Safety Zone; Cape Fear River, Wilmington, NC, 49281-49283 [2018-21276]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 190 / Monday, October 1, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
U.S.C.
from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
Dated: September 24, 2018.
Steven M. Fischer,
Bridge Administrator, Thirteenth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2018–21254 Filed 9–28–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2018–0920]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Cape Fear River,
Wilmington, NC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the navigable waters of the Cape Fear
River to minimize risks caused by
vessels transiting near vessels and
divers conducting post-Hurricane
Florence recovery operations. Entry of
vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless a vessel meets the
stated requirements or is specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
North Carolina (COTP).
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from October 1, 2018,
through October 17, 2018. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from September 26, 2018,
through October 1, 2018.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2018–
0920 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Chief Petty Officer Joshua
O’Rourke, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector North
Carolina, Wilmington, NC; telephone
910–772–2227, email:
joshua.p.orourke@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
COTP Captain of the Port
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Sep 28, 2018
Jkt 247001
United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
After Hurricane Florence passed over
the Cape Fear River, the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration and U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers conducted surveys of the
navigable channel to identify
obstructions that may have collected on
the river bottom and pose risks to
shipping traffic. The surveys identified
a number of potential obstructions that
require further investigation and
possible removal. Operations are
scheduled to begin on September 26,
2018. These operations involve diving
in murky water with strong currents,
using heavy-lift equipment on floating
platforms, and other inherently risky
activities that require strict safety
procedures. Vessels that pass too close
or too quickly increase the risk of these
operations. To mitigate such risks, the
COTP is establishing a safety zone
around the vessels conducting diving
and salvage operations. This safety zone
will move with the vessels as they
transit the river to investigate and
remove obstructions.
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
(5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because to do
so would be impracticable and contrary
to the public interest. Waiting to return
the waterway to conditions that
accommodate the safe, full resumption
of commercial shipping is contrary to
the public interest. It is impracticable to
publish an NPRM because recovery
assets will be on scene on or about
September 26, 2018, and the safety zone
needs to be in place at that time to
protect vessels and persons in the
vicinity of salvage operations.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest.
Immediate action is needed to protect
vessels and persons conducting diving
and salvage operations, as well as
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
49281
vessels transiting nearby, from the
potential hazards associated with these
operations.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The
Captain of the Port North Carolina
(COTP) has determined that potential
hazards associated with salvage
operations starting on or about
September 26, 2018, will be a safety
concern when anyone approaches
within 100 yards of salvage vessels and
divers. This rule is needed to protect
personnel and vessels in the navigable
waters within and transiting near the
safety zone.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a moving safety
zone that protects vessels and affiliated
divers engaged in post-Hurricane
Florence salvage operations on the
navigable waters of the Cape Fear River.
The safety zone includes all navigable
waters within 100 yards of vessels
actively engaged in salvage and dive
support vessels being used to conduct
salvage operations on the Cape Fear
River. No vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the
COTP or a designated representative.
Vessels requesting to enter or transit the
safety zone may contact the Sector
North Carolina Command Center via
VHF–FM channel 16 or telephone at
910–362–4015.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, and
E:\FR\FM\01OCR1.SGM
01OCR1
49282
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 190 / Monday, October 1, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
flexibility of the safety zone. Because of
its size, vessels will typically be able to
safely transit around the zone. In cases
where the location of salvage operations
don’t allow safe passage without
transiting through the zone, the
regulation is written to give the
opportunity for transiting through after
coordinating with salvage operators and
the COTP. Moreover, the Coast Guard
will issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel
16 about the zone updating mariners of
the location of current salvage
operations.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Sep 28, 2018
Jkt 247001
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01 and Commandant
Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone that is active only during salvage
operations that will prohibit entry
within 100 yards of salvage vessels,
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
machinery, and divers being used to
investigate and remove obstructions
from the Cape Fear River. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–0920 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T05–0920 Safety Zone, Cape Fear
River, Wilmington, NC.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of the
Cape Fear River, from surface to bottom,
within 100 yards of:
(1) Any salvage vessel exhibiting
visual signals for vessels restricted in
ability to maneuver in accordance with
33 CFR 83.27(b); and
(2) Any diving vessel exhibiting
visual signals for vessels engaged in
diving operations in accordance with 33
CFR 83.27(e).
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section—
Captain of the Port means the
Commander, Sector North Carolina.
Designated representative means a
Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
including a Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer designated by
the Captain of the Port North Carolina
(COTP) for the enforcement of the safety
zone.
E:\FR\FM\01OCR1.SGM
01OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 190 / Monday, October 1, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, you may not enter the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or designated
representative via VHF–FM channel 16
or telephone at 910–362–4015 and
comply with all lawful orders or
directions given.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the safety zone by
Federal, State, and local agencies.
(e) Enforcement periods. This section
will be enforced any time salvage
vessels are exhibiting visual signals for
vessels restricted in ability to maneuver
in accordance with 33 CFR 83.27(b) or
any time diving vessels are exhibiting
visual signals for vessels engaged in
diving operations in accordance with 33
CFR 83.27(e). The exact timeframe that
will be required to complete diving and
salvage operations is unknown, but the
Coast Guard estimates that it may take
21 days from beginning of salvage
operations until the channel is returned
to pre-Hurricane Florence conditions.
Dated: September 26, 2018.
Bion B. Stewart,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2018–21276 Filed 9–28–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2018–0563]
RIN 1625–AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Straits of
Mackinac
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a Regulated Navigation
Area (RNA) for certain waters of the
Straits of Mackinac. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life
and protection of property on these
navigable waters near Mackinaw City,
MI. This rule prohibits persons and
vessels from anchoring or loitering
within the RNA unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port of Sault Sainte
Marie, Michigan or a designated
representative.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Sep 28, 2018
Jkt 247001
DATES:
This rule is effective October 31,
2018.
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2018–
0563 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Jason Radcliffe, Ninth
District Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone 216–902–6060,
email Jason.A.Radcliffe2@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
RNA Regulated Navigation Area
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
RNA Regulated Navigation Area
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
The northwest part of Lake Huron
forms the approach to, and the east part
of the, Straits of Mackinac. At the
extreme northwest end, the lake
narrows abruptly to a width of 4 miles.
Spanning this divide is the Mackinac
Bridge. Two main shipping lanes lead
north and south of Bois Blanc Island
and pass under the bridge. Numerous
shoals and several islands obstruct the
Straits Area. Located approximately a
mile west of the Mackinac Bridge are
submerged electrical cables and the
Enbridge Line 5 Pipeline. Posted on
NOAAs navigation charts are cautionary
notes advising mariners of the cable and
pipeline area. There is no prohibition
nor is there an enforcement mechanism
to discourage anchoring in this area.
The Captain of the Port (COTP) of Sault
Sainte Marie has determined that the
high volume of vessel transits and the
potential for damage to submerged
infrastructure warrants the creation of a
regulatory measure to specifically
outline an area of regulated navigation
that establishes transit and
communication expectations through
the Straits.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
better enhance the safety of vessels and
protection of sub-surface cables and
pipelines within the navigable waters of
the Straits of Mackinac. The Coast
Guard publishes this rulemaking under
authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C.
191; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
49283
160.5; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
On the behalf of COTP Sector Sault
Sainte Marie, the Ninth Coast Guard
District is creating a Regulated
Navigation Area that mandates
transiting vessels make a direct passage
with no anchoring or loitering, unless
expressly granted permission from the
COTP or designated representative.
Vessels that are required to comply with
this RNA include vessels of 40 meters
or more in length, towing vessels of 20
meters or more in length while engaged
in towing another vessel, vessels
certificated to carry 50 or more
passengers for hire, when engaged in
trade, or any dredge or floating plant.
Within the RNA, the District
Commander or COTP may establish
temporary traffic rules that include but
are not limited to channel obstructions,
winter navigation, unusual weather
conditions, or unusual water levels.
This rule will ensure transiting mariners
are fully aware of existing and emergent
hazards to navigation on or below the
navigable waterways and provide the
Coast Guard with greater situational
awareness and oversight. The regulatory
text appears at the end of this
document.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
In total, we received 21 comments on
the proposed regulated navigation area
(RNA) for the Straits of Mackinac
published on August 2, 2018 (83 FR
37780). In consideration of the
comments received, we have amended
the regulatory text in this final rule.
We received seven comments
expressing support for proceeding with
the rulemaking.
One comment did not address the
proposed rule, nor offer any support for
or criticism against the rulemaking.
One commenter suggested that
pipelines and cables could be protected
with a smaller than proposed RNA. The
Coast Guard believes that requiring
ships to seek permission from the COTP
to anchor in any part of the regulated
area, coupled with the requirement to
notify the COTP 15 minutes prior to
getting underway, will reduce the
likelihood of an accidental anchor
deployment through areas with pipes
and cables below.
Another commenter expressed
disapproval of the proposed rule, saying
it would not prevent accidents in the
future. The comment did not offer any
suggestions for how to improve the
regulations. For the same reasons given
above, the Coast Guard believes that
E:\FR\FM\01OCR1.SGM
01OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 190 (Monday, October 1, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49281-49283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-21276]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2018-0920]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Cape Fear River, Wilmington, NC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
navigable waters of the Cape Fear River to minimize risks caused by
vessels transiting near vessels and divers conducting post-Hurricane
Florence recovery operations. Entry of vessels or persons into this
zone is prohibited unless a vessel meets the stated requirements or is
specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port North Carolina
(COTP).
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from October 1,
2018, through October 17, 2018. For the purposes of enforcement, actual
notice will be used from September 26, 2018, through October 1, 2018.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2018-0920 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Chief Petty Officer Joshua O'Rourke, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector North Carolina, Wilmington, NC;
telephone 910-772-2227, email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
COTP Captain of the Port
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
After Hurricane Florence passed over the Cape Fear River, the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers conducted surveys of the navigable channel to identify
obstructions that may have collected on the river bottom and pose risks
to shipping traffic. The surveys identified a number of potential
obstructions that require further investigation and possible removal.
Operations are scheduled to begin on September 26, 2018. These
operations involve diving in murky water with strong currents, using
heavy-lift equipment on floating platforms, and other inherently risky
activities that require strict safety procedures. Vessels that pass too
close or too quickly increase the risk of these operations. To mitigate
such risks, the COTP is establishing a safety zone around the vessels
conducting diving and salvage operations. This safety zone will move
with the vessels as they transit the river to investigate and remove
obstructions.
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because to do so would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. Waiting to return the waterway to
conditions that accommodate the safe, full resumption of commercial
shipping is contrary to the public interest. It is impracticable to
publish an NPRM because recovery assets will be on scene on or about
September 26, 2018, and the safety zone needs to be in place at that
time to protect vessels and persons in the vicinity of salvage
operations.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest.
Immediate action is needed to protect vessels and persons conducting
diving and salvage operations, as well as vessels transiting nearby,
from the potential hazards associated with these operations.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231. The Captain of the Port North Carolina (COTP) has determined that
potential hazards associated with salvage operations starting on or
about September 26, 2018, will be a safety concern when anyone
approaches within 100 yards of salvage vessels and divers. This rule is
needed to protect personnel and vessels in the navigable waters within
and transiting near the safety zone.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a moving safety zone that protects vessels
and affiliated divers engaged in post-Hurricane Florence salvage
operations on the navigable waters of the Cape Fear River. The safety
zone includes all navigable waters within 100 yards of vessels actively
engaged in salvage and dive support vessels being used to conduct
salvage operations on the Cape Fear River. No vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated representative. Vessels requesting to enter or
transit the safety zone may contact the Sector North Carolina Command
Center via VHF-FM channel 16 or telephone at 910-362-4015.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and
[[Page 49282]]
flexibility of the safety zone. Because of its size, vessels will
typically be able to safely transit around the zone. In cases where the
location of salvage operations don't allow safe passage without
transiting through the zone, the regulation is written to give the
opportunity for transiting through after coordinating with salvage
operators and the COTP. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the
zone updating mariners of the location of current salvage operations.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have
a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone that is active only during salvage operations that will
prohibit entry within 100 yards of salvage vessels, machinery, and
divers being used to investigate and remove obstructions from the Cape
Fear River. It is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-
01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting
this determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0920 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0920 Safety Zone, Cape Fear River, Wilmington, NC.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters of the Cape Fear River, from surface to bottom, within 100 yards
of:
(1) Any salvage vessel exhibiting visual signals for vessels
restricted in ability to maneuver in accordance with 33 CFR 83.27(b);
and
(2) Any diving vessel exhibiting visual signals for vessels engaged
in diving operations in accordance with 33 CFR 83.27(e).
(b) Definitions. As used in this section--
Captain of the Port means the Commander, Sector North Carolina.
Designated representative means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
including a Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
designated by the Captain of the Port North Carolina (COTP) for the
enforcement of the safety zone.
[[Page 49283]]
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or
designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or designated
representative via VHF-FM channel 16 or telephone at 910-362-4015 and
comply with all lawful orders or directions given.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local
agencies.
(e) Enforcement periods. This section will be enforced any time
salvage vessels are exhibiting visual signals for vessels restricted in
ability to maneuver in accordance with 33 CFR 83.27(b) or any time
diving vessels are exhibiting visual signals for vessels engaged in
diving operations in accordance with 33 CFR 83.27(e). The exact
timeframe that will be required to complete diving and salvage
operations is unknown, but the Coast Guard estimates that it may take
21 days from beginning of salvage operations until the channel is
returned to pre-Hurricane Florence conditions.
Dated: September 26, 2018.
Bion B. Stewart,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2018-21276 Filed 9-28-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P