 12.4, equation
303–3 is corrected, as proposed, by
inserting ‘‘where y = ’’ in front of the
equation.
II. Method 308 of Appendix A of Part 63
As proposed, in Method 308,
deionized distilled water replaces the
aqueous n-proponal solution; the
affected sections are 2.0, 7.2.2, 7.2.3.3,
and 11.3.2. Section 7.2.2, which defines
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56717
the aqueous n-proponal solution, is
removed, as proposed. In section
7.2.3.3, the erroneous ‘‘four’’ is replaced
as proposed, with ‘‘three’’ in the
sentence that reads ‘‘Pipette 5, 15, and
25 ml of this standard, respectively into
four 50-ml volumetric flasks.’’ Section
8.1.2 is revised, as proposed, to require
a leak check prior to the sampling run
(in addition to after the sampling run)
for QA purposes; as explained at
proposal, requiring a leak check prior to
the sampling run would potentially save
time and money. In section 9.1,
methanol spike recovery check is added
as a quality control (QC) measure in
Table 9.1, as proposed. In section 12.1,
variables used in equations 308–4 and
308–5 are added and section 12.5,
which includes equations 308–4 and
308–5, is added, as proposed. In section
13.0, the title ‘‘Reserved’’ is replaced
with ‘‘Method Performance’’ and QA
requirements would be added to be
consistent with other methods, as
proposed. The erroneous proposed
paragraph (a) of section 13.0 is replaced,
as proposed, with ‘‘Calibration
standards must meet the requirements
in section 10.2.1 or 10.2.2 as
applicable.’’
JJ. Method 320 of Appendix A of Part 63
In section 8.2.2.4, the denominator in
equation 2 is corrected from PSS to PS,
as proposed. In section 9.2.3, the word
‘‘where’’ in the statement, ‘‘Calculate
the dilution ratio using the tracer gas as
follows: where:’’ is deleted, as proposed.
Also in section 9.2.3, the inadvertently
superscripted ‘‘dir’’ on the definition of
spike is subscripted, as proposed.
KK. Method 323 of Appendix A of Part
63
In Method 323, section 12.9, the
denominator in equation 323–8 is
corrected, as proposed.
LL. Method 325A of Appendix A of Part
63
In Method 325A, section 8.2.1.3 is
revised, as proposed, to clarify that only
one extra sampling site is required near
known sources of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) when the source is
located both within 50 meters of the
boundary and between two monitors.
Based on a public comment we received
on the proposed regulatory text,
wording changes have been made to the
language in section 8.2.1.3. As
proposed, the label under Figure 8.1 is
corrected from ‘‘Refinery (20% angle)’’
to ‘‘Refinery (20° angle).’’ Section 8.2.3.2
is revised, as proposed, to include
facilities with a monitoring perimeter
length equal to 7,315 meters (24,000
feet). Section 8.2.3.3 is added, as
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
56718
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
proposed, to provide clarification and
an equivalent procedure in Option 2
(linear distance between sites) for site
locations that parallel section 8.2.2.2.4
in Option 1 (radial distance between
sites). In response to comments, section
8.4.3 is added to address worker safety
during extenuating circumstances.
MM. Method 325B of Appendix A of
Part 63
In Method 325B, section 9.3.2 is
revised, as proposed, to correct an error
in the number of field blank samples
required for a sampling period and to
provide consistency with the sample
analysis required in Method 325B. In
sections 9.13 and 11.3.2.5, the erroneous
reference to section 10.6.3 is corrected
to 10.0, as proposed. Also in section
11.3.2.5, the erroneous reference to
section 10.9.5 is corrected to 9.13, as
proposed. Section 12.2.2 is revised, as
proposed, to correct the calculation of
target compound concentrations at
standard conditions, and the erroneous
reference to Ustd in the note in section
12.2.2 is revised to UNTP. Sections 12.2.3
and 12.2.4 are deleted, as proposed,
because the equations for target
concentrations are incorrect. Table 17–
1 is revised, as proposed, to add
inadvertently omitted QC criteria from
section 9.3.3.
IV. Public Comments on the Proposed
Rule
Eighty-three (83) comment letters
were received from the public; 23 of the
comment letters were relevant, and the
other 60 comment letters were
considered as beyond the scope of the
proposed rule. The public comments
and the agency’s responses are
summarized in the Response to
Comments document located in the
docket for this rule. See the ADDRESSES
section of this preamble.
A summary of the relevant portions of
significant comments that we received
on the proposal and agency responses
are presented below.
Comment: Three commenters
provided comments on our proposed
revisions to the General Provisions
(Subpart A) of Part 63. One commenter
stated that the proposed revisions
impose new requirements on CMS
performance evaluations and QA testing
for types of monitors not previously
subject to such requirements. Another
commenter remarked that the proposed
revisions to various requirements in Part
63 revisions were vague. Yet another
commenter remarked that the proposed
revisions to § 63.8(e)(5) would shorten
the CMS performance evaluation
reporting period for CMS associated
with performance tests.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
Response: We disagree with the
comment that the proposed changes to
§ 63.8(e)(5)(i) would impose new
requirements given that at proposal, the
agency had explained that they were
intended to clarify and codify data
elements and reporting requirements
that are already routinely requested by
the Administrator’s delegated
authorities. With regard to § 63.8(e)(5),
in a change from proposal, we have
retained the existing requirement that
allows for the simultaneous submission
of the report of a CMS performance
evaluation with results of performance
testing required under 40 CFR 63.7. We
also edited the final rule language for 40
CFR 63.7(g)(2)(v) to improve clarity and
to eliminate confusion.
Comment: Fifteen commenters
provided comments arguing against the
proposal to tighten the filter
temperature tolerance in 40 CFR
60.46(b)(2)(i); 60.50Da(b)(1)(ii)(A);
60.45c(a)(5); 60.58a(b)(3); 60.293(f);
60.296(d)(2); 63.1385(a)(5); and sections
2.0, 6.1.1.2, 6.1.1.6, 6.1.1.7 and 8.5 of
Method 5, Appendix A–3 of Part 60.
They cited issues that included: weather
(e.g., ambient temperature fluctuations
and windy conditions); costs; lack of
justification and data for the revision;
inconsistent language (e.g., the use of
‘‘shall’’ vs. ‘‘may’’ and proposed
revisions to temperature tolerance in
Methods 5, 5B, and 5I but not in
Methods 5D, 5E, and 5F); and safety
risks. Nine commenters remarked that
ambient conditions (cold climates, wind
gusts, etc.) can cause temperature
fluctuations that are difficult to manage.
More specifically, one commenter stated
that the reduced allowable temperature
range would be problematic during
testing in cold, windy ambient
conditions that are persistent in the
winter months in northern climates
because the time required for
temperature recovery after a component
change in these conditions could add
hours and possibly days to testing
programs. One commenter remarked
that the proposed ±5 °C is unattainable
for sources in cold or windy climates.
Eight commenters stated that
alteration or replacement of equipment
components would likely be necessary
to achieve the proposed temperature
tolerances resulting in additional costs.
One commenter noted potential
equipment improvements, such as
increased probe sheath tubing diameter
to make room for added insulation
around every probe heater; re-design of
filter heating ovens; improved sealing
and insulation of the openings at the
inlet and outlet of filter heating ovens;
and/or for sources with high stack
temperatures, more frequent use of air-
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
cooled or water-cooled probes. One
commenter remarked that this revision
would force cold weather stack testers
to replace or retrofit equipment with
higher power heating devices and
possibly more refined control devices
which would be costly. One commenter
remarked that this revision will most
likely require air sampling equipment
suppliers to redesign sample probes by
either increasing sheath diameter,
altering the placement or increasing the
number of thermocouples used to
control the probe heating system, and/
or increasing the insulation around the
sample liner. The commenter added that
an increase in the diameter of the probe
sheath would have a cascading effect
either requiring test companies to
purchase new sample hot boxes or
retrofit existing sample hot boxes to
accommodate the increased probe
sheath diameter.
Seven commenters stated that neither
information nor data was provided to
support, justify, or quantify the claimed
increased precision of filterable PM
measurements, and a few of these
commenters noted that the Electric
Power Research Institute (EPRI) paper
that the EPA used as the basis for
tightening the filter temperature
tolerance was from a comparison of
results measured at four coal-fired
power plants.
One commenter requested that the
statement in § 60.50Da(b)(1)(ii)(A), ‘‘The
probe and filter holder heating system
in the sampling train may be set to
provide an average gas temperature of
no greater than 160 ±5 °C (320 ±9 °F),’’
be changed to, ‘‘The probe and filter
holder heating system in the sampling
train shall be set to provide an average
gas temperature of 160 ±5 °C (320
±9 °F),’’ because they believe that this
was the agency’s intent. Similarly,
another commenter requested that the
statement in § 60.296(d)(2), ‘‘The probe
and filter holder heating system may be
set to provide a gas temperature no
greater than 177 ±5 °C (320 ±9 °F),’’ be
changed to, ‘‘The probe and filter holder
heating system shall be set to provide an
average gas temperature 160 ±5 °C (320
±9 °F),’’ because they believe that this
was the agency’s intent. One commenter
also recommended changing the
sentence in Method 5B to, ‘‘The
collected sample is then heated in an
oven at 160 °C (320 °F) for 6 hours . . .
,’’ to, ‘‘The collected sample is then
heated in an oven at 160 ±5 °C (320
±9 °F) for 6 hours . . .,’’ to be internally
consistent.
Three commenters noted that if the
temperature tolerances are changed in
Method 5, methods that reference
Method 5 (namely Method 5D, section
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
2.1; Method 5E, section 2.0; and Method
5F, section 2.0) would also need to be
revised.
Three commenters remarked that
tightening the filter temperature
tolerance conflicts with the assertion
that the proposed rule will improve the
quality of data but will not impose new
substantive requirements. Two of the
three commenters further remarked that
the proposed rule does not meet the
requirements of Executive Order 13771
nor the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
Three commenters acknowledged that
an improvement in measurement
precision could benefit the data quality
in limited situations, such as the
Mercury and Air Toxics Standards
(MATS).
Four commenters remarked that if the
proposed revisions to the temperature
tolerances lead to a measurable change
in reported PM emissions, sources that
were previously in compliance with
their emission standards may become
non-compliant; one commenter added
that the opposite situation may occur.
One commenter stated that the proposed
revision may have the unintended
consequence of redefining the filterable
PM being measured leading to either
higher or lower PM measurements as
compared to sampling runs conducted
with wider tolerances.
Two commenters mentioned that this
revision could result in a potential
safety risk. One of the commenters
remarked that the added weight and
handling difficulties associated with airor water-cooled probes (if necessary to
control the probe temperature) can
increase safety risks to testing
personnel, and the other commenter
remarked that the proposed
requirements may require the use of
encapsulated probes which are heavy
and cumbersome resulting in hazards.
Response: In response to these
comments and in a change from
proposal, we are deferring finalizing
proposed revisions of the temperature
tolerances of probe and filter holder
heating systems as part of this
rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we
received on the proposed rule and may
propose either revisions or similar
requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive Orders can be
found at https://www2.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was, therefore, not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This action is considered an
Executive Order 13771 deregulatory
action. This final rule provides
meaningful burden reduction by
allowing regulated facilities the
flexibility to use newly-approved
alternative procedures for compliance
demonstration purposes, which may
result in lower labor costs for some
facilities (e.g., allowing digital
photography in lieu of manual
documentation in EPA Method 22);
lower compliance testing costs (e.g.,
additional sample storage container
options now allowed by Method 26);
reducing the likelihood of re-testing
(e.g., revised QA requirements in
Method 308); and expediting data
processing (e.g., simplified calculations
in Method 325B).
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
PRA. The revisions do not substantively
revise the existing information
collection requirements but simply
corrects, updates, and clarifies
performance testing and continuous
monitoring requirements.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. In making this
determination, the impact of concern is
any significant adverse economic
impact on small entities. An agency may
certify that a rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities if
the rule relieves regulatory burden, has
no net burden or otherwise has a
positive economic effect on the small
entities subject to the rule. This action
will not impose emission measurement
requirements beyond those specified in
the current regulations, nor does it
change any emission standard. We have,
therefore, concluded that this action
will have no net regulatory burden for
all directly regulated small entities.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56719
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain any
unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. The action imposes no
enforceable duty on any state, local or
tribal governments or the private sector.
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175. This action simply
corrects and updates existing testing
regulations. Thus, Executive Order
13175 does not apply to this action.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern
environmental health or safety risks that
the EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive Order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not concern an
environmental health risk or safety risk.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
J. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA) and 1 CFR
part 51
This action involves technical
standards. The EPA used ASTM D6216–
12 for continuous opacity monitors in
Performance Specification 1. The ASTM
D6216–12 standard covers the
procedure for certifying continuous
opacity monitors and includes design
and performance specifications, test
procedures, and QA requirements to
ensure that continuous opacity monitors
meet minimum design and calibration
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
requirements necessary, in part, for
accurate opacity monitoring
measurements in regulatory
environmental opacity monitoring
applications subject to 10 percent or
higher opacity standards.
The ASTM D6216–12 standard was
developed and adopted by the American
Society for Testing and Materials
(ASTM). The standard may be obtained
from https://www.astm.org or from the
ASTM at 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O.
Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA
19428–2959.
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action is
not subject to Executive Order 12898 (59
FR 7629, February 16, 1994) because it
does not establish an environmental
health or safety standard. This action is
a technical correction to previously
promulgated regulatory actions and
does not have an impact on human
health or the environment.
L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and
the EPA will submit a rule report to
*
*
*
*
*
Method 204—Criteria for and Verification of
a Permanent or Temporary Total Enclosure
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
40 CFR Part 60
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Performance specifications,
Test methods and procedures.
40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Performance specifications,
Test methods and procedures.
Dated: November 5, 2018.
Andrew R. Wheeler,
Acting Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Environmental Protection
Agency amends title 40, chapter I of the
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
be made available for inspection at the test
site.
*
20:18 Nov 13, 2018
*
*
*
*
Jkt 247001
4. In § 60.17, revise paragraph (h)(177)
to read as follows:
Incorporations by reference.
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(177) ASTM D6216–12, Standard
Practice for Opacity Monitor
Manufacturers to Certify Conformance
with Design and Performance
Specifications, approved October 1,
2012; IBR approved for appendix B to
part 60.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The revisions read as follows:
Appendix M to Part 51—Recommended
Test Methods for State Implementation
Plans
*
*
*
*
Method 201A—Determination of PM10 and
PM2.5 Emissions From Stationary Sources
(Constant Sampling Rate Procedure)
*
*
12.5
*
*
*
* * *
5. In Appendix A–1 to part 60, revise
‘‘(CO2)a’’ in section 12.1 in Method 2B
to read as follows:
■
*
■
*
2. Amend appendix M to part 51 as
follows:
■ a. Revise section 12.5, equation 24, in
Method 201A.
■ b. Revise the last sentence in section
8.2 in Method 204.
■ c. Revise section 2.1.1 in Method 205.
■
Appendix A–1 to Part 60—Test
Methods 1 through 2F
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
§ 60.17
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 101; 42 U.S.C. 7401–
7671q.
*
3. The authority citation for part 60
continues to read as follows:
2.1.1 The gas dilution system shall be
recalibrated once per calendar year using
NIST-traceable flow standards with an
uncertainty ≤0.25 percent. You shall report
the results of the calibration by the person or
manufacturer who carried out the calibration
whenever the dilution system is used, listing
the date of the most recent calibration, the
due date for the next calibration, calibration
point, reference flow device (ID, S/N), and
acceptance criteria. Follow the
manufacturer’s instructions for the operation
and use of the gas dilution system. A copy
of the manufacturer’s instructions for the
operation of the instrument, as well as the
most recent calibration documentation, shall
VerDate Sep<11>2014
1. The authority citation for part 51
continues to read as follows:
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Performance
specifications, Test methods and
procedures.
*
PART 51—REQUIREMENTS FOR
PREPARATION, ADOPTION, AND
SUBMITTAL OF IMPLEMENTATION
PLANS
■
40 CFR Part 51
■
Method 205—Verification of Gas Dilution
Systems for Field Instrument Calibrations
*
List of Subjects
PART 60—STANDARDS OF
PERFORMANCE FOR NEW
STATIONARY SOURCES
8.2 * * *
The NEAR must be ≤0.05.
*
each house of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
*
*
*
*
Method 2B—Determination of Exhaust Gas
Volume Flow Rate From Gasoline Vapor
Incinerators
*
*
*
*
*
12.1 * * *
(CO2)a = Ambient carbon dioxide
concentration, ppm (if not measured during
the test period, may be assumed to equal the
global monthly mean CO2 concentration
posted at https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/
ccgg/trends/global.html#global_data).
*
*
*
*
*
6. In appendix A–3 to part 60:
■ a. Revise sections 6.1.1.9 and 11.2.1 in
Method 5.
■ b. Revise section 11.0 in Method 5B.
■ c. Add section 17.0 in Method 5B.
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
ER14NO18.059
56720
56721
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Appendix A–3 to Part 60—Test
Methods 4 through 5I
*
*
*
*
*
Method 5—Determination of Particulate
Matter Emissions From Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
6.1.1.9 Metering System. Vacuum gauge,
leak-free pump, calibrated temperature
sensors, dry gas meter (DGM) capable of
measuring volume to within 2 percent, and
related equipment, as shown in Figure 5–1.
Other metering systems capable of
maintaining sampling rates within 10 percent
of isokinetic and of determining sample
volumes to within 2 percent may be used,
subject to the approval of the Administrator.
When the metering system is used in
conjunction with a pitot tube, the system
shall allow periodic checks of isokinetic
rates. The average DGM temperature for use
in the calculations of section 12.0 may be
obtained by averaging the two temperature
sensors located at the inlet and outlet of the
DGM as shown in Figure 5–3 or alternatively
from a single temperature sensor located at
the immediate outlet of the DGM or the
plenum of the DGM.
*
*
*
*
*
11.2.1 Container No. 1. Leave the
contents in the shipping container or transfer
the filter and any loose PM from the sample
container to a tared weighing container.
Desiccate for 24 hours in a desiccator
containing anhydrous calcium sulfate. Weigh
to a constant weight, and report the results
to the nearest 0.1 mg. For the purposes of this
section, the term ‘‘constant weight’’ means a
difference of no more than 0.5 mg or 1
percent of total weight less tare weight,
whichever is greater, between two
consecutive weighings, with no less than 6
hours of desiccation time between weighings.
Alternatively, the sample may be oven dried
at 104 °C (220 °F) for 2 to 3 hours, cooled in
the desiccator, and weighed to a constant
weight, unless otherwise specified by the
Administrator. The sample may be oven
dried at 104 °C (220 °F) for 2 to 3 hours. Once
the sample has cooled, weigh the sample,
and use this weight as a final weight.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 5B-Determination of Nonsulfuric
Acid Particulate Matter Emissions From
Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
11.0 Analytical Procedure
11.1 Record and report the data required
on a sheet such as the one shown in Figure
5B–1.
11.2 Handle each sample container as
follows:
11.2.1 Container No. 1. Leave the
contents in the shipping container or transfer
the filter and any loose PM from the sample
container to a tared non-reactive oven-proof
container. Oven dry the filter sample at a
temperature of 160 ±5 °C (320 ±9 °F) for 6
hours. Cool in a desiccator for 2 hours, and
weigh to constant weight. Report the results
to the nearest 0.1 mg. For the purposes of this
section, the term ‘‘constant weight’’ means a
difference of no more than 0.5 mg or 1
percent of total weight less tare weight,
whichever is greater, between two
consecutive weighings, with no less than 6
hours of desiccation time between weighings.
11.2.2 Container No. 2. Note the level of
liquid in the container, and confirm on the
analysis sheet whether leakage occurred
during transport. If a noticeable amount of
leakage has occurred, either void the sample
or use methods, subject to the approval of the
Administrator, to correct the final results.
Measure the liquid in this container either
volumetrically to ±1 ml or gravimetrically to
±0.5 g. Transfer the contents to a tared 250
ml beaker, and evaporate to dryness at
ambient temperature and pressure. Then
oven dry the probe sample at a temperature
of 160 ±5 °C (320 ±9 °F) for 6 hours. Cool in
a desiccator for 2 hours, and weigh to
constant weight. Report the results to the
nearest 0.1 mg.
11.2.3 Container No. 3. Weigh the spent
silica gel (or silica gel plus impinger) to the
nearest 0.5 g using a balance. This step may
be conducted in the field.
11.2.4 Acetone Blank Container. Measure
the acetone in this container either
volumetrically or gravimetrically. Transfer
the acetone to a tared 250 ml beaker, and
evaporate to dryness at ambient temperature
and pressure. Desiccate for 24 hours, and
weigh to a constant weight. Report the results
to the nearest 0.1 mg.
Note: The contents of Container No. 2 as
well as the acetone blank container may be
evaporated at temperatures higher than
ambient. If evaporation is done at an elevated
temperature, the temperature must be below
the boiling point of the solvent; also, to
prevent ‘‘bumping,’’ the evaporation process
must be closely supervised, and the contents
of the beaker must be swirled occasionally to
maintain an even temperature. Use extreme
care, as acetone is highly flammable and has
a low flash point.
*
*
*
*
*
17.0 Tables, Diagrams, Flowcharts, and
Validation Data
Weight of particulate collected, mg
Container number
Final weight
Tare weight
Weight gain
1.
2.
Total:
Less acetone blank
Weight of particulate matter
Volume of liquid water collected
Impinger volume,
Silica gel weight,
ml
g
Final
Initial
Liquid collected
Total volume collected
g*
ml
* Convert weight of water to volume by dividing total weight increase by density of water (1 g/ml).
Figure 5B–1. Analytical Data Sheet
*
*
*
*
*
7. In appendix A–4 to part 60:
■ a. Revise sections 10.1.2 and 11.3 in
Method 7.
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
b. Redesignate sections 6.1.1.1
through 6.1.1.4 as sections 6.1.1.2
through 6.1.1.5 in Method 8.
■ c. Add a new section 6.1.1.1 in
Method 8.
■ d. Revise Figure 8–1 in Method 8.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
Appendix A–4 to Part 60—Test
Methods 6 Through 10B
*
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
*
*
14NOR1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Method 7—Determination of Nitrogen Oxide
Emissions From Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
10.1.2 Determination of
Spectrophotometer Calibration Factor Kc.
Add 0 ml, 2.0 ml, 4.0 ml, 6.0 ml, and 8.0 ml
of the KNO3 working standard solution (1 ml
= 100 mg NO2) to a series of five 50-ml
volumetric flasks. To each flask, add 25 ml
of absorbing solution and 10 ml water. Add
1 N NaOH to each flask until the pH is
between 9 and 12 (about 25 to 35 drops).
Dilute to the mark with water. Mix
thoroughly, and pipette a 25-ml aliquot of
each solution into a separate porcelain
evaporating dish. Beginning with the
evaporation step, follow the analysis
procedure of section 11.2 until the solution
has been transferred to the 100-ml volumetric
flask and diluted to the mark. Measure the
absorbance of each solution at the optimum
wavelength as determined in section 10.1.1.
This calibration procedure must be repeated
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
on each day that samples are analyzed.
Calculate the spectrophotometer calibration
factor as shown in section 12.2.
*
*
*
*
*
11.3 Sample Analysis. Mix the contents
of the flask thoroughly, and measure the
absorbance at the optimum wavelength used
for the standards (section 10.1.1), using the
blank solution as a zero reference. Dilute the
sample and the blank with equal volumes of
water if the absorbance exceeds A4, the
absorbance of the 400-mg NO2 standard (see
section 10.1.3).
*
*
*
*
*
Method 8—Determination of Sulfuric Acid
and Sulfur Dioxide Emissions From
Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
6.1.1.1 Probe Nozzle. Borosilicate or
quartz glass with a sharp, tapered leading
edge and coupled to the probe liner using a
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or glass-lined
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
union (e.g., fused silica, Slico, or equivalent).
When the stack temperature exceeds 210 °C
(410 °F), a leak-free ground glass fitting or
other leak free, non-contaminating fitting
must be used to couple the nozzle to the
probe liner. It is also acceptable to use a onepiece glass nozzle/liner assembly. The angle
of the taper shall be ≤30°, and the taper shall
be on the outside to preserve a constant
internal diameter. The probe nozzle shall be
of the button-hook or elbow design, unless
otherwise specified by the Administrator.
Other materials of construction may be used,
subject to the approval of the Administrator.
A range of nozzle sizes suitable for isokinetic
sampling should be available. Typical nozzle
sizes range from 0.32 to 1.27 cm (1⁄8 to 1⁄2 in)
inside diameter (ID) in increments of 0.16 cm
(1⁄16 in). Larger nozzles sizes are also
available if higher volume sampling trains
are used.
*
*
*
*
*
17.0 * * *
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
ER14NO18.060
56722
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
Appendix A–6 to Part 60—[Amended]
8. In Appendix A–6 to part 60,
redesignate paragraph (c) as paragraph
(b) in section 13.1 in Method 18.
■ 9. In appendix A–7 to part 60:
■ a. Revise sections 11.2.1 and 11.2.2 in
Method 22.
■ b. Add section 11.2.3 in Method 22.
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
Appendix A–7 to Part 60—Test
Methods 19 Through 25E
*
*
*
*
*
Method 22—Visual Determination of
Fugitive Emissions From Material Sources
and Smoke Emissions From Flares
*
*
*
*
*
11.2.1 Outdoor Location. Record the
following information on the field data sheet
(Figure 22–1): Company name, industry,
process unit, observer’s name, observer’s
affiliation, and date. Record also the
estimated wind speed, wind direction, and
sky condition. Sketch the process unit being
observed, and note the observer location
relative to the source and the sun. Indicate
the potential and actual emission points on
the sketch. Alternatively, digital photography
as described in section 11.2.3 may be used
for a subset of the recordkeeping
requirements of this section.
11.2.2 Indoor Location. Record the
following information on the field data sheet
(Figure 22–2): Company name, industry,
process unit, observer’s name, observer’s
affiliation, and date. Record as appropriate
the type, location, and intensity of lighting
on the data sheet. Sketch the process unit
*
*
*
*
*
11. In appendix B to part 60:
a. Add the following entries to the list
of Performance Specifications in
numeric order:
■ i. Performance Specification 12B—
Specifications and Test Procedures for
Monitoring Total Vapor Phase Mercury
Emissions From Stationary Sources
Using A Sorbent Trap Monitoring
System
■ ii. Performance Specification 17
[Reserved]
■ iii. Performance Specification 18—
Performance Specifications and Test
Procedures for Gaseous Hydrogen
Chloride (HCl) Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems at Stationary
Sources
■ iv. PS–18—Appendix A Standard
Addition Procedures
■ b. In Performance Specification 1,
remove ‘‘D 6216–98’’ wherever it
appears and add in its place ‘‘D6216–
■
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
being observed, and note the observer
location relative to the source. Indicate the
potential and actual fugitive emission points
on the sketch. Alternatively, digital
photography as described in section 11.2.3
may be used for a subset of the recordkeeping
requirements of this section.
11.2.3 Digital Photographic Records.
Digital photographs, annotated or unaltered,
may be used to record and report sky
conditions, observer’s location relative to the
source, observer’s location relative to the sun,
process unit being observed, potential
emission points and actual emission points
for the requirements in sections 11.2.1 and
11.2.2. The image must have the proper
lighting, field of view and depth of field to
properly distinguish the sky condition (if
applicable), process unit, potential emission
point and actual emission point. At least one
digital photograph must be from the point of
the view of the observer. The photograph(s)
representing the environmental conditions
including the sky conditions and the position
of the sun relative to the observer and the
emission point must be taken within a
reasonable time of the observation (i.e., 15
minutes). When observations are taken from
exactly the same observation point on a
routine basis (i.e., daily) and as long as there
are no modifications to the units depicted,
only a single photograph each is necessary to
document the observer’s location relative to
the emissions source, the process unit being
observed, and the location of potential and
actual emission points. Any photographs
altered or annotated must be retained in an
unaltered format for recordkeeping purposes.
■
*
*
*
*
*
10. In appendix A–8 to part 60:
a. Revise section 6.2.2 in Method 26.
b. Revise section 6.2.1 in Method 26A.
c. Add section 6.2.4 in Method 26A.
Test Method 28WHH for Measurement of
Particulate Emissions and Heating Efficiency
of Wood-Fired Hydronic Heating Appliances
12’’, and revise section 2.1, the
introductory text of section 13.0,
sections 13.1 and 13.2, and paragraph 8.
of section 16.0.
■ c. In Performance Specification 2,
revise section 13.2.
■ d. In Performance Specification 3,
revise sections 12.0 and 13.2.
■ e. In Performance Specification 11,
revise section 13.1.
■ f. In Performance Specification 15,
add reserved section 13.0.
■ g. In Performance Specification 18,
revise section 11.8.7 and table 1 in
section 17.0, and add reserved section
12.0 to PS–18.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
Performance Specification 1—Specifications
and Test Procedures for Continuous Opacity
Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources
■
■
■
■
Appendix B to Part 60—Performance
Specifications
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00025
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
d. Revise equation 8 in section 13.5.1
in Test Method 28WHH.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
Appendix A–8 to Part 60—Test
Methods 26 Through 30B
*
*
*
*
*
Method 26—Determination of Hydrogen
Halide and Halogen Emissions From
Stationary Sources Non-Isokinetic Method
*
*
*
*
*
6.2.2 Storage Containers. 100- or 250-ml,
high-density polyethylene or glass sample
storage containers with Teflon screw cap
liners to store impinger samples.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 26A—Determination of Hydrogen
Halide and Halogen Emissions From
Stationary Sources Isokinetic Method
*
*
*
*
*
6.2.1 Probe-Liner and Probe-Nozzle
Brushes, Wash Bottles, Petri Dishes,
Graduated Cylinder and/or Balance, and
Rubber Policeman. Same as Method 5,
sections 6.2.1, 6.2.2, 6.2.4, 6.2.5, and 6.2.7.
*
*
*
*
*
6.2.4 Sample Storage Containers. Highdensity polyethylene or glass sample storage
containers with Teflon screw cap liners to
store impinger samples.
*
*
*
*
*
*
13.5.1
*
*
*
*
*
*
* * *
*
*
*
2.1 ASTM D6216–12 (incorporated by
reference, see § 60.17) is the reference for
design specifications, manufacturer’s
performance specifications, and test
procedures. The opacity monitor
manufacturer must periodically select and
test an opacity monitor, that is representative
of a group of monitors produced during a
specified period or lot, for conformance with
the design specifications in ASTM D6216–12.
The opacity monitor manufacturer must test
each opacity monitor for conformance with
the manufacturer’s performance
specifications in ASTM D6216–12. Note: If
the initial certification of the opacity monitor
occurred before November 14, 2018 using
D6216–98, D6216–03, or D6216–07, it is not
necessary to recertify using D6216–12.
*
*
*
*
*
13.0 What Specifications Does a COMS
Have to Meet for Certification?
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
ER14NO18.061
*
56723
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
13.1 Design Specifications. The opacity
monitoring equipment must comply with the
design specifications of ASTM D6216–12.
13.2 Manufacturer’s Performance
Specifications. The opacity monitor must
comply with the manufacturer’s performance
specifications of ASTM D6216–12.
*
*
*
*
*
16.0 * * *
8. ASTM D6216–12: Standard Practice for
Opacity Monitor Manufacturers to Certify
Conformance with Design and Performance
Specifications. ASTM. October 2012.
*
*
*
*
*
Performance Specification 2—Specifications
and Test Procedures for SO2 and NOX
Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in
Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
13.2 Relative Accuracy Performance
Specification.
RA criteria
(%)
Calculate . . .
If average emissions during the RATA are ≥50% of emission
standard.
If average emissions during the RATA are <50% of emission
standard.
For SO2 emission standards ≤130 but ≥86 ng/J (0.30 and
0.20 lb/million Btu).
For SO2 emission standards <86 ng/J (0.20 lb/million Btu) ....
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
13.2 CEMS Relative Accuracy
Performance Specification. The RA of the
CEMS must be no greater than 20.0 percent
of the mean value of the reference method
(RM) data when calculated using equation
3–1. The results are also acceptable if the
result of Equation 3–2 is less than or equal
to 1.0 percent O2 (or CO2).
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
≤20.0
Use Eq. 2–6, emission standard in the denominator .............
≤10.0
Use Eq. 2–6, emission standard in the denominator .............
≤15.0
Use Eq. 2–6, emission standard in the denominator .............
≤20.0
Performance Specification 3—Specifications
and Test Procedures for O2 and CO2
Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in
Stationary Sources
*
*
*
Use Eq. 2–6, with RM in the denominator .............................
Jkt 247001
*
*
*
*
Performance Specification 11—
Specifications and Test Procedures for
Particulate Matter Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
13.1 What is the 7-day drift check
performance specification? Your daily PM
CEMS internal drift checks must demonstrate
that the daily drift of your PM CEMS does
not deviate from the value of the reference
light, optical filter, Beta attenuation signal, or
other technology-suitable reference standard
by more than 2 percent of the response range.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
12.0 Calculations and Data Analysis
Calculate the RA using equations 3–1 and
3–2. Summarize the results on a data sheet
similar to that shown in Figure 2.2 of PS2.
Sfmt 4700
If your CEMS includes diluent and/or
auxiliary monitors (for temperature, pressure,
and/or moisture) that are employed as a
necessary part of this performance
specification, you must determine the
calibration drift separately for each ancillary
monitor in terms of its respective output (see
the appropriate performance specification for
the diluent CEMS specification). None of the
calibration drifts may exceed their individual
specification.
*
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
*
*
14NOR1
*
*
ER14NO18.073
A COMS must meet the following design,
manufacturer’s performance, and field audit
performance specifications:
Note: If the initial certification of the
opacity monitor occurred before November
14, 2018 using D6216–98, D6216–03, or
D6216–07, it is not necessary to recertify
using D6216–12.A. COMS must meet the
following design, manufacturer’s
performance, and field audit performance
specifications.
ER14NO18.062
56724
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Performance Specification 15—Performance
Specification for Extractive FTIR Continuous
Emissions Monitor Systems in Stationary
Sources
*
*
13.0
*
*
*
*
*
Method Performance [Reserved]
*
*
*
Performance Specification 18—Performance
Specifications and Test Procedures for
Gaseous Hydrogen Chloride (HCl)
Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems at
Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
11.8.7 The zero-level and mid-level CD
for each day must be less than 5.0 percent of
the span value as specified in section 13.2 of
this PS. You must meet this criterion for 7
consecutive operating days.
*
*
*
*
*
17.0 * * *
TABLE 1—INTERFERENCE TEST GAS
CONCENTRATIONS
Potential
interferent gas 1
Approximate concentration
(balance N2)
CO2 ...................
CO ....................
CH2O ................
CH4 ...................
NH3 ...................
15% ± 1% CO2.2
100 ± 20 ppm.
20 ± 5 ppm.
100 ± 20 ppm.
10 ± 5 ppm (extractive
CEMS only).
250 ± 50 ppm.
200 ± 20 ppm.
3% ± 1% O2.2
10% ± 1% H2O.2
Balance.2
NO ....................
SO2 ...................
O2 .....................
H2O ...................
N2 ......................
1 Any of these specific gases can be tested
at a lower level if the manufacturer has provided reliable means for limiting or scrubbing
that gas to a specified level in CEMS field installations.
2 Gases for short path IP cell interference
tests cannot be added above 100 percent
stack equivalent concentration. Add these
gases at the indicated percentages to make
up the remaining cell volume.
56725
*
*
*
*
*
PS–18 Appendix A Standard
Addition Procedures
*
*
*
*
*
12.0 [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
12. Revise sections 5.1.2(1) and (3) in
Procedure 1 of appendix F to part 60 to
read as follows:
■
Appendix F to Part 60—Quality
Assurance Procedures
Procedure 1—Quality Assurance
Requirements for Gas Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems Used For Compliance
Determination
*
*
*
*
*
5.1.2 * * *
(1) Challenge the CEMS (both pollutant
and diluent portions of the CEMS, if
applicable) with an audit gas of known
concentration at two points within the
following ranges:
Audit range
Audit point
Diluent monitors for—
Pollutant monitors
O2
CO2
1 .................................
2 .................................
20 to 30% of span value ..............................
50 to 60% of span value ..............................
Introduce each of the audit gases, three
times each for a total of six challenges.
Introduce the gases in such a manner that the
entire CEMS is challenged. Do not introduce
the same gas concentration twice in
succession.
Use of separate audit gas cylinder for audit
points 1 and 2. Do not dilute gas from audit
cylinder when challenging the CEMS.
The monitor should be challenged at each
audit point for a sufficient period of time to
assure adsorption-desorption of the CEMS
sample transport surfaces has stabilized.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Use Certified Reference Materials
(CRM’s) (See Citation 1) audit gases that have
been certified by comparison to National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Standard Reference Materials (SRM’s) or EPA
Protocol Gases following the most recent
edition of the EPA Traceability Protocol for
Assay and Certification of Gaseous
Calibration Standards (See Citation 2).
Procedures for preparation of CRM’s are
described in Citation 1. Procedures for
preparation of EPA Protocol Gases are
described in Citation 2. In the case that a
suitable audit gas level is not commercially
available, Method 205 (See Citation 3) may
be used to dilute CRM’s or EPA Protocol
Gases to the needed level. The difference
between the actual concentration of the audit
gas and the concentration indicated by the
monitor is used to assess the accuracy of the
CEMS.
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
5 to 8% by volume .......................................
10 to 14% by volume ...................................
4 to 6% by volume.
8 to 12% by volume.
14. In § 63.7, revise paragraphs (g)(2)
introductory text and (g)(2)(v) to read as
follows:
report, the following shall be included
in your report: Record of preparation of
standards, record of calibrations, raw
data sheets for field sampling, raw data
sheets for field and laboratory analyses,
chain-of-custody documentation, and
example calculations for reported
results.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 15. In § 63.8, revise paragraph (e)(5)(i)
to read as follows:
§ 63.7
§ 63.8
PART 63—NATIONAL EMISSION
STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR
POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE
CATEGORIES
13. The authority citation for part 63
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
■
Performance testing requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(2) Contents of a performance test,
CMS performance evaluation, or CMS
quality assurance test report (electronic
or paper submitted copy). Unless
otherwise specified in a relevant
standard, test method, CMS
performance specification, or quality
assurance requirement for a CMS, or as
otherwise approved by the
Administrator in writing, the report
shall include the elements identified in
paragraphs (g)(2)(i) through (vi) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) Where a test method, CEMS,
PEMS, or COMS performance
specification, or on-going quality
assurance requirement for a CEMS,
PEMS, or COMS requires you record or
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Monitoring requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(5) * * * (i) The owner or operator
shall furnish the Administrator a copy
of a written report of the results of the
performance evaluation containing the
information specified in § 63.7(g)(2)(i)
through (vi) simultaneously with the
results of the performance test required
under § 63.7 or within 60 days of
completion of the performance
evaluation, unless otherwise specified
in a relevant standard.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 16. Revise Table 6 to Subpart DDDDD
of part 63 to read as follows:
Table 6 to Subpart DDDDD of Part 63—
Fuel Analysis Requirements
As stated in § 63.7521, you must
comply with the following requirements
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
56726
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
for fuel analysis testing for existing, new
or reconstructed affected sources.
However, equivalent methods (as
defined in § 63.7575) may be used in
lieu of the prescribed methods at the
discretion of the source owner or
operator:
To conduct a fuel analysis for the
following pollutant . . .
You must . . .
Using . . .
1. Mercury .......................................
a. Collect fuel samples ..................
Procedure in § 63.7521(c) or ASTM D5192a, or ASTM D7430a, or
ASTM D6883a, or ASTM D2234/D2234Ma (for coal) or EPA 1631
or EPA 1631E or ASTM D6323a (for solid), or EPA 821–R–01–013
(for liquid or solid), or ASTM D4177a (for liquid), or ASTM D4057a
(for liquid), or equivalent.
Procedure in § 63.7521(d) or equivalent.
EPA SW–846–3050Ba (for solid samples), ASTM D2013/D2013Ma
(for coal), ASTM D5198a (for biomass), or EPA 3050a (for solid
fuel), or EPA 821–R–01–013a (for liquid or solid), or equivalent.
ASTM D5865a (for coal) or ASTM E711a (for biomass), or ASTM
D5864a for liquids and other solids, or ASTM D240a or equivalent.
ASTM D3173a, ASTM E871a, or ASTM D5864a, or ASTM D240a, or
ASTM D95a (for liquid fuels), or ASTM D4006a (for liquid fuels), or
equivalent.
ASTM D6722a (for coal), EPA SW–846–7471Ba or EPA 1631 or EPA
1631Ea (for solid samples), or EPA SW–846–7470Aa or EPA SW–
846–7471Ba (for liquid samples), or EPA 821–R–01–013a (for liquid or solid), or equivalent.
For fuel mixtures use Equation 8 in § 63.7530.
b. Composite fuel samples ............
c. Prepare composited fuel samples.
d. Determine heat content of the
fuel type.
e. Determine moisture content of
the fuel type.
f. Measure mercury concentration
in fuel sample.
2. HCl ..............................................
g. Convert concentration into units
of pounds of mercury per
MMBtu of heat content.
a. Collect fuel samples ..................
b. Composite fuel samples ............
c. Prepare composited fuel samples.
d. Determine heat content of the
fuel type.
e. Determine moisture content of
the fuel type.
f. Measure chlorine concentration
in fuel sample.
g.
3. Mercury Fuel Specification for
other gas 1 fuels.
4. TSM .............................................
Convert concentrations into
units of pounds of HCl per
MMBtu of heat content.
a. Measure mercury concentration
in the fuel sample and convert
to units of micrograms per cubic
meter, or.
b. Measure mercury concentration
in the exhaust gas when firing
only the other gas 1 fuel is fired
in the boiler or process heater.
a. Collect fuel samples ..................
b. Composite fuel samples ............
c. Prepare composited fuel samples.
d. Determine heat content of the
fuel type.
e. Determine moisture content of
the fuel type.
f. Measure TSM concentration in
fuel sample.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Procedure in § 63.7521(c) or ASTM D5192a, or ASTM D7430a, or
ASTM D6883a, or ASTM D2234/D2234Ma (for coal) or ASTM
D6323a (for coal or biomass), ASTM D4177a (for liquid fuels) or
ASTM D4057a (for liquid fuels), or equivalent.
Procedure in § 63.7521(d) or equivalent.
EPA SW–846–3050Ba (for solid samples), ASTM D2013/D2013Ma
(for coal), or ASTM D5198a (for biomass), or EPA 3050a or equivalent.
ASTM D5865a (for coal) or ASTM E711a (for biomass), ASTM
D5864a, ASTM D240a or equivalent.
ASTM D3173a or ASTM E871a, or D5864a, or ASTM D240a, or
ASTM D95a (for liquid fuels), or ASTM D4006a (for liquid fuels), or
equivalent.
EPA SW–846–9250a, ASTM D6721a, ASTM D4208a (for coal), or
EPA SW–846–5050a or ASTM E776a (for solid fuel), or EPA SW–
846–9056a or SW–846–9076a (for solids or liquids) or equivalent.
For fuel mixtures use Equation 7 in § 63.7530 and convert from chlorine to HCl by multiplying by 1.028.
Method 30B (M30B) at 40 CFR part 60, appendix A–8 of this chapter
or ASTM D5954a, ASTM D6350a, ISO 6978–1:2003(E)a, or ISO
6978–2:2003(E)a, or EPA–1631a or equivalent.
Method 29, 30A, or 30B (M29, M30A, or M30B) at 40 CFR part 60,
appendix A–8 of this chapter or Method 101A or Method 102 at 40
CFR part 61, appendix B of this chapter, or ASTM Method D6784a
or equivalent.
Procedure in § 63.7521(c) or ASTM D5192a, or ASTM D7430a, or
ASTM D6883a, or ASTM D2234/D2234Ma (for coal) or ASTM
D6323a (for coal or biomass), or ASTM D4177a, (for liquid fuels),
or ASTM D4057a (for liquid fuels), or equivalent.
Procedure in § 63.7521(d) or equivalent.
EPA SW–846–3050Ba (for solid samples), ASTM D2013/D2013Ma
(for coal), ASTM D5198a or TAPPI T266a (for biomass), or EPA
3050a or equivalent.
ASTM D5865a (for coal) or ASTM E711a (for biomass), or ASTM
D5864a for liquids and other solids, or ASTM D240a or equivalent.
ASTM D3173a or ASTM E871a, or D5864a, or ASTM D240a, or
ASTM D95a (for liquid fuels), or ASTM D4006a (for liquid fuels), or
ASTM D4177a (for liquid fuels) or ASTM D4057a (for liquid fuels),
or equivalent.
ASTM D3683a, or ASTM D4606a, or ASTM D6357a or EPA 200.8a or
EPA SW–846–6020a, or EPA SW–846–6020Aa, or EPA SW–846–
6010Ca, EPA 7060a or EPA 7060Aa (for arsenic only), or EPA
SW–846–7740a (for selenium only).
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
To conduct a fuel analysis for the
following pollutant . . .
a Incorporated
*
*
*
You must . . .
Using . . .
g.
For fuel mixtures use Equation 9 in § 63.7530.
Convert concentrations into
units of pounds of TSM per
MMBtu of heat content.
by reference, see § 63.14.
*
*
17. Revise Table 5 to Subpart UUUUU
of part 63 to read as follows:
■
Table 5 to Subpart UUUUU of Part 63—
Performance Testing Requirements
for performance testing for existing, new
or reconstructed affected sources: 1
As stated in § 63.10007, you must
comply with the following requirements
You must perform the following activities,
as applicable to your input- or outputbased emission limit . . .
To conduct a performance test
for the following pollutant . . .
Using . . .
1. Filterable Particulate matter
(PM).
Emissions Testing ...
a. Select sampling ports location and the
number of traverse points.
b. Determine velocity and volumetric flowrate of the stack gas.
c. Determine oxygen and carbon dioxide
concentrations of the stack gas.
d. Measure the moisture content of the
stack gas.
e. Measure the filterable PM concentration
f. Convert emissions concentration to lb/
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions rates.
OR
PM CEMS ................
OR
a. Install, certify, operate, and maintain
the PM CEMS.
b. Install, certify, operate, and maintain
the diluent gas, flow rate, and/or moisture monitoring systems.
c. Convert hourly emissions concentrations to 30 boiler operating day rolling
average lb/MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions
rates.
2. Total or individual non-Hg
HAP metals.
Emissions Testing ...
a. Select sampling ports location and the
number of traverse points.
b. Determine velocity and volumetric flowrate of the stack gas.
c. Determine oxygen and carbon dioxide
concentrations of the stack gas.
d. Measure the moisture content of the
stack gas.
Using . . .2
Method 1 at appendix A–1 to part 60 of
this chapter.
Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G or 2H at appendix A–1 or A–2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
Method 3A or 3B at appendix A–2 to part
60 of this chapter, or ANSI/ASME PTC
19.10–1981.3
Method 4 at appendix A–3 to part 60 of
this chapter.
Methods 5 and 5I at appendix A–3 to part
60 of this chapter.
For positive pressure fabric filters, Method
5D at appendix A–3 to part 60 of this
chapter for filterable PM emissions.
Note that the Method 5 or 5I front half
temperature shall be 160° ±14 °C (320°
±25 °F).
Method 19 F-factor methodology at appendix A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, or
calculate using mass emissions rate
and
gross
output
data
(see
§ 63.10007(e)).
Performance Specification 11 at appendix
B to part 60 of this chapter and Procedure 2 at appendix F to part 60 of this
chapter.
Part 75 of this chapter and § 63.10010(a),
(b), (c), and (d).
Method 19 F-factor methodology at appendix A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, or
calculate using mass emissions rate
and
gross
output
data
(see
§ 63.10007(e)).
Method 1 at appendix A–1 to part 60 of
this chapter.
Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G or 2H at appendix A–1 or A–2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
Method 3A or 3B at appendix A–2 to part
60 of this chapter, or ANSI/ASME PTC
19.10–1981.3
Method 4 at appendix A–3 to part 60 of
this chapter.
1 Regarding emissions data collected during
periods of startup or shutdown, see §§ 63.10020(b)
and (c) and 63.10021(h).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
56727
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
56728
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
To conduct a performance test
for the following pollutant . . .
You must perform the following activities,
as applicable to your input- or outputbased emission limit . . .
Using . . .
e. Measure the HAP metals emissions
concentrations and determine each individual HAP metals emissions concentration, as well as the total filterable
HAP metals emissions concentration
and total HAP metals emissions concentration.
f. Convert emissions concentrations (individual HAP metals, total filterable HAP
metals, and total HAP metals) to lb/
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions rates.
3. Hydrogen chloride (HCl) and
hydrogen fluoride (HF).
Emissions Testing ...
a. Select sampling ports location and the
number of traverse points.
b. Determine velocity and volumetric flowrate of the stack gas.
c. Determine oxygen and carbon dioxide
concentrations of the stack gas.
d. Measure the moisture content of the
stack gas.
e. Measure the HCl and HF emissions
concentrations.
3.e.1(D) The %R value for each
compound must be reported in the test
report and all field measurements
corrected with the calculated %R value
Using . . .2
Method 29 at appendix A–8 to part 60 of
this chapter. For liquid oil-fired units, Hg
is included in HAP metals and you may
use Method 29, Method 30B at appendix A–8 to part 60 of this chapter; for
Method 29, you must report the front
half and back half results separately.
When using Method 29, report metals
matrix spike and recovery levels.
Method 19 F-factor methodology at appendix A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, or
calculate using mass emissions rate
and
gross
output
data
(see
§ 63.10007(e)).
Method 1 at appendix A–1 to part 60 of
this chapter.
Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G or 2H at appendix A–1 or A–2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
Method 3A or 3B at appendix A–2 to part
60 of this chapter, or ANSI/ASME PTC
19.10–1981.3
Method 4 at appendix A–3 to part 60 of
this chapter.
Method 26 or Method 26A at appendix A–
8 to part 60 of this chapter or Method
320 at appendix A to part 63 of this
chapter or ASTM D6348–03 3 with
(1) the following conditions when using
ASTM D6348–03:
(A) The test plan preparation and implementation in the Annexes to ASTM
D6348–03, Sections A1 through A8 are
mandatory;
(B) For ASTM D6348–03 Annex A5
(Analyte Spiking Technique), the percent (%) R must be determined for
each target analyte (see Equation
A5.5);
(C) For the ASTM D6348–03 test data to
be acceptable for a target analyte, %R
must be 70% ≥R ≤130%; and
for that compound using the following
equation:
and
To conduct a performance test
for the following pollutant . . .
(cont’d)
Using . . . (cont’d)
You must perform the following activities,
as applicable to your input- or outputbased emission limit . . . (cont’d)
Using . . .2 (cont’d)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
ER14NO18.072
(2) spiking levels nominally no greater
than two times the level corresponding
to the applicable emission limit.
Method 26A must be used if there are entrained water droplets in the exhaust
stream.
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
To conduct a performance test
for the following pollutant . . .
(cont’d)
You must perform the following activities,
as applicable to your input- or outputbased emission limit . . . (cont’d)
Using . . . (cont’d)
f. Convert emissions concentration to lb/
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions rates.
OR
HCl and/or HF
CEMS.
4. Mercury (Hg) .........................
OR
a. Install, certify, operate, and maintain
the HCl or HF CEMS.
b. Install, certify, operate, and maintain
the diluent gas, flow rate, and/or moisture monitoring systems.
c. Convert hourly emissions concentrations to 30 boiler operating day rolling
average lb/MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions
rates.
Emissions Testing ...
a. Select sampling ports location and the
number of traverse points.
b. Determine velocity and volumetric flowrate of the stack gas.
c. Determine oxygen and carbon dioxide
concentrations of the stack gas.
d. Measure the moisture content of the
stack gas.
e. Measure the Hg emission concentration
f. Convert emissions concentration to lb/
TBtu or lb/GWh emission rates.
OR
Hg CEMS ................
OR
Sorbent trap monitoring system.
OR
LEE testing ..............
OR
a. Install, certify, operate, and maintain
the CEMS.
b. Install, certify, operate, and maintain
the diluent gas, flow rate, and/or moisture monitoring systems.
c. Convert hourly emissions concentrations to 30 boiler operating day rolling
average lb/TBtu or lb/GWh emissions
rates.
OR
a. Install, certify, operate, and maintain
the sorbent trap monitoring system.
b. Install, operate, and maintain the diluent gas, flow rate, and/or moisture
monitoring systems.
c. Convert emissions concentrations to 30
boiler operating day rolling average lb/
TBtu or lb/GWh emissions rates.
OR
a. Select sampling ports location and the
number of traverse points.
b. Determine velocity and volumetric flowrate of the stack gas.
c. Determine oxygen and carbon dioxide
concentrations of the stack gas.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56729
Using . . .2 (cont’d)
Method 19 F-factor methodology at appendix A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, or
calculate using mass emissions rate
and
gross
output
data
(see
§ 63.10007(e)).
Appendix B of this subpart.
Part 75 of this chapter and § 63.10010(a),
(b), (c), and (d).
Method 19 F-factor methodology at appendix A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, or
calculate using mass emissions rate
and
gross
output
data
(see
§ 63.10007(e)).
Method 1 at appendix A–1 to part 60 of
this chapter or Method 30B at Appendix
A–8 for Method 30B point selection.
Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G or 2H at appendix A–1 or A–2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
Method 3A or 3B at appendix A–1 to part
60 of this chapter, or ANSI/ASME PTC
19.10–1981.3
Method 4 at appendix A–3 to part 60 of
this chapter.
Method 30B at appendix A–8 to part 60 of
this chapter, ASTM D6784,3 or Method
29 at appendix A–8 to part 60 of this
chapter; for Method 29, you must report
the front half and back half results separately.
Method 19 F-factor methodology at appendix A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, or
calculate using mass emissions rate
and
gross
output
data
(see
§ 63.10007(e)).
Sections 3.2.1 and 5.1 of appendix A of
this subpart.
Part 75 of this chapter and § 63.10010(a),
(b), (c), and (d).
Section 6 of appendix A to this subpart.
Sections 3.2.2 and 5.2 of appendix A to
this subpart.
Part 75 of this chapter and § 63.10010(a),
(b), (c), and (d).
Section 6 of appendix A to this subpart.
Single point located at the 10% centroidal
area of the duct at a port location per
Method 1 at appendix A–1 to part 60 of
this chapter or Method 30B at Appendix
A–8 for Method 30B point selection.
Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G, or 2H at appendix A–1 or A–2 to part 60 of this
chapter or flow monitoring system certified per appendix A of this subpart.
Method 3A or 3B at appendix A–1 to part
60 of this chapter, or ANSI/ASME PTC
19.10–1981,3 or diluent gas monitoring
systems certified according to part 75 of
this chapter.
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
To conduct a performance test
for the following pollutant . . .
(cont’d)
You must perform the following activities,
as applicable to your input- or outputbased emission limit . . . (cont’d)
Using . . . (cont’d)
d. Measure the moisture content of the
stack gas.
e. Measure the Hg emission concentration
f. Convert emissions concentrations from
the LEE test to lb/TBtu or lb/GWh emissions rates.
5. Sulfur dioxide (SO2) ..............
SO2 CEMS ..............
g. Convert average lb/TBtu or lb/GWh Hg
emission rate to lb/year, if you are attempting to meet the 29.0 lb/year
threshold.
a. Install, certify, operate, and maintain
the CEMS.
b. Install, operate, and maintain the diluent gas, flow rate, and/or moisture
monitoring systems.
c. Convert hourly emissions concentrations to 30 boiler operating day rolling
average lb/MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions
rates.
18. In appendix A to Part 63:
a. Revise section 12.4 in Method 303.
■ b. Revise section 2.0 in Method 308.
■ c. Remove and reserve section 7.2.2 in
Method 308.
■ d. Revise sections 7.2.3.3, 8.1.2, 9.1,
11.3.2, and 12.1 in Method 308.
■ e. Add sections 12.5 and 13.0 in
Method 308.
■ f. Revise sections 8.2.2.4 and 9.2.3 in
Method 320.
■ g. Revise section 12.9 in Method 323.
■
*
returned to the laboratory where the
methanol in the water fraction is separated
from other organic compounds with a gas
chromatograph (GC) and is then measured by
a flame ionization detector (FID). The
fraction adsorbed on silica gel is extracted
with deionized distilled water and is then
separated and measured by GC/FID.
■
■
*
*
*
*
Method 308—Procedure for Determination
of Methanol Emission From Stationary
Sources
*
*
*
*
*
2.0 Summary of Method
A gas sample is extracted from the
sampling point in the stack. The methanol is
collected in deionized distilled water and
adsorbed on silica gel. The sample is
2 See Tables 1 and 2 to this subpart for required
sample volumes and/or sampling run times.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
h. Revise section 8.2.1.3, Figure 8.1.
and section 8.2.3.2 in Method 325A.
■ i. Add sections 8.2.3.3 and 8.4.3 in
Method 325A.
■ j. Revise sections 9.3.2, 9.13, 11.3.2.5,
and 12.2.2 in Method 325B.
■ k. Remove sections 12.2.3 and 12.2.4
in Method 325B.
■ l. Revise table 17.1 in Method 325B.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
*
*
*
3 Incorporated
PO 00000
Frm 00032
*
*
Using . . .2 (cont’d)
Method 4 at appendix A–3 to part 60 of
this chapter, or moisture monitoring systems certified according to part 75 of
this chapter.
Method 30B at appendix A–8 to part 60 of
this chapter; perform a 30 operating day
test, with a maximum of 10 operating
days per run (i.e., per pair of sorbent
traps) or sorbent trap monitoring system
or Hg CEMS certified per appendix A of
this subpart.
Method 19 F-factor methodology at appendix A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, or
calculate using mass emissions rate
and
gross
output
data
(see
§ 63.10007(e)).
Potential maximum annual heat input in
TBtu or potential maximum electricity
generated in GWh.
Part 75 of this chapter and § 63.10010(a)
and (f).
Part 75 of this chapter and § 63.10010(a),
(b), (c), and (d).
Method 19 F-factor methodology at appendix A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, or
calculate using mass emissions rate
and
gross
output
data
(see
§ 63.10007(e)).
Appendix A to Part 63—Test Methods
*
*
*
Sfmt 4700
*
Method 303—Determination of Visible
Emissions From By-Product Coke Oven
Batteries
*
*
*
*
*
12.4 Average Duration of VE from
Charging Operations. Use Equation 303–3 to
calculate the daily 30-day rolling log average
of seconds of visible emissions from the
charging operation for each battery using
these current day’s observations and the 29
previous valid daily sets of observations.
7.2.2
*
*
[Reserved]
*
*
*
7.2.3.3 Methanol Standards for Adsorbent
Tube Samples. Prepare a series of methanol
standards by first pipetting 10 ml of the
methanol working standard into a 100-ml
volumetric flask and diluting the contents to
exactly 100 ml with deionized distilled
water. This standard will contain 10 mg/ml of
methanol. Pipette 5, 15, and 25 ml of this
by reference, see § 63.14.
Fmt 4700
*
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
ER14NO18.063
56730
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
indicated by the rotameter. A leakage rate in
excess of 2 percent of the average sampling
rate is acceptable.
Note: Carefully release the probe inlet plug
before turning off the pump.
*
*
*
*
*
9.1 Miscellaneous Quality Control
Measures. The following quality control
measures are required:
Section
Quality control measure
Effect
8.1.2, 8.1.3, 10.1 ..................
10.2 ......................................
13.0 ......................................
Sampling equipment leak check and calibration ............
GC calibration .................................................................
Methanol spike recovery check ......................................
Ensures accurate measurement of sample volume.
Ensures precision of GC analysis.
Verifies all methanol in stack gas is being captured in
impinge/adsorbent tube setup.
12.1 Nomenclature.
Caf = Concentration of methanol in the front
of the adsorbent tube, mg/ml.
Cab = Concentration of methanol in the back
of the adsorbent tube, mg/ml.
Ci = Concentration of methanol in the
impinger portion of the sample train,
mg/ml.
E = Mass emission rate of methanol, mg/hr
(lb/hr).
ms = Total mass of compound measured in
impinger and on adsorbent with spiked
train (mg).
mu = Total mass of compound measured in
impinger and on adsorbent with unspiked
train (mg).
mv = Mass per volume of spiked compound
measured (mg/L).
Mtot = Total mass of methanol collected in
the sample train, mg.
Pbar = Barometric pressure at the exit orifice
of the DGM, mm Hg (in. Hg).
Pstd = Standard absolute pressure, 760 mm Hg
(29.92 in. Hg).
Qstd = Dry volumetric stack gas flow rate
corrected to standard conditions, dscm/hr
(dscf/hr).
R = fraction of spiked compound recovered
s = theoretical concentration (ppm) of spiked
target compound
Tm = Average DGM absolute temperature,
degrees K (°R).
Tstd = Standard absolute temperature, 293
degrees K (528 °R).
Vaf = Volume of front half adsorbent sample,
ml.
Vab = Volume of back half adsorbent sample,
ml.
Vi = Volume of impinger sample, ml.
Vm = Dry gas volume as measured by the
DGM, dry cubic meters (dcm), dry cubic
feet (dcf).
Vm(std) = Dry gas volume measured by the
DGM, corrected to standard conditions, dry
standard cubic meters (dscm), dry standard
cubic feet (dscf).
13.0 Method Performance
Since a potential sample may contain a
variety of compounds from various sources,
a specific precision limit for the analysis of
field samples is impractical. Precision in the
range of 5 to 10 percent relative standard
deviation (RSD) is typical for gas
chromatographic techniques, but an
experienced GC operator with a reliable
instrument can readily achieve 5 percent
RSD. For this method, the following
combined GC/operator values are required.
(a) Precision. Calibration standards must
meet the requirements in section 10.2.1 or
10.2.2 as applicable.
(b) Recovery. After developing an
appropriate sampling and analytical system
for the pollutants of interest, conduct the
following spike recovery procedure at each
sampling point where the method is being
applied.
i. Methanol Spike. Set up two identical
sampling trains. Collocate the two sampling
probes in the stack. The probes shall be
placed in the same horizontal plane, where
the first probe tip is 2.5 cm from the outside
edge of the other. One of the sampling trains
shall be designated the spiked train and the
other the unspiked train. Spike methanol into
the impinger, and onto the adsorbent tube in
the spiked train prior to sampling. The total
mass of methanol shall be 40 to 60 percent
of the mass expected to be collected with the
unspiked train. Sample the stack gas into the
two trains simultaneously. Analyze the
impingers and adsorbents from the two trains
utilizing identical analytical procedures and
instrumentation. Determine the fraction of
spiked methanol recovered (R) by combining
the amount recovered in the impinger and in
the adsorbent tube, using the equations in
section 12.5. Recovery values must fall in the
range: 0.70 ≤ R ≤ 1.30. Report the R value in
the test report.
ii. [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
11.3.2 Desorption of Samples. Add 3 ml
of deionized distilled water to each of the
stoppered vials and shake or vibrate the vials
for 30 minutes.
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
*
*
12.5
*
*
*
*
*
Recovery Fraction (R)
*
*
*
Method 320—Measurement of Vapor Phase
Organic and Inorganic Emissions By
Extractive Fourier Transform Infrared
(FTIR) Spectroscopy
*
*
*
*
*
8.2.2.4 Determine the percent leak
volume %VL for the signal integration time
tSS and for DPmax, i.e., the larger of DPv or DPp,
as follows:
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
ER14NO18.065 ER14NO18.066
*
8.1.2 Leak Check. A leak check before
and after the sampling run is mandatory. The
leak-check procedure is as follows:
Temporarily attach a suitable (e.g., 0- to 40ml/min) rotameter to the outlet of the DGM,
and place a vacuum gauge at or near the
probe inlet. Plug the probe inlet, pull a
vacuum of at least 250 mm (10 inch) Hg or
the highest vacuum experienced during the
sampling run, and note the flow rate as
ER14NO18.064
standard, respectively, into three 50-ml
volumetric flasks. Dilute each solution to 50
ml with deionized distilled water. These
standards will have 1, 3, and 5 mg/ml of
methanol, respectively. Transfer all four
standards into 40-ml glass vials capped with
Teflon®-lined septa and store under
refrigeration. Discard any excess solution.
56731
56732
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Where:
50 = 100% divided by the leak-check time of
2 minutes.
*
*
*
*
9.2.3 Calculate the dilution ratio using
the tracer gas as follows:
*
DF = Dilution factor of the spike gas; this
value shall be ≥10.
SF6(dir) = SF6 (or tracer gas) concentration
measured directly in undiluted spike
gas.
SF6(spk) = Diluted SF6 (or tracer gas)
concentration measured in a spiked
sample.
Spikedir = Concentration of the analyte in the
spike standard measured by filling the
FTIR cell directly.
CS = Expected concentration of the spiked
samples.
Unspike = Native concentration of analytes
in unspiked samples.
Method 323—Measurment of Formaldehyde
Emissions From Natural Gas-Fired
Stationary Sources-Acetyl Acetone
Derivitization Method
*
*
Method 325A—Volatile Organic Compounds
From Fugitive and Area Sources: Sampler
Deployment and VOC Sample Collection
feet) of the boundary and the source or
sources are located between two monitors.
Measure the distance (x) between the two
monitors and place another monitor
approximately halfway between (x/2 ±10
percent) the two monitors. Only one extra
sampler is required between two monitors to
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
12.9 Formaldehyde Concentration
Corrected to 15% Oxygen
*
*
*
*
account for known sources of VOCs. For
example, in Figure 8.1, the facility added
three additional monitors (i.e., light shaded
sampler locations), and in Figure 8.2, the
facility added two additional monitors to
provide sufficient coverage of all area
sources.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
ER14NO18.067
ER14NO18.068 ER14NO18.069
ER14NO18.070
8.2.1.3 An extra sampler must be placed
near known sources of VOCs if potential
emission sources are within 50 meters (162
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Figure 8.1. Facility with a Regular Shape
Between 750 and 1,500 Acres in Area
schedule is allowed but must occur as soon
as safe access to sampling sites is possible.
*
*
*
*
*
*
8.2.3.2 For facilities with a monitoring
perimeter length greater than or equal to
7,315 meters (24,000 feet), sampling locations
are spaced 610 ± 76 meters (2,000 ± 250 feet)
apart.
8.2.3.3 Unless otherwise specified in an
applicable regulation, permit or other
requirement, for small disconnected subareas
with known sources within 50 meters (162
feet) of the monitoring perimeter, sampling
points need not be placed closer than 152
meters (500 feet) apart as long as a minimum
of 3 monitoring locations are used for each
subarea.
*
*
*
*
*
8.4.3 When extenuating circumstances do
not permit safe deployment or retrieval of
passive samplers (e.g., extreme weather,
power failure), sampler placement or
retrieval earlier or later than the prescribed
Where:
mmeas = The mass of the compound as
measured in the sorbent tube (mg).
t = The exposure time (minutes).
tss = The average temperature during the
collection period at the sampling
site (K).
UNTP = The method defined diffusive
uptake rate (sampling rate) (mL/
min).
*
*
*
*
Method 325B—Volatile Organic Compounds
From Fugitive and Area Sources: Sampler
Preparation and Analysis
*
*
*
*
*
9.3.2 Field blanks must be shipped to the
monitoring site with the sampling tubes and
must be stored at the sampling location
throughout the monitoring exercise. The field
blanks must be installed under a protective
hood/cover at the sampling location, but the
long-term storage caps must remain in place
throughout the monitoring period (see
Method 325A). The field blanks are then
shipped back to the laboratory in the same
container as the sampled tubes. Collect at
least two field blank samples per sampling
period to ensure sample integrity associated
with shipment, collection, and storage.
*
*
*
*
*
9.13 Routine CCV at the Start of a
Sequence. Run CCV before each sequence of
Note: Diffusive uptake rates (UNTP) for
common VOCs, using carbon sorbents
packed into sorbent tubes of the
dimensions specified in section 6.1, are
listed in Table 12.1. Adjust analytical
conditions to keep expected sampled
masses within range (see sections
11.3.1.3 to 11.3.1.5). Best possible
method detection limits are typically in
56733
analyses and after every tenth sample to
ensure that the previous multi-level
calibration (see section 10.0) is still valid.
*
*
*
*
*
11.3.2.5 Whenever the thermal
desorption—GC/MS analytical method is
changed or major equipment maintenance is
performed, you must conduct a new fivelevel calibration (see section 10.0). System
calibration remains valid as long as results
from subsequent CCV are within 30 percent
of the most recent 5-point calibration (see
section 9.13). Include relevant CCV data in
the supporting information in the data report
for each set of samples.
*
*
*
*
*
12.2.2 Determine the equivalent
concentrations of compounds in atmospheres
as follows. Correct target compound
concentrations determined at the sampling
site temperature and atmospheric pressure to
standard conditions (25 °C and 760 mm
mercury) using Equation 12.5.
the order of 0.1 ppb for 1,3-butadiene
and 0.05 ppb for volatile aromatics such
as benzene for 14-day monitoring.
However, actual detection limits will
depend upon the analytical conditions
selected.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE 17.1—SUMMARY OF GC/MS ANALYSIS QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES
Parameter
Frequency
Acceptance criteria
Corrective action
Bromofluorobenzene
Instrument
Tune Performance Check.
Five point calibration bracketing
the expected sample concentration.
Daily a prior to sample analysis ....
Evaluation criteria presented in
Section 9.5 and Table 9.2.
(1) Percent Deviation (%DEV) of
response factors ±30%.
(2) Relative Retention Times
(RRTs) for target peaks ±0.06
units from mean RRT.
Calibration Verification (CCV Second
source
calibration
verification check).
Laboratory Blank Analysis .............
Following the calibration curve .....
(1) Retune and or
(2) Perform Maintenance.
(1) Repeat calibration sample
analysis.
(2) Repeat linearity check.
(3) Prepare new calibration standards as necessary and repeat
analysis.
(1) Repeat calibration check.
(2) Repeat calibration curve.
Samples—Internal Standards ........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Daily a following bromofluoro benzene and calibration check;
prior to sample analysis.
One tube analyzed for each batch
of tubes cleaned or 10 percent
of tubes whichever is greater.
All samples ...................................
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
The response factor ±30% DEV
from calibration curve average
response factor.
(1) ≤0.2 ppbv per analyte or ≤3
times the LOD, whichever is
greater.
(2) Internal Standard (IS) area response ±40% and IS Retention
Time (RT) ±0.33 min. of most
recent calibration check.
<0.2 ppbv per VOC targeted compound or 3 times the LOD,
whichever is greater.
IS area response ±40% and IS
RT ±0.33 min. of most recent
calibration validation.
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
(1) Repeat analysis with new
blank tube.
(2) Check system for leaks, contamination.
(3) Analyze additional blank.
Re-clean all tubes in batch and
reanalyze.
Flag Data for possible invalidation.
14NOR1
ER14NO18.071
Blank Sorbent Tube Certification ...
Following any major change, repair or maintenance or if daily
CCV does not meet method requirements. Recalibration not to
exceed three months.
56734
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 17.1—SUMMARY OF GC/MS ANALYSIS QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES—Continued
Parameter
Frequency
Acceptance criteria
Corrective action
Field Blanks ...................................
Two per sampling period ..............
No greater than one-third of the
measured target analyte or
compliance limit.
Flag Data for possible invalidation
due to high blank bias.
a Every
*
24 hours.
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–24747 Filed 11–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2018–0222; FRL–9986–31–
Region 9]
Approval of Arizona Air Plan; Hayden
Lead Nonattainment Area Plan for the
2008 Lead Standard
Table of Contents
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a state
implementation plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Arizona to
meet Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘Act’’)
requirements applicable to the Hayden
lead nonattainment area (‘‘Hayden Lead
NAA’’). The EPA is approving the base
year emissions inventory, the
attainment demonstration, the control
strategy, including reasonably available
control technology and reasonably
available control measures
demonstrations, the reasonable further
progress demonstration, and the
contingency measure as meeting the
requirements of the CAA and the EPA’s
implementing regulations for the 2008
lead national ambient air quality
standard (NAAQS). We also find that
the State has demonstrated that the
Arizona SIP meets the new source
review (NSR) requirements of CAA
section 172(c)(5) for the Hayden Lead
NAA.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
December 14, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2018–0222. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Nov 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ginger Vagenas, EPA Region IX, 415–
972–3964, Vagenas.Ginger@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, the terms
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ mean the EPA.
I. Background
II. Proposed Action and Public Comment
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Lead is generally emitted in the form
of particles that are deposited in water,
soil, and dust. People may be exposed
to lead by inhaling it or by ingesting
lead-contaminated food, water, soil, or
dust. Once in the body, lead is quickly
absorbed into the bloodstream and can
result in a broad range of adverse health
effects including damage to the central
nervous system, cardiovascular
function, kidneys, immune system, and
red blood cells. Children are
particularly vulnerable to lead exposure,
in part because they are more likely to
ingest lead and in part because their
still-developing bodies are more
sensitive to the effects of lead. The
harmful effects to children’s developing
nervous systems (including their brains)
arising from lead exposure may include
IQ 1 loss, poor academic achievement,
long-term learning disabilities, and an
increased risk of delinquent behavior.
The EPA first established a lead
standard in 1978 at 1.5 micrograms per
meter cubed (mg/m3) as a quarterly
average.2 Based on new health and
scientific data, the EPA revised the
federal lead standard to 0.15 mg/m3 and
1 IQ (intelligence quotient) is a score created by
dividing a person’s mental age score, obtained by
administering an intelligence test, by the person’s
chronological age, both expressed in terms of years
and months. ‘‘Glossary of Important Assessment
and Measurement Terms,’’ Philadelphia, PA:
National Council on Measurement in Education.
2016.
2 43 FR 46246 (October 5, 1978).
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
revised the averaging time for the
standard on October 15, 2008.3 A
violation of the standard occurs when
ambient lead concentrations exceed 0.15
mg/m3 averaged over a 3-month rolling
period.
Following the promulgation of a new
or revised NAAQS, the EPA is required
by the CAA to designate areas
throughout the United States as
attaining or not attaining the NAAQS.
This process is set forth in section
107(d)(1) of the Act. After initially being
designated unclassifiable due to
insufficient monitoring data, the
Hayden area was redesignated
nonattainment on September 3, 2014,
effective October 3, 2014.4 5 The
designation of the Hayden area as
nonattainment for the 2008 lead
NAAQS triggered requirements under
section 191(a) of the CAA requiring
Arizona to submit a SIP revision with a
plan to attain the standard as
expeditiously as practicable, but no later
than October 3, 2019.
The Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality (ADEQ) is the air
quality agency that develops SIP
revisions for the Hayden area. The SIP
revision for the Hayden Lead NAA,
entitled ‘‘SIP Revision: Hayden Lead
Nonattainment Area’’ (‘‘2017 Hayden
Lead Plan’’ or ‘‘Plan’’) was adopted by
ADEQ on March 3, 2017, and submitted
to the EPA on the same day.6 The Plan
includes a 2012 base year emissions
inventory, a demonstration that controls
required under the Plan are sufficient to
bring the area into attainment of the
2008 lead NAAQS, an analysis that
demonstrates reasonably available
control measures/reasonably available
control technology (RACM/RACT)
levels of control are required to be
implemented, a demonstration that the
Plan provides for reasonable further
progress (RFP) towards attainment, and
a contingency measure that will be
implemented if the area fails to make
3 73 FR 66964 (November 12, 2008) (‘‘lead
NAAQS rule’’).
4 79 FR 52205.
5 For an exact description of the Hayden Lead
NAA, see 40 CFR 81.303.
6 Letter dated March 3, 2017, from Timothy S.
Franquist, Director, Air Quality Division, ADEQ, to
Alexis Strauss, Acting Regional Administrator, EPA
Region IX.
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 14, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56713-56734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-24747]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 51, 60, and 63
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0510; FRL-9986-42-OAR]
RIN 2060-AS95
Testing Regulations for Air Emission Sources
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action amends certain existing testing regulations to
reflect corrections, updates, and the addition of alternative equipment
and methods for source testing of emissions. These revisions will
improve the quality of data and provide flexibility in the use of
[[Page 56714]]
approved alternative procedures. The revisions do not impose any new
substantive requirements on source owners or operators.
DATES: The final rule is effective on January 14, 2019. The
incorporation by reference materials listed in the rule are approved by
the Director of the Federal Register as of January 14, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0510. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
confidential business information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available
electronically through https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lula H. Melton, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division (E143-
02), Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711;
telephone number: (919) 541-2910; fax number: (919) 541-0516; email
address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The supplementary information in this
preamble is organized as follows:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. What action is the agency taking?
C. Judicial Review
II. Background
III. Summary of Amendments
A. Method 201A of Appendix M of Part 51
B. Method 204 of Appendix M of Part 51
C. Method 205 of Appendix M of Part 51
D. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 60
E. Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators (Subpart D) Part 60
F. Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (Subpart Da) Part 60
G. Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units
(Subpart Db) Part 60
H. Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating
Units (Subpart Dc) Part 60
I. Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction is
Commenced After December 20, 1989 and on or Before September 20,
1994 (Subpart Ea) Part 60
J. Glass Manufacturing Plants (Subpart CC) Part 60
K. New Residential Wood Heaters, New Residential Hydronic
Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces (Subpart QQQQ) Part 60
L. Method 2B of Appendix A-1 of Part 60
M. Method 5 of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
N. Method 5B of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
O. Method 5I of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
P. Method 7 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
Q. Method 8 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
R. Method 18 of Appendix A-6 of Part 60
S. Method 22 of Appendix A-7 of Part 60
T. Method 26 of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
U. Method 26A of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
V. Test Method 28WHH of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
W. Performance Specification 1 of Appendix B of Part 60
X. Performance Specification 2 of Appendix B of Part 60
Y. Performance Specification 3 of Appendix B of Part 60
Z. Performance Specification 11 of Appendix B of Part 60
AA. Performance Specification 15 of Appendix B of Part 60
BB. Performance Specification 18 of Appendix B of Part 60
CC. Procedure 1 of Appendix F of Part 60
DD. General Provisions (Subpart A) Part 63
EE. Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing (Subpart NNN) Part 63
FF. Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional
Boilers and Process Heaters (Subpart DDDDD) Part 63
GG. Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units
(Subpart UUUUU) Part 63
HH. Method 303 of Appendix A of Part 63
II. Method 308 of Appendix A of Part 63
JJ. Method 320 of Appendix A of Part 63
KK. Method 323 of Appendix A of Part 63
LL. Method 325A of Appendix A of Part 63
MM. Method 325B of Appendix A of Part 63
IV. Public Comments on the Proposed Rule
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) and
1 CFR part 51
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
The revisions promulgated in this final rule apply to industries
that are subject to the current provisions of 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) parts 51, 60, and 63. We did not list all of the
specific affected industries or their North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) codes herein since there are many
affected sources in numerous NAICS categories. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult either the air permitting authority for the entity or
your EPA Regional representative as listed in 40 CFR 63.13.
B. What action is the agency taking?
We are promulgating corrections and updates to regulations for
source testing of emissions. More specifically, we are correcting
typographical and technical errors, updating obsolete testing
procedures, adding approved testing alternatives, and clarifying
testing requirements.
C. Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), judicial review
of this final rule is available by filing a petition for review in the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit by
January 14, 2019. Under section 307(d)(7)(B) of the CAA, only an
objection to this final rule that was raised with reasonable
specificity during the period for public comment can be raised during
judicial review. Moreover, under section 307(b)(2) of the CAA, the
requirements that are the subject of this final rule may not be
challenged later in civil or criminal proceedings brought by the EPA to
enforce these requirements.
II. Background
The revisions to testing regulations for air emission sources were
proposed in the Federal Register on January 26, 2018 (83 FR 3636). The
public comment period ended March 27, 2018, and 83 comment letters were
received from the public; 23 of the comment letters were relevant, and
the other 60 comment letters were considered beyond the scope of the
proposed rule. This final rule was developed based on public comments
that the agency received on the proposed rule.
III. Summary of Amendments
A. Method 201A of Appendix M of Part 51
In Method 201A, in section 12.5, the denominator of equation 24 is
corrected
[[Page 56715]]
as proposed; the proposed c'p in the denominator is changed
to Cp' to be consistent with the nomenclature in section
12.1. The cp in the numerator is changed to Cp
also to be consistent with the nomenclature in section 12.1.
B. Method 204 of Appendix M of Part 51
In Method 204, in section 8.2, the statement regarding equation
204-2 is corrected to ``The NEAR must be <=0.05,'' as proposed.
C. Method 205 of Appendix M of Part 51
In Method 205, section 2.1.1 is revised to allow the use of
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)-traceable
transfer standards to calibrate the gas dilution system as proposed.
The agency continues to believe that these standards are widely
available and provide the accuracy necessary to perform the
calibration. Section 2.1.1 is also revised as proposed to require
testers to report the results of the calibration of the dilution system
to enable the regulatory authority to review this information.
D. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 60
In the General Provisions of part 60, Sec. 60.17(h) is revised as
proposed to add ASTM D6216-12 to the list of incorporations by
reference and to re-number the remaining consensus standards that are
incorporated by reference in alpha-numeric order.
E. Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators (Subpart D) Part 60
In a change from proposal, the allowed filter temperature in Sec.
60.46(b)(2)(i) is not revised. Based on comments we received on the
proposed revisions, we are deferring finalizing the proposed revisions
of the temperature tolerances of probe and filter holder heating
systems as part of this rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we received on the proposed rule and
may propose either revisions or similar requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
F. Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (Subpart Da) Part 60
In a change from proposal, the allowed filter temperature in Sec.
60.50Da (b)(1)(ii)(A) is not revised. Based on comments we received on
the proposed revisions, we are deferring finalizing the proposed
revisions of the temperature tolerances of probe and filter holder
heating systems as part of this rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we received on the proposed rule and
may propose either revisions or similar requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
G. Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units (Subpart
Db) Part 60
In a change from proposal, the allowed filter temperature in Sec.
60.46b(d)(4) is not revised. Based on comments we received on the
proposed revisions, we are deferring finalizing the proposed revisions
of the temperature tolerances of probe and filter holder heating
systems as part of this rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we received on the proposed rule and
may propose either revisions or similar requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
H. Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units
(Subpart Dc) Part 60
In a change from proposal, the allowed filter temperature in Sec.
60.45c(a)(5) is not revised. Based on comments we received on the
proposed revisions, we are deferring finalizing the proposed revisions
of the temperature tolerances of probe and filter holder heating
systems as part of this rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we received on the proposed rule and
may propose either revisions or similar requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
I. Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction is Commenced After
December 20, 1989 and on or Before September 20, 1994 (Subpart Ea) Part
60
In a change from proposal, the allowed filter temperature in Sec.
60.58a(b)(3) is not revised. Based on comments we received on the
proposed revisions, we are deferring finalizing the proposed revisions
of the temperature tolerances of probe and filter holder heating
systems as part of this rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we received on the proposed rule and
may propose either revisions or similar requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
J. Glass Manufacturing Plants (Subpart CC) Part 60
In a change from proposal, the allowed filter temperatures in
Sec. Sec. 60.293(f) and 60.296(d)(2) are not revised. Based on
comments we received on the proposed revisions, we are deferring
finalizing the proposed revisions of the temperature tolerances of
probe and filter holder heating systems as part of this rulemaking. We
will continue to review supporting information and data we received on
the proposed rule and may propose either revisions or similar
requirements as part of future rulemakings.
K. New Residential Wood Heaters, New Residential Hydronic Heaters and
Forced-Air Furnaces (Subpart QQQQ) Part 60
In subpart QQQQ, in Method 28WHH, in section 13.5.1, equation 8 is
corrected as proposed.
L. Method 2B of Appendix A-1 of Part 60
In Method 2B, in section 12.1, the definition of ambient carbon
dioxide concentration is revised as proposed. The agency continues to
believe that the global monthly mean (CO2)a
concentration varies over time. Also, a website link is added to the
definition as specified at proposal.
M. Method 5 of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
In a change from proposal, allowed filter temperatures in Method 5,
sections 2.0, 6.1.1.2, 6.1.1.6, 6.1.1.7, and 8.5 are not revised. Based
on comments we received on the proposed revisions, we are deferring
finalizing the proposed revisions of the temperature tolerances of
probe and filter holder heating systems as part of this rulemaking. We
will continue to review supporting information and data we received on
the proposed rule and may propose either revisions or similar
requirements as part of future rulemakings.
Section 6.1.1.9 is revised as proposed to allow the use of a single
temperature sensor in lieu of two temperature sensors on the dry gas
meter as allowed by Technical Information Document 19 (TID-19) and the
approved broadly applicable alternative, ALT-117 (see https://www.epa.gov/emc). Consistent with our response to the comment regarding
allowing flexibility for the weighing container in section 11.2.1,
Method 5B, the first sentence in section 11.2.1, Method 5 is revised
similarly.
N. Method 5B of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
In a change from proposal, the allowed filter temperatures in
Method 5B, sections 2.0, 6.1, and 8.2 are not revised. Based on
comments we received on the proposed revisions, we are deferring
finalizing the proposed revisions of the temperature tolerances of
probe and filter holder heating
[[Page 56716]]
systems as part of this rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we received on the proposed rule and
may propose either revisions or similar requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
Section 11.0 is revised as proposed to replace the reference to
Method 5, section 11.0 with specific analytical procedures and to
report the results using Figure 5B-1 for complete data review. Section
17.0 is revised as proposed to delete the word ``Reserved'' from the
title, and Figure 5B-1 (Analytical Data Sheet) is added.
O. Method 5I of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
In a change from proposal, Method 5I, sections 2.1 and 8.5.2.2 are
not revised to tighten the allowed filter temperatures. Based on
comments we received on the proposed revisions, we are deferring
finalizing the proposed revisions of the temperature tolerances of
probe and filter holder heating systems as part of this rulemaking. We
will continue to review supporting information and data we received on
the proposed rule and may propose either revisions or similar
requirements as part of future rulemakings.
P. Method 7 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
In Method 7, sections 10.1.2 and 11.3 reference erroneous sections;
the correct section is inserted, as proposed. The proposed referenced
section 10.1.1.2 is changed to 10.1.1 to include procedures in both
sections 10.1.1.1 and 10.1.1.2.
Q. Method 8 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
As proposed, Method 8, sections 6.1.1.1 through 6.1.1.4 are
renumbered to 6.1.1.2 through 6.1.1.5; a new section 6.1.1.1 is added
to clarify the requirements that apply to the probe nozzle; and, in
response to comments, Figure 8-1 (Sulfuric Acid Sampling Train) is
corrected by: (1) Modifying the impinger graphics to make it consistent
with the text in section 6.1.1.4 and (2) revising the proposed label S-
Type Pitot Tube to Type S Pitot Tube for consistency. The proposed
first sentence in section 6.1.1.1 is revised to ``Borosilicate or
quartz glass with a sharp, tapered leading edge and coupled to the
probe liner using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or glass-lined union
(e.g., fused silica, Silico, or equivalent).'' Based on a public
comment that recommended adding Silco coated stainless steel unions as
an option for Teflon unions, and for consistency with other test
methods, we have replaced Teflon with the generic option
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE).
R. Method 18 of Appendix A-6 of Part 60
In Method 18, in section 13.1, the erroneous paragraph (c)
designation is re-designated as (b), as proposed.
S. Method 22 of Appendix A-7 of Part 60
In Method 22, sections 11.2.1 and 11.2.2 are revised as proposed to
allow digital photography to be used for a subset of the recordkeeping
requirements. As proposed, section 11.2.3 is added to specify the
requirements for digital photographic records. In response to comments
on the proposal, the next to the last sentence in section 11.2.3
regarding photographs that must be taken within 15 minutes of the
observation period is revised from the proposal, and another sentence
is added to provide clarity. The revised and new sentences read: ``The
photograph(s) representing the environmental conditions including the
sky conditions and the position of the sun relative to the observer and
the emission point must be taken within a reasonable time of the
observation (i.e., 15 minutes). When observations are taken from
exactly the same observation point on a routine basis (e.g., daily) and
as long as there are no modifications to the units depicted, only a
single photograph each day is necessary to document the observer's
location relative to the emissions source, the process unit being
observed, and the location of potential and actual emission points.''
The agency notes that ALT-109 (see https://www.epa.gov/emc) is the
associated broadly applicable alternative that allows the use of
digital photographs for specific recordkeeping requirements.
T. Method 26 of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
As proposed, Method 26, section 6.2.2 is revised to allow the use
of glass sample storage containers as an option to allow flexibility
and to be consistent with Method 26A. The proposed title of section
6.2.2, ``Storage Bottles,'' is changed to ``Storage Containers'' to be
consistent with the language in section 6.2.2.
U. Method 26A of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
As proposed, in Method 26A, section 6.2.1 is revised to remove the
language regarding sample storage containers. In response to comments
on our proposal, we have determined that high-density polyethylene is
an acceptable material for sample storage containers in addition to the
currently allowed glass. Therefore, in a new section 6.2.4., we have
specified that both high-density polyethylene and glass are acceptable
sample storage containers.
V. Test Method 28WHH of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
In Test Method 28WHH, equation 8 in section 13.5.1 is corrected, as
proposed.
W. Performance Specification 1 of Appendix B of Part 60
As proposed, in Performance Specification 1, references to ASTM
D6216-98 (in sections 2.1, 3.1, 6.1, 8.1(1), 8.1(3)(ii), 8.2(1),
8.2(2), 8.2(3), 9.0, 12.1, 13.0, 13.1, 13.2, and 16.0 paragraph 8) are
replaced with ASTM D6216-12. As noted at proposal, if the initial
certification of the continuous opacity monitoring system (COMS) has
already occurred using D6216-98, D6216-03, or D6216-07, it will not be
necessary to recertify using D6216-12. In response to comments on our
decision to add ASTM D6216 to the list of consensus standards, the
April 1998 publication date for ASTM D6216 in paragraph 8 in section
16.0 is replaced with October 2012, the ASTM D6216-12 publication date.
In response to comments, for consistency with section 2.1, and for
purposes of clarification, the note at the end of section 2.1 is added
to section 13.0.
X. Performance Specification 2 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 2, section 13.2 is replaced with a
table that indicates the relative accuracy performance specifications,
as proposed. Given that the equals to (=) signs were erroneously
omitted from several of the < and > values during publication of the
table in the proposed rule, these values have been corrected.
Y. Performance Specification 3 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 3, the two sentences in section 12.0
that read, ``Calculate the arithmetic difference between the RM and the
CEMS output for each run. The average difference of the nine (or more)
data sets constitute the RA.'' are deleted, as proposed; these two
sentences are no longer necessary since equations 3-1 and 3-2 would be
moved from section 13.2 to section 12.0. The sentence, ``Calculate the
RA using equations 3-1 and 3-2.'' is added to the beginning of section
12.0.
Z. Performance Specification 11 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 11, section 13.1, the word ``average''
erroneously exists in the second sentence and is deleted, as proposed.
[[Page 56717]]
AA. Performance Specification 15 of Appendix B of Part 60
As proposed, in Performance Specification 15, section 13.0 is added
as ``Method Performance [Reserved].''
BB. Performance Specification 18 of Appendix B of Part 60
As proposed, in Performance Specification 18, in section 11.8.7,
the last sentence is revised to clarify the duration of the drift
check. In Table 1, the erroneous acronym ``NO2'' is replaced
with ``NO,'' as proposed. In the appendix of Performance Specification
18, the inadvertently omitted reserved section 12.0 is added, as
proposed.
CC. Procedure 1 of Appendix F of Part 60
As proposed, in Procedure 1, in section 5.1.2 (1), the sentence
immediately following the table that reads, ``Challenge the CEMS three
times at each audit point, and use the average of the three responses
in determining accuracy.'' is replaced with, ``Introduce each of the
audit gases, three times each for a total of six challenges. Introduce
the gases in such a manner that the entire CEMS is challenged. Do not
introduce the same gas concentration twice in succession.'' In order to
obtain six distinct readings during the cylinder gas audit (CGA), the
same gas must not be introduced twice in succession, and this revised
language accurately reflects this standard scientific practice. As also
proposed, in section 5.1.2 (3), the reference to EPA's traceability
protocol for gaseous calibration standards is updated, and the language
regarding the use of EPA Method 205 for dilution of audit gases is
clarified.
DD. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 63
Sections 63.7(g)(2), 63.7(g)(2)(v), and 63.8(e)(5)(i) of the
General Provisions (subpart A) of part 63 are revised, as proposed, to
require the reporting of specific test data for continuous monitoring
system performance evaluation tests and ongoing quality assurance (QA)
tests. These data elements are required regardless of the format of the
report, i.e., electronic or paper. These modifications will ensure that
performance evaluation and QA test reporting include all data necessary
for the compliance authority to assess and assure the quality of the
reported data and that the reported information describes and
identifies the specific unit covered by the evaluation test report. In
response to comment, we specified the level of reporting needed for
continuous parameter monitoring systems (CPMS) versus other continuous
monitoring systems including continuous emission monitoring systems
(CEMS), COMS, and predictive emissions monitoring systems (PEMS).
EE. Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing (Subpart NNN) Part 63
In a change from proposal, the allowed filter temperature in Sec.
63.1385(a)(5) is not revised. Based on comments we received on the
proposed revisions, we are deferring finalizing proposed revisions of
the temperature tolerances of probe and filter holder heating systems
as part of this rulemaking. We will continue to review supporting
information and data we received on the proposed rule and may propose
either revisions or similar requirements as part of future rulemakings.
FF. Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers
and Process Heaters (Subpart DDDDD) Part 63
As proposed, in Table 6 of subpart DDDDD, row 1.f. is revised to
allow the use of EPA SW-846-7471B (for liquid samples) in addition to
EPA SW-846-7470A for measuring mercury to allow for compliance
flexibility.
GG. Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units
(Subpart UUUUU) Part 63
In a change from proposal, the allowed filter temperature in Sec.
63.10010(h)(7)(i)(1) is not revised. Based on comments we received on
the proposed revisions, we are deferring finalizing proposed revisions
of the temperature tolerances of probe and filter holder heating
systems as part of this rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we received on the proposed rule and
may propose either revisions or similar requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
As proposed, in Table 5, Method 5I is specified as a test method
option because, as explained at proposal, Method 5I is designed for low
particulate matter (PM) application.
HH. Method 303 of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 303, section 12.4, equation 303-3 is corrected, as
proposed, by inserting ``where y = '' in front of the equation.
II. Method 308 of Appendix A of Part 63
As proposed, in Method 308, deionized distilled water replaces the
aqueous n-proponal solution; the affected sections are 2.0, 7.2.2,
7.2.3.3, and 11.3.2. Section 7.2.2, which defines the aqueous n-
proponal solution, is removed, as proposed. In section 7.2.3.3, the
erroneous ``four'' is replaced as proposed, with ``three'' in the
sentence that reads ``Pipette 5, 15, and 25 ml of this standard,
respectively into four 50-ml volumetric flasks.'' Section 8.1.2 is
revised, as proposed, to require a leak check prior to the sampling run
(in addition to after the sampling run) for QA purposes; as explained
at proposal, requiring a leak check prior to the sampling run would
potentially save time and money. In section 9.1, methanol spike
recovery check is added as a quality control (QC) measure in Table 9.1,
as proposed. In section 12.1, variables used in equations 308-4 and
308-5 are added and section 12.5, which includes equations 308-4 and
308-5, is added, as proposed. In section 13.0, the title ``Reserved''
is replaced with ``Method Performance'' and QA requirements would be
added to be consistent with other methods, as proposed. The erroneous
proposed paragraph (a) of section 13.0 is replaced, as proposed, with
``Calibration standards must meet the requirements in section 10.2.1 or
10.2.2 as applicable.''
JJ. Method 320 of Appendix A of Part 63
In section 8.2.2.4, the denominator in equation 2 is corrected from
PSS to PS, as proposed. In section 9.2.3, the
word ``where'' in the statement, ``Calculate the dilution ratio using
the tracer gas as follows: where:'' is deleted, as proposed. Also in
section 9.2.3, the inadvertently superscripted ``dir'' on the
definition of spike is subscripted, as proposed.
KK. Method 323 of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 323, section 12.9, the denominator in equation 323-8 is
corrected, as proposed.
LL. Method 325A of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 325A, section 8.2.1.3 is revised, as proposed, to clarify
that only one extra sampling site is required near known sources of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) when the source is located both
within 50 meters of the boundary and between two monitors. Based on a
public comment we received on the proposed regulatory text, wording
changes have been made to the language in section 8.2.1.3. As proposed,
the label under Figure 8.1 is corrected from ``Refinery (20% angle)''
to ``Refinery (20[deg] angle).'' Section 8.2.3.2 is revised, as
proposed, to include facilities with a monitoring perimeter length
equal to 7,315 meters (24,000 feet). Section 8.2.3.3 is added, as
[[Page 56718]]
proposed, to provide clarification and an equivalent procedure in
Option 2 (linear distance between sites) for site locations that
parallel section 8.2.2.2.4 in Option 1 (radial distance between sites).
In response to comments, section 8.4.3 is added to address worker
safety during extenuating circumstances.
MM. Method 325B of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 325B, section 9.3.2 is revised, as proposed, to correct
an error in the number of field blank samples required for a sampling
period and to provide consistency with the sample analysis required in
Method 325B. In sections 9.13 and 11.3.2.5, the erroneous reference to
section 10.6.3 is corrected to 10.0, as proposed. Also in section
11.3.2.5, the erroneous reference to section 10.9.5 is corrected to
9.13, as proposed. Section 12.2.2 is revised, as proposed, to correct
the calculation of target compound concentrations at standard
conditions, and the erroneous reference to Ustd in the note
in section 12.2.2 is revised to UNTP. Sections 12.2.3 and
12.2.4 are deleted, as proposed, because the equations for target
concentrations are incorrect. Table 17-1 is revised, as proposed, to
add inadvertently omitted QC criteria from section 9.3.3.
IV. Public Comments on the Proposed Rule
Eighty-three (83) comment letters were received from the public; 23
of the comment letters were relevant, and the other 60 comment letters
were considered as beyond the scope of the proposed rule. The public
comments and the agency's responses are summarized in the Response to
Comments document located in the docket for this rule. See the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
A summary of the relevant portions of significant comments that we
received on the proposal and agency responses are presented below.
Comment: Three commenters provided comments on our proposed
revisions to the General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 63. One
commenter stated that the proposed revisions impose new requirements on
CMS performance evaluations and QA testing for types of monitors not
previously subject to such requirements. Another commenter remarked
that the proposed revisions to various requirements in Part 63
revisions were vague. Yet another commenter remarked that the proposed
revisions to Sec. 63.8(e)(5) would shorten the CMS performance
evaluation reporting period for CMS associated with performance tests.
Response: We disagree with the comment that the proposed changes to
Sec. 63.8(e)(5)(i) would impose new requirements given that at
proposal, the agency had explained that they were intended to clarify
and codify data elements and reporting requirements that are already
routinely requested by the Administrator's delegated authorities. With
regard to Sec. 63.8(e)(5), in a change from proposal, we have retained
the existing requirement that allows for the simultaneous submission of
the report of a CMS performance evaluation with results of performance
testing required under 40 CFR 63.7. We also edited the final rule
language for 40 CFR 63.7(g)(2)(v) to improve clarity and to eliminate
confusion.
Comment: Fifteen commenters provided comments arguing against the
proposal to tighten the filter temperature tolerance in 40 CFR
60.46(b)(2)(i); 60.50Da(b)(1)(ii)(A); 60.45c(a)(5); 60.58a(b)(3);
60.293(f); 60.296(d)(2); 63.1385(a)(5); and sections 2.0, 6.1.1.2,
6.1.1.6, 6.1.1.7 and 8.5 of Method 5, Appendix A-3 of Part 60. They
cited issues that included: weather (e.g., ambient temperature
fluctuations and windy conditions); costs; lack of justification and
data for the revision; inconsistent language (e.g., the use of
``shall'' vs. ``may'' and proposed revisions to temperature tolerance
in Methods 5, 5B, and 5I but not in Methods 5D, 5E, and 5F); and safety
risks. Nine commenters remarked that ambient conditions (cold climates,
wind gusts, etc.) can cause temperature fluctuations that are difficult
to manage. More specifically, one commenter stated that the reduced
allowable temperature range would be problematic during testing in
cold, windy ambient conditions that are persistent in the winter months
in northern climates because the time required for temperature recovery
after a component change in these conditions could add hours and
possibly days to testing programs. One commenter remarked that the
proposed 5 [deg]C is unattainable for sources in cold or
windy climates.
Eight commenters stated that alteration or replacement of equipment
components would likely be necessary to achieve the proposed
temperature tolerances resulting in additional costs. One commenter
noted potential equipment improvements, such as increased probe sheath
tubing diameter to make room for added insulation around every probe
heater; re-design of filter heating ovens; improved sealing and
insulation of the openings at the inlet and outlet of filter heating
ovens; and/or for sources with high stack temperatures, more frequent
use of air-cooled or water-cooled probes. One commenter remarked that
this revision would force cold weather stack testers to replace or
retrofit equipment with higher power heating devices and possibly more
refined control devices which would be costly. One commenter remarked
that this revision will most likely require air sampling equipment
suppliers to redesign sample probes by either increasing sheath
diameter, altering the placement or increasing the number of
thermocouples used to control the probe heating system, and/or
increasing the insulation around the sample liner. The commenter added
that an increase in the diameter of the probe sheath would have a
cascading effect either requiring test companies to purchase new sample
hot boxes or retrofit existing sample hot boxes to accommodate the
increased probe sheath diameter.
Seven commenters stated that neither information nor data was
provided to support, justify, or quantify the claimed increased
precision of filterable PM measurements, and a few of these commenters
noted that the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) paper that the
EPA used as the basis for tightening the filter temperature tolerance
was from a comparison of results measured at four coal-fired power
plants.
One commenter requested that the statement in Sec.
60.50Da(b)(1)(ii)(A), ``The probe and filter holder heating system in
the sampling train may be set to provide an average gas temperature of
no greater than 160 5 [deg]C (320 9 [deg]F),''
be changed to, ``The probe and filter holder heating system in the
sampling train shall be set to provide an average gas temperature of
160 5 [deg]C (320 9 [deg]F),'' because they
believe that this was the agency's intent. Similarly, another commenter
requested that the statement in Sec. 60.296(d)(2), ``The probe and
filter holder heating system may be set to provide a gas temperature no
greater than 177 5 [deg]C (320 9 [deg]F),'' be
changed to, ``The probe and filter holder heating system shall be set
to provide an average gas temperature 160 5 [deg]C (320
9 [deg]F),'' because they believe that this was the
agency's intent. One commenter also recommended changing the sentence
in Method 5B to, ``The collected sample is then heated in an oven at
160 [deg]C (320 [deg]F) for 6 hours . . . ,'' to, ``The collected
sample is then heated in an oven at 160 5 [deg]C (320
9 [deg]F) for 6 hours . . .,'' to be internally consistent.
Three commenters noted that if the temperature tolerances are
changed in Method 5, methods that reference Method 5 (namely Method 5D,
section
[[Page 56719]]
2.1; Method 5E, section 2.0; and Method 5F, section 2.0) would also
need to be revised.
Three commenters remarked that tightening the filter temperature
tolerance conflicts with the assertion that the proposed rule will
improve the quality of data but will not impose new substantive
requirements. Two of the three commenters further remarked that the
proposed rule does not meet the requirements of Executive Order 13771
nor the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
Three commenters acknowledged that an improvement in measurement
precision could benefit the data quality in limited situations, such as
the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS).
Four commenters remarked that if the proposed revisions to the
temperature tolerances lead to a measurable change in reported PM
emissions, sources that were previously in compliance with their
emission standards may become non-compliant; one commenter added that
the opposite situation may occur. One commenter stated that the
proposed revision may have the unintended consequence of redefining the
filterable PM being measured leading to either higher or lower PM
measurements as compared to sampling runs conducted with wider
tolerances.
Two commenters mentioned that this revision could result in a
potential safety risk. One of the commenters remarked that the added
weight and handling difficulties associated with air- or water-cooled
probes (if necessary to control the probe temperature) can increase
safety risks to testing personnel, and the other commenter remarked
that the proposed requirements may require the use of encapsulated
probes which are heavy and cumbersome resulting in hazards.
Response: In response to these comments and in a change from
proposal, we are deferring finalizing proposed revisions of the
temperature tolerances of probe and filter holder heating systems as
part of this rulemaking. We will continue to review supporting
information and data we received on the proposed rule and may propose
either revisions or similar requirements as part of future rulemakings.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at https://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was,
therefore, not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
This action is considered an Executive Order 13771 deregulatory
action. This final rule provides meaningful burden reduction by
allowing regulated facilities the flexibility to use newly-approved
alternative procedures for compliance demonstration purposes, which may
result in lower labor costs for some facilities (e.g., allowing digital
photography in lieu of manual documentation in EPA Method 22); lower
compliance testing costs (e.g., additional sample storage container
options now allowed by Method 26); reducing the likelihood of re-
testing (e.g., revised QA requirements in Method 308); and expediting
data processing (e.g., simplified calculations in Method 325B).
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA. The revisions do not substantively revise the existing
information collection requirements but simply corrects, updates, and
clarifies performance testing and continuous monitoring requirements.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. In
making this determination, the impact of concern is any significant
adverse economic impact on small entities. An agency may certify that a
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities if the rule relieves regulatory burden, has no
net burden or otherwise has a positive economic effect on the small
entities subject to the rule. This action will not impose emission
measurement requirements beyond those specified in the current
regulations, nor does it change any emission standard. We have,
therefore, concluded that this action will have no net regulatory
burden for all directly regulated small entities.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local or tribal governments or the private sector.
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. This action simply corrects and updates existing
testing regulations. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this
action.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) and 1 CFR
part 51
This action involves technical standards. The EPA used ASTM D6216-
12 for continuous opacity monitors in Performance Specification 1. The
ASTM D6216-12 standard covers the procedure for certifying continuous
opacity monitors and includes design and performance specifications,
test procedures, and QA requirements to ensure that continuous opacity
monitors meet minimum design and calibration
[[Page 56720]]
requirements necessary, in part, for accurate opacity monitoring
measurements in regulatory environmental opacity monitoring
applications subject to 10 percent or higher opacity standards.
The ASTM D6216-12 standard was developed and adopted by the
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). The standard may be
obtained from https://www.astm.org or from the ASTM at 100 Barr Harbor
Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action is not subject to Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) because it does not establish an
environmental health or safety standard. This action is a technical
correction to previously promulgated regulatory actions and does not
have an impact on human health or the environment.
L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each house of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 51
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Performance
specifications, Test methods and procedures.
40 CFR Part 60
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Performance specifications, Test methods and procedures.
40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Performance specifications, Test methods and procedures.
Dated: November 5, 2018.
Andrew R. Wheeler,
Acting Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental
Protection Agency amends title 40, chapter I of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 51--REQUIREMENTS FOR PREPARATION, ADOPTION, AND SUBMITTAL OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 51 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 101; 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
0
2. Amend appendix M to part 51 as follows:
0
a. Revise section 12.5, equation 24, in Method 201A.
0
b. Revise the last sentence in section 8.2 in Method 204.
0
c. Revise section 2.1.1 in Method 205.
The revisions read as follows:
Appendix M to Part 51--Recommended Test Methods for State
Implementation Plans
* * * * *
Method 201A--Determination of PM10 and PM2.5 Emissions From Stationary
Sources (Constant Sampling Rate Procedure)
* * * * *
12.5 * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.059
* * * * *
Method 204--Criteria for and Verification of a Permanent or Temporary
Total Enclosure
* * * * *
8.2 * * *
The NEAR must be <=0.05.
* * * * *
Method 205--Verification of Gas Dilution Systems for Field Instrument
Calibrations
* * * * *
2.1.1 The gas dilution system shall be recalibrated once per
calendar year using NIST-traceable flow standards with an
uncertainty <=0.25 percent. You shall report the results of the
calibration by the person or manufacturer who carried out the
calibration whenever the dilution system is used, listing the date
of the most recent calibration, the due date for the next
calibration, calibration point, reference flow device (ID, S/N), and
acceptance criteria. Follow the manufacturer's instructions for the
operation and use of the gas dilution system. A copy of the
manufacturer's instructions for the operation of the instrument, as
well as the most recent calibration documentation, shall be made
available for inspection at the test site.
* * * * *
PART 60--STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES
0
3. The authority citation for part 60 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
4. In Sec. 60.17, revise paragraph (h)(177) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.17 Incorporations by reference.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(177) ASTM D6216-12, Standard Practice for Opacity Monitor
Manufacturers to Certify Conformance with Design and Performance
Specifications, approved October 1, 2012; IBR approved for appendix B
to part 60.
* * * * *
0
5. In Appendix A-1 to part 60, revise ``(CO2)a''
in section 12.1 in Method 2B to read as follows:
Appendix A-1 to Part 60--Test Methods 1 through 2F
* * * * *
Method 2B--Determination of Exhaust Gas Volume Flow Rate From Gasoline
Vapor Incinerators
* * * * *
12.1 * * *
(CO2)a = Ambient carbon dioxide
concentration, ppm (if not measured during the test period, may be
assumed to equal the global monthly mean CO2
concentration posted at https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/global.html#global_data).
* * * * *
0
6. In appendix A-3 to part 60:
0
a. Revise sections 6.1.1.9 and 11.2.1 in Method 5.
0
b. Revise section 11.0 in Method 5B.
0
c. Add section 17.0 in Method 5B.
The revisions and addition read as follows:
[[Page 56721]]
Appendix A-3 to Part 60--Test Methods 4 through 5I
* * * * *
Method 5--Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions From Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
6.1.1.9 Metering System. Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump,
calibrated temperature sensors, dry gas meter (DGM) capable of
measuring volume to within 2 percent, and related equipment, as
shown in Figure 5-1. Other metering systems capable of maintaining
sampling rates within 10 percent of isokinetic and of determining
sample volumes to within 2 percent may be used, subject to the
approval of the Administrator. When the metering system is used in
conjunction with a pitot tube, the system shall allow periodic
checks of isokinetic rates. The average DGM temperature for use in
the calculations of section 12.0 may be obtained by averaging the
two temperature sensors located at the inlet and outlet of the DGM
as shown in Figure 5-3 or alternatively from a single temperature
sensor located at the immediate outlet of the DGM or the plenum of
the DGM.
* * * * *
11.2.1 Container No. 1. Leave the contents in the shipping
container or transfer the filter and any loose PM from the sample
container to a tared weighing container. Desiccate for 24 hours in a
desiccator containing anhydrous calcium sulfate. Weigh to a constant
weight, and report the results to the nearest 0.1 mg. For the
purposes of this section, the term ``constant weight'' means a
difference of no more than 0.5 mg or 1 percent of total weight less
tare weight, whichever is greater, between two consecutive
weighings, with no less than 6 hours of desiccation time between
weighings. Alternatively, the sample may be oven dried at 104 [deg]C
(220 [deg]F) for 2 to 3 hours, cooled in the desiccator, and weighed
to a constant weight, unless otherwise specified by the
Administrator. The sample may be oven dried at 104 [deg]C (220
[deg]F) for 2 to 3 hours. Once the sample has cooled, weigh the
sample, and use this weight as a final weight.
* * * * *
Method 5B-Determination of Nonsulfuric Acid Particulate Matter
Emissions From Stationary Sources
* * * * *
11.0 Analytical Procedure
11.1 Record and report the data required on a sheet such as the
one shown in Figure 5B-1.
11.2 Handle each sample container as follows:
11.2.1 Container No. 1. Leave the contents in the shipping
container or transfer the filter and any loose PM from the sample
container to a tared non-reactive oven-proof container. Oven dry the
filter sample at a temperature of 160 5 [deg]C (320
9 [deg]F) for 6 hours. Cool in a desiccator for 2 hours,
and weigh to constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1
mg. For the purposes of this section, the term ``constant weight''
means a difference of no more than 0.5 mg or 1 percent of total
weight less tare weight, whichever is greater, between two
consecutive weighings, with no less than 6 hours of desiccation time
between weighings.
11.2.2 Container No. 2. Note the level of liquid in the
container, and confirm on the analysis sheet whether leakage
occurred during transport. If a noticeable amount of leakage has
occurred, either void the sample or use methods, subject to the
approval of the Administrator, to correct the final results. Measure
the liquid in this container either volumetrically to 1
ml or gravimetrically to 0.5 g. Transfer the contents to
a tared 250 ml beaker, and evaporate to dryness at ambient
temperature and pressure. Then oven dry the probe sample at a
temperature of 160 5 [deg]C (320 9 [deg]F)
for 6 hours. Cool in a desiccator for 2 hours, and weigh to constant
weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 mg.
11.2.3 Container No. 3. Weigh the spent silica gel (or silica
gel plus impinger) to the nearest 0.5 g using a balance. This step
may be conducted in the field.
11.2.4 Acetone Blank Container. Measure the acetone in this
container either volumetrically or gravimetrically. Transfer the
acetone to a tared 250 ml beaker, and evaporate to dryness at
ambient temperature and pressure. Desiccate for 24 hours, and weigh
to a constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 mg.
Note: The contents of Container No. 2 as well as the acetone
blank container may be evaporated at temperatures higher than
ambient. If evaporation is done at an elevated temperature, the
temperature must be below the boiling point of the solvent; also, to
prevent ``bumping,'' the evaporation process must be closely
supervised, and the contents of the beaker must be swirled
occasionally to maintain an even temperature. Use extreme care, as
acetone is highly flammable and has a low flash point.
* * * * *
17.0 Tables, Diagrams, Flowcharts, and Validation Data
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weight of particulate collected, mg
Container number -----------------------------------------------
Final weight Tare weight Weight gain
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
-----------------------------------------------
Total:
-----------------------------------------------
Less acetone blank
Weight of particulate
matter
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Volume of liquid water collected
---------------------------------------------------
Impinger volume, Silica gel weight,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ml g
---------------------------------------------------
Final
Initial
Liquid collected
Total volume g* ml
collected
* Convert weight of water to volume by dividing total weight increase by
density of water (1 g/ml).
Figure 5B-1. Analytical Data Sheet
* * * * *
0
7. In appendix A-4 to part 60:
0
a. Revise sections 10.1.2 and 11.3 in Method 7.
0
b. Redesignate sections 6.1.1.1 through 6.1.1.4 as sections 6.1.1.2
through 6.1.1.5 in Method 8.
0
c. Add a new section 6.1.1.1 in Method 8.
0
d. Revise Figure 8-1 in Method 8.
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Appendix A-4 to Part 60--Test Methods 6 Through 10B
* * * * *
[[Page 56722]]
Method 7--Determination of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions From Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
10.1.2 Determination of Spectrophotometer Calibration Factor
Kc. Add 0 ml, 2.0 ml, 4.0 ml, 6.0 ml, and 8.0 ml of the
KNO3 working standard solution (1 ml = 100 [micro]g
NO2) to a series of five 50-ml volumetric flasks. To each
flask, add 25 ml of absorbing solution and 10 ml water. Add 1 N NaOH
to each flask until the pH is between 9 and 12 (about 25 to 35
drops). Dilute to the mark with water. Mix thoroughly, and pipette a
25-ml aliquot of each solution into a separate porcelain evaporating
dish. Beginning with the evaporation step, follow the analysis
procedure of section 11.2 until the solution has been transferred to
the 100-ml volumetric flask and diluted to the mark. Measure the
absorbance of each solution at the optimum wavelength as determined
in section 10.1.1. This calibration procedure must be repeated on
each day that samples are analyzed. Calculate the spectrophotometer
calibration factor as shown in section 12.2.
* * * * *
11.3 Sample Analysis. Mix the contents of the flask thoroughly,
and measure the absorbance at the optimum wavelength used for the
standards (section 10.1.1), using the blank solution as a zero
reference. Dilute the sample and the blank with equal volumes of
water if the absorbance exceeds A4, the absorbance of the
400-[micro]g NO2 standard (see section 10.1.3).
* * * * *
Method 8--Determination of Sulfuric Acid and Sulfur Dioxide Emissions
From Stationary Sources
* * * * *
6.1.1.1 Probe Nozzle. Borosilicate or quartz glass with a sharp,
tapered leading edge and coupled to the probe liner using a
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or glass-lined union (e.g., fused
silica, Slico, or equivalent). When the stack temperature exceeds
210 [deg]C (410 [deg]F), a leak-free ground glass fitting or other
leak free, non-contaminating fitting must be used to couple the
nozzle to the probe liner. It is also acceptable to use a one-piece
glass nozzle/liner assembly. The angle of the taper shall be
<=30[deg], and the taper shall be on the outside to preserve a
constant internal diameter. The probe nozzle shall be of the button-
hook or elbow design, unless otherwise specified by the
Administrator. Other materials of construction may be used, subject
to the approval of the Administrator. A range of nozzle sizes
suitable for isokinetic sampling should be available. Typical nozzle
sizes range from 0.32 to 1.27 cm (\1/8\ to \1/2\ in) inside diameter
(ID) in increments of 0.16 cm (\1/16\ in). Larger nozzles sizes are
also available if higher volume sampling trains are used.
* * * * *
17.0 * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.060
[[Page 56723]]
* * * * *
Appendix A-6 to Part 60--[Amended]
0
8. In Appendix A-6 to part 60, redesignate paragraph (c) as paragraph
(b) in section 13.1 in Method 18.
0
9. In appendix A-7 to part 60:
0
a. Revise sections 11.2.1 and 11.2.2 in Method 22.
0
b. Add section 11.2.3 in Method 22.
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Appendix A-7 to Part 60--Test Methods 19 Through 25E
* * * * *
Method 22--Visual Determination of Fugitive Emissions From Material
Sources and Smoke Emissions From Flares
* * * * *
11.2.1 Outdoor Location. Record the following information on the
field data sheet (Figure 22-1): Company name, industry, process
unit, observer's name, observer's affiliation, and date. Record also
the estimated wind speed, wind direction, and sky condition. Sketch
the process unit being observed, and note the observer location
relative to the source and the sun. Indicate the potential and
actual emission points on the sketch. Alternatively, digital
photography as described in section 11.2.3 may be used for a subset
of the recordkeeping requirements of this section.
11.2.2 Indoor Location. Record the following information on the
field data sheet (Figure 22-2): Company name, industry, process
unit, observer's name, observer's affiliation, and date. Record as
appropriate the type, location, and intensity of lighting on the
data sheet. Sketch the process unit being observed, and note the
observer location relative to the source. Indicate the potential and
actual fugitive emission points on the sketch. Alternatively,
digital photography as described in section 11.2.3 may be used for a
subset of the recordkeeping requirements of this section.
11.2.3 Digital Photographic Records. Digital photographs,
annotated or unaltered, may be used to record and report sky
conditions, observer's location relative to the source, observer's
location relative to the sun, process unit being observed, potential
emission points and actual emission points for the requirements in
sections 11.2.1 and 11.2.2. The image must have the proper lighting,
field of view and depth of field to properly distinguish the sky
condition (if applicable), process unit, potential emission point
and actual emission point. At least one digital photograph must be
from the point of the view of the observer. The photograph(s)
representing the environmental conditions including the sky
conditions and the position of the sun relative to the observer and
the emission point must be taken within a reasonable time of the
observation (i.e., 15 minutes). When observations are taken from
exactly the same observation point on a routine basis (i.e., daily)
and as long as there are no modifications to the units depicted,
only a single photograph each is necessary to document the
observer's location relative to the emissions source, the process
unit being observed, and the location of potential and actual
emission points. Any photographs altered or annotated must be
retained in an unaltered format for recordkeeping purposes.
* * * * *
0
10. In appendix A-8 to part 60:
0
a. Revise section 6.2.2 in Method 26.
0
b. Revise section 6.2.1 in Method 26A.
0
c. Add section 6.2.4 in Method 26A.
0
d. Revise equation 8 in section 13.5.1 in Test Method 28WHH.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Appendix A-8 to Part 60--Test Methods 26 Through 30B
* * * * *
Method 26--Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions From
Stationary Sources Non-Isokinetic Method
* * * * *
6.2.2 Storage Containers. 100- or 250-ml, high-density
polyethylene or glass sample storage containers with Teflon screw
cap liners to store impinger samples.
* * * * *
Method 26A--Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions From
Stationary Sources Isokinetic Method
* * * * *
6.2.1 Probe-Liner and Probe-Nozzle Brushes, Wash Bottles, Petri
Dishes, Graduated Cylinder and/or Balance, and Rubber Policeman.
Same as Method 5, sections 6.2.1, 6.2.2, 6.2.4, 6.2.5, and 6.2.7.
* * * * *
6.2.4 Sample Storage Containers. High-density polyethylene or
glass sample storage containers with Teflon screw cap liners to
store impinger samples.
* * * * *
Test Method 28WHH for Measurement of Particulate Emissions and Heating
Efficiency of Wood-Fired Hydronic Heating Appliances
* * * * *
13.5.1 * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.061
* * * * *
0
11. In appendix B to part 60:
0
a. Add the following entries to the list of Performance Specifications
in numeric order:
0
i. Performance Specification 12B--Specifications and Test Procedures
for Monitoring Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emissions From Stationary
Sources Using A Sorbent Trap Monitoring System
0
ii. Performance Specification 17 [Reserved]
0
iii. Performance Specification 18--Performance Specifications and Test
Procedures for Gaseous Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources
0
iv. PS-18--Appendix A Standard Addition Procedures
0
b. In Performance Specification 1, remove ``D 6216-98'' wherever it
appears and add in its place ``D6216-12'', and revise section 2.1, the
introductory text of section 13.0, sections 13.1 and 13.2, and
paragraph 8. of section 16.0.
0
c. In Performance Specification 2, revise section 13.2.
0
d. In Performance Specification 3, revise sections 12.0 and 13.2.
0
e. In Performance Specification 11, revise section 13.1.
0
f. In Performance Specification 15, add reserved section 13.0.
0
g. In Performance Specification 18, revise section 11.8.7 and table 1
in section 17.0, and add reserved section 12.0 to PS-18.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Appendix B to Part 60--Performance Specifications
* * * * *
Performance Specification 1--Specifications and Test Procedures for
Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources
* * * * *
2.1 ASTM D6216-12 (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 60.17)
is the reference for design specifications, manufacturer's
performance specifications, and test procedures. The opacity monitor
manufacturer must periodically select and test an opacity monitor,
that is representative of a group of monitors produced during a
specified period or lot, for conformance with the design
specifications in ASTM D6216-12. The opacity monitor manufacturer
must test each opacity monitor for conformance with the
manufacturer's performance specifications in ASTM D6216-12. Note: If
the initial certification of the opacity monitor occurred before
November 14, 2018 using D6216-98, D6216-03, or D6216-07, it is not
necessary to recertify using D6216-12.
* * * * *
13.0 What Specifications Does a COMS Have to Meet for
Certification?
[[Page 56724]]
A COMS must meet the following design, manufacturer's
performance, and field audit performance specifications:
Note: If the initial certification of the opacity monitor
occurred before November 14, 2018 using D6216-98, D6216-03, or
D6216-07, it is not necessary to recertify using D6216-12.A. COMS
must meet the following design, manufacturer's performance, and
field audit performance specifications.
13.1 Design Specifications. The opacity monitoring equipment
must comply with the design specifications of ASTM D6216-12.
13.2 Manufacturer's Performance Specifications. The opacity
monitor must comply with the manufacturer's performance
specifications of ASTM D6216-12.
* * * * *
16.0 * * *
8. ASTM D6216-12: Standard Practice for Opacity Monitor
Manufacturers to Certify Conformance with Design and Performance
Specifications. ASTM. October 2012.
* * * * *
Performance Specification 2--Specifications and Test Procedures for
SO2 and NOX Continuous Emission Monitoring
Systems in Stationary Sources
* * * * *
13.2 Relative Accuracy Performance Specification.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Calculate . . . RA criteria (%)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If average emissions during the Use Eq. 2-6, with <=20.0
RATA are >=50% of emission RM in the
standard. denominator.
If average emissions during the Use Eq. 2-6, <=10.0
RATA are <50% of emission emission standard
standard. in the denominator.
For SO2 emission standards <=130 Use Eq. 2-6, <=15.0
but >=86 ng/J (0.30 and 0.20 lb/ emission standard
million Btu). in the denominator.
For SO2 emission standards <86 Use Eq. 2-6, <=20.0
ng/J (0.20 lb/million Btu). emission standard
in the denominator.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Performance Specification 3--Specifications and Test Procedures for
O2 and CO2 Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems
in Stationary Sources
* * * * *
12.0 Calculations and Data Analysis
Calculate the RA using equations 3-1 and 3-2. Summarize the
results on a data sheet similar to that shown in Figure 2.2 of PS2.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.062
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.073
* * * * *
13.2 CEMS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification. The RA of
the CEMS must be no greater than 20.0 percent of the mean value of
the reference method (RM) data when calculated using equation 3-1.
The results are also acceptable if the result of Equation 3-2 is
less than or equal to 1.0 percent O2 (or CO2).
* * * * *
Performance Specification 11--Specifications and Test Procedures for
Particulate Matter Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems at Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
13.1 What is the 7-day drift check performance specification?
Your daily PM CEMS internal drift checks must demonstrate that the
daily drift of your PM CEMS does not deviate from the value of the
reference light, optical filter, Beta attenuation signal, or other
technology-suitable reference standard by more than 2 percent of the
response range. If your CEMS includes diluent and/or auxiliary
monitors (for temperature, pressure, and/or moisture) that are
employed as a necessary part of this performance specification, you
must determine the calibration drift separately for each ancillary
monitor in terms of its respective output (see the appropriate
performance specification for the diluent CEMS specification). None
of the calibration drifts may exceed their individual specification.
* * * * *
[[Page 56725]]
Performance Specification 15--Performance Specification for Extractive
FTIR Continuous Emissions Monitor Systems in Stationary Sources
* * * * *
13.0 Method Performance [Reserved]
* * * * *
Performance Specification 18--Performance Specifications and Test
Procedures for Gaseous Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources
* * * * *
11.8.7 The zero-level and mid-level CD for each day must be less
than 5.0 percent of the span value as specified in section 13.2 of
this PS. You must meet this criterion for 7 consecutive operating
days.
* * * * *
17.0 * * *
Table 1--Interference Test Gas Concentrations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approximate concentration
Potential interferent gas \1\ (balance N2)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CO2....................................... 15% 1% CO2.\2\
CO........................................ 100 20 ppm.
CH2O...................................... 20 5 ppm.
CH4....................................... 100 20 ppm.
NH3....................................... 10 5 ppm
(extractive CEMS only).
NO........................................ 250 50 ppm.
SO2....................................... 200 20 ppm.
O2........................................ 3% 1% O2.\2\
H2O....................................... 10% 1% H2O.\2\
N2........................................ Balance.\2\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Any of these specific gases can be tested at a lower level if the
manufacturer has provided reliable means for limiting or scrubbing
that gas to a specified level in CEMS field installations.
\2\ Gases for short path IP cell interference tests cannot be added
above 100 percent stack equivalent concentration. Add these gases at
the indicated percentages to make up the remaining cell volume.
* * * * *
PS-18 Appendix A Standard Addition Procedures
* * * * *
12.0 [Reserved]
* * * * *
0
12. Revise sections 5.1.2(1) and (3) in Procedure 1 of appendix F to
part 60 to read as follows:
Appendix F to Part 60--Quality Assurance Procedures
Procedure 1--Quality Assurance Requirements for Gas Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems Used For Compliance Determination
* * * * *
5.1.2 * * *
(1) Challenge the CEMS (both pollutant and diluent portions of
the CEMS, if applicable) with an audit gas of known concentration at
two points within the following ranges:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Audit range
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Audit point Diluent monitors for--
Pollutant monitors ----------------------------------------------------------
CO2 O2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1............................... 20 to 30% of span 5 to 8% by volume.. 4 to 6% by volume.
value.
2............................... 50 to 60% of span 10 to 14% by volume 8 to 12% by volume.
value.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introduce each of the audit gases, three times each for a total
of six challenges. Introduce the gases in such a manner that the
entire CEMS is challenged. Do not introduce the same gas
concentration twice in succession.
Use of separate audit gas cylinder for audit points 1 and 2. Do
not dilute gas from audit cylinder when challenging the CEMS.
The monitor should be challenged at each audit point for a
sufficient period of time to assure adsorption-desorption of the
CEMS sample transport surfaces has stabilized.
* * * * *
(3) Use Certified Reference Materials (CRM's) (See Citation 1)
audit gases that have been certified by comparison to National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Standard Reference
Materials (SRM's) or EPA Protocol Gases following the most recent
edition of the EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification
of Gaseous Calibration Standards (See Citation 2). Procedures for
preparation of CRM's are described in Citation 1. Procedures for
preparation of EPA Protocol Gases are described in Citation 2. In
the case that a suitable audit gas level is not commercially
available, Method 205 (See Citation 3) may be used to dilute CRM's
or EPA Protocol Gases to the needed level. The difference between
the actual concentration of the audit gas and the concentration
indicated by the monitor is used to assess the accuracy of the CEMS.
* * * * *
PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES
0
13. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
14. In Sec. 63.7, revise paragraphs (g)(2) introductory text and
(g)(2)(v) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.7 Performance testing requirements.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(2) Contents of a performance test, CMS performance evaluation, or
CMS quality assurance test report (electronic or paper submitted copy).
Unless otherwise specified in a relevant standard, test method, CMS
performance specification, or quality assurance requirement for a CMS,
or as otherwise approved by the Administrator in writing, the report
shall include the elements identified in paragraphs (g)(2)(i) through
(vi) of this section.
* * * * *
(v) Where a test method, CEMS, PEMS, or COMS performance
specification, or on-going quality assurance requirement for a CEMS,
PEMS, or COMS requires you record or report, the following shall be
included in your report: Record of preparation of standards, record of
calibrations, raw data sheets for field sampling, raw data sheets for
field and laboratory analyses, chain-of-custody documentation, and
example calculations for reported results.
* * * * *
0
15. In Sec. 63.8, revise paragraph (e)(5)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.8 Monitoring requirements.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(5) * * * (i) The owner or operator shall furnish the Administrator
a copy of a written report of the results of the performance evaluation
containing the information specified in Sec. 63.7(g)(2)(i) through
(vi) simultaneously with the results of the performance test required
under Sec. 63.7 or within 60 days of completion of the performance
evaluation, unless otherwise specified in a relevant standard.
* * * * *
0
16. Revise Table 6 to Subpart DDDDD of part 63 to read as follows:
Table 6 to Subpart DDDDD of Part 63--Fuel Analysis Requirements
As stated in Sec. 63.7521, you must comply with the following
requirements
[[Page 56726]]
for fuel analysis testing for existing, new or reconstructed affected
sources. However, equivalent methods (as defined in Sec. 63.7575) may
be used in lieu of the prescribed methods at the discretion of the
source owner or operator:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To conduct a fuel analysis for
the following pollutant . . . You must . . . Using . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Mercury.................... a. Collect fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(c) or ASTM
D5192\a\, or ASTM
D7430\a\, or ASTM
D6883\a\, or ASTM
D2234/D2234M\a\ (for
coal) or EPA 1631 or
EPA 1631E or ASTM
D6323\a\ (for
solid), or EPA 821-R-
01-013 (for liquid
or solid), or ASTM
D4177\a\ (for
liquid), or ASTM
D4057\a\ (for
liquid), or
equivalent.
b. Composite fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(d) or
equivalent.
c. Prepare EPA SW-846-3050B\a\
composited fuel (for solid samples),
samples. ASTM D2013/D2013M\a\
(for coal), ASTM
D5198\a\ (for
biomass), or EPA
3050\a\ (for solid
fuel), or EPA 821-R-
01-013\a\ (for
liquid or solid), or
equivalent.
d. Determine heat ASTM D5865\a\ (for
content of the coal) or ASTM
fuel type. E711\a\ (for
biomass), or ASTM
D5864\a\ for liquids
and other solids, or
ASTM D240\a\ or
equivalent.
e. Determine ASTM D3173\a\, ASTM
moisture content E871\a\, or ASTM
of the fuel type. D5864\a\, or ASTM
D240\a\, or ASTM
D95\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or ASTM
D4006\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or
equivalent.
f. Measure ASTM D6722\a\ (for
mercury coal), EPA SW-846-
concentration in 7471B\a\ or EPA 1631
fuel sample. or EPA 1631E\a\ (for
solid samples), or
EPA SW-846-7470A\a\
or EPA SW-846-
7471B\a\ (for liquid
samples), or EPA 821-
R-01-013\a\ (for
liquid or solid), or
equivalent.
g. Convert For fuel mixtures use
concentration Equation 8 in Sec.
into units of 63.7530.
pounds of
mercury per
MMBtu of heat
content.
2. HCl........................ a. Collect fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(c) or ASTM
D5192\a\, or ASTM
D7430\a\, or ASTM
D6883\a\, or ASTM
D2234/D2234M\a\ (for
coal) or ASTM
D6323\a\ (for coal
or biomass), ASTM
D4177\a\ (for liquid
fuels) or ASTM
D4057\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or
equivalent.
b. Composite fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(d) or
equivalent.
c. Prepare EPA SW-846-3050B\a\
composited fuel (for solid samples),
samples. ASTM D2013/D2013M\a\
(for coal), or ASTM
D5198\a\ (for
biomass), or EPA
3050\a\ or
equivalent.
d. Determine heat ASTM D5865\a\ (for
content of the coal) or ASTM
fuel type. E711\a\ (for
biomass), ASTM
D5864\a\, ASTM
D240\a\ or
equivalent.
e. Determine ASTM D3173\a\ or ASTM
moisture content E871\a\, or
of the fuel type. D5864\a\, or ASTM
D240\a\, or ASTM
D95\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or ASTM
D4006\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or
equivalent.
f. Measure EPA SW-846-9250\a\,
chlorine ASTM D6721\a\, ASTM
concentration in D4208\a\ (for coal),
fuel sample. or EPA SW-846-
5050\a\ or ASTM
E776\a\ (for solid
fuel), or EPA SW-846-
9056\a\ or SW-846-
9076\a\ (for solids
or liquids) or
equivalent.
g. Convert For fuel mixtures use
concentrations Equation 7 in Sec.
into units of 63.7530 and convert
pounds of HCl from chlorine to HCl
per MMBtu of by multiplying by
heat content. 1.028.
3. Mercury Fuel Specification a. Measure Method 30B (M30B) at
for other gas 1 fuels. mercury 40 CFR part 60,
concentration in appendix A-8 of this
the fuel sample chapter or ASTM
and convert to D5954\a\, ASTM
units of D6350\a\, ISO 6978-
micrograms per 1:2003(E)\a\, or ISO
cubic meter, or. 6978-2:2003(E)\a\,
or EPA-1631\a\ or
equivalent.
b. Measure Method 29, 30A, or
mercury 30B (M29, M30A, or
concentration in M30B) at 40 CFR part
the exhaust gas 60, appendix A-8 of
when firing only this chapter or
the other gas 1 Method 101A or
fuel is fired in Method 102 at 40 CFR
the boiler or part 61, appendix B
process heater. of this chapter, or
ASTM Method D6784\a\
or equivalent.
4. TSM........................ a. Collect fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(c) or ASTM
D5192\a\, or ASTM
D7430\a\, or ASTM
D6883\a\, or ASTM
D2234/D2234M\a\ (for
coal) or ASTM
D6323\a\ (for coal
or biomass), or ASTM
D4177\a\, (for
liquid fuels), or
ASTM D4057\a\ (for
liquid fuels), or
equivalent.
b. Composite fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(d) or
equivalent.
c. Prepare EPA SW-846-3050B\a\
composited fuel (for solid samples),
samples. ASTM D2013/D2013M\a\
(for coal), ASTM
D5198\a\ or TAPPI
T266\a\ (for
biomass), or EPA
3050\a\ or
equivalent.
d. Determine heat ASTM D5865\a\ (for
content of the coal) or ASTM
fuel type. E711\a\ (for
biomass), or ASTM
D5864\a\ for liquids
and other solids, or
ASTM D240\a\ or
equivalent.
e. Determine ASTM D3173\a\ or ASTM
moisture content E871\a\, or
of the fuel type. D5864\a\, or ASTM
D240\a\, or ASTM
D95\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or ASTM
D4006\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or ASTM
D4177\a\ (for liquid
fuels) or ASTM
D4057\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or
equivalent.
f. Measure TSM ASTM D3683\a\, or
concentration in ASTM D4606\a\, or
fuel sample. ASTM D6357\a\ or EPA
200.8\a\ or EPA SW-
846-6020\a\, or EPA
SW-846-6020A\a\, or
EPA SW-846-6010C\a\,
EPA 7060\a\ or EPA
7060A\a\ (for
arsenic only), or
EPA SW-846-7740\a\
(for selenium only).
[[Page 56727]]
g. Convert For fuel mixtures use
concentrations Equation 9 in Sec.
into units of 63.7530.
pounds of TSM
per MMBtu of
heat content.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14.
* * * * *
0
17. Revise Table 5 to Subpart UUUUU of part 63 to read as follows:
Table 5 to Subpart UUUUU of Part 63--Performance Testing Requirements
As stated in Sec. 63.10007, you must comply with the following
requirements for performance testing for existing, new or reconstructed
affected sources: \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Regarding emissions data collected during periods of startup
or shutdown, see Sec. Sec. 63.10020(b) and (c) and 63.10021(h).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You must perform the
following activities, as
To conduct a performance test for Using . . . applicable to your input- Using . . .\2\
the following pollutant . . . or output-based emission
limit . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Filterable Particulate matter Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1
(PM). location and the number to part 60 of this
of traverse points. chapter.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-2 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.\3\
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter.
e. Measure the filterable Methods 5 and 5I at
PM concentration. appendix A-3 to part 60
of this chapter.
For positive pressure
fabric filters, Method
5D at appendix A-3 to
part 60 of this chapter
for filterable PM
emissions.
Note that the Method 5 or
5I front half
temperature shall be
160[deg] 14
[deg]C (320[deg] 25 [deg]F).
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentration to lb/MMBtu methodology at appendix
or lb/MWh emissions rates. A-7 to part 60 of this
chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions
rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
OR OR
PM CEMS.............. a. Install, certify, Performance Specification
operate, and maintain the 11 at appendix B to part
PM CEMS. 60 of this chapter and
Procedure 2 at appendix
F to part 60 of this
chapter.
b. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter
operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a),
diluent gas, flow rate, (b), (c), and (d).
and/or moisture
monitoring systems.
c. Convert hourly Method 19 F-factor
emissions concentrations methodology at appendix
to 30 boiler operating A-7 to part 60 of this
day rolling average lb/ chapter, or calculate
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions using mass emissions
rates. rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
2. Total or individual non-Hg HAP Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1
metals. location and the number to part 60 of this
of traverse points. chapter.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-2 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.\3\
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter.
[[Page 56728]]
e. Measure the HAP metals Method 29 at appendix A-8
emissions concentrations to part 60 of this
and determine each chapter. For liquid oil-
individual HAP metals fired units, Hg is
emissions concentration, included in HAP metals
as well as the total and you may use Method
filterable HAP metals 29, Method 30B at
emissions concentration appendix A-8 to part 60
and total HAP metals of this chapter; for
emissions concentration. Method 29, you must
report the front half
and back half results
separately. When using
Method 29, report metals
matrix spike and
recovery levels.
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentrations methodology at appendix
(individual HAP metals, A-7 to part 60 of this
total filterable HAP chapter, or calculate
metals, and total HAP using mass emissions
metals) to lb/MMBtu or lb/ rate and gross output
MWh emissions rates. data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
3. Hydrogen chloride (HCl) and Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1
hydrogen fluoride (HF). location and the number to part 60 of this
of traverse points. chapter.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-2 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.\3\
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter.
e. Measure the HCl and HF Method 26 or Method 26A
emissions concentrations. at appendix A-8 to part
60 of this chapter or
Method 320 at appendix A
to part 63 of this
chapter or ASTM D6348-03
\3\ with
(1) the following
conditions when using
ASTM D6348-03:
(A) The test plan
preparation and
implementation in the
Annexes to ASTM D6348-
03, Sections A1 through
A8 are mandatory;
(B) For ASTM D6348-03
Annex A5 (Analyte
Spiking Technique), the
percent (%) R must be
determined for each
target analyte (see
Equation A5.5);
(C) For the ASTM D6348-03
test data to be
acceptable for a target
analyte, %R must be 70%
>=R <=130%; and
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.e.1(D) The %R value for each compound must be reported in the
test report and all field measurements corrected with the calculated %R
value for that compound using the following equation:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.072
and
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You must perform the
To conduct a performance test for following activities, as
the following pollutant . . . Using . . . (cont'd) applicable to your input- Using . . .\2\ (cont'd)
(cont'd) or output-based emission
limit . . . (cont'd)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) spiking levels
nominally no greater
than two times the level
corresponding to the
applicable emission
limit.
Method 26A must be used
if there are entrained
water droplets in the
exhaust stream.
[[Page 56729]]
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentration to lb/MMBtu methodology at appendix
or lb/MWh emissions rates. A-7 to part 60 of this
chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions
rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
OR OR
HCl and/or HF CEMS... a. Install, certify, Appendix B of this
operate, and maintain the subpart.
HCl or HF CEMS.
b. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter
operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a),
diluent gas, flow rate, (b), (c), and (d).
and/or moisture
monitoring systems.
c. Convert hourly Method 19 F-factor
emissions concentrations methodology at appendix
to 30 boiler operating A-7 to part 60 of this
day rolling average lb/ chapter, or calculate
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions using mass emissions
rates. rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
4. Mercury (Hg)................... Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1
location and the number to part 60 of this
of traverse points. chapter or Method 30B at
Appendix A-8 for Method
30B point selection.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-1 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.\3\
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter.
e. Measure the Hg emission Method 30B at appendix A-
concentration. 8 to part 60 of this
chapter, ASTM D6784,\3\
or Method 29 at appendix
A-8 to part 60 of this
chapter; for Method 29,
you must report the
front half and back half
results separately.
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentration to lb/TBtu methodology at appendix
or lb/GWh emission rates. A-7 to part 60 of this
chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions
rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
OR OR
Hg CEMS.............. a. Install, certify, Sections 3.2.1 and 5.1 of
operate, and maintain the appendix A of this
CEMS. subpart.
b. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter
operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a),
diluent gas, flow rate, (b), (c), and (d).
and/or moisture
monitoring systems.
c. Convert hourly Section 6 of appendix A
emissions concentrations to this subpart.
to 30 boiler operating
day rolling average lb/
TBtu or lb/GWh emissions
rates.
OR OR
Sorbent trap a. Install, certify, Sections 3.2.2 and 5.2 of
monitoring system. operate, and maintain the appendix A to this
sorbent trap monitoring subpart.
system.
b. Install, operate, and Part 75 of this chapter
maintain the diluent gas, and Sec. 63.10010(a),
flow rate, and/or (b), (c), and (d).
moisture monitoring
systems.
c. Convert emissions Section 6 of appendix A
concentrations to 30 to this subpart.
boiler operating day
rolling average lb/TBtu
or lb/GWh emissions rates.
OR OR
LEE testing.......... a. Select sampling ports Single point located at
location and the number the 10% centroidal area
of traverse points. of the duct at a port
location per Method 1 at
appendix A-1 to part 60
of this chapter or
Method 30B at Appendix A-
8 for Method 30B point
selection.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G,
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter or flow
monitoring system
certified per appendix A
of this subpart.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-1 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981,\3\
or diluent gas
monitoring systems
certified according to
part 75 of this chapter.
[[Page 56730]]
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter, or moisture
monitoring systems
certified according to
part 75 of this chapter.
e. Measure the Hg emission Method 30B at appendix A-
concentration. 8 to part 60 of this
chapter; perform a 30
operating day test, with
a maximum of 10
operating days per run
(i.e., per pair of
sorbent traps) or
sorbent trap monitoring
system or Hg CEMS
certified per appendix A
of this subpart.
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentrations from the methodology at appendix
LEE test to lb/TBtu or lb/ A-7 to part 60 of this
GWh emissions rates. chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions
rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
g. Convert average lb/TBtu Potential maximum annual
or lb/GWh Hg emission heat input in TBtu or
rate to lb/year, if you potential maximum
are attempting to meet electricity generated in
the 29.0 lb/year GWh.
threshold.
5. Sulfur dioxide (SO2)........... SO2 CEMS............. a. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter
operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a)
CEMS. and (f).
b. Install, operate, and Part 75 of this chapter
maintain the diluent gas, and Sec. 63.10010(a),
flow rate, and/or (b), (c), and (d).
moisture monitoring
systems.
c. Convert hourly Method 19 F-factor
emissions concentrations methodology at appendix
to 30 boiler operating A-7 to part 60 of this
day rolling average lb/ chapter, or calculate
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions using mass emissions
rates. rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
18. In appendix A to Part 63:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Tables 1 and 2 to this subpart for required sample
volumes and/or sampling run times.
\3\ Incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
a. Revise section 12.4 in Method 303.
0
b. Revise section 2.0 in Method 308.
0
c. Remove and reserve section 7.2.2 in Method 308.
0
d. Revise sections 7.2.3.3, 8.1.2, 9.1, 11.3.2, and 12.1 in Method 308.
0
e. Add sections 12.5 and 13.0 in Method 308.
0
f. Revise sections 8.2.2.4 and 9.2.3 in Method 320.
0
g. Revise section 12.9 in Method 323.
0
h. Revise section 8.2.1.3, Figure 8.1. and section 8.2.3.2 in Method
325A.
0
i. Add sections 8.2.3.3 and 8.4.3 in Method 325A.
0
j. Revise sections 9.3.2, 9.13, 11.3.2.5, and 12.2.2 in Method 325B.
0
k. Remove sections 12.2.3 and 12.2.4 in Method 325B.
0
l. Revise table 17.1 in Method 325B.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 63--Test Methods
* * * * *
Method 303--Determination of Visible Emissions From By-Product Coke
Oven Batteries
* * * * *
12.4 Average Duration of VE from Charging Operations. Use
Equation 303-3 to calculate the daily 30-day rolling log average of
seconds of visible emissions from the charging operation for each
battery using these current day's observations and the 29 previous
valid daily sets of observations.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.063
* * * * *
Method 308--Procedure for Determination of Methanol Emission From
Stationary Sources
* * * * *
2.0 Summary of Method
A gas sample is extracted from the sampling point in the stack.
The methanol is collected in deionized distilled water and adsorbed
on silica gel. The sample is returned to the laboratory where the
methanol in the water fraction is separated from other organic
compounds with a gas chromatograph (GC) and is then measured by a
flame ionization detector (FID). The fraction adsorbed on silica gel
is extracted with deionized distilled water and is then separated
and measured by GC/FID.
* * * * *
7.2.2 [Reserved]
* * * * *
7.2.3.3 Methanol Standards for Adsorbent Tube Samples. Prepare a
series of methanol standards by first pipetting 10 ml of the
methanol working standard into a 100-ml volumetric flask and
diluting the contents to exactly 100 ml with deionized distilled
water. This standard will contain 10 [micro]g/ml of methanol.
Pipette 5, 15, and 25 ml of this
[[Page 56731]]
standard, respectively, into three 50-ml volumetric flasks. Dilute
each solution to 50 ml with deionized distilled water. These
standards will have 1, 3, and 5 [micro]g/ml of methanol,
respectively. Transfer all four standards into 40-ml glass vials
capped with Teflon[supreg]-lined septa and store under
refrigeration. Discard any excess solution.
* * * * *
8.1.2 Leak Check. A leak check before and after the sampling run
is mandatory. The leak-check procedure is as follows:
Temporarily attach a suitable (e.g., 0- to 40-ml/min) rotameter
to the outlet of the DGM, and place a vacuum gauge at or near the
probe inlet. Plug the probe inlet, pull a vacuum of at least 250 mm
(10 inch) Hg or the highest vacuum experienced during the sampling
run, and note the flow rate as indicated by the rotameter. A leakage
rate in excess of 2 percent of the average sampling rate is
acceptable.
Note: Carefully release the probe inlet plug before turning off
the pump.
* * * * *
9.1 Miscellaneous Quality Control Measures. The following
quality control measures are required:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quality control
Section measure Effect
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.1.2, 8.1.3, 10.1.......... Sampling equipment Ensures accurate
leak check and measurement of
calibration. sample volume.
10.2........................ GC calibration...... Ensures precision of
GC analysis.
13.0........................ Methanol spike Verifies all
recovery check. methanol in stack
gas is being
captured in impinge/
adsorbent tube
setup.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
11.3.2 Desorption of Samples. Add 3 ml of deionized distilled
water to each of the stoppered vials and shake or vibrate the vials
for 30 minutes.
* * * * *
12.1 Nomenclature.
Caf = Concentration of methanol in the front of the
adsorbent tube, [micro]g/ml.
Cab = Concentration of methanol in the back of the
adsorbent tube, [micro]g/ml.
Ci = Concentration of methanol in the impinger portion of
the sample train, [micro]g/ml.
E = Mass emission rate of methanol, [micro]g/hr (lb/hr).
ms = Total mass of compound measured in impinger and on
adsorbent with spiked train (mg).
mu = Total mass of compound measured in impinger and on
adsorbent with unspiked train (mg).
mv = Mass per volume of spiked compound measured (mg/L).
Mtot = Total mass of methanol collected in the sample
train, [micro]g.
Pbar = Barometric pressure at the exit orifice of the
DGM, mm Hg (in. Hg).
Pstd = Standard absolute pressure, 760 mm Hg (29.92 in.
Hg).
Qstd = Dry volumetric stack gas flow rate corrected to
standard conditions, dscm/hr (dscf/hr).
R = fraction of spiked compound recovered
s = theoretical concentration (ppm) of spiked target compound
Tm = Average DGM absolute temperature, degrees K
([deg]R).
Tstd = Standard absolute temperature, 293 degrees K (528
[deg]R).
Vaf = Volume of front half adsorbent sample, ml.
Vab = Volume of back half adsorbent sample, ml.
Vi = Volume of impinger sample, ml.
Vm = Dry gas volume as measured by the DGM, dry cubic
meters (dcm), dry cubic feet (dcf).
Vm(std) = Dry gas volume measured by the DGM, corrected
to standard conditions, dry standard cubic meters (dscm), dry
standard cubic feet (dscf).
* * * * *
12.5 Recovery Fraction (R)
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.064
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.065
13.0 Method Performance
Since a potential sample may contain a variety of compounds from
various sources, a specific precision limit for the analysis of
field samples is impractical. Precision in the range of 5 to 10
percent relative standard deviation (RSD) is typical for gas
chromatographic techniques, but an experienced GC operator with a
reliable instrument can readily achieve 5 percent RSD. For this
method, the following combined GC/operator values are required.
(a) Precision. Calibration standards must meet the requirements
in section 10.2.1 or 10.2.2 as applicable.
(b) Recovery. After developing an appropriate sampling and
analytical system for the pollutants of interest, conduct the
following spike recovery procedure at each sampling point where the
method is being applied.
i. Methanol Spike. Set up two identical sampling trains.
Collocate the two sampling probes in the stack. The probes shall be
placed in the same horizontal plane, where the first probe tip is
2.5 cm from the outside edge of the other. One of the sampling
trains shall be designated the spiked train and the other the
unspiked train. Spike methanol into the impinger, and onto the
adsorbent tube in the spiked train prior to sampling. The total mass
of methanol shall be 40 to 60 percent of the mass expected to be
collected with the unspiked train. Sample the stack gas into the two
trains simultaneously. Analyze the impingers and adsorbents from the
two trains utilizing identical analytical procedures and
instrumentation. Determine the fraction of spiked methanol recovered
(R) by combining the amount recovered in the impinger and in the
adsorbent tube, using the equations in section 12.5. Recovery values
must fall in the range: 0.70 <= R <= 1.30. Report the R value in the
test report.
ii. [Reserved]
* * * * *
Method 320--Measurement of Vapor Phase Organic and Inorganic Emissions
By Extractive Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy
* * * * *
8.2.2.4 Determine the percent leak volume %VL for the
signal integration time tSS and for
[Delta]Pmax, i.e., the larger of [Delta]Pv or
[Delta]Pp, as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.066
[[Page 56732]]
Where:
50 = 100% divided by the leak-check time of 2 minutes.
* * * * *
9.2.3 Calculate the dilution ratio using the tracer gas as
follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.067
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.068
DF = Dilution factor of the spike gas; this value shall be >=10.
SF6(dir) = SF6 (or tracer gas) concentration
measured directly in undiluted spike gas.
SF6(spk) = Diluted SF6 (or tracer gas)
concentration measured in a spiked sample.
Spikedir = Concentration of the analyte in the spike
standard measured by filling the FTIR cell directly.
CS = Expected concentration of the spiked samples.
Unspike = Native concentration of analytes in unspiked samples.
* * * * *
Method 323--Measurment of Formaldehyde Emissions From Natural Gas-Fired
Stationary Sources-Acetyl Acetone Derivitization Method
* * * * *
12.9 Formaldehyde Concentration Corrected to 15% Oxygen
* * * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.069
Method 325A--Volatile Organic Compounds From Fugitive and Area Sources:
Sampler Deployment and VOC Sample Collection
* * * * *
8.2.1.3 An extra sampler must be placed near known sources of
VOCs if potential emission sources are within 50 meters (162 feet)
of the boundary and the source or sources are located between two
monitors. Measure the distance (x) between the two monitors and
place another monitor approximately halfway between (x/2 10 percent) the two monitors. Only one extra sampler is
required between two monitors to account for known sources of VOCs.
For example, in Figure 8.1, the facility added three additional
monitors (i.e., light shaded sampler locations), and in Figure 8.2,
the facility added two additional monitors to provide sufficient
coverage of all area sources.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.070
[[Page 56733]]
Figure 8.1. Facility with a Regular Shape Between 750 and 1,500 Acres
in Area
* * * * *
8.2.3.2 For facilities with a monitoring perimeter length
greater than or equal to 7,315 meters (24,000 feet), sampling
locations are spaced 610 76 meters (2,000
250 feet) apart.
8.2.3.3 Unless otherwise specified in an applicable regulation,
permit or other requirement, for small disconnected subareas with
known sources within 50 meters (162 feet) of the monitoring
perimeter, sampling points need not be placed closer than 152 meters
(500 feet) apart as long as a minimum of 3 monitoring locations are
used for each subarea.
* * * * *
8.4.3 When extenuating circumstances do not permit safe
deployment or retrieval of passive samplers (e.g., extreme weather,
power failure), sampler placement or retrieval earlier or later than
the prescribed schedule is allowed but must occur as soon as safe
access to sampling sites is possible.
* * * * *
Method 325B--Volatile Organic Compounds From Fugitive and Area Sources:
Sampler Preparation and Analysis
* * * * *
9.3.2 Field blanks must be shipped to the monitoring site with
the sampling tubes and must be stored at the sampling location
throughout the monitoring exercise. The field blanks must be
installed under a protective hood/cover at the sampling location,
but the long-term storage caps must remain in place throughout the
monitoring period (see Method 325A). The field blanks are then
shipped back to the laboratory in the same container as the sampled
tubes. Collect at least two field blank samples per sampling period
to ensure sample integrity associated with shipment, collection, and
storage.
* * * * *
9.13 Routine CCV at the Start of a Sequence. Run CCV before each
sequence of analyses and after every tenth sample to ensure that the
previous multi-level calibration (see section 10.0) is still valid.
* * * * *
11.3.2.5 Whenever the thermal desorption--GC/MS analytical
method is changed or major equipment maintenance is performed, you
must conduct a new five-level calibration (see section 10.0). System
calibration remains valid as long as results from subsequent CCV are
within 30 percent of the most recent 5-point calibration (see
section 9.13). Include relevant CCV data in the supporting
information in the data report for each set of samples.
* * * * *
12.2.2 Determine the equivalent concentrations of compounds in
atmospheres as follows. Correct target compound concentrations
determined at the sampling site temperature and atmospheric pressure
to standard conditions (25 [deg]C and 760 mm mercury) using Equation
12.5.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.071
Where:
mmeas = The mass of the compound as measured in the sorbent
tube ([micro]g).
t = The exposure time (minutes).
tss = The average temperature during the collection period
at the sampling site (K).
UNTP = The method defined diffusive uptake rate (sampling
rate) (mL/min).
Note: Diffusive uptake rates (UNTP) for common VOCs,
using carbon sorbents packed into sorbent tubes of the dimensions
specified in section 6.1, are listed in Table 12.1. Adjust analytical
conditions to keep expected sampled masses within range (see sections
11.3.1.3 to 11.3.1.5). Best possible method detection limits are
typically in the order of 0.1 ppb for 1,3-butadiene and 0.05 ppb for
volatile aromatics such as benzene for 14-day monitoring. However,
actual detection limits will depend upon the analytical conditions
selected.
* * * * *
Table 17.1--Summary of GC/MS Analysis Quality Control Procedures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parameter Frequency Acceptance criteria Corrective action
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bromofluorobenzene Instrument Tune Daily \a\ prior to Evaluation criteria (1) Retune and or
Performance Check. sample analysis. presented in Section (2) Perform
9.5 and Table 9.2. Maintenance.
Five point calibration bracketing the Following any major (1) Percent Deviation (1) Repeat calibration
expected sample concentration. change, repair or (%DEV) of response sample analysis.
maintenance or if factors 30%. check.
meet method (2) Relative Retention (3) Prepare new
requirements. Times (RRTs) for calibration standards
Recalibration not to target peaks 0.06 units from repeat analysis.
mean RRT.
Calibration Verification (CCV Second Following the The response factor (1) Repeat calibration
source calibration verification calibration curve. 30% DEV check.
check). from calibration curve (2) Repeat calibration
average response curve.
factor.
Laboratory Blank Analysis............ Daily \a\ following (1) <=0.2 ppbv per (1) Repeat analysis
bromofluoro benzene analyte or <=3 times with new blank tube.
and calibration check; the LOD, whichever is (2) Check system for
prior to sample greater. leaks, contamination.
analysis. (2) Internal Standard (3) Analyze additional
(IS) area response blank.
40% and IS
Retention Time (RT)
0.33 min.
of most recent
calibration check.
Blank Sorbent Tube Certification..... One tube analyzed for <0.2 ppbv per VOC Re-clean all tubes in
each batch of tubes targeted compound or 3 batch and reanalyze.
cleaned or 10 percent times the LOD,
of tubes whichever is whichever is greater.
greater.
Samples--Internal Standards.......... All samples............ IS area response 40% and IS RT invalidation.
0.33 min.
of most recent
calibration validation.
[[Page 56734]]
Field Blanks......................... Two per sampling period No greater than one- Flag Data for possible
third of the measured invalidation due to
target analyte or high blank bias.
compliance limit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Every 24 hours.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-24747 Filed 11-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P