Food Additives Permitted for Direct Addition to Food for Human Consumption; Styrene, 50487-50490 [2018-21808]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
V. The Repeal of the Rule Is Not
Intended To Preempt State Action for
Deceptive or Unfair Acts or Practices
Regarding Television Screen Size
To prevent what CTA characterized as
the potential for ‘‘a complicated
patchwork quilt of inconsistent [state
law] mandates,’’ 42 it asked the
Commission to issue an affirmative
statement that by repealing the Rule it
intends to preempt any state regulatory
or enforcement actions regarding
representations of television screen
size.43 The Commission declines to
issue such a statement.
While the Commission concludes that
a trade regulation rule for television
screen measurement is no longer
necessary, it retains its authority to
address future unfair or deceptive
practices relating to television screen
measurement on a case-by-case basis.44
Similarly, states have authority under
analogous state laws. Therefore, the
Commission’s repeal of the Rule is not
intended to preempt the states from
taking regulatory or enforcement actions
to prevent deception or unfairness
concerning television screen
measurement.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act and
Regulatory Analysis
Under Section 22 of the FTC Act, 15
U.S.C. 57b–3, the Commission must
issue a final regulatory analysis for a
proceeding to amend a rule only when
it: (1) Estimates that the amendment
will have an annual effect on the
national economy of $100 million or
more; (2) estimates that the amendment
will cause a substantial change in the
cost or price of certain categories of
goods or services; or (3) otherwise
determines that the amendment will
have a significant effect upon covered
entities or upon consumers. The
Commission determines that the repeal
of the Rule will not have such effects on
the national economy; on the cost of
televisions; or on covered parties or
consumers. The Rule repeal, rather than
imposing any costs on covered parties
or consumers, will eliminate any costs
associated with complying with the
Rule. Accordingly, the repeal of the
Rule is exempt from Section 22’s final
regulatory analysis requirements.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
(‘‘RFA’’), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, requires that
the Commission conduct an analysis of
enforcement, the Commission stated that should it
find any future deception of the type that the Rule
was intended to prevent, the Commission could
address this deception through case-by-case
enforcement).
42 CTA–II at 9.
43 CTA–II at 9–11.
44 See n. 41, supra.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Oct 05, 2018
Jkt 247001
the anticipated economic impact of the
amendment of a rule on small entities.
The purpose of a regulatory flexibility
analysis is to ensure that an agency
considers the impacts on small entities
and examines regulatory alternatives
that could achieve the regulatory
purpose while minimizing burdens on
small entities. Section 605 of the RFA,
5 U.S.C. 605, provides that such an
analysis is not required if the agency
head certifies that the regulatory action
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The Commission concludes
that the repeal of the Rule will not have
a significant economic impact upon
small entities because the Rule’s repeal
will eliminate any costs associated with
complying with the Rule. Therefore, in
the Commission’s view, the repeal of the
Rule will not have a significant or
disproportionate impact on the costs of
small entities that sell televisions. These
entities appear to provide consumers
with the screen size as measured by a
television’s manufacturer and that
typically appears on a television’s
packaging. In addition, the Commission
is not aware of any existing federal laws
or regulations that address the
measurement of television screens and
that would conflict with the repeal of
the Rule. Therefore, based on available
information, the Commission certifies
that repealing the Rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
VII. Repeal of Rule
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, and under the authority of 15
U.S.C. 57a, the Commission removes 16
CFR part 410.
List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 410
Advertising, Electronic funds transfer,
Television, and Trade practices.
By direction of the Commission,
Commissioner Wilson not participating.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
PART 410—[REMOVED]
Accordingly, under the authority of 15
U.S.C. 57a, the Commission removes 16
CFR part 410.
■
[FR Doc. 2018–21803 Filed 10–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50487
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 172
[Docket No. FDA–2016–F–1444]
Food Additives Permitted for Direct
Addition to Food for Human
Consumption; Styrene
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, the Agency, or
we) is amending the food additive
regulations to no longer provide for the
use of styrene as a flavoring substance
and adjuvant for use in food because
these uses have been abandoned. We are
taking this action in response to a food
additive petition submitted by the
Styrene Information and Research
Center (SIRC).
DATES: This rule is effective October 9,
2018. See section VIII for further
information on the filing of objections.
Submit either electronic or written
objections and requests for a hearing on
the final rule by November 8, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit objections
and requests for a hearing as follows.
Please note that late, untimely filed
objections will not be considered.
Electronic objections must be submitted
on or before November 8, 2018.
Objections received by mail/hand
delivery/courier (for written/paper
submissions) will be considered timely
if they are postmarked or the delivery
service acceptance receipt is on or
before that date.
SUMMARY:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic objections in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Objections submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
objection will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
objection does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
E:\FR\FM\09OCR1.SGM
09OCR1
50488
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
objection, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit an objection
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the objection as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper objections
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your objection, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2016–F–1444 for ‘‘Food Additives
Permitted for Direct Addition to Food
for Human Consumption; Styrene.’’
Received objections, those filed in a
timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be
placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit an objection with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
objections only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Oct 05, 2018
Jkt 247001
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/
fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/201523389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Judith Kidwell, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–265), Food
and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus
Dr., College Park, MD 20740–3835, 240–
402–1071.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the Federal Register of June 15,
2016 (81 FR 38984), we announced that
we filed a food additive petition (FAP
6A4817), submitted by SIRC, c/o Keller
and Heckman LLP, 1001 G Street NW,
Suite 500 West, Washington, DC 20001.
The petition proposed to amend
§ 172.515 Synthetic flavoring substances
and adjuvants (21 CFR 172.515) to no
longer provide for the use of styrene
(CAS Reg. No. 100–42–5) as a synthetic
flavoring substance and adjuvant in
food because these uses of styrene have
been abandoned. Any use of styrene
other than as a synthetic flavoring
substance and adjuvant in food in
accordance with § 172.515 was
considered outside the scope of this
petition.
II. Evaluation of Abandonment
Section 409(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21
U.S.C. 348(i)) states that we must by
regulation establish the procedure for
amending or repealing a food additive
regulation and that this procedure must
conform to the procedure provided in
section 409 of the FD&C Act for the
issuance of such regulations. Our
regulations specific to administrative
actions for food additives provide that
the Commissioner of Food and Drugs,
on his own initiative or on the petition
of any interested person, under 21 CFR
part 10, may propose the issuance of a
regulation amending or repealing a
regulation pertaining to a food additive
or granting or repealing an exception for
such additive (§ 171.130(a) (21 CFR
171.130(a))). The regulations further
provide that any such petition must
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
include an assertion of facts, supported
by data, showing that new information
exists with respect to the food additive
or that new uses have been developed
or old uses abandoned, that new data
are available as to toxicity of the
chemical, or that experience with the
existing regulation or exemption may
justify its amendment or repeal. New
data must be furnished in the form
specified in §§ 171.1 and 171.100 for
submitting petitions (§ 171.130(b)).
Under these regulations, a petitioner
may propose that we amend a food
additive regulation if the petitioner can
demonstrate that there are ‘‘old uses
abandoned’’ for the relevant food
additive. Such abandonment must be
complete for any intended uses in the
United States market. While section 409
of the FD&C Act and § 171.130 also
provide for amending or revoking a food
additive regulation based on safety, an
amendment or revocation based on
abandonment is not based on safety, but
is based on the fact that regulatory
authorization is no longer necessary
because the use of that food additive has
been abandoned.
Abandonment may be based on the
abandonment of certain authorized food
additive uses for a substance (e.g., if a
substance is no longer used in certain
product categories) or on the
abandonment of all authorized food
additive uses of a substance (e.g., if a
substance is no longer being
manufactured). If a petition seeks an
amendment to a food additive
regulation based on the abandonment of
certain uses of the food additive, such
uses should be adequately defined so
that both the scope of the abandonment
and any amendment to the food additive
regulation are clear.
The petition submitted on behalf of
SIRC contains information collected
from its members to support the
petitioner’s claim that styrene is no
longer manufactured, imported, or
otherwise marketed for use as a
synthetic flavoring substance and
adjuvant in food in the U.S. market and
that industry has abandoned such use of
styrene. Specifically, the petition
contained information SIRC collected
through surveying its membership,
which contains over 95 percent of the
current North American styrene
industry, to verify that its members:
• Do not currently manufacture
styrene for use as a synthetic flavoring
substance and adjuvant in food in the
United States;
• do not currently import styrene for
use as a synthetic flavoring substance
and adjuvant in food into the United
States;
E:\FR\FM\09OCR1.SGM
09OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
• do not intend to manufacture or
import styrene for use as a synthetic
flavoring substance and adjuvant in
food in the United States in the future;
and
• do not currently maintain any
inventory of styrene for sale or
distribution into commerce that is
intended to be marketed for use as a
synthetic flavoring substance and
adjuvant in food in the United States.
SIRC also confirmed that no foreign
manufacturers appear to be using or
marketing styrene for use as a synthetic
flavoring substance or adjuvant in food,
based on information received from the
Japan Styrene Industry Association, the
European Chemical Industry Council,
and contacts in China.
Additionally, SIRC consulted with the
Flavor and Extract Manufacturers
Association of the Unites States and
received a determination confirming
that the Flavor and Extract
Manufacturers Association members no
longer use or produce styrene as a
synthetic flavoring substance or
adjuvant in food. The Flavor and Extract
Manufacturers Association also
submitted to the docket for this petition
data and information in support of the
petition, which FDA reviewed and
evaluated in making its decision on this
petition. The Flavor and Extract
Manufacturers Association is a national
association of the U.S. flavor industry
whose members include flavor
manufacturers, flavor users, flavor
ingredient suppliers, and others. Based
on information provided from Flavor
and Extract Manufacturers Association,
its members manufacture more than 95
percent of all flavoring substances sold
in the United States.
III. Comments on the Filing Notice
We provided 60 days for comments
on the filing notice. We received two
comments. For ease of reading, we
preface each comment discussion with
a numbered ‘‘Comment,’’ and the word
‘‘Response’’ appears before FDA’s
response. The number assigned is for
organizational purposes only and does
not signify any individual comment’s
value, importance, or order in which it
was received. One comment expressed
concerns about the timing of FDA action
on SIRC’s abandonment petition. This
comment is summarized below,
followed by FDA’s response. The other
comment supported SIRC’s conclusions
that the use of styrene as a synthetic
flavoring substance or adjuvant in food
has been abandoned.
(Comment 1) One comment requested
that we not make a final decision on the
petition until after we make a final
decision on a food additive petition
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Oct 05, 2018
Jkt 247001
(FAP 5A4810) submitted in 2015 by
several consumer groups asking us to
remove styrene (and six other additives)
from § 172.515 as a synthetic flavoring
substance and adjuvant in food on the
basis that it is not safe for use in food
(Docket No. FDA–2015–F–4317). The
comment stated that if we make a
decision on the petition based on
abandonment before making a decision
on FAP 5A4810 based on safety, a
company may conclude that the use of
styrene is generally recognized as safe
(GRAS) without notifying us. The
comment also stated that making a
decision based on abandonment ‘‘leaves
unresolved the safety issue . . . and
encourages industry to only consider
whether something is abandoned in
order to preempt a safety decision.’’
Further, the comment stated that FDA is
statutorily required to regulate food
additives and prevent the use of those
that are unsafe and that FDA’s failure to
make a determination based on safety
would fall short of FDA’s statutory duty.
(Response 1) FDA disagrees. We are
not required to make a final decision on
FAP 5A4810 before the current petition.
With regard to the assertion that FDA is
required to make a safety determination
and that failure to do so falls short of
FDA’s statutory duty, FDA has
numerous responsibilities related to
food additives. Each year, FDA receives
and responds to hundreds of
submissions under the various petition
and notification programs we
administer. Therefore, if the use of a
food additive is no longer authorized in
response to an abandonment petition,
FDA may determine that it is neither
necessary nor an efficient use of its
limited resources to address safety
arguments related to an abandoned use.
With regard to the comment’s concern
that a manufacturer may conclude that
the use of styrene as a synthetic
flavoring substance and adjuvant in
food is GRAS without notifying us, we
note that, for a substance to be GRAS
based on scientific procedures, the
scientific data and information about
the use of a substance must be generally
available and there must be general
recognition among qualified experts that
those data and information establish
that the substance is safe under the
conditions of its intended use (21 CFR
170.30). Prior approval as a food
additive does not mean that the use of
a substance is GRAS (see 81 FR 54960
at 54976, August 17, 2016). FDA
encourages firms to seek our evaluation
of any conclusion of GRAS status before
they introduce the substance into the
market. In the event that a manufacturer
later wishes to reinstate the use of
styrene as a synthetic flavoring
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50489
substance and adjuvant in food, we
would expect the manufacturer to seek
re-authorization through submission of
a food additive petition because this
intended use was previously authorized
under section 409 of the FD&C Act.
With regard to the assertion that an
abandonment petition could be used by
industry to preempt a safety
determination by FDA, we have the
discretion to make a safety
determination regardless of whether
there is an abandonment petition.
Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register we have published a final rule
in response to FAP 5A4810 amending
§ 172.515 to no longer authorize the use
of benzophenone, ethyl acrylate,
eugenyl methyl ether, myrcene,
pulegone, and pyridine as synthetic
flavoring substances and adjuvants in
food.
IV. Conclusion
FDA reviewed the data and
information in the petition and other
available relevant material to evaluate
whether the use of styrene as a synthetic
flavoring substance and adjuvant in
food has been has been permanently
and completely abandoned. Based on
the available information, we have
determined that the use of styrene as a
synthetic flavoring substance and
adjuvant in food has been abandoned.
Therefore, we are amending § 172.515 to
no longer provide for the use of styrene
as a synthetic flavoring substance and
adjuvant in food.
V. Public Disclosure
In accordance with § 171.1(h) (21 CFR
171.1(h)), the petition and the
documents that we considered and
relied upon in reaching our decision to
approve the petition will be made
available for public disclosure (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). As
provided in § 171.1(h), we will delete
from the documents any materials that
are not available for public disclosure.
VI. Analysis of Environmental Impact
We previously considered the
environmental effects of this rule, as
stated in the June 15, 2016, Federal
Register notice of petition for FAP
6A4817 (81 FR 38984). We stated that
we had determined, under 21 CFR
25.32(m), that this action ‘‘is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment’’ such that
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required. We have not received any
new information or comments that
would affect our previous
determination.
E:\FR\FM\09OCR1.SGM
09OCR1
50490
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final rule contains no collection
of information. Therefore, clearance by
the Office of Management and Budget
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 is not required.
VIII. Objections
If you will be adversely affected by
one or more provisions of this
regulation, you may file with the
Dockets Management Staff (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
objections. You must separately number
each objection, and within each
numbered objection you must specify
with particularity the provision(s) to
which you object and the grounds for
your objection. Within each numbered
objection, you must specifically state
whether you are requesting a hearing on
the particular provision that you specify
in that numbered objection. If you do
not request a hearing for any particular
objection, you waive the right to a
hearing on that objection. If you request
a hearing, your objection must include
a detailed description and analysis of
the specific factual information you
intend to present in support of the
objection in the event that a hearing is
held. If you do not include such a
description and analysis for any
particular objection, you waive the right
to a hearing on the objection.
Any objections received in response
to the regulation may be seen in the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, and will be posted to the docket
at https://www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 172
Food additives, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs and redelegated to
the Director, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition, 21 CFR part 172 is
amended as follows:
PART 172—FOOD ADDITIVES
PERMITTED FOR DIRECT ADDITION
TO FOOD FOR HUMAN
CONSUMPTION
1. The authority citation for part 172
continues to read as follows:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 342, 348,
371, 379e.
§ 172.515
[Amended]
2. Amend § 172.515(b) by removing
the entry for ‘‘Styrene.’’
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Oct 05, 2018
Jkt 247001
Dated: October 2, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018–21808 Filed 10–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Parts 172 and 177
[Docket No. FDA–2015–F–4317]
Food Additive Regulations; Synthetic
Flavoring Agents and Adjuvants
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Final rule; notification of partial
denial of petition.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, the Agency, or
we) is partially granting a petition
submitted by the Breast Cancer Fund
(now known as the Breast Cancer
Prevention Partners), Center for
Environmental Health, Center for Food
Safety, Center for Science in the Public
Interest, Consumers Union,
Environmental Defense Fund,
Environmental Working Group,
Improving Kids’ Environment, Natural
Resources Defense Council, WE ACT for
Environmental Justice, and Mr. James
Huff, by amending the food additive
regulations to no longer authorize the
use of benzophenone, ethyl acrylate,
eugenyl methyl ether, myrcene,
pulegone, and pyridine as synthetic
flavoring substances for use in food. We
are taking this action because, despite
FDA’s scientific analysis and
determination that these substances do
not pose a risk to public health under
the conditions of their intended use, the
petitioners provided data demonstrating
that these additives induce cancer in
laboratory animals, and, as a result of
this finding in animals, FDA cannot as
a matter of law maintain the listing of
these synthetic flavoring substances in
the food additive regulations. Because of
evidence that benzophenone causes
cancer in animals, FDA also is
amending the food additive regulations
to no longer provide for the use of
benzophenone as a plasticizer in rubber
articles intended for repeated use in
contact with food. FDA is denying as
moot the portions of the petition
proposing that the food additive
regulations be amended to no longer
authorize the use of styrene as a
synthetic flavoring substance because
this use has been permanently and
completely abandoned. In addition,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FDA is declining to act on the
petitioners’ request to issue a regulation
to prohibit the use of these synthetic
flavoring substances in food because
that issue is not the proper subject of a
food additive petition.
DATES: This rule is effective October 9,
2018. See section IX for further
information on the filing of objections.
Submit either electronic or written
objections and requests for a hearing on
the final rule by November 8, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit objections
and requests for a hearing as follows.
Please note that late, untimely filed
objections will not be considered.
Electronic objections must be submitted
on or before November 8, 2018.
Objections received by mail/hand
delivery/courier (for written/paper
submissions) will be considered timely
if they are postmarked or the delivery
service acceptance receipt is on or
before that date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic objections in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Objections submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
objection will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
objection does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
objection, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit an objection
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the objection as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper objections
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your objection, as
E:\FR\FM\09OCR1.SGM
09OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 9, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50487-50490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-21808]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 172
[Docket No. FDA-2016-F-1444]
Food Additives Permitted for Direct Addition to Food for Human
Consumption; Styrene
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is
amending the food additive regulations to no longer provide for the use
of styrene as a flavoring substance and adjuvant for use in food
because these uses have been abandoned. We are taking this action in
response to a food additive petition submitted by the Styrene
Information and Research Center (SIRC).
DATES: This rule is effective October 9, 2018. See section VIII for
further information on the filing of objections. Submit either
electronic or written objections and requests for a hearing on the
final rule by November 8, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit objections and requests for a hearing as
follows. Please note that late, untimely filed objections will not be
considered. Electronic objections must be submitted on or before
November 8, 2018. Objections received by mail/hand delivery/courier
(for written/paper submissions) will be considered timely if they are
postmarked or the delivery service acceptance receipt is on or before
that date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic objections in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Objections submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your objection will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your
objection does not include any confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted, such as medical information,
your or anyone else's Social Security number, or confidential business
information, such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you
include your name, contact information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
[[Page 50488]]
objection, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit an objection with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the objection as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper objections submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your objection, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2016-F-1444 for ``Food Additives Permitted for Direct Addition to
Food for Human Consumption; Styrene.'' Received objections, those filed
in a timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed in the docket and,
except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management
Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit an objection with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your objections only as a written/paper submission.
You should submit two copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note
that states ``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The
Agency will review this copy, including the claimed confidential
information, in its consideration of comments. The second copy, which
will have the claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out,
will be available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov. Submit both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and contact information to be made
publicly available, you can provide this information on the cover sheet
and not in the body of your comments and you must identify this
information as ``confidential.'' Any information marked as
``confidential'' will not be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR
10.20 and other applicable disclosure law. For more information about
FDA's posting of comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September
18, 2015, or access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judith Kidwell, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-265), Food and Drug Administration, 5001
Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740-3835, 240-402-1071.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the Federal Register of June 15, 2016 (81 FR 38984), we
announced that we filed a food additive petition (FAP 6A4817),
submitted by SIRC, c/o Keller and Heckman LLP, 1001 G Street NW, Suite
500 West, Washington, DC 20001. The petition proposed to amend
Sec. [thinsp]172.515 Synthetic flavoring substances and adjuvants (21
CFR 172.515) to no longer provide for the use of styrene (CAS Reg. No.
100-42-5) as a synthetic flavoring substance and adjuvant in food
because these uses of styrene have been abandoned. Any use of styrene
other than as a synthetic flavoring substance and adjuvant in food in
accordance with Sec. 172.515 was considered outside the scope of this
petition.
II. Evaluation of Abandonment
Section 409(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C
Act) (21 U.S.C. 348(i)) states that we must by regulation establish the
procedure for amending or repealing a food additive regulation and that
this procedure must conform to the procedure provided in section 409 of
the FD&C Act for the issuance of such regulations. Our regulations
specific to administrative actions for food additives provide that the
Commissioner of Food and Drugs, on his own initiative or on the
petition of any interested person, under 21 CFR part 10, may propose
the issuance of a regulation amending or repealing a regulation
pertaining to a food additive or granting or repealing an exception for
such additive (Sec. 171.130(a) (21 CFR 171.130(a))). The regulations
further provide that any such petition must include an assertion of
facts, supported by data, showing that new information exists with
respect to the food additive or that new uses have been developed or
old uses abandoned, that new data are available as to toxicity of the
chemical, or that experience with the existing regulation or exemption
may justify its amendment or repeal. New data must be furnished in the
form specified in Sec. Sec. 171.1 and 171.100 for submitting petitions
(Sec. 171.130(b)). Under these regulations, a petitioner may propose
that we amend a food additive regulation if the petitioner can
demonstrate that there are ``old uses abandoned'' for the relevant food
additive. Such abandonment must be complete for any intended uses in
the United States market. While section 409 of the FD&C Act and Sec.
171.130 also provide for amending or revoking a food additive
regulation based on safety, an amendment or revocation based on
abandonment is not based on safety, but is based on the fact that
regulatory authorization is no longer necessary because the use of that
food additive has been abandoned.
Abandonment may be based on the abandonment of certain authorized
food additive uses for a substance (e.g., if a substance is no longer
used in certain product categories) or on the abandonment of all
authorized food additive uses of a substance (e.g., if a substance is
no longer being manufactured). If a petition seeks an amendment to a
food additive regulation based on the abandonment of certain uses of
the food additive, such uses should be adequately defined so that both
the scope of the abandonment and any amendment to the food additive
regulation are clear.
The petition submitted on behalf of SIRC contains information
collected from its members to support the petitioner's claim that
styrene is no longer manufactured, imported, or otherwise marketed for
use as a synthetic flavoring substance and adjuvant in food in the U.S.
market and that industry has abandoned such use of styrene.
Specifically, the petition contained information SIRC collected through
surveying its membership, which contains over 95 percent of the current
North American styrene industry, to verify that its members:
Do not currently manufacture styrene for use as a
synthetic flavoring substance and adjuvant in food in the United
States;
do not currently import styrene for use as a synthetic
flavoring substance and adjuvant in food into the United States;
[[Page 50489]]
do not intend to manufacture or import styrene for use as
a synthetic flavoring substance and adjuvant in food in the United
States in the future; and
do not currently maintain any inventory of styrene for
sale or distribution into commerce that is intended to be marketed for
use as a synthetic flavoring substance and adjuvant in food in the
United States.
SIRC also confirmed that no foreign manufacturers appear to be
using or marketing styrene for use as a synthetic flavoring substance
or adjuvant in food, based on information received from the Japan
Styrene Industry Association, the European Chemical Industry Council,
and contacts in China.
Additionally, SIRC consulted with the Flavor and Extract
Manufacturers Association of the Unites States and received a
determination confirming that the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers
Association members no longer use or produce styrene as a synthetic
flavoring substance or adjuvant in food. The Flavor and Extract
Manufacturers Association also submitted to the docket for this
petition data and information in support of the petition, which FDA
reviewed and evaluated in making its decision on this petition. The
Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association is a national association
of the U.S. flavor industry whose members include flavor manufacturers,
flavor users, flavor ingredient suppliers, and others. Based on
information provided from Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association,
its members manufacture more than 95 percent of all flavoring
substances sold in the United States.
III. Comments on the Filing Notice
We provided 60 days for comments on the filing notice. We received
two comments. For ease of reading, we preface each comment discussion
with a numbered ``Comment,'' and the word ``Response'' appears before
FDA's response. The number assigned is for organizational purposes only
and does not signify any individual comment's value, importance, or
order in which it was received. One comment expressed concerns about
the timing of FDA action on SIRC's abandonment petition. This comment
is summarized below, followed by FDA's response. The other comment
supported SIRC's conclusions that the use of styrene as a synthetic
flavoring substance or adjuvant in food has been abandoned.
(Comment 1) One comment requested that we not make a final decision
on the petition until after we make a final decision on a food additive
petition (FAP 5A4810) submitted in 2015 by several consumer groups
asking us to remove styrene (and six other additives) from Sec.
172.515 as a synthetic flavoring substance and adjuvant in food on the
basis that it is not safe for use in food (Docket No. FDA-2015-F-4317).
The comment stated that if we make a decision on the petition based on
abandonment before making a decision on FAP 5A4810 based on safety, a
company may conclude that the use of styrene is generally recognized as
safe (GRAS) without notifying us. The comment also stated that making a
decision based on abandonment ``leaves unresolved the safety issue . .
. and encourages industry to only consider whether something is
abandoned in order to preempt a safety decision.'' Further, the comment
stated that FDA is statutorily required to regulate food additives and
prevent the use of those that are unsafe and that FDA's failure to make
a determination based on safety would fall short of FDA's statutory
duty.
(Response 1) FDA disagrees. We are not required to make a final
decision on FAP 5A4810 before the current petition. With regard to the
assertion that FDA is required to make a safety determination and that
failure to do so falls short of FDA's statutory duty, FDA has numerous
responsibilities related to food additives. Each year, FDA receives and
responds to hundreds of submissions under the various petition and
notification programs we administer. Therefore, if the use of a food
additive is no longer authorized in response to an abandonment
petition, FDA may determine that it is neither necessary nor an
efficient use of its limited resources to address safety arguments
related to an abandoned use.
With regard to the comment's concern that a manufacturer may
conclude that the use of styrene as a synthetic flavoring substance and
adjuvant in food is GRAS without notifying us, we note that, for a
substance to be GRAS based on scientific procedures, the scientific
data and information about the use of a substance must be generally
available and there must be general recognition among qualified experts
that those data and information establish that the substance is safe
under the conditions of its intended use (21 CFR 170.30). Prior
approval as a food additive does not mean that the use of a substance
is GRAS (see 81 FR 54960 at 54976, August 17, 2016). FDA encourages
firms to seek our evaluation of any conclusion of GRAS status before
they introduce the substance into the market. In the event that a
manufacturer later wishes to reinstate the use of styrene as a
synthetic flavoring substance and adjuvant in food, we would expect the
manufacturer to seek re-authorization through submission of a food
additive petition because this intended use was previously authorized
under section 409 of the FD&C Act.
With regard to the assertion that an abandonment petition could be
used by industry to preempt a safety determination by FDA, we have the
discretion to make a safety determination regardless of whether there
is an abandonment petition.
Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register we have published a
final rule in response to FAP 5A4810 amending Sec. 172.515 to no
longer authorize the use of benzophenone, ethyl acrylate, eugenyl
methyl ether, myrcene, pulegone, and pyridine as synthetic flavoring
substances and adjuvants in food.
IV. Conclusion
FDA reviewed the data and information in the petition and other
available relevant material to evaluate whether the use of styrene as a
synthetic flavoring substance and adjuvant in food has been has been
permanently and completely abandoned. Based on the available
information, we have determined that the use of styrene as a synthetic
flavoring substance and adjuvant in food has been abandoned. Therefore,
we are amending Sec. 172.515 to no longer provide for the use of
styrene as a synthetic flavoring substance and adjuvant in food.
V. Public Disclosure
In accordance with Sec. 171.1(h) (21 CFR 171.1(h)), the petition
and the documents that we considered and relied upon in reaching our
decision to approve the petition will be made available for public
disclosure (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). As provided in Sec.
171.1(h), we will delete from the documents any materials that are not
available for public disclosure.
VI. Analysis of Environmental Impact
We previously considered the environmental effects of this rule, as
stated in the June 15, 2016, Federal Register notice of petition for
FAP 6A4817 (81 FR 38984). We stated that we had determined, under 21
CFR 25.32(m), that this action ``is of a type that does not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment'' such that neither an environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is required. We have not received any
new information or comments that would affect our previous
determination.
[[Page 50490]]
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final rule contains no collection of information. Therefore,
clearance by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 is not required.
VIII. Objections
If you will be adversely affected by one or more provisions of this
regulation, you may file with the Dockets Management Staff (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written objections. You must separately
number each objection, and within each numbered objection you must
specify with particularity the provision(s) to which you object and the
grounds for your objection. Within each numbered objection, you must
specifically state whether you are requesting a hearing on the
particular provision that you specify in that numbered objection. If
you do not request a hearing for any particular objection, you waive
the right to a hearing on that objection. If you request a hearing,
your objection must include a detailed description and analysis of the
specific factual information you intend to present in support of the
objection in the event that a hearing is held. If you do not include
such a description and analysis for any particular objection, you waive
the right to a hearing on the objection.
Any objections received in response to the regulation may be seen
in the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at https://www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 172
Food additives, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and
redelegated to the Director, Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition, 21 CFR part 172 is amended as follows:
PART 172--FOOD ADDITIVES PERMITTED FOR DIRECT ADDITION TO FOOD FOR
HUMAN CONSUMPTION
0
1. The authority citation for part 172 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 342, 348, 371, 379e.
Sec. 172.515 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 172.515(b) by removing the entry for ``Styrene.''
Dated: October 2, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-21808 Filed 10-5-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P