Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Black Pinesnake, 51418-51424 [2018-22013]
Download as PDF
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
51418
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
emission rate in lb/MMBtu from the
arithmetic average of all valid hourly
emission rates from the CEMS for the
current operating day and the previous
29 successive operating days.
(B) At the end of each calendar year,
the owner/operator shall calculate the
annual average SO2 emission rate in lb/
MMBtu across Laramie River Station
Units 1 and 2 as the sum of the SO2
annual mass emissions (pounds)
divided by the sum of the annual heat
inputs (MMBtu). For Laramie River
Station Units 1 and 2, the owner/
operator shall calculate the annual mass
emissions for SO2 and the annual heat
input in accordance with 40 CFR part 75
for each unit.
(C) An hourly average SO2 and/or
NOX emission rate in lb/MMBtu is valid
only if the minimum number of data
points, as specified in 40 CFR part 75,
is acquired by both the pollutant
concentration monitor (SO2 and/or
NOX) and the diluent monitor (O2 or
CO2).
(D) Data reported to meet the
requirements of this section shall not
include data substituted using the
missing data substitution procedures of
subpart D of 40 CFR part 75, nor shall
the data have been bias adjusted
according to the procedures of 40 CFR
part 75.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(1) The owner/operator of each unit
shall submit quarterly excess emissions
reports for SO2 and/or NOX BART units
no later than the 30th day following the
end of each calendar quarter. Excess
emissions means emissions that exceed
the emissions limits specified in
paragraph (c) of this section. The reports
shall include the magnitude, date(s),
and duration of each period of excess
emissions, specific identification of
each period of excess emissions that
occurs during startups, shutdowns, and
malfunctions of the unit, the nature and
cause of any malfunction (if known),
and the corrective action taken or
preventative measures adopted.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) * * *
(1) The owner/operator shall
promptly submit notification of
commencement of construction of any
equipment which is being constructed
to comply with the SO2 and/or NOX
emission limits in paragraph (c) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–21949 Filed 10–10–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:17 Oct 10, 2018
Jkt 247001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2014–0065;
4500030114]
RIN 1018–BD52
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Designation of Critical
Habitat for the Black Pinesnake
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; revision,
reopening of comment period, and
announcement of public meetings.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
reopening of the comment period on our
March 11, 2015, proposed designation
of critical habitat for the black
pinesnake (Pituophis melanoleucus
lodingi) under the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (Act). We are
reopening the comment period to accept
comments on our proposal, including
revisions to proposed Units 7 and 8 that
are described in this document. As a
result of these revisions, we are now
proposing to designate a total of 338,379
acres (136,937 hectares) as critical
habitat for the black pinesnake across
eight units within portions of Forrest,
George, Greene, Harrison, Jones, Marion,
Perry, Stone, and Wayne Counties in
Mississippi, and Clarke County in
Alabama. This is a small increase in
acreage from the area we proposed to
designate in our March 11, 2015,
proposed rule but constitutes less
privately owned lands. In addition, we
announce two public informational
meetings on the proposed rule. We are
reopening the comment period on our
March 11, 2015, proposed rule to allow
all interested parties the opportunity to
comment on the revised proposed rule.
Comments previously submitted need
not be resubmitted, as they will be fully
considered in preparation of the final
rule.
SUMMARY:
The comment period for the
proposed rule published March 11,
2015, at 80 FR 12846 is reopened.
Written comments: So that we can
fully consider your comments in our
final determination, submit them on or
before November 13, 2018. Comments
submitted electronically using the
Federal eRulemaking Portal (see
ADDRESSES, below) must be received by
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing
date.
Public informational meetings: We
will hold two public meetings, one from
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. on October 22,
2018, and a second from 6:00 p.m. to
7:30 p.m. on October 24, 2018.
ADDRESSES:
Document availability: You may
obtain copies of the March 11, 2015,
proposed rule and associated
documents on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS–R4–ES–2014–0065 or by mail
from the Mississippi Ecological Services
Field Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
Written comments: You may submit
written comments by one of the
following methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,
enter FWS–R4–ES–2014–0065, which is
the docket number for this rulemaking.
Then, click on the Search button. On the
resulting page, in the Search panel on
the left side of the screen, under the
Document Type heading, click on the
Proposed Rule box to locate this
document. You may submit a comment
by clicking on ‘‘Comment Now!’’
(2) By hard copy: Submit your
comments by U.S. mail or hand-delivery
to: Public Comments Processing, Attn:
FWS–R4–ES–2014–0065, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, MS: BPHC, 5275
Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041–
3803.
We request that you send comments
only by the methods described above.
We will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see Public
Comments, below, for more
information).
Public informational meetings: The
public informational meetings will be
held in the following locations:
• On October 22, 2018, at Pearl River
Community College, Lowery A. Woodall
Advanced Technology Center, 906
Sullivan Drive, Hattiesburg, MS 39401.
• On October 24, 2018, at Alabama
Coastal Community College,
Administration Building, Tombigbee
Conference Room, 30755 Hwy. 43
South, Thomasville, AL 36784. See
Public Informational Meetings, below,
for more information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen Ricks, Field Supervisor,
Mississippi Ecological Services Field
Office, 6578 Dogwood View Parkway,
Jackson, MS 39213; telephone 601–321–
1122; or facsimile 601–965–4340.
Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Relay Service at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
Public Comments
We will accept written comments and
information during this reopened
comment period on our proposed
designation of critical habitat for the
black pinesnake that was published in
the Federal Register on March 11, 2015
(80 FR 12846), the revisions to the
proposed designation that are described
in this document, and our draft
economic assessment (DEA) of the
proposed designation. We will consider
information and recommendations from
all interested parties. We are
particularly interested in comments
concerning:
(1) The reasons why we should or
should not designate habitat as ‘‘critical
habitat’’ under section 4 of the Act,
including whether there are threats to
the species from human activity, the
degree of which can be expected to
increase due to the designation, and
whether that increase in threat
outweighs the benefit of designation
such that the designation of critical
habitat is not prudent.
(2) Specific information on:
(a) The amount and distribution of
black pinesnake habitat;
(b) What areas occupied by the
species at the time of listing (or are
currently occupied) that contain
features essential for the conservation of
the species we should include in the
designation and why;
(c) Special management
considerations or protection that may be
needed in critical habitat areas we are
proposing, including managing for the
potential effects of climate change; and
(d) What areas not occupied at the
time of listing are essential for the
conservation of the species and why.
(3) Land use designations and current
or planned activities in the subject areas
and their probable impacts on proposed
critical habitat.
(4) How the patch size of proposed
critical habitat was derived (i.e., how
much acreage a viable population of
black pinesnakes requires).
(5) Information on the projected and
reasonably likely impacts of climate
change on the black pinesnake and
proposed critical habitat.
(6) Any probable economic, national
security, or other relevant impacts of
designating any area that may be
included in the final designation; in
particular, we seek information on any
impacts on small entities or families,
and the benefits of including or
excluding areas that exhibit these
impacts.
(7) Information on the extent to which
the description of economic impacts in
the DEA is a reasonable estimate of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:17 Oct 10, 2018
Jkt 247001
likely economic impacts and is
complete and accurate.
(8) The likelihood of adverse social
reactions to the designation of critical
habitat, as discussed in the associated
documents of the DEA, and how the
consequences of such reactions, if likely
to occur, would relate to the
conservation and regulatory benefits of
the proposed critical habitat
designation.
(9) Whether any areas we are
proposing for critical habitat
designation should be considered for
exclusion under section 4(b)(2) of the
Act, and whether the benefits of
potentially excluding any specific area
outweigh the benefits of including that
area under section 4(b)(2) of the Act,
particularly those areas described in this
document.
(10) Whether we could improve or
modify our approach to designating
critical habitat in any way to provide for
greater public participation and
understanding, or to better
accommodate public concerns and
comments.
If you submitted comments or
information on the March 11, 2015,
proposed rule during the initial
comment period from March 11, 2015,
to May 11, 2015, please do not resubmit
them. Any such comments are
incorporated as part of the public record
of this rulemaking proceeding, and we
will fully consider them in the
preparation of our final determination.
Our final determination concerning
critical habitat will take into
consideration all written comments and
any additional information we receive
during both comment periods. The final
decision may differ from this revised
proposed rule, based on our review of
all information received during this
rulemaking proceeding.
You may submit your comments and
materials concerning the proposed rule
or DEA by one of the methods listed in
ADDRESSES. We request that you send
comments only by the methods
described in ADDRESSES.
If you submit a comment via https://
www.regulations.gov, your entire
comment—including any personal
identifying information—will be posted
on the website. We will post all
hardcopy comments on https://
www.regulations.gov as well. If you
submit a hardcopy comment that
includes personal identifying
information, you may request at the top
of your document that we withhold this
information from public review.
However, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so.
Comments and materials we receive,
as well as supporting documentation we
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
51419
used in preparing the proposed rule and
DEA, will be available for public
inspection on https://
www.regulations.gov at Docket No.
FWS–R4–ES–2014–0065, or by
appointment, during normal business
hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Mississippi Ecological Services
Field Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT). You may obtain
copies of the proposed rule and the DEA
on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov at Docket No.
FWS–R4–ES–2014–0065, or by mail
from the Mississippi Ecological Services
Field Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
Public Informational Meetings
We will hold two public
informational meetings on the dates and
times shown in DATES at the addresses
shown in ADDRESSES. People needing
reasonable accommodations in order to
attend and participate in the public
informational meetings should contact
Stephen Ricks, Mississippi Ecological
Services Field Office, at (601) 321–1122,
as soon as possible. In order to allow
sufficient time to process requests,
please call no later than 1 week before
the meeting date (see DATES).
Background
It is our intent to discuss in this
document only those topics directly
relevant to the designation of critical
habitat for black pinesnake. For more
information on previous Federal actions
concerning the black pinesnake, or
information regarding its biology, status,
distribution, and habitat, refer to the
proposed designation of critical habitat
published in the Federal Register on
March 11, 2015 (80 FR 12846), and the
October 6, 2015, final listing rule (80 FR
60468), both of which are available
online at https://www.regulations.gov (at
Docket Nos. FWS–R4–ES–2014–0065
and FWS–R4–ES–2014–0046) or from
the Mississippi Ecological Services
Field Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
In our March 11, 2015, proposed rule,
we proposed to designate critical habitat
for the black pinesnake in eight units
encompassing approximately 338,100
acres (136,824 hectares) in Forrest,
George, Greene, Harrison, Jones, Marion,
Perry, Stone, and Wayne Counties,
Mississippi, and Clarke County,
Alabama. In addition, we announced
the availability of a DEA of the proposed
critical habitat designation. We accepted
comments on the proposal and DEA for
60 days, ending May 11, 2015. Based on
information we received during the
public comment period, we have
decided to reopen the comment period
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
51420
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
to allow the public additional time to
submit comments on the proposed
critical habitat designation and to hold
two informational meetings.
New Information and Revisions to
Previously Proposed Critical Habitat
In this document, we propose certain
revisions to the critical habitat
designation we proposed for the black
pinesnake on March 11, 2015.
Specifically, we propose to revise the
name of Unit 7 to reflect the removal of
all lands by the landowner from the
State Wildlife Management Area
(WMA). As a result of the removal, the
name of the proposed unit is changed
from Scotch WMA to Jones Branch. We
also propose to revise the boundaries of
Unit 8 in Clarke County, Alabama,
resulting in fewer acres on private land
and more acres on State-owned land,
with a net increase in acreage. An index
map of the revised proposed critical
habitat area (338,379 acres (136,937
hectares)) is provided in the Proposed
Regulation Promulgation section, below.
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
Unit 7: Jones Branch (formerly Scotch
WMA), Clarke County, Alabama
In September 2015, we received
notice of a recent observation of a black
pinesnake in proposed Unit 7 within the
Scotch WMA in Clarke County,
Alabama. A black pinesnake was
captured during the course of a turkey
trapping study and was positively
verified by Service and State
herpetologists. Therefore, within
proposed Unit 7, there are now 5
records for black pinesnakes, one
observed as recently as July 2015, and
all records are in close proximity to one
another and part of the same breeding
population.
In June 2016, Scotch Land
Management Company, LCC, which
manages most of the lands in proposed
Unit 7, announced the withdrawal of its
lands from the Alabama Department of
Conservation and Natural Resources’
WMA program. As a result, no lands
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:17 Oct 10, 2018
Jkt 247001
within proposed Unit 7 are within the
WMA, and therefore, the name of the
unit is being changed from Scotch WMA
to Jones Branch. Ownership of the lands
within proposed Unit 7 has not
changed; it remains entirely privately
owned. In addition, the boundaries and
acreage of proposed Unit 7 are the same
as what we proposed for this unit on
March 11, 2015.
contain all of the physical or biological
features of the black pinesnake to
support life-history functions essential
to the conservation of the subspecies;
and may require special management
and protection from threats as outlined
in the March 11, 2015, critical habitat
proposal.
Unit 8: Fred T. Stimpson WMA, Clarke
County, Alabama
During a re-examination of all the
proposed critical habitat units following
the close of the proposed rule’s
comment period on May 11, 2015, we
determined that some of the best black
pinesnake habitat, located on the
southern end of the Stimpson WMA,
had not been incorporated into
proposed Unit 8, and that other land,
located on the northern end of proposed
Unit 8, had been included in error. This
re-assessment used updated aerial
imagery, and wetlands, elevation, soils,
and land cover overlays, to redefine the
best available, most suitable, contiguous
forested habitat surrounding the known
pinesnake records at that site.
Accordingly, we are shifting proposed
Unit 8 to the south; among other things,
this results in more acreage overlapping
with the WMA, as well as a slight
increase in the size of the unit. The total
acreage in revised proposed Unit 8 is
now 5,940 acres (2,404 hectares), an
increase of 279 acres (113 hectares). The
State of Alabama owns 3,789 acres
(1,533 hectares; 64 percent) of Unit 8,
and 2,151 acres (870 hectares; 36
percent) are privately owned. The newly
added land in revised proposed Unit 8
is of the same habitat type, and
contiguous with, those lands analyzed
in the March 11, 2015, proposed rule;
therefore, the determination that these
additional lands meet the definition of
critical habitat is the same as for the
original proposed Unit 8. As with the
original lands within proposed Unit 8,
the additional lands are occupied;
The primary authors of this document
are the staff members of the Mississippi
Ecological Services Field Office,
Southeast Region, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Authors
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17
Endangered and threatened species,
Exports, Imports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements,
Transportation.
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
Accordingly, we propose to further
amend part 17, subchapter B of chapter
I, title 50 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, as proposed to be amended
at 80 FR 12846 (March 11, 2015) as set
forth below:
PART 17—ENDANGERED AND
THREATENED WILDLIFE AND PLANTS
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361–1407; 1531–
1544; and 4201–4245, unless otherwise
noted.
2. Amend § 17.95 by revising
paragraphs (c)(5), (12), and (13) to read
as follows:
■
§ 17.95
Critical habitat—fish and wildlife.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Reptiles.
*
*
*
*
*
Black Pinesnake (Pituophis
melanoleucus lodingi)
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Note: Index map follows:
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
*
(12) Unit 7: Jones Branch—Clarke
County, Alabama.
(i) This unit is bordered by Salitpa
Creek to the south, Tallahatta Creek to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:17 Oct 10, 2018
Jkt 247001
the north, and Harris Creek to the west.
It is located approximately 2.7 mi (4.3
km) southeast of Campbell. Unit 7 is
located 1.1 mi (1.8 km) north of the
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
intersection of Old Mill Pond Road and
Reedy Branch Road.
(ii) Map of Unit 7 (Jones Branch)
follows:
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
EP11OC18.022
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
*
51421
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(13) Unit 8: Fred T. Stimpson Wildlife
Management Area (WMA)—Clarke
County, Alabama.
(i) This unit is located between Sand
Hill Creek and the Tombigbee River, is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:17 Oct 10, 2018
Jkt 247001
approximately 1 mi (1.6 km) north of
Carlton, and is 1.5 mi (2.4 km) south of
the intersection of County Road 15 and
Christian Vall Road. Most of this unit is
on the Fred T. Stimpson WMA.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(ii) Map of Unit 8 (Fred T. Stimpson
WMA) follows:
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
EP11OC18.023
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
51422
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
51423
Unit 8 Critical Habitat for the Black Pinesnake
Clarke County, Alabama
~ Critical Habitat
~~---~ Fred T Stimpson WMA
Rivers/Streams/Lakes
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
0
VerDate Sep<11>2014
0.75
1.5
0.75
20:17 Oct 10, 2018
3
1.5
Jkt 247001
6 Kilometers
4.5
6 Miles
4.5
3
PO 00000
=Roads
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
EP11OC18.024
0
51424
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
Dated: August 14, 2018.
James W. Kurth,
Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Exercising the Authority of the
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–22013 Filed 10–10–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–C
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
RIN 0648–BI46
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Coastal
Migratory Pelagics Resources in the
Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Region;
Amendment 31
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notification of availability;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
The South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council (South Atlantic
Council) and Gulf of Mexico Fishery
Management Council (Gulf Council)
(Councils) have submitted Amendment
31 to the Fishery Management Plan
(FMP) for Coastal Migratory Pelagics
(CMP) of the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) and
Atlantic Region (Amendment 31) for
review, approval, and implementation
by NMFS. Amendment 31 would
remove Atlantic migratory group cobia
(Atlantic cobia) from Federal
management under the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens
Act). At the same time, NMFS would
implement comparable regulations
under the Atlantic Coastal Fisheries
Cooperative Management Act (Atlantic
Coastal Act) to replace the existing
Magnuson-Stevens Act based
regulations in Atlantic Federal waters.
The purpose of Amendment 31 is to
facilitate improved coordination of
Atlantic cobia in state and Federal
waters, thereby more effectively
constraining harvest and preventing
overfishing and decreasing adverse
socio-economic effects to fishermen.
DATES: Written comments on
Amendment 31 must be received by
December 10, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on Amendment 31, identified by
‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2018–0114,’’ by either
of the following methods:
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:17 Oct 10, 2018
Jkt 247001
• Electronic submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;
D=NOAA-NMFS-2018-0114 click the
‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the
required fields, and enter or attach your
comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Karla Gore, NMFS Southeast Regional
Office, 263 13th Avenue South St.
Petersburg, FL 33701.
• Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter
‘‘N/A’’ in required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
Electronic copies Amendment 31 may
be obtained from the Southeast Regional
Office website at https://www.fisheries.
noaa.gov/action/coastal-migratorypelagics-amendment-31-managementatlantic-migratory-group-cobia.
Amendment 31 includes an
environmental assessment, a fishery
impact statement, a regulatory impact
review, and a Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA) analysis.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karla Gore, NMFS Southeast Regional
Office, telephone: 727–551–5753, or
email: karla.gore@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Magnuson-Stevens Act requires each
regional fishery management council to
submit FMPs or amendments to NMFS
for review and approval, partial
approval, or disapproval. The
Magnuson-Stevens Act also requires
that NMFS, upon receiving an FMP or
amendment, publish an announcement
in the Federal Register notifying the
public that the FMP or amendment is
available for review and comment.
Background
Through the CMP FMP, cobia is
managed in two distinct migratory
groups. The Gulf migratory group of
cobia ranges in the Gulf from Texas
through Florida and in the Atlantic
includes cobia off the east coast of
Florida. Atlantic cobia is managed from
Georgia through New York. The
boundary between the two migratory
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
groups is the Georgia-Florida state
boundary. Both Gulf and Atlantic cobia
were assessed through SEDAR 28 in
2013 and neither stock was determined
to be overfished or experiencing
overfishing.
The majority of Atlantic cobia
landings occur in state waters and,
despite closures in Federal water in
recent years, recreational landings have
exceeded the recreational annual catch
limit (ACL) and the combined stock
ACL. This has resulted in shortened
fishing seasons, which have been
ineffective at constraining harvest.
Following overages of the recreational
and combined stock ACLs in 2015 and
2016, Federal waters closures for
recreational harvest occurred in both
2016 (June 20) and 2017 (January 24).
Additionally, Federal waters were
closed to commercial harvest of Atlantic
cobia in 2016 (December 5) and 2017
(September 4), because the commercial
ACL was projected to be reached during
the fishing year.
Allowable harvest in state waters
following the Federal closures varied by
time and area. Georgia did not close
state waters to recreational harvest of
Atlantic cobia in 2016 or 2017. South
Carolina allowed harvest in 2016 during
May in the Southern Cobia Management
Zone and closed state waters in 2017
when Federal waters closed. Most
harvest of Atlantic cobia off Georgia and
South Carolina occurs in Federal waters.
Off North Carolina, recreational harvest
of Atlantic cobia closed on September
30, 2016; in 2017, harvest was allowed
May 1 through August 31. Off Virginia
in 2016, harvest was allowed until
August 30, 2016, and in 2017, Virginia
allowed harvest June 1 through
September 15. Harvest in state waters
during the Federal closures contributed
to the overage of the recreational ACL
and the combined stock ACL.
The South Atlantic Council requested
that the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission (ASMFC) consider
complementary management measures
for Atlantic cobia, as constraining
harvest in Federal waters has not
prevented the recreational and
combined ACLs from being exceeded.
The ASMFC consists of 15 Atlantic
coastal states that manage and conserve
their shared coastal fishery resources.
The majority of ASMFC’s fisheries
decision-making occurs through the
Interstate Fisheries Management
Program, where species management
boards determine management strategies
that the states implement through
fishing regulations.
In May 2016, the ASMFC started
developing an interstate FMP for
Atlantic cobia with the purpose to
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 197 (Thursday, October 11, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51418-51424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22013]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2014-0065; 4500030114]
RIN 1018-BD52
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of
Critical Habitat for the Black Pinesnake
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; revision, reopening of comment period, and
announcement of public meetings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
reopening of the comment period on our March 11, 2015, proposed
designation of critical habitat for the black pinesnake (Pituophis
melanoleucus lodingi) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). We are reopening the comment period to accept comments
on our proposal, including revisions to proposed Units 7 and 8 that are
described in this document. As a result of these revisions, we are now
proposing to designate a total of 338,379 acres (136,937 hectares) as
critical habitat for the black pinesnake across eight units within
portions of Forrest, George, Greene, Harrison, Jones, Marion, Perry,
Stone, and Wayne Counties in Mississippi, and Clarke County in Alabama.
This is a small increase in acreage from the area we proposed to
designate in our March 11, 2015, proposed rule but constitutes less
privately owned lands. In addition, we announce two public
informational meetings on the proposed rule. We are reopening the
comment period on our March 11, 2015, proposed rule to allow all
interested parties the opportunity to comment on the revised proposed
rule. Comments previously submitted need not be resubmitted, as they
will be fully considered in preparation of the final rule.
DATES: The comment period for the proposed rule published March 11,
2015, at 80 FR 12846 is reopened.
Written comments: So that we can fully consider your comments in
our final determination, submit them on or before November 13, 2018.
Comments submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking Portal
(see ADDRESSES, below) must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on
the closing date.
Public informational meetings: We will hold two public meetings,
one from 6:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. on October 22, 2018, and a second from
6:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. on October 24, 2018.
ADDRESSES:
Document availability: You may obtain copies of the March 11, 2015,
proposed rule and associated documents on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2014-0065 or by mail
from the Mississippi Ecological Services Field Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
Written comments: You may submit written comments by one of the
following methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, enter FWS-R4-ES-2014-0065,
which is the docket number for this rulemaking. Then, click on the
Search button. On the resulting page, in the Search panel on the left
side of the screen, under the Document Type heading, click on the
Proposed Rule box to locate this document. You may submit a comment by
clicking on ``Comment Now!''
(2) By hard copy: Submit your comments by U.S. mail or hand-
delivery to: Public Comments Processing, Attn: FWS-R4-ES-2014-0065,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS: BPHC, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls
Church, VA 22041-3803.
We request that you send comments only by the methods described
above. We will post all comments on https://www.regulations.gov. This
generally means that we will post any personal information you provide
us (see Public Comments, below, for more information).
Public informational meetings: The public informational meetings
will be held in the following locations:
On October 22, 2018, at Pearl River Community College,
Lowery A. Woodall Advanced Technology Center, 906 Sullivan Drive,
Hattiesburg, MS 39401.
On October 24, 2018, at Alabama Coastal Community College,
Administration Building, Tombigbee Conference Room, 30755 Hwy. 43
South, Thomasville, AL 36784. See Public Informational Meetings, below,
for more information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Ricks, Field Supervisor,
Mississippi Ecological Services Field Office, 6578 Dogwood View
Parkway, Jackson, MS 39213; telephone 601-321-1122; or facsimile 601-
965-4340. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 51419]]
Public Comments
We will accept written comments and information during this
reopened comment period on our proposed designation of critical habitat
for the black pinesnake that was published in the Federal Register on
March 11, 2015 (80 FR 12846), the revisions to the proposed designation
that are described in this document, and our draft economic assessment
(DEA) of the proposed designation. We will consider information and
recommendations from all interested parties. We are particularly
interested in comments concerning:
(1) The reasons why we should or should not designate habitat as
``critical habitat'' under section 4 of the Act, including whether
there are threats to the species from human activity, the degree of
which can be expected to increase due to the designation, and whether
that increase in threat outweighs the benefit of designation such that
the designation of critical habitat is not prudent.
(2) Specific information on:
(a) The amount and distribution of black pinesnake habitat;
(b) What areas occupied by the species at the time of listing (or
are currently occupied) that contain features essential for the
conservation of the species we should include in the designation and
why;
(c) Special management considerations or protection that may be
needed in critical habitat areas we are proposing, including managing
for the potential effects of climate change; and
(d) What areas not occupied at the time of listing are essential
for the conservation of the species and why.
(3) Land use designations and current or planned activities in the
subject areas and their probable impacts on proposed critical habitat.
(4) How the patch size of proposed critical habitat was derived
(i.e., how much acreage a viable population of black pinesnakes
requires).
(5) Information on the projected and reasonably likely impacts of
climate change on the black pinesnake and proposed critical habitat.
(6) Any probable economic, national security, or other relevant
impacts of designating any area that may be included in the final
designation; in particular, we seek information on any impacts on small
entities or families, and the benefits of including or excluding areas
that exhibit these impacts.
(7) Information on the extent to which the description of economic
impacts in the DEA is a reasonable estimate of the likely economic
impacts and is complete and accurate.
(8) The likelihood of adverse social reactions to the designation
of critical habitat, as discussed in the associated documents of the
DEA, and how the consequences of such reactions, if likely to occur,
would relate to the conservation and regulatory benefits of the
proposed critical habitat designation.
(9) Whether any areas we are proposing for critical habitat
designation should be considered for exclusion under section 4(b)(2) of
the Act, and whether the benefits of potentially excluding any specific
area outweigh the benefits of including that area under section 4(b)(2)
of the Act, particularly those areas described in this document.
(10) Whether we could improve or modify our approach to designating
critical habitat in any way to provide for greater public participation
and understanding, or to better accommodate public concerns and
comments.
If you submitted comments or information on the March 11, 2015,
proposed rule during the initial comment period from March 11, 2015, to
May 11, 2015, please do not resubmit them. Any such comments are
incorporated as part of the public record of this rulemaking
proceeding, and we will fully consider them in the preparation of our
final determination. Our final determination concerning critical
habitat will take into consideration all written comments and any
additional information we receive during both comment periods. The
final decision may differ from this revised proposed rule, based on our
review of all information received during this rulemaking proceeding.
You may submit your comments and materials concerning the proposed
rule or DEA by one of the methods listed in ADDRESSES. We request that
you send comments only by the methods described in ADDRESSES.
If you submit a comment via https://www.regulations.gov, your entire
comment--including any personal identifying information--will be posted
on the website. We will post all hardcopy comments on https://www.regulations.gov as well. If you submit a hardcopy comment that
includes personal identifying information, you may request at the top
of your document that we withhold this information from public review.
However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Comments and materials we receive, as well as supporting
documentation we used in preparing the proposed rule and DEA, will be
available for public inspection on https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FWS-R4-ES-2014-0065, or by appointment, during normal business
hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Mississippi Ecological
Services Field Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). You may
obtain copies of the proposed rule and the DEA on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov at Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2014-0065, or by
mail from the Mississippi Ecological Services Field Office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Public Informational Meetings
We will hold two public informational meetings on the dates and
times shown in DATES at the addresses shown in ADDRESSES. People
needing reasonable accommodations in order to attend and participate in
the public informational meetings should contact Stephen Ricks,
Mississippi Ecological Services Field Office, at (601) 321-1122, as
soon as possible. In order to allow sufficient time to process
requests, please call no later than 1 week before the meeting date (see
DATES).
Background
It is our intent to discuss in this document only those topics
directly relevant to the designation of critical habitat for black
pinesnake. For more information on previous Federal actions concerning
the black pinesnake, or information regarding its biology, status,
distribution, and habitat, refer to the proposed designation of
critical habitat published in the Federal Register on March 11, 2015
(80 FR 12846), and the October 6, 2015, final listing rule (80 FR
60468), both of which are available online at https://www.regulations.gov (at Docket Nos. FWS-R4-ES-2014-0065 and FWS-R4-ES-
2014-0046) or from the Mississippi Ecological Services Field Office
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
In our March 11, 2015, proposed rule, we proposed to designate
critical habitat for the black pinesnake in eight units encompassing
approximately 338,100 acres (136,824 hectares) in Forrest, George,
Greene, Harrison, Jones, Marion, Perry, Stone, and Wayne Counties,
Mississippi, and Clarke County, Alabama. In addition, we announced the
availability of a DEA of the proposed critical habitat designation. We
accepted comments on the proposal and DEA for 60 days, ending May 11,
2015. Based on information we received during the public comment
period, we have decided to reopen the comment period
[[Page 51420]]
to allow the public additional time to submit comments on the proposed
critical habitat designation and to hold two informational meetings.
New Information and Revisions to Previously Proposed Critical Habitat
In this document, we propose certain revisions to the critical
habitat designation we proposed for the black pinesnake on March 11,
2015. Specifically, we propose to revise the name of Unit 7 to reflect
the removal of all lands by the landowner from the State Wildlife
Management Area (WMA). As a result of the removal, the name of the
proposed unit is changed from Scotch WMA to Jones Branch. We also
propose to revise the boundaries of Unit 8 in Clarke County, Alabama,
resulting in fewer acres on private land and more acres on State-owned
land, with a net increase in acreage. An index map of the revised
proposed critical habitat area (338,379 acres (136,937 hectares)) is
provided in the Proposed Regulation Promulgation section, below.
Unit 7: Jones Branch (formerly Scotch WMA), Clarke County, Alabama
In September 2015, we received notice of a recent observation of a
black pinesnake in proposed Unit 7 within the Scotch WMA in Clarke
County, Alabama. A black pinesnake was captured during the course of a
turkey trapping study and was positively verified by Service and State
herpetologists. Therefore, within proposed Unit 7, there are now 5
records for black pinesnakes, one observed as recently as July 2015,
and all records are in close proximity to one another and part of the
same breeding population.
In June 2016, Scotch Land Management Company, LCC, which manages
most of the lands in proposed Unit 7, announced the withdrawal of its
lands from the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural
Resources' WMA program. As a result, no lands within proposed Unit 7
are within the WMA, and therefore, the name of the unit is being
changed from Scotch WMA to Jones Branch. Ownership of the lands within
proposed Unit 7 has not changed; it remains entirely privately owned.
In addition, the boundaries and acreage of proposed Unit 7 are the same
as what we proposed for this unit on March 11, 2015.
Unit 8: Fred T. Stimpson WMA, Clarke County, Alabama
During a re-examination of all the proposed critical habitat units
following the close of the proposed rule's comment period on May 11,
2015, we determined that some of the best black pinesnake habitat,
located on the southern end of the Stimpson WMA, had not been
incorporated into proposed Unit 8, and that other land, located on the
northern end of proposed Unit 8, had been included in error. This re-
assessment used updated aerial imagery, and wetlands, elevation, soils,
and land cover overlays, to redefine the best available, most suitable,
contiguous forested habitat surrounding the known pinesnake records at
that site. Accordingly, we are shifting proposed Unit 8 to the south;
among other things, this results in more acreage overlapping with the
WMA, as well as a slight increase in the size of the unit. The total
acreage in revised proposed Unit 8 is now 5,940 acres (2,404 hectares),
an increase of 279 acres (113 hectares). The State of Alabama owns
3,789 acres (1,533 hectares; 64 percent) of Unit 8, and 2,151 acres
(870 hectares; 36 percent) are privately owned. The newly added land in
revised proposed Unit 8 is of the same habitat type, and contiguous
with, those lands analyzed in the March 11, 2015, proposed rule;
therefore, the determination that these additional lands meet the
definition of critical habitat is the same as for the original proposed
Unit 8. As with the original lands within proposed Unit 8, the
additional lands are occupied; contain all of the physical or
biological features of the black pinesnake to support life-history
functions essential to the conservation of the subspecies; and may
require special management and protection from threats as outlined in
the March 11, 2015, critical habitat proposal.
Authors
The primary authors of this document are the staff members of the
Mississippi Ecological Services Field Office, Southeast Region, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17
Endangered and threatened species, Exports, Imports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Transportation.
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
Accordingly, we propose to further amend part 17, subchapter B of
chapter I, title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as proposed to
be amended at 80 FR 12846 (March 11, 2015) as set forth below:
PART 17--ENDANGERED AND THREATENED WILDLIFE AND PLANTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361-1407; 1531-1544; and 4201-4245, unless
otherwise noted.
0
2. Amend Sec. 17.95 by revising paragraphs (c)(5), (12), and (13) to
read as follows:
Sec. 17.95 Critical habitat--fish and wildlife.
* * * * *
(c) Reptiles.
* * * * *
Black Pinesnake (Pituophis melanoleucus lodingi)
* * * * *
(5) Note: Index map follows:
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P
[[Page 51421]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP11OC18.022
* * * * *
(12) Unit 7: Jones Branch--Clarke County, Alabama.
(i) This unit is bordered by Salitpa Creek to the south, Tallahatta
Creek to the north, and Harris Creek to the west. It is located
approximately 2.7 mi (4.3 km) southeast of Campbell. Unit 7 is located
1.1 mi (1.8 km) north of the intersection of Old Mill Pond Road and
Reedy Branch Road.
(ii) Map of Unit 7 (Jones Branch) follows:
[[Page 51422]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP11OC18.023
(13) Unit 8: Fred T. Stimpson Wildlife Management Area (WMA)--
Clarke County, Alabama.
(i) This unit is located between Sand Hill Creek and the Tombigbee
River, is approximately 1 mi (1.6 km) north of Carlton, and is 1.5 mi
(2.4 km) south of the intersection of County Road 15 and Christian Vall
Road. Most of this unit is on the Fred T. Stimpson WMA.
(ii) Map of Unit 8 (Fred T. Stimpson WMA) follows:
[[Page 51423]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP11OC18.024
[[Page 51424]]
* * * * *
Dated: August 14, 2018.
James W. Kurth,
Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Exercising the
Authority of the Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-22013 Filed 10-10-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-C