Flumioxazin; Pesticide Tolerances, 50284-50288 [2018-21746]
Download as PDF
50284
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 194 / Friday, October 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
LANE COUNTY REGIONAL AIR POLLUTION AUTHORITY REGULATIONS, APPROVED BUT NOT INCORPORATED BY
REFERENCE—Continued
State
effective
date
LRAPA citation
Title/subject
15–065 ...............
Appeals ...................................................................................................
31–0070 .............
Hearing Procedures ...............................................................................
6/13/1995
EPA approval date
Explanation
8/3/2001, 66 FR 40616 ......
Title 31—Public Participation
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 52.1987 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1987
quality.
Significant deterioration of air
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The Lane Regional Air Protection
Agency rules for the prevention of
significant deterioration of air quality
(provisions of LRAPA Titles 12, 29, 31,
37, 38 (except 0510(3) inter-pollutant
offset ratios), 40, 42, and 50) as in effect
March 23, 2018, are approved as
meeting the requirements of title I, part
C, subpart I of the Clean Air Act for
preventing significant deterioration of
air quality.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–21558 Filed 10–4–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
10/5/2018, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael L. Goodis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001; main telephone number:
(703) 305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:.
40 CFR Part 180
I. General Information
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0333; FRL–9984–01]
A. Does this action apply to me?
Flumioxazin; Pesticide Tolerances
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes
tolerances with regional registrations for
residues of flumioxazin in or on Grass,
forage and Grass, hay. Interregional
Research Project Number 4 (IR–4)
requested these tolerances under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA).
SUMMARY:
This regulation is effective
October 5, 2018. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before December 4, 2018, and
must be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0333, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
DATES:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
3/23/2018
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Oct 04, 2018
Jkt 247001
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR
site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2017–0333 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before December 4, 2018. Addresses for
mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2017–0333, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 194 / Friday, October 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
II. Summary of Petitioned-For
Tolerance
In the Federal Register of October 23,
2017 (82 FR 49020) (FRL–9967–37),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 7E8565) by IR–4,
Rutgers, The State University of New
Jersey, 500 College Road East, Suite
201W, Princeton, NJ 08540. The petition
requested that 40 CFR 180.568(c) be
amended by establishing tolerances
with regional registrations for residues
of the herbicide flumioxazin, 2-[7fluoro-3,4-dihydro-3-oxo-4-(2propynyl)-2H-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)dione, including its metabolites and
degradates, determined by measuring
only flumioxazin, in or on Grass, forage
at 0.4 parts per million (ppm) and Grass,
hay 0.05 ppm. That document
referenced a summary of the petition
prepared by Valent, U.S.A. Corporation,
the registrant, which is available in the
docket, https://www.regulations.gov.
This petition request is associated with
an application to allow use of
flumioxazin on grass in the States of
Washington, Idaho, and Oregon.
Although comments were submitted to
the docket, none were relevant to the
safety of the tolerances being
established in this action.
Consistent with the authority in
FFDCA 408(d)(4)(A)(i), EPA is issuing a
tolerance that varies from what the
petitioner sought. The reason for this
change is explained in Unit IV.C.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Oct 04, 2018
Jkt 247001
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .’’
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for flumioxazin
including exposure resulting from the
tolerances established by this action.
EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks
associated with flumioxazin follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available
toxicity data and considered its validity,
completeness, and reliability as well as
the relationship of the results of the
studies to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information
concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable
subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children.
Toxicity associated with flumioxazin
includes anemia and effects on the
cardiovascular system and liver.
Specifically, alterations in hemoglobin
parameters were observed in rats, as
well as increased renal toxicity in male
rats, and increased absolute and relative
liver weights and increased alkaline
phosphate values were seen in dogs.
No evidence of neurotoxicity was
seen in male or female rats in the acute
or subchronic neurotoxicity studies. The
oral and dermal developmental rat
studies showed evidence of increased
quantitative susceptibility of fetuses, as
cardiovascular anomalies (ventral septal
defects) were found. These
developmental effects in the offspring
were more severe and seen at doses
lower than those that caused parental
and systemic toxicity. The regulatory
endpoints for flumioxazin are protective
of this increased susceptibility,
however, so there is low concern and no
residual uncertainties for these effects.
Flumioxazin was negative for
mutagenicity in most of the available
studies, however, there were aberrations
in a chromosomal aberration assay. The
lack of carcinogenicity in mice and rats
permits flumioxazin to be classified as
‘‘not likely to be carcinogenic to
humans.’’
Specific information on the studies
received and the nature of the adverse
effects caused by flumioxazin as well as
the no-observed-adverse-effect-level
(NOAEL) and the lowest-observedadverse-effect-level (LOAEL) from the
toxicity studies can be found at https://
www.regulations.gov in document titled,
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50285
‘‘SUBJECT: Flumioxazin. Human Health
Risk Assessment for the Proposed New
Uses on Grass (Seed Crop)’’ at page 24
in docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2017–0333.
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/
Levels of Concern
Once a pesticide’s toxicological
profile is determined, EPA identifies
toxicological points of departure (POD)
and levels of concern to use in
evaluating the risk posed by human
exposure to the pesticide. For hazards
that have a threshold below which there
is no appreciable risk, the toxicological
POD is used as the basis for derivation
of reference values for risk assessment.
PODs are developed based on a careful
analysis of the doses in each
toxicological study to determine the
dose at which no adverse effects are
observed (the NOAEL) and the lowest
dose at which adverse effects of concern
are identified (the LOAEL). Uncertainty/
safety factors are used in conjunction
with the POD to calculate a safe
exposure level—generally referred to as
a population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a
reference dose (RfD)—and a safe margin
of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold
risks, the Agency assumes that any
amount of exposure will lead to some
degree of risk. Thus, the Agency
estimates risk in terms of the probability
of an occurrence of the adverse effect
expected in a lifetime. For more
information on the general principles
EPA uses in risk characterization and a
complete description of the risk
assessment process, see https://
www2.epa.gov/pesticide-scienceandassessing-pesticide-risks/
assessinghuman-health-risk-pesticides.
A summary of the toxicological
endpoints for flumioxazin used for
human risk assessment is discussed in
Unit III. B of the final rule published in
the Federal Register of September 21,
2012 (77 FR 58493) (FRL–9358–3). One
additional endpoint has since been
identified, i.e., the selection of an adult
oral endpoint for assessing the aggregate
risks from short-term and intermediateterm oral exposure: An oral NOAEL of
3 mg/kg/day based on cardiovascular
effects in fetuses seen at the LOAEL of
10 mg/kg/day in the rat developmental
study was used, along with a 10X
interspecies uncertainty factor, a 10X
intraspecies uncertainty factor, and a 1X
FQPA safety factor. Long-term
exposures (greater than 6 months) are
not expected based on the existing
flumioxazin use pattern.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and
feed uses. In evaluating dietary
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
50286
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 194 / Friday, October 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
exposure to flumioxazin, EPA
considered exposure under the
petitioned-for tolerances as well as all
existing flumioxazin tolerances in 40
CFR 180.568. EPA assessed dietary
exposures from flumioxazin in food as
follows:
i. Acute exposure. Quantitative acute
dietary exposure and risk assessments
are performed for a food-use pesticide,
if a toxicological study has indicated the
possibility of an effect of concern
occurring as a result of a 1-day or single
exposure.
Such effects were identified for
flumioxazin for females 13–49. In
estimating acute dietary exposure, EPA
used food consumption information
from the Dietary Exposure Evaluation
Model software with the Food
Commodity Intake Database (DEEM–
FCID) Version 3.16. This software uses
2003–2008 food consumption data from
the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey, What We
Eat in America (NHANES/WWEIA;
2003–2008). As to residue levels in
food, EPA assumed tolerance-level
residues, 100% crop treated (PCT) for
all commodities and DEEM–FCID
version 3.16.
ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting
the chronic dietary exposure assessment
EPA used the DEEM–FCID Version 3.16
software which incorporates 2003–2008
food consumption data from USDA’s
NHANES/WWEIA. As to residue levels
in food, EPA incorporated tolerancelevel residues and/or 100 PCT for all
commodities.
iii. Cancer. Based on the data
summarized in Unit III.A., EPA has
concluded that flumioxazin does not
pose a cancer risk to humans. Therefore,
a dietary exposure assessment for the
purpose of assessing cancer risk is
unnecessary.
iv. Anticipated residue and percent
crop treated (PCT) information. EPA did
not use anticipated residue and/or PCT
information in the dietary assessment
for flumioxazin. Tolerance-level
residues and/or 100 PCT were assumed
for all food commodities.
2. Dietary exposure from drinking
water. The Agency used screening-level
water exposure models in the dietary
exposure analysis and risk assessment
for flumioxazin in drinking water. These
simulation models take into account
data on the physical, chemical, and fate/
transport characteristics of flumioxazin.
The estimated drinking water
concentrations (EDWCs) are based on
hydrolysis and the residues of concern
for flumioxazin and its major degradates
(482–HA, and APF), expressed as
flumioxazin equivalents. Further
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Oct 04, 2018
Jkt 247001
information regarding EPA drinking
water models used in pesticide
exposure assessment can be found at
https://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-scienceand-assessing-pesticide-risks/aboutwater-exposure-models-used-pesticide.
Based on the First Index Reservoir
Screening Tool (FIRST) model, the
EDWCs in surface water for acute
exposures are 400 parts per billion (ppb)
for flumioxazin and for chronic
exposures are estimated to be 9.4 ppb,
21.6 ppb, and 110.1 ppb for
flumioxazin, 482–HA and APF
degradates, respectively, for a total
concentration of 141 ppb. Based on the
Screening Concentration in Ground
Water (SCI–GROW) model, for both
acute and chronic (non-cancer)
exposures, the EDWCs of 482–HA and
APF are estimated to be 45.27 ppb and
2.66 ppb, respectively, for ground water.
EDWCs of flumioxazin are estimated to
be negligible in ground water for
chronic exposures. Estimates of
drinking water concentrations were
directly entered into the dietary
exposure model as follows. The peak
day zero of 400 ppb for flumioxazin
(degradates 482–HA and APF were not
detected) was used to assess the
contribution to drinking water for the
acute dietary risk assessment, and the
day 30 total of 141 ppb for flumioxazin,
482–HA and APF degradates was used
to assess the contribution to drinking
water for the chronic dietary risk
assessment.
3. From non-dietary exposure. The
term ‘‘residential exposure’’ is used in
this document to refer to nonoccupational, non-dietary exposure
(e.g., for lawn and garden pest control,
indoor pest control, termiticides, and
flea and tick control on pets).
Flumioxazin is currently registered
for the following uses that could result
in residential exposures: Turf grass,
residential lawns, ornamentals, and
aquatic weeds. EPA assessed residential
exposure under the assumption that
homeowner handlers wear shorts, shortsleeved shirts, socks, and shoes, and
that they complete all tasks associated
with the use of a pesticide product
including mixing/loading, if needed, as
well as the application. Residential
handler exposure scenarios for both
dermal and inhalation are considered to
be short-term only, due to the infrequent
use patterns associated with homeowner
products.
EPA uses the term ‘‘post-application’’
to describe exposure to individuals that
occur as a result of being in an
environment that has been previously
treated with a pesticide. Flumioxazin
can be used in many areas that can be
frequented by the general population
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
including residential areas, lakes, and
ponds. As a result, individuals can be
exposed by entering these areas if they
have been previously treated. Therefore,
short-term and intermediate-term
dermal and oral post-application
exposures and risks were assessed for
adults and children. In addition, oral
post-application exposures and risks
were assessed specifically for children
to be protective of possible hand-tomouth, object-to-mouth, and soil
ingestion activities that may occur on
treated turf areas. Further information
regarding EPA standard assumptions
and generic inputs for residential
exposures may be found at https://
www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-andassessing-pesticide-risks/standardoperating-procedures-residentialpesticide.
4. Cumulative effects from substances
with a common mechanism of toxicity.
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA
requires that, when considering whether
to establish, modify, or revoke a
tolerance, the Agency consider
‘‘available information’’ concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular
pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other
substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’
EPA has not found flumioxazin to
share a common mechanism of toxicity
with any other substances, and
flumioxazin does not appear to produce
a toxic metabolite produced by other
substances. For the purposes of this
tolerance action, therefore, EPA has
assumed that flumioxazin does not have
a common mechanism of toxicity with
other substances. For information
regarding EPA’s efforts to determine
which chemicals have a common
mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate
the cumulative effects of such
chemicals, see EPA’s website at https://
www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-andassessing-pesticide-risks/cumulativeassessment-risk-pesticides.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and
Children
1. In general. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of
FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply
an additional tenfold (10X) margin of
safety for infants and children in the
case of threshold effects to account for
prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the
completeness of the database on toxicity
and exposure unless EPA determines
based on reliable data that a different
margin of safety will be safe for infants
and children. This additional margin of
safety is commonly referred to as the
FQPA Safety Factor (SF). In applying
this provision, EPA either retains the
default value of 10X, or uses a different
additional safety factor when reliable
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 194 / Friday, October 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
data available to EPA support the choice
of a different factor.
2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity.
There is evidence of increased
quantitative susceptibility of fetuses in
the oral and dermal developmental rat
studies, where cardiovascular
abnormalities occurred in the absence of
maternal toxicity. The rat reproduction
study also showed evidence of
qualitative and quantitative post-natal
susceptibility since reproductive effects
in offspring were more severe and were
seen at lower doses than those that
caused parental/systemic toxicity. Even
with this observed increased
susceptibility, the Agency has
concluded there is a low concern and no
residual uncertainties for pre- and/or
postnatal toxicity because the
developmental toxicity NOAELs/
LOAELs are well-characterized after oral
and dermal exposure, and the offspring
toxicity NOAEL and LOAEL are well
characterized in the reproduction study.
Furthermore, the doses and endpoints
have been selected from the
developmental and reproductive
toxicity studies for risk assessment of
the relevant exposed populations (e.g.,
pregnant females and children), with
the exception of the chronic dietary
endpoint, for which a chronic study was
selected. Therefore, regulatory
endpoints for flumioxazin are protective
of the increased susceptibility and there
are no residual concerns for these
effects.
3. Conclusion. EPA has determined
that reliable data show the safety of
infants and children would be
adequately protected if the FQPA SF
were reduced to 1X for oral and dermal
exposures, but retained the 10X FQPA
database uncertainty factor (UF) for
inhalation exposure and risk assessment
due to the lack of an inhalation study.
That decision is based on the following
findings:
i. The toxicity database for
flumioxazin is incomplete but sufficient
for assessing the toxicity and
characterizing the hazard of flumioxazin
due to the absence of an acceptable
inhalation study. Therefore, the Agency
is retaining the 10X FQPA safety factor
for assessing inhalation risk.
ii. There is no indication that
flumioxazin is a neurotoxic chemical
and there is no need for a
developmental neurotoxicity study or
additional UFs to account for
neurotoxicity.
iii. There is evidence that flumioxazin
may result in increased susceptibility in
in utero rats or rabbits in the prenatal
developmental studies or in young rats
in the 2-generation reproduction study.
The Agency concluded that while there
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Oct 04, 2018
Jkt 247001
is an increased susceptibility, there is a
low concern and no residual
uncertainties for pre-and/or postnatal
toxicity because the developmental
toxicity NOAELs/LOAELs are well
characterized after oral and dermal
exposure; the offspring toxicity NOAEL
and LOAEL are well characterized in
the reproduction study; and the doses
and endpoints have been selected from
the developmental and reproductive
toxicity studies for the relevant
populations, except for the chronic
dietary endpoint, for which a chronic
study was chosen. Therefore, the
regulatory endpoints for flumioxazin are
protective of the increased susceptibility
seen in the developmental and
reproduction studies, and there are no
residual concerns for these effects.
iv. There are no residual uncertainties
identified in the exposure databases.
The acute and chronic dietary food
exposure assessments were performed
based on tolerance-level residues,
default processing factors, and assuming
100 PCT. EPA made conservative
(protective) assumptions in the ground
and surface water modeling used to
assess exposure to flumioxazin in
drinking water. EPA used similarly
conservative assumptions to assess postapplication exposure of children as well
as incidental oral exposure of toddlers.
These assessments will not
underestimate the exposure and risks
posed by flumioxazin.
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of
Safety
EPA determines whether acute and
chronic dietary pesticide exposures are
safe by comparing aggregate exposure
estimates to the acute PAD (aPAD) and
chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer
risks, EPA calculates the lifetime
probability of acquiring cancer given the
estimated aggregate exposure. Short-,
intermediate-, and chronic-term risks
are evaluated by comparing the
estimated aggregate food, water, and
residential exposure to the appropriate
PODs to ensure that an adequate MOE
exists.
1. Acute risk. Using the exposure
assumptions discussed in this unit for
acute exposure, the acute dietary
exposure from food and water to
flumioxazin will occupy 76% of the
aPAD for females 13–49 years old, the
population group receiving the greatest
exposure.
2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure
assumptions described in this unit for
chronic exposure, EPA has concluded
that chronic exposure to flumioxazin
from food and water will utilize 44% of
the cPAD for all infants <1 year old, the
population group receiving the greatest
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50287
exposure. Based on the explanation in
Unit III.C.3., regarding residential use
patterns, chronic residential exposure to
residues of flumioxazin is not expected.
3. Short-term and intermediate-term
risks. Short-term and intermediate-term
aggregate exposure takes into account
short-term and intermediate-term
residential exposure plus chronic
exposure to food and water (considered
to be a background exposure level).
Flumioxazin is currently registered for
uses that could result in short-term and
intermediate residential exposures, and
the Agency has determined that it is
appropriate to aggregate chronic
exposure through food and water with
short-term and intermediate-term
residential exposures to flumioxazin.
Since the Agency has determined that
the short-term and intermediate-term
points of departure are the same, the
aggregate risks are the same for both
short-term and intermediate-term
exposures.
Using the exposure assumptions
described in this unit for short-term
exposures, EPA has concluded the
combined short-term and intermediateterm food, water, and residential
exposures result in aggregate MOEs of
110 for adult females 13–49 years and
MOE of 200 for children less than 2
years. Because EPA’s level of concern
for flumioxazin is a MOE of 100 or
below, these MOEs are not of concern.
4. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S.
population. Based on the lack of
evidence of carcinogenicity in two
adequate rodent carcinogenicity studies,
flumioxazin is not expected to pose a
cancer risk to humans.
5. Determination of safety. Based on
these risk assessments, EPA concludes
that there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm will result to the general
population, or to infants and children
from aggregate exposure to flumioxazin
residues.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodology
(gas chromatography/nitrogenphosphorus detection (GC/NPD)
method, Valent Method RM30–A–1), is
available to enforce the tolerance
expression. The reported method limits
of quantitation and detection (LOQ and
LOD) for flumioxazin in/on plant
commodities are 0.02 and 0.01 ppm,
respectively.
The method may be requested from:
Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch,
Environmental Science Center, 701
Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755–5350;
telephone number: (410) 305–2905;
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
50288
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 194 / Friday, October 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
email address: residuemethods@
epa.gov.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA
seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with
international standards whenever
possible, consistent with U.S. food
safety standards and agricultural
practices. EPA considers the
international maximum residue limits
(MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).
The Codex Alimentarius is a joint
United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization/World Health
Organization food standards program,
and it is recognized as an international
food safety standards-setting
organization in trade agreements to
which the United States is a party. EPA
may establish a tolerance that is
different from a Codex MRL; however,
FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that
EPA explain the reasons for departing
from the Codex level.
The Codex has not established a MRL
for flumioxazin in/on grass, therefore
there are no international harmonization
issues.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
C. Revisions to Petitioned-For
Tolerances
EPA is establishing a tolerance for
Grass, forage at 0.40 ppm, rather than
0.4 ppm, to be consistent with its
practice to provide greater precision
about the levels of residues that are
permitted by a tolerance. This is
intended to avoid the situation where
residues may be higher than the
tolerance level, but as a result of
rounding would be considered nonviolative. For example, Grass, forage
tolerance proposed at 0.4 ppm was
established at 0.40 ppm, to avoid an
observed hypothetical tolerance at 0.44
ppm being rounded to 0.4 ppm.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances with regional
registrations are established for residues
of flumioxazin, 2-[7-fluoro-3,4-dihydro3-oxo-4-(2-propynyl)-2H-1,4benzoxazin-6-yl]-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1Hisoindole-1,3(2H)-dione, including its
metabolites and degradates determined
by measuring only flumioxazin, in or on
raw agricultural commodities, in or on
Grass, forage at 0.40 ppm and Grass, hay
at 0.05 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes tolerances
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Oct 04, 2018
Jkt 247001
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997); or Executive Order
13771, entitled ‘‘Reducing Regulations
and Controlling Regulatory Costs’’ (82
FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action
does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does
it require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: September 21, 2018.
Michael L. Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.568, add alphabetically the
commodities ‘‘Grass, forage’’ and
‘‘Grass, hay’’ to the table in paragraph
(c) to read as follows:
■
§ 180.568 Flumioxazin; tolerances for
residues.
*
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
Parts per
million
Commodity
*
*
*
*
Grass, forage ..............................
Grass, hay ..................................
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–21746 Filed 10–4–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
*
0.40
0.05
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 194 (Friday, October 5, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50284-50288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-21746]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0333; FRL-9984-01]
Flumioxazin; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances with regional
registrations for residues of flumioxazin in or on Grass, forage and
Grass, hay. Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4) requested
these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective October 5, 2018. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before December 4, 2018,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0333, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael L. Goodis, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:.
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government
Printing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0333 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
December 4, 2018. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0333, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket,
[[Page 50285]]
along with more information about dockets generally, is available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance
In the Federal Register of October 23, 2017 (82 FR 49020) (FRL-
9967-37), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
7E8565) by IR-4, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 500
College Road East, Suite 201W, Princeton, NJ 08540. The petition
requested that 40 CFR 180.568(c) be amended by establishing tolerances
with regional registrations for residues of the herbicide flumioxazin,
2-[7-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-3-oxo-4-(2-propynyl)-2H-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-
4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione, including its
metabolites and degradates, determined by measuring only flumioxazin,
in or on Grass, forage at 0.4 parts per million (ppm) and Grass, hay
0.05 ppm. That document referenced a summary of the petition prepared
by Valent, U.S.A. Corporation, the registrant, which is available in
the docket, https://www.regulations.gov. This petition request is
associated with an application to allow use of flumioxazin on grass in
the States of Washington, Idaho, and Oregon. Although comments were
submitted to the docket, none were relevant to the safety of the
tolerances being established in this action.
Consistent with the authority in FFDCA 408(d)(4)(A)(i), EPA is
issuing a tolerance that varies from what the petitioner sought. The
reason for this change is explained in Unit IV.C.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for flumioxazin including exposure
resulting from the tolerances established by this action. EPA's
assessment of exposures and risks associated with flumioxazin follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children.
Toxicity associated with flumioxazin includes anemia and effects on
the cardiovascular system and liver. Specifically, alterations in
hemoglobin parameters were observed in rats, as well as increased renal
toxicity in male rats, and increased absolute and relative liver
weights and increased alkaline phosphate values were seen in dogs.
No evidence of neurotoxicity was seen in male or female rats in the
acute or subchronic neurotoxicity studies. The oral and dermal
developmental rat studies showed evidence of increased quantitative
susceptibility of fetuses, as cardiovascular anomalies (ventral septal
defects) were found. These developmental effects in the offspring were
more severe and seen at doses lower than those that caused parental and
systemic toxicity. The regulatory endpoints for flumioxazin are
protective of this increased susceptibility, however, so there is low
concern and no residual uncertainties for these effects.
Flumioxazin was negative for mutagenicity in most of the available
studies, however, there were aberrations in a chromosomal aberration
assay. The lack of carcinogenicity in mice and rats permits flumioxazin
to be classified as ``not likely to be carcinogenic to humans.''
Specific information on the studies received and the nature of the
adverse effects caused by flumioxazin as well as the no-observed-
adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-
level (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies can be found at https://www.regulations.gov in document titled, ``SUBJECT: Flumioxazin. Human
Health Risk Assessment for the Proposed New Uses on Grass (Seed Crop)''
at page 24 in docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0333.
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern
Once a pesticide's toxicological profile is determined, EPA
identifies toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of
concern to use in evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the
pesticide. For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no
appreciable risk, the toxicological POD is used as the basis for
derivation of reference values for risk assessment. PODs are developed
based on a careful analysis of the doses in each toxicological study to
determine the dose at which no adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL)
and the lowest dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified
(the LOAEL). Uncertainty/safety factors are used in conjunction with
the POD to calculate a safe exposure level--generally referred to as a
population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a reference dose (RfD)--and a safe
margin of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes
that any amount of exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the
Agency estimates risk in terms of the probability of an occurrence of
the adverse effect expected in a lifetime. For more information on the
general principles EPA uses in risk characterization and a complete
description of the risk assessment process, see https://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-andassessing-pesticide-risks/assessinghuman-health-risk-pesticides.
A summary of the toxicological endpoints for flumioxazin used for
human risk assessment is discussed in Unit III. B of the final rule
published in the Federal Register of September 21, 2012 (77 FR 58493)
(FRL-9358-3). One additional endpoint has since been identified, i.e.,
the selection of an adult oral endpoint for assessing the aggregate
risks from short-term and intermediate-term oral exposure: An oral
NOAEL of 3 mg/kg/day based on cardiovascular effects in fetuses seen at
the LOAEL of 10 mg/kg/day in the rat developmental study was used,
along with a 10X interspecies uncertainty factor, a 10X intraspecies
uncertainty factor, and a 1X FQPA safety factor. Long-term exposures
(greater than 6 months) are not expected based on the existing
flumioxazin use pattern.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. In evaluating dietary
[[Page 50286]]
exposure to flumioxazin, EPA considered exposure under the petitioned-
for tolerances as well as all existing flumioxazin tolerances in 40 CFR
180.568. EPA assessed dietary exposures from flumioxazin in food as
follows:
i. Acute exposure. Quantitative acute dietary exposure and risk
assessments are performed for a food-use pesticide, if a toxicological
study has indicated the possibility of an effect of concern occurring
as a result of a 1-day or single exposure.
Such effects were identified for flumioxazin for females 13-49. In
estimating acute dietary exposure, EPA used food consumption
information from the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model software with
the Food Commodity Intake Database (DEEM-FCID) Version 3.16. This
software uses 2003-2008 food consumption data from the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey, What We Eat in America (NHANES/WWEIA; 2003-2008).
As to residue levels in food, EPA assumed tolerance-level residues,
100% crop treated (PCT) for all commodities and DEEM-FCID version 3.16.
ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting the chronic dietary exposure
assessment EPA used the DEEM-FCID Version 3.16 software which
incorporates 2003-2008 food consumption data from USDA's NHANES/WWEIA.
As to residue levels in food, EPA incorporated tolerance-level residues
and/or 100 PCT for all commodities.
iii. Cancer. Based on the data summarized in Unit III.A., EPA has
concluded that flumioxazin does not pose a cancer risk to humans.
Therefore, a dietary exposure assessment for the purpose of assessing
cancer risk is unnecessary.
iv. Anticipated residue and percent crop treated (PCT) information.
EPA did not use anticipated residue and/or PCT information in the
dietary assessment for flumioxazin. Tolerance-level residues and/or 100
PCT were assumed for all food commodities.
2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The Agency used screening-
level water exposure models in the dietary exposure analysis and risk
assessment for flumioxazin in drinking water. These simulation models
take into account data on the physical, chemical, and fate/transport
characteristics of flumioxazin. The estimated drinking water
concentrations (EDWCs) are based on hydrolysis and the residues of
concern for flumioxazin and its major degradates (482-HA, and APF),
expressed as flumioxazin equivalents. Further information regarding EPA
drinking water models used in pesticide exposure assessment can be
found at https://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/about-water-exposure-models-used-pesticide.
Based on the First Index Reservoir Screening Tool (FIRST) model,
the EDWCs in surface water for acute exposures are 400 parts per
billion (ppb) for flumioxazin and for chronic exposures are estimated
to be 9.4 ppb, 21.6 ppb, and 110.1 ppb for flumioxazin, 482-HA and APF
degradates, respectively, for a total concentration of 141 ppb. Based
on the Screening Concentration in Ground Water (SCI-GROW) model, for
both acute and chronic (non-cancer) exposures, the EDWCs of 482-HA and
APF are estimated to be 45.27 ppb and 2.66 ppb, respectively, for
ground water. EDWCs of flumioxazin are estimated to be negligible in
ground water for chronic exposures. Estimates of drinking water
concentrations were directly entered into the dietary exposure model as
follows. The peak day zero of 400 ppb for flumioxazin (degradates 482-
HA and APF were not detected) was used to assess the contribution to
drinking water for the acute dietary risk assessment, and the day 30
total of 141 ppb for flumioxazin, 482-HA and APF degradates was used to
assess the contribution to drinking water for the chronic dietary risk
assessment.
3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control, indoor pest control,
termiticides, and flea and tick control on pets).
Flumioxazin is currently registered for the following uses that
could result in residential exposures: Turf grass, residential lawns,
ornamentals, and aquatic weeds. EPA assessed residential exposure under
the assumption that homeowner handlers wear shorts, short-sleeved
shirts, socks, and shoes, and that they complete all tasks associated
with the use of a pesticide product including mixing/loading, if
needed, as well as the application. Residential handler exposure
scenarios for both dermal and inhalation are considered to be short-
term only, due to the infrequent use patterns associated with homeowner
products.
EPA uses the term ``post-application'' to describe exposure to
individuals that occur as a result of being in an environment that has
been previously treated with a pesticide. Flumioxazin can be used in
many areas that can be frequented by the general population including
residential areas, lakes, and ponds. As a result, individuals can be
exposed by entering these areas if they have been previously treated.
Therefore, short-term and intermediate-term dermal and oral post-
application exposures and risks were assessed for adults and children.
In addition, oral post-application exposures and risks were assessed
specifically for children to be protective of possible hand-to-mouth,
object-to-mouth, and soil ingestion activities that may occur on
treated turf areas. Further information regarding EPA standard
assumptions and generic inputs for residential exposures may be found
at https://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/standard-operating-procedures-residential-pesticide.
4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
EPA has not found flumioxazin to share a common mechanism of
toxicity with any other substances, and flumioxazin does not appear to
produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the
purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has assumed that
flumioxazin does not have a common mechanism of toxicity with other
substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which
chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the
cumulative effects of such chemicals, see EPA's website at https://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/cumulative-assessment-risk-pesticides.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children
1. In general. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA
shall apply an additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants
and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal
and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity
and exposure unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a
different margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. This
additional margin of safety is commonly referred to as the FQPA Safety
Factor (SF). In applying this provision, EPA either retains the default
value of 10X, or uses a different additional safety factor when
reliable
[[Page 50287]]
data available to EPA support the choice of a different factor.
2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity. There is evidence of
increased quantitative susceptibility of fetuses in the oral and dermal
developmental rat studies, where cardiovascular abnormalities occurred
in the absence of maternal toxicity. The rat reproduction study also
showed evidence of qualitative and quantitative post-natal
susceptibility since reproductive effects in offspring were more severe
and were seen at lower doses than those that caused parental/systemic
toxicity. Even with this observed increased susceptibility, the Agency
has concluded there is a low concern and no residual uncertainties for
pre- and/or postnatal toxicity because the developmental toxicity
NOAELs/LOAELs are well-characterized after oral and dermal exposure,
and the offspring toxicity NOAEL and LOAEL are well characterized in
the reproduction study. Furthermore, the doses and endpoints have been
selected from the developmental and reproductive toxicity studies for
risk assessment of the relevant exposed populations (e.g., pregnant
females and children), with the exception of the chronic dietary
endpoint, for which a chronic study was selected. Therefore, regulatory
endpoints for flumioxazin are protective of the increased
susceptibility and there are no residual concerns for these effects.
3. Conclusion. EPA has determined that reliable data show the
safety of infants and children would be adequately protected if the
FQPA SF were reduced to 1X for oral and dermal exposures, but retained
the 10X FQPA database uncertainty factor (UF) for inhalation exposure
and risk assessment due to the lack of an inhalation study. That
decision is based on the following findings:
i. The toxicity database for flumioxazin is incomplete but
sufficient for assessing the toxicity and characterizing the hazard of
flumioxazin due to the absence of an acceptable inhalation study.
Therefore, the Agency is retaining the 10X FQPA safety factor for
assessing inhalation risk.
ii. There is no indication that flumioxazin is a neurotoxic
chemical and there is no need for a developmental neurotoxicity study
or additional UFs to account for neurotoxicity.
iii. There is evidence that flumioxazin may result in increased
susceptibility in in utero rats or rabbits in the prenatal
developmental studies or in young rats in the 2-generation reproduction
study. The Agency concluded that while there is an increased
susceptibility, there is a low concern and no residual uncertainties
for pre-and/or postnatal toxicity because the developmental toxicity
NOAELs/LOAELs are well characterized after oral and dermal exposure;
the offspring toxicity NOAEL and LOAEL are well characterized in the
reproduction study; and the doses and endpoints have been selected from
the developmental and reproductive toxicity studies for the relevant
populations, except for the chronic dietary endpoint, for which a
chronic study was chosen. Therefore, the regulatory endpoints for
flumioxazin are protective of the increased susceptibility seen in the
developmental and reproduction studies, and there are no residual
concerns for these effects.
iv. There are no residual uncertainties identified in the exposure
databases. The acute and chronic dietary food exposure assessments were
performed based on tolerance-level residues, default processing
factors, and assuming 100 PCT. EPA made conservative (protective)
assumptions in the ground and surface water modeling used to assess
exposure to flumioxazin in drinking water. EPA used similarly
conservative assumptions to assess post-application exposure of
children as well as incidental oral exposure of toddlers. These
assessments will not underestimate the exposure and risks posed by
flumioxazin.
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety
EPA determines whether acute and chronic dietary pesticide
exposures are safe by comparing aggregate exposure estimates to the
acute PAD (aPAD) and chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer risks, EPA
calculates the lifetime probability of acquiring cancer given the
estimated aggregate exposure. Short-, intermediate-, and chronic-term
risks are evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate food, water,
and residential exposure to the appropriate PODs to ensure that an
adequate MOE exists.
1. Acute risk. Using the exposure assumptions discussed in this
unit for acute exposure, the acute dietary exposure from food and water
to flumioxazin will occupy 76% of the aPAD for females 13-49 years old,
the population group receiving the greatest exposure.
2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure assumptions described in this
unit for chronic exposure, EPA has concluded that chronic exposure to
flumioxazin from food and water will utilize 44% of the cPAD for all
infants <1 year old, the population group receiving the greatest
exposure. Based on the explanation in Unit III.C.3., regarding
residential use patterns, chronic residential exposure to residues of
flumioxazin is not expected.
3. Short-term and intermediate-term risks. Short-term and
intermediate-term aggregate exposure takes into account short-term and
intermediate-term residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food
and water (considered to be a background exposure level). Flumioxazin
is currently registered for uses that could result in short-term and
intermediate residential exposures, and the Agency has determined that
it is appropriate to aggregate chronic exposure through food and water
with short-term and intermediate-term residential exposures to
flumioxazin. Since the Agency has determined that the short-term and
intermediate-term points of departure are the same, the aggregate risks
are the same for both short-term and intermediate-term exposures.
Using the exposure assumptions described in this unit for short-
term exposures, EPA has concluded the combined short-term and
intermediate-term food, water, and residential exposures result in
aggregate MOEs of 110 for adult females 13-49 years and MOE of 200 for
children less than 2 years. Because EPA's level of concern for
flumioxazin is a MOE of 100 or below, these MOEs are not of concern.
4. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S. population. Based on the lack of
evidence of carcinogenicity in two adequate rodent carcinogenicity
studies, flumioxazin is not expected to pose a cancer risk to humans.
5. Determination of safety. Based on these risk assessments, EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result
to the general population, or to infants and children from aggregate
exposure to flumioxazin residues.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodology (gas chromatography/nitrogen-
phosphorus detection (GC/NPD) method, Valent Method RM30-A-1), is
available to enforce the tolerance expression. The reported method
limits of quantitation and detection (LOQ and LOD) for flumioxazin in/
on plant commodities are 0.02 and 0.01 ppm, respectively.
The method may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry
Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD
20755-5350; telephone number: (410) 305-2905;
[[Page 50288]]
email address: [email protected].
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food
standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain
the reasons for departing from the Codex level.
The Codex has not established a MRL for flumioxazin in/on grass,
therefore there are no international harmonization issues.
C. Revisions to Petitioned-For Tolerances
EPA is establishing a tolerance for Grass, forage at 0.40 ppm,
rather than 0.4 ppm, to be consistent with its practice to provide
greater precision about the levels of residues that are permitted by a
tolerance. This is intended to avoid the situation where residues may
be higher than the tolerance level, but as a result of rounding would
be considered non-violative. For example, Grass, forage tolerance
proposed at 0.4 ppm was established at 0.40 ppm, to avoid an observed
hypothetical tolerance at 0.44 ppm being rounded to 0.4 ppm.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances with regional registrations are established
for residues of flumioxazin, 2-[7-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-3-oxo-4-(2-
propynyl)-2H-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-isoindole-
1,3(2H)-dione, including its metabolites and degradates determined by
measuring only flumioxazin, in or on raw agricultural commodities, in
or on Grass, forage at 0.40 ppm and Grass, hay at 0.05 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); or Executive Order 13771,
entitled ``Reducing Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs'' (82
FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: September 21, 2018.
Michael L. Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.568, add alphabetically the commodities ``Grass,
forage'' and ``Grass, hay'' to the table in paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 180.568 Flumioxazin; tolerances for residues.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grass, forage............................................... 0.40
Grass, hay.................................................. 0.05
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-21746 Filed 10-4-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P