Adopting Standards for Laboratory Requirements, 52345-52350 [2018-22452]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 17, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Legislative Branch Appropriations
highlighted the need for the Office to
decrease its processing times in its
hearing on the Library of Congress’s
fiscal year 2019 budget request.80 While
inquiring about the appropriate
turnaround time for completing a
copyright registration, Chairman Kevin
Yoder emphasized that the aim is to
make the registration system ‘‘more
efficient and quicker.’’ 81 It is believed
that this proposal would further
significantly decrease burdens on both
copyright owners and the Copyright
Office by simplifying registration
requirements and the examination
process, and subsequently decreasing
pendency times.
When an applicant sends a physical
deposit with their application for
registration, that deposit must be sent
offsite to be screened and
decontaminated for possible pathogens.
Once the deposit is delivered to the
Office, the Office’s Receipt Analysis and
Control Division (‘‘RAC’’) must
manually match the physical deposit to
its corresponding pending application
and deliver the deposit to an
examiner.82 This time consuming
process can delay examination. And if
the examiner later discovers that the
applicant submitted an incorrect
deposit, this process may be repeated,
which would delay examination and reset the EDR to the date that an
acceptable deposit was received by the
Office. Additionally, physical deposits
are often heavy and unwieldy. The
Office moves these deposits multiple
times during the examination process,
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
80 See
Legislative Branch Appropriations for
2019, Hearings Before the Subcomm. on Legislative
Branch of the H. Comm. on Appropriations, Part 2,
115th Cong., 2d Sess. 325, 357–359
(2018)(statement from Rep. Kevin Yoder, Chairman,
Subcomm. on Legislative Branch concerning
registration processing times, noting ‘‘we really
want the Copyright Office to be successful and []
efficient’’), available at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/
pkg/CHRG-115hhrg30357/pdf/CHRG115hhrg30357.pdf.
81 Legislative Branch Appropriations for 2019,
Hearings Before the Subcomm. on Legislative
Branch of the H. Comm. on Appropriations, Part 2,
115th Cong., 2d Sess. at 358 (2018).
82 When an applicant submits an online
application and sends the deposit through the mail,
they are expected to print and attach a ‘‘shipping
slip’’ to the deposit. This document contains a
barcode generated by the electronic registration
system that is used to connect the deposit with the
appropriate registration application. Unfortunately,
large quantities of deposits are submitted without
a shipping slip. In such cases, RAC staff must
correspond with the applicant to obtain the tendigit case numbers that have been assigned to all
of the applications submitted by that party, and
then search for those applications in the electronic
registration system. Before delivering the deposit to
the examiner for a substantive review, RAC staff
must match each application to its corresponding
deposit by manually generating a new shipping slip
with an identifying barcode.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 16, 2018
Jkt 247001
which increases the risk that they may
be damaged, misplaced, mismatched, or
lost.
By contrast, when an applicant
uploads a digital deposit to the
electronic registration system, the Office
receives the deposit as soon as the
application is submitted. An examiner
can immediately access the deposit
when they open the application.
Examiners do not need to move deposits
around the Office. Electronic deposits
allow examiners to process more claims
per hour, thereby cutting processing
times significantly.
The Office is interested in hearing
from copyright owners on how this
digital approach may or may not
incentivize the routine registration of
copyrighted works and improve the
efficiency of the registration system. The
Office also seeks comments on how this
approach may affect copyright owners
with regard to their compliance with
mandatory deposit.
16. Digital Deposit Security
83 See National Institute of Standards and
Technology, Minimum Security Requirements for
Federal Information and Information Systems, FIPS
PUB 200, available at https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/
nistpubs/FIPS/NIST.FIPS.200.pdf; National
Institute of Standards and Technology, Security and
Privacy Controls for Information Systems and
Organizations, SP 800–53, available at https://
csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media//Publications/sp/800-53/
rev-5/draft/documents/sp800-53r5-draft.pdf.
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
these security controls are and remain
effective.
The Office, working with OCIO, plans
to implement these same controls in the
new online registration system.
Additionally, the Office’s IT
infrastructure is being updated to
support increased numbers of digital
deposits. The Office welcomes comment
on the current and future state of the
Office’s deposit security as well as any
additional approaches to this issue.
E. Additional Considerations
The Office is dedicated to developing
a robust and efficient registration system
and invites comment on any additional
considerations that it should take into
account during its modernization
process.
Dated: October 11, 2018.
Karyn Temple,
Acting Register of Copyrights and Director
of the U.S. Copyright Office.
[FR Doc. 2018–22486 Filed 10–16–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
Any approach that increases the
deposit of digital formats must be
supported by a robust security system.
Users have expressed concern regarding
the capacity of the Office’s current IT
infrastructure to handle an increase in
digital deposits, as well as the Office’s
mechanisms for securing these deposits.
The Office currently utilizes a multilevel security design to ensure the
confidentiality, integrity, and
availability of the data within the eCO
system. The system is certified to
operate at the National Institute of
Standards and Technology (‘‘NIST’’)
Moderate security level.83 The entire
eCO system operates on hardware and
software dedicated to this system and it
does not share any computer or storage
resources. Strict access controls are in
place throughout the system for public
users, staff, and system administrators,
enforcing the principle of least
privilege, which means that users in
each role may only access what is
needed for their role. The system is also
protected by multiple levels of network
firewalls and other network-based
security, such as anti-malware
protection. Finally, the eCO system is
under continuous monitoring, both
operational and security, to ensure that
PO 00000
52345
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AP64
Adopting Standards for Laboratory
Requirements
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
medical regulations to establish
standards for VA clinical laboratories.
The Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) has established
standards for the staffing, management,
procedures, and oversight of clinical
laboratories that perform testing used
for the diagnosis, prevention, or
treatment of any disease or impairment
of, or health assessment of, human
beings. VA is required, in consultation
with HHS, to establish standards equal
to those applicable to other clinical
laboratories. As a matter of policy and
practice VA has applied HHS standards
to its VA laboratory operations, and this
proposed rule would formalize this
practice. The proposed rule would
establish quality standards for
laboratory testing performed on
specimens from humans, such as blood,
body fluid and tissue, for the purpose of
diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of
disease, or assessment of health.
Specifically, it would address how VA
applies regulations as the controlling
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17OCP1.SGM
17OCP1
52346
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 17, 2018 / Proposed Rules
standards for VA medical facility
laboratories.
Comments must be received on
or before December 17, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through www.regulations.gov;
by mail or hand-delivery to the Director,
Regulation Policy and Management
(00REG), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW, Room
1063B, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax
to (202) 273–9026. Comments should
indicate that they are submitted in
response to ‘‘RIN 2900–AP64—
Adopting 42 CFR Part 493 Laboratory
Requirements.’’ Copies of comments
received will be available for public
inspection in the Office of Regulation
Policy and Management, Room 1063B,
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday (except
holidays). Please call (202) 461–4902 for
an appointment. (This is not a toll-free
number.) In addition, during the
comment period, comments may be
viewed online through the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) at
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Quynh Vantu, Health Science
Specialist, Pathology and Laboratory
Service (10P11P), Office of Specialty
Care Services, Veterans Health
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW, Room
1063B, Washington, DC 20420, (202)
632–8418. (This is not a toll-free
number.)
DATES:
The
Clinical Laboratory Improvement
Amendments of 1988 (Pub. L. (PL) 100–
578) amended section 353 of the Public
Health Service Act to establish legal
requirements for the staffing,
management, procedures, and oversight
of clinical laboratories that perform
testing used for the diagnosis,
prevention, or treatment of any disease
or impairment of, or health assessment
of, human beings. These statutory
requirements are codified at 42 U.S.C.
263a. The term ‘‘laboratory’’ or ‘‘clinical
laboratory’’ are defined at 42 U.S.C.
263a(a) as a facility for the biological,
microbiological, serological, chemical,
immuno-hematological, hematological,
biophysical, cytological, pathological, or
other examination of materials derived
from the human body for the purpose of
providing information for the diagnosis,
prevention, or treatment of any disease
or impairment of, or the assessment of
the health of, human beings. Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS),
within HHS, promulgated regulations
for the Clinical Laboratory Improvement
Amendments (CLIA) at title 42, Code of
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 16, 2018
Jkt 247001
Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 493.
CMS has primary responsibility for the
administration of the CLIA program.
‘‘. . . [T]o assure consistent
performance of medical facility
laboratories under the jurisdiction of the
Secretary [of Veterans Affairs] of valid
and reliable laboratory examinations
and other procedures,’’ section 101 of
Public Law 102–139 (‘‘1991 Act’’) was
enacted, requiring VA, within a
specified time-frame and in consultation
with HHS, ‘‘to establish standards [by
regulation] equal to that applicable to
other medical facility laboratories in
accordance with the requirements of
section 353(f) of the Public Health
Service Act.’’ VA’s regulations must
‘‘include appropriate provisions
respecting compliance with such
requirements [set forth in section 353(f)
of the Public Health Service Act]’’ and
may include appropriate provisions
respecting waivers and accreditations
described in sections 353(d) and 353(e),
respectively, of the Public Health
Service Act. As a matter of policy and
practice, VA believes it has met these
statutory requirements; however, VA is
issuing this proposed rule to comply
with the requirement for formal
rulemaking. Since enactment of section
101(a) of the 1991 Act, VA has
collaborated with HHS in reviewing VA
requirements and in developing
standards for VA’s medical facility
laboratories that meet the requirements
of law.
VA policy and practice regarding
CLIA compliance was developed in
consultation with HHS in 1994 and
1998. VA laboratories are accredited by
accrediting organizations granted
deeming authority by CMS (i.e., HHSapproved accreditation organization) to
ensure its laboratories are in compliance
with current CLIA regulations. Based on
consultation with CMS in 1994 and
1998, the accreditation organization(s)
provide oversight for proficiency testing
in VA laboratories, as set forth in CLIA.
Deeming authority is granted to an
accrediting organization by CMS after a
determination that the organization’s
accreditation oversight program requires
that laboratories comply with or exceed
CLIA standards. CMS has granted
‘‘deeming authority’’ to several other
organization allowing them to accredit
laboratories and inspect the laboratories
in CMS’s stead. The history of the
process of the development of CLIA
equivalent VHA standards in
consultation with CMS is documented
in the interagency agreement (IAA)
between VA and CMS.
In 2000, after further consultation, VA
and CMS entered into an IAA, which
documented the history of the parties’
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
consultations and agreements and
granted VA limited authority to act on
behalf of CMS. Specifically, the IAA
authorized VA to issue CMS CLIA
numbers and CLIA certificates to VA
laboratories, which requires VA to
notify CMS when VA suspends or
retires CLIA numbers assigned to VA
laboratories.
This agreement was renewed in 2010,
and CMS and VA have agreed to review
and update the interagency agreement
as necessary in 2018, and every 6 years
thereafter. In addition, CMS and VA
agree to meet annually to discuss
program issues of mutual importance.
To ensure VA remains current with
CMS CLIA requirements, VA
participates in the CMS Partners in
Laboratory Oversight group, consults
will CMS as needed, and participates in
at least one formal consultative meeting
per year. These engagements with CMS
facilitates ongoing communication and
coordination, and promotes effective
oversight necessary to coordinate major
activities, and expeditious, effective
response to complaints, survey findings,
and publicly volatile situations. VA staff
attend State Agency Surveyor training,
and CLIA surveyor webinars. VA has
also convened ad hoc conferences with
CMS when the exchange of information
on CLIA may be needed. VA provides
updates at the annual partners meeting
and participates in audio conferences as
requested. The CMS CLIA Program
Director participates in VA’s annual
conference in which CMS, VA, and
Department of Defense provide updates
on laboratory issues and enforcement of
laboratory regulations. As discussed
below, VA laboratories that perform
testing are all accredited and inspected
by accrediting organizations granted
deeming authority by CMS. As such, VA
has documentation that its laboratories
meet current CLIA standards.
VA provides updated data to CMS for
each VA laboratory assigned a CLIA
number at least every two years, or as
changes occur. VA provides CMS with
any requested information regarding the
operation and performance of VA
laboratories and the operations of the
oversight program.
Under the 1991 Act, the definition of
‘‘medical facility laboratories’’ has the
same meaning previously used to define
the terms ‘‘laboratory’’ or ‘‘clinical
laboratory’’ pursuant to section 353(a) of
the Public Health Service Act, codified
at 42 U.S.C. 263a(a). VA concluded that
it should adopt 42 CFR part 493
regulations that were applicable to
clinical laboratory operations but keep
oversight and enforcement of these
regulations as applied to VA
laboratories within VA, rather than
E:\FR\FM\17OCP1.SGM
17OCP1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 17, 2018 / Proposed Rules
HHS. Under current VA practice, VA
fulfills all laboratory oversight of and
enforcement functions for VA
laboratories that CMS fulfills for HHS
with respect to laboratories subject to
CLIA. VA has the authority and
responsibility to provide enforcement of
the CLIA regulations for VA
laboratories, including imposing
sanctions and discontinuing laboratory
testing. VA believes this determination
is consistent with the fact that Congress
passed an entirely separate law (Pub. L.
102–139) for VA medical facility
laboratories under the exclusive
jurisdiction and control of the Secretary
of Veterans Affairs.
The 42 CFR part 493 regulations are
very detailed and include multiple
subparts that address clinical laboratory
tests. The laboratory regulations include
requirements for proficiency testing;
facility administration; quality systems;
personnel qualifications;
responsibilities for laboratory personnel,
including laboratory directors and
testing personnel; laboratory
inspections; and enforcement. Several
subparts are not directly applicable to
VA medical facility laboratories because
they address administration of the
oversight and enforcement functions
performed by CMS under 42 CFR part
493. Sections of 42 CFR part 493 that
refer to the interactions with state
programs, collections of fees,
suspension of payments, creation of an
advisory committee, and civil action are
not applicable to VA, as discussed in
greater detail below.
Although the requirement for
consultation between HHS and VA was
accomplished over 20 years ago, we are
now proposing to formalize, document,
and update, as necessary, VA’s
application of the CLIA requirements to
VA laboratory operations. VA proposes
to amend its medical regulations to
reference the portions of 42 CFR part
493 adopted by VA as they apply to VA
medical facility laboratories and clinics
and to clarify that these standards are
subject to VA oversight and enforcement
by VA only. In addition, the proposed
rule would require VA laboratories to be
accredited by an accreditation
organization granted deeming authority
by CMS, in accordance with the
accreditation requirement in CLIA, and
participate in an HHS approved
proficiency testing program.
Through this proposed rulemaking, in
accordance with current VA policy and
practice, VA can continue to assure that
medical facility laboratories across our
system perform consistent, accurate and
reliable laboratory testing, ensuring the
provision of quality testing for our
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 16, 2018
Jkt 247001
veteran-patients in a manner
comparable to non-VA laboratories.
We note that, in addition to 42 CFR
part 493 standards, VA recognizes and
adheres to worker safety standards
established by the Occupational Safety
and Health Administration (OSHA) and
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC). In addition, the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
regulates the collection of blood and
blood components intended for
transfusion or for further manufacturing
use, such as to make clotting factors,
and establishes standards for blood and
blood products. FDA also regulates
related products such as cell separation
devices, blood collection containers and
HIV screening tests that are intended for
use in the manufacture of blood or
blood products. FDA develops and
enforces quality standards, inspects
blood establishments, and monitors
reports of errors, accidents and adverse
clinical events. Those additional
standards are beyond the scope of this
proposed rule.
VA proposes to add a new section
17.3500, ‘‘Adopting 42 CFR Part 493
Laboratory Requirements,’’ to its
medical regulations. There, we would
address CLIA regulations found at 42
CFR part 493, by subpart, and how VA
would apply those regulations.
We state that all laboratory testing
within VA performed for the diagnosis,
treatment, and prevention of disease,
and assessment of health in patients
would comply with the relevant
requirements established by HHS under
42 CFR part 493 as enforced by VA. VA
laboratory testing must meet, at a
minimum, requirements established in
42 CFR part 493. These requirements
must be met for any laboratory service
offered by a VA medical facility, as well
as contracted laboratory services
performed on site at VA laboratories,
outreach clinics, or testing sites.
Provisions that are specific to oversight
by state licensure programs are not
applicable, since VA as a federal entity
is not subject to state licensing
requirements. Except as noted in the
proposed rule, functions and
responsibilities assigned to CMS in 42
CFR part 493 are assumed by VA with
respect to laboratories operated by or on
behalf of VA.
Part 493 subpart A covers general
provisions. We propose that all
provisions of subpart A would apply to
VA with several exceptions intended to
reflect that VA has the authority,
responsibility, and duty to administer
42 CFR part 493 standards within VA.
We state that functions assigned to HHS
in this subpart would be performed by
VA. This is consistent with an IAA
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
52347
previously entered into between VA and
CMS. The regulation would set forth
that the respective provisions of 42 CFR
part 493 apply to VA laboratories
performing waived, moderate, and high
complexity tests.
Subparts B through D address
certificates issued by CMS. Subpart B
focuses on Certificates of Waiver.
Subpart C addresses Registration
Certificates, Certificates for PPM
procedures, and Certificates of
Compliance. PPM procedures are a
select group of moderately complex
microscopy tests commonly performed
by specific health care providers during
patient office visits. Tests included in
PPM procedures do not meet the criteria
for waiver because they are not simple
procedures; they require training and
specific skills for test performance.
Subpart D focuses on Certificates of
Accreditation. These subparts establish
standards for CMS-issuance of the listed
certificates as well as fees that must be
remitted to CMS by regulated
laboratories in order to apply for and
receive certification. We state that all
provisions of these subparts would
apply to VA laboratories, except that
certificates issued by HHS under these
subparts are instead issued by VA
pursuant to the previously noted
interagency agreement between CMS
and VA. As certificates are issued by VA
rather than CMS, CMS does not require
remittance of a fee from laboratories for
any certificate issued by VA under these
subparts.
Subpart E addresses accreditation by
a private, nonprofit accreditation
organization or exemption under an
approved State laboratory program.
Under this subpart, a laboratory may
meet individual VA and CLIA program
requirements through accreditation by a
CMS approved nonprofit accreditation
organization (AO). The subpart
establishes an application and approval
process for an accreditation organization
seeking to be granted deeming authority
by CMS, as well as a process in which
CMS may validate findings of an
accreditation organization by
reinspection of a laboratory following an
inspection by that accreditation
organization. CLIA has granted
‘‘deeming authority’’ to several
accreditation organizations allowing
them to accredit laboratories and
inspect the laboratories. These
accreditation organizations must impose
organizations’ requirements equal to or
more stringent than those contained in
42 CFR part 493 at the condition level.
The subpart also establishes standards
for CLIA exemptions under an approved
State laboratory program. All provisions
would apply to VA, to the extent that
E:\FR\FM\17OCP1.SGM
17OCP1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
52348
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 17, 2018 / Proposed Rules
this subpart addresses accreditation by
a private, nonprofit accreditation
organization. However, the provisions
related to approved State laboratory
program do not apply to VA.
The proposed rule states that VA
would use only accreditation agencies
with CMS-granted deeming authority to
accredit VA laboratories. This is
consistent with current, longstanding,
VA practice. CMS has an established
process for determining whether an
accreditation organization should be
granted deeming authority, and
experience in making that
determination. VA has determined that
there is no need to duplicate that
process and relying on CMS’ approval of
an accreditation organization ensures
that VA would not reach any
conclusions on deeming authority that
are inconsistent with CMS.
A validation inspection is a quality
control measure performed by CMS
under Subpart E. It involves CMS
reinspection of a laboratory that has
recently been inspected by an
accreditation organization with deeming
authority, to validate that AO’s survey
findings. We state that validation
inspections performed by CMS under
subpart E would be performed instead
by VA. This is consistent with current
practice, and VA’s authority under the
1991 Act to provide oversight and
enforcement of the requirements set
forth in 42 CFR part 493, as oversight
and enforcement functions under this
subpart as applied to VA laboratories
are performed by VA.
General administration provisions
related to 42 CFR part 493 are found at
Subpart F. This subpart sets forth the
methodology for determining the
amount of fees for issuing the
appropriate certificate, and for
determining compliance with the
applicable standards of the Public
Health Service Act and the Federal
validation of accredited laboratories. We
state that provisions of Subpart F would
not be applicable to VA, as CMS does
not collect fees for certification of VA
laboratories
Subpart H addresses participation in
proficiency testing for laboratories
performing nonwaived testing.
Nonwaived testing is the term used by
CMS to refer collectively to moderate
and high complexity testing. We state
that all provisions of this subpart would
apply to VA, and VA employs scoring
criteria under this subpart.
Subpart I focuses on the approval of
proficiency testing programs. The
proposed rule states that VA would rely
on HHS to approve proficiency testing
programs. VA would continue to use
only HHS approved proficiency testing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 16, 2018
Jkt 247001
programs. HHS has an established
process for proficiency testing program
approval and experience in making that
determination. VA has determined that
there is no need to duplicate that
process and relies on HHS program
approvals.
Subpart J addresses facility
administration for nonwaived testing,
and sets standards for facility
construction, transfusion services, and
records retention. We state that all
provisions of this subpart would apply
to VA.
Subpart K focuses on quality systems
for nonwaived testing. Under this
subpart, each laboratory that performs
nonwaived testing must establish and
maintain written policies and
procedures that implement and monitor
a quality system for all phases of the
total testing process (that is, preanalytic,
analytic, and postanalytic) as well as
general laboratory systems. Laboratory
quality systems must include a quality
assessment component that ensures
continuous improvement of the
laboratory’s performance and services
through ongoing monitoring that
identifies, evaluates, and resolves
problems. The laboratory’s quality
system must be appropriate for the
specialties and subspecialties of testing
that the laboratory performs, services it
offers, and clients it serves. This subpart
establishes requirements for different
specialties and subspecialties of
laboratory tests and VA would apply all
established requirements.
Personnel requirements for
performing non-waived testing are
addressed in subpart M. All applicable
personnel requirements would meet
CLIA requirements with the exception
of state-specific licensing requirements.
Subpart M requires that certain
personnel maintain a license in the state
in which the laboratory is located.
While VA health care providers must be
licensed in a state, there is no
requirement that the health care
provider be licensed in the state where
the VA facility at which the provider
works is located. See, 38 U.S.C. 7402
(requiring licensure in any state for
eligibility to an appointment as VHA
health care provider regardless of VHA
facility location).
Subpart Q establishes inspection
requirements for all CLIA-certified and
CLIA-exempt state laboratories. We state
that all provisions would apply to VA,
except that all enforcement and
oversight functions that are assigned to
HHS in this subpart are performed by
VA.
Subpart R sets forth enforcement
procedures, including the policies and
procedures CMS uses to enforce CLIA
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
requirements, as well as appeal rights of
laboratories on which CMS imposes
sanctions. We state that all provisions
would apply to VA with the following
exceptions. Suspension of the right to
Medicare or Medicaid payments as an
available sanction against VA
laboratories is not applicable because
VA laboratories do not participate in
these programs. Enforcement and
oversight functions would be performed
by VA rather than HHS or CMS. VA is
responsible for ensuring its laboratories
comply with these CLIA requirements,
and taking immediate action in the
jeopardy to patients. See, Public Law
102–139, section 101; 42 CFR 493.1218.
Due process protections afforded by
CMS-certified laboratories facing
sanctions would not apply to
laboratories operating by or under
contract with VA. If VA had a
substantial testing issue with a non-VA
CMS-certified laboratory, VA would
notify CMS of that instant. Laboratories
subject to this proposed rule are
operated by VA or under contract with
VA. Finally, we state that VA would not
participate in laboratory registry under
42 CFR 493.1850. This is consistent
with longstanding VA policy and
practice. The laboratory registry
operated by CMS under part 493
includes collection of data that is not
applicable to VA. Examples include a
list of laboratories that have been
convicted, under Federal or State laws
relating to fraud and abuse, false billing,
or kickbacks; all appeals and hearing
decisions; a list of laboratories against
which CMS has sued under § 493.1846
and the reasons for those actions; and,
a list of laboratories that have been
excluded from participation in Medicare
or Medicaid and the reasons for the
exclusion. VA has made VA laboratory
information available to the public in
accordance with the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552. VA
believes this would provide the public
with greater access to information than
that found in the private sector.
Subpart T requires HHS to establish a
Clinical Laboratory Improvement
Advisory Committee (CLIAC) to advise
and make recommendations on
technical and scientific aspects of the
provisions of part 493. The committee is
managed by the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), provides
scientific and technical advice and
guidance to HHS. The Committee
includes diverse membership across
laboratory specialties, professional
roles, (laboratory management,
technical, physicians, nurses) and
practice settings (academic, clinical,
public health), and includes a consumer
E:\FR\FM\17OCP1.SGM
17OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 17, 2018 / Proposed Rules
representative. VA benefits from the
diversity, broad knowledge, and
expertise of government and nongovernment participants that make up
CLIAC, because any issues addressed
that result in changes to the part 493
regulations, then also become a
requirement for VA. Since VA complies
with part 493 regulations, VA ultimately
benefits from revisions for improvement
to standards initiated by CLIAC. CLIAC
is governed by the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA), Public Law 92–
463. FACA was enacted in 1972 to
establish guidelines on federal advisory
committee structures and operations. As
VA does not have a similar FACA-level
advisory committee, this subpart would
not apply to VA.
Effect of Rulemaking
The Code of Federal Regulations, as
proposed to be revised by this proposed
rulemaking, would represent the
exclusive legal authority on this subject.
No contrary rules or procedures would
be authorized. All VA guidance would
be read to conform with this proposed
rulemaking if possible or, if not
possible, such guidance would be
superseded by this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no
provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3521).
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. It
would affect only the operations of VA
medical facility laboratories. Therefore,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this
rulemaking would be exempt from the
initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603
and 604.
Executive Order 12866, 13563 and
13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 16, 2018
Jkt 247001
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), unless OMB waives such
review, as ‘‘any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1)
Have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or tribal governments or communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency; (3)
Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive
Order.’’
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this proposed rule have
been examined, and it has been
determined to be a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866,
because it raises novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive Order. VA’s
impact analysis can be found as a
supporting document at https://
www.regulations.gov, usually within 48
hours after the rulemaking document is
published. Additionally, a copy of the
rulemaking and its impact analysis are
available on VA’s website at https://
www.va.gov/orpm/, by following the
link for ‘‘VA Regulations Published
From FY 2004 Through Fiscal Year to
Date.’’ This proposed rule is not
expected to be subject to the
requirements of E.O. 13771 because this
proposed rule is expected to result in no
more than de minimis costs using a
post-statutory baseline reflecting current
practices within VA.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This proposed rule would
have no such effect on State, local, and
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
52349
tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance numbers and titles for the
programs affected by this document are
64.008—Veterans Domiciliary Care;
64.011—Veterans Dental Care; 64.029—
Purchase Care Program; 64.033—VA
Supportive Services for Veteran
Families Program; 64.040—VA Inpatient
Medicine; 64.041—VA Outpatient
Specialty Care; 64.042—VA Inpatient
Surgery; 64.043—VA Mental Health
Residential; 64.044—VA Home Care;
64.045—VA Outpatient Ancillary
Services; 64.046—VA Inpatient
Psychiatry; 64.047—VA Primary Care;
64.048—VA Mental Health clinics;
64.049—VA Community Living Center;
64.050—VA Diagnostic Care; 64.054—
Research and Development.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism,
Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug
abuse, Government contracts, Grant
programs-health, Grant programsveterans, Health care, Health facilities,
Health professions, Health records,
Homeless, Medical and Dental schools,
Medical devices, Medical research,
Mental health programs, Nursing
homes, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Travel and transportation
expenses, Veterans.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. Gina
S. Farrisee, Deputy Chief of Staff,
Department of Veterans Affairs,
approved this document on September
19, 2017, for publication.
Dated: October 11, 2018.
Consuela Benjamin,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office
of Regulation Policy & Management, Office
of the Secretary, Department of Veterans
Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, VA proposes to amend 38
CFR part 17 as follows:
PART 17—MEDICAL
1. The authority citation for part 17 is
amended by adding a sentence
immediately following the statutory
authority citation for section 17.655 to
read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\17OCP1.SGM
17OCP1
52350
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 17, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as noted in
specific sections:
*
*
*
*
*
Section 17.3500 is also issued under Public
Law 102–139 sec. 101.
2. Add an undesignated center
heading and § 17.3500 to read as
follows:
■
Clinical Laboratory Standards
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 17.3500 VA application of 42 CFR part
493 standards for clinical laboratory
operations.
All laboratory testing within VA
performed for the diagnosis, prevention,
or treatment of any disease or
impairment of, or health assessment of,
human beings must comply with the
listed requirements established by the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) under the following
subparts of 42 CFR part 493 as
interpreted, administered, and enforced
by VA. VA laboratory testing must meet,
at a minimum, requirements established
in 42 CFR part 493. These standards
must be met for any laboratory service
offered within a VA medical facility or
outreach clinics, as well as contracted
laboratory services performed on site at
VA laboratories, outreach clinics, or
testing sites. Except as noted below,
functions and responsibilities assigned
to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) in 42 CFR part 493 are
assumed by VA. Provisions that are
specific to oversight by state licensure
programs are not applicable. VA
administers the application of the
relevant provisions of 42 CFR part 493
to VA laboratories as follows:
(a) Subpart A—General provisions.
All provisions apply to VA with the
following exceptions:
(1) Functions assigned to HHS in this
subpart are performed by VA.
(2) While 42 CFR part 493 requires
laboratories that perform waived,
moderate and high complexity tests to
meet the regulations, VA requires VA
laboratories meet or exceed the
requirements of 42 CFR part 493.
(b) Subpart B—Certificate of waiver.
All provisions apply to VA, except that:
(1) Certificates issued by HHS under
this subpart are instead issued by VA
pursuant to an agreement between CMS
and VA.
(2) CMS does not require remittance
of a fee from laboratories for any
certificate issued by the VA under this
subpart.
(c) Subpart C—Registration
certificate, certificate for providerperformed microscopy procedures, and
certificate of compliance. All provisions
apply to VA, except that:
(1) Certificates issued by HHS under
this subpart are instead issued by VA
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 16, 2018
Jkt 247001
pursuant to an agreement between CMS
and VA.
(2) CMS does not require remittance
of a fee from laboratories for any
certificate issued by VA under this
subpart.
(d) Subpart D—Certificates of
accreditation. All provisions apply to
VA, except that:
(1) Certificates issued by HHS under
this subpart are instead issued by VA
pursuant to an agreement between CMS
and VA.
(2) CMS does not require remittance
of a fee from laboratories for any
certificate issued by VA under this
subpart.
(e) Subpart E—Accreditation by a
private, nonprofit accreditation
organization or exemption under an
approved state laboratory program. All
provisions apply to VA, to the extent
that this subpart addresses accreditation
by a private, nonprofit accreditation
organization. VA applies this subpart as
follows:
(1) VA relies on CMS to grant
deeming authority for accreditation
organizations. VA uses only these
accreditation agencies with deeming
authority to accredit VA laboratories.
(2) VA uses only CMS approved
proficiency testing providers.
(3) Proficiency testing providers
release proficiency testing results
directly to VA.
(4) VA, rather than CMS, performs
validation inspections of VA
laboratories.
(5) Oversight and enforcement
functions under this subpart are
performed by VA.
(f) Subpart F—General
administration. This subpart sets forth
the methodology for determining the
amount of the fees for issuing the
appropriate certificate, and for
determining compliance with the
applicable standards of the Public
Health Service Act and the Federal
validation of accredited laboratories and
of CLIA-exempt laboratories. This
subpart is inapplicable to VA, as CMS
does not collect fees for certification of
VA laboratories.
(g) Subpart H—Participation in
proficiency testing for laboratories
performing nonwaived testing. All
provisions apply to VA, except that all
enforcement and oversight functions
related to proficiency testing which are
assigned to HHS in this subpart are
performed by VA.
(h) Subpart I—Proficiency testing
programs for nonwaived testing. All
provisions apply to VA, and VA
employs scoring criteria under this
subpart. VA uses only CMS approved
proficiency testing providers.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
Enforcement and oversight functions
related to proficiency testing which are
assigned to HHS in this subpart are
performed by VA.
(i) Subpart J—Facility administration
for nonwaived testing. VA applies
standards established in this subpart.
(j) Subpart K—Quality system for
nonwaived testing. VA applies
standards established in this subpart.
(k) Subpart M—Personnel for
nonwaived testing. VA applies
standards established in this subpart,
except that requirements regarding
maintaining a license in the state where
the laboratory is located are not
applicable.
(l) Subpart Q—Inspection. VA applies
standards established in this subpart,
except that all enforcement and
oversight functions, which are assigned
to HHS in this subpart are performed by
VA.
(m) Subpart R—Enforcement
procedures. VA applies standards
established in this subpart, except:
(1) Enforcement and oversight
functions which are assigned to HHS in
this subpart are performed by VA.
(2) Due process protections afforded
by CMS-certified for laboratories facing
sanctions are not applicable to
laboratories operating under this
section.
(3) Suspension of the right to
Medicare or Medicaid payments as an
available sanction is not applicable. VA
does not participate in these programs.
(4) State onsite monitoring and
monetary penalties imposed by CMS as
an alternate sanction under 42 CFR
493.1806(c) are not applicable.
(5) VA may cease laboratory testing
immediately at any site subject to this
section upon notification of immediate
jeopardy to patients.
(6) VA does not participate in
laboratory registry under 42 CFR
493.1850. VA may disclose laboratory
information useful in evaluating the
performance of laboratories under 5
U.S.C. 552.
(n) Subpart T—Consultations. This
subpart requires HHS to establish a
Clinical Laboratory Improvement
Advisory Committee (CLIAC) to advise
and make recommendations on
technical and scientific aspects of the
provisions of part 493. This subpart
does not apply to VA.
[FR Doc. 2018–22452 Filed 10–16–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
E:\FR\FM\17OCP1.SGM
17OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 17, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 52345-52350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22452]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900-AP64
Adopting Standards for Laboratory Requirements
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
medical regulations to establish standards for VA clinical
laboratories. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has
established standards for the staffing, management, procedures, and
oversight of clinical laboratories that perform testing used for the
diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of any disease or impairment of, or
health assessment of, human beings. VA is required, in consultation
with HHS, to establish standards equal to those applicable to other
clinical laboratories. As a matter of policy and practice VA has
applied HHS standards to its VA laboratory operations, and this
proposed rule would formalize this practice. The proposed rule would
establish quality standards for laboratory testing performed on
specimens from humans, such as blood, body fluid and tissue, for the
purpose of diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of disease, or
assessment of health. Specifically, it would address how VA applies
regulations as the controlling
[[Page 52346]]
standards for VA medical facility laboratories.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 17, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through
www.regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to the Director,
Regulation Policy and Management (00REG), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW, Room 1063B, Washington, DC 20420; or by
fax to (202) 273-9026. Comments should indicate that they are submitted
in response to ``RIN 2900-AP64--Adopting 42 CFR Part 493 Laboratory
Requirements.'' Copies of comments received will be available for
public inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and Management,
Room 1063B, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday (except holidays). Please call (202) 461-4902 for an
appointment. (This is not a toll-free number.) In addition, during the
comment period, comments may be viewed online through the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Quynh Vantu, Health Science
Specialist, Pathology and Laboratory Service (10P11P), Office of
Specialty Care Services, Veterans Health Administration, Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW, Room 1063B, Washington, DC
20420, (202) 632-8418. (This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Clinical Laboratory Improvement
Amendments of 1988 (Pub. L. (PL) 100-578) amended section 353 of the
Public Health Service Act to establish legal requirements for the
staffing, management, procedures, and oversight of clinical
laboratories that perform testing used for the diagnosis, prevention,
or treatment of any disease or impairment of, or health assessment of,
human beings. These statutory requirements are codified at 42 U.S.C.
263a. The term ``laboratory'' or ``clinical laboratory'' are defined at
42 U.S.C. 263a(a) as a facility for the biological, microbiological,
serological, chemical, immuno-hematological, hematological,
biophysical, cytological, pathological, or other examination of
materials derived from the human body for the purpose of providing
information for the diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of any disease
or impairment of, or the assessment of the health of, human beings.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), within HHS, promulgated
regulations for the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)
at title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 493. CMS has
primary responsibility for the administration of the CLIA program.
``. . . [T]o assure consistent performance of medical facility
laboratories under the jurisdiction of the Secretary [of Veterans
Affairs] of valid and reliable laboratory examinations and other
procedures,'' section 101 of Public Law 102-139 (``1991 Act'') was
enacted, requiring VA, within a specified time-frame and in
consultation with HHS, ``to establish standards [by regulation] equal
to that applicable to other medical facility laboratories in accordance
with the requirements of section 353(f) of the Public Health Service
Act.'' VA's regulations must ``include appropriate provisions
respecting compliance with such requirements [set forth in section
353(f) of the Public Health Service Act]'' and may include appropriate
provisions respecting waivers and accreditations described in sections
353(d) and 353(e), respectively, of the Public Health Service Act. As a
matter of policy and practice, VA believes it has met these statutory
requirements; however, VA is issuing this proposed rule to comply with
the requirement for formal rulemaking. Since enactment of section
101(a) of the 1991 Act, VA has collaborated with HHS in reviewing VA
requirements and in developing standards for VA's medical facility
laboratories that meet the requirements of law.
VA policy and practice regarding CLIA compliance was developed in
consultation with HHS in 1994 and 1998. VA laboratories are accredited
by accrediting organizations granted deeming authority by CMS (i.e.,
HHS-approved accreditation organization) to ensure its laboratories are
in compliance with current CLIA regulations. Based on consultation with
CMS in 1994 and 1998, the accreditation organization(s) provide
oversight for proficiency testing in VA laboratories, as set forth in
CLIA. Deeming authority is granted to an accrediting organization by
CMS after a determination that the organization's accreditation
oversight program requires that laboratories comply with or exceed CLIA
standards. CMS has granted ``deeming authority'' to several other
organization allowing them to accredit laboratories and inspect the
laboratories in CMS's stead. The history of the process of the
development of CLIA equivalent VHA standards in consultation with CMS
is documented in the interagency agreement (IAA) between VA and CMS.
In 2000, after further consultation, VA and CMS entered into an
IAA, which documented the history of the parties' consultations and
agreements and granted VA limited authority to act on behalf of CMS.
Specifically, the IAA authorized VA to issue CMS CLIA numbers and CLIA
certificates to VA laboratories, which requires VA to notify CMS when
VA suspends or retires CLIA numbers assigned to VA laboratories.
This agreement was renewed in 2010, and CMS and VA have agreed to
review and update the interagency agreement as necessary in 2018, and
every 6 years thereafter. In addition, CMS and VA agree to meet
annually to discuss program issues of mutual importance.
To ensure VA remains current with CMS CLIA requirements, VA
participates in the CMS Partners in Laboratory Oversight group,
consults will CMS as needed, and participates in at least one formal
consultative meeting per year. These engagements with CMS facilitates
ongoing communication and coordination, and promotes effective
oversight necessary to coordinate major activities, and expeditious,
effective response to complaints, survey findings, and publicly
volatile situations. VA staff attend State Agency Surveyor training,
and CLIA surveyor webinars. VA has also convened ad hoc conferences
with CMS when the exchange of information on CLIA may be needed. VA
provides updates at the annual partners meeting and participates in
audio conferences as requested. The CMS CLIA Program Director
participates in VA's annual conference in which CMS, VA, and Department
of Defense provide updates on laboratory issues and enforcement of
laboratory regulations. As discussed below, VA laboratories that
perform testing are all accredited and inspected by accrediting
organizations granted deeming authority by CMS. As such, VA has
documentation that its laboratories meet current CLIA standards.
VA provides updated data to CMS for each VA laboratory assigned a
CLIA number at least every two years, or as changes occur. VA provides
CMS with any requested information regarding the operation and
performance of VA laboratories and the operations of the oversight
program.
Under the 1991 Act, the definition of ``medical facility
laboratories'' has the same meaning previously used to define the terms
``laboratory'' or ``clinical laboratory'' pursuant to section 353(a) of
the Public Health Service Act, codified at 42 U.S.C. 263a(a). VA
concluded that it should adopt 42 CFR part 493 regulations that were
applicable to clinical laboratory operations but keep oversight and
enforcement of these regulations as applied to VA laboratories within
VA, rather than
[[Page 52347]]
HHS. Under current VA practice, VA fulfills all laboratory oversight of
and enforcement functions for VA laboratories that CMS fulfills for HHS
with respect to laboratories subject to CLIA. VA has the authority and
responsibility to provide enforcement of the CLIA regulations for VA
laboratories, including imposing sanctions and discontinuing laboratory
testing. VA believes this determination is consistent with the fact
that Congress passed an entirely separate law (Pub. L. 102-139) for VA
medical facility laboratories under the exclusive jurisdiction and
control of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
The 42 CFR part 493 regulations are very detailed and include
multiple subparts that address clinical laboratory tests. The
laboratory regulations include requirements for proficiency testing;
facility administration; quality systems; personnel qualifications;
responsibilities for laboratory personnel, including laboratory
directors and testing personnel; laboratory inspections; and
enforcement. Several subparts are not directly applicable to VA medical
facility laboratories because they address administration of the
oversight and enforcement functions performed by CMS under 42 CFR part
493. Sections of 42 CFR part 493 that refer to the interactions with
state programs, collections of fees, suspension of payments, creation
of an advisory committee, and civil action are not applicable to VA, as
discussed in greater detail below.
Although the requirement for consultation between HHS and VA was
accomplished over 20 years ago, we are now proposing to formalize,
document, and update, as necessary, VA's application of the CLIA
requirements to VA laboratory operations. VA proposes to amend its
medical regulations to reference the portions of 42 CFR part 493
adopted by VA as they apply to VA medical facility laboratories and
clinics and to clarify that these standards are subject to VA oversight
and enforcement by VA only. In addition, the proposed rule would
require VA laboratories to be accredited by an accreditation
organization granted deeming authority by CMS, in accordance with the
accreditation requirement in CLIA, and participate in an HHS approved
proficiency testing program.
Through this proposed rulemaking, in accordance with current VA
policy and practice, VA can continue to assure that medical facility
laboratories across our system perform consistent, accurate and
reliable laboratory testing, ensuring the provision of quality testing
for our veteran-patients in a manner comparable to non-VA laboratories.
We note that, in addition to 42 CFR part 493 standards, VA
recognizes and adheres to worker safety standards established by the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). In addition, the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) regulates the collection of blood and blood
components intended for transfusion or for further manufacturing use,
such as to make clotting factors, and establishes standards for blood
and blood products. FDA also regulates related products such as cell
separation devices, blood collection containers and HIV screening tests
that are intended for use in the manufacture of blood or blood
products. FDA develops and enforces quality standards, inspects blood
establishments, and monitors reports of errors, accidents and adverse
clinical events. Those additional standards are beyond the scope of
this proposed rule.
VA proposes to add a new section 17.3500, ``Adopting 42 CFR Part
493 Laboratory Requirements,'' to its medical regulations. There, we
would address CLIA regulations found at 42 CFR part 493, by subpart,
and how VA would apply those regulations.
We state that all laboratory testing within VA performed for the
diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of disease, and assessment of
health in patients would comply with the relevant requirements
established by HHS under 42 CFR part 493 as enforced by VA. VA
laboratory testing must meet, at a minimum, requirements established in
42 CFR part 493. These requirements must be met for any laboratory
service offered by a VA medical facility, as well as contracted
laboratory services performed on site at VA laboratories, outreach
clinics, or testing sites. Provisions that are specific to oversight by
state licensure programs are not applicable, since VA as a federal
entity is not subject to state licensing requirements. Except as noted
in the proposed rule, functions and responsibilities assigned to CMS in
42 CFR part 493 are assumed by VA with respect to laboratories operated
by or on behalf of VA.
Part 493 subpart A covers general provisions. We propose that all
provisions of subpart A would apply to VA with several exceptions
intended to reflect that VA has the authority, responsibility, and duty
to administer 42 CFR part 493 standards within VA. We state that
functions assigned to HHS in this subpart would be performed by VA.
This is consistent with an IAA previously entered into between VA and
CMS. The regulation would set forth that the respective provisions of
42 CFR part 493 apply to VA laboratories performing waived, moderate,
and high complexity tests.
Subparts B through D address certificates issued by CMS. Subpart B
focuses on Certificates of Waiver. Subpart C addresses Registration
Certificates, Certificates for PPM procedures, and Certificates of
Compliance. PPM procedures are a select group of moderately complex
microscopy tests commonly performed by specific health care providers
during patient office visits. Tests included in PPM procedures do not
meet the criteria for waiver because they are not simple procedures;
they require training and specific skills for test performance. Subpart
D focuses on Certificates of Accreditation. These subparts establish
standards for CMS-issuance of the listed certificates as well as fees
that must be remitted to CMS by regulated laboratories in order to
apply for and receive certification. We state that all provisions of
these subparts would apply to VA laboratories, except that certificates
issued by HHS under these subparts are instead issued by VA pursuant to
the previously noted interagency agreement between CMS and VA. As
certificates are issued by VA rather than CMS, CMS does not require
remittance of a fee from laboratories for any certificate issued by VA
under these subparts.
Subpart E addresses accreditation by a private, nonprofit
accreditation organization or exemption under an approved State
laboratory program. Under this subpart, a laboratory may meet
individual VA and CLIA program requirements through accreditation by a
CMS approved nonprofit accreditation organization (AO). The subpart
establishes an application and approval process for an accreditation
organization seeking to be granted deeming authority by CMS, as well as
a process in which CMS may validate findings of an accreditation
organization by reinspection of a laboratory following an inspection by
that accreditation organization. CLIA has granted ``deeming authority''
to several accreditation organizations allowing them to accredit
laboratories and inspect the laboratories. These accreditation
organizations must impose organizations' requirements equal to or more
stringent than those contained in 42 CFR part 493 at the condition
level. The subpart also establishes standards for CLIA exemptions under
an approved State laboratory program. All provisions would apply to VA,
to the extent that
[[Page 52348]]
this subpart addresses accreditation by a private, nonprofit
accreditation organization. However, the provisions related to approved
State laboratory program do not apply to VA.
The proposed rule states that VA would use only accreditation
agencies with CMS-granted deeming authority to accredit VA
laboratories. This is consistent with current, longstanding, VA
practice. CMS has an established process for determining whether an
accreditation organization should be granted deeming authority, and
experience in making that determination. VA has determined that there
is no need to duplicate that process and relying on CMS' approval of an
accreditation organization ensures that VA would not reach any
conclusions on deeming authority that are inconsistent with CMS.
A validation inspection is a quality control measure performed by
CMS under Subpart E. It involves CMS reinspection of a laboratory that
has recently been inspected by an accreditation organization with
deeming authority, to validate that AO's survey findings. We state that
validation inspections performed by CMS under subpart E would be
performed instead by VA. This is consistent with current practice, and
VA's authority under the 1991 Act to provide oversight and enforcement
of the requirements set forth in 42 CFR part 493, as oversight and
enforcement functions under this subpart as applied to VA laboratories
are performed by VA.
General administration provisions related to 42 CFR part 493 are
found at Subpart F. This subpart sets forth the methodology for
determining the amount of fees for issuing the appropriate certificate,
and for determining compliance with the applicable standards of the
Public Health Service Act and the Federal validation of accredited
laboratories. We state that provisions of Subpart F would not be
applicable to VA, as CMS does not collect fees for certification of VA
laboratories
Subpart H addresses participation in proficiency testing for
laboratories performing nonwaived testing. Nonwaived testing is the
term used by CMS to refer collectively to moderate and high complexity
testing. We state that all provisions of this subpart would apply to
VA, and VA employs scoring criteria under this subpart.
Subpart I focuses on the approval of proficiency testing programs.
The proposed rule states that VA would rely on HHS to approve
proficiency testing programs. VA would continue to use only HHS
approved proficiency testing programs. HHS has an established process
for proficiency testing program approval and experience in making that
determination. VA has determined that there is no need to duplicate
that process and relies on HHS program approvals.
Subpart J addresses facility administration for nonwaived testing,
and sets standards for facility construction, transfusion services, and
records retention. We state that all provisions of this subpart would
apply to VA.
Subpart K focuses on quality systems for nonwaived testing. Under
this subpart, each laboratory that performs nonwaived testing must
establish and maintain written policies and procedures that implement
and monitor a quality system for all phases of the total testing
process (that is, preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic) as well as
general laboratory systems. Laboratory quality systems must include a
quality assessment component that ensures continuous improvement of the
laboratory's performance and services through ongoing monitoring that
identifies, evaluates, and resolves problems. The laboratory's quality
system must be appropriate for the specialties and subspecialties of
testing that the laboratory performs, services it offers, and clients
it serves. This subpart establishes requirements for different
specialties and subspecialties of laboratory tests and VA would apply
all established requirements.
Personnel requirements for performing non-waived testing are
addressed in subpart M. All applicable personnel requirements would
meet CLIA requirements with the exception of state-specific licensing
requirements. Subpart M requires that certain personnel maintain a
license in the state in which the laboratory is located. While VA
health care providers must be licensed in a state, there is no
requirement that the health care provider be licensed in the state
where the VA facility at which the provider works is located. See, 38
U.S.C. 7402 (requiring licensure in any state for eligibility to an
appointment as VHA health care provider regardless of VHA facility
location).
Subpart Q establishes inspection requirements for all CLIA-
certified and CLIA-exempt state laboratories. We state that all
provisions would apply to VA, except that all enforcement and oversight
functions that are assigned to HHS in this subpart are performed by VA.
Subpart R sets forth enforcement procedures, including the policies
and procedures CMS uses to enforce CLIA requirements, as well as appeal
rights of laboratories on which CMS imposes sanctions. We state that
all provisions would apply to VA with the following exceptions.
Suspension of the right to Medicare or Medicaid payments as an
available sanction against VA laboratories is not applicable because VA
laboratories do not participate in these programs. Enforcement and
oversight functions would be performed by VA rather than HHS or CMS. VA
is responsible for ensuring its laboratories comply with these CLIA
requirements, and taking immediate action in the jeopardy to patients.
See, Public Law 102-139, section 101; 42 CFR 493.1218. Due process
protections afforded by CMS-certified laboratories facing sanctions
would not apply to laboratories operating by or under contract with VA.
If VA had a substantial testing issue with a non-VA CMS-certified
laboratory, VA would notify CMS of that instant. Laboratories subject
to this proposed rule are operated by VA or under contract with VA.
Finally, we state that VA would not participate in laboratory registry
under 42 CFR 493.1850. This is consistent with longstanding VA policy
and practice. The laboratory registry operated by CMS under part 493
includes collection of data that is not applicable to VA. Examples
include a list of laboratories that have been convicted, under Federal
or State laws relating to fraud and abuse, false billing, or kickbacks;
all appeals and hearing decisions; a list of laboratories against which
CMS has sued under Sec. 493.1846 and the reasons for those actions;
and, a list of laboratories that have been excluded from participation
in Medicare or Medicaid and the reasons for the exclusion. VA has made
VA laboratory information available to the public in accordance with
the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552. VA believes this would
provide the public with greater access to information than that found
in the private sector.
Subpart T requires HHS to establish a Clinical Laboratory
Improvement Advisory Committee (CLIAC) to advise and make
recommendations on technical and scientific aspects of the provisions
of part 493. The committee is managed by the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), provides scientific and technical advice
and guidance to HHS. The Committee includes diverse membership across
laboratory specialties, professional roles, (laboratory management,
technical, physicians, nurses) and practice settings (academic,
clinical, public health), and includes a consumer
[[Page 52349]]
representative. VA benefits from the diversity, broad knowledge, and
expertise of government and non-government participants that make up
CLIAC, because any issues addressed that result in changes to the part
493 regulations, then also become a requirement for VA. Since VA
complies with part 493 regulations, VA ultimately benefits from
revisions for improvement to standards initiated by CLIAC. CLIAC is
governed by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), Public Law 92-
463. FACA was enacted in 1972 to establish guidelines on federal
advisory committee structures and operations. As VA does not have a
similar FACA-level advisory committee, this subpart would not apply to
VA.
Effect of Rulemaking
The Code of Federal Regulations, as proposed to be revised by this
proposed rulemaking, would represent the exclusive legal authority on
this subject. No contrary rules or procedures would be authorized. All
VA guidance would be read to conform with this proposed rulemaking if
possible or, if not possible, such guidance would be superseded by this
rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no provisions constituting a collection
of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501-3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612. It would affect only the operations of VA medical
facility laboratories. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this
rulemaking would be exempt from the initial and final regulatory
flexibility analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604.
Executive Order 12866, 13563 and 13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a
``significant regulatory action,'' requiring review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), unless OMB waives such review, as ``any
regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2)
Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal
or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's
priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order.''
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this proposed rule have been examined, and it has been
determined to be a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866, because it raises novel legal or policy issues arising out of
legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth
in this Executive Order. VA's impact analysis can be found as a
supporting document at https://www.regulations.gov, usually within 48
hours after the rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy
of the rulemaking and its impact analysis are available on VA's website
at https://www.va.gov/orpm/, by following the link for ``VA Regulations
Published From FY 2004 Through Fiscal Year to Date.'' This proposed
rule is not expected to be subject to the requirements of E.O. 13771
because this proposed rule is expected to result in no more than de
minimis costs using a post-statutory baseline reflecting current
practices within VA.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This proposed rule would have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance numbers and titles for
the programs affected by this document are 64.008--Veterans Domiciliary
Care; 64.011--Veterans Dental Care; 64.029--Purchase Care Program;
64.033--VA Supportive Services for Veteran Families Program; 64.040--VA
Inpatient Medicine; 64.041--VA Outpatient Specialty Care; 64.042--VA
Inpatient Surgery; 64.043--VA Mental Health Residential; 64.044--VA
Home Care; 64.045--VA Outpatient Ancillary Services; 64.046--VA
Inpatient Psychiatry; 64.047--VA Primary Care; 64.048--VA Mental Health
clinics; 64.049--VA Community Living Center; 64.050--VA Diagnostic
Care; 64.054--Research and Development.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism,
Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug abuse, Government contracts,
Grant programs-health, Grant programs-veterans, Health care, Health
facilities, Health professions, Health records, Homeless, Medical and
Dental schools, Medical devices, Medical research, Mental health
programs, Nursing homes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Travel and transportation expenses, Veterans.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Gina S.
Farrisee, Deputy Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs,
approved this document on September 19, 2017, for publication.
Dated: October 11, 2018.
Consuela Benjamin,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office of Regulation Policy &
Management, Office of the Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, VA proposes to amend 38
CFR part 17 as follows:
PART 17--MEDICAL
0
1. The authority citation for part 17 is amended by adding a sentence
immediately following the statutory authority citation for section
17.655 to read as follows:
[[Page 52350]]
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as noted in specific sections:
* * * * *
Section 17.3500 is also issued under Public Law 102-139 sec.
101.
0
2. Add an undesignated center heading and Sec. 17.3500 to read as
follows:
Clinical Laboratory Standards
Sec. 17.3500 VA application of 42 CFR part 493 standards for clinical
laboratory operations.
All laboratory testing within VA performed for the diagnosis,
prevention, or treatment of any disease or impairment of, or health
assessment of, human beings must comply with the listed requirements
established by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under
the following subparts of 42 CFR part 493 as interpreted, administered,
and enforced by VA. VA laboratory testing must meet, at a minimum,
requirements established in 42 CFR part 493. These standards must be
met for any laboratory service offered within a VA medical facility or
outreach clinics, as well as contracted laboratory services performed
on site at VA laboratories, outreach clinics, or testing sites. Except
as noted below, functions and responsibilities assigned to the Centers
for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in 42 CFR part 493 are assumed
by VA. Provisions that are specific to oversight by state licensure
programs are not applicable. VA administers the application of the
relevant provisions of 42 CFR part 493 to VA laboratories as follows:
(a) Subpart A--General provisions. All provisions apply to VA with
the following exceptions:
(1) Functions assigned to HHS in this subpart are performed by VA.
(2) While 42 CFR part 493 requires laboratories that perform
waived, moderate and high complexity tests to meet the regulations, VA
requires VA laboratories meet or exceed the requirements of 42 CFR part
493.
(b) Subpart B--Certificate of waiver. All provisions apply to VA,
except that:
(1) Certificates issued by HHS under this subpart are instead
issued by VA pursuant to an agreement between CMS and VA.
(2) CMS does not require remittance of a fee from laboratories for
any certificate issued by the VA under this subpart.
(c) Subpart C--Registration certificate, certificate for provider-
performed microscopy procedures, and certificate of compliance. All
provisions apply to VA, except that:
(1) Certificates issued by HHS under this subpart are instead
issued by VA pursuant to an agreement between CMS and VA.
(2) CMS does not require remittance of a fee from laboratories for
any certificate issued by VA under this subpart.
(d) Subpart D--Certificates of accreditation. All provisions apply
to VA, except that:
(1) Certificates issued by HHS under this subpart are instead
issued by VA pursuant to an agreement between CMS and VA.
(2) CMS does not require remittance of a fee from laboratories for
any certificate issued by VA under this subpart.
(e) Subpart E--Accreditation by a private, nonprofit accreditation
organization or exemption under an approved state laboratory program.
All provisions apply to VA, to the extent that this subpart addresses
accreditation by a private, nonprofit accreditation organization. VA
applies this subpart as follows:
(1) VA relies on CMS to grant deeming authority for accreditation
organizations. VA uses only these accreditation agencies with deeming
authority to accredit VA laboratories.
(2) VA uses only CMS approved proficiency testing providers.
(3) Proficiency testing providers release proficiency testing
results directly to VA.
(4) VA, rather than CMS, performs validation inspections of VA
laboratories.
(5) Oversight and enforcement functions under this subpart are
performed by VA.
(f) Subpart F--General administration. This subpart sets forth the
methodology for determining the amount of the fees for issuing the
appropriate certificate, and for determining compliance with the
applicable standards of the Public Health Service Act and the Federal
validation of accredited laboratories and of CLIA-exempt laboratories.
This subpart is inapplicable to VA, as CMS does not collect fees for
certification of VA laboratories.
(g) Subpart H--Participation in proficiency testing for
laboratories performing nonwaived testing. All provisions apply to VA,
except that all enforcement and oversight functions related to
proficiency testing which are assigned to HHS in this subpart are
performed by VA.
(h) Subpart I--Proficiency testing programs for nonwaived testing.
All provisions apply to VA, and VA employs scoring criteria under this
subpart. VA uses only CMS approved proficiency testing providers.
Enforcement and oversight functions related to proficiency testing
which are assigned to HHS in this subpart are performed by VA.
(i) Subpart J--Facility administration for nonwaived testing. VA
applies standards established in this subpart.
(j) Subpart K--Quality system for nonwaived testing. VA applies
standards established in this subpart.
(k) Subpart M--Personnel for nonwaived testing. VA applies
standards established in this subpart, except that requirements
regarding maintaining a license in the state where the laboratory is
located are not applicable.
(l) Subpart Q--Inspection. VA applies standards established in this
subpart, except that all enforcement and oversight functions, which are
assigned to HHS in this subpart are performed by VA.
(m) Subpart R--Enforcement procedures. VA applies standards
established in this subpart, except:
(1) Enforcement and oversight functions which are assigned to HHS
in this subpart are performed by VA.
(2) Due process protections afforded by CMS-certified for
laboratories facing sanctions are not applicable to laboratories
operating under this section.
(3) Suspension of the right to Medicare or Medicaid payments as an
available sanction is not applicable. VA does not participate in these
programs.
(4) State onsite monitoring and monetary penalties imposed by CMS
as an alternate sanction under 42 CFR 493.1806(c) are not applicable.
(5) VA may cease laboratory testing immediately at any site subject
to this section upon notification of immediate jeopardy to patients.
(6) VA does not participate in laboratory registry under 42 CFR
493.1850. VA may disclose laboratory information useful in evaluating
the performance of laboratories under 5 U.S.C. 552.
(n) Subpart T--Consultations. This subpart requires HHS to
establish a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Advisory Committee (CLIAC)
to advise and make recommendations on technical and scientific aspects
of the provisions of part 493. This subpart does not apply to VA.
[FR Doc. 2018-22452 Filed 10-16-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P