Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Repeal of DFARS Clause “Indefinite Quantities-No Fixed Charges” (DFARS Case 2018-D034), 49179-49180 [2018-20972]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 189 / Friday, September 28, 2018 / Rules and Regulations PART 247—TRANSPORTATION 247.271–3 [Amended] 2. Amend section 247.271–3 by— a. Removing paragraph (n); and b. Redesignating paragraph (o) as paragraph (n). ■ ■ ■ PART 252—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES 252.247–7020 [Removed and Reserved] 3. Remove and reserve section 252.247–7020. ■ [FR Doc. 2018–20971 Filed 9–27–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–06–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Defense Acquisition Regulations System 48 CFR Parts 247 and 252 [Docket DARS–2018–0045] RIN 0750–AJ96 Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Repeal of DFARS Clause ‘‘Indefinite Quantities— No Fixed Charges’’ (DFARS Case 2018–D034) Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to remove a clause that is no longer necessary. DATES: Effective September 28, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carrie Moore, telephone 571–372–6093. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES2 I. Background DoD is amending the DFARS to remove the DFARS clause 252.247– 7005, Indefinite Quantities—No Fixed Charges, and the associated clause prescription at DFARS 247.270–4(e). The DFARS clause is used in indefinitedelivery, indefinite-quantity contracts for stevedoring services to notify the contractor that the minimum value of an order placed under the contract shall not be less than $100. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause 52.216–19, Order Limitations, is prescribed for use in all indefinitedelivery contracts and notifies the contractor of the minimum and maximum values of orders to be placed under the contract. In the FAR clause, VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:35 Sep 27, 2018 Jkt 244001 the minimum and maximum values are blank spaces to be filled-in by the contracting officer prior to solicitation. The FAR clause serves the same purpose as the DFARS clause and can be used to reflect the appropriate ordering limitations for stevedoring services. As such, this DFARS clause is unnecessary and can be removed. The removal of this DFARS clause supports a recommendation from the DoD Regulatory Reform Task Force. On February 24, 2017, the President signed Executive Order (E.O.) 13777, ‘‘Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda,’’ which established a Federal policy ‘‘to alleviate unnecessary regulatory burdens’’ on the American people. In accordance with E.O. 13777, DoD established a Regulatory Reform Task Force to review and validate DoD regulations, including the DFARS. A public notice of the establishment of the DFARS Subgroup to the DoD Regulatory Reform Task Force, for the purpose of reviewing DFARS provisions and clauses, was published in the Federal Register at 82 FR 35741 on August 1, 2017, and requested public input. No public comments were received on this clause. Subsequently, the DoD Task Force reviewed the requirements of DFARS clause 252.247–7005, Indefinite Quantities—No Fixed Charges, and determined that the DFARS clause was unnecessary and recommended removal. II. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available Offthe-Shelf Items This rule only removes DFARS clause 252.247–7005, Indefinite Quantities— No Fixed Charges, which is obsolete. Therefore, the rule does not impose any new requirements on contracts at or below the simplified acquisition threshold or for commercial items, including commercially available offthe-shelf items. III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review; and E.O. 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 49179 flexibility. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), has determined that this is not a significant regulatory action as defined under section 3(f) of E.O. 12866 and, therefore, was not subject to review under section 6(b). This rule is not a major rule as defined at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). IV. Executive Order 13771 This rule is not an E.O. 13771, Reducing and Controlling Regulatory Costs, regulatory action, because this rule is not significant under E.O. 12866. V. Publication of This Final Rule for Public Comment Is Not Required by Statute The statute that applies to the publication of the FAR is Office of Federal Procurement Policy statute (codified at title 41 of the United States Code). Specifically, 41 U.S.C. 1707(a)(1) requires that a procurement policy, regulation, procedure or form (including an amendment or modification thereof) must be published for public comment if it relates to the expenditure of appropriated funds, and has either a significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of the agency issuing the policy, regulation, procedure, or form, or has a significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors. This final rule is not required to be published for public comment, because DoD is not issuing a new regulation; rather, this rule merely removes an obsolete requirement from the DFARS. VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment are not required to be given for this rule under 41 U.S.C. 1707(a)(1) (see section V. of this preamble), the analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are not applicable. Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required and none has been prepared. VII. Paperwork Reduction Act The rule does not contain any information collection requirements that require the approval of OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). E:\FR\FM\28SER2.SGM 28SER2 49180 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 189 / Friday, September 28, 2018 / Rules and Regulations List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 247 and 252 Government procurement. Jennifer Lee Hawes, Regulatory Control Officer, Defense Acquisition Regulations System. Therefore, 48 CFR parts 247 and 252 are amended as follows: ■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 247 and 252 continues to read as follows: Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1. PART 247—TRANSPORTATION 247.270–4 [Amended] 2. Amend section 247.270–4 by— a. Removing paragraph (e); and b. Redesignating paragraph (f) as paragraph (e). ■ ■ ■ PART 252—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES 252.247–7005 [Removed and Reserved] 3. Remove and reserve section 252.247–7005. ■ 252.247–7007 [Amended] 4. Amend section 252.247–7007, in the introductory text, by removing ‘‘247.270–4(f)’’ and adding ‘‘247.270– 4(e)’’ in its place. ■ [FR Doc. 2018–20972 Filed 9–27–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–06–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Defense Acquisition Regulations System 48 CFR Parts 216 and 252 [Docket DARS–2018–0044] RIN 0750–AJ99 Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Repeal of DFARS Clause ‘‘Award Fee’’ (DFARS Case 2018–D037) Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to remove a clause that is no longer necessary. DATES: Effective September 28, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carrie Moore, telephone 571–372–6093. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES2 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:35 Sep 27, 2018 Jkt 244001 I. Background DoD is amending the DFARS to remove the DFARS clause 252.216– 7005, Award Fee, and the associated clause prescription at DFARS 216.406(e)(2). The DFARS clause advises contractors that: They may earn an award fee from zero dollars to the maximum amount stated in the award fee plan; an award fee will not be paid for any evaluation period in which the Government rates the contractor’s overall cost, schedule, and technical performance below satisfactory; and, the contracting officer may unilaterally revise the award fee plan prior to the beginning of a rating period in order to redirect the contractor’s emphasis on performance. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 16.401 prescribes the award fee pool percentages that are available to the contractor and required for use by the Government in an award fee plan. Like the DFARS clause, these percentages permit the contractor to earn between 0% and 100% of the award fee pool. Also like the DFARS clause, the FAR requires all award fee plans to prohibit contractors from earning any award fee when the contractor’s overall cost, schedule, and technical performance is below satisfactory. While the FAR does not address the unilateral ability to of the contracting officer to make revisions to the award fee plan, as discussed in the DFARS clause, the FAR does require award fee plans to contain reasonable and attainable targets that motivate contractors and discourage inefficiency or waste. Finally, DFARS 216.401 requires the award fee plan to be incorporated into the contract. This action provides contractors with an award fee plan that conveys all of the FAR information and requirements for award fee plans. As such, this DFARS clause is unnecessary and can be removed. The removal of this DFARS clause supports a recommendation from the DoD Regulatory Reform Task Force. On February 24, 2017, the President signed Executive Order (E.O.) 13777, ‘‘Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda,’’ which established a Federal policy ‘‘to alleviate unnecessary regulatory burdens’’ on the American people. In accordance with E.O. 13777, DoD established a Regulatory Reform Task Force to review and validate DoD regulations, including the DFARS. A public notice of the establishment of the DFARS Subgroup to the DoD Regulatory Reform Task Force, for the purpose of reviewing DFARS provisions and clauses, was published in the Federal Register at 82 FR 35741 on August 1, PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 2017, and requested public input. No public comments were received on this clause. Subsequently, the DoD Task Force reviewed the requirements of DFARS clause 252.216–7005, Award Fee, and determined that the DFARS clause was unnecessary and recommended removal. II. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available Offthe-Shelf Items This rule only removes DFARS clause 252.216–7005, Award Fee, which is obsolete. Therefore, the rule does not impose any new requirements on contracts at or below the simplified acquisition threshold and for commercial items, including commercially available off-the-shelf items. III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review; and E.O. 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), has determined that this is not a significant regulatory action as defined under section 3(f) of E.O. 12866 and, therefore, was not subject to review under section 6(b). This rule is not a major rule as defined at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). IV. Executive Order 13771 This rule is not an E.O. 13771, Reducing and Controlling Regulatory Costs, regulatory action, because this rule is not significant under E.O. 12866. V. Publication of This Final Rule for Public Comment Is Not Required by Statute The statute that applies to the publication of the FAR is Office of Federal Procurement Policy statute (codified at title 41 of the United States Code). Specifically, 41 U.S.C. 1707(a)(1) requires that a procurement policy, regulation, procedure or form (including an amendment or modification thereof) must be published for public comment if it relates to the expenditure of E:\FR\FM\28SER2.SGM 28SER2

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 189 (Friday, September 28, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49179-49180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20972]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Parts 247 and 252

[Docket DARS-2018-0045]
RIN 0750-AJ96


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Repeal of 
DFARS Clause ``Indefinite Quantities--No Fixed Charges'' (DFARS Case 
2018-D034)

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to remove a clause that is no 
longer necessary.

DATES: Effective September 28, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carrie Moore, telephone 571-372-
6093.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    DoD is amending the DFARS to remove the DFARS clause 252.247-7005, 
Indefinite Quantities--No Fixed Charges, and the associated clause 
prescription at DFARS 247.270-4(e). The DFARS clause is used in 
indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contracts for stevedoring 
services to notify the contractor that the minimum value of an order 
placed under the contract shall not be less than $100.
    Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause 52.216-19, Order 
Limitations, is prescribed for use in all indefinite-delivery contracts 
and notifies the contractor of the minimum and maximum values of orders 
to be placed under the contract. In the FAR clause, the minimum and 
maximum values are blank spaces to be filled-in by the contracting 
officer prior to solicitation. The FAR clause serves the same purpose 
as the DFARS clause and can be used to reflect the appropriate ordering 
limitations for stevedoring services. As such, this DFARS clause is 
unnecessary and can be removed.
    The removal of this DFARS clause supports a recommendation from the 
DoD Regulatory Reform Task Force. On February 24, 2017, the President 
signed Executive Order (E.O.) 13777, ``Enforcing the Regulatory Reform 
Agenda,'' which established a Federal policy ``to alleviate unnecessary 
regulatory burdens'' on the American people. In accordance with E.O. 
13777, DoD established a Regulatory Reform Task Force to review and 
validate DoD regulations, including the DFARS. A public notice of the 
establishment of the DFARS Subgroup to the DoD Regulatory Reform Task 
Force, for the purpose of reviewing DFARS provisions and clauses, was 
published in the Federal Register at 82 FR 35741 on August 1, 2017, and 
requested public input. No public comments were received on this 
clause. Subsequently, the DoD Task Force reviewed the requirements of 
DFARS clause 252.247-7005, Indefinite Quantities--No Fixed Charges, and 
determined that the DFARS clause was unnecessary and recommended 
removal.

II. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition 
Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available 
Off-the-Shelf Items

    This rule only removes DFARS clause 252.247-7005, Indefinite 
Quantities--No Fixed Charges, which is obsolete. Therefore, the rule 
does not impose any new requirements on contracts at or below the 
simplified acquisition threshold or for commercial items, including 
commercially available off-the-shelf items.

III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

    E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review; and E.O. 13563, 
Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, direct agencies to assess 
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, 
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. 
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), has determined that this is not a 
significant regulatory action as defined under section 3(f) of E.O. 
12866 and, therefore, was not subject to review under section 6(b). 
This rule is not a major rule as defined at 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

IV. Executive Order 13771

    This rule is not an E.O. 13771, Reducing and Controlling Regulatory 
Costs, regulatory action, because this rule is not significant under 
E.O. 12866.

V. Publication of This Final Rule for Public Comment Is Not Required by 
Statute

    The statute that applies to the publication of the FAR is Office of 
Federal Procurement Policy statute (codified at title 41 of the United 
States Code). Specifically, 41 U.S.C. 1707(a)(1) requires that a 
procurement policy, regulation, procedure or form (including an 
amendment or modification thereof) must be published for public comment 
if it relates to the expenditure of appropriated funds, and has either 
a significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of the 
agency issuing the policy, regulation, procedure, or form, or has a 
significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors. 
This final rule is not required to be published for public comment, 
because DoD is not issuing a new regulation; rather, this rule merely 
removes an obsolete requirement from the DFARS.

VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for 
public comment are not required to be given for this rule under 41 
U.S.C. 1707(a)(1) (see section V. of this preamble), the analytical 
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) 
are not applicable. Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility analysis is 
required and none has been prepared.

VII. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The rule does not contain any information collection requirements 
that require the approval of OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. chapter 35).

[[Page 49180]]

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 247 and 252

    Government procurement.

Jennifer Lee Hawes,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

    Therefore, 48 CFR parts 247 and 252 are amended as follows:

0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 247 and 252 continues to 
read as follows:

    Authority:  41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.

PART 247--TRANSPORTATION


247.270-4  [Amended]

0
2. Amend section 247.270-4 by--
0
a. Removing paragraph (e); and
0
b. Redesignating paragraph (f) as paragraph (e).

PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES


252.247-7005  [Removed and Reserved]

0
3. Remove and reserve section 252.247-7005.


252.247-7007   [Amended]

0
4. Amend section 252.247-7007, in the introductory text, by removing 
``247.270-4(f)'' and adding ``247.270-4(e)'' in its place.

[FR Doc. 2018-20972 Filed 9-27-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.