Certifications and Exemptions Under the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972, 54674-54676 [2018-23374]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
54674
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Prevention, ‘‘Fourth National Report on
Human Exposure to Environmental
Chemicals, Updated Tables, March 2018,
Volume One.’’ https://www.cdc.gov/
exposurereport/pdf/FourthReport_
UpdatedTables_Volume1_Mar2018.pdf.
11. Mielke, H.W., M.D. Taylor, C.R. Gonzales,
et al., ‘‘Lead-Based Hair Coloring
Products: Too Hazardous for Household
Use,’’ Journal of the American
Pharmaceutical Association, NS37:85–
89, 1997b.
12. Deeb, W., D. Cachia, C. Quinn, et al.,
‘‘Peripheral Neuropathy After Hair Dye
Exposure: A Case Report,’’ Journal of
Clinical Neuromuscular Disease, 15:161–
163, 2014.
*13. The Scientific Committee on Cosmetic
Products and Non-Food Products
Intended for Consumers. Opinion
Concerning Lead Acetate, SCCNFP/0832/
04, July 1, 2004. https://ec.europa.eu/
health/ph_risk/committees/sccp/
documents/out286_en.pdf.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 73
Color additives, Cosmetics, Drugs,
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 73 is
amended as follows:
PART 73—LISTING OF COLOR
ADDITIVES EXEMPT FROM
CERTIFICATION
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 342, 343,
348, 351, 352, 355, 361, 362, 371, 379e.
§ 73.2396
■
[Removed]
2. Remove § 73.2396.
Dated: October 25, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018–23725 Filed 10–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 706
Certifications and Exemptions Under
the International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972
AGENCY:
Department of the Navy (DoN),
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
DoD.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Oct 30, 2018
Jkt 247001
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Department of the Navy
(DoN) is amending its certifications and
exemptions under the International
Regulations for Preventing Collisions at
Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that
the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (DAJAG) (Admiralty and
Maritime Law) has determined that USS
CINCINNATI (LCS 20) is a vessel of the
Navy which, due to its special
construction and purpose, cannot fully
comply with certain provisions of the 72
COLREGS without interfering with its
special function as a naval ship. The
intended effect of this rule is to warn
mariners in waters where 72 COLREGS
apply.
DATES: This rule is effective October 31,
2018 and is applicable beginning
October 19, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Commander Kyle Fralick,
JAGC, U.S. Navy, Admiralty Attorney,
(Admiralty and Maritime Law), Office of
the Judge Advocate General, Department
of the Navy, 1322 Patterson Ave. SE,
Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC
20374–5066, telephone number: 202–
685–5040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the authority granted in 33 U.S.C.
1605, the DoN amends 32 CFR part 706.
This amendment provides notice that
the DAJAG (Admiralty and Maritime
Law), under authority delegated by the
Secretary of the Navy, has certified that
USS CINCINNATI (LCS 20) is a vessel
of the Navy which, due to its special
construction and purpose, cannot fully
comply with the following specific
provisions of 72 COLREGS without
interfering with its special function as a
naval ship: Annex I, paragraph 2(a)(i),
pertaining to the height of the forward
masthead light above the hull; Annex I,
paragraph 3(a), pertaining to the
location of the forward masthead light
in the forward quarter of the ship and
the horizontal distance between the
forward and after masthead light; Rule
21(a) and Annex I, paragraph 2(f)(i),
requiring the masthead lights be above
and clear of all other lights and
obstructions; Annex I, paragraph 2(f)(ii)
and Annex I, paragraph 3(c), pertaining
to the horizontal and vertical spacing of
task lights; and Rule 27(b)(i) and Annex
I, paragraph 9(b), pertaining to the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
visibility of task lights. The DAJAG
(Admiralty and Maritime Law) has also
certified that the lights involved are
located in closest possible compliance
with the applicable 72 COLREGS
requirements.
Moreover, it has been determined, in
accordance with 32 CFR parts 296 and
701, that publication of this amendment
for public comment prior to adoption is
impracticable, unnecessary, and
contrary to public interest since it is
based on technical findings that the
placement of lights on this vessel in a
manner differently from that prescribed
herein will adversely affect the vessel’s
ability to perform its military functions.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706
Marine safety, Navigation (water).
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the DoN amends part 706 of
title 32 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 706—CERTIFICATIONS AND
EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE
INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS FOR
PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA,
1972
1. The authority citation for part 706
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605.
2. Section 706.2 is amended by:
a. In Table One, adding, in alpha
numerical order, by vessel number, an
entry for USS CINCINNATI (LCS 20);
■ b. In Table Four, under Paragraph 15,
adding, in alpha numerical order, by
vessel number, an entry for USS
CINCINNATI (LCS 20);
■ c. In Table Four, under Paragraph 16,
adding, in alpha numerical order, by
vessel number, an entry for USS
CINCINNATI (LCS 20);
■ d. In Table Four, under Paragraph 27,
adding, in alpha numerical order, by
vessel number, an entry for USS
CINCINNATI (LCS 20); and
■ e. In Table Five, adding, in alpha
numerical order, by vessel number, an
entry for USS CINCINNATI (LCS 20).
■
■
§ 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of
the Navy under Executive Order 11964 and
33 U.S.C. 1605.
*
E:\FR\FM\31OCR1.SGM
*
*
31OCR1
*
*
54675
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE ONE
Vessel
No.
Distance in meters
of forward masthead
light below minimum
required height.
§ 2(a)(i) Annex I
*
*
*
*
*
USS CINCINNATI ................................................................................................................................................
*
(LCS 20)
*
4.2
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
15. * * *
TABLE FOUR
*
*
*
*
No.
*
*
*
USS CINCINNATI ......................................................
LCS 20 ..
*
*
*
Horizontal distances from the
fore and aft centerline of the
vessel in the athwartship direction
Vessel
*
*
*
Upper—0.20 meters.
Middle—1.3 meters.
Lower—1.3 meters.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
16. * * *
Obstruction angle relative
ship’s headings
Vessel
No.
*
*
*
USS CINCINNATI ......................................................
LCS 20 ..
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
27. On the following ships, the arc of
visibility of the middle task light
*
USS CINCINNATI ......................................................
LCS 20 ..
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
following angles relative to ship’s
heading;
Obstruction angle relative
ship heading
No.
*
*
(restricted maneuverability), required by
the rule 27(b)(i) and Annex I, paragraph
9(b)(i), may be obstructed at the
Vessel
*
*
72° thru 74°.
286° thru 288°.
47° thru 59°.
301° thru 313°.
*
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
TABLE FIVE
Vessel
No.
*
*
*
USS CINCINNATI ...................................................................
(LCS 20)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Oct 30, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Masthead
lights
not over all
other lights and
obstructions.
Annex I,
sec. 2(f)
*
Fmt 4700
Forward
masthead
light not in
forward
quarter of
ship. Annex I,
sec. 3(a)
After masthead
light less than
⁄ ship’s length
aft of forward
masthead light.
Annex I, sec.
3(a)
12
*
.........................
Sfmt 4700
*
X
E:\FR\FM\31OCR1.SGM
X
31OCR1
Percentage
horizontal
separation
attained
*
15.2
54676
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE FIVE—Continued
Vessel
*
No.
*
*
Approved: October 19, 2018.
A.S. Janin,
Captain, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy Assistant
Judge Advocate General (Admiralty and
Maritime Law).
Dated: October 19, 2018.
Meredith Steingold Werner,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate
General’s Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018–23374 Filed 10–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 141
[EPA–HQ–OW–2018–0558; FRL–9985–19–
OW]
Expedited Approval of Alternative Test
Procedures for the Analysis of
Contaminants Under the Safe Drinking
Water Act; Analysis and Sampling
Procedures
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
Correction
In rule document 2018–22162,
appearing on pages 51636 through
51652, in the issue of Friday, October
12, 2018, make the following
corrections:
1. On page 51646, in the table labelled
‘‘ALTERNATIVE TESTING METHODS
FOR CONTAMINANTS LISTED AT 40
CFR 141.24(e)(1),’’ for the Contaminant
‘‘Atrazine’’ and the Methodology ‘‘Solid
Phase Extraction/Gas Chromatography/
Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS),’’ the EPA
Method should read ‘‘525.3 24, 523 26’’
and the SM 21st edition 1 should be
blank.
2. On page 51647, in the table labelled
‘‘ALTERNATIVE TESTING METHODS
FOR CONTAMINANTS LISTED AT 40
CFR 141.24(e)(1)—Continued,’’ for the
Contaminant ‘‘Simazine’’ and the
Methodology ‘‘Solid Phase Extraction/
Gas Chromatography/Mass
Spectrometry (GC/MS),’’ the EPA
Method should read ‘‘525.3 24, 523 26’’
and the SM 21st edition 1 should be
blank.
3. On the same page, in the same
table, for the Contaminant ‘‘Total
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Oct 30, 2018
Jkt 247001
Masthead
lights
not over all
other lights and
obstructions.
Annex I,
sec. 2(f)
*
Forward
masthead
light not in
forward
quarter of
ship. Annex I,
sec. 3(a)
*
Trihalomethanes’’ and the Methodology
‘‘Purge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/
Mass Spectrometry,’’ the EPA Method
should read ‘‘524.3 9, 524.4 29’’ and the
SM 21st edition 1 should be blank.
4. On page 51649, in the table labelled
‘‘ALTERNATIVE TESTING METHODS
FOR CONTAMINANTS LISTED AT 40
CFR 141.131(b)(1)—Continued,’’ the
second Contaminant should read
‘‘Chlorite—daily monitoring as
prescribed in 40 CFR
141.132(b)(2)(i)(A)’’.
5. On the same page, in the same
table, on the same row, the Methodology
should read ‘‘Amperometric Titration’’
and the EPA Method should be blank.
6. On page 51650, in the table labelled
‘‘ALTERNATIVE TESTING METHODS
FOR CONTAMINANTS LISTED AT 40
CFR 143.4(b),’’ for the Contaminant
‘‘Chloride’’ and the Methodology
‘‘Silver Nitrate Titration,’’ the SM 21st
edition 1 should read ‘‘4500–Cl¥ B’’.
7. On the same page, in the same
table, on the same row, the SM 22nd
edition,28 SM 23rd edition 49 should
read ‘‘4500–Cl¥ B’’.
[FR Doc. C1–2018–22162 Filed 10–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1301–00–D
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 211 and 252
[Docket DARS–2018–0048]
RIN 0750–AJ95
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Repeal of
DFARS Clause ‘‘Acquisition
Streamlining’’ (DFARS Case 2018–
D033)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to remove a clause that is no
longer necessary.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
After masthead
light less than
1⁄2 ship’s length
aft of forward
masthead light.
Annex I, sec.
3(a)
Sfmt 4700
*
DATES:
Percentage
horizontal
separation
attained
*
Effective October 31, 2018.
Ms.
Carrie Moore, telephone 571–372–6093.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Background
DoD is amending the DFARS to
remove DFARS clause 252.211–7000,
Acquisition Streamlining, and the
associated clause prescription at DFARS
211.002–70. This clause is included in
all solicitations and contracts for
systems acquisition programs and
requires contractors to: Prepare
acquisition streamlining
recommendations in accordance with
the performance work statement; format
and submit the recommendations in
accordance with the contract data
requirements list of the contract; and
include the clause in all subcontracts
valued over $1.5 million that are
awarded in the performance of the
contract. DoD may accept, modify, or
reject the contractor’s recommendations.
This clause was added to the DFARS
to implement a requirement of DoD
Directive (DoDD) 5000.43, Acquisition
Streamlining. DoDD 5000.43 has been
cancelled and replaced by DoD
Instruction 5000.02, Operation of the
Defense Acquisition System, which
requires contractors to submit
acquisition streamlining
recommendations. Additionally, Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) subpart
7.1, Acquisition Plans, already includes
acquisition streamlining and industry
engagement as considerations to be
made when preparing a written
acquisition plan. As the implementing
DoDD has been cancelled and FAR
subpart 7.1 addresses acquisition
streamlining, this DFARS clause is
unnecessary and can be removed.
The removal of this DFARS text
supports a recommendation from the
DoD Regulatory Reform Task Force. On
February 24, 2017, the President signed
Executive Order (E.O.) 13777,
‘‘Enforcing the Regulatory Reform
Agenda,’’ which established a Federal
policy ‘‘to alleviate unnecessary
regulatory burdens’’ on the American
people. In accordance with E.O. 13777,
DoD established a Regulatory Reform
E:\FR\FM\31OCR1.SGM
31OCR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 211 (Wednesday, October 31, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54674-54676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-23374]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 706
Certifications and Exemptions Under the International Regulations
for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972
AGENCY: Department of the Navy (DoN), DoD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy (DoN) is amending its
certifications and exemptions under the International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that the
Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (DAJAG) (Admiralty and Maritime
Law) has determined that USS CINCINNATI (LCS 20) is a vessel of the
Navy which, due to its special construction and purpose, cannot fully
comply with certain provisions of the 72 COLREGS without interfering
with its special function as a naval ship. The intended effect of this
rule is to warn mariners in waters where 72 COLREGS apply.
DATES: This rule is effective October 31, 2018 and is applicable
beginning October 19, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Commander Kyle Fralick,
JAGC, U.S. Navy, Admiralty Attorney, (Admiralty and Maritime Law),
Office of the Judge Advocate General, Department of the Navy, 1322
Patterson Ave. SE, Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5066,
telephone number: 202-685-5040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the authority granted in 33
U.S.C. 1605, the DoN amends 32 CFR part 706.
This amendment provides notice that the DAJAG (Admiralty and
Maritime Law), under authority delegated by the Secretary of the Navy,
has certified that USS CINCINNATI (LCS 20) is a vessel of the Navy
which, due to its special construction and purpose, cannot fully comply
with the following specific provisions of 72 COLREGS without
interfering with its special function as a naval ship: Annex I,
paragraph 2(a)(i), pertaining to the height of the forward masthead
light above the hull; Annex I, paragraph 3(a), pertaining to the
location of the forward masthead light in the forward quarter of the
ship and the horizontal distance between the forward and after masthead
light; Rule 21(a) and Annex I, paragraph 2(f)(i), requiring the
masthead lights be above and clear of all other lights and
obstructions; Annex I, paragraph 2(f)(ii) and Annex I, paragraph 3(c),
pertaining to the horizontal and vertical spacing of task lights; and
Rule 27(b)(i) and Annex I, paragraph 9(b), pertaining to the visibility
of task lights. The DAJAG (Admiralty and Maritime Law) has also
certified that the lights involved are located in closest possible
compliance with the applicable 72 COLREGS requirements.
Moreover, it has been determined, in accordance with 32 CFR parts
296 and 701, that publication of this amendment for public comment
prior to adoption is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to public
interest since it is based on technical findings that the placement of
lights on this vessel in a manner differently from that prescribed
herein will adversely affect the vessel's ability to perform its
military functions.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706
Marine safety, Navigation (water).
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the DoN amends part 706
of title 32 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 706--CERTIFICATIONS AND EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE INTERNATIONAL
REGULATIONS FOR PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA, 1972
0
1. The authority citation for part 706 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605.
0
2. Section 706.2 is amended by:
0
a. In Table One, adding, in alpha numerical order, by vessel number, an
entry for USS CINCINNATI (LCS 20);
0
b. In Table Four, under Paragraph 15, adding, in alpha numerical order,
by vessel number, an entry for USS CINCINNATI (LCS 20);
0
c. In Table Four, under Paragraph 16, adding, in alpha numerical order,
by vessel number, an entry for USS CINCINNATI (LCS 20);
0
d. In Table Four, under Paragraph 27, adding, in alpha numerical order,
by vessel number, an entry for USS CINCINNATI (LCS 20); and
0
e. In Table Five, adding, in alpha numerical order, by vessel number,
an entry for USS CINCINNATI (LCS 20).
Sec. 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of the Navy under
Executive Order 11964 and 33 U.S.C. 1605.
* * * * *
[[Page 54675]]
Table One
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distance in meters of
forward masthead
Vessel No. light below minimum
required height. Sec.
2(a)(i) Annex I
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
USS CINCINNATI.................. (LCS 20)....... 4.2
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
15. * * *
Table Four
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Horizontal
distances from the
fore and aft
Vessel No. centerline of the
vessel in the
athwartship
direction
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
USS CINCINNATI................... LCS 20.......... Upper--0.20 meters.
Middle--1.3 meters.
Lower--1.3 meters.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
16. * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Obstruction angle
Vessel No. relative ship's
headings
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
USS CINCINNATI................... LCS 20.......... 72[deg] thru
74[deg].
286[deg] thru
288[deg].
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
27. On the following ships, the arc of visibility of the middle
task light (restricted maneuverability), required by the rule 27(b)(i)
and Annex I, paragraph 9(b)(i), may be obstructed at the following
angles relative to ship's heading;
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Obstruction angle
Vessel No. relative ship
heading
------------------------------------------------------------------------
USS CINCINNATI................... LCS 20.......... 47[deg] thru
59[deg].
301[deg] thru
313[deg].
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Table Five
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
After masthead
Forward light less than
Masthead lights not over all masthead light \1/2\ ship's Percentage
Vessel No. other lights and obstructions. not in forward length aft of horizontal
Annex I, sec. 2(f) quarter of forward masthead separation
ship. Annex I, light. Annex I, attained
sec. 3(a) sec. 3(a)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
USS CINCINNATI........................... (LCS 20)................ .............................. X X 15.2
[[Page 54676]]
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approved: October 19, 2018.
A.S. Janin,
Captain, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General
(Admiralty and Maritime Law).
Dated: October 19, 2018.
Meredith Steingold Werner,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-23374 Filed 10-30-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
