The Special 510(k) Program; Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff; Availability, 49097-49099 [2018-21141]
Download as PDF
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 189 / Friday, September 28, 2018 / Notices
II. Arguments
Fleming submitted multiple
documents in support of his arguments
that his guilty plea ‘‘does not state a
crime’’ and that he is ‘‘actually
innocent.’’ However, section 306(l) of
the FD&C Act defines conviction as
when a Federal or State court’s
judgment of conviction or when a
Federal or State court’s acceptance of a
guilty plea. In Fleming’s ‘‘Petition to
Enter a Plea of Guilty,’’ he stated that he
understood the charges against him and
that he was voluntarily entering his
guilty plea. The court entered a
judgment of conviction after accepting
Fleming’s guilty plea. Federal court is
the proper venue for any challenge to
Fleming’s guilty plea based on a claim
of actual innocence, not this remedial
proceeding. OSI carefully reviewed
Fleming’s submission in its entirety,
and Fleming does not dispute that the
court entered a judgment of conviction
or that the court accepted his guilty
plea; therefore, Fleming’s arguments
regarding his actual innocence fail to
raise a genuine and substantial issue of
fact warranting a hearing.
Under section 306(b)(2)(B)(ii)(I) of the
FD&C Act, FDA has the authority to
debar an individual convicted of certain
Federal felonies, involving, among other
things, fraud, if FDA finds that the
individual has demonstrated a pattern
of conduct giving reason to believe that
he may violate requirements under the
FD&C Act relating to drug products. The
relevant factual issues are whether
Fleming was, in fact, convicted of a
felony involving fraud and whether
there is reason to believe that he may
violate requirements under the FD&C
Act relating to drug products. Fleming
does not dispute that he pled guilty to
felony healthcare fraud and felony mail
fraud or that, based on these
convictions, there is reason to believe
that he may violate requirements under
the FD&C Act relating to drug products.
Therefore, Fleming has failed to raise a
genuine and substantial issue of fact
warranting a hearing regarding whether
he is subject to debarment.
Fleming’s response included one
argument that may be construed to be a
challenge to ORA’s proposed findings
on the nature and seriousness of his
offense. Fleming appears to claim that
the imaging studies he performed on his
patients were safer than the imaging
studies he billed to Medicare and
Medicaid. In the proposal to debar, in
evaluating the nature and seriousness of
the offenses, ORA noted that Fleming
was convicted of two felonies,
healthcare fraud and mail fraud. ORA
considered that he billed Medicare and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:22 Sep 27, 2018
Jkt 244001
Medicaid for procedures other than
those that he had performed, that he
falsified clinical trial data, and that his
actions ‘‘have the potential for causing
significant loss of public confidence in
the healthcare system.’’ Fleming’s
actions took place over a period of
several months and demonstrated
multiple instances of fraud. While
Fleming contends that he performed
safer imaging studies than those billed,
FDA must weigh this claim against the
serious nature of the fraud he
committed. Construing Fleming’s
argument in a light most favorable to
him, whether he performed safer
imaging studies does not sufficiently
counter the very serious nature of
fraudulent conduct and is not enough to
establish that a shorter debarment
period would be appropriate.
Based on the factual findings in the
proposal to debar and on the record, OSI
finds that a 5-year debarment period for
each felony offense is appropriate. The
nature and seriousness of Fleming’s
offense, Fleming’s managerial
participation, and his lack of voluntary
steps to mitigate the impact on the
public weigh in favor of debarment.
Although Fleming does not appear to
have prior criminal convictions
involving matters within FDA’s
jurisdiction, a debarment period of 5
years for each felony conviction is
appropriate. As noted in the proposal to
debar, the conduct underlying the
offenses involved submitting claims for
payment for procedures other than the
procedures Fleming performed and
falsifying clinical trial data, and ‘‘[t]he
conduct that form[ed] the basis of [his]
conviction occurred in the course of
[his] profession and showed disregard
for the obligations of [his] profession
and the law.’’ Based on the pattern of
fraudulent conduct, FDA has reason to
believe that Fleming may violate the
requirements under the FD&C Act
relating to drug products. Furthermore,
given that Fleming has offered no
arguments challenging the proposed
determination regarding the extent to
which his debarment periods should
run concurrently or consecutively, OSI
further determines that the 5-year
debarment period for each felony
conviction should run consecutively,
resulting in a total debarment of 10
years.
III. Findings and Order
Therefore, the Director of OSI, under
section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the FD&C
Act and authority delegated to him by
the Commissioner of Food and Drugs,
finds that: (1) Fleming has been
convicted of a felony which involves
bribery, payment of illegal gratuities,
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49097
fraud, perjury, false statement,
racketeering, blackmail, extortion,
falsification or destruction of records, or
interference with, obstruction of an
investigation into, or prosecution of, any
criminal offense and (2) based on the
conviction and other information,
Fleming has demonstrated a pattern of
conduct giving reason to believe that he
may violate requirements under the
FD&C Act relating to drug products.
FDA considered the applicable factors
listed in section 306(c)(3) of the FD&C
Act and determined that a debarment of
10 years is appropriate.
As a result of the foregoing findings,
Fleming is debarred for 10 years from
providing services in any capacity to a
person with an approved or pending
drug product application under sections
505, 512, or 802 of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 355, 360b, or 382), or under
section 351 of the Public Health Service
Act (42 U.S.C. 262), effective (see DATES)
(see 21 U.S.C. 335a(c)(1)(B) and
(c)(2)(A)(iii) and 21 U.S.C. 321(dd)).
Any person with an approved or
pending drug product application, who
knowingly uses the services of Fleming,
in any capacity during his period of
debarment, will be subject to civil
money penalties (section 307(a)(6) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 335b(a)(6))). If
Fleming, during his period of
debarment, provides services in any
capacity to a person with an approved
or pending drug product application, he
will be subject to civil money penalties
(section 307(a)(7) of the FD&C Act). In
addition, FDA will not accept or review
any abbreviated new drug applications
submitted by or with the assistance of
Fleming during his period of debarment
(section 306(c)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act).
Dated: September 25, 2018.
George M. Warren,
Director, Office of Scientific Integrity.
[FR Doc. 2018–21210 Filed 9–27–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2018–D–3304]
The Special 510(k) Program; Draft
Guidance for Industry and Food and
Drug Administration Staff; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice of availability.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing the availability of the draft
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
49098
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 189 / Friday, September 28, 2018 / Notices
guidance entitled ‘‘The Special 510(k)
Program.’’ FDA established the Special
510(k) Program to facilitate the
submission, review, and clearance of
changes to a manufacturer’s own legally
marketed predicate device. This draft
guidance, when finalized, will provide
the framework that FDA will use when
considering whether a premarket
notification (510(k)) is appropriate for
review as a Special 510(k). This draft
guidance is not final nor is it in effect
at this time.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on the draft guidance
by November 27, 2018 to ensure that the
Agency considers your comment on this
draft guidance before it begins work on
the final version of the guidance.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on any guidance at any time as follows:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:22 Sep 27, 2018
Jkt 244001
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2018–D–3304 for ‘‘The Special 510(k)
Program.’’ Received comments will be
placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/
fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/201523389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://www.regulations
.gov and insert the docket number,
found in brackets in the heading of this
document, into the ‘‘Search’’ box and
follow the prompts and/or go to the
Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
You may submit comments on any
guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
An electronic copy of the guidance
document is available for download
from the internet. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
information on electronic access to the
guidance. Submit written requests for a
single hard copy of the draft guidance
document entitled ‘‘The Special 510(k)
Program’’ to the Office of the Center
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Director, Guidance and Policy
Development, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5431, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002; or the Office of
Communication, Outreach, and
Development, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to
assist that office in processing your
request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua Silverstein, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1615, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–5155; Angela
DeMarco, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1611, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–4471; or
Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 240–
402–7911.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On March 20, 1998, FDA issued the
guidance document entitled ‘‘The New
510(k) Paradigm: Alternate Approaches
to Demonstrating Substantial
Equivalence in Premarket
Notifications,’’ which established the
Special 510(k) Program. By establishing
the Special 510(k) Program, FDA sought
to streamline review of 510(k)
submissions by leveraging design
control requirements. The Special
510(k) Program allows manufacturers
who are intending to change their own
legally marketed device to utilize risk
analysis and verification and validation
activities to facilitate submission,
review, and clearance of the change.
While FDA intends to review Special
510(k)s within 30 days, the Special
510(k) Program does not alter any
statutory or regulatory requirements
related to the premarket notification
process under sections 510 and 513 of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360 and 360c)
and 21 CFR part 807, subpart E.
To improve the efficiency of 510(k)
review, FDA believes that an update to
the Special 510(k) Program both clarifies
existing policy and expands on device
changes appropriate for the Program.
This draft guidance, when finalized,
will explain the updated factors FDA
intends to use when considering
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 189 / Friday, September 28, 2018 / Notices
whether a 510(k) is appropriate for
review as a Special 510(k). In general, a
change to an existing device may be
appropriate for a Special 510(k) when:
(1) The proposed change is made and
submitted by the manufacturer
authorized to market the existing
device; (2) performance data are
unnecessary, or if performance data are
necessary, well-established methods are
available to evaluate the change; and (3)
all performance data necessary to
support substantial equivalence can be
reviewed in a summary or risk analysis
format.
When finalized, this guidance will
supersede the Special 510(k) policy in
the 1998 guidance entitled ‘‘The New
510(k) Paradigm: Alternate Approaches
to Demonstrating Substantial
Equivalence in Premarket
Notifications.’’
II. Significance of Guidance
This draft guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
Information/default.htm. Persons
unable to download an electronic copy
of ‘‘The Special 510(k) Program’’ may
send an email request to CDRHGuidance@fda.hhs.gov to receive an
electronic copy of the document. Please
use the document number 18008 to
identify the guidance you are
requesting.
III. Electronic Access
Persons interested in obtaining a copy
of the draft guidance may do so by
downloading an electronic copy from
the internet. A search capability for all
Center for Devices and Radiological
Health guidance documents is available
at https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/
DeviceRegulationandGuidance/
GuidanceDocuments/default.htm. This
guidance document is also available at
https://www.regulations.gov or https://
www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/
GuidanceComplianceRegulatory
This draft guidance refers to
previously approved collections of
information. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
collections of information in the
following FDA regulations have been
approved by OMB as listed in the
following table:
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
OMB control
No.
Topic
807, subpart E ..........................................
801 ............................................................
820 ............................................................
Premarket Notification ..................................................................................................
Medical Device Labeling Regulations ..........................................................................
Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP); Quality System (QS) Regulation .....
[FR Doc. 2018–21141 Filed 9–27–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0613]
John D. McCoy; Denial of Hearing;
Final Debarment Order
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is denying a
request for a hearing submitted by John
D. McCoy (McCoy) and is issuing an
order under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) debarring
McCoy for 4 years from providing
services in any capacity to a person that
has an approved or pending drug
product application. FDA bases this
order on a finding that McCoy was
convicted of a misdemeanor under
Federal law for conduct relating to the
regulation of a drug product under the
SUMMARY:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The draft guidance, when finalized, will
represent the current thinking of FDA
on ‘‘The Special 510(k) Program.’’ It
does not establish any rights for any
person and is not binding on FDA or the
public. You can use an alternative
approach if it satisfies the requirements
of the applicable statutes and
regulations. This guidance is not subject
to Executive Order 12866.
21 CFR part; guidance; or FDA form
Dated: September 24, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:22 Sep 27, 2018
Jkt 244001
49099
FD&C Act and that the conduct
underlying the conviction undermines
the process for the regulation of drugs.
In determining the appropriateness and
period of McCoy’s debarment, FDA has
considered the relevant factors listed in
the FD&C Act. McCoy has failed to file
with the Agency information and
analyses sufficient to create a basis for
a hearing concerning this action.
DATES: The order is applicable
September 28, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Any application for
termination of debarment by McCoy
under section 306(d) of the FD&C Act
(application) may be submitted as
follows:
Electronic Submissions
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
An application submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
application will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
application does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
0910–0120
0910–0485
0910–0073
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
application, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit an
application with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made available to the public, submit the
application as a written/paper
submission and in the manner detailed
(see ‘‘Written/Paper Submissions’’ and
‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For a written/paper application
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your application, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: Your application must
include the Docket No. FDA–2011–N–
0613. An application will be placed in
the docket and, unless submitted as
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 189 (Friday, September 28, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49097-49099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-21141]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2018-D-3304]
The Special 510(k) Program; Draft Guidance for Industry and Food
and Drug Administration Staff; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of the draft
[[Page 49098]]
guidance entitled ``The Special 510(k) Program.'' FDA established the
Special 510(k) Program to facilitate the submission, review, and
clearance of changes to a manufacturer's own legally marketed predicate
device. This draft guidance, when finalized, will provide the framework
that FDA will use when considering whether a premarket notification
(510(k)) is appropriate for review as a Special 510(k). This draft
guidance is not final nor is it in effect at this time.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by November 27, 2018 to ensure that the Agency considers your
comment on this draft guidance before it begins work on the final
version of the guidance.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on any guidance at any time as
follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2018-D-3304 for ``The Special 510(k) Program.'' Received comments
will be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as
``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
An electronic copy of the guidance document is available for
download from the internet. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for information on electronic access to the guidance. Submit written
requests for a single hard copy of the draft guidance document entitled
``The Special 510(k) Program'' to the Office of the Center Director,
Guidance and Policy Development, Center for Devices and Radiological
Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
66, Rm. 5431, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002; or the Office of
Communication, Outreach, and Development, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing
your request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua Silverstein, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1615, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-5155; Angela DeMarco, Center for Devices and Radiological Health,
Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm.
1611, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-4471; or Stephen Ripley,
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-402-7911.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On March 20, 1998, FDA issued the guidance document entitled ``The
New 510(k) Paradigm: Alternate Approaches to Demonstrating Substantial
Equivalence in Premarket Notifications,'' which established the Special
510(k) Program. By establishing the Special 510(k) Program, FDA sought
to streamline review of 510(k) submissions by leveraging design control
requirements. The Special 510(k) Program allows manufacturers who are
intending to change their own legally marketed device to utilize risk
analysis and verification and validation activities to facilitate
submission, review, and clearance of the change. While FDA intends to
review Special 510(k)s within 30 days, the Special 510(k) Program does
not alter any statutory or regulatory requirements related to the
premarket notification process under sections 510 and 513 of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 360 and 360c) and 21 CFR part 807, subpart E.
To improve the efficiency of 510(k) review, FDA believes that an
update to the Special 510(k) Program both clarifies existing policy and
expands on device changes appropriate for the Program. This draft
guidance, when finalized, will explain the updated factors FDA intends
to use when considering
[[Page 49099]]
whether a 510(k) is appropriate for review as a Special 510(k). In
general, a change to an existing device may be appropriate for a
Special 510(k) when: (1) The proposed change is made and submitted by
the manufacturer authorized to market the existing device; (2)
performance data are unnecessary, or if performance data are necessary,
well-established methods are available to evaluate the change; and (3)
all performance data necessary to support substantial equivalence can
be reviewed in a summary or risk analysis format.
When finalized, this guidance will supersede the Special 510(k)
policy in the 1998 guidance entitled ``The New 510(k) Paradigm:
Alternate Approaches to Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence in
Premarket Notifications.''
II. Significance of Guidance
This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the current thinking of FDA on ``The Special
510(k) Program.'' It does not establish any rights for any person and
is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative
approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations. This guidance is not subject to Executive Order 12866.
III. Electronic Access
Persons interested in obtaining a copy of the draft guidance may do
so by downloading an electronic copy from the internet. A search
capability for all Center for Devices and Radiological Health guidance
documents is available at https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/default.htm. This
guidance document is also available at https://www.regulations.gov or
https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/default.htm. Persons unable to
download an electronic copy of ``The Special 510(k) Program'' may send
an email request to [email protected] to receive an electronic
copy of the document. Please use the document number 18008 to identify
the guidance you are requesting.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This draft guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information. These collections of information are subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of information in
the following FDA regulations have been approved by OMB as listed in
the following table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
21 CFR part; guidance; or FDA OMB control
form Topic No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
807, subpart E................. Premarket Notification. 0910-0120
801............................ Medical Device Labeling 0910-0485
Regulations.
820............................ Current Good 0910-0073
Manufacturing Practice
(CGMP); Quality System
(QS) Regulation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: September 24, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-21141 Filed 9-27-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P