Collection of Information Under Review by Office of Management and Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625-NEW, 54128-54129 [2018-23477]

Download as PDF 54128 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2018 / Notices unless, prior to that time, VA determines that such comments are no longer needed and notifies the ACHP, in writing, or the ACHP withdraws the Program Comment in accordance with 36 CFR 800.14(e)(6). Following such withdrawal, VA will again be required to comply with Section 106 through the process in 36 CFR 800.3–800.7, or an applicable program alternative under 36 CFR 800.14, for each individual undertaking formerly covered by this Program Comment. During the first six months of the ninth year since issuance of this Program Comment, VA and the ACHP will meet to determine whether to consider an extension to its term. Such an extension would need to be pursued through an amendment, as detailed below. 10. Amendment The ACHP may amend this Program Comment after consulting with VA, and other parties as appropriate. The ACHP will publish notice in the Federal Register to that effect within 30 days after its decision to amend this Program Comment. khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES Attachment 1: VA Program Comment Form 1–A This Section To Be Completed by Facility Staff Facility Name and Location: Building Number: Date building vacated and/or number of years vacant: Date building listed as underutilized and/or number of years underutilized: Type of building: lutilitarian lnonutilitarian Photo: insert below Describe Proposed Undertaking/Action: Please Circle the Applicable Undertaking and give an explanation: (1) Enhanced Use Leases, NHPA Section 111 Leases and Exchanges (2) Sales, Transfers, Exchanges, Conveyances (3) Deconstruction, Demolition (4) Maintenance and repair of non-historic properties and utilitarian historic properties Are there any ground-disturbing activities associated with Undertaking? If yes, describe the activities in detail and include a map indicating where these activities will likely occur (Area of Potential Effects): Has the APE been previously surveyed for archaeological historic properties or properties of traditional religious and cultural significance to Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations? If yes, reference reports: Your Name: Title: Email address: Phone number: Signature: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:32 Oct 25, 2018 Jkt 247001 Date: This Section To Be Completed by VA’s Federal Preservation Officer Historic Evaluation: —Date —Historic Status Comments: VA FPO Approval Signature: Date: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard [Docket No. USCG–2014–0713] Collection of Information Under Review by Office of Management and Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625– NEW Attachment 2: Annual Meeting Protocol AGENCY: Annual Meeting Protocol ACTION: A. Annual Meeting: A meeting among VA, ACHP, NCSHPO, NATHPO, National Trust for Historic Preservation, and interested VSOs will be coordinated on an annual basis for the duration of this Program Comment. B. Topics: At least two weeks prior to these meetings, VA will provide the other parties with the following information (subject to the confidentiality requirements of 36 CFR 800.11(c), and other applicable laws): 1. A list of all undertakings reviewed in the previous year under Sections 4 through 8 of this Program Comment, including the following: a. Building or site identification, including location; b. a brief undertaking description; c. portfolio outcome, with completion date; C. Assessing Overall Effectiveness: In addition to providing an opportunity for the parties to discuss the specific information described in paragraph B, the annual meetings will also provide the parties an opportunity to assess the overall effectiveness of the Program Comment in addressing the preservation of historic properties, consistent with the operational mission and activities of VA. Specifically, the annual meetings will provide the parties an opportunity to discuss the planning, design, review, and implementation of undertakings affecting historic properties, and to discuss and evaluate the following issues: 1. Whether the time periods allocated for review and consultation in the Program Comment have been adequate to ensure consideration of potential alternatives that avoid, minimize, or mitigate harm to historic properties; and 2. Whether problems or misunderstandings have arisen in the course of applying the Program Comment and, if so, how those problems could be avoided in the future. Authority: 36 CFR 800.14(e). Dated: October 22, 2018. John M. Fowler, Executive Director. [FR Doc. 2018–23397 Filed 10–25–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–K6–P PO 00000 Coast Guard, DHS. Thirty-day notice requesting comments. In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 the U.S. Coast Guard is forwarding an Information Collection Request (ICR), abstracted below, to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting approval for the following collection of information: 1625–NEW, State Registration Data. Our ICR describes the information we seek to collect from the public. Review and comments by OIRA ensure we only impose paperwork burdens commensurate with our performance of duties. DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard and OIRA on or before November 26, 2018. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket number [USCG–2014–0713] to the Coast Guard using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Alternatively, you may submit comments to OIRA using one of the following means: (1) Email: dhsdeskofficer@ omb.eop.gov. (2) Mail: OIRA, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503, attention Desk Officer for the Coast Guard. A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the internet at https:// www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available from: COMMANDANT (CG–612), Attn: Paperwork Reduction Act Manager, U.S. Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE, Stop 7710, Washington, DC 20593–7710. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Anthony Smith, Office of Information Management, telephone 202–475–3532, or fax 202–372–8405, for questions on these documents. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Public Participation and Request for Comments This Notice relies on the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended. An Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM 26OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2018 / Notices ICR is an application to OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or renewal of a Coast Guard collection of information (Collection). The ICR contains information describing the Collection’s purpose, the Collection’s likely burden on the affected public, an explanation of the necessity of the Collection, and other important information describing the Collection. There is one ICR for each Collection. The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be granted based on the Collection being necessary for the proper performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the Collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the Collection; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information subject to the Collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the Collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. These comments will help OIRA determine whether to approve the ICR referred to in this Notice. We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments and related materials. Comments to Coast Guard or OIRA must contain the OMB Control Number of the ICR. They must also contain the docket number of this request, [USCG–2014–0713], and must be received by November 26, 2018. khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES Submitting Comments We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https:// www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be submitted using https:// www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate instructions. Documents mentioned in this notice, and all public comments, are in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website’s instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted. We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal Docket Management System in the March 24, VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:32 Oct 25, 2018 Jkt 247001 2005, issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 15086). OIRA posts its decisions on ICRs online at https://www.reginfo.gov/ public/do/PRAMain after the comment period for each ICR. An OMB Notice of Action on each ICR will become available via a hyperlink in the OMB Control Number: 1625–NEW. Previous Request for Comments This request provides a 30-day comment period required by OIRA. The Coast Guard published the 60-day Notice (81 FR 85987, November 29, 2016) required by 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2). The Coast Guard previously published a 60-day Notice for this ICR on October 7, 2014 (79 FR 60483). The comments from that Notice were addressed in the latest 60-day Notice (81 FR 85987), November 29, 2016). The present 60-day Notice elicited several questions from a single commenter. Comment (1) A commenter questioned the Coast Guard’s response to previously submitted comment (6) in which the Coast Guard noted a reduced reporting burden with the revised form. The commenter noted that the burden is not reduced since collecting aspects of vessels such as hull material and engine type are already required under 33 CFR 174 even if statistics regarding these aspects are not required on form CGHQ– 3923. Answer: The burden of filling out the revised form is reduced. On the previous version of CGHQ–3923, the Coast Guard required statistics on over 150 data points whereas the proposed version of the form requires only 69. The previous version requested information on five variables (vessel type, hull material, length, engine type and use) whereas the proposed version requires only three variables (vessel type, length, primary operation). The Coast Guard expects a reduced burden as the proposed form will require fewer queries and fewer data point checks to complete it. Comment (2) A commenter questioned why aspects of vessels such as hull material and engine type are necessary in 33 CFR 174 since they are not required elements to be reported on form CGHQ–3923. Answer: Various aspects of vessels are required to be collected for law enforcement purposes. Even though various vessel aspects such as hull material and engine type are not on the proposed form CGHQ–3923, they are used in accident, theft, and fraud investigations. Using common PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 54129 terminology facilitates common understanding. Comment (3) A commenter noted that hull material and engine type are of interest to sectors and should be on form CGHQ–3923 since information on them cannot be obtained outside of CGHQ–3923. Answer: The Coast Guard works with various sectors including government, industry, non-profits, and researchers. If a party requested information other than what is available on CGHQ–3923, the Coast Guard would direct the user to a more appropriate contact. Comment (4) A commenter provided a recommended version of CGHQ–3923 that is a medication of the previous CGHQ–3923. It includes additional hull material entries, an additional engine type, and changes the names of some categories. Answer: The Coast Guard thanks the commenter for the suggested form but maintains a desire to have a simplified form for use by the States. The Coast Guard has not used the hull material or engine information collected previously. Because we have not used the data, we removed it from the form so as to reduce the burden of data reporting on the States. Information Collection Request Title: State Registration Data. OMB Control Number: 1625–NEW. Summary: This file provides information on the collection of registration data from the State reporting authorities. Need: 46 U.S.C. 12302 and 33 CFR 174.123 authorize the collection of this information. Registration data is used for statistical purposes. Forms: CGHQ–3923, State Registration Data. Respondents: 56 State reporting authorities respond. Frequency: Annually. Hour Burden Estimate: This is a new information collection; the estimated annual burden is 42 hours a year. Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended. Dated: 23 October 2018. James D. Roppel, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Chief, Office of Information Management. [FR Doc. 2018–23477 Filed 10–25–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM 26OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 208 (Friday, October 26, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54128-54129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-23477]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2014-0713]


Collection of Information Under Review by Office of Management 
and Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625-NEW

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Thirty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 the 
U.S. Coast Guard is forwarding an Information Collection Request (ICR), 
abstracted below, to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office 
of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting approval for 
the following collection of information: 1625-NEW, State Registration 
Data. Our ICR describes the information we seek to collect from the 
public. Review and comments by OIRA ensure we only impose paperwork 
burdens commensurate with our performance of duties.

DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard and OIRA on or before 
November 26, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket 
number [USCG-2014-0713] to the Coast Guard using the Federal 
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Alternatively, you 
may submit comments to OIRA using one of the following means:
    (1) Email: [email protected].
    (2) Mail: OIRA, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503, attention 
Desk Officer for the Coast Guard.
    A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the internet 
at https://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available 
from: COMMANDANT (CG-612), Attn: Paperwork Reduction Act Manager, U.S. 
Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE, Stop 7710, 
Washington, DC 20593-7710.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Anthony Smith, Office of 
Information Management, telephone 202-475-3532, or fax 202-372-8405, 
for questions on these documents.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    This Notice relies on the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended. An

[[Page 54129]]

ICR is an application to OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or 
renewal of a Coast Guard collection of information (Collection). The 
ICR contains information describing the Collection's purpose, the 
Collection's likely burden on the affected public, an explanation of 
the necessity of the Collection, and other important information 
describing the Collection. There is one ICR for each Collection.
    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be 
granted based on the Collection being necessary for the proper 
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard 
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the 
Collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the Collection; 
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information 
subject to the Collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the 
Collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology. These comments 
will help OIRA determine whether to approve the ICR referred to in this 
Notice.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments 
and related materials. Comments to Coast Guard or OIRA must contain the 
OMB Control Number of the ICR. They must also contain the docket number 
of this request, [USCG-2014-0713], and must be received by November 26, 
2018.

Submitting Comments

    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions. Documents mentioned in this notice, and all public 
comments, are in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and 
can be viewed by following that website's instructions. Additionally, 
if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will 
be notified when comments are posted.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal 
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal 
Register (70 FR 15086).
    OIRA posts its decisions on ICRs online at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain after the comment period for each ICR. An OMB Notice 
of Action on each ICR will become available via a hyperlink in the OMB 
Control Number: 1625-NEW.

Previous Request for Comments

    This request provides a 30-day comment period required by OIRA. The 
Coast Guard published the 60-day Notice (81 FR 85987, November 29, 
2016) required by 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2). The Coast Guard previously 
published a 60-day Notice for this ICR on October 7, 2014 (79 FR 
60483). The comments from that Notice were addressed in the latest 60-
day Notice (81 FR 85987), November 29, 2016). The present 60-day Notice 
elicited several questions from a single commenter.
    Comment (1) A commenter questioned the Coast Guard's response to 
previously submitted comment (6) in which the Coast Guard noted a 
reduced reporting burden with the revised form. The commenter noted 
that the burden is not reduced since collecting aspects of vessels such 
as hull material and engine type are already required under 33 CFR 174 
even if statistics regarding these aspects are not required on form 
CGHQ-3923.
    Answer: The burden of filling out the revised form is reduced. On 
the previous version of CGHQ-3923, the Coast Guard required statistics 
on over 150 data points whereas the proposed version of the form 
requires only 69. The previous version requested information on five 
variables (vessel type, hull material, length, engine type and use) 
whereas the proposed version requires only three variables (vessel 
type, length, primary operation). The Coast Guard expects a reduced 
burden as the proposed form will require fewer queries and fewer data 
point checks to complete it.
    Comment (2) A commenter questioned why aspects of vessels such as 
hull material and engine type are necessary in 33 CFR 174 since they 
are not required elements to be reported on form CGHQ-3923.
    Answer: Various aspects of vessels are required to be collected for 
law enforcement purposes. Even though various vessel aspects such as 
hull material and engine type are not on the proposed form CGHQ-3923, 
they are used in accident, theft, and fraud investigations. Using 
common terminology facilitates common understanding.
    Comment (3) A commenter noted that hull material and engine type 
are of interest to sectors and should be on form CGHQ-3923 since 
information on them cannot be obtained outside of CGHQ-3923.
    Answer: The Coast Guard works with various sectors including 
government, industry, non-profits, and researchers. If a party 
requested information other than what is available on CGHQ-3923, the 
Coast Guard would direct the user to a more appropriate contact.
    Comment (4) A commenter provided a recommended version of CGHQ-3923 
that is a medication of the previous CGHQ-3923. It includes additional 
hull material entries, an additional engine type, and changes the names 
of some categories.
    Answer: The Coast Guard thanks the commenter for the suggested form 
but maintains a desire to have a simplified form for use by the States. 
The Coast Guard has not used the hull material or engine information 
collected previously. Because we have not used the data, we removed it 
from the form so as to reduce the burden of data reporting on the 
States.

Information Collection Request

    Title: State Registration Data.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-NEW.
    Summary: This file provides information on the collection of 
registration data from the State reporting authorities.
    Need: 46 U.S.C. 12302 and 33 CFR 174.123 authorize the collection 
of this information. Registration data is used for statistical 
purposes.
    Forms: CGHQ-3923, State Registration Data.
    Respondents: 56 State reporting authorities respond.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Hour Burden Estimate: This is a new information collection; the 
estimated annual burden is 42 hours a year.
    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 
35, as amended.

    Dated: 23 October 2018.
James D. Roppel,
U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Chief, Office of Information Management.
[FR Doc. 2018-23477 Filed 10-25-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.