National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures, 52235-52242 [2018-22439]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2018 / Notices
Dated: October 9, 2018.
Michel Smyth,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018–22434 Filed 10–15–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–HX–P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE
PRESIDENT
Office of National Drug Control Policy
Designation of 10 Areas as High
Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas
Office of National Drug Control
Policy (ONDCP).
ACTION: Notice of HIDTA Designations.
AGENCY:
The Director of the Office of
National Drug Control Policy designated
10 additional areas as High Intensity
Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA)
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 1706. The new
areas are (1) Montgomery and Powell
Counties in Kentucky as part of the
Appalachia HIDTA; (2) Charleston
County in South Carolina and the
Eastern Band of Cherokee Indian
Reservation as part of the Atlanta/
Carolinas HIDTA; (3) Atlantic County in
New Jersey as part of the Liberty MidAtlantic HIDTA; (4) Allegheny, Beaver,
and Washington Counties in
Pennsylvania and Butler County in Ohio
as part of the Ohio HIDTA; and (5)
Mineral County in West Virginia as part
of the Washington/Baltimore HIDTA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions regarding this notice should
be directed to Michael K. Gottlieb,
National HIDTA Program Director,
Office of National Drug Control Policy,
Executive Office of the President,
Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395–4868.
SUMMARY:
Dated: October 11, 2018.
Michael Passante,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2018–22462 Filed 10–15–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3280–F5–P
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
National Endowment for the
Humanities
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
National Environmental Policy Act
Implementing Procedures
National Endowment for the
Humanities.
ACTION: Notice of availability and
request for comment.
AGENCY:
The National Endowment for
the Humanities (‘‘NEH’’) proposes to
promulgate procedures implementing
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Oct 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (‘‘NEPA’’), Executive Order
(‘‘E.O.’’) 11514 (as amended), and
Council on Environmental Quality
(‘‘CEQ’’) NEPA implementing
regulations. Pursuant to CEQ
regulations, NEH is soliciting comments
on its proposed procedures.
DATES: NEH is providing a 30-day
review period. You must submit
comments by no later than November
15, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Email: akress@neh.gov. Include
‘‘NEH NEPA Implementing Procedures’’
in the subject line of the email.
• Mail: National Endowment for the
Humanities, Office of the General
Counsel, 400 7th Street SW, Room 4060,
Washington, DC 20506, ATTN: Adam
Kress.
• Fax: (202) 606–8600. Please send
your comments to the attention of Adam
Kress.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and title
for this Federal Register document:
‘‘NEPA Implementing Procedures.’’
Please submit your comments using
only one method. NEH will post
comments as received to https://
www.neh.gov/about/foia/library. NEH
will not redact or edit personal
identifying information from comment
submissions. You should only submit
information that you wish to make
publicly available. NEH reserves the
right, but shall have no obligation, to
redact and/or refuse to post any or all
of your submission that it may deem to
be inappropriate for publication, such as
obscene language.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Adam M. Kress, (202) 606–8322;
akress@neh.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NEH is an
independent agency within the
executive branch of the United States
government, established by the National
Foundation on the Arts and the
Humanities Act of 1965. NEH extends
financial assistance to individuals and
organizations to support research,
education, preservation, and public
programs in the humanities. It also has
statutory authority to extend financial
assistance to cultural organizations to
enable infrastructure development and
capacity building, including through the
design, purchase, construction,
restoration, or renovation of facilities
needed for humanities activities and
historic landscapes.
NEPA and implementing regulations
promulgated by CEQ (40 CFR parts
1500–1508) established a broad national
policy to use all practicable means and
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52235
measures, including financial and
technical assistance, in a manner
calculated to foster and promote the
general welfare, as well as to create and
maintain conditions under which man
and nature can exist in productive
harmony and fulfill the social,
economic, and other requirements of
present and future generations of
Americans. The CEQ regulations
implementing the procedural provisions
of NEPA are designed to ensure that this
national policy, environmental
considerations, and associated public
concerns are given careful attention and
appropriate weight in all decisions of
the federal government. Sections 102(2)
of NEPA and 40 CFR 1505.1 and 1507.3
require federal agencies to develop and,
as needed, revise implementing
procedures consistent with the CEQ
regulations. NEH is issuing the
following NEPA implementing
procedures that comply with NEPA and
supplement the CEQ regulations.
In accordance with CEQ regulations
(40 CFR 1507.3), NEH consulted with
CEQ prior to publication of the
proposed procedures set forth below.
These proposed procedures include
proposed categorical exclusions specific
to NEH projects and actions that NEH
determined will not normally have a
potentially significant effect,
individually or cumulatively, on the
human environment.
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distribute impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. These procedures have not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ because they do not:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a section of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
52236
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2018 / Notices
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or
the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in these Executive Orders. The
text of the complete proposed
procedures appears below.
Dated: October 10, 2018.
Adam M. Kress,
Attorney-Advisor, National Endowment for
the Humanities.
Table of Contents
1. Purpose
2. Applicability
3. Environmental Policy
4. Terms and Abbreviations
5. Federal and Intergovernmental
Relationships
6. Applicant Responsibility
7. NEH Responsibility
8. Public Involvement
9. Environmental Review Process
10. Categorical Exclusions
a. General
b. Conditions
c. Extraordinary Circumstances
11. Environmental Assessments
a. Content
b. General Considerations in Preparing
Environmental Assessments
c. Public Involvement
d. Actions Resulting From Assessment
e. Findings of No Significant Impact
f. Proposals Normally Requiring an
Environmental Assessment
12. Environmental Impact Statements
a. Notice of Intent and Scoping
b. Preparation and Filing of Draft and Final
Environmental Impact Statements
c. Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement
d. Adoption
e. Proposals Normally Requiring an
Environmental Impact Statement
The National Environmental Policy Act
Procedures for NEH
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
1. Purpose
These procedures implement the
provisions of NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq. They adopt and supplement the
CEQ regulations implementing NEPA,
40 CFR parts 1500–1508, by establishing
policy, directing environmental
planning, and assigning responsibilities
in NEH to prepare, review, and approve
environmental documents, 40 CFR
1508.10, that comply with NEPA.
2. Applicability
These procedures apply NEPA to NEH
programs and activities, including
programs and activities carried out by
state and local governments, federallyrecognized tribal governments and nongovernmental organizations, with the
use of NEH financial assistance.
3. Environmental Policy
It is the policy of NEH to:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Oct 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
(a) Start the NEPA process at the
earliest possible time as an effective
decision-making tool while evaluating a
proposed action;
(b) Comply with the procedures and
policies of NEPA and other related
environmental laws, regulations, and
orders applicable to NEH actions;
(c) Provide guidance to applicants
responsible for ensuring that proposals
comply with all appropriate NEH
requirements;
(d) Integrate NEPA requirements and
other planning and environmental
review procedures required by law or
NEH practice so that all such
procedures run concurrently rather than
consecutively;
(e) Encourage and facilitate public
involvement in NEH actions that affect
the quality of the human environment;
(f) Use the NEPA process to identify
and assess reasonable alternatives to
proposed NEH actions to avoid or
minimize adverse effects upon the
quality of the human environment; and
(g) Use all practicable means
consistent with NEPA and other
essential considerations of national
policy to restore or enhance the quality
of the human environment and avoid,
minimize, or otherwise mitigate any
possible adverse effects of NEH actions
upon the quality of the human
environment.
4. Terms and Abbreviations
(a) For the purposes of this section,
the definitions in the CEQ regulations,
40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508, are
adopted and supplemented as set out in
paragraphs (a)(i) through (vi) of this
section. In the event of a conflict the
CEQ regulations apply.
(i) Action. Action and Federal action
as defined in 40 CFR 1508.18 include
projects and programs entirely or partly
financed, assisted, conducted, regulated,
or approved by NEH.
(ii) Applicant. The state, local or
federally-recognized tribal government
or non-governmental partner or
organization applying to NEH for
financial assistance or other approval.
An applicant may be an organization
already in receipt of NEH-awarded
funds.
(iii) Approving Official. The NEH
Chairman or an NEH staff member
designated by the NEH Chairman to
fulfill the responsibilities defined in
Section 6 below, including overseeing
development of and approval of the
NEPA document.
(iv) Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) is a document by NEH briefly
presenting the reasons why an action,
not otherwise excluded as provided in
Section 10 below, will not have a
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
significant impact on the human
environment and for which an EIS will
not be prepared.
(v) NEH Proposal (or proposal). A
proposal, as defined at 40 CFR 1508.23,
is an NEH proposal whether initiated by
NEH, another federal agency or an
applicant.
(vi) NEH Chairman: The Chairman of
NEH, as established in Section 7 of the
National Foundation on the Arts and the
Humanities Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. 956.
(b) The following abbreviations are
used throughout these procedures:
(i) CATEX—Categorical exclusions;
(ii) CEQ—Council on Environmental
Quality;
(iii) EA—Environmental assessment;
(iv) EIS—Environmental impact
statement;
(v) FONSI—Finding of no significant
impact;
(vi) NEPA—National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, as amended;
(vii) NOI—Notice of intent; and
(viii) ROD—Record of decision.
5. Federal and Intergovernmental
Relationships
NEH occasionally partners with
federal, state and local agencies, and
federally-recognized tribal governments,
and may depend on these governmental
agencies for project management. Under
such circumstances, NEH may rely on
the expertise and processes already in
use by partnering agencies to help
prepare NEH NEPA analyses and
documents.
(a) With federal partners, NEH will
work as either a joint lead agency (40
CFR 1501.5 and 1508.16) or cooperating
agency (40 CFR 1501.6 and 1508.5).
NEH may invite other Federal agencies
to serve as the lead agency, a joint lead
agency, or as a cooperating agency.
(b) Consistent with 40 CFR 1508.5,
NEH may invite state and local
government partners, and federallyrecognized tribal governments, to serve
as cooperating agencies.
6. Applicant Responsibility
Applicants shall work under NEH
direction provided by the Approving
Official, and assist NEH in fulfilling its
NEPA obligations by preparing NEPA
analyses and documents that comply
with the provisions of NEPA (42 U.S.C.
4321–4347), the CEQ regulations (40
CFR parts 1500 through 1508), and the
requirements set forth in this part.
Applicants shall follow NEH direction
when they assist NEH with the
following responsibilities, among
others:
(a) Prepare and disseminate
applicable environmental
documentation concurrent with a
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2018 / Notices
proposal’s engineering, planning, and
design;
(b) Create and distribute public
notices;
(c) Coordinate public hearings and
meetings as required;
(d) Submit all environmental
documents created pursuant to these
procedures to NEH for review and
approval before public distribution;
(e) Participate in all NEH-conducted
hearings or meetings;
(f) Consult with NEH prior to
obtaining the services of an
environmental consultant; in the case
that an EIS is required, the consultant or
contractor will be selected by NEH; and
(g) Implement mitigation measures
included as voluntary commitments by
the applicant or as requirements of the
applicant in NEH decision documents
(FONSI or ROD).
7. NEH Responsibility
(a) The NEH Chairman or his/her
designee shall designate an Approving
Official for each NEH proposal, and
shall provide environmental guidance to
the Approving Official;
(b) The Approving Official shall
provide direction and guidance to the
applicant as well as identification and
development of required analyses and
documentation;
(c) The Approving Official shall make
an independent evaluation of the
environmental issues, take
responsibility for the scope and content
of the environmental document (EA or
EIS), and make the environmental
finding;
(d) The Approving Official shall
ensure mitigation measures included in
NEH decision documents (FONSI or
ROD) are implemented; and
(e) The Approving official shall be
responsible for coordinating
communications with cooperating
agencies and other federal agencies.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
8. Public Involvement
NEH will make diligent efforts to
involve the public in preparing and
implementing its NEPA procedures in
accordance with 40 CFR 1501.4(b),
1506.6 and part 1503. When developing
a plan to include the public and affected
parties in the environmental analysis
process, NEH will consider the
following factors: (a) The magnitude of
the environmental considerations
associated with the proposal; (b) the
extent of expected public interest; and
(c) any relevant questions of national
concern. NEH will specifically publish
EAs and draft FONSIs on its website as
provided in Section 11(c) below.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Oct 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
9. Environmental Review Process
The environmental review process is
the investigation of potential
environmental impacts to determine the
environmental process to be followed
and to assist in the preparation of the
environmental document. NEH shall
specifically determine whether any NEH
proposal:
(a) Is categorically excluded from
preparation of either an EA or an EIS;
(b) Requires preparation of an EA; or
(c) Requires preparation of an EIS.
10. Categorical Exclusions
(a) General. A categorical exclusion
(CATEX) is defined in 40 CFR 1508.4 as
a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment and for which, in the
absence of extraordinary circumstances,
neither an EA nor an EIS is required.
Actions that meet the conditions in
paragraph (b) of this section and are
listed in section A of appendix A of
these procedures can be categorically
excluded from further analysis and
documentation in an EA or EIS. Actions
that meet the screening conditions in
paragraph (b) of this section and are
listed in section B of appendix A require
documentation in a Record of
Environmental Consideration (‘‘REC’’)
in order to be categorically excluded
from further analysis and
documentation in an EA or EIS. A draft
REC is attached as Appendix B to these
procedures.
(b) Conditions. The following three
conditions must be met for an action to
be categorically excluded from further
analysis in an EA or EIS.
(i) The action has not been segmented
(too narrowly defined or broken down
into small parts in order minimize its
potential effects and avoid a higher level
of NEPA review) and its scope includes
the consideration of connected actions
and, when evaluating extraordinary
circumstances, cumulative impacts.
(ii) No extraordinary circumstances
described in paragraph (c) of this
section exist.
(iii) The proposed action fits within
one of the categorical exclusions
described in either section of Appendix
A of this part.
(c) Extraordinary Circumstances. Any
action that normally would be classified
as a CATEX but could involve
extraordinary circumstances will
require appropriate environmental
review documented in an NEH CATEX
checklist to determine if the CATEX
classification is proper or if an EA or
EIS should be prepared. Extraordinary
circumstances to be considered include
those reasonably likely to:
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52237
(i) Have significant impacts on public
health, public safety, or the
environment;
(ii) Have effects on the environment
that are highly controversial or involve
unresolved conflicts concerning
alternative uses of available resources;
(iii) Have effects on the human
environment that are highly uncertain,
involve unique or unknown risks, or are
scientifically controversial;
(iv) Establish a precedent for future
action or represent a decision in
principle about future actions with
potentially significant environmental
effects;
(v) Relate to other actions with
individually insignificant but
cumulatively significant environmental
effects;
(vi) Have a greater scope or size than
is normal for the category of action;
(vii) Degrade already existing poor
environmental conditions or initiate a
degrading influence, activity, or effect in
areas not already significantly modified
from their natural condition;
(viii) Have a disproportionately high
and adverse effect on low income or
minority populations (see Executive
Order 12898);
(ix) Limit access to and ceremonial
use of Indian sacred sites on federal
lands by Indian religious practitioners
or adversely affect the physical integrity
of such sacred sites (see Executive Order
13007);
(x) Threaten a violation of a federal,
tribal, state or local law or requirement
imposed for the protection of the
environment;
(xi) Significantly affect subsistence
activities; or
(xii) Significantly affect
environmentally sensitive resources,
such as (A) properties listed, or eligible
for listing, in the National Register of
Historic Places; (B) species listed, or
proposed to be listed, on the List of
Endangered or Threatened Species, or
their habitat; or (C) natural resources
and unique geographic characteristics
such as historic or cultural resources;
park, recreation or refuge lands;
wilderness areas; wild or scenic rivers;
national natural landmarks; sole or
principal drinking water aquifers; prime
farmlands; special aquatic sites (defined
under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act); floodplains; national monuments;
and other ecologically significant or
critical areas.
11. Environmental Assessments
An EA is required for all proposals,
except those exempt from NEPA or
categorically excluded under these
procedures, and those requiring an EIS.
An EA is not necessary if the NEH has
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
52238
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2018 / Notices
decided to prepare an EIS. EAs provide
sufficient evidence and analysis to
determine whether to prepare an EIS or
issue a finding of no significant impact
(FONSI). In addition, an EA may be
prepared on any action at any time in
order to assist in planning and decision
making, to aid in NEH’s compliance
with NEPA when no EIS is necessary, or
to facilitate EIS preparation. EAs shall
be prepared in accordance with these
procedures and shall contain analyses to
support conclusions regarding
environmental impacts. If a FONSI is
proposed, it shall be prepared in
accordance with Section 11(e) below.
(a) Content
(i) The EA shall include brief
discussions of the need for the proposal;
of alternatives to the proposal as
required by NEPA section 102(2)(E); and
of the environmental impacts of the
proposal and alternatives. The EA shall
also include a listing of agencies and
persons consulted in the preparation of
the EA.
(ii) The EA may describe a broad
range of alternatives and proposed
mitigation measures to facilitate
planning and decision-making.
(iii) The EA should also document
compliance, to the extent possible, with
all applicable environmental laws and
Executive Orders, or provide reasonable
assurance that those requirements can
be met.
(iv) The EA should be a concise
public document. The level of detail
and depth of impact analysis will
normally be limited to the minimum
needed to determine the significance of
potential environmental effects.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
(b) General Considerations in Preparing
Environmental Assessments
(i) Adoption of an EA. NEH may
adopt an EA prepared for a proposal
before NEH by another agency or an
applicant when the EA, or a portion
thereof, addresses the proposed NEH
action and meets the standards for an
adequate analysis under these
procedures and relevant provisions of
40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508,
provided that NEH makes its own
evaluation of the environmental issues
and takes responsibility for the scope
and content of the EA in accordance
with 40 CFR 1506.5(b).
(ii) Incorporation by reference into the
EA. Any document may be incorporated
by reference in accordance with 40 CFR
1502.21 and used in preparing an EA in
accordance with 40 CFR 1501.4(b) and
1506.5(a), provided that NEH makes its
own evaluation of the environmental
issues and takes responsibility for the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Oct 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
scope and content of the EA in
accordance with 40 CFR 1506.5(b).
(iii) Applicant responsibility. The
applicant shall assist NEH with
preparing the EA. NEH remains
responsible for compiling the public
hearing summary or minutes, where
applicable; and copies of any written
comments received and responses
thereto.
(c) Public Involvement
(i) In accordance with 40 CFR 1506.6,
the Approving Official shall publish
EAs and draft FONSIs on the NEH
website and make such documents
available for public comment for not
less than 15 calendar days.
(ii) NEH will only take final action on
an EA and draft FONSI after it reviews
and considers public comments.
(d) Actions Resulting From Assessment
(i) Accepted without modification.
NEH may accept a proposal without
modifications if the EA indicates that
the proposal does not have significant
environmental impacts and a FONSI is
prepared in accordance with Section
11(e) below.
(ii) Accepted with modification. If an
EA identifies potentially significant
environmental impacts, the proposal
may be modified to eliminate such
impacts. Proposals so modified may be
accepted by NEH if the proposed
changes are evaluated in an EA and a
FONSI is prepared in accordance with
Section 11(e) below.
(iii) Mitigated FONSI. If mitigation is
required to reduce the impacts below
significant the FONSI shall identify the
mitigation and adopt applicable
monitoring and enforcement measures
that are necessary to ensure the
implementation of the mitigation
measures.
(iv) Prepare an EIS. NEH shall require
that the proposal be evaluated in an EIS,
prepared in accordance with Section 12
below, if the EA indicates significant
environmental impacts that are not
mitigated below a specified level of
significance.
(v) Rejected. NEH may always elect to
reject a proposal.
(e) Findings of No Significant Impact
(i) Content. A FONSI shall include the
EA or a summary of it and shall note
any other environmental documents
related to it (40 CFR 1501.7(a)(5)). If the
EA is included, the finding need not
repeat any of the discussion in the
assessment but may incorporate it by
reference.
(ii) Publication. NEH shall make the
final FONSI available to the public on
the NEH website.
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(f) Proposals Normally Requiring an EA
Proposals that normally require
preparation of an EA include proposed
actions that potentially result in
significant changes to established land
use.
12. Environmental Impact Statements
An EIS is required when the project
is determined to have a potentially
significant impact on the human
environment.
(a) Notice of Intent and Scoping
NEH shall publish an NOI, as
described in 40 CFR 1508.22, in the
Federal Register as soon as practicable
after NEH makes a decision to prepare
an EIS. If there will be a lengthy period
of time between NEH’s decision to
prepare an EIS and its actual
preparation, NEH may defer publication
of the NOI until a reasonable time before
preparing the EIS, provided that NEH
allows a reasonable opportunity for
interested parties to participate in the
EIS process. NEH and the applicant will
coordinate during the time period prior
to the publication of the NOI to identify:
The scope of the action, potential
modifications to the proposal, potential
alternatives, environmental constraints,
potential timeframes for the
environmental review, and federal,
state, or tribal entities that could be
interested in the project, including those
with the potential to become
cooperating agencies. Through the NOI,
NEH shall invite comments and
suggestions on the scope of the EIS.
Publication of the NOI in the Federal
Register shall begin the public scoping
process. The public scoping process for
an NEH EIS shall allow a minimum of
15 days for the receipt of public
comments.
(b) Preparation and Filing of Draft and
Final EISs
(i) General. EISs shall be prepared in
two stages and may be supplemented.
(ii) Format. The EIS format
recommended by 40 CFR 1502.10 shall
be used unless NEH makes a
determination on a particular project
that there is a reason to do otherwise.
In such a case, the EIS format must meet
the minimum requirements prescribed
in 40 CFR 1502.10, as further described
in 40 CFR 1502.11 through 1502.18.
(iii) Applicant role. The draft or final
EIS shall be prepared by NEH with
assistance from the applicant under
appropriate guidance and direction from
the Approving Official.
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2018 / Notices
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
(iv) Third-party consultants. A thirdparty consultant selected by NEH or in
cooperation with a cooperating agency
may prepare the draft or final EIS.
(v) NEH responsibility. NEH shall
provide a schedule with time limits,
provide guidance, participate in the
preparation, independently evaluate,
and take responsibility for the content of
the draft and final EIS.
(vi) Filing. After a draft or final EIS
has been prepared, NEH shall file the
EIS with the Environmental Protection
Agency (‘‘EPA’’) for publication of a
notice of availability in accordance with
40 CFR 1506.9 and 1506.10.
(vii) Draft to final EIS. When a final
EIS does not require substantial changes
from the draft EIS, NEH may document
required changes in errata sheets,
insertion pages, and revised sections.
NEH will then circulate such changes
together with comments on the draft
EIS, responses to comments, and other
appropriate information as its final EIS.
NEH will not circulate the draft EIS
again; however, NEH will post the EIS
on its website and provide the draft EIS
if requested.
(viii) Record of decision. A record of
decision (ROD) will be prepared in
accordance with 40 CFR 1505.2 and
1505.3.
(c) Supplemental EIS
(i) Supplements to either draft or final
EISs shall be prepared, as prescribed in
40 CFR 1502.9, when NEH finds that
there are substantial changes proposed
in a project that are relevant to
environmental concerns; or when there
are significant new circumstances or
information relevant to environmental
concerns and bearing on the proposed
action or its impacts.
(ii) Where NEH action remains to be
taken and the EIS is more than three
years old, NEH will review the EIS to
determine whether it is adequate or
requires supplementation.
(iii) NEH shall prepare, circulate and
file a supplement to an EIS in the same
fashion (exclusive of scoping) as a draft
and final EIS. In addition, the
supplement and accompanying
administrative record shall be included
in the administrative record for the
proposal. When an applicant is
involved, the applicant shall, under the
direction of the Approving Official,
provide assistance.
(iv) An NOI to prepare a supplement
to a final EIS will be published in those
cases where a ROD has already been
issued.
(d) Adoption
(i) NEH may adopt a draft or final EIS
or portion thereof (see 40 CFR 1506.3),
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Oct 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
including a programmatic EIS, prepared
by another agency.
(ii) If the actions covered by the
original EIS and the proposal are
substantially the same, NEH shall
recirculate it as a final statement.
Otherwise, NEH shall treat the
statement as a draft and recirculate it
except as provided in paragraph (iii) of
this section.
(iii) Where NEH is a cooperating
agency, it may adopt the EIS of the lead
agency without recirculating it when,
after an independent review of the EIS,
NEH concludes that its comments and
suggestions have been satisfied.
(iv) When NEH adopts an EIS which
is not final within the agency that
prepared it, or when the action it
assesses is the subject of a referral under
40 CFR part 1504, or when the EIS’s
adequacy is the subject of a judicial
action which is not final, NEH shall so
specify.
(e) Proposals Normally Requiring an EIS
Given the nature of NEH activities,
there are no proposals that would
normally require use of an EIS. NEH
would most likely use an EA in any
given case to determine whether a
project has a potentially significant
impact on the human environment. The
conclusion reached by NEH in the EA
would dictate whether it would then
prepare an EIS.
Appendix A to the National
Environmental Policy Act Procedures
for NEH
Actions consistent with any of the
following categories are, in the absence of
extraordinary circumstances, categorically
excluded from further analysis in an EA or
EIS:
A. General Categorical Exclusions
1. Routine administrative and management
activities including, but not limited to, those
activities related to budgeting, finance,
personnel actions, procurement activities,
compliance with applicable executive orders
and procedures for sustainable or ‘‘greened’’
procurement, retaining legal counsel, public
affairs activities (e.g., issuing press releases,
newsletters and notices of funding
availability), internal and external program
evaluation and monitoring (e.g., site visits),
database development and maintenance, and
computer systems administration.
2. Preparing, revising, or adopting
regulations, including those that implement
without substantial change the regulations,
instructions, directives, or guidance
documents from other Federal agencies.
3. Routine activities undertaken by NEH to
support its program partners, such as serving
on task forces, ad hoc committees or
representing NEH interests in other forums.
4. Approving and issuing financial
assistance to support research, education,
preservation, and public programs in the
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52239
humanities, except where such assistance
supports the construction, restoration, or
renovation of facilities, including the
purchase or lease of new infrastructure, or
otherwise involves ground disturbing
activity.
5. Approving and issuing financial
assistance to support facility planning and
design.
6. Approving and issuing grants to support
the purchase or lease of preexisting
infrastructure.
7. Nondestructive data collection,
inventory, study, research, and monitoring
activities.
B. Program Specific Categorical Exclusions
Actions consistent with any of the
following categories are, in the absence of
extraordinary circumstances, categorically
excluded from further analysis and
documentation in an EA or EIS upon
completion of the NEH CATEX checklist. As
contemplated by the checklist, for any
proposed action requiring review under
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (‘‘NHPA’’), a categorical
exclusion may only apply after NEH has
determined that such action is not reasonably
likely to have a significant effect on historic
properties.
1. Upgrade, repair, maintenance,
replacement, or minor renovations and
additions to facilities, grounds and
equipment, including but not limited to, roof
replacement, foundation repair, access ramp
and door improvements pursuant to the
Americans with Disabilities Act (‘‘ADA’’),
weatherization and energy efficiency related
improvements, HVAC renovations, painting,
floor system replacement, repaving parking
lots and ground maintenance, that do not
result in a change in the functional use of the
real property.
2. Construction, purchase or lease of new
infrastructure, including, but not limited to,
museums, libraries and other community
buildings, and office space, that is similar to
existing land use if the area to be disturbed
has no more than two acres of new surface
disturbance. The following conditions must
be met:
a. The structure and proposed use are
compatible with applicable Federal, tribal,
state, and local planning and zoning
standards.
b. The site and scale of the construction or
improvement is consistent with those of
existing, adjacent, or nearby buildings.
c. There is no evidence of community
controversy.
d. The proposed use will not substantially
increase the number of motor vehicles at the
facility or in the area.
e. The construction or improvement will
not result in uses that exceed existing
support infrastructure capacities (road,
sewer, water, parking, etc.).
3. Construction, purchase or lease of new
infrastructure, including, but not limited to,
museums, libraries and other community
buildings, and office space, where such
construction, purchase or lease is for
infrastructure of less than 12,000 square feet
of useable space.
4. Demolition, disposal, or improvements
involving buildings or structures when done
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
52240
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2018 / Notices
in accordance with applicable regulations,
including those regulations applying to
removal of asbestos, polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs), and other hazardous
materials.
BILLING CODE 7356–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Oct 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
EN16OC18.005
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Dnft
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Oct 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
52241
EN16OC18.006
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2018 / Notices
52242
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2018 / Notices
[FR Doc. 2018–22439 Filed 10–15–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536–01–C
NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION
SAFETY BOARD
Sunshine Act Meetings
9:30 a.m., Tuesday,
October 30, 2018.
PLACE: NTSB Conference Center, 429
L’Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC
20594.
STATUS: The one item is open to the
public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
58536 Railroad Accident Report:
Derailment and Hazardous Materials
Release of Union Pacific Railroad
Unit Ethanol Train in Graettinger,
Iowa, March 10, 2017
News Media Contact: Telephone:
(202) 314–6100. The press and public
may enter the NTSB Conference Center
one hour prior to the meeting for set up
and seating.
Individuals requesting specific
accommodations should contact
Rochelle McCallister at (202) 314–6305
or by email at Rochelle.McCallister@
ntsb.gov by Wednesday, October 24,
2018.
The public may view the meeting via
a live or archived webcast by accessing
a link under ‘‘News & Events’’ on the
NTSB home page at www.ntsb.gov.
Schedule updates, including weatherrelated cancellations, are also available
at www.ntsb.gov.
For More Information Contact: Candi
Bing at (202) 314–6403 or by email at
bingc@ntsb.gov.
FOR MEDIA INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter
Knudson at (202) 314–6100 or by email
at peter.knudson@ntsb.gov.
TIME AND DATE:
Dated: October 12, 2018.
LaSean McCray,
Assistant Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018–22572 Filed 10–12–18; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7533–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. R2019–1; Order No. 4851]
Market Dominant Price Adjustment
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recently filed Postal Service notice of
inflation-based rate adjustments
affecting market dominant domestic and
international products and services,
along with temporary mailing
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Oct 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
promotions and numerous proposed
classification changes. The adjustments
and other changes are scheduled to take
effect January 27, 2019. This notice
informs the public of the filing, invites
public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: October 30,
2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction and Overview
II. Initial Administrative Actions
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction and Overview
On October 10, 2018, the Postal
Service filed a notice of inflation-based
price adjustments affecting market
dominant domestic and international
products and services, along with
temporary mailing promotions and
numerous proposed classification
changes to the Mail Classification
Schedule (MCS).1 The intended
effective date is January 27, 2019. Notice
at 1. The Notice, which was filed
pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3622 and 39 CFR
part 3010, triggers a notice-andcomment proceeding.2
Contents of filing. The Postal Service’s
filing consists of the Notice, which the
Postal Service represents addresses the
data and information required under 39
CFR 3010.12; four attachments
(Attachments A–D) to the Notice; and
eight sets of workpapers filed as library
references.
Attachment A presents the proposed
price and related product description
changes to the MCS. Notice, Attachment
A. Attachments B and C address
workshare discounts and the price cap
calculation, respectively. Notice,
Attachments B and C. Attachment D
presents the promotions schedule.
Notice, Attachment D.
Several library references present
supporting financial documentation for
the five classes of mail. Notice at 4–5
nn. 7–9. The Postal Service filed one
1 United States Postal Service Notice of MarketDominant Price Change, October 10, 2018 (Notice).
2 This is a Type 1–B proceeding. See 39 CFR part
3010, subparts A–C for additional information.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
library reference pertaining to the two
international mail products within FirstClass Mail (Outbound Single-Piece
First-Class Mail International and
Inbound Letter Post) under seal and
applied for non-public treatment of
those materials.3
Planned price adjustments. The Postal
Service’s planned percentage changes
by class are, on average, as follows:
Market dominant class
First-Class Mail .....................
USPS Marketing Mail ...........
Periodicals ............................
Package Services .................
Special Services ...................
Planned price
adjustment
(%)
2.486
2.479
2.52
2.522
2.512
Notice at 4.
Price adjustments for products within
classes vary from the average. See, e.g.,
id. at 6, 15 (Table 5 showing range for
First-Class Mail products and Table 7
showing range for USPS Marketing Mail
products). Most of the planned
adjustments entail increases to market
dominant rates and fees; however, in a
few instances, the Postal Service
proposes either no adjustment or a
decrease. See id. at 6.
Proposed classification changes. The
Postal Service proposes numerous
classification changes in its Notice and
identifies the impact on the MCS in
Attachment A. Id. at 32–34; id.
Attachment A.
Calendar Year 2019 promotions. The
Postal Service seeks approval for the
following six promotions for the
indicated periods:
• Emerging and Advanced
Technology Promotion (Mar. 1–Aug. 31,
2019);
• Mobile Shopping Promotion (Aug.
1–Dec. 31, 2019);
• Tactile, Sensory and Interactive
Mailpiece Engagement Promotion
(Feb.1–July 31, 2019);
• Personalized Color Transpromo
Promotion (July 1–Dec. 31, 2019);
• Informed Delivery Promotion
(Sept.1–Nov. 30, 2019); and
• Earned Value Reply Mail Promotion
(Apr. 1–June 30, 2019).
Notice, Attachment D.
II. Initial Administrative Actions
Pursuant to 39 CFR 3010.11(a), the
Commission establishes Docket No.
R2019–1 to consider the planned price
adjustments for market dominant postal
products and services, as well as the
related classification changes, identified
in the Notice. The Commission invites
3 See USPS Notice of Filing USPS–LR–R2019–1/
NP1, October 10, 2018, Attachment 1.
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52235-52242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22439]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
National Endowment for the Humanities
National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures
AGENCY: National Endowment for the Humanities.
ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Humanities (``NEH'') proposes
to promulgate procedures implementing the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (``NEPA''), Executive Order (``E.O.'') 11514 (as amended),
and Council on Environmental Quality (``CEQ'') NEPA implementing
regulations. Pursuant to CEQ regulations, NEH is soliciting comments on
its proposed procedures.
DATES: NEH is providing a 30-day review period. You must submit
comments by no later than November 15, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Email: [email protected]. Include ``NEH NEPA Implementing
Procedures'' in the subject line of the email.
Mail: National Endowment for the Humanities, Office of the
General Counsel, 400 7th Street SW, Room 4060, Washington, DC 20506,
ATTN: Adam Kress.
Fax: (202) 606-8600. Please send your comments to the
attention of Adam Kress.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and title for this Federal Register document: ``NEPA Implementing
Procedures.'' Please submit your comments using only one method. NEH
will post comments as received to https://www.neh.gov/about/foia/library. NEH will not redact or edit personal identifying information
from comment submissions. You should only submit information that you
wish to make publicly available. NEH reserves the right, but shall have
no obligation, to redact and/or refuse to post any or all of your
submission that it may deem to be inappropriate for publication, such
as obscene language.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adam M. Kress, (202) 606-8322;
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NEH is an independent agency within the
executive branch of the United States government, established by the
National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965. NEH
extends financial assistance to individuals and organizations to
support research, education, preservation, and public programs in the
humanities. It also has statutory authority to extend financial
assistance to cultural organizations to enable infrastructure
development and capacity building, including through the design,
purchase, construction, restoration, or renovation of facilities needed
for humanities activities and historic landscapes.
NEPA and implementing regulations promulgated by CEQ (40 CFR parts
1500-1508) established a broad national policy to use all practicable
means and measures, including financial and technical assistance, in a
manner calculated to foster and promote the general welfare, as well as
to create and maintain conditions under which man and nature can exist
in productive harmony and fulfill the social, economic, and other
requirements of present and future generations of Americans. The CEQ
regulations implementing the procedural provisions of NEPA are designed
to ensure that this national policy, environmental considerations, and
associated public concerns are given careful attention and appropriate
weight in all decisions of the federal government. Sections 102(2) of
NEPA and 40 CFR 1505.1 and 1507.3 require federal agencies to develop
and, as needed, revise implementing procedures consistent with the CEQ
regulations. NEH is issuing the following NEPA implementing procedures
that comply with NEPA and supplement the CEQ regulations.
In accordance with CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1507.3), NEH consulted
with CEQ prior to publication of the proposed procedures set forth
below. These proposed procedures include proposed categorical
exclusions specific to NEH projects and actions that NEH determined
will not normally have a potentially significant effect, individually
or cumulatively, on the human environment.
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distribute impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. These procedures have not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action'' because they do not: (1) Have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material
way the economy; a section of the economy; productivity; competition;
jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State, local, or
tribal governments or communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency
or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another
Agency; (3) materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements,
[[Page 52236]]
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy issues arising
out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles
set forth in these Executive Orders. The text of the complete proposed
procedures appears below.
Dated: October 10, 2018.
Adam M. Kress,
Attorney-Advisor, National Endowment for the Humanities.
Table of Contents
1. Purpose
2. Applicability
3. Environmental Policy
4. Terms and Abbreviations
5. Federal and Intergovernmental Relationships
6. Applicant Responsibility
7. NEH Responsibility
8. Public Involvement
9. Environmental Review Process
10. Categorical Exclusions
a. General
b. Conditions
c. Extraordinary Circumstances
11. Environmental Assessments
a. Content
b. General Considerations in Preparing Environmental Assessments
c. Public Involvement
d. Actions Resulting From Assessment
e. Findings of No Significant Impact
f. Proposals Normally Requiring an Environmental Assessment
12. Environmental Impact Statements
a. Notice of Intent and Scoping
b. Preparation and Filing of Draft and Final Environmental
Impact Statements
c. Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
d. Adoption
e. Proposals Normally Requiring an Environmental Impact
Statement
The National Environmental Policy Act Procedures for NEH
1. Purpose
These procedures implement the provisions of NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321
et seq. They adopt and supplement the CEQ regulations implementing
NEPA, 40 CFR parts 1500-1508, by establishing policy, directing
environmental planning, and assigning responsibilities in NEH to
prepare, review, and approve environmental documents, 40 CFR 1508.10,
that comply with NEPA.
2. Applicability
These procedures apply NEPA to NEH programs and activities,
including programs and activities carried out by state and local
governments, federally-recognized tribal governments and non-
governmental organizations, with the use of NEH financial assistance.
3. Environmental Policy
It is the policy of NEH to:
(a) Start the NEPA process at the earliest possible time as an
effective decision-making tool while evaluating a proposed action;
(b) Comply with the procedures and policies of NEPA and other
related environmental laws, regulations, and orders applicable to NEH
actions;
(c) Provide guidance to applicants responsible for ensuring that
proposals comply with all appropriate NEH requirements;
(d) Integrate NEPA requirements and other planning and
environmental review procedures required by law or NEH practice so that
all such procedures run concurrently rather than consecutively;
(e) Encourage and facilitate public involvement in NEH actions that
affect the quality of the human environment;
(f) Use the NEPA process to identify and assess reasonable
alternatives to proposed NEH actions to avoid or minimize adverse
effects upon the quality of the human environment; and
(g) Use all practicable means consistent with NEPA and other
essential considerations of national policy to restore or enhance the
quality of the human environment and avoid, minimize, or otherwise
mitigate any possible adverse effects of NEH actions upon the quality
of the human environment.
4. Terms and Abbreviations
(a) For the purposes of this section, the definitions in the CEQ
regulations, 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508, are adopted and
supplemented as set out in paragraphs (a)(i) through (vi) of this
section. In the event of a conflict the CEQ regulations apply.
(i) Action. Action and Federal action as defined in 40 CFR 1508.18
include projects and programs entirely or partly financed, assisted,
conducted, regulated, or approved by NEH.
(ii) Applicant. The state, local or federally-recognized tribal
government or non-governmental partner or organization applying to NEH
for financial assistance or other approval. An applicant may be an
organization already in receipt of NEH-awarded funds.
(iii) Approving Official. The NEH Chairman or an NEH staff member
designated by the NEH Chairman to fulfill the responsibilities defined
in Section 6 below, including overseeing development of and approval of
the NEPA document.
(iv) Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is a document by NEH
briefly presenting the reasons why an action, not otherwise excluded as
provided in Section 10 below, will not have a significant impact on the
human environment and for which an EIS will not be prepared.
(v) NEH Proposal (or proposal). A proposal, as defined at 40 CFR
1508.23, is an NEH proposal whether initiated by NEH, another federal
agency or an applicant.
(vi) NEH Chairman: The Chairman of NEH, as established in Section 7
of the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965,
20 U.S.C. 956.
(b) The following abbreviations are used throughout these
procedures:
(i) CATEX--Categorical exclusions;
(ii) CEQ--Council on Environmental Quality;
(iii) EA--Environmental assessment;
(iv) EIS--Environmental impact statement;
(v) FONSI--Finding of no significant impact;
(vi) NEPA--National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended;
(vii) NOI--Notice of intent; and
(viii) ROD--Record of decision.
5. Federal and Intergovernmental Relationships
NEH occasionally partners with federal, state and local agencies,
and federally-recognized tribal governments, and may depend on these
governmental agencies for project management. Under such circumstances,
NEH may rely on the expertise and processes already in use by
partnering agencies to help prepare NEH NEPA analyses and documents.
(a) With federal partners, NEH will work as either a joint lead
agency (40 CFR 1501.5 and 1508.16) or cooperating agency (40 CFR 1501.6
and 1508.5). NEH may invite other Federal agencies to serve as the lead
agency, a joint lead agency, or as a cooperating agency.
(b) Consistent with 40 CFR 1508.5, NEH may invite state and local
government partners, and federally-recognized tribal governments, to
serve as cooperating agencies.
6. Applicant Responsibility
Applicants shall work under NEH direction provided by the Approving
Official, and assist NEH in fulfilling its NEPA obligations by
preparing NEPA analyses and documents that comply with the provisions
of NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321-4347), the CEQ regulations (40 CFR parts 1500
through 1508), and the requirements set forth in this part.
Applicants shall follow NEH direction when they assist NEH with the
following responsibilities, among others:
(a) Prepare and disseminate applicable environmental documentation
concurrent with a
[[Page 52237]]
proposal's engineering, planning, and design;
(b) Create and distribute public notices;
(c) Coordinate public hearings and meetings as required;
(d) Submit all environmental documents created pursuant to these
procedures to NEH for review and approval before public distribution;
(e) Participate in all NEH-conducted hearings or meetings;
(f) Consult with NEH prior to obtaining the services of an
environmental consultant; in the case that an EIS is required, the
consultant or contractor will be selected by NEH; and
(g) Implement mitigation measures included as voluntary commitments
by the applicant or as requirements of the applicant in NEH decision
documents (FONSI or ROD).
7. NEH Responsibility
(a) The NEH Chairman or his/her designee shall designate an
Approving Official for each NEH proposal, and shall provide
environmental guidance to the Approving Official;
(b) The Approving Official shall provide direction and guidance to
the applicant as well as identification and development of required
analyses and documentation;
(c) The Approving Official shall make an independent evaluation of
the environmental issues, take responsibility for the scope and content
of the environmental document (EA or EIS), and make the environmental
finding;
(d) The Approving Official shall ensure mitigation measures
included in NEH decision documents (FONSI or ROD) are implemented; and
(e) The Approving official shall be responsible for coordinating
communications with cooperating agencies and other federal agencies.
8. Public Involvement
NEH will make diligent efforts to involve the public in preparing
and implementing its NEPA procedures in accordance with 40 CFR
1501.4(b), 1506.6 and part 1503. When developing a plan to include the
public and affected parties in the environmental analysis process, NEH
will consider the following factors: (a) The magnitude of the
environmental considerations associated with the proposal; (b) the
extent of expected public interest; and (c) any relevant questions of
national concern. NEH will specifically publish EAs and draft FONSIs on
its website as provided in Section 11(c) below.
9. Environmental Review Process
The environmental review process is the investigation of potential
environmental impacts to determine the environmental process to be
followed and to assist in the preparation of the environmental
document. NEH shall specifically determine whether any NEH proposal:
(a) Is categorically excluded from preparation of either an EA or
an EIS;
(b) Requires preparation of an EA; or
(c) Requires preparation of an EIS.
10. Categorical Exclusions
(a) General. A categorical exclusion (CATEX) is defined in 40 CFR
1508.4 as a category of actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment and for
which, in the absence of extraordinary circumstances, neither an EA nor
an EIS is required. Actions that meet the conditions in paragraph (b)
of this section and are listed in section A of appendix A of these
procedures can be categorically excluded from further analysis and
documentation in an EA or EIS. Actions that meet the screening
conditions in paragraph (b) of this section and are listed in section B
of appendix A require documentation in a Record of Environmental
Consideration (``REC'') in order to be categorically excluded from
further analysis and documentation in an EA or EIS. A draft REC is
attached as Appendix B to these procedures.
(b) Conditions. The following three conditions must be met for an
action to be categorically excluded from further analysis in an EA or
EIS.
(i) The action has not been segmented (too narrowly defined or
broken down into small parts in order minimize its potential effects
and avoid a higher level of NEPA review) and its scope includes the
consideration of connected actions and, when evaluating extraordinary
circumstances, cumulative impacts.
(ii) No extraordinary circumstances described in paragraph (c) of
this section exist.
(iii) The proposed action fits within one of the categorical
exclusions described in either section of Appendix A of this part.
(c) Extraordinary Circumstances. Any action that normally would be
classified as a CATEX but could involve extraordinary circumstances
will require appropriate environmental review documented in an NEH
CATEX checklist to determine if the CATEX classification is proper or
if an EA or EIS should be prepared. Extraordinary circumstances to be
considered include those reasonably likely to:
(i) Have significant impacts on public health, public safety, or
the environment;
(ii) Have effects on the environment that are highly controversial
or involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of
available resources;
(iii) Have effects on the human environment that are highly
uncertain, involve unique or unknown risks, or are scientifically
controversial;
(iv) Establish a precedent for future action or represent a
decision in principle about future actions with potentially significant
environmental effects;
(v) Relate to other actions with individually insignificant but
cumulatively significant environmental effects;
(vi) Have a greater scope or size than is normal for the category
of action;
(vii) Degrade already existing poor environmental conditions or
initiate a degrading influence, activity, or effect in areas not
already significantly modified from their natural condition;
(viii) Have a disproportionately high and adverse effect on low
income or minority populations (see Executive Order 12898);
(ix) Limit access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites on
federal lands by Indian religious practitioners or adversely affect the
physical integrity of such sacred sites (see Executive Order 13007);
(x) Threaten a violation of a federal, tribal, state or local law
or requirement imposed for the protection of the environment;
(xi) Significantly affect subsistence activities; or
(xii) Significantly affect environmentally sensitive resources,
such as (A) properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National
Register of Historic Places; (B) species listed, or proposed to be
listed, on the List of Endangered or Threatened Species, or their
habitat; or (C) natural resources and unique geographic characteristics
such as historic or cultural resources; park, recreation or refuge
lands; wilderness areas; wild or scenic rivers; national natural
landmarks; sole or principal drinking water aquifers; prime farmlands;
special aquatic sites (defined under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act); floodplains; national monuments; and other ecologically
significant or critical areas.
11. Environmental Assessments
An EA is required for all proposals, except those exempt from NEPA
or categorically excluded under these procedures, and those requiring
an EIS. An EA is not necessary if the NEH has
[[Page 52238]]
decided to prepare an EIS. EAs provide sufficient evidence and analysis
to determine whether to prepare an EIS or issue a finding of no
significant impact (FONSI). In addition, an EA may be prepared on any
action at any time in order to assist in planning and decision making,
to aid in NEH's compliance with NEPA when no EIS is necessary, or to
facilitate EIS preparation. EAs shall be prepared in accordance with
these procedures and shall contain analyses to support conclusions
regarding environmental impacts. If a FONSI is proposed, it shall be
prepared in accordance with Section 11(e) below.
(a) Content
(i) The EA shall include brief discussions of the need for the
proposal; of alternatives to the proposal as required by NEPA section
102(2)(E); and of the environmental impacts of the proposal and
alternatives. The EA shall also include a listing of agencies and
persons consulted in the preparation of the EA.
(ii) The EA may describe a broad range of alternatives and proposed
mitigation measures to facilitate planning and decision-making.
(iii) The EA should also document compliance, to the extent
possible, with all applicable environmental laws and Executive Orders,
or provide reasonable assurance that those requirements can be met.
(iv) The EA should be a concise public document. The level of
detail and depth of impact analysis will normally be limited to the
minimum needed to determine the significance of potential environmental
effects.
(b) General Considerations in Preparing Environmental Assessments
(i) Adoption of an EA. NEH may adopt an EA prepared for a proposal
before NEH by another agency or an applicant when the EA, or a portion
thereof, addresses the proposed NEH action and meets the standards for
an adequate analysis under these procedures and relevant provisions of
40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508, provided that NEH makes its own
evaluation of the environmental issues and takes responsibility for the
scope and content of the EA in accordance with 40 CFR 1506.5(b).
(ii) Incorporation by reference into the EA. Any document may be
incorporated by reference in accordance with 40 CFR 1502.21 and used in
preparing an EA in accordance with 40 CFR 1501.4(b) and 1506.5(a),
provided that NEH makes its own evaluation of the environmental issues
and takes responsibility for the scope and content of the EA in
accordance with 40 CFR 1506.5(b).
(iii) Applicant responsibility. The applicant shall assist NEH with
preparing the EA. NEH remains responsible for compiling the public
hearing summary or minutes, where applicable; and copies of any written
comments received and responses thereto.
(c) Public Involvement
(i) In accordance with 40 CFR 1506.6, the Approving Official shall
publish EAs and draft FONSIs on the NEH website and make such documents
available for public comment for not less than 15 calendar days.
(ii) NEH will only take final action on an EA and draft FONSI after
it reviews and considers public comments.
(d) Actions Resulting From Assessment
(i) Accepted without modification. NEH may accept a proposal
without modifications if the EA indicates that the proposal does not
have significant environmental impacts and a FONSI is prepared in
accordance with Section 11(e) below.
(ii) Accepted with modification. If an EA identifies potentially
significant environmental impacts, the proposal may be modified to
eliminate such impacts. Proposals so modified may be accepted by NEH if
the proposed changes are evaluated in an EA and a FONSI is prepared in
accordance with Section 11(e) below.
(iii) Mitigated FONSI. If mitigation is required to reduce the
impacts below significant the FONSI shall identify the mitigation and
adopt applicable monitoring and enforcement measures that are necessary
to ensure the implementation of the mitigation measures.
(iv) Prepare an EIS. NEH shall require that the proposal be
evaluated in an EIS, prepared in accordance with Section 12 below, if
the EA indicates significant environmental impacts that are not
mitigated below a specified level of significance.
(v) Rejected. NEH may always elect to reject a proposal.
(e) Findings of No Significant Impact
(i) Content. A FONSI shall include the EA or a summary of it and
shall note any other environmental documents related to it (40 CFR
1501.7(a)(5)). If the EA is included, the finding need not repeat any
of the discussion in the assessment but may incorporate it by
reference.
(ii) Publication. NEH shall make the final FONSI available to the
public on the NEH website.
(f) Proposals Normally Requiring an EA
Proposals that normally require preparation of an EA include
proposed actions that potentially result in significant changes to
established land use.
12. Environmental Impact Statements
An EIS is required when the project is determined to have a
potentially significant impact on the human environment.
(a) Notice of Intent and Scoping
NEH shall publish an NOI, as described in 40 CFR 1508.22, in the
Federal Register as soon as practicable after NEH makes a decision to
prepare an EIS. If there will be a lengthy period of time between NEH's
decision to prepare an EIS and its actual preparation, NEH may defer
publication of the NOI until a reasonable time before preparing the
EIS, provided that NEH allows a reasonable opportunity for interested
parties to participate in the EIS process. NEH and the applicant will
coordinate during the time period prior to the publication of the NOI
to identify: The scope of the action, potential modifications to the
proposal, potential alternatives, environmental constraints, potential
timeframes for the environmental review, and federal, state, or tribal
entities that could be interested in the project, including those with
the potential to become cooperating agencies. Through the NOI, NEH
shall invite comments and suggestions on the scope of the EIS.
Publication of the NOI in the Federal Register shall begin the
public scoping process. The public scoping process for an NEH EIS shall
allow a minimum of 15 days for the receipt of public comments.
(b) Preparation and Filing of Draft and Final EISs
(i) General. EISs shall be prepared in two stages and may be
supplemented.
(ii) Format. The EIS format recommended by 40 CFR 1502.10 shall be
used unless NEH makes a determination on a particular project that
there is a reason to do otherwise. In such a case, the EIS format must
meet the minimum requirements prescribed in 40 CFR 1502.10, as further
described in 40 CFR 1502.11 through 1502.18.
(iii) Applicant role. The draft or final EIS shall be prepared by
NEH with assistance from the applicant under appropriate guidance and
direction from the Approving Official.
[[Page 52239]]
(iv) Third-party consultants. A third-party consultant selected by
NEH or in cooperation with a cooperating agency may prepare the draft
or final EIS.
(v) NEH responsibility. NEH shall provide a schedule with time
limits, provide guidance, participate in the preparation, independently
evaluate, and take responsibility for the content of the draft and
final EIS.
(vi) Filing. After a draft or final EIS has been prepared, NEH
shall file the EIS with the Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA'')
for publication of a notice of availability in accordance with 40 CFR
1506.9 and 1506.10.
(vii) Draft to final EIS. When a final EIS does not require
substantial changes from the draft EIS, NEH may document required
changes in errata sheets, insertion pages, and revised sections. NEH
will then circulate such changes together with comments on the draft
EIS, responses to comments, and other appropriate information as its
final EIS. NEH will not circulate the draft EIS again; however, NEH
will post the EIS on its website and provide the draft EIS if
requested.
(viii) Record of decision. A record of decision (ROD) will be
prepared in accordance with 40 CFR 1505.2 and 1505.3.
(c) Supplemental EIS
(i) Supplements to either draft or final EISs shall be prepared, as
prescribed in 40 CFR 1502.9, when NEH finds that there are substantial
changes proposed in a project that are relevant to environmental
concerns; or when there are significant new circumstances or
information relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the
proposed action or its impacts.
(ii) Where NEH action remains to be taken and the EIS is more than
three years old, NEH will review the EIS to determine whether it is
adequate or requires supplementation.
(iii) NEH shall prepare, circulate and file a supplement to an EIS
in the same fashion (exclusive of scoping) as a draft and final EIS. In
addition, the supplement and accompanying administrative record shall
be included in the administrative record for the proposal. When an
applicant is involved, the applicant shall, under the direction of the
Approving Official, provide assistance.
(iv) An NOI to prepare a supplement to a final EIS will be
published in those cases where a ROD has already been issued.
(d) Adoption
(i) NEH may adopt a draft or final EIS or portion thereof (see 40
CFR 1506.3), including a programmatic EIS, prepared by another agency.
(ii) If the actions covered by the original EIS and the proposal
are substantially the same, NEH shall recirculate it as a final
statement. Otherwise, NEH shall treat the statement as a draft and
recirculate it except as provided in paragraph (iii) of this section.
(iii) Where NEH is a cooperating agency, it may adopt the EIS of
the lead agency without recirculating it when, after an independent
review of the EIS, NEH concludes that its comments and suggestions have
been satisfied.
(iv) When NEH adopts an EIS which is not final within the agency
that prepared it, or when the action it assesses is the subject of a
referral under 40 CFR part 1504, or when the EIS's adequacy is the
subject of a judicial action which is not final, NEH shall so specify.
(e) Proposals Normally Requiring an EIS
Given the nature of NEH activities, there are no proposals that
would normally require use of an EIS. NEH would most likely use an EA
in any given case to determine whether a project has a potentially
significant impact on the human environment. The conclusion reached by
NEH in the EA would dictate whether it would then prepare an EIS.
Appendix A to the National Environmental Policy Act Procedures for NEH
Actions consistent with any of the following categories are, in
the absence of extraordinary circumstances, categorically excluded
from further analysis in an EA or EIS:
A. General Categorical Exclusions
1. Routine administrative and management activities including,
but not limited to, those activities related to budgeting, finance,
personnel actions, procurement activities, compliance with
applicable executive orders and procedures for sustainable or
``greened'' procurement, retaining legal counsel, public affairs
activities (e.g., issuing press releases, newsletters and notices of
funding availability), internal and external program evaluation and
monitoring (e.g., site visits), database development and
maintenance, and computer systems administration.
2. Preparing, revising, or adopting regulations, including those
that implement without substantial change the regulations,
instructions, directives, or guidance documents from other Federal
agencies.
3. Routine activities undertaken by NEH to support its program
partners, such as serving on task forces, ad hoc committees or
representing NEH interests in other forums.
4. Approving and issuing financial assistance to support
research, education, preservation, and public programs in the
humanities, except where such assistance supports the construction,
restoration, or renovation of facilities, including the purchase or
lease of new infrastructure, or otherwise involves ground disturbing
activity.
5. Approving and issuing financial assistance to support
facility planning and design.
6. Approving and issuing grants to support the purchase or lease
of preexisting infrastructure.
7. Nondestructive data collection, inventory, study, research,
and monitoring activities.
B. Program Specific Categorical Exclusions
Actions consistent with any of the following categories are, in
the absence of extraordinary circumstances, categorically excluded
from further analysis and documentation in an EA or EIS upon
completion of the NEH CATEX checklist. As contemplated by the
checklist, for any proposed action requiring review under Section
106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (``NHPA''), a
categorical exclusion may only apply after NEH has determined that
such action is not reasonably likely to have a significant effect on
historic properties.
1. Upgrade, repair, maintenance, replacement, or minor
renovations and additions to facilities, grounds and equipment,
including but not limited to, roof replacement, foundation repair,
access ramp and door improvements pursuant to the Americans with
Disabilities Act (``ADA''), weatherization and energy efficiency
related improvements, HVAC renovations, painting, floor system
replacement, repaving parking lots and ground maintenance, that do
not result in a change in the functional use of the real property.
2. Construction, purchase or lease of new infrastructure,
including, but not limited to, museums, libraries and other
community buildings, and office space, that is similar to existing
land use if the area to be disturbed has no more than two acres of
new surface disturbance. The following conditions must be met:
a. The structure and proposed use are compatible with applicable
Federal, tribal, state, and local planning and zoning standards.
b. The site and scale of the construction or improvement is
consistent with those of existing, adjacent, or nearby buildings.
c. There is no evidence of community controversy.
d. The proposed use will not substantially increase the number
of motor vehicles at the facility or in the area.
e. The construction or improvement will not result in uses that
exceed existing support infrastructure capacities (road, sewer,
water, parking, etc.).
3. Construction, purchase or lease of new infrastructure,
including, but not limited to, museums, libraries and other
community buildings, and office space, where such construction,
purchase or lease is for infrastructure of less than 12,000 square
feet of useable space.
4. Demolition, disposal, or improvements involving buildings or
structures when done
[[Page 52240]]
in accordance with applicable regulations, including those
regulations applying to removal of asbestos, polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs), and other hazardous materials.
BILLING CODE 7356-01-P
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16OC18.005
[[Page 52241]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16OC18.006
[[Page 52242]]
[FR Doc. 2018-22439 Filed 10-15-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-C