Implementing the Freedom of Information Act, 54684-54691 [2018-23606]
Download as PDF
54684
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 83, No. 211
Wednesday, October 31, 2018
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY POLICY
32 CFR Part 2402
Implementing the Freedom of
Information Act
Office of Science and
Technology Policy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and request for public comment.
AGENCY:
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 72
The White House Office of
Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)
is amending its regulations to
implement the FOIA Improvement Act
of 2016. The regulations reflect OSTP’s
policy and practices and reaffirm its
commitment to provide the fullest
possible disclosure of records to the
public.
SUMMARY:
[NRC–2018–0075]
RIN 3150–AK12
List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage
Casks: NAC International NAC–UMS®;
Universal Storage System, Certificate
of Compliance No. 1015, Amendment
No. 6
Correction
In proposed rule document 2018–
22913 beginning on page 53191 in the
issue of Monday, October 22, 2018,
make the following correction:
On page 53192 the table should read
as follows:
Document
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Request to Amend Certificate of
Compliance No. 1015 for the
Cask
System,
NAC–UMS®
dated May 23, 2017.
Revision of Request to Amend
Certificate of Compliance No.
1015 for the NAC–UMS® Cask
System, dated January 16, 2018.
Revision 11 to NAC–UMS® Final
Safety Analysis Report for the
UMS Universal Storage System.
Proposed CoC No. 1015, Amendment No. 6.
Proposed Technical Specifications
Appendix A—Proposed Technical
Specifications.
Appendix B—Preliminary Safety
Evaluation Report.
ADAMS
accession
No./web link/
Federal
Register
citation
ML17145A380
ML18018A893
ML16341B102
ML18088A174
ML18088A176
ML18088A178
ML18088A181
[FR Doc. C1–2018–22913 Filed 10–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1301–00–D
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Oct 30, 2018
Jkt 247001
Comments will be received
through November 30, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Comments of approximately
one page or less in length (4000
characters) are requested. All
submissions must be in English.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Email: ostpfoia@ostp.eop.gov. Include
‘‘FOIA PROPOSED RULEMAKING’’ in
the subject line of the message. OSTP
does not currently accept attachments
sent to the FOIA mailbox. Please paste
the text of your comment into the
message body of your email.
Mail: Office of Science and
Technology Policy, Eisenhower
Executive Office Building, 1650
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20502. Attention: ‘‘FOIA PROPOSED
RULEMAKING.’’
Fax: (202) 395–1224. Please clearly
label all submissions as ‘‘FOIA
PROPOSED RULEMAKING.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Mendoza, 202–456–4444.
Questions about the content of this
document should be sent to ostpfoia@
ostp.eop.gov. Include ‘‘FOIA
PROPOSED RULEMAKING’’ in the
subject line of the message. Questions
may also be sent by mail (please allow
additional time for processing) to: Office
of Science and Technology Policy,
Eisenhower Executive Office Building,
1650 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20502. Attention:
‘‘FOIA PROPOSED RULEMAKING.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OSTP is
proposing new regulations to govern its
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
implementation of the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA). In 2013, OSTP
implemented its FOIA regulations,
currently codified at 32 CFR part 2402.
The FOIA Improvement Act of 2016,
Pub. L. 114–185, requires each agency to
review and update their FOIA
regulations in accordance with its
provisions. Among other things, the Act
makes changes that require agencies to
(1) withhold information only when it is
reasonably foreseeable that disclosure
would harm to an interest protected by
an exemption; (2) allow a minimum of
90 days to file an appeal following an
adverse determination; and (3) inform
requesters of their right to seek dispute
resolution services.
In connection with OSTP’s review of
its FOIA regulations, OSTP proposes the
following rule to update its FOIA
regulations, clarifying OSTP’s process
for responding to requests for
information, incorporating new
language on partial disclosures of
information, increasing the period of
time for a requester to appeal an adverse
determination from 30 days to 90 days,
and requiring OSTP to notify requesters
of their right to seek dispute resolution
services. Due to the scope of the
proposed revisions, the proposed rule
would replace OSTP’s current FOIA
regulations in their entirety. This
proposed rule will update OSTP’s
regulations to reflect the statutory
changes to FOIA and improve FOIArelated service and performance,
thereby strengthening OSTP’s
compliance with FOIA. Accordingly,
OSTP proposes these regulations
implementing FOIA and submits them
for public comment.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Executive Order 12866 and 13563
These regulations have been drafted
and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review,’’ section 1(b),
Principles of Regulation, and in
accordance with Executive Order 13563,
‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review,’’ section 1(b), General
Principles of Regulation. These
regulations are not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866; accordingly,
this rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Further, both Executive Orders
12866 and 13563 direct agencies to
E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM
31OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 2018 / Proposed Rules
assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation
is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. OSTP has
assessed the costs and benefits of this
regulation and believes that the
regulatory approach selected maximizes
net benefits.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These regulations meet the applicable
standards set forth in Executive Order
12988, Civil Justice Reform.
Executive Order 13132
These regulations will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
OSTP has determined that these
regulations do not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary
impact statement.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
OSTP, in accordance with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
605(b), has reviewed these proposed
regulations and certifies that they will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
because they pertain to administrative
matters affecting the agency.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 2402
Executive Order 12988
These regulations will not result in
the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
by the private sector, of $100 million or
more in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions are
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995, 2 U.S.C. 1501, et seq.
17:15 Oct 30, 2018
These regulations are not major rules
as defined by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, 5 U.S.C. 804. They will not result
in an annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more, a major increase
in costs or prices, or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and
export markets.
OSTP has reviewed this action for
purposes of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C.
4321–4347, and has determined that
this action will not have a significant
effect on the human environment.
OSTP has determined that the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq., does not apply because
these regulations do not contain any
information collection requirements
subject to OMB’s approval.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
Jkt 247001
Administrative practice and
procedure, Freedom of information.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, OSTP proposes to amend
Chapter XXIV by revising 32 CFR part
2402 to read as follows:
PART 2402—REGULATIONS
IMPLEMENTING THE FREEDOM OF
INFORMATION ACT
Sec.
2402.1 Purpose and scope.
2402.2 Delegation of authority and
responsibilities.
2402.3 General policy and definitions.
2402.4 Procedure for requesting records.
2402.5 Responses to requests.
2402.6 Timing of Responses to Requests.
2402.7 Confidential commercial
information.
2402.8 Appeal of denials.
2402.9 Fees.
2402.10 Waiver of fees.
2402.11 Maintenance of statistics.
2402.12 Disclaimer.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552; E.O. 13392, 70 FR
75373, 3 CFR, 2005 Comp., p. 216.
§ 2402.1
Purpose and scope.
The regulations in this part prescribe
procedures by which individuals may
obtain access to the Office of Science
and Technology Policy (OSTP) agency
records under the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, as
amended (FOIA), as well as the
procedures OSTP must follow in
response to requests for records under
FOIA. The regulations should be read
together with the FOIA and the Office
of Management and Budget’s (OMB)
‘‘Uniform Freedom of Information Fee
Schedule and Guidelines,’’ which
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54685
provides information about access to
records. All requests for access to
information contained within a system
of records pursuant to the Privacy Act
of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, shall be
processed in accordance with these
regulations as well as those contained in
32 CFR part 2403.
§ 2402.2 Delegation of authority and
responsibilities.
(a) The Director of OSTP designates
the OSTP General Counsel as the Chief
FOIA Officer, and hereby delegates to
the Chief FOIA Officer the authority to
act upon all requests for agency records
and to re-delegate such authority at his
or her discretion.
(b) The Chief FOIA Officer shall
designate a FOIA Public Liaison, who
shall serve as the supervisory official to
whom a FOIA requester can raise
concerns about the service the FOIA
requester has received following an
initial response. The FOIA Public
Liaison will be listed on the OSTP
website (https://www.whitehouse.gov/
ostp/foia) and may re-delegate the FOIA
Public Liaison’s authority at his or her
discretion.
(c) The Director establishes a FOIA
Requester Service Center that shall be
staffed by the Chief FOIA Officer and
the FOIA Public Liaison. The contact
information for the FOIA Requester
Service Center is Office of Science and
Technology Policy, Eisenhower
Executive Office Building, 1650
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20504; Telephone: (202) 456–4444;
Fax: (202) 395–1224; Email: ostpfoia@
ostp.eop.gov. Updates to this contact
information will be made on the OSTP
website.
§ 2402.3
General policy and definitions.
(a) Non-exempt records available to
public. Except for records exempt from
disclosure by 5 U.S.C. 552(b) or
published in the Federal Register under
5 U.S.C. 552(a)(1), OSTP’s agency
records subject to FOIA are available to
any requester who requests them in
accordance with these regulations.
(b) Record availability on the OSTP
website. OSTP shall make records
available on its website in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2), as amended,
and other documents that, because of
the nature of their subject matter, are
likely to be the subject of FOIA requests.
To save both time and money, OSTP
strongly urges requesters to review
documents available on the OSTP
website before submitting a request.
(c) Definitions. For purposes of this
part:
(1) All of the terms defined in the
Freedom of Information Act, and the
E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM
31OCP1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
54686
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 2018 / Proposed Rules
definitions included in OMB’s
‘‘Uniform Freedom of Information Act
Fee Schedule and Guidelines’’ apply,
unless otherwise defined in this
subpart.
(2) The term ‘‘agency record’’ means
records that are:
(i) Either created or obtained by
OSTP; and
(ii) Under OSTP control at the time of
the FOIA request.
(3) The term ‘‘commercial use
request’’ means a request from or on
behalf of a person who seeks
information for a use or purpose that
furthers his or her commercial, trade, or
profit interests, which can include
furthering those interests through
litigation. OSTP shall determine,
whenever reasonably possible, the use
to which a requester will put the
requested records. When it appears that
the requester will put the records to a
commercial use, either because of the
nature of the request itself or because
OSTP has reasonable cause to doubt a
requester’s stated use, OSTP shall
provide the requester a reasonable
opportunity to submit further
clarification.
(4) The terms ‘‘disclose’’ or
‘‘disclosure’’ refer to making records
available, upon request, for examination
and copying, or furnishing a copy of
records.
(5) The term ‘‘direct cost’’ means
those expenditures by OSTP actually
incurred in searching for and
duplicating (and, in the case of
commercial use requests, reviewing)
records in response to the FOIA request.
Direct costs include the salary of the
employee or employees performing the
work (i.e., the basic rate of pay for the
employee plus 16 percent of that rate to
cover benefits) and the cost of operating
computers and other electronic
equipment, such as photocopiers and
scanners. Direct costs do not include
overhead expenses, such as the cost of
space, heating, or lighting of the facility
in which the records are stored.
(6) The term ‘‘duplication’’ means the
making of a copy of a record, or of the
information contained in it, necessary to
respond to a FOIA request. Copies can
take the form of paper, microform,
audiovisual materials, or electronic
records (for example, magnetic tape or
disk), among others.
(7) The term ‘‘educational institution’’
means a preschool, a public or private
elementary or secondary school, an
institution of undergraduate higher
education, an institution of graduate
higher education, an institution of
professional education, or an institution
of vocational education that operates a
program of scholarly research. To be in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Oct 30, 2018
Jkt 247001
this category, a requester must show
that the request is authorized by and is
made under the auspices of a qualifying
institution and that the records are not
sought for a commercial use, but are
sought to further scholarly research.
(8) The term ‘‘fee waiver’’ means the
waiver or reduction of processing fees if
a requester can demonstrate that certain
statutory standards are satisfied.
(9) The term ‘‘FOIA Public Liaison’’
means an agency official who is
responsible for assisting requesters in
defining the scope of their request to
reduce processing time, increasing
transparency and understanding of the
status of requests, as well as assisting in
the resolution of disputes.
(10) The term ‘‘noncommercial
scientific institution’’ means an
institution that is not operated on a
‘‘commercial’’ basis, as that term is
defined in these regulations, and that is
operated solely for the purpose of
conducting scientific research, the
results of which are not intended to
promote any particular product or
industry. To be in this category, a
requester must show that the request is
authorized by and is made under the
auspices of a qualifying institution and
that the records are not sought for a
commercial use but are sought to further
scientific research.
(11) The term ‘‘perfected request’’
means a FOIA request for records that
reasonably describes the records sought,
that has been received by OSTP in
accordance with the requirements set
forth in § 2402.4.
(12) The terms ‘‘representative of the
news media’’ or ‘‘news media requester’’
mean any person or entity that gathers
information of potential interest to a
segment of the public, uses its editorial
skills to turn the raw materials into a
distinct work, and distributes that work
to an audience. In this clause, the term
‘‘news’’ means information that is about
current events or that would be of
current interest to the public. Examples
of news media entities are television or
radio stations broadcasting to the public
at large and publishers of periodicals
(but only if such entities qualify as
disseminators of news) who make their
products available for purchase by or
subscription by or free distribution to
the general public. These examples are
not all-inclusive. Moreover, as methods
of news delivery evolve, such as
through electronic or digital means,
such news sources shall be considered
to be news media entities. A freelance
journalist shall be regarded as working
for a news-media entity if the journalist
can demonstrate a solid basis for
expecting publication through that
entity, whether or not the journalist is
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
actually employed by the entity. A
publication contract would present a
solid basis for such an expectation; the
Government may also consider the past
publication record of the requester in
making such a determination.
(13) The term ‘‘requester’’ means any
person, including an individual,
partnership, corporation, association,
Native American tribe, or other public
or private organization other than a
Federal agency that requests access to
records.
(14) The term ‘‘review’’ means the
process of examining documents located
in response to a request that is for a
commercial use to determine whether
any portion of any document located is
permitted to be withheld. It includes
processing of any documents for
disclosure, e.g., doing all that is
necessary to excise exempt information
and otherwise prepare them for release.
Review does not include time spent
resolving general legal or policy issues
regarding the application of exemptions.
(15) The term ‘‘search’’ refers to the
process of looking for and retrieving
records or information responsive to a
request. It includes page-by-page or lineby-line identification of information
within records and also includes
reasonable efforts to locate and retrieve
information from records maintained in
electronic form or format.
(16) The term ‘‘working day’’ means a
regular Federal working day between
the hours of 9:00AM and 5:00PM. It
does not include Saturdays, Sundays, or
legal Federal holidays. Any requests
received after 5:00PM on any given
working day will be considered received
on the next working day.
§ 2402.4
Procedure for requesting records.
(a) Format of requests—(1) In general.
Requests for information must be made
in writing and may be delivered by
mail, fax, or electronic mail, as specified
in § 2402.2(c). All requests must be
made in English. Requests for
information may specify the preferred
format (including electronic formats) of
the response. When requesters do not
specify the preferred format of the
response, OSTP shall produce scanned
records to be delivered electronically.
(2) Electronic format records. (i) OSTP
shall provide the responsive records in
the format requested if the record or
records are readily reproducible by
OSTP in that format. OSTP shall make
reasonable efforts to maintain its records
in formats that are reproducible for the
purpose of disclosure. For purposes of
this paragraph, the term readily
reproducible means, with respect to
electronic format, a record that can be
downloaded or transferred intact to an
E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM
31OCP1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 2018 / Proposed Rules
electronic medium using equipment
currently in use by the office processing
the request. Even though some records
may initially be readily reproducible,
the need to segregate exempt from
nonexempt records may cause the
releasable material to be not readily
reproducible.
(ii) In responding to a request for
records, OSTP shall make reasonable
efforts to search for the records in
electronic format, except where such
efforts would interfere with the
operation of the agency’s automated
information system(s). For purposes of
this paragraph, the term ‘‘search’’ means
to locate, manually or by automated
means, agency records for the purpose
of identifying those records that are
responsive to a request.
(iii) Searches for records maintained
in electronic format may require the
application of codes, queries, or other
minor forms of programming to retrieve
the requested records.
(3) Attachment restrictions. To protect
OSTP’s computer systems, OSTP will
not accept files sent as email
attachments or as web links. Requesters
can submit requests by postal mail, by
fax, or in the body of the email text.
(b) Contents. A request must describe
the records sought in sufficient detail to
enable OSTP personnel to locate the
records with a reasonable amount of
effort. To the extent possible, requesters
should include specific information that
may assist OSTP personnel in
identifying the requested records, such
as the date, title or name, author,
recipient, and subject matter of the
record. In general, requesters should
include as much detail as possible about
the specific records or the types of
records he or she is seeking. Before
submitting a request, requesters may
contact the OSTP FOIA Public Liaison
to discuss the records they are seeking
and to receive assistance in describing
the records. If, after receiving a request,
OSTP determines that it does not
reasonably describe the records sought
or that the request will be unduly
burdensome to process, OSTP shall
inform the requester what additional
information is needed or how the
request may be modified. Requesters
who are attempting to reformulate or
modify such a request may discuss their
request with OSTP’s FOIA Public
Liaison, who is available to assist.
(c) Date of receipt. A request that
complies with paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this section is deemed a ‘‘perfected
request.’’ A perfected request is deemed
received on the actual date it is received
by OSTP. A request that does not
comply with paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this section is deemed received when
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Oct 30, 2018
Jkt 247001
sufficient information to perfect the
request is actually received by OSTP.
(d) Contact information. Requesters
must provide contact information, such
as the requester’s phone number, email
address, or mailing address, to enable
OSTP to communicate with the
requester about the request and provide
released records. If OSTP cannot contact
the requester, or the requester does not
respond within 30 calendar days to
OSTP’s requests for clarification, OSTP
will administratively close the request.
(e) Types of records not available. The
FOIA does not require OSTP to:
(1) Compile or create records solely
for the purpose of satisfying a request
for records;
(2) Provide records not yet in
existence, even if such records may be
expected to come into existence at some
future time;
(3) Restore records destroyed or
otherwise disposed of, except that OSTP
must notify the requester that the
requested records have been destroyed
or disposed.
§ 2402.5
Responses to requests.
(a) In general. In determining which
records are responsive to a request,
OSTP will ordinarily include only
records in its possession as of the date
it begins its search for records. If any
other date is used, the OSTP shall
inform the requester of that date.
(b) Authority to grant or deny
requests. OSTP shall make initial
determinations to grant or deny in
whole or in part a request for records.
(c) Granting of Requests. When OSTP
determines that any responsive records
shall be made available, OSTP shall
notify the requester in writing and
provide copies of the requested records
in whole or in part. Records disclosed
in part shall be marked or annotated to
show the exemption applied to the
withheld information and the amount of
information withheld unless to do so
would harm the interest protected by an
applicable exemption. If a requested
record contains exempted material
along with nonexempt material, all
reasonable segregable material shall be
disclosed.
(d) Adverse determinations. If OSTP
makes an adverse determination
denying a request in any respect, it must
notify the requester of that adverse
determination in writing. Adverse
determinations include decisions that:
The requested record is exempt from
disclosure, in whole or in part; the
request does not reasonably describe the
records sought, but only if, after
discussion with the FOIA Public
Liaison, the requester refuses to modify
the terms of the request; the information
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54687
requested is not a record subject to the
FOIA; the requested record does not
exist, cannot be located, or has been
destroyed; or the requested record is not
readily reproducible in the form or
format sought by the requester; denials
involving fees or fee waiver matters; and
denials of requests for expedited
processing.
(e) Content of adverse determinations.
Any adverse determination issued by
OSTP must include:
(1) A brief statement of the reasons for
the adverse determination, including
any FOIA exemption applied by the
agency in denying access to a record
unless to do so would harm the interest
protected by an applicable exemption;
(2) An estimate of the volume of any
records or information withheld, such
as the number of pages or other
reasonable form of estimation, although
such an estimate is not required if the
volume is otherwise indicated by
deletions marked on records that are
disclosed in part or if providing an
estimate would harm an interest
protected by an applicable exemption;
(3) A statement that the adverse
determination may be appealed under
§ 2402.8 and a description of the appeal
requirements.
(4) A statement notifying the requester
of the assistance available from OSTP’s
FOIA Public Liaison and the dispute
resolution services offered by the Office
of Government Information Services.
(f) Consultations, referrals, and
coordinations. When OSTP receives a
request for a record in its possession, it
shall determine whether another agency
of the Federal Government is better able
to determine whether the record is
exempt from disclosure under FOIA
and, if so, whether it should be
disclosed as a matter of administrative
discretion. If OSTP determines that it is
best able to process the record in
response to the request, then it shall do
so. If OSTP determines that it is not best
able to process the record, then it shall
proceed in one of the following ways:
(1) Consultation. When records
originating with OSTP contain
information of interest to another
Federal agency, OSTP should typically
consult with that Federal agency prior
to making a release determination.
(2) Referral. (i) When OSTP believes
that a different Federal agency is best
able to determine whether to disclose
the record, OSTP should typically refer
the responsibility for responding to the
request regarding that record to that
agency. Ordinarily, the agency that
originated the record is presumed to be
the best agency to make the disclosure
determination. If OSTP and another
Federal agency jointly agree that the
E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM
31OCP1
54688
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 2018 / Proposed Rules
agency processing the request is in the
best position to respond regarding the
record, then the record may be handled
as a consultation.
(ii) Whenever OSTP refers any part of
the responsibility for responding to a
request to another agency, OSTP must
document the referral, maintain a copy
of the record that it refers, and notify the
requester of the referral.
(iii) After OSTP refers a record to
another Federal agency, the agency
receiving the referral shall make a
disclosure determination and respond
directly to the requester. The referral of
a record is not an adverse determination
and no appeal rights accrue to the
requester.
(3) Coordination. The standard
referral procedure is not appropriate
where disclosure of the identity of the
Federal agency to which the referral
would be made could harm an interest
protected by an applicable exemption,
such as the exemptions that protect
personal privacy or national security
interests. For example, if a non-law
enforcement agency responding to a
request for records on a living third
party locates within its files records
originating with a law enforcement
agency, and if the existence of that law
enforcement interest in the third party
was not publicly known, then to
disclose that law enforcement interest
could cause an unwarranted invasion of
the personal privacy of the third party.
Similarly, if an agency locates within its
files material originating with an
Intelligence Community agency, and the
involvement of that agency in the matter
is classified and not publicly
acknowledged, then to disclose or give
attribution to the involvement of that
Intelligence Community agency could
cause national security harms. In such
instances, in order to avoid harm to an
interest protected by an applicable
exemption, OSTP will coordinate with
the originating agency to seek its views
on disclosure of the record. OSTP will
then notify the requester of the release
determination for the record that is the
subject of the coordination.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 2402.6 Timing of Responses to
Requests.
(a) In general. OSTP shall ordinarily
respond to requests according to their
order of receipt.
(b) Initial determinations. OSTP will
exercise all reasonable efforts to make
an initial determination acknowledging,
granting, partially granting, or denying a
request for records within 20 working
days after receiving a perfected request.
(c) Extensions of response time in
‘‘unusual circumstances.’’ (1) The 20
working day period provided in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Oct 30, 2018
Jkt 247001
paragraph (b) of this section may be
extended if unusual circumstances
arise. If an extension is necessary, OSTP
shall promptly notify the requester of
the extension, briefly stating the reasons
for the extension, and estimating when
a response will be issued. Unusual
circumstances warranting extension are:
(i) The need to search for and collect
the requested records from field
facilities or other establishments that are
separate from the office processing the
request;
(ii) The need to search for, collect,
and appropriately examine a
voluminous amount of separate and
distinct records which are demanded in
a single request; or
(iii) The need for consultation, which
shall be conducted with all practicable
speed, with another agency having a
substantial interest in the determination
of the request or among two or more
components of the agency having a
substantial subject-matter interest
therein.
(2) After OSTP notifies the requester
of the reasons for the delay, the
requester will have an opportunity to
modify the request or arrange for an
alternative time frame for completion of
the request. To assist in this process,
OSTP shall advise the requester of the
availability of OSTP’s FOIA Public
Liaison to aid in the resolution of any
disputes between the requester and
OSTP, and notify the requester of his or
her right to seek dispute resolution
services from the Office of Government
Information Services.
(3) If no initial determination is made
at the end of the 20 day period provided
for in paragraph (b) of this section,
including any extension, the requester
may appeal the action to the FOIA
Appeals Officer.
(d) Expedited processing of request.
(1) A requester may make a request for
expedited processing at any time.
(2) When a request for expedited
processing is received, OSTP must
determine whether to grant the request
for expedited processing within ten (10)
calendar days of its receipt. Requests
will receive expedited processing if one
of the following compelling needs is
met:
(i) The requester can establish that
failure to receive the records quickly
could reasonably be expected to pose an
imminent threat to the life or physical
safety of an individual; or
(ii) The requester is primarily engaged
in disseminating information and can
demonstrate that an urgency to inform
the public concerning actual or alleged
federal government activity exists.
(3) A requester who seeks expedited
processing must submit a statement,
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
certified to be true and correct,
explaining in detail the basis for making
the request for expedited processing. As
a matter of administrative discretion,
OSTP may waive the formal
certification requirement.
(4) Administrative appeals of denials
of expedited processing will be given
expeditious consideration. If the FOIA
Appeals Officer upholds the denial of
expedited processing, that decision is
immediately subject to judicial review
in the appropriate Federal district court.
(e) Multi-track processing. (1) OSTP
may use multi-track processing in
responding to requests. Multi-track
processing means placing simple
requests that require limited review in
one processing track and placing more
voluminous and complex requests in
one or more other tracks. Requests in
each track are processed on a first-in/
first-out basis.
(i) Track one—expedited requests.
Track one is made up of requests that
sought and received expedited
processing as provided for in paragraph
(d)(2) of this section.
(ii) Track two—simple requests. Track
two is for requests of simple to moderate
complexity that do not require
consultations with other entities and do
not involve voluminous records.
(iii) Track three—complex requests.
Track three is for complex requests that
involve voluminous records, require
lengthy or numerous consultations,
raise unique or novel legal questions, or
require submitter review under § 2402.7.
(2) OSTP may provide requesters with
requests in slower track(s) with an
opportunity to limit the scope of their
requests in order to qualify for faster
processing within the specified limits of
faster track(s). OSTP will do so by
contracting the requester by letter,
telephone, email, or facsimile,
whichever is more efficient in each case.
When providing a requester with the
opportunity to limit the scope of a
request, OSTP shall also advise the
requester of OSTP’s FOIA Public
Liaison to aid in the resolution of any
dispute arising between the requester
and OSTP as well as the requester’s
right to seek dispute resolution services
from the Office of Government
Information Services.
(f) Aggregating requests. OSTP may
aggregate requests if it reasonably
appears that multiple requests
submitted either by a single requester,
or by a group of requesters acting in
concert, involve related matters and
constitute a single request that
otherwise would involve unusual
circumstances. For example, OSTP may
aggregate multiple requests for similar
E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM
31OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 2018 / Proposed Rules
information filed by a single requester
within a short period of time.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 2402.7 Confidential commercial
information.
(a) In general. Business information
obtained by OSTP from a submitter will
be disclosed under FOIA only under
this section.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this
section:
(1) Confidential commercial
information means records provided to
the government by a submitter that
arguably contain material exempt from
release under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4).
(2) Submitter means any person or
entity from whom OSTP obtains
confidential commercial information,
directly or indirectly. The term includes
corporations; state, local, and tribal
governments; universities; non-profit
organizations; associations; and foreign
governments.
(c) Designation of business
information. A submitter of business
information will use good-faith efforts to
designate, by appropriate markings,
either at the time of submission or at a
reasonable time thereafter, any portions
of its submission that it considers to be
protected from disclosure under 5
U.S.C. 552(b)(4). These designations
will expire ten years after the date of the
submission unless the submitter
requests, and provides justification for,
a longer designation period.
(d) Notice to submitters. OSTP shall
provide a submitter with prompt written
notice of a FOIA request or
administrative appeal that seeks its
business information, in order to give
the submitter an opportunity to object to
disclosure of any specified portion of
that information. The notice shall either
describe the business information
requested or include copies of the
requested records or record portions
containing the information. When
notification of a voluminous number of
submitters is required, notification may
be made by posting or publishing the
notice in a place reasonably likely to
accomplish it.
(e) Where notice is required. Notice
shall be given to a submitter wherever:
(1) The information has been
designated in good faith by the
submitter as information considered
protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4; or
(2) OSTP has reason to believe that
the information may be protected from
disclosure under Exemption 4.
(f) Opportunity to object to disclosure.
OSTP will allow a submitter a
reasonable time to respond to the notice
described in paragraph (d) of this
section and will specify that time period
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Oct 30, 2018
Jkt 247001
within the notice. If a submitter has any
objection to disclosure, the submitter is
required to provide a detailed written
statement of objections. The statement
must specify all grounds for
withholding any portion of the
information under any exemption of
FOIA and, in the case of information
withheld under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4), the
submitter must demonstrate the reasons
the submitter believes the information is
a trade secret or commercial or financial
information that is privileged or
confidential. In the event that a
submitter fails to adequately respond to
the notice within the time specified, the
submitter will be considered to have no
objection to disclosure of the
information. Information provided by
the submitter that OSTP does not
receive within the time specified shall
not be considered by OSTP. Information
provided by a submitter under this
paragraph may itself be subject to
disclosure under FOIA.
(g) Notice of intent to disclose. OSTP
shall consider a submitter’s objections
and specific grounds for nondisclosure
in deciding whether to disclose business
information. Whenever OSTP
determines that disclosure is
appropriate over the objection of a
submitter, OSTP shall, within a
reasonable number of days prior to
disclosure, provide the submitter with
written notice of the intent to disclose,
which shall include:
(1) A statement of the reason(s) why
each of the submitter’s disclosure
objections was not sustained;
(2) A description of the business
information to be disclosed; and
(3) A specified disclosure date, which
shall be a reasonable time subsequent to
the notice.
(h) Exceptions to notice requirements.
The notice requirements of paragraphs
(d) and (g) of this section shall not apply
if:
(1) OSTP determines that the
information should not be disclosed;
(2) The information lawfully has been
published or has been officially made
available to the public;
(3) Disclosure of the information is
required by statute (other than FOIA) or
by a regulation issued in accordance
with the requirements of Executive
Order 12600 of June 23, 1987.
(4) The designation made by the
submitter under paragraph (c) of this
section appears obviously frivolous. In
such a case, OSTP shall, within a
reasonable time prior to a specified
disclosure date, give the submitter
written notice of any final decision to
disclose the information within a
reasonable number of days prior to the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54689
specified disclosure date, but no
opportunity to object will be offered; or
(5) The information requested was not
designated by the submitter as exempt
from disclosure in accordance with this
part, when the submitter had an
opportunity to do so at the time of
submission of the information or a
reasonable time thereafter, unless OSTP
has substantial reason to believe that
disclosure of the information would
result in competitive harm.
(i) Notice of FOIA lawsuit. Whenever
a requester files a lawsuit seeking to
compel the disclosure of business
information, OSTP shall promptly
notify the submitter.
(j) Notice to requesters. Whenever
OSTP provides a submitter with notice
and an opportunity to object to
disclosure under paragraph (d) of this
section, OSTP shall also notify the
requester(s). Whenever OSTP notifies a
submitter of its intent to disclose
requested information under paragraph
(g) of this section, OSTP shall also
notify the requester(s). Whenever a
submitter files a lawsuit seeking to
prevent the disclosure of business
information, OSTP shall notify the
requester(s).
§ 2402.8
Appeal of denials.
(a) Right to administrative appeal.
The requester has the right to appeal to
the FOIA Appeals Officer any adverse
determination.
(b) Notice of appeal—(1) Time for
appeal. To be considered timely, an
appeal must be postmarked, or in the
case of electronic submissions,
transmitted no later than ninety (90)
calendar days after the date of the initial
adverse determination or after the time
limit for response by OSTP has expired.
Prior to submitting an appeal, the
requester must pay in full any
outstanding fess associated with the
request.
(2) Form of appeal. An appeal shall be
initiated by filing a written notice of
appeal. The notice shall specify the
internal control number assigned to the
FOIA request by OSTP and be
accompanied by copies of the original
request and adverse determination. To
expedite the appellate process and give
the requester an opportunity to present
his or her arguments, the notice should
contain a brief statement of the reasons
why the requester believes the adverse
determination to be in error. Requesters
may submit appeals by mail or
electronically. Appeals sent via
electronic mail shall be submitted to
ostpfoia@ostp.eop.gov. If sent by regular
mail, appeals shall be sent to: Chief
FOIA Officer, Office of Science and
Technology Policy, Eisenhower
E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM
31OCP1
54690
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Executive Office Building, 1650
Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC
20504. Updates to this contact
information will be made on the OSTP
website. To facilitate handling, the
requester should mark both the appeal
letter and envelop or subject line of the
electronic transmission ‘‘Freedom of
Information Act Appeal.’’
(c) Decisions on Appeals. The Chief
FOIA Officer (or designee) shall make a
determination in writing on the appeal
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A)(ii) within 20
working days after the receipt of the
appeal. If the denial is wholly or
partially upheld, the Chief FOIA Officer
shall:
(1) Notify the requester that judicial
review is available pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(B)–(G); and
(2) Notify the requester that the Office
of Government Information Services
(OGIS) offers mediation services to
resolve disputes between FOIA
requesters and federal agencies as a nonexclusive alternative to litigation.
Contact information for OGIS is: Office
of Government Information Services,
National Archives and Records
Administration, 8601 Adelphi RoadOGIS, College Park, MD 20740, Email:
ogis@nara.gov, Telephone: 202–741–
5770, Facsimile: 202–741–5769, Tollfree: 1–877–684–6448.
(d) Dispute resolution services.
Dispute resolution is a voluntary
process. If OSTP agrees to participate in
the dispute resolution services provided
by the Office of Government
Information Services, it will actively
engage as a partner to the process in an
attempt to resolve the dispute.
(e) When appeal is required. Before
seeking judicial review by a court of
OSTP’s adverse determination, a
requester generally must first submit a
timely administrative appeal.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 2402.9
Fees.
(a) Fees generally required. OSTP
shall use the most efficient and least
costly methods to comply with requests
for documents made under FOIA. OSTP
shall charge fees in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this section unless fees
are waived or reduced in accordance
with § 2402.10.
(b) Calculation of fees. In general, fees
for searching, reviewing, and
duplication will be based on the direct
costs of these services, including the
average hourly salary (basic pay plus
16% for benefits) for the employee(s)
conducting the search, reviewing the
records for exemption, or duplicating
the records. Charges for time less than
a full hour will be in increments of
quarter hours.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Oct 30, 2018
Jkt 247001
(1) Search fee. Search fees may be
charged even if responsive documents
are not located or if they are located but
withheld on the basis of an exemption.
However, search fees shall be limited or
not charged as follows:
(i) Educational, scientific or news
media requests. No search fee shall be
charged if the request is not sought for
a commercial use and is made by an
educational or scientific institution,
whose purpose is scholarly or scientific
research, or by a representative of the
news media.
(ii) Other non-commercial requests.
No search fee shall be charged for the
first two hours of searching if the
request is not for a commercial use and
is submitted by an entity that is not an
educational or scientific institution, or a
representative of the news media.
(iii) Requests for records about self.
No search fee shall be charged to search
for records performed under the terms
of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(f)(5).
(2) Review fee. Review fees shall be
assessed only with respect to those
requesters who seek records for a
commercial use. A review fee shall be
charged for the initial examination of
documents located in response to a
request to determine whether the
documents may be withheld from
disclosure and for the redaction of
document portions exempt from
disclosure. Records or portions of
records withheld in full under an
exemption that is subsequently
determined not to apply may be
reviewed again to determine the
applicability of other exemptions not
previously considered. The costs for
such a subsequent review are also
assessable.
(3) Duplication fee. Records will be
photocopied at a rate of $0.10 per page.
For other methods of reproduction or
duplication, OSTP will charge the
actual direct costs of producing the
document(s). Duplication fees shall not
be charged for the first 100 pages of
copies unless the copies are requested
for a commercial use.
(c) Aggregation of requests. When
OSTP determines that a requester, or a
group of requesters acting in concert, is
attempting to evade the assessment of
fees by submitting multiple requests in
the place of a single more complex
request, OSTP may aggregate any such
requests and assess fees accordingly.
(d) Fees likely to exceed $25. If the
total fee charges are likely to exceed
$25, OSTP shall notify the requester of
the estimated amount of the charges.
The notification shall offer the requester
an opportunity to confer with the FOIA
Public Liaison to reformulate the
request to meet the requester’s needs at
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
a lower cost. OSTP may
administratively close a submitted FOIA
request if the requester does not respond
in writing within 30 calendar days after
the date on which OSTP notifies the
requester of the fee estimate.
(e) Advance payments. Fees may be
paid upon provision of the requested
records, except that payment may be
required prior to that time if the
requester has previously failed to pay
fees or if OSTP determines that the total
fee will exceed $250.00. When payment
is required in advance of the processing
of a request, the time limits prescribed
in § 2402.6 shall not be deemed to begin
until OSTP has received payment of the
assessed fee. If the requester has
previously failed to pay fees or charges
are likely to exceed $250, OSTP shall
notify the requester of the estimated cost
and:
(1) Obtain satisfactory assurance from
the requester, in writing, of full
payment; or
(2) OSTP may require the requester to
pay the full amount of any fees owed
and/or make an advance payment of the
full amount of OSTP’s estimated
charges.
(3) If OSTP does not receive an
adequate response, assurance, or
advanced payment within 30 calendar
days of a fee determination or
notification issued under the authority
of this section, OSTP will
administratively close the
corresponding request.
(f) Other charges. OSTP will recover
the full costs of providing services such
as those enumerated below when it
elects to provide them:
(1) Certifying that records are true
copies;
(2) Sending records by special
methods such as express mail.
(g) Remittances. Remittances shall be
in the form either of a personal check
or bank draft drawn on a bank in the
United States, or a postal money order.
Remittances shall be made payable to
the Treasury of the United States and
mailed to the Chief FOIA Officer, Office
of Science and Technology Policy,
Eisenhower Executive Office Building,
1650 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20504. Updates to this
contact information will be made on the
OSTP website.
(h) Receipts and refunds. A receipt for
fees paid will be given upon request. A
refund of fees paid for services actually
rendered will not be made.
§ 2402.10
Waiver of fees.
(a) In general. OSTP shall waive part
or all of the fees assessed under § 2402.9
if, based upon information provided by
a requester or otherwise made known to
E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM
31OCP1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 2018 / Proposed Rules
OSTP, the disclosure of the requested
information is in the public interest.
Disclosure is in the public interest if it
is likely to contribute significantly to
public understanding of government
operations and is not primarily for
commercial purposes. Requests for a
waiver or reduction of fees shall be
considered on a case by case basis. To
determine whether a fee waiver
requirement is met, OSTP shall consider
the following factors:
(1) Disclosure of the requested
information would shed light on the
operations or activities of the
government. The subject of the request
must concern identifiable operations or
activities of the Federal Government
with a connection that is direct and
clear, not remote or attenuated.
(2) Disclosure of the requested
information is likely to contribute
significantly to public understanding of
those operations or activities. This
factor is satisfied when the following
criteria are met:
(i) Disclosure of the requested records
must be meaningfully informative about
government operations or activities. The
disclosure of information that already is
in the public domain, in either the same
or a substantially identical form, would
not be meaningfully informative if
nothing new would be added to the
public’s understanding.
(ii) The disclosure must contribute to
the understanding of a reasonably broad
audience of persons interested in the
subject, as opposed to the individual
understanding of the requester. A
requester’s expertise in the subject area
as well as the requester’s ability and
intention to effectively convey
information to the public must be
considered. OSTP will presume that a
representative of the news media will
satisfy this consideration.
(3) The disclosure must not be
primarily in the commercial interest of
the requester. To determine whether
disclosure of the requested information
is primarily in the commercial interest
of the requester, OSTP will consider the
following criteria:
(i) OSTP will identify whether the
requester has any commercial interest
that would be furthered by the
requested disclosure. A commercial
interest includes any commercial, trade,
or profit interest. Requesters are
encouraged to provide explanatory
information regarding this
consideration.
(ii) If there is an identified
commercial interest, OSTP will
determine whether that is the primary
interest furthered by the request. OSTP
will ordinarily presume that when a
news media requester has satisfied
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Oct 30, 2018
Jkt 247001
factors in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of
this section, the request is not primarily
in the commercial interest of the
requester. Data brokers or others who
merely compile and market government
information for direct economic return
will not be presumed to primarily serve
the public interest.
(b) Timing of fee waivers. Requests for
a waiver or reduction of fees should be
made when the request is first
submitted to the agency and should
address the criteria referenced in
paragraph (a) of this section. A requester
may submit a fee waiver request at a
later time so long as the underlying
record request is pending or on
administrative appeal. When a requester
who has committed to pay fees
subsequently asks for a waiver of those
fees and that waiver is denied, the
requester must pay any costs incurred
up to the date of the fee waiver request
was received.
(b) Clarification. Where OSTP has
reasonable cause to doubt the use to
which a requester will put the records
sought, or where that use is not clear
from the request itself, OSTP may seek
clarification from the requester before
assigning the request to a specific
category for fee assessment purposes.
(c) Restrictions on charging fees.
Except as described in paragraphs (c)(1)
through (3) of this section, if OSTP fails
to comply with the FOIA’s time limits
for responding to a request, it may not
charge search fees. In addition, subject
to the exceptions set forth in (c)(1)
through (3) of this section, if OSTP does
not comply with the FOIA’s time limits
for responding to a request, it may not
charge duplication fees when records
are not sought for a commercial use and
the request is made by an educational
institution, non-commercial scientific
institution, or representative of the news
media.
(1) If OSTP determines that unusual
circumstances, as defined by the FOIA,
apply and provides timely written
notice to the requester in accordance
with the FOIA, then a failure to comply
with the statutory time limit shall be
excused for an additional 10 days.
(2) If OSTP determines that unusual
circumstances, as defined by the FOIA,
apply and more than 5,000 pages are
necessary to respond to the request,
then OSTP may charge search fees and
duplication fees, where applicable, if
the following steps are taken. OSTP
must (1) provide timely written notice
of unusual circumstances to the
requester in accordance with the FOIA;
and (2) discuss with the requester via
written mail, email, or telephone (or
made not less than three good-faith
attempts to do so) how the requester
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54691
could effectively limit the scope of the
request in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(B)(ii).
(3) If a court determines that
exceptional circumstances exist, as
defined by the FOIA, then a failure to
comply with the time limits shall be
excused for the length of time provided
by the court order.
§ 2402.11
Maintenance of statistics.
(a) OSTP shall maintain records that
are sufficient to allow accurate reporting
of FOIA processing statistics, as
required under 5 U.S.C. 552(e) and all
guidelines for the preparation of annual
FOIA reports issued by the Department
of Justice.
(b) OSTP shall annually, on or before
February 1 of each year, prepare and
submit to the Attorney General an
annual report compiling the statistics
maintained in accordance with
paragraph (a) of this section for the
previous fiscal year. A copy of the
report will be available for public
inspection at the OSTP website.
§ 2402.12
Disclaimer.
Nothing in this part shall be
construed to entitle any person, as a
right, to any service or to the disclosure
of any record to which such person is
not entitled under FOIA.
Ted Wackler,
Deputy Chief of Staff and Assistant Director.
[FR Doc. 2018–23606 Filed 10–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3270–F9–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 49 and 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2017–0347; FRL–9985–78–
Region 10]
Indian Country: Air Quality Planning
and Management; Federal
Implementation Plan for the Kalispel
Indian Community of the Kalispel
Reservation, Washington;
Redesignation to a PSD Class I Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
and seek public comment on the May
11, 2017, proposal by the Kalispel
Indian Community of the Kalispel
Reservation (herein referred to as the
Kalispel Tribe of Indians or Kalispel
Tribe) to redesignate lands within the
exterior boundaries of the Kalispel
Indian Reservation located in the State
of Washington to Class I under the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM
31OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 211 (Wednesday, October 31, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54684-54691]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-23606]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY
32 CFR Part 2402
Implementing the Freedom of Information Act
AGENCY: Office of Science and Technology Policy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)
is amending its regulations to implement the FOIA Improvement Act of
2016. The regulations reflect OSTP's policy and practices and reaffirm
its commitment to provide the fullest possible disclosure of records to
the public.
DATES: Comments will be received through November 30, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Comments of approximately one page or less in length (4000
characters) are requested. All submissions must be in English. Comments
may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Email: [email protected]. Include ``FOIA PROPOSED RULEMAKING''
in the subject line of the message. OSTP does not currently accept
attachments sent to the FOIA mailbox. Please paste the text of your
comment into the message body of your email.
Mail: Office of Science and Technology Policy, Eisenhower Executive
Office Building, 1650 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20502.
Attention: ``FOIA PROPOSED RULEMAKING.''
Fax: (202) 395-1224. Please clearly label all submissions as ``FOIA
PROPOSED RULEMAKING.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Mendoza, 202-456-4444.
Questions about the content of this document should be sent to
[email protected]. Include ``FOIA PROPOSED RULEMAKING'' in the
subject line of the message. Questions may also be sent by mail (please
allow additional time for processing) to: Office of Science and
Technology Policy, Eisenhower Executive Office Building, 1650
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20502. Attention: ``FOIA
PROPOSED RULEMAKING.''
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OSTP is proposing new regulations to govern
its implementation of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). In 2013,
OSTP implemented its FOIA regulations, currently codified at 32 CFR
part 2402. The FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, Pub. L. 114-185, requires
each agency to review and update their FOIA regulations in accordance
with its provisions. Among other things, the Act makes changes that
require agencies to (1) withhold information only when it is reasonably
foreseeable that disclosure would harm to an interest protected by an
exemption; (2) allow a minimum of 90 days to file an appeal following
an adverse determination; and (3) inform requesters of their right to
seek dispute resolution services.
In connection with OSTP's review of its FOIA regulations, OSTP
proposes the following rule to update its FOIA regulations, clarifying
OSTP's process for responding to requests for information,
incorporating new language on partial disclosures of information,
increasing the period of time for a requester to appeal an adverse
determination from 30 days to 90 days, and requiring OSTP to notify
requesters of their right to seek dispute resolution services. Due to
the scope of the proposed revisions, the proposed rule would replace
OSTP's current FOIA regulations in their entirety. This proposed rule
will update OSTP's regulations to reflect the statutory changes to FOIA
and improve FOIA-related service and performance, thereby strengthening
OSTP's compliance with FOIA. Accordingly, OSTP proposes these
regulations implementing FOIA and submits them for public comment.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Executive Order 12866 and 13563
These regulations have been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' section
1(b), Principles of Regulation, and in accordance with Executive Order
13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' section 1(b),
General Principles of Regulation. These regulations are not a
significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866; accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). Further, both Executive Orders 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to
[[Page 54685]]
assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that
maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental,
public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both
costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of
promoting flexibility. OSTP has assessed the costs and benefits of this
regulation and believes that the regulatory approach selected maximizes
net benefits.
Paperwork Reduction Act
OSTP has determined that the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq., does not apply because these regulations do not contain
any information collection requirements subject to OMB's approval.
Executive Order 12988
These regulations meet the applicable standards set forth in
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform.
Executive Order 13132
These regulations will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, OSTP has determined that these regulations do not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
federalism summary impact statement.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
OSTP, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
605(b), has reviewed these proposed regulations and certifies that they
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities because they pertain to administrative matters affecting
the agency.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
These regulations will not result in the expenditure by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million or more in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions are necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1501, et seq.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
These regulations are not major rules as defined by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C. 804.
They will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more, a major increase in costs or prices, or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or the ability of United States-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and export markets.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
OSTP has reviewed this action for purposes of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, and has
determined that this action will not have a significant effect on the
human environment.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 2402
Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, OSTP proposes to amend
Chapter XXIV by revising 32 CFR part 2402 to read as follows:
PART 2402--REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
Sec.
2402.1 Purpose and scope.
2402.2 Delegation of authority and responsibilities.
2402.3 General policy and definitions.
2402.4 Procedure for requesting records.
2402.5 Responses to requests.
2402.6 Timing of Responses to Requests.
2402.7 Confidential commercial information.
2402.8 Appeal of denials.
2402.9 Fees.
2402.10 Waiver of fees.
2402.11 Maintenance of statistics.
2402.12 Disclaimer.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552; E.O. 13392, 70 FR 75373, 3 CFR, 2005
Comp., p. 216.
Sec. 2402.1 Purpose and scope.
The regulations in this part prescribe procedures by which
individuals may obtain access to the Office of Science and Technology
Policy (OSTP) agency records under the Freedom of Information Act, 5
U.S.C. 552, as amended (FOIA), as well as the procedures OSTP must
follow in response to requests for records under FOIA. The regulations
should be read together with the FOIA and the Office of Management and
Budget's (OMB) ``Uniform Freedom of Information Fee Schedule and
Guidelines,'' which provides information about access to records. All
requests for access to information contained within a system of records
pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, shall be processed
in accordance with these regulations as well as those contained in 32
CFR part 2403.
Sec. 2402.2 Delegation of authority and responsibilities.
(a) The Director of OSTP designates the OSTP General Counsel as the
Chief FOIA Officer, and hereby delegates to the Chief FOIA Officer the
authority to act upon all requests for agency records and to re-
delegate such authority at his or her discretion.
(b) The Chief FOIA Officer shall designate a FOIA Public Liaison,
who shall serve as the supervisory official to whom a FOIA requester
can raise concerns about the service the FOIA requester has received
following an initial response. The FOIA Public Liaison will be listed
on the OSTP website (https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/foia) and may re-
delegate the FOIA Public Liaison's authority at his or her discretion.
(c) The Director establishes a FOIA Requester Service Center that
shall be staffed by the Chief FOIA Officer and the FOIA Public Liaison.
The contact information for the FOIA Requester Service Center is Office
of Science and Technology Policy, Eisenhower Executive Office Building,
1650 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20504; Telephone: (202)
456-4444; Fax: (202) 395-1224; Email: [email protected]. Updates to
this contact information will be made on the OSTP website.
Sec. 2402.3 General policy and definitions.
(a) Non-exempt records available to public. Except for records
exempt from disclosure by 5 U.S.C. 552(b) or published in the Federal
Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(1), OSTP's agency records subject to
FOIA are available to any requester who requests them in accordance
with these regulations.
(b) Record availability on the OSTP website. OSTP shall make
records available on its website in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2),
as amended, and other documents that, because of the nature of their
subject matter, are likely to be the subject of FOIA requests. To save
both time and money, OSTP strongly urges requesters to review documents
available on the OSTP website before submitting a request.
(c) Definitions. For purposes of this part:
(1) All of the terms defined in the Freedom of Information Act, and
the
[[Page 54686]]
definitions included in OMB's ``Uniform Freedom of Information Act Fee
Schedule and Guidelines'' apply, unless otherwise defined in this
subpart.
(2) The term ``agency record'' means records that are:
(i) Either created or obtained by OSTP; and
(ii) Under OSTP control at the time of the FOIA request.
(3) The term ``commercial use request'' means a request from or on
behalf of a person who seeks information for a use or purpose that
furthers his or her commercial, trade, or profit interests, which can
include furthering those interests through litigation. OSTP shall
determine, whenever reasonably possible, the use to which a requester
will put the requested records. When it appears that the requester will
put the records to a commercial use, either because of the nature of
the request itself or because OSTP has reasonable cause to doubt a
requester's stated use, OSTP shall provide the requester a reasonable
opportunity to submit further clarification.
(4) The terms ``disclose'' or ``disclosure'' refer to making
records available, upon request, for examination and copying, or
furnishing a copy of records.
(5) The term ``direct cost'' means those expenditures by OSTP
actually incurred in searching for and duplicating (and, in the case of
commercial use requests, reviewing) records in response to the FOIA
request. Direct costs include the salary of the employee or employees
performing the work (i.e., the basic rate of pay for the employee plus
16 percent of that rate to cover benefits) and the cost of operating
computers and other electronic equipment, such as photocopiers and
scanners. Direct costs do not include overhead expenses, such as the
cost of space, heating, or lighting of the facility in which the
records are stored.
(6) The term ``duplication'' means the making of a copy of a
record, or of the information contained in it, necessary to respond to
a FOIA request. Copies can take the form of paper, microform,
audiovisual materials, or electronic records (for example, magnetic
tape or disk), among others.
(7) The term ``educational institution'' means a preschool, a
public or private elementary or secondary school, an institution of
undergraduate higher education, an institution of graduate higher
education, an institution of professional education, or an institution
of vocational education that operates a program of scholarly research.
To be in this category, a requester must show that the request is
authorized by and is made under the auspices of a qualifying
institution and that the records are not sought for a commercial use,
but are sought to further scholarly research.
(8) The term ``fee waiver'' means the waiver or reduction of
processing fees if a requester can demonstrate that certain statutory
standards are satisfied.
(9) The term ``FOIA Public Liaison'' means an agency official who
is responsible for assisting requesters in defining the scope of their
request to reduce processing time, increasing transparency and
understanding of the status of requests, as well as assisting in the
resolution of disputes.
(10) The term ``noncommercial scientific institution'' means an
institution that is not operated on a ``commercial'' basis, as that
term is defined in these regulations, and that is operated solely for
the purpose of conducting scientific research, the results of which are
not intended to promote any particular product or industry. To be in
this category, a requester must show that the request is authorized by
and is made under the auspices of a qualifying institution and that the
records are not sought for a commercial use but are sought to further
scientific research.
(11) The term ``perfected request'' means a FOIA request for
records that reasonably describes the records sought, that has been
received by OSTP in accordance with the requirements set forth in Sec.
2402.4.
(12) The terms ``representative of the news media'' or ``news media
requester'' mean any person or entity that gathers information of
potential interest to a segment of the public, uses its editorial
skills to turn the raw materials into a distinct work, and distributes
that work to an audience. In this clause, the term ``news'' means
information that is about current events or that would be of current
interest to the public. Examples of news media entities are television
or radio stations broadcasting to the public at large and publishers of
periodicals (but only if such entities qualify as disseminators of
news) who make their products available for purchase by or subscription
by or free distribution to the general public. These examples are not
all-inclusive. Moreover, as methods of news delivery evolve, such as
through electronic or digital means, such news sources shall be
considered to be news media entities. A freelance journalist shall be
regarded as working for a news-media entity if the journalist can
demonstrate a solid basis for expecting publication through that
entity, whether or not the journalist is actually employed by the
entity. A publication contract would present a solid basis for such an
expectation; the Government may also consider the past publication
record of the requester in making such a determination.
(13) The term ``requester'' means any person, including an
individual, partnership, corporation, association, Native American
tribe, or other public or private organization other than a Federal
agency that requests access to records.
(14) The term ``review'' means the process of examining documents
located in response to a request that is for a commercial use to
determine whether any portion of any document located is permitted to
be withheld. It includes processing of any documents for disclosure,
e.g., doing all that is necessary to excise exempt information and
otherwise prepare them for release. Review does not include time spent
resolving general legal or policy issues regarding the application of
exemptions.
(15) The term ``search'' refers to the process of looking for and
retrieving records or information responsive to a request. It includes
page-by-page or line-by-line identification of information within
records and also includes reasonable efforts to locate and retrieve
information from records maintained in electronic form or format.
(16) The term ``working day'' means a regular Federal working day
between the hours of 9:00AM and 5:00PM. It does not include Saturdays,
Sundays, or legal Federal holidays. Any requests received after 5:00PM
on any given working day will be considered received on the next
working day.
Sec. 2402.4 Procedure for requesting records.
(a) Format of requests--(1) In general. Requests for information
must be made in writing and may be delivered by mail, fax, or
electronic mail, as specified in Sec. 2402.2(c). All requests must be
made in English. Requests for information may specify the preferred
format (including electronic formats) of the response. When requesters
do not specify the preferred format of the response, OSTP shall produce
scanned records to be delivered electronically.
(2) Electronic format records. (i) OSTP shall provide the
responsive records in the format requested if the record or records are
readily reproducible by OSTP in that format. OSTP shall make reasonable
efforts to maintain its records in formats that are reproducible for
the purpose of disclosure. For purposes of this paragraph, the term
readily reproducible means, with respect to electronic format, a record
that can be downloaded or transferred intact to an
[[Page 54687]]
electronic medium using equipment currently in use by the office
processing the request. Even though some records may initially be
readily reproducible, the need to segregate exempt from nonexempt
records may cause the releasable material to be not readily
reproducible.
(ii) In responding to a request for records, OSTP shall make
reasonable efforts to search for the records in electronic format,
except where such efforts would interfere with the operation of the
agency's automated information system(s). For purposes of this
paragraph, the term ``search'' means to locate, manually or by
automated means, agency records for the purpose of identifying those
records that are responsive to a request.
(iii) Searches for records maintained in electronic format may
require the application of codes, queries, or other minor forms of
programming to retrieve the requested records.
(3) Attachment restrictions. To protect OSTP's computer systems,
OSTP will not accept files sent as email attachments or as web links.
Requesters can submit requests by postal mail, by fax, or in the body
of the email text.
(b) Contents. A request must describe the records sought in
sufficient detail to enable OSTP personnel to locate the records with a
reasonable amount of effort. To the extent possible, requesters should
include specific information that may assist OSTP personnel in
identifying the requested records, such as the date, title or name,
author, recipient, and subject matter of the record. In general,
requesters should include as much detail as possible about the specific
records or the types of records he or she is seeking. Before submitting
a request, requesters may contact the OSTP FOIA Public Liaison to
discuss the records they are seeking and to receive assistance in
describing the records. If, after receiving a request, OSTP determines
that it does not reasonably describe the records sought or that the
request will be unduly burdensome to process, OSTP shall inform the
requester what additional information is needed or how the request may
be modified. Requesters who are attempting to reformulate or modify
such a request may discuss their request with OSTP's FOIA Public
Liaison, who is available to assist.
(c) Date of receipt. A request that complies with paragraphs (a)
and (b) of this section is deemed a ``perfected request.'' A perfected
request is deemed received on the actual date it is received by OSTP. A
request that does not comply with paragraphs (a) and (b) of this
section is deemed received when sufficient information to perfect the
request is actually received by OSTP.
(d) Contact information. Requesters must provide contact
information, such as the requester's phone number, email address, or
mailing address, to enable OSTP to communicate with the requester about
the request and provide released records. If OSTP cannot contact the
requester, or the requester does not respond within 30 calendar days to
OSTP's requests for clarification, OSTP will administratively close the
request.
(e) Types of records not available. The FOIA does not require OSTP
to:
(1) Compile or create records solely for the purpose of satisfying
a request for records;
(2) Provide records not yet in existence, even if such records may
be expected to come into existence at some future time;
(3) Restore records destroyed or otherwise disposed of, except that
OSTP must notify the requester that the requested records have been
destroyed or disposed.
Sec. 2402.5 Responses to requests.
(a) In general. In determining which records are responsive to a
request, OSTP will ordinarily include only records in its possession as
of the date it begins its search for records. If any other date is
used, the OSTP shall inform the requester of that date.
(b) Authority to grant or deny requests. OSTP shall make initial
determinations to grant or deny in whole or in part a request for
records.
(c) Granting of Requests. When OSTP determines that any responsive
records shall be made available, OSTP shall notify the requester in
writing and provide copies of the requested records in whole or in
part. Records disclosed in part shall be marked or annotated to show
the exemption applied to the withheld information and the amount of
information withheld unless to do so would harm the interest protected
by an applicable exemption. If a requested record contains exempted
material along with nonexempt material, all reasonable segregable
material shall be disclosed.
(d) Adverse determinations. If OSTP makes an adverse determination
denying a request in any respect, it must notify the requester of that
adverse determination in writing. Adverse determinations include
decisions that: The requested record is exempt from disclosure, in
whole or in part; the request does not reasonably describe the records
sought, but only if, after discussion with the FOIA Public Liaison, the
requester refuses to modify the terms of the request; the information
requested is not a record subject to the FOIA; the requested record
does not exist, cannot be located, or has been destroyed; or the
requested record is not readily reproducible in the form or format
sought by the requester; denials involving fees or fee waiver matters;
and denials of requests for expedited processing.
(e) Content of adverse determinations. Any adverse determination
issued by OSTP must include:
(1) A brief statement of the reasons for the adverse determination,
including any FOIA exemption applied by the agency in denying access to
a record unless to do so would harm the interest protected by an
applicable exemption;
(2) An estimate of the volume of any records or information
withheld, such as the number of pages or other reasonable form of
estimation, although such an estimate is not required if the volume is
otherwise indicated by deletions marked on records that are disclosed
in part or if providing an estimate would harm an interest protected by
an applicable exemption;
(3) A statement that the adverse determination may be appealed
under Sec. 2402.8 and a description of the appeal requirements.
(4) A statement notifying the requester of the assistance available
from OSTP's FOIA Public Liaison and the dispute resolution services
offered by the Office of Government Information Services.
(f) Consultations, referrals, and coordinations. When OSTP receives
a request for a record in its possession, it shall determine whether
another agency of the Federal Government is better able to determine
whether the record is exempt from disclosure under FOIA and, if so,
whether it should be disclosed as a matter of administrative
discretion. If OSTP determines that it is best able to process the
record in response to the request, then it shall do so. If OSTP
determines that it is not best able to process the record, then it
shall proceed in one of the following ways:
(1) Consultation. When records originating with OSTP contain
information of interest to another Federal agency, OSTP should
typically consult with that Federal agency prior to making a release
determination.
(2) Referral. (i) When OSTP believes that a different Federal
agency is best able to determine whether to disclose the record, OSTP
should typically refer the responsibility for responding to the request
regarding that record to that agency. Ordinarily, the agency that
originated the record is presumed to be the best agency to make the
disclosure determination. If OSTP and another Federal agency jointly
agree that the
[[Page 54688]]
agency processing the request is in the best position to respond
regarding the record, then the record may be handled as a consultation.
(ii) Whenever OSTP refers any part of the responsibility for
responding to a request to another agency, OSTP must document the
referral, maintain a copy of the record that it refers, and notify the
requester of the referral.
(iii) After OSTP refers a record to another Federal agency, the
agency receiving the referral shall make a disclosure determination and
respond directly to the requester. The referral of a record is not an
adverse determination and no appeal rights accrue to the requester.
(3) Coordination. The standard referral procedure is not
appropriate where disclosure of the identity of the Federal agency to
which the referral would be made could harm an interest protected by an
applicable exemption, such as the exemptions that protect personal
privacy or national security interests. For example, if a non-law
enforcement agency responding to a request for records on a living
third party locates within its files records originating with a law
enforcement agency, and if the existence of that law enforcement
interest in the third party was not publicly known, then to disclose
that law enforcement interest could cause an unwarranted invasion of
the personal privacy of the third party. Similarly, if an agency
locates within its files material originating with an Intelligence
Community agency, and the involvement of that agency in the matter is
classified and not publicly acknowledged, then to disclose or give
attribution to the involvement of that Intelligence Community agency
could cause national security harms. In such instances, in order to
avoid harm to an interest protected by an applicable exemption, OSTP
will coordinate with the originating agency to seek its views on
disclosure of the record. OSTP will then notify the requester of the
release determination for the record that is the subject of the
coordination.
Sec. 2402.6 Timing of Responses to Requests.
(a) In general. OSTP shall ordinarily respond to requests according
to their order of receipt.
(b) Initial determinations. OSTP will exercise all reasonable
efforts to make an initial determination acknowledging, granting,
partially granting, or denying a request for records within 20 working
days after receiving a perfected request.
(c) Extensions of response time in ``unusual circumstances.'' (1)
The 20 working day period provided in paragraph (b) of this section may
be extended if unusual circumstances arise. If an extension is
necessary, OSTP shall promptly notify the requester of the extension,
briefly stating the reasons for the extension, and estimating when a
response will be issued. Unusual circumstances warranting extension
are:
(i) The need to search for and collect the requested records from
field facilities or other establishments that are separate from the
office processing the request;
(ii) The need to search for, collect, and appropriately examine a
voluminous amount of separate and distinct records which are demanded
in a single request; or
(iii) The need for consultation, which shall be conducted with all
practicable speed, with another agency having a substantial interest in
the determination of the request or among two or more components of the
agency having a substantial subject-matter interest therein.
(2) After OSTP notifies the requester of the reasons for the delay,
the requester will have an opportunity to modify the request or arrange
for an alternative time frame for completion of the request. To assist
in this process, OSTP shall advise the requester of the availability of
OSTP's FOIA Public Liaison to aid in the resolution of any disputes
between the requester and OSTP, and notify the requester of his or her
right to seek dispute resolution services from the Office of Government
Information Services.
(3) If no initial determination is made at the end of the 20 day
period provided for in paragraph (b) of this section, including any
extension, the requester may appeal the action to the FOIA Appeals
Officer.
(d) Expedited processing of request. (1) A requester may make a
request for expedited processing at any time.
(2) When a request for expedited processing is received, OSTP must
determine whether to grant the request for expedited processing within
ten (10) calendar days of its receipt. Requests will receive expedited
processing if one of the following compelling needs is met:
(i) The requester can establish that failure to receive the records
quickly could reasonably be expected to pose an imminent threat to the
life or physical safety of an individual; or
(ii) The requester is primarily engaged in disseminating
information and can demonstrate that an urgency to inform the public
concerning actual or alleged federal government activity exists.
(3) A requester who seeks expedited processing must submit a
statement, certified to be true and correct, explaining in detail the
basis for making the request for expedited processing. As a matter of
administrative discretion, OSTP may waive the formal certification
requirement.
(4) Administrative appeals of denials of expedited processing will
be given expeditious consideration. If the FOIA Appeals Officer upholds
the denial of expedited processing, that decision is immediately
subject to judicial review in the appropriate Federal district court.
(e) Multi-track processing. (1) OSTP may use multi-track processing
in responding to requests. Multi-track processing means placing simple
requests that require limited review in one processing track and
placing more voluminous and complex requests in one or more other
tracks. Requests in each track are processed on a first-in/first-out
basis.
(i) Track one--expedited requests. Track one is made up of requests
that sought and received expedited processing as provided for in
paragraph (d)(2) of this section.
(ii) Track two--simple requests. Track two is for requests of
simple to moderate complexity that do not require consultations with
other entities and do not involve voluminous records.
(iii) Track three--complex requests. Track three is for complex
requests that involve voluminous records, require lengthy or numerous
consultations, raise unique or novel legal questions, or require
submitter review under Sec. 2402.7.
(2) OSTP may provide requesters with requests in slower track(s)
with an opportunity to limit the scope of their requests in order to
qualify for faster processing within the specified limits of faster
track(s). OSTP will do so by contracting the requester by letter,
telephone, email, or facsimile, whichever is more efficient in each
case. When providing a requester with the opportunity to limit the
scope of a request, OSTP shall also advise the requester of OSTP's FOIA
Public Liaison to aid in the resolution of any dispute arising between
the requester and OSTP as well as the requester's right to seek dispute
resolution services from the Office of Government Information Services.
(f) Aggregating requests. OSTP may aggregate requests if it
reasonably appears that multiple requests submitted either by a single
requester, or by a group of requesters acting in concert, involve
related matters and constitute a single request that otherwise would
involve unusual circumstances. For example, OSTP may aggregate multiple
requests for similar
[[Page 54689]]
information filed by a single requester within a short period of time.
Sec. 2402.7 Confidential commercial information.
(a) In general. Business information obtained by OSTP from a
submitter will be disclosed under FOIA only under this section.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this section:
(1) Confidential commercial information means records provided to
the government by a submitter that arguably contain material exempt
from release under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4).
(2) Submitter means any person or entity from whom OSTP obtains
confidential commercial information, directly or indirectly. The term
includes corporations; state, local, and tribal governments;
universities; non-profit organizations; associations; and foreign
governments.
(c) Designation of business information. A submitter of business
information will use good-faith efforts to designate, by appropriate
markings, either at the time of submission or at a reasonable time
thereafter, any portions of its submission that it considers to be
protected from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4). These designations
will expire ten years after the date of the submission unless the
submitter requests, and provides justification for, a longer
designation period.
(d) Notice to submitters. OSTP shall provide a submitter with
prompt written notice of a FOIA request or administrative appeal that
seeks its business information, in order to give the submitter an
opportunity to object to disclosure of any specified portion of that
information. The notice shall either describe the business information
requested or include copies of the requested records or record portions
containing the information. When notification of a voluminous number of
submitters is required, notification may be made by posting or
publishing the notice in a place reasonably likely to accomplish it.
(e) Where notice is required. Notice shall be given to a submitter
wherever:
(1) The information has been designated in good faith by the
submitter as information considered protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4; or
(2) OSTP has reason to believe that the information may be
protected from disclosure under Exemption 4.
(f) Opportunity to object to disclosure. OSTP will allow a
submitter a reasonable time to respond to the notice described in
paragraph (d) of this section and will specify that time period within
the notice. If a submitter has any objection to disclosure, the
submitter is required to provide a detailed written statement of
objections. The statement must specify all grounds for withholding any
portion of the information under any exemption of FOIA and, in the case
of information withheld under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4), the submitter must
demonstrate the reasons the submitter believes the information is a
trade secret or commercial or financial information that is privileged
or confidential. In the event that a submitter fails to adequately
respond to the notice within the time specified, the submitter will be
considered to have no objection to disclosure of the information.
Information provided by the submitter that OSTP does not receive within
the time specified shall not be considered by OSTP. Information
provided by a submitter under this paragraph may itself be subject to
disclosure under FOIA.
(g) Notice of intent to disclose. OSTP shall consider a submitter's
objections and specific grounds for nondisclosure in deciding whether
to disclose business information. Whenever OSTP determines that
disclosure is appropriate over the objection of a submitter, OSTP
shall, within a reasonable number of days prior to disclosure, provide
the submitter with written notice of the intent to disclose, which
shall include:
(1) A statement of the reason(s) why each of the submitter's
disclosure objections was not sustained;
(2) A description of the business information to be disclosed; and
(3) A specified disclosure date, which shall be a reasonable time
subsequent to the notice.
(h) Exceptions to notice requirements. The notice requirements of
paragraphs (d) and (g) of this section shall not apply if:
(1) OSTP determines that the information should not be disclosed;
(2) The information lawfully has been published or has been
officially made available to the public;
(3) Disclosure of the information is required by statute (other
than FOIA) or by a regulation issued in accordance with the
requirements of Executive Order 12600 of June 23, 1987.
(4) The designation made by the submitter under paragraph (c) of
this section appears obviously frivolous. In such a case, OSTP shall,
within a reasonable time prior to a specified disclosure date, give the
submitter written notice of any final decision to disclose the
information within a reasonable number of days prior to the specified
disclosure date, but no opportunity to object will be offered; or
(5) The information requested was not designated by the submitter
as exempt from disclosure in accordance with this part, when the
submitter had an opportunity to do so at the time of submission of the
information or a reasonable time thereafter, unless OSTP has
substantial reason to believe that disclosure of the information would
result in competitive harm.
(i) Notice of FOIA lawsuit. Whenever a requester files a lawsuit
seeking to compel the disclosure of business information, OSTP shall
promptly notify the submitter.
(j) Notice to requesters. Whenever OSTP provides a submitter with
notice and an opportunity to object to disclosure under paragraph (d)
of this section, OSTP shall also notify the requester(s). Whenever OSTP
notifies a submitter of its intent to disclose requested information
under paragraph (g) of this section, OSTP shall also notify the
requester(s). Whenever a submitter files a lawsuit seeking to prevent
the disclosure of business information, OSTP shall notify the
requester(s).
Sec. 2402.8 Appeal of denials.
(a) Right to administrative appeal. The requester has the right to
appeal to the FOIA Appeals Officer any adverse determination.
(b) Notice of appeal--(1) Time for appeal. To be considered timely,
an appeal must be postmarked, or in the case of electronic submissions,
transmitted no later than ninety (90) calendar days after the date of
the initial adverse determination or after the time limit for response
by OSTP has expired. Prior to submitting an appeal, the requester must
pay in full any outstanding fess associated with the request.
(2) Form of appeal. An appeal shall be initiated by filing a
written notice of appeal. The notice shall specify the internal control
number assigned to the FOIA request by OSTP and be accompanied by
copies of the original request and adverse determination. To expedite
the appellate process and give the requester an opportunity to present
his or her arguments, the notice should contain a brief statement of
the reasons why the requester believes the adverse determination to be
in error. Requesters may submit appeals by mail or electronically.
Appeals sent via electronic mail shall be submitted to
[email protected]. If sent by regular mail, appeals shall be sent
to: Chief FOIA Officer, Office of Science and Technology Policy,
Eisenhower
[[Page 54690]]
Executive Office Building, 1650 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC
20504. Updates to this contact information will be made on the OSTP
website. To facilitate handling, the requester should mark both the
appeal letter and envelop or subject line of the electronic
transmission ``Freedom of Information Act Appeal.''
(c) Decisions on Appeals. The Chief FOIA Officer (or designee)
shall make a determination in writing on the appeal under 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(A)(ii) within 20 working days after the receipt of the
appeal. If the denial is wholly or partially upheld, the Chief FOIA
Officer shall:
(1) Notify the requester that judicial review is available pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B)-(G); and
(2) Notify the requester that the Office of Government Information
Services (OGIS) offers mediation services to resolve disputes between
FOIA requesters and federal agencies as a non-exclusive alternative to
litigation. Contact information for OGIS is: Office of Government
Information Services, National Archives and Records Administration,
8601 Adelphi Road-OGIS, College Park, MD 20740, Email: [email protected],
Telephone: 202-741-5770, Facsimile: 202-741-5769, Toll-free: 1-877-684-
6448.
(d) Dispute resolution services. Dispute resolution is a voluntary
process. If OSTP agrees to participate in the dispute resolution
services provided by the Office of Government Information Services, it
will actively engage as a partner to the process in an attempt to
resolve the dispute.
(e) When appeal is required. Before seeking judicial review by a
court of OSTP's adverse determination, a requester generally must first
submit a timely administrative appeal.
Sec. 2402.9 Fees.
(a) Fees generally required. OSTP shall use the most efficient and
least costly methods to comply with requests for documents made under
FOIA. OSTP shall charge fees in accordance with paragraph (b) of this
section unless fees are waived or reduced in accordance with Sec.
2402.10.
(b) Calculation of fees. In general, fees for searching, reviewing,
and duplication will be based on the direct costs of these services,
including the average hourly salary (basic pay plus 16% for benefits)
for the employee(s) conducting the search, reviewing the records for
exemption, or duplicating the records. Charges for time less than a
full hour will be in increments of quarter hours.
(1) Search fee. Search fees may be charged even if responsive
documents are not located or if they are located but withheld on the
basis of an exemption. However, search fees shall be limited or not
charged as follows:
(i) Educational, scientific or news media requests. No search fee
shall be charged if the request is not sought for a commercial use and
is made by an educational or scientific institution, whose purpose is
scholarly or scientific research, or by a representative of the news
media.
(ii) Other non-commercial requests. No search fee shall be charged
for the first two hours of searching if the request is not for a
commercial use and is submitted by an entity that is not an educational
or scientific institution, or a representative of the news media.
(iii) Requests for records about self. No search fee shall be
charged to search for records performed under the terms of the Privacy
Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(f)(5).
(2) Review fee. Review fees shall be assessed only with respect to
those requesters who seek records for a commercial use. A review fee
shall be charged for the initial examination of documents located in
response to a request to determine whether the documents may be
withheld from disclosure and for the redaction of document portions
exempt from disclosure. Records or portions of records withheld in full
under an exemption that is subsequently determined not to apply may be
reviewed again to determine the applicability of other exemptions not
previously considered. The costs for such a subsequent review are also
assessable.
(3) Duplication fee. Records will be photocopied at a rate of $0.10
per page. For other methods of reproduction or duplication, OSTP will
charge the actual direct costs of producing the document(s).
Duplication fees shall not be charged for the first 100 pages of copies
unless the copies are requested for a commercial use.
(c) Aggregation of requests. When OSTP determines that a requester,
or a group of requesters acting in concert, is attempting to evade the
assessment of fees by submitting multiple requests in the place of a
single more complex request, OSTP may aggregate any such requests and
assess fees accordingly.
(d) Fees likely to exceed $25. If the total fee charges are likely
to exceed $25, OSTP shall notify the requester of the estimated amount
of the charges. The notification shall offer the requester an
opportunity to confer with the FOIA Public Liaison to reformulate the
request to meet the requester's needs at a lower cost. OSTP may
administratively close a submitted FOIA request if the requester does
not respond in writing within 30 calendar days after the date on which
OSTP notifies the requester of the fee estimate.
(e) Advance payments. Fees may be paid upon provision of the
requested records, except that payment may be required prior to that
time if the requester has previously failed to pay fees or if OSTP
determines that the total fee will exceed $250.00. When payment is
required in advance of the processing of a request, the time limits
prescribed in Sec. 2402.6 shall not be deemed to begin until OSTP has
received payment of the assessed fee. If the requester has previously
failed to pay fees or charges are likely to exceed $250, OSTP shall
notify the requester of the estimated cost and:
(1) Obtain satisfactory assurance from the requester, in writing,
of full payment; or
(2) OSTP may require the requester to pay the full amount of any
fees owed and/or make an advance payment of the full amount of OSTP's
estimated charges.
(3) If OSTP does not receive an adequate response, assurance, or
advanced payment within 30 calendar days of a fee determination or
notification issued under the authority of this section, OSTP will
administratively close the corresponding request.
(f) Other charges. OSTP will recover the full costs of providing
services such as those enumerated below when it elects to provide them:
(1) Certifying that records are true copies;
(2) Sending records by special methods such as express mail.
(g) Remittances. Remittances shall be in the form either of a
personal check or bank draft drawn on a bank in the United States, or a
postal money order. Remittances shall be made payable to the Treasury
of the United States and mailed to the Chief FOIA Officer, Office of
Science and Technology Policy, Eisenhower Executive Office Building,
1650 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20504. Updates to this
contact information will be made on the OSTP website.
(h) Receipts and refunds. A receipt for fees paid will be given
upon request. A refund of fees paid for services actually rendered will
not be made.
Sec. 2402.10 Waiver of fees.
(a) In general. OSTP shall waive part or all of the fees assessed
under Sec. 2402.9 if, based upon information provided by a requester
or otherwise made known to
[[Page 54691]]
OSTP, the disclosure of the requested information is in the public
interest. Disclosure is in the public interest if it is likely to
contribute significantly to public understanding of government
operations and is not primarily for commercial purposes. Requests for a
waiver or reduction of fees shall be considered on a case by case
basis. To determine whether a fee waiver requirement is met, OSTP shall
consider the following factors:
(1) Disclosure of the requested information would shed light on the
operations or activities of the government. The subject of the request
must concern identifiable operations or activities of the Federal
Government with a connection that is direct and clear, not remote or
attenuated.
(2) Disclosure of the requested information is likely to contribute
significantly to public understanding of those operations or
activities. This factor is satisfied when the following criteria are
met:
(i) Disclosure of the requested records must be meaningfully
informative about government operations or activities. The disclosure
of information that already is in the public domain, in either the same
or a substantially identical form, would not be meaningfully
informative if nothing new would be added to the public's
understanding.
(ii) The disclosure must contribute to the understanding of a
reasonably broad audience of persons interested in the subject, as
opposed to the individual understanding of the requester. A requester's
expertise in the subject area as well as the requester's ability and
intention to effectively convey information to the public must be
considered. OSTP will presume that a representative of the news media
will satisfy this consideration.
(3) The disclosure must not be primarily in the commercial interest
of the requester. To determine whether disclosure of the requested
information is primarily in the commercial interest of the requester,
OSTP will consider the following criteria:
(i) OSTP will identify whether the requester has any commercial
interest that would be furthered by the requested disclosure. A
commercial interest includes any commercial, trade, or profit interest.
Requesters are encouraged to provide explanatory information regarding
this consideration.
(ii) If there is an identified commercial interest, OSTP will
determine whether that is the primary interest furthered by the
request. OSTP will ordinarily presume that when a news media requester
has satisfied factors in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section, the
request is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester.
Data brokers or others who merely compile and market government
information for direct economic return will not be presumed to
primarily serve the public interest.
(b) Timing of fee waivers. Requests for a waiver or reduction of
fees should be made when the request is first submitted to the agency
and should address the criteria referenced in paragraph (a) of this
section. A requester may submit a fee waiver request at a later time so
long as the underlying record request is pending or on administrative
appeal. When a requester who has committed to pay fees subsequently
asks for a waiver of those fees and that waiver is denied, the
requester must pay any costs incurred up to the date of the fee waiver
request was received.
(b) Clarification. Where OSTP has reasonable cause to doubt the use
to which a requester will put the records sought, or where that use is
not clear from the request itself, OSTP may seek clarification from the
requester before assigning the request to a specific category for fee
assessment purposes.
(c) Restrictions on charging fees. Except as described in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this section, if OSTP fails to comply
with the FOIA's time limits for responding to a request, it may not
charge search fees. In addition, subject to the exceptions set forth in
(c)(1) through (3) of this section, if OSTP does not comply with the
FOIA's time limits for responding to a request, it may not charge
duplication fees when records are not sought for a commercial use and
the request is made by an educational institution, non-commercial
scientific institution, or representative of the news media.
(1) If OSTP determines that unusual circumstances, as defined by
the FOIA, apply and provides timely written notice to the requester in
accordance with the FOIA, then a failure to comply with the statutory
time limit shall be excused for an additional 10 days.
(2) If OSTP determines that unusual circumstances, as defined by
the FOIA, apply and more than 5,000 pages are necessary to respond to
the request, then OSTP may charge search fees and duplication fees,
where applicable, if the following steps are taken. OSTP must (1)
provide timely written notice of unusual circumstances to the requester
in accordance with the FOIA; and (2) discuss with the requester via
written mail, email, or telephone (or made not less than three good-
faith attempts to do so) how the requester could effectively limit the
scope of the request in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(B)(ii).
(3) If a court determines that exceptional circumstances exist, as
defined by the FOIA, then a failure to comply with the time limits
shall be excused for the length of time provided by the court order.
Sec. 2402.11 Maintenance of statistics.
(a) OSTP shall maintain records that are sufficient to allow
accurate reporting of FOIA processing statistics, as required under 5
U.S.C. 552(e) and all guidelines for the preparation of annual FOIA
reports issued by the Department of Justice.
(b) OSTP shall annually, on or before February 1 of each year,
prepare and submit to the Attorney General an annual report compiling
the statistics maintained in accordance with paragraph (a) of this
section for the previous fiscal year. A copy of the report will be
available for public inspection at the OSTP website.
Sec. 2402.12 Disclaimer.
Nothing in this part shall be construed to entitle any person, as a
right, to any service or to the disclosure of any record to which such
person is not entitled under FOIA.
Ted Wackler,
Deputy Chief of Staff and Assistant Director.
[FR Doc. 2018-23606 Filed 10-30-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3270-F9-P