Honey Packers and Importers Research, Promotion, Consumer Education and Industry Information Order; Change in Membership, 49314-49317 [2018-21266]
Download as PDF
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
49314
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 190 / Monday, October 1, 2018 / Proposed Rules
area. All interested persons were invited
to attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the July
19, 2018, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue.
Interested persons are invited to submit
comments on this proposed rule,
including the regulatory and
information collection impacts of this
action on small businesses.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the Order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189, Fruit
Crops. No changes in those
requirements would be necessary as a
result of this proposed rule. Should any
changes become necessary, they would
be submitted to OMB for approval.
This proposed rule would not impose
any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either
small or large California kiwifruit
handlers. As with all Federal marketing
order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this action.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Richard Lower
at the previously-mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
A 30-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposed rule. All written
comments timely received will be
considered before a final determination
is made on this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 920
Kiwifruit, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 920 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Sep 28, 2018
Jkt 247001
PART 920—KIWIFRUIT GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for part 920
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 920.213 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 920.213
On and after August 1, 2018, an
assessment rate of $0.025 per 9-kilo
volume-fill container or equivalent of
kiwifruit is established for kiwifruit
grown in California.
Dated: September 26, 2018.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–21264 Filed 9–28–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1212
[Document Number AMS–SC–18–0016]
Honey Packers and Importers
Research, Promotion, Consumer
Education and Industry Information
Order; Change in Membership
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposal invites
comments on changing the National
Honey Board (Board) importer-handler
member and alternate to an importer
member and alternate. The Honey
Packers and Importers Research,
Promotion, Consumer Education and
Industry Information Order (Order) is
administered by the Board with
oversight by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA). This proposal
would also update the definition for the
term Board to reflect current practices,
and make clarifying and conforming
changes to other provisions of the
program.
DATES: Comments must be received by
October 31, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments
may be submitted on the internet at:
https://www.regulations.gov or to the
Promotion and Economics Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW, Room
1406–S, Stop 0244, Washington, DC
20250–0244; facsimile: (202) 205–2800.
All comments should reference the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Sue
Coleman, Marketing Specialist,
Promotion and Economics Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW, Room
1406–S, Stop 0244, Washington, DC
20250–0244; telephone: (202) 378–2569;
facsimile: (202) 205–2800; or electronic
mail: Sue.Coleman@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposal affecting 7 CFR part 1212 is
authorized under the Commodity
Promotion, Research, and Information
Act of 1996 (1996 Act) (7 U.S.C. 7411–
7425).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Assessment rate.
SUMMARY:
document number and the date and
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be made available for
public inspection, including name and
address, if provided, in the above office
during regular business hours or it can
be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, reducing costs,
harmonizing rules and promoting
flexibility. This action falls within a
category of regulatory actions that the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) exempted from Executive Order
12866 review. Additionally, because
this rule does not meet the definition of
a significant regulatory action it does
not trigger the requirements contained
in Executive Order 13771. See OMB’s
Memorandum titled ‘‘Interim Guidance
Implementing Section 2 of the Executive
Order of January 30, 2017, titled
‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
Executive Order 13175
This action has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that
this regulation would not have
substantial and direct effects on Tribal
governments and would not have
significant Tribal implications.
Executive Order 12988
This proposal has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
E:\FR\FM\01OCP1.SGM
01OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 190 / Monday, October 1, 2018 / Proposed Rules
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Justice Reform. It is not intended to
have retroactive effect. Section 524 of
the 1996 Act (7 U.S.C. 7423) provides
that it shall not affect or preempt any
other Federal or State law authorizing
promotion or research relating to an
agricultural commodity.
Under section 519 of the 1996 Act (7
U.S.C. 7418), a person subject to an
order may file a written petition with
USDA stating that an order, any
provision of an order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with an order, is
not established in accordance with the
law, and request a modification of an
order or an exemption from an order.
Any petition filed challenging an order,
any provision of an order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
an order, shall be filed within two years
after the effective date of an order,
provision, or obligation subject to
challenge in the petition. The petitioner
will have the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. Thereafter, USDA will
issue a ruling on the petition. The 1996
Act provides that the district court of
the United States for any district in
which the petitioner resides or conducts
business shall have the jurisdiction to
review a final ruling on the petition, if
the petitioner files a complaint for that
purpose not later than 20 days after the
date of the entry of USDA’s final ruling.
Background
This proposal invites comments on
changing the importer-handler member
and alternate to an importer member
and alternate on the Board under the
Honey Packers and Importers Research,
Promotion, Consumer Education and
Industry Information Order (Order). The
Order is administered by the Board with
oversight by USDA. Under the Order,
assessments are collected from first
handlers and importers and used for
research and promotion projects
designed to maintain and expand the
market for honey and honey products in
the United States and abroad. This
proposal would change the importerhandler representatives to importer
representatives and make clarifying and
conforming changes to other provisions
of the program. This action was
unanimously recommended by the
Board in October 2017 and would allow
more importers to be eligible to serve on
the Board.
Section 1212.46 of the Order provides
authority for the Board to recommend
amendments to the Order. Section
1212.40 of the Order provides that the
Board have ten members—three first
handlers, two importers, one importerhandler, three producers, and one
marketing cooperative representative.
Each member shall have an alternate.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Sep 28, 2018
Jkt 247001
Currently, the eligible importer-handler
member and alternate must import at
least 75 percent of the honey or honey
products they market in the United
States and handle at least 250,000
pounds annually. With the proposed
amendment, the total number of Board
representatives would remain at ten, but
importer representatives would increase
from two to three representatives and
the importer-handler member would be
removed. Handlers would continue to
be represented with three members on
the Board. A corresponding adjustment
would be made to the alternate
representatives for each member. This
action would increase the pool of
importer nominees eligible to serve on
the Board and reflect the current
distribution of the industry.
U.S. honey imports have dramatically
increased from 104,984 metric tons in
2008 to 203,534 metric tons in 2017. In
comparison, U.S. honey production has
decreased. USDA’s National
Agricultural Statistics Service estimates
U.S. honey production from producers
with 5 or more colonies at 164 million
pounds in 2008 and at 148 million
pounds in 2017.1 The proposed changes
to the Board would reflect the
distribution of the production of honey
and the quantity of the honey and honey
products imported into the United
States.
Nominations to the Board are made by
qualified national organizations and
these organizations were consulted
before the Board’s recommendation. No
qualified national organizations were
opposed to the recommendation.
The Board met on October 26, 2017,
and unanimously recommended that the
importer-handler member and alternate
become an importer member and
alternate. This should allow more
importers to be eligible to serve on the
Board. Section 1212.40 of the Order is
proposed to be revised accordingly.
Conforming changes would be made to
remove references to the importerhandler representative by removing
§ 1212.12 and revising §§ 1212.22,
1212.41, and 1212.42(b).
The current importer-handler member
and alternate were appointed to the
Board for a term that began on January
1, 2018 and ends on December 31, 2020.
The importer-handler member and
alternate would remain in their
positions until their term expires on
December 31, 2020. The following term
beginning on January 1, 2021, would be
1 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service,
Honey, March 14, 2018, p. 3, https://
usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/Hone/
Hone-03-14-2018.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49315
filled by an importer member and
importer alternate.
Finally, this proposal would revise
the term Board as defined in § 1212.2
from the ‘Honey Packers and Importers
Board’ to the ‘National Honey Board’ to
reflect current practices. The term as it
appears in § 1212.40 and in the
undesignated heading preceding
§ 1212.40 would also be revised to read
‘National Honey Board.’
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act
Analysis
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601–
612), AMS is required to examine the
impact of the proposed rule on small
entities. Accordingly, AMS has
considered the economic impact of this
action on such entities.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so
that small businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened. The Small
Business Administration (SBA) defines,
in 13 CFR part 121, small agricultural
producers as those having annual
receipts of no more than $750,000, and
small agricultural service firms (first
handlers and importers) as those having
annual receipts of no more than $7.5
million.
The Board reported that there were
about 785 importers and 40 first
handlers of honey and honey products
covered under the program during the
2017 fiscal period. Fourteen out of the
40 first handlers (35 percent) and 23 out
of the 785 importers (3 percent)
accounted for 91 and 90 percent of the
assessments in their respective
categories. Total assessments for 2017
were $8.87 million, of which $2.09
million (24 percent) were paid by first
handlers and $6.78 million (76 percent)
were paid by importers. This data can
be used to compute an estimate of
average annual revenue from honey
sales from each of these categories,
which in turn helps to estimate the
number of large and small first handlers
and importers. As mentioned above, 14
first handlers account for 91 percent of
the domestic assessments. Multiplying
first handler assessments in 2017 of
$2,091,881 by 0.91 and then dividing by
14 yields an average annual assessment
of $135,972 for the first handlers in this
category. Dividing this figure ($135,972)
by the assessment rate of 1.5 cents per
pound ($0.015) yields an average
quantity per first handler of 9.065
million pounds. Multiplying 9.065
million pounds by the average 2017 U.S.
E:\FR\FM\01OCP1.SGM
01OCP1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
49316
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 190 / Monday, October 1, 2018 / Proposed Rules
domestic price of $2.16 per pound 2
yields an average, annual honey revenue
per handler of $19.58 million, which is
well above the SBA threshold of $7.5
million. It should be noted that this
revenue estimate is based on the average
price at the producer level, and the
$19.58 million is an estimate of the total
value at which the average size handler
acquired the honey from producers.
Therefore, most of the 14 first handlers
that pay 91 percent of the domestic
assessments are likely to be large firms
according to the SBA definition.
An equivalent computation can be
made for the 23 importers who paid 90
percent of the $6,778,147 in assessments
in 2017. Of the 23 importers, the average
assessment per importer was $265,741.
Dividing the average assessment per
importer by the assessment rate of
$0.015 per pound yields an average
quantity per importer estimate of 17.716
million pounds.
For honey imports, the equivalent of
the season average price for domestic
honey is referred to as a ‘‘unit value.’’
The unit value of $1.23 per pound is
computed by dividing annual imported
honey value of $550.16 million by
average quantity of 448.72 million
pounds.3 Multiplying the $1.23 unit
value by the average quantity of 17.716
million pounds yields average annual
honey revenue per importer figure of
$21.790 million, almost three times the
SBA threshold figure of $7.5 million for
a large firm. Therefore, the majority of
the 23 importers that pay 90 percent of
the assessments are large firms,
according to the SBA definition.
Comparable computations can be
made to determine the average 2017
honey revenue for the 26 first handlers
and 762 importers that paid 9 and 10
percent, respectively, of the assessment
in the first handler and importer
categories. The first handler and
importer average annual honey revenue
figures are approximately $1,043,000
and $17,000, respectively, indicating
that the vast majority are small
businesses (in terms of honey sales),
under the SBA large business threshold
of $7.5 million in annual sales.
Based on the foregoing, the majority
of first handlers and importers may be
classified as small entities.
This proposed rule invites comments
on changing the importer-handler Board
member and alternate, as specified in
section 1212.40 of the Order, to an
importer member and alternate. The
2 USDA, NASS, Honey, March 14, 2018, p. 3,
https://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/
Hone/Hone-03-14-2018.pdf.
3 USDA, AMS, SCP, MND, National Honey
Report, February 26, 2018, p. 10, https://
www.ams.usda.gov/mnreports/fvmhoney.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Sep 28, 2018
Jkt 247001
Order currently requires one importerhandler representative on the Board
who must import at least 75 percent of
the honey or honey products they
market in the United States and handle
at least 250,000 pounds annually. The
U.S. honey industry has experienced
dramatic increases in imported honey
and honey products, as the domestic
production has decreased. Thus, the
Board unanimously recommended that
the importer-handler representative
become an importer representative. This
would allow for a greater pool of
importer nominees to be eligible to
serve on the Board. Conforming changes
would also be made to remove § 1212.12
and revise §§ 1212.22, 1212.41, and
1212.42(b). Finally, this proposal would
update the term Board to reflect current
practices (§ 1212.2, the heading
preceding § 1212.40 and § 1212.40).
Authority for this action is provided in
section 1212.46(d) of the Order.
Relaxing the eligibility requirements
for importer representatives on the
Board is administrative in nature and
would have no economic impact on
entities covered under the program.
This change would help increase the
number of importers who would be
eligible to serve on the Board. Eligible
producers, first handlers, and importers
interested in serving on the Board
would have to complete a background
questionnaire. Those requirements are
addressed later in this proposal in the
section titled Reporting and
Recordkeeping Requirements.
Prior to arriving at this proposed
action, the Board consulted with the
qualified national organizations that
make the nominations to the Board.
Alternatives that were considered
included making no changes and
adjusting the eligibility requirements.
However, in considering the
distribution of the production of honey
and the quantity of honey and honey
products imported into the United
States, the Board concluded that
revising the importer-handler
representative to an importer
representative would be an accurate
reflection of the industry and would
increase the pool of eligible importers.
Reporting and Recordkeeping
Requirements
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the information collection
requirements that are imposed by the
part have been previously approved by
OMB under OMB control number 0581–
0093. Additionally, Board nominees
(including producers) must submit a
Background Information form (AD–755)
to ensure they are qualified to serve on
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the Board. The time to complete that
form is estimated at 30 minutes per
response. The background form is
approved under OMB control no. 0505–
0001. This proposed rule would not
result in a change to the information
collection and recordkeeping
requirements previously approved and
would impose no additional reporting
requirements and recordkeeping burden
on honey producers, first handlers, or
importers.
As with all Federal promotion
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and publicsector agencies. Finally, USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this proposed rule.
This action was discussed with the
qualified national organizations. The
Board met on October 26, 2017, and
unanimously recommended changing
the importer-handler representative to
an importer representative. All of the
Board’s meetings are open to the public
and interested persons are invited to
participate and express their views.
AMS has performed this initial RFA
regarding the impact of this proposed
action on small entities and invites
comments concerning potential effects
of this action.
USDA has determined that this
proposed rule is consistent with and
would effectuate the purposes of the
1996 Act.
A 30-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. All written comments
received in response to this proposed
rule by the date specified will be
considered prior to finalizing this
action.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1212
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Consumer
information, Honey Packer and Importer
promotion, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 1212 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 1212—HONEY PACKERS AND
IMPORTERS RESEARCH,
PROMOTION, CONSUMER
EDUCATION AND INDUSTRY
INFORMATION ORDER
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 1212 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411–7425; 7 U.S.C.
7401.
■
2. Revise § 1212.2 to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\01OCP1.SGM
01OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 190 / Monday, October 1, 2018 / Proposed Rules
§ 1212.2
Board.
‘‘Board’’ or ‘‘National Honey Board’’
means the administrative body
established pursuant to § 1212.40, or
such other name as recommended by
the Board and approved by the
Department.
■ 3. Remove and reserve § 1212.12.
■ 4. Revise § 1212.22 to read as follows:
§ 1212.22 Qualified national organization
representing importer interests.
‘‘Qualified national organization
representing importer interests’’ means
an organization that the Secretary
certifies as being eligible to nominate
importer and alternate importer
members of the Board under § 1212.42.
■ 5. Revise the undesignated center
heading preceding § 1212.40 to read
‘‘National Honey Board.’’
■ 6. Revise 1212.40 to read as follows:
§ 1212.40
Establishment and membership.
The National Honey Board is
established to administer the terms and
provisions of this part. The Board shall
have ten members, composed of three
first handler representatives, three
importer representatives, three producer
representatives, and one marketing
cooperative representative. In addition,
each producer representative must
produce a minimum of 50,000 pounds
of honey in the United States annually
based on the best three-year average of
the most recent five calendar years, as
certified by producers. The Secretary
will appoint members to the Board from
nominees submitted in accordance with
§ 1212.42. The Secretary shall also
appoint an alternate for each member.
■ 7. Revise § 1212.41 to read as follows:
§ 1212.41
Term of office.
Each Board member and alternate will
serve a three-year term or until the
Secretary selects his or her successor.
No member or alternate may serve more
than two consecutive terms. Each term
of office will end on December 31, with
new terms of office beginning on
January 1.
■ 8. Revise § 1212.42 paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
§ 1212.42
Nominations and appointments.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
*
*
*
*
*
(b) All qualified national
organizations representing importer
interests will have the opportunity to
participate in a nomination caucus and
will, to the extent practical, submit as a
group a single slate of nominations to
the Secretary for importer positions and
the importer alternate positions on the
Board. If the Secretary determines that
there are no qualified national
organizations representing importer
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Sep 28, 2018
Jkt 247001
interests, individual importers who
have paid assessments to the Board in
the most recent fiscal period may
submit nominations.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: September 26, 2018.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018–21266 Filed 9–28–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0801; Product
Identifier 2017–NM–147–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc., Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2008–24–
14, which applies to all Bombardier,
Inc., Model CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet
Series 100 & 440) airplanes. AD 2008–
24–14 requires revising the instructions
for continued airworthiness to
incorporate certain airworthiness
limitations for the main landing gear
(MLG) trunnion fitting assembly. Since
we issued AD 2008–24–14, new
airworthiness limitation (AWL) tasks
have been introduced with revised
inspection, modification, and safe-life
requirements. This proposed AD would
require revising the maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate certain AWLs. It would also
require reworking the trunnion fitting in
order to meet new structural safe-life
limits. We are proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
SUMMARY:
We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 15,
2018.
DATES:
You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49317
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Bombardier, Inc.,
400 Coˆte-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Que´bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; Widebody
Customer Response Center North
America toll-free telephone 1–866–538–
1247 or direct-dial telephone 1–514–
855–2999; fax 514–855–7401; email
ac.yul@aero.bombardier.com; internet
https://www.bombardier.com. You may
view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 206–231–3195.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0801; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aziz
Ahmed, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
and Mechanical Systems Section, FAA,
New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone 516–228–7329; fax
516–794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2018–0801; Product Identifier 2017–
NM–147–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
E:\FR\FM\01OCP1.SGM
01OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 190 (Monday, October 1, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49314-49317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-21266]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1212
[Document Number AMS-SC-18-0016]
Honey Packers and Importers Research, Promotion, Consumer
Education and Industry Information Order; Change in Membership
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposal invites comments on changing the National Honey
Board (Board) importer-handler member and alternate to an importer
member and alternate. The Honey Packers and Importers Research,
Promotion, Consumer Education and Industry Information Order (Order) is
administered by the Board with oversight by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA). This proposal would also update the definition for
the term Board to reflect current practices, and make clarifying and
conforming changes to other provisions of the program.
DATES: Comments must be received by October 31, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments may be submitted on the internet at:
https://www.regulations.gov or to the Promotion and Economics Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Room
1406-S, Stop 0244, Washington, DC 20250-0244; facsimile: (202) 205-
2800. All comments should reference the document number and the date
and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be made
available for public inspection, including name and address, if
provided, in the above office during regular business hours or it can
be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sue Coleman, Marketing Specialist,
Promotion and Economics Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW, Room 1406-S, Stop 0244, Washington, DC
20250-0244; telephone: (202) 378-2569; facsimile: (202) 205-2800; or
electronic mail: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal affecting 7 CFR part 1212 is
authorized under the Commodity Promotion, Research, and Information Act
of 1996 (1996 Act) (7 U.S.C. 7411-7425).
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules and promoting flexibility.
This action falls within a category of regulatory actions that the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order
12866 review. Additionally, because this rule does not meet the
definition of a significant regulatory action it does not trigger the
requirements contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum
titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order
of January 30, 2017, titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017).
Executive Order 13175
This action has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements
of Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments. The review reveals that this regulation would not
have substantial and direct effects on Tribal governments and would not
have significant Tribal implications.
Executive Order 12988
This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
[[Page 49315]]
Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect. Section
524 of the 1996 Act (7 U.S.C. 7423) provides that it shall not affect
or preempt any other Federal or State law authorizing promotion or
research relating to an agricultural commodity.
Under section 519 of the 1996 Act (7 U.S.C. 7418), a person subject
to an order may file a written petition with USDA stating that an
order, any provision of an order, or any obligation imposed in
connection with an order, is not established in accordance with the
law, and request a modification of an order or an exemption from an
order. Any petition filed challenging an order, any provision of an
order, or any obligation imposed in connection with an order, shall be
filed within two years after the effective date of an order, provision,
or obligation subject to challenge in the petition. The petitioner will
have the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. Thereafter, USDA
will issue a ruling on the petition. The 1996 Act provides that the
district court of the United States for any district in which the
petitioner resides or conducts business shall have the jurisdiction to
review a final ruling on the petition, if the petitioner files a
complaint for that purpose not later than 20 days after the date of the
entry of USDA's final ruling.
Background
This proposal invites comments on changing the importer-handler
member and alternate to an importer member and alternate on the Board
under the Honey Packers and Importers Research, Promotion, Consumer
Education and Industry Information Order (Order). The Order is
administered by the Board with oversight by USDA. Under the Order,
assessments are collected from first handlers and importers and used
for research and promotion projects designed to maintain and expand the
market for honey and honey products in the United States and abroad.
This proposal would change the importer-handler representatives to
importer representatives and make clarifying and conforming changes to
other provisions of the program. This action was unanimously
recommended by the Board in October 2017 and would allow more importers
to be eligible to serve on the Board.
Section 1212.46 of the Order provides authority for the Board to
recommend amendments to the Order. Section 1212.40 of the Order
provides that the Board have ten members--three first handlers, two
importers, one importer-handler, three producers, and one marketing
cooperative representative. Each member shall have an alternate.
Currently, the eligible importer-handler member and alternate must
import at least 75 percent of the honey or honey products they market
in the United States and handle at least 250,000 pounds annually. With
the proposed amendment, the total number of Board representatives would
remain at ten, but importer representatives would increase from two to
three representatives and the importer-handler member would be removed.
Handlers would continue to be represented with three members on the
Board. A corresponding adjustment would be made to the alternate
representatives for each member. This action would increase the pool of
importer nominees eligible to serve on the Board and reflect the
current distribution of the industry.
U.S. honey imports have dramatically increased from 104,984 metric
tons in 2008 to 203,534 metric tons in 2017. In comparison, U.S. honey
production has decreased. USDA's National Agricultural Statistics
Service estimates U.S. honey production from producers with 5 or more
colonies at 164 million pounds in 2008 and at 148 million pounds in
2017.\1\ The proposed changes to the Board would reflect the
distribution of the production of honey and the quantity of the honey
and honey products imported into the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Honey, March
14, 2018, p. 3, https://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/Hone/Hone-03-14-2018.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nominations to the Board are made by qualified national
organizations and these organizations were consulted before the Board's
recommendation. No qualified national organizations were opposed to the
recommendation.
The Board met on October 26, 2017, and unanimously recommended that
the importer-handler member and alternate become an importer member and
alternate. This should allow more importers to be eligible to serve on
the Board. Section 1212.40 of the Order is proposed to be revised
accordingly. Conforming changes would be made to remove references to
the importer-handler representative by removing Sec. 1212.12 and
revising Sec. Sec. 1212.22, 1212.41, and 1212.42(b).
The current importer-handler member and alternate were appointed to
the Board for a term that began on January 1, 2018 and ends on December
31, 2020. The importer-handler member and alternate would remain in
their positions until their term expires on December 31, 2020. The
following term beginning on January 1, 2021, would be filled by an
importer member and importer alternate.
Finally, this proposal would revise the term Board as defined in
Sec. 1212.2 from the `Honey Packers and Importers Board' to the
`National Honey Board' to reflect current practices. The term as it
appears in Sec. 1212.40 and in the undesignated heading preceding
Sec. 1212.40 would also be revised to read `National Honey Board.'
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C.
601-612), AMS is required to examine the impact of the proposed rule on
small entities. Accordingly, AMS has considered the economic impact of
this action on such entities.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened. The Small Business Administration (SBA)
defines, in 13 CFR part 121, small agricultural producers as those
having annual receipts of no more than $750,000, and small agricultural
service firms (first handlers and importers) as those having annual
receipts of no more than $7.5 million.
The Board reported that there were about 785 importers and 40 first
handlers of honey and honey products covered under the program during
the 2017 fiscal period. Fourteen out of the 40 first handlers (35
percent) and 23 out of the 785 importers (3 percent) accounted for 91
and 90 percent of the assessments in their respective categories. Total
assessments for 2017 were $8.87 million, of which $2.09 million (24
percent) were paid by first handlers and $6.78 million (76 percent)
were paid by importers. This data can be used to compute an estimate of
average annual revenue from honey sales from each of these categories,
which in turn helps to estimate the number of large and small first
handlers and importers. As mentioned above, 14 first handlers account
for 91 percent of the domestic assessments. Multiplying first handler
assessments in 2017 of $2,091,881 by 0.91 and then dividing by 14
yields an average annual assessment of $135,972 for the first handlers
in this category. Dividing this figure ($135,972) by the assessment
rate of 1.5 cents per pound ($0.015) yields an average quantity per
first handler of 9.065 million pounds. Multiplying 9.065 million pounds
by the average 2017 U.S.
[[Page 49316]]
domestic price of $2.16 per pound \2\ yields an average, annual honey
revenue per handler of $19.58 million, which is well above the SBA
threshold of $7.5 million. It should be noted that this revenue
estimate is based on the average price at the producer level, and the
$19.58 million is an estimate of the total value at which the average
size handler acquired the honey from producers. Therefore, most of the
14 first handlers that pay 91 percent of the domestic assessments are
likely to be large firms according to the SBA definition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ USDA, NASS, Honey, March 14, 2018, p. 3, https://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/Hone/Hone-03-14-2018.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An equivalent computation can be made for the 23 importers who paid
90 percent of the $6,778,147 in assessments in 2017. Of the 23
importers, the average assessment per importer was $265,741. Dividing
the average assessment per importer by the assessment rate of $0.015
per pound yields an average quantity per importer estimate of 17.716
million pounds.
For honey imports, the equivalent of the season average price for
domestic honey is referred to as a ``unit value.'' The unit value of
$1.23 per pound is computed by dividing annual imported honey value of
$550.16 million by average quantity of 448.72 million pounds.\3\
Multiplying the $1.23 unit value by the average quantity of 17.716
million pounds yields average annual honey revenue per importer figure
of $21.790 million, almost three times the SBA threshold figure of $7.5
million for a large firm. Therefore, the majority of the 23 importers
that pay 90 percent of the assessments are large firms, according to
the SBA definition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ USDA, AMS, SCP, MND, National Honey Report, February 26,
2018, p. 10, https://www.ams.usda.gov/mnreports/fvmhoney.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparable computations can be made to determine the average 2017
honey revenue for the 26 first handlers and 762 importers that paid 9
and 10 percent, respectively, of the assessment in the first handler
and importer categories. The first handler and importer average annual
honey revenue figures are approximately $1,043,000 and $17,000,
respectively, indicating that the vast majority are small businesses
(in terms of honey sales), under the SBA large business threshold of
$7.5 million in annual sales.
Based on the foregoing, the majority of first handlers and
importers may be classified as small entities.
This proposed rule invites comments on changing the importer-
handler Board member and alternate, as specified in section 1212.40 of
the Order, to an importer member and alternate. The Order currently
requires one importer-handler representative on the Board who must
import at least 75 percent of the honey or honey products they market
in the United States and handle at least 250,000 pounds annually. The
U.S. honey industry has experienced dramatic increases in imported
honey and honey products, as the domestic production has decreased.
Thus, the Board unanimously recommended that the importer-handler
representative become an importer representative. This would allow for
a greater pool of importer nominees to be eligible to serve on the
Board. Conforming changes would also be made to remove Sec. 1212.12
and revise Sec. Sec. 1212.22, 1212.41, and 1212.42(b). Finally, this
proposal would update the term Board to reflect current practices
(Sec. 1212.2, the heading preceding Sec. 1212.40 and Sec. 1212.40).
Authority for this action is provided in section 1212.46(d) of the
Order.
Relaxing the eligibility requirements for importer representatives
on the Board is administrative in nature and would have no economic
impact on entities covered under the program. This change would help
increase the number of importers who would be eligible to serve on the
Board. Eligible producers, first handlers, and importers interested in
serving on the Board would have to complete a background questionnaire.
Those requirements are addressed later in this proposal in the section
titled Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements.
Prior to arriving at this proposed action, the Board consulted with
the qualified national organizations that make the nominations to the
Board. Alternatives that were considered included making no changes and
adjusting the eligibility requirements. However, in considering the
distribution of the production of honey and the quantity of honey and
honey products imported into the United States, the Board concluded
that revising the importer-handler representative to an importer
representative would be an accurate reflection of the industry and
would increase the pool of eligible importers.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the information collection requirements that are imposed
by the part have been previously approved by OMB under OMB control
number 0581-0093. Additionally, Board nominees (including producers)
must submit a Background Information form (AD-755) to ensure they are
qualified to serve on the Board. The time to complete that form is
estimated at 30 minutes per response. The background form is approved
under OMB control no. 0505-0001. This proposed rule would not result in
a change to the information collection and recordkeeping requirements
previously approved and would impose no additional reporting
requirements and recordkeeping burden on honey producers, first
handlers, or importers.
As with all Federal promotion programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public-sector agencies. Finally, USDA has
not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this proposed rule.
This action was discussed with the qualified national
organizations. The Board met on October 26, 2017, and unanimously
recommended changing the importer-handler representative to an importer
representative. All of the Board's meetings are open to the public and
interested persons are invited to participate and express their views.
AMS has performed this initial RFA regarding the impact of this
proposed action on small entities and invites comments concerning
potential effects of this action.
USDA has determined that this proposed rule is consistent with and
would effectuate the purposes of the 1996 Act.
A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposal. All written comments received in response to
this proposed rule by the date specified will be considered prior to
finalizing this action.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1212
Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Consumer
information, Honey Packer and Importer promotion, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 1212 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1212--HONEY PACKERS AND IMPORTERS RESEARCH, PROMOTION,
CONSUMER EDUCATION AND INDUSTRY INFORMATION ORDER
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1212 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411-7425; 7 U.S.C. 7401.
0
2. Revise Sec. 1212.2 to read as follows:
[[Page 49317]]
Sec. 1212.2 Board.
``Board'' or ``National Honey Board'' means the administrative body
established pursuant to Sec. 1212.40, or such other name as
recommended by the Board and approved by the Department.
0
3. Remove and reserve Sec. 1212.12.
0
4. Revise Sec. 1212.22 to read as follows:
Sec. 1212.22 Qualified national organization representing importer
interests.
``Qualified national organization representing importer interests''
means an organization that the Secretary certifies as being eligible to
nominate importer and alternate importer members of the Board under
Sec. 1212.42.
0
5. Revise the undesignated center heading preceding Sec. 1212.40 to
read ``National Honey Board.''
0
6. Revise 1212.40 to read as follows:
Sec. 1212.40 Establishment and membership.
The National Honey Board is established to administer the terms and
provisions of this part. The Board shall have ten members, composed of
three first handler representatives, three importer representatives,
three producer representatives, and one marketing cooperative
representative. In addition, each producer representative must produce
a minimum of 50,000 pounds of honey in the United States annually based
on the best three-year average of the most recent five calendar years,
as certified by producers. The Secretary will appoint members to the
Board from nominees submitted in accordance with Sec. 1212.42. The
Secretary shall also appoint an alternate for each member.
0
7. Revise Sec. 1212.41 to read as follows:
Sec. 1212.41 Term of office.
Each Board member and alternate will serve a three-year term or
until the Secretary selects his or her successor. No member or
alternate may serve more than two consecutive terms. Each term of
office will end on December 31, with new terms of office beginning on
January 1.
0
8. Revise Sec. 1212.42 paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 1212.42 Nominations and appointments.
* * * * *
(b) All qualified national organizations representing importer
interests will have the opportunity to participate in a nomination
caucus and will, to the extent practical, submit as a group a single
slate of nominations to the Secretary for importer positions and the
importer alternate positions on the Board. If the Secretary determines
that there are no qualified national organizations representing
importer interests, individual importers who have paid assessments to
the Board in the most recent fiscal period may submit nominations.
* * * * *
Dated: September 26, 2018.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-21266 Filed 9-28-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P