Shipping Act, Merchant Marine, and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) Provisions; Fishing Vessel, Fishing Facility and Individual Fishing Quota Lending Program, 55137-55141 [2018-23956]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 213 / Friday, November 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
six months, the effective date of the
2017 final rule from July 1, 2019 to
January 1, 2019.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 10
Biologics, Business and industry,
Diseases, Drugs, Health, Health care,
Health facilities, Hospitals.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and Tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more (adjusted annually
for inflation) in any one year.’’ In 2018,
that threshold is approximately $150
million. HHS does not expect this rule
to exceed the threshold.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires that OMB
approve all collections of information
by a Federal agency from the public
before they can be implemented. This
proposed rule is projected to have no
impact on current reporting and
recordkeeping burden for manufacturers
under the 340B Program. Changes
proposed in this rule would result in no
new reporting burdens. Comments are
welcome on the accuracy of this
statement.
16:35 Nov 01, 2018
Jkt 247001
[FR Doc. 2018–24057 Filed 10–31–18; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 253
HHS has reviewed this proposed rule
in accordance with Executive Order
13132 regarding federalism, and has
determined that it does not have
‘‘federalism implications.’’ This rule
would not ‘‘have substantial direct
effects on the States, or on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’ The proposal to
rescind the June 5, 2018 final rule and
make the January 5, 2017 final rule
effective as of January 1, 2019 would not
adversely affect the following family
elements: Family safety, family stability,
marital commitment; parental rights in
the education, nurture, and supervision
of their children; family functioning,
disposable income or poverty; or the
behavior and personal responsibility of
youth, as determined under Section
654(c) of the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act of
1999. HHS invites additional comments
on the impact of this proposed rule from
affected stakeholders.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Dated: October 26, 2018.
George Sigounas,
Administrator, Health Resources and Services
Administration.
Approved: October 30, 2018.
Alex M. Azar II,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human
Services.
[Docket No. 180220192–8192–01]
RIN 0648–BH82
Shipping Act, Merchant Marine, and
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) Provisions;
Fishing Vessel, Fishing Facility and
Individual Fishing Quota Lending
Program
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The NMFS’ Fisheries Finance
Program (FFP or Program) proposes to
revise the operating rules of the Program
and set forth procedures, eligibility
criteria, loan terms, and other
requirements to add FFP financing to
construct fishing vessels or reconstruct
fishing vessels in limited access
fisheries that are neither overfished or
subject to overfishing. NMFS believes
that this change will help preserve the
economic benefits the nation derives
from its commercial fishing fleets. Aging
fishing vessels will need to be replaced.
This will allow the FFP to play a small
role in this process. Additionally, new
fishing vessels will provide a safer
environment for fishing crews and will
be more fuel efficient. The rule provides
for controls over the uses of replaced
vessels that might otherwise contribute
to additional harvesting efforts that
could lead to overfishing. Currently, the
Program provides loans to purchase,
refurbish, or refinance fishing vessels,
fish processing facilities, aquaculture
facilities and individual fishing quota
(IFQ) permits. The program also offers
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55137
loans to community development quota
(CDQ) groups to borrow for traditional
loan purposes. NMFS also recently
amended its regulations to add the
purchase or refinancing of federally
managed harvesting rights in limited
access fisheries.
DATES: The comment period for this
draft rule ends December 17, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by NOAA–NMFS–2014–0062,
by any one of the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=
NOAA-NMFS-2014-0062, click the
‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the
required fields and enter or attach your
comments.
• Fax: 301–713–1305, Attn: Earl
Bennett;
• Mail: Earl Bennett, Program Leader,
FFP, Financial Services Division,
NMFS, Attn: F/MB5, 1315 East West
Highway, SSMC3, Silver Spring, MD
20910.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information. Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Earl
Bennett, NMFS, Fisheries Finance
Program, 301–427–8765.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
This proposed rule is also accessible
at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr.
Background
Since 1997, the FFP has provided
direct loans (loan guarantees prior to
that) at 2 percentage points above the
Treasury borrowing rate. All FFP vessel
loans are collateralized by the fishing
vessel, and often include additional
collateral and/or guarantees. The
creditworthiness of borrowers is also
examined to ensure their ability to repay
the loan. These provide a means of
recovery in the event of a payment
default. To date, less than one percent
of borrowers have defaulted.
In 2016, Congress passed section 302
of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of
2015 (the ‘‘Act’’) (Pub. L. 114–120)
which included specific authority for
E:\FR\FM\02NOP1.SGM
02NOP1
55138
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 213 / Friday, November 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
the Program to finance the construction
or reconstruction of fishing vessels in a
fishery that is managed under a limited
access system. (16 U.S.C. Section 1802)
This rule is being proposed because of
concerns raised by commercial fisheries
that private commercial markets
improperly evaluate the risk associated
with capital needs of the fishing
industry, leading to shorter amortization
periods and higher interest rates than
would support the upfront investment
required for new vessel construction.
Current FFP regulations prohibit
financing the cost of new vessel
construction. There was a time when
there were many open domestic
fisheries. It was deemed important that
the program would not add harvesting
capacity to unregulated fisheries. Now
NMFS is proposing to restrict new
vessel construction to fisheries with a
limited access system which is
consistent with the goal to have
sustainable fisheries.
This rule, if finalized, removes the
prohibition on new vessel construction
and reconstruction financing. The rule
would also provide the same general
loan requirements for new vessel
construction that apply to all traditional
loans. These changes would have no
effect on currently allowed fisheries
financing activities, including current
traditional loans and the separately
authorized Northwest halibut and
sablefish quota share (HSQS), Bering
Sea and Aleutian Island (BSAI) crab
IFQ, and North Pacific CDQ loans
except that it would also explicitly state
that loans are restricted to fisheries that
are subject to managed limited access
systems that are neither overfished or
subject to overfishing.
Other than specifically identified, this
rule if implemented would not change
any of the existing FFP regulations,
requirements or procedures.
NMFS specially notes that in response
to the industry’s concerns, the FFP does
take into consideration the value of
permits, quota share or other harvesting
rights associated with the project being
financed. The value of harvesting rights
will be taken into consideration when
determining the adequacy of collateral.
Vessel Construction and Reconstruction
Financing Overview
The replacement of aged vessels in
managed fisheries will result in the
more efficient use of fisheries, promote
safety at sea, and improve
environmental operations of fishers.
Furthermore, recapitalization and
modernization of an over-aged fishing
fleet goes hand-in-hand with effective
fisheries management.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Nov 01, 2018
Jkt 247001
Based on current loan authority
amounts, the rule change would provide
the opportunity for a small number of
fishers in federally managed limited
access fisheries, setting total allowable
catch limits, to modernize their
operations by building new,
replacement vessels, or rebuilding their
current vessels. Loans will only be
available for projects in fisheries that are
in managed limited access systems that
are not deemed to be overfished or
subject to overfishing.
Even though fishing vessels can be
replaced, without the benefit of FFP
loans, the fishing industry cannot
always find the feasible, long-term,
fixed-rate financing necessary to make a
replacement vessel economically viable.
Smaller, one-vessel operators often have
a hard time finding adequate financing.
Variable interest rates increase the
economic uncertainty of fishing
operations that are already subject to
variations in weather, prices, and total
allowable catch. The availability of the
FFP will provide some stability in one
critical aspect of managing a fishing
operation.
To ensure the FFP program does not
contribute to over-fishing, loans
provided for the construction or
reconstruction of fishing vessels that
increase capacity, not to be confused
with increased harvesting, would be
provided only where no affected species
are overfished or subject to overfishing.
As is the current practice, the FFP
will notify the fisheries Regional
Administrators of a loan application to
ensure that it meets the requirements of
the fishery(ies) in which the new vessel
will participate. Since the new vessel
will replace an existing vessel, as
explained below, and will fish under
the old vessel’s permits, all harvesting
must be part of the fisheries
management plan. The FFP would not
provide financing if the fisheries
management plan could not support the
harvesting level, regardless of the
increased fishing capacity of the new
vessel, required for the applicant to be
financially viable.
NMFS would implement the new
vessel construction and reconstruction
loans on the same equitable first come,
first served basis based on individual
qualifications as current loans. That is,
the FFP would evaluate each vessel
construction or reconstruction project
on the basis of its ability, with present
permits and entitlements and overall
catch limitations, to repay the requested
loan. This includes recent fluctuations
in the conditions of the fisheries, prices,
economics, useful life of the fishing
vessel, and financial condition of the
borrower. As a result, projections of
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
total allowable catch over time are not
useful for evaluating the financial
viability of a certain project as it is too
speculative. However, present catch
limits do provide valuable perspective
on the current financial condition of a
prospective borrower. If the subject
fishery becomes ‘‘deemed to be
overfished’’ while the loan application
is under consideration, the FFP would
cease processing the loan at that point.
Applicants need to be mindful that the
current application fee of one half of
one percent of the amount requested
once paid, irrespective of why the
Program denies a loan, statutory
provisions limit refunds to fifty percent
of the fee. The proposed revisions also
clarify that NMFS only extends
financing in managed fisheries under
limited access systems.
This rule would also address the issue
of what to do with the replaced vessels.
While the replaced vessels may be old
and in need of modernization, they may
retain substantial market value. A
borrower may choose from the following
options:
(a) The replaced vessel will be
scrapped,
(b) The vessel will continue to operate
in a federally-managed fishery under
limited access, or
(c) The federal fishery endorsement
will be permanently cancelled and the
vessel will be prohibited from fishing or
providing support to fishing activities
anywhere in the world; the vessel’s title
will also be marked to prohibit the
vessel’s transfer to any foreign flag. If
the vessel were ever to cease operation
in a federally-managed fishery under
limited access or is sold, then option (c)
would automatically apply.
The requirements under these options
would have to be completed within four
months of the loan closing(s). If the
borrower selects option (c), at loan
closing the borrower would authorize
the Program and the United States Coast
Guard to act on the borrower’s behalf to
have the fisheries endorsement revoked
and have the vessel’s title amended to
prohibit a transfer to a foreign flag. In
addition, failure to complete any of the
tasks outlined in the options above
would be considered an event of default
under the loan.
Vessel Construction Borrowing
Opportunities
Borrowers would be able to
participate in new vessel construction
financing in two basic ways: Direct
construction financing, or ‘‘take-out’’
financing of private sector construction
loans.
Direct construction financing—The
FFP would provide up to 80 percent of
E:\FR\FM\02NOP1.SGM
02NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 213 / Friday, November 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
the cost of financing a new fishing
vessel during its construction. The
vessel owner would commit 20 percent
to the project and keep a reserve of as
much as thirty (30) percent of the
estimated cost to cover potential cost
overruns. Or, in lieu of a reserve
account, the vessel owner would be
responsible for securing a completion
bond or insurance, as approved by the
FFP. The program would make periodic
payments to the shipyard as key
milestones were met as verified by the
surveyor reporting to NMFS. This
would necessitate the vessel owner
closing multiple loans over the
construction period—each closing
having its own costs—and accruing
interest on those loans while the vessel/
partial vessel was still in the yard.
Finally, FFP loan commitments would
be usable within a five-year period of
obligation as long as the applicant
remains qualified. The vessel
construction project would have to be
completed and funded within that time.
Project risk faced by the FFP in this
option would be higher than take out
financing.
Take-out financing—The FFP could
evaluate a new vessel construction
project and, based on that evaluation,
make a commitment to refinance nonFFP construction loans after completion
of the construction. With the availability
of take-out financing, the vessel owner
may secure prime-rate construction
financing in the private sector. Once the
vessel was successfully completed
(including sea trials), fully licensed and
permitted in its intended fishery and the
vessel owner was in compliance with all
loan terms, NMFS would disburse funds
to the construction financing lender.
There would be just one closing, which
would refinance up to 80 percent of the
eligible costs of construction. Project
risk with this option would be relatively
low for the FFP.
Finally, the Act now specifically
allows vessels over 165 feet in length in
Pacific Northwest fisheries to be
considered for FFP loans. The cost of
these vessels is likely to exceed $130
million each. Construction costs of
vessels of 300 feet or greater length may
exceed $170 million. The FFP
authorized lending each year is
presently $100 million and is limited by
statute to a total outstanding principal
balance of $850 million.
Comments Requested
NMFS seeks comments on this
proposed rule, particularly concerning
the orderly implementation of the rule,
the conditions placed on new vessel
construction loans, and the reserve
account requirements. NMFS is also
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Nov 01, 2018
Jkt 247001
interested in what time-frames should
be expected for the construction of a
new fishing vessel of less than 100 feet,
or more than 100 feet? Should NMFS
solely provide construction financing,
or should it consider refinancing private
sector construction debt? What are
reasonable terms for shipyard
performance bonds or insurance on
vessel construction? How should the
vessel surveyor or engineer, reporting to
NMFS, be contracted? Should a
replaced vessel be allowed to become a
replacement vessel within the same
federally managed fishery, a different
federally managed fishery, or should it
be scrapped altogether in order to
qualify for the loan? Transfer to a nonregulated fishery would not be allowed.
Over the last 2 years, the average
interest rate charged for FFP loans was
4.53 percent. NMFS also specifically
seeks comments regarding the industry
standard for interest charged for new
vessel construction loans.
NMFS welcomes comments on these
and any related questions regarding
financing of new fishing vessels.
Changes in the Proposed Rule
The general definitions at § 253.10
will revise the definition of ‘‘Project’’ to
include construction of a new fishing
vessel and adds definitions for ‘‘Vessel
construction financing’’ and ‘‘limited
access system.’’ Revisions to § 253.16
regarding actual cost, would redesignate
and revise paragraph (d) to paragraph (e)
and adds new paragraph (d) to provide
the basis for determining the actual cost
of vessel construction lending.
Traditional loans at § 253.26 parts (a)
and (b) are revised to include
implementing guidance for new vessel
construction. A new section, Vessel
construction financing, is added as
§ 253.32 to provide requirements
specific to new vessel construction
financing. The new section § 253.33 is
added to codify NMFS’ policy that all
financings shall require participation in
managed fisheries with harvest
limitation. Moreover, vessel
construction and harvesting rights loan
participation will be further restricted to
federally managed limited access
systems. NMFS also made minor
changes to correct errors or improve
readability that do not affect the
substantive provisions of the rule.
Classification
This proposed rule is published under
the authority of, and is consistent with,
Chapter 537 of Title 46 of the United
States Code and the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, as amended. The NMFS Assistant
Administrator has determined that this
proposed rule is consistent with Chapter
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55139
537 of Title 46 of the U.S. Code, the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, as amended,
and other applicable law, subject to
further consideration after public
comment.
In addition to public comment about
the proposed rule’s substance, NMFS
also seeks public comment on any
ambiguity or unnecessary complexity
from the language used in this proposed
rule.
NEPA
NMFS has made a preliminary
determination that this rule qualifies to
be categorically excluded from further
NEPA review. This action is consistent
with categories of activities identified in
CE G7 of the Companion Manual for
NOAA Administrative Order 216–6A,
and we have identified no extraordinary
circumstances that would preclude this
categorical exclusion. NMFS is
accepting comments and information
during the public comment period for
the proposed rule relevant to our
preliminary categorical exclusion
determination.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
This proposed rule does not
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any
other relevant Federal rules.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce has
certified to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) that this proposed
rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., requires that,
whenever an agency is required by
section 553 of this title (5 U.S.C. 553),
or any other law, to publish general
notice of proposed rulemaking for any
proposed rule, or publishes a notice of
proposed rulemaking for an
interpretative rule involving the internal
revenue laws of the United States, the
agency shall prepare and make available
for public comment an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis. Such analysis shall
describe the impact of the proposed rule
on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603(a).
However, where an agency can certify
that the rule will not, if promulgated,
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
then an agency need not undertake a
full regulatory flexibility analysis. 5
U.S.C. 605(b).
E:\FR\FM\02NOP1.SGM
02NOP1
55140
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 213 / Friday, November 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Participation in the FFP is entirely
voluntary. This action imposes no
mandatory requirements on any
business. If finalized, this proposed rule
would implement programs authorized
by law. Specifically, this rule would
create a new lending purpose
authorized by the Act and would be
implemented in accordance with 50
CFR part 253, subpart B. This action
will create new § 253.32 and amend
several other sections.
As defined by NMFS for RFA
purposes, this rule may affect small
fishing entities that have annual
revenues of $11.0 million or less,
including, but not limited to, vessel
owners, vessel operators, individual
fishermen, small corporations, and
others engaged in commercial fishing
activities regulated by NMFS. Borrowers
under this authority may also include
large businesses. Notably, because the
FFP is a voluntary program that
provides loans to qualified borrowers,
non-borrowers—large or small—would
not be regulated by this rule.
Although the FFP requires certain
supporting documentation during the
life of a loan, the requirements do not
impose unusual burdens when
compared to the burdens imposed by
other lenders. Moreover, because the
basic need for financing would continue
to exist without the FFP, the individuals
seeking financing would still need to
comply with similar, if not identical,
requirements imposed by another
lender. Records required to participate
in the FFP are usually within the
normal records already maintained by
fishermen. It should take no more than
eight hours per application to meet
these requirements.
The information required from
borrowers, such as income tax returns,
insurance policies, permits, licenses,
etc., is already available to them.
Depending on circumstances, the FFP
may require other supporting
documents, including financial
statements, property descriptions, and
other documents that can be acquired at
reasonable cost if they are not already
available.
FFP lending is a source of long-term,
fixed rate capital financing and imposes
no regulatory requirements on anyone
other than those applying for loans. FFP
borrowers make a voluntary decision to
use the available lending.
These loan programs will only have
positive impacts on borrowers. Because
participation is voluntary and requires
effort and the outlay of an application
fee, borrowers for harvesting rights
financing are assumed to have made a
determination that using FFP financing
provides a benefit, such that the FFP’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Nov 01, 2018
Jkt 247001
long-term, fixed rate financing provides
only a positive economic impact.
Importantly, the FFP does not regulate
or manage the affairs of its borrowers,
and the regulations impose no
additional compliance, operating or
other fees or costs on small entities
other than those that a financing
relationship would require.
Because this rule would not have a
significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities, an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis is
not required and none has been
prepared.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains
collection-of information requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA). The collections of information
have been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
OMB Control Number 0648–0012 (loan
application). The public reporting
burden for the FFP financing is
estimated to average no more than eight
hours per response, including the time
for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection
of information. Send comments
regarding these burden estimates or any
other aspect of this data information,
including suggestions for reducing the
burden, to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and
by email to OIRA_submission@
omb.eop.gov, or fax to 202–395–7285.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 253
Aquaculture, Community
development groups, Direct lending,
Financial assistance, Fisheries, Fishing,
Individual fishing quota.
Dated: October 29, 2018.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 253 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 253—FISHERIES ASSISTANCE
PROGRAMS
1. The authority citation for part 253
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 53701 and 16 U.S.C.
4101 et seq.
2. Amend § 253.10 by:
a. Revising the definition for
subparagraph (1) under ‘‘Project’’,
■ b. Adding the definitions for ‘‘limited
access system’’ and ‘‘Vessel
construction financing’’ in alphabetical
order.
■
■
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 253.10
General definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Project means:
(1) The financing or refinancing of the
construction of a new fishing vessel or
the financing or refinancing of a fishery
or aquaculture facility or the
refurbishing or purchase of an existing
vessel or facility, including, but not
limited to, architectural, engineering,
inspection, delivery, outfitting, and
interest costs, as well as the cost of any
consulting contract the Program
requires;
*
*
*
*
*
Limited access system has the same
meaning given to that term in section
three of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (16
U.S.C. 1802.)
Vessel construction financing means
either financing the ongoing
construction of a new vessel from its
inception through completion,
including successful sea trials, or
refinancing up to 80 percent of the cost
of the construction of a new vessel upon
the completion of such construction and
successful vessel sea trails.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 253.16 redesignate and revise
paragraph (d) as paragraph (e) and add
new paragraph (d) to read as follows:
§ 253.16
Actual cost.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The actual cost of a vessel which
is the subject of vessel construction
financing shall be determined as
follows:
(1) The initial actual cost shall be the
estimated eligible costs of the
construction; and
(2) The final actual cost shall be the
total final documented eligible costs of
the completed construction.
(e) The actual cost of any Project that
includes any combination of items
described in paragraphs (a), (b), (c) or
(d) of this section shall be the sum of
such calculations.
■ 4. Revise § 253.26 paragraphs (a) and
(b) to read as follows:
§ 253.26
Traditional loans.
(a) Eligible projects. Financing or
refinancing up to 80 percent of a
project’s actual cost shall be available to
any citizen who is determined to be
eligible and qualified under the Act and
these rules.
(b) Financing or refinancing.
(1) Projects may be financed, as well
as refinanced.
(2) The Program may finance the
construction cost of a Vessel or Facility
E:\FR\FM\02NOP1.SGM
02NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 213 / Friday, November 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
or refinance the construction cost of a
Vessel or Facility that has already been
financed (or otherwise paid) prior to the
submission of a loan application.
(3) The Program may finance the
refurbishing cost of a Vessel or Facility
or refinance the refurbishing cost of a
Vessel or Facility that has already been
financed (or otherwise paid) prior to the
submission of a loan application.
(4) The Program may finance or
refinance the purchase or refurbishment
of any vessel or facility for which the
Secretary has:
(i) Accelerated and/or paid
outstanding debts or obligations;
(ii) Acquired; or
(iii) Sold at foreclosure.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Add § 253.32 to read as follows:
§ 253.32
Vessel construction financing.
(a) Project Performance and
Completion. The program, in the case of
financing the ongoing construction of a
new vessel will require a bond,
insurance or reserve fund to protect
against cost overruns and/or failure of
the borrower to complete vessel
construction in an amount up to thirty
(30) percent of estimated construction
cost. The amount and form of such
protection shall be determined in the
sole discretion of the Program. All costs
associated with such protection shall be
paid by the borrower. In the case of
Vessel construction financing that only
involves Program funding after the
completion of vessel construction and
sea trials, this section is not applicable.
(b) Vessel Surveyor. The program, in
the case of financing the ongoing
construction of a new vessel, will
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Nov 01, 2018
Jkt 247001
require the borrower to secure a vessel
surveyor or naval architect for the
period of vessel construction. The
surveyor will report on the vessel’s
progress through construction and
represent the Program’s interest. All
costs associated with such services shall
be paid by the borrower. In the case of
Vessel construction financing that only
involves Program funding after the
completion of vessel construction and
sea trials, this section is not applicable.
(c) Replaced Vessel. The vessel to be
replaced by the new vessel must be
named at the time of loan application.
The replaced vessel:
(1) Must be scrapped,
(2) Continues to operate in a federallymanaged fishery under limited access,
or
(3) Must have its federal fishery
endorsement permanently cancelled
and the vessel is permanently
prohibited from fishing or providing
support to fishing activities anywhere in
the world; and the vessel’s title is
marked to prohibit the vessel’s transfer
to any foreign flag. If the vessel were
ever to cease operation in a federallymanaged fishery under limited access or
is sold, then option (c) would
automatically apply. This requirement
must be completed within four (4)
months from the closing of the
financing. The borrower will authorize
the Program and the United States Coast
Guard Vessel Documentation Center to
act on the borrower’s behalf to make the
vessel title changes if this requirement
is not completed within the four (4)
month requirement. Failure to comply
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
55141
with this requirement shall be an event
of default under the loan.
(d) Multiple loans. In the case of
financing the ongoing construction of a
vessel, the Program may have to close
multiple loans to meet shipyard
payment demands or use an escrow
account to hold funds. All costs,
including but not limited to escrow fees,
loan interest and quarterly payments,
associated with either option shall be
paid by the borrower.
(e) Limited Access Fisheries. All
vessels constructed under this authority
must be used only in a federally
managed limited access system that is
not deemed to be overfished or subject
to overfishing.
■ 6. Add § 253.33 to read as follows:
§ 253.33
Managed Fisheries Requirement.
(a) All financings shall require
participation in managed fisheries with
harvest limitations, and
(b) For vessel construction and
harvesting rights loans, participation is
further restricted to federally managed
limited access systems that are not
deemed to be overfished or subject to
overfishing.
(c) The FFP will cease processing a
loan application at any point during the
process including at closing if the
subject fishery is moved to an
‘‘overfished’’ or ‘‘subject to overfishing’’
category. Refunds of the application fee
of one half of one percent of the amount
requested once paid, irrespective of why
the program denies a loan, are limited
to 50 percent of the fee.
[FR Doc. 2018–23956 Filed 11–1–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\02NOP1.SGM
02NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 213 (Friday, November 2, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55137-55141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-23956]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 253
[Docket No. 180220192-8192-01]
RIN 0648-BH82
Shipping Act, Merchant Marine, and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) Provisions;
Fishing Vessel, Fishing Facility and Individual Fishing Quota Lending
Program
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The NMFS' Fisheries Finance Program (FFP or Program) proposes
to revise the operating rules of the Program and set forth procedures,
eligibility criteria, loan terms, and other requirements to add FFP
financing to construct fishing vessels or reconstruct fishing vessels
in limited access fisheries that are neither overfished or subject to
overfishing. NMFS believes that this change will help preserve the
economic benefits the nation derives from its commercial fishing
fleets. Aging fishing vessels will need to be replaced. This will allow
the FFP to play a small role in this process. Additionally, new fishing
vessels will provide a safer environment for fishing crews and will be
more fuel efficient. The rule provides for controls over the uses of
replaced vessels that might otherwise contribute to additional
harvesting efforts that could lead to overfishing. Currently, the
Program provides loans to purchase, refurbish, or refinance fishing
vessels, fish processing facilities, aquaculture facilities and
individual fishing quota (IFQ) permits. The program also offers loans
to community development quota (CDQ) groups to borrow for traditional
loan purposes. NMFS also recently amended its regulations to add the
purchase or refinancing of federally managed harvesting rights in
limited access fisheries.
DATES: The comment period for this draft rule ends December 17, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2014-0062,
by any one of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2014-0062, click the ``Comment Now!'' icon,
complete the required fields and enter or attach your comments.
Fax: 301-713-1305, Attn: Earl Bennett;
Mail: Earl Bennett, Program Leader, FFP, Financial
Services Division, NMFS, Attn: F/MB5, 1315 East West Highway, SSMC3,
Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Earl Bennett, NMFS, Fisheries Finance
Program, 301-427-8765.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
This proposed rule is also accessible at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr.
Background
Since 1997, the FFP has provided direct loans (loan guarantees
prior to that) at 2 percentage points above the Treasury borrowing
rate. All FFP vessel loans are collateralized by the fishing vessel,
and often include additional collateral and/or guarantees. The
creditworthiness of borrowers is also examined to ensure their ability
to repay the loan. These provide a means of recovery in the event of a
payment default. To date, less than one percent of borrowers have
defaulted.
In 2016, Congress passed section 302 of the Coast Guard
Authorization Act of 2015 (the ``Act'') (Pub. L. 114-120) which
included specific authority for
[[Page 55138]]
the Program to finance the construction or reconstruction of fishing
vessels in a fishery that is managed under a limited access system. (16
U.S.C. Section 1802)
This rule is being proposed because of concerns raised by
commercial fisheries that private commercial markets improperly
evaluate the risk associated with capital needs of the fishing
industry, leading to shorter amortization periods and higher interest
rates than would support the upfront investment required for new vessel
construction. Current FFP regulations prohibit financing the cost of
new vessel construction. There was a time when there were many open
domestic fisheries. It was deemed important that the program would not
add harvesting capacity to unregulated fisheries. Now NMFS is proposing
to restrict new vessel construction to fisheries with a limited access
system which is consistent with the goal to have sustainable fisheries.
This rule, if finalized, removes the prohibition on new vessel
construction and reconstruction financing. The rule would also provide
the same general loan requirements for new vessel construction that
apply to all traditional loans. These changes would have no effect on
currently allowed fisheries financing activities, including current
traditional loans and the separately authorized Northwest halibut and
sablefish quota share (HSQS), Bering Sea and Aleutian Island (BSAI)
crab IFQ, and North Pacific CDQ loans except that it would also
explicitly state that loans are restricted to fisheries that are
subject to managed limited access systems that are neither overfished
or subject to overfishing.
Other than specifically identified, this rule if implemented would
not change any of the existing FFP regulations, requirements or
procedures.
NMFS specially notes that in response to the industry's concerns,
the FFP does take into consideration the value of permits, quota share
or other harvesting rights associated with the project being financed.
The value of harvesting rights will be taken into consideration when
determining the adequacy of collateral.
Vessel Construction and Reconstruction Financing Overview
The replacement of aged vessels in managed fisheries will result in
the more efficient use of fisheries, promote safety at sea, and improve
environmental operations of fishers. Furthermore, recapitalization and
modernization of an over-aged fishing fleet goes hand-in-hand with
effective fisheries management.
Based on current loan authority amounts, the rule change would
provide the opportunity for a small number of fishers in federally
managed limited access fisheries, setting total allowable catch limits,
to modernize their operations by building new, replacement vessels, or
rebuilding their current vessels. Loans will only be available for
projects in fisheries that are in managed limited access systems that
are not deemed to be overfished or subject to overfishing.
Even though fishing vessels can be replaced, without the benefit of
FFP loans, the fishing industry cannot always find the feasible, long-
term, fixed-rate financing necessary to make a replacement vessel
economically viable. Smaller, one-vessel operators often have a hard
time finding adequate financing. Variable interest rates increase the
economic uncertainty of fishing operations that are already subject to
variations in weather, prices, and total allowable catch. The
availability of the FFP will provide some stability in one critical
aspect of managing a fishing operation.
To ensure the FFP program does not contribute to over-fishing,
loans provided for the construction or reconstruction of fishing
vessels that increase capacity, not to be confused with increased
harvesting, would be provided only where no affected species are
overfished or subject to overfishing.
As is the current practice, the FFP will notify the fisheries
Regional Administrators of a loan application to ensure that it meets
the requirements of the fishery(ies) in which the new vessel will
participate. Since the new vessel will replace an existing vessel, as
explained below, and will fish under the old vessel's permits, all
harvesting must be part of the fisheries management plan. The FFP would
not provide financing if the fisheries management plan could not
support the harvesting level, regardless of the increased fishing
capacity of the new vessel, required for the applicant to be
financially viable.
NMFS would implement the new vessel construction and reconstruction
loans on the same equitable first come, first served basis based on
individual qualifications as current loans. That is, the FFP would
evaluate each vessel construction or reconstruction project on the
basis of its ability, with present permits and entitlements and overall
catch limitations, to repay the requested loan. This includes recent
fluctuations in the conditions of the fisheries, prices, economics,
useful life of the fishing vessel, and financial condition of the
borrower. As a result, projections of total allowable catch over time
are not useful for evaluating the financial viability of a certain
project as it is too speculative. However, present catch limits do
provide valuable perspective on the current financial condition of a
prospective borrower. If the subject fishery becomes ``deemed to be
overfished'' while the loan application is under consideration, the FFP
would cease processing the loan at that point. Applicants need to be
mindful that the current application fee of one half of one percent of
the amount requested once paid, irrespective of why the Program denies
a loan, statutory provisions limit refunds to fifty percent of the fee.
The proposed revisions also clarify that NMFS only extends financing in
managed fisheries under limited access systems.
This rule would also address the issue of what to do with the
replaced vessels. While the replaced vessels may be old and in need of
modernization, they may retain substantial market value. A borrower may
choose from the following options:
(a) The replaced vessel will be scrapped,
(b) The vessel will continue to operate in a federally-managed
fishery under limited access, or
(c) The federal fishery endorsement will be permanently cancelled
and the vessel will be prohibited from fishing or providing support to
fishing activities anywhere in the world; the vessel's title will also
be marked to prohibit the vessel's transfer to any foreign flag. If the
vessel were ever to cease operation in a federally-managed fishery
under limited access or is sold, then option (c) would automatically
apply.
The requirements under these options would have to be completed
within four months of the loan closing(s). If the borrower selects
option (c), at loan closing the borrower would authorize the Program
and the United States Coast Guard to act on the borrower's behalf to
have the fisheries endorsement revoked and have the vessel's title
amended to prohibit a transfer to a foreign flag. In addition, failure
to complete any of the tasks outlined in the options above would be
considered an event of default under the loan.
Vessel Construction Borrowing Opportunities
Borrowers would be able to participate in new vessel construction
financing in two basic ways: Direct construction financing, or ``take-
out'' financing of private sector construction loans.
Direct construction financing--The FFP would provide up to 80
percent of
[[Page 55139]]
the cost of financing a new fishing vessel during its construction. The
vessel owner would commit 20 percent to the project and keep a reserve
of as much as thirty (30) percent of the estimated cost to cover
potential cost overruns. Or, in lieu of a reserve account, the vessel
owner would be responsible for securing a completion bond or insurance,
as approved by the FFP. The program would make periodic payments to the
shipyard as key milestones were met as verified by the surveyor
reporting to NMFS. This would necessitate the vessel owner closing
multiple loans over the construction period--each closing having its
own costs--and accruing interest on those loans while the vessel/
partial vessel was still in the yard. Finally, FFP loan commitments
would be usable within a five-year period of obligation as long as the
applicant remains qualified. The vessel construction project would have
to be completed and funded within that time. Project risk faced by the
FFP in this option would be higher than take out financing.
Take-out financing--The FFP could evaluate a new vessel
construction project and, based on that evaluation, make a commitment
to refinance non-FFP construction loans after completion of the
construction. With the availability of take-out financing, the vessel
owner may secure prime-rate construction financing in the private
sector. Once the vessel was successfully completed (including sea
trials), fully licensed and permitted in its intended fishery and the
vessel owner was in compliance with all loan terms, NMFS would disburse
funds to the construction financing lender. There would be just one
closing, which would refinance up to 80 percent of the eligible costs
of construction. Project risk with this option would be relatively low
for the FFP.
Finally, the Act now specifically allows vessels over 165 feet in
length in Pacific Northwest fisheries to be considered for FFP loans.
The cost of these vessels is likely to exceed $130 million each.
Construction costs of vessels of 300 feet or greater length may exceed
$170 million. The FFP authorized lending each year is presently $100
million and is limited by statute to a total outstanding principal
balance of $850 million.
Comments Requested
NMFS seeks comments on this proposed rule, particularly concerning
the orderly implementation of the rule, the conditions placed on new
vessel construction loans, and the reserve account requirements. NMFS
is also interested in what time-frames should be expected for the
construction of a new fishing vessel of less than 100 feet, or more
than 100 feet? Should NMFS solely provide construction financing, or
should it consider refinancing private sector construction debt? What
are reasonable terms for shipyard performance bonds or insurance on
vessel construction? How should the vessel surveyor or engineer,
reporting to NMFS, be contracted? Should a replaced vessel be allowed
to become a replacement vessel within the same federally managed
fishery, a different federally managed fishery, or should it be
scrapped altogether in order to qualify for the loan? Transfer to a
non-regulated fishery would not be allowed.
Over the last 2 years, the average interest rate charged for FFP
loans was 4.53 percent. NMFS also specifically seeks comments regarding
the industry standard for interest charged for new vessel construction
loans.
NMFS welcomes comments on these and any related questions regarding
financing of new fishing vessels.
Changes in the Proposed Rule
The general definitions at Sec. 253.10 will revise the definition
of ``Project'' to include construction of a new fishing vessel and adds
definitions for ``Vessel construction financing'' and ``limited access
system.'' Revisions to Sec. 253.16 regarding actual cost, would
redesignate and revise paragraph (d) to paragraph (e) and adds new
paragraph (d) to provide the basis for determining the actual cost of
vessel construction lending. Traditional loans at Sec. 253.26 parts
(a) and (b) are revised to include implementing guidance for new vessel
construction. A new section, Vessel construction financing, is added as
Sec. 253.32 to provide requirements specific to new vessel
construction financing. The new section Sec. 253.33 is added to codify
NMFS' policy that all financings shall require participation in managed
fisheries with harvest limitation. Moreover, vessel construction and
harvesting rights loan participation will be further restricted to
federally managed limited access systems. NMFS also made minor changes
to correct errors or improve readability that do not affect the
substantive provisions of the rule.
Classification
This proposed rule is published under the authority of, and is
consistent with, Chapter 537 of Title 46 of the United States Code and
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, as amended. The NMFS Assistant Administrator
has determined that this proposed rule is consistent with Chapter 537
of Title 46 of the U.S. Code, the Magnuson-Stevens Act, as amended, and
other applicable law, subject to further consideration after public
comment.
In addition to public comment about the proposed rule's substance,
NMFS also seeks public comment on any ambiguity or unnecessary
complexity from the language used in this proposed rule.
NEPA
NMFS has made a preliminary determination that this rule qualifies
to be categorically excluded from further NEPA review. This action is
consistent with categories of activities identified in CE G7 of the
Companion Manual for NOAA Administrative Order 216-6A, and we have
identified no extraordinary circumstances that would preclude this
categorical exclusion. NMFS is accepting comments and information
during the public comment period for the proposed rule relevant to our
preliminary categorical exclusion determination.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
This proposed rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
any other relevant Federal rules.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce has
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
requires that, whenever an agency is required by section 553 of this
title (5 U.S.C. 553), or any other law, to publish general notice of
proposed rulemaking for any proposed rule, or publishes a notice of
proposed rulemaking for an interpretative rule involving the internal
revenue laws of the United States, the agency shall prepare and make
available for public comment an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis. Such analysis shall describe the impact of the proposed rule
on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603(a). However, where an agency can
certify that the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities then an
agency need not undertake a full regulatory flexibility analysis. 5
U.S.C. 605(b).
[[Page 55140]]
Participation in the FFP is entirely voluntary. This action imposes
no mandatory requirements on any business. If finalized, this proposed
rule would implement programs authorized by law. Specifically, this
rule would create a new lending purpose authorized by the Act and would
be implemented in accordance with 50 CFR part 253, subpart B. This
action will create new Sec. 253.32 and amend several other sections.
As defined by NMFS for RFA purposes, this rule may affect small
fishing entities that have annual revenues of $11.0 million or less,
including, but not limited to, vessel owners, vessel operators,
individual fishermen, small corporations, and others engaged in
commercial fishing activities regulated by NMFS. Borrowers under this
authority may also include large businesses. Notably, because the FFP
is a voluntary program that provides loans to qualified borrowers, non-
borrowers--large or small--would not be regulated by this rule.
Although the FFP requires certain supporting documentation during
the life of a loan, the requirements do not impose unusual burdens when
compared to the burdens imposed by other lenders. Moreover, because the
basic need for financing would continue to exist without the FFP, the
individuals seeking financing would still need to comply with similar,
if not identical, requirements imposed by another lender. Records
required to participate in the FFP are usually within the normal
records already maintained by fishermen. It should take no more than
eight hours per application to meet these requirements.
The information required from borrowers, such as income tax
returns, insurance policies, permits, licenses, etc., is already
available to them. Depending on circumstances, the FFP may require
other supporting documents, including financial statements, property
descriptions, and other documents that can be acquired at reasonable
cost if they are not already available.
FFP lending is a source of long-term, fixed rate capital financing
and imposes no regulatory requirements on anyone other than those
applying for loans. FFP borrowers make a voluntary decision to use the
available lending.
These loan programs will only have positive impacts on borrowers.
Because participation is voluntary and requires effort and the outlay
of an application fee, borrowers for harvesting rights financing are
assumed to have made a determination that using FFP financing provides
a benefit, such that the FFP's long-term, fixed rate financing provides
only a positive economic impact. Importantly, the FFP does not regulate
or manage the affairs of its borrowers, and the regulations impose no
additional compliance, operating or other fees or costs on small
entities other than those that a financing relationship would require.
Because this rule would not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities, an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis is not required and none has been prepared.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains collection-of information requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The collections of
information have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under OMB Control Number 0648-0012 (loan application). The public
reporting burden for the FFP financing is estimated to average no more
than eight hours per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information. Send comments regarding these burden
estimates or any other aspect of this data information, including
suggestions for reducing the burden, to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and by
email to [email protected], or fax to 202-395-7285.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 253
Aquaculture, Community development groups, Direct lending,
Financial assistance, Fisheries, Fishing, Individual fishing quota.
Dated: October 29, 2018.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 253 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 253--FISHERIES ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 253 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 53701 and 16 U.S.C. 4101 et seq.
0
2. Amend Sec. 253.10 by:
0
a. Revising the definition for subparagraph (1) under ``Project'',
0
b. Adding the definitions for ``limited access system'' and ``Vessel
construction financing'' in alphabetical order.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 253.10 General definitions.
* * * * *
Project means:
(1) The financing or refinancing of the construction of a new
fishing vessel or the financing or refinancing of a fishery or
aquaculture facility or the refurbishing or purchase of an existing
vessel or facility, including, but not limited to, architectural,
engineering, inspection, delivery, outfitting, and interest costs, as
well as the cost of any consulting contract the Program requires;
* * * * *
Limited access system has the same meaning given to that term in
section three of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1802.)
Vessel construction financing means either financing the ongoing
construction of a new vessel from its inception through completion,
including successful sea trials, or refinancing up to 80 percent of the
cost of the construction of a new vessel upon the completion of such
construction and successful vessel sea trails.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 253.16 redesignate and revise paragraph (d) as paragraph
(e) and add new paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 253.16 Actual cost.
* * * * *
(d) The actual cost of a vessel which is the subject of vessel
construction financing shall be determined as follows:
(1) The initial actual cost shall be the estimated eligible costs
of the construction; and
(2) The final actual cost shall be the total final documented
eligible costs of the completed construction.
(e) The actual cost of any Project that includes any combination of
items described in paragraphs (a), (b), (c) or (d) of this section
shall be the sum of such calculations.
0
4. Revise Sec. 253.26 paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 253.26 Traditional loans.
(a) Eligible projects. Financing or refinancing up to 80 percent of
a project's actual cost shall be available to any citizen who is
determined to be eligible and qualified under the Act and these rules.
(b) Financing or refinancing.
(1) Projects may be financed, as well as refinanced.
(2) The Program may finance the construction cost of a Vessel or
Facility
[[Page 55141]]
or refinance the construction cost of a Vessel or Facility that has
already been financed (or otherwise paid) prior to the submission of a
loan application.
(3) The Program may finance the refurbishing cost of a Vessel or
Facility or refinance the refurbishing cost of a Vessel or Facility
that has already been financed (or otherwise paid) prior to the
submission of a loan application.
(4) The Program may finance or refinance the purchase or
refurbishment of any vessel or facility for which the Secretary has:
(i) Accelerated and/or paid outstanding debts or obligations;
(ii) Acquired; or
(iii) Sold at foreclosure.
* * * * *
0
5. Add Sec. 253.32 to read as follows:
Sec. 253.32 Vessel construction financing.
(a) Project Performance and Completion. The program, in the case of
financing the ongoing construction of a new vessel will require a bond,
insurance or reserve fund to protect against cost overruns and/or
failure of the borrower to complete vessel construction in an amount up
to thirty (30) percent of estimated construction cost. The amount and
form of such protection shall be determined in the sole discretion of
the Program. All costs associated with such protection shall be paid by
the borrower. In the case of Vessel construction financing that only
involves Program funding after the completion of vessel construction
and sea trials, this section is not applicable.
(b) Vessel Surveyor. The program, in the case of financing the
ongoing construction of a new vessel, will require the borrower to
secure a vessel surveyor or naval architect for the period of vessel
construction. The surveyor will report on the vessel's progress through
construction and represent the Program's interest. All costs associated
with such services shall be paid by the borrower. In the case of Vessel
construction financing that only involves Program funding after the
completion of vessel construction and sea trials, this section is not
applicable.
(c) Replaced Vessel. The vessel to be replaced by the new vessel
must be named at the time of loan application. The replaced vessel:
(1) Must be scrapped,
(2) Continues to operate in a federally-managed fishery under
limited access, or
(3) Must have its federal fishery endorsement permanently cancelled
and the vessel is permanently prohibited from fishing or providing
support to fishing activities anywhere in the world; and the vessel's
title is marked to prohibit the vessel's transfer to any foreign flag.
If the vessel were ever to cease operation in a federally-managed
fishery under limited access or is sold, then option (c) would
automatically apply. This requirement must be completed within four (4)
months from the closing of the financing. The borrower will authorize
the Program and the United States Coast Guard Vessel Documentation
Center to act on the borrower's behalf to make the vessel title changes
if this requirement is not completed within the four (4) month
requirement. Failure to comply with this requirement shall be an event
of default under the loan.
(d) Multiple loans. In the case of financing the ongoing
construction of a vessel, the Program may have to close multiple loans
to meet shipyard payment demands or use an escrow account to hold
funds. All costs, including but not limited to escrow fees, loan
interest and quarterly payments, associated with either option shall be
paid by the borrower.
(e) Limited Access Fisheries. All vessels constructed under this
authority must be used only in a federally managed limited access
system that is not deemed to be overfished or subject to overfishing.
0
6. Add Sec. 253.33 to read as follows:
Sec. 253.33 Managed Fisheries Requirement.
(a) All financings shall require participation in managed fisheries
with harvest limitations, and
(b) For vessel construction and harvesting rights loans,
participation is further restricted to federally managed limited access
systems that are not deemed to be overfished or subject to overfishing.
(c) The FFP will cease processing a loan application at any point
during the process including at closing if the subject fishery is moved
to an ``overfished'' or ``subject to overfishing'' category. Refunds of
the application fee of one half of one percent of the amount requested
once paid, irrespective of why the program denies a loan, are limited
to 50 percent of the fee.
[FR Doc. 2018-23956 Filed 11-1-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P