Isachi Gil; Denial of Hearing; Final Debarment Order, 52487-52488 [2018-22581]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 17, 2018 / Notices
Dated: October 11, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
application, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit an
application with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made available to the public, submit the
application as a written/paper
submission and in the manner detailed
(see ‘‘Written/Paper Submissions’’ and
‘‘Instructions’’).
[FR Doc. 2018–22568 Filed 10–16–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–N–1018]
Isachi Gil; Denial of Hearing; Final
Debarment Order
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is denying Isachi
Gil’s (Gil’s) request for a hearing and
issuing an order under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C
Act) debarring Gil for 6 years from
providing services in any capacity to a
person that has an approved or pending
drug product application. FDA bases
this order on findings that Gil was
convicted of 12 felonies under Federal
Law involving fraud or falsification and
that Gil has demonstrated a pattern of
conduct sufficient to find that there is
reason to believe she may violate
requirements under the FD&C Act
relating to drug products. In
determining the appropriateness and
period of Gil’s debarment, FDA
considered the relevant factors listed in
the FD&C Act. Gil failed to file with the
Agency information and analyses
sufficient to create a basis for a hearing
concerning this action.
DATES: This order is applicable October
17, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Any application for
termination of debarment by Gil under
section 306(d) of the FD&C Act
(application) may be submitted as
follows:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
Electronic Submissions
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
An application submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
application will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
application does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:46 Oct 16, 2018
Jkt 247001
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For a written/paper application
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your application, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: Your application must
include the Docket No. FDA–2013–N–
1018. An application will be placed in
the docket and, unless submitted as
‘‘Confidential Submissions,’’ publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Dockets Management Staff
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit an application with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
application only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of your application.
The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your application and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52487
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/
fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/201523389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov and insert
the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852 between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Publicly available submissions may be
seen in the docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachael V. Linowes, Office of Scientific
Integrity, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 1, Rm. 4206, Silver Spring,
MD 20993, 240–402–5931.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 306(b)(2)(B)(ii)(I) of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 335a(b)(2)(B)(ii)(I))
permits FDA to debar an individual if it
finds that the individual: (1) Has been
convicted of a felony that involves
bribery, payment of illegal gratuities,
fraud, perjury, false statement,
racketeering, blackmail, extortion,
falsification or destruction of records, or
interference with, obstruction of an
investigation into, or prosecution of, any
criminal offense and (2) based on the
conviction and other information, has
demonstrated a pattern of conduct
sufficient to find that there is reason to
believe that the person may violate
requirements under the FD&C Act
relating to drug products.
On May 24, 2011, a jury found Gil
guilty of 12 felonies. On September 28,
2011, the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of Florida entered
judgment against her for five counts of
felony healthcare fraud, in violation of
18 U.S.C. 1347, and seven counts of
felony false statements related to
healthcare matters, in violation of 18
U.S.C. 1035(a)(2). The court sentenced
Gil to 43 months in prison, with 3 years
of supervised release.
Gil’s convictions stemmed from her
work as a registered nurse in the home
health field. From around March 14,
2007, through about July 15, 2009, Gil
worked as a registered nurse, employed
by a nursing staffing company and local
home health agencies. During this time,
Gil knowingly and willfully submitted
and caused the submission of false and
fraudulent claims to Medicare, seeking
reimbursement for various home health
services she had not provided.
Specifically, Gil falsified and caused
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
52488
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 17, 2018 / Notices
Medicare beneficiaries to falsify weekly
visit/time record sheets indicating that
she provided skilled nursing services
twice a day, 7 days a week, when she
did not provide those services with such
frequency. Gil falsified daily blood
sugar/insulin log sheets stating that she
administered insulin injections and
provided other medical services to
Medicare beneficiaries when she did not
provide those services. Lastly, Gil
created false weekly visit/time records
claiming that she provided skilled
nursing services to two separate
Medicare beneficiaries at the same time
and she caused local home health
agencies to submit false and fraudulent
claims that falsely represented that she
provided home health services to
eligible Medicare beneficiaries.
By letter dated March 18, 2014, FDA’s
Office of Regulatory Affairs (ORA)
notified Gil of a proposal to debar her
for 6 years from providing services in
any capacity to a person that has an
approved or pending drug product
application. The proposal explained
that the proposed debarment period was
based on her 12 felony convictions. The
proposal stated that maximum
debarment period for each offense is 5
years and that FDA may determine
whether debarment periods for multiple
offenses should run concurrently or
consecutively.
The proposal outlined findings
regarding the four applicable factors
ORA considered in determining the
appropriateness and period of
debarment, as provided in section
306(c)(3) of the FD&C Act: (1) The
nature and seriousness of the offense,
(2) the nature and extent of management
participation in any offense, (3) the
nature and extent of voluntary steps to
mitigate the impact on the public, and
(4) prior convictions under the FD&C
Act or other acts involving matters
within FDA’s jurisdiction. ORA found
that the nature and seriousness of the
offenses and her failure to take
voluntary steps to mitigate the impact of
her offenses were unfavorable factors for
Gil. ORA found that her lack of prior
convictions was a favorable factor for
Gil. Finally, ORA found that the
management participation factor was
not applicable based on the information
in the record. ORA concluded that ‘‘the
unfavorable factors cumulatively
outweigh the favorable factors and that
debarment is appropriate.’’ ORA
proposed that each felony offense
should have a 3-year debarment period.
ORA further proposed that the 3-year
debarment period for each healthcare
fraud conviction should run
concurrently and that the 3-year
debarment period for each false
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:46 Oct 16, 2018
Jkt 247001
statement conviction should run
concurrently, for a total debarment
period of 6 years.
The proposal offered Gil the
opportunity to request a hearing,
providing her 30 days from the date of
receipt of the letter to file the request
and 60 days from the date of receipt of
the letter to support her request with
information sufficient to justify a
hearing. In a letter dated May 9, 2014,
through counsel, Gil filed a request for
hearing and indicated that she had not
received the proposal until April 10,
2014. She also stated that the
information justifying the hearing
request would be forthcoming. More
than 60 days have passed from the date
Gil represents she received FDA’s letter,
and she has not filed any information,
or any legal or policy arguments, to
support her request.
Under the authority delegated to him
by the Commissioner of Food and
Drugs, the Acting Director of the Office
of Scientific Integrity (OSI) has
considered Gil’s request for a hearing.
Hearings will not be granted on issues
of policy or law, on mere allegations,
denials, or general descriptions of
positions and contentions, or on data
and information insufficient to justify
the factual determination urged (see 21
CFR 21.24(b)).
Inasmuch as Gil has not presented
any information to support her hearing
request, OSI concludes that Gil has
failed to raise a genuine and substantial
issue of fact requiring a hearing.
Therefore, OSI denies Gil’s request for a
hearing. Further, Gil has not presented
any arguments concerning whether
debarment is appropriate for each of her
felony convictions or whether the
proposed debarment periods are
appropriate. Based on the factual
findings in the proposal to debar, OSI
finds that a 3-year debarment period for
each felony offense is appropriate and
that the 3-year debarment period for
each healthcare fraud conviction should
run concurrently and that the 3-year
debarment period for each false
statement conviction should run
concurrently, for a resulting total
debarment of 6 years.
II. Findings and Order
Therefore, the Director of OSI, under
section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the FD&C
Act and authority delegated to him by
the Commissioner of Food and Drugs,
finds that: (1) Gil was convicted of a
felony that involves bribery, payment of
illegal gratuities, fraud, perjury, false
statement, racketeering, blackmail,
extortion, falsification or destruction of
records, or interference with,
obstruction of an investigation into, or
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
prosecution of, any criminal offense and
(2) based on the conviction and other
information, Gil demonstrated a pattern
of conduct giving reason to believe that
she may violate requirements under the
FD&C Act relating to drug products.
FDA considered the applicable factors
listed in section 306(c)(3) of the FD&C
Act and determined that a 6-year
debarment is appropriate.
As a result of the foregoing findings,
Isachi Gil is debarred for 6 years from
providing services in any capacity to a
person with an approved or pending
drug product application under sections
505, 512, or 802 of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 355, 360b, or 382), or under
section 351 of the Public Health Service
Act (42 U.S.C. 262), effective (see
DATES), (see 21 U.S.C. 335a(c)(1)(B) and
(c)(2)(A)(iii) and 21 U.S.C. 321(dd)).
Any person with an approved or
pending drug application who
knowingly uses the services of Gil, in
any capacity during her debarment, will
be subject to civil money penalties
(section 307(a)(6) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 335b(a)(6))). If Gil, during her
period of debarment, provides services
in any capacity to a person with an
approved or pending drug product
application, she will be subject to civil
money penalties (section 307(a)(7) of the
FD&C Act). In addition, FDA will not
accept or review any abbreviated new
drug applications submitted by or with
the assistance of Gil during her period
of debarment (section 306(c)(1)(B) of the
FD&C Act).
Dated: October 10, 2018.
George M. Warren,
Director, Office of Scientific Integrity.
[FR Doc. 2018–22581 Filed 10–16–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–D–0125]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Guidance for
Industry on Establishing That a
Tobacco Product Was Commercially
Marketed in the United States as of
February 15, 2007
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing an opportunity for public
comment on the proposed collection of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52487-52488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22581]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-1018]
Isachi Gil; Denial of Hearing; Final Debarment Order
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is denying Isachi Gil's
(Gil's) request for a hearing and issuing an order under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) debarring Gil for 6 years from
providing services in any capacity to a person that has an approved or
pending drug product application. FDA bases this order on findings that
Gil was convicted of 12 felonies under Federal Law involving fraud or
falsification and that Gil has demonstrated a pattern of conduct
sufficient to find that there is reason to believe she may violate
requirements under the FD&C Act relating to drug products. In
determining the appropriateness and period of Gil's debarment, FDA
considered the relevant factors listed in the FD&C Act. Gil failed to
file with the Agency information and analyses sufficient to create a
basis for a hearing concerning this action.
DATES: This order is applicable October 17, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Any application for termination of debarment by Gil under
section 306(d) of the FD&C Act (application) may be submitted as
follows:
Electronic Submissions
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. An application
submitted electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because
your application will be made public, you are solely responsible for
ensuring that your application does not include any confidential
information that you or a third party may not wish to be posted, such
as medical information, your or anyone else's Social Security number,
or confidential business information, such as a manufacturing process.
Please note that if you include your name, contact information, or
other information that identifies you in the body of your application,
that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit an application with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the application as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For a written/paper application submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your application, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: Your application must include the Docket No. FDA-
2013-N-1018. An application will be placed in the docket and, unless
submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit an application with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your application only as a written/paper submission.
You should submit two copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note
that states ``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The
Agency will review this copy, including the claimed confidential
information, in its consideration of your application. The second copy,
which will have the claimed confidential information redacted/blacked
out, will be available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov. Submit both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and contact information to be made
publicly available, you can provide this information on the cover sheet
and not in the body of your application and you must identify this
information as ``confidential.'' Any information marked as
``confidential'' will not be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR
10.20 and other applicable disclosure law. For more information about
FDA's posting of comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September
18, 2015, or access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov
and insert the docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this
document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to
the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852 between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. Publicly
available submissions may be seen in the docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachael V. Linowes, Office of
Scientific Integrity, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 1, Rm. 4206, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 240-402-5931.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 306(b)(2)(B)(ii)(I) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
335a(b)(2)(B)(ii)(I)) permits FDA to debar an individual if it finds
that the individual: (1) Has been convicted of a felony that involves
bribery, payment of illegal gratuities, fraud, perjury, false
statement, racketeering, blackmail, extortion, falsification or
destruction of records, or interference with, obstruction of an
investigation into, or prosecution of, any criminal offense and (2)
based on the conviction and other information, has demonstrated a
pattern of conduct sufficient to find that there is reason to believe
that the person may violate requirements under the FD&C Act relating to
drug products.
On May 24, 2011, a jury found Gil guilty of 12 felonies. On
September 28, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District
of Florida entered judgment against her for five counts of felony
healthcare fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1347, and seven counts of
felony false statements related to healthcare matters, in violation of
18 U.S.C. 1035(a)(2). The court sentenced Gil to 43 months in prison,
with 3 years of supervised release.
Gil's convictions stemmed from her work as a registered nurse in
the home health field. From around March 14, 2007, through about July
15, 2009, Gil worked as a registered nurse, employed by a nursing
staffing company and local home health agencies. During this time, Gil
knowingly and willfully submitted and caused the submission of false
and fraudulent claims to Medicare, seeking reimbursement for various
home health services she had not provided. Specifically, Gil falsified
and caused
[[Page 52488]]
Medicare beneficiaries to falsify weekly visit/time record sheets
indicating that she provided skilled nursing services twice a day, 7
days a week, when she did not provide those services with such
frequency. Gil falsified daily blood sugar/insulin log sheets stating
that she administered insulin injections and provided other medical
services to Medicare beneficiaries when she did not provide those
services. Lastly, Gil created false weekly visit/time records claiming
that she provided skilled nursing services to two separate Medicare
beneficiaries at the same time and she caused local home health
agencies to submit false and fraudulent claims that falsely represented
that she provided home health services to eligible Medicare
beneficiaries.
By letter dated March 18, 2014, FDA's Office of Regulatory Affairs
(ORA) notified Gil of a proposal to debar her for 6 years from
providing services in any capacity to a person that has an approved or
pending drug product application. The proposal explained that the
proposed debarment period was based on her 12 felony convictions. The
proposal stated that maximum debarment period for each offense is 5
years and that FDA may determine whether debarment periods for multiple
offenses should run concurrently or consecutively.
The proposal outlined findings regarding the four applicable
factors ORA considered in determining the appropriateness and period of
debarment, as provided in section 306(c)(3) of the FD&C Act: (1) The
nature and seriousness of the offense, (2) the nature and extent of
management participation in any offense, (3) the nature and extent of
voluntary steps to mitigate the impact on the public, and (4) prior
convictions under the FD&C Act or other acts involving matters within
FDA's jurisdiction. ORA found that the nature and seriousness of the
offenses and her failure to take voluntary steps to mitigate the impact
of her offenses were unfavorable factors for Gil. ORA found that her
lack of prior convictions was a favorable factor for Gil. Finally, ORA
found that the management participation factor was not applicable based
on the information in the record. ORA concluded that ``the unfavorable
factors cumulatively outweigh the favorable factors and that debarment
is appropriate.'' ORA proposed that each felony offense should have a
3-year debarment period. ORA further proposed that the 3-year debarment
period for each healthcare fraud conviction should run concurrently and
that the 3-year debarment period for each false statement conviction
should run concurrently, for a total debarment period of 6 years.
The proposal offered Gil the opportunity to request a hearing,
providing her 30 days from the date of receipt of the letter to file
the request and 60 days from the date of receipt of the letter to
support her request with information sufficient to justify a hearing.
In a letter dated May 9, 2014, through counsel, Gil filed a request for
hearing and indicated that she had not received the proposal until
April 10, 2014. She also stated that the information justifying the
hearing request would be forthcoming. More than 60 days have passed
from the date Gil represents she received FDA's letter, and she has not
filed any information, or any legal or policy arguments, to support her
request.
Under the authority delegated to him by the Commissioner of Food
and Drugs, the Acting Director of the Office of Scientific Integrity
(OSI) has considered Gil's request for a hearing. Hearings will not be
granted on issues of policy or law, on mere allegations, denials, or
general descriptions of positions and contentions, or on data and
information insufficient to justify the factual determination urged
(see 21 CFR 21.24(b)).
Inasmuch as Gil has not presented any information to support her
hearing request, OSI concludes that Gil has failed to raise a genuine
and substantial issue of fact requiring a hearing. Therefore, OSI
denies Gil's request for a hearing. Further, Gil has not presented any
arguments concerning whether debarment is appropriate for each of her
felony convictions or whether the proposed debarment periods are
appropriate. Based on the factual findings in the proposal to debar,
OSI finds that a 3-year debarment period for each felony offense is
appropriate and that the 3-year debarment period for each healthcare
fraud conviction should run concurrently and that the 3-year debarment
period for each false statement conviction should run concurrently, for
a resulting total debarment of 6 years.
II. Findings and Order
Therefore, the Director of OSI, under section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) of
the FD&C Act and authority delegated to him by the Commissioner of Food
and Drugs, finds that: (1) Gil was convicted of a felony that involves
bribery, payment of illegal gratuities, fraud, perjury, false
statement, racketeering, blackmail, extortion, falsification or
destruction of records, or interference with, obstruction of an
investigation into, or prosecution of, any criminal offense and (2)
based on the conviction and other information, Gil demonstrated a
pattern of conduct giving reason to believe that she may violate
requirements under the FD&C Act relating to drug products. FDA
considered the applicable factors listed in section 306(c)(3) of the
FD&C Act and determined that a 6-year debarment is appropriate.
As a result of the foregoing findings, Isachi Gil is debarred for 6
years from providing services in any capacity to a person with an
approved or pending drug product application under sections 505, 512,
or 802 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 355, 360b, or 382), or under section
351 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262), effective (see
DATES), (see 21 U.S.C. 335a(c)(1)(B) and (c)(2)(A)(iii) and 21 U.S.C.
321(dd)). Any person with an approved or pending drug application who
knowingly uses the services of Gil, in any capacity during her
debarment, will be subject to civil money penalties (section 307(a)(6)
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 335b(a)(6))). If Gil, during her period of
debarment, provides services in any capacity to a person with an
approved or pending drug product application, she will be subject to
civil money penalties (section 307(a)(7) of the FD&C Act). In addition,
FDA will not accept or review any abbreviated new drug applications
submitted by or with the assistance of Gil during her period of
debarment (section 306(c)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act).
Dated: October 10, 2018.
George M. Warren,
Director, Office of Scientific Integrity.
[FR Doc. 2018-22581 Filed 10-16-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P