Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown in California; Order Amending Marketing Order No. 989, 53965-53974 [2018-23089]
Download as PDF
53965
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 83, No. 208
Friday, October 26, 2018
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 989
[Doc. No. AO–FV–16–0016; AMS–SC–16–
0011; SC16–989–1]
Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown
in California; Order Amending
Marketing Order No. 989
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule amends
Marketing Order No. 989 (Order), which
regulates the handling of raisins
produced from grapes grown in
California. Five amendments were
proposed by the Raisin Administrative
Committee (RAC) and three were
proposed by the Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS). Seven of the eight
proposed amendments were favored by
California raisin growers in a mail
referendum, held December 4 through
15, 2017. This final rule also makes
administrative revisions to subpart
headings to bring the language into
conformance with the Office of Federal
Register requirements.
DATES: This rule is effective November
26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Marketing Order and
Agreement Division, Specialty Crops
Program, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa Schmaedick, Marketing Order
and Agreement Division, Specialty
Crops Program, AMS, USDA, Post Office
Box 952, Moab, UT 84532; Telephone:
(202) 557–4783, Fax: (435) 259–1502, or
Michelle Sharrow, Marketing Order and
Agreement Division, Specialty Crops
Program, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 Oct 25, 2018
Jkt 247001
720–8938, or Email:
Melissa.Schmaedick@ams.usda.gov or
Michelle.Sharrow@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on this proceeding by
contacting Richard Lower, Marketing
Order and Agreement Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938, or Email: Richard.Lower@
ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Prior
documents in this proceeding: Notice of
Hearing issued on April 14, 2016, and
published in the April 22, 2016, issue of
the Federal Register (81 FR 23650) and
a Recommended Decision issued on
May 3, 2017, and published in the May
31, 2017, issue of the Federal Register
(82 FR 24882); and a Secretary’s
Decision and Referendum Order issued
September 19, 2017, and published in
the September 29, 2017, issue of the
Federal Register (82 FR 45517).
This action is governed by the
provisions of sections 556 and 557 of
title 5 of the United States Code and,
therefore, is excluded from the
requirements of Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 13175. Additionally,
because this rule does not meet the
definition of a significant regulatory
action it does not trigger the
requirements contained in Executive
Order 13771. See the Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB)
Memorandum titled ‘‘Interim Guidance
Implementing Section 2 of the Executive
Order of January 30, 2017 titled
‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
Notice of this rulemaking action was
provided to tribal governments through
the Department of Agriculture’s (USDA)
Office of Tribal Relations.
Preliminary Statement
This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 556
and 557, finalizes amendments to
regulations issued to carry out a
marketing order as defined in 7 CFR
900.2(j). This rule is issued under
Marketing Order No. 989, as amended (7
CFR part 989), regulating the handling
of raisins produced from grapes grown
in California. Part 989 (referred to as the
Order) is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This rule is formulated on the record
of a public hearing held on May 3 and
4, 2016, in Clovis, California. The
hearing was held pursuant to the
provisions of the Act, and the applicable
rules of practice and procedure
governing the formulation and
amendment of marketing agreements
and orders (7 CFR part 900). Notice of
this hearing was published in the
Federal Register on April 22, 2016 (81
FR 23650). The notice of hearing
contained five proposals submitted by
the RAC and three proposals by AMS.
Upon the basis of evidence
introduced at the hearing and the record
thereof, the Administrator of AMS on
May 3, 2017, filed with the Hearing
Clerk, USDA, a Recommended Decision
and Opportunity to File Written
Exceptions thereto by June 30, 2017.
One exception was filed. The exception
filed opposed the proposed amendment
to establish term limits.
A Secretary’s Decision and
Referendum Order was issued on
September 29, 2017, directing that a
referendum be conducted during the
period of December 4 through 17, 2017,
among eligible California raisin growers
to determine whether they favored the
proposed amendments to the Order. To
become effective, the amendments had
to be approved by at least two-thirds of
those growers voting, or by voters
representing at least two-thirds of the
volume of raisins represented by voters
voting in the referendum. The approved
amendments were favored by over
ninety percent of the growers voting in
the referendum, representing over
ninety percent of the total volume of
raisins produced by those voting. The
failed amendment was opposed by
ninety-three percent of those voting and
ninety-five percent of the represented
volume.
The amendments favored by voters
and included in this final order will:
Authorize production research;
establish new nomination procedures
for independent grower member and
alternate member seats; add authority to
regulate quality; add authority to
establish different regulations for
different market destinations; add a
continuance referenda requirement; and
remove volume regulation and reserve
pool authority from the Order.
USDA also made changes as were
necessary to conform the Order
provisions to the effectuated
E:\FR\FM\26OCR1.SGM
26OCR1
53966
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
amendments. Conforming changes and
corrections proposed by USDA include:
Revising all references of ‘‘offgrade’’ to
‘‘off-grade’’; revising all references of
‘‘nonnormal’’ to ‘‘non-normal’’; and,
revising all references of ‘‘committee’’ to
‘‘Committee.’’ These corrections will
result in consistent spelling of these
terms throughout the Order. Also in this
final rule, USDA will revise the
amendment of § 989.58(d) from
‘‘interplant’’ and ‘‘interhandler’’ to
‘‘inter-plant’’ and ‘‘inter-handler’’ as it
appears in amended § 989.59(e).
In addition, the words ‘‘Processed
Products Standardization and
Inspection Branch’’ in §§ 989.58(d) and
989.59(d) will be changed to ‘‘Specialty
Crops Inspection Division.’’ Similarly,
‘‘Processed Products Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Division’’ in § 989.102 will be
changed to ‘‘Specialty Crops Inspection
Division.’’ These corrections will reflect
the official name change of the AMS’s
inspection service office for fruit,
vegetables and specialty crops.
Lastly, an additional correction will
change the amendatory language in
§§ 989.55, 989.56, 989.65, 989.66,
989.67, 989.71, 989.72, 989.82, 989.154,
989.156, 989.166, 989.167, 989.221,
989.257 and 989.401, from ‘‘remove’’ to
‘‘remove and reserve.’’ This change will
prevent the unintentional renumbering
of remaining sections of the Order.
The amended marketing agreement
was subsequently mailed to all raisin
handlers in the production area for their
approval. The marketing agreement was
approved by handlers representing more
than 50 percent of the volume of raisins
handled by all handlers during the
August 1, 2016, through July 31, 2017,
representative period. Consequently, a
companion handler agreement will also
be established.
Small Business Consideration
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
AMS has considered the economic
impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders and amendments
thereto are unique in that they are
normally brought about through group
action of essentially small entities for
their own benefit.
According to the hearing transcript,
there are approximately 3,000 raisin
producers in California. According to
National Agricultural Statistics Service
data presented at the hearing, the total
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 Oct 25, 2018
Jkt 247001
value of production of raisins in the
2014/15 crop year is $598,052,000.
Taking the total value of production for
raisins and dividing it by the total
number of raisin producers provides an
average return per producer of
$199,950.67. A small producer as
defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201)
is one that grosses less than $750,000
annually. Therefore, a majority of raisin
producers are considered small entities
under SBA’s standards.
According to the industry, there were
23 raisin handlers for the 2015/16 crop
year. While individual handling
operation information is proprietary,
both testimonies offered by handler
witnesses and an assessment of total
value of dried production leads USDA
to conclude that 13 handlers would be
considered small entities under SBA’s
standards.
According to the record, two of the 23
handlers handled roughly 60 percent of
total production during the 2015/16
crop year. A calculation using the 2014
total value of production of
$598,052,000 puts the value handled by
the cooperatives at $358,831,200
($598,052,000 × 60 percent) and the
value handled by all other handlers at
$239,220,800. With 21 non-cooperative
handlers remaining, $239,220,800
divided by that number results in an
average handler receipt of $11,391,467.
Assuming a normal bell-curve
distribution, coupled with the number
of handlers self-identifying at the
hearing as small business entities,
USDA accepts the Committee’s assertion
that 13 handlers fall under the SBA
definition of small agricultural service
firm. A small agricultural service firm as
defined by the SBA is one that grosses
less than $7,500,000 annually. Thus,
slightly more than half of the industry’s
handlers are considered small entities
under SBA’s standards.
The production area regulated under
the Order covers the state of California.
Acreage devoted to raisin production in
the regulated area has declined in recent
years. According to data presented at
the hearing, bearing acreage for raisins
reached a high of 280,000 acres during
the 2000/01 crop year. Since then,
bearing acreage for raisins has decreased
32 percent to 190,000 acres in 2014/15.
As a result, the total production of
raisins reached a high during the 2000/
01 crop year of 484,500 tons (dried
basis). Since the 2000/01 crop year, total
production for raisins has decreased 32
percent to 328,600 tons in 2014/15.
During the hearing held May 3 and 4,
2016, interested persons were invited to
present evidence on the probable
regulatory and information collection
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
impact of the proposed amendments to
the Order on small businesses. The
evidence presented at the hearing shows
that none of the proposed amendments
would have any burdensome effects or
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small agricultural
producers or firms.
Material Issues
Material Issue Number 1—Authorize
Production Research
This action amends § 989.53 to
authorize production research.
Currently, the California Raisin
Marketing Board (CRMB) is the funding
source for production research for the
California raisin industry. Three years
ago, payments of assessments to the
CRMB were suspended due to the
results of litigation. Without funding,
the CRMB has been unable to conduct
any new production research projects.
The amendment to § 989.53 will
authorize the RAC to conduct
production research without having to
rely on the CRMB for funding.
Witnesses stated that future research
could potentially impact producers in
many ways, such as reducing pesticide
usage or the development of new
varieties that are less labor intensive.
Production research will provide the
raisin industry the ability to meet the
needs of the ever changing domestic and
international markets. According to a
witness’s testimony, the benefits of the
proposed amendment will outweigh any
costs and will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Material Issue Number 2—Authorize
Separate Nominations for Independent
Producer Member and Independent
Producer Alternate Member Seats
This action amends §§ 989.29 and
989.129 to authorize separate
nominations for independent producer
members and independent producer
alternate member seats.
Currently, the RAC has difficulty
filling Committee seats designated for
independent producer members and
independent producer alternate
members. Independent producer
alternate member seats have gone
unfilled for several consecutive years.
According to witnesses’ testimony,
this amendment will increase the
participation of independent producers
willing to participate on the RAC.
Allowing for separate nominations for
members and alternates will encourage
participation by those who wish to serve
in one capacity and not the other. Full
participation would give the
independent producers full
E:\FR\FM\26OCR1.SGM
26OCR1
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
representation on the Board they
represented and a voice in RAC
decisions.
It is determined that the benefits of
increased RAC participation by
independent producers will outweigh
any costs associated with the
implementation of this amendment.
It is determined that any additional
costs incurred for this amendment will
be outweighed by the increased
flexibility for the industry to respond to
a changing global marketplace. The
costs of implementing this amendment
will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Material Issue Number 3—Add
Authority To Regulate Quality
This action will amend §§ 989.58,
989.59 and 989.61 to add authority to
regulate quality under the Order. A
corresponding change will also revise
the heading prior to § 989.58 to include
quality.
Currently, §§ 989.58 and 989.59 state
that the RAC has the authority to
recommend grade and condition
standards under the Order. The attribute
‘‘quality’’ is not specifically mentioned.
The amendment will add language to
include ‘‘quality’’ as an attribute that
can be regulated under the Order.
According to a witness at the hearing,
the amendment will give the RAC
flexibility to ensure consumer safety by
setting quality standards for residue
levels for herbicides, pesticides or
fungicides. The quality standards will
be equally applied to all handlers of
raisins within the U.S.; some handlers
are already testing for certain types of
fungicides so the increased costs will be
minimal.
It is determined that the additional
costs incurred to regulate quality will be
greatly outweighed by the increased
flexibility for the industry, increased
consumer safety, and other benefits
gained from implementing this
amendment. The costs of implementing
it will not have a significant impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Material Issue Number 5—Continuance
Referenda
This action will amend § 989.91 to
require continuance referenda.
The amendment will require the
USDA to conduct a continuance
referendum between year five and year
six after implementation for the first
referendum, and every six years
thereafter. A witness testified that a
continuance referendum is the best tool
for assuring that the Order remains
responsive to the needs of the industry.
While a continuance referendum will
not directly improve producer returns, it
will indirectly ensure that the industry
believes that the Order is operating in
the producer’s best interest.
For these reasons, it is determined
that the benefits of conducting a
continuance referendum will outweigh
the potential costs of implementing this
amendment. The costs of implementing
this amendment will be minimal and
will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Material Issue Number 4—Add
Authority To Establish Different
Regulations for Different Markets
This action will amend § 989.59 to
add authority to establish different
regulations for different markets.
The Order does not currently allow
for different quality or grade standards
to be applied to different foreign
markets. The language in the Order only
has two classifications for grade and
condition standards, Grade A or Grade
B. The current grade and condition
standards are consistent across all
markets.
This amendment will give the RAC
the authority to develop requirements
for raisins intended for export to
different foreign markets. Industry will
have the flexibility to tailor product
attributes to meet the foreign consumer
profile and the customer demands for
each individual market.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 Oct 25, 2018
Jkt 247001
Material Issue Number 6—Remove
Volume Regulations and Reserve Pool
Authority
This action will amend the Order to
remove volume regulation and reserve
pool authority. This will include:
deleting and reserving §§ 989.55 and
989.56, §§ 989.65 through 989.67,
§§ 989.71, 989.72, 989.82, 989.154,
989.156, 989.166, 989.167, 989.221,
989.257, and 989.401; revising
§§ 989.11, 989.53, 989.54, 989.58,
989.59, 989.60, 989.73, 989.79, 989.80,
989.84, 989.158, 989.173, and 989.210;
and re-designating § 989.70 as § 989.96.
Corresponding changes will also remove
the following headings: ‘‘Volume
Regulation’’ prior to § 989.65; ‘‘Volume
Regulation’’ prior to § 989.166; and,
‘‘Subpart-Schedule of Payments’’ prior
to § 989.401.
The amendment will remove all
authority for the RAC to recommend
volume restrictions and a reserve pool.
On June 22, 2015, the United States
Supreme Court, in Horne v. USDA,
ruled that the application of the Order’s
reserve pool authority to the Horne’s
was a taking under the Fifth
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. In
a July 16, 2015, letter to the RAC, USDA
stated, ‘‘In light of the Horne decision,
the U.S. Department of Agriculture has
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53967
decided not to authorize the reserve
program of the Federal marketing order
for California raisins for the foreseeable
future, effective immediately.’’
One witness at the hearing explained
that bearing acres have declined the past
ten years, which supports the theory
that the California raisin industry is
adjusting to a decreasing or flat demand
for the product. The witness stated that,
in the future, supply will likely remain
in better balance with demand and,
therefore, the reserve pool and volume
regulation are no longer as relevant as
they were in higher production times.
To further the point, the witness stated
that the Order’s reserve pool authority
has not been utilized since 2010.
The amendment will be a relaxation
of regulatory requirements. For this
reason, it is determined that no
significant impact on small business
entities is anticipated from this change.
The costs attributed to these
amendments are minimal; therefore,
there will not be a significant impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this rule. These
amendments are intended to improve
the operation and administration of the
Order and to assist in the marketing of
California raisins.
RAC meetings regarding these
amendments, as well as the hearing date
and location, were widely publicized
throughout the California raisin
industry, and all interested persons
were invited to attend the meetings and
the hearing to participate in RAC
deliberations on all issues. All RAC
meetings and the hearing were public
forums, and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express views on
these issues. Finally, interested persons
were invited to submit information on
the regulatory and information
collection impacts of this action on
small businesses.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Current information collection
requirements for Part 989 are approved
by OMB, under OMB Number 0581–
0189—‘‘Generic OMB Fruit Crops.’’ No
changes are anticipated in these
requirements as a result of this
proceeding. Should any such changes
become necessary, they will be
submitted to OMB for approval.
As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and publicsector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the Government Paperwork Elimination
E:\FR\FM\26OCR1.SGM
26OCR1
53968
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Act, which requires Government
agencies in general to provide the public
the option of submitting information or
transacting business electronically to
the maximum extent possible.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Civil Justice Reform
The amendments to the Order stated
herein have been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. They are not intended to have
retroactive effect. The amendments do
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
no later than 20 days after the date of
entry of the ruling.
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Order Amending the Order Regulating
the Handling of Raisins Produced From
Grapes Grown in California 1
Findings and Determinations
The findings and determinations
hereinafter set forth are supplementary
to the findings and determinations that
were previously made in connection
with the issuance of the Marketing
Order; and all said previous findings
and determinations are hereby ratified
and affirmed, except insofar as such
findings and determinations may be in
conflict with the findings and
determinations set forth herein.
(a) Findings and Determinations
Upon the Basis of the Hearing Record
1 This order shall not become effective unless and
until the requirements of § 900.14 of the rules of
practice and procedure governing proceedings to
formulate marketing agreements and marketing
orders have been met.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 Oct 25, 2018
Jkt 247001
Pursuant to the provisions of the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
and the applicable rules of practice and
procedure effective thereunder (7 CFR
part 900), a public hearing was held
upon further amendment of Marketing
Order No. 989, regulating the handling
of raisins produced from grapes grown
in California.
Upon the basis of the record, it is
found that:
(1) The Order, as amended, and as
hereby further amended, and all of the
terms and conditions thereof, would
tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act;
(2) The Order, as amended, and as
hereby further amended, regulates the
handling of raisins produced from
grapes grown in the production area in
the same manner as, and are applicable
only to, persons in the respective classes
of commercial and industrial activity
specified in the Order upon which a
hearing has been held;
(3) The Order, as amended, and as
hereby further amended, is limited in its
application to the smallest regional
production area that is practicable,
consistent with carrying out the
declared policy of the Act, and the
issuance of several orders applicable to
subdivisions of the production area
would not effectively carry out the
declared policy of the Act;
(4) The Order, as amended, and as
hereby further amended, prescribes,
insofar as practicable, such different
terms applicable to different parts of the
production area as are necessary to give
due recognition to the differences in the
production and marketing of raisins
produced from grapes grown in
California; and
(5) All handling of raisins produced
from grapes grown in the production
area as defined in the Order is in the
current of interstate or foreign
commerce or directly burdens,
obstructs, or affects such commerce.
(b) Determinations. It is hereby
determined that:
(1) Handlers (excluding cooperative
associations of growers who are not
engaged in processing, distributing, or
shipping raisins covered by the Order as
hereby amended) who, during the
period August 1, 2016, through July 31,
2017, handled 50 percent or more of the
volume of such raisins covered by said
Order, as hereby amended, have signed
an amended marketing agreement;
(2) The issuance of this amendatory
Order, further amending the aforesaid
Order, was favored or approved by at
least two-thirds of the growers who
participated in a referendum on the
question of approval and who, during
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the period of August 1, 2016, through
July 31, 2017 (which has been deemed
to be a representative period), have been
engaged within the production area in
the production of such raisins, such
growers having also produced for
market at least two-thirds of the volume
of such commodity represented in the
referendum; and
(3) The issuance of this amendatory
Order advances the interests of
producers of raisins in the production
area pursuant to the declared policy of
the Act.
Order Relative to Handling
It is therefore ordered, that on and
after the effective date hereof, all
handling of raisins produced from
grapes grown in California shall be in
conformity to, and in compliance with,
the terms and conditions of the said
Order as hereby amended as follows:
The provisions of the amendments to
the Order contained in the Secretary’s
Decision issued September 19, 2017,
and published in the September 29,
2017, issue of the Federal Register (82
FR 45517), with the exception of the
proposal to establish term limits, will be
and are the terms and provisions of this
Order amending the Order and are set
forth in full herein.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 989
Raisins, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 989 is amended as
follows:
PART 989—RAISINS PRODUCED
FROM GRAPES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for part 989
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
Subpart Redesignated as Subpart A
2. Designate the subpart labeled
‘‘Order Regulating Handling’’ as subpart
A.
■ 3. Section 989.11 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 989.11
Producer.
Producer means any person engaged
in a proprietary capacity in the
production of grapes which are sundried or dehydrated by artificial means
until they become raisins.
■ 4. In § 989.29:
■ a. Revise paragraph (b)(2)(ii);
■ b. Redesignate paragraph (b)(2)(iii) as
paragraph (b)(2)(iv);
■ c. Add new paragraph (b)(2)(iii); and
E:\FR\FM\26OCR1.SGM
26OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
d. Revise newly redesignated
paragraph (b)(2)(iv).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
§ 989.29 Initial members and nomination
of successor members.
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Each such producer whose name
is offered in nomination for producer
member positions to represent on the
Committee independent producers or
producers who are affiliated with
cooperative marketing association(s)
handling less than 10 percent of the
total raisin acquisitions during the
preceding crop year shall be given the
opportunity to provide the Committee a
short statement outlining qualifications
and desire to serve if selected. Similarly,
each such producer whose name is
offered in nomination for producer
alternate member positions to represent
on the Committee independent
producers or producers who are
affiliated with cooperative marketing
association(s) handling less than 10
percent of the total raisin acquisitions
during the preceding crop year shall be
given the opportunity to provide the
Committee a short statement outlining
qualifications and desire to serve if
selected. These brief statements,
together with a ballot and voting
instructions, shall be mailed to all
independent producers and producers
who are affiliated with cooperative
marketing associations handling less
than 10 percent of the total raisin
acquisitions during the preceding crop
year of record with the Committee in
each district. The producer member
candidate receiving the highest number
of votes shall be designated as the first
member nominee, the second highest
shall be designated as the second
member nominee until nominees for all
producer member positions have been
filled. Similarly, the producer alternate
member candidate receiving the highest
number of votes shall be designated as
the first alternate member nominee, the
second highest shall be designated as
the second alternate member nominee
until nominees for all member positions
have been filled.
(iii) In the event that there are more
producer member nominees than
positions to be filled and not enough
producer alternate member nominees to
fill all positions, producer member
nominees not nominated for a member
seat may be nominated to fill vacant
alternate member seats. Member seat
nominees shall indicate, prior to the
nomination vote, whether they are
willing to accept nomination for an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 Oct 25, 2018
Jkt 247001
alternate seat in the event they are not
nominated for a member seat and there
are vacant alternate member seats.
Member seat nominees that do not
indicate willingness to be considered for
vacant alternate member seats shall not
be considered.
(iv) Each independent producer or
producer affiliated with cooperative
marketing association(s) handling less
than 10 percent of the total raisin
acquisitions during the preceding crop
year shall cast only one vote with
respect to each position for which
nominations are to be made. Write-in
candidates shall be accepted. The
person receiving the most votes with
respect to each position to be filled, in
accordance with paragraph (b)(2)(ii) and
(iii) of this section, shall be the person
to be certified to the Secretary as the
nominee. The Committee may, subject
to the approval of the Secretary,
establish rules and regulations to
effectuate this section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. In § 989.53, revise the introductory
text of paragraph (a), and remove the
undesignated paragraph that follows
paragraph (a)(5) to read as follows:
§ 989.53
Research and development.
(a) General. The Committee, with the
approval of the Secretary, may establish
or provide for the establishment of
projects involving production research,
market research and development,
marketing promotion including paid
advertising, designed to assist, improve,
or promote the production, marketing,
distribution, and consumption of raisins
in domestic and foreign markets. These
projects may include, but need not be
limited to those designed to:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. In § 989.54:
■ a. Remove paragraphs (a) through (d)
and (g);
■ b. Remove paragraph (e)(4);
■ c. Redesignate paragraphs (e)(5)
through (e)(10) as (e)(4) through (e)(9),
respectively;
■ d. Redesignate paragraphs (e), (f), and
(h) as paragraphs (a), (b), and (c),
respectively; and
■ e. Revise newly redesignated
paragraphs (a) introductory text, (a)(1),
(a)(4), (a)(5) and (c).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 989.54
Marketing policy.
(a) Marketing policy. Each crop year,
the Committee shall prepare and submit
to the Secretary a report setting forth its
recommended marketing policy,
including quality regulations for the
pending crop. In developing the
marketing policy, the Committee may
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53969
give consideration to the production,
harvesting, processing, and storage
conditions of that crop, as well as the
following factors:
(1) The estimated tonnage held by
producers and handlers at the beginning
of the crop year;
*
*
*
*
*
(4) An estimated desirable carryout at
the end of the crop year;
(5) The estimated market demand for
raisins, considering the estimated world
raisin supply and demand situation;
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Publicity. The Committee shall
promptly give reasonable publicity to
producers, dehydrators, handlers, and
the cooperative bargaining association(s)
of each meeting to consider a marketing
policy or any modification thereof, and
each such meeting shall be open to
them. Similar publicity shall be given to
producers, dehydrators, handlers, and
the cooperative bargaining association(s)
of each marketing policy report or
modification thereof, filed with the
Secretary and of the Secretary’s action
thereon.
Copies of all marketing policy reports
shall be maintained in the office of the
Committee, where they shall be made
available for examination by any
producer, dehydrator, handler, or
cooperative bargaining association
representative. The Committee shall
notify handlers, dehydrators and the
cooperative bargaining association(s),
and give reasonable publicity to
producers of its computation.
§§ 989.55 and 989.56
reserved]
[Removed and
7. Sections 989.55 and 989.56 are
removed and reserved.
■ 8. Revise the undesignated heading
prior to § 989.58 to read as follows:
‘‘Grade, Quality, and Condition
Standards’’.
■ 9. In § 989.58, revise paragraphs (a),
(b), (d)(1), (e)(1), and (e)(4) to read as
follows:
■
§ 989.58
Natural condition raisins.
(a) Regulation. No handler shall
acquire or receive natural condition
raisins which fail to meet such
minimum grade, quality, and condition
standards as the Committee may
establish, with the approval of the
Secretary, in applicable rules and
regulations: Provided, That a handler
may receive raisins for inspection, may
receive off-grade raisins for
reconditioning and may receive or
acquire off-grade raisins for use in
eligible non-normal outlets: And
provided further, That a handler may
acquire natural condition raisins which
E:\FR\FM\26OCR1.SGM
26OCR1
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
53970
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
exceed the tolerance established for
maturity under a weight dockage system
established pursuant to rules and
regulations recommended by the
Committee and approved by the
Secretary. Nothing contained in this
paragraph shall apply to the acquisition
or receipt of natural condition raisins of
a particular varietal type for which
minimum grade, quality, and condition
standards are not applicable or then in
effect pursuant to this part.
(b) Changes in minimum grade,
quality, and condition standards for
natural condition raisins. The
Committee may recommend to the
Secretary changes in the minimum
grade, quality, and condition standards
for natural condition raisins of any
varietal type and may recommend to the
Secretary that minimum grade, quality,
and condition standards for any varietal
type be added to or deleted. The
Committee shall submit with its
recommendation all data and
information upon which it acted in
making its recommendation, and such
other information as the Secretary may
request. The Secretary shall approve any
such change if he finds, upon the basis
of data submitted to him by the
Committee or from other pertinent
information available to him, that to do
so would tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) Each handler shall cause an
inspection and certification to be made
of all natural condition raisins acquired
or received by him, except with respect
to:
(i) An inter-plant or inter-handler
transfer of off-grade raisins as described
in paragraph (e)(2) of this section,
unless such inspection and certification
are required by rules and procedures
made effective pursuant to this
amended subpart;
(ii) An inter-plant or inter-handler
transfer of standard raisins as described
in § 989.59(e);
(iii) Raisins received from a
dehydrator which have been previously
inspected pursuant to paragraph (d)(2)
of this section;
(iv) Any raisins for which minimum
grade, quality, and condition standards
are not then in effect;
(v) Raisins received from a
cooperative bargaining association
which have been inspected and are in
compliance with requirements
established pursuant to paragraph (d)(3)
of this section; and
(vi) Any raisins, if permitted in
accordance with such rules and
procedures as the Committee may
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 Oct 25, 2018
Jkt 247001
establish with the approval of the
Secretary, acquired or received for
disposition in eligible non-normal
outlets. Except as otherwise provided in
this section, prior to blending raisins,
acquiring raisins, storing raisins,
reconditioning raisins, or acquiring
raisins which have been reconditioned,
each handler shall obtain an inspection
certification showing whether or not the
raisins meet the applicable grade,
quality, and condition standards:
Provided, That the initial inspection for
infestation shall not be required if the
raisins are fumigated in accordance with
such rules and procedures as the
Committee shall establish with the
approval of the Secretary. The handler
shall submit or cause to be submitted to
the Committee a copy of such
certification, together with such other
documents or records as the Committee
may require. Such certification shall be
issued by inspectors of the Processed
Products Standardization and
Inspection Branch of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, unless the
Committee determines, and the
Secretary concurs in such
determination, that inspection by
another agency would improve the
administration of this amended subpart.
The Committee may require that raisins
held on memorandum receipt be reinspected and certified as a condition
for their acquisition by a handler.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) Any natural condition raisins
tendered to a handler which fail to meet
the applicable minimum grade, quality,
and condition standards may:
(i) Be received or acquired by the
handler for disposition, without further
inspection, in eligible non-normal
outlets;
(ii) Be returned unstemmed to the
person tendering the raisins; or
(iii) Be received by the handler for
reconditioning. Off-grade raisins
received by a handler under any one of
the three described categories may be
changed to any other of the categories
under such rules and procedures as the
Committee, with the approval of the
Secretary, shall establish. No handler
shall ship or otherwise dispose of offgrade raisins which he does not return
to the tenderer, transfer to another
handler as provided in paragraph (e)(2)
of this section, or recondition so that
they at least meet the minimum
standards prescribed in or pursuant to
this amended subpart, except into
eligible non-normal outlets.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) If the handler is to acquire the
raisins after they are reconditioned, his
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
obligation with respect to such raisins
shall be based on the weight of the
raisins (if stemmed, adjusted to natural
condition weight) after they have been
reconditioned.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. In § 989.59, revise paragraphs (a),
(b), (d), (e), and (g) to read as follows:
§ 989.59 Regulation of the handling of
raisins subsequent to their acquisition by
handlers.
(a) Regulation. Unless otherwise
provided in this part, no handler shall:
(1) Ship or otherwise make final
disposition of natural condition raisins
unless they at least meet the effective
and applicable minimum grade, quality,
and condition standards for natural
condition raisins; or
(2) Ship or otherwise make final
disposition of packed raisins unless
they at least meet such minimum grade
quality, and condition standards
established by the Committee, with the
approval of the Secretary, in applicable
rules and regulations or as later changed
or prescribed pursuant to the provisions
of paragraph (b) of this section:
Provided, That nothing contained in this
paragraph shall prohibit the shipment or
final disposition of any raisins of a
particular varietal type for which
minimum standards are not applicable
or then in effect pursuant to this part.
And provided further, That a handler
may grind raisins, which do not meet
the minimum grade, quality, and
condition standards for packed raisins
because of mechanical damage or
sugaring, into a raisin paste. The
Committee may establish, with approval
of the Secretary, different grade, quality,
and condition regulations for different
markets.
(b) Changes to minimum grade,
quality, or condition standards. The
Committee may recommend changes in
the minimum grade, quality, or
condition standards for packed raisins
of any varietal type and may
recommend to the Secretary that
minimum grade, quality, or condition
standards for any varietal type be added
or deleted. The Committee shall submit
with its recommendation all data and
information upon which it acted in
making its recommendation, and such
other information as the Secretary may
request. The Secretary shall approve any
such change if he finds, upon the basis
of data submitted to him by the
Committee or from other pertinent
information available to him, that to do
so would tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Inspection and certification.
Unless otherwise provided in this
E:\FR\FM\26OCR1.SGM
26OCR1
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
section, each handler shall, at his own
expense, before shipping or otherwise
making final disposition of raisins,
cause an inspection to be made of such
raisins to determine whether they meet
the then applicable minimum grade,
quality, and condition standards for
natural condition raisins or the then
applicable minimum standards for
packed raisins. Such handler shall
obtain a certificate that such raisins
meet the aforementioned applicable
minimum standards and shall submit or
cause to be submitted to the Committee
a copy of such certificate together with
such other documents or records as the
Committee may require. The certificate
shall be issued by the Processed
Products Standardization and
Inspection Branch of the United States
Department of Agriculture, unless the
Committee determines, and the
Secretary concurs in such
determination, that inspection by
another agency will improve the
administration of this amended subpart.
Any certificate issued pursuant to this
paragraph shall be valid only for such
period of time as the Committee may
specify, with the approval of the
Secretary, in appropriate rules and
regulations.
(e) Inter-plant and inter-handler
transfers. Any handler may transfer
from his plant to his own or another
handler’s plant within the State of
California any raisins without having
had such raisins inspected as provided
in paragraph (d) of this section. The
transferring handler shall transmit
promptly to the Committee a report of
such transfer, except that transfers
between plants owned or operated by
the same handler need not be reported.
Before shipping or otherwise making
final disposition of such raisins, the
receiving handler shall comply with the
requirements of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Exemption of experimental and
specialty packs. The Committee may
establish, with the approval of the
Secretary, rules and procedures
providing for the exemption of raisins in
experimental and specialty packs from
one or more of the requirements of the
minimum grade, quality, or condition
standards of this section, together with
the inspection and certification
requirements if applicable.
■ 11. Amend § 989.60 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 989.60
Exemption.
(a) Notwithstanding any other
provisions of this amended subpart, the
Committee may establish, with the
approval of the Secretary, such rules
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 Oct 25, 2018
Jkt 247001
and procedures as may be necessary to
permit the acquisition and disposition
of any off-grade raisins, free from any or
all regulations, for uses in non-normal
outlets.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 12. Section 989.61 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 989.61
Above parity situations.
The provisions of this part relating to
minimum grade, quality, and condition
standards and inspection requirements,
within the meaning of section 2(3) of the
Act, and any other provisions pertaining
to the administration and enforcement
of the Order, shall continue in effect
irrespective of whether the estimated
season average price to producers for
raisins is in excess of the parity level
specified in section 2(1) of the Act.
■ 13. Remove the undesignated heading
‘‘Volume Regulation’’ prior to § 989.65.
§§ 989.65, 989.66, and 989.67
and reserved]
[Removed
14. Sections 989.65, 989.66, and
989.67 are removed and reserved.
■
§ 989.70
■
[Redesignated as § 989.96]
15. Redesignate § 989.70 as § 989.96.
§§ 989.71 and 989.72
reserved]
[Removed and
16. Sections 989.71 and 989.72 are
removed and reserved.
■ 17. Amend § 989.73 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
§ 989.73
Reports.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Acquisition reports. Each handler
shall submit to the Committee in
accordance with such rules and
procedures as are prescribed by the
Committee, with the approval of the
Secretary, certified reports, for such
periods as the Committee may require,
with respect to his acquisitions of each
varietal type of raisins during the
particular period covered by such
report, which report shall include, but
not be limited to:
(1) The total quantity of standard
raisins acquired;
(2) The total quantity of off-grade
raisins acquired pursuant to
§ 989.58(e)(1)(i); and
(3) Cumulative totals of such
acquisitions from the beginning of the
then current crop year to and including
the end of the period for which the
report is made. Upon written
application made to the Committee, a
handler may be relieved of submitting
such reports after completing his
packing operations for the season. Upon
request of the Committee, each handler
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53971
shall furnish to the Committee, in such
manner and at such times as it may
require, the name and address of each
person from whom he acquired raisins
and the quantity of each varietal type of
raisins acquired from each such person.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 18. Section 989.79 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 989.79
Expenses.
The Committee is authorized to incur
such expenses as the Secretary finds are
reasonable and likely to be incurred by
it during each crop year, for the
maintenance and functioning of the
Committee and for such purposes as he
may, pursuant to this subpart,
determine to be appropriate. The funds
to cover such expenses shall be obtained
levying assessments as provided in
§ 989.80. The Committee shall file with
the Secretary for each crop year a
proposed budget of these expenses and
a proposal as to the assessment rate to
be fixed pursuant to § 989.80, together
with a report thereon. Such filing shall
be not later than October 5 of the crop
year, but this date may be extended by
the Committee not more than 5 days if
warranted by a late crop.
■ 19. In § 989.80, revise paragraphs (a)
through (c) to read as follows:
§ 989.80
Assessments.
(a) Each handler shall pay to the
Committee, upon demand, his pro rata
share of the expenses which the
Secretary finds will be incurred, as
aforesaid, by the Committee during each
crop year less any amounts credited
pursuant to § 989.53. Such handler’s pro
rata share of such expenses shall be
equal to the ratio between the total
raisin tonnage acquired by such handler
during the applicable crop year and the
total raisin tonnage acquired by all
handlers during the same crop year.
(b) Each handler who reconditions
off-grade raisins but does not acquire
the standard raisins recovered therefrom
shall, with respect to his assessable
portion of all such standard raisins, pay
to the Committee, upon demand, his pro
rata share of the expenses which the
Secretary finds will be incurred by the
Committee each crop year. Such
handler’s pro rata share of such
expenses shall be equal to the ratio
between the handler’s assessable
portion (which shall be a quantity equal
to such handler’s standard raisins which
are acquired by some other handler or
handlers) during the applicable crop
year and the total raisin tonnage
acquired by all handlers.
(c) The Secretary shall fix the rate of
assessment to be paid by all handlers on
E:\FR\FM\26OCR1.SGM
26OCR1
53972
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
the basis of a specified rate per ton. At
any time during or after a crop year, the
Secretary may increase the rate of
assessment to obtain sufficient funds to
cover any later finding by the Secretary
relative to the expenses of the
Committee. Each handler shall pay such
additional assessment to the Committee
upon demand. In order to provide funds
to carry out the functions of the
Committee, the Committee may accept
advance payments from any handler to
be credited toward such assessments as
may be levied pursuant to this section
against such handler during the crop
year. The payment of assessments for
the maintenance and functioning of the
Committee, and for such purposes as the
Secretary may pursuant to this subpart
determine to be appropriate, may be
required under this part throughout the
period it is in effect, irrespective of
whether particular provisions thereof
are suspended or become inoperative.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 989.82
[Removed and reserved]
20. Section 989.82 is removed and
reserved.
■ 21. Section 989.84 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 989.84
Disposition limitation.
No handler shall dispose of standard
raisins, off-grade raisins, or other failing
raisins, except in accordance with the
provisions of this subpart or pursuant to
regulations issued by the committee.
■ 22. In § 989.91:
■ a. Redesignate paragraphs (c) and (d)
as paragraphs (d) and (e), respectively;
and
■ b. Add new paragraph (c).
The addition reads as follows:
§ 989.91
Suspension or termination.
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(c) No less than five crop years and no
later than six crop years after the
effective date of this amendment, the
Secretary shall conduct a referendum to
ascertain whether continuance of this
part is favored by producers.
Subsequent referenda to ascertain
continuance shall be conducted every
six crop years thereafter. The Secretary
may terminate the provisions of this
part at the end of any crop year in
which the Secretary has found that
continuance of this part is not favored
by a two-thirds majority of voting
producers, or a two-thirds majority of
volume represented thereby, who,
during a representative period
determined by the Secretary, have been
engaged in the production for market of
grapes used in the production of raisins
in the State of California. Such
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 Oct 25, 2018
Jkt 247001
termination shall be announced on or
before the end of the crop year.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart Redesignated as Subpart B
and Amended
23. Redesignate ‘‘SubpartAdministrative Rules and Regulations’’
as subpart B and revise the heading to
read as follows:
■
Subpart B—Administrative
Requirements
Voting at nomination meetings.
Any person (defined in § 989.3 as an
individual, partnership, corporation,
association, or any other business unit)
who is engaged, in a proprietary
capacity, in the production of grapes
which are sun-dried or dehydrated by
artificial means to produce raisins and
who qualifies under the provisions of
§ 989.29(b)(2) shall be eligible to cast
one ballot for a nominee for each
producer member position and one
ballot for a nominee for each producer
alternate member position on the
committee which is to be filled for his
district. Such person must be the one
who or which: Owns and farms land
resulting in his or its ownership of such
grapes produced thereon; rents and
farms land, resulting in his or its
ownership of all or a portion of such
grapes produced thereon; or owns land
which he or it does not farm and, as
rental for such land, obtains the
ownership of a portion of such grapes or
the raisins. In this connection, a
partnership shall be deemed to include
two or more persons (including a
husband and wife) with respect to land
the title to which, or leasehold interest
in which, is vested in them as tenants
in common, joint tenants, or under
community property laws, as
community property. In a landlordtenant relationship, wherein each of the
parties is a producer, each such
producer shall be entitled to one vote
for a nominee for each producer
member position and one vote for each
producer alternate member position.
Hence, where two persons operate land
as landlord and tenant on a share-crop
basis, each person is entitled to one vote
for each such position to be filled.
Where land is leased on a cash rental
basis, only the person who is the tenant
or cash renter (producer) is entitled to
vote. A partnership or corporation,
when eligible, is entitled to cast only
one vote for a nominee for each
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§§ 989.154 and 989.156
reserved]
[Removed and
26. Sections 989.154 and 989.156 are
removed and reserved.
■
27. Section 989.158(c)(4)(i) is revised
to read as follows:
■
Natural condition raisins.
*
24. Section 989.129 is revised to read
as follows:
PO 00000
25. Remove the undesignated heading
‘‘Marketing Policy’’ prior to § 989.154.
■
§ 989.158
■
§ 989.129
producer position to be filled in its
district.
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) The handler shall notify the
inspection service at least one business
day in advance of the time such handler
plans to begin reconditioning each lot of
raisins, unless a shorter period is
acceptable to the inspection service.
Such notification shall be provided
verbally or by other means of
communication, including email.
Natural condition raisins which have
been reconditioned shall continue to be
considered natural condition raisins for
purposes of reinspection (inspection
pursuant to § 989.58(d)) after such
reconditioning has been completed, if
no water or moisture has been added;
otherwise, such raisins shall be
considered as packed raisins. The
weight of the raisins reconditioned
successfully shall be determined by
reweighing, except where a lot, before
reconditioning, failed due to excess
moisture only. The weight of such
raisins resulting from reconditioning a
lot failing account excess moisture may
be determined by deducting 1.2 percent
of the weight for each percent of
moisture in excess of the allowable
tolerance. When necessary due to the
presence of sand, as determined by the
inspection service, the requirement for
deducting sand tare and the manner of
its determination, as prescribed in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, shall
apply in computing the net weight of
any such successfully reconditioned
natural condition raisins. The weight of
the reconditioned raisins acquired as
packed raisins shall be adjusted to
natural condition weight by the use of
factors applicable to the various degrees
of processing accomplished. The
applicable factor shall be that selected
by the inspector of the reconditioned
raisins from among factors established
by the Committee with the approval of
the Secretary.
*
*
*
*
*
28. Remove the undesignated heading
‘‘Volume Regulation’’ prior to § 989.166.
■
E:\FR\FM\26OCR1.SGM
26OCR1
53973
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
§§ 989.166 and 989.167
reserved]
[Removed and
29. Sections 989.166 and 989.167 are
removed and reserved.
■ 30. In § 989.173:
■ a. Remove paragraphs (b)(2)(ii), (f),
and (g)(1)(ii);
■ b. Redesignate paragraphs (b)(2)(iii)
and (g) as paragraphs (b)(2)(ii) and (f),
respectively;
■ c. Redesignate newly designated
paragraph (f)(1)(iii) as paragraph
(f)(1)(ii); and
■ d. Revise paragraphs (a), (b)(2)(i),
newly redesignated paragraph (b)(2)(ii),
(c)(1) introductory text, (d)(1)
introductory text, (d)(1)(v), and newly
redesignated paragraphs (f)(1)(i),
(f)(2)(i), and (f)(3) introductory text.
The revisions read as follows:
■
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
§ 989.173
Reports.
(a) Inventory reports. Each handler
shall submit to the Committee as of the
close of business on July 31 of each crop
year, and not later than the following
August 6, an inventory report which
shall show, with respect to each varietal
type of raisins held by such handler, the
quantity of off-grade raisins segregated
as to those for reconditioning and those
for disposition as such. Provided, That,
for the Other Seedless varietal type,
handlers shall report the information
required in this paragraph separately for
the different types of Other Seedless
raisins. Upon request by the Committee,
each handler shall file at other times,
and as of other dates, any of the said
information which may reasonably be
necessary and which the Committee
shall specify in its request.
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The total net weight of the standard
raisins acquired during the reporting
period; and
(ii) The cumulative totals of such
acquisitions from the beginning of the
then current crop year.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) Each month each handler who is
not a processor shall furnish to the
Committee, on an appropriate form
provided by the Committee and so that
it is received by the Committee not later
than the seventh day of the month, a
report showing the aggregate quantity of
each varietal type of packed raisins and
standard natural condition raisins
which were shipped or otherwise
disposed of by such handler during the
preceding month (exclusive of transfers
within the State of California between
plants of any such handler and from
such handler to other handlers):
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 Oct 25, 2018
Jkt 247001
Provided, That, for the Other Seedless
varietal type, handlers shall report such
information for the different types of
Other Seedless raisins. Such required
information shall be segregated as to:
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) Any handler who transfers raisins
to another handler within the State of
California shall submit to the Committee
not later than five calendar days
following such transfer a report
showing:
*
*
*
*
*
(v) If packed, the transferring handler
shall certify that such handler is
transferring only acquired raisins that
meet all applicable marketing order
requirements, including reporting,
incoming inspection, and assessments.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) The quantity of raisins, segregated
as to locations where they are stored
and whether they are natural condition
or packed;
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(i) The total net weight of the standard
raisins acquired during the reporting
period; and
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Disposition report of organicallyproduced raisins. No later than the
seventh day of each month, handlers
who are not processors shall submit to
the Committee, on an appropriate form
provided by the Committee, a report
showing the aggregate quantity of
packed raisins and standard natural
condition raisins which were shipped or
otherwise disposed of by such handler
during the preceding month (exclusive
of transfer within the State of California
between the plants of any such handler
and from such handler to other
handlers). Such information shall
include:
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart Redesignated as Subpart C
and Amended
c. Revise newly redesignated
paragraph (b).
■
The revisions read as follows:
§ 989.210 Handling of varietal types of
raisins acquired pursuant to a weight
dockage system.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Assessments. Assessments on any
lot of raisins of the varietal types
specified in paragraph (a) of this section
acquired by a handler pursuant to a
weight dockage system shall be
applicable to the creditable weight of
such lot.
*
*
*
*
*
§§ 989.221 and 989.257
reserved]
[Removed and
33. Sections 989.221 and 989.257 are
removed and reserved.
■
Subpart Redesignated as Subpart D
34. Designate the subpart labeled
‘‘Subpart-Assessment Rates’’ as subpart
D.
■
Subpart Removed
35. Subpart—Schedule of Payments is
removed.
■
Subpart Redesignated as Subpart E
36. Designate the subpart labeled
‘‘Conversion Factors’’ as subpart E.
■
Subpart Redesignated as Subpart F
37. Designate the subpart labeled
‘‘Quality Control’’ as subpart F.
■
Subpart Redesignated as Subpart G
38. Designate the subpart labeled
‘‘Antitrust Immunity and Liability’’ as
subpart G.
■
39. In part 989 revise all references to
‘‘offgrade’’ to read ‘‘off-grade’’ and
revise all references to ‘‘Offgrade’’ to
read ‘‘Off-grade’’.
■
40. In part 989 revise all references to
‘‘nonnormal’’ read ‘‘non-normal.’’
31. Redesignate ‘‘SubpartSupplementary Regulations’’ as subpart
C and revise the heading to read as
follows:
■
Subpart C—Supplementary
Requirements
§§ 989.58, 989.59, and 989.102
■
41. In part 989 revise all references to
‘‘committee’’ to read ‘‘Committee.’’
■
42. In the list below, for each section
indicated in the left column, remove the
title indicated in the middle column
from wherever it appears in the section,
and add the title indicated in the right
column:
■
32. In § 989.210:
a. Remove paragraphs (b), (c) and (e);
b. Redesignate paragraph (d) as (b),
paragraph (f) as (c), and paragraph (g) as
(d); and
■
■
■
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[Amended]
E:\FR\FM\26OCR1.SGM
26OCR1
53974
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Section
Remove
989.58(d)(1) ............
989.59(d) .................
989.102 ...................
Processed Products Standardization and Inspection Branch ...............................
Processed Products Standardization and Inspection Branch ...............................
Processed Products Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division ..................................
Dated: October 17, 2018.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–23089 Filed 10–25–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0898; Product
Identifier 2018–NE–29–AD; Amendment 39–
19456; AD 2018–20–22]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General
Electric Company Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
General Electric Company (GE) GE90–
110B1, GE90–113B, and GE90–115B
turbofan engines with a certain case
combustor assembly (combustion case)
installed. This AD requires removal of
affected combustion cases from service
and their replacement with a part
eligible for installation. This AD was
prompted by the discovery of a quality
escape at a manufacturing facility
involving unapproved welds on
combustion cases. We are issuing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.
DATES: This AD is effective November
13, 2018.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of November 13, 2018.
We must receive comments on this
AD by December 10, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 Oct 25, 2018
Jkt 247001
Add
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this final rule, contact General Electric
Company, GE Aviation, 1 Neumann
Way, Cincinnati, OH 45215; telephone
513–552–3272; email:
aviation.fleetsupport@ge.com. You may
view this service information at the
FAA, Engine and Propeller Standards
Branch, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 781–238–7759. It is also
available on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0898.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0898; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this final rule,
the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Operations (phone: 800–647–
5527) is listed above. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew Smith, Aerospace Engineer,
ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:
781–238–7735; fax: 781–238–7199;
email: matthew.c.smith@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We learned from GE of a quality
escape that one of their suppliers, AECC
Aero Science and Technology Co., Ltd.,
was performing welds on newlymanufactured components to correct
errors introduced in their manufacturing
process. These welds were not reviewed
or approved by either GE or the FAA.
GE’s review of manufacturing records
determined that these parts include
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Specialty Crops Inspection Division.
Specialty Crops Inspection Division.
Specialty Crops Inspection Division.
combustion cases installed on GE GE90–
100 turbofan engines. These combustion
cases are life limited. The unapproved
repairs reduced the material capability
of these cases, which requires their
removal prior to reaching their
published Airworthiness Limitation
Section life limit. This condition, if not
addressed, could result in failure of the
combustion case, engine fire, and
damage to the airplane. We are issuing
this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed GE GE90–100 Service
Bulletin (SB) SB 72–0784 R00, dated
May 4, 2018; GE SB GE90–100 S/B 72–
0788, Revision 4, dated July 30, 2018;
and GE SB GE90–100 SB 72–0793 R00,
dated August 10, 2018. The SBs
describe procedures for removing the
affected combustion cases from the
engine. GE SB GE90–100 SB 72–0784
R00 is effective for GE90–100 turbofan
engines with the combustion case S/Ns
listed in that SB. GE SB GE90–100 S/B
72–0788 is effective for GE90–100
turbofan engines with the combustion
case S/Ns listed in that SB. GE SB
GE90–100 SB 72–0793 R00 is effective
for GE90–100 turbofan engines with the
combustion case S/Ns listed in that SB.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination
We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
AD Requirements
This AD requires removal of the
affected combustion cases from service
and their replacement with a part
eligible for installation.
FAA’s Justification and Determination
of the Effective Date
An unsafe condition exists that
requires the immediate adoption of this
AD without providing an opportunity
for public comments prior to adoption.
The FAA has found that the risk to the
flying public justifies waiving notice
E:\FR\FM\26OCR1.SGM
26OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 208 (Friday, October 26, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53965-53974]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-23089]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2018 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 53965]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 989
[Doc. No. AO-FV-16-0016; AMS-SC-16-0011; SC16-989-1]
Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown in California; Order Amending
Marketing Order No. 989
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule amends Marketing Order No. 989 (Order), which
regulates the handling of raisins produced from grapes grown in
California. Five amendments were proposed by the Raisin Administrative
Committee (RAC) and three were proposed by the Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS). Seven of the eight proposed amendments were favored by
California raisin growers in a mail referendum, held December 4 through
15, 2017. This final rule also makes administrative revisions to
subpart headings to bring the language into conformance with the Office
of Federal Register requirements.
DATES: This rule is effective November 26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops
Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0237, Washington,
DC 20250-0237.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Schmaedick, Marketing Order
and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, Post Office
Box 952, Moab, UT 84532; Telephone: (202) 557-4783, Fax: (435) 259-
1502, or Michelle Sharrow, Marketing Order and Agreement Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop
0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202)
720-8938, or Email: [email protected] or
[email protected].
Small businesses may request information on this proceeding by
contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop
0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202)
720-8938, or Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Prior documents in this proceeding: Notice
of Hearing issued on April 14, 2016, and published in the April 22,
2016, issue of the Federal Register (81 FR 23650) and a Recommended
Decision issued on May 3, 2017, and published in the May 31, 2017,
issue of the Federal Register (82 FR 24882); and a Secretary's Decision
and Referendum Order issued September 19, 2017, and published in the
September 29, 2017, issue of the Federal Register (82 FR 45517).
This action is governed by the provisions of sections 556 and 557
of title 5 of the United States Code and, therefore, is excluded from
the requirements of Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13175.
Additionally, because this rule does not meet the definition of a
significant regulatory action it does not trigger the requirements
contained in Executive Order 13771. See the Office of Management and
Budget's (OMB) Memorandum titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing
Section 2 of the Executive Order of January 30, 2017 titled `Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017).
Notice of this rulemaking action was provided to tribal governments
through the Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Office of Tribal
Relations.
Preliminary Statement
This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557, finalizes amendments
to regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as defined in 7
CFR 900.2(j). This rule is issued under Marketing Order No. 989, as
amended (7 CFR part 989), regulating the handling of raisins produced
from grapes grown in California. Part 989 (referred to as the Order) is
effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
This rule is formulated on the record of a public hearing held on
May 3 and 4, 2016, in Clovis, California. The hearing was held pursuant
to the provisions of the Act, and the applicable rules of practice and
procedure governing the formulation and amendment of marketing
agreements and orders (7 CFR part 900). Notice of this hearing was
published in the Federal Register on April 22, 2016 (81 FR 23650). The
notice of hearing contained five proposals submitted by the RAC and
three proposals by AMS.
Upon the basis of evidence introduced at the hearing and the record
thereof, the Administrator of AMS on May 3, 2017, filed with the
Hearing Clerk, USDA, a Recommended Decision and Opportunity to File
Written Exceptions thereto by June 30, 2017. One exception was filed.
The exception filed opposed the proposed amendment to establish term
limits.
A Secretary's Decision and Referendum Order was issued on September
29, 2017, directing that a referendum be conducted during the period of
December 4 through 17, 2017, among eligible California raisin growers
to determine whether they favored the proposed amendments to the Order.
To become effective, the amendments had to be approved by at least two-
thirds of those growers voting, or by voters representing at least two-
thirds of the volume of raisins represented by voters voting in the
referendum. The approved amendments were favored by over ninety percent
of the growers voting in the referendum, representing over ninety
percent of the total volume of raisins produced by those voting. The
failed amendment was opposed by ninety-three percent of those voting
and ninety-five percent of the represented volume.
The amendments favored by voters and included in this final order
will: Authorize production research; establish new nomination
procedures for independent grower member and alternate member seats;
add authority to regulate quality; add authority to establish different
regulations for different market destinations; add a continuance
referenda requirement; and remove volume regulation and reserve pool
authority from the Order.
USDA also made changes as were necessary to conform the Order
provisions to the effectuated
[[Page 53966]]
amendments. Conforming changes and corrections proposed by USDA
include: Revising all references of ``offgrade'' to ``off-grade'';
revising all references of ``nonnormal'' to ``non-normal''; and,
revising all references of ``committee'' to ``Committee.'' These
corrections will result in consistent spelling of these terms
throughout the Order. Also in this final rule, USDA will revise the
amendment of Sec. 989.58(d) from ``interplant'' and ``interhandler''
to ``inter-plant'' and ``inter-handler'' as it appears in amended Sec.
989.59(e).
In addition, the words ``Processed Products Standardization and
Inspection Branch'' in Sec. Sec. 989.58(d) and 989.59(d) will be
changed to ``Specialty Crops Inspection Division.'' Similarly,
``Processed Products Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division'' in Sec.
989.102 will be changed to ``Specialty Crops Inspection Division.''
These corrections will reflect the official name change of the AMS's
inspection service office for fruit, vegetables and specialty crops.
Lastly, an additional correction will change the amendatory
language in Sec. Sec. 989.55, 989.56, 989.65, 989.66, 989.67, 989.71,
989.72, 989.82, 989.154, 989.156, 989.166, 989.167, 989.221, 989.257
and 989.401, from ``remove'' to ``remove and reserve.'' This change
will prevent the unintentional renumbering of remaining sections of the
Order.
The amended marketing agreement was subsequently mailed to all
raisin handlers in the production area for their approval. The
marketing agreement was approved by handlers representing more than 50
percent of the volume of raisins handled by all handlers during the
August 1, 2016, through July 31, 2017, representative period.
Consequently, a companion handler agreement will also be established.
Small Business Consideration
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), AMS has considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final
regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders and amendments
thereto are unique in that they are normally brought about through
group action of essentially small entities for their own benefit.
According to the hearing transcript, there are approximately 3,000
raisin producers in California. According to National Agricultural
Statistics Service data presented at the hearing, the total value of
production of raisins in the 2014/15 crop year is $598,052,000. Taking
the total value of production for raisins and dividing it by the total
number of raisin producers provides an average return per producer of
$199,950.67. A small producer as defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) is one that grosses less than
$750,000 annually. Therefore, a majority of raisin producers are
considered small entities under SBA's standards.
According to the industry, there were 23 raisin handlers for the
2015/16 crop year. While individual handling operation information is
proprietary, both testimonies offered by handler witnesses and an
assessment of total value of dried production leads USDA to conclude
that 13 handlers would be considered small entities under SBA's
standards.
According to the record, two of the 23 handlers handled roughly 60
percent of total production during the 2015/16 crop year. A calculation
using the 2014 total value of production of $598,052,000 puts the value
handled by the cooperatives at $358,831,200 ($598,052,000 x 60 percent)
and the value handled by all other handlers at $239,220,800. With 21
non-cooperative handlers remaining, $239,220,800 divided by that number
results in an average handler receipt of $11,391,467. Assuming a normal
bell-curve distribution, coupled with the number of handlers self-
identifying at the hearing as small business entities, USDA accepts the
Committee's assertion that 13 handlers fall under the SBA definition of
small agricultural service firm. A small agricultural service firm as
defined by the SBA is one that grosses less than $7,500,000 annually.
Thus, slightly more than half of the industry's handlers are considered
small entities under SBA's standards.
The production area regulated under the Order covers the state of
California. Acreage devoted to raisin production in the regulated area
has declined in recent years. According to data presented at the
hearing, bearing acreage for raisins reached a high of 280,000 acres
during the 2000/01 crop year. Since then, bearing acreage for raisins
has decreased 32 percent to 190,000 acres in 2014/15. As a result, the
total production of raisins reached a high during the 2000/01 crop year
of 484,500 tons (dried basis). Since the 2000/01 crop year, total
production for raisins has decreased 32 percent to 328,600 tons in
2014/15.
During the hearing held May 3 and 4, 2016, interested persons were
invited to present evidence on the probable regulatory and information
collection impact of the proposed amendments to the Order on small
businesses. The evidence presented at the hearing shows that none of
the proposed amendments would have any burdensome effects or a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
agricultural producers or firms.
Material Issues
Material Issue Number 1--Authorize Production Research
This action amends Sec. 989.53 to authorize production research.
Currently, the California Raisin Marketing Board (CRMB) is the
funding source for production research for the California raisin
industry. Three years ago, payments of assessments to the CRMB were
suspended due to the results of litigation. Without funding, the CRMB
has been unable to conduct any new production research projects. The
amendment to Sec. 989.53 will authorize the RAC to conduct production
research without having to rely on the CRMB for funding.
Witnesses stated that future research could potentially impact
producers in many ways, such as reducing pesticide usage or the
development of new varieties that are less labor intensive. Production
research will provide the raisin industry the ability to meet the needs
of the ever changing domestic and international markets. According to a
witness's testimony, the benefits of the proposed amendment will
outweigh any costs and will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Material Issue Number 2--Authorize Separate Nominations for Independent
Producer Member and Independent Producer Alternate Member Seats
This action amends Sec. Sec. 989.29 and 989.129 to authorize
separate nominations for independent producer members and independent
producer alternate member seats.
Currently, the RAC has difficulty filling Committee seats
designated for independent producer members and independent producer
alternate members. Independent producer alternate member seats have
gone unfilled for several consecutive years.
According to witnesses' testimony, this amendment will increase the
participation of independent producers willing to participate on the
RAC. Allowing for separate nominations for members and alternates will
encourage participation by those who wish to serve in one capacity and
not the other. Full participation would give the independent producers
full
[[Page 53967]]
representation on the Board they represented and a voice in RAC
decisions.
It is determined that the benefits of increased RAC participation
by independent producers will outweigh any costs associated with the
implementation of this amendment.
Material Issue Number 3--Add Authority To Regulate Quality
This action will amend Sec. Sec. 989.58, 989.59 and 989.61 to add
authority to regulate quality under the Order. A corresponding change
will also revise the heading prior to Sec. 989.58 to include quality.
Currently, Sec. Sec. 989.58 and 989.59 state that the RAC has the
authority to recommend grade and condition standards under the Order.
The attribute ``quality'' is not specifically mentioned. The amendment
will add language to include ``quality'' as an attribute that can be
regulated under the Order.
According to a witness at the hearing, the amendment will give the
RAC flexibility to ensure consumer safety by setting quality standards
for residue levels for herbicides, pesticides or fungicides. The
quality standards will be equally applied to all handlers of raisins
within the U.S.; some handlers are already testing for certain types of
fungicides so the increased costs will be minimal.
It is determined that the additional costs incurred to regulate
quality will be greatly outweighed by the increased flexibility for the
industry, increased consumer safety, and other benefits gained from
implementing this amendment. The costs of implementing it will not have
a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Material Issue Number 4--Add Authority To Establish Different
Regulations for Different Markets
This action will amend Sec. 989.59 to add authority to establish
different regulations for different markets.
The Order does not currently allow for different quality or grade
standards to be applied to different foreign markets. The language in
the Order only has two classifications for grade and condition
standards, Grade A or Grade B. The current grade and condition
standards are consistent across all markets.
This amendment will give the RAC the authority to develop
requirements for raisins intended for export to different foreign
markets. Industry will have the flexibility to tailor product
attributes to meet the foreign consumer profile and the customer
demands for each individual market.
It is determined that any additional costs incurred for this
amendment will be outweighed by the increased flexibility for the
industry to respond to a changing global marketplace. The costs of
implementing this amendment will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Material Issue Number 5--Continuance Referenda
This action will amend Sec. 989.91 to require continuance
referenda.
The amendment will require the USDA to conduct a continuance
referendum between year five and year six after implementation for the
first referendum, and every six years thereafter. A witness testified
that a continuance referendum is the best tool for assuring that the
Order remains responsive to the needs of the industry. While a
continuance referendum will not directly improve producer returns, it
will indirectly ensure that the industry believes that the Order is
operating in the producer's best interest.
For these reasons, it is determined that the benefits of conducting
a continuance referendum will outweigh the potential costs of
implementing this amendment. The costs of implementing this amendment
will be minimal and will not have a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Material Issue Number 6--Remove Volume Regulations and Reserve Pool
Authority
This action will amend the Order to remove volume regulation and
reserve pool authority. This will include: deleting and reserving
Sec. Sec. 989.55 and 989.56, Sec. Sec. 989.65 through 989.67,
Sec. Sec. 989.71, 989.72, 989.82, 989.154, 989.156, 989.166, 989.167,
989.221, 989.257, and 989.401; revising Sec. Sec. 989.11, 989.53,
989.54, 989.58, 989.59, 989.60, 989.73, 989.79, 989.80, 989.84,
989.158, 989.173, and 989.210; and re-designating Sec. 989.70 as Sec.
989.96. Corresponding changes will also remove the following headings:
``Volume Regulation'' prior to Sec. 989.65; ``Volume Regulation''
prior to Sec. 989.166; and, ``Subpart-Schedule of Payments'' prior to
Sec. 989.401.
The amendment will remove all authority for the RAC to recommend
volume restrictions and a reserve pool. On June 22, 2015, the United
States Supreme Court, in Horne v. USDA, ruled that the application of
the Order's reserve pool authority to the Horne's was a taking under
the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. In a July 16, 2015,
letter to the RAC, USDA stated, ``In light of the Horne decision, the
U.S. Department of Agriculture has decided not to authorize the reserve
program of the Federal marketing order for California raisins for the
foreseeable future, effective immediately.''
One witness at the hearing explained that bearing acres have
declined the past ten years, which supports the theory that the
California raisin industry is adjusting to a decreasing or flat demand
for the product. The witness stated that, in the future, supply will
likely remain in better balance with demand and, therefore, the reserve
pool and volume regulation are no longer as relevant as they were in
higher production times. To further the point, the witness stated that
the Order's reserve pool authority has not been utilized since 2010.
The amendment will be a relaxation of regulatory requirements. For
this reason, it is determined that no significant impact on small
business entities is anticipated from this change.
The costs attributed to these amendments are minimal; therefore,
there will not be a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap or conflict with this rule. These amendments are intended to
improve the operation and administration of the Order and to assist in
the marketing of California raisins.
RAC meetings regarding these amendments, as well as the hearing
date and location, were widely publicized throughout the California
raisin industry, and all interested persons were invited to attend the
meetings and the hearing to participate in RAC deliberations on all
issues. All RAC meetings and the hearing were public forums, and all
entities, both large and small, were able to express views on these
issues. Finally, interested persons were invited to submit information
on the regulatory and information collection impacts of this action on
small businesses.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Current information collection requirements for Part 989 are
approved by OMB, under OMB Number 0581-0189--``Generic OMB Fruit
Crops.'' No changes are anticipated in these requirements as a result
of this proceeding. Should any such changes become necessary, they will
be submitted to OMB for approval.
As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public-sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the Government Paperwork
Elimination
[[Page 53968]]
Act, which requires Government agencies in general to provide the
public the option of submitting information or transacting business
electronically to the maximum extent possible.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
Civil Justice Reform
The amendments to the Order stated herein have been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. They are not intended to
have retroactive effect. The amendments do not preempt any State or
local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an
irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed no later than 20 days after the date of
entry of the ruling.
Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Raisins Produced
From Grapes Grown in California 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This order shall not become effective unless and until the
requirements of Sec. 900.14 of the rules of practice and procedure
governing proceedings to formulate marketing agreements and
marketing orders have been met.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Findings and Determinations
The findings and determinations hereinafter set forth are
supplementary to the findings and determinations that were previously
made in connection with the issuance of the Marketing Order; and all
said previous findings and determinations are hereby ratified and
affirmed, except insofar as such findings and determinations may be in
conflict with the findings and determinations set forth herein.
(a) Findings and Determinations Upon the Basis of the Hearing
Record
Pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), and the applicable rules of
practice and procedure effective thereunder (7 CFR part 900), a public
hearing was held upon further amendment of Marketing Order No. 989,
regulating the handling of raisins produced from grapes grown in
California.
Upon the basis of the record, it is found that:
(1) The Order, as amended, and as hereby further amended, and all
of the terms and conditions thereof, would tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act;
(2) The Order, as amended, and as hereby further amended, regulates
the handling of raisins produced from grapes grown in the production
area in the same manner as, and are applicable only to, persons in the
respective classes of commercial and industrial activity specified in
the Order upon which a hearing has been held;
(3) The Order, as amended, and as hereby further amended, is
limited in its application to the smallest regional production area
that is practicable, consistent with carrying out the declared policy
of the Act, and the issuance of several orders applicable to
subdivisions of the production area would not effectively carry out the
declared policy of the Act;
(4) The Order, as amended, and as hereby further amended,
prescribes, insofar as practicable, such different terms applicable to
different parts of the production area as are necessary to give due
recognition to the differences in the production and marketing of
raisins produced from grapes grown in California; and
(5) All handling of raisins produced from grapes grown in the
production area as defined in the Order is in the current of interstate
or foreign commerce or directly burdens, obstructs, or affects such
commerce.
(b) Determinations. It is hereby determined that:
(1) Handlers (excluding cooperative associations of growers who are
not engaged in processing, distributing, or shipping raisins covered by
the Order as hereby amended) who, during the period August 1, 2016,
through July 31, 2017, handled 50 percent or more of the volume of such
raisins covered by said Order, as hereby amended, have signed an
amended marketing agreement;
(2) The issuance of this amendatory Order, further amending the
aforesaid Order, was favored or approved by at least two-thirds of the
growers who participated in a referendum on the question of approval
and who, during the period of August 1, 2016, through July 31, 2017
(which has been deemed to be a representative period), have been
engaged within the production area in the production of such raisins,
such growers having also produced for market at least two-thirds of the
volume of such commodity represented in the referendum; and
(3) The issuance of this amendatory Order advances the interests of
producers of raisins in the production area pursuant to the declared
policy of the Act.
Order Relative to Handling
It is therefore ordered, that on and after the effective date
hereof, all handling of raisins produced from grapes grown in
California shall be in conformity to, and in compliance with, the terms
and conditions of the said Order as hereby amended as follows:
The provisions of the amendments to the Order contained in the
Secretary's Decision issued September 19, 2017, and published in the
September 29, 2017, issue of the Federal Register (82 FR 45517), with
the exception of the proposal to establish term limits, will be and are
the terms and provisions of this Order amending the Order and are set
forth in full herein.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 989
Raisins, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 7 CFR part 989 is amended
as follows:
PART 989--RAISINS PRODUCED FROM GRAPES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for part 989 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
Subpart Redesignated as Subpart A
0
2. Designate the subpart labeled ``Order Regulating Handling'' as
subpart A.
0
3. Section 989.11 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 989.11 Producer.
Producer means any person engaged in a proprietary capacity in the
production of grapes which are sun-dried or dehydrated by artificial
means until they become raisins.
0
4. In Sec. 989.29:
0
a. Revise paragraph (b)(2)(ii);
0
b. Redesignate paragraph (b)(2)(iii) as paragraph (b)(2)(iv);
0
c. Add new paragraph (b)(2)(iii); and
[[Page 53969]]
0
d. Revise newly redesignated paragraph (b)(2)(iv).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 989.29 Initial members and nomination of successor members.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Each such producer whose name is offered in nomination for
producer member positions to represent on the Committee independent
producers or producers who are affiliated with cooperative marketing
association(s) handling less than 10 percent of the total raisin
acquisitions during the preceding crop year shall be given the
opportunity to provide the Committee a short statement outlining
qualifications and desire to serve if selected. Similarly, each such
producer whose name is offered in nomination for producer alternate
member positions to represent on the Committee independent producers or
producers who are affiliated with cooperative marketing association(s)
handling less than 10 percent of the total raisin acquisitions during
the preceding crop year shall be given the opportunity to provide the
Committee a short statement outlining qualifications and desire to
serve if selected. These brief statements, together with a ballot and
voting instructions, shall be mailed to all independent producers and
producers who are affiliated with cooperative marketing associations
handling less than 10 percent of the total raisin acquisitions during
the preceding crop year of record with the Committee in each district.
The producer member candidate receiving the highest number of votes
shall be designated as the first member nominee, the second highest
shall be designated as the second member nominee until nominees for all
producer member positions have been filled. Similarly, the producer
alternate member candidate receiving the highest number of votes shall
be designated as the first alternate member nominee, the second highest
shall be designated as the second alternate member nominee until
nominees for all member positions have been filled.
(iii) In the event that there are more producer member nominees
than positions to be filled and not enough producer alternate member
nominees to fill all positions, producer member nominees not nominated
for a member seat may be nominated to fill vacant alternate member
seats. Member seat nominees shall indicate, prior to the nomination
vote, whether they are willing to accept nomination for an alternate
seat in the event they are not nominated for a member seat and there
are vacant alternate member seats. Member seat nominees that do not
indicate willingness to be considered for vacant alternate member seats
shall not be considered.
(iv) Each independent producer or producer affiliated with
cooperative marketing association(s) handling less than 10 percent of
the total raisin acquisitions during the preceding crop year shall cast
only one vote with respect to each position for which nominations are
to be made. Write-in candidates shall be accepted. The person receiving
the most votes with respect to each position to be filled, in
accordance with paragraph (b)(2)(ii) and (iii) of this section, shall
be the person to be certified to the Secretary as the nominee. The
Committee may, subject to the approval of the Secretary, establish
rules and regulations to effectuate this section.
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 989.53, revise the introductory text of paragraph (a), and
remove the undesignated paragraph that follows paragraph (a)(5) to read
as follows:
Sec. 989.53 Research and development.
(a) General. The Committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may
establish or provide for the establishment of projects involving
production research, market research and development, marketing
promotion including paid advertising, designed to assist, improve, or
promote the production, marketing, distribution, and consumption of
raisins in domestic and foreign markets. These projects may include,
but need not be limited to those designed to:
* * * * *
0
6. In Sec. 989.54:
0
a. Remove paragraphs (a) through (d) and (g);
0
b. Remove paragraph (e)(4);
0
c. Redesignate paragraphs (e)(5) through (e)(10) as (e)(4) through
(e)(9), respectively;
0
d. Redesignate paragraphs (e), (f), and (h) as paragraphs (a), (b), and
(c), respectively; and
0
e. Revise newly redesignated paragraphs (a) introductory text, (a)(1),
(a)(4), (a)(5) and (c).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 989.54 Marketing policy.
(a) Marketing policy. Each crop year, the Committee shall prepare
and submit to the Secretary a report setting forth its recommended
marketing policy, including quality regulations for the pending crop.
In developing the marketing policy, the Committee may give
consideration to the production, harvesting, processing, and storage
conditions of that crop, as well as the following factors:
(1) The estimated tonnage held by producers and handlers at the
beginning of the crop year;
* * * * *
(4) An estimated desirable carryout at the end of the crop year;
(5) The estimated market demand for raisins, considering the
estimated world raisin supply and demand situation;
* * * * *
(c) Publicity. The Committee shall promptly give reasonable
publicity to producers, dehydrators, handlers, and the cooperative
bargaining association(s) of each meeting to consider a marketing
policy or any modification thereof, and each such meeting shall be open
to them. Similar publicity shall be given to producers, dehydrators,
handlers, and the cooperative bargaining association(s) of each
marketing policy report or modification thereof, filed with the
Secretary and of the Secretary's action thereon.
Copies of all marketing policy reports shall be maintained in the
office of the Committee, where they shall be made available for
examination by any producer, dehydrator, handler, or cooperative
bargaining association representative. The Committee shall notify
handlers, dehydrators and the cooperative bargaining association(s),
and give reasonable publicity to producers of its computation.
Sec. Sec. 989.55 and 989.56 [Removed and reserved]
0
7. Sections 989.55 and 989.56 are removed and reserved.
0
8. Revise the undesignated heading prior to Sec. 989.58 to read as
follows: ``Grade, Quality, and Condition Standards''.
0
9. In Sec. 989.58, revise paragraphs (a), (b), (d)(1), (e)(1), and
(e)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 989.58 Natural condition raisins.
(a) Regulation. No handler shall acquire or receive natural
condition raisins which fail to meet such minimum grade, quality, and
condition standards as the Committee may establish, with the approval
of the Secretary, in applicable rules and regulations: Provided, That a
handler may receive raisins for inspection, may receive off-grade
raisins for reconditioning and may receive or acquire off-grade raisins
for use in eligible non-normal outlets: And provided further, That a
handler may acquire natural condition raisins which
[[Page 53970]]
exceed the tolerance established for maturity under a weight dockage
system established pursuant to rules and regulations recommended by the
Committee and approved by the Secretary. Nothing contained in this
paragraph shall apply to the acquisition or receipt of natural
condition raisins of a particular varietal type for which minimum
grade, quality, and condition standards are not applicable or then in
effect pursuant to this part.
(b) Changes in minimum grade, quality, and condition standards for
natural condition raisins. The Committee may recommend to the Secretary
changes in the minimum grade, quality, and condition standards for
natural condition raisins of any varietal type and may recommend to the
Secretary that minimum grade, quality, and condition standards for any
varietal type be added to or deleted. The Committee shall submit with
its recommendation all data and information upon which it acted in
making its recommendation, and such other information as the Secretary
may request. The Secretary shall approve any such change if he finds,
upon the basis of data submitted to him by the Committee or from other
pertinent information available to him, that to do so would tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) Each handler shall cause an inspection and certification to be
made of all natural condition raisins acquired or received by him,
except with respect to:
(i) An inter-plant or inter-handler transfer of off-grade raisins
as described in paragraph (e)(2) of this section, unless such
inspection and certification are required by rules and procedures made
effective pursuant to this amended subpart;
(ii) An inter-plant or inter-handler transfer of standard raisins
as described in Sec. 989.59(e);
(iii) Raisins received from a dehydrator which have been previously
inspected pursuant to paragraph (d)(2) of this section;
(iv) Any raisins for which minimum grade, quality, and condition
standards are not then in effect;
(v) Raisins received from a cooperative bargaining association
which have been inspected and are in compliance with requirements
established pursuant to paragraph (d)(3) of this section; and
(vi) Any raisins, if permitted in accordance with such rules and
procedures as the Committee may establish with the approval of the
Secretary, acquired or received for disposition in eligible non-normal
outlets. Except as otherwise provided in this section, prior to
blending raisins, acquiring raisins, storing raisins, reconditioning
raisins, or acquiring raisins which have been reconditioned, each
handler shall obtain an inspection certification showing whether or not
the raisins meet the applicable grade, quality, and condition
standards: Provided, That the initial inspection for infestation shall
not be required if the raisins are fumigated in accordance with such
rules and procedures as the Committee shall establish with the approval
of the Secretary. The handler shall submit or cause to be submitted to
the Committee a copy of such certification, together with such other
documents or records as the Committee may require. Such certification
shall be issued by inspectors of the Processed Products Standardization
and Inspection Branch of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, unless the
Committee determines, and the Secretary concurs in such determination,
that inspection by another agency would improve the administration of
this amended subpart. The Committee may require that raisins held on
memorandum receipt be re-inspected and certified as a condition for
their acquisition by a handler.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) Any natural condition raisins tendered to a handler which fail
to meet the applicable minimum grade, quality, and condition standards
may:
(i) Be received or acquired by the handler for disposition, without
further inspection, in eligible non-normal outlets;
(ii) Be returned unstemmed to the person tendering the raisins; or
(iii) Be received by the handler for reconditioning. Off-grade
raisins received by a handler under any one of the three described
categories may be changed to any other of the categories under such
rules and procedures as the Committee, with the approval of the
Secretary, shall establish. No handler shall ship or otherwise dispose
of off-grade raisins which he does not return to the tenderer, transfer
to another handler as provided in paragraph (e)(2) of this section, or
recondition so that they at least meet the minimum standards prescribed
in or pursuant to this amended subpart, except into eligible non-normal
outlets.
* * * * *
(4) If the handler is to acquire the raisins after they are
reconditioned, his obligation with respect to such raisins shall be
based on the weight of the raisins (if stemmed, adjusted to natural
condition weight) after they have been reconditioned.
* * * * *
0
10. In Sec. 989.59, revise paragraphs (a), (b), (d), (e), and (g) to
read as follows:
Sec. 989.59 Regulation of the handling of raisins subsequent to
their acquisition by handlers.
(a) Regulation. Unless otherwise provided in this part, no handler
shall:
(1) Ship or otherwise make final disposition of natural condition
raisins unless they at least meet the effective and applicable minimum
grade, quality, and condition standards for natural condition raisins;
or
(2) Ship or otherwise make final disposition of packed raisins
unless they at least meet such minimum grade quality, and condition
standards established by the Committee, with the approval of the
Secretary, in applicable rules and regulations or as later changed or
prescribed pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section:
Provided, That nothing contained in this paragraph shall prohibit the
shipment or final disposition of any raisins of a particular varietal
type for which minimum standards are not applicable or then in effect
pursuant to this part. And provided further, That a handler may grind
raisins, which do not meet the minimum grade, quality, and condition
standards for packed raisins because of mechanical damage or sugaring,
into a raisin paste. The Committee may establish, with approval of the
Secretary, different grade, quality, and condition regulations for
different markets.
(b) Changes to minimum grade, quality, or condition standards. The
Committee may recommend changes in the minimum grade, quality, or
condition standards for packed raisins of any varietal type and may
recommend to the Secretary that minimum grade, quality, or condition
standards for any varietal type be added or deleted. The Committee
shall submit with its recommendation all data and information upon
which it acted in making its recommendation, and such other information
as the Secretary may request. The Secretary shall approve any such
change if he finds, upon the basis of data submitted to him by the
Committee or from other pertinent information available to him, that to
do so would tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
* * * * *
(d) Inspection and certification. Unless otherwise provided in this
[[Page 53971]]
section, each handler shall, at his own expense, before shipping or
otherwise making final disposition of raisins, cause an inspection to
be made of such raisins to determine whether they meet the then
applicable minimum grade, quality, and condition standards for natural
condition raisins or the then applicable minimum standards for packed
raisins. Such handler shall obtain a certificate that such raisins meet
the aforementioned applicable minimum standards and shall submit or
cause to be submitted to the Committee a copy of such certificate
together with such other documents or records as the Committee may
require. The certificate shall be issued by the Processed Products
Standardization and Inspection Branch of the United States Department
of Agriculture, unless the Committee determines, and the Secretary
concurs in such determination, that inspection by another agency will
improve the administration of this amended subpart. Any certificate
issued pursuant to this paragraph shall be valid only for such period
of time as the Committee may specify, with the approval of the
Secretary, in appropriate rules and regulations.
(e) Inter-plant and inter-handler transfers. Any handler may
transfer from his plant to his own or another handler's plant within
the State of California any raisins without having had such raisins
inspected as provided in paragraph (d) of this section. The
transferring handler shall transmit promptly to the Committee a report
of such transfer, except that transfers between plants owned or
operated by the same handler need not be reported. Before shipping or
otherwise making final disposition of such raisins, the receiving
handler shall comply with the requirements of this section.
* * * * *
(g) Exemption of experimental and specialty packs. The Committee
may establish, with the approval of the Secretary, rules and procedures
providing for the exemption of raisins in experimental and specialty
packs from one or more of the requirements of the minimum grade,
quality, or condition standards of this section, together with the
inspection and certification requirements if applicable.
0
11. Amend Sec. 989.60 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 989.60 Exemption.
(a) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this amended subpart,
the Committee may establish, with the approval of the Secretary, such
rules and procedures as may be necessary to permit the acquisition and
disposition of any off-grade raisins, free from any or all regulations,
for uses in non-normal outlets.
* * * * *
0
12. Section 989.61 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 989.61 Above parity situations.
The provisions of this part relating to minimum grade, quality, and
condition standards and inspection requirements, within the meaning of
section 2(3) of the Act, and any other provisions pertaining to the
administration and enforcement of the Order, shall continue in effect
irrespective of whether the estimated season average price to producers
for raisins is in excess of the parity level specified in section 2(1)
of the Act.
0
13. Remove the undesignated heading ``Volume Regulation'' prior to
Sec. 989.65.
Sec. Sec. 989.65, 989.66, and 989.67 [Removed and reserved]
0
14. Sections 989.65, 989.66, and 989.67 are removed and reserved.
Sec. 989.70 [Redesignated as Sec. 989.96]
0
15. Redesignate Sec. 989.70 as Sec. 989.96.
Sec. Sec. 989.71 and 989.72 [Removed and reserved]
0
16. Sections 989.71 and 989.72 are removed and reserved.
0
17. Amend Sec. 989.73 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 989.73 Reports.
* * * * *
(b) Acquisition reports. Each handler shall submit to the Committee
in accordance with such rules and procedures as are prescribed by the
Committee, with the approval of the Secretary, certified reports, for
such periods as the Committee may require, with respect to his
acquisitions of each varietal type of raisins during the particular
period covered by such report, which report shall include, but not be
limited to:
(1) The total quantity of standard raisins acquired;
(2) The total quantity of off-grade raisins acquired pursuant to
Sec. 989.58(e)(1)(i); and
(3) Cumulative totals of such acquisitions from the beginning of
the then current crop year to and including the end of the period for
which the report is made. Upon written application made to the
Committee, a handler may be relieved of submitting such reports after
completing his packing operations for the season. Upon request of the
Committee, each handler shall furnish to the Committee, in such manner
and at such times as it may require, the name and address of each
person from whom he acquired raisins and the quantity of each varietal
type of raisins acquired from each such person.
* * * * *
0
18. Section 989.79 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 989.79 Expenses.
The Committee is authorized to incur such expenses as the Secretary
finds are reasonable and likely to be incurred by it during each crop
year, for the maintenance and functioning of the Committee and for such
purposes as he may, pursuant to this subpart, determine to be
appropriate. The funds to cover such expenses shall be obtained levying
assessments as provided in Sec. 989.80. The Committee shall file with
the Secretary for each crop year a proposed budget of these expenses
and a proposal as to the assessment rate to be fixed pursuant to Sec.
989.80, together with a report thereon. Such filing shall be not later
than October 5 of the crop year, but this date may be extended by the
Committee not more than 5 days if warranted by a late crop.
0
19. In Sec. 989.80, revise paragraphs (a) through (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 989.80 Assessments.
(a) Each handler shall pay to the Committee, upon demand, his pro
rata share of the expenses which the Secretary finds will be incurred,
as aforesaid, by the Committee during each crop year less any amounts
credited pursuant to Sec. 989.53. Such handler's pro rata share of
such expenses shall be equal to the ratio between the total raisin
tonnage acquired by such handler during the applicable crop year and
the total raisin tonnage acquired by all handlers during the same crop
year.
(b) Each handler who reconditions off-grade raisins but does not
acquire the standard raisins recovered therefrom shall, with respect to
his assessable portion of all such standard raisins, pay to the
Committee, upon demand, his pro rata share of the expenses which the
Secretary finds will be incurred by the Committee each crop year. Such
handler's pro rata share of such expenses shall be equal to the ratio
between the handler's assessable portion (which shall be a quantity
equal to such handler's standard raisins which are acquired by some
other handler or handlers) during the applicable crop year and the
total raisin tonnage acquired by all handlers.
(c) The Secretary shall fix the rate of assessment to be paid by
all handlers on
[[Page 53972]]
the basis of a specified rate per ton. At any time during or after a
crop year, the Secretary may increase the rate of assessment to obtain
sufficient funds to cover any later finding by the Secretary relative
to the expenses of the Committee. Each handler shall pay such
additional assessment to the Committee upon demand. In order to provide
funds to carry out the functions of the Committee, the Committee may
accept advance payments from any handler to be credited toward such
assessments as may be levied pursuant to this section against such
handler during the crop year. The payment of assessments for the
maintenance and functioning of the Committee, and for such purposes as
the Secretary may pursuant to this subpart determine to be appropriate,
may be required under this part throughout the period it is in effect,
irrespective of whether particular provisions thereof are suspended or
become inoperative.
* * * * *
Sec. 989.82 [Removed and reserved]
0
20. Section 989.82 is removed and reserved.
0
21. Section 989.84 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 989.84 Disposition limitation.
No handler shall dispose of standard raisins, off-grade raisins, or
other failing raisins, except in accordance with the provisions of this
subpart or pursuant to regulations issued by the committee.
0
22. In Sec. 989.91:
0
a. Redesignate paragraphs (c) and (d) as paragraphs (d) and (e),
respectively; and
0
b. Add new paragraph (c).
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 989.91 Suspension or termination.
* * * * *
(c) No less than five crop years and no later than six crop years
after the effective date of this amendment, the Secretary shall conduct
a referendum to ascertain whether continuance of this part is favored
by producers. Subsequent referenda to ascertain continuance shall be
conducted every six crop years thereafter. The Secretary may terminate
the provisions of this part at the end of any crop year in which the
Secretary has found that continuance of this part is not favored by a
two-thirds majority of voting producers, or a two-thirds majority of
volume represented thereby, who, during a representative period
determined by the Secretary, have been engaged in the production for
market of grapes used in the production of raisins in the State of
California. Such termination shall be announced on or before the end of
the crop year.
* * * * *
Subpart Redesignated as Subpart B and Amended
0
23. Redesignate ``Subpart-Administrative Rules and Regulations'' as
subpart B and revise the heading to read as follows:
Subpart B--Administrative Requirements
0
24. Section 989.129 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 989.129 Voting at nomination meetings.
Any person (defined in Sec. 989.3 as an individual, partnership,
corporation, association, or any other business unit) who is engaged,
in a proprietary capacity, in the production of grapes which are sun-
dried or dehydrated by artificial means to produce raisins and who
qualifies under the provisions of Sec. 989.29(b)(2) shall be eligible
to cast one ballot for a nominee for each producer member position and
one ballot for a nominee for each producer alternate member position on
the committee which is to be filled for his district. Such person must
be the one who or which: Owns and farms land resulting in his or its
ownership of such grapes produced thereon; rents and farms land,
resulting in his or its ownership of all or a portion of such grapes
produced thereon; or owns land which he or it does not farm and, as
rental for such land, obtains the ownership of a portion of such grapes
or the raisins. In this connection, a partnership shall be deemed to
include two or more persons (including a husband and wife) with respect
to land the title to which, or leasehold interest in which, is vested
in them as tenants in common, joint tenants, or under community
property laws, as community property. In a landlord-tenant
relationship, wherein each of the parties is a producer, each such
producer shall be entitled to one vote for a nominee for each producer
member position and one vote for each producer alternate member
position. Hence, where two persons operate land as landlord and tenant
on a share-crop basis, each person is entitled to one vote for each
such position to be filled. Where land is leased on a cash rental
basis, only the person who is the tenant or cash renter (producer) is
entitled to vote. A partnership or corporation, when eligible, is
entitled to cast only one vote for a nominee for each producer position
to be filled in its district.
0
25. Remove the undesignated heading ``Marketing Policy'' prior to Sec.
989.154.
Sec. Sec. 989.154 and 989.156 [Removed and reserved]
0
26. Sections 989.154 and 989.156 are removed and reserved.
0
27. Section 989.158(c)(4)(i) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 989.158 Natural condition raisins.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) The handler shall notify the inspection service at least one
business day in advance of the time such handler plans to begin
reconditioning each lot of raisins, unless a shorter period is
acceptable to the inspection service. Such notification shall be
provided verbally or by other means of communication, including email.
Natural condition raisins which have been reconditioned shall continue
to be considered natural condition raisins for purposes of reinspection
(inspection pursuant to Sec. 989.58(d)) after such reconditioning has
been completed, if no water or moisture has been added; otherwise, such
raisins shall be considered as packed raisins. The weight of the
raisins reconditioned successfully shall be determined by reweighing,
except where a lot, before reconditioning, failed due to excess
moisture only. The weight of such raisins resulting from reconditioning
a lot failing account excess moisture may be determined by deducting
1.2 percent of the weight for each percent of moisture in excess of the
allowable tolerance. When necessary due to the presence of sand, as
determined by the inspection service, the requirement for deducting
sand tare and the manner of its determination, as prescribed in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, shall apply in computing the net
weight of any such successfully reconditioned natural condition
raisins. The weight of the reconditioned raisins acquired as packed
raisins shall be adjusted to natural condition weight by the use of
factors applicable to the various degrees of processing accomplished.
The applicable factor shall be that selected by the inspector of the
reconditioned raisins from among factors established by the Committee
with the approval of the Secretary.
* * * * *
0
28. Remove the undesignated heading ``Volume Regulation'' prior to
Sec. 989.166.
[[Page 53973]]
Sec. Sec. 989.166 and 989.167 [Removed and reserved]
0
29. Sections 989.166 and 989.167 are removed and reserved.
0
30. In Sec. 989.173:
0
a. Remove paragraphs (b)(2)(ii), (f), and (g)(1)(ii);
0
b. Redesignate paragraphs (b)(2)(iii) and (g) as paragraphs (b)(2)(ii)
and (f), respectively;
0
c. Redesignate newly designated paragraph (f)(1)(iii) as paragraph
(f)(1)(ii); and
0
d. Revise paragraphs (a), (b)(2)(i), newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(2)(ii), (c)(1) introductory text, (d)(1) introductory text,
(d)(1)(v), and newly redesignated paragraphs (f)(1)(i), (f)(2)(i), and
(f)(3) introductory text.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 989.173 Reports.
(a) Inventory reports. Each handler shall submit to the Committee
as of the close of business on July 31 of each crop year, and not later
than the following August 6, an inventory report which shall show, with
respect to each varietal type of raisins held by such handler, the
quantity of off-grade raisins segregated as to those for reconditioning
and those for disposition as such. Provided, That, for the Other
Seedless varietal type, handlers shall report the information required
in this paragraph separately for the different types of Other Seedless
raisins. Upon request by the Committee, each handler shall file at
other times, and as of other dates, any of the said information which
may reasonably be necessary and which the Committee shall specify in
its request.
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The total net weight of the standard raisins acquired during
the reporting period; and
(ii) The cumulative totals of such acquisitions from the beginning
of the then current crop year.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) Each month each handler who is not a processor shall furnish to
the Committee, on an appropriate form provided by the Committee and so
that it is received by the Committee not later than the seventh day of
the month, a report showing the aggregate quantity of each varietal
type of packed raisins and standard natural condition raisins which
were shipped or otherwise disposed of by such handler during the
preceding month (exclusive of transfers within the State of California
between plants of any such handler and from such handler to other
handlers): Provided, That, for the Other Seedless varietal type,
handlers shall report such information for the different types of Other
Seedless raisins. Such required information shall be segregated as to:
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) Any handler who transfers raisins to another handler within the
State of California shall submit to the Committee not later than five
calendar days following such transfer a report showing:
* * * * *
(v) If packed, the transferring handler shall certify that such
handler is transferring only acquired raisins that meet all applicable
marketing order requirements, including reporting, incoming inspection,
and assessments.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) The quantity of raisins, segregated as to locations where they
are stored and whether they are natural condition or packed;
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The total net weight of the standard raisins acquired during
the reporting period; and
* * * * *
(3) Disposition report of organically-produced raisins. No later
than the seventh day of each month, handlers who are not processors
shall submit to the Committee, on an appropriate form provided by the
Committee, a report showing the aggregate quantity of packed raisins
and standard natural condition raisins which were shipped or otherwise
disposed of by such handler during the preceding month (exclusive of
transfer within the State of California between the plants of any such
handler and from such handler to other handlers). Such information
shall include:
* * * * *
Subpart Redesignated as Subpart C and Amended
0
31. Redesignate ``Subpart-Supplementary Regulations'' as subpart C and
revise the heading to read as follows:
Subpart C--Supplementary Requirements
0
32. In Sec. 989.210:
0
a. Remove paragraphs (b), (c) and (e);
0
b. Redesignate paragraph (d) as (b), paragraph (f) as (c), and
paragraph (g) as (d); and
0
c. Revise newly redesignated paragraph (b).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 989.210 Handling of varietal types of raisins acquired pursuant
to a weight dockage system.
* * * * *
(b) Assessments. Assessments on any lot of raisins of the varietal
types specified in paragraph (a) of this section acquired by a handler
pursuant to a weight dockage system shall be applicable to the
creditable weight of such lot.
* * * * *
Sec. Sec. 989.221 and 989.257 [Removed and reserved]
0
33. Sections 989.221 and 989.257 are removed and reserved.
Subpart Redesignated as Subpart D
0
34. Designate the subpart labeled ``Subpart-Assessment Rates'' as
subpart D.
Subpart Removed
0
35. Subpart--Schedule of Payments is removed.
Subpart Redesignated as Subpart E
0
36. Designate the subpart labeled ``Conversion Factors'' as subpart E.
Subpart Redesignated as Subpart F
0
37. Designate the subpart labeled ``Quality Control'' as subpart F.
Subpart Redesignated as Subpart G
0
38. Designate the subpart labeled ``Antitrust Immunity and Liability''
as subpart G.
0
39. In part 989 revise all references to ``offgrade'' to read ``off-
grade'' and revise all references to ``Offgrade'' to read ``Off-
grade''.
0
40. In part 989 revise all references to ``nonnormal'' read ``non-
normal.''
0
41. In part 989 revise all references to ``committee'' to read
``Committee.''
Sec. Sec. 989.58, 989.59, and 989.102 [Amended]
0
42. In the list below, for each section indicated in the left column,
remove the title indicated in the middle column from wherever it
appears in the section, and add the title indicated in the right
column:
[[Page 53974]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section Remove Add
------------------------------------------------------------------------
989.58(d)(1)............... Processed Products Specialty Crops
Standardization and Inspection
Inspection Branch. Division.
989.59(d).................. Processed Products Specialty Crops
Standardization and Inspection
Inspection Branch. Division.
989.102.................... Processed Products Specialty Crops
Branch, Fruit and Inspection
Vegetable Division. Division.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: October 17, 2018.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-23089 Filed 10-25-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P