Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries Off West Coast States; Tribal Usual and Accustomed Fishing Areas, 53827-53828 [2018-23290]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 207 / Thursday, October 25, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
single-year adjustment to the
commercial ACT will be made, in the
following fishing year. The ACT will be
reduced by the exact amount, in
pounds, of the product of the overage,
defined as the difference between the
commercial catch and the commercial
ACT, and the payback coefficient. The
payback coefficient is the difference
between the most recent estimate of
biomass and BMSY (i.e., BMSY¥B)
divided by one-half of BMSY.
(iii) If biomass is above BMSY. If the
most recent estimate of biomass is above
BMSY (i.e., B/BMSY is greater than 1.0),
then no single-year AM payback is
required.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 648.123, paragraph (b) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 648.123
Scup accountability measures.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Non-landing accountability
measure. In the event that the
commercial ACL has been exceeded and
the overage has not been accommodated
through the landings-based AM, then
the following procedure will be
followed:
(1) Overfishing, rebuilding, or
unknown stock status. If the most recent
estimate of biomass is below the BMSY
threshold (i.e., B/BMSY is less than 0.5),
the stock is under a rebuilding plan, or
the biological reference points (B or
BMSY) are unknown, and the commercial
ACL has been exceeded, then the exact
amount, in pounds, by which the most
recent year’s commercial catch estimate
exceeded the most recent year’s
commercial ACL will be deducted, in
the following fishing year from the
commercial ACT, as a single-year
adjustment.
(2) If biomass is above the threshold,
but below the target, and the stock is not
under rebuilding. If the most recent
estimate of biomass is above the
biomass threshold (B/BMSY is greater
than 0.5), but below the biomass target
(B/BMSY is less than 1.0), and the stock
is not under a rebuilding plan, then the
following AMs will apply:
(i) If the Commercial ACL has been
exceeded, but not the overall ABC, then
no single-year AM payback is required.
(ii) If the Commercial ACL and ABC
have been exceeded, then a scaled
single-year adjustment to the
commercial ACT will be made, in the
following fishing year. The ACT will be
reduced by the exact amount, in
pounds, of the product of the overage,
defined as the difference between the
commercial catch and the commercial
ACT, and the payback coefficient. The
payback coefficient is the difference
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:53 Oct 24, 2018
Jkt 247001
between the most recent estimate of
biomass and BMSY (i.e., BMSY¥B)
divided by one-half of BMSY.
(3) If biomass is above BMSY. If the
most recent estimate of biomass is above
BMSY (i.e., B/BMSY is greater than 1.0),
then no single-year AM payback is
required.
*
*
*
*
*
4. In § 648.143, paragraph (b) is
revised to read as follows:
■
§ 648.143 Black sea bass accountability
measures
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Non-landing accountability
measure. In the event that the
commercial ACL has been exceeded and
the overage has not been accommodated
through the landings-based AM, then
the following procedure will be
followed:
(1) Overfishing, rebuilding, or
unknown stock status. If the most recent
estimate of biomass is below the BMSY
threshold (i.e., B/BMSY is less than 0.5),
the stock is under a rebuilding plan, or
the biological reference points (B or
BMSY) are unknown, and the commercial
ACL has been exceeded, then the exact
amount, in pounds, by which the most
recent year’s commercial catch estimate
exceeded the most recent year’s
commercial ACL will be deducted, in
the following fishing year from the
commercial ACT, as a single-year
adjustment.
(2) If biomass is above the threshold,
but below the target, and the stock is not
under rebuilding. If the most recent
estimate of biomass is above the
biomass threshold (B/BMSY is greater
than 0.5), but below the biomass target
(B/BMSY is less than 1.0), and the stock
is not under a rebuilding plan, then the
following AMs will apply:
(i) If the Commercial ACL has been
exceeded, but not the overall ABC, then
no single-year AM payback is required.
(ii) If the Commercial ACL and ABC
have been exceeded, then a scaled
single-year adjustment to the
commercial ACT will be made, in the
following fishing year. The ACT will be
reduced by the exact amount, in
pounds, of the product of the overage,
defined as the difference between the
commercial catch and the commercial
ACT, and the payback coefficient. The
payback coefficient is the difference
between the most recent estimate of
biomass and BMSY (i.e., BMSY¥B)
divided by one-half of BMSY.
(3) If biomass is above BMSY. If the
most recent estimate of biomass is above
BMSY (i.e., B/BMSY is greater than 1.0),
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53827
then no single-year AM payback is
required.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–23289 Filed 10–24–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 180531512–8512–01]
RIN 0648–BH97
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
Fisheries Off West Coast States; Tribal
Usual and Accustomed Fishing Areas
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule implements
the decision in United States v.
Washington, 2:09–sp–00001–RSM,
(W.D. Wash. March 5, 2018) (Order
Regarding Boundaries of Quinault and
Quileute U&As), which revised the
western boundaries of the usual and
accustomed (U&A) fishing areas of the
Quileute Indian Tribe and Quinault
Indian Nation.
DATES: This final rule is effective
October 25, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Information relevant to this
final rule is available from Aja Szumylo,
West Coast Region, NMFS, 7600 Sand
Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115–0070.
SUMMARY:
Electronic Access
This rule is accessible via the internet
at the Office of the Federal Register
website at https://www.federalregister.
gov. Background information and
documents are available at the NMFS
West Coast Region website at https://
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathryn Blair, phone: 503–231–6858,
fax: 503–231–6893, or email:
kathryn.blair@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Regulations at 50 CFR 660.4 describe
the usual and accustomed fishing areas
of Indian tribes with treaty fishing rights
to species managed under the
Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act). Those
regulations explain that boundaries of a
tribe’s fishing area may be revised as
E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM
25OCR1
53828
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 207 / Thursday, October 25, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
ordered by a Federal Court. 50 CFR
660.4(a).
On March 5, 2018, the United States
District Court for the Western District of
Washington revised the western
boundaries of the U&A fishing areas for
the Quileute Indian Tribe and the
Quinault Indian Nation. United States v.
Washington, 2:09–sp–00001–RSM,
(W.D. Wash. March 5, 2018) (Order
Regarding Boundaries of Quinault and
Quileute U&As). These revised
boundaries mirror the coast of the
Washington shoreline at a distance of 40
miles for the Quileute Indian Tribe and
30 miles for the Quinault Indian Nation.
Other boundaries and their supporting
rationale described in previous
rulemakings on the U&A fishing areas
are not affected by this rulemaking.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Classification
The Regional Administrator, West
Coast Region, NMFS, determined that
the regulatory amendments associated
with the court-ordered changes to tribal
U&A fishing areas, which this final rule
implements, are necessary for
conservation and management and are
consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens
Act and other applicable laws.
NMFS finds good cause to waive prior
public notice and comment on the
revisions to regulations in this final rule
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) because notice
and comment would be impracticable
and contrary to the public interest.
Affording the time necessary for notice
and comment rulemaking for these
changes to regulations is impracticable
and contrary to the public interest
because the U.S. District Court has
issued its final judgment and the
boundaries adjudicated by the court are
controlling. NMFS regulations must be
modified consistent with the court order
as quickly as possible to bring them into
compliance with the legal requirements.
It is further necessary to act quickly to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:53 Oct 24, 2018
Jkt 247001
modify the tribal U&A fishing area
boundaries in Title 50, part 660, to
prevent the confusion that arises out of
conflicting boundaries, which adds
complexity to the management regime
and creates problems for state and
Federal management and enforcement.
Furthermore, NMFS is not exercising
any discretion in issuing this rule, but
only making the changes necessary to
comply with the court order. For the
same reasons, NMFS also finds good
cause to waive the 30-day delay in
effectiveness under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866.
This final rule is not an Executive
Order 13771 regulatory action because
this action is not significant under
Executive Order 12866.
Because prior notice and opportunity
for public comment are not required for
this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other
law, the analytical requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq., are inapplicable.
This final rule does not contain
policies with federalism or ‘‘takings’’
implications as those terms are defined
in E.O. 13132 and E.O. 12630,
respectively.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Fisheries, Fishing, Indian Fisheries.
Dated: October 19, 2018.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is amended
as follows:
PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST
COAST STATES
1. The authority citation for part 660
continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C.
773 et seq., and 16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
2. In § 660.4, revise paragraphs (a)(2)
and (4) to read as follows:
■
§ 660.4 Usual and accustomed fishing
areas for Pacific Coast treaty Indian tribes.
(a) * * *
(2) Quileute. The area commencing at
Cape Alava, located at 48°10′00″ N lat.,
124°43′56.9″ W long.; then proceeding
west approximately forty nautical miles
at that latitude to a northwestern point
located at 48°10′00″ N lat., 125°44′00″ W
long.; then proceeding in a southeasterly
direction mirroring the coastline at a
distance no farther than forty nautical
miles from the mainland Pacific coast
shoreline at any line of latitude, to a
southwestern point at 47°31′42″ N lat.,
125°20′26″ W long.; then proceeding
east along that line of latitude to the
Pacific coast shoreline at 47°31′42″ N
lat., 124°21′9.0″ W long.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Quinault. The area commencing at
the Pacific coast shoreline near
Destruction Island, located at 47°40′06″
N lat., 124°23′51.362″ W long.; then
proceeding west approximately thirty
nautical miles at that latitude to a
northwestern point located at 47°40′06″
N lat., 125°08′30″ W long.; then
proceeding in a southeasterly direction
mirroring the coastline no farther than
thirty nautical miles from the mainland
Pacific coast shoreline at any line of
latitude, to a southwestern point at
46°53′18″ N lat., 124°53′53″ W long.;
then proceeding east along that line of
latitude to the Pacific coast shoreline at
46°53′18″ N lat., 124°7′36.6″ W long.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–23290 Filed 10–24–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM
25OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 207 (Thursday, October 25, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53827-53828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-23290]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 180531512-8512-01]
RIN 0648-BH97
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Tribal Usual and Accustomed Fishing Areas
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule implements the decision in United States v.
Washington, 2:09-sp-00001-RSM, (W.D. Wash. March 5, 2018) (Order
Regarding Boundaries of Quinault and Quileute U&As), which revised the
western boundaries of the usual and accustomed (U&A) fishing areas of
the Quileute Indian Tribe and Quinault Indian Nation.
DATES: This final rule is effective October 25, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Information relevant to this final rule is available from
Aja Szumylo, West Coast Region, NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle,
WA 98115-0070.
Electronic Access
This rule is accessible via the internet at the Office of the
Federal Register website at https://www.federalregister.gov. Background
information and documents are available at the NMFS West Coast Region
website at https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathryn Blair, phone: 503-231-6858,
fax: 503-231-6893, or email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Regulations at 50 CFR 660.4 describe the usual and accustomed
fishing areas of Indian tribes with treaty fishing rights to species
managed under the Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). Those regulations explain that
boundaries of a tribe's fishing area may be revised as
[[Page 53828]]
ordered by a Federal Court. 50 CFR 660.4(a).
On March 5, 2018, the United States District Court for the Western
District of Washington revised the western boundaries of the U&A
fishing areas for the Quileute Indian Tribe and the Quinault Indian
Nation. United States v. Washington, 2:09-sp-00001-RSM, (W.D. Wash.
March 5, 2018) (Order Regarding Boundaries of Quinault and Quileute
U&As). These revised boundaries mirror the coast of the Washington
shoreline at a distance of 40 miles for the Quileute Indian Tribe and
30 miles for the Quinault Indian Nation. Other boundaries and their
supporting rationale described in previous rulemakings on the U&A
fishing areas are not affected by this rulemaking.
Classification
The Regional Administrator, West Coast Region, NMFS, determined
that the regulatory amendments associated with the court-ordered
changes to tribal U&A fishing areas, which this final rule implements,
are necessary for conservation and management and are consistent with
the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable laws.
NMFS finds good cause to waive prior public notice and comment on
the revisions to regulations in this final rule under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B) because notice and comment would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. Affording the time necessary for
notice and comment rulemaking for these changes to regulations is
impracticable and contrary to the public interest because the U.S.
District Court has issued its final judgment and the boundaries
adjudicated by the court are controlling. NMFS regulations must be
modified consistent with the court order as quickly as possible to
bring them into compliance with the legal requirements. It is further
necessary to act quickly to modify the tribal U&A fishing area
boundaries in Title 50, part 660, to prevent the confusion that arises
out of conflicting boundaries, which adds complexity to the management
regime and creates problems for state and Federal management and
enforcement. Furthermore, NMFS is not exercising any discretion in
issuing this rule, but only making the changes necessary to comply with
the court order. For the same reasons, NMFS also finds good cause to
waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866.
This final rule is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
because this action is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
Because prior notice and opportunity for public comment are not
required for this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other law, the
analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq., are inapplicable.
This final rule does not contain policies with federalism or
``takings'' implications as those terms are defined in E.O. 13132 and
E.O. 12630, respectively.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Fisheries, Fishing, Indian Fisheries.
Dated: October 19, 2018.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is amended
as follows:
PART 660--FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., and 16
U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 660.4, revise paragraphs (a)(2) and (4) to read as follows:
Sec. 660.4 Usual and accustomed fishing areas for Pacific Coast
treaty Indian tribes.
(a) * * *
(2) Quileute. The area commencing at Cape Alava, located at
48[deg]10'00'' N lat., 124[deg]43'56.9'' W long.; then proceeding west
approximately forty nautical miles at that latitude to a northwestern
point located at 48[deg]10'00'' N lat., 125[deg]44'00'' W long.; then
proceeding in a southeasterly direction mirroring the coastline at a
distance no farther than forty nautical miles from the mainland Pacific
coast shoreline at any line of latitude, to a southwestern point at
47[deg]31'42'' N lat., 125[deg]20'26'' W long.; then proceeding east
along that line of latitude to the Pacific coast shoreline at
47[deg]31'42'' N lat., 124[deg]21'9.0'' W long.
* * * * *
(4) Quinault. The area commencing at the Pacific coast shoreline
near Destruction Island, located at 47[deg]40'06'' N lat.,
124[deg]23'51.362'' W long.; then proceeding west approximately thirty
nautical miles at that latitude to a northwestern point located at
47[deg]40'06'' N lat., 125[deg]08'30'' W long.; then proceeding in a
southeasterly direction mirroring the coastline no farther than thirty
nautical miles from the mainland Pacific coast shoreline at any line of
latitude, to a southwestern point at 46[deg]53'18'' N lat.,
124[deg]53'53'' W long.; then proceeding east along that line of
latitude to the Pacific coast shoreline at 46[deg]53'18'' N lat.,
124[deg]7'36.6'' W long.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-23290 Filed 10-24-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P