Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Tchefuncta River, Madisonville, LA, 53810-53813 [2018-23367]
Download as PDF
53810
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 207 / Thursday, October 25, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11C,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 13, 2018, and
effective September 15, 2018, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
*
AAL AK E5 Gustavus, AK [Amended]
Gustavus Airport, AK
(Lat. 58°25′31″ N, long. 135°42′27″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within the area
bounded by a line beginning at lat. 58°32′19″
N, long. 135°44′54″ W, to lat. 58°11′58″ N,
long. 135°02′11″ W, to lat. 58°10′08″ N, long.
135°05′18″ W, to lat. 58°03′38″ N, long.
134°57′10″ W, to lat. 57°59′34″ N, long.
135°10′49″ W, to lat. 57°59′40″ N, long.
135°25′05″ W, to lat. 58°08′36″ N, long.
135°26′55″ W, to lat. 58°25′37″ N, long.
136°00′20″ W, thence to the point of
beginning.
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on October
12, 2018.
Shawn M. Kozica,
Group Manager, Operations Support Group,
Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2018–23144 Filed 10–24–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2016–0963]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Tchefuncta River, Madisonville, LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is changing
the operating schedule that governs the
State Route 22 Bridge (Madisonville (SR
22) swing span bridge) across the
Tchefuncta River, mile 2.5, at
Madisonville, St. Tammany Parish,
Louisiana. This action is necessary to
relieve vehicular traffic congestion
along SR 22 near Madisonville, LA
during peak, afternoon traffic periods on
weekdays.
DATES: This rule is effective November
26, 2018.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:53 Oct 24, 2018
Jkt 247001
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Type USCG–
2016–0963 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and
click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this rule, call
or email Mr. Doug Blakemore, Eighth
Coast Guard District Bridge
Administrator; telephone (504) 671–
2128, email Douglas.A.Blakemore@
uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
LA–DOTD Louisiana Department of
Transportation and Development
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
SNPRM Supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
This final rule changes the operating
schedule that governs the State Route 22
Bridge (Madisonville (SR 22) swing
span bridge) across the Tchefuncta
River, mile 2.5, at Madisonville.
The Madisonville (SR 22) swing span
bridge has a vertical clearance of 6.2 feet
above Mean High Water in the closedto-navigation position and unlimited
clearance in the open-to-navigation
position. The bridge cycle time for an
opening is approximately six minutes.
Because the largest commercial facility
upstream of the bridge is no longer in
service, navigation on the Tchefuncta
River consists primarily of recreational
traffic. The drawbridge is regulated
under 33 CFR 117.500. Currently, on
both weekdays and weekends during
daytime hours from 6 a.m. through 7
p.m., the draw opens on signal every
half hour, and during nighttime hours
from 7 p.m. through 6 a.m., it opens on
signal. However, the current regulation
provides that on weekdays Monday
through Friday except federal holidays,
the draw only opens once an hour
during peak vehicular traffic periods in
the morning and afternoon, between 6
a.m. and 9 a.m. and between 4 p.m. and
7 p.m.
In 2016, the bridge owner, Louisiana
Department of Transportation and
Development (LA–DOTD), requested a
change to the bridge’s operating
schedule to relieve vehicular traffic
congestion along SR 22 near
Madisonville, LA. LA–DOTD’s
regulation change request had three
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
components. First, it requested that the
Coast Guard extend the daytime
openings from half-hour intervals to
hourly intervals on both weekdays and
on weekends. Second, it requested that
the bridge stay closed at 8 a.m. on
weekdays. Third, it requested that the
bridge stay closed at 5 p.m. and 6 p.m.
on weekdays. In other words, generally
speaking, LA–DOTD requested that
during daytime hours on both weekdays
and weekends, the bridge would open
hourly, except that during weekday
morning and afternoon vehicular
commuting times, the bridge would be
closed for a two-hour period in the
morning and three-hour period in the
afternoon.
In November of 2016, the Coast Guard
issued a 180-day test deviation allowing
the LA–DOTD to adopt the proposed
schedule for the purpose of facilitating
a study of vehicular traffic flow over the
bridge as it related to a four way stop
sign and traffic light at the intersection
of SR 22 and SR 21 and its proposed
schedule.1 At the same time, the Coast
Guard published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) requesting public
comments on adopting the proposed
change.2 We did not receive any
comments on the temporary deviation
or the NPRM. In 2017, LA–DOTD
conducted a traffic study and replaced
the four-way stop sign at the
intersection of SR 22 and SR 21/SR 1077
with a traffic light. The test deviation
expired on May 18, 2017.
On June 14, 2018, the Coast Guard
published a supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) titled
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Tchefuncta River, Madisonville, LA (83
FR 27732). The SNPRM contained a
detailed regulatory history of this rule
and explained our review of LA–
DOTD’s request in light of the study.
The Coast Guard determined that the
study did not support all of LA–DOTD’s
requested changes, but that there was a
potential correlation between traffic
congestion and bridge openings on
weekday afternoons and that a
regulation change may alleviate
vehicular traffic while also providing for
the reasonable needs of navigation. The
SNPRM proposed to change the bridge
operating schedule and allow the bridge
to remain closed to marine traffic at the
scheduled weekday openings at 4 p.m.,
4:30 p.m., 5 p.m. and 5:30 p.m. Monday
through Friday except federal holidays.
The proposed change would allow
vehicles to travel along SR 22
1 Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Tchefuncta
River, Madisonville, LA (81 FR 76866).
2 Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Tchefuncta
River, Madisonville, LA (81 FR 76889).
E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM
25OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 207 / Thursday, October 25, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
unimpeded by bridge openings for a two
and a half-hour period during the
weekday afternoon commute. During
the comment period that ended on July
16, 2018, we received 300 comments.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority 33 U.S.C. 499. The
Eighth Coast Guard District Commander
has determined that this change to the
operating schedule of the Madisonville
(SR 22) swing span bridge that allows it
to remain closed to marine traffic for a
two and a half hour-period, after the
3:30 p.m. opening until the 6 p.m.
opening on weekday afternoon
commutes, is necessary and reasonable.
The purpose of this rule is to alleviate
vehicle congestion on SR 22 during
peak afternoon traffic hours and meet
the reasonable needs of recreational
vessels to use the Tchefuncta River.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
As noted above, we received 300
comments on our SNPRM published on
June 14, 2018. Of the comments we
received, 287 were in favor of the
proposed rule, 8 were not in favor of the
proposed rule, and 5 comments were
unclear as to whether or not they were
in favor of the proposed rule.
Nearly all the commenters expressed
general dissatisfaction with the regular
movement of vehicular traffic over the
Madisonville (SR 22) swing span bridge.
Of the 287 comments in favor of the two
and one-half afternoon closure period
during weekday afternoon commutes,
120 commenters requested that the
Coast Guard also consider a morning
weekday closure; another 42 of the 287
commenters requested that the Coast
Guard extend the period between all
openings from a half hour to an hour;
and another 30 requested that the Coast
Guard extend the two and one-half hour
afternoon closure to accommodate
either earlier school traffic patterns or a
longer rush hour period into the
evening. Although the Coast Guard
understands the commenters’ wellstated concerns for requiring additional
closures and fewer openings, the Coast
Guard is in need of data upon which to
propose such changes. At this time, the
Coast Guard believes that there is
insufficient objective evidence that
making the schedule more restrictive to
vessels would result in a corresponding
alleviation in the traffic congestion.
In particular, some commenters in
support of the change claimed that
recreational vessel use of the Tchefunta
River, rather than commercial use, is
insufficient use of the waterway to
warrant a disproportionate
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:53 Oct 24, 2018
Jkt 247001
inconvenience to motorists travelling on
SR 22. However, a greater number of
commenters also acknowledged that the
opening of the drawbridge may not be
the only factor causing the vehicular
congestion, and that even closing the
drawbridge entirely may not
permanently solve the motorists’ delay.
The commenters pointed to the recent
population increase in the area, the fact
that SR 22 is one of only two routes over
the Tchefunta River in the area, and the
location of a traffic light less than 500
feet from the drawbridge as factors
indicating that a land-based traffic
management solution may be necessary.
Some commenters recommended
widening SR 22, replacing the swingspan bridge with a fixed bridge,
adjusting the schedule of the nearby
traffic light, or creating a circle pattern
at the SR 22 and SR 21/SR 1077
intersection. We have forwarded those
comments to LA–DOTD.
Of the 8 comments not in favor of the
rule, most stated that the current
schedule was acceptable and opposed
any further restriction on bridge
openings for vessels. In particular, some
of the 8 commenters stated that
waterways should take priority over
roadways and echoed the abovementioned statements that vessel traffic
is not the cause of the motorists’ delay,
citing the increase in vehicular traffic
and expressing an unwillingness to
accommodate the local population
increase. None of the commenters
against the proposed afternoon closure
presented an alternate closure period or
presented any facts or data indicating
that the recreational vessels could not
adjust their transits according to the
new schedule. In particular, one
commenter expressed concern that the
schedule would unnecessarily restrict
tax-paying vessel owners from taking
evening sunset cruises from November
to February. While the Coast Guard
understands that this schedule change
will impact evening vessel transits, the
impact will only be during weeknights,
when vehicular traffic is heaviest, and
the weekend schedule will provide
flexibility for vessels requiring evening
openings.
In addition, some commenters in
favor of the rule expressed a
misunderstanding as to the way the
Coast Guard regulates drawbridges and
their operation generally. As a
preliminary matter, all drawbridges
open ‘‘on signal,’’ which means that
drawbridges must open promptly and
fully for the passage of vessels when a
request or signal to open is given in
accordance with 33 CFR 117.15. In other
words, even at the scheduled times in
the regulation, the drawbridge does not
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53811
open unless a vessel actually signals for
an opening. Moreover, vessels may not
signal for a drawbridge opening if the
vertical clearance is sufficient to allow
a vessel, after all lowerable
nonstructural vessel appurtenances that
are not essential to navigation have been
lowered, to safely pass under the
drawbridge in the closed position.
Accordingly, the Coast Guard may
assess penalties for the unnecessary
opening of the draw. Finally, at least 6
commenters expressed concern overs
delays of emergency medical vehicles.
The Coast Guard regulations in 33 CFR
117.31 already address this issue,
requiring that the drawtender make all
reasonable efforts to close the draw
when the emergency vehicle arrives.
Nor did the Coast Guard receive
comments from any police, fire, or
emergency medical service providers
that indicated concern with this
regulation specific to their needs. In
sum, the regulatory framework already
provides: (1) That drawbridges do not
open unless signaled by a vessel; (2) that
vessels may be penalized for requesting
unnecessary openings; and (3) that the
drawbridge should close for emergency
vehicles.
The Coast Guard thanks all
commenters for their participation in
this rulemaking. After considering all of
the 300 comments we received, the
Coast Guard believes that the SNPRM’s
proposed schedule adopting a two and
half-hour closure period for weeknight
afternoon commutes will meet the
reasonable needs of vessel traffic on the
Tchefuncta River. Accordingly, there are
no changes in the regulatory text of this
rule from the proposed rule in the
SNPRM.
V. Discussion of Final Rule
This final rule changes the
Madisonville (SR 22) swing span bridge
operating schedule and allows the
bridge to remain closed to marine traffic
at the scheduled openings at 4 p.m.,
4:30 p.m., 5 p.m., and 5:30 p.m. Monday
through Friday except Federal holidays.
Vessels may request an opening at 3:30
p.m., and again at 6 p.m. This allows
vehicles to travel along SR 22 near
Madisonville, LA unimpeded by bridge
openings for a two and a half hour
period during the afternoon commute.
There are no other proposed changes to
the operating schedule. The regulatory
text appears at the end of this
document.
VI. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM
25OCR1
53812
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 207 / Thursday, October 25, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
based on these statutes and Executive
orders and we discuss First Amendment
rights of protestors.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on a reduction of commercial
vessel traffic on this waterway, and the
recreational powerboats and sailboats
that routinely transit the bridge under
the schedule. Those vessels with a
vertical clearance requirement of less
than 6.2 feet above mean high water
may transit the bridge at any time, and
the bridge will open in case of
emergency at any time. This regulatory
action takes into account the reasonable
needs of vessel and vehicular traffic.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
from the Small Business Administration
on the November 4, 2016 NPRM. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the bridge
may be small entities, for the reasons
stated in section V.A above, this rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:53 Oct 24, 2018
Jkt 247001
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule does not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
change to the operating schedule of a
drawbridge. It is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
L49 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
Rev. 01. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
■
2. Revise § 117.500 to read as follows:
§ 117.500
Tchefuncta River.
The draw of the S22 Bridge, mile 2.5,
at Madisonville, LA shall open on signal
from 7 p.m. to 6 a.m. From 6 a.m. to 7
p.m. the draw need only open on the
hour and half hour, except that:
(a) From 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. Monday
through Friday except federal holidays
the draw need only open on the hour;
and
E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM
25OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 207 / Thursday, October 25, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
(b) From 4 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. Monday
through Friday except federal holidays
the draw need not open.
Dated: October 22, 2018.
Paul F. Thomas,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2018–23367 Filed 10–24–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2018–0974]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Middle River, Between Bacon Island
and Lower Jones Tract, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of deviation from
drawbridge regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard has issued a
temporary deviation from the operating
schedule that governs the San Joaquin
County (Bacon Island Road) highway
bridge across Middle River, mile 8.6,
between Bacon Island and Lower Jones
Tract, CA. The deviation is necessary
due to a scheduled public utility power
outage, resulting in no power to the
bridge. This deviation allows the bridge
to remain in the closed-to-navigation
position.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
8 a.m. through 6 p.m. on November 3,
2018.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
deviation, USCG–2018–0974, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Type the docket number in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
deviation, call or email Carl T. Hausner,
Chief, Bridge Section, Eleventh Coast
Guard District; telephone 510–437–
3516, email Carl.T.Hausner@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The San
Joaquin County Department of Public
Works has requested a temporary
change to the operation of the San
Joaquin County (Bacon Island Road)
highway bridge, across Middle River,
mile 8.6, between Bacon Island and
Lower Jones Tract, CA. The drawbridge
navigation span provides a vertical
clearance of 8 feet above Mean High
Water in the closed-to-navigation
position. The draw operates as required
by 33 CFR 117.171(a). Navigation on the
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:53 Oct 24, 2018
Jkt 247001
waterway is commercial and
recreational.
The drawspan will be secured in the
closed-to-navigation position from 8
a.m. to 6 p.m. on November 3, 2018, to
allow Pacific Gas & Electric secure
power to the bridge to perform
necessary work on a transformer. This
temporary deviation has been
coordinated with the waterway users.
No objections to the proposed
temporary deviation were raised.
Vessels able to pass through the
bridge in the closed position may do so
at anytime. The bridge will not be able
to open for emergencies. Old River can
be used as an alternate route for vessels
unable to pass through the bridge in the
closed position. The Coast Guard will
also inform the users of the waterway
through our Local and Broadcast
Notices to Mariners of the change in
operating schedule for the bridge so that
vessel operators can arrange their
transits to minimize any impact caused
by the temporary deviation.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the effective period of this
temporary deviation. This deviation
from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
Dated: October 22, 2018.
Carl T. Hausner
District Bridge Chief, Eleventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2018–23368 Filed 10–24–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2018–0972]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Elizabeth River—Eastern Branch,
Norfolk, VA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of deviation from
drawbridge regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard has issued a
temporary deviation from the operating
schedule that governs the Berkley (U.S.
460/S.R. 337) Bridge across the
Elizabeth River—Eastern Branch, mile
0.4, at Norfolk, VA. The deviation is
necessary to allow the bridge to remain
in the closed-to-navigation position to
facilitate testing of the emergency drive
motors.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
2:30 a.m. to 6 a.m. on October 28, 2018.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53813
The docket for this
deviation, [USCG–2018–0972], is
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Type the docket number in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH’’.
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation.
ADDRESSES:
If
you have questions on this temporary
deviation, call or email Mr. Mickey
Sanders, Bridge Administration Branch
Fifth District, Coast Guard; telephone
(757) 398–6587, email
Mickey.D.Sanders2@uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The
Virginia Department of Transportation,
who owns and operates the Berkley
(U.S. 460/S.R. 337) Bridge across the
Elizabeth River—Eastern Branch, mile
0.4, at Norfolk, VA, has requested a
temporary deviation from the current
operating regulation set out in 33 CFR
117.1007(b), to facilitate testing of the
emergency drive motor on both spans of
the bridge.
Under this temporary deviation, the
bridge will remain in the closed-tonavigation position from 2:30 a.m. to 6
a.m. on October 28, 2018. The
drawbridge has two spans, each with
double-leaf bascule draws, and both
spans have a vertical clearance in the
closed-to-navigation position of 48 feet
above mean high water.
The Elizabeth River—Eastern Branch
is transited by recreational vessels, tug
and barge traffic, fishing vessels, and
small commercial vessels. The Coast
Guard has carefully considered the
nature and volume of vessel traffic on
the waterway in publishing this
temporary deviation.
Vessels able to pass through the
bridges in the closed position may do so
at any time. The bridge spans will not
be able to open in case of an emergency
and there is no immediate alternate
route for vessels to pass. The Coast
Guard will also inform the users of the
waterway through our Local Notice and
Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the
change in operating schedule for the
bridge so that vessel operators can
arrange their transits to minimize any
impact caused by the temporary
deviation.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the effective period of this
temporary deviation. This deviation
from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM
25OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 207 (Thursday, October 25, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53810-53813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-23367]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2016-0963]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Tchefuncta River, Madisonville,
LA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is changing the operating schedule that
governs the State Route 22 Bridge (Madisonville (SR 22) swing span
bridge) across the Tchefuncta River, mile 2.5, at Madisonville, St.
Tammany Parish, Louisiana. This action is necessary to relieve
vehicular traffic congestion along SR 22 near Madisonville, LA during
peak, afternoon traffic periods on weekdays.
DATES: This rule is effective November 26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov. Type USCG-
2016-0963 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule,
call or email Mr. Doug Blakemore, Eighth Coast Guard District Bridge
Administrator; telephone (504) 671-2128, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
LA-DOTD Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
SNPRM Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
This final rule changes the operating schedule that governs the
State Route 22 Bridge (Madisonville (SR 22) swing span bridge) across
the Tchefuncta River, mile 2.5, at Madisonville.
The Madisonville (SR 22) swing span bridge has a vertical clearance
of 6.2 feet above Mean High Water in the closed-to-navigation position
and unlimited clearance in the open-to-navigation position. The bridge
cycle time for an opening is approximately six minutes. Because the
largest commercial facility upstream of the bridge is no longer in
service, navigation on the Tchefuncta River consists primarily of
recreational traffic. The drawbridge is regulated under 33 CFR 117.500.
Currently, on both weekdays and weekends during daytime hours from 6
a.m. through 7 p.m., the draw opens on signal every half hour, and
during nighttime hours from 7 p.m. through 6 a.m., it opens on signal.
However, the current regulation provides that on weekdays Monday
through Friday except federal holidays, the draw only opens once an
hour during peak vehicular traffic periods in the morning and
afternoon, between 6 a.m. and 9 a.m. and between 4 p.m. and 7 p.m.
In 2016, the bridge owner, Louisiana Department of Transportation
and Development (LA-DOTD), requested a change to the bridge's operating
schedule to relieve vehicular traffic congestion along SR 22 near
Madisonville, LA. LA-DOTD's regulation change request had three
components. First, it requested that the Coast Guard extend the daytime
openings from half-hour intervals to hourly intervals on both weekdays
and on weekends. Second, it requested that the bridge stay closed at 8
a.m. on weekdays. Third, it requested that the bridge stay closed at 5
p.m. and 6 p.m. on weekdays. In other words, generally speaking, LA-
DOTD requested that during daytime hours on both weekdays and weekends,
the bridge would open hourly, except that during weekday morning and
afternoon vehicular commuting times, the bridge would be closed for a
two-hour period in the morning and three-hour period in the afternoon.
In November of 2016, the Coast Guard issued a 180-day test
deviation allowing the LA-DOTD to adopt the proposed schedule for the
purpose of facilitating a study of vehicular traffic flow over the
bridge as it related to a four way stop sign and traffic light at the
intersection of SR 22 and SR 21 and its proposed schedule.\1\ At the
same time, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) requesting public comments on adopting the proposed change.\2\
We did not receive any comments on the temporary deviation or the NPRM.
In 2017, LA-DOTD conducted a traffic study and replaced the four-way
stop sign at the intersection of SR 22 and SR 21/SR 1077 with a traffic
light. The test deviation expired on May 18, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Tchefuncta River,
Madisonville, LA (81 FR 76866).
\2\ Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Tchefuncta River,
Madisonville, LA (81 FR 76889).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On June 14, 2018, the Coast Guard published a supplemental notice
of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) titled Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Tchefuncta River, Madisonville, LA (83 FR 27732). The SNPRM contained a
detailed regulatory history of this rule and explained our review of
LA-DOTD's request in light of the study. The Coast Guard determined
that the study did not support all of LA-DOTD's requested changes, but
that there was a potential correlation between traffic congestion and
bridge openings on weekday afternoons and that a regulation change may
alleviate vehicular traffic while also providing for the reasonable
needs of navigation. The SNPRM proposed to change the bridge operating
schedule and allow the bridge to remain closed to marine traffic at the
scheduled weekday openings at 4 p.m., 4:30 p.m., 5 p.m. and 5:30 p.m.
Monday through Friday except federal holidays. The proposed change
would allow vehicles to travel along SR 22
[[Page 53811]]
unimpeded by bridge openings for a two and a half-hour period during
the weekday afternoon commute. During the comment period that ended on
July 16, 2018, we received 300 comments.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority 33 U.S.C. 499.
The Eighth Coast Guard District Commander has determined that this
change to the operating schedule of the Madisonville (SR 22) swing span
bridge that allows it to remain closed to marine traffic for a two and
a half hour-period, after the 3:30 p.m. opening until the 6 p.m.
opening on weekday afternoon commutes, is necessary and reasonable. The
purpose of this rule is to alleviate vehicle congestion on SR 22 during
peak afternoon traffic hours and meet the reasonable needs of
recreational vessels to use the Tchefuncta River.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule
As noted above, we received 300 comments on our SNPRM published on
June 14, 2018. Of the comments we received, 287 were in favor of the
proposed rule, 8 were not in favor of the proposed rule, and 5 comments
were unclear as to whether or not they were in favor of the proposed
rule.
Nearly all the commenters expressed general dissatisfaction with
the regular movement of vehicular traffic over the Madisonville (SR 22)
swing span bridge. Of the 287 comments in favor of the two and one-half
afternoon closure period during weekday afternoon commutes, 120
commenters requested that the Coast Guard also consider a morning
weekday closure; another 42 of the 287 commenters requested that the
Coast Guard extend the period between all openings from a half hour to
an hour; and another 30 requested that the Coast Guard extend the two
and one-half hour afternoon closure to accommodate either earlier
school traffic patterns or a longer rush hour period into the evening.
Although the Coast Guard understands the commenters' well-stated
concerns for requiring additional closures and fewer openings, the
Coast Guard is in need of data upon which to propose such changes. At
this time, the Coast Guard believes that there is insufficient
objective evidence that making the schedule more restrictive to vessels
would result in a corresponding alleviation in the traffic congestion.
In particular, some commenters in support of the change claimed
that recreational vessel use of the Tchefunta River, rather than
commercial use, is insufficient use of the waterway to warrant a
disproportionate inconvenience to motorists travelling on SR 22.
However, a greater number of commenters also acknowledged that the
opening of the drawbridge may not be the only factor causing the
vehicular congestion, and that even closing the drawbridge entirely may
not permanently solve the motorists' delay. The commenters pointed to
the recent population increase in the area, the fact that SR 22 is one
of only two routes over the Tchefunta River in the area, and the
location of a traffic light less than 500 feet from the drawbridge as
factors indicating that a land-based traffic management solution may be
necessary. Some commenters recommended widening SR 22, replacing the
swing-span bridge with a fixed bridge, adjusting the schedule of the
nearby traffic light, or creating a circle pattern at the SR 22 and SR
21/SR 1077 intersection. We have forwarded those comments to LA-DOTD.
Of the 8 comments not in favor of the rule, most stated that the
current schedule was acceptable and opposed any further restriction on
bridge openings for vessels. In particular, some of the 8 commenters
stated that waterways should take priority over roadways and echoed the
above-mentioned statements that vessel traffic is not the cause of the
motorists' delay, citing the increase in vehicular traffic and
expressing an unwillingness to accommodate the local population
increase. None of the commenters against the proposed afternoon closure
presented an alternate closure period or presented any facts or data
indicating that the recreational vessels could not adjust their
transits according to the new schedule. In particular, one commenter
expressed concern that the schedule would unnecessarily restrict tax-
paying vessel owners from taking evening sunset cruises from November
to February. While the Coast Guard understands that this schedule
change will impact evening vessel transits, the impact will only be
during weeknights, when vehicular traffic is heaviest, and the weekend
schedule will provide flexibility for vessels requiring evening
openings.
In addition, some commenters in favor of the rule expressed a
misunderstanding as to the way the Coast Guard regulates drawbridges
and their operation generally. As a preliminary matter, all drawbridges
open ``on signal,'' which means that drawbridges must open promptly and
fully for the passage of vessels when a request or signal to open is
given in accordance with 33 CFR 117.15. In other words, even at the
scheduled times in the regulation, the drawbridge does not open unless
a vessel actually signals for an opening. Moreover, vessels may not
signal for a drawbridge opening if the vertical clearance is sufficient
to allow a vessel, after all lowerable nonstructural vessel
appurtenances that are not essential to navigation have been lowered,
to safely pass under the drawbridge in the closed position.
Accordingly, the Coast Guard may assess penalties for the unnecessary
opening of the draw. Finally, at least 6 commenters expressed concern
overs delays of emergency medical vehicles. The Coast Guard regulations
in 33 CFR 117.31 already address this issue, requiring that the
drawtender make all reasonable efforts to close the draw when the
emergency vehicle arrives. Nor did the Coast Guard receive comments
from any police, fire, or emergency medical service providers that
indicated concern with this regulation specific to their needs. In sum,
the regulatory framework already provides: (1) That drawbridges do not
open unless signaled by a vessel; (2) that vessels may be penalized for
requesting unnecessary openings; and (3) that the drawbridge should
close for emergency vehicles.
The Coast Guard thanks all commenters for their participation in
this rulemaking. After considering all of the 300 comments we received,
the Coast Guard believes that the SNPRM's proposed schedule adopting a
two and half-hour closure period for weeknight afternoon commutes will
meet the reasonable needs of vessel traffic on the Tchefuncta River.
Accordingly, there are no changes in the regulatory text of this rule
from the proposed rule in the SNPRM.
V. Discussion of Final Rule
This final rule changes the Madisonville (SR 22) swing span bridge
operating schedule and allows the bridge to remain closed to marine
traffic at the scheduled openings at 4 p.m., 4:30 p.m., 5 p.m., and
5:30 p.m. Monday through Friday except Federal holidays. Vessels may
request an opening at 3:30 p.m., and again at 6 p.m. This allows
vehicles to travel along SR 22 near Madisonville, LA unimpeded by
bridge openings for a two and a half hour period during the afternoon
commute. There are no other proposed changes to the operating schedule.
The regulatory text appears at the end of this document.
VI. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
[[Page 53812]]
based on these statutes and Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on a reduction of
commercial vessel traffic on this waterway, and the recreational
powerboats and sailboats that routinely transit the bridge under the
schedule. Those vessels with a vertical clearance requirement of less
than 6.2 feet above mean high water may transit the bridge at any time,
and the bridge will open in case of emergency at any time. This
regulatory action takes into account the reasonable needs of vessel and
vehicular traffic.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on the November 4, 2016 NPRM. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
bridge may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A
above, this rule would not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule does not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule would not result
in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule involves a change to the operating schedule of a drawbridge. It is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L49 of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01.
We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 117.500 to read as follows:
Sec. 117.500 Tchefuncta River.
The draw of the S22 Bridge, mile 2.5, at Madisonville, LA shall
open on signal from 7 p.m. to 6 a.m. From 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. the draw
need only open on the hour and half hour, except that:
(a) From 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. Monday through Friday except federal
holidays the draw need only open on the hour; and
[[Page 53813]]
(b) From 4 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. Monday through Friday except federal
holidays the draw need not open.
Dated: October 22, 2018.
Paul F. Thomas,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2018-23367 Filed 10-24-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P