Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act; Traceability Information Program for Seafood, 51426-51434 [2018-22039]
Download as PDF
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
51426
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
kg)) was set aside to account for harvests
in de minimis states (Maryland,
Delaware, New Jersey). The harvest
targets for each state, in both state and
Federal waters, are 58,311 lb (26,449 kg)
for Georgia, 74,885 lb (33,967 kg) for
South Carolina, 236,316 lb (107,191 kg)
for North Carolina and 244,292 lb
(110,809 kg) for Virginia. Percentage
allocations are based on states’
percentages of the coastwide historical
landings in numbers of fish, derived as
50 percent of the 10-year average
landings from 2006–2015 and 50
percent of the 5-year average landings
from 2011–2015.
The proposed removal of Atlantic
cobia from Federal management under
the Magnuson-Stevens Act would
remove the recreational sector AM for
Atlantic cobia. The recreational AM
requires that both the recreational ACL
and the stock ACL are exceeded in a
fishing year then in the following
fishing year, recreational landings will
be monitored for a persistence in
increased landings, and, if necessary,
the recreational vessel limit will be
reduced to no less than 2 fish per vessel
to ensure recreational landings achieve
the recreational annual catch target, but
do not exceed the recreational ACL in
that fishing year. Additionally, if the
reduction in the recreational vessel limit
is determined to be insufficient to
ensure that recreational landings will
not exceed the recreational ACL, then
the length of the recreational fishing
season will also be reduced.
In place of the current recreational
AM, state-defined regulations and
seasons implemented consistent with
the ASMFC’s Interstate FMP are
designed to keep harvest within the
state harvest targets. If a state’s average
annual landings over the 3-year time
period are greater than their annual
harvest target, then the Insterstate FMP
requires the state to adjust their
recreational season length or
recreational vessel limits for the
following 3 years, as necessary, to
prevent exceeding their harvest target in
the future years.
If Amendment 31 is subsequently
approved and implemented, Atlantic
cobia would be managed under the
ASMFC Interstate FMP in state waters
and through Atlantic Coastal Act
regulations in Federal waters. This will
ensure that Atlantic cobia continues to
be managed in Federal waters and that
there would be no lapse in management
of the stock. These regulations would be
expected to be implemented
concurrently with the removal of
Atlantic cobia from the CMP FMP and
serve essentially the same function as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:17 Oct 10, 2018
Jkt 247001
the current CMP FMP based
management measures.
Proposed Rule for Amendment 31
A proposed rule that would
implement Amendment 31 has been
drafted. In accordance with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, NMFS is
evaluating the proposed rule to
determine whether it is consistent with
the CMP FMP, the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and other applicable laws. If that
determination is affirmative, NMFS will
publish the proposed rule in the Federal
Register for public review and
comment.
Consideration of Public Comments
The Councils have submitted
Amendment 31 for Secretarial review,
approval, and implementation.
Comments on Amendment 31 must be
received by December 10, 2018.
Comments received during the
respective comment periods, whether
specifically directed to Amendment 31
or the proposed rule, will be considered
by NMFS in the decision to approve,
disapprove, or partially approve
Amendment 31. Comments received
after the comment periods will not be
considered by NMFS in this decision.
All comments received by NMFS on
Amendment 31 or the proposed rule
during their respective comment
periods will be addressed in the final
rule.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: October 4, 2018.
Margo B. Schulze-Haugen,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–22000 Filed 10–10–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 698
[Docket No. 180328324–8464–01]
RIN 0648–BH87
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act;
Traceability Information Program for
Seafood
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Pursuant to the Commerce,
Justice, Science, and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act, 2018 and the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(MSA), NMFS is proposing a
Traceability Information Program for
Seafood to establish registration,
reporting and recordkeeping
requirements for U.S. aquaculture
producers of shrimp and abalone, two
species subject to the Seafood
Traceability Program, also known as the
Seafood Import Monitoring Program
(SIMP). This proposed rule, if finalized,
would provide traceability for these
species from the point of production to
entry into U.S. commerce. Collection of
traceability information for U.S.
aquacultured shrimp and abalone will
be accomplished by electronic
submission of data to NMFS. This rule
would require owners or operators of
U.S. inland, coastal and marine
commercial aquaculture facilities
(‘‘producers’’) to report information
about production and entry into U.S.
commerce of shrimp and abalone
products. In addition, this rule would
require producers to register with NMFS
and retain records pertaining to the
production of shrimp and abalone and
entry of those products into U.S.
commerce. This proposed rule serves as
a domestic counterpart to the shrimp
and abalone import requirements under
SIMP, and will help NMFS verify that
U.S. aquacultured shrimp and abalone
were lawfully produced by providing
information to trace each production
event(s) to entry of the fish or fish
products into U.S. commerce. The rule
will also decrease the incidence of
seafood fraud by requiring the reporting
of this information to the U.S.
Government at the point of entry into
U.S. commerce so that the information
reported (e.g., regarding species and
harvest location) can be verified.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by November 26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on this
action, identified by NOAA–NMFS–
2018–0055, may be submitted by either
of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
Docket Number NOAA–NMFS–2018–
0055, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Celeste Leroux, Office of
International Affairs and Seafood
Inspection, NOAA Fisheries, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information (for
example, name and address) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter may be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments. Enter N/A in the required
fields if you wish to remain anonymous.
Attachments to electronic comments
will be accepted in Microsoft Word,
Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe portable
document file (PDF) formats only.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted to the NOAA
Fisheries Office of International Affairs
and Seafood Inspection (IASI) and by
email to: OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Celeste Leroux at (301) 427–8372 or
Celeste.Leroux@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
Background
On March 15, 2015, the Presidential
Task Force on Combating Illegal,
Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU)
Fishing and Seafood Fraud (Task Force),
co-chaired by the Departments of
Commerce and State, published its
action plan to implement Task Force
recommendations for a comprehensive
framework of integrated programs to
combat IUU fishing and seafood fraud.
As part of implementing the Task Force
plan, NMFS issued a final rule (81 FR
88975, December 9, 2016) for a riskbased traceability program to track
seafood from production to entry into
U.S. commerce known as the Seafood
Traceability Program or Seafood Import
Monitoring Program (SIMP) (see 50 CFR
300.320–300.325). For clarity, NMFS
will refer to this program as SIMP
throughout this preamble, while the
codified regulatory text at 50 CFR
300.320–300.325 uses the term ‘‘Seafood
Traceability Program.’’ The final rule
included, for designated priority fish
species, permitting, reporting, and
recordkeeping requirements relating to
the importation of certain fish and fish
products to provide for traceability from
point of production to point of entry
into U.S. commerce in order to prevent
illegally harvested or produced and
misrepresented seafood from entering
into U.S. commerce. SIMP applies to
thirteen species and species groups,
including shrimp and abalone,
identified as particularly vulnerable to
IUU fishing and/or seafood fraud.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:17 Oct 10, 2018
Jkt 247001
However, in the final rule establishing
SIMP, NMFS stayed program
requirements for shrimp and abalone
species indefinitely because there is
commercial scale aquaculture of shrimp
and abalone in the United States and
gaps existed in the collection of
traceability information for domestic
aquaculture, which is largely regulated
at the State level.
In the SIMP final rule, NMFS
explained that when the domestic
reporting and recordkeeping gaps have
been closed, NMFS will then publish an
action in the Federal Register to lift the
stay of the effective date for
§ 300.324(a)(3) of the rule pertaining to
shrimp and abalone. (81 FR at 88977–
78, December 9, 2016).
On March 23, 2018, the President
signed into law the Commerce, Justice,
Science, and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act, 2018 (2018
Appropriations Act) (Pub. L. 115–141,
Div. B). Section 539 of the Act directs
the Secretary of Commerce to lift the
stay on the effective date of the SIMP
final rule for shrimp and abalone
species and establish a compliance date
not later than December 31, 2018. On
April 24, 2018, NMFS published a final
rule lifting that stay, and established a
compliance date of December 31, 2018
for imports of shrimp and abalone (83
FR 17762).
In addition to the requirement to
include shrimp and abalone species
under SIMP, section 539 of the 2018
Appropriations Act directed the
Secretary of Commerce to ‘‘. . .
establish a traceability program for
United States inland, coastal, and
marine aquaculture of shrimp and
abalone . . .’’ and by December 31,
2018 to ‘‘. . . promulgate such
regulations as are necessary and
appropriate to establish and implement
the program.’’
This proposed Traceability
Information Program for Seafood
(Program) would establish registration,
reporting and recordkeeping
requirements for domestic, commercial
aquaculture producers of shrimp and
abalone species and products containing
those species from the point of
production to entry into U.S. commerce.
A producer, i.e., the owner or operator
of an aquaculture facility that produces
shrimp or abalone for human
consumption, is responsible for the
registration, reporting and
recordkeeping requirements of this
Program. Section 698.2 defines producer
and aquaculture facility. Consistent
with the plain language of section 539
of the 2018 Appropriations Act, the
scope of the Program will be limited to
shrimp and abalone species unless and
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
51427
until otherwise authorized by Congress.
The requirements under this proposed
Program will fill the gaps identified
during development of the SIMP with
respect to the collection of traceability
information for domestic aquaculture of
shrimp and abalone species.
Section 539 further directs that
information collected pursuant to a
regulation promulgated under this
section shall be confidential and shall
not be disclosed except for the
information disclosed under section
401(b)(1) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (16 U.S.C. 1881a(b)(1). Section
1881a(b)(1) corresponds to MSA section
402(b)(1). Thus, NMFS believes that the
reference to MSA section 401(b)(1) is a
typographical error and the intent of
Congress was to cite to MSA section
402(b)(1). MSA section 401(b)(1)
pertains to fishing vessel registration,
whereas 402(b)(1) addresses data
confidentiality which lends further
support to the notion that Congress
intended to cite to section 402(b)(1).
Accordingly, NMFS will apply the data
confidentiality provisions of MSA
section 402(b)(1) to the data required to
be submitted under this proposed
Program.
The proposed Traceability
Information Program for Seafood
consists of three components: (1)
Registration; (2) monthly reporting of
production events; and (3)
recordkeeping requirements with
respect to both production events and
chain of custody information from
production to the point of entry into
U.S. commerce via sale or non-sale
transaction (including transfers between
components of a vertically-integrated
enterprise). Application of the
Program’s reporting and recordkeeping
requirements would enable NMFS to
determine the origin of the domestic
aquaculture shrimp and abalone
products and confirm that they were
lawfully produced and not
misrepresented. Coextensive with the
scope of SIMP, the Traceability
Information Program for Seafood traces
fish and fish products from production
to entry into U.S. commerce. Fish or fish
products regulated under the
Traceability Information Program for
Seafood are shrimp and abalone species
produced by an aquaculture facility and
products containing those aquacultured
species. Section 698.2 defines fish or
fish products regulated under this part,
‘‘produce/production,’’ and ‘‘entry into
U.S. commerce.’’
I. Registration
In § 698.4, NMFS proposes to identify
aquaculture producers (i.e., owners or
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
51428
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
operators of aquaculture facilities)
through a registration process that will
link each producer with a unique
producer identifier. The purpose of
registration is not to permit or regulate
production activities, but rather to
identify the person responsible for
reporting data to NMFS and
recordkeeping for audit and inspection
purposes. Use of a unique producer
identifier will ensure that data reported
is attributed to the correct producer. As
proposed, all U.S. producers of species
covered by this program that annually
enter product for human consumption
valued at $1,000 or more into U.S.
commerce must electronically register
and submit their fee for registration via
an electronic reporting system
established by NMFS. The amount of
the one-time registration fee, currently
estimated to be $30.00, will be
calculated in accordance with
procedures set forth in Chapter 9 of the
NOAA Finance Handbook for
determining the administrative costs for
special products and services (https://
www.corporateservices.noaa.gov/
finance/Finance%20Handbook.html);
the registration fee will not exceed such
costs. Because the electronic registration
system has not yet been completed,
NMFS has not made a final
determination about total development
costs and out-year costs for operations
and maintenance. Additionally, the
number of users may vary from NMFS
estimates as the number of aquaculture
operations expands or contracts.
Consequently, the calculation of the
administrative cost recovery fee may be
higher or lower than the $30 estimate.
NMFS requests comment on the impact
that registration fees may have on
aquaculture operations that would be
subject to this rule.
NMFS is proposing $1,000 as the de
minimis sales level for exemption from
the Program because it matches the U.S.
Department of Agriculture minimum
sales threshold for reporting under the
Census of Agriculture. As producers are
familiar with the Census of Agriculture,
adopting their threshold should allow
producers to easily self-identify their
need to register and report under this
Program. Additionally, it is presumed
that foreign aquaculture operations
producing under this annual value
threshold would be serving local
markets and not be exporting product to
the United States, thus they would not
have shipments subject to the
documentation requirements of SIMP.
NMFS requests public comment to
assist in the identification of alternative
thresholds for registration and reporting
under this Program that would exempt
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:17 Oct 10, 2018
Jkt 247001
aquaculture facilities where all
production for human consumption is
intended for direct sale to consumers, as
this level of small-scale commerce is not
comparable to the scale of commerce
monitored under the Seafood
Traceability Program.
A producer who is required to register
only needs one registration identifier. If
the producer provides a valid and
unique registration identifier for its
aquaculture facility that is currently in
use by another State or federal agency,
NMFS may approve the use of that
alternative identifier, provided that
NMFS can independently verify the
identity of the producer. NOAA seeks
public comment on whether identifiers
assigned under other programs, such as
the Data Universal Numbering System
(DUNs), the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration’s Registration of Food
Facilities, or a similar State or federal
facility registration, could be used for
this purpose, and whether such an
approach would reduce the burden of
registration on industry.
In addition to the requirements in this
proposed rule, for some species or
products, permits from other federal or
State agencies may be required (e.g.,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service permits
for products of species listed under the
Convention for International Trade in
Endangered Species). The Traceability
Information Program for Seafood does
not supersede any other federal or State
requirements.
The electronic reporting system to be
established by NMFS will consist of two
parts. The first will be a publicly
accessible registration page where
producers (an aquaculture facility
owner or operator) will provide basic
information to identify their business:
• Business name, Tax Identification
Number, physical address, and phone
number
• Farm physical address (if different
than business physical address)
• Point of contact name, mailing
address, email and phone number
Once a producer identifier has been
designated via the NMFS system, the
producer can obtain login credentials to
access the second part—a data entry
portal that will require a unique login
for each user. After logging into this site,
the user will be able to report the
required data elements as described in
section III below, Data for Reporting and
Recordkeeping.
II. Registration Renewal
Section 698.4(c) sets out a registration
renewal requirement. As explained
below, this rule requires that the
producer, or representative acting on its
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
behalf, submit reports to NMFS via an
electronic reporting system at monthly
intervals. If a producer has no reportable
production events for an entire 12month period, the producer must so
certify through the electronic
registration and reporting system
established by NMFS in order to renew
the producer’s registration. Producers
that have submitted monthly reports
would need to certify that all applicable
entries have been reported. Annually,
all producers would need to confirm
their identifying business information in
order to renew their registration. Once
the producer has submitted all required
certifications, registration renewals
would be automatic and at no additional
cost to the producer. If the registration
lapses, the producer would have to reregister and pay the cost-recovery fee.
III. Data for Reporting and
Recordkeeping
The data reporting and recordkeeping
requirements under this rule would be
in addition to any reporting and
recordkeeping required by States or
other federal agencies. To align this
proposed Program with the SIMP data
reporting requirements, NMFS
proposes, in § 698.5, that producers
required to register under the
Traceability Information Program for
Seafood would be required to report
information for each entry into U.S.
commerce of fish or fish products
regulated under the Traceability
Information Program for Seafood that
are intended for human consumption.
As outlined in § 698.5(b), producers
would submit reports through NMFS’s
electronic registration and reporting
system and reports would include:
• Identifying the aquaculture facility
producing the fish or fish products by
providing a current, valid producer
identifier.
• Information on the fish or fish
products produced: 3-alpha Aquatic
Sciences and Fisheries Information
System (ASFIS) code; Product weight
and form (whole, head removed, etc.) at
point of production and at point of entry
into U.S. commerce.
• Information on where and when the
fish were produced: Location of
aquaculture facility; Date of production
(i.e., removal from aquaculture facility).
• Name of entity(ies) (processor,
dealer, retailer) to which fish was sold
or delivered. For direct sales, the
producer would need to report
information under the first three bullets
above. The producer would not need to
report information about the consumer,
just describe where the fish was sold
(e.g., on premises of the aquaculture
facility, roadside stand, or farmer’s
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
market). See proposed §§ 698.5(b) and
698.2 (defining ‘‘direct sale’’ and ‘‘entry
into U.S. commerce’’).
NMFS proposes that at monthly
intervals producers would be required
to report information for each entry into
U.S. commerce of fish or fish products
intended for human consumption from
the previous month. For example, a
producer would be required to report
each applicable entry occurring in the
month of May on or before the last day
of June. If no applicable entries occurred
in a given month, no report to NMFS is
required. However, if a producer has no
reportable production events for an
entire 12-month period, the producer
must certify that through the electronic
reporting system established by NMFS
in order to renew its registration. See
Registration Renewal section above.
In designing the reporting
requirements for the Traceability
Information Program for Seafood, NMFS
reviewed the temporal span of harvests
that contribute to an entry subject to
SIMP requirements and found that the
temporal span for most entries was a
month or less. Thus, NMFS is proposing
monthly reporting for the Traceability
Information Program for Seafood which
provides a similar reporting burden
when compared to the SIMP and
contributes to the objective of the rule.
NMFS seeks comment on whether
producers would have production to
report every month and whether the
monthly reporting frequency for
domestic producers is, in fact,
comparable to the temporal aggregation
of harvests required under the SIMP.
Producers would also be required to
keep supporting documentation for the
reports that are sufficient to trace the
fish or fish product from the point of
production (i.e., removal from the
aquaculture facility) to entry into U.S.
commerce as described in § 698.6(a).
NMFS expects that typical supply chain
records that are kept in the normal
course of business, including
production logs, and transaction records
which include such information as the
identity of the custodian, the type of
processing, and the weight of the
product, would provide sufficient
information for NMFS to conduct a trace
of the supply chain. Such information
must include records regarding each
custodian of the fish and fish product,
including, as applicable, processors,
storage facilities, and distributors,
sufficient to trace the fish or fish
product from the point of entry into U.S.
commerce back to the point of
production and to verify the information
reported about entry into U.S.
commerce. Section 698.6(a) establishes
that producers would be required to
retain reports and supporting
documentation, in either paper or
electronic format, for two years from the
date of the reports. Producers must
make reports and supporting
documentation available for inspection
by NMFS and must provide them to
NMFS upon request to support an audit
as stated in § 698.6(b)–(c)). NMFS
requests comment on the duration of the
recordkeeping requirement and the
extent to which the two-year period is
consistent with other State and Federal
recordkeeping requirements applicable
to the business operations of
aquaculture facilities that would be
subject to this program.
NMFS proposes to mirror the
requirements of this Program such that
its requirements are equivalent to those
that apply to imports of shrimp and
abalone under SIMP. Thus, production
of shrimp and abalone species not
intended for human consumption (e.g.,
fish produced for research, grow out of
post-larvae, broodstock, or
environmental management programs)
would not be within the scope of this
proposed domestic Traceability
Information Program for Seafood as
stated in § 698.1(d), because SIMP is
limited to imports of covered species for
human consumption. In addition, any
producer that enters shrimp and/or
abalone valued at less than $1,000 total
per year into U.S. commerce is exempt
from the registration, reporting, and
recordkeeping requirements of this
Program as stated in § 698.4(c).
51429
IV. Audit and Inspection Mechanisms
To implement this regulation,
business rules will be programmed into
the electronic registration and reporting
system established by NMFS to
automatically validate that the producer
has populated all data fields in
conformance with format specifications.
Absent this validation, the report
submission would be rejected and the
producer would be notified of the
deficiencies that must be addressed in
order for the report to be accepted.
Reports may also be subject to random
or targeted audit by NMFS, as provided
in § 698.6(b), in order to verify that the
supplied data elements are true, can be
corroborated (e.g., production was
authorized by the applicable authority,
processor receipts correspond to
outputs/deliveries), and are sufficient to
demonstrate that products entering U.S.
commerce were not produced in
violation of domestic law and are not
fraudulently represented. If a producer
fails to provide requested records to
NMFS in a timely manner, or fails to
provide information to verify that
covered products were lawfully
produced and accurately represented,
the matter will be referred to NOAA
Fisheries Office of Law Enforcement for
possible follow-up action.
Intersection With Other Applicable
Requirements
In addition to the registration,
reporting, and recordkeeping
requirements of this proposed rule,
several States have specific regulations
applicable to aquaculture operations,
typically including requirements on
permitting, certification, and
registration. Table 1 contains
information, by State, on existing
regulations relevant to traceability. To
the extent practicable, and subject to
applicable data confidentiality laws,
NMFS will work to minimize
duplicative requirements. For example,
proposed § 698.4(b) provides that NMFS
may approve the use of an alternative
producer identifier obtained through
other Federal or State programs.
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
TABLE 1—EXISTING AQUACULTURE REGISTRATION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
State
Citation
Summary of requirement
Alabama ......................
California .....................
Statute: Ala. Code section 9–2–150 (2015) ....
Statute: California Fish & Game Code section
15400 (2006).
Connecticut .................
Statutes: Conn. Gen. Stat. section 26–194
(2013); Conn. Gen. Stat. section 22–11i
(2013).
Statute: Del. Code tit. 3 section 4 (2013);
Regulation: 7–3800 Del. Admin. Code
(2014).
Statute: 2006 N. Mar. I. Public Law 15–43 .....
Oyster leases required.
Aquaculture Registration is required for each facility devoted to the propagation, cultivation,
maintenance, and harvesting of fish, shellfish and plants in marine, brackish, and fresh
water.
Aquaculture-related permits are overseen by the Department of Agriculture, Bureau of
Aquaculture and the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. Permits are required.
In addition to various permits needed dependent on species, all aquaculture operations
must register with Delaware Department of Agriculture—valid for 5 years.
Delaware .....................
Northern Marianas Islands.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:17 Oct 10, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Site permit in coastal waters only.
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
51430
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—EXISTING AQUACULTURE REGISTRATION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS—Continued
State
Citation
Summary of requirement
Florida .........................
Statute: Fla. Stat. section 597.004 (2017) ......
Georgia ........................
Statute: Ga. Code Ann. section 27–4–255
(2017).
Statute: Haw. Rev. Stat. section 187–3.5
(2012); Regulation: Haw. Code R. section
13–74–43 (1996).
Regulation: Ill. Admin. Code tit. 17, pt. 870 ....
Aquaculture registration is required with the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs, annually.
Aquaculture of some species requires permits and for other species, registration with the
Georgia Department of Natural Resources.
Permit with record-keeping required for aquaculture, including fish ponds through the Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources.
Hawaii ..........................
Illinois ..........................
Indiana .........................
Iowa .............................
Louisiana .....................
Maine ...........................
Maryland ......................
Massachusetts ............
Michigan ......................
Mississippi ...................
Nevada ........................
New Hampshire ...........
New Jersey .................
New York .....................
North Carolina .............
Ohio .............................
Oregon ........................
Rhode Island ...............
South Carolina ............
Texas ...........................
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
Washington .................
Regulation: Aquaculture Permit, 312 Ind.
Admin. Code 9–10–17 (2001).
Regulation: Iowa Admin. Code r. 571–89
(1992).
Regulation: La. Admin. Code tit. 76, section
901–907.
Statutes: Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, section
6072 (2017); Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 7 section 1501 (2017); Regulation: 13 188 Me.
Code R. 2 (2018).
Regulation: Md. Code Regs. 08.02.14 (2016)
Statute: Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 130, section
80; Regulation: 322 Mass. Code Regs.
7.01–02 (2017); Guidance: Dept. of Food &
Agriculture, Mass. Aquaculture Permits
Guidance Doc. (April 1, 1998).
Statute: Mich. Comp. Laws section 286.871–
884 (1996).
Statute: Miss. Code Ann. section 79–22–13
(2013).
Statutes: Nev. Rev. Stat. section 561.301;
Nev. Rev. Stat. section 576.128.
Statute: N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. section 211:
62–e (2016).
Statute: N.J. Rev. Stat. section 4:27 (1997) ...
Aquaculture facilities must be registered annually with the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development and are limited to approve species. Operations may be
inspected by State Officials at any time.
Some types of aquaculture require a permit from the Mississippi Department of Agriculture
and Commerce. A requirement of the permit is record-keeping.
Aquaculture registration (same as farm registration) is annual with the Nevada Department
of Agriculture.
Aquaculture must be permitted through the New Hampshire Department of Fish and Game.
Aquaculture permit is required along with a license for operations through both the Department of Environmental Protection and the Department of Agriculture.
Regulation: N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. The New York Department of Environmental Conservation issues annual permits that re6, section 48 (2018).
quire record-keeping.
Statutes: N.C. Gen. Stat. section 63–106; The North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services administers permits
N.C. Gen. Stat. section 16A–113 (2017).
for allowable freshwater species. North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries authorizes
marine aquaculture leases with annual fees.
Regulation: Ohio Adm. Code 1501:31–39–01
Annual Permit from the Ohio Division of Wildlife is required along with a recordkeeping requirement.
Statutes: Or. Rev. Stat. Ann. section 215.213 Annual permit for shellfish required through the Oregon Department of Agriculture with
(2018); Or. Rev. Stat. Ann. section 622.270.
record-keeping and an annual report submission.
Statute: 20 R.I. Gen. Laws section 20–10 Permit through the Coastal Resources Management Council is required, and automatically
(2013); Regulation: 250 R.I. Code R. secrenewed annually. Other permits may also be required.
tion 40–00–1 (2017).
Statute: S.C. Code Ann. section 50–18–2 Permit required for freshwater game fish aquaculture through the South Carolina Depart(2003).
ment of Natural Resources, with a record keeping requirement. Annual permits also required for shellfish.
Statute: Tex. Agriculture Code sections A Texas Department of Agriculture license. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commis134.011–134.023 (1999).
sion permit to dispose of wastewater. The license is valid for two years and is renewable.
Statutes: Wash. Aadmin. Code section 220– In addition to various permits for different types of aquaculture, all aquatic farms must reg370–060 (2017); Wash. Admin. Code secister with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Finfish farms must also keep
tion 220–370–090 (2017).
records.
State and federal regulations
applicable to aquaculture operations are
not affected by this rule, thus proposed
§ 698.3 provides that the registration,
reporting and recordkeeping
requirements under the Traceability
Information Program for Seafood do not
supersede any requirements established
under any other federal or State law.
NOAA seeks public comment on
Table 1, including information on
additional, existing registration and
reporting requirements and mechanisms
that might assign unique, alternate
producer identifiers referenced in
§ 698.4(b) that could be recognized by
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Annual permit required, with a recordkeeping component and annual reporting to the Illinois
Department of Natural Resources.
A permit is needed from Indiana Department of Agriculture, which requires records retention and inspection of the facility at any time.
Annual License required through Iowa Department of Natural Resources, which includes an
annual reporting requirement.
Permit applications currently available for Catfish, Tilapia and Oysters. Other species must
enter a separate approval process for permitting through the Louisiana Department of
Fish and Wildlife.
Coastal aquaculture through 20 year leases from the Maine Department of Marine Resources with annual rent and record-keeping requirements.
Land-based aquaculture is licensed through the Department of Agriculture, Conservation &
Forestry.
Must be permitted before operating a facility through the Maryland Department of Natural
Resources.
Facilities must be permitted and the permit has a record keeping component and requires a
State Inspection prior to permitting. Both the Department of Environmental Protection and
the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife are involved in permitting.
20:17 Oct 10, 2018
Jkt 247001
NMFS for purposes of the Traceability
Information Program for Seafood.
Stakeholder Engagement
NMFS will hold public meetings to
discuss implementation of the
Traceability Information Program for
Seafood and address questions from
participants. Information on future
Program implementation meetings and
transcripts of prior meetings and
webinars can be found at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/about/officeinternational-affairs-seafood-inspection.
NMFS encourages stakeholders who
may be affected by this rule, if
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
implemented as proposed, to participate
in the public meetings and to submit
written comments (see ADDRESSES). In
particular, NMFS seeks comment on:
The assumption that the proposed
recordkeeping incurs a marginal cost given
the background of Food and Drug
Administration recordkeeping requirements
and that the proposed NMFS online reporting
system will minimize the reporting burden;
the assumption that the $1000 annual
value threshold as a de minimis level for
exemption from the Program is, in fact,
comparable to the minimum size of farms
contributing to imports of these species
under the SIMP;
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
the assumption that the registration/
reporting system, if operated at cost of $30
per registrant, is not a significant business
cost and, if the cost varies depending on final
system costs and number of users, what
threshold fee would constitute a significant
cost;
whether the proposed recordkeeping
period of 2 years is inconsistent with other
State or federal requirements applicable to
businesses affected by the Program; and,
whether the Program overlaps with State
recordkeeping and reporting programs,
especially for abalone producers in California
and Hawaii.
Classification
This proposed rule is published under
the authority of the Commerce, Justice,
Science, and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act, 2018, Public Law
115–141, and the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
The NMFS Assistant Administrator
has determined that this proposed
action is consistent with the provisions
of these and other applicable laws,
subject to further consideration after
public comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
NMFS has prepared a regulatory impact
review of this action, which is available
from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
Regulatory Flexibility Act
NMFS prepared an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) for this
proposed rule, as required by section
603 of the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 603. The IRFA
describes the economic impact that this
proposed rule, if implemented, would
have on small entities. A description of
the proposed rule, why it is being
considered, and the objectives of, and
legal basis for this proposed rule are
contained at the beginning of this
section in the preamble and in the
SUMMARY section of the preamble. A
copy of the full analysis is available
from the NMFS (see ADDRESSES). A
summary of the IRFA follows.
For U.S. commercial aquaculture
producers of shrimp and abalone for
human consumption, this proposed rule
would create a mandatory registration,
reporting and recordkeeping program.
NMFS anticipates that U.S. entities will
not have any significant adverse
economic effects as a result of this
action, because it does not pose any
significant new burdens with regard to
existing reporting and recordkeeping
requirements or business practices.
NMFS believes the recordkeeping and
reporting costs are accounted for in
earlier U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) regulatory
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:17 Oct 10, 2018
Jkt 247001
actions, which contain more extensive
recordkeeping requirements. See FDA
Public Health Security and Bioterrorism
Preparedness and Response Act
(Bioterrorism Act) final rule, Table 23,
69 FR 71562 at 71646 and Table 26 at
71650 (Dec. 9, 2004); Food Safety
Modernization Act regulations (21 CFR
1.361); and Seafood Hazard Analysis
and Critical Control Point (HACCP)
regulations (21 CFR part 123). NMFS
seeks comment on whether there could
be economic impacts that have not been
evaluated in the supporting analyses of
this proposed rule, or that could be
difficult to anticipate.
NMFS proposes this action to comply
with the 2018 Appropriations Act and
to collect or have access to additional
data on domestic aquaculture shrimp
and abalone products to determine
whether they have been lawfully
produced and are accurately
represented, to deter illegally-produced
or misrepresented seafood from entering
into U.S. commerce, and as a domestic
counterpart to the shrimp and abalone
species import requirements under the
Seafood Import Monitoring Program.
These data reporting and recordkeeping
requirements affect producers of
aquacultured shrimp and abalone
products, many of which are small
businesses that commercially produce
for entry into U.S. commerce products
valued at $1,000 or more per year. The
registration, electronic reporting and
recordkeeping requirements proposed
by this rulemaking would build on
current business practices (e.g.,
information systems to document
business transactions, facilitate product
recalls, maintain product quality, or
reduce risks of food borne illnesses) and
are not estimated to pose significant
adverse or long-term economic impacts
on small entities.
The proposed rule, if implemented,
will directly affect entities engaged in
aquaculture of shrimp and abalone
within the scope of the Traceability
Information Program for Seafood. The
Small Business Administration has
established size criteria for all major
industry sectors in the United States
including aquaculture operations. A
business involved in aquaculture is
classified as a small business if it is
independently owned and operated, is
not dominant in its field of operation
(including its affiliates), and has
combined annual receipts not in excess
of $0.75 million North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS)
code 112512 Shellfish Farming, 112519
Other Aquaculture, and 112511 finfish
farming and fish hatcheries) for all its
affiliated operations worldwide.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
51431
Based on the United States
Department of Agriculture Census of
Agriculture, Census of Aquaculture
2013 and the Bureau of Labor and
Statistics’ 2017 mean hourly wage for
bookkeeping, NMFS has estimated that
this rule would potentially affect 66
producers, requiring each to make a
maximum of 12 reports annually
($19.76/hour at 0.5 hours per report) to
NMFS on production of the species
subject to the Traceability Information
Program for Seafood. Total maximum
costs for registration and renewal, data
entry, recordkeeping and data storage
per registrant are estimated by NMFS to
amount to $150.21 (includes $30.00
registration fee and registration labor
cost) in the first year, and $118.56
annually thereafter.
This rule has been developed to avoid
duplication or conflict with any other
federal rules. To the extent that the
requirements of the rule overlap with
other reporting requirements applicable
to the designated species, this has been
taken into account to avoid collecting
data more than once. Given the fact that
traceability systems are being
increasingly used within the seafood
industry, it is not expected that this rule
will significantly affect the overall
volume of trade or alter trade flows in
the U.S. market for fish and fish
products that are legally produced and
accurately represented.
Based on limited financial
information available to NMFS about
the affected entities, NMFS believes that
most affected producers of shrimp are
small entities as defined by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA); that is,
they are independently owned and
operated and not dominant in their
fields of operation, and have annual
receipts of no more than $0.75 million.
NMFS believes there are a few
producers of abalone that would be
considered large entities. While there
are a few large entities, the one-time
registration fee and cost of reporting are
low (maximum annual cost of $150.21).
Therefore, NMFS has determined that
this proposed rule would affect a
substantial number of small entities;
however, the issue of disproportionate
effects on small versus large entities
does not arise in the present case.
With regard to the possible economic
effects of this action, NMFS believes
that small entities will not be
significantly adversely affected by this
action because it does not directly
restrict production or trade in the
designated species and does not pose
entirely new burdens with regard to the
collection and submission of
information necessary to comply with
the monitoring program. While this rule
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
51432
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
would establish new reporting
requirements, it will not require any
additional professional skill. Some of
the data proposed to be collected at
entry into U.S. commerce or to be
subject to recordkeeping requirements is
already collected by the seafood
industry in order to comply with food
safety and product labeling
requirements or to document business
transactions.
NMFS considered two regulatory
action alternatives in this rulemaking as
well as a no-action alternative: NMFS
considered requiring registration for all
shrimp and abalone aquaculture
producers, including those who sell
under $1,000 per year of these species,
but determined that producers of such
small amounts of shrimp and abalone
can be exempted from the Program
without impacting its overall integrity.
Also, there is no verifiable data on firms
under the $1,000 threshold. The $1,000
threshold was chosen because it
matches the U.S. Department of
Agriculture minimum sales threshold
for reporting under the Census of
Agriculture. NMFS also considered
requiring reporting of all shrimp and
abalone production regardless of its
intended use, but determined this was
not necessary as the selection of certain
Harmonized Tariff Schedule codes for
inclusion under SIMP limits the scope
of SIMP to just those seafood products
intended for human consumption and
excludes products not intended for
human consumption. Recognizing that
$1,000 in sales per year may result in
the inclusion of facilities not selling
meaningful quantities of shrimp and
abalone into U.S. commerce, NMFS may
finalize a higher threshold. NMFS seeks
comment on a threshold that both
satisfies the requirements of the
Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2018,
while also minimizing burden on the
smallest producers.
In light of the information on total
annual compliance cost described
above, NMFS believes the rule, if
implemented will not reduce profits for
a substantial number of small entities.
Therefore, NMFS believes the proposed
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, however, we
seek public comment on this analysis.
NMFS prepared an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis to describe the
economic impact this proposed rule
would have on small entities. A copy of
this analysis is available from NMFS
(see ADDRESSES). NMFS requests
comments, particularly focused on the
costs of compliance with the proposed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:17 Oct 10, 2018
Jkt 247001
reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains a new
collection-of-information requirement
subject to review and approval by OMB
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA). This requirement has been
submitted to OMB for approval. The
information collection burden for the
requirements proposed under this rule
(i.e., registration or renewal; monthly
reports; recordkeeping and data storage;
and provision of records of supply chain
information when selected for audit) as
applicable to production of shrimp and
abalone species is estimated by NMFS
to be 0.5 hour. Compliance costs are
estimated to total a maximum of
$1,980.00 ($30.00 × 66) for the
registration fees, no more than $7,824.96
($118.56 × 66) for data entry, and $0 for
data storage as these records are already
required for tax and business purposes.
Registration Requirement: With the
requirement to register as a producer
under this program, there would be
approximately 66 respondents who
would need approximately 5 minutes to
fill out the online registration form
resulting in a total annual burden of 5.5
hours and a cost of $108.68.
Data Submission Requirement: Data
to be submitted electronically are, to
some extent, either already collected by
the trade in the course of supply chain
management, already required to be
collected and available for inspection
under existing federal programs (e.g.,
Bioterrorism Act; Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act), or may be collected in
support of third party certification
schemes voluntarily adopted by the
trade.
Public comment is sought regarding:
Whether this proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the appropriateness of monthly
reporting for achieving stated objectives;
the accuracy of the assumptions used in
calculating the burden estimate; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. Send comments on these or
any other aspects of the collection of
information to the NOAA Fisheries
Office of International Affairs and
Seafood Inspection at the ADDRESSES
above, and by email to OIRA_
Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax to (202)
395–7285.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, and no person shall be
subject to penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 698
Fisheries, Statistics, Aquaculture,
Reporting and recordkeeping.
Dated: October 4, 2018.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 698 is proposed
to be added to read as follows:
■
PART 698—TRACEABILITY
INFORMATION PROGRAM FOR
SEAFOOD
Sec.
698.1 Purpose and scope.
698.2 Definitions.
698.3 Relation to other Federal and state
laws.
698.4 Aquaculture facility registration.
698.5 Reporting.
698.6 Recordkeeping and audits.
698.7 Confidentiality and disclosure.
698.8 Prohibitions.
Authority: Pub. L. 115–141, Div. B, section
539; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
§ 698.1
Purpose and scope.
(a) This part implements a
Traceability Information Program for
Seafood from the point of production to
entry into U.S. commerce pursuant to
the Commerce, Justice, Science and
Related Agencies Appropriations Act,
2018, section 539 (Pub. L. 115–141, Div.
B) and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(MSA).
(b) This Program establishes
registration, reporting and
recordkeeping requirements for U.S.
inland, coastal, and marine aquaculture
facilities that produce shrimp and
abalone and complements the Seafood
Traceability Program established in
§ 300.324 of this title.
(c) The scope of the Program is
limited to U.S. commercial aquaculture
facilities that produce shrimp and
abalone for human consumption for
entry into U.S. commerce.
(d) Production of fish and fish
products regulated under this part not
intended for human consumption,
including production intended for
research, broodstock, or post-larval grow
out, is outside the scope of the Program.
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
§ 698.2
Definitions.
In addition to the terms defined in
§ 600.10 of this title, and in the MSA,
the following definitions apply to this
part. If a term is defined differently in
§ 600.10, or in the MSA, the definition
in this section shall apply.
Aquaculture facility means any farm
with ponds, tanks or pools in open air
or in an enclosed structure, or a net pen
or enclosure in open water that
produces for human consumption fish
or fish products regulated under this
part.
Direct sale means the sale or offer for
sale of fish or fish products regulated
under this part from an aquaculture
facility, whether on or off the premises
of the facility, to an individual for
personal use.
Entry into U.S. commerce means
direct sale or the sale or transfer of
custody of fish or fish products
regulated under this part to a first
receiver, either directly or through a
third party. Entry into U.S. commerce
includes changes in custody with no
change in ownership, e.g., the receiving
or acquiring of fish or fish products
from an aquaculture facility by a
processor or distributor that is owned by
the same person who owns the
aquaculture facility.
First receiver means the person who
first receives fish produced from an
aquaculture facility for any commercial
purpose (e.g., processing, distribution or
sale) other than a direct sale. The first
receiver may be a person affiliated with
the aquaculture facility that receives
fish or fish products regulated under
this part through a no–sale transaction
but does not include a person taking
possession of fish for the sole purpose
of transportation.
Fish or fish products regulated under
this part means shrimp and abalone
species produced by an aquaculture
facility and products containing those
species.
Person has the same meaning as
under section 3 of the MSA, 16 U.S.C.
1802.
Producer means the owner or operator
of an aquaculture facility.
Produce/Production means remove/
removal of fish from an aquaculture
facility for the purposes of entry into
U.S. commerce.
Traceability Information Program for
Seafood means the registration, data
reporting and recordkeeping
requirements established under this
part.
§ 698.3
laws.
Relation to other Federal and state
Registration, reporting and
recordkeeping requirements under the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:17 Oct 10, 2018
Jkt 247001
Traceability Information Program for
Seafood do not supersede any
requirements established under any
other federal or State law.
§ 698.4
Aquaculture facility registration.
(a) The producer of fish or fish
products regulated under this part must
register the aquaculture facility through
the NMFS Traceability Information
Program for Seafood electronic
registration and reporting system. Such
registration is valid for a period of one
year and must be renewed annually.
The electronic registration and reporting
system will assign a unique producer
identifier. Producers must notify NMFS
within 30 days of any change in their
information submitted to or used in the
electronic registration and reporting
system (e.g., business name, addresses
or contact information; if such changes
are not reported to NMFS within 30
days, the registration is invalid as of the
30th day after such change.
(b) Alternative Producer Identifier.
NMFS may approve the use of an
alternative producer identifier obtained
through another Federal or State
program.
(c) Registration Renewal. Annually,
all producers must confirm their
identifying business information in
order to renew their registration.
Producers that have submitted monthly
reports under § 698.5 must certify that
all applicable entries have been
reported. Producers that have had no
reportable production events for an
entire 12-month period must so certify
through the electronic registration and
reporting system. If registration lapses,
the producer must re-register.
(d) De Minimis Exemption. Any
producer that produces for entry into
U.S. commerce fish or fish products
regulated under this part valued at less
than $1,000 per year is exempt from the
registration requirement of this section.
§ 698.5
Reporting.
A producer that is required to be
registered under § 698.4 must report
information regarding all entries into
U.S. commerce of fish or fish products
regulated under this part.
(a) Frequency. The producer must
submit monthly reports through the
NMFS electronic registration and
reporting system, including all entries
into U.S. commerce of fish or fish
products regulated under this part that
occurred during that calendar month.
The report for a monthly period is due
on or before the last day of the next
calendar month. Producers are not
required to submit reports for any
month in which there were no entries
into U.S. commerce.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
51433
(b) Content. Reports must contain the
details of each entry into U.S.
commerce, including producer
identifier, the species (3-alpha Aquatic
Sciences and Fisheries Information
System (ASFIS) code), the date of
production, date of entry into U.S.
commerce, the production volume, the
unit of measure, the product form and
weight at entry into U.S. commerce, and
business name, address and email and/
or phone number for the first receiver.
For direct sales, the report need not
contain the name, address and email
and/or phone number of the individual
who purchased the fish or fish products
for personal use.
§ 698.6
Recordkeeping and audits.
(a) Recordkeeping. The producer must
maintain a paper or electronic copy of
any report required under § 698.5 and
supporting documentation for the report
sufficient to trace the fish or fish
product from point of production to
entry into U.S. commerce. Records may
include widely used commercial
documents (e.g., records related to
production, sale, processing, shipment,
cold storage, and distribution). The
supporting documentation must include
records regarding each custodian of the
fish and fish product, e.g., including
processors, storage facilities, and
distributors, sufficient to trace the fish
or fish product from the point of entry
into U.S. commerce back to the point of
production and to verify the information
reported about entry into U.S.
commerce. The producer must retain
such reports and supporting
documentation in electronic or paper
format for a period of two years from the
date of the report.
(b) Audit. Reports and supporting
documentation described under
paragraph (a) of this section may be
selected for audit in order to verify the
information submitted in the reports. To
support such audits, the producer must,
upon request, make such reports and
supporting documentation available for
inspection by NMFS or otherwise
provide them as requested by NMFS.
(c) Inspection. The producer must
make all reports and records required
under paragraph (a) of this section
available for inspection by an
authorized officer upon request.
§ 698.7
Confidentiality and disclosure.
All information and records required
to be submitted under this part shall be
subject to the Magnuson-Stevens Act
confidentiality provisions and shall not
be disclosed except as provided under
section 402(b)(1) of the MagnusonStevens Act and part 600, subpart E of
this title.
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
51434
§ 698.8
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Prohibitions.
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
In addition to the general prohibitions
listed at § 600.725 of this title, it is
unlawful for any person to do any of the
following:
(a) Violate any of the registration,
reporting or recordkeeping provisions of
this part.
(b) Sell, offer for sale, or attempt to
sell or offer for sale, fish or fish products
regulated under this part that were
produced by an aquaculture facility that
has failed to register as required under
§ 698.4.
(c) Dispose of fish or fish products
regulated under this part, or any reports
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:17 Oct 10, 2018
Jkt 247001
or supporting documentation required
to be retained under § 698.6(a), after any
communication from an authorized
officer that the aquaculture facility, or
such reports or supporting
documentation, are to be inspected.
(d) Make any false statement, oral or
written, to an authorized officer
concerning the production, purchase,
sale, offer for sale, receipt, acquisition,
possession, transport or transfer of any
fish or fish products regulated under
this part, or any attempt to do any of the
above.
(e) Provide false, incomplete or
inaccurate information in the
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
registration required under § 698.4 or
reports required under § 698.5 or falsify
any reports or supporting
documentation required to be retained
under § 698.6.
(f) Fail to make reports or supporting
documentation available for inspection,
as required under § 698.6(c).
(g) Fail to make available, or
otherwise produce, reports and
supporting documentation to support an
audit, as required under § 698.6(b).
[FR Doc. 2018–22039 Filed 10–10–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 197 (Thursday, October 11, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51426-51434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22039]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 698
[Docket No. 180328324-8464-01]
RIN 0648-BH87
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act;
Traceability Information Program for Seafood
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2018 and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (MSA), NMFS is proposing a Traceability
Information Program for Seafood to establish registration, reporting
and recordkeeping requirements for U.S. aquaculture producers of shrimp
and abalone, two species subject to the Seafood Traceability Program,
also known as the Seafood Import Monitoring Program (SIMP). This
proposed rule, if finalized, would provide traceability for these
species from the point of production to entry into U.S. commerce.
Collection of traceability information for U.S. aquacultured shrimp and
abalone will be accomplished by electronic submission of data to NMFS.
This rule would require owners or operators of U.S. inland, coastal and
marine commercial aquaculture facilities (``producers'') to report
information about production and entry into U.S. commerce of shrimp and
abalone products. In addition, this rule would require producers to
register with NMFS and retain records pertaining to the production of
shrimp and abalone and entry of those products into U.S. commerce. This
proposed rule serves as a domestic counterpart to the shrimp and
abalone import requirements under SIMP, and will help NMFS verify that
U.S. aquacultured shrimp and abalone were lawfully produced by
providing information to trace each production event(s) to entry of the
fish or fish products into U.S. commerce. The rule will also decrease
the incidence of seafood fraud by requiring the reporting of this
information to the U.S. Government at the point of entry into U.S.
commerce so that the information reported (e.g., regarding species and
harvest location) can be verified.
DATES: Written comments must be received by November 26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on this action, identified by NOAA-NMFS-
2018-0055, may be submitted by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to Docket Number NOAA-NMFS-
2018-0055, click the ``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required
fields, and enter or attach your comments.
Mail: Celeste Leroux, Office of International Affairs and
Seafood Inspection, NOAA Fisheries, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver
Spring, MD 20910.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://
[[Page 51427]]
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (for example, name and address) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential
business information or otherwise sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments. Enter N/A in the required
fields if you wish to remain anonymous. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe portable document file (PDF) formats only.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
proposed rule may be submitted to the NOAA Fisheries Office of
International Affairs and Seafood Inspection (IASI) and by email to:
[email protected] or fax to (202) 395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Celeste Leroux at (301) 427-8372 or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 15, 2015, the Presidential Task Force on Combating
Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing and Seafood Fraud
(Task Force), co-chaired by the Departments of Commerce and State,
published its action plan to implement Task Force recommendations for a
comprehensive framework of integrated programs to combat IUU fishing
and seafood fraud. As part of implementing the Task Force plan, NMFS
issued a final rule (81 FR 88975, December 9, 2016) for a risk-based
traceability program to track seafood from production to entry into
U.S. commerce known as the Seafood Traceability Program or Seafood
Import Monitoring Program (SIMP) (see 50 CFR 300.320-300.325). For
clarity, NMFS will refer to this program as SIMP throughout this
preamble, while the codified regulatory text at 50 CFR 300.320-300.325
uses the term ``Seafood Traceability Program.'' The final rule
included, for designated priority fish species, permitting, reporting,
and recordkeeping requirements relating to the importation of certain
fish and fish products to provide for traceability from point of
production to point of entry into U.S. commerce in order to prevent
illegally harvested or produced and misrepresented seafood from
entering into U.S. commerce. SIMP applies to thirteen species and
species groups, including shrimp and abalone, identified as
particularly vulnerable to IUU fishing and/or seafood fraud. However,
in the final rule establishing SIMP, NMFS stayed program requirements
for shrimp and abalone species indefinitely because there is commercial
scale aquaculture of shrimp and abalone in the United States and gaps
existed in the collection of traceability information for domestic
aquaculture, which is largely regulated at the State level.
In the SIMP final rule, NMFS explained that when the domestic
reporting and recordkeeping gaps have been closed, NMFS will then
publish an action in the Federal Register to lift the stay of the
effective date for Sec. 300.324(a)(3) of the rule pertaining to shrimp
and abalone. (81 FR at 88977-78, December 9, 2016).
On March 23, 2018, the President signed into law the Commerce,
Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2018 (2018
Appropriations Act) (Pub. L. 115-141, Div. B). Section 539 of the Act
directs the Secretary of Commerce to lift the stay on the effective
date of the SIMP final rule for shrimp and abalone species and
establish a compliance date not later than December 31, 2018. On April
24, 2018, NMFS published a final rule lifting that stay, and
established a compliance date of December 31, 2018 for imports of
shrimp and abalone (83 FR 17762).
In addition to the requirement to include shrimp and abalone
species under SIMP, section 539 of the 2018 Appropriations Act directed
the Secretary of Commerce to ``. . . establish a traceability program
for United States inland, coastal, and marine aquaculture of shrimp and
abalone . . .'' and by December 31, 2018 to ``. . . promulgate such
regulations as are necessary and appropriate to establish and implement
the program.''
This proposed Traceability Information Program for Seafood
(Program) would establish registration, reporting and recordkeeping
requirements for domestic, commercial aquaculture producers of shrimp
and abalone species and products containing those species from the
point of production to entry into U.S. commerce. A producer, i.e., the
owner or operator of an aquaculture facility that produces shrimp or
abalone for human consumption, is responsible for the registration,
reporting and recordkeeping requirements of this Program. Section 698.2
defines producer and aquaculture facility. Consistent with the plain
language of section 539 of the 2018 Appropriations Act, the scope of
the Program will be limited to shrimp and abalone species unless and
until otherwise authorized by Congress. The requirements under this
proposed Program will fill the gaps identified during development of
the SIMP with respect to the collection of traceability information for
domestic aquaculture of shrimp and abalone species.
Section 539 further directs that information collected pursuant to
a regulation promulgated under this section shall be confidential and
shall not be disclosed except for the information disclosed under
section 401(b)(1) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1881a(b)(1). Section 1881a(b)(1) corresponds
to MSA section 402(b)(1). Thus, NMFS believes that the reference to MSA
section 401(b)(1) is a typographical error and the intent of Congress
was to cite to MSA section 402(b)(1). MSA section 401(b)(1) pertains to
fishing vessel registration, whereas 402(b)(1) addresses data
confidentiality which lends further support to the notion that Congress
intended to cite to section 402(b)(1). Accordingly, NMFS will apply the
data confidentiality provisions of MSA section 402(b)(1) to the data
required to be submitted under this proposed Program.
The proposed Traceability Information Program for Seafood consists
of three components: (1) Registration; (2) monthly reporting of
production events; and (3) recordkeeping requirements with respect to
both production events and chain of custody information from production
to the point of entry into U.S. commerce via sale or non-sale
transaction (including transfers between components of a vertically-
integrated enterprise). Application of the Program's reporting and
recordkeeping requirements would enable NMFS to determine the origin of
the domestic aquaculture shrimp and abalone products and confirm that
they were lawfully produced and not misrepresented. Coextensive with
the scope of SIMP, the Traceability Information Program for Seafood
traces fish and fish products from production to entry into U.S.
commerce. Fish or fish products regulated under the Traceability
Information Program for Seafood are shrimp and abalone species produced
by an aquaculture facility and products containing those aquacultured
species. Section 698.2 defines fish or fish products regulated under
this part, ``produce/production,'' and ``entry into U.S. commerce.''
I. Registration
In Sec. 698.4, NMFS proposes to identify aquaculture producers
(i.e., owners or
[[Page 51428]]
operators of aquaculture facilities) through a registration process
that will link each producer with a unique producer identifier. The
purpose of registration is not to permit or regulate production
activities, but rather to identify the person responsible for reporting
data to NMFS and recordkeeping for audit and inspection purposes. Use
of a unique producer identifier will ensure that data reported is
attributed to the correct producer. As proposed, all U.S. producers of
species covered by this program that annually enter product for human
consumption valued at $1,000 or more into U.S. commerce must
electronically register and submit their fee for registration via an
electronic reporting system established by NMFS. The amount of the one-
time registration fee, currently estimated to be $30.00, will be
calculated in accordance with procedures set forth in Chapter 9 of the
NOAA Finance Handbook for determining the administrative costs for
special products and services (https://www.corporateservices.noaa.gov/finance/Finance%20Handbook.html); the registration fee will not exceed
such costs. Because the electronic registration system has not yet been
completed, NMFS has not made a final determination about total
development costs and out-year costs for operations and maintenance.
Additionally, the number of users may vary from NMFS estimates as the
number of aquaculture operations expands or contracts. Consequently,
the calculation of the administrative cost recovery fee may be higher
or lower than the $30 estimate. NMFS requests comment on the impact
that registration fees may have on aquaculture operations that would be
subject to this rule.
NMFS is proposing $1,000 as the de minimis sales level for
exemption from the Program because it matches the U.S. Department of
Agriculture minimum sales threshold for reporting under the Census of
Agriculture. As producers are familiar with the Census of Agriculture,
adopting their threshold should allow producers to easily self-identify
their need to register and report under this Program. Additionally, it
is presumed that foreign aquaculture operations producing under this
annual value threshold would be serving local markets and not be
exporting product to the United States, thus they would not have
shipments subject to the documentation requirements of SIMP. NMFS
requests public comment to assist in the identification of alternative
thresholds for registration and reporting under this Program that would
exempt aquaculture facilities where all production for human
consumption is intended for direct sale to consumers, as this level of
small-scale commerce is not comparable to the scale of commerce
monitored under the Seafood Traceability Program.
A producer who is required to register only needs one registration
identifier. If the producer provides a valid and unique registration
identifier for its aquaculture facility that is currently in use by
another State or federal agency, NMFS may approve the use of that
alternative identifier, provided that NMFS can independently verify the
identity of the producer. NOAA seeks public comment on whether
identifiers assigned under other programs, such as the Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNs), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's
Registration of Food Facilities, or a similar State or federal facility
registration, could be used for this purpose, and whether such an
approach would reduce the burden of registration on industry.
In addition to the requirements in this proposed rule, for some
species or products, permits from other federal or State agencies may
be required (e.g., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service permits for products
of species listed under the Convention for International Trade in
Endangered Species). The Traceability Information Program for Seafood
does not supersede any other federal or State requirements.
The electronic reporting system to be established by NMFS will
consist of two parts. The first will be a publicly accessible
registration page where producers (an aquaculture facility owner or
operator) will provide basic information to identify their business:
Business name, Tax Identification Number, physical address,
and phone number
Farm physical address (if different than business physical
address)
Point of contact name, mailing address, email and phone number
Once a producer identifier has been designated via the NMFS system,
the producer can obtain login credentials to access the second part--a
data entry portal that will require a unique login for each user. After
logging into this site, the user will be able to report the required
data elements as described in section III below, Data for Reporting and
Recordkeeping.
II. Registration Renewal
Section 698.4(c) sets out a registration renewal requirement. As
explained below, this rule requires that the producer, or
representative acting on its behalf, submit reports to NMFS via an
electronic reporting system at monthly intervals. If a producer has no
reportable production events for an entire 12-month period, the
producer must so certify through the electronic registration and
reporting system established by NMFS in order to renew the producer's
registration. Producers that have submitted monthly reports would need
to certify that all applicable entries have been reported. Annually,
all producers would need to confirm their identifying business
information in order to renew their registration. Once the producer has
submitted all required certifications, registration renewals would be
automatic and at no additional cost to the producer. If the
registration lapses, the producer would have to re-register and pay the
cost-recovery fee.
III. Data for Reporting and Recordkeeping
The data reporting and recordkeeping requirements under this rule
would be in addition to any reporting and recordkeeping required by
States or other federal agencies. To align this proposed Program with
the SIMP data reporting requirements, NMFS proposes, in Sec. 698.5,
that producers required to register under the Traceability Information
Program for Seafood would be required to report information for each
entry into U.S. commerce of fish or fish products regulated under the
Traceability Information Program for Seafood that are intended for
human consumption. As outlined in Sec. 698.5(b), producers would
submit reports through NMFS's electronic registration and reporting
system and reports would include:
Identifying the aquaculture facility producing the fish or
fish products by providing a current, valid producer identifier.
Information on the fish or fish products produced: 3-alpha
Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Information System (ASFIS) code; Product
weight and form (whole, head removed, etc.) at point of production and
at point of entry into U.S. commerce.
Information on where and when the fish were produced:
Location of aquaculture facility; Date of production (i.e., removal
from aquaculture facility).
Name of entity(ies) (processor, dealer, retailer) to which
fish was sold or delivered. For direct sales, the producer would need
to report information under the first three bullets above. The producer
would not need to report information about the consumer, just describe
where the fish was sold (e.g., on premises of the aquaculture facility,
roadside stand, or farmer's
[[Page 51429]]
market). See proposed Sec. Sec. 698.5(b) and 698.2 (defining ``direct
sale'' and ``entry into U.S. commerce'').
NMFS proposes that at monthly intervals producers would be required
to report information for each entry into U.S. commerce of fish or fish
products intended for human consumption from the previous month. For
example, a producer would be required to report each applicable entry
occurring in the month of May on or before the last day of June. If no
applicable entries occurred in a given month, no report to NMFS is
required. However, if a producer has no reportable production events
for an entire 12-month period, the producer must certify that through
the electronic reporting system established by NMFS in order to renew
its registration. See Registration Renewal section above.
In designing the reporting requirements for the Traceability
Information Program for Seafood, NMFS reviewed the temporal span of
harvests that contribute to an entry subject to SIMP requirements and
found that the temporal span for most entries was a month or less.
Thus, NMFS is proposing monthly reporting for the Traceability
Information Program for Seafood which provides a similar reporting
burden when compared to the SIMP and contributes to the objective of
the rule. NMFS seeks comment on whether producers would have production
to report every month and whether the monthly reporting frequency for
domestic producers is, in fact, comparable to the temporal aggregation
of harvests required under the SIMP.
Producers would also be required to keep supporting documentation
for the reports that are sufficient to trace the fish or fish product
from the point of production (i.e., removal from the aquaculture
facility) to entry into U.S. commerce as described in Sec. 698.6(a).
NMFS expects that typical supply chain records that are kept in the
normal course of business, including production logs, and transaction
records which include such information as the identity of the
custodian, the type of processing, and the weight of the product, would
provide sufficient information for NMFS to conduct a trace of the
supply chain. Such information must include records regarding each
custodian of the fish and fish product, including, as applicable,
processors, storage facilities, and distributors, sufficient to trace
the fish or fish product from the point of entry into U.S. commerce
back to the point of production and to verify the information reported
about entry into U.S. commerce. Section 698.6(a) establishes that
producers would be required to retain reports and supporting
documentation, in either paper or electronic format, for two years from
the date of the reports. Producers must make reports and supporting
documentation available for inspection by NMFS and must provide them to
NMFS upon request to support an audit as stated in Sec. 698.6(b)-(c)).
NMFS requests comment on the duration of the recordkeeping requirement
and the extent to which the two-year period is consistent with other
State and Federal recordkeeping requirements applicable to the business
operations of aquaculture facilities that would be subject to this
program.
NMFS proposes to mirror the requirements of this Program such that
its requirements are equivalent to those that apply to imports of
shrimp and abalone under SIMP. Thus, production of shrimp and abalone
species not intended for human consumption (e.g., fish produced for
research, grow out of post-larvae, broodstock, or environmental
management programs) would not be within the scope of this proposed
domestic Traceability Information Program for Seafood as stated in
Sec. 698.1(d), because SIMP is limited to imports of covered species
for human consumption. In addition, any producer that enters shrimp
and/or abalone valued at less than $1,000 total per year into U.S.
commerce is exempt from the registration, reporting, and recordkeeping
requirements of this Program as stated in Sec. 698.4(c).
IV. Audit and Inspection Mechanisms
To implement this regulation, business rules will be programmed
into the electronic registration and reporting system established by
NMFS to automatically validate that the producer has populated all data
fields in conformance with format specifications. Absent this
validation, the report submission would be rejected and the producer
would be notified of the deficiencies that must be addressed in order
for the report to be accepted.
Reports may also be subject to random or targeted audit by NMFS, as
provided in Sec. 698.6(b), in order to verify that the supplied data
elements are true, can be corroborated (e.g., production was authorized
by the applicable authority, processor receipts correspond to outputs/
deliveries), and are sufficient to demonstrate that products entering
U.S. commerce were not produced in violation of domestic law and are
not fraudulently represented. If a producer fails to provide requested
records to NMFS in a timely manner, or fails to provide information to
verify that covered products were lawfully produced and accurately
represented, the matter will be referred to NOAA Fisheries Office of
Law Enforcement for possible follow-up action.
Intersection With Other Applicable Requirements
In addition to the registration, reporting, and recordkeeping
requirements of this proposed rule, several States have specific
regulations applicable to aquaculture operations, typically including
requirements on permitting, certification, and registration. Table 1
contains information, by State, on existing regulations relevant to
traceability. To the extent practicable, and subject to applicable data
confidentiality laws, NMFS will work to minimize duplicative
requirements. For example, proposed Sec. 698.4(b) provides that NMFS
may approve the use of an alternative producer identifier obtained
through other Federal or State programs.
Table 1--Existing Aquaculture Registration and Reporting Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Citation Summary of requirement
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama............................ Statute: Ala. Code section Oyster leases required.
9-2-150 (2015).
California......................... Statute: California Fish & Aquaculture Registration is required for each
Game Code section 15400 facility devoted to the propagation,
(2006). cultivation, maintenance, and harvesting of
fish, shellfish and plants in marine,
brackish, and fresh water.
Connecticut........................ Statutes: Conn. Gen. Stat. Aquaculture-related permits are overseen by
section 26-194 (2013); the Department of Agriculture, Bureau of
Conn. Gen. Stat. section Aquaculture and the Department of Energy and
22-11i (2013). Environmental Protection. Permits are
required.
Delaware........................... Statute: Del. Code tit. 3 In addition to various permits needed
section 4 (2013); dependent on species, all aquaculture
Regulation: 7-3800 Del. operations must register with Delaware
Admin. Code (2014). Department of Agriculture--valid for 5 years.
Northern Marianas Islands.......... Statute: 2006 N. Mar. I. Site permit in coastal waters only.
Public Law 15-43.
[[Page 51430]]
Florida............................ Statute: Fla. Stat. section Aquaculture registration is required with the
597.004 (2017). Florida Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Affairs, annually.
Georgia............................ Statute: Ga. Code Ann. Aquaculture of some species requires permits
section 27-4-255 (2017). and for other species, registration with the
Georgia Department of Natural Resources.
Hawaii............................. Statute: Haw. Rev. Stat. Permit with record-keeping required for
section 187-3.5 (2012); aquaculture, including fish ponds through the
Regulation: Haw. Code R. Hawaii Department of Land and Natural
section 13-74-43 (1996). Resources.
Illinois........................... Regulation: Ill. Admin. Annual permit required, with a recordkeeping
Code tit. 17, pt. 870. component and annual reporting to the
Illinois Department of Natural Resources.
Indiana............................ Regulation: Aquaculture A permit is needed from Indiana Department of
Permit, 312 Ind. Admin. Agriculture, which requires records retention
Code 9-10-17 (2001). and inspection of the facility at any time.
Iowa............................... Regulation: Iowa Admin. Annual License required through Iowa
Code r. 571-89 (1992). Department of Natural Resources, which
includes an annual reporting requirement.
Louisiana.......................... Regulation: La. Admin. Code Permit applications currently available for
tit. 76, section 901-907. Catfish, Tilapia and Oysters. Other species
must enter a separate approval process for
permitting through the Louisiana Department
of Fish and Wildlife.
Maine.............................. Statutes: Me. Rev. Stat. Coastal aquaculture through 20 year leases
Ann. tit. 12, section 6072 from the Maine Department of Marine Resources
(2017); Me. Rev. Stat. with annual rent and record-keeping
Ann. tit. 7 section 1501 requirements.
(2017); Regulation: 13 188 Land-based aquaculture is licensed through the
Me. Code R. 2 (2018). Department of Agriculture, Conservation &
Forestry.
Maryland........................... Regulation: Md. Code Regs. Must be permitted before operating a facility
08.02.14 (2016). through the Maryland Department of Natural
Resources.
Massachusetts...................... Statute: Mass. Gen. Laws Facilities must be permitted and the permit
ch. 130, section 80; has a record keeping component and requires a
Regulation: 322 Mass. Code State Inspection prior to permitting. Both
Regs. 7.01-02 (2017); the Department of Environmental Protection
Guidance: Dept. of Food & and the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife
Agriculture, Mass. are involved in permitting.
Aquaculture Permits
Guidance Doc. (April 1,
1998).
Michigan........................... Statute: Mich. Comp. Laws Aquaculture facilities must be registered
section 286.871-884 (1996). annually with the Michigan Department of
Agriculture and Rural Development and are
limited to approve species. Operations may be
inspected by State Officials at any time.
Mississippi........................ Statute: Miss. Code Ann. Some types of aquaculture require a permit
section 79-22-13 (2013). from the Mississippi Department of
Agriculture and Commerce. A requirement of
the permit is record-keeping.
Nevada............................. Statutes: Nev. Rev. Stat. Aquaculture registration (same as farm
section 561.301; Nev. Rev. registration) is annual with the Nevada
Stat. section 576.128. Department of Agriculture.
New Hampshire...................... Statute: N.H. Rev. Stat. Aquaculture must be permitted through the New
Ann. section 211: 62-e Hampshire Department of Fish and Game.
(2016).
New Jersey......................... Statute: N.J. Rev. Stat. Aquaculture permit is required along with a
section 4:27 (1997). license for operations through both the
Department of Environmental Protection and
the Department of Agriculture.
New York........................... Regulation: N.Y. Comp. The New York Department of Environmental
Codes R. & Regs. tit. 6, Conservation issues annual permits that
section 48 (2018). require record-keeping.
North Carolina..................... Statutes: N.C. Gen. Stat. The North Carolina Department of Agriculture
section 63-106; N.C. Gen. and Consumer Services administers permits for
Stat. section 16A-113 allowable freshwater species. North Carolina
(2017). Division of Marine Fisheries authorizes
marine aquaculture leases with annual fees.
Ohio............................... Regulation: Ohio Adm. Code Annual Permit from the Ohio Division of
1501:31-39-01. Wildlife is required along with a
recordkeeping requirement.
Oregon............................. Statutes: Or. Rev. Stat. Annual permit for shellfish required through
Ann. section 215.213 the Oregon Department of Agriculture with
(2018); Or. Rev. Stat. record-keeping and an annual report
Ann. section 622.270. submission.
Rhode Island....................... Statute: 20 R.I. Gen. Laws Permit through the Coastal Resources
section 20-10 (2013); Management Council is required, and
Regulation: 250 R.I. Code automatically renewed annually. Other permits
R. section 40-00-1 (2017). may also be required.
South Carolina..................... Statute: S.C. Code Ann. Permit required for freshwater game fish
section 50-18-2 (2003). aquaculture through the South Carolina
Department of Natural Resources, with a
record keeping requirement. Annual permits
also required for shellfish.
Texas.............................. Statute: Tex. Agriculture A Texas Department of Agriculture license.
Code sections 134.011- Texas Natural Resource Conservation
134.023 (1999). Commission permit to dispose of wastewater.
The license is valid for two years and is
renewable.
Washington......................... Statutes: Wash. Aadmin. In addition to various permits for different
Code section 220-370-060 types of aquaculture, all aquatic farms must
(2017); Wash. Admin. Code register with the Washington Department of
section 220-370-090 (2017). Fish and Wildlife. Finfish farms must also
keep records.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State and federal regulations applicable to aquaculture operations
are not affected by this rule, thus proposed Sec. 698.3 provides that
the registration, reporting and recordkeeping requirements under the
Traceability Information Program for Seafood do not supersede any
requirements established under any other federal or State law.
NOAA seeks public comment on Table 1, including information on
additional, existing registration and reporting requirements and
mechanisms that might assign unique, alternate producer identifiers
referenced in Sec. 698.4(b) that could be recognized by NMFS for
purposes of the Traceability Information Program for Seafood.
Stakeholder Engagement
NMFS will hold public meetings to discuss implementation of the
Traceability Information Program for Seafood and address questions from
participants. Information on future Program implementation meetings and
transcripts of prior meetings and webinars can be found at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/about/office-international-affairs-seafood-inspection.
NMFS encourages stakeholders who may be affected by this rule, if
implemented as proposed, to participate in the public meetings and to
submit written comments (see ADDRESSES). In particular, NMFS seeks
comment on:
The assumption that the proposed recordkeeping incurs a marginal
cost given the background of Food and Drug Administration
recordkeeping requirements and that the proposed NMFS online
reporting system will minimize the reporting burden;
the assumption that the $1000 annual value threshold as a de
minimis level for exemption from the Program is, in fact, comparable
to the minimum size of farms contributing to imports of these
species under the SIMP;
[[Page 51431]]
the assumption that the registration/reporting system, if
operated at cost of $30 per registrant, is not a significant
business cost and, if the cost varies depending on final system
costs and number of users, what threshold fee would constitute a
significant cost;
whether the proposed recordkeeping period of 2 years is
inconsistent with other State or federal requirements applicable to
businesses affected by the Program; and,
whether the Program overlaps with State recordkeeping and
reporting programs, especially for abalone producers in California
and Hawaii.
Classification
This proposed rule is published under the authority of the
Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,
2018, Public Law 115-141, and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
The NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed
action is consistent with the provisions of these and other applicable
laws, subject to further consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866. NMFS has prepared a regulatory
impact review of this action, which is available from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
NMFS prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) for
this proposed rule, as required by section 603 of the RFA, 5 U.S.C.
603. The IRFA describes the economic impact that this proposed rule, if
implemented, would have on small entities. A description of the
proposed rule, why it is being considered, and the objectives of, and
legal basis for this proposed rule are contained at the beginning of
this section in the preamble and in the SUMMARY section of the
preamble. A copy of the full analysis is available from the NMFS (see
ADDRESSES). A summary of the IRFA follows.
For U.S. commercial aquaculture producers of shrimp and abalone for
human consumption, this proposed rule would create a mandatory
registration, reporting and recordkeeping program. NMFS anticipates
that U.S. entities will not have any significant adverse economic
effects as a result of this action, because it does not pose any
significant new burdens with regard to existing reporting and
recordkeeping requirements or business practices. NMFS believes the
recordkeeping and reporting costs are accounted for in earlier U.S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory actions, which contain
more extensive recordkeeping requirements. See FDA Public Health
Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act (Bioterrorism
Act) final rule, Table 23, 69 FR 71562 at 71646 and Table 26 at 71650
(Dec. 9, 2004); Food Safety Modernization Act regulations (21 CFR
1.361); and Seafood Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP)
regulations (21 CFR part 123). NMFS seeks comment on whether there
could be economic impacts that have not been evaluated in the
supporting analyses of this proposed rule, or that could be difficult
to anticipate.
NMFS proposes this action to comply with the 2018 Appropriations
Act and to collect or have access to additional data on domestic
aquaculture shrimp and abalone products to determine whether they have
been lawfully produced and are accurately represented, to deter
illegally-produced or misrepresented seafood from entering into U.S.
commerce, and as a domestic counterpart to the shrimp and abalone
species import requirements under the Seafood Import Monitoring
Program. These data reporting and recordkeeping requirements affect
producers of aquacultured shrimp and abalone products, many of which
are small businesses that commercially produce for entry into U.S.
commerce products valued at $1,000 or more per year. The registration,
electronic reporting and recordkeeping requirements proposed by this
rulemaking would build on current business practices (e.g., information
systems to document business transactions, facilitate product recalls,
maintain product quality, or reduce risks of food borne illnesses) and
are not estimated to pose significant adverse or long-term economic
impacts on small entities.
The proposed rule, if implemented, will directly affect entities
engaged in aquaculture of shrimp and abalone within the scope of the
Traceability Information Program for Seafood. The Small Business
Administration has established size criteria for all major industry
sectors in the United States including aquaculture operations. A
business involved in aquaculture is classified as a small business if
it is independently owned and operated, is not dominant in its field of
operation (including its affiliates), and has combined annual receipts
not in excess of $0.75 million North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) code 112512 Shellfish Farming, 112519 Other Aquaculture,
and 112511 finfish farming and fish hatcheries) for all its affiliated
operations worldwide.
Based on the United States Department of Agriculture Census of
Agriculture, Census of Aquaculture 2013 and the Bureau of Labor and
Statistics' 2017 mean hourly wage for bookkeeping, NMFS has estimated
that this rule would potentially affect 66 producers, requiring each to
make a maximum of 12 reports annually ($19.76/hour at 0.5 hours per
report) to NMFS on production of the species subject to the
Traceability Information Program for Seafood. Total maximum costs for
registration and renewal, data entry, recordkeeping and data storage
per registrant are estimated by NMFS to amount to $150.21 (includes
$30.00 registration fee and registration labor cost) in the first year,
and $118.56 annually thereafter.
This rule has been developed to avoid duplication or conflict with
any other federal rules. To the extent that the requirements of the
rule overlap with other reporting requirements applicable to the
designated species, this has been taken into account to avoid
collecting data more than once. Given the fact that traceability
systems are being increasingly used within the seafood industry, it is
not expected that this rule will significantly affect the overall
volume of trade or alter trade flows in the U.S. market for fish and
fish products that are legally produced and accurately represented.
Based on limited financial information available to NMFS about the
affected entities, NMFS believes that most affected producers of shrimp
are small entities as defined by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA);
that is, they are independently owned and operated and not dominant in
their fields of operation, and have annual receipts of no more than
$0.75 million. NMFS believes there are a few producers of abalone that
would be considered large entities. While there are a few large
entities, the one-time registration fee and cost of reporting are low
(maximum annual cost of $150.21). Therefore, NMFS has determined that
this proposed rule would affect a substantial number of small entities;
however, the issue of disproportionate effects on small versus large
entities does not arise in the present case.
With regard to the possible economic effects of this action, NMFS
believes that small entities will not be significantly adversely
affected by this action because it does not directly restrict
production or trade in the designated species and does not pose
entirely new burdens with regard to the collection and submission of
information necessary to comply with the monitoring program. While this
rule
[[Page 51432]]
would establish new reporting requirements, it will not require any
additional professional skill. Some of the data proposed to be
collected at entry into U.S. commerce or to be subject to recordkeeping
requirements is already collected by the seafood industry in order to
comply with food safety and product labeling requirements or to
document business transactions.
NMFS considered two regulatory action alternatives in this
rulemaking as well as a no-action alternative: NMFS considered
requiring registration for all shrimp and abalone aquaculture
producers, including those who sell under $1,000 per year of these
species, but determined that producers of such small amounts of shrimp
and abalone can be exempted from the Program without impacting its
overall integrity. Also, there is no verifiable data on firms under the
$1,000 threshold. The $1,000 threshold was chosen because it matches
the U.S. Department of Agriculture minimum sales threshold for
reporting under the Census of Agriculture. NMFS also considered
requiring reporting of all shrimp and abalone production regardless of
its intended use, but determined this was not necessary as the
selection of certain Harmonized Tariff Schedule codes for inclusion
under SIMP limits the scope of SIMP to just those seafood products
intended for human consumption and excludes products not intended for
human consumption. Recognizing that $1,000 in sales per year may result
in the inclusion of facilities not selling meaningful quantities of
shrimp and abalone into U.S. commerce, NMFS may finalize a higher
threshold. NMFS seeks comment on a threshold that both satisfies the
requirements of the Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act, 2018, while also minimizing burden on the smallest
producers.
In light of the information on total annual compliance cost
described above, NMFS believes the rule, if implemented will not reduce
profits for a substantial number of small entities. Therefore, NMFS
believes the proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities, however, we seek public
comment on this analysis. NMFS prepared an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis to describe the economic impact this proposed rule
would have on small entities. A copy of this analysis is available from
NMFS (see ADDRESSES). NMFS requests comments, particularly focused on
the costs of compliance with the proposed reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains a new collection-of-information
requirement subject to review and approval by OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA). This requirement has been submitted to OMB for
approval. The information collection burden for the requirements
proposed under this rule (i.e., registration or renewal; monthly
reports; recordkeeping and data storage; and provision of records of
supply chain information when selected for audit) as applicable to
production of shrimp and abalone species is estimated by NMFS to be 0.5
hour. Compliance costs are estimated to total a maximum of $1,980.00
($30.00 x 66) for the registration fees, no more than $7,824.96
($118.56 x 66) for data entry, and $0 for data storage as these records
are already required for tax and business purposes.
Registration Requirement: With the requirement to register as a
producer under this program, there would be approximately 66
respondents who would need approximately 5 minutes to fill out the
online registration form resulting in a total annual burden of 5.5
hours and a cost of $108.68.
Data Submission Requirement: Data to be submitted electronically
are, to some extent, either already collected by the trade in the
course of supply chain management, already required to be collected and
available for inspection under existing federal programs (e.g.,
Bioterrorism Act; Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act), or may be collected in
support of third party certification schemes voluntarily adopted by the
trade.
Public comment is sought regarding: Whether this proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; the appropriateness of monthly reporting for
achieving stated objectives; the accuracy of the assumptions used in
calculating the burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology. Send comments on these or any other aspects of the
collection of information to the NOAA Fisheries Office of International
Affairs and Seafood Inspection at the ADDRESSES above, and by email to
[email protected] or fax to (202) 395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, and no person shall be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 698
Fisheries, Statistics, Aquaculture, Reporting and recordkeeping.
Dated: October 4, 2018.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 698 is proposed to
be added to read as follows:
PART 698--TRACEABILITY INFORMATION PROGRAM FOR SEAFOOD
Sec.
698.1 Purpose and scope.
698.2 Definitions.
698.3 Relation to other Federal and state laws.
698.4 Aquaculture facility registration.
698.5 Reporting.
698.6 Recordkeeping and audits.
698.7 Confidentiality and disclosure.
698.8 Prohibitions.
Authority: Pub. L. 115-141, Div. B, section 539; 16 U.S.C. 1801
et seq.
Sec. 698.1 Purpose and scope.
(a) This part implements a Traceability Information Program for
Seafood from the point of production to entry into U.S. commerce
pursuant to the Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act, 2018, section 539 (Pub. L. 115-141, Div. B) and the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA).
(b) This Program establishes registration, reporting and
recordkeeping requirements for U.S. inland, coastal, and marine
aquaculture facilities that produce shrimp and abalone and complements
the Seafood Traceability Program established in Sec. 300.324 of this
title.
(c) The scope of the Program is limited to U.S. commercial
aquaculture facilities that produce shrimp and abalone for human
consumption for entry into U.S. commerce.
(d) Production of fish and fish products regulated under this part
not intended for human consumption, including production intended for
research, broodstock, or post-larval grow out, is outside the scope of
the Program.
[[Page 51433]]
Sec. 698.2 Definitions.
In addition to the terms defined in Sec. 600.10 of this title, and
in the MSA, the following definitions apply to this part. If a term is
defined differently in Sec. 600.10, or in the MSA, the definition in
this section shall apply.
Aquaculture facility means any farm with ponds, tanks or pools in
open air or in an enclosed structure, or a net pen or enclosure in open
water that produces for human consumption fish or fish products
regulated under this part.
Direct sale means the sale or offer for sale of fish or fish
products regulated under this part from an aquaculture facility,
whether on or off the premises of the facility, to an individual for
personal use.
Entry into U.S. commerce means direct sale or the sale or transfer
of custody of fish or fish products regulated under this part to a
first receiver, either directly or through a third party. Entry into
U.S. commerce includes changes in custody with no change in ownership,
e.g., the receiving or acquiring of fish or fish products from an
aquaculture facility by a processor or distributor that is owned by the
same person who owns the aquaculture facility.
First receiver means the person who first receives fish produced
from an aquaculture facility for any commercial purpose (e.g.,
processing, distribution or sale) other than a direct sale. The first
receiver may be a person affiliated with the aquaculture facility that
receives fish or fish products regulated under this part through a no-
sale transaction but does not include a person taking possession of
fish for the sole purpose of transportation.
Fish or fish products regulated under this part means shrimp and
abalone species produced by an aquaculture facility and products
containing those species.
Person has the same meaning as under section 3 of the MSA, 16
U.S.C. 1802.
Producer means the owner or operator of an aquaculture facility.
Produce/Production means remove/removal of fish from an aquaculture
facility for the purposes of entry into U.S. commerce.
Traceability Information Program for Seafood means the
registration, data reporting and recordkeeping requirements established
under this part.
Sec. 698.3 Relation to other Federal and state laws.
Registration, reporting and recordkeeping requirements under the
Traceability Information Program for Seafood do not supersede any
requirements established under any other federal or State law.
Sec. 698.4 Aquaculture facility registration.
(a) The producer of fish or fish products regulated under this part
must register the aquaculture facility through the NMFS Traceability
Information Program for Seafood electronic registration and reporting
system. Such registration is valid for a period of one year and must be
renewed annually. The electronic registration and reporting system will
assign a unique producer identifier. Producers must notify NMFS within
30 days of any change in their information submitted to or used in the
electronic registration and reporting system (e.g., business name,
addresses or contact information; if such changes are not reported to
NMFS within 30 days, the registration is invalid as of the 30th day
after such change.
(b) Alternative Producer Identifier. NMFS may approve the use of an
alternative producer identifier obtained through another Federal or
State program.
(c) Registration Renewal. Annually, all producers must confirm
their identifying business information in order to renew their
registration. Producers that have submitted monthly reports under Sec.
698.5 must certify that all applicable entries have been reported.
Producers that have had no reportable production events for an entire
12-month period must so certify through the electronic registration and
reporting system. If registration lapses, the producer must re-
register.
(d) De Minimis Exemption. Any producer that produces for entry into
U.S. commerce fish or fish products regulated under this part valued at
less than $1,000 per year is exempt from the registration requirement
of this section.
Sec. 698.5 Reporting.
A producer that is required to be registered under Sec. 698.4 must
report information regarding all entries into U.S. commerce of fish or
fish products regulated under this part.
(a) Frequency. The producer must submit monthly reports through the
NMFS electronic registration and reporting system, including all
entries into U.S. commerce of fish or fish products regulated under
this part that occurred during that calendar month. The report for a
monthly period is due on or before the last day of the next calendar
month. Producers are not required to submit reports for any month in
which there were no entries into U.S. commerce.
(b) Content. Reports must contain the details of each entry into
U.S. commerce, including producer identifier, the species (3-alpha
Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Information System (ASFIS) code), the
date of production, date of entry into U.S. commerce, the production
volume, the unit of measure, the product form and weight at entry into
U.S. commerce, and business name, address and email and/or phone number
for the first receiver. For direct sales, the report need not contain
the name, address and email and/or phone number of the individual who
purchased the fish or fish products for personal use.
Sec. 698.6 Recordkeeping and audits.
(a) Recordkeeping. The producer must maintain a paper or electronic
copy of any report required under Sec. 698.5 and supporting
documentation for the report sufficient to trace the fish or fish
product from point of production to entry into U.S. commerce. Records
may include widely used commercial documents (e.g., records related to
production, sale, processing, shipment, cold storage, and
distribution). The supporting documentation must include records
regarding each custodian of the fish and fish product, e.g., including
processors, storage facilities, and distributors, sufficient to trace
the fish or fish product from the point of entry into U.S. commerce
back to the point of production and to verify the information reported
about entry into U.S. commerce. The producer must retain such reports
and supporting documentation in electronic or paper format for a period
of two years from the date of the report.
(b) Audit. Reports and supporting documentation described under
paragraph (a) of this section may be selected for audit in order to
verify the information submitted in the reports. To support such
audits, the producer must, upon request, make such reports and
supporting documentation available for inspection by NMFS or otherwise
provide them as requested by NMFS.
(c) Inspection. The producer must make all reports and records
required under paragraph (a) of this section available for inspection
by an authorized officer upon request.
Sec. 698.7 Confidentiality and disclosure.
All information and records required to be submitted under this
part shall be subject to the Magnuson-Stevens Act confidentiality
provisions and shall not be disclosed except as provided under section
402(b)(1) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and part 600, subpart E of this
title.
[[Page 51434]]
Sec. 698.8 Prohibitions.
In addition to the general prohibitions listed at Sec. 600.725 of
this title, it is unlawful for any person to do any of the following:
(a) Violate any of the registration, reporting or recordkeeping
provisions of this part.
(b) Sell, offer for sale, or attempt to sell or offer for sale,
fish or fish products regulated under this part that were produced by
an aquaculture facility that has failed to register as required under
Sec. 698.4.
(c) Dispose of fish or fish products regulated under this part, or
any reports or supporting documentation required to be retained under
Sec. 698.6(a), after any communication from an authorized officer that
the aquaculture facility, or such reports or supporting documentation,
are to be inspected.
(d) Make any false statement, oral or written, to an authorized
officer concerning the production, purchase, sale, offer for sale,
receipt, acquisition, possession, transport or transfer of any fish or
fish products regulated under this part, or any attempt to do any of
the above.
(e) Provide false, incomplete or inaccurate information in the
registration required under Sec. 698.4 or reports required under Sec.
698.5 or falsify any reports or supporting documentation required to be
retained under Sec. 698.6.
(f) Fail to make reports or supporting documentation available for
inspection, as required under Sec. 698.6(c).
(g) Fail to make available, or otherwise produce, reports and
supporting documentation to support an audit, as required under Sec.
698.6(b).
[FR Doc. 2018-22039 Filed 10-10-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P