Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act; Solicitation for Candidate Projects in the Interstate System Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Pilot Program (ISRRPP), 49624-49627 [2018-21340]
Download as PDF
49624
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 2, 2018 / Notices
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
9. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Repsol Oil & Gas USA, LLC
(Susquehanna River), Terry Township,
Bradford County, Pa. Renewal of surface
water withdrawal of up to 1.500 mgd
(peak day) (Docket No. 20140909).
10. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Repsol Oil & Gas USA, LLC
(Wappasening Creek), Windham
Township, Bradford County, Pa.
Renewal of surface water withdrawal of
up to 0.999 mgd (peak day) (Docket No.
20140910).
11. Project Sponsor and Facility:
SWEPI LP (Cowanesque River),
Deerfield Township, Tioga County, Pa.
Modification to reduce surface water
withdrawal from 2.000 mgd to 1.000
mgd (peak day) and reassess passby
flow thresholds (Docket No. 20161218).
12. Project Sponsor and Facility: Togg
Mountain LLC, Town of Fabius,
Onondaga County, NY. Consumptive
use of up to 0.485 mgd (peak day).
13. Project Sponsor and Facility: Togg
Mountain LLC (West Branch of
Tioughnioga Creek), Town of Fabius,
Onondaga County, NY. Surface water
withdrawal of up to 2.200 mgd (peak
day).
14. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Towanda Municipal Authority, North
Towanda Township, Bradford County,
Pa. Groundwater withdrawal of up to
0.432 mgd (30-day average) from Church
Production Well 1.
15. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Towanda Municipal Authority, North
Towanda Township, Bradford County,
Pa. Groundwater withdrawal of up to
1.000 mgd (30-day average) from
Roberts Production Well 1.
16. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Towanda Municipal Authority, North
Towanda Township, Bradford County,
Pa. Groundwater withdrawal of up to
1.000 mgd (30-day average) from
Roberts Production Well 2.
Project Applications Tabled
The Commission tabled action on the
following project applications:
1. Project Sponsor: Aqua
Pennsylvania, Inc. Project Facility:
Beech Mountain System, Butler
Township, Luzerne County, Pa.
Application for groundwater
withdrawal of up to 0.144 mgd (30-day
average) from Beech Mountain Well 1.
2. Project Sponsor: Aqua
Pennsylvania, Inc. Project Facility:
Beech Mountain System, Butler
Township, Luzerne County, Pa.
Application for groundwater
withdrawal of up to 0.144 mgd (30-day
average) from Beech Mountain Well 2.
3. Project Sponsor: Aqua
Pennsylvania, Inc. Project Facility:
Beech Mountain System, Butler
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Oct 01, 2018
Jkt 247001
Township, Luzerne County, Pa.
Application for groundwater
withdrawal of up to 0.124 mgd (30-day
average) from Beech Mountain Well 3.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
years. The FHWA will conduct regular
information sessions regarding ISRRPP.
Regular program updates will be
available as to how many provisional
slots are available. For more
information, please visit: https://
www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/tolling_and_
pricing/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions about the pilot program: Ms.
Cynthia Essenmacher, Center for
Innovative Finance Support, Office of
Innovative Program Delivery, Federal
Highway Administration, 315 West
Allegan Street, Room 201, Lansing, MI
48933, (517) 702–1856. For legal
questions: Mr. Steven Rochlis, Office of
the Chief Counsel, Federal Highway
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590,
(202) 366–1395. Office hours are from
8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. E.T., Monday
through Friday, except for Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal Highway Administration
Table of Contents
Fixing America’s Surface
Transportation (FAST) Act; Solicitation
for Candidate Projects in the Interstate
System Reconstruction and
Rehabilitation Pilot Program (ISRRPP)
A. Program Description
B. Program Slots
C. Eligibility Information
D. Submission Information
E. Review Information
F. Requirements for Provisionally Approved
Projects
Project Application Withdrawn
The following project application was
withdrawn by the project sponsor:
1. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Eclipse Resources-PA, LP (Pine Creek),
Gaines Township, Tioga County, Pa.
Application for surface water
withdrawal of up to 3.000 mgd (peak
day).
Authority: Pub. L. 91–575, 84 Stat. 1509 et
seq., 18 CFR parts 806, 807, and 808.
Dated: September 27, 2018.
Stephanie L. Richardson,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018–21416 Filed 10–1–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040–01–P
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice; solicitation for
applications.
AGENCY:
The FHWA invites State
transportation departments to submit
applications for candidate projects in
the Interstate System Reconstruction
and Rehabilitation Pilot Program
(ISRRPP), authorized in section 1216(b)
of the Transportation Equity Act for the
21st Century and amended by section
1411(c) of the Fixing America’s Surface
Transportation (FAST) Act. Under
ISRRPP, FHWA may permit up to three
States to collect tolls on a facility on the
Interstate System for the purpose of
reconstructing or rehabilitating
Interstate highway corridors that could
not otherwise be adequately maintained
or functionally improved without the
collection of tolls. This notice describes
general program provisions, eligibility
and selection criteria, and the
application submission and evaluation
process.
SUMMARY:
Applications will be considered
on a first-come, first serve rolling basis
until further notice. The FHWA will
review submissions in the order that
they are received and award provisional
approvals to States that will be expected
to fully satisfy ISRRPP criteria within 3
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. Program Description
1. Tolling Authority Under ISRRPP
The FAST Act Section 1411(c)
amends ISRRPP authorized under
Section 1216(b) of the Transportation
Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA–
21). The ISRRPP allows a State to collect
tolls on a facility on the Interstate
System in order to reconstruct or
rehabilitate an Interstate highway
corridor that could not otherwise be
adequately maintained or functionally
improved without the collection of tolls.
Up to three facilities may participate in
ISRRPP, and each must be
geographically located in a different
State.
Since ISRRPP’s establishment in
1998, several States have requested and
received what FHWA has termed
‘‘provisional approval’’ of pilot projects,
also referred to as the reservation of a
‘‘program slot.’’ The purpose of this step
has been to enable States to invest the
considerable resources needed to fully
satisfy the program criteria, which are
described below, without fear of being
superseded by a subsequent applicant.
To date, however, no State has fully
satisfied ISRRPP criteria.
2. Other Interstate Tolling Authority
The ISRRPP is not the only authority
available to States to toll facilities on the
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 2, 2018 / Notices
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Interstate System. Today, the 46,730mile Interstate System includes
approximately 2,900 miles of toll roads,
most built as turnpikes and
incorporated into the system in 1957.
Current Federal law provides several
options for States to toll Interstate
facilities. The authorities in 23 United
States Code (U.S.C.) 129(a)(1) now allow
for the initial construction of an
Interstate toll facility; the conversion of
an Interstate high occupancy vehicle
(HOV) lane to a toll facility; the
expansion of an Interstate highway and
tolling of the new capacity as long as the
current number of toll-free non-HOV
lanes is maintained; and the
reconstruction or replacement of a tollfree Interstate System bridge or tunnel
and its conversion to a toll facility.
Additional authorities are provided
under 23 U.S.C. 166(c), which allows
public agencies to permit toll-paying
vehicles that do not meet minimum
occupancy standards to use highoccupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes. Such
lanes are commonly referred to as high
occupancy toll (HOT) lanes. Finally, the
Value Pricing Pilot Program (VPPP),
initially authorized in the Intermodal
Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of
1991 (ISTEA, Pub. L. 102–240) as the
Congestion Pricing Pilot Program and
subsequently amended under other
laws, encourages implementation and
evaluation of value pricing pilot projects
to manage congestion through tolling
and other pricing mechanisms on
facilities both on and off the Interstate
System. All these current tolling
authorities are separate and distinct
from ISRRPP.
3. FAST Act Amendments to ISRRPP
The FAST Act amendments to
ISRRPP create several changes. First,
acknowledging the key role that State
legislative authority has in
implementing ISRRPP, the FAST Act
adds the specific selection criterion that
‘‘a State has the authority required for
the project to proceed.’’ This addresses
a common challenge facing those States
that have held provisional approvals,
i.e., securing legal authority from their
State legislatures to collect tolls on a
currently toll-free Interstate highway.
Second, the FAST Act specifies
timeframes under which States with
provisional approvals must complete
the program’s requirements. Any State
receiving a provisional approval as a
result of this solicitation will have 3
years from the date of the approval to
fully satisfy the program criteria,
complete environmental review under
the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (NEPA), and execute a toll
agreement with FHWA. The FAST Act
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Oct 01, 2018
Jkt 247001
allows for a 1-year extension of the
3-year provisional approval if the State
demonstrates material progress toward
implementation of its pilot project.
Third, the FAST Act gave the States
holding provisional approvals at the
time the FAST Act was enacted 1 year
to satisfy the program criteria or request
an extension for an additional year. On
the date of enactment, December 4,
2015, three States—Missouri, North
Carolina and Virginia—held ISRRPP
provisional approvals. Since then, all
three have relinquished their program
slots.
B. Program Slots
In announcing this ISRRPP
solicitation, FHWA seeks applications
from States for candidate projects under
the program.
Based on the program’s experience,
FHWA believes it unlikely that any
State would invest the considerable
effort to develop an application that
fully satisfies the program criteria
without assurance that its efforts would
not be superseded by a competing
applicant. Conversely, FHWA
recognizes that provisional approval
and the reservation of a program slot—
while allowing a State to work in
earnest to meet the program’s
environmental, financial, public support
and operational requirements—also
inhibits other States from pursuing
similar projects. Therefore, FHWA will
review each candidate project
thoroughly before making any
commitment of provisional approval.
As provided in Section 1411(c) of the
FAST Act, FHWA may grant provisional
approval to up to three projects that will
fully implement ISRRPP (reconstruct or
rehabilitate an Interstate segment and
convert it to a toll facility) based on an
assessment that eligibility and selection
criteria can be met. At the present time,
all three program slots are available.
This solicitation does not offer any
Federal funds for these projects.
Formula Federal-aid highway funds
may be used toward a candidate project,
subject to the eligibility requirements
for these funds. In addition, a candidate
project may qualify for credit assistance
under 23 U.S.C. 601–609, DOT’s
Transportation Infrastructure Finance
and Innovation Act (TIFIA) credit
program.
While Section 1216(b)(6) of TEA–21
specifically prohibited the use of
Interstate Maintenance (IM) funds on
the Interstate facility covered by an
ISRRPP project during the period tolls
are collected, the IM program has since
been discontinued. Given the expansion
of tolling authority under 23 U.S.C. 129,
the restriction on use of IM funds is not
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49625
applied to the use of eligible funding
sources, including the National
Highway Performance Program.
C. Eligibility Information
To be selected for provisional
approval in ISRRPP, an applicant must
be a State DOT and the project must be
a facility on the Interstate System.
1. Interstate Facility
A facility on the Interstate System is
considered to be a route on the Dwight
D. Eisenhower National System of
Interstate and Defense Highways as
described in 23 U.S.C. 103(c). This is
the originally designated Interstate
System and includes those Interstate
additions under former 23 U.S.C. 139(a).
A State may propose only a single
Interstate facility as its candidate
project, and each facility selected by
FHWA must be in a different State.
Note that the existing statute in 23
U.S.C. 129(a)(1)(E) already allows for
reconstruction or replacement of a tollfree Interstate bridge or tunnel and its
conversion to a toll facility. For the
purposes of ISRRPP, the scope of the
candidate project must include
reconstruction or rehabilitation
throughout the Interstate facility (not
solely on bridges or tunnels), where
estimated improvement costs exceed
available funding sources and work
cannot be advanced without the
collection of tolls.
2. Toll Revenue Uses
The ISRRPP’s conditions on toll
revenue uses reflect the intent that tolls
are collected to reconstruct or
rehabilitate an Interstate facility, not to
support other surface transportation
projects. The State must execute an
agreement with FHWA specifying that
toll revenues received from operation of
the facility will be used in accordance
with the requirements set forth in
Section 1216(b)(5) of TEA–21. This
section requires that all toll revenues be
used only for (1) debt service, (2)
reasonable return on investment of any
private person financing the project, and
(3) any costs necessary for the
improvement of and the proper
operation and maintenance of the toll
facility, including reconstruction,
resurfacing, restoration and
rehabilitation of the toll facility. It is
important that applicants understand
that these conditions are more
restrictive than those that apply to
projects authorized under 23 U.S.C. 129
or 23 U.S.C. 166.
In addition, the toll agreement must
include a provision that the State will
conduct regular (e.g., annual) audits to
ensure compliance with the provisions
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
49626
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 2, 2018 / Notices
regarding use of toll revenues, and the
results of these audits will be
transmitted to FHWA.
The FHWA is concerned that the
initiation of new toll collection should
not occur until it is evident to the
traveling public that tolls will result in
investment on the facility. Accordingly,
the earliest that tolls may be imposed on
an ISRRPP facility is the date of award
of a contract for the physical
reconstruction or rehabilitation of a
significant portion of the facility. In the
case of a design-build contract or
public-private partnership agreement,
this would occur when a notice to
proceed for the physical construction
has been issued or when the designbuilder otherwise becomes contractually
obligated to accomplish the physical
construction activities of the project.
3. Federal-Aid Requirements
Regardless of whether Federal-aid
funds are to be used in the
reconstruction or rehabilitation
activities, each ISRRPP project must
satisfy the applicable Federal laws, rules
and regulations set forth in title 23
U.S.C. and title 23 Code of Federal
Regulations.
A State receiving provisional approval
must complete the environmental
review and permitting process under
(NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) for the
candidate project before it can receive
final approval. The NEPA analysis must
take into account not only the impacts
of the proposed reconstruction or
rehabilitation activities but also
consider impacts associated with
converting the toll-free facility to a toll
facility.
D. Submission Information
A State that seeks to participate in the
pilot program must submit an
application that addresses the program’s
statutory eligibility and selection
criteria as described below.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
1. Address
A State DOT must submit the
application to its respective FHWA
Division Office. Subsequent application
tasks will also be coordinated through
the Division Office.
2. Content and Form of Application
Although the State DOT may
determine the appropriate form, the
application package is limited to no
more than 25 pages. The FHWA
recommends that the project narrative
be prepared with standard formatting
preferences (i.e., a single-spaced
document, using a standard 12-point
font such as Times New Roman, with
1-inch margins). The project narrative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Oct 01, 2018
Jkt 247001
may not exceed 25 pages in length,
excluding cover pages and table of
contents. The only substantive portions
that may exceed the 25-page limit are
supporting documents to support
assertions or conclusions made in the
25-page project narrative. If necessary,
FHWA may request supplemental or
clarifying information from the State.
The application should include
information required for FHWA to
assess each of the criteria specified in
Section E (Review Information). The
State should demonstrate the
responsiveness of a project to any
pertinent selection criteria with the
most relevant information it can
provide, regardless of whether such
information has been specifically
requested, or identified, in this notice.
The application should describe all
critical project milestones and the
State’s current progress toward
achieving them.
The FHWA recommends that the
application adhere to the following
basic outline and the project narrative
include a table of contents, maps, and
graphics as appropriate to inform the
review. The specific statutory references
from Section 1216 of TEA–21 (as
amended by Section 1411 of the FAST
Act) are noted in brackets after each
item:
i. Project Description: An
identification of the facility on the
Interstate System proposed to become a
toll facility, including the age,
condition, and intensity of use of the
facility [1216(b)(3)(A)].
ii. Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO) Consultation: In the
case of a facility that affects a
metropolitan area, a description of the
State’s current consultations regarding
the candidate project with that area’s
MPO established under 23 U.S.C. 134.
Full satisfaction of this eligibility
criteria requires an assurance that MPO
for the area has been consulted
concerning the placement and amount
of tolls on the facility [1216(b)(3)(B)].
iii. Financial Analysis: An analysis
demonstrating that the facility could not
be maintained or improved to meet
current or future needs from the State’s
Federal-aid apportionments and
allocations and from revenues for
highways from any other source without
toll revenues [1216(b)(3)(C)].
iv. Facility Management Plan:
(a) A plan for implementing tolls on
the facility [1216(b)(3)(D)(i)]. Note that
an approved plan must take into
account the interests of local, regional,
and Interstate travelers [1216(b)(4)(C)].
(b) A proposed schedule and finance
plan for the reconstruction or
rehabilitation of the facility using toll
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
revenues [1216(b)(3)(D)(ii)]. The plan
should give extensive focus to the
development phase requirements,
including among its milestones the
completion of NEPA, the acquisition of
tolling authority from the legislature,
and the issuance of any debt backed by
toll revenues.
(c) A description of the public
transportation agency that will be
responsible for implementation and
administration of the candidate project
[1216(b)(3)(D)(iii)].
(d) A description of whether
consideration will be given to
privatizing the maintenance and
operational aspects of the facility, while
retaining legal and administrative
control of the portion of the Interstate
route [1216(b)(3)(D)(iv)]. Note that
ISRRPP selection criteria require the
State to give preference to the use of a
public toll agency with demonstrated
capability to build, operate and
maintain a toll expressway system
meeting criteria for the Interstate System
[1216(b)(4)(E)].
(e) A statement as to whether the State
currently has the authority required for
the toll project to proceed and, if not, a
plan and timetable for when such
authority will be obtained
[1216(b)(4)(F)].
3. Submission Date
A State DOT may submit an
application to its FHWA Division Office
at any time. Applications will be
considered on a first-come, first serve
rolling basis until further notice. States
are strongly encouraged to work closely
with their respective division offices
throughout the preparation of the
application.
E. Review Information
1. Review and Selection Process
The FHWA will perform an initial
eligibility review of an application.
Based on its knowledge of the proposed
project and the State’s highway
program, FHWA will evaluate the
project’s technical and financial
feasibility, risks, planning approvals,
NEPA and other environmental reviews/
approvals, tolling authority, agreements
to operate and maintain a toll
expressway system, and other
implementation agreements.
The FHWA Headquarters evaluation
team will use the information in the
application to assess the State’s
readiness and capability to fully satisfy
the ISRRPP criteria in order to deliver
the candidate project. Based upon this
evaluation, FHWA may provide a
provisional approval to the applicant
State if it is expected to be able to fully
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 2, 2018 / Notices
satisfy the following selection criteria
within 3 years. The selection criteria are
set forth (in italics) in Section 1216(b)(4)
of TEA–21 as amended by Section
1411(c)(1) of the FAST Act:
A. The State is unable to reconstruct
or rehabilitate the proposed toll facility
using existing apportionments. Because
Federal-aid formula apportionments can
support municipal bond issues (i.e.,
GARVEEs), the State must demonstrate
that toll revenue financing (whether
through the TIFIA Program or another
capital market source) is essential to
raising the needed funds. This
information should be provided in the
Financial Analysis section of the
application.
B. The facility has a sufficient
intensity of use, age, or condition to
warrant the collection of tolls. A State
should use its asset management
process or life cycle planning analysis to
support this criterion. This effort should
include conducting a performance gap
analysis to identify deficiencies
hindering progress toward improving or
preserving the facility and achieving
and sustaining the desired state of good
repair. The FHWA will give preference
to a facilities with a greater gap between
current/projected and target
performance. This information should
be provided in the Project Description
section of the application.
C. The State plan for implementing
tolls on the facility takes into account
the interests of local, regional, and
Interstate travelers. The FHWA will give
preference to candidate projects that
have already been considered for tolling
as a strategy in their State and MPO
long-range plans, which should also
take into account the impact of tolling
on local, regional, and Interstate freight
movement. This information should be
provided in the Facility Management
Plan section of the application.
D. The State plan for reconstruction
or rehabilitation of the facility using toll
revenues is reasonable. A reasonable
plan will balance the estimated sources
and uses of funds in accordance with
the requirements on toll revenue use set
forth in Section 1216(b)(5) of TEA–21.
Likewise, the estimated cost of the
candidate project must be matched by a
financial plan that includes traffic and
revenue projections sufficient to secure
the needed debt component. This
information should be provided in the
Facility Management Plan section of the
application.
E. The State has given preference to
the use of a public toll agency with
demonstrated capability to build,
operate, and maintain a toll expressway
system meeting criteria for the Interstate
System. Should a State determine that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Oct 01, 2018
Jkt 247001
its public toll agencies lack the
capability or resources to take on the
candidate project, a public-private
partnership may well provide a viable
alternative. This information should be
provided in the Facility Management
Plan section of the application.
F. The State has the authority
required for the project to proceed. The
lack of such authority has previously
prevented provisionally approved
projects from fully satisfying the
program criteria. The FHWA will give
preference to candidate projects that
have already obtained statutory
authority to toll the candidate project or,
lacking that, demonstrate the likelihood
of obtaining the authority to toll the
candidate project as evidenced by
expressions of support for the project
from State and local governments,
community interests, and the public.
The FHWA will also give preference to
candidate projects that demonstrate the
likelihood of completing the
environmental review and permitting
process under the NEPA within 3 years
of provisional approval. This
information should be provided in the
Facility Management Plan section of the
application.
F. Requirements for Provisionally
Approved Projects
Should FHWA provisionally approve
a candidate project, a State will have 3
years from the date the provisional
approval is granted in which to:
• Submit a complete application that
fully satisfies the eligibility and
selection criteria noted above
[1216(b)(6)(A)(i)].
• Complete environmental review
and permitting process under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) for
the project [1216(b)(6)(A)(ii)].
• Execute a toll agreement
[1216(b)(6)(A)(iii)].
Further, FHWA may allow for a 1-year
extension of the provisional approval if
the State demonstrates material progress
toward implementation of the project as
evidenced by:
• Substantial progress in completing
the environmental review and
permitting process for the pilot project
under NEPA [1216(b)(6)(B)(i)].
• Funding and financing
commitments for the project
[1216(b)(6)(B)(ii)].
• Expressions of support for the
project from State and local
governments, community interests, and
the public [1216(b)(6)(B)(iii)].
• Submission of a facility
management plan as noted under the
eligibility criteria above
[1216(b)(6)(B)(iv)].
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49627
Given the extensive State DOT and
FHWA collaboration needed to
implement a project under the ISRRPP,
FHWA will regularly assess the progress
of each provisionally approved project.
Should it become evident that the
project will not meet the statutory
deadline, FHWA reserves the right to
revoke the provisional approval prior to
the deadline and re-offer the program
slot to other State DOTs.
Issued on: September 24, 2018.
Brandye L. Hendrickson,
Deputy Administrator, Federal Highway
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2018–21340 Filed 10–1–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2018–0024; Notice No.
2018–11]
Hazardous Materials: Public Meeting
Notice for International Standards on
the Transport of Dangerous Goods
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of public meetings.
AGENCY:
This notice announces that on
Tuesday, November 13, 2018, PHMSA
will host two public meetings. The first
meeting—led by PHMSA—will solicit
public input on current proposals and
discuss potential new work items for
inclusion in the agenda of the 54th
session of the United Nations SubCommittee of Experts on the Transport
of Dangerous Goods (UNSCOE TDG).
The second meeting—led by the
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA)—will discuss
proposals in preparation for the 36th
session of the United Nations SubCommittee of Experts on the Globally
Harmonized System of Classification
and Labelling of Chemicals
(UNSCEGHS).
Time and Location: Both public
meetings will be held at DOT
Headquarters, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, West Building, Conference Center,
Washington, DC 20590–0001 on
Tuesday, November 13, 2018.
PHMSA Public Meeting: 9 a.m. to 12
p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
OSHA Public Meeting: 1 p.m. to 4
p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
Registration: DOT requests that
attendees pre-register for these meetings
by completing the form at https://
www.surveymonkey.com/r/XGN8J7X.
Attendees may use the same form to
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49624-49627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-21340]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act; Solicitation
for Candidate Projects in the Interstate System Reconstruction and
Rehabilitation Pilot Program (ISRRPP)
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice; solicitation for applications.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA invites State transportation departments to submit
applications for candidate projects in the Interstate System
Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Pilot Program (ISRRPP), authorized in
section 1216(b) of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
and amended by section 1411(c) of the Fixing America's Surface
Transportation (FAST) Act. Under ISRRPP, FHWA may permit up to three
States to collect tolls on a facility on the Interstate System for the
purpose of reconstructing or rehabilitating Interstate highway
corridors that could not otherwise be adequately maintained or
functionally improved without the collection of tolls. This notice
describes general program provisions, eligibility and selection
criteria, and the application submission and evaluation process.
DATES: Applications will be considered on a first-come, first serve
rolling basis until further notice. The FHWA will review submissions in
the order that they are received and award provisional approvals to
States that will be expected to fully satisfy ISRRPP criteria within 3
years. The FHWA will conduct regular information sessions regarding
ISRRPP. Regular program updates will be available as to how many
provisional slots are available. For more information, please visit:
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/tolling_and_pricing/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about the pilot program:
Ms. Cynthia Essenmacher, Center for Innovative Finance Support, Office
of Innovative Program Delivery, Federal Highway Administration, 315
West Allegan Street, Room 201, Lansing, MI 48933, (517) 702-1856. For
legal questions: Mr. Steven Rochlis, Office of the Chief Counsel,
Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington,
DC 20590, (202) 366-1395. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
E.T., Monday through Friday, except for Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
A. Program Description
B. Program Slots
C. Eligibility Information
D. Submission Information
E. Review Information
F. Requirements for Provisionally Approved Projects
A. Program Description
1. Tolling Authority Under ISRRPP
The FAST Act Section 1411(c) amends ISRRPP authorized under Section
1216(b) of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21).
The ISRRPP allows a State to collect tolls on a facility on the
Interstate System in order to reconstruct or rehabilitate an Interstate
highway corridor that could not otherwise be adequately maintained or
functionally improved without the collection of tolls. Up to three
facilities may participate in ISRRPP, and each must be geographically
located in a different State.
Since ISRRPP's establishment in 1998, several States have requested
and received what FHWA has termed ``provisional approval'' of pilot
projects, also referred to as the reservation of a ``program slot.''
The purpose of this step has been to enable States to invest the
considerable resources needed to fully satisfy the program criteria,
which are described below, without fear of being superseded by a
subsequent applicant. To date, however, no State has fully satisfied
ISRRPP criteria.
2. Other Interstate Tolling Authority
The ISRRPP is not the only authority available to States to toll
facilities on the
[[Page 49625]]
Interstate System. Today, the 46,730-mile Interstate System includes
approximately 2,900 miles of toll roads, most built as turnpikes and
incorporated into the system in 1957. Current Federal law provides
several options for States to toll Interstate facilities. The
authorities in 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) 129(a)(1) now allow for
the initial construction of an Interstate toll facility; the conversion
of an Interstate high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane to a toll facility;
the expansion of an Interstate highway and tolling of the new capacity
as long as the current number of toll-free non-HOV lanes is maintained;
and the reconstruction or replacement of a toll-free Interstate System
bridge or tunnel and its conversion to a toll facility.
Additional authorities are provided under 23 U.S.C. 166(c), which
allows public agencies to permit toll-paying vehicles that do not meet
minimum occupancy standards to use high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes.
Such lanes are commonly referred to as high occupancy toll (HOT) lanes.
Finally, the Value Pricing Pilot Program (VPPP), initially authorized
in the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA,
Pub. L. 102-240) as the Congestion Pricing Pilot Program and
subsequently amended under other laws, encourages implementation and
evaluation of value pricing pilot projects to manage congestion through
tolling and other pricing mechanisms on facilities both on and off the
Interstate System. All these current tolling authorities are separate
and distinct from ISRRPP.
3. FAST Act Amendments to ISRRPP
The FAST Act amendments to ISRRPP create several changes. First,
acknowledging the key role that State legislative authority has in
implementing ISRRPP, the FAST Act adds the specific selection criterion
that ``a State has the authority required for the project to proceed.''
This addresses a common challenge facing those States that have held
provisional approvals, i.e., securing legal authority from their State
legislatures to collect tolls on a currently toll-free Interstate
highway.
Second, the FAST Act specifies timeframes under which States with
provisional approvals must complete the program's requirements. Any
State receiving a provisional approval as a result of this solicitation
will have 3 years from the date of the approval to fully satisfy the
program criteria, complete environmental review under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), and execute a toll agreement
with FHWA. The FAST Act allows for a 1-year extension of the 3-year
provisional approval if the State demonstrates material progress toward
implementation of its pilot project.
Third, the FAST Act gave the States holding provisional approvals
at the time the FAST Act was enacted 1 year to satisfy the program
criteria or request an extension for an additional year. On the date of
enactment, December 4, 2015, three States--Missouri, North Carolina and
Virginia--held ISRRPP provisional approvals. Since then, all three have
relinquished their program slots.
B. Program Slots
In announcing this ISRRPP solicitation, FHWA seeks applications
from States for candidate projects under the program.
Based on the program's experience, FHWA believes it unlikely that
any State would invest the considerable effort to develop an
application that fully satisfies the program criteria without assurance
that its efforts would not be superseded by a competing applicant.
Conversely, FHWA recognizes that provisional approval and the
reservation of a program slot--while allowing a State to work in
earnest to meet the program's environmental, financial, public support
and operational requirements--also inhibits other States from pursuing
similar projects. Therefore, FHWA will review each candidate project
thoroughly before making any commitment of provisional approval.
As provided in Section 1411(c) of the FAST Act, FHWA may grant
provisional approval to up to three projects that will fully implement
ISRRPP (reconstruct or rehabilitate an Interstate segment and convert
it to a toll facility) based on an assessment that eligibility and
selection criteria can be met. At the present time, all three program
slots are available.
This solicitation does not offer any Federal funds for these
projects. Formula Federal-aid highway funds may be used toward a
candidate project, subject to the eligibility requirements for these
funds. In addition, a candidate project may qualify for credit
assistance under 23 U.S.C. 601-609, DOT's Transportation Infrastructure
Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) credit program.
While Section 1216(b)(6) of TEA-21 specifically prohibited the use
of Interstate Maintenance (IM) funds on the Interstate facility covered
by an ISRRPP project during the period tolls are collected, the IM
program has since been discontinued. Given the expansion of tolling
authority under 23 U.S.C. 129, the restriction on use of IM funds is
not applied to the use of eligible funding sources, including the
National Highway Performance Program.
C. Eligibility Information
To be selected for provisional approval in ISRRPP, an applicant
must be a State DOT and the project must be a facility on the
Interstate System.
1. Interstate Facility
A facility on the Interstate System is considered to be a route on
the Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense
Highways as described in 23 U.S.C. 103(c). This is the originally
designated Interstate System and includes those Interstate additions
under former 23 U.S.C. 139(a).
A State may propose only a single Interstate facility as its
candidate project, and each facility selected by FHWA must be in a
different State.
Note that the existing statute in 23 U.S.C. 129(a)(1)(E) already
allows for reconstruction or replacement of a toll-free Interstate
bridge or tunnel and its conversion to a toll facility. For the
purposes of ISRRPP, the scope of the candidate project must include
reconstruction or rehabilitation throughout the Interstate facility
(not solely on bridges or tunnels), where estimated improvement costs
exceed available funding sources and work cannot be advanced without
the collection of tolls.
2. Toll Revenue Uses
The ISRRPP's conditions on toll revenue uses reflect the intent
that tolls are collected to reconstruct or rehabilitate an Interstate
facility, not to support other surface transportation projects. The
State must execute an agreement with FHWA specifying that toll revenues
received from operation of the facility will be used in accordance with
the requirements set forth in Section 1216(b)(5) of TEA-21. This
section requires that all toll revenues be used only for (1) debt
service, (2) reasonable return on investment of any private person
financing the project, and (3) any costs necessary for the improvement
of and the proper operation and maintenance of the toll facility,
including reconstruction, resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation
of the toll facility. It is important that applicants understand that
these conditions are more restrictive than those that apply to projects
authorized under 23 U.S.C. 129 or 23 U.S.C. 166.
In addition, the toll agreement must include a provision that the
State will conduct regular (e.g., annual) audits to ensure compliance
with the provisions
[[Page 49626]]
regarding use of toll revenues, and the results of these audits will be
transmitted to FHWA.
The FHWA is concerned that the initiation of new toll collection
should not occur until it is evident to the traveling public that tolls
will result in investment on the facility. Accordingly, the earliest
that tolls may be imposed on an ISRRPP facility is the date of award of
a contract for the physical reconstruction or rehabilitation of a
significant portion of the facility. In the case of a design-build
contract or public-private partnership agreement, this would occur when
a notice to proceed for the physical construction has been issued or
when the design-builder otherwise becomes contractually obligated to
accomplish the physical construction activities of the project.
3. Federal-Aid Requirements
Regardless of whether Federal-aid funds are to be used in the
reconstruction or rehabilitation activities, each ISRRPP project must
satisfy the applicable Federal laws, rules and regulations set forth in
title 23 U.S.C. and title 23 Code of Federal Regulations.
A State receiving provisional approval must complete the
environmental review and permitting process under (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321
et seq.) for the candidate project before it can receive final
approval. The NEPA analysis must take into account not only the impacts
of the proposed reconstruction or rehabilitation activities but also
consider impacts associated with converting the toll-free facility to a
toll facility.
D. Submission Information
A State that seeks to participate in the pilot program must submit
an application that addresses the program's statutory eligibility and
selection criteria as described below.
1. Address
A State DOT must submit the application to its respective FHWA
Division Office. Subsequent application tasks will also be coordinated
through the Division Office.
2. Content and Form of Application
Although the State DOT may determine the appropriate form, the
application package is limited to no more than 25 pages. The FHWA
recommends that the project narrative be prepared with standard
formatting preferences (i.e., a single-spaced document, using a
standard 12-point font such as Times New Roman, with 1-inch margins).
The project narrative may not exceed 25 pages in length, excluding
cover pages and table of contents. The only substantive portions that
may exceed the 25-page limit are supporting documents to support
assertions or conclusions made in the 25-page project narrative. If
necessary, FHWA may request supplemental or clarifying information from
the State.
The application should include information required for FHWA to
assess each of the criteria specified in Section E (Review
Information). The State should demonstrate the responsiveness of a
project to any pertinent selection criteria with the most relevant
information it can provide, regardless of whether such information has
been specifically requested, or identified, in this notice. The
application should describe all critical project milestones and the
State's current progress toward achieving them.
The FHWA recommends that the application adhere to the following
basic outline and the project narrative include a table of contents,
maps, and graphics as appropriate to inform the review. The specific
statutory references from Section 1216 of TEA-21 (as amended by Section
1411 of the FAST Act) are noted in brackets after each item:
i. Project Description: An identification of the facility on the
Interstate System proposed to become a toll facility, including the
age, condition, and intensity of use of the facility [1216(b)(3)(A)].
ii. Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Consultation: In the
case of a facility that affects a metropolitan area, a description of
the State's current consultations regarding the candidate project with
that area's MPO established under 23 U.S.C. 134. Full satisfaction of
this eligibility criteria requires an assurance that MPO for the area
has been consulted concerning the placement and amount of tolls on the
facility [1216(b)(3)(B)].
iii. Financial Analysis: An analysis demonstrating that the
facility could not be maintained or improved to meet current or future
needs from the State's Federal-aid apportionments and allocations and
from revenues for highways from any other source without toll revenues
[1216(b)(3)(C)].
iv. Facility Management Plan:
(a) A plan for implementing tolls on the facility
[1216(b)(3)(D)(i)]. Note that an approved plan must take into account
the interests of local, regional, and Interstate travelers
[1216(b)(4)(C)].
(b) A proposed schedule and finance plan for the reconstruction or
rehabilitation of the facility using toll revenues [1216(b)(3)(D)(ii)].
The plan should give extensive focus to the development phase
requirements, including among its milestones the completion of NEPA,
the acquisition of tolling authority from the legislature, and the
issuance of any debt backed by toll revenues.
(c) A description of the public transportation agency that will be
responsible for implementation and administration of the candidate
project [1216(b)(3)(D)(iii)].
(d) A description of whether consideration will be given to
privatizing the maintenance and operational aspects of the facility,
while retaining legal and administrative control of the portion of the
Interstate route [1216(b)(3)(D)(iv)]. Note that ISRRPP selection
criteria require the State to give preference to the use of a public
toll agency with demonstrated capability to build, operate and maintain
a toll expressway system meeting criteria for the Interstate System
[1216(b)(4)(E)].
(e) A statement as to whether the State currently has the authority
required for the toll project to proceed and, if not, a plan and
timetable for when such authority will be obtained [1216(b)(4)(F)].
3. Submission Date
A State DOT may submit an application to its FHWA Division Office
at any time. Applications will be considered on a first-come, first
serve rolling basis until further notice. States are strongly
encouraged to work closely with their respective division offices
throughout the preparation of the application.
E. Review Information
1. Review and Selection Process
The FHWA will perform an initial eligibility review of an
application. Based on its knowledge of the proposed project and the
State's highway program, FHWA will evaluate the project's technical and
financial feasibility, risks, planning approvals, NEPA and other
environmental reviews/approvals, tolling authority, agreements to
operate and maintain a toll expressway system, and other implementation
agreements.
The FHWA Headquarters evaluation team will use the information in
the application to assess the State's readiness and capability to fully
satisfy the ISRRPP criteria in order to deliver the candidate project.
Based upon this evaluation, FHWA may provide a provisional approval to
the applicant State if it is expected to be able to fully
[[Page 49627]]
satisfy the following selection criteria within 3 years. The selection
criteria are set forth (in italics) in Section 1216(b)(4) of TEA-21 as
amended by Section 1411(c)(1) of the FAST Act:
A. The State is unable to reconstruct or rehabilitate the proposed
toll facility using existing apportionments. Because Federal-aid
formula apportionments can support municipal bond issues (i.e.,
GARVEEs), the State must demonstrate that toll revenue financing
(whether through the TIFIA Program or another capital market source) is
essential to raising the needed funds. This information should be
provided in the Financial Analysis section of the application.
B. The facility has a sufficient intensity of use, age, or
condition to warrant the collection of tolls. A State should use its
asset management process or life cycle planning analysis to support
this criterion. This effort should include conducting a performance gap
analysis to identify deficiencies hindering progress toward improving
or preserving the facility and achieving and sustaining the desired
state of good repair. The FHWA will give preference to a facilities
with a greater gap between current/projected and target performance.
This information should be provided in the Project Description section
of the application.
C. The State plan for implementing tolls on the facility takes into
account the interests of local, regional, and Interstate travelers. The
FHWA will give preference to candidate projects that have already been
considered for tolling as a strategy in their State and MPO long-range
plans, which should also take into account the impact of tolling on
local, regional, and Interstate freight movement. This information
should be provided in the Facility Management Plan section of the
application.
D. The State plan for reconstruction or rehabilitation of the
facility using toll revenues is reasonable. A reasonable plan will
balance the estimated sources and uses of funds in accordance with the
requirements on toll revenue use set forth in Section 1216(b)(5) of
TEA-21. Likewise, the estimated cost of the candidate project must be
matched by a financial plan that includes traffic and revenue
projections sufficient to secure the needed debt component. This
information should be provided in the Facility Management Plan section
of the application.
E. The State has given preference to the use of a public toll
agency with demonstrated capability to build, operate, and maintain a
toll expressway system meeting criteria for the Interstate System.
Should a State determine that its public toll agencies lack the
capability or resources to take on the candidate project, a public-
private partnership may well provide a viable alternative. This
information should be provided in the Facility Management Plan section
of the application.
F. The State has the authority required for the project to proceed.
The lack of such authority has previously prevented provisionally
approved projects from fully satisfying the program criteria. The FHWA
will give preference to candidate projects that have already obtained
statutory authority to toll the candidate project or, lacking that,
demonstrate the likelihood of obtaining the authority to toll the
candidate project as evidenced by expressions of support for the
project from State and local governments, community interests, and the
public. The FHWA will also give preference to candidate projects that
demonstrate the likelihood of completing the environmental review and
permitting process under the NEPA within 3 years of provisional
approval. This information should be provided in the Facility
Management Plan section of the application.
F. Requirements for Provisionally Approved Projects
Should FHWA provisionally approve a candidate project, a State will
have 3 years from the date the provisional approval is granted in which
to:
Submit a complete application that fully satisfies the
eligibility and selection criteria noted above [1216(b)(6)(A)(i)].
Complete environmental review and permitting process under
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.) for the project [1216(b)(6)(A)(ii)].
Execute a toll agreement [1216(b)(6)(A)(iii)].
Further, FHWA may allow for a 1-year extension of the provisional
approval if the State demonstrates material progress toward
implementation of the project as evidenced by:
Substantial progress in completing the environmental
review and permitting process for the pilot project under NEPA
[1216(b)(6)(B)(i)].
Funding and financing commitments for the project
[1216(b)(6)(B)(ii)].
Expressions of support for the project from State and
local governments, community interests, and the public
[1216(b)(6)(B)(iii)].
Submission of a facility management plan as noted under
the eligibility criteria above [1216(b)(6)(B)(iv)].
Given the extensive State DOT and FHWA collaboration needed to
implement a project under the ISRRPP, FHWA will regularly assess the
progress of each provisionally approved project. Should it become
evident that the project will not meet the statutory deadline, FHWA
reserves the right to revoke the provisional approval prior to the
deadline and re-offer the program slot to other State DOTs.
Issued on: September 24, 2018.
Brandye L. Hendrickson,
Deputy Administrator, Federal Highway Administration.
[FR Doc. 2018-21340 Filed 10-1-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P