Right to Financial Privacy Act, 54297-54300 [2018-23396]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 209 / Monday, October 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 275
[Docket ID: DOD–2018–OS–0026]
RIN 0790–AK01
Right to Financial Privacy Act
Department of Defense.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This proposed rule describes
the procedures that the Department of
Defense (DoD) is proposing to follow
when seeking access to customer
records maintained by financial
institutions. These updates are required
to fulfill DoD’s responsibilities under
the Right to Financial Privacy Act.
DATES: Comments must be received by
December 28, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and/or RIN
number and title, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Department of Defense, Office
of the Chief Management Officer,
Directorate of Oversight and
Compliance, 4800 Mark Center Drive,
Mailbox #24, Suite 08D09, Alexandria,
VA 22350–1700.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
document. The general policy is for
submissions to be made available for
public viewing at https://
www.regulations.gov without change,
including any personal identifiers or
contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cindy Allard, (703) 571–0086.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
Authority and Background
The Right to Financial Privacy Act of
1978, Public Law. No. 95–630, was
enacted to provide the financial records
of financial institution customers a
reasonable amount of privacy from
federal government scrutiny. The Act,
which became effective in March 1979,
establishes specific procedures that
government authorities must follow
when requesting a customer’s financial
records from a bank or other financial
institution. It also imposes duties and
limitations on financial institutions
prior to the release of information
sought by government agencies. In
addition, the act generally requires that
customers receive:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Oct 26, 2018
Jkt 247001
—A written notice of the federal
authority’s intent to obtain financial
records
—An explanation of the purpose for
which the records are sought
—A statement describing procedures to
follow if the customer does not wish
such records or information to be
made available
Certain exceptions allow for delayed
notice or no customer notice at all. Prior
to passage of the Act, bank customers
were not informed that their personal
financial records were being turned over
to a government authority and could not
challenge government access to the
records. In United States v. Miller (425
U.S. 435 (1976)), the Supreme Court
held that because financial records are
maintained by a financial institution,
the records belong to the institution
rather than the customer; therefore, the
customer has no protectable legal
interest in the bank’s records and cannot
limit government access to those
records. It was principally in response
to this decision that the Right to
Financial Privacy Act was enacted.
Coverage
Coverage under the Act specifically
extends to customers of financial
institutions. A customer is defined as
any person or authorized representative
of that person who uses or has used any
service of a financial institution. The
definition also includes any person for
whom the financial institution acts as a
fiduciary. Corporations and
partnerships of six or more individuals
are not considered customers for
purposes of the Act.
54297
must maintain a record of all instances
in which a customer’s records are
disclosed to a government authority
pursuant to customer authorization. The
records should include the date, the
name of the government authority, and
an identification of the records
disclosed. Generally, the customer has a
right to inspect the records. Although
there are no specific record-retention
requirements in the act, financial
institutions should retain copies of all
administrative and judicial subpoenas,
search warrants, and formal written
requests given to them by federal
government agencies or departments
along with the written certification
required. A financial institution must
begin assembling the required
information upon receipt of the agency’s
summons or subpoena or a judicial
subpoena and must be prepared to
deliver the records upon receipt of the
written certificate of compliance.
Cost Reimbursement
With certain exceptions, government
entities must reimburse financial
institutions for the cost of providing the
information. This reimbursement may
include costs for assembling or
providing records, reproduction and
transportation costs, or any other costs
reasonably necessary or incurred in
gathering and delivering the requested
information. The Federal Reserve
Board’s Regulation S establishes rates
and the conditions under which these
payments may be made https://
www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2009-09-30/
pdf/E9-23407.pdf.
Requirements
Exceptions to Notice and Certification
Requirements
To obtain access to, copies of, or
information contained in a customer’s
financial records, a government
authority, generally, must first obtain
one of the following:
—An authorization, signed and dated by
the customer, that identifies the
records, the reasons the records are
being requested, and the customer’s
rights under the Act
—An administrative subpoena or
summons
—A search warrant
—A judicial subpoena
—A formal written request by a
government agency (to be used only if
no administrative summons or
subpoena authority is available)
A financial institution may not release
a customer’s financial records until the
government authority seeking the
records certifies in writing that it has
complied with the applicable provision
of the Act. In addition, the institution
In general, exceptions to the notice
and certification requirements cover
situations pertinent to routine banking
business, information requested by
supervisory agencies, and requests
subject to other statutory requirements.
Specific exceptions include records:
—Submitted by financial institutions to
any court or agency when perfecting
a security interest, proving a claim in
bankruptcy, or collecting a debt for
itself or a fiduciary
—Requested by a supervisory agency in
connection with its supervisory,
regulatory, or monetary functions.
—Sought in accordance with procedures
authorized by the Internal Revenue
Code (records that are intended to be
accessed by procedures authorized by
the Tax Reform Act of 1976)
—Required to be reported in accordance
with any federal statute (or rule
promulgated thereunder, such as the
Bank Secrecy Act)
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
54298
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 209 / Monday, October 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
—Requested by the Government
Accountability Office for an
authorized proceeding, investigation,
examination, or audit directed at a
federal agency
—Subject to a subpoena issued in
conjunction with proceedings before a
grand jury (with the exception of cost
reimbursement and the restricted use
of grand jury information)
—Requested by a government authority
subject to a lawsuit involving the
bank customer (the records may be
obtained under the Federal Rules of
Civil and Criminal Procedure)
The Act also allows financial
institutions to:
—Release records that are not
individually identifiable with a
particular customer
—Notify law enforcement officials if it
has information relevant to a violation
of the law
Exceptions to Notice Requirements but
Not to Certification Requirements
In certain cases, the Act does not
require the customer to be notified of
the request but still requires the federal
agency requesting the information to
certify in writing that it has complied
with all applicable provisions of the act.
Exceptions to the notice provisions
include:
—Instances in which a financial
institution, rather than a customer, is
being investigated
—Requests for records incidental to the
processing of a government loan, loan
guaranty, loan insurance agreement,
or default on a government
guaranteed or government-insured
loan (in this case, the federal agency
must give the loan applicant a notice
of the government’s rights to access
financial records when the customer
initially applies for the loan. The
financial institution is then required
to keep a record of all disclosures
made to government authorities, and
the customer is entitled to inspect this
record).
—Instances in which the government is
engaging in authorized foreign
intelligence activities or the Secret
Service is carrying out its protective
functions
Although the Securities and Exchange
Commission is covered by the Act, it
can obtain customer records from an
institution without prior notice to the
customer by obtaining an order from a
U.S. district court. The agency must,
however, provide the certificate of
compliance to the institution along with
the court order prohibiting disclosure of
the fact that the documents have been
obtained. The court order will set a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Oct 26, 2018
Jkt 247001
delay-of-notification date, after which
the customer will be notified by the
institution that the SEC has obtained his
or her records.
Delayed-Notice Requirements
Under certain circumstances, a
government entity may request a court
order delaying the customer notice for
up to ninety days. This delay may be
granted if the court finds that earlier
notice would result in endangering the
life or physical safety of any person,
flight from prosecution, destruction of
or tampering with evidence, or
intimidation of potential witnesses or
would otherwise seriously jeopardize or
unduly delay an investigation, trial, or
official proceeding. Delayed notice of up
to ninety days is also allowed for search
warrants.
Civil Liability
A customer may collect civil penalties
from any government agency or
department that obtains, or any
financial institution or employee of the
institution who discloses, information
in violation of the act. These penalties
include:
—Actual damages,
—$100, regardless of the volume of
records involved,
—Court costs and reasonable attorney’s
fees, and
—Such punitive damages as the court
may allow for willful or intentional
violations. An action may be brought
up to three years after the date of the
violation or the date the violation was
discovered. A financial institution
that relies in good faith on a federal
agency’s certification may not be held
liable to a customer for the disclosure
of financial records.
Description of Proposed Changes
DoD’s current rule was last updated
on May 4, 2006 (71 FR 26221). DoD’s
proposed revisions seek to only include
content relating to those instances when
the Department submits ‘‘formal written
requests’’ to financial institutions for
customer records, as described by 12
U.S.C. 3408. The final rule will apply
DoD-wide to provide consistent
implementation across all components.
When the final rule is published one
component-level rule at 32 CFR part 504
will be rescinded.
Expected Costs and Benefits
The primary benefit to a DoD-wide
rule is consistent implementation across
the DoD’s responsibilities under the Act.
The Act requires DoD to reimburse a
financial institution for such costs as are
reasonably necessary and which have
been directly incurred based on the
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
rates of reimbursement established by
the Federal Reserve Board in 12 CFR
part 219.3. The average cost of
reimbursement from DoD to financial
institutions over the past five years is
$4,328 and the Department does not
anticipate an increase with the
finalization of this rule. DoD has not
paid any civil penalties associated with
this rule as discussed in the Civil
Liability section of the rule. DoD
welcomes comments on the costs
associated with implementation of the
Act.
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distribute impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rulemaking has been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ although not economically
significant, under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the proposed rule has been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
Executive Order 13771, ‘‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’’
This proposed rule is not expected to
be subject to the requirements of E.O.
13771 (82 CFR 9339, February 3, 2017)
because this proposed rule is expected
to result in no more than de minimis
costs.
Public Law 104–4, ‘‘Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act’’ (2 U.S.C. Ch. 25)
This proposed rule is not subject to
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
because it does not contain a federal
mandate that may result in the
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100M or more in any
one year.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Ch. 6)
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
275 is not subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it
does not have a significant economic
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 209 / Monday, October 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Department of Defense (hereafter
referred to as the ‘‘DoD Components’’).
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Ch. 35)
§ 275.3
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
275 does not impose reporting or
recordkeeping requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a
proposed rule (and subsequent final
rule) that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on state and local
governments, preempts state law, or
otherwise has federalism implications.
This proposed rule will not have a
substantial effect on state and local
governments, or otherwise have
federalism implications.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 275
Banks, banking; credit; Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 275 is
proposed to be revised to read as
follows:
PART 275—RIGHT TO FINANCIAL
PRIVACY ACT
Sec.
275.1
275.2
275.3
275.4
275.5
275.6
Purpose.
Definitions.
Authorization.
Formal written request.
Certification.
Cost reimbursement.
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 3401, et seq.
§ 275.2
Purpose.
The purpose of this regulation is to
authorize DoD Components to request
financial records from a financial
institution pursuant to the formal
written request procedure authorized by
section 1108 of the Act and to set forth
the conditions under which such
requests may be made.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 275.2
Definitions.
The terms used in this part have the
same meaning as similar terms used in
the Right to Financial Privacy Act of
1978, Title XI of Public Law 95–630.
Act means the Right to Financial
Privacy Act of 1978.
DoD Components means the law
enforcement activities of the Office of
the Secretary of Defense, the Military
Departments, the Office of the Chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Joint
Staff, the Combatant Commands, the
Office of the Inspector General of the
Department of Defense, the Defense
Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and
all other organizational entities in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Oct 26, 2018
Jkt 247001
Authorization.
The DoD Components are authorized
to request financial records of any
customer from a financial institution
pursuant to a formal written request
under the Act only if:
(a) No administrative summons or
subpoena authority reasonably appears
to be available to the DoD Component
to obtain financial records for the
purpose for which the records are
sought;
(b) There is reason to believe that the
records sought are relevant to a
legitimate law enforcement inquiry and
will further that inquiry;
(c) The request is issued by a
supervisory official of a grade
designated by the head of the DoD
Component. Officials so designated
shall not delegate this authority to
others;
(d) The request adheres to the
requirements set forth in § 275.4 of this
part; and
(e) The notice requirements required
by section 1108(4) of the Act, or the
requirements pertaining to the delay of
notice in section 1109 of the Act, and
described in 275.3(e) (1) through (e)(5)
are satisfied, except in situations (e.g.,
section 1113(g)) where no notice is
required.
(1) The notice requirements are
satisfied when a copy of the request has
been served on the customer or mailed
to the customer’s last known address on
or before the date on which the request
was made to the financial institution
together with the following notice
which shall state with reasonable
specificity the nature of the law
enforcement inquiry: ‘‘Records or
information concerning your
transactions held by the financial
institution named in the attached
request are being sought by the
Department of Defense [or the specific
DoD Component] in accordance with
the Right to Financial Privacy Act of
1978 for the following purpose:’’
(2) Within ten days of service or
within fourteen days of mailing of a
subpoena, summons, or formal written
request, a customer may file a motion to
quash an administrative summons or
judicial subpoena, or an application to
enjoin a Government authority from
obtaining financial records pursuant to
a formal written request, with copies
served upon the Government authority.
A motion to quash a judicial subpoena
shall be filed in the court that issued the
subpoena. A motion to quash an
administrative summons or an
application to enjoin a Government
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54299
authority from obtaining records
pursuant to a formal written request
shall be filed in the appropriate United
States District Court. Such motion or
application shall contain an affidavit or
sworn statement stating:
(i) That the applicant is a customer of
the financial institution from which
financial records pertaining to said
customer have been sought; and
(ii) the applicant’s reasons for
believing that the financial records
sought are not relevant to the legitimate
law enforcement inquiry stated by the
Government authority in its notice, or
that there has not been substantial
compliance within the provisions of
Public Law 95–630.
Service shall be made upon a
Government authority by delivering or
mailing by registered or certified mail a
copy of the papers to the person, office,
or department specified in the notice
which the customer has received a
request.
(3) If you desire that such records or
information not be made available you
must:
(i) Fill out the accompanying motion
paper and sworn statement or write one
of your own, stating that you are the
customer whose records are being
requested by the Government and either
giving the reasons you believe that the
records are not relevant to the legitimate
law enforcement inquiry stated in this
notice or any other legal basis for
objecting to the release of the records.
(ii) File the motion and statement by
mailing or delivering them to the clerk
at an appropriate United States District
Court.
(iii) Serve the Government authority
requesting the records by mailing or
delivering a copy of your motion and
statement to the Government authority.
(iv) Be prepared to go to court and
present your position in further detail.
(v) You do not need to have a lawyer,
although you may wish to employ one
to represent you and protect your rights.
(4) If you do not follow the above
procedures, upon the expiration of ten
days from the date of service or fourteen
days from the date of mailing of the
notice, the records or information
requested therein may be made
available. The records may be
transferred to other Government
authorities for legitimate law
enforcement inquiries, in which event
you will be notified after the transfer.
(5) Also, the records or information
requested therein may be made
available if ten days have expired from
the date of service or fourteen days from
the date of mailing of the notice and
within such time period you have not
filed a sworn statement and an
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
54300
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 209 / Monday, October 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules
application to enjoin the Government
authority in an appropriate court, or the
customer challenge provisions.
§ 275.4
Formal written request.
(a) The formal written request must be
in the form of a letter or memorandum
to an appropriate official of the financial
institution from which financial records
are requested. The request shall be
signed by the issuing official, and shall
set forth that official’s name, title,
business address, and business phone
number. The request shall also contain
the following:
(1) The identity of the customer or
customers to whom the records pertain;
(2) A reasonable description of the
records sought; and
(3) Such additional information
which may be appropriate—e.g., the
date when the opportunity for the
customer to challenge the formal written
request expires, the date on which the
DoD Component expects to present a
certificate of compliance with the
applicable provisions of the Act, the
name and title of the individual (if
known) to whom disclosure is to be
made.
(b) In cases where customer notice is
delayed by court order, a copy of the
court order must be attached to the
formal written request.
§ 275.5
Certification.
Before obtaining the requested records
pursuant to a formal written request
described in § 275.4 of this part, an
official of a rank designated by the head
of the requesting DoD Component shall
certify in writing to the financial
institution that the DoD Component has
complied with the applicable provisions
of the Act.
§ 275.6
Cost reimbursement.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Cost reimbursement to financial
institutions for providing financial
records will be made consistent with
title 12, Code of Federal Regulations,
part 219.3, subpart A.
Dated: October 22, 2018.
Shelly E. Finke,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2018–23396 Filed 10–26–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Oct 26, 2018
Jkt 247001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R02–OAR–2018–0621, FRL–9985–87–
Region 2]
Approval of Source-Specific Air
Quality Implementation Plans; New
Jersey
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
source-specific revisions to the New
Jersey State Implementation Plan (SIP)
for 8-hour ozone for Paulsboro Refining,
Buckeye Port Reading Terminal,
Buckeye Pennsauken Terminal, and
Phillips 66 Company’s Linden facility.
The source-specific SIPs address the
Reasonably Available Control
Technology for volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) for external floating
roof tanks. The intended effect of these
revisions is to address how facilities
should meet state regulatory obligations
for external floating roof tanks that store
VOCs with vapor pressure three (3) or
more pounds per square inch absolute
to be equipped with a domed roof.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 28, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID number EPA–
R02–OAR–2018–0621, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or withdrawn. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e., on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, such as
the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda Longo, Air Programs Branch,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Environmental Protection Agency, 290
Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New
York 10007–1866, (212) 637–3565, or by
email at longo.linda@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. The EPA’s Evaluation of New Jersey’s
Submittals
a. Paulsboro Refining
b. Buckeye Port Reading Terminal and
Buckeye Pennsauken Terminal
c. Phillips 66 Company
III. Proposed Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
The Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) proposes to approve revisions to
the New Jersey State Implementation
Plan (SIP) for attainment and
maintenance of the 8-hour ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) for the following major
volatile organic compound (VOC)
facilities: Paulsboro Refining, Buckeye
Port Reading Terminal, Buckeye
Pennsauken Terminal, and Phillips 66
Company’s Linden facility. Specifically,
under New Jersey Administrative Code
(NJAC), Title 7, Chapter 27, Subchapter
16 (‘‘Control and Prohibition of Air
Pollution by Volatile Organic
Compound’’), Section 2 (‘‘VOC
Stationary Storage Tanks’’), all external
floating roof tanks (EFRTs) in Range III
with vapor pressure three (3) or more
pounds per square inch absolute (psia)
and that were in existence on May 18,
2009 must be equipped with a domed
roof the first time the tank is degassed
after May 19, 2009, and by no later than
May 1, 2020. See NJAC 7:27–16.2(l)(4).
In addition, NJAC 7:27–16.17(a–q)
establishes procedures and standards for
alternative and facility-specific VOC
control requirements. The four relevant
facilities were in existence on May 18,
2009, and so absent the currently
proposed SIP revisions would be
required to dome all EFRTs in
accordance with NJAC 7:27–16.2(l)(4),
which has already been approved by the
EPA into the New Jersey SIP. See 75 FR
45483 (August 3, 2010). However, the
New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection (NJDEP)
reviewed and approved for these
facilities alternative VOC control plans
and respective Reasonably Available
Control Technology (RACT), i.e.,
analysis of the lowest economically
feasible emission limitation, for their
EFRTs.
Following NJDEP’s review and
approval, the EPA reviewed the four
facilities’ alternative VOC control plans
and RACT analyses that include (1)
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 209 (Monday, October 29, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54297-54300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-23396]
[[Page 54297]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 275
[Docket ID: DOD-2018-OS-0026]
RIN 0790-AK01
Right to Financial Privacy Act
AGENCY: Department of Defense.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule describes the procedures that the
Department of Defense (DoD) is proposing to follow when seeking access
to customer records maintained by financial institutions. These updates
are required to fulfill DoD's responsibilities under the Right to
Financial Privacy Act.
DATES: Comments must be received by December 28, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and/or
RIN number and title, by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Department of Defense, Office of the Chief
Management Officer, Directorate of Oversight and Compliance, 4800 Mark
Center Drive, Mailbox #24, Suite 08D09, Alexandria, VA 22350-1700.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
document. The general policy is for submissions to be made available
for public viewing at https://www.regulations.gov without change,
including any personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Allard, (703) 571-0086.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority and Background
The Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978, Public Law. No. 95-630,
was enacted to provide the financial records of financial institution
customers a reasonable amount of privacy from federal government
scrutiny. The Act, which became effective in March 1979, establishes
specific procedures that government authorities must follow when
requesting a customer's financial records from a bank or other
financial institution. It also imposes duties and limitations on
financial institutions prior to the release of information sought by
government agencies. In addition, the act generally requires that
customers receive:
--A written notice of the federal authority's intent to obtain
financial records
--An explanation of the purpose for which the records are sought
--A statement describing procedures to follow if the customer does not
wish such records or information to be made available
Certain exceptions allow for delayed notice or no customer notice
at all. Prior to passage of the Act, bank customers were not informed
that their personal financial records were being turned over to a
government authority and could not challenge government access to the
records. In United States v. Miller (425 U.S. 435 (1976)), the Supreme
Court held that because financial records are maintained by a financial
institution, the records belong to the institution rather than the
customer; therefore, the customer has no protectable legal interest in
the bank's records and cannot limit government access to those records.
It was principally in response to this decision that the Right to
Financial Privacy Act was enacted.
Coverage
Coverage under the Act specifically extends to customers of
financial institutions. A customer is defined as any person or
authorized representative of that person who uses or has used any
service of a financial institution. The definition also includes any
person for whom the financial institution acts as a fiduciary.
Corporations and partnerships of six or more individuals are not
considered customers for purposes of the Act.
Requirements
To obtain access to, copies of, or information contained in a
customer's financial records, a government authority, generally, must
first obtain one of the following:
--An authorization, signed and dated by the customer, that identifies
the records, the reasons the records are being requested, and the
customer's rights under the Act
--An administrative subpoena or summons
--A search warrant
--A judicial subpoena
--A formal written request by a government agency (to be used only if
no administrative summons or subpoena authority is available)
A financial institution may not release a customer's financial
records until the government authority seeking the records certifies in
writing that it has complied with the applicable provision of the Act.
In addition, the institution must maintain a record of all instances in
which a customer's records are disclosed to a government authority
pursuant to customer authorization. The records should include the
date, the name of the government authority, and an identification of
the records disclosed. Generally, the customer has a right to inspect
the records. Although there are no specific record-retention
requirements in the act, financial institutions should retain copies of
all administrative and judicial subpoenas, search warrants, and formal
written requests given to them by federal government agencies or
departments along with the written certification required. A financial
institution must begin assembling the required information upon receipt
of the agency's summons or subpoena or a judicial subpoena and must be
prepared to deliver the records upon receipt of the written certificate
of compliance.
Cost Reimbursement
With certain exceptions, government entities must reimburse
financial institutions for the cost of providing the information. This
reimbursement may include costs for assembling or providing records,
reproduction and transportation costs, or any other costs reasonably
necessary or incurred in gathering and delivering the requested
information. The Federal Reserve Board's Regulation S establishes rates
and the conditions under which these payments may be made https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2009-09-30/pdf/E9-23407.pdf.
Exceptions to Notice and Certification Requirements
In general, exceptions to the notice and certification requirements
cover situations pertinent to routine banking business, information
requested by supervisory agencies, and requests subject to other
statutory requirements. Specific exceptions include records:
--Submitted by financial institutions to any court or agency when
perfecting a security interest, proving a claim in bankruptcy, or
collecting a debt for itself or a fiduciary
--Requested by a supervisory agency in connection with its supervisory,
regulatory, or monetary functions.
--Sought in accordance with procedures authorized by the Internal
Revenue Code (records that are intended to be accessed by procedures
authorized by the Tax Reform Act of 1976)
--Required to be reported in accordance with any federal statute (or
rule promulgated thereunder, such as the Bank Secrecy Act)
[[Page 54298]]
--Requested by the Government Accountability Office for an authorized
proceeding, investigation, examination, or audit directed at a federal
agency
--Subject to a subpoena issued in conjunction with proceedings before a
grand jury (with the exception of cost reimbursement and the restricted
use of grand jury information)
--Requested by a government authority subject to a lawsuit involving
the bank customer (the records may be obtained under the Federal Rules
of Civil and Criminal Procedure)
The Act also allows financial institutions to:
--Release records that are not individually identifiable with a
particular customer
--Notify law enforcement officials if it has information relevant to a
violation of the law
Exceptions to Notice Requirements but Not to Certification Requirements
In certain cases, the Act does not require the customer to be
notified of the request but still requires the federal agency
requesting the information to certify in writing that it has complied
with all applicable provisions of the act. Exceptions to the notice
provisions include:
--Instances in which a financial institution, rather than a customer,
is being investigated
--Requests for records incidental to the processing of a government
loan, loan guaranty, loan insurance agreement, or default on a
government guaranteed or government-insured loan (in this case, the
federal agency must give the loan applicant a notice of the
government's rights to access financial records when the customer
initially applies for the loan. The financial institution is then
required to keep a record of all disclosures made to government
authorities, and the customer is entitled to inspect this record).
--Instances in which the government is engaging in authorized foreign
intelligence activities or the Secret Service is carrying out its
protective functions
Although the Securities and Exchange Commission is covered by the
Act, it can obtain customer records from an institution without prior
notice to the customer by obtaining an order from a U.S. district
court. The agency must, however, provide the certificate of compliance
to the institution along with the court order prohibiting disclosure of
the fact that the documents have been obtained. The court order will
set a delay-of-notification date, after which the customer will be
notified by the institution that the SEC has obtained his or her
records.
Delayed-Notice Requirements
Under certain circumstances, a government entity may request a
court order delaying the customer notice for up to ninety days. This
delay may be granted if the court finds that earlier notice would
result in endangering the life or physical safety of any person, flight
from prosecution, destruction of or tampering with evidence, or
intimidation of potential witnesses or would otherwise seriously
jeopardize or unduly delay an investigation, trial, or official
proceeding. Delayed notice of up to ninety days is also allowed for
search warrants.
Civil Liability
A customer may collect civil penalties from any government agency
or department that obtains, or any financial institution or employee of
the institution who discloses, information in violation of the act.
These penalties include:
--Actual damages,
--$100, regardless of the volume of records involved,
--Court costs and reasonable attorney's fees, and
--Such punitive damages as the court may allow for willful or
intentional violations. An action may be brought up to three years
after the date of the violation or the date the violation was
discovered. A financial institution that relies in good faith on a
federal agency's certification may not be held liable to a customer for
the disclosure of financial records.
Description of Proposed Changes
DoD's current rule was last updated on May 4, 2006 (71 FR 26221).
DoD's proposed revisions seek to only include content relating to those
instances when the Department submits ``formal written requests'' to
financial institutions for customer records, as described by 12 U.S.C.
3408. The final rule will apply DoD-wide to provide consistent
implementation across all components. When the final rule is published
one component-level rule at 32 CFR part 504 will be rescinded.
Expected Costs and Benefits
The primary benefit to a DoD-wide rule is consistent implementation
across the DoD's responsibilities under the Act. The Act requires DoD
to reimburse a financial institution for such costs as are reasonably
necessary and which have been directly incurred based on the rates of
reimbursement established by the Federal Reserve Board in 12 CFR part
219.3. The average cost of reimbursement from DoD to financial
institutions over the past five years is $4,328 and the Department does
not anticipate an increase with the finalization of this rule. DoD has
not paid any civil penalties associated with this rule as discussed in
the Civil Liability section of the rule. DoD welcomes comments on the
costs associated with implementation of the Act.
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distribute impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rulemaking has been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' although not economically significant, under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the proposed rule
has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 13771, ``Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs''
This proposed rule is not expected to be subject to the
requirements of E.O. 13771 (82 CFR 9339, February 3, 2017) because this
proposed rule is expected to result in no more than de minimis costs.
Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act'' (2 U.S.C. Ch. 25)
This proposed rule is not subject to the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act because it does not contain a federal mandate that may result in
the expenditure by state, local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100M or more in any one year.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Ch. 6)
It has been certified that 32 CFR part 275 is not subject to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it does not have a
significant economic
[[Page 54299]]
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Ch. 35)
It has been certified that 32 CFR part 275 does not impose
reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent
final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on state
and local governments, preempts state law, or otherwise has federalism
implications. This proposed rule will not have a substantial effect on
state and local governments, or otherwise have federalism implications.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 275
Banks, banking; credit; Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 275 is proposed to be revised to read as
follows:
PART 275--RIGHT TO FINANCIAL PRIVACY ACT
Sec.
275.1 Purpose.
275.2 Definitions.
275.3 Authorization.
275.4 Formal written request.
275.5 Certification.
275.6 Cost reimbursement.
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 3401, et seq.
Sec. 275.2 Purpose.
The purpose of this regulation is to authorize DoD Components to
request financial records from a financial institution pursuant to the
formal written request procedure authorized by section 1108 of the Act
and to set forth the conditions under which such requests may be made.
Sec. 275.2 Definitions.
The terms used in this part have the same meaning as similar terms
used in the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978, Title XI of Public
Law 95-630.
Act means the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978.
DoD Components means the law enforcement activities of the Office
of the Secretary of Defense, the Military Departments, the Office of
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Joint Staff, the
Combatant Commands, the Office of the Inspector General of the
Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies, the DoD Field Activities,
and all other organizational entities in the Department of Defense
(hereafter referred to as the ``DoD Components'').
Sec. 275.3 Authorization.
The DoD Components are authorized to request financial records of
any customer from a financial institution pursuant to a formal written
request under the Act only if:
(a) No administrative summons or subpoena authority reasonably
appears to be available to the DoD Component to obtain financial
records for the purpose for which the records are sought;
(b) There is reason to believe that the records sought are relevant
to a legitimate law enforcement inquiry and will further that inquiry;
(c) The request is issued by a supervisory official of a grade
designated by the head of the DoD Component. Officials so designated
shall not delegate this authority to others;
(d) The request adheres to the requirements set forth in Sec.
275.4 of this part; and
(e) The notice requirements required by section 1108(4) of the Act,
or the requirements pertaining to the delay of notice in section 1109
of the Act, and described in 275.3(e) (1) through (e)(5) are satisfied,
except in situations (e.g., section 1113(g)) where no notice is
required.
(1) The notice requirements are satisfied when a copy of the
request has been served on the customer or mailed to the customer's
last known address on or before the date on which the request was made
to the financial institution together with the following notice which
shall state with reasonable specificity the nature of the law
enforcement inquiry: ``Records or information concerning your
transactions held by the financial institution named in the attached
request are being sought by the Department of Defense [or the specific
DoD Component] in accordance with the Right to Financial Privacy Act of
1978 for the following purpose:''
(2) Within ten days of service or within fourteen days of mailing
of a subpoena, summons, or formal written request, a customer may file
a motion to quash an administrative summons or judicial subpoena, or an
application to enjoin a Government authority from obtaining financial
records pursuant to a formal written request, with copies served upon
the Government authority. A motion to quash a judicial subpoena shall
be filed in the court that issued the subpoena. A motion to quash an
administrative summons or an application to enjoin a Government
authority from obtaining records pursuant to a formal written request
shall be filed in the appropriate United States District Court. Such
motion or application shall contain an affidavit or sworn statement
stating:
(i) That the applicant is a customer of the financial institution
from which financial records pertaining to said customer have been
sought; and
(ii) the applicant's reasons for believing that the financial
records sought are not relevant to the legitimate law enforcement
inquiry stated by the Government authority in its notice, or that there
has not been substantial compliance within the provisions of Public Law
95-630.
Service shall be made upon a Government authority by delivering or
mailing by registered or certified mail a copy of the papers to the
person, office, or department specified in the notice which the
customer has received a request.
(3) If you desire that such records or information not be made
available you must:
(i) Fill out the accompanying motion paper and sworn statement or
write one of your own, stating that you are the customer whose records
are being requested by the Government and either giving the reasons you
believe that the records are not relevant to the legitimate law
enforcement inquiry stated in this notice or any other legal basis for
objecting to the release of the records.
(ii) File the motion and statement by mailing or delivering them to
the clerk at an appropriate United States District Court.
(iii) Serve the Government authority requesting the records by
mailing or delivering a copy of your motion and statement to the
Government authority.
(iv) Be prepared to go to court and present your position in
further detail.
(v) You do not need to have a lawyer, although you may wish to
employ one to represent you and protect your rights.
(4) If you do not follow the above procedures, upon the expiration
of ten days from the date of service or fourteen days from the date of
mailing of the notice, the records or information requested therein may
be made available. The records may be transferred to other Government
authorities for legitimate law enforcement inquiries, in which event
you will be notified after the transfer.
(5) Also, the records or information requested therein may be made
available if ten days have expired from the date of service or fourteen
days from the date of mailing of the notice and within such time period
you have not filed a sworn statement and an
[[Page 54300]]
application to enjoin the Government authority in an appropriate court,
or the customer challenge provisions.
Sec. 275.4 Formal written request.
(a) The formal written request must be in the form of a letter or
memorandum to an appropriate official of the financial institution from
which financial records are requested. The request shall be signed by
the issuing official, and shall set forth that official's name, title,
business address, and business phone number. The request shall also
contain the following:
(1) The identity of the customer or customers to whom the records
pertain;
(2) A reasonable description of the records sought; and
(3) Such additional information which may be appropriate--e.g., the
date when the opportunity for the customer to challenge the formal
written request expires, the date on which the DoD Component expects to
present a certificate of compliance with the applicable provisions of
the Act, the name and title of the individual (if known) to whom
disclosure is to be made.
(b) In cases where customer notice is delayed by court order, a
copy of the court order must be attached to the formal written request.
Sec. 275.5 Certification.
Before obtaining the requested records pursuant to a formal written
request described in Sec. 275.4 of this part, an official of a rank
designated by the head of the requesting DoD Component shall certify in
writing to the financial institution that the DoD Component has
complied with the applicable provisions of the Act.
Sec. 275.6 Cost reimbursement.
Cost reimbursement to financial institutions for providing
financial records will be made consistent with title 12, Code of
Federal Regulations, part 219.3, subpart A.
Dated: October 22, 2018.
Shelly E. Finke,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2018-23396 Filed 10-26-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P