Safety Zone; NASA Activities, Gulf of Mexico, Galveston, TX, 53023-53026 [2018-22866]
Download as PDF
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 203 / Friday, October 19, 2018 / Proposed Rules
provided to the geographic Combatant
Commander concerned, the General
Counsel and the Judge Advocate
General of the Military Department
concerned or, in the case of the USMC,
to the General Counsel of the Navy and
the Staff Judge Advocate to the
Commandant of the Marine Corps, or, in
the case of the Coast Guard, the Judge
Advocate General of the Coast Guard,
and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff.
(c) Counsel fees and related
assistance for U.S. personnel not subject
to the UCMJ. In cases of exceptional
interest to the Military Department
concerned or the Department of
Homeland Security involving nonmilitary DoD personnel, the Secretary of
that Military Department or the
Secretary of Homeland Security may
approve, pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 1037,
under the following circumstances:
(1) Criminal cases. Requests for the
provision of counsel fees and payment
of expenses in criminal cases may be
approved in pre-trial, trial, appellate,
and post-trial proceedings in any
criminal case where:
(i) The sentence that is normally
imposed includes confinement, whether
or not such sentence is suspended;
(ii) Capital punishment might be
imposed;
(iii) An appeal is made from any
proceeding in which there appears to
have been a denial of the substantial
rights of the accused;
(iv) The case, although not within the
criteria established in paragraphs
(c)(1)(i) through (c)(1)(iii) of this section,
is considered to have significant impact
on U.S. interests, including upon the
relations of the Armed Forces with the
host country.
(2) Civil cases. Requests for provision
of counsel fees and payment of expenses
in civil cases may be granted in trial and
appellate proceedings in civil cases
where the case is considered to have a
significant impact on the relations of the
Armed Forces with the host country; or
in cases brought against eligible nonmilitary DoD personnel (and in
exceptional cases, by such personnel) if
the case is considered to involve any
other U.S. interest.
(3) Funding restrictions. (i) No funds
will be provided under this part in cases
where the U.S. Government is—in
actuality or in legal effect—the plaintiff
or the defendant; all such cases shall be
referred to the Department of Justice,
Office of Foreign Litigation. No funds
will be provided under this part in cases
where the non-military DoD personnel
member is a plaintiff without prior
authorization of the Secretary of the
Military Department concerned or the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Oct 18, 2018
Jkt 247001
Secretary of Homeland Security. The
provisions of this paragraph also are
applicable to proceedings with civil
aspects that are brought by eligible
personnel as criminal cases in
accordance with local law. Funds for
the posting of bail or bond to secure the
release of non-military DoD personnel
from confinement will be used as
provided by applicable Armed Force
regulations.
(ii) No funds will be provided under
paragraph (c)(2) of this section to a
plaintiff who, if successful, will receive
an award, in whole or in part, from the
United States.
(iii) As provided for in 10 U.S.C.
1037, a person on whose behalf a
payment is made under this provision is
not liable to reimburse the United States
for that payment, unless he or she is
responsible for the forfeiture of bail
provided for him or her under this
provision.
(d) Treatment of dependents confined
in foreign penal institutions. In
cooperation with the appropriate U.S.
Chief of Mission and to the maximum
extent possible, military commanders
will ensure that dependents of DoD
personnel receive the same treatment,
rights, and support as would be
extended to Armed Forces members
when in the custody of foreign
authorities, or when confined (pretrial
and post-trial) in foreign penal
institutions. Commanders will work
with the appropriate U.S. Chief of
Mission to make appropriate diplomatic
contacts for the categories of dependents
described in this section who are not
U.S. nationals.
(e) Information policy. The general
public and the Congress must be
provided promptly with the maximum
information concerning status of forces
matters that are consistent with the
national interest. Information will be
coordinated and provided to the public
and the Congress in accordance with
established procedures, including those
in DoD Directive 5122.05, ‘‘Assistant
Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs
(ASD(PA))’’ (available at https://
www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/
Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/
512205_dodd_2017.pdf?ver=2017-0807-125832-023), 32 CFR part 286, 32
CFR part 310, and DoD Instruction
5400.04, ‘‘Provision of Information to
Congress’’ (available at https://
www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/
Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/
540004p.pdf).
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
53023
Dated: October 15, 2018.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2018–22752 Filed 10–18–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2018–0962]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; NASA Activities, Gulf of
Mexico, Galveston, TX
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is proposing
to establish a temporary, moving safety
zone for all navigable waters within a
1000-yard radius of the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration’s
(NASA’s) crew module uprighting
system test article while it is being
tested in the territorial waters of the
Gulf of Mexico off the coast of
Galveston, TX. The safety zone is
necessary to protect persons, vessels,
and the marine environment from
potential hazards created by vessels and
equipment engaged in the crew
capsule’s at-sea testing. This proposed
rulemaking would prohibit persons and
vessels from being in the safety zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Sector Houston-Galveston or a
designated representative. We invite
your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before November 5, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2018–0962 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
Collin Sykes, Eighth Coast Guard
District, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
504–671–2119, email Collin.T.Sykes@
uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19OCP1.SGM
19OCP1
53024
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 203 / Friday, October 19, 2018 / Proposed Rules
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CMUS Crew module uprighting system
COTP Captain of the Port Sector HoustonGalveston
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NASA National Aeronautics and Space
Administration
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
The National Aeronautics and Space
Administration’s (NASA’s) Orion
program is evaluating an updated design
to the crew module uprighting system
(CMUS), the system of five airbags on
top of the crew capsule that inflate upon
splashdown. NASA tested the CMUS at
the Neutral Buoyancy Lab at NASA’s
Johnson Space Center in Houston, and
requested Coast Guard support for the
at-sea uprighting tests. The at-sea testing
will involve numerous surface vessels,
divers, and remote-operated submarine
vehicles, and features a rapid rotation of
the Orion test article in a confined area
and partially controlled environment.
Due to the complexity of the test and
proximity of the participants,
unauthorized access by persons or
vessels outside the scope of the test
present a significant hazard to human
life, vessels, and government property.
The Captain of the Port Sector HoustonGalveston (COTP) has determined that
this rule is needed to protect persons,
vessels, and the marine environment on
the navigable waters within the safety
zone during the test.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of persons, vessels,
and the marine environment on the
navigable waters within a 1000-yard
radius of the CMUS test article before,
during, and after the scheduled testing
activities.
The Coast Guard is issuing this notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with a
15-day prior notice and opportunity to
comment pursuant to section (b)(3) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
(5 U.S.C. 553). Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for publishing this
NPRM with a 15-day comment period
because it is impractical to provide a 30day comment period. It is impracticable
to publish an NPRM with a 30-day
comment period because we must
establish this temporary safety zone by
November 28, 2018. A 15-day comment
period would allow the Coast Guard to
provide for public notice and comment,
but also publish a rule, if adopted, soon
enough that the length of the notice and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Oct 18, 2018
Jkt 247001
comment period does not compromise
public safety.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to establish a
temporary, moving safety zone that
would cover all navigable waters within
1000 yards of NASA’s CMUS test
article, which will be located in the
territorial waters of the Gulf of Mexico
off the coast of Galveston, TX. NASA
anticipates that the testing activities will
take place on approximately three days
during the effective period, during
daylight hours only. The effective
period of this proposed rule covers a
nine day window from November 28,
2018 through December 6, 2018, to
allow for scheduling delays due to
inclement weather or technical
difficulties. On each of the
approximately three days that the
proposed rule would be enforced, the
enforcement periods would begin
approximately 2 hours before testing
activities and last until approximately 2
hours after the testing activities. The
COTP or a designated representative
would inform the public through
Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNMs),
Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs), and/
or Marine Safety Information Bulletins
(MSIBs), and/or other means of public
notice, as appropriate, at least 3 hours
in advance of each enforcement period.
Such notice of enforcement would also
include more specific information
regarding the location of the CMUS test
article.
The duration of the proposed zone is
intended to protect persons, vessels, and
the marine environment on these
navigable waters during the NASA
testing activities. No vessel or person
would be permitted to enter or remain
in the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. A designated
representative is a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel, and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the COTP in
the enforcement of the safety zone. The
Patrol Commander may be contacted on
Channel 16 VHF–FM (156.8 MHz) by
the call sign ‘‘PATCOM’’. Vessels
requiring entry into this safety zone
must request permission from the COTP
or a designated representative. They
may be contacted on VHF–FM Channel
16. All persons and vessels permitted to
enter this safety zone must transit at
their slowest safe speed and comply
with all lawful directions issued by the
COTP or the designated representative.
The COTP or a designated
representative will inform the public of
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the enforcement times, dates, and
locations, for this safety zone through
BNMs, LNMs, and/or MSIBs, as
appropriate. The regulatory text we are
proposing appears at the end of this
document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, and
duration of the safety zone. Vessel
traffic will be able to safely transit
around this safety zone, which would
affect a small, designated area off the
coast of Galveston, TX, outside of the
Houston Ship Channel and safety
fairway during daylight hours on
approximately three days. Moreover, the
Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners via VHF–FM marine
channel 16 about the zone, and the rule
would allow vessels to seek permission
to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the
temporary safety zone may be small
E:\FR\FM\19OCP1.SGM
19OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 203 / Friday, October 19, 2018 / Proposed Rules
entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would
not have a significant economic impact
on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Oct 18, 2018
Jkt 247001
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves a temporary, moving safety
zone that would prohibit entry within
1000 yards of the CMUS test article
during daylight hours on approximately
three days in the Gulf of Mexico.
Normally, such actions are categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table
1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–
001–01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record
of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
53025
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard is proposing
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T08–0962 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T08–0962 Safety Zone; NASA
Activities, Gulf of Mexico, Galveston, TX.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters within
1,000 yards of the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration’s (NASA’s)
crew module uprighting system test
article.
(b) Effective period. This section will
be effective from November 28, 2018
through December 6, 2018.
(c) Enforcement periods. This section
will be enforced on approximately 3
days during the effective period, during
daylight hours. Each period of
E:\FR\FM\19OCP1.SGM
19OCP1
53026
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 203 / Friday, October 19, 2018 / Proposed Rules
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
enforcement will begin approximately 2
hours before testing activities and end
approximately 2 hours after testing
activities. The Captain of the Port Sector
Houston-Galveston (COTP) or a
designated representative will inform
the public of the enforcement through
Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNMs),
Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs), and/
or Marine Safety Information Bulletins
(MSIBs) or other means of public notice
at least 3 hours in advance of the
enforcement of this safety zone. Such
notice of enforcement will also include
more specific information regarding the
location of the CMUS test article.
(d) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, you may not enter the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or a designated representative. A
designated representative is a Coast
Guard Patrol Commander, including a
Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or
other officer operating a Coast Guard
vessel, and a Federal, State, and local
officer designated by or assisting the
COTP) in the enforcement of the safety
zone. The Patrol Commander may be
contacted on Channel 16 VHF–FM
(156.8 MHz) by the call sign
‘‘PATCOM’’.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or a designated
representative by VHF Channel 16.
(3) If granted permission to enter, all
vessels must transit at their slowest safe
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Oct 18, 2018
Jkt 247001
speed and comply with all lawful orders
or directions of the COTP or a
designated representative.
(e) Informational broadcasts. The
COTP or a designated representative
will inform the public through
Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNMs),
Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs), and/
or Marine Safety Information Bulletins
(MSIBs) or other means of public notice
of the enforcement period for the
temporary safety zone as well as any
changes in the dates and times of
enforcement.
Dated: October 16, 2018.
Kevin D. Oditt,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Houston-Galveston.
document in the Federal Register of
September 19, 2018 (83 FR 47325),
regarding a Petition for Reconsideration
(Petition) filed in the Commission’s
rulemaking proceeding. The document
contained the incorrect deadline for
filing replies to an opposition to the
Petition. This document corrects the
deadline for replies to an opposition to
the Petition.
DATES:
October 19, 2018.
Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street SW,
Washington, DC 20554.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2018–22866 Filed 10–18–18; 8:45 am]
Michele Berlove, Wireline Competition
Bureau, at: (202) 418–1477; email:
Michele.Berlove@fcc.gov.
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Correction
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 63
[WC Docket No. 17–84; Report No. 3101]
Petition for Reconsideration of Action
in Rulemaking Proceeding; Correction
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Petition for Reconsideration;
correction.
AGENCY:
The Federal Communications
Commission (Commission) published a
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
In the Federal Register of September
19, 2018, in FR Doc. 2018–20238, on
page 47325, in the third column, and on
page 47326 in the first column, correct
the DATES section to read:
Oppositions to the Petition must
be filed on or before October 4, 2018.
Replies to an opposition must be filed
on or before October 15, 2018.
DATES:
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–22357 Filed 10–18–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\19OCP1.SGM
19OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 203 (Friday, October 19, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 53023-53026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22866]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2018-0962]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; NASA Activities, Gulf of Mexico, Galveston, TX
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a temporary, moving
safety zone for all navigable waters within a 1000-yard radius of the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA's) crew module
uprighting system test article while it is being tested in the
territorial waters of the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Galveston,
TX. The safety zone is necessary to protect persons, vessels, and the
marine environment from potential hazards created by vessels and
equipment engaged in the crew capsule's at-sea testing. This proposed
rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in the safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Houston-
Galveston or a designated representative. We invite your comments on
this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before November 5, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0962 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Collin Sykes, Eighth
Coast Guard District, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 504-671-2119, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 53024]]
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CMUS Crew module uprighting system
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Houston-Galveston
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA's) Orion
program is evaluating an updated design to the crew module uprighting
system (CMUS), the system of five airbags on top of the crew capsule
that inflate upon splashdown. NASA tested the CMUS at the Neutral
Buoyancy Lab at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston, and requested
Coast Guard support for the at-sea uprighting tests. The at-sea testing
will involve numerous surface vessels, divers, and remote-operated
submarine vehicles, and features a rapid rotation of the Orion test
article in a confined area and partially controlled environment. Due to
the complexity of the test and proximity of the participants,
unauthorized access by persons or vessels outside the scope of the test
present a significant hazard to human life, vessels, and government
property. The Captain of the Port Sector Houston-Galveston (COTP) has
determined that this rule is needed to protect persons, vessels, and
the marine environment on the navigable waters within the safety zone
during the test.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of persons,
vessels, and the marine environment on the navigable waters within a
1000-yard radius of the CMUS test article before, during, and after the
scheduled testing activities.
The Coast Guard is issuing this notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) with a 15-day prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant
to section (b)(3) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C.
553). Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for publishing this NPRM with a 15-day comment period
because it is impractical to provide a 30-day comment period. It is
impracticable to publish an NPRM with a 30-day comment period because
we must establish this temporary safety zone by November 28, 2018. A
15-day comment period would allow the Coast Guard to provide for public
notice and comment, but also publish a rule, if adopted, soon enough
that the length of the notice and comment period does not compromise
public safety.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to establish a temporary, moving safety zone
that would cover all navigable waters within 1000 yards of NASA's CMUS
test article, which will be located in the territorial waters of the
Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Galveston, TX. NASA anticipates that
the testing activities will take place on approximately three days
during the effective period, during daylight hours only. The effective
period of this proposed rule covers a nine day window from November 28,
2018 through December 6, 2018, to allow for scheduling delays due to
inclement weather or technical difficulties. On each of the
approximately three days that the proposed rule would be enforced, the
enforcement periods would begin approximately 2 hours before testing
activities and last until approximately 2 hours after the testing
activities. The COTP or a designated representative would inform the
public through Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNMs), Local Notices to
Mariners (LNMs), and/or Marine Safety Information Bulletins (MSIBs),
and/or other means of public notice, as appropriate, at least 3 hours
in advance of each enforcement period. Such notice of enforcement would
also include more specific information regarding the location of the
CMUS test article.
The duration of the proposed zone is intended to protect persons,
vessels, and the marine environment on these navigable waters during
the NASA testing activities. No vessel or person would be permitted to
enter or remain in the safety zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated representative. A designated representative is
a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty
officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel, and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the COTP
in the enforcement of the safety zone. The Patrol Commander may be
contacted on Channel 16 VHF-FM (156.8 MHz) by the call sign ``PATCOM''.
Vessels requiring entry into this safety zone must request permission
from the COTP or a designated representative. They may be contacted on
VHF-FM Channel 16. All persons and vessels permitted to enter this
safety zone must transit at their slowest safe speed and comply with
all lawful directions issued by the COTP or the designated
representative. The COTP or a designated representative will inform the
public of the enforcement times, dates, and locations, for this safety
zone through BNMs, LNMs, and/or MSIBs, as appropriate. The regulatory
text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the safety zone. Vessel traffic will be able
to safely transit around this safety zone, which would affect a small,
designated area off the coast of Galveston, TX, outside of the Houston
Ship Channel and safety fairway during daylight hours on approximately
three days. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the rule
would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
temporary safety zone may be small
[[Page 53025]]
entities, for the reasons stated in section IV.A above, this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary
determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule involves a temporary, moving safety
zone that would prohibit entry within 1000 yards of the CMUS test
article during daylight hours on approximately three days in the Gulf
of Mexico. Normally, such actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available
in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T08-0962 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T08-0962 Safety Zone; NASA Activities, Gulf of Mexico,
Galveston, TX.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters within 1,000 yards of the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration's (NASA's) crew module uprighting system test article.
(b) Effective period. This section will be effective from November
28, 2018 through December 6, 2018.
(c) Enforcement periods. This section will be enforced on
approximately 3 days during the effective period, during daylight
hours. Each period of
[[Page 53026]]
enforcement will begin approximately 2 hours before testing activities
and end approximately 2 hours after testing activities. The Captain of
the Port Sector Houston-Galveston (COTP) or a designated representative
will inform the public of the enforcement through Broadcast Notices to
Mariners (BNMs), Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs), and/or Marine Safety
Information Bulletins (MSIBs) or other means of public notice at least
3 hours in advance of the enforcement of this safety zone. Such notice
of enforcement will also include more specific information regarding
the location of the CMUS test article.
(d) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or a
designated representative. A designated representative is a Coast Guard
Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or
other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel, and a Federal, State, and
local officer designated by or assisting the COTP) in the enforcement
of the safety zone. The Patrol Commander may be contacted on Channel 16
VHF-FM (156.8 MHz) by the call sign ``PATCOM''.
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or a designated
representative by VHF Channel 16.
(3) If granted permission to enter, all vessels must transit at
their slowest safe speed and comply with all lawful orders or
directions of the COTP or a designated representative.
(e) Informational broadcasts. The COTP or a designated
representative will inform the public through Broadcast Notices to
Mariners (BNMs), Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs), and/or Marine Safety
Information Bulletins (MSIBs) or other means of public notice of the
enforcement period for the temporary safety zone as well as any changes
in the dates and times of enforcement.
Dated: October 16, 2018.
Kevin D. Oditt,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Houston-
Galveston.
[FR Doc. 2018-22866 Filed 10-18-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P