Mississippi: Proposed Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revisions, 54304-54307 [2018-23580]
Download as PDF
54304
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 209 / Monday, October 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules
speakers in approximate order. The EPA
will make every effort to follow the
schedule as closely as possible on the
day of the hearing; however, please plan
for the hearing to run either ahead of
schedule or behind schedule.
Additionally, requests to speak will be
taken the day of the hearing at the
hearing registration desk. The EPA will
make every effort to accommodate all
speakers who arrive and register,
although preferences on speaking times
may not be able to be fulfilled.
Each
commenter will have 5 minutes to
provide oral testimony. The EPA
encourages commenters to provide the
EPA with a copy of their oral testimony
electronically (via email) or in hard
copy form.
The EPA may ask clarifying questions
during the oral presentations, but will
not respond to the presentations at that
time. Written statements and supporting
information submitted during the
comment period will be considered
with the same weight as oral comments
and supporting information presented at
the public hearing. Commenters should
notify Virginia Hunt if there are special
needs related to providing comments at
the hearings. Verbatim transcripts of the
hearings and written statements will be
included in the docket for the
rulemaking.
Please note that any updates made to
any aspect of the hearing will be posted
online at https://www.epa.gov/
controlling-air-pollution-oil-andnatural-gas-industry/forms/publichearing-proposed-improvements. While
the EPA expects the hearing to go
forward as set forth above, please
monitor our website or contact Virginia
Hunt at (919) 541–0832 or
hunt.virginia@epa.gov to determine if
there are any updates. The EPA does not
intend to publish a document in the
Federal Register announcing updates.
The EPA will not provide audiovisual
equipment for presentations. Any media
presentations should be submitted to
the public docket at https://
www.regulations.gov/, identified by
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2017–
0483. The EPA must receive comments
on the proposed action (83 FR 52056) no
later than December 17, 2018.
If you require the service of a
translator or special accommodations
such as audio description, please preregister for the hearing and describe
your needs by November 6, 2018. We
may not be able to arrange
accommodations without advanced
notice.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Oct 26, 2018
Jkt 247001
Dated: October 22, 2018.
Panagiotis Tsirigotis,
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards.
[FR Doc. 2018–23570 Filed 10–26–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA–R04–RCRA–2018–0528; FRL- 9985–
93–Region 4]
Mississippi: Proposed Authorization of
State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
Mississippi has applied to the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
for final authorization of changes to its
hazardous waste program under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA), as amended. EPA has
reviewed Mississippi’s application and
is proposing to determine that these
changes satisfy all requirements needed
to qualify for final authorization.
Therefore, we are proposing to authorize
the State’s changes. EPA seeks public
comment prior to taking final action.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 28, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
RCRA–2018–0528, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from
www.regulations.gov. EPA may publish
any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://
www2.epa.gov/dockets/commentingepa-dockets.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leah Davis, Materials and Waste
Management Branch, RCR Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960;
telephone number: (404) 562–8562; fax
number: (404) 562–9964; email address:
davis.leah@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why are revisions to state programs
necessary?
States that have received final
authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must
maintain a hazardous waste program
that is equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the federal
program. As the federal program
changes, states must change their
programs and ask EPA to authorize the
changes. Changes to state programs may
be necessary when federal or state
statutory or regulatory authority is
modified or when certain other changes
occur. Most commonly, states must
change their programs because of
changes to EPA’s regulations in 40 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124,
260 through 268, 270, 273, and 279.
New federal requirements and
prohibitions imposed by federal
regulations that EPA promulgates
pursuant to the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA)
take effect in authorized states at the
same time that they take effect in
unauthorized states. Thus, EPA will
implement those requirements and
prohibitions in the states, including the
issuance of new permits implementing
those requirements, until the states are
granted authorization to do so.
B. What decisions is EPA proposing to
make in this rule?
Mississippi submitted program
revision applications, dated September
10, 2014 and June 1, 2018, seeking
authorization of changes to its
hazardous waste program that
correspond to certain federal rules
promulgated between July 1, 2004 and
June 30, 2014 (including RCRA
Clusters 1 XV through XXIII). EPA
concludes that Mississippi’s
applications to revise its authorized
program meet all of the statutory and
regulatory requirements established by
RCRA, as set forth in RCRA section
3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), and 40 CFR
part 271. Therefore, EPA proposes to
grant Mississippi final authorization to
operate its hazardous waste program
1 A ‘‘cluster’’ is a grouping of hazardous waste
rules that EPA promulgates from July 1st of one
year to June 30th of the following year.
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 209 / Monday, October 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules
D. What happens if EPA receives
comments that oppose this action?
C. What is the effect of this proposed
authorization decision?
If Mississippi is authorized for the
changes described in Mississippi’s
authorization applications, these
changes will become part of the
authorized State hazardous waste
program, and therefore will be federally
enforceable. Mississippi will continue
to have primary enforcement authority
and responsibility for its State
hazardous waste program. EPA would
retain its authorities under RCRA
sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003,
including its authority to:
• Conduct inspections, and require
monitoring, tests, analyses or reports;
• Enforce RCRA requirements,
including authorized State program
requirements, and suspend or revoke
permits; and
• Take enforcement actions regardless
of whether the State has taken its own
actions.
This action will not impose additional
requirements on the regulated
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
(59 FR 12857); June 1, 1995, effective
July 31, 1995 (60 FR 28539); August 30,
1995, effective October 30, 1995 (60 FR
5718); February 23, 2005, effective April
25, 2005 (70 FR 8731); and August 4,
2008, effective October 3, 2008 (73 FR
45170).
community because the regulations for
which EPA is proposing to authorize
Mississippi are already effective, and
are not changed by today’s proposed
action.
with the changes described in its
authorization applications, and as
outlined below in Section F of this
document.
Mississippi has responsibility for
permitting treatment, storage, and
disposal facilities within its borders
(except in Indian country) and for
carrying out the aspects of the RCRA
program described in its revised
program applications, subject to the
limitations of HSWA, as discussed
above.
54305
EPA will evaluate any comments
received on this proposed action and
will make a final decision on approval
or disapproval of Mississippi’s proposed
authorization. Our decision will be
published in the Federal Register. You
may not have another opportunity to
comment. If you want to comment on
this authorization, you must do so at
this time.
E. What has Mississippi previously
been authorized for?
Mississippi initially received final
authorization on June 13, 1984, effective
June 27, 1984 (49 FR 24377), to
implement the RCRA hazardous waste
management program. EPA granted
authorization for changes to
Mississippi’s program on August 17,
1988, effective October 17, 1988 (53 FR
31000); August 10, 1990, effective
October 9, 1990 (55 FR 32624); March
29, 1991, effective May 28, 1991 (56 FR
13079); June 26, 1991, effective August
27, 1991 (56 FR 29589); May 11, 1992,
effective July 10, 1992 (57 FR 20056);
April 8, 1993, effective June 7, 1993 (58
FR 18162); October 20, 1993, effective
December 20, 1993 (58 FR 54044);
March 18, 1994, effective May 17, 1994
F. What changes are we proposing with
today’s action?
Mississippi submitted program
revision applications, dated September
10, 2014 and June 1, 2018, seeking
authorization of changes to its
hazardous waste management program
in accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. The
September 10, 2014 application
included changes associated with
Checklists 2 206.1, 207.1, 208–215, 217–
218, 220, 222–223, and 225–228. All of
these Checklists were resubmitted with
Mississippi’s June 1, 2018 application in
response to prior EPA comments. The
June 1, 2018 application also included
changes associated with Checklists 229–
232, as well as the non-checklist
technical correction published at 72 FR
35666 (June 29, 2007). EPA proposes to
determine, subject to receipt of written
comments that oppose this action, that
Mississippi’s hazardous waste program
revisions are equivalent to, consistent
with, and no less stringent than the
federal program, and therefore satisfy all
of the requirements necessary to qualify
for final authorization. Therefore, EPA
is proposing to authorize Mississippi for
the following program changes:
Description of Federal requirement
Federal Register
date and page
Checklist 206.1, Nonwastewaters from Dyes and Pigments (Correction) .......................
Checklist 207.1, Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest Rule (Correction) .........................
Checklist 208, Methods Innovation Rule and SW–846 Final Update IIIB .......................
70 FR 35032, 6/16/05 ........
70 FR 35034, 6/16/05 ........
70 FR 34538, 6/14/05, 70
FR 44150, 8/1/05.
Checklist 209, Universal Waste Rule: Specific Provisions for Mercury Containing
Equipment.
Checklist 210, Standardized Permit for RCRA Hazardous Waste Management Facilities.
Checklist 211, Revision of Wastewater Treatment Exemptions for Hazardous Waste
Mixtures (‘‘Headworks exemptions’’).
Checklist 212, NESHAP: Final Standards for Hazardous Waste Combustors (Phase I
Final Replacement Standards and Phase II).
Checklist 213,4 Burden Reduction Initiative .....................................................................
70 FR 45508, 8/5/05 ..........
71 FR 16862, 4/4/06 ..........
Checklist 214, Corrections to Errors in the Code of Federal Regulations .......................
71 FR 40254, 7/14/06 ........
Checklist 215, Cathode Ray Tubes (CRT) Rule ..............................................................
Checklist 217, NESHAP: Final Standards for Hazardous Waste Combustors (Phase I
Final Replacement Standards and Phase II) Amendments.
Checklist 218, F019 Exemption for Wastewater Treatment Sludges from Auto Manufacturing Zinc Phosphating Processes.
Checklist 220, Academic Laboratories Generator Standards ..........................................
71 FR 42928, 7/28/06 ........
73 FR 18970, 4/8/08 ..........
R. 1.1, 1.7, 1.11, 1.13,
and 1.16.
R. 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.11,
1.13, 1.15, and 1.16.
R. 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.7, 1.11,
1.13, 1.14, 1.15, 1.16,
1.21, and 1.22.
R. 1.1 and 1.2.
R. 1.7 and 1.13.
73 FR 31756, 6/4/08 ..........
R. 1.2.
73 FR 72912, 12/1/08 ........
R. 1.2 and 1.3.
2 A ‘‘checklist’’ is developed by EPA for each
federal rule amending the RCRA regulations. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Oct 26, 2018
Jkt 247001
70 FR 53420, 9/8/05 ..........
70 FR 57769, 10/4/05 ........
70 FR 59402, 10/12/05 ......
checklists document the changes made by each
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Analogous State
authority 3
R. 1.2.
R. 1.3, 1.7, and 1.11.
R. 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.11,
1.13, 1.15, 1.16, and
1.22.
R. 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.11,
1.15, 1.16, and 1.21.
R. 1.1, 1.2, 1.14, 1.16,
and 1.23.
R. 1.2.
federal rule and are presented and numbered in
chronological order by date of promulgation.
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
54306
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 209 / Monday, October 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Description of Federal requirement
Federal Register
date and page
Analogous State
authority 3
Checklist 222, OECD Requirements; Export Shipment of Spent Lead-Acid Batteries ....
75 FR 1236, 1/8/10 ............
Checklist 223, Hazardous Waste Technical Corrections and Clarifications ....................
75 FR 12989 3/18/10, 75
FR 31716 6/4/10.
Checklist 225, Removal of Saccharin and its Salts from the Lists of Hazardous Constituents.
Checklist 226, Academic Laboratories Generator Standards Technical Corrections ......
Checklist 227, Revision of the Land Disposal Treatment Standards for Carbamate
Wastes.
Checklist 228, Hazardous Waste Technical Corrections and Clarifications ....................
Checklist 229, Conditional Exclusions for Solvent Contaminated Wipes ........................
Checklist 230, Conditional Exclusions for Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Streams in Geologic
Sequestration Activities.
Checklist 231, Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest Rule .............................................
75 FR 78918, 12/17/10 ......
R. 1.3, 1.5, 1.7, 1.11, and
1.13.
R. 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.7,
1.11, 1.13, 1.15, and
1.16.
R. 1.2 and 1.15.
75 FR 79304, 12/20/10 ......
76 FR 34147, 6/13/11 ........
R. 1.3.
R. 1.15.
77 FR 22229, 4/13/12 ........
78 FR 46448, 7/31/13 ........
79 FR 350, 1/3/14 ..............
R. 1.2 and 1.13.
R. 1.1 and 1.2.
R. 1.1 and 1.2.
79 FR 7518, 2/7/14 ............
79 FR 36220, 6/26/14 ........
R. 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, 1.7, and
1.11.
R. 1.1 and 1.2.
72 FR 35666, 6/29/07 ........
R. 1.21.
Checklist 232, Revisions to the Export Provisions of the Cathode Ray Tube (CRT)
Rule.
Non-Checklist Item Technical Correction .........................................................................
3 The
Mississippi regulatory provisions are from the Mississippi Hazardous Waste Regulations, Title 11, Part 3, Chapter 1, effective November
17, 2017.
4 The National Environmental Performance Track Program referenced in the Burden Reduction Initiative Rule has been discontinued.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
G. Where are the revised State rules
different from the federal rules?
When revised state rules differ from
the federal rules in the RCRA state
authorization process, EPA determines
whether the state rules are equivalent to,
more stringent than, or broader in scope
than the federal program. Pursuant to
Section 3009 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6929,
state programs may contain
requirements that are more stringent
than the federal regulations. Such more
stringent requirements can be federally
authorized and, once authorized,
become federally enforceable. Although
the statute does not prevent states from
adopting regulations that are broader in
scope than the federal program, such
regulations cannot be authorized and
are not federally enforceable. In its
review of the Mississippi regulations
submitted as part of the program
revision applications that are the subject
of this proposed rule, EPA did not find
any State regulations to be more
stringent or broader in scope than the
federal program.
EPA cannot delegate certain federal
requirements associated with the
manifest registry system in the Uniform
Hazardous Waste Manifest Rule
(Checklist 207) or the operation of the
electronic manifest system in the
Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest
Rule (Checklist 231). Mississippi has
adopted these requirements and
appropriately preserved EPA’s authority
to implement them (see 11 Miss.
Admin. Code Pt. 3, Ch. 1, Rules 1.1, 1.3,
1.5, 1.7, and 1.11).
EPA also cannot delegate the federal
requirements associated with
international shipments (i.e., import and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Oct 26, 2018
Jkt 247001
export provisions) associated with the
Cathode Ray Tubes Rule (Checklists 215
and 232) and the OECD Requirements
for Export Shipments of Spent LeadAcid Batteries (Checklist 222).
Mississippi has adopted these
requirements and appropriately
preserved EPA’s authority to implement
them (see 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3,
Ch. 1, Rules 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3).
H. Who handles permits after the final
authorization takes effect?
Mississippi will issue permits for all
the provisions for which it is authorized
and will administer the permits it
issues. EPA will continue to administer
any RCRA hazardous waste permits or
portions of permits which EPA issued
prior to the effective date of
authorization until they expire or are
terminated. EPA will not issue any new
permits or new portions of permits for
the provisions listed in the Table above
after the effective date of the final
authorization. EPA will continue to
implement and issue permits for HSWA
requirements for which Mississippi is
not yet authorized.
I. How does today’s proposed action
affect Indian country (18 U.S.C. 1151)
in Mississippi?
Mississippi is not authorized to carry
out its hazardous waste program in
Indian country within the State, which
includes the Mississippi Band of
Choctaw Indians. Therefore, this
proposed action has no effect on Indian
Country. EPA will continue to
implement and administer the RCRA
program on these lands.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
J. What is codification and will EPA
codify Mississippi’s hazardous waste
program as proposed in this rule?
Codification is the process of placing
the state’s statutes and regulations that
comprise the state’s authorized
hazardous waste program into the Code
of Federal Regulations. EPA does this by
referencing the authorized state rules in
40 CFR part 272. EPA is not proposing
to codify the authorization of
Mississippi’s changes at this time.
However, EPA reserves the amendment
of 40 CFR part 272, subpart Z, for the
authorization of Mississippi’s program
changes at a later date.
K. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted this action from
the requirements of Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993)
and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011). This action proposes to authorize
State requirements for the purpose of
RCRA section 3006 and imposes no
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. Therefore, this
action is not subject to review by OMB.
This action is not an Executive Order
13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017)
regulatory action because actions such
as today’s proposed authorization of
Mississippi’s revised hazardous waste
program under RCRA are exempted
under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, I certify that this action
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
action proposes to authorize pre-
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 209 / Monday, October 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
existing requirements under State law
and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required
by State law, it does not contain any
unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538). For the same reason, this action
also does not significantly or uniquely
affect the communities of tribal
governments, as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). This action will not have
substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), because it merely
proposes to authorize State
requirements as part of the State RCRA
hazardous waste program without
altering the relationship or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by RCRA.
This action also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant and it does not
make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001), because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Oct 26, 2018
Jkt 247001
Under RCRA section 3006(b), EPA
grants a state’s application for
authorization as long as the state meets
the criteria required by RCRA. It would
thus be inconsistent with applicable law
for EPA, when it reviews a state
authorization application, to require the
use of any particular voluntary
consensus standard in place of another
standard that otherwise satisfies the
requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in
proposing this rule, EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct. EPA
has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by
examining the takings implications of
this action in accordance with the
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings’’ issued under the executive
order. This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
‘‘Burden’’ is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) establishes federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
54307
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
Because this action proposes
authorization of pre-existing State rules
which are at least equivalent to, and no
less stringent than existing federal
requirements, and imposes no
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law, and there are no
anticipated significant adverse human
health or environmental effects, this
proposed rule is not subject to Executive
Order 12898.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of sections 2002(a), 3006, and
7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, and
6974(b).
Dated: September 27, 2018.
Onis ‘‘Trey’’ Glenn, III,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2018–23580 Filed 10–26–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 209 (Monday, October 29, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54304-54307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-23580]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA-R04-RCRA-2018-0528; FRL- 9985-93-Region 4]
Mississippi: Proposed Authorization of State Hazardous Waste
Management Program Revisions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Mississippi has applied to the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) for final authorization of changes to its hazardous waste program
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended.
EPA has reviewed Mississippi's application and is proposing to
determine that these changes satisfy all requirements needed to qualify
for final authorization. Therefore, we are proposing to authorize the
State's changes. EPA seeks public comment prior to taking final action.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 28, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
RCRA-2018-0528, at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from www.regulations.gov. EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leah Davis, Materials and Waste
Management Branch, RCR Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-
8960; telephone number: (404) 562-8562; fax number: (404) 562-9964;
email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why are revisions to state programs necessary?
States that have received final authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous waste
program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent
than the federal program. As the federal program changes, states must
change their programs and ask EPA to authorize the changes. Changes to
state programs may be necessary when federal or state statutory or
regulatory authority is modified or when certain other changes occur.
Most commonly, states must change their programs because of changes to
EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124,
260 through 268, 270, 273, and 279.
New federal requirements and prohibitions imposed by federal
regulations that EPA promulgates pursuant to the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA) take effect in authorized states at the
same time that they take effect in unauthorized states. Thus, EPA will
implement those requirements and prohibitions in the states, including
the issuance of new permits implementing those requirements, until the
states are granted authorization to do so.
B. What decisions is EPA proposing to make in this rule?
Mississippi submitted program revision applications, dated
September 10, 2014 and June 1, 2018, seeking authorization of changes
to its hazardous waste program that correspond to certain federal rules
promulgated between July 1, 2004 and June 30, 2014 (including RCRA
Clusters \1\ XV through XXIII). EPA concludes that Mississippi's
applications to revise its authorized program meet all of the statutory
and regulatory requirements established by RCRA, as set forth in RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), and 40 CFR part 271. Therefore, EPA
proposes to grant Mississippi final authorization to operate its
hazardous waste program
[[Page 54305]]
with the changes described in its authorization applications, and as
outlined below in Section F of this document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A ``cluster'' is a grouping of hazardous waste rules that
EPA promulgates from July 1st of one year to June 30th of the
following year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mississippi has responsibility for permitting treatment, storage,
and disposal facilities within its borders (except in Indian country)
and for carrying out the aspects of the RCRA program described in its
revised program applications, subject to the limitations of HSWA, as
discussed above.
C. What is the effect of this proposed authorization decision?
If Mississippi is authorized for the changes described in
Mississippi's authorization applications, these changes will become
part of the authorized State hazardous waste program, and therefore
will be federally enforceable. Mississippi will continue to have
primary enforcement authority and responsibility for its State
hazardous waste program. EPA would retain its authorities under RCRA
sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003, including its authority to:
Conduct inspections, and require monitoring, tests,
analyses or reports;
Enforce RCRA requirements, including authorized State
program requirements, and suspend or revoke permits; and
Take enforcement actions regardless of whether the State
has taken its own actions.
This action will not impose additional requirements on the
regulated community because the regulations for which EPA is proposing
to authorize Mississippi are already effective, and are not changed by
today's proposed action.
D. What happens if EPA receives comments that oppose this action?
EPA will evaluate any comments received on this proposed action and
will make a final decision on approval or disapproval of Mississippi's
proposed authorization. Our decision will be published in the Federal
Register. You may not have another opportunity to comment. If you want
to comment on this authorization, you must do so at this time.
E. What has Mississippi previously been authorized for?
Mississippi initially received final authorization on June 13,
1984, effective June 27, 1984 (49 FR 24377), to implement the RCRA
hazardous waste management program. EPA granted authorization for
changes to Mississippi's program on August 17, 1988, effective October
17, 1988 (53 FR 31000); August 10, 1990, effective October 9, 1990 (55
FR 32624); March 29, 1991, effective May 28, 1991 (56 FR 13079); June
26, 1991, effective August 27, 1991 (56 FR 29589); May 11, 1992,
effective July 10, 1992 (57 FR 20056); April 8, 1993, effective June 7,
1993 (58 FR 18162); October 20, 1993, effective December 20, 1993 (58
FR 54044); March 18, 1994, effective May 17, 1994 (59 FR 12857); June
1, 1995, effective July 31, 1995 (60 FR 28539); August 30, 1995,
effective October 30, 1995 (60 FR 5718); February 23, 2005, effective
April 25, 2005 (70 FR 8731); and August 4, 2008, effective October 3,
2008 (73 FR 45170).
F. What changes are we proposing with today's action?
Mississippi submitted program revision applications, dated
September 10, 2014 and June 1, 2018, seeking authorization of changes
to its hazardous waste management program in accordance with 40 CFR
271.21. The September 10, 2014 application included changes associated
with Checklists \2\ 206.1, 207.1, 208-215, 217-218, 220, 222-223, and
225-228. All of these Checklists were resubmitted with Mississippi's
June 1, 2018 application in response to prior EPA comments. The June 1,
2018 application also included changes associated with Checklists 229-
232, as well as the non-checklist technical correction published at 72
FR 35666 (June 29, 2007). EPA proposes to determine, subject to receipt
of written comments that oppose this action, that Mississippi's
hazardous waste program revisions are equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the federal program, and therefore satisfy
all of the requirements necessary to qualify for final authorization.
Therefore, EPA is proposing to authorize Mississippi for the following
program changes:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ A ``checklist'' is developed by EPA for each federal rule
amending the RCRA regulations. The checklists document the changes
made by each federal rule and are presented and numbered in
chronological order by date of promulgation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analogous State authority
Description of Federal requirement Federal Register date and page \3\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Checklist 206.1, Nonwastewaters from 70 FR 35032, 6/16/05........................ R. 1.2.
Dyes and Pigments (Correction).
Checklist 207.1, Uniform Hazardous 70 FR 35034, 6/16/05........................ R. 1.3, 1.7, and 1.11.
Waste Manifest Rule (Correction).
Checklist 208, Methods Innovation Rule 70 FR 34538, 6/14/05, 70 FR 44150, 8/1/05... R. 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.11,
and SW-846 Final Update IIIB. 1.13, 1.15, 1.16, and
1.22.
Checklist 209, Universal Waste Rule: 70 FR 45508, 8/5/05......................... R. 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.11,
Specific Provisions for Mercury 1.15, 1.16, and 1.21.
Containing Equipment.
Checklist 210, Standardized Permit for 70 FR 53420, 9/8/05......................... R. 1.1, 1.2, 1.14, 1.16,
RCRA Hazardous Waste Management and 1.23.
Facilities.
Checklist 211, Revision of Wastewater 70 FR 57769, 10/4/05........................ R. 1.2.
Treatment Exemptions for Hazardous
Waste Mixtures (``Headworks
exemptions'').
Checklist 212, NESHAP: Final Standards 70 FR 59402, 10/12/05....................... R. 1.1, 1.7, 1.11, 1.13,
for Hazardous Waste Combustors (Phase and 1.16.
I Final Replacement Standards and
Phase II).
Checklist 213,\4\ Burden Reduction 71 FR 16862, 4/4/06......................... R. 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.11,
Initiative. 1.13, 1.15, and 1.16.
Checklist 214, Corrections to Errors in 71 FR 40254, 7/14/06........................ R. 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.7,
the Code of Federal Regulations. 1.11, 1.13, 1.14, 1.15,
1.16, 1.21, and 1.22.
Checklist 215, Cathode Ray Tubes (CRT) 71 FR 42928, 7/28/06........................ R. 1.1 and 1.2.
Rule.
Checklist 217, NESHAP: Final Standards 73 FR 18970, 4/8/08......................... R. 1.7 and 1.13.
for Hazardous Waste Combustors (Phase
I Final Replacement Standards and
Phase II) Amendments.
Checklist 218, F019 Exemption for 73 FR 31756, 6/4/08......................... R. 1.2.
Wastewater Treatment Sludges from Auto
Manufacturing Zinc Phosphating
Processes.
Checklist 220, Academic Laboratories 73 FR 72912, 12/1/08........................ R. 1.2 and 1.3.
Generator Standards.
[[Page 54306]]
Checklist 222, OECD Requirements; 75 FR 1236, 1/8/10.......................... R. 1.3, 1.5, 1.7, 1.11,
Export Shipment of Spent Lead-Acid and 1.13.
Batteries.
Checklist 223, Hazardous Waste 75 FR 12989 3/18/10, 75 FR 31716 6/4/10..... R. 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5,
Technical Corrections and 1.7, 1.11, 1.13, 1.15,
Clarifications. and 1.16.
Checklist 225, Removal of Saccharin and 75 FR 78918, 12/17/10....................... R. 1.2 and 1.15.
its Salts from the Lists of Hazardous
Constituents.
Checklist 226, Academic Laboratories 75 FR 79304, 12/20/10....................... R. 1.3.
Generator Standards Technical
Corrections.
Checklist 227, Revision of the Land 76 FR 34147, 6/13/11........................ R. 1.15.
Disposal Treatment Standards for
Carbamate Wastes.
Checklist 228, Hazardous Waste 77 FR 22229, 4/13/12........................ R. 1.2 and 1.13.
Technical Corrections and
Clarifications.
Checklist 229, Conditional Exclusions 78 FR 46448, 7/31/13........................ R. 1.1 and 1.2.
for Solvent Contaminated Wipes.
Checklist 230, Conditional Exclusions 79 FR 350, 1/3/14........................... R. 1.1 and 1.2.
for Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Streams in
Geologic Sequestration Activities.
Checklist 231, Hazardous Waste 79 FR 7518, 2/7/14.......................... R. 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, 1.7,
Electronic Manifest Rule. and 1.11.
Checklist 232, Revisions to the Export 79 FR 36220, 6/26/14........................ R. 1.1 and 1.2.
Provisions of the Cathode Ray Tube
(CRT) Rule.
Non-Checklist Item Technical Correction 72 FR 35666, 6/29/07........................ R. 1.21.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Mississippi regulatory provisions are from the Mississippi Hazardous Waste Regulations, Title 11, Part
3, Chapter 1, effective November 17, 2017.
\4\ The National Environmental Performance Track Program referenced in the Burden Reduction Initiative Rule has
been discontinued.
G. Where are the revised State rules different from the federal rules?
When revised state rules differ from the federal rules in the RCRA
state authorization process, EPA determines whether the state rules are
equivalent to, more stringent than, or broader in scope than the
federal program. Pursuant to Section 3009 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6929,
state programs may contain requirements that are more stringent than
the federal regulations. Such more stringent requirements can be
federally authorized and, once authorized, become federally
enforceable. Although the statute does not prevent states from adopting
regulations that are broader in scope than the federal program, such
regulations cannot be authorized and are not federally enforceable. In
its review of the Mississippi regulations submitted as part of the
program revision applications that are the subject of this proposed
rule, EPA did not find any State regulations to be more stringent or
broader in scope than the federal program.
EPA cannot delegate certain federal requirements associated with
the manifest registry system in the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest
Rule (Checklist 207) or the operation of the electronic manifest system
in the Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest Rule (Checklist 231).
Mississippi has adopted these requirements and appropriately preserved
EPA's authority to implement them (see 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, Ch.
1, Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, 1.7, and 1.11).
EPA also cannot delegate the federal requirements associated with
international shipments (i.e., import and export provisions) associated
with the Cathode Ray Tubes Rule (Checklists 215 and 232) and the OECD
Requirements for Export Shipments of Spent Lead-Acid Batteries
(Checklist 222). Mississippi has adopted these requirements and
appropriately preserved EPA's authority to implement them (see 11 Miss.
Admin. Code Pt. 3, Ch. 1, Rules 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3).
H. Who handles permits after the final authorization takes effect?
Mississippi will issue permits for all the provisions for which it
is authorized and will administer the permits it issues. EPA will
continue to administer any RCRA hazardous waste permits or portions of
permits which EPA issued prior to the effective date of authorization
until they expire or are terminated. EPA will not issue any new permits
or new portions of permits for the provisions listed in the Table above
after the effective date of the final authorization. EPA will continue
to implement and issue permits for HSWA requirements for which
Mississippi is not yet authorized.
I. How does today's proposed action affect Indian country (18 U.S.C.
1151) in Mississippi?
Mississippi is not authorized to carry out its hazardous waste
program in Indian country within the State, which includes the
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians. Therefore, this proposed action
has no effect on Indian Country. EPA will continue to implement and
administer the RCRA program on these lands.
J. What is codification and will EPA codify Mississippi's hazardous
waste program as proposed in this rule?
Codification is the process of placing the state's statutes and
regulations that comprise the state's authorized hazardous waste
program into the Code of Federal Regulations. EPA does this by
referencing the authorized state rules in 40 CFR part 272. EPA is not
proposing to codify the authorization of Mississippi's changes at this
time. However, EPA reserves the amendment of 40 CFR part 272, subpart
Z, for the authorization of Mississippi's program changes at a later
date.
K. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this action
from the requirements of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011). This action proposes to
authorize State requirements for the purpose of RCRA section 3006 and
imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law.
Therefore, this action is not subject to review by OMB. This action is
not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017) regulatory
action because actions such as today's proposed authorization of
Mississippi's revised hazardous waste program under RCRA are exempted
under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, I certify that this action
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.). Because this action proposes to authorize pre-
[[Page 54307]]
existing requirements under State law and does not impose any
additional enforceable duty beyond that required by State law, it does
not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect
small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538). For the same reason, this action also does
not significantly or uniquely affect the communities of tribal
governments, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000). This action will not have substantial direct effects
on the states, on the relationship between the national government and
the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among
the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132
(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely proposes to authorize
State requirements as part of the State RCRA hazardous waste program
without altering the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established by RCRA. This action also is not subject
to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is
not economically significant and it does not make decisions based on
environmental health or safety risks. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001), because it is not a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866.
Under RCRA section 3006(b), EPA grants a state's application for
authorization as long as the state meets the criteria required by RCRA.
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it
reviews a state authorization application, to require the use of any
particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard
that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996),
in proposing this rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and
provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining
the takings implications of this action in accordance with the
``Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the executive
order. This action does not impose an information collection burden
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.). ``Burden'' is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes federal
executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision directs
federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by
law, to make environmental justice part of their mission by identifying
and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and
activities on minority populations and low-income populations in the
United States. Because this action proposes authorization of pre-
existing State rules which are at least equivalent to, and no less
stringent than existing federal requirements, and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by State law, and there are no
anticipated significant adverse human health or environmental effects,
this proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 12898.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the authority of
sections 2002(a), 3006, and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act
as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, and 6974(b).
Dated: September 27, 2018.
Onis ``Trey'' Glenn, III,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2018-23580 Filed 10-26-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P