Medical Devices; General and Plastic Surgery Devices; Classification of the Wound Autofluorescence Imaging Device, 52966-52968 [2018-22837]
Download as PDF
52966
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 203 / Friday, October 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
FDA has determined that special
controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to
health and provide reasonable assurance
of safety and effectiveness. In order for
a device to fall within this classification,
and thus avoid automatic classification
in class III, it would have to comply
with the special controls named in this
final order. The necessary special
controls appear in the regulation
codified by this order. This device is
subject to premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act.
At the time of classification, positive
airway pressure delivery systems are for
prescription use only. Prescription
devices are exempt from the
requirement for adequate directions for
use for the layperson under section
502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act and 21 CFR
801.5, as long as the conditions of 21
CFR 801.109 are met (referring to 21
U.S.C. 352(f)(1)).
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special
controls that refer to previously
approved collections of information
found in other FDA regulations and
guidance. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
collections of information in the
guidance document ‘‘De Novo
Classification Process (Evaluation of
Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0844; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 814,
subparts A through E, regarding
premarket approval, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0231; the collection of
information in 21 CFR part 820,
regarding quality system regulation,
have been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0073; the collections of
information in part 807, subpart E,
regarding premarket notification
submissions, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0120; and
the collections of information in part 21
CFR part 801, regarding labeling, have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0485.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 Oct 18, 2018
Jkt 247001
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 868
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, part 868 is amended
as follows:
PART 868—ANESTHESIOLOGY
DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 868
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 868.5273 to subpart F to read
as follows:
■
§ 868.5273 Positive airway pressure
delivery system.
(a) Identification. A positive airway
pressure delivery system is a
prescription noninvasive ventilatory
device that delivers expiratory positive
airway pressure for patients suffering
from obstructive sleep apnea. The
system also provides positive airway
pressure during incipient apnea. The
system may include a dedicated flow
generator and a patient interface.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) The patient-contacting
components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(2) Non-clinical performance testing
must demonstrate that the device
performs as intended under anticipated
conditions of use, including the
following:
(i) Waveform testing must simulate
breathing conditions and evaluate
pressure and airflow response over a
range and combination of high and low
breath rates and tidal volumes.
(ii) Use life testing must demonstrate
adequate device performance over the
labeled use life of the device.
(iii) Device integrity testing must
demonstrate that the device can
withstand typical forces expected
during use.
(iv) Carbon dioxide rebreathing
testing must be performed.
(v) System flow rate, maximum
expiratory pressure, inhalation pressure,
and intra-mask static pressure testing
must be performed.
(vi) Air bolus testing must
demonstrate that the device can
withstand worst-case scenario air
pressures.
(vii) Maximum limited pressure
testing of the flow generator in single
fault condition must be performed.
(viii) Maximum output temperature
testing of delivered gas, if humidified,
must be performed.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(3) Performance data must validate
reprocessing instructions for any
reusable components of the device.
(4) Performance data must
demonstrate the electrical, thermal, and
mechanical safety and the
electromagnetic compatibility of the
device.
(5) Software verification, validation,
and hazard analysis must be performed.
(6) Labeling must include the
following:
(i) Therapy pressure range;
(ii) Use life and replacement schedule
for all components;
(iii) Cleaning instructions; and
(iv) Instructions for assembly and
connection of device components.
Dated: October 16, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018–22840 Filed 10–18–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 878
[Docket No. FDA–2018–N–3696]
Medical Devices; General and Plastic
Surgery Devices; Classification of the
Wound Autofluorescence Imaging
Device
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
classifying the wound autofluorescence
imaging device into class I. We are
taking this action because we have
determined that classifying the device
into class I will provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness of
the device. We believe this action will
also enhance patients’ access to
beneficial innovative devices, in part by
reducing regulatory burdens.
DATES: This order is effective October
19, 2018. The classification was
applicable on July 31, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yasaman Ardeshirpour, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. G455,
Silver Spring, MD, 20993–0002, 240–
402–3706, Yasaman.Ardeshirpour@
fda.hhs.gov.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM
19OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 203 / Friday, October 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the
wound autofluorescence imaging device
as class I (general controls), which we
have determined will provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness. In addition, we believe
this action will enhance patients’ access
to beneficial innovation, in part by
reducing regulatory burdens by placing
the device into a lower device class than
the automatic class III assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III
occurs by operation of law and without
any action by FDA, regardless of the
level of risk posed by the new device.
Any device that was not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, is
automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket
approval unless and until FDA takes an
action to classify or reclassify the device
(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to
these devices as ‘‘postamendments
devices’’ because they were not in
commercial distribution prior to the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976, which amended
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in
appropriate circumstances to classify or
reclassify a device into class I or II. We
may issue an order finding a new device
to be substantially equivalent under
section 513(i) of the FD&C Act to a
predicate device that does not require
premarket approval (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(i)). We determine whether a new
device is substantially equivalent to a
predicate by means of the procedures
for premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device
through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a
common name for the process
authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)). Section
207 of the Food and Drug
Administration Modernization Act of
1997 established the first procedure for
De Novo classification (Pub. L. 105–
115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation
Act modified the De Novo application
process by adding a second procedure
(Pub. L. 112–144). A device sponsor
may utilize either procedure for De
Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person
submits a 510(k) for a device that has
not previously been classified. After
receiving an order from FDA classifying
the device into class III under section
513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person
then requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 Oct 18, 2018
Jkt 247001
Under the second procedure, rather
than first submitting a 510(k) and then
a request for classification, if the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence, that person requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo
classification, FDA shall classify the
device by written order within 120 days.
The classification will be according to
the criteria under section 513(a)(1) of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)).
Although the device was automatically
within class III, the De Novo
classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
We believe this De Novo classification
will enhance patients’ access to
beneficial innovation, in part by
reducing regulatory burdens. When FDA
classifies a device into class I or II via
the De Novo process, the device can
serve as a predicate for future devices of
that type, including for 510(k)s (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a result, other
device sponsors do not have to submit
a De Novo request or PMA in order to
market a substantially equivalent device
(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i), defining
‘‘substantial equivalence’’). Instead,
sponsors can use the less-burdensome
510(k) process, when necessary, to
market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On February 16, 2018, MolecuLight,
Inc. submitted a request for De Novo
classification of the MolecuLight i:X.
FDA reviewed the request in order to
classify the device under the criteria for
classification set forth in section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class I if
general controls are sufficient to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device for its
intended use (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(a)(1)(A)). After review of the
information submitted in the request,
we determined that the device can be
classified into class I. FDA has
determined that general controls will
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on July 31, 2018, FDA
issued an order to the requester
classifying the device into class I. FDA
is codifying the classification of the
device by adding 21 CFR 878.4165. We
have named the generic type of device
wound autofluorescence imaging
device, and it is identified as a tool to
view autofluorescence images from skin
wounds that are exposed to an
excitation light. The device is not
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52967
intended to provide quantitative or
diagnostic information.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
this type of device: electrical/
mechanical/thermal, electromagnetic
compatibility (EMC) and optical safety
of the device, and the error in
fluorescence detection from the wound.
Section 510(l)(1) of the FD&C Act
provides that a device within a type that
has been classified into class I under
section 513 of the FD&C Act is exempt
from premarket notification under
section 510(k), unless the device is of
substantial importance in preventing
impairment of human health or presents
a potentially unreasonable risk of illness
or injury (21 U.S.C. 360(l)(1)). Devices
within this type are exempt from the
premarket notification requirements
under section 510(k), subject to the
limitations of exemptions in 21 CFR
878.9.
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order refers to previously
approved collections of information
found in other FDA regulations and
guidance. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
collections of information in the
guidance document ‘‘De Novo
Classification Process (Evaluation of
Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0844; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 814,
subparts A through E, regarding
premarket approval, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0231; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 820,
regarding current good manufacturing
practices, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0073; and
the collections of information in part
807, subpart E, regarding premarket
notification submissions, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0120; and the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 801,
regarding labeling, have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0485.
E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM
19OCR1
52968
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 203 / Friday, October 19, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 878
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, part 878 is amended
as follows:
PART 878—GENERAL AND PLASTIC
SURGERY DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 878
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 878.4165 to subpart E to read
as follows:
■
§ 878.4165 Wound autofluorescence
imaging device.
(a) Identification. A wound
autofluorescence imaging device is a
tool to view autofluorescence images
from skin wounds that are exposed to an
excitation light. The device is not
intended to provide quantitative or
diagnostic information.
(b) Classification. Class I (general
controls). The device is exempt from the
premarket notification procedures in
subpart E of part 807 of this chapter,
subject to the limitations in § 878.9.
Dated: October 16, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018–22837 Filed 10–18–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 878
[Docket No. FDA–2018–N–3598]
Medical Devices; General and Plastic
Surgery Devices; Classification of the
Light Based Energy Source Device for
Topical Application
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
classifying the light based energy source
device for topical application into class
II (special controls). The special controls
that apply to the device type are
identified in this order and will be part
of the codified language for the light
based energy source device for topical
application’s classification. We are
taking this action because we have
determined that classifying the device
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 Oct 18, 2018
Jkt 247001
into class II (special controls) will
provide a reasonable assurance of safety
and effectiveness of the device. We
believe this action will also enhance
patients’ access to beneficial innovative
devices, in part by reducing regulatory
burdens.
DATES: This order is effective October
19, 2018. The classification was
applicable on October 18, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Neil
Ogden, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. G414, Silver Spring,
MD, 20993–0002, 301–796–6397,
Neil.Ogden@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the
light based energy source device for
topical application as class II (special
controls), which we have determined
will provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness. In addition, we
believe this action will enhance
patients’ access to beneficial innovation,
in part by reducing regulatory burdens
by placing the device into a lower
device class than the automatic class III
assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III
occurs by operation of law and without
any action by FDA, regardless of the
level of risk posed by the new device.
Any device that was not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, is
automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket
approval unless and until FDA takes an
action to classify or reclassify the device
(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to
these devices as ‘‘postamendments
devices’’ because they were not in
commercial distribution prior to the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976, which amended
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in
appropriate circumstances to classify or
reclassify a device into class I or II. We
may issue an order finding a new device
to be substantially equivalent under
section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that
does not require premarket approval.
We determine whether a new device is
substantially equivalent to a predicate
by means of the procedures for
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device
through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a
common name for the process
authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and
Drug Administration Modernization Act
of 1997 (Pub. L. 105–115) established
the first procedure for De Novo
classification. Section 607 of the Food
and Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112–144)
modified the De Novo application
process by adding a second procedure.
A device sponsor may utilize either
procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person
submits a 510(k) for a device that has
not previously been classified. After
receiving an order from FDA classifying
the device into class III under section
513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person
then requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather
than first submitting a 510(k) and then
a request for classification, if the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence, that person requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo
classification, FDA shall classify the
device by written order within 120 days.
The classification will be according to
the criteria under section 513(a)(1) of
the FD&C Act. Although the device was
automatically placed within class III,
the De Novo classification is considered
to be the initial classification of the
device.
We believe this De Novo classification
will enhance patients’ access to
beneficial innovation, in part by
reducing regulatory burdens. When FDA
classifies a device into class I or II via
the De Novo process, the device can
serve as a predicate for future devices of
that type, including for 510(k)s (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a result, other
device sponsors do not have to submit
a De Novo request or premarket
approval application (PMA) to market a
substantially equivalent device (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(i), defining ‘‘substantial
equivalence’’). Instead, sponsors can use
the less-burdensome 510(k) process,
when necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
For this device, FDA issued an order
on June 10, 2009, finding the ViruLite
Cold Sore Machine not substantially
equivalent to a predicate not subject to
PMA. Thus, the device remained in
class III in accordance with section
513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act when we
issued the order.
On June 30, 2009, Pacer Therapeutics,
Ltd. submitted a request for De Novo
classification of the ViruLite Cold Sore
Machine. FDA reviewed the request in
E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM
19OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 203 (Friday, October 19, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52966-52968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22837]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 878
[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-3696]
Medical Devices; General and Plastic Surgery Devices;
Classification of the Wound Autofluorescence Imaging Device
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is classifying
the wound autofluorescence imaging device into class I. We are taking
this action because we have determined that classifying the device into
class I will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness
of the device. We believe this action will also enhance patients'
access to beneficial innovative devices, in part by reducing regulatory
burdens.
DATES: This order is effective October 19, 2018. The classification was
applicable on July 31, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yasaman Ardeshirpour, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. G455, Silver Spring, MD, 20993-0002,
240-402-3706, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 52967]]
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the wound autofluorescence imaging
device as class I (general controls), which we have determined will
provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. In
addition, we believe this action will enhance patients' access to
beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory burdens by
placing the device into a lower device class than the automatic class
III assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices''
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section
513(i) of the FD&C Act to a predicate device that does not require
premarket approval (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i)). We determine whether a new
device is substantially equivalent to a predicate by means of the
procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification,
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)). Section 207 of the Food and Drug
Administration Modernization Act of 1997 established the first
procedure for De Novo classification (Pub. L. 105-115). Section 607 of
the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act modified the
De Novo application process by adding a second procedure (Pub. L. 112-
144). A device sponsor may utilize either procedure for De Novo
classification.
Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device
that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from
FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section
513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k)
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA shall
classify the device by written order within 120 days. The
classification will be according to the criteria under section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)). Although the device
was automatically within class III, the De Novo classification is
considered to be the initial classification of the device.
We believe this De Novo classification will enhance patients'
access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory
burdens. When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De
Novo process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of
that type, including for 510(k)s (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a
result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a De Novo request
or PMA in order to market a substantially equivalent device (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(i), defining ``substantial equivalence''). Instead,
sponsors can use the less-burdensome 510(k) process, when necessary, to
market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On February 16, 2018, MolecuLight, Inc. submitted a request for De
Novo classification of the MolecuLight i:X. FDA reviewed the request in
order to classify the device under the criteria for classification set
forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class I if general controls are sufficient
to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the
device for its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(A)). After review
of the information submitted in the request, we determined that the
device can be classified into class I. FDA has determined that general
controls will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on July 31, 2018, FDA issued an order to the requester
classifying the device into class I. FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding 21 CFR 878.4165. We have named
the generic type of device wound autofluorescence imaging device, and
it is identified as a tool to view autofluorescence images from skin
wounds that are exposed to an excitation light. The device is not
intended to provide quantitative or diagnostic information.
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated
specifically with this type of device: electrical/mechanical/thermal,
electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and optical safety of the device,
and the error in fluorescence detection from the wound.
Section 510(l)(1) of the FD&C Act provides that a device within a
type that has been classified into class I under section 513 of the
FD&C Act is exempt from premarket notification under section 510(k),
unless the device is of substantial importance in preventing impairment
of human health or presents a potentially unreasonable risk of illness
or injury (21 U.S.C. 360(l)(1)). Devices within this type are exempt
from the premarket notification requirements under section 510(k),
subject to the limitations of exemptions in 21 CFR 878.9.
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order refers to previously approved collections of
information found in other FDA regulations and guidance. These
collections of information are subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of information in the guidance
document ``De Novo Classification Process (Evaluation of Automatic
Class III Designation)'' have been approved under OMB control number
0910-0844; the collections of information in 21 CFR part 814, subparts
A through E, regarding premarket approval, have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0231; the collections of information in 21 CFR part
820, regarding current good manufacturing practices, have been approved
under OMB control number 0910-0073; and the collections of information
in part 807, subpart E, regarding premarket notification submissions,
have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0120; and the
collections of information in 21 CFR part 801, regarding labeling, have
been approved under OMB control number 0910-0485.
[[Page 52968]]
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 878
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, part 878 is
amended as follows:
PART 878--GENERAL AND PLASTIC SURGERY DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 878 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 878.4165 to subpart E to read as follows:
Sec. 878.4165 Wound autofluorescence imaging device.
(a) Identification. A wound autofluorescence imaging device is a
tool to view autofluorescence images from skin wounds that are exposed
to an excitation light. The device is not intended to provide
quantitative or diagnostic information.
(b) Classification. Class I (general controls). The device is
exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part
807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in Sec. 878.9.
Dated: October 16, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-22837 Filed 10-18-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P